1 00:00:02,360 --> 00:00:05,000 Speaker 1: The antimous inner. Welcome to Property Insights. Hello, thank you. 2 00:00:05,600 --> 00:00:08,240 Speaker 1: Now you're the deputy chief economists at AMP Bank or 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:11,959 Speaker 1: AMP it's just AMP, just a But is there an AMP? 4 00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:15,319 Speaker 1: So does the AMP bank the actual banking license that 5 00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:17,040 Speaker 1: fit within the AMP yes. 6 00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:18,120 Speaker 2: Group, Yes, that's right. 7 00:00:18,160 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: Yeah. 8 00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:21,720 Speaker 3: So AMP has a bank, a platforms business called North 9 00:00:22,040 --> 00:00:24,040 Speaker 3: and then Superinvestments, which is where I sit. 10 00:00:24,200 --> 00:00:26,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so are you doing the Super Investments part? 11 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 1: That's so you're you're giving them economic updates and advice 12 00:00:30,280 --> 00:00:32,600 Speaker 1: and guidance and whatever have have you. 13 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:36,600 Speaker 3: In relations, We do support the whole business. We do 14 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 3: suffer bank, We just suffer platforms. I mean it is 15 00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:43,000 Speaker 3: quite integrated. But our main area is sitting within the 16 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:46,040 Speaker 3: multi asset team, within the Super Investments business, to give 17 00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:50,000 Speaker 3: them our economic forecast, to talk about us allocation with 18 00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:51,440 Speaker 3: our portfolio management team. 19 00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:53,080 Speaker 1: So just to get a bit of a sense of that, 20 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:56,320 Speaker 1: because most people think AMP is, you know, full of 21 00:00:56,320 --> 00:01:00,160 Speaker 1: financial planners. It's not anymore. But AMP is a not 22 00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:04,440 Speaker 1: only as a platform, but AMP shows products superproducts, which 23 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:10,360 Speaker 1: are you know, the inventory of a planner, let's call it. 24 00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:11,959 Speaker 1: Can we get a bit of a sense of what 25 00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:15,560 Speaker 1: size we're talking about in terms of the products. 26 00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:18,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, so the funds under management are about eighty billion 27 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:21,000 Speaker 3: dollars now. The types of super funds, so we would 28 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 3: have corporate super plans. So for example, if if you 29 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:29,279 Speaker 3: go into a into a business and they have chosen 30 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 3: AMP as their as their fund manager, then your default 31 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 3: option would be to go with an AMP fund. 32 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:36,600 Speaker 1: Unless you choose to do it somewhere, unless you. 33 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:37,960 Speaker 2: Choose to go somewhere else. Yeah, but that would be 34 00:01:37,959 --> 00:01:38,679 Speaker 2: your default option. 35 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 3: That's so that's one part of a corporate super But 36 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:43,360 Speaker 3: a lot of the other super options are ones that 37 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 3: are available on our platform NORTH, so the advisors can 38 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 3: choose to use AMP. Now, we don't have many AMP 39 00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 3: financial planners anymore. And actually that business was sold off 40 00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:57,160 Speaker 3: at the end of last year, which is to entirety, 41 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:01,480 Speaker 3: but that is also part of where people would be 42 00:02:01,480 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 3: investing their money through super via the platform. 43 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:08,959 Speaker 1: But if you're an entirety planner and you're talking to 44 00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:15,120 Speaker 1: your customers or your clients, the AMP product suite is 45 00:02:15,160 --> 00:02:16,440 Speaker 1: available to those clients. 46 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:19,400 Speaker 3: Yeah, and I mean it can be available to people 47 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 3: who are just using NORTH. You don't have to necessarily 48 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:25,440 Speaker 3: be aligned to AMP. You could just choose a product 49 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:28,440 Speaker 3: that's available or notth just like many other index providers 50 00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:30,680 Speaker 3: would also be on north. So it's just sort of 51 00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:33,800 Speaker 3: an offering that we have there as one of our funds. 52 00:02:33,480 --> 00:02:36,880 Speaker 1: As opposed to pushing it through a planning division because 53 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:37,800 Speaker 1: you guys don't own the planet. 54 00:02:37,840 --> 00:02:39,600 Speaker 2: No, we don't know. We don't own that anymore. 55 00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:41,600 Speaker 3: And that's sort of that really changed after the Royal 56 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:44,480 Speaker 3: Commission anyways, because the vertical integration issues. 57 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:48,639 Speaker 1: Yeah, generally speaking, that affected quite a lot of organizations, 58 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 1: including the banks. So if where I'm interested in, where 59 00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:55,040 Speaker 1: our audience is interested in his interest rates of course, 60 00:02:55,040 --> 00:02:57,360 Speaker 1: and the economy. So if I just turned to the 61 00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:01,239 Speaker 1: economy from a macro economy, a macro point of view, 62 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 1: what do you guys think, what does your team think 63 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: at AMP in relation to the macroeconomics? And I'm going 64 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:10,960 Speaker 1: to do which parts of it I'm interested in of 65 00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 1: Australia today, And let's start with just GDP, So I 66 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:18,920 Speaker 1: will to about inflation to GDP for stuff like in 67 00:03:18,919 --> 00:03:21,640 Speaker 1: other words, how we're traveling like as a as a nation. 68 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:24,880 Speaker 1: You know, the way one way of measuring this is 69 00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:27,519 Speaker 1: gross domestic product. You know, I know it's flawed and 70 00:03:27,560 --> 00:03:29,720 Speaker 1: that sort of stuff. But where do you think, how 71 00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:33,840 Speaker 1: do you think we're traveling in terms of traditional methodologies 72 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:34,480 Speaker 1: of measurement. 73 00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:37,920 Speaker 3: I think Australia is doing okay. But the more important 74 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,280 Speaker 3: thing is we're likely to do better in the next 75 00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:43,720 Speaker 3: twelve months. The last two years, our activity in the 76 00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:46,560 Speaker 3: economy as measured by GDP, which is basically a sense 77 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:48,840 Speaker 3: of production in the economy, how much a business is 78 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:51,880 Speaker 3: selling and how much a consumer's buying, it's been pretty soft. 79 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:54,360 Speaker 3: It's been running at one to one and a half 80 00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:55,280 Speaker 3: percent per year. 81 00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 1: Why is that so off relatives to some other numbers 82 00:03:58,200 --> 00:03:58,760 Speaker 1: the number. 83 00:03:58,920 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 2: I was about to get to that. 84 00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 3: So the reason that it's soft is because when you 85 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:04,280 Speaker 3: think about how much should GDP grow in the future, 86 00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:06,480 Speaker 3: it should be a factor of how much is your 87 00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 3: population growing, how much is the productivity growth in the economy, 88 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 3: and what's the participation rate of the lavemark in the economy. 89 00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:15,400 Speaker 3: So when you put all those things together, because Australia 90 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:18,640 Speaker 3: runs very high levels of immigration, we should be running 91 00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:21,000 Speaker 3: it close to two point seventy five or three percent 92 00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:24,120 Speaker 3: every single year growth terms. So compare that to a 93 00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 3: country like China, for example, they're running at five percent 94 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 3: because they have their well, they're trying to get their 95 00:04:30,680 --> 00:04:35,760 Speaker 3: economy growing. And also when you're an emerging economy, it's 96 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 3: easier to have higher levels of a gittyp. 97 00:04:38,360 --> 00:04:40,320 Speaker 1: Grewth this should be growing much, that's right. 98 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:43,560 Speaker 3: So all Western countries generally grow between say one to 99 00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:46,279 Speaker 3: three percent year on year, but one percent one to 100 00:04:46,320 --> 00:04:48,760 Speaker 3: one half percent, and your growth through Australia is pretty low. 101 00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:50,360 Speaker 2: That outside of the pandemic. 102 00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 3: That's actually the lowest pace of economic growth that we've 103 00:04:53,200 --> 00:04:56,440 Speaker 3: had since the early nineties recession, which was nearly thirty 104 00:04:56,480 --> 00:04:59,400 Speaker 3: which was more than thirty years ago now, so it's 105 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:01,120 Speaker 3: a pretty it was a pretty poor outcome, and I 106 00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:03,440 Speaker 3: think that's why, especially in the private sector, a lot 107 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:05,200 Speaker 3: of people felt like we were in a bit of 108 00:05:05,200 --> 00:05:08,320 Speaker 3: a recession and per person, our level of GDP growth 109 00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 3: was actually going backwards, so that's why people were saying 110 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:13,880 Speaker 3: as in negative negative that's right. We had seven negative 111 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:17,080 Speaker 3: quarters of per capita GDP growth up until the last 112 00:05:17,080 --> 00:05:21,040 Speaker 3: print of December, so for seven quarters our economy went 113 00:05:21,080 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 3: backwards per person, and that's generally seemed to be a 114 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,040 Speaker 3: negative for things like living standards, So. 115 00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 1: Just and as an economist, if you could just sort 116 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 1: of help us out here, so these measurements and per person, 117 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:41,679 Speaker 1: maybe you could explain why that's important because you mentioned 118 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:46,120 Speaker 1: it just a moment ago. We tend to always try 119 00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:49,520 Speaker 1: to measure everything as human nature, and one of the 120 00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:52,279 Speaker 1: things we try to measure is how well are we 121 00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:55,880 Speaker 1: living as individuals? What does my standard of living? What 122 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 1: can I afford? What I can't afford? Which what can't 123 00:05:58,080 --> 00:05:59,320 Speaker 1: I afford that I used to be able to afford, 124 00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:01,479 Speaker 1: or what could I not afford in the past I 125 00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:04,159 Speaker 1: can now afford. That was sort of indicated an increase 126 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:07,600 Speaker 1: the stand of living. Stand living? Why is it so 127 00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:11,479 Speaker 1: important to economists? Why do you guys sort of really 128 00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:12,440 Speaker 1: talk about a lot. 129 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:15,239 Speaker 3: Well, there's different ways to measure your standard of living. 130 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 3: So there's household income growth, there's productivity growth, there's GDP growth, 131 00:06:21,240 --> 00:06:24,520 Speaker 3: there's looking at inflation versus wage. I think they are 132 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:28,760 Speaker 3: all encompassing of the standard living. But I guess traditionally 133 00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:31,440 Speaker 3: the best way to measure the wealth of a nation 134 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,880 Speaker 3: is via GEDDP growth because it's the production of the 135 00:06:34,920 --> 00:06:40,000 Speaker 3: whole economy. So that's why when GDP per person goes backwards, 136 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:43,039 Speaker 3: that tends to be negative. It shows you that per person, 137 00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 3: you're becoming less wealthy, I mean than it was last year. 138 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:50,039 Speaker 3: Then you were even compared to a quarter ago or 139 00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:50,800 Speaker 3: a year ago. 140 00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:51,280 Speaker 1: That's right. 141 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:54,920 Speaker 2: So we were actually going backwards every quarter for seven. 142 00:06:54,760 --> 00:06:56,880 Speaker 1: Quarters on a per capit on a purpose. 143 00:06:56,520 --> 00:06:57,960 Speaker 2: A per person basis, that's right. 144 00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 3: And the measure of a the measure of a recession, 145 00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:05,159 Speaker 3: according to GDP growth is two negative quarters, two consecutive 146 00:07:05,200 --> 00:07:08,200 Speaker 3: negative quarters of GITDP growth, which is why people said 147 00:07:08,200 --> 00:07:10,200 Speaker 3: when we had seven negative quarters that we were in 148 00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 3: a per capita recession. I mean, there are other ways 149 00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:14,560 Speaker 3: to measure, you know, how wealthy you are as your 150 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:17,760 Speaker 3: own household, you have your own obviously household balance sheet, 151 00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 3: we get household wealth numbers as well. Household wealth has 152 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:24,920 Speaker 3: actually increased throughout this period, and it's actually increased to 153 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:28,720 Speaker 3: a record high because the superannuation balance of the average 154 00:07:28,760 --> 00:07:31,680 Speaker 3: household has increased so much. Our supersystem has done so 155 00:07:31,720 --> 00:07:35,680 Speaker 3: well from very high returns. But GITDP is another measure 156 00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 3: of household wealth, so. 157 00:07:37,640 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 1: It but is it fair to say, and forgive me 158 00:07:41,080 --> 00:07:43,520 Speaker 1: for the saying this, but these are all fictions, mathematical fictions, 159 00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:48,080 Speaker 1: because there are all attempts to somehow in a matheticmatical 160 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 1: way and in a statistical way, to measure a nation 161 00:07:55,720 --> 00:07:58,000 Speaker 1: every single individual. And then if you get invited by 162 00:07:58,040 --> 00:08:00,160 Speaker 1: the number of individuals we get, let's call it to 163 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:04,840 Speaker 1: per person number. But they're mathematical fictions because somebody like, 164 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:08,559 Speaker 1: let's say, I just make this argument for the moment, 165 00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:14,360 Speaker 1: I am one of the people live in this country. Therefore, technically, 166 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 1: over the last seven quarters, my standard of living has 167 00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:21,680 Speaker 1: reduced because me as a a person in this country, 168 00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:27,800 Speaker 1: I've had I've endured seven negative quarters seven yes, seve 169 00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:32,400 Speaker 1: negative quarters. But on the other hand, maybe my wealth's 170 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 1: gone up because all the realist that I own has 171 00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:38,160 Speaker 1: gone up like quite a bit. So therefore it's a 172 00:08:38,200 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 1: bit fictional. 173 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:41,400 Speaker 3: I guess it's a it's an attempt. It's a stock 174 00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:45,080 Speaker 3: versus a flow as well. So GDP is a flow measure. 175 00:08:45,640 --> 00:08:48,400 Speaker 3: It does it does change every since what not that 176 00:08:48,440 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 3: wealth doesn't. But when you think about your own wealth, 177 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,600 Speaker 3: it is it is more of a stock like figure, 178 00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:55,839 Speaker 3: whereas GDP is a production figure. You know what has 179 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 3: changed over that quarter. So it's you're just measuring different things. 180 00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: Basically, is that measurement and I know that media talks 181 00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:05,160 Speaker 1: about all the time, but is that measure of GDP 182 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:10,360 Speaker 1: per person somewhat a little bit I would say, misguided 183 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,040 Speaker 1: but potentially misleading. 184 00:09:13,240 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 2: Absolutely in some ways. 185 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:17,240 Speaker 3: But I think you know, every single statistic is because 186 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 3: what is the average household. 187 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:20,679 Speaker 1: Thing? 188 00:09:21,400 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 3: And there's not especially in the last few years, I 189 00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 3: think we've had such high levels of inequality in terms 190 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:31,480 Speaker 3: of asset rich versus asset poor households in Australia. Different 191 00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:35,559 Speaker 3: age brackets doing quite differently in terms of the pain 192 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 3: that some households are felt with mortgage repayments, the pain 193 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:42,320 Speaker 3: that for example, retirees might fill with inflation because they're 194 00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:44,600 Speaker 3: not getting their wages that are compensated to inflation. So 195 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:47,120 Speaker 3: it's been quite diverse outcome. 196 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:48,200 Speaker 2: So it's very. 197 00:09:48,080 --> 00:09:51,920 Speaker 3: Hard to actually talk aboutage consumer and it's much more absolutely. 198 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:54,040 Speaker 1: So, Therefore, do you think it would be a good idea? 199 00:09:54,120 --> 00:09:56,000 Speaker 1: And I know this sounds a bit esoterical, but I 200 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:58,439 Speaker 1: think it's important becaus is rarely we get actually an 201 00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 1: economist on the show. Do you think that the media 202 00:10:03,160 --> 00:10:07,720 Speaker 1: should be encouraged to say when you miss the media 203 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:11,080 Speaker 1: person right, that it's on a per capita basis, we're 204 00:10:11,120 --> 00:10:14,040 Speaker 1: in a per capita recession. We should also write though 205 00:10:14,120 --> 00:10:17,320 Speaker 1: that there's one part of the economy is doing very well, 206 00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 1: as one part of the economy is doing crap. And 207 00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:22,080 Speaker 1: maybe you start to talk about other statistical measures like, 208 00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:25,559 Speaker 1: for example, the Gini coefficient, you know, like the split 209 00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:29,840 Speaker 1: between rich and poor, and how that's why, Nick, do 210 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:33,320 Speaker 1: you think that we need to have They need maybe 211 00:10:33,360 --> 00:10:34,839 Speaker 1: to talk more of them, need to talk to you. 212 00:10:35,440 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: There needs to be more education of our commentary so 213 00:10:39,559 --> 00:10:43,160 Speaker 1: that we can get an apolitical view on this stuff 214 00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:46,440 Speaker 1: and in a better sense of how important or how 215 00:10:46,480 --> 00:10:50,679 Speaker 1: the statistics statistical analysis fits in. Otherwise it can be 216 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:51,880 Speaker 1: misleading for sure. 217 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:55,080 Speaker 3: Well, this is why people try and nitpick whichever parts 218 00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:56,800 Speaker 3: of the data that they want, because you can sort 219 00:10:56,840 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 3: of find different statistics to suit your point of view. 220 00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:03,880 Speaker 3: And was traditionally economists and the media have commented on 221 00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:06,520 Speaker 3: that specific release that's coming out, So it's not like 222 00:11:06,520 --> 00:11:08,120 Speaker 3: you get all the released on one day. You get 223 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:10,480 Speaker 3: retail sales, you get the home price data, you get 224 00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:13,320 Speaker 3: GDP growth, so we just naturally just comment on that 225 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:15,040 Speaker 3: one bit of data. But it is a good point 226 00:11:15,040 --> 00:11:17,400 Speaker 3: that we need to keep in mind the whole range 227 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,840 Speaker 3: of other indicators. And that's what economists try to do, really, 228 00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:24,080 Speaker 3: is to digest everything and to plug that into whatever 229 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:26,320 Speaker 3: model that we use to try and make sense of Actually, 230 00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:28,440 Speaker 3: what's what's going on in the world. 231 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:31,000 Speaker 1: Do you think the Reserve Bank looks at all those 232 00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:33,960 Speaker 1: things when they're making their call absolutely about what to 233 00:11:34,000 --> 00:11:37,800 Speaker 1: do with or we might just wheel back one one 234 00:11:37,840 --> 00:11:40,760 Speaker 1: the will back a little bit what people most people 235 00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:43,800 Speaker 1: don't realize. Everyone thinks the reserve banks here look at 236 00:11:44,040 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 1: insut rai's relative to inflation. Well, that's sort of right, 237 00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:50,320 Speaker 1: But the actual mandate is is the growth and welfare 238 00:11:50,360 --> 00:11:53,360 Speaker 1: of sorry, prosperity and welfare of all Australians. Somehow you've 239 00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:57,160 Speaker 1: got to measure both of those. But that's part of it, 240 00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:59,559 Speaker 1: that's the main part of the mandate and the way 241 00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:02,000 Speaker 1: they do it, the way the measure to something sense 242 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:06,840 Speaker 1: using looking inflation and then the way they manage inflation 243 00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:10,040 Speaker 1: steal interest rates. But when it comes to prosperity and 244 00:12:10,120 --> 00:12:12,559 Speaker 1: welfare of all Australians, what do you think the Reserve 245 00:12:12,559 --> 00:12:15,000 Speaker 1: banks looking at apart from DUDP and apart from inflation, 246 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:17,080 Speaker 1: what other things do you think they're sort of considered. 247 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:18,320 Speaker 3: Well, The two things that are in their mandate is 248 00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:23,360 Speaker 3: price price stability, which is the inflation target, keeping inflation 249 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:25,920 Speaker 3: within two to three percent over the course of business cycle. 250 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:27,520 Speaker 3: How long is a business cycle? I don't know how 251 00:12:27,520 --> 00:12:28,480 Speaker 3: long is a piece of string. 252 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:31,480 Speaker 1: But you know they have to a medium term though, 253 00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:32,079 Speaker 1: don't they? 254 00:12:32,240 --> 00:12:34,079 Speaker 2: But what is the medium term? Five years? Is it 255 00:12:34,120 --> 00:12:35,120 Speaker 2: seven years, ten years? 256 00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:38,080 Speaker 3: A lot of governors have looked at what inflation has 257 00:12:38,120 --> 00:12:40,480 Speaker 3: been over the course of their of their whole terms 258 00:12:40,720 --> 00:12:42,679 Speaker 3: term or terms over the course. 259 00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:43,199 Speaker 2: Of a few years. 260 00:12:43,880 --> 00:12:46,760 Speaker 3: Do you take out periods like the pandemic? I think 261 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:49,040 Speaker 3: it's up. It's open to debate, but yes, like I 262 00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:52,080 Speaker 3: would say, on a five to seven year basis, what 263 00:12:52,160 --> 00:12:54,920 Speaker 3: has been average inflation. So they try and target price 264 00:12:55,320 --> 00:12:58,200 Speaker 3: stability by having inflation at two to three percent. Then 265 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,840 Speaker 3: they also there are the mandate. They have dual mandate. 266 00:13:00,880 --> 00:13:03,640 Speaker 3: Their other mandate is full employment, so keeping the unemployment 267 00:13:03,679 --> 00:13:06,560 Speaker 3: rate basically as low as possible for the prospect. 268 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:08,160 Speaker 1: We don't know what full employment means, by the way, 269 00:13:08,200 --> 00:13:10,760 Speaker 1: and they may unemployment, so they sort of say, well, 270 00:13:10,760 --> 00:13:12,719 Speaker 1: we don't know what full employment means, but therefore we 271 00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:13,720 Speaker 1: look at unemployment. 272 00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:17,360 Speaker 3: They have a list of full employment indicators, and I 273 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:21,400 Speaker 3: guess historically we have used the unemployment rate more as 274 00:13:21,400 --> 00:13:24,680 Speaker 3: a guide to full employment, but more recently, I think 275 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 3: it's become a bit more nuanced since the pandemic because 276 00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:30,280 Speaker 3: the indicators of the labor market have actually been a 277 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:33,600 Speaker 3: little bit diverse. We've had some strange outcomes in the 278 00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:37,720 Speaker 3: employment market. The unemployment rate has been artificially low despite 279 00:13:37,720 --> 00:13:40,840 Speaker 3: other indicators of the labor market weakening. So there are 280 00:13:40,880 --> 00:13:43,280 Speaker 3: a few funny things that are going on that I 281 00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:46,320 Speaker 3: think do have explanations. But it's for this reason that 282 00:13:46,320 --> 00:13:48,720 Speaker 3: the Reserve Bank basically has a whole list of full 283 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:51,800 Speaker 3: employment indicators and it tries to gauge how far away 284 00:13:51,920 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 3: are we from their understanding of where full employment is. 285 00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 3: But the way I think that there's a simpler way 286 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:00,000 Speaker 3: to think about it. When you're think about how to 287 00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:02,560 Speaker 3: height is a labor market, you basically just need to 288 00:14:02,559 --> 00:14:06,200 Speaker 3: look at wages growth. If wages growth is slowing, it's 289 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:09,240 Speaker 3: basically a signal that the labor market has weakened to 290 00:14:09,240 --> 00:14:12,640 Speaker 3: some extent. Because if you were still in an environment 291 00:14:12,679 --> 00:14:14,920 Speaker 3: where things were extremely tight in the labor market, people 292 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:17,959 Speaker 3: were competing for jobs, it was hard to find a job, 293 00:14:18,080 --> 00:14:20,880 Speaker 3: then wages growth should be going up. But in the 294 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:23,360 Speaker 3: last twelve months we've seen that wages growth has actually slowed. 295 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:26,720 Speaker 3: It's running it just over three percent year on year, 296 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:28,480 Speaker 3: but you know, we were running it. 297 00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:30,520 Speaker 2: Close to four percent, if not a little bit above that. 298 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 3: So the slowing in wages growth, to me, is a 299 00:14:32,720 --> 00:14:36,160 Speaker 3: sign that we're past the point of the peak in 300 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:40,920 Speaker 3: full employment. We've sort of gone below that. Now our 301 00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:44,680 Speaker 3: unemployment rate is running above its full employment level. 302 00:14:45,080 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 1: So we just talked about GDP, in other words, how 303 00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:53,880 Speaker 1: well the country's performing in terms of let's call it 304 00:14:54,320 --> 00:15:00,400 Speaker 1: a productivity measurement, full employment somehow measure buying, ploy and 305 00:15:00,440 --> 00:15:05,360 Speaker 1: other factors let's talk about, and these are reserve band considerations. 306 00:15:06,040 --> 00:15:12,360 Speaker 1: Let's look at inflation. So headline inflation was what we 307 00:15:12,440 --> 00:15:14,760 Speaker 1: used to look at, or the RBA used to sort 308 00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:16,480 Speaker 1: of talk about, and some people still get to be 309 00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:18,800 Speaker 1: carried away with some of our politicians do, particularly when 310 00:15:18,800 --> 00:15:23,920 Speaker 1: it's lower. Maybe you could just explain what they mean 311 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:25,960 Speaker 1: by the so called trim mean or the underlying inflation. 312 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:29,120 Speaker 1: What does that really mean, why is it and why 313 00:15:29,120 --> 00:15:31,440 Speaker 1: has it become much more important? 314 00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:34,880 Speaker 3: So it's funny I've listened to a few people say 315 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:37,360 Speaker 3: why do economists have all these different measures of inflation. 316 00:15:37,440 --> 00:15:39,600 Speaker 3: They just try and take out whatever they don't like 317 00:15:40,880 --> 00:15:43,160 Speaker 3: for prices. But there are reasons for why. We look 318 00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:46,040 Speaker 3: at a few different things. So there's headline inflation and 319 00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:49,560 Speaker 3: then there's what Australia calls the trimmed mean. We also 320 00:15:49,640 --> 00:15:51,960 Speaker 3: have a weighted medium, which is another version of the 321 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:55,480 Speaker 3: trim mean. So the trim mean is basically trying to 322 00:15:55,560 --> 00:15:58,800 Speaker 3: tell you what is going on below the surface. We 323 00:15:58,920 --> 00:16:02,520 Speaker 3: call it underlying inflat. It takes out the volatilities of 324 00:16:02,640 --> 00:16:05,560 Speaker 3: headline prices. So for example, there are going to be 325 00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:08,680 Speaker 3: volatile items happening all the time. When we had a 326 00:16:08,760 --> 00:16:12,680 Speaker 3: spike in banana prices, banana prices might have increased. Let 327 00:16:12,800 --> 00:16:16,720 Speaker 3: us whatever one that's righting cabbage gate egg prices at 328 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:19,880 Speaker 3: the moment. That is going to skew what happens to 329 00:16:19,960 --> 00:16:22,960 Speaker 3: headline inflation. Headline inflation is actually what everyone pays. If 330 00:16:22,960 --> 00:16:25,160 Speaker 3: inflation's running at the moment, it's running at two point 331 00:16:25,200 --> 00:16:27,800 Speaker 3: four percent year on year on the monthly figure, that 332 00:16:27,960 --> 00:16:30,120 Speaker 3: is what you're paying compared to a year ago for 333 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:32,280 Speaker 3: an average basket. Again, we can debate you know what 334 00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:35,000 Speaker 3: an average basket is, but for an average basket, according 335 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:37,240 Speaker 3: to the ABS, that is what someone's paying. The true 336 00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:40,760 Speaker 3: mean will take out the fifteen percent of the top 337 00:16:40,840 --> 00:16:43,920 Speaker 3: volatile items and the bottom fifteen percent most volatile items. 338 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:45,760 Speaker 3: So it's trying to give you a read of what's 339 00:16:45,800 --> 00:16:48,880 Speaker 3: going on beyond some of those volatilities that a lot 340 00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:50,880 Speaker 3: of the time, we know that those volatilities are not 341 00:16:50,920 --> 00:16:53,239 Speaker 3: going to persist. We're not going to have a cyclone 342 00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:55,640 Speaker 3: every month that's going to make food prices go up 343 00:16:55,680 --> 00:16:58,120 Speaker 3: all the time. We're not going to have electricity rebates 344 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:01,640 Speaker 3: continuing forever. So this is why economists like to what 345 00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:04,480 Speaker 3: we call trim those out and just look at. 346 00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:08,080 Speaker 1: Blow the surface so as a better indicator of where 347 00:17:08,080 --> 00:17:08,920 Speaker 1: inflation is hitting. 348 00:17:09,840 --> 00:17:13,480 Speaker 3: It gives the RBA, I think, more clarity and more 349 00:17:13,520 --> 00:17:16,920 Speaker 3: guidance as to where they think inflation is going to settle. 350 00:17:17,680 --> 00:17:19,800 Speaker 3: And also because it does, it does tend to be 351 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:22,399 Speaker 3: less volatile, and you could have a situation where the 352 00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:26,639 Speaker 3: headline figures might might run from you a three percent 353 00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:29,040 Speaker 3: to two point five percent the next month on a 354 00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:32,360 Speaker 3: yearly basis, And it's because some of those volatile items 355 00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:36,560 Speaker 3: that are going to skew the numbers, so the trimmed 356 00:17:36,560 --> 00:17:39,199 Speaker 3: demean doesn't move around as much, and that's why it 357 00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:41,320 Speaker 3: gives the RBA better read for longer term inflation. 358 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:47,119 Speaker 1: So where where's imp at the moment? So just let's 359 00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:51,800 Speaker 1: look at the balance of twenty twenty five. There's the 360 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:54,000 Speaker 1: next board meeting. When this goes, when you and I 361 00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:56,560 Speaker 1: go to where on this one will be in late 362 00:17:57,320 --> 00:17:59,960 Speaker 1: mid to late May, they will have had the March 363 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:02,840 Speaker 1: quarter numbers which come out I think the towards the 364 00:18:02,880 --> 00:18:07,080 Speaker 1: end of April sometime around as a day. What are 365 00:18:07,119 --> 00:18:10,399 Speaker 1: you guys thinking, are you sort of in the in 366 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:12,920 Speaker 1: the in the same vein as the money markets now 367 00:18:13,640 --> 00:18:16,320 Speaker 1: thinking that we'll probably get another point five point six 368 00:18:16,400 --> 00:18:18,320 Speaker 1: read for inflation for the quarter. 369 00:18:19,520 --> 00:18:24,280 Speaker 3: At the moment, we're at point sixty five for the 370 00:18:24,440 --> 00:18:26,920 Speaker 3: for the quarter March, for the March quarter. 371 00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:29,880 Speaker 2: I think with that type of number we will see 372 00:18:29,880 --> 00:18:30,560 Speaker 2: a May cut. 373 00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:31,320 Speaker 1: Right. 374 00:18:31,480 --> 00:18:34,760 Speaker 3: The RBA's forecasts are basically somewhere between point seven or 375 00:18:34,760 --> 00:18:36,560 Speaker 3: point eight. We don't actually know the exact, you know, 376 00:18:36,640 --> 00:18:38,439 Speaker 3: point estimate that they have, but we can sort of 377 00:18:38,480 --> 00:18:41,960 Speaker 3: read read as to what they're what what they're forecasting. 378 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:44,280 Speaker 3: But so I think it's going to come a tad 379 00:18:44,320 --> 00:18:46,879 Speaker 3: below their forecast. But what's probably more important to me 380 00:18:47,119 --> 00:18:49,239 Speaker 3: is what the components are doing. Because we know that 381 00:18:49,240 --> 00:18:52,000 Speaker 3: the RBA has been concerned about particular parts of the 382 00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:57,040 Speaker 3: services sector services inflation, so duelling, construction costs, rents, medical costs, 383 00:18:57,080 --> 00:19:01,080 Speaker 3: insurance costs, education, and we're seeing good signs that a 384 00:19:01,080 --> 00:19:02,879 Speaker 3: lot of those items are starting to soften. 385 00:19:02,920 --> 00:19:03,720 Speaker 2: So I think it will. 386 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:07,440 Speaker 3: Give the RBA clarity as to how fast that services 387 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:11,320 Speaker 3: inflation unwind is progressing, which is quite important for their 388 00:19:11,359 --> 00:19:14,359 Speaker 3: longer term inflation views. If they're seeing that inflation over 389 00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:16,840 Speaker 3: the next one to two years is likely to come 390 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:21,639 Speaker 3: in below those longer term forecasts, then that will, I 391 00:19:21,680 --> 00:19:24,520 Speaker 3: think give them the room to cut rates again. 392 00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:26,560 Speaker 1: So if I could just put it in a sort 393 00:19:26,600 --> 00:19:29,560 Speaker 1: of more layman term, So if it is a point, 394 00:19:29,640 --> 00:19:32,240 Speaker 1: let's say, if the RBA's guidances point seven, they're not 395 00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:34,320 Speaker 1: giving gods, but let's say it is. If you just 396 00:19:34,760 --> 00:19:36,879 Speaker 1: simply extrapolate that forward and just say four sets of 397 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:39,240 Speaker 1: twenty eight, that's two point eight, which is below three. 398 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:41,639 Speaker 1: Is somewhere between two and three, which is sort of 399 00:19:41,640 --> 00:19:45,199 Speaker 1: where the RBA wants to see it. Mind trimman or 400 00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:47,399 Speaker 1: the underlying inflation sort of where they want to see it, 401 00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:49,040 Speaker 1: and if it's lower then obviously you know for seas 402 00:19:49,080 --> 00:19:53,240 Speaker 1: to twenty four four or five two, so like we're 403 00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:59,560 Speaker 1: in the right territory. So they're looking at they would 404 00:19:59,600 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 1: like to see two quarters of this nice number. We've 405 00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:05,560 Speaker 1: already got a good quarter in December point five trum mean, 406 00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:08,080 Speaker 1: they probably like to see another good quarter for March, 407 00:20:09,080 --> 00:20:10,879 Speaker 1: but they sort of gives them confidence that they should 408 00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:18,640 Speaker 1: reduce rates. Does the AMP see I maybe ask you this, 409 00:20:18,880 --> 00:20:20,040 Speaker 1: and I don't know if you're lay to say it, 410 00:20:20,200 --> 00:20:22,280 Speaker 1: but where does the Where does the AMP think that 411 00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:26,080 Speaker 1: they see the cash rates settling? So like, are you 412 00:20:26,160 --> 00:20:29,520 Speaker 1: thinking about one hundred base points from here or twenty five? 413 00:20:29,840 --> 00:20:31,879 Speaker 1: And there's only prediction that doesn't mean anything. 414 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:34,919 Speaker 3: They've been quite careful with guiding the market on this, 415 00:20:35,040 --> 00:20:36,919 Speaker 3: I think because they worry that people think that this 416 00:20:36,960 --> 00:20:38,760 Speaker 3: is where the cash rat's going to settle. So when 417 00:20:38,800 --> 00:20:40,679 Speaker 3: they think about they haven't actually told us where they 418 00:20:40,680 --> 00:20:42,720 Speaker 3: think the cash rates going to end up, but they 419 00:20:42,760 --> 00:20:45,440 Speaker 3: do give estimates about what they call the neutral level 420 00:20:45,440 --> 00:20:48,000 Speaker 3: of interest rates, which is basically a guide us to 421 00:20:48,040 --> 00:20:50,600 Speaker 3: the longer term level of cash rate, and that's somewhere 422 00:20:50,640 --> 00:20:55,439 Speaker 3: between three to three and a half percent. And I 423 00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:57,640 Speaker 3: think our own view at AMP is that the cash 424 00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:00,080 Speaker 3: rates going to settle at three point one percent at 425 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 3: the end of this cycle, so one point two five 426 00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:06,320 Speaker 3: percent basis one point two five percent worth of rate 427 00:21:06,359 --> 00:21:06,960 Speaker 3: cuts in this. 428 00:21:06,960 --> 00:21:11,080 Speaker 1: Cycle to five more cuts, potentially five more cuts, five 429 00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:13,120 Speaker 1: more twenty five if they're twenty five base point cuts, 430 00:21:13,119 --> 00:21:15,840 Speaker 1: five more cuts and this cycle are you talking about 431 00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:18,200 Speaker 1: this calendar year or what are you guys thinking is 432 00:21:18,240 --> 00:21:20,120 Speaker 1: going to be the cycle? Is that between say now 433 00:21:20,119 --> 00:21:22,840 Speaker 1: and June next year, and cycles could be going out 434 00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 1: longer than in the past. 435 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:27,720 Speaker 3: We think we'll get two rate cuts this year, two 436 00:21:27,720 --> 00:21:29,840 Speaker 3: more rate cuts. Two more rate cuts were May in August, 437 00:21:29,840 --> 00:21:33,480 Speaker 3: so we've already had one in February, and then two 438 00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 3: to three next next year. 439 00:21:35,080 --> 00:21:36,719 Speaker 1: Really do you see one it may then? 440 00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:39,840 Speaker 3: Yes, So we expect a rate cut in May after 441 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:42,360 Speaker 3: the March quarter inflation figure. So we think the March 442 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:44,560 Speaker 3: cored inflation figures will be good again because we already 443 00:21:44,560 --> 00:21:47,360 Speaker 3: had January and February monthly data and that was quite positive, 444 00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:51,360 Speaker 3: a little bit below consensus forecasts and in line with 445 00:21:51,760 --> 00:21:55,119 Speaker 3: our own estimates, and the full March quarter figures we 446 00:21:55,160 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 3: think will show another good read for some of those 447 00:21:57,320 --> 00:22:02,680 Speaker 3: problematic services areas. So that's why we think that it will. 448 00:22:02,840 --> 00:22:05,359 Speaker 3: The inflation data will just point them into the direction 449 00:22:05,640 --> 00:22:07,760 Speaker 3: of needing to ease interest rates. 450 00:22:07,800 --> 00:22:10,320 Speaker 1: So now I could you just explain something is important. 451 00:22:10,359 --> 00:22:13,399 Speaker 1: I mean to you, its second nature. But when you're 452 00:22:13,400 --> 00:22:16,560 Speaker 1: talking about services, what we've got everyone's going to understand 453 00:22:16,560 --> 00:22:20,159 Speaker 1: is that the inflation is measured against a basket that 454 00:22:20,760 --> 00:22:23,600 Speaker 1: strain bististics lects you and I don't, but someone else 455 00:22:23,640 --> 00:22:28,000 Speaker 1: slects a basket of the prices and changes in those 456 00:22:28,040 --> 00:22:32,320 Speaker 1: prices of they call a basket of goods and services. 457 00:22:34,920 --> 00:22:37,159 Speaker 1: The goods seem to be under control. In other words, 458 00:22:37,760 --> 00:22:43,200 Speaker 1: price rises in goods in that basket, as calculated or 459 00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:47,000 Speaker 1: assessed by the reserve by the ABS is performing quite 460 00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:50,480 Speaker 1: well in the range between two and three. But the 461 00:22:50,560 --> 00:22:53,760 Speaker 1: services have been very stubborn. And in the services with 462 00:22:53,960 --> 00:22:56,880 Speaker 1: you you mentioned, but with think things like insurance costs, 463 00:22:57,320 --> 00:23:02,159 Speaker 1: school fees or education costs. Yeah, basically everything that you 464 00:23:02,160 --> 00:23:05,120 Speaker 1: don't want to pay for. Yeah, yeah, they're not things 465 00:23:05,160 --> 00:23:07,320 Speaker 1: like this, you know they're not. You know, they're not things, 466 00:23:07,359 --> 00:23:10,439 Speaker 1: we tangible things we take away the services, they've been 467 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:13,600 Speaker 1: quite difficult and a lot of it has to do 468 00:23:13,640 --> 00:23:16,320 Speaker 1: with infrastructure and stuff like that and various other policies, 469 00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:18,800 Speaker 1: changes around immigration, et cetera of cause these problems, but 470 00:23:19,080 --> 00:23:25,119 Speaker 1: or attributed to these problems. But why why are services 471 00:23:25,320 --> 00:23:28,440 Speaker 1: so stubborn? And is this a global issue? 472 00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:31,720 Speaker 3: In the Western world? It's been a global issue. I 473 00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:33,800 Speaker 3: think in Australia as well. We haven't had as much 474 00:23:33,800 --> 00:23:37,080 Speaker 3: goods deflation to deflations when price actually go negative, so 475 00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:40,080 Speaker 3: they go down. Because a lot of people don't even 476 00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:42,560 Speaker 3: understand when I when I talk to them and I say, 477 00:23:42,640 --> 00:23:45,080 Speaker 3: inflations come down from basically eight percent in your own 478 00:23:45,160 --> 00:23:47,040 Speaker 3: year to two point four percent, And people say, well, 479 00:23:47,160 --> 00:23:49,040 Speaker 3: but when I go to the shops, things are still expensive. 480 00:23:49,240 --> 00:23:52,400 Speaker 1: Course it hasn't gone down, because that's just a change. Yeah, 481 00:23:52,800 --> 00:23:54,439 Speaker 1: that's the importantoint you go through that. 482 00:23:54,680 --> 00:23:57,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's really important. So inflation is the change in prices. 483 00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:00,359 Speaker 3: Just because you've had lower inflation still means that prices 484 00:24:00,359 --> 00:24:03,000 Speaker 3: are going up, They're just going up at a slower rate. 485 00:24:03,800 --> 00:24:08,119 Speaker 3: The level of price changes has been about twenty percent 486 00:24:08,720 --> 00:24:10,800 Speaker 3: over the last four years. Wages growth has gone up 487 00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 3: by fifteen percent. So people are feeling this is and 488 00:24:13,600 --> 00:24:15,639 Speaker 3: this is the cost of living issue. People are feeling 489 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:18,080 Speaker 3: like there is this massive gap between the level of 490 00:24:18,119 --> 00:24:20,879 Speaker 3: prices that they're paying actually their take home pay. And 491 00:24:20,920 --> 00:24:25,200 Speaker 3: I absolutely relate to that and understand that, and the 492 00:24:25,240 --> 00:24:27,320 Speaker 3: government does too, which is why they're giving people back 493 00:24:27,359 --> 00:24:29,639 Speaker 3: these cost of living or rebates. So just because we 494 00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:32,199 Speaker 3: have slower inflation doesn't mean that price rises are not 495 00:24:32,240 --> 00:24:32,720 Speaker 3: going to keep. 496 00:24:32,800 --> 00:24:35,560 Speaker 1: Things are going to become more affordable, things are going 497 00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:35,840 Speaker 1: to be. 498 00:24:35,880 --> 00:24:38,679 Speaker 3: Relative to you know, where we were a few years ago. Core, 499 00:24:38,880 --> 00:24:40,879 Speaker 3: but prices are still going to go up, just at 500 00:24:40,880 --> 00:24:41,720 Speaker 3: a slower rate. 501 00:24:41,880 --> 00:24:44,160 Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's an important point because most people don't 502 00:24:44,200 --> 00:24:48,359 Speaker 1: get that. They think, oh, inflation's not very high, but 503 00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:49,560 Speaker 1: my cost of living is still the same. 504 00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:49,800 Speaker 3: Yeah. 505 00:24:49,800 --> 00:24:51,679 Speaker 1: Of course, you know, because the retailer, just because the 506 00:24:52,119 --> 00:24:54,280 Speaker 1: inflation number comes out, you know, some of the will worse, 507 00:24:54,400 --> 00:24:57,720 Speaker 1: or Coals or one of the big retails, Oh, let's 508 00:24:57,760 --> 00:25:01,120 Speaker 1: now reduce our prices, because that's unlikely because the cost 509 00:25:01,119 --> 00:25:02,639 Speaker 1: of what they're getting is probably about the same. So 510 00:25:02,920 --> 00:25:06,080 Speaker 1: it's a margin game for them. So what we're talking 511 00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:09,160 Speaker 1: about here is the increase in prices on any one 512 00:25:09,240 --> 00:25:13,439 Speaker 1: quarter or any one period from the previous period. But 513 00:25:13,480 --> 00:25:18,359 Speaker 1: it doesn't necessarily follow that a or a decrease doesn't 514 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 1: necessarily follow that the cost of living is going to improve. 515 00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:27,160 Speaker 3: We need in wages basically to be rising by more 516 00:25:27,160 --> 00:25:31,080 Speaker 3: than inflation to see the gap between prices and wages close, 517 00:25:31,520 --> 00:25:34,800 Speaker 3: and that is possible to in most times. Wages growth 518 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:38,040 Speaker 3: runs on average and austraight about three percent. Inflation hopefully 519 00:25:38,240 --> 00:25:40,440 Speaker 3: runs at about two and a half percent, so usually 520 00:25:40,480 --> 00:25:44,120 Speaker 3: we should be getting wages growth running above inflation, and 521 00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:45,400 Speaker 3: on current numbers. 522 00:25:45,119 --> 00:25:46,080 Speaker 2: That is actually the case. 523 00:25:46,119 --> 00:25:48,879 Speaker 3: Wages growth is at three point two, headline inflations at 524 00:25:48,880 --> 00:25:50,919 Speaker 3: two point four. I know some people won't feel like 525 00:25:50,920 --> 00:25:53,360 Speaker 3: that though, because again those painful items, like the services 526 00:25:53,400 --> 00:25:57,560 Speaker 3: that you mentioned, they're still their price growth is still 527 00:25:57,600 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 3: quite high. Rents are still riuting it over five five percent. 528 00:26:01,080 --> 00:26:03,399 Speaker 3: Insurance prices are running at a similar level. And the 529 00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:07,080 Speaker 3: reason that services prices are what we call sticky or 530 00:26:07,560 --> 00:26:09,920 Speaker 3: or high at those levels is one because they tend 531 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:12,960 Speaker 3: to lag what happens to other parts of inflation. So 532 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:15,479 Speaker 3: because we had an inflation problem in twenty twenty two 533 00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:18,560 Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, services prices take time to adjust to that. 534 00:26:18,960 --> 00:26:20,639 Speaker 3: Part of the reason for that is also because wages 535 00:26:20,680 --> 00:26:23,119 Speaker 3: growth increase by such a high rate, and services prices 536 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,000 Speaker 3: are normally driven a lot by what happens to wages growth. 537 00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:29,560 Speaker 1: They're heavily affected by the cost of staff. Yeah, heavily 538 00:26:29,600 --> 00:26:31,560 Speaker 1: effect because it's usually staff that provide the service. 539 00:26:31,680 --> 00:26:32,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. 540 00:26:33,280 --> 00:26:35,920 Speaker 3: And with things like insurance, so they're going through their 541 00:26:35,960 --> 00:26:41,080 Speaker 3: own industry specific problems around climate change, very high premiums. 542 00:26:40,840 --> 00:26:42,959 Speaker 2: The cost of stuff overall. 543 00:26:43,359 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 3: So I think those are some industry specific things that 544 00:26:45,880 --> 00:26:48,800 Speaker 3: are also happening. Healthcare is related to our aging population, 545 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:52,600 Speaker 3: high immigration, or high population growth, so there are broader 546 00:26:52,800 --> 00:26:55,520 Speaker 3: macroeconomic factors that also influence what happens to some of 547 00:26:55,560 --> 00:26:57,600 Speaker 3: these services areas. The good news, though, I think, is 548 00:26:57,960 --> 00:27:01,520 Speaker 3: that those problematic services areas are slowing. They're just not 549 00:27:01,640 --> 00:27:03,800 Speaker 3: slowing as fast as the IRBIT probably would have wanted 550 00:27:03,840 --> 00:27:06,480 Speaker 3: them to. But I think that in the past six 551 00:27:06,520 --> 00:27:08,760 Speaker 3: months a bit of that has changed. The new dwelling 552 00:27:08,800 --> 00:27:11,400 Speaker 3: construction costs at the cost to build a home has 553 00:27:11,440 --> 00:27:13,800 Speaker 3: come down a lot. Rents has definitely reached a peek. 554 00:27:13,880 --> 00:27:15,679 Speaker 3: You can see that in the new asking rents we're 555 00:27:15,680 --> 00:27:18,720 Speaker 3: getting more supply into the market. Immigration levels are going 556 00:27:18,800 --> 00:27:22,600 Speaker 3: to slow, so the rental market's going to look much 557 00:27:22,640 --> 00:27:24,720 Speaker 3: better for a renter in the next twelve to twenty 558 00:27:24,760 --> 00:27:25,280 Speaker 3: four months. 559 00:27:26,240 --> 00:27:28,639 Speaker 1: It's my final question too, But if Australia it was 560 00:27:29,160 --> 00:27:34,000 Speaker 1: looking for the goldilocks period, like you know, when and 561 00:27:34,040 --> 00:27:38,680 Speaker 1: in terms of economics, I'm talking about when inflation is 562 00:27:39,680 --> 00:27:41,880 Speaker 1: and has been for a long enough time traveling out 563 00:27:41,880 --> 00:27:47,160 Speaker 1: a number less lower than wage growth, and let's call 564 00:27:47,200 --> 00:27:51,919 Speaker 1: immigration out as immigrations settled down from where it was 565 00:27:52,480 --> 00:27:56,919 Speaker 1: back to more normal normal numbers. Does someone like the 566 00:27:56,960 --> 00:27:59,399 Speaker 1: AMP or do you have a general sense when do 567 00:27:59,480 --> 00:28:02,880 Speaker 1: we reach goldilocks period? In other words, if we're paying 568 00:28:02,920 --> 00:28:07,159 Speaker 1: twenty percent more for everything that we're buying and using 569 00:28:08,400 --> 00:28:12,439 Speaker 1: just by way of assumption, but now we're going to 570 00:28:12,440 --> 00:28:16,199 Speaker 1: pick up the difference of the new increase in prices 571 00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:18,679 Speaker 1: of two point four percent relative to an increase in 572 00:28:18,720 --> 00:28:21,200 Speaker 1: wages of three percent, and let's take bracket creep out 573 00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:23,960 Speaker 1: for a second three percent wage growth, do you guys 574 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:25,440 Speaker 1: get a sense of when do we do it? When 575 00:28:25,440 --> 00:28:28,119 Speaker 1: do we achieve our catch up? When does Australia as 576 00:28:28,119 --> 00:28:31,000 Speaker 1: a nation achieves catch up? Forgetting about trads and mortgage 577 00:28:31,040 --> 00:28:32,760 Speaker 1: and stuff of them. When do we achieve our catchup? 578 00:28:33,160 --> 00:28:34,919 Speaker 1: Is it like a straight line thing, like you know, 579 00:28:34,960 --> 00:28:37,040 Speaker 1: we've had twenty percent increase, we're only going to make it. 580 00:28:37,119 --> 00:28:39,520 Speaker 1: We're going to pick up a difference of one percent preanum. 581 00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:41,080 Speaker 1: So if we're going to wait twenty years to catch 582 00:28:41,120 --> 00:28:43,520 Speaker 1: up or is there a sense of this down the train? 583 00:28:43,600 --> 00:28:46,880 Speaker 3: It's about five to six years if wages growth runs 584 00:28:46,960 --> 00:28:49,200 Speaker 3: at the levels that we think three point twenty five 585 00:28:49,280 --> 00:28:49,440 Speaker 3: or so. 586 00:28:50,720 --> 00:28:53,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, so in the early twenty thirties basically. 587 00:28:54,000 --> 00:28:58,840 Speaker 1: Yeah. So so really we should get back to that 588 00:28:59,040 --> 00:29:04,000 Speaker 1: normal period normalization somewhere towards the end of this ten years, 589 00:29:04,040 --> 00:29:07,640 Speaker 1: the end of this decade. Making some assumptions of course 590 00:29:07,680 --> 00:29:09,360 Speaker 1: that we should get back to what is normal. So 591 00:29:10,920 --> 00:29:13,480 Speaker 1: maybe Australians has just got to buckle down and just 592 00:29:13,920 --> 00:29:16,560 Speaker 1: hold on, you know, that's all you can do. You 593 00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:20,240 Speaker 1: can't hope the government's going to change your prosperity overnight, 594 00:29:21,040 --> 00:29:23,360 Speaker 1: you know, then give you electricity, rebase on sort of stuff, 595 00:29:23,360 --> 00:29:26,240 Speaker 1: but they're not going to change your prosperity overnight. 596 00:29:26,600 --> 00:29:28,800 Speaker 3: I think I think Australians should just focus on trying 597 00:29:28,840 --> 00:29:31,400 Speaker 3: to build their own wealth as much as they can, 598 00:29:31,640 --> 00:29:34,240 Speaker 3: trying to think about investing, investing for the long term, 599 00:29:34,560 --> 00:29:37,880 Speaker 3: the benefits of compound interest. So really it's about getting 600 00:29:37,920 --> 00:29:41,560 Speaker 3: yourself more literate, financial and economic literate, to try and 601 00:29:41,640 --> 00:29:43,760 Speaker 3: understand what's going on the market, try and get the 602 00:29:43,760 --> 00:29:45,320 Speaker 3: best deals that you can for your mortgage. 603 00:29:45,440 --> 00:29:46,640 Speaker 2: Understand what's what's. 604 00:29:46,400 --> 00:29:49,840 Speaker 3: Happening when the castrate declines and your mortgage rate falls, 605 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:53,000 Speaker 3: try and trying to ask for those things. Look at 606 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:55,680 Speaker 3: your super trying to make sure that you're invested in 607 00:29:56,240 --> 00:29:58,640 Speaker 3: the right fund. So it's really all about making yourself 608 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:00,440 Speaker 3: more literate to build your wealth. 609 00:30:00,720 --> 00:30:03,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's I'm not here to plug game, 610 00:30:03,960 --> 00:30:07,600 Speaker 1: but that's that's that's the thing. Like you made a 611 00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:10,160 Speaker 1: very good point. Australians just can't sit back and way 612 00:30:10,200 --> 00:30:11,560 Speaker 1: for someone else's soult forum. 613 00:30:11,840 --> 00:30:12,600 Speaker 2: No one's going to do it. 614 00:30:12,640 --> 00:30:15,000 Speaker 1: You've got to educate yourself. Yeah, so does a MP 615 00:30:16,680 --> 00:30:19,520 Speaker 1: your whole group? Do you do publications, et cetera? The 616 00:30:19,560 --> 00:30:20,560 Speaker 1: puplic and access is. 617 00:30:20,480 --> 00:30:21,720 Speaker 2: The stuff that absolutely we do. 618 00:30:21,800 --> 00:30:25,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, our team, the economics team, Shane Olvera, me Boy 619 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:30,000 Speaker 3: and myself, we publish a weekly report, multiple reports a week. 620 00:30:30,240 --> 00:30:32,920 Speaker 3: We we have a podcast channel that people can listen to. 621 00:30:33,240 --> 00:30:35,320 Speaker 1: What's where? Where to? Where do people access this stuff? 622 00:30:36,000 --> 00:30:37,320 Speaker 2: On normal place? 623 00:30:37,360 --> 00:30:40,160 Speaker 3: You can access your podcasts. We're called Simplifying Investing. 624 00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:41,920 Speaker 1: Simplify and Investing. That's I guess. 625 00:30:41,920 --> 00:30:46,400 Speaker 3: It's on Spotify and Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, or you 626 00:30:46,440 --> 00:30:50,880 Speaker 3: can follow Econo Sights, which is our economics channel on Instagram. 627 00:30:51,600 --> 00:30:53,960 Speaker 1: Econo sites, sites, dot com dot you. 628 00:30:54,440 --> 00:30:57,400 Speaker 3: That Econo Sights is our tag for all the social 629 00:30:57,400 --> 00:31:00,360 Speaker 3: media stuff. So we do short form videos trying to 630 00:31:00,400 --> 00:31:02,960 Speaker 3: make people more financial literate, talking about the data, talking 631 00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:06,640 Speaker 3: about politics, basically a fun way of relating economics to 632 00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:09,640 Speaker 3: the everyday person so that people understand actually what's going 633 00:31:09,680 --> 00:31:12,520 Speaker 3: on and what it actually means for their own wealth. 634 00:31:12,640 --> 00:31:14,360 Speaker 1: And I think that's the whole purpose of my show 635 00:31:14,440 --> 00:31:18,120 Speaker 1: is to introduce people like you to the audience. But 636 00:31:18,560 --> 00:31:20,520 Speaker 1: that audience is up to you to do something about it. 637 00:31:20,600 --> 00:31:23,000 Speaker 1: So you're not going to learn about everything now sitting 638 00:31:23,000 --> 00:31:25,840 Speaker 1: in this room. Just this really an introduction to Deanerlan 639 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:27,520 Speaker 1: and the team. By the way, shanelv was one of 640 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:30,680 Speaker 1: the best. So you've got to do something about it, 641 00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:32,160 Speaker 1: and you've got to go That's why I'm asking you 642 00:31:32,200 --> 00:31:34,280 Speaker 1: where can they go on access sisting because people don't know. 643 00:31:34,360 --> 00:31:36,520 Speaker 1: I wouldn't know. I mean I read stuff all the time, 644 00:31:36,560 --> 00:31:38,560 Speaker 1: but I didn't know that you had this KND of 645 00:31:38,600 --> 00:31:42,760 Speaker 1: sights hashtag. I didn't know that you had I didn't 646 00:31:42,760 --> 00:31:45,040 Speaker 1: realize you had a social media environment at all. 647 00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:48,280 Speaker 2: So that's how your team found me. 648 00:31:48,520 --> 00:31:52,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, my team, My team found you. Yeah, but that's 649 00:31:52,040 --> 00:31:54,760 Speaker 1: the point. My team, that's your job used to hunt 650 00:31:54,760 --> 00:31:56,520 Speaker 1: for people like you and bring him to the show, 651 00:31:56,880 --> 00:32:00,200 Speaker 1: and our job is to take you and you push 652 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:01,840 Speaker 1: you out in front of everybody. But at the same time, 653 00:32:01,880 --> 00:32:04,080 Speaker 1: people need to know how to access you. Guys. You know, 654 00:32:03,880 --> 00:32:05,680 Speaker 1: you might not be on the show again front of 655 00:32:05,680 --> 00:32:07,440 Speaker 1: the Tall month so and you had other stuff to do. 656 00:32:07,520 --> 00:32:10,560 Speaker 1: But what's important is that people and what's interesting here 657 00:32:10,600 --> 00:32:13,000 Speaker 1: is that you're not selling them anything. You're not trying 658 00:32:13,040 --> 00:32:15,120 Speaker 1: to sell them anything from a I mean, you're not 659 00:32:15,120 --> 00:32:19,000 Speaker 1: a salesperson. You're in the policy division of an organization. 660 00:32:19,120 --> 00:32:21,520 Speaker 1: It just talks about the economy and that's really important. 661 00:32:21,560 --> 00:32:23,680 Speaker 1: So Dean, I really appreciate you coming on. Thanks very 662 00:32:23,720 --> 00:32:27,360 Speaker 1: much doing that. And I think it's important that Australians 663 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:30,840 Speaker 1: know that. And it's good that you're female too, that 664 00:32:30,920 --> 00:32:35,320 Speaker 1: we have economists here who want to share with us 665 00:32:35,960 --> 00:32:39,760 Speaker 1: their views on how to improve their lot, and having 666 00:32:39,760 --> 00:32:42,000 Speaker 1: a female for a change, we haven't had one on 667 00:32:42,360 --> 00:32:45,880 Speaker 1: talking about economics for a long time other than from Westpac. 668 00:32:46,400 --> 00:32:47,320 Speaker 1: I appreciate a lot. 669 00:32:47,640 --> 00:32:48,440 Speaker 2: Thank you, thank you,