Speaker 1: On skyld's Australia. This is the Wider Paney Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the readA Panehy Show. We
Speaker 2: have a packed program for you tonight, Rea during Nick
Speaker 2: Cata with the day's biggest stories, Josh Hammer with the
Speaker 2: latest from the US, and later in the hour Kinsey
Speaker 2: Schofield with all the Royland celebrity news, and tonight an
Speaker 2: extra long edition of Lefty's Losing It Before the First Outbreak, the.
Speaker 3: Shoulders on the Drag and go share me sham shammy,
Speaker 3: Share share share me, share share sham.
Speaker 2: But first, Labor is going all in on its social
Speaker 2: media campaign and listening the help of online influencers to
Speaker 2: get its message out to younger voters. Labor invited thirteen
Speaker 2: influencers to Tuesday's budget lock up, including Instagram, finance advisors
Speaker 2: and left wing feminists. Are like Hannah Ferguson, mill Rose
Speaker 2: Banister Tash invest I've got no idea who these people are.
Speaker 2: In a statement, the government said that almost half of
Speaker 2: Australians primarily consumed their news online through new media, podcasts
Speaker 2: and social media. That percentage is even higher for young
Speaker 2: Australians and let's now have a look at how Labor
Speaker 2: has been sharing its plan to build Australia's future on
Speaker 2: their official Instagram page. Okay, and then there was this what.
Speaker 4: Do you think of Peter Dutton.
Speaker 5: Personally?
Speaker 2: He's very amiable politically joining me now. A senior fellow
Speaker 2: at the Menzies Research Center, Nick Cata nicked lefty social
Speaker 2: media influences on the campaign trail. Yes or no?
Speaker 6: I just I'm not really sure. I think if they
Speaker 6: want influencers and they really want to be talking to
Speaker 6: people like you, you know, professional journalists who still actually
Speaker 6: you know, the majority of people get their news, particularly
Speaker 6: on something like the budget, from the mainstream media, and
Speaker 6: that's who they should be talking to. But Baz, you
Speaker 6: we really think they'll get a bit of a softer
Speaker 6: ride from these people. I had to look at some
Speaker 6: of these influencers what they posted from Canberra. One was
Speaker 6: they spent half the Instagram telling us what they brought
Speaker 6: in the supermarket by way of food to keep them going.
Speaker 6: Another one was complaining that there was four hours in
Speaker 6: the lock up without internet and it was hell. I
Speaker 6: would have thought it would be quite pleasant actually, but anyway,
Speaker 6: that's it. It's all pretty shallow, pretty ordinary. I don't
Speaker 6: think these people really have that much influence, and if
Speaker 6: they do, the people they're influencing must be even more
Speaker 6: insignificant than they are. So I think it's a bit
Speaker 6: of a gimmick, to be honest.
Speaker 2: It will be interesting, You'll be interesting to see if
Speaker 2: it does have an impact because that younger demographic can
Speaker 2: be harder to reach. So if they're getting the message through,
Speaker 2: it's just not as silly as it seems. Now to
Speaker 2: yesterday's Senate debate on new laws to protect Tasmania's salmon
Speaker 2: farming industry, and we had this performance from Green's Senator
Speaker 2: Sarah Hanson Young.
Speaker 7: On the eve of the election, have you sold out
Speaker 7: your environment credentials? Throw it often stinking and that attention
Speaker 7: salmon hats intention salmon Senate Sarah hands Young removed the
Speaker 7: crop from the chamber.
Speaker 2: Really is a bit of a circus. Unfortunately for Sarah,
Speaker 2: the stunt didn't really convince anyone. The law passed the Senate.
Speaker 2: Nick the Greens are they going to come up with
Speaker 2: more imaginative ways to grab headlines?
Speaker 6: I think they kind of lost their way, haven't they.
Speaker 6: It's nice to see in a way the Greens going
Speaker 6: back and talking about the environment, I suppose more broadly,
Speaker 6: and not about Palestine or gender equity and all these
Speaker 6: other things. They talk about transgender rights. But look, I
Speaker 6: think it shows the desperation the Greens are, the desperate
Speaker 6: spot they're in at the moment. They vot are softened,
Speaker 6: it's flattened. They're having trouble getting traction. Part of that,
Speaker 6: I think is because the Labor Party under Albanezi has
Speaker 6: gone so far to the left and stolen much of
Speaker 6: their ground. But they really are struggling really to find
Speaker 6: their way right now. I mean, what do they represent?
Speaker 6: The party of dead fish apparently, you know. And I
Speaker 6: think the attack on the Tasmanian salmon industry obviously is
Speaker 6: very damaging to the people in Tasmania. And I see
Speaker 6: that the Prime Minister has actually had the good sense
Speaker 6: not to come down against salmon farming.
Speaker 2: Now the Coal Is has pledged to half the fuel
Speaker 2: excise for twelve months if they win the upcoming election,
Speaker 2: meaning a driver who fills up a fifty five liter
Speaker 2: tank once a week would save around fourteen dollars a week.
Speaker 2: If you drive a large suv or a ute, the
Speaker 2: savings will be about twenty dollars a week.
Speaker 8: Nick.
Speaker 2: It's a policy the Greenees will certainly hate, but it
Speaker 2: leaves most Australians better off than Labour's seventy cents a
Speaker 2: day tax cut. Is this a winner?
Speaker 6: I think it's very well targeted retail. I think the
Speaker 6: sort of people that will benefit from this are the
Speaker 6: people in the outer suburbs and regions where the Coalition
Speaker 6: has a very good chance of picking up some labor
Speaker 6: seats from some very angry labor voters in places like
Speaker 6: Sydney and Melbourne. These are the people with sometimes two
Speaker 6: three four cars per household, and not because they want
Speaker 6: to show off, but because they've simply got to have
Speaker 6: them to get anywhere. You know, their trade is the
Speaker 6: people having to take the kids to school and mum's
Speaker 6: trying to get to work. So I think it will
Speaker 6: be I think this will go down very well, indeed,
Speaker 6: and it's much better than giving a very almost nothing
Speaker 6: tax cut to almost everybody. It's much better to target
Speaker 6: this at hardworking Australians who really need some relief at
Speaker 6: the petrol pumps.
Speaker 2: Let's turn our attention now to this rally that took place.
Speaker 2: Looks like it's at the University of Technology in Sydney.
Speaker 2: And according to this man, Jews in Australia should not
Speaker 2: feel comfortable.
Speaker 9: I should feel uncomfortable, and it's to make them uncomfortable
Speaker 9: and that includes the followers.
Speaker 2: And who is this Randa he agrees with. It appears
Speaker 2: to be doctor Randa abdel Fatta at mccrorra University, academic
Speaker 2: infamous for her appearances at pro Palestinian rallies. Universe uts
Speaker 2: War contacted for comment and they said the university has
Speaker 2: zero tolerance for any form of racism or discrimination and
Speaker 2: investigation into comments made at the rally is underway. Nick,
Speaker 2: What happened to these new laws we were going to
Speaker 2: have which were meant to prevent this sort of thing,
Speaker 2: and this entire idea of making Jewish students feel uncomfortable,
Speaker 2: It is just so abhorrent and the fact that it's
Speaker 2: been spoken about loudly and proudly, it just shows you
Speaker 2: just how far we have fallen and how deep this
Speaker 2: anti Semitism is in the community.
Speaker 6: Exactly they just don't seem to realize is the very people,
Speaker 6: of course, that would be up in arms about any
Speaker 6: hint of discrimination against any other group in the country,
Speaker 6: whether it's Muslims or people from indigenous people first nations people,
Speaker 6: of course we should call them retail. Should remember that
Speaker 6: in any sort of discrimination they would be up in
Speaker 6: arms again. But this is okay, apparently. And yet this
Speaker 6: is extraordinarily damaging to multicultural Australia. And we've got to
Speaker 6: a position I thought in Australia where we just you know,
Speaker 6: race didn't matter, those things didn't matter. These people are
Speaker 6: making it matter again in a very very ugly way.
Speaker 6: And most Australians I think, would be deeply uncomfortable about
Speaker 6: the fact that this sort of thing is not only
Speaker 6: going on, but apparently is condoned.
Speaker 2: Now, let's talk about disg in the corporate sector. The
Speaker 2: Australian Reports, founder of software Titan Technology one Adrian DeMarco
Speaker 2: says the best people are staying away from public boards
Speaker 2: because listed Australian companies have become two woke and that
Speaker 2: Donald Trump's war on d I programs is a wake
Speaker 2: up call. He also said it's the reason I won't
Speaker 2: sit on public boards because it's just too inefficient. Nick
Speaker 2: DeMarco argues that superannuation funds, with all their DEI mandates,
Speaker 2: just have too much influence on how publicly traded businesses
Speaker 2: run their affairs. Do you agree with that?
Speaker 6: I do that. I mean I want a superannuation fund
Speaker 6: to invest my money where it's going to make the
Speaker 6: most money, not according to some artificial criteria about d
Speaker 6: I or ees G or any of these other things.
Speaker 6: They're not. Of course, It's interesting, isn't it. These companies.
Speaker 6: They're investing so much of our money that we have
Speaker 6: to give them. By the way, we don't have any
Speaker 6: choice about it, investing in super in this country, and
Speaker 6: that they just live off the profits of it and
Speaker 6: just operate their businesses in an entirely ludicrous way. But
Speaker 6: there's certainly a backlash coming against this, not just in
Speaker 6: the US, you can see it here too, And I'm
Speaker 6: convinced that that the tide is changing Rita. It might
Speaker 6: take quite a while to change in places like the
Speaker 6: university and our ABC, but I think in the corporate
Speaker 6: world they're beginning to see the light.
Speaker 2: Well, let's hope so, because it is just rife throughout
Speaker 2: the corporate world. The lefts march through the institutions may
Speaker 2: have started in academia, but my gosh, they have progressed
Speaker 2: and they are really dominating in the corporate world as
Speaker 2: well when it comes to corporate culture, and it's creating
Speaker 2: so many problems. Now we've got a long way to
Speaker 2: go though, to get to the UK, where they've just
Speaker 2: seemed completely lost. The plot got a pedophile migrant he
Speaker 2: and Nick who assaulted a teenage girl in Britain, but
Speaker 2: it's been allowed to remain in the country because the
Speaker 2: judge's rule that deporting this sex offender would be unduly
Speaker 2: harsh and one of the reasons I argued was that
Speaker 2: it would be inhumane or degrading treatment of who were
Speaker 2: sent back to Pakistan because of his alcoholism. So the
Speaker 2: alcoholism has helped him remain in the UK despite his
Speaker 2: horrendous track record.
Speaker 6: It's extraord isn't it. It's just like they're looking for
Speaker 6: an excuse for ey to I mean, this just doesn't
Speaker 6: stand any sort of light to day of this kind
Speaker 6: of argument, any excuse, any excuse to allow this pedophile
Speaker 6: to stay in Britain. This is causing a great deal
Speaker 6: of anger in Britain, as you know, as it is
Speaker 6: in the United States, as it is here. Aren't people
Speaker 6: just sick of this stuff? You know that it seems
Speaker 6: like the people who actually live in the country, the
Speaker 6: actual citizens of the country, their rights are just not
Speaker 6: nobody that takes any notice of those anymore. And certainly,
Speaker 6: you know the rights of children not to be interfered
Speaker 6: with by Pakistanis who are there illegally. That doesn't come
Speaker 6: into it, don't it anymore? It's the rights of this
Speaker 6: poor man. You know, it will be inhumane to send
Speaker 6: him back to Pakistan, a place where presuming he was born,
Speaker 6: read and board up, just because he has an alcohol problem.
Speaker 6: You know, this is this just takes the biscuit, doesn't it.
Speaker 6: I mean, I know alcohol is not frowned upon in Pakistan,
Speaker 6: but you know, it's a ridiculous excuse.
Speaker 2: And another example of the UK completely losing the plot.
Speaker 2: Damon Joshua who posted a comment about her mask being
Speaker 2: disgusting terrorists. He posted this on a staff discussion board.
Speaker 2: That's what he said. He called her mask disgusting terrorists. Well,
Speaker 2: apparently that caused significant events offense Nick and he was sacked.
Speaker 2: He was sacked by severin Trent Water, a UK water
Speaker 2: supply operator. What have we come to where if you
Speaker 2: call murderous, barbaric terrorists what they are? If you call
Speaker 2: them disgusting, you could lose your job.
Speaker 6: It's extraordinary, isn't it.
Speaker 10: Reader?
Speaker 6: It is absolutely extraordinary that a water company should think
Speaker 6: this was anything of their business, that loan matter to
Speaker 6: dismiss a member of staff. And what he said is
Speaker 6: entirely defensible. In fact, it's the truth. These are terrorists
Speaker 6: and they are disgusting. So where does that cause harm
Speaker 6: to anybody? If anybody wants to dispute, that go ahead.
Speaker 6: But they are terrorists and they are very, very disgusting people.
Speaker 6: I think disgusting is too mild a word to be
Speaker 6: quite honest. So why this should cause any controversy said
Speaker 6: anywhere anywhere in the world, I don't.
Speaker 2: Know, Nick Cata, Thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 2: Now it's time for lefties losing it, and I regret
Speaker 2: to inform you that the Democrats have lost whatever tenuous
Speaker 2: grip they had on sanity. Watch this performance from Democrat
Speaker 2: Congressmen Robert Garcia. He actually thought he was clever here,
Speaker 2: asking the CEO of taxpayer funded PABs the following.
Speaker 11: The American people want to know, is Elmo now or
Speaker 11: has he ever been a member of the Communist Party
Speaker 11: of the United states, Yes or no, no, But let's
Speaker 11: talk about somebody else. Let's talk about cookie monster. Now
Speaker 11: we know that Health Secretary RFK Junior is coming out
Speaker 11: against fast food and bake goods. Are we silencing pro
Speaker 11: cookie voters? Yes or no, mis Grger.
Speaker 4: But cookies are a sometime food.
Speaker 11: Now, these two guys actually live together, they're friends, they're
Speaker 11: supportive of each other. Now that might be triggering to
Speaker 11: our chairwoman and someone this committee, and perhaps that's also
Speaker 11: why we're here today, Ms Kerger, an important question. Our
Speaker 11: burton Ernie part of an extreme homosexual agenda.
Speaker 2: So infantile because yeah, pbs are never political, are they. Well,
Speaker 2: let's have a look at us show. The taxpayer funded
Speaker 2: PAB is produced. So get your singing voices ready.
Speaker 3: We're gonna start with our hips. The hips on the
Speaker 3: dragondo swish swish Swish, Swish, Swish swish, and the shoulders
Speaker 3: on the drag we go share me Shamy Shammy, Share
Speaker 3: Share share me, share sham shammy, blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: Oh dear, But there was one lifty losing it even
Speaker 2: more than the Democrats, and some would say lying even
Speaker 2: more than the Democrats, And that was NPR CEO and
Speaker 2: hard left ideologue Catherine Mam.
Speaker 1: Do you think the white people should pay reparations?
Speaker 4: I have never said that, sir.
Speaker 1: Yes you did. You said it in January of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: You tweeted, yes, the North, yes, all of us, Yes, America, Yes,
Speaker 1: our original collective sin and unpaid debt. Yes, reparations, yes
Speaker 1: on this day.
Speaker 4: I don't believe that was a reference to fiscal reparation, sir.
Speaker 1: What kind of reparations was it a reference to.
Speaker 4: I think it was just a reference to the idea
Speaker 4: that we all owe much to the people who came
Speaker 4: before us.
Speaker 1: That's a bizarre way to frame what you tweeted.
Speaker 2: Oops. Yes, her old tweets are coming back to haunt her.
Speaker 2: There are plenty of them, Mars. Old tweets are a
Speaker 2: hot mess of far left lunacy and racist emoting a
Speaker 2: lot of anti white racism, and then loopy stuff like this,
Speaker 2: like getting triggered with words like boys and girls. She posted,
Speaker 2: I do wish Hillary wouldn't use the language of boy
Speaker 2: and girl. It's a raising language for non binary people.
Speaker 2: Goodness me, this is a woman who ran Wikipedia and
Speaker 2: helped ruin that site with leftist propaganda. Masquerading as facts.
Speaker 2: Before moving on to NPR and today, she struggled to
Speaker 2: answer straightforward questions and tried to justify her past hysterical,
Speaker 2: fact free statements like calling the press a fascist.
Speaker 6: Let me ask you, why did you call President Trump
Speaker 6: fascist and a deranged racist sociopath in twenty.
Speaker 4: Twenty, Congressman, I appreciate the opportunity to address this. I
Speaker 4: regret those tweets. I would not tweet them again today.
Speaker 4: They represented at a time where I was reflecting on
Speaker 4: something that I believe that the President had said, rather
Speaker 4: than who he is. I don't presume that anyone is
Speaker 4: a racist.
Speaker 1: Would you don't believe anyone is a racist.
Speaker 4: I don't start by presuming anyone as a racist.
Speaker 2: She's on a roll, now Here's she got some laughs
Speaker 2: when she claimed MPR wasn't biased and she knew nothing
Speaker 2: about the politics of her editorial staff, Like the fact
Speaker 2: that eighty seven editorial positions are filled by registered Democrats
Speaker 2: in DC and zero by Republicans.
Speaker 12: Is in PR biased?
Speaker 4: Congressman, I have never seen any instance of never of
Speaker 4: pro political bias determining editorial decisions.
Speaker 12: Now it was eighty seven Democrats, zero Republicans and you
Speaker 12: say MPR is not biased, and.
Speaker 2: Those old tweets kept coming back to haunt her. But
Speaker 2: don't worry. She has changed dramatically in the last four
Speaker 2: or five years or half a decade, as she refers
Speaker 2: to call it what a mess.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that America is addicted to white supremacy?
Speaker 4: I believe that I tweeted that, and as I've said earlier,
Speaker 4: I believe much of my thinking has evolved over the
Speaker 4: last half decade.
Speaker 1: It has evolved. Why did you tweet that?
Speaker 4: I don't recall the exact context, sir, so I wouldn't
Speaker 4: be able to say.
Speaker 1: Okay, do you believe that America believes in black plunder
Speaker 1: and white democracy?
Speaker 4: I don't believe that, sir.
Speaker 1: You tweeted that is reference to a book you were
Speaker 1: reading at the time, apparently the Case for Reparations.
Speaker 4: I don't think I've ever read that book, Sir.
Speaker 2: Catherine, you certainly did. You tweeted about it at length.
Speaker 2: You took a day off to just read the book
Speaker 2: you posted America Begins in Black Plunder and White Demo Christy.
Speaker 2: I appreciate the day off today to finally fully read
Speaker 2: the Case for reparations. Now you claim you never read it,
Speaker 2: but you posted about it repeatedly. Okay, let's explore just
Speaker 2: how lunatic left this woman who ran Wikipedia? Now mpre's
Speaker 2: thankfully Brandon gil has the receipts.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that looting is morally wrong?
Speaker 4: I believe that looting is illegal, and I referred to
Speaker 4: it as counterproductive. I think it should be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: Do you believe it's morally wrong? Though, of course, be
Speaker 1: tweeted it's hard to be mad about protests in reference
Speaker 1: to the BLM protests not prioritizing the private property of
Speaker 1: a system of oppression. You didn't condemn the looting, you
Speaker 1: said that it was counter productive. NPR also promoted a
Speaker 1: book called in Defensive Looting. Do you think that that's
Speaker 1: an appropriate use of taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 4: I'm unfamiliar with that book, sir, and I don't believe
Speaker 4: that was.
Speaker 1: My tweeted that you read that book.
Speaker 4: But I don't believe that I did read that.
Speaker 2: Now let's go to the disaster that is Disney's Snow White.
Speaker 2: I can't imagine why people are not warming to this
Speaker 2: woke reimagining of a much loved favorite and they're not
Speaker 2: warming to its star, Rachel Zegler Eater. Here she is
Speaker 2: before the election saying, if you don't intend to vote
Speaker 2: for Kamala, then you should unfollow her. Vote for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 10: And it's actually non negotiable. Our rates are on the line, folks,
Speaker 10: are reproductive rates. Come on GOVT Blue And if you
Speaker 10: disagree with the sentiment, just set the unfollow button. I
Speaker 10: don't need your business.
Speaker 2: Thanks, okay, Rachel. Now listen to her promote the film.
Speaker 4: The Girl You Remember.
Speaker 13: But she's definitely made for the modern age, and there's
Speaker 13: such an emphasis on what it really means to be
Speaker 13: the fairest of the mall and personal way. It's coming
Speaker 13: to terms with finding herself and finding her in her
Speaker 13: voice and finding a sense of agency so that she
Speaker 13: can be a just ruler.
Speaker 2: And the reviews are in and even the leftist publications
Speaker 2: can't put lipstick on this pig. This production is a
Speaker 2: train wreck. Let's go to some of these reviews. We've
Speaker 2: got this from The Independent. Lazy, visually repellent, out exhaustingly
Speaker 2: awful and toe curling terrible, said The Guardian. The most
Speaker 2: controversial Disney Adult nightmare ever was from Rolling Stone, a
Speaker 2: strange hot mess at the Huffington Post, and good enough
Speaker 2: for TV. That's the nicest you'll get from Vanity Fair. Now,
Speaker 2: y'all remember Jussi Smullett, Well, we may have found the
Speaker 2: female version. A Pennsylvania city worker, Latasha Brown has been
Speaker 2: charged with staging a fake hate crime after she allegedly
Speaker 2: planted a noose on our own desk.
Speaker 14: Got how police department conducted a thorough investigation, including interviews
Speaker 14: of persons, analysis of evidence, and consultation with the District
Speaker 14: Attorney's Office of Lehigh County. As a result of the
Speaker 14: subsequent investigation, well Tarsha Brown was charged with hampering with
Speaker 14: or fabricating physical evidence, a misdemeanor of the second degree,
Speaker 14: and false reports to law enforcement.
Speaker 2: Seems like the demand for racism is outstripping the supply.
Speaker 2: Now let's go to Elon Musk's transgender son, which Juteen
Speaker 2: Vogue has featured in their publication just so this kid
Speaker 2: can blast his father and the Trump administration. Why else
Speaker 2: will they feature Vivian Jenna Wilson, a twenty year old
Speaker 2: that's not really doing much, not exactly setting the world
Speaker 2: on fire. Even with their social media output.
Speaker 1: Give us some of your political beliefs.
Speaker 3: Kill everyone now, condone first degree murder, advocate cannibalism, felt
Speaker 3: as my politics felt there's my life.
Speaker 10: Take whatever you like.
Speaker 2: And for being so brave and stunning and hating on
Speaker 2: her anti woke dad, and of course Trump, Vivian gets
Speaker 2: a teen Vogue fluff fees complete with the star treatment
Speaker 2: still to come. Despite the media hysteria, Trump is more
Speaker 2: popular now than when he won the election in a landslide.
Speaker 2: Josh Hammer joins me next with all the details. Welcome back.
Speaker 2: Now it's time for my new segment, The Golden Age,
Speaker 2: the Golden Age of America. And this next story fills
Speaker 2: me with joy, absolute joy. This is good over evil,
Speaker 2: meritocracy over ideology. It's a man who took a courageous
Speaker 2: stand to speak truth to power about COVID lockdowns and mandates.
Speaker 2: He was attacked, he was defamed, he was suppressed on
Speaker 2: social media and smear in the mainstream media, but not
Speaker 2: on this program. I was proud to give this eminently
Speaker 2: qualified expert a platform.
Speaker 15: It's the government that ordered the censorship and the political
Speaker 15: authorities that ordered it. They still have not faced to
Speaker 15: come up as read it. Thank you for having me
Speaker 15: on even in times when it was very difficult for
Speaker 15: me to get my message out. There were very few
Speaker 15: mediailists that were willing.
Speaker 1: To do that.
Speaker 2: And he was right. He was right about everything. He
Speaker 2: was right about the lockdowns, the school closures, the mandates,
Speaker 2: and overnight, doctor J. Battashuria was confirmed as the new
Speaker 2: director of the National Institute of Health. We're in the
Speaker 2: golden age. Indeed, folks now to CNN with some sobering
Speaker 2: news about Donald Trump's popularity. If there are any lefties
Speaker 2: in the room, I'm giving you a trigger warning, this
Speaker 2: is gonna hurt.
Speaker 8: I think sometimes it's important to do a little bit
Speaker 8: of reality check and take a little different spin at
Speaker 8: the numbers. I'm gonna do that right here, because all
Speaker 8: we talk about is how unpopular Donald Trump is. But
Speaker 8: in reality, he's basically more popular than he was at
Speaker 8: any point in term number one, and more popular than
Speaker 8: he was when he won election back in November of
Speaker 8: twenty twenty four. What are we talking about, isn't that
Speaker 8: fabual rating right now comes in at minus four points.
Speaker 8: Compare that to where he was when he won in
Speaker 8: November twenty twenty four, when he was at minus seven
Speaker 8: points or March of twenty seventeen when he was at
Speaker 8: minus ten points. So when you compare Trump against himself,
Speaker 8: he's actually closer to the apex than he is to
Speaker 8: the bottom of the trop And of course that's so
Speaker 8: important because Donald Trump, historically speaking, is how to his
Speaker 8: numbers underestimated. So I think it's very important to compare
Speaker 8: him to himself to understand he's actually more popular now
Speaker 8: than he was when he won.
Speaker 2: So, despite the media hysterian lies, Donald Trump is more
Speaker 2: popular now than when he won the election in a landslide. Remember,
Speaker 2: he won every swing state. He won the popular vote,
Speaker 2: he beat Kamala Harris three hundred and twelve to two
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty six electoral College votes. It wasn't close, folks.
Speaker 2: And if there was an election today, those polls indicate
Speaker 2: he'd win with an even bigger margin. Let's bring in
Speaker 2: Newsweek's senior editor at Large and article three Projects Senior Council,
Speaker 2: Josh Hammer. Josh, that is incredible to see those numbers,
Speaker 2: despite the hysteria we're here from the media relentlessly.
Speaker 9: Yeah, and there's a number of reasons for that.
Speaker 4: Reader.
Speaker 9: So first of all, I mean there's the old pithy
Speaker 9: maxim that goes back really as old time that says
Speaker 9: that a man is defined not merely by his friends,
Speaker 9: but by his enemies. And Donald Trump, Donald Trump has
Speaker 9: always had the benefit really since his entire political career started,
Speaker 9: but especially it seems like over the past six months
Speaker 9: to a year or so he has the benefit of
Speaker 9: having world historically terrible enemies. I mean, I mean, just
Speaker 9: the utter calamity that was the Joe Biden clearly having
Speaker 9: the mental physicals declined to Kamala Harris being the least
Speaker 9: popular candidate. Frankly just the simple worst presidential candidate, I
Speaker 9: would argue in arguing all of American history. There to
Speaker 9: Democrats right now refusing to get off their bum during
Speaker 9: the State of the Union address to cheer for Peydon McNabb,
Speaker 9: this high school viball player who had her brain smashed
Speaker 9: him by a biological mail.
Speaker 12: There.
Speaker 9: I mean, Democrats are not just shooting themselves in the
Speaker 9: foot of this point, They're basically just shooting themselves in
Speaker 9: the torso. And Donald Trump, above all is the number
Speaker 9: one beneficiary of that. And then you kind of couple
Speaker 9: that on the one hand with on the other hand,
Speaker 9: there he's implementing a lot of very common sense policies.
Speaker 9: He is leading the way on eighty twenty issues, seventy
Speaker 9: to thirty issues. I mean, the whole mach mu Khalil
Speaker 9: thing at Columbia University. This notion that this pro hamas sympathizer,
Speaker 9: not even a US citizen. I mean, I mean, let
Speaker 9: the lefties complain about deporting him there. I'm sorry, this
Speaker 9: is this is probably actually a ninety ten issue Frankly, there, So,
Speaker 9: I mean, he's taken the right side of these overwhelming
Speaker 9: popular issues there. The media obviously is trying to obfuscape.
Speaker 9: They're trying to blow all of the minor quibbles such
Speaker 9: as this signal group chat thing out of a portion there.
Speaker 9: But he is in great shape with the American people.
Speaker 9: I'm not particularly surprised by it, Franklin.
Speaker 2: Now to a wonderful bit of news, doctor j Battaturia.
Speaker 2: He's already been vindicated. Years ago. Everything is said about COVID.
Speaker 2: The COVID measures turned out to be right. But four
Speaker 2: years ago, Josh, he was not only being defamed extensively,
Speaker 2: he was placed on a COVID blacklist on Twitter, having
Speaker 2: his very sensible advice censored and suppressed. Today he has
Speaker 2: been a confirmed director of the NIH, the National Institute
Speaker 2: of Health. This is such a dramatic turnaround. What changes
Speaker 2: is he going to institute?
Speaker 9: So, first of all, doctor Baucharia is a wonderful human being.
Speaker 9: I actually know him a bit in a personal capacity.
Speaker 9: Before I was senior editor at large Newsweek, I was
Speaker 9: the opinion editor. I ran the op ed section. We
Speaker 9: ran any number of op eds from doctor Baducharia. I
Speaker 9: would email him edits and so forth. They're very pleasant man,
Speaker 9: just a good human being who was severely, severely mistreated
Speaker 9: by the powers that be, as you alluded to during
Speaker 9: the COVID nineteen pandemic. He was one of the heroes
Speaker 9: who came out charging with the Great Barrington Declaration early
Speaker 9: on the pandemic, basically calling into question all the lockdowns
Speaker 9: and the masking there and as you correctly know, time
Speaker 9: has proven him completely correct.
Speaker 14: There.
Speaker 9: So a good human being who's been in a very
Speaker 9: important position there, I think, among other things, I mean
Speaker 9: related to what I was just talking about there, he
Speaker 9: is going to help put in place some very different procedures,
Speaker 9: some very different procedures when it comes to future pandemics.
Speaker 9: I mean, look, we all know the pandemics happen. That's
Speaker 9: kind of just the way that human history has worked
Speaker 9: for a thousand of years.
Speaker 14: There.
Speaker 9: So, among other things, he's definitely going to put in
Speaker 9: very different different practices, different habits. I mean, we're not
Speaker 9: going to have the forced lockdowns obviously, we're not going
Speaker 9: to have the mandatory vaccines there or anything like that there. Frankly, Rita,
Speaker 9: I hope that the NIH, working probably with the CDC
Speaker 9: and potentially other agents there. I'm not sure that we've
Speaker 9: actually got into the bottom of some of the fraud that,
Speaker 9: in my opinion, likely existed when it comes to the
Speaker 9: COVID nineteen vaccine manufacturers themselves. So here in Florida, Riola
Speaker 9: of our Governor rom dessanis initiate a statewide inquiry to this.
Speaker 9: Maybe about a year year and a half ago or so,
Speaker 9: it came back fairly inconclusive there. I would like to
Speaker 9: see a federal inquiry into whether or not these these
Speaker 9: vaccines have actually committed mass fraud on a national scale.
Speaker 9: That strikes me as one thing that could potentially be
Speaker 9: within doctor Botichari's value with there, but from a public
Speaker 9: health perspective. There there is a need to get the
Speaker 9: American people back to believing in the public health authorities again.
Speaker 9: And frankly, you could do a heck of a lot
Speaker 9: worse than someone who who was basically bat at a
Speaker 9: thousand gotten it totally right over the past fear.
Speaker 2: He put his reputation on the line, he put his
Speaker 2: professional standing on the line, and he was vindicated. But
Speaker 2: it was rough. Therefore, for several years, the way he
Speaker 2: was treated by authorities, the way he was treated by
Speaker 2: segments of the media, was frankly disgusting. Now we've played
Speaker 2: already some clips of the MPR CEO floundering as she
Speaker 2: tried to answer questions about the extreme bias of the
Speaker 2: news organization, a taxpayer funded news organization that has eighty
Speaker 2: seven editorial positions filled by registered Democrats in DC and
Speaker 2: zero by Republicans.
Speaker 12: In the DC area editorial positions at MPR, he said
Speaker 12: he found eighty seven registered Democrats, zero Republicans.
Speaker 4: Is that accurate? We do not track the numbers or
Speaker 4: the voter registration.
Speaker 12: October twenty twenty in New York Post had the Hunter
Speaker 12: Biden lapped and one of those editors I guess one
Speaker 12: of those eighty seven Democrat editors said this, we don't
Speaker 12: want to waste our time on stories that are not
Speaker 12: really stories. We don't want to waste the listeners and
Speaker 12: readers times on stories that are just pure distractions. Without
Speaker 12: a pure distraction story.
Speaker 4: Our current editorial leadership believes that that was a mistake,
Speaker 4: as do I Josh.
Speaker 2: They think it's relevant now when it actually mattered when
Speaker 2: it was influencing an election result, they were pushing disinformation
Speaker 2: trying to discredit that story.
Speaker 11: Read it.
Speaker 9: It's completely inexcusable, beyond inexcusable. I don't even know what
Speaker 9: the argument is. Frankly, for the American taxpayer to subsidize
Speaker 9: NPR and PBS in the year twenty twenty five, it
Speaker 9: is insane. It is an anachronistic throwback to a bygone era,
Speaker 9: to an era where TV was, frankly, an up and
Speaker 9: coming technology and it was competing back then with President
Speaker 9: Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the fireside chats, and maybe the government
Speaker 9: want to put a direct investment to try to stimulate
Speaker 9: the growth of public access television there. But whatever merapis
Speaker 9: argument may or may not have had sixty seventy eighty
Speaker 9: years ago. Whennot there, it has utterly and completely collapsed
Speaker 9: in today's day and age, where you have left wing
Speaker 9: lunatics like this woman who are presiding over a taxpayer
Speaker 9: funded agency there. You know Urie Berliner, who left NPR
Speaker 9: last year. He subspillion has become closely involved with Barry
Speaker 9: Weiss's Free Press organization there. He has been very candid
Speaker 9: and fourth right about what he saw behind the scenes there,
Speaker 9: and it is bad stuff. I mean, talk about monolithic
Speaker 9: ideological group think within the newsroom there. This is nothing
Speaker 9: other than a typical MSNBC style left wing hack activist
Speaker 9: quote unquote media organization. The only difference is that they
Speaker 9: get taxpayer dollars. That's a pretty important difference.
Speaker 2: Let's end that tomorrow, I say, and I think Berlina
Speaker 2: came out and said he has spoken with the CEO
Speaker 2: about these issues, because I think she gave evidence there
Speaker 2: that she would have liked to have talked to him
Speaker 2: about some of his findings. So yeah, her memory seems
Speaker 2: to be very sketchy, indeed, and that's a fairly generous
Speaker 2: interpretation of what we heard today. What's the latest, Josh,
Speaker 2: you mentioned that security breach that saw the Atlantics Josh
Speaker 2: Goldberg added to a group chat on Signal discussing s
Speaker 2: strikes in Yemen. What more have we found out about
Speaker 2: that in the last twenty four hours.
Speaker 9: So we're still trying to figure out exactly how this happened,
Speaker 9: specifically how Jeffrey Goldberg got on the sinel chat now
Speaker 9: read it. There's multiple things going on here. There are
Speaker 9: some people that are having a meltdown because high ranking
Speaker 9: officials were using Signal the app itself there. I don't
Speaker 9: actually have a tremendous issue about, to be honest with
Speaker 9: it was actually the buy administration that basically installs Signal
Speaker 9: and government devices there. All else considered, Signal actually is
Speaker 9: among the more secure and encrypto messaging apps out there.
Speaker 9: So I think those people are frankly barking up the
Speaker 9: wrong tree. The question that I still am wing to
Speaker 9: hear a coding think coherent answer on is how a
Speaker 9: left wing professional activist posing as a journalist like Jeffrey
Speaker 9: Goldberg somehow found his way into a group chat with
Speaker 9: people like Mike Waltz jd Vance. It's obviously not a
Speaker 9: good look. I mean, we should not pretend like it is.
Speaker 9: It's obviously a terrible look. This could have gone horrifically
Speaker 9: wrong in about a million in about a million different
Speaker 9: ways there. In my opinion, what the administration should do
Speaker 9: is stop issuing it's kind of only semi coherent crisis communications.
Speaker 9: You should basically just have a fall guy figure out
Speaker 9: how this happens. Maybe he's a Mike Waltz staffer in
Speaker 9: the NSA's office. Make that guy the fall guy, fire him,
Speaker 9: vow to do better next time, and at that point
Speaker 9: I think the story's over.
Speaker 2: I think, yeah, I think there needs to be some
Speaker 2: sort of accountability because this is a stuff up. And
Speaker 2: you're right. Jeffrey Goldberg is a far left activist masquerading
Speaker 2: as a journalist and editor.
Speaker 3: He was.
Speaker 2: Pushed all sorts of disinformation, including the fine people hoax,
Speaker 2: the suckers and losers hoax. There's a whole bunch of
Speaker 2: them going back several years. So for him to be
Speaker 2: the one who's inadvertently added to this list in particular,
Speaker 2: it's just wild. Now let's go to a report from
Speaker 2: CBS into what is happening in Boston. Tom Homan the
Speaker 2: Trump administration's borders. I accused authorities in Boston of releasing
Speaker 2: illegal immigrants charged with violent crimes, releasing them back into
Speaker 2: the community. And it turns out that CBS found plenty
Speaker 2: of examples of this. We've got just a few to
Speaker 2: ur to mention here. We had a Guatemalan charge with
Speaker 2: three counts of aggravated child rape, released on seven and
Speaker 2: a half thousand dollars bail, Josh another man charge with
Speaker 2: aggravated child rape. The victim's age was nine or below,
Speaker 2: again seven and a half thousand bail. Others released with
Speaker 2: zero bail, including a Honduran charge with assault must robbery
Speaker 2: released on his own reconnaissance with zero bail. So many
Speaker 2: other examples there. Someone charged with fentanyl trafficking released on
Speaker 2: a four thousand dollar bond before ICE could even arrive.
Speaker 2: How many other cases are like this across the country
Speaker 2: where authorities are frustrating what ICE is trying to do,
Speaker 2: what the Trump administration is attempting to do, and releasing
Speaker 2: these dangerous people back into the community on small bond
Speaker 2: or no bond to continue with their criminality.
Speaker 9: So, first of all, let me point out that this
Speaker 9: is a Massachusetts or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Met you
Speaker 9: mentioned a fentanyl trafficker. This actually hits home on a
Speaker 9: very personal note. My cousin meet his memory be a blessing,
Speaker 9: actually overdose and diet from ventanyl in Massachusetts about seven
Speaker 9: years ago. This story actually hits pretty pretty home for me, actually,
Speaker 9: that massachuse authorities are are letting free actually the kind
Speaker 9: of people in this case, the kind of illegal aliens,
Speaker 9: you know, the likes of which tragically resulted in my
Speaker 9: cousins over that seven years ago.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 9: So this is just horrific stuff. Massa Chusetts is a
Speaker 9: Democrat governed state, has been a Democrat state for longer
Speaker 9: than longer than I've been alive. I fear rita that
Speaker 9: this is actually pretty common throughout the United States, especially
Speaker 9: in these far left jurisdictions, places like Massachusetts and California.
Speaker 9: I mean, Gavin Newsom's kind of sort of changing his
Speaker 9: tune a little bit there. No one should believe a
Speaker 9: darn thing, the guy says, But you're still going to
Speaker 9: have some very far left holdouts like the city of Boston,
Speaker 9: like the city of Chicago, Illinois. There funda mentally, as
Speaker 9: a matter of constitutional law, it is the United States
Speaker 9: federal government that has the duty to enforce the federal
Speaker 9: immigration laws, and the state governments are not allowed to
Speaker 9: undermine the enforcement of those immigration laws. There now, they
Speaker 9: cannot necessarily be forced to do so, but you could
Speaker 9: actually offer some very clever carrot and sticks. So, for instance,
Speaker 9: the Department of Justice on under PAMBONDI can basically condition
Speaker 9: all federal funding of local police departments because the federal
Speaker 9: government does subsize a lot of local police friends, you
Speaker 9: can say, we're only going to give you that funding
Speaker 9: on the condition that you actively assist us with federal
Speaker 9: ingra immigration force. And that's the kind of clever policy
Speaker 9: making that I would like to see a little bit
Speaker 9: more of to try and put these so called sanctuary
Speaker 9: jurisdictions back in their place.
Speaker 2: Josh Hamma, thank you so much for a time tonight.
Speaker 2: Thank you reader Stilta. Come. Meghan Markel accused of monetizing
Speaker 2: the monarchy and using her children as clickbait. Kinsey'sco Field
Speaker 2: has some details. You're watching the Radar Panny Show and
Speaker 2: joining me now is celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey Scofield.
Speaker 2: Kinsey Meghan Markel has been accused of monetizing the monarchy
Speaker 2: after establishing a shop my page using her royal title Megan,
Speaker 2: Duchess of Sussex, where she is posting links to her
Speaker 2: favorite outfits, allowing her to earn a commission when people
Speaker 2: buy them. She's also been accused of using Archie and
Speaker 2: Lilibet as clickbait in an act of desperation to get
Speaker 2: people to visit her new online pseudo's store. Kids, this
Speaker 2: is not something we expect from a royal or even
Speaker 2: an A list celebrity.
Speaker 5: They're calling it the Markell Mall, which I think the
Speaker 5: Markell Mall, which I think is so funny. I mean this,
Speaker 5: first of all, this violates the Megxet agreement, which is
Speaker 5: the conversation that Prince Harry had with the Royal Family
Speaker 5: during the Sandringham Summit negotiating the Sussex's exit from the
Speaker 5: Royal Family as being working members of the Royal family,
Speaker 5: and the Royal Family was incredibly patient with these two.
Speaker 5: They could have Wallace and Edward them, but they didn't.
Speaker 5: You know, they gave them plenty of chances and they
Speaker 5: were kind throughout the process, and here Megan is taking
Speaker 5: advantage of their kindness. I think that this makes her
Speaker 5: look greedy and shallow, shilling products is the antithesis of
Speaker 5: Princess Diana and Queen Elizabeth. And I think she's showing
Speaker 5: us exactly who she is and what her ultimate objective
Speaker 5: was all along. And there's You're right, there's nothing royal
Speaker 5: about trying to sell us.
Speaker 4: You know, a Gucci shoe.
Speaker 2: No, and collecting I don't know whatever the percentage commission
Speaker 2: is for each sale. Really, that's you would think that
Speaker 2: would be the one area where they are perfectly comfortable.
Speaker 2: Despite the failure of so many of their little schemes.
Speaker 2: They have actually signed these enormous contracts and have benefited
Speaker 2: financially from their titles, so you would think there would
Speaker 2: be no financial pressures. So why she would cheapen her
Speaker 2: name with something like this is beyond me. Now, meanwhile,
Speaker 2: we've got Prince Harry resigning from his charity center Belle
Speaker 2: Amid unthinkable in fighting in the organization, there's been accusations
Speaker 2: of pool governance, weak executive management, abuse of power, bullying,
Speaker 2: accusations of harassment, misogyny. Tell me about this charity. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna say I've never been heard of this one, but
Speaker 2: apparently can see his heartbroken about having to leave.
Speaker 5: Well, this has almost existed for twenty years. He started
Speaker 5: it to honor Princess Diana's legacy because in places like Botswana,
Speaker 5: they work to help children that are HIV positive. They
Speaker 5: want to help children avoid becoming HIV positive. And this
Speaker 5: we understand. It's a charity that's been really near and
Speaker 5: dear to Prince Harry's heart. But leadership now accusing Prince
Speaker 5: Harry and his team, his trustees, his co creator of racism,
Speaker 5: sexism and bullying, and it's placed him in a very
Speaker 5: shaky position, potentially undermining his credibility as an advocate against racism.
Speaker 5: So we'll have to see how all of this plays out.
Speaker 5: But Prince Harry's quit his charity, and leadership is suing
Speaker 5: him over it, suing the charity over it.
Speaker 2: Goodness may now. George Clooney is an A list and
Speaker 2: he appeared on sixty Minutes. He talked about his decision
Speaker 2: to stop supporting Joe Biden during the presidential election. He
Speaker 2: gave a very self serving answer, one that is actually
Speaker 2: contradicted by the fax. Kinsey, what's the response been like
Speaker 2: in the US.
Speaker 5: You're right, the response in the US has been this
Speaker 5: guy did not realize after a fundraiser that Joe Biden
Speaker 5: wasn't equipped to run the world. He realized along with
Speaker 5: all of us after he did the debate between him
Speaker 5: and President Trump, and he just looks totally self serving
Speaker 5: and dishonest.
Speaker 1: And who are you?
Speaker 5: You're not your wife, Who are you to tell us
Speaker 5: that you're better than us and that you're wiser than us,
Speaker 5: and that you should be making these types of decisions.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we went through the timeline on last night's program.
Speaker 2: He did that fundraiser, the one where Joe Biden had
Speaker 2: to be helped off stage by Barack Obama said nothing afterwards.
Speaker 2: I think it was a couple of weeks later when
Speaker 2: that infamous debate occurred where Joe Biden was completely incoherent,
Speaker 2: and when Biden was refusing to step down. In the
Speaker 2: weeks following that, that's when George Clooney finally wrote that
Speaker 2: old ed which is now saying that you know, his
Speaker 2: essentially was courageous and brave and refused to be silent
Speaker 2: in the face of what was obvious. So sorry, We've
Speaker 2: got the receipts, George, We've got the receipts. Now, let's
Speaker 2: talk about Kim caut Dash In She's set to testify
Speaker 2: against the Parisian Underground gang accused of coordinating the robbery
Speaker 2: against her. In twenty sixteen. The thieves allegedly stole ten
Speaker 2: million dollars worth of jewels, including a four million dollar
Speaker 2: wedding ring. Then husband Carnie West gave her tell us
Speaker 2: about this lengthy investigation. French officials have ordered twelve of
Speaker 2: the seventeen suspects to trial, and finally the trials beginning.
Speaker 2: I mean this case occurred years ago, Yeah, it did,
Speaker 2: you know?
Speaker 5: I think that this is the perfect content for the
Speaker 5: Kardashians reality show on Hulu. A sympathized with Kim over
Speaker 5: the incident, but we've watched her milk it four years now,
Speaker 5: and I want to think she learned her lesson. She
Speaker 5: was flashing all of these jewels all over Instagram, but
Speaker 5: I watched her continue to do similar things today, so
Speaker 5: I don't even feel like there was a lesson learned.
Speaker 5: I think that this is probably the greatest opportunity for
Speaker 5: her to enter the victimhood arena again, which is great
Speaker 5: for her brand. But I wouldn't be tuning in if
Speaker 5: it was televised. I'm not interested.
Speaker 2: Now, let's see it briefly from Joe Rogan, who's ripped
Speaker 2: into black Lively and Ryan Reynolds over their attempts to
Speaker 2: bring down Justin Baldini.
Speaker 16: Ryan's trying to get out of it now, he's trying
Speaker 16: to get out of the lawsuit, and they're like, you
Speaker 16: were a key part of this. They were trying to
Speaker 16: take over the movie and the whole franchise. He owned
Speaker 16: the franchise. The whole thing's crazy and he's soon in
Speaker 16: the New York Times and he's got a great case
Speaker 16: of going on.
Speaker 1: To the paint. But that's what it takes.
Speaker 2: It's like Johnny Depp Kinsey. It has been a pr
Speaker 2: disaster and it might be a financial disaster for the
Speaker 2: A list couple.
Speaker 4: Read it.
Speaker 5: My dream Salon visit would be you on my right
Speaker 5: side and Joe Rogan on my left side. Because did
Speaker 5: that not feel like a gossip session you fiercely wanted
Speaker 5: to get involved in. Watching Joe Rogan have any sort
Speaker 5: of opinion on Blake Lively whatsoever blows my mind And
Speaker 5: I am eager to see how this all plays out.
Speaker 5: But I feel like this, but I think both parties
Speaker 5: have serious regrets at this point in time.
Speaker 2: Oh absolutely, it's going to end in tears, but I
Speaker 2: think for Ryan Reynolds and Black Lively it's going to
Speaker 2: be a very expensive a nightmare and Discofield. Thank you
Speaker 2: so much for your time tonight. I'll see you tomorrow
Speaker 2: night at nine pm for Left is Losing it Up.
Speaker 2: Next is Newsnight.