WEBVTT - Chris Masters on unravelling the Ben Roberts-Smith story

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben Robert Smith, the Victoria Cross recipient found to have

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>committed war crimes on deployment in Afghanistan, has this morning

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>been arrested.

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>This week, Australia's most decorated living soldier, Ben Robert Smith,

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 2>was arrested and charged with war crimes. It came as

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 2>a shock to even those closest to the story.

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised, you know. I knew that obviously something

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>had to happen because the OSI had been investigating for

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>quite some time, but I wasn't absolutely sure that it

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>ever would happen. I, frankly in the background, had to

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>wonder whether Australia had the appetite for locking up its soldiers,

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly a war hero.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 2>And I know back in two thousand and seven, journalist

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Chris Masters went to Afghanistan to report an Australia's war

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 2>from the ground, to see how Australia's soldiers were fighting

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and what the war was doing to them. Over time,

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>he began to hear whispers that some elite soldiers had

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>crossed the line. Years later, working alongside his Nick Mackenzie,

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Masters helped turn those whispers into one of the biggest

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 2>investigations in recent Australian journalism.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Australia's most decorated soldier has been entangled in an investigation

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 3>into the actions of Special Forces in Afghanistan.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Murder war, criminal war hero to zero.

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.639
<v Speaker 3>A small group of SAS soldiers had gone rogue getting

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>their kill count.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Up by acting as judge, jury and executioner.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Daniel James, and you're listening to seven AM Today

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Award winning journalist Chris Masters on the reporting that helped

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>bring Robert Smith's a Learned Crimes to light on what

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 2>this case says about war accountability and the country that

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 2>sends soldiers to fight in far away places. It's Friday,

0:01:54.280 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>April tenth. Chris Sissl began with you going to Afghanistan

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>more than fifteen years ago. Now, can you tell me

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>about when you first went to Afghanistan and what you

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>were doing there and who you met.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I went there three times. The first time was in

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven. This was a point in that

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>long conflict where reconstruction was pretty much the goal. I

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>was impressed by young Australian soldiers who were putting their

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>life on the line to improve the lives of Afghan civilians.

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and seven, four Corners visited Taran Cott

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>filming with Australian Army engineers on a mission to provide

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>security and reconstruction for the sake of building governance. I

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>went back in twenty ten and I saw a different

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>phase of the operation when we were moving out into

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the bad lands and we were applying what they called

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>courageous restraint. Whereas conventional Australian forces were trying to stand

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>between the Taliban and the local population and encourage the

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>local population to accept a new government. The soldiers do

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not stay hidden. They patrolled constantly by day and many

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a night, ninety percent of the time on foot, showing

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a deliberate face, to become familiar to locals, to gather

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and confront the enemy. Then I went back a

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>year later with special Forces, where I saw something of

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the much more kinetic side of the mission. That is,

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the feverish fighting, jumping in helicopters, racing out

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there to try to capture or kill what they called

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>were high value targets. On the way here, plans changed.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>They heard on the radio that the Taliban commander was

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>confirmed to be here in this motorcycle shop, so plans

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>changed and the combat forces rushed this location. Now, most

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of the time there I thought that the Australians, even

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>though it was an ugly war and a difficult war

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and probably an impossible war, that Australians weren't exactly on

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the wrong side. It was only towards the end, when

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I was working with special forces that some misgivings began

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to emerge, essentially, because occasionally I'd be out there in

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the bad lands with them and I just saw the

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>hatred in the eyes of the Afghans and felt that

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>something had to be wrong.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>When did the rumors around Ben Roberts Smith start to emerge?

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Essentially? I think in the beginning it was the psychologists,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence officers, etc. That started to hear misgivings, and

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>then some of the soldiers themselves started to talk to me.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was because they had concerns about some

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that happened over there. They elevated those

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>concerns to their immediate command. But the immediate command didn't

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>seem to want to do anything about it. And that's

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:05.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty much how it all started. It takes a while.

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if you know, it's just a matter

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of some deep throat giving you a tip off and

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you're putting it in the paper the next day. It

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was something like twenty fifteen that I started hearing these

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>things about Robert Smith, and it wasn't until twenty seventeen

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that I put some of the questions to him. And

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it was really his response that made me think that

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>this really was a serious issue, that there was something

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to it.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 2>And so when you spoke to him in two thousand

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and seven, anquist, what kind of the meana did he

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>have with you?

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We met in the Rose Garden at the Highatt Hotel

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in Canberra. It was before Anzac Day twenty seventeen, and

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, you lead big footprints when you

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>do this work. So he knew I'd been asking questions,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and he knew that I was in contact with some

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of the people that he saw as his detractors, and

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he wanted to kind of embrace me into

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the fold. You know, look, Chris, come and see me.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you the truth. You know, I'm a war

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>hero and a much better story than a story about winging soldiers.

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And when I started putting a few questions to him,

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>not some of the central stuff that emerged later about

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>war crimes, but just some of the misgivings people had

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>had about particular incidents on operation. He really arked up,

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just came away from that meeting with a

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>strong sense that he was the man with something to hide.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>He didn't just dismiss those concerns and say, look, soldiers

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>are aggrieved, they see things differently the fog of war.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't criticize them for having a different view, but

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't agree with it. He didn't say that

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>at all. He just lawyered up and he took us on,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and that was really the beginning of the next chapter.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>So he tries try to intimidate you. That original story

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.559
<v Speaker 2>they get published in twenty eighteen, But was there any

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>point where you felt the heat or intimidation to drop

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the story.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>At that point? You know? Really, I was more a

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>freelance reporter working with Nick McKenzie, who had the backing

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the nine network Sidney Morning Herald. And it amazes

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>me when I think about it, that back in twenty

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen we did make some serious defamatory accusations about Robert Smith,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a Victoria Cross recipient, being accused of war crimes. And

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>not just war crimes, but murder. You know, the stakes

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are very, very high.

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Mister Robert Smith launched information proceedings against Fairfax Media in

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 4>August a series of reports, including war crime allegations. The

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Victorian Cross recipient continues to strongly deny all the allegations.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, really, if you look back on it, you'd

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>say that I don't think anybody anticipated that the bills

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>would end up reaching something like thirty plus million dollars.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But our employer probably would have been happier to settle

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>somewhere along the line for commercial reasons. It's just that

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Robert Smith didn't want it.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>People have to remember that he was the one who

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>sued us, He took us on, and when opposite settlement

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>were considered, it was Robert Smith who didn't want a settlement.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>He wanted a victory coming up.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Does Ben Robert Smith's arrest redefine the limits of matship? Chris?

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>This story has shocked the nation in many ways. You

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 2>were reporting helped lead to the bread and inquiry into

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 2>alleged war crimes. But there are still those that are

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>vehemently defending Ben Robert Smith's character.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I s he Ben Robert Smith as a highly decorated

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 3>war hero and you always will be that to me.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about seventeen years after the fact. You know

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 3>this evidence has been brought against him. Yes, there is

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 3>a process and it will go through the court system.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 3>But I highly respect that man and what he's done.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>What does that say about the country that it seems

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 2>to be that this issue is evolving into yet another

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>cultural war.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, look, I think it has divided the nation and

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got some very important debates ahead of us. Whenever

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I hear this story about leve Ben Robert Smith alone,

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and I hear it every day, I have to think, well,

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be across the evidence. There was one hundred

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and ten days of evidence in court, We went to

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a civil trial, it was appealed. There was an attempt

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.119
<v Speaker 1>to get it to the High Court, which was rejected.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So this matter has been adjudicated mightily.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 5>But after a five year battle, with one hundred and

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 5>one days of evidence, forty one witnesses, six thousand pages

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 5>of transcript and around thirty million dollars in neal costs

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 5>to be paid by Robert Smith or his supporters, the

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 5>verdict was clear.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>The evidence is profound, profoundly against Robert Smith. How can

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you defend an action when an innocent Afghan is pushed

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to the ground and defenseless is shot to death. How

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can you defend the fact that this was actually strategically counterproductive,

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that we were actually antagonizing the Afghan population, making the

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>lives of our own soldiers more dangerous. How can you

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>defend the psychological impact on young soldiers who were bullied

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>into committing unconscientable acts. The people who continue to say

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>leave this alone can't actually be across the evidence.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Now that bed Robert Smith has been arrested and charged,

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 2>how different will this criminal case be compared to the

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 2>civil defamation case.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>No doubt about it, it is different. There's a different

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>standard between balance of probabilities and beyond reasonable doubt. And

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a great many of the witnesses who already

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been through this probably don't want to go through it again.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not beyond the realm of possibilities that an Australian

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>jury won't want to convict a war hero, want to

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>send an Australian soldier to prison. But none of that

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>should discredit the evidence and the findings of the original

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>civil trial. It just seems to be a different issue altogether.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 2>And what's the significance of this case in terms of

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 2>shedding light on the complexities of war and Australia's role

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 2>in Afghanistan. Do you think the public is prepared for

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>what might come out?

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Robert Smith, there's been a few owned goals.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>He started with a very strong reputation. There's been a

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lot that's canvas that would challenge into that reputation. And

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I think also the whole reputation of Anzac to some

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>degree is under challenge. I think back to the Charles

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>ban tenets of what really made the Australian soldiers special

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and different, and he often said that it was about matship. Well,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I wonder whether that needs to be rethought at the moment,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you were Ben Robert Smith's mate and you

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>felt that the obligation of matship was that you should

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>cover up all of his unconscioable acts, then what's the

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>point of that? You know, where is the value in

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>matship in that respect? You know, I have great gratitude

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for the moral courage of the soldiers who were prepared

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to invite the opprobrium of their colleagues by standing up

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for the integrity of their regiment over this nonsense about

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>you know you stick by your mate no matter what.

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what does that mean? You stick by your

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>mate no matter what, even if it allows your mate

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to continue to do unlawful and damaging acts that are

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>psychologically excredly difficult to deal with by many of the

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>youngest soldiers in the tumult of war, they don't have

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>time to stop and think when they come back and

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the comradeship, the mateship, the stuff that keeps them quiet

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>starts to dissipate. They start to talk, they start to reflect,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they start to think about what went wrong and why

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not feeling great. You know, special force of soldiers

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>who've done all that training. You know, they're hero worshiped,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet they would come back often feeling like they

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>were ashamed of themselves.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And finally, Chris, what does this say about the accountability

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 2>within Australia's mility you in terms of those up the

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 2>line who oversaw a lot of this culture and a

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of these operations. No one has been held to

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>account at senior levels.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>That's an open question. It's a good question too. The

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>critics who say, why are we prosecuting this? We'll often

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>also say and what about the officers? And this is

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>one area where I absolutely agree. I think it's a

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>pity that it's corporals and troopers who are in the

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>frame where it was command accountability. Why did they not

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>know what was going on? You know, why aren't they

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>being held to account? I think a lot more work

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done in that respect.

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Chris Masters, thank you so much for your time.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Put on you. Thank you.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Also in the news, Prime Minister Anthony Albernesi has called

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>on Israel to end it strikes in Lebanon, saying the

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Middle East ceasefires should be expanded to include the country.

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 2>The US, Israel, and Iran have ostensibly agreed to a

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 2>tensative two weeks ceasefire, but all sides have presented vastly

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>different versions of the terms. There are also conflicting views

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 2>on whether the ceasefire includes Israel ending its fighting against

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Hezbollah in Lebanon. Meanwhile, the federal government has repeated its

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>warnings to consumers that economic relief from the fuel crisis

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>won't follow immediately from the reopening of the Strait of

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Hormuz ship traffic through the Strait of Homus has remained

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>at an effective standstill since Iran conditionally lifted its blockade.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>A major shipping company say conditions remain uncertain as vessels

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>are concerned about security in the Strait. Anthie Albernesi is

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 2>currently in Singapore for talks aimed at further shoring up

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Australia's fuel supplies. I'm Daniel James. You've been listening to

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 2>seven Am. We'll be back tomorrow.