WEBVTT - When Flanno's Saints Go Marching In

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, right back for another episode of the Daily

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Telegraph and Real podcast. Adam Mob's here with you with

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Fatima Cando. How are you going, Fatima?

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I am well, the wea on, but well.

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Under the weather. Well Tyson Jackson who jumping in the

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>hot seat this week? And you and I've got a

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of sidebant going at the moment because I'm

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>an eelsman and you're a Tiger supporter, and we thought

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>round twenty seven might be the wooden spoon by my friend,

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>but you might have just got the jump on you

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>after last weekend.

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh it's there's still a couple of weeks left. I

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't get to ahead of yourself. I jumped on the

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 3>ladder predicted last night and the Tiger's still going to

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 3>finish sixteenth and there's only one team they'll finish below that.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'll leave that to your imagination.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm your left questioning Mobs here where where that performance

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 2>from the Ills was like six eight weeks ago? Look,

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>well maybe it's a it's a taste of they're just

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 2>resigned to the fact that the season is done and

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>there's that less pressure and.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Well you look last week they were the better team

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first half against Melbourne and trailed. They threw

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of trial, gave a couple of tries up,

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they had all the possession. You look back earlier in

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the year, they should have beaten Canary that time when

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. You know, Mitch Moses should have iced that game.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>They were in it against the Roosters that time. There

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>was three games in the middle. I think the Gold

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Coast was the other one. That games they should have

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>one that would have you look at that roster. They're

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.839
<v Speaker 1>not a wooden spoon roster and no offense tice. But yeah,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>but it is what it.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Is, and they did play in patches this year where

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you're got your thinking like, how is this team at

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of the roster, bottom of the table even

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>with all the injuries they've had in the setbacks and

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the rest of it. So maybe it's not as bad

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>it Maybe it's not bottom of the barrel just yet.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it might be if the chat on the radio

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>this morning through that Mitch that the Dragons are monitoring

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Mitchell Moses's situation.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so is that in the same conversation that Mitchell

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Moses wants to go somewhere where he's going to win

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a comp and St. Georgia Laura and that conversation. Come on,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not listening to this crap anymore.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>He's a premiership winning coach, so he's gone that over

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Jason Rayles.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Well he is. And what about what do you make

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Dragons at the weekend?

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Very good? I thought they were. They were very good.

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they were, they were good. I didn't realize it

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>was Anthony Mundane. Whodo is another like generational thing that

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>we should have known about.

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, ninety nine Grand Final they were with in

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a whisker of beating Melbourne. Obviously there was the the

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Craig Smith incident, the call with Jamie Ayin's co and

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you know the penalty try. But you know they were

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>within a whisker of winning it when Mundane was he

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>could have passed it right on the line when himself

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>knocked it on and Chock said the next year, you know,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to charm who the real deal is, and

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne pumped him seventy to ten the following They haven't

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>won in twenty five years there. But tell you what

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what Shane Flatagan's done with this team, that same roster

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>as last year and to go down there to mel

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't care who you are, especially the Dragons

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>after twenty five years to put in the performance they did,

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're always sitting here watching this going, oh god,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne are going to do something here. They're just going

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to find a way, find a way. And the Dragons

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>held so firm in defense, unbelievable. Jaden Sewer I thought

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>was terrific in attack again.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>He's been great since missing out on Origin. In that

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>last game, I think it was yeah, yeah, And they're

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>just they're just in terms of like physicality, conditioning fitness wise.

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>They matched it with a storm, the Storm more obviously.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I know they've been sort of off the pace for

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of weeks. They've probably got away with

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>one last week. The thing for the Dragons for me

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>is when they're in that mood like they were against

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the Storm, you know, they look like a top eight team,

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>but then they get blown off the park every now

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 2>and then, and so they're still struggling for that consistency.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>And I know that's something that Shane Flanagan is working on.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the people derided their forward pack seems

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>to be matching them they've got really big outside backs.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Zach Climax. I feel it's probably been a little bit

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 2>off the pace since Origin, but you know, yeah, they

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 2>look good and it sets up a massive game at

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Cogra against Cannobary.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Tyrrell Sloan's performance, Tice?

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I thought, coming back and all the criticism, I thought

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 3>it was all right. I thought, you know, I spoke

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 3>to Flano last week before they left for Melbourne, and

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I was surprised when Flano was very open and saying

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>that he didn't want to bring him back. I thought

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 3>that was not a tough call. But I mean to

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 3>come and tell the media that you don't see many

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 3>other coaches doing that. So then that might have let

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>a rocket under Tyrolle and I think after a win

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>like that, he probably keeps his spot.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy for him. I'm so happy for because

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Flannel has not been backwards in coming forward about tyre

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Ol Sloan's format and what he sees as deficiencies in

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>his role as a fallback. You know, he's sometimes, you know,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>willing to put your head in the areas that other

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>people won't put them, that kind of thing. But obviously

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was the ball support runner that we saw on the weekend,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, but you know, he didn't shirk his responsibilities

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>at all. And they were they were so tough. They

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>were so tough out there, just supporting each other through

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the middle. And Flano has got him playing some really

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>nice football and I don't know about you guys' we'll

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>get to this. I've got him in my eight for

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season. I think they're going to

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>play finals.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's it's kind of between. The Dragons

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 3>will only make it titan Stone, so they need the

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Titans to drop off a couple of massive weeks though,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 3>Like we said, that Bulldogs game is going to be unbelievable.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Sell out our Cogra. I'm a local there so you

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>might see me. Ye might get around, but yeah, I

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 3>can't wait. Rugby League is a good place when the

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Dragons and the Bulldogs. Hopefully one day the Tigers are

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>doing well. So I'm excited. I think, yeah, like a

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>world of momentum. The atmosphere comes Saturday night at Cogra

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to be unbelievable.

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be interesting because it's two very passionate

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, Sydney supporter basis. So I think Flannel was

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 2>on the radio this morning saying how much they love

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>coming to Cogra to play because it is a different

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>group of fans, you know, to the Illawarra so and

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 2>we saw all the scenes at Bellmore. They were carrying

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 2>on like they just won the Grand Final. So they're

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>probably going to take over the streets of Cogor as

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 2>well if they win too. But it'll be the same

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>for the Dragons, who you know, if they put themselves

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 2>well and truly in the finals race, if they get

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>over the Bulldogs, I think it's going to be it'll

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 2>be interesting because they're both gritty teams when they can be,

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and they both can score points when they want to.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's going to be a tight, closer,

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 2>fair and I think defense is going to win this one,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and they're both defensive minded coaches.

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, well I looked. I looked last night. The

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Dragons have only won back to back games twice this year. Yeah,

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 3>so massive tests. If that's their deficiency. There might be

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>a bit of complacency. They have a real high one

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 3>week and then the next week drop a bit. I

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 3>don't know, but that's that's going to be the biggest

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 3>test for them is to go back to back for

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 3>only the third time this year. And I mean to

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 3>get into the top eight mobs. You say the Dragons

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>are in your eight. They need to be able to

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 3>do that. If they can't do that, then then you

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>have to put a line to them.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, the start off the year that way, didn't they

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>They smashed the Titans away from home. I thought, oh wow,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't pick them week one. So they're playing

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins week two. I said, oh, I'm on the Dragons.

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 3>They get pump thirty eight l Yeah.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>You know. Then they beat teams like they beat the

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Warriors in Woollongong. They got smashed by sixty by the Roosters.

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, they lose to the Sharks, they beat South,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they get smashed by Canterbury, they come and beat the Dragons,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sorry the Panthers in fair Refords. It's a crazy stat

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Aaron Wallace from Fox League had a weird

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>step that there's only one other team that's beaten Penrith

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and Melbourne home and away in a season and that

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>was Paramatter in twenty twenty two. In the last five years.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>But so you're saying the Dragons are going to win.

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>They're going to win. They were in anything from there.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's but that also says a bit about because

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I think after all those blobout scores they came back

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 2>and wine right, They've been able to bounce back. So

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that says a lot about the kind of

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 2>coach Flannely is and the way he's able to sort

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>of elicit a response from his side when they've just

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 2>been in the dumps. But yeah, the key is consistency.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>If they can find that consistency, then you know, as

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Tyson said, you know, Canvy is shown that can be consistent.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 2>All of a sudden, you've got these two sides that

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>are struggled for a really long time playing some really

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 2>good footy. And I mean, I guess if you're a

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Sydney footy fan, it's what you want.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 3>You can tell how the Dragons are going to go

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 3>after the first fifteen minutes of a game. If they

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 3>come out with that kind of bully mentality that Shane

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Flanagan meant, you know you're in for a rough night.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Both times a versus Tigers this year, they've come out

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 3>with that form and as a Tiger supporter, I'm like going, no,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, but then you see him sometimes when they

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>don't come out with that form and that first impact,

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 3>that first carry is not that well, you kind of

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 3>go back to my Dragons mates. You guys are in

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 3>for a rough day to day.

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But what impressed me most is you've got to do

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it for eighty minutes against the Storm because they will

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>just pick you apart. And like I said, I was

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>just waiting at one point for Melbourne to turn it

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on and just put on a move blom away and

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>then okay and just do what Melbourne do and then

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't get the job done. So big game against

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Bulldogs who were great against I thought your Raiders played

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>really well. They turn up red to play, but shows

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you how tight the comp can be.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it was a strange game because there was

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of blowout scores in that round as well,

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 2>so I thought, you know, I don't know, maybe they're

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 2>going to turn it on, but it was a really

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>tight game. I mean there were I was really surprised

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to see Ricky leave Ethan strange out of that game.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 2>He played all year, this massive game they need to win.

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a final spot on the line. And sort of

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the way he explained it after the game was he

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>felt like he was it was time to start managing

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>his workload. It was really curious cool and I don't

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>know whether I buy that. You know, he's played, he's

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 2>played all year, he's built that combination on the edge,

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and then to pull him out of the game. I'm

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>not gonna say that's the reason why they lost, but

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 2>it was curious decision. But yeah, they were, they were

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>in it. There was just a couple of tries from

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Canary that were just absolutely freaky.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>You saw Stephen Crichton with his chip over the shoulder,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>like howdie defend that? You know, and then Matt Burdon

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 2>had been sort of kept his bomb sort of in

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the kick bag for weeks and weeks and then comes

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 2>up with a bomb and that I think Critter was

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.599
<v Speaker 2>on the other side of the field, gathered, you know,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 2>gives it off to Fish to josh Oda car and

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>they score. So that was the that was the difference

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>in the end. I think Burton's bomb. So yeah, in it,

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 2>but still a game that they had to win because

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders, if you look at their own hammand, we're

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 2>going to look at it a little bit later. It

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>is it is tough. I don't think they could have

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 2>afforded to drop those two points, to be honest, they.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Struggled to score points. I think defense on both sides

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 3>wasn't really the issue. And you look at you look

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 3>at the triers of the Bulldog scored and they weren't

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 3>like this is just individual brilliance. But Ethan strange. I mean,

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 3>he's broken games open this year for them before. And

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 3>I think Cook's a great player, you know, playing in

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 3>the harves and he's a good backup player. But I

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 3>think he really got a back your young guys there

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 3>to do a job.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I find found strange, Right, he backed

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>him all the way up until this point, and this

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>is probably the biggest game of their season and he's

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>not there.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 3>So and it looked like they missed him.

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, I wonder what's going on there for Ricky

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to make that call.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean he said it before. I mean, you know,

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 2>with Savage, right when Savage first came through it, I

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 2>was like, oh, this kid's are prodigy, this kid's are

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.599
<v Speaker 2>that And Sticky sort of was bringing him in and

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>out of the side adamant that he was doing the

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>right thing by him. I mean, eventually Savage came good,

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, it is strange since he's played the whole year.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got to ask. I had the last rites for

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>him a couple of weeks ago, but officially now the

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Broncos are gone for the year. You talk about rosses

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that should be top eight rosters and teams that were

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>what seventeen minutes away from a Grand Final win until

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Cleary worked from his slumber last year. Where do

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you fix the Broncos? What is the issue? And they

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of players coming off contract the

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>end of this year. CoreOS is still battling for a contract.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>They've got a couple of most of the guys are

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on deck, and then come November one, you've got guys

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>like Catoni Stags. So we're expecting Reese Walsh to sign

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a new deal soon and it's going to take up

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their salary cap as well of a

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>significantly larger portion that it is currently. So I don't

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>know if they're going to be able to hit the

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>market to bring in replacements.

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>But when you look at them full strength, they don't

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 2>need to be in the market and I like, I

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 2>understand something. So what's Yeah, I know that's it. What's

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the issue? And the reality is I think they led

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>into a half time here and didn't score a point

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 2>and the Titans scored seven tries in the second half.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's a team. And I think Kevy said

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 2>it like there was just no fight in that second half.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>And it's curious. It's like, I just don't know. They

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 2>just don't have any resilience. They haven't had any resilience

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 2>at all this year. And I don't know. Maybe maybe

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's talk about the kind of approach they

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 2>took to the preseason after the Grand Final, maybe they

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>looked around, it's a roster for the superstars. They made

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the Grand Final. You know, maybe the preseason wasn't as

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 2>tough or as hard as grueling as it should have been.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Kevy, you know, took the foot off the pedal

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. I don't know, because I think it's

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a mental It's not a roster thing. It's not a

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>skill thing. It's got to be an attitude mental thing.

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I'll touch on that. I think it's really evident in sport,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and I guess in life in general. It's hard to

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>wake up and get into the grind when you sleep

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 3>in silk sheets. I think the saying goes. You see

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 3>it with athletes all the time. You see it with

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>people that move up in the world all the time,

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 3>that all of a sudden their lives kind of shift.

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 3>You look at the Broncos eighteen months ago. Are they

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the superstars they are now or are they even close

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 3>to it? No, all of a sudden, they're the hottest

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 3>things in rugby league. They're almost the hottest thing in

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Australia sport. You go to one of their games and

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing people there that you would have never seen

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 3>a rugby league game before. But they're there because they're

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>not there to watch the fleet. They're there because they

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 3>like these players and they like the superstars that these

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>players have kind of become. When you're getting all that

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 3>love and attention, you're getting the Instagram followers, getting the

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 3>endorsement deal, you're getting all that stuff, it's hard to

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 3>get up, go to training in the morning and get

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 3>up for the get up for the grind. Like they've

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 3>got the high life, you know. You look at the

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 3>way they live on their social medias and things like that.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 2>But see it's I do agree with you, but if

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>you look at Penrith, it's fair to say that Penrith

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 2>experienced something similar. Right all of a sudden, they were

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the kings of Western Sydney. They were superstars wherever they went.

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're quite vocal on social media. They don't

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>hold back on social media. But after they lost twenty

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty Grand Final, they worked even harder, you know what

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>They where they come from. Though they came from that

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of that twenty nineteen they weren't. They weren't that

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 3>crash hot Ivan Cleary blooded a lot of young players

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>they dealt with that kind of hardships. These young guys,

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 3>guys like Reese Walsh, Patrick Carroghan, they're informed that were

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 3>not the best form. But they're still playing decent footy.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 3>But they've been handed all this luxury straight away. I

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think they know how to deal with it, and

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what's making them struggle on the field

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 3>because they're not there for the.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Fight back to you know what is going on at training,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>other coaching staff being hard enough on them to build

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>that toughness and that resilience. It's you know, you've got

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to We're getting to a point where man managing your

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>players is as important as them being well drilled and

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>well coached and skilled in the rest of it. And

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what Penrith has done really well. You know,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 2>like Ivan Cleary is obviously an incredible coach, but he's

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>also been really good at managing his players, the personalities

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>of his players, And I wonder whether you know, Kevy

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>or anybody at the Broncos has done a good enough

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>job on that the soft skills side of things as

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>opposed to you know, they don't need too much coaching

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 2>because they're already, like you said, individually, quite brilliant players.

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>It's quite a juxtaposition when you think that the Red

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Hill is still the place where a couple of eys ago,

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they're erecting fences, mesh fences to keep the Fians out

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and hiring extra security to deal with the popularity of

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this team. That was just on a tail spin. But

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>speaking of someone from a rival club the other day

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Broncos, he pointed out something really interesting. He

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>said that they know if you chip away at the

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Broncos this season, you can beat them, because he pointed

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>out there was a lack of discipline in their defense

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>where you had guys shooting out of the line, guys

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not trusting the guy inside, and the second efforts weren't there.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>If they do conceide a tackle bus last year you

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>saw the hunger to sit there and chase down as

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a team and hunting a pack in defense. They haven't

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>done that this year, and that if you can break

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>them open a little bit, you can get through them,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's the way they're going. You saw what the

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Titans did the other day, and you saw I think

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly what chem Siroaldo did the week before when targeting

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>those edges and finding where they thought, okay, this is

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>where we can get through and the week before was

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>done without Stephen Crichton, you know, and yeah, I think, yeah,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of soul search and do

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at Redhill ahead of next season because you know, someone

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>out my Wakers living at Penrith Way very happily pointed

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>out that the three of the bottom four teams are

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Grand finalists beatn Greend finalists from Penrith, from pen So

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Tigers sixteenth. My Yells were fifteenth, are we Broncos fifteenth?

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And South's fourteenth.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 2>That's versus So Penrith are building their own dynasty all

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the while ruining everybody else's.

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thanks a lot, Penrith.

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 2>It's fascinating, you know, all those sides and then have

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 2>gone on to miss the final.

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fascinating for team. I love it. Great.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 3>That's a lot three years in.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh but yeah, anyway, can anyone stop Penrith.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 2>At the moment, I think I think maybe Melbourne have

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 2>another gear in them, I reckon even though they've been

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>the latter leaders like all season, I feel like they're

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>probably we haven't seen the best of them just yet.

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And I also think we probably haven't seen the best

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 2>of Penrith just yet because they have. I mean, Fish

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 2>was out Fish and Harris was out for this game.

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 2>He'll be out for three more weeks once their full strength.

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah don't I don't know. I don't know. Like you

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>look at the outside of the storm in the top

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>four at the moment, you've got Kanala and you've got

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 2>the Roosters. I don't think either of them at the

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 2>moment can challenge those two. The Roosters have they're another one,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 2>like just completely star studded outfit and for you know,

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 2>somebody called them for twenty minutes every week they look

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>like the Harlem Globe trotters, and then all of a

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 2>sudden they switch off and again they're another team that

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 2>hasn't found any consistency. They also haven't beaten anybody above

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 2>them on the ladder this year, so I've lost to Kanala,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 2>I think they've lost to Melbourne twice, and I've lost

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>to Penrith, so they don't really have a good record

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>against the other genuine contenders. I don't know whether I'm

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking way too deeply into this, but if it holds

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>true that defense wins Premierships, then you have to be

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 2>you have to include Canterbury in that conversation at the moment.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 2>And it feels, I don't know, I feel it feels

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>like I'm talking, you know, shit when I say it

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 2>out loud, But I mean, I think the average points

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 2>conceded in the last twenty years for the Premiere has

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>been about sixteen points per game, and right now, outside

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of Penrith, Canbury are the best defensive team in the competition.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, you do know twenty fourteen Grand Final, Yeah, Canterbury

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four nineteen ninety four yep, and then yeah,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>let's not talk about eighty four.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know, maybe that's another one of those

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>things that holds true, but yeah, if defense does win premierships,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>then you know, Canterbury has earned the right to be

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>in that conversation.

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Going back to seventy four, could I give, I'll give,

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give a sneaky for you.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, I was on lad to Predict the

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 3>last night, just with a friend on the phone, and

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 3>we'll kind of.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>You must have a fascinating life.

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>It was about nine. I just finished Joe Rogan's new

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 3>comedy special on Netflix, and I was like, I wonder

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 3>we may soon we went through the last couple of rounds.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that I don't see the Panthers and the

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Storm both making the Grand Final. I think the Roosters

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 3>still have a bit of footy left to play that

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 3>we haven't seen yet. And I also think the Roosters

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 3>is going to get up for someone like Jared for

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of weeks. I think it's really important

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to them and Robot will get that into them. So

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I can see a world where the Roosters play Panthers

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 3>in week one of the finals and can somehow knock

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 3>them off.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>This could be your last podcast. Just wait, just wait.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I still see Panthers making the Grand Final though, because

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 3>then I see Panthers beating the storm in the week before,

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and then I have a Rooster's Bulldogs Grand Final this year.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Rooster's Bulldogs Grand Final. Wow? Okay, geez, can I ask

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>about anything? Was there any illicit substances taken? That's wild?

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Although I do like I love the idea for Tima

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the camp being a bit more open, because no, guys,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I say it. I think it's it's absolutely sounds big

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>bulb call. But it's penrith to lose. They just agree

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Bulldogs Panthers. Why don't they Roosters. I'm in Bulldogs Panthers.

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Hang because I said it, and then I was like, wait,

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't make sense. And then yeah, so Bulldogs Bulldogs

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 3>will get in from the from outside of the fort

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 3>and then Panthers will We'll get into the ground final

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 3>by beating the storm.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 2>In the week before the ground v v His Panthers. Oh,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean that would be I mean, we think about

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Grand finals and I know we're being we're probably being

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>very you know, selfish as people from New South Wales.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>But that is like, you can't get any better than that.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 3>You need to be stuck in that car park at

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 3>home Bush. I hate to be stuck in that car park.

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 3>We transport the train as well.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>That's all you need. Yeah, it's I like that. I

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>like that's interesting. You got me a little excited because

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. Penrith weren't great yesterday against Newcastle. Newcastle I

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>thought fought really hard and for a team you know,

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>down down on a little bit, but Penrith just seemed

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to find that way, that that bit of that bit

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of excellence that when you need that little five percent,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Penrith have it. And they have it in different areas

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where you know, I know it's been Nathan clearly the

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, but you've got jerme Leuyes been

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>carrying them for a lot this season. Dylan Edwards still

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to come back when the forwards turn it on, it's I.

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Mean how yeah, I mean Isaiah YOUNGI was their third

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 2>string fullback, do you know what I mean? And it's

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 2>just it's ridiculous if they get the McLean brothers as.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, and they've signed another one in Paris. Sorry, I'm

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just venting. Session'm still that over blaze to Lungey.

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh ok, yeah, I kick no, but it's just just

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 2>on that. It just got me thinking. And I can't

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>remember which because of covered Penrith quite close to the

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years, and I can't remember. It was

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>after the winning the first Grand Fine. It's when I

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 2>watch Pennies play, especially when they're completely like when they're peaking,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>when they're at their best, And it was something that

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it was Jerome that Dravivila. I said to me,

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 2>we know how to win Grand finals now, and you

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 2>can sort of see it when they're peaking, And I

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 2>think that's probably another thing you talk about what separates

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>them from everything else. They've got this sort of knowledge

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 2>that you know on how to win big games that

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 2>other teams just because they've been so good and so dominant,

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 2>haven't had the chance to experience yet. So I think

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 2>that also is another thing that's probably the difference for

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 2>them that separates them from everyone else.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So am I right in saying I think the

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>top seven spots standard mainly I think are sewn up.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think those seven teams will play finals. Are we

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>happy to say that the remaining teams, your Dolphins, Raiders, Dragons,

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Knights are playing for the remaining spots and the Titans, who,

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>although the Titans are not, both have to win all

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>their games and overcomes some pretty horrific points differential. So

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think your Raiders, unfortunately for Tima, have the toughest

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>run of anyone on the way home.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh sorry, I just need to I think I got

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the that a little bit wrong. So the Dragons at

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 2>eighth at the moment, Dolphins are ninth, Camera are tenth,

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and the Titans.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Times eleventh, ninth, twelfth, yere. But I think your Raiders,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>who are sitting in tenth, Seagulls at home, Cowboys away,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Panthers at home, Roosters away, Dragons away. I can't. I

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can't see that getting him into the eighth. You know,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins, the last couple of weeks, their losses are

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>going to come back to haunt them. I think, especially

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>They've got the Warriors this week, but the next two

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 1>weeks Tice, Bulldogs away, Storm away. I think that'll be costly.

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That's their season on the line.

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I think they. I think the Dolphins

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 3>be the Warriors, depending on the result between the Bulldogs

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 3>and the Dragons will vary how that game goes. I

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 3>think I really think the Dolphins can only afford to

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 3>drop one out of those and you're probably etching that

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 3>against the Storm. So yeah, it's there's also.

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Like when you look at it and you know there's

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 2>also Baniana pill games for all those sides in that

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.479
<v Speaker 2>run home. You know, like the eels I reckon are

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be a thorn for some sides the Titans

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>are playing.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Really try sucking up to me now it's too late.

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Titans have played some really good football. I mean, we

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>saw that the Knights refuse to go against the Panthers

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and sort of those three sides.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Titans could be the best second half football team I've

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. Yeah, what about that halftime sprays from Das

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>must be epic? My goodness, there's second Halve's lately been terrific.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But that's shows what potential they've got. I know, I

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think from this year, from next year on with des

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>having his second year, to see what he can do

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>with them.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>But you know they're still a J. Brimson and No.

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 2>Ten from Lali, so it's definitely got But that's what

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 2>we sort of expected anyway, what we're seeing now from

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the Titans is what we sort of thought Des was

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 2>going to deliver right from the start. It just took

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a while for everything to gel

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and then out of nowhere Kinney dispersed onto the scene

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 2>and he just you know, has added another sort of

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 2>X factor player for them. So yeah, but sides like

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 2>the Titans, like the Eels, like the Knights, I reckon

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>will have a bit of a say into how the

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 2>top eight ends up ends up looking I.

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Think, yeah, well, the Dragons have got two really big

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>although they've got a lot of big games because they're

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>sitting in eighth with the bad points differential, but they're

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on twenty six points there, two points ahead of camera

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and then who were over of the Gold Coast in

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the night, so they've got that advantage. Sorry, yeah, ahead

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of Dolphins and Camera. But the next two weeks Bulldogs

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at home, Titans at home and there basically home. Well,

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>those first to four point turnaround game for you, where

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you sit on the ladder, you know you can put

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.719
<v Speaker 1>yourself that you know you can you can climb up

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>towards Canterbury, or you can escape the Gold Coast there

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got that Shark's home game, which is huge,

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and then they finish off a way to Paramatta and

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>then Camber again at home. So it's a winnable lot

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of games. But if that schizophrenic Dragon's outfit what you

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>earlier turn up, who knows. So's yeah, it's getting interesting.

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, from teams that didn't make it last year, Canterbury,

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Manly St Georgia, Lawarov got them coming in.

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, yeah, I think, like I said earlier,

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I think Canberra had to win that game against Doggies

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 2>just to keep their chances alive. You look at their run,

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>it's probably a bit maybe a stretch too far. So

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the same with the Dolphins. You know, they're sort of

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of going through the same late season fade out

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 2>as they did last year. So I mean, if you

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 2>look at the if you look at the way the

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>top eight looks at the moment, it's probably going to

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 2>be that way in five weeks.

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And the Cowboys have got to buy as well, which

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>means they only need one win to book a final spot.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But Bronco's Raiders Storm Bulldogs not an easy run, so

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a team that's sitting six. Then you know,

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>potentially could push for a top four spot. It's a

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>tough lot of games. If they managed to win those,

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>who knows, but you know, they could sort of slip

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>down that pecking order a little bit.

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I don't like the Cowboys, so I think

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 3>if a team's going to slip out, it's going to

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 3>be them. To be honest, I don't think they're locked in.

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Was that.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I just think they're too inconsistent, way, way, way too inconsistent.

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>They've got twenty eight points, they're sitting in six.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>They almost I spoke to Todd Payden after their game

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 3>against the Tigers and he was worried if Isa Popoli

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 3>scored that they were going to lose and they had

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 3>twelve men on the field, Like you're I said it

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 3>from from day dot. They they tend to just be scraping,

0:29:56.120 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 3>scraping by, scraping by. If they lose a couple of

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the next ones and you know, things go right for

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 3>these other teams, they can slide out. I don't think

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 3>it's as locked in as as maybe.

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.959
<v Speaker 1>It looks as maybe I'm saying, just call it if

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to go after me that's fine.

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah did you when you did you allow to predictor yesterday?

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Where did you have them? Okay?

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you sneaking in ahead of them.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 3>I've got the Dragons and the Dolphins.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Dragons and Dolphins.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah wow, I don't think dragons nights. I saw Dragons,

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Titans and Dolphins can make it. But I think the

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Dragons and the Dolphins can make it over the Cowboys.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you're predicting a really to our North Queensland listeners,

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I must apologize that. I'll send your Tyson mobile number

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for when they do make the eight so you can

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>ring and give him a bagging. But that's It's interesting.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 2>I think they might be the worst defensive side in

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the top eight at the moment too. They're scoring a

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of points, but they're conceding a hell of a

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of points as well.

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 3>So who do they have? Have the Queensland Derby. Yeah,

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 3>so they've got the Broncos, which can always go either

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 3>way no matter where the team's sitting, The Raiders they've

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>got the buy which is two points in the storm,

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 3>and the Bulldogs. Like, realistically, they could lose all four

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 3>of those games. So I think I think it's a

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 3>tough drawer, right, and you're struggling to beat my tigers.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Mate, you've got you've got a bulldog's Panthers Grand Final.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got the Cowboys slipping from six to out of

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the eight. I like the way the last few weeks

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to go up topsy turvy with according to

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the Tyson Jackson system.

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Got three of three of the last four up in Townsville.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So then might give them a bit of an advantage.

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 3>You take that, Tys, talk to me in five weeks.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what we want here.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so what's your what's your prediction?

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got drag I've got the top eight.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 2>As it is as it is, Yeah, I sort of

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I tend to.

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Agree with I think the Dragons are going to sneak in.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>If they because twenty six points, they're going to win.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>You get three weeks out of one to three wins

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>out of five win lost win lost win or lost

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>win lost win. Ohy, gonna be called one short. If

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they can't win back to back games again, they're going

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to. That's a challenge, isn't it.

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 3>It has to be. This week tells you what's gonna

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.959
<v Speaker 3>happen with the Dragons. If they can pull it off

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 3>against the Bulldogs, then it was in Wooingngrang. I'd probably

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 3>say that you can almost lock the Dragons in. They

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 3>have a really good record there. But Cogras it's only

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 3>ten minutes away from Belmore, I think they'll be is

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 3>it me?

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 2>And again, this might be a generational thing, but is

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 2>it me or is the local derby between We can

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 2>call it that right because the geographically neighbors between Canterbury

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and the Dragons have sort of overtaken the one that

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>they have with the Sharks. I know there's it's you

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 2>know that's always been sort of the traditional one, but

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's always a bit more mission.

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 3>Like generation or the Dragons and the Sharks as of

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 3>recent I've always been on opposite sides of the Learner.

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 3>There's always been a bit more to playful between the

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Dogs and the Dragons, I feel. But now with the

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Dog's warback.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have Darby's. It's great when teams are

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>playing well, that's when Darby's matters.

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I love sets like.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Paramount of playing Penrith this week. It's a big game

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for Penrith. You know, if you're going well, that's what

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you say, but I love that kind of bender. But

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I love Derby's. I think they're great in footy. So

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to this weekend. But I've got to

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ask you. I want to get your thoughts on who

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is your most improved player this year because we're having

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a chat about this before and there's some names on

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>our list, but there's no award for this officially anywhere,

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but we could go and hand out some plak to somebody.

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But the first name that came to my list was

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Carraz, who is I think is playing some really

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>mature football at Canterbury. He's been asked to play. You know,

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>he goes on the wings to come into center and

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>each time he's done it. You know, I've seen a

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>lot out of him. I know he's only a couple

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of years into his career, but really really impressing me.

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh it's a good it's a good pick. But when

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 3>you say most improved, only think of Ja Krask. I

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 3>think Jame Kraz has always been really good, Like he

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 3>hasn't really had a rollercoaster re form. He's just playing

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 3>more consistently this year. Last year, I think he had

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 3>a couple of injuries and was in and out of

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the team.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 2>But we had a he had had a back injury, yeah,

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 2>that he had to manage, and there was a bit

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 2>of talk that you know, he might have to see

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 2>out in the first couple of rounds of the season,

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 2>but he was able to get it good and he's

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 2>been amazing since because he's I was having a look

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 2>at actually some of his stats and I didn't realize, like,

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously he's a meter eater, but to average one hundred

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 2>and ninety odd meters is that's just ridiculous. Yeah, it

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>really is.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>He's only twenty two. He debuted a couple of years ago.

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>But he's winning percentage up until this year was third

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>three thirty three percent. Now the Bulldogs this year or

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>almost sixty percent. So playing what fifty odd games for

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Canterbury in those two years is almost like one hundred

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else because you're forged in fire and but yeah,

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you're right for him. He's almost doubled his line breaks

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this year. He's improved, he's running meters, he's a good finisher,

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think his football maturity is really excelling. So

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I just think you know, you're right, Tys he hasn't

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>had a dip to be most improved, but he's been

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>coming along and I think this year he's been one

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the beneficiaries of what Cameron Sera has come to

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>do with that club. The other guy at the Bulldogs

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is Reed Marnie.

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 2>He's the one I would think, like, I know, obviously

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 2>he's been there, paid some big games and got a

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of experience at the moment, but he just looks

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 2>like a completely different player to what he was last year,

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 2>and almost a different player to what he was at

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 2>the Eels. So you know, I feel like he's got

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 2>a more all rounded game in a different role and

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 2>he does and it suits him.

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 3>You say, Rollet really interesting because I feel that this

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 3>year he's picked up more of a leadership role without

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the captaincy beside him. You see him really trying to

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 3>lead that team up front and trying to make things happen,

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 3>even things like as much as I dislike it, but

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 3>ripping into players like you know, that gets them up,

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 3>that that works for them, and there's teams like that.

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.919
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I tend to agree with you with with Reid.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 3>For me personally, I think Tommy's allow from Manley has

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 3>been probably the most improved player in the competition. You

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 3>look at you know he's he always was that guy.

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 3>When he played for the Tigers. You looked at him

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 3>and you're like, you've got so much potential, but they're

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 3>just I don't know what between injuries injuries and like

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 3>even when he wasn't injured, he tend tended to find

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 3>himself playing cup a lot there. But he's been He's

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 3>been awesome for especially on the wing, I think for

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 3>the Seagulls, getting out of trouble, scoring tries. I think

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 3>he's been great. Also, we can't look past Mitch Barnett.

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 3>He's had an amazing year for the Warriors, and I

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 3>think his Game three for the Blues was a big

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 3>reason why why they did so well as well.

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Can you Brooks in there? I feel like he just

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this year at the Seagulls we've actually

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of seen its potential that everybody spent the best

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 2>part of a decade talking about just the way he

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 2>runs the football. He's free, So I feel like he's

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 2>definitely a more improved player at the Seagulls.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Then he's in an approved team, isn't he. I saw

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>his running game the Tigers. I don't think he was

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the blame for the ills of that club club.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the reason why I didn't even think of

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Luke Brooks is because I watch him play for many

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 3>and I still see the same player. I think the

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 3>only difference is no one's talking about him, which for

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 3>him I'm so happy for because he got hammered for

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 3>no reason at times at the Tigers. So I mean,

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 3>I tend to disagree with you're saying most improved because

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he's still the same player. It's just the

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 3>spotlights off him, and I think having someone like DC

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 3>beside him has has taken that pressure off him. And

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 3>he's doing his role. He's not doing anything spectacular, He's

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 3>doing what he needs so he's running games great. It's

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 3>helping them, you know, have some really polished plays. And yes,

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't seem as the most improved. I see him

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 3>as just you know, the attentions of him. I guess

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 3>he's flying under the radar.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, we're seeing a lot more of that, yeah,

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in that team, in that better setup.

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and not to continue that the Tiger's trend, but

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 2>I feel like someone like Shaun blow as well, I

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know if he's being most improved, but he's definitely

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 2>improved after going to Melbourne and it was a bit

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>of a slow start for him, you know. I don't

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.399
<v Speaker 2>know whether it's a fitness thing or just took time

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 2>to learn the Melbourne system. He missed out in the

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.240
<v Speaker 2>first couple of games, came back I think was selected

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 2>in round three, hasn't looked back since. And get one

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 2>of those guys where when he was at Penris, because

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 2>he came from penrist to the Tiger from memory, just

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 2>another one bit like Tommy Till out right just sort

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 2>of couldn't really kick on when he was at the Tigers,

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and now it was just this big destructive edge forward

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 2>that we sort of expect him. He's just reached the

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:21.919
<v Speaker 2>potential that we knew that he could.

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I remember his debut game against the Eels and he

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 3>picked out Nathan Brown and every time Nathan Brown ran,

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Seawan Blaw was there. Every time Sean Blaw ran, Nathan

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 3>Brown was there, and all Tigers supports were like, we've

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 3>got ourselves a gem here. And then yeah, like you said.

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Just same, he's another one who had injuries. I think

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 2>he might.

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he had a couple of injuries, but just tended

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 3>to not kick on. And then we were hearing reports

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 3>that when he went to Storm, he when he went

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 3>to the Storm, he was struggling fitness wise and intensity

0:39:56.239 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 3>wise for their preseason. So yeah, again, like yeah, I

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 3>probably do tend to agree more on blow than books

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 3>with that because he has improved.

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>What about what about Jadon Campbell? He was identified last

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>year as a potential X factor for the Eels and

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I looked at went really is a bit small. I

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know where it quite where he fits and injuries

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and positional switches, et cetera. But I think he's thriving

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 1>with the five eighth with number six Jersey on his back.

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I like his running game. When we're talking about Luke Brooks,

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I like what he's doing there. I'm really enjoying watching

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>his footy when I flick on to see the times, Okay,

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to watch what Jaden Campbell's doing.

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 2>It was one of those ones where for a long

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 2>time he was probably a victim of that X factor

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 2>tag because it meant that he got shuffled around a

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 2>little bit, like is he X fact off the bench?

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Is he like a backline impact player. Is he a fullback?

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Is he you know, where is his best position? But

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's also like what Tyson said about Brooks

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and DCE, I think Ford has done also a pretty

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 2>good job of being a foil for Jaden Campbell. So

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 2>he's taken off a lot of that pressure where the

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 2>only thing he has to do is run, and like

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 2>you said, in that situation, his smaller size, his agility

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 2>when sides are fatigued, like we saw, you know, against

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos, he really comes to the foe and so yeah,

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 2>absolutely you'd tap him in that conversation. It's just a

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 2>bit interesting to see is this his position? And he

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 2>might be forced into that position just by the fact

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of the emergence of Kinney And they've still got a J.

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 2>Brimson to come into the side, So.

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 3>There's that long jam there at the Titans. It's I mean,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 3>it's a headache for des but I mean it's almost

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 3>a good headache. I don't see where you fit Brimson

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 3>in though, now because of how good Campbell's going in

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 3>the five eight and then obviously got Kinney up the back,

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 3>he's been a revelation for them. So yeah, again, he's

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 3>probably he's always had that skill there. It's not like

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 3>he ever played poorly. But moving into five eighth, I

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 3>guess we've seen more of him, and we've seen him

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 3>play consistently and I guess almost get involved. He said

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 3>he loves tackling as well, which I mean, he's a

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 3>small guy. He'd be the first person you want to

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 3>run at. So I guess yeah, position wise, it's a

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 3>big improvement.

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And a couple of others throw up this up quick

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Terrell May, I think it's been vastly. I think he

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>stepped up. I think he stepped up big time. So

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>when Lindsay Collins went down the other night and Torell

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 1>May is the guy that made a stack of tackles,

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>stack of hit ups. It's been a mainstay in the

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Danny Crankovitch thirteen my super Coach team this year, so I.

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Think it might be in mind as well. Yeah, I

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 2>might have started the season with him.

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just I kept ignoring Tommy Sankster's intimation that

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I should sell him if I'm just gonna hold, just

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna hold, and yeah, proved revelation.

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And speaking of logjams, the rooster sort of when

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>you look at their forward pack, there is a bit

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 2>of a log jam there so but still like even

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 2>though you know, still guys like Lindsay Collins now spent

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 2>so Lennie you you know, obviously Jared's moving on, but

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 2>still that log jam of prop forwards in front of him,

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 2>but that hasn't seemed to bother him and he has

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 2>taken his game to another level. It'll be interesting to

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 2>see post Jared what that forward pack looks like. Whether

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Terrell's a starter with a spence Learning's a starter. But

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I think what's really promising about him is it doesn't

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 2>matter whether you start him or whether he's off the bench.

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 2>The impact that he plays with has been massive for them.

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And what do you make I had to throw this

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>guy in Jaden Sewer, Yeah, I think he's.

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Been he's been really good. We've did him play Origin

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago and it looked like he

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 3>was really going to kick on and then obviously had

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I think a bit of a quiet last year, came

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 3>back into the Origin arena this year, although didn't hold

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 3>his spot for Game three. I think that's almost a

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 3>fire under him and we've seen his best foot after

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 3>after the Origin series, So yeah, I think he's definitely

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 3>improved this year.

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, interesting what our listeners think, so send him

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Send me an email, guy, Adam Mobs.

0:43:58.200 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those ones where I feel like

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be some names that we've missed. So

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 2>if anybody has had.

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Any ideas, let us know, Adam dot Mobs at news

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com that you let us know, because yeah, I'm

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sure there's Jacob Little, Tyrone Wishart, There's guys all through

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>here that we could talk about. What we needed to

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:17.720
<v Speaker 1>move on to is Fatima's favorite segment?

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:21.760
<v Speaker 2>What are you watching?

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Watch? Well, I'm I'm only watching Olympics at the moment

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm so busy with I love my Olympics. I've

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>just I'm fallen into that. But I have been receiving

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>some notes from our listeners on disaster movies, because you know,

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of been my stick the last few weeks.

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Tim sent me an email and said, if Fatima likes

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>True Stories, Pam likes Celine Dion, and I'm a disaster

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>movie buff, we should get together to watch Titanic. He said, thanks,

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he loves the podcast. Yeah, I thought that was nice

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and Tesa listening in from Zurich in Switzerland. He says

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>The Tearing Inferno is the best disaster movie ever, aid

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Paul Newman. Steve McQueen need I go on, but I will.

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 1>It's not an over the top stupid movie, but more

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a foreshadowing of what could happen to these skyscraper has

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>been built in the sixties and seventies. The tension starts

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>building early and the time flies by.

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and is it like the.

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen seventy four and there's a bloke on there?

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 2>O J.

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Simpson. So I don't know whether I got it. I

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>got to admit I haven't seen this, So I'm going

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to go and see whether O Jay is as good

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in this as he was in the Naked Gun series.

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Now you guys are a bit younger. Did you ever

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>see Naked Gun? Leslie Nielsen.

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 2>I've heard of it, but I haven't seen it.

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Watched the first You watched the first one and you

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't follow it up with Naked Gun.

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:45.240
<v Speaker 3>My parents.

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've heard of Paul Newman. I don't think I've

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 2>ever watched a movie.

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of Paul Newman, Oh my goodness.

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Other than The Towering Inferno has any Wait, let me

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 2>rephrase that. What other prominent movies should I have watched

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 2>that he's been He's.

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much just a legend of screen. So we're going

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to go.

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't even make tomato sauce.

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 1>It's like George Former makes grills. Oh my god, move on,

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm out. That's it. You've lost me.

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, Okay, I am. I'm actually still going through my

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 2>true crime face so I'm up to So I was

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 2>watching New York Homicide. I'm up to Los Angele's Homicide,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>which is like the second season of that show. I'm

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 2>also still going through Supercell as well. So I thought,

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:31.839
<v Speaker 2>rather than because I'm not watching anything new, I will

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 2>recommend Sweet Tooth, which is I don't know whether it's

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:37.879
<v Speaker 2>based on a book or not. Sorry, I watch things

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 2>without doing too much research. But basically, it's a world

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 2>where there are hybrid children, so that a part human,

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 2>part animal, and they're like, I don't know, trying to

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 2>find some people are trying to find a cure cure

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 2>for it. But to find a cure, I think they

0:46:55.000 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 2>have to like exterminate the hybrid children. It's it's interesting,

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:03.479
<v Speaker 2>it's a bit sci fi debate. The hybrids are cute.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a fun, easy watch.

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested.

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:09.720
<v Speaker 2>It's one of I think it was. The first season

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 2>was one of the most popular shows on Netflix.

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess continuing on with your mutant type things,

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I went and watched Wolverine or Deadpool and Wolverine on

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the weekend. I'm not a big superhero guy. I like Batman,

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 3>but that's about it. So yeah, I was. I really

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 3>enjoyed this movie. I thought it was funny, good action scenes.

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Hugh Jackman's aussy gem, so that was nice.

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.399
<v Speaker 2>So is it like Deadpool the Wolverine or are they

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 2>like you've.

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Seen the first one?

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I seen Deadpool, you have.

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I think they're like that. They're like a team is

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the best way to put it. But yeah, watched watch

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 3>the movie for team.

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 2>It's a there's two Deadpools, right, is there two?

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the third?

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 3>This is the third, third installment. Yeah, so it was

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 3>really funny. I was laughing out loud in the cinema,

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 3>which I'm a bit bat.

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:02.279
<v Speaker 1>We're laughing when he was making out with the ugly Dog.

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It was literally the world ugliest dog starts in this movie.

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a clip. It's disturb That was pretty funny.

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 3>It was good to see. The cinema was packed as well,

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:13.760
<v Speaker 3>which is always nice, so there was no free seats

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 3>in there.

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Big bands back for Marvel, couple of stinkers.

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I stopped watching after the most recent Spider Man. I

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 3>think that was my last one, and then I was like, yeah,

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I can't watch.

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Who do you know a spider Man?

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Spider Man growing up Tom Holand has been.

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Pretty good since Tom Holands Superman.

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man.

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't watch too many superhero movies. Is Joker super superhero?

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 3>He's a villain, He's in DC.

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We're on mar You will be upsetting people.

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I'm going to be judged for this.

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 2>The last the last time I went into a cinema

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:49.399
<v Speaker 2>to watch the.

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Movie Footage of the Dog.

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, yeah, it was The Joker. That was the last

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 2>movie I watched in the cinema. It's been years now.

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 3>The second one is coming out soon. The team will

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 3>be back in the same guys.

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll give you at some homework and season from

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:10.320
<v Speaker 2>from from the cinema.

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 1>We're going to give you hots vouchers and just going

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to make you sit there and watch some classics.

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:17.839
<v Speaker 2>So I would say, now, well.

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>We're better push off. But i just want to thank

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:21.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone for tuning in because I'm sure there's a thousand

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Rugby league podcasts around there, so it's nice that you

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>spent some time stopping by with us. So again, disaster movies,

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if there's any others or any other suggestions for it.

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.439
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say it was like a disaster months. Yeah,

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 2>well to August now, so you still have you got

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 2>any the Olympics.

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>The Olympics got in the way, so I'm straight back

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>into what.

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Can be a new se for August. Have you got any.

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Ideas My daughter's getting to the age he's fifteen now,

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to start watching some more mature movies, but what

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>matures in content? So I'm talking ted and things like that.

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going, no, there's we're not watching that. It's just

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, just terrible.

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, maybe give her a couple of years.

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>No, no, someone will be reporting me to docks from this,

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get back to work. Thanks for stopping by.

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you,