Speaker 1: Why On Sky News Bitess and Sharry.
Speaker 2: Good Evening, Welcome to the show, and it's a big
Speaker 2: show tonight. In breaking news, Peter Dutton has demanded that
Speaker 2: ABC chair Kim Williams show some backbone and rainan Laura Tingle,
Speaker 2: who he accused of hijacking, yes, hijacking the ABC. These
Speaker 2: are Peter Dutton's strongest comments yet about the public broadcaster.
Speaker 2: I spoke with him in an exclusive interview where Dutton
Speaker 2: is now in Israel. He's just sat down with Benjamin
Speaker 2: Netanyahoo and Dutton spoke with the Israeli Prime Minister about
Speaker 2: the need to repair the relationship between Australia and Israel
Speaker 2: after it's been damaged by the Albanezy government. That full interview,
Speaker 2: very strong remarks. You don't want to miss it. That's
Speaker 2: coming up shortly. Also on the show tonight, New Hope
Speaker 2: for homeowners ahead of a crucial rates call. A leading
Speaker 2: economist will join me to break down today's inflation data.
Speaker 3: Also tonight, an.
Speaker 2: Olympic gender row has boiled over in Paris, and what
Speaker 2: Rex airlines downfall.
Speaker 3: Means for regional communities.
Speaker 2: But first in major news today, leaders of Hamas and
Speaker 2: Hezbla have been killed in a win for the fight
Speaker 2: against terror. Hamas's political leader, Ismael Hanier was killed in
Speaker 2: the early hours of the morning at his residence in Tehran.
Speaker 2: Iran released a statement saying that he was assassinated inn
Speaker 2: and I quote a treacherous Zionus.
Speaker 3: Raid on his residence in Tehran.
Speaker 2: Israel has confirmed the death but has not made a
Speaker 2: comment accepting responsibility. Hanier did nothing for Palestinians. They suffered
Speaker 2: in this war thanks to Hamas, putting them in harm's way.
Speaker 2: All the while, Honier was a billionaire living a life
Speaker 2: of luxury nowhere near Gaza. The aim of Israel's war
Speaker 2: against Hamas is to eliminate the terror group which murdered babies, children,
Speaker 2: and even a pregnant woman in cold blood on October seven.
Speaker 2: Hamas is a force of evil in this world and
Speaker 2: it must be dismantled. Its leaders must be killed. Yet
Speaker 2: Hanie's death was shockingly condemned here in Australia by the
Speaker 2: Australian Palestine Advocacy Network and its president Nasamashni. In a
Speaker 2: media release, APAN said the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network says
Speaker 2: the extra judicial assassination of the political head of Hamas
Speaker 2: is Mael Hania is a grave war crime that risks
Speaker 2: exacerbating violence in the region.
Speaker 3: They said.
Speaker 2: The Australian government must condemn these brazen violations of international
Speaker 2: law and take immediate and decisive action to see Israel
Speaker 2: held to account for its crimes. This, perhaps more than
Speaker 2: anything else, has exposed the Palistine Inian organization here in
Speaker 2: Australia to be upset about the death of a terrorist leader,
Speaker 2: her Maas that not only massacret Israeli's but deliberately sparked
Speaker 2: this war that has cost too many Palestinian lives as well.
Speaker 2: This is the Palestinian organization that the media loves to quote.
Speaker 4: No one's addressing the root issue in this conflict, which
Speaker 4: is the displacement and destruction of Palestine, the ethnic cleansing
Speaker 4: of Palestine, as David Cameron described it when he was
Speaker 4: Prime Minister, an open air prison. The reality is that
Speaker 4: whilst Israel denies Palestinian's hope, we've got to work towards
Speaker 4: a better tomorrow. This land is Abraham's land. We've got
Speaker 4: a situation. We are manufacturing consent for a genocide.
Speaker 1: Her mass is not the problem.
Speaker 4: The problem is Zionism.
Speaker 2: Well, perhaps the likes of the ABC network, ten other
Speaker 2: commercial networks and even Daytime Sky should now realize precisely
Speaker 2: who they're having on air, because no moderate individual is
Speaker 2: upset by the death of a bloodthirsty terrorist. His death is, however,
Speaker 2: a blow to Hamas and to Iran, and they're anti
Speaker 2: West supporters like Russia, and the deputy Russian Foreign Minister
Speaker 2: Mikhail Boghdadov reportedly said this is an absolutely unacceptable political
Speaker 2: murder and it will lead to further escalations of tensions.
Speaker 2: Turkey's Foreign ministry also criticized the we what they called
Speaker 2: shameful assassination in Tehran, saying in a statement quoted by
Speaker 2: Reuters that this attack also aims to spread the Gaza
Speaker 2: war to a regional dimension, and the terror chief's death
Speaker 2: has also been condemned by Iran, Qatar, Malaysia, and as
Speaker 2: I said, Russia. Well, the assassination embarrasses Iran because if
Speaker 2: it turns out that the Massad managed to target a
Speaker 2: senior figure within their borders, well it shows flaws in
Speaker 2: their own security. And Hesbela's top military chief was also
Speaker 2: killed in an air strike overnight in Beirut, and that
Speaker 2: was in retaliation for the murder of twelve children who
Speaker 2: were just playing soccer on a field in northern Israel. Now,
Speaker 2: the death of hamasa's top political leader is making news
Speaker 2: around the world, and it comes on top of thirteen
Speaker 2: thousand terrorists that Israel says it has killed in Gaza.
Speaker 3: This is all a positive sign that.
Speaker 2: Israel does appear to be making inroads against Hamas, perhaps
Speaker 2: winning the war, and this is unquestionably crucial for any
Speaker 2: future peace and stability in the region. Opposition leader Peter
Speaker 2: Dutton is in Israel at the moment. He's holding high
Speaker 2: level meetings and I spoke with him in an exclusive
Speaker 2: interview a little earlier this afternoon. Peter Dutton, Welcome to
Speaker 2: the program from Jerusalem in Israel.
Speaker 1: Pleasure sharing. Nice to be with you. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Look you're there at the time the major news has
Speaker 2: broken that the political leader of Hamas has been killed.
Speaker 2: What's your reaction to this news that's making headlines around
Speaker 2: the world.
Speaker 5: We'll share there are many reports obviously at the moment,
Speaker 5: but we know that Hamas is a terrorist organization. We
Speaker 5: know that they were responsible for the brutal slaughter literally
Speaker 5: all over a longer period of time, thousands of people,
Speaker 5: and we know that they were the mastermind behind the
Speaker 5: October seven atrocities. So, like we know with al Qaeda
Speaker 5: and other terrorist organizations, they pose a threat to our
Speaker 5: way of life. They certainly pose an existential threat to
Speaker 5: the Israeli people, and you would expect the Israelis to
Speaker 5: take action, particularly.
Speaker 1: Given the slaughter that took place on October seven.
Speaker 2: Mister Dartan, you've met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Natanyahu.
Speaker 2: This is a very significant meeting, the first Australian politician
Speaker 2: to meet with him since October seven.
Speaker 3: What did you discuss.
Speaker 5: Well, we had about an hour meeting which was quite lengthy,
Speaker 5: and he had his national security team there as well,
Speaker 5: so it was high level and I was very grateful
Speaker 5: for the access and the time that he gave to us.
Speaker 5: As you know, Israel has provided intelligence to Australia over
Speaker 5: a period of time which has resulted in the lives
Speaker 5: of Australian diggers being saved in the Middle East, and
Speaker 5: I think it's a relationship that we need to rebuild,
Speaker 5: that we need to restore, and that we need to respect.
Speaker 5: And I sent a very clear message on behalf of
Speaker 5: the coalition that should we win the next election, we
Speaker 5: look forward to the relationship becoming stronger and making sure
Speaker 5: that we can build off the platform of previous prime
Speaker 5: ministers where the relationship has been close, it has been
Speaker 5: strong and too our mutual benefit. So we just obviously
Speaker 5: a broad range of issues. Obviously in relation to the
Speaker 5: current security context. What's happening with the WHODI is, what's
Speaker 5: happening with the Maas and hesblah, the threats to here
Speaker 5: to Israel otherwise, and obviously a broad ranging discussion on
Speaker 5: areas of mutual interest.
Speaker 2: Otherwise, I understand from my own contacts that the Prime
Speaker 2: Minister Netanya Who thanked you for your support of Israel
Speaker 2: and your personal leadership on anti Semitism in your answer
Speaker 2: to me before you use the word rebuilt, that you
Speaker 2: indicated to Natanya that if a coalition team was in government,
Speaker 2: you would rebuild the relationship between Israel and Australia. Was
Speaker 2: there therefore an element of concern from Netanya Who and
Speaker 2: his security team with the various foreign policy positions and
Speaker 2: public criticisms that have been taken by the Albanezy government,
Speaker 2: particularly in the wake of October seven, Well.
Speaker 5: Sharry I've certainly expressed a publicly and privately my view
Speaker 5: in relation to the level of anti Semitism and the
Speaker 5: lack of leadership that the Prime Minister has demonstrated. I
Speaker 5: think most Australians recognize that now it was the time
Speaker 5: for the Prime Minister to stand up when that unruly
Speaker 5: mob stepped onto the fore court in Sydney at the
Speaker 5: Opera House. He didn't, and it's allowed a level of
Speaker 5: anti Semitism to rise in our country that's provided a
Speaker 5: level of really distress, I've got to say within the
Speaker 5: Jewish community, as you will know, so I've spoken publicly
Speaker 5: and privately about that the level of antisemitism seeing in
Speaker 5: our country has not been evidenced in our country's history,
Speaker 5: and in fact, it's very confronting to me that when
Speaker 5: you speak to Holocaust survivors or the descendants, they are
Speaker 5: very clear in their advice that frankly they're thinking about
Speaker 5: coming back to Israel because I think it would be
Speaker 5: safer than staying in Australia. People have lived in peace
Speaker 5: and harmony since nineteen forty five, and for the first
Speaker 5: time in twenty twenty four, they feel unsecure in our
Speaker 5: country and there's a reason for for that.
Speaker 1: So my job is to.
Speaker 5: Make sure that we build our equities and to make
Speaker 5: sure that we re establish relationships where they've been damaged.
Speaker 5: I'm not going to go into the private conversations, obviously,
Speaker 5: but I've been publicly critical of both Penny Wong, our
Speaker 5: Foreign Minister, and also of the Prime Minister. I think
Speaker 5: they have demonstrated a lack of leadership and I think
Speaker 5: we should have a zero tolerance for anti Semitism in Australia.
Speaker 5: That's been a consistent message from the Coalition since October seven,
Speaker 5: and we won't be deviating from that part.
Speaker 2: I understand that there was a sense out of your
Speaker 2: discussions that these threats that we're seeing aren't just a
Speaker 2: threat to Israel, but a civilizational battle that's raging in
Speaker 2: the West as well. Was that a theme not just
Speaker 2: with your discussion with Natan Yahoo, but also with the
Speaker 2: Israeli President Isaac Kurtzog.
Speaker 5: Well, it's certainly a broader theme, and I think it's
Speaker 5: a very valid one. I think in the West we
Speaker 5: need to realize that our civilization, as we know at
Speaker 5: our democracy, our rule of law, that the adherence international law,
Speaker 5: all of that is under threat, and it is a
Speaker 5: time for Australia to reassess where we are in the world,
Speaker 5: to make sure that we align ourselves more significantly with
Speaker 5: our partners. The Orchest deal with the United States and
Speaker 5: the United Kingdom was integral to us forming a stronger
Speaker 5: alliance with those two countries, but so too when the
Speaker 5: Coalition government was in power, we were able to bring
Speaker 5: together the Quad with Japan and India as well as
Speaker 5: the United States. All of those relationships are vital, but
Speaker 5: so too is the relationship with Israel.
Speaker 1: They're our closest.
Speaker 5: Ally in the Middle East, and as I say, they've
Speaker 5: been a force for good in terms of providing support
Speaker 5: to our interests in the Middle East over the course
Speaker 5: of the last couple of decades, and we shouldn't neglect that.
Speaker 1: We should never forget it.
Speaker 2: What sense of determination did you get from Natanyahu and
Speaker 2: his team about the urgency of securing the release of
Speaker 2: the hostages and also the need to eliminate hamas.
Speaker 1: Will show. It's a great question.
Speaker 5: I mean, as we know there are still one hundred
Speaker 5: and fifteen people who are held in captivity, who were.
Speaker 1: Buried away in tunnels.
Speaker 5: We don't know how many are alive, how many are dead,
Speaker 5: What brutality they've experienced at the hands of these terrorists,
Speaker 5: and the barbaric acts we saw when we visited the
Speaker 5: Kabutz and the Nova Music Festival site yesterday.
Speaker 1: They're horrific scenes young people who are butchered.
Speaker 5: We've seen the videos, the body cam footage of some
Speaker 5: of the terrorist that was recovered hunting people down in
Speaker 5: the streets, going in murdering children and women, abducting people
Speaker 5: and taking them back as hostages. So I have to say,
Speaker 5: as you would expect from the President down the Prime
Speaker 5: Minister down here, they are absolutely determined to make sure
Speaker 5: that they can keep the people of Israel safe and secure,
Speaker 5: to make sure that there's not a recurrence of what
Speaker 5: we saw on October seven, And they have the capacity
Speaker 5: to do that. Prime Minister Netna Netnyahu, as you know,
Speaker 5: has been an experienced hand and I think it's valued
Speaker 5: here in Israel in terms of making sure that they
Speaker 5: can meet the threats and stare down the threats that
Speaker 5: are existential to people here. When we hear the chance
Speaker 5: of river to the sea, this is where I'm standing,
Speaker 5: and they want to drive people from their homes here
Speaker 5: literally into the sea off the map, and so you
Speaker 5: can understand why they take so seriously the issue of
Speaker 5: safety and security here.
Speaker 2: Look, we're showing people at home at the moment, footage
Speaker 2: of you visiting the site of the Nova Music Festival.
Speaker 2: What was that like for you, Peter Dutton, going to
Speaker 2: that site of the massacre where so many people were
Speaker 2: just killed in.
Speaker 5: Cold blood, Well, it was To say it was confronting
Speaker 5: is just an understatement. We'd watched the classified videos before,
Speaker 5: as I said, and it showed literally that the of
Speaker 5: these innocent young people at the festival, but elsewhere in
Speaker 5: the attack as well.
Speaker 1: So to have that.
Speaker 5: Image in your mind as you go there and physically
Speaker 5: walk the ground, there's just nowhere to hide.
Speaker 1: It's flat ground.
Speaker 5: You've got thousands of people shouting and chanting and firing
Speaker 5: shots they had. They're particularly well armed, as we know,
Speaker 5: and people were just mowed down. They were trying to
Speaker 5: escape into their cars. And the footage of them being
Speaker 5: shot as they were approaching checkpoints that Hamas has set up.
Speaker 1: It was graphic. It was horrific.
Speaker 5: And to see the faces of those young people on
Speaker 5: the signs, it's the face of innocence.
Speaker 1: These people don't have a political acts to grind.
Speaker 5: In fact, many of them younger people, probably left leaning,
Speaker 5: very sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, would have been in
Speaker 5: the case of those involved in some of the Kutz activities,
Speaker 5: providing support to financial court to some people in the
Speaker 5: Palestinian territory as well. So it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 5: But most acts of barbaric, dehumanized conduct from terrorist groups,
Speaker 5: I mean that don't make sense. We saw it and
Speaker 5: we still see it today with is and we've seen
Speaker 5: it over a long period of time. The senseless attacks
Speaker 5: on men and women are people of Islamic faith as well,
Speaker 5: who were slaughtered by Hamas. It's a terrible, terrible circumstance,
Speaker 5: and we hope that the people who being held captive
Speaker 5: can be returned home soon and there can be a
Speaker 5: ceasefy following that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, absolutely, I understand.
Speaker 2: You also had quite emotional and moving meetings with both
Speaker 2: hostage families and even a hostage an elderly person who
Speaker 2: was taken captive by Hamasa and then a father who
Speaker 2: had four members of his family who are being held hostage.
Speaker 2: What wire those meetings like for you, you know, speaking
Speaker 2: to those people who are actually dealing with the reality
Speaker 2: of not knowing if they're ever going to see their
Speaker 2: family members again.
Speaker 5: Well again, it's I mean, it was raw emotion and
Speaker 5: you could see the pain in their eyes. The elderly
Speaker 5: lady that we spoke to had been released, but she
Speaker 5: obviously had gone through an unbelievable experience that I didn't
Speaker 5: ask her to share, and I don't want.
Speaker 1: The graphic details.
Speaker 5: I could see the pain that she'd been through as
Speaker 5: she was speaking about the initial attack.
Speaker 1: And when you look at the.
Speaker 5: Father and you see the father holding up the photos
Speaker 5: of loved ones that he just wants back. These are
Speaker 5: innocent people, as I say, they're not soldiers, that they're
Speaker 5: not political players, they're not people who are.
Speaker 1: Anything other than young people.
Speaker 5: Enjoying their lives, and that they're still held captive, particularly
Speaker 5: for the younger earls, not knowing what sort of brutalization
Speaker 5: takes place. That's the reality of their life. It's incomprehensible
Speaker 5: as a parent, and I really felt for them during
Speaker 5: our discussions, and it was a very moving exchange.
Speaker 2: As you say, look, you've been in Israel about three
Speaker 2: days now. You've had many high level meetings and meeting
Speaker 2: with local community leaders as well. Has there been a
Speaker 2: sense of concern and confusion about where the Israel Australia
Speaker 2: relationship has been over the past nine and a half months.
Speaker 5: Well, just talk generally, because obviously we've spoken with a
Speaker 5: lot of people and there are a lot of friends
Speaker 5: here of Australia. There are a lot of Australians that
Speaker 5: we've run into here as well who are living in
Speaker 5: Israel or visiting friends. Just at a restaurant last night,
Speaker 5: a couple of people stopped. I was out walking this
Speaker 5: morning and stopped by an individual, and others that we've
Speaker 5: spoken to, there is a wilderment to be honest about
Speaker 5: the government's approach. I think people really have been quite
Speaker 5: shocked about the departure from the position that Australia is
Speaker 5: long held, the activity at the un by Penny Wong
Speaker 5: and the statements of restraint when Hermas was still holding
Speaker 5: people captive and the attack was still underway. I mean,
Speaker 5: it's quite remarkable in the circumstances that the government has
Speaker 5: taken that decision for their own grass domestic political purposes,
Speaker 5: and that's a decision that they need to live with
Speaker 5: because I believe the relationship is too important and too
Speaker 5: necessary to be playing politics with. And that's why I say,
Speaker 5: and I'm very definite about this, from day one in government,
Speaker 5: we will make sure that we prioritize the rebuilding of
Speaker 5: this relationship because it's in Australia's long term interests. We
Speaker 5: don't know when we'll need to rely on Israel again.
Speaker 5: That we want to be a friend that's not fair weather,
Speaker 5: a friend that's there in all seasons, and that says
Speaker 5: it should be.
Speaker 2: Mister Darton, I understand from my own contacts that Australia's
Speaker 2: anti Israel media coverage and even the impartiality of the
Speaker 2: taxpayer funded ABC was raised during your meeting with Natan
Speaker 2: Yahoo and Ron Dermer. I understand that Rondrmer spoke about
Speaker 2: his own experience of being interviewed on the seven thirty report.
Speaker 2: He saw that as a hostile interview. Did you find
Speaker 2: it extraordinary that the taxpayer funded ABC was caught into
Speaker 2: question at the highest levels of the Israeli government, Well.
Speaker 5: Sherry, I watched, actually had watched Ron's interview on the ABC.
Speaker 5: I found it quite astounding and I think the ABC
Speaker 5: needs to have a recheck. I think Kim Williams really
Speaker 5: needs to show some backbone and stand up to people
Speaker 5: like Laura Single and others who have hijacked the ABC.
Speaker 5: This is taxpayers money and it needs to be objective
Speaker 5: in its reporting. Clearly it's not in the The inherent
Speaker 5: bias now, the cultural bias within the ABC is the
Speaker 5: reason that their numbers are plummeting. In most Austrains find
Speaker 5: it a distraction from their daily lives and their own
Speaker 5: views instead of being the informative news source that it
Speaker 5: has been for all of us over a long period
Speaker 5: of time. So brother Ron did an exceptional job in
Speaker 5: that interview and pushing back.
Speaker 1: In fact, i'd encourage him to to do more.
Speaker 5: But I think, yes, I mean, I think there's people
Speaker 5: who really have been quite amazed by some of the reporting,
Speaker 5: particularly the ABC, and that's been expressed to us by
Speaker 5: different people on this visit.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, Peter Dutton, thank you very much, not
Speaker 2: just for joining us with this exclusive interview from Israel,
Speaker 2: but also for making this trip, for bearing witness to
Speaker 2: the atrocities that have taken place, that have killed so
Speaker 2: many Jewish people, the largest loss of life.
Speaker 3: In a single day since the Holocaust.
Speaker 2: It's the trip the prime minister should have made many
Speaker 2: other most other Western leaders did make that trip in
Speaker 2: the wake of October seven, and thank you for going
Speaker 2: there and making the trip.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Cherry TAKEO appreciate it. Thank you.
Speaker 2: And that was Opposition leader Peter Darton from Israel very
Speaker 2: newsy interview. The two big revelations there that during his
Speaker 2: meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he said that
Speaker 2: if he were Prime minister, he would rebuild the broken
Speaker 2: Israel Australia relationship. And also he said that ABC chair
Speaker 2: Kim Williams should show some backbone and raining journalists. He says,
Speaker 2: like Laura Tinkle who dart and accused of hijacking the ABC.
Speaker 2: We'll discuss that a bit later with my panel. More
Speaker 2: to come after the break and new poll reveals Australians
Speaker 2: are blaming labor for high power prices plus the Olympic
Speaker 2: gender row.
Speaker 3: That stole the show in Paris. Welcome back.
Speaker 2: Well, let's bring in now our Wednesday panel, former Victorian
Speaker 2: Liberal Party president Mac Kroger and labor.
Speaker 3: Legend At Graham Richardson. Great to see you both.
Speaker 2: Look, we're going to get to the inflation data in
Speaker 2: just a minute, but I just want to get your
Speaker 2: reaction to Peter Dutton's comments there Michael Kroger very specifically
Speaker 2: about that ABC. He said that it was about time
Speaker 2: that Kim Williams showed some backbone rained in the ABC.
Speaker 2: He said the journalists like Laura Tingle but others were
Speaker 2: hijacking the public broadcaster. He said there was an inherent
Speaker 2: bias in it, a cultural bias. He said, it's tax
Speaker 2: payers money. It needs to be objective in its reporting
Speaker 2: that it's clearly not. And he said that that most
Speaker 2: Australians find it a distraction from their daily lives instead
Speaker 2: of finding it the informative source of news that it's
Speaker 2: meant to be, and also of course accusing it of
Speaker 2: an anti Israel bias. What did you think of those comments,
Speaker 2: Michael Kroger.
Speaker 6: Well, of course Dutton's absolutely right, and the Sydney based
Speaker 6: ABC News and Current Affairs Division is holding host Stinge.
Speaker 6: The rest of the ABC, I mean, Rural ABC, which
Speaker 6: is fantastic Rural Radio, which is great kids, children's drama, sport, comedy,
Speaker 6: et cetera, are all being tarnished by this sort of
Speaker 6: horrific sort are hard left bias coming out of the
Speaker 6: Sydney News and Current Affairs Division. It's been going on
Speaker 6: for years, and of course Peter Dutton is right. Kim
Speaker 6: Williams is someone who has brought in and there was
Speaker 6: a lot of hope that Kim Williams, who owed nothing
Speaker 6: to anybody, would come in and just clean up this
Speaker 6: sort of you know, Stall would have left wing you know, propaganda,
Speaker 6: and let's hope he does. I mean, you know ITAs
Speaker 6: now come out and said, oh the thing's biased. Well
Speaker 6: good on you Ida. You know we tried to warn
Speaker 6: you about that when you were there. So let's hope
Speaker 6: Kim Williams can do something because the ABC is tarnishing
Speaker 6: its brand and it's doing it very badly.
Speaker 2: Charry so Rich Peter Dutton's criticism, in particular of Laura Tingle,
Speaker 2: saying she's hijacking the ABC. All this comes after Laura
Speaker 2: Tingle has been very critical of the opposition leader in
Speaker 2: recent times. She's accused him of adopting Trumpian language, of
Speaker 2: having a loose grasp of the facts, criticized his nuclear policy.
Speaker 3: So is it surprising that Dutton.
Speaker 2: Has come out this strongly and do you agree should
Speaker 2: Kim Williams reign in the journalists like Dutton has demanded.
Speaker 7: Well, I think Kim Williams is going to have to
Speaker 7: have a quiet word in her ear because I think
Speaker 7: she has gone over the top. I think Dutton's absolutely
Speaker 7: entitled to say it's wrong. I'm not going to get
Speaker 7: in the road of that as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 7: The ABC does have a duty to be impartial and occasionally,
Speaker 7: and I might say it's only occasional, but it does
Speaker 7: go over the top, and I think cross a line
Speaker 7: you shouldn't cross.
Speaker 2: Well, let's look at the inflation data today, and your
Speaker 2: inflation rose to three point eight percent, up from three
Speaker 2: point six percent from the start of the year. Now
Speaker 2: this was a line with the RBA's forecast, but not treasuries.
Speaker 2: If there is a silver lining in today's data, it's
Speaker 2: that underlying inflation declined ever so slightly, from four percent
Speaker 2: to three point nine percent. Michael Krogie, there's been debate
Speaker 2: over these figures today. We've heard opposing views from the
Speaker 2: Treasurer Jim Chalmers and the Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor.
Speaker 3: What's your view.
Speaker 6: Well, as you know, I've never taken a view the
Speaker 6: view that we three interest rate rises this year. I
Speaker 6: didn't ever think that was politically possible, but it looks
Speaker 6: as if next week, next Tuesday, the RBA won't do anything,
Speaker 6: and it's now wait and see game. You know, I've
Speaker 6: always taken the view that Albaneze he needs a rate
Speaker 6: cut before he goes to election, because he promised people
Speaker 6: that he would be able to solve the cost of
Speaker 6: living crisis. You know, he said he had a plan
Speaker 6: to fix this, and he won hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 6: votes on the basis of that and the two hundred
Speaker 6: and seventy five dollars cut to power prices. So one
Speaker 6: of the reasons his polls are are clining. He promised
Speaker 6: beyond his capacity to deliver, and that is now doing
Speaker 6: him immense damage. When people see he is on these issues,
Speaker 6: he is an empty suit and he's not helped by
Speaker 6: the way by Jim Charmers. I'm sure it's a very
Speaker 6: nice fellow. But as I've said for months, Jim's a commentator.
Speaker 6: I mean, Jim can just tell you what's happening. Well,
Speaker 6: I can read that in the newspapers. He's about to
Speaker 6: deliver four budgets. The next four budgets will have over
Speaker 6: one hundred billion dollars worth of deficits shari which are forecast,
Speaker 6: which is why there won't be another budget before the
Speaker 6: next election. But Albanize is spending far too much money
Speaker 6: and any increase in aggregate demand puts pressure on prices
Speaker 6: and therefore inflation.
Speaker 2: Rich O, what do you think do you think this
Speaker 2: will take the pressure off a rate hike next week
Speaker 2: that the data that we saw.
Speaker 7: Today, Well, I think it takes some pressure off, but
Speaker 7: not enough. I think I expect more rate rises. I'm
Speaker 7: not sure they're very good politically, but I expect them.
Speaker 7: I think Jim Chalmers is a brilliant guy, but I
Speaker 7: think he's got to be a bit tougher. I think
Speaker 7: he needs to do more and he needs to show
Speaker 7: those around him that he's got what it takes, because obviously,
Speaker 7: I think there's a vat on in the knapsack somewhere there.
Speaker 7: So if you're carrying the bat hole, you need to
Speaker 7: show you're worthy.
Speaker 2: Well, many of us think he would be a leadership
Speaker 2: successor to Albanezi.
Speaker 3: But while we're on this.
Speaker 2: Topic, rich what about Tony Burke thinking his son prime
Speaker 2: minister or aspirant and now albows elevated him to the
Speaker 2: Home Affairs portfolio. Surely no one is seriously considering Tony
Speaker 2: Burke is a future prime minister.
Speaker 7: Well, I don't think that Tony would be out of
Speaker 7: the running. I think he's certainly in there. But you know,
Speaker 7: future prime minister's hard charmers and Miles have got a
Speaker 7: pretty head, big head start on him and it's hard
Speaker 7: to catch up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that would be a joke, wouldn't it. Michael Kroger
Speaker 2: having someone like Tony Burke as a prime minister.
Speaker 6: Well, you and I might be laughing, but I don't
Speaker 6: think so. I mean Burke, Burke is one of the
Speaker 6: hard men of labor. He's delivered for the unions in
Speaker 6: his Portfolilore. He's a very good media performer, right, he
Speaker 6: won't be caught like Giles and O'Neill. He's a very
Speaker 6: good media performer. He'll have the backing now of a
Speaker 6: lot of the trade unions and look, in the end,
Speaker 6: the cream rises to the top. And his performance as
Speaker 6: a labor minister, right, as a labor minister, in terms
Speaker 6: of appealing to the labor caucus and the labor faithful,
Speaker 6: he's done a lot more to win votes amongst his
Speaker 6: constituency than Chalmers has or Richard Males has. So I
Speaker 6: think Richard's fading and Charmers is just as rich I
Speaker 6: absolutely says Jim Chalmers as I was the hell of
Speaker 6: a nice blake. You preferred him at a barbecue than
Speaker 6: Tony Burke. But that's not what we're going for here.
Speaker 6: I think Bert Stocks have risen dramatically within the caucus,
Speaker 6: whilst Chalmers is fading because Jim just can't make a point.
Speaker 6: You've got to make some enemies in this business, as
Speaker 6: Richard knows better than anyone, You've got to make enemies
Speaker 6: to make anything. He who makes no enemies makes nothing
Speaker 6: at all. Jim's a hell of a nice bloke. He's
Speaker 6: handing out, you know, free confetti at the weddings. But
Speaker 6: he's a lovely fellow. But boy, he's just a commentator.
Speaker 6: He's a suburban new newspaper journalist writing about the local sport,
Speaker 6: telling us what happened on Saturday. Doesn't want to make
Speaker 6: any enemies, Jim, and that doesn't serve you well in politics.
Speaker 3: Quick final word, Richo, I think.
Speaker 7: I think Jim could deal with a few more enemies.
Speaker 7: I'll leave it at that all right.
Speaker 2: Michael Kroger, Graham Richardson, thank you both very much for
Speaker 2: joining me. Now still to come, a leading economist will
Speaker 2: break down today's inflation data and what it means for
Speaker 2: the cash rate. Plus we'll return to our top story,
Speaker 2: conflict in the Middle East as Hamasa's top leader is killed.
Speaker 2: Will cross live to an Israeli journalist shortly.
Speaker 3: Welcome back well.
Speaker 2: Concerns over a rate hike next week are easing slightly
Speaker 2: after today's inflation data was in line with the Central
Speaker 2: banks forecasts, although it was higher than what Treasury had
Speaker 2: predicted just a few months ago. CPI rose one percent
Speaker 2: in the June twenty twenty four quarter, bringing annual inflation
Speaker 2: to three point eight percent. This was Treasurer Jim Chalmer's response,
Speaker 2: saying that inflation is still easing despite the rise.
Speaker 3: Have a look.
Speaker 8: We know that people are still under pressure and this
Speaker 8: inflation in our economy is more persistent than any of
Speaker 8: us would like. But there are some within the data,
Speaker 8: there are some welcome developments. Even though inflation overall is
Speaker 8: still sticky and stubborn. We've got to get on top
Speaker 8: of this inflation challenge in our economy without smashing our
Speaker 8: economy or without smashing jobs.
Speaker 2: But Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor had a different take. He insisted,
Speaker 2: inflation is now homegrown.
Speaker 9: This is homegrown inflation.
Speaker 8: This is Labour's homegrown inflation inflicting pain on every Australian household.
Speaker 2: All right, Judo Banks, A Chief economic advisor Warren Hogan
Speaker 2: joins me. Now, thank you very much for your time. Now,
Speaker 2: it did rise to three point eight percent, so the
Speaker 2: Treasury had forecast it was going to be three and
Speaker 2: a half percent the middle of this year. They were
Speaker 2: then forecasting that by the end of the year it
Speaker 2: would be down to three percent. That's getting very close
Speaker 2: to the target band of two to three percent. So
Speaker 2: we're seeing that the Treasury was more optimistic. But given
Speaker 2: it was in line with where the RBA is expected
Speaker 2: inflation to be, do you think they're therefore less likely
Speaker 2: to raise rates at their board meeting next week.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 9: We were worried today's number would be a bad number
Speaker 9: because the monthly numbers for April and May had been
Speaker 9: and we thought there'd be a smoking gun for the RBA.
Speaker 9: But as it turned out, we got a more moderate number.
Speaker 9: It's still a bad number. We're still getting inflation at
Speaker 9: one percent in the quarter four percent and rates, so
Speaker 9: the smoking guns not there. But the RBA could easily say, look,
Speaker 9: it's sort of coming down. We can wait for another
Speaker 9: three months. But by the same token, the case for
Speaker 9: higher rates is quite clear, and that is inflation has
Speaker 9: stopped falling. It got to eight, it's come down to
Speaker 9: four late last year, and now it's just going sideways.
Speaker 9: And even though the days data didn't bear out the worst,
Speaker 9: it's still not telling us that inflation's heading to target.
Speaker 9: So the RBA has a case to go on top
Speaker 9: of the fact that we're creating a lot of jobs.
Speaker 1: And of course the.
Speaker 9: Big one is there's a huge fiscal stimulus about the
Speaker 9: hit the economy. Well he's hitting it right now, and
Speaker 9: text cuts and subsidies and so forth.
Speaker 2: Well, the treasurers seemed to be urging, not directly, of course,
Speaker 2: you know, he says he would never tell the independent
Speaker 2: IBA what to do, but it seemed to be urging
Speaker 2: the IRBA in his public commentary to hold off because
Speaker 2: he's saying that when some of the extra subsidies hit,
Speaker 2: that will lower inflation. This is part of his argument
Speaker 2: that his budget is deflationary.
Speaker 3: Do you think that proposition's accurate?
Speaker 1: No, it's not.
Speaker 9: I mean, it's a narrative for the broader community, and
Speaker 9: it's obviously a cost of living measure which is helping
Speaker 9: people in terms of their budgets, But in terms of
Speaker 9: the inflation process and what worries the RBA and the
Speaker 9: idea of getting inflation out of our economy, Throwing money
Speaker 9: at the economy is not a solution to inflation. In fact,
Speaker 9: it adds to it. And I think the real risk
Speaker 9: here is the RBA chooses not to go next week
Speaker 9: because of this broader pressure on them to not raise rates,
Speaker 9: because this number wasn't as bad as feared. But as
Speaker 9: the stimulus that's coming through with tax cuts kicks in
Speaker 9: and the economy starts to look a bit better, and
Speaker 9: the next inflation number is no better, if could be
Speaker 9: even worse. Then if they raise rates later in the year,
Speaker 9: then the government's got nowhere to go, and it'll be
Speaker 9: clearly because the fiscal stimulus is hit and of course
Speaker 9: the inflation is not going away. So in a way
Speaker 9: you could argue the government should want to hike next
Speaker 9: week because that sort of is a hike not related
Speaker 9: to their fiscal stimulus. But it's coming and there's some
Speaker 9: early signs that people are responding positively to the tax
Speaker 9: as you'd expect.
Speaker 2: The Treasurer has argued that because of their energy subsidies,
Speaker 2: that component of inflation was much lower than it would
Speaker 2: have been. What happens when those subsidies and in about
Speaker 2: a year's time, well, the.
Speaker 9: Inflation goes back up. So electricity is one hundred and
Speaker 9: it goes to one hundred and ten, but the government
Speaker 9: gives you a subsidy and says it's only going to
Speaker 9: cost you one hundred and five. The electricity generator is
Speaker 9: still getting one hundred and ten, but the CPI says
Speaker 9: it's only going up to one hundred and five. But
Speaker 9: in the following year they remove the subsidy. The consumer
Speaker 9: pays one hundred and ten, and even though the electricity
Speaker 9: price hasn't changed, the CPI will measure it as an increase.
Speaker 9: So it's just a mask in terms of inflation. So
Speaker 9: if you remove the subsity, inflation will go up. So
Speaker 9: the IBA is said quite clearly they're going to look
Speaker 9: through it. I mean, this is something economists have understood
Speaker 9: for decades. These are tricks in terms of the measurement
Speaker 9: of inflation rather than what's actually out there.
Speaker 2: So you think the IBA will still have to raise rates,
Speaker 2: but it might be they might shift it towards the
Speaker 2: end of the year bonding to some of the public pressure,
Speaker 2: or maybe it's just not urgent for them.
Speaker 3: To do it right now.
Speaker 9: Yeah, well, I mean there is a lot of pressure.
Speaker 9: It's not just this sort of political pressure from political leaders,
Speaker 9: but they are concerned about their position in the community.
Speaker 3: Well, thirteen rate rises. It's hurting that, you know, people
Speaker 3: are having to.
Speaker 9: Sell their homes, it is, But the reality is is
Speaker 9: the inflation is what's doing the damage to people's standards
Speaker 9: are living, particularly the most vulnerable in our community, and
Speaker 9: it's their job to get rid of it. So it's
Speaker 9: a judgment call. But I still think that the level
Speaker 9: of the cash rate is not high enough that we
Speaker 9: will need to see further rate hikes, and the sooner
Speaker 9: we do it, the less they'll have to be. So
Speaker 9: it's really the RBA is really it's a big, big
Speaker 9: meeting next week. Most people think they're not going to move.
Speaker 9: I still think that there's a chance they will because
Speaker 9: I think it's the right thing to do. But I
Speaker 9: don't think we're out of the woods on rates or
Speaker 9: inflation by any stretch of the imagination. Just because this
Speaker 9: numbered the day came in a touch better than expected.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, and even the Treasurer says it's sticky and stubborn.
Speaker 2: Now let's have a look at Rex Airlines. It has
Speaker 2: gone into voluntary administration. It's already fired three hundred and
Speaker 2: sixty employees. It's axed their Capital city flights, some jobs,
Speaker 2: More jobs are on the line, more flights are up
Speaker 2: for being cut as well. This is really impacting regional communities.
Speaker 2: Do you think there's anything the government should be doing.
Speaker 9: Yeah, well, look the process has got to have a
Speaker 9: look at what can be retrieved. So they've gone into
Speaker 9: these new routes in the last few years and the
Speaker 9: capital city routes that hasn't worked. Can they get out
Speaker 9: of those routes and still have a business the one
Speaker 9: we know in regional Australia. If they can, great, If not,
Speaker 9: I think there's a case for the government to provide
Speaker 9: some support, whether it's the state governments or the federal
Speaker 9: But this is a crucial service. We know that the
Speaker 9: airline industry is difficult, and of course rex is a
Speaker 9: really important service for Australia. So I think there is
Speaker 9: a case for government as long as it's a transparent
Speaker 9: process that shows that it can't be saved on its own.
Speaker 3: All right, Larin Hogan, thank you very much for your time.
Speaker 3: Appreciate it.
Speaker 10: Thanks V.
Speaker 3: It's been a big day for you, I know, analyzing
Speaker 3: all of this data.
Speaker 2: Returning to our top story, now that Hamas chief Ishmael
Speaker 2: Haneieir has been killed in Tehran, let's bring in Israeli
Speaker 2: journalist in New Zanka, Littel Shamesh. Thank you very much
Speaker 2: for your time. Have what response have we heard from
Speaker 2: Israel over this?
Speaker 3: Has anyone in the.
Speaker 2: Israeli government taken responsibility for this assassination?
Speaker 11: Hi, Jerry, thank you so much, first of all for
Speaker 11: having me so No, at the moment, Israel is not
Speaker 11: taking responsibility for that assassination. To be honest, I don't
Speaker 11: think it will in the upcoming a few years. Usually
Speaker 11: Israel do not take responsibility for any kinds of measures
Speaker 11: as like that on the soil of Tyran, on the
Speaker 11: land of Iran. What I can tell you is that
Speaker 11: Israel took responsibility for taking down one of the heads
Speaker 11: of Risbela just yesterday in the heart of Beiwut. So
Speaker 11: to see these two act within less than twelve hours,
Speaker 11: taking down heads of Isbelah and the number one personality
Speaker 11: of Hamas is a great, great achievement for the State
Speaker 11: of Israel. And this whole thing is happening on the
Speaker 11: same day of the inauguration of the President of Iran,
Speaker 11: which is sending a clear message to Iran, we will
Speaker 11: not be afraid to take down your proxies, heads of
Speaker 11: his Blah, heads of Hamas, and we know how to
Speaker 11: get to each and single one of them. So it's
Speaker 11: basically a great success for the Israeli intelligence.
Speaker 3: Yeah, indeed it is. It's also an embarrassment for te Iran.
Speaker 2: Is there an expectation that the Iranian leadership will now retaliate.
Speaker 11: So that's a question that we're all asking ourselves in
Speaker 11: Israel whether Tyran would want to respond to this act
Speaker 11: being held on its territory or will Iran will back
Speaker 11: down because at the moment, Israel is trying to defeat
Speaker 11: Ramas in the Gaza strip. In the recent few months,
Speaker 11: Israel has been taken down five of the six top
Speaker 11: men in Hamas, so including muhammadef who are Israel took
Speaker 11: down just last week. So we're talking about getting one
Speaker 11: step closer to the surrender of Ramas.
Speaker 2: Do you think the terrorist group is looking weaker by
Speaker 2: the day. Many international experts have argued that ultimately Hamas
Speaker 2: can't be killed because it's an extremist ideology and there's
Speaker 2: so much of that extremism that's infiltrated the Palestinian population.
Speaker 3: But there has been an effort. Israel says it's targeted or.
Speaker 2: Killed some thirteen to fifteen thousand Hamas terrorists in Gaza.
Speaker 2: So is this looking like a more realistic proposition that
Speaker 2: the terror group could be destroyed?
Speaker 11: Yeah, So, on one hand, you're right. On one hand,
Speaker 11: this is a fundamentalist organization. We're talking about an extremist idea,
Speaker 11: the same as isis calling for the illumination, illumination of
Speaker 11: the State of Israel and of the Jewish people as
Speaker 11: a whole. But at the end of the day, Israel
Speaker 11: cannot allow itself to leave side by side with a
Speaker 11: tear entity controlling the Gaza strip. And if we're just
Speaker 11: talking about Ismailhaniah was assassinated yesterday. This man estimated worth
Speaker 11: is four billion dollars.
Speaker 3: And I think the entire.
Speaker 11: World should wake up and understand when it's sending aid
Speaker 11: to Gaza, when it's sending humanitarian aid into the Palacine
Speaker 11: and Authority, the money goes eventually to the hands of
Speaker 11: the leaders of RAMAS. Just a few months ago, Australia
Speaker 11: has declared fifty two million dollars eight into God And
Speaker 11: can you verify that this money is not going to
Speaker 11: the hands off the heads of Ramas who are traveling
Speaker 11: in private jets, who are slipping in luxurious hotels, And
Speaker 11: at the end of the day, you don't know if
Speaker 11: that tax paying money is going to the hands of
Speaker 11: the leaders corrupted leaders of RAMAS and policine Authority are
Speaker 11: actually going to help Palesinians. So I think the entire
Speaker 11: world should gather up to fight this fundamentalist, extremist terr
Speaker 11: organization that Israel is fighting Tramas alongside with Fisbola and
Speaker 11: at the end of the day, both of these branches
Speaker 11: are proxies of Iran.
Speaker 2: Yeah, such a good point. Dettel, really appreciate having you
Speaker 2: on the show tonight.
Speaker 3: Thank you now Still to come.
Speaker 2: Labour's renewable energy plan continues to lose public support as
Speaker 2: power bills get high, and my panel.
Speaker 3: Will join me next. Welcome back.
Speaker 2: Well, let's bring in tonight's political panel Labor MP Daniel
Speaker 2: Melino and Coalition MP Andrew Wallace.
Speaker 3: Welcome to you both. Look, let's have a look at
Speaker 3: the issue of.
Speaker 2: Power bills and how this is playing out amongst Australians.
Speaker 2: The Daily Telegraph had a Redbridge poll that found that
Speaker 2: Australians are not buying into Labour's renewable vision. Fifty four
Speaker 2: percent of voters agreed with the proposition that the government's
Speaker 2: transition to renewable energy has pushed up power bills. Daniel,
Speaker 2: it seems Australians are not convinced by Albanese's renewable plan.
Speaker 10: Well, Sherry, thanks for having me on. Look.
Speaker 12: I've seen a whole lot of poles on energy over
Speaker 12: the last few months, and I would say that the
Speaker 12: balance of the polling suggests that people actually support moving
Speaker 12: forward with renewables becoming an ever larger share of our
Speaker 12: energy source, so long as it's firmed appropriately, and I
Speaker 12: think the government's plan is for that to be gas.
Speaker 12: I've seen poles, for example, by Essential showing that a
Speaker 12: strong majority support renewables as the most suitable energy source
Speaker 12: going forward, that they don't support deferring action for fifteen.
Speaker 10: Years or more waiting for nuclear.
Speaker 12: And there are other poles also which point to very
Speaker 12: similar results. For example a CSIO pole recently. I think
Speaker 12: what people want is action. The problem with the nuclear
Speaker 12: approach is that we're going to be kicking the can
Speaker 12: down the road for at least fifteen years and we
Speaker 12: just can't afford to do that.
Speaker 3: Andrew, what do you think.
Speaker 2: Do you agree with what Daniel just said that people
Speaker 2: do want renewable action and that they think nuclear energy
Speaker 2: is to remote proposition.
Speaker 13: Well, Sharie, not necessarily, No, I don't agree with that
Speaker 13: because effectively, what we're seeing is Australians are hurting badly.
Speaker 13: We're seeing more than six hundred Australians each week getting
Speaker 13: in touch with their energy providers and going onto hardship provisions.
Speaker 13: The cost of living is continuing to buy. This inflation
Speaker 13: crisis that we're seeing is home grown and people are
Speaker 13: hurting badly and what they are seeing is that as
Speaker 13: opposed to what Anthony Alberanezi said on ninety seven occasions
Speaker 13: prior to the election, is that he reduce energy prices.
Speaker 13: What we've actually seen, rather than be reduced, we're seeing
Speaker 13: them increase by one thousand dollars. So you know, Australians
Speaker 13: aren't buying this anymore because they know it is hurting
Speaker 13: them in the back pocket. What they want is cheaper,
Speaker 13: cleaner and consistent energy. Now we say in the Coalition
Speaker 13: that we're returned to government that will provide an integrated
Speaker 13: energy mix and that can be done through certainly through renewables,
Speaker 13: firmed by gas and then ultimately by a nuclear This
Speaker 13: folly that Chris Bowen has been on with eighty three
Speaker 13: percent renewables is driving people's energy prices through the roof.
Speaker 2: Let's have a look at Paris now, and there's been
Speaker 2: a gender row ererupt. It was discovered that two boxers
Speaker 2: who have been disqualified from the World Championships were then
Speaker 2: allowed to compete at the Olympics. The fight has failed
Speaker 2: gender eligibility tests last year, so they weren't deemed to
Speaker 2: be women last year. But the IOC is now defending
Speaker 2: the pair, confirming they have both met the criteria to
Speaker 2: be women to compete at these Olympics.
Speaker 3: Daniel, what do you make of this?
Speaker 10: We look.
Speaker 12: I think we've seen a lot of debates around transgender
Speaker 12: athletes in sports across a range of different sports over
Speaker 12: the last ten years or more, and I think.
Speaker 10: They generated a lot of hysteria.
Speaker 12: And I think what led to more measured and sensible
Speaker 12: policies was that we went towards a process where the
Speaker 12: governing bodies for each of the major sports around the
Speaker 12: world looked at the issue and based upon the particular
Speaker 12: characteristics of each sport, made decisions about who could participate
Speaker 12: and who couldn't. And to me, if you look at
Speaker 12: the kinds of outcomes we saw in swimming and athletics,
Speaker 12: it seemed to result in sensible, pragmatic outcomes across a
Speaker 12: whole range of sports, and that, to me, that seemed
Speaker 12: to be the sensible approach.
Speaker 10: That we should look at it on a sport by
Speaker 10: sport basis.
Speaker 12: What we see here is to me a situation where, look,
Speaker 12: I don't know all the details of this particular situation,
Speaker 12: the organizers in Paris seem to be saying that the
Speaker 12: two athletes have competed in women's categories in a number
Speaker 12: of competitions in the past, and if that's the case,
Speaker 12: then it would suggest that a number of competitions have
Speaker 12: deemed it suitable. So, look, it may be a case
Speaker 12: that boxing is still grappling with the rules and that
Speaker 12: perhaps a number of their eligibility rules need to be
Speaker 12: settled before we get to major competitions.
Speaker 10: I guess I just reiterate.
Speaker 12: I think, broadly speaking, I think a sport by sport
Speaker 12: approach makes sense. Boxing clearly is a relatively high resport,
Speaker 12: so it just seems a little strange to me that
Speaker 12: we're still dealing with eligibility issues at such a major event.
Speaker 2: Yeah, look, there seems to be a lot of different views.
Speaker 2: This is going to continue to be a big controversy.
Speaker 2: Andrew Wallace, The New South Wales and South Australian governments
Speaker 2: are holding a joint two day summit on the impact
Speaker 2: of social media on young people. They want to raise
Speaker 2: the age of the platforms to sixteen.
Speaker 3: Do you think this should be a federal.
Speaker 2: Government initiative, to have a national approach instead of just
Speaker 2: two states.
Speaker 13: Well, I applaud both Chris Mins and Steven Malanowskis for
Speaker 13: coming out and talking about this. This is something that
Speaker 13: I've been banging on for a while and it's something
Speaker 13: that the Social Media Committee on which I is looking
Speaker 13: at doing expressly, and that is raising the social media
Speaker 13: age minimum age to sixteen. The platforms currently have them
Speaker 13: at thirteen. We know it from a recent UK study
Speaker 13: that thirty four percent of young people on social media
Speaker 13: their parents are happy to lie for them to say
Speaker 13: that they are over thirteen.
Speaker 10: Which is a great concern.
Speaker 13: But look, we think that thirteen and even thirteen is
Speaker 13: far too young for developing minds to be exposed to
Speaker 13: sort of problems we see in social media.
Speaker 2: Indeed it is Daniel Melino Andrew Wallace really appreciate your
Speaker 2: time tonight. Thank you very much, and thanks everyone for
Speaker 2: your company at home. I'll see you tomorrow at eight.
Speaker 2: And right now, here's Paul Murray.