Speaker 1: A lot of this is outside. Good morning, and welcome
Speaker 1: to Outsiders, the show that is to woke, virtue signaling
Speaker 1: and identity politics on steroids. What the Humble household Pets
Speaker 1: the Cats and Dogs of America to Harmala Kamala Harris's
Speaker 1: chance of winning the White House.
Speaker 2: They're in Springfield.
Speaker 3: They're eating the dogs, the people that came in.
Speaker 4: They're eating the cats. They're eating They're.
Speaker 3: Eating the pits of the people that live there.
Speaker 4: They're eating the dogs.
Speaker 5: They're eating the cats, eat the cat.
Speaker 6: Yes, that was Donald Trump's comment about Asian refugees in Springfield,
Speaker 6: Ohio eating cats and dogs.
Speaker 7: Such a music and taking the Internet by storm.
Speaker 6: And here is Hank Azaria, the man who plays the
Speaker 6: police commissioner in the Simpsons cartoon series in the hometown
Speaker 6: of funnily enough, Springfield, also joining the.
Speaker 8: Fund springfand police chief plans. She with them speaking, I'm
Speaker 8: going to have you. People are eating dogs, I mean
Speaker 8: the hot dogs, O cats. Mister cats is eating hot dog. Now,
Speaker 8: people are eating dogs and cats. People are eating dogs
Speaker 8: and cats in Springfield?
Speaker 1: Are they good?
Speaker 2: Brilliant? But what do our furry friends make of all this? Springfield?
Speaker 3: They're eating the dogs, the people that came in. They're
Speaker 3: eating the cats, they're eating they're eating the pets of
Speaker 3: the people that live there.
Speaker 1: And this is of course what the Internet does best,
Speaker 1: allowing the public to mock our politicians, which is probably
Speaker 1: why our politicians are so keen to ban the Internet,
Speaker 1: particularly here in Australia, which we shall discuss right here
Speaker 1: and right now in Outsiders News. Well, it's been a
Speaker 1: big week for banning the Internet, James and Rita. We've
Speaker 1: had the Misinformation Disinformation Bill, which was put forward a
Speaker 1: few months ago turned down now back worse than ever before,
Speaker 1: worse than ever before. Thanks to Labor, the Coalition appeared
Speaker 1: to be finally standing up against this insanity. Rita, what
Speaker 1: do you make of it?
Speaker 6: Well, thank god we're getting some sense from the Coalition
Speaker 6: because they have been inconsistent, to say the least on
Speaker 6: this issue. Their support of the e Safety Commissioner and
Speaker 6: her role that E.
Speaker 7: Karen has been terribly worrying.
Speaker 6: And there's these measures are orwelly and there's no other
Speaker 6: way to describe them. What they label misinformation disinformation, as
Speaker 6: we saw through the COVID years, just happened to be
Speaker 6: often the correct information that was inconvenient, and which is
Speaker 6: now they've come around to accepting. And we saw during
Speaker 6: that period just how dangerous it is to suppress free speech,
Speaker 6: to suppress the free speech of experts.
Speaker 7: There was a world renowned.
Speaker 6: Infectious disease experts who were censored and suppressed when they
Speaker 6: were questioning some of the insane measures that we took during.
Speaker 1: Except on this show, and we're talking here about it,
Speaker 1: how professors Oxford professes.
Speaker 6: We're not talking about crack pots on the internet as they.
Speaker 7: Like to misca.
Speaker 6: Proudly, proudly, this is something that Australians should care about.
Speaker 6: We just had labor and pay on this station just
Speaker 6: saying the most absurd stuff I've got to say, trying
Speaker 6: to say this is for our safety.
Speaker 2: Sorry, sorry, Rita, this goes This is a lot more
Speaker 2: sinister even than you characterize it. The Coalition must right
Speaker 2: now make a firm break with its own past with
Speaker 2: Scott Morrison and Paul Fletcher, who were the originators of
Speaker 2: this horrendous idea. Let's be real clear about what this
Speaker 2: does here. This turns the AKMA bureaucracy into a ministry
Speaker 2: of truth. This creates two tiers of free speech. One
Speaker 2: for people who are protected. Journalists are protected, academics are protected,
Speaker 2: others are protected. Another for everybody else, which means citizen journalists,
Speaker 2: people out there on X, which is what they are
Speaker 2: terrified of, because of course that is what undermines official narratives.
Speaker 2: They are going to be captured by this bill. And
Speaker 2: what can't you say, Well, they say that all sorts
Speaker 2: of things. Now, this is like communist China. This is
Speaker 2: like Soviet Russia. If you say anything about public health measures,
Speaker 2: and that could be by the way, you know, saying
Speaker 2: I don't think the ban on vapes is a good idea.
Speaker 2: I think that that is misconstrued. That could be misinformation.
Speaker 2: Anything that affects financial markets could be deep misinformation. That
Speaker 2: could be saying, hey, you know, I'd like to get
Speaker 2: some bitcoin because you know, in case banks collapse because
Speaker 2: of the property market falls apart, you know, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: have some hedge. That's misinformation. You could get done for that.
Speaker 2: This bill protects the elite in our society from being
Speaker 2: questioned by everybody else. This is a huge threat to
Speaker 2: free speech. The coalition needs to not just say we're
Speaker 2: going to vote against it. They need to actively fight
Speaker 2: against it. And they need to also say whenever anybody says, oh, well,
Speaker 2: what are you gonna do about misinformation? Say, you know what,
Speaker 2: we believe in free speech. We think people are smart
Speaker 2: enough to have the debate and work it out for themselves.
Speaker 1: Well, the first thing to be said is that the
Speaker 1: words misinformation and disinformation are themselves misinformation and disinformation. These
Speaker 1: words were barely barely in existence a decade ago. What
Speaker 1: you have, what you actually have, is truth or lies.
Speaker 1: What you have is truth or falsehood. What you have
Speaker 1: is truth or defamation. What you have is truth or propaganda.
Speaker 1: The idea that information that is out there has to
Speaker 1: be monitored by a government and bureaucrats within a government
Speaker 1: is utterly obscene. Elon Muskers called it fascism. It is fascism.
Speaker 1: It is the very thing our grandparents, our parents, grandparents
Speaker 1: and their parents fought against in two World wars. The
Speaker 1: idea that a government is the arbiter of truth. No,
Speaker 1: a government is there to run, you know, public services
Speaker 1: and make sure the country runs smoothly. It is not
Speaker 1: there to determine what is and what isn't the truth.
Speaker 1: That is for every individual and their own conscience to
Speaker 1: decide and we have had always in free societies protections
Speaker 1: against lies, falsehoods, propaganda and so on. Ultimately, it comes
Speaker 1: down to the individual and governments do not have the
Speaker 1: rights in any any situation to tell us as individuals,
Speaker 1: what is the truth? That is our conscience that tells us.
Speaker 6: That, and daylight is the best disinfected. So if there
Speaker 6: is dangerous lies being spread, you counter those lies with
Speaker 6: the truth. You tru tind to suppress it. And we've
Speaker 6: already had a taste of this. We've had more than
Speaker 6: a taste, unfortunately, with the E Safety Commissioner deciding that
Speaker 6: a breastfeeding expert saying that men can't breastfeed is something
Speaker 6: that is worthy of being bad. So we've already had
Speaker 6: tweets posted in that fashion being removed at the behest
Speaker 6: of the E Safety Commission. And we know Jasmine Sussex
Speaker 6: is now being dragged through a tribunal over this issue
Speaker 6: as well. But before that happened, her tweet on this
Speaker 6: issue completely factual. I would add that yes, men cannot
Speaker 6: pre speed is somehow now controversial. It's disinformation information.
Speaker 1: It's not in the public scanda where left wing propaganda
Speaker 1: becomes labeled the truth. This is what happened, because.
Speaker 4: That's my situation.
Speaker 1: This is not let what.
Speaker 2: This is about. It's not just and let's be real clear.
Speaker 2: This is not just about controlling what you say and
Speaker 2: what you read. It is ultimately about determining what you
Speaker 2: are allowed to think. This goes back to or Well
Speaker 2: in nineteen eighty four, and it's all about this idea
Speaker 2: that you know, what's the guy said ninety four the instruction
Speaker 2: of words is a beauty thing. And soon people will
Speaker 2: have no ability to even think wrong thoughts. And we
Speaker 2: not only had the tweet about the breastfeeding men, but
Speaker 2: we've also had remember the effort by the E Karen
Speaker 2: the E Safety Commissioner to censor the video of that
Speaker 2: bishop being attacked in Western Sydney because that might threaten
Speaker 2: social cohesion. People might think the wrong things, jump to
Speaker 2: conclusions that the government doesn't want them to about a
Speaker 2: whole number of My stay why it is so sinister.
Speaker 6: That's the most dangerous one when they start talking about
Speaker 6: something that's a threat to social cohesion, So it doesn't
Speaker 6: even have to fit their warfed ideas of disinformation, misinformation
Speaker 6: that can acknowledge its one hundred percent accurate, but if
Speaker 6: it threatens social cohesion, if it's an uncomfortable truth, it's
Speaker 6: an inconvenient fact that challenges policies that they are pushing,
Speaker 6: then you're going to find.
Speaker 7: Yourself in strife.
Speaker 6: And the way they're going to do it is to
Speaker 6: put so much pressure, to put such penalties on these
Speaker 6: social media companies that they're going to abide. They don't
Speaker 6: want to face these massive daily fines, so they're going
Speaker 6: to just crack down. And this is an assault on
Speaker 6: everyday Australians. It's not an assault against us.
Speaker 2: And it's important this protects the elite absolutely.
Speaker 1: Now, the reality is if you went sat down and
Speaker 1: did account, you would find that during COVID, which Rita mentioned,
Speaker 1: you got the truth here this desk, on this show
Speaker 1: by these three individuals more often than you got the
Speaker 1: so called truth from any other media source, the ABC
Speaker 1: or anyone else. You do a fact check on it,
Speaker 1: you will find that that is the truth. Yet we
Speaker 1: were slammed for peddling disinformation, misinformation, try to get us,
Speaker 1: get us absolutely so. This stuff is so insidious and
Speaker 1: you will be the victims of it. The Liberal Party
Speaker 1: must stand against all this and stand for free speech,
Speaker 1: which supposed is in the DNA of the party. Now
Speaker 1: let's move on to something else. My phone lit up
Speaker 1: last night with the welcome to country at the AFL
Speaker 1: last night in Brisbane. I think it was have a
Speaker 1: look at this and see if you think this is
Speaker 1: truth or lies, truth or propaganda, truth or whatever else.
Speaker 1: Have a look.
Speaker 9: A welcome to country is not a welcome to Australia.
Speaker 9: Within Australia, we have many Aboriginal lands and we refer
Speaker 9: to our lands as country. A welcome to country is
Speaker 9: not a ceremony that we've invented to cater for white people.
Speaker 9: It's a ceremony we've been doing for two hundred and
Speaker 9: fifty thousand years plus BC, and the BC stands for
Speaker 9: before cook pride to colonization. You could get yourself into
Speaker 9: a lot of trouble for walking on someone else's lands
Speaker 9: without being welcomed onto those.
Speaker 1: Lands two hundred and fifty thousand years. I mean fascinating.
Speaker 6: His time frames just are so flexible and if you
Speaker 6: question that, well, gee, who's who's who's peddling the misinformation here?
Speaker 7: There any is there any concern from the.
Speaker 6: Safety commissioners or when you want in the Alban easy
Speaker 6: government about that sort of rehetoric going out to I
Speaker 6: would say well.
Speaker 7: Over a million people.
Speaker 6: The most watched events in this country on television are
Speaker 6: sporting events, particularly looking at the final series of the AFL,
Speaker 6: anyone coming out and saying, well, wait a second, things
Speaker 6: we want to fact check here.
Speaker 2: No, yeah, no, no, no, I mean, this is just
Speaker 2: a typical divisive rhetoric. And I'm sorry. I find these
Speaker 2: ceremonies more and more uncomfortable, more and more cringe every
Speaker 2: time I see them. Every event you go to, now
Speaker 2: you'll get this long sort of speech. This one was
Speaker 2: particularly divisive, too, filled of misinformation, but also suggested I
Speaker 2: don't know. I mean I thought that there was this
Speaker 2: peaceful ead utopia here before.
Speaker 7: Actually liked because that was actually.
Speaker 1: It's that's the very point here. And I've been saying
Speaker 1: now for a couple of months now, we must get
Speaker 1: rid of the welcome to country. The coalition must make
Speaker 1: that its policy in going into the next election, that
Speaker 1: this thing will be scrapped from government bodies and government organizations.
Speaker 1: It is no longer the kind of touchy feely quantity
Speaker 1: type thing that was supposed to be a decade or
Speaker 1: so ago, where we're all felt warm and cozy. Wasn't
Speaker 1: this likely? This is this is aggressively divisive. Yeah, it
Speaker 1: is aggressive against white people. It is dividing this nation.
Speaker 1: It's fabricating history. And by the way, the welcome to
Speaker 1: country did come about in order to combat the hacker
Speaker 1: or to be a version of that. Yes, there are
Speaker 1: tribes that had various aspects of welcome to country. But
Speaker 1: the idea now being propagated that this has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with Australia. This is the whole point of welcome
Speaker 1: to country is defined there that this is no longer Australia.
Speaker 1: This is something else that the activists wish it to be.
Speaker 1: They call it country or whatever, but it is not Australia.
Speaker 1: You heard it from that guy. This is UnAustralian. If
Speaker 1: you think you belong to Australia, refuse to do welcome
Speaker 1: to country because they are telling you now you are
Speaker 1: not welcome. This is not about Australia. Australians are the
Speaker 1: foreigners here, bro and you mentioned.
Speaker 6: White people there. But I think it goes much further
Speaker 6: than that. As an immigrant, I think it is an
Speaker 6: anti immigrant message because it tells people who have chosen
Speaker 6: to call Australia home, I've come here, that you need
Speaker 6: to be welcome to your own country, that you're not
Speaker 6: ever going to be as entitled as others to call
Speaker 6: this place yours because of your ethnicity, because you don't
Speaker 6: have indigenous heritage this place. It's almost a PC way
Speaker 6: of saying, go back to it case what it is.
Speaker 6: That's how I interpreted as an immigrant, and I know
Speaker 6: that's how many immigrants are interpreted, and that came out
Speaker 6: during the referendum, during that reference that one good thing
Speaker 6: the referendum did was shine a light on this entire
Speaker 6: ideology that's taken hold amongst the left of this racial division,
Speaker 6: this racial privilege that they wanted to enshrine into the constitution.
Speaker 6: And I think it was fantastic that Australians finally got
Speaker 6: to have a say.
Speaker 7: But the elite haven't listened to that message.
Speaker 6: They haven't listened to the overwhelming result there where every
Speaker 6: single state said no, including Victorian New South Wales.
Speaker 1: And has now brought in the notion of BC before
Speaker 1: Cook and after Cook. So well, it's a separate thing.
Speaker 1: Now this is what too.
Speaker 2: There's a really interesting thing. But I'm glad, really you
Speaker 2: brought about the point about immigrants, because of course I
Speaker 2: came here as well about twenty four years ago. And
Speaker 2: the thing is about this is I was at a
Speaker 2: welcome country the other day and the person said this
Speaker 2: is my country, and I wanted to get him say, well, no,
Speaker 2: this is my country. This is into this lad as well.
Speaker 2: But there is also on the official left. And this
Speaker 2: is where the great division comes in. You know this
Speaker 2: idea that history was fantastic before cook, I guess you
Speaker 2: would say BC, and then it was terrible, and then
Speaker 2: it was only with official multiculturalism that things started to
Speaker 2: be good again. And it's about really diminishing that Anglo
Speaker 2: heritage that British institutions, all of the institutions that actually
Speaker 2: make us such a successful and prosperous for the moment
Speaker 2: and tolerant nation.
Speaker 1: Including large football stadiums, I might add, but anyway, that's
Speaker 1: another question. I'm not sure many of those were around BC.
Speaker 1: Kevin right has pucked up again. He's got another drag.
Speaker 1: He seems to like these drag queen parties. So expensive,
Speaker 1: fortunately the tax payer. For Kevin to wander around at
Speaker 1: drag conty.
Speaker 7: His tie with the drag queen.
Speaker 1: It's what a great representative Kevin Right is of this country.
Speaker 7: I mean, he's a fine diplomatism.
Speaker 1: Yes, well fine. The Marty Grass headquarters, by the way,
Speaker 1: have been given a new free lodgings James. Why is this.
Speaker 2: Well because apparently they were running out of money, so
Speaker 2: it's really I don't know, but yeah, corporate has.
Speaker 6: Got this amazing LGBT and initiative. They all changed their
Speaker 6: colors for Pride Month. You would think this would be
Speaker 6: one of the biggest money spinners in the country.
Speaker 7: Why do they need free rank?
Speaker 2: I mean, the thing is, so this is about the
Speaker 2: Mardi Gras parade organization, which has been running into huge
Speaker 2: financial problems for years and years ago. Why well again
Speaker 2: because you know, because because part of the thing is
Speaker 2: is that you know, a Chesstreet where the parade is held,
Speaker 2: has completely changed. So the whole character of that is
Speaker 2: sort of the gay center city has really changed. In fact,
Speaker 2: nightlife there is just dead no matter what your sexuality is,
Speaker 2: which is a real shape. But also because you know,
Speaker 2: post gay marriage, clever side, post everything else. You know,
Speaker 2: the idea of this sort of liberation I think political
Speaker 2: push as I think you know, gone off to the
Speaker 2: wayside because of course, you know society is from more
Speaker 2: tolerated accepting anyway.
Speaker 1: You're right about Sydney being dead. I was down in
Speaker 1: Canberra last weekend. Canbra's alive and buzzing in the evening
Speaker 1: late night. Who'd have thought it? Because exactly, And it's
Speaker 1: only industry. It's only industry is regulation generating regulation.
Speaker 2: People all your money.
Speaker 1: And restaurants around the deck and Sydney is dead. Great work,
Speaker 1: great work the Sydney and I put the clover wore
Speaker 1: back in again. Are they completely insane? We'll get back
Speaker 1: to all of this for more. Now let's go. Let's
Speaker 1: go to the UK to bring in reform. UK candidate
Speaker 1: Myron Sentil Nathan. Great to have you back on the show, Myron.
Speaker 1: Now tell us all sorts of things been happening there
Speaker 1: in London. Labor could bankrupt Britain with its net zero
Speaker 1: policy when those surprises there were trying to do the
Speaker 1: same thing here under labor. But tell us about Britain, Myron.
Speaker 4: Well, net zero.
Speaker 10: I think if you ask the average member of the public,
Speaker 10: they'll tell you that net zero is a government policy
Speaker 10: that is going to save the planet. And what I
Speaker 10: hope from this Labor government who is I think the
Speaker 10: UK is going to be a case study for the
Speaker 10: world to show that net zero is government policy that
Speaker 10: will effectively bankrupt a country and do almost nothing to
Speaker 10: save the planet. It effectively deindustrializes your country. It makes
Speaker 10: the taxpayer spend billions of pounds chasing renewables which are intermittent.
Speaker 10: It offshows industry abroad and then they make things like
Speaker 10: steel when we end up having to buy that same
Speaker 10: steal from abroad where the jobs go instead of our
Speaker 10: own economy benefiting from it. So that's the summ of
Speaker 10: what net zero is. And we have a minister called
Speaker 10: Ed miller Band who many people think is perhaps the
Speaker 10: most dangerous man in Britain because he's effectively a net
Speaker 10: zero extremist. While we have pensioners struggling to heat their homes,
Speaker 10: he's spending billions upon billions of taxpayers money chasing and
Speaker 10: looking to decarbonize the National Grid, which many experts are
Speaker 10: saying is actually impossible, and he himself doesn't really understand
Speaker 10: how to do that, and it was quite an embarrassing
Speaker 10: moment where he actually wrote an open letter to.
Speaker 4: The National Grid asking him.
Speaker 10: For ideas as to how to do this, so we
Speaker 10: billions of pounds and he really doesn't have any idea
Speaker 10: how to do it, and it is an effective suicide
Speaker 10: note for the economy.
Speaker 4: And so I'm quite worried, and.
Speaker 10: I think the British public are slowly waking up out
Speaker 10: of their slumber to realize zero government policy does not
Speaker 10: mean saving the climate, especially when you have a country
Speaker 10: that produces less than one percent of global carbon emissions.
Speaker 6: Ritta, Ah, Well, the labor honeymoon has certainly been short lived.
Speaker 6: They've had disaster after disaster. You had the likes of
Speaker 6: David Lammie having these unsuccessful meetings with Joe Biden. Tell
Speaker 6: us about that, Tell me about how that's being reported
Speaker 6: in the UK.
Speaker 7: And I noticed.
Speaker 6: Lammy showed up to this meeting wearing sneakers. I mean, sure,
Speaker 6: if you're meeting the leader of the free world, put
Speaker 6: on some nice stress shoes.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 10: I mean David Lammy is a funny character. I mean
Speaker 10: he called the eurosceptic part of the Conservative Party Nazis,
Speaker 10: and when when asked about it, he just he doubled
Speaker 10: down on it even more so, he's a strange figure.
Speaker 10: He's somebody who is I think another embarrassing figure for
Speaker 10: the UK government because he with drew and withdrew in
Speaker 10: objection for Benjamin Netting Yahoo to be arrested, and then
Speaker 10: he went to Israel, you know, clamoring for an audience
Speaker 10: with Benjamin Nutting and he was basically snubbed and he
Speaker 10: had to just return back again. Very embarrassing for the
Speaker 10: Foreign Secretary. He's gone over to America. He's parading himself
Speaker 10: like some kind of statesman, but the reality is he
Speaker 10: is diminished Britain on the world stage, primarily because of
Speaker 10: stopping arms to Israel. That's a big deal. And he's
Speaker 10: done that not for judicial reasons of human rights and
Speaker 10: international law as he claims, but to appease the Muslim
Speaker 10: vote in Britain, which the Labor Party is very concerned about.
Speaker 2: James Maron, I want to ask you to go back
Speaker 2: to just Keir Starmer and how he's going with you
Speaker 2: know a lot of things that really make me think
Speaker 2: that he actually just really doesn't like the British people
Speaker 2: very much. And I'm talking about the latest sort of
Speaker 2: war on pensioners push where they're going to cancel the
Speaker 2: fuel credits, so pensions we're going to get now in
Speaker 2: our position his old study found that this could lead
Speaker 2: to four thousand deaths. But now it's like they're almost
Speaker 2: gleeful about doing anything to punish and screw down pensioners.
Speaker 2: All British people'll tell us about it.
Speaker 10: Yeah, So last time I was on your show, I
Speaker 10: talked about the broken contract with the ordinary working class,
Speaker 10: whould concerned about borders and mass migration. He's now moved
Speaker 10: on to breaking the contract with the elderly. Previously, the
Speaker 10: Labor government used to champion the winter fuel allowance because
Speaker 10: it would it's a necessary thing, it was a compassionate
Speaker 10: thing to do. But what's happened now is he's cut
Speaker 10: it and the veneer of compassion that the left Labor
Speaker 10: Party used to have has been completely ripped apart and
Speaker 10: they are now the party, the nasty party. And it's
Speaker 10: not just for cutting the winter fuel allowance, it's the
Speaker 10: way that they've done it. They said they had no choice,
Speaker 10: but the reality is manifesto after manifesto in previous campaign
Speaker 10: is they protected the winter fuel allowance, but in this
Speaker 10: manifesto they deliberately didn't protect the winter fuel ins which
Speaker 10: which suggests this was premeditated. They then went into government
Speaker 10: and declared there was a twenty two billion black hole
Speaker 10: in the finances which has got nothing to do with
Speaker 10: the ten billion pounds they spent on the union's inflation
Speaker 10: pay busting deals. It has got nothing to do with
Speaker 10: the eleven point five billion they spent on foreign climate aid.
Speaker 10: This twenty two billion plack hole is apparently due to
Speaker 10: the previous Conservative Party. When asked for details, they refused
Speaker 10: to give them, so where we don't know what to do,
Speaker 10: and they basically have said that one of the only
Speaker 10: ways they they're forced to cut the winter fuel allowance
Speaker 10: to plug to help plug this black hole. The winter
Speaker 10: fuel allowance will only save one point five billion. And
Speaker 10: get this, the minister, one of the ministers of the
Speaker 10: Labor Party said, if we did not cut the winter
Speaker 10: fuel allowance, there would be a run on the pound
Speaker 10: and the economy would collab apps. I never heard such
Speaker 10: a bare face lie to the British people. And they said,
Speaker 10: you know, if you're struggling, if a pensioner who's struggling,
Speaker 10: you can fill in. You can fill in this form
Speaker 10: and will give you some extra benefits. The problem is
Speaker 10: this form has about two hundred and forty questions and
Speaker 10: is unlikely to be processed. And even if they're eight
Speaker 10: hundred thousand pensioners who would benefit from this extra tax break,
Speaker 10: this extra allowance, if they would all apply, it would
Speaker 10: negate the saving made by cutting the winter fuel allowance
Speaker 10: in the first place.
Speaker 4: So the whole thing is a fiasco.
Speaker 10: And apart from the pensioners themselves, the labor back benches
Speaker 10: are enraged because their constituents are filling their email inbox
Speaker 10: pleading with them not to do this. They are well
Speaker 10: and truly the nasty party of Britain.
Speaker 1: They certainly are Meyer and I'd go beyond that and
Speaker 1: say they're the evil party because at the same time
Speaker 1: as they're denying old age pensioners and so on, heating
Speaker 1: it driven by our mad climate change ideology, they're pouring
Speaker 1: in immigrants and giving the mobile phones and accommodation in
Speaker 1: hotels and all the rest of its characters coming from
Speaker 1: all around the world. Absolutely disgraceful. Just quickly. Myron Suella Bravaman,
Speaker 1: who I was thought, along with Kemy Badenoch, was the
Speaker 1: hope of the side for the Tories. She made an
Speaker 1: interesting comment the other day on white privilege.
Speaker 11: Have a listen this concept of white privilege is a
Speaker 11: nonsense to me. Say that to the white working class
Speaker 11: boys in Britain who are the most underachieving when it
Speaker 11: comes to literacy and numeracy and school outcomes.
Speaker 1: How's this message received, Myron, Well, there's.
Speaker 10: Always going to be people who are going to be
Speaker 10: triggered by this. But she's absolutely right. I mean, we
Speaker 10: have an ethnic minority, an Indian origin prime minister.
Speaker 4: With Shei Sunak.
Speaker 10: If you look at the cabinet of the Conservative Party
Speaker 10: who are in government recently, many of them were of
Speaker 10: an f minority. You know, we have whole towns and
Speaker 10: some cities even where the white population are in a minority,
Speaker 10: you'll have, as you Braven mentioned, white working class boys
Speaker 10: are the most left behind of all groups. And then
Speaker 10: you have the whole grooming gang scenario which which Towell
Speaker 10: a bravemen brought up again, which everyone needs to understand.
Speaker 10: White working class girls were allowed to be used on
Speaker 10: an industrial scale in the most abominable, horrific way possible.
Speaker 10: And the reason why justice was not served by social workers,
Speaker 10: by police officers, by community members, by MPs. The reason
Speaker 10: why justice was not served was because everybody.
Speaker 4: Was scared of being called racist, right, and.
Speaker 10: So to say that our country is a racist country
Speaker 10: is unbelievable. So this idea of white privilege needs to
Speaker 10: be firmly put in the beer instead. I believe we
Speaker 10: need to be looking a little bit at brown privilege
Speaker 10: or black privilege, because there are certain things that are
Speaker 10: becoming overly normalized where it is becoming okay to turn
Speaker 10: on the white man the white woman and cast in side,
Speaker 10: cast them aside, and cast insults and treat them in
Speaker 10: a certain way. And that's what the grooming Gangs naibi
Speaker 10: really highlights. And so Swetter Braveman is absolutely right, but
Speaker 10: of course she's always going to trigger some people.
Speaker 1: Maya and centhil Nathan. Fantastic to chat to you again,
Speaker 1: and we'll chat to you very soon. And you're absolutely right,
Speaker 1: brown privilege, black privilege. You've opened a whole argument. They're
Speaker 1: fantastic stuff. Great, we'll chat to you in a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks. So it's so good there from London. After
Speaker 1: the break readers reality Check and we'll speak to former
Speaker 1: Shark Tank investor Steve Baxter. Had a great initiative seapack.
Speaker 1: What's to tell you about seapack in a tip.
Speaker 6: You're watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Dean, James Morrow,
Speaker 6: and I'm Ruda Panahin. Soon we'll be talking to a
Speaker 6: shark tankster, and later in the hour we'll delve into
Speaker 6: the latest examples of lefty lunacy.
Speaker 7: This week's starring Taylor Swift. That'll be fun.
Speaker 6: But first, I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Speaker 6: You don't hate the leftist media enough if you think
Speaker 6: you do, but trust me, you don't. Just when you
Speaker 6: thought there could not be any more shamelessly biased and
Speaker 6: dishonest in their activism along Comms, there a great debate
Speaker 6: between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, not really a debate,
Speaker 6: but a setup where the two hack moderators became the story.
Speaker 6: Democrat Dave and Davis disgrace themselves with not only framing
Speaker 6: every question from a leftist perspective, but refusing to ask
Speaker 6: about pertinent events like Trump almost having his head blown
Speaker 6: off a few weeks ago, to Kamala's support for the
Speaker 6: most radical policies, from backing a bail fund for BLM
Speaker 6: thugs to supporting taxpayer funds being used for sex change
Speaker 6: operations for criminals, and not a single question about Kamala
Speaker 6: abandoning the gold Star families who lost their loved ones
Speaker 6: during the Biden Harris administrations botched Afghanistan withdrawal nothing not,
Speaker 6: even as she claimed over and over again that it's
Speaker 6: Trump that has no respect for the military. The moderators
Speaker 6: also insisted on fact checking Trump even when he was
Speaker 6: one hundred percent right, like about the crime rate and
Speaker 6: lack term abortions, but they refused to do the same
Speaker 6: with Kamala Harris even when she repeated the most outrageous,
Speaker 6: verifiable lies, including the dangerous Charlottesville fine people hoax and
Speaker 6: the more recent bloodbath lie, which was actually about.
Speaker 7: The auto industry. And it didn't end with the debate.
Speaker 6: Much of the media went into a full blown meltdown
Speaker 6: trying to debunk Trump's claims about Harris's policy positions, even
Speaker 6: when they happen to be true. Here is the New
Speaker 6: Yorker Suzann Glass tweeting Trump made history last night, for sure.
Speaker 6: Who will ever forget him ranting on stage about immigrants
Speaker 6: eating people's dogs or insisting that the vice president wants
Speaker 6: to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in jail.
Speaker 6: My piece on Trump's too crazy moment. And yes, you
Speaker 6: published her activism masquading as journalism in the New Yorker.
Speaker 7: But guess what.
Speaker 6: It may sound too crazy, but Kamala does what taxpayer
Speaker 6: funds use for sex change operations for illegal immigrants in prison?
Speaker 6: Let's marvel at this wonderful moment in journalism. Look at
Speaker 6: this correction from Time Magazine. The original version of this
Speaker 6: story mischaracterized as false Donald Trump's statement accusing Kamala Harris
Speaker 6: of supporting transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.
Speaker 7: As a presidential candidate in.
Speaker 6: To nineteen, Harris filled out a questionnaire saying she supported
Speaker 6: taxpayer funded gender transition treatment for detained immigrants. Oh, she
Speaker 6: didn't just mention it in a questionnaire. She has proudly
Speaker 6: boasted about her far left, radical lunatic views and putting
Speaker 6: them into action.
Speaker 12: That they were standing in the way of surgery for
Speaker 12: prisoners for prisoners. And there was a specific case. And
Speaker 12: when I learned about the case, I worked behind the
Speaker 12: scenes to not only make sure that that transgender woman
Speaker 12: got the services she was deserving.
Speaker 13: So it was not only about that case.
Speaker 12: I made sure that they changed the policy in the
Speaker 12: state of California so that every transgender inmate in the
Speaker 12: prison system would have access to the medical care that
Speaker 12: they desire and need. And I believe it was not
Speaker 12: only that I know it was historic in California, but
Speaker 12: I believe actually it may have been one of the first,
Speaker 12: not the first, in the country where I pushed for
Speaker 12: that policy in a Department of Corrections.
Speaker 6: And yet even when the proof came out, the media
Speaker 6: tried to soften the blow for the Democrats by claiming
Speaker 6: Donald Trump's statement needed context. Yes, the context is she
Speaker 6: absolutely said what he said as she said, and she
Speaker 6: means it. She's never retracted from that position for those policies.
Speaker 6: But perhaps the most devastating lie that Kamala was allowed
Speaker 6: to utter without correction from the moderators was the fine
Speaker 6: people hoax, which they knew to be.
Speaker 7: A lie, a dangerous lie.
Speaker 6: This is what Trump actually said, And yes, he did
Speaker 6: condemn the white supremacist completely. His fine people comment was
Speaker 6: about folks who were protesting the removal of historic statues.
Speaker 6: And guess what, those folks were one hundred percent right.
Speaker 6: But for the record, let's go to the tape.
Speaker 3: And you had people and I'm not talking about the
Speaker 3: neo Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be
Speaker 3: condemned totally.
Speaker 1: But you had many people in that group other than.
Speaker 3: Neo Nazis and white nationalists, okay, should.
Speaker 6: Be condemned totally, got turned twisted into white supremacists, where
Speaker 6: very fine people. That's what the media did, and those
Speaker 6: moderators knew perfectly well that Harris was lying, and they let.
Speaker 7: It go over and over and over again.
Speaker 6: But here is a devastating fact check delivered by American
Speaker 6: troops serving in a combat zone. Watched their reaction to
Speaker 6: their Vice presidents lies about their service.
Speaker 14: As of today, there is not one member of the
Speaker 14: United States military who is an active duty in a
Speaker 14: combat zone in any war zone around the world the
Speaker 14: first time.
Speaker 4: But let's understand, So what.
Speaker 1: Are we right now?
Speaker 6: Before I go, let's check in with the good folk
Speaker 6: at Please explain Pauline Hanson's satirical cartoons. There is this
Speaker 6: week the cartoon stars Albow and the Treasurer.
Speaker 15: Well Goalie Gosh, Captain Albow. We're in a real pickle
Speaker 15: out there. We're losing the war which war Jim, the
Speaker 15: warriors free speech, the warrior social media, the Warrior's affordable housing,
Speaker 15: hands to.
Speaker 2: Me, Meser.
Speaker 4: It's the war against inflation.
Speaker 16: Ah, there's no need to worry about that, boy, Jim,
Speaker 16: We're winn the warrior against inflation.
Speaker 15: Don't you worry about that, lod No, no, captain blowing
Speaker 15: out on the front lawns myself and goalie.
Speaker 4: It's a real miss out there. The inflation represser is relentless.
Speaker 16: She'll Sam, that's not our fault, Jim, that's the governor's fault.
Speaker 16: Go blame Michelle Bullock and her interest rates. Lord will
Speaker 16: I detraw that, captain? But gee whiz here. Everyone keep
Speaker 16: saying we need to focus on less.
Speaker 15: Spending, less spending, Oh yeah, sure, and lose the fight
Speaker 15: against climate change and we'll just give up the battle
Speaker 15: against recession.
Speaker 16: Shall we now behold the national credit card? Just look
Speaker 16: at a Jim fear less limitless power.
Speaker 15: Well, sir, or, I think we should spend buddy, we
Speaker 15: don't have should we radi in spending?
Speaker 16: Oh no, Jim, We're not raiding anything in. We've got
Speaker 16: to fight votes, divide money to.
Speaker 1: More great stuff.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 1: The good news mentioned before the Outsiders the three of
Speaker 1: us will be appearing at the twenty twenty four Seapack
Speaker 1: conference in Brisbane on the weekend of October fifth and sixth.
Speaker 1: Want you to be there Outsiders Live. We'll have an audience.
Speaker 1: It'll be so much fun. Can't wait. Speakers at Seapack
Speaker 1: include former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, British comedian Leo Curse,
Speaker 1: plus many other favorites from here, Bridgite McKenzie, Warren Munday, Alexandiks.
Speaker 1: Sounds like an Outsider show the whole weekend and we'll
Speaker 1: speak to many of those during our live Outsiders on
Speaker 1: that Sunday morning there at Seapack, So get your tickets.
Speaker 1: Go to Seapack, get your tickets there at the websites.
Speaker 1: Can't wait to see you. Then. It's going to be
Speaker 1: a great, great weekend fighting for free speech, fighting for freedom,
Speaker 1: fighting for traditional Australian values. Go to Seapack dot network.
Speaker 1: That's where you get your tickets and yes, you'll see
Speaker 1: Outsiders Live thrown in along with everything else. Now during
Speaker 1: the show, will be taking questions from the audience, So
Speaker 1: if you are attending Seapack and more'd like to ask
Speaker 1: us a question rather than yelling it out from the back,
Speaker 1: which I'm sure you'll do anyway. But first why not
Speaker 1: email it to us at seapack at sky News dot
Speaker 1: com dot au. Send those questions in. Then at least
Speaker 1: we get a chance to have your question ready to go.
Speaker 1: Can't wait now. One of the guest speakers will be
Speaker 1: former Shark Tank investors Steve Baxter. He will be part
Speaker 1: of a great initiative to spotlight young conservatives. You know,
Speaker 1: this is something we've talked a lot about on this
Speaker 1: show here. I mean, we need those young conservatives. We
Speaker 1: need those who are passionate about fighting workers and fighting
Speaker 1: the left. We need them. And Steve Baxter has got
Speaker 1: an idea for Seapack and he joins us now to
Speaker 1: tell us about it. Steve, great to see you as always.
Speaker 1: Tell us exactly what you what you're doing here with
Speaker 1: Seapack and how it's going to get young conservatives involved.
Speaker 17: Thanks very much, Ron crew. What we're doing with Seapack
Speaker 17: this year, it's not the first time, is at the
Speaker 17: third time we've done it where we're doing Seapack Global
Speaker 17: Explorers Program. We're taking a group of young people, I
Speaker 17: think the thirteen you're eighteen to thirty year olds to
Speaker 17: the US between the nine eighth of February and the
Speaker 17: twenty second to February to the SEAPAC conference in DSA
Speaker 17: or Maryland, DC, same sort of area. We did that
Speaker 17: this year, We're doing it next year. We all that
Speaker 17: did ARC last year as well with a few people.
Speaker 17: So the idea is to get over there and there's
Speaker 17: them in this wonderful gathering of conservatives and have them
Speaker 17: come back here energized and obviously add to the debate
Speaker 17: and the you know, I suppose the contest of ideas.
Speaker 1: So how do you get involved? What do you have
Speaker 1: to do?
Speaker 17: Yeah, so you need to there's a there's on the
Speaker 17: website there which I'm sure you're point put up on
Speaker 17: the screen. There's a quick sixty second video into events
Speaker 17: at seapack dot net. That's events as a spelled in
Speaker 17: the dictionary at seapack dot network. Excuse me, seapack up
Speaker 17: network short sixty second video explaining why why you should
Speaker 17: join seapack USA twenty twenty five from there?
Speaker 1: Sorry, mat Yeah, what sort of things have you had
Speaker 1: in the past? What sort of things should people be
Speaker 1: looking at? Just are you looking for humor? Are you
Speaker 1: looking for great ideas? Are you looking for that kind
Speaker 1: of contrarian point of view? Or just well, don't go
Speaker 1: and there.
Speaker 17: Blue and orange here is probably a good start.
Speaker 1: Pronouns obviously you obviously you want the pronouns first.
Speaker 17: Maybe that'll self exclude. I'm a huge fan of confidence.
Speaker 17: So you come out of confidence and you can speak
Speaker 17: and I suppose elucidate what you're about. That gets it
Speaker 17: to me, like ninety percent of things is confident. So
Speaker 17: come in there, give us a fresh message about what
Speaker 17: in your view of conservatism, libertarian wrop, it might be
Speaker 17: free market, free speech. They're all the sort of buttonly
Speaker 17: one pushed with the respect of that it's only sixty seconds.
Speaker 17: You can't do everything. Convinces why we should put you
Speaker 17: on stage, So that the winners from that or will
Speaker 17: actually go on stage on the sixth of October at
Speaker 17: the Seapac conference and pitch in front of myself and
Speaker 17: a couple of other entrepreneurs around Australia as opposed to
Speaker 17: why you should go. So that'll be a great opportunity.
Speaker 1: Rita.
Speaker 6: Now, as a business leader, you're not misleading us with
Speaker 6: your shirt there, because all we can see is that
Speaker 6: get woke part. Are you telling us to get go bright?
Speaker 1: There? Well done, we.
Speaker 6: Got that fantastic Now we have seen Brad Go Go broke.
Speaker 6: Bud Light obviously is a famous example. But you've had
Speaker 6: giants like Disney flirt with wokeness and feel the consequences,
Speaker 6: and brands you wouldn't expect, like Harley Davidson now has
Speaker 6: got all sorts of questions about its leadership. So why
Speaker 6: do we have brands risking their market position by going
Speaker 6: down this political road, possibly alienating fifty percent of the
Speaker 6: population if not more.
Speaker 17: Well, I don't know why they did it to me
Speaker 17: is why they continue to do it When you look
Speaker 17: at the examples of Bud Wise or Harley Davidson, and
Speaker 17: surely this is just you're out to annoy half his
Speaker 17: potential customer base. I don't understand it as a businessman,
Speaker 17: and keep out of politics, Please keep out of politics.
Speaker 17: So why do they do it that? There's obviously a
Speaker 17: strata of people of executives inside the organization who have
Speaker 17: swallowed the work pill pushing because let's face it, most
Speaker 17: of their consumers don't want to borrow this stuff. So look,
Speaker 17: just just listen to you, listen to your customers. Any
Speaker 17: person gets an opinion on business in your business person
Speaker 17: pulls a wallet out and spends money.
Speaker 1: Listen to them, But Steve, I think speaking putting my
Speaker 1: ex adman hats on. The reason a lot of these
Speaker 1: companies do it is because purely it's lazy marketing. They
Speaker 1: don't have a usp, they don't have a unique selling
Speaker 1: proposition of their own, so they think, oh well, let's
Speaker 1: attach ourselves to the Voice, or let's attach ourselves to
Speaker 1: this lgbt IQ stuff. It's lazy marketers who don't have
Speaker 1: a product that can stand on its own two feed.
Speaker 1: That's how it strikes me. I don't know, you're the
Speaker 1: businessman if you agree with that point of view.
Speaker 17: I think, especially when it comes to the Voice, why
Speaker 17: they would ever get involved in politics absolutely stunt me,
Speaker 17: to be honest, How to just annoy a fifty percent
Speaker 17: of we're such a far It was such a I
Speaker 17: suppose evenly split polity. Why would you go to annoy harkey?
Speaker 17: Customer basic? Just a customer place, all right? So that'st them.
Speaker 17: I listen, So I'm not then Roland, and I don't
Speaker 17: understand it, to be honest, So stick to knitting, make money,
Speaker 17: shut up and do a good job.
Speaker 1: That sounds like the sixty second pitch to go to Seapack.
Speaker 1: Perfect Steve Baxter, thanks so much for coming on. If
Speaker 1: you want to get involved, particularly get your kids, your grandkids, whatever.
Speaker 1: We need those young conservative minds. Young people are curious,
Speaker 1: they're interested, they're imaginative, they're smart, they're rebellious above all,
Speaker 1: and they challenge this woke orthodoxy which gets ran down
Speaker 1: their throats at schools and universities day in day out
Speaker 1: by people more often not far less intelligent than they are.
Speaker 1: So speak up. We want those young conservatives at sea Pack.
Speaker 1: Apply to the website there and get involved with Steve
Speaker 1: Baxter there, Thanks so much. Coming up in a tick.
Speaker 1: Lots more coming up. We've got Alexantik talking about this
Speaker 1: misinformation nonsense. Netsani Wakademi left you lunacy all Inmity, well,
Speaker 1: lots of lefty lunacy this week in Australia with all
Speaker 1: the protests, disgusting protests, people attacking horses and I'm sorry
Speaker 1: you spray stuff up the nose of a horse. You
Speaker 1: deserve not only the horse to kick you really hard
Speaker 1: in the back, that you deserve the full way to
Speaker 1: the law. I'd like to see you put away for
Speaker 1: five years. Absolutely disgusting. The behavior that went on Rita,
Speaker 1: these protests pro Palestinian pro Hamas, whatever you want to
Speaker 1: call them. They were disgusting, they were ugly.
Speaker 6: Your thoughts, well, they were. Those scenes have gone around
Speaker 6: the world. People were commenting, Oh.
Speaker 7: This is some conflict in the Middle East. No, it's Melbourne, Australia.
Speaker 6: Because that's what some of the scenes were looking like.
Speaker 6: And we had so much resources devoted to trying to
Speaker 6: keep control. Yeah, eighteen hundred police officers, twelve thousand rostered shifts.
Speaker 6: So we're talking about thirty million dollars of taxpayers money
Speaker 6: going towards trying to have some.
Speaker 7: Sort of law and order.
Speaker 6: So this event could take place, and this only has
Speaker 6: come about because Victoria has had this very tolerant attitude
Speaker 6: to left wing activists taking over the city, causing mass disruption,
Speaker 6: behaving unlawfully. It happens so often. Obviously this is a
Speaker 6: fairly intense version amongst your protesters are combined.
Speaker 2: Problem to this reader. I mean, if we think back
Speaker 2: to the COVID protests, you know, think back to how
Speaker 2: the Victorian Knowlice managed those protests. Think about how also
Speaker 2: most of the media treated people who had legitimate grievances
Speaker 2: against COVID restrictions and the way the Dan Andrews government
Speaker 2: had that. Compare and contrast that with the kid gloves
Speaker 2: treatment that so many of these protesters who are protesting,
Speaker 2: you know, using this Landforce's weapons expo as a focus
Speaker 2: point for the grievances against Western civilization, against the very
Speaker 2: freedoms that allow them to protest, and contrast the way
Speaker 2: they were treated there. They were allowed to literally run riot.
Speaker 2: It's disgrace and it shows the hipolity on the left.
Speaker 1: We've got some footage here of the pro Palestinian protests that.
Speaker 6: Just pro Palestinians was extinction rebellion, it was climate change.
Speaker 6: It was a whole bunch and they're all the same
Speaker 6: mob essentially as the usual left of.
Speaker 17: You can see here you go, they're quite literally throwing
Speaker 17: things at the police as they're trying to do their job.
Speaker 18: Yeah, that was really difficult to see.
Speaker 7: A look yep.
Speaker 19: So they're still just cutting into the cement now, Pete.
Speaker 7: So a bit of a situation here at the moment.
Speaker 1: Concreting yourself to a car to protest clam change is
Speaker 1: a very simple solution. Just leave it there. She'll figure
Speaker 1: it out.
Speaker 2: How is how is it that if you concrete yourself
Speaker 2: to probably your mom's station wagon, you know, you know,
Speaker 2: so I'm part of the car here to go conqueror
Speaker 2: how is that suddenly the police's problem. I mean, honestly,
Speaker 2: it's just what a waste of resources.
Speaker 1: Concrete is made with fossil fuels.
Speaker 6: I hope she knows, yes, that probably a lot of
Speaker 6: what she's wearing and what she uses day to day
Speaker 6: is because of fossil fuels. The privilege she enjoys living
Speaker 6: in a prosperous, peaceful country until her and her mates
Speaker 6: to go over Melbourne is largely due to fossil fuels
Speaker 6: and the economics they give us. But these people have
Speaker 6: been indulged for far too long.
Speaker 7: This is the problem.
Speaker 6: They have been elevated by the way the media reports
Speaker 6: on them. Even during these completely unhinged protests. The media,
Speaker 6: we're calling them pro piece, anti war protesters.
Speaker 7: No, they're not anti war.
Speaker 6: You're seeing their conduct, You're seeing how they're carrying on
Speaker 6: to They always characterize them the way the protesters call themselves.
Speaker 6: You know, if you see a white supremacist marching in
Speaker 6: the street, you don't say, oh, that's some superior being.
Speaker 6: You don't call them how they see themselves. You call
Speaker 6: them what they are, which is a racist low life.
Speaker 6: And with these protesters, they should be called what they are.
Speaker 6: You stop calling them anti fascists.
Speaker 2: Again again, Rita enroll it. It comes down to the
Speaker 2: utter hypocrisy of this leftist mob and the way they
Speaker 2: are covered. And you know, I also think much of
Speaker 2: the media could do a better job of also talking
Speaker 2: about what exactly it is they're protesting, which is actually
Speaker 2: you know, the mechanism by which at the point the
Speaker 2: end of things, we stay free and you have the
Speaker 2: freedom to protest. That is a really important thing. But
Speaker 2: you know, in the last few weeks, think about all
Speaker 2: the things we've seen around the world. We've seen Afghanistan
Speaker 2: putting even more restrictions on women, who are you know,
Speaker 2: basically now complete slaves in that country. Were they protesting
Speaker 2: about that? No? Nothing, you know, this whole handbadge tail
Speaker 2: thing coming to life. You know, talk about China climate change.
Speaker 2: Are they ever outside the Chinese embassy or Chinese consulants
Speaker 2: protesting They're building new coal fire power stations. No. Never,
Speaker 2: They are anti West, They're anti civilization.
Speaker 6: What they are about the China, or and Afghanistan. Right here,
Speaker 6: right there in Melbourne, there's a male sexual predator in
Speaker 6: a woman's prison.
Speaker 7: Are they protesting against that?
Speaker 6: Of that protesting for the rights of those female prisoners
Speaker 6: who are signing petitions signing the.
Speaker 1: Reality James ask the question, what are they protesting for?
Speaker 15: That?
Speaker 1: Specifically testing to stop Australia selling arms to Israel to
Speaker 1: defend itself against the horrors of October seventh. They are protesting,
Speaker 1: They're calling for a ceasefire. They're calling for an end
Speaker 1: to Australia helping its ally Israel, which is an absolute disgrace.
Speaker 1: We'll be discussing that with Noah Tchishbee in the second though.
Speaker 2: It's worse than.
Speaker 1: That, because this comes from the leadership of Albanesi in
Speaker 1: Penny one, which indulges this sort of stuff. We're going
Speaker 1: to take a short break. We'll talk more about us.
Speaker 16: In a tick.
Speaker 1: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with Rita Tailings, Pond Panahie James, Rotary,
Speaker 1: Drill Morrow and myself Rowan blast furnace Dean. Yes. This
Speaker 1: week the Albanesi government declared war on mining, and in
Speaker 1: doing so, declared war on the future prosperity of every
Speaker 1: individual in this nation. Once upon a time, so the
Speaker 1: ads told us, Australia was built on four things.
Speaker 16: Figercount fall time.
Speaker 1: Those days seem like a far off dream now, But
Speaker 1: the reality of Australia has always been the same. This
Speaker 1: nation has built on two things, agriculture and mining. Every
Speaker 1: hospital bed in the land, every road, every highway, every footpath,
Speaker 1: every shopping mall, every school, every university, every old people's home,
Speaker 1: every park, every office block, every bank, every welfare check,
Speaker 1: every homeless shelter, every woman's shelter, every charity, every small business,
Speaker 1: every trendy boutique, every aeroplane that reaches for the skies,
Speaker 1: every car on our roads, every traffic light, every tram,
Speaker 1: every bus, every bus stop, every refrigerator, every kitchen, every kitchen, appliants,
Speaker 1: every dinner at every restaurant, every night out, every fireworks display.
Speaker 1: We owe it all ultimately to Australian mining. Twenty twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two to twenty three financial year, mining alone contributed
Speaker 1: seventy four billion dollars just in company tax and royalties,
Speaker 1: far more than any other industry. Seventy four billion dollars
Speaker 1: in just twelve months into our coffers. Think of all
Speaker 1: the goods and services that provided to this increasingly welfare
Speaker 1: dependent nation. And that's before you factor in all the
Speaker 1: direct and indirect employment and products that go along with
Speaker 1: mining and agriculture. This is the wealth that our nation
Speaker 1: is not only built on, but will rely on more
Speaker 1: and more to survive in an ever increasingly expensive and
Speaker 1: energy dependent world into the future. The last two surpluses
Speaker 1: that Jim Charmers and Labor are so proud of only
Speaker 1: existed because of rising iron ore prices and rising coal prices.
Speaker 1: Otherwise we're broke. Yet we have, under Anthony Albanesi and
Speaker 1: his mob, a hardcore socialist government that is determined to
Speaker 1: blow to smithereens the wealth that has given us every
Speaker 1: aspect of our precious Australian way of life that cares.
Speaker 1: A government that cares not two hoots for mining or agriculture,
Speaker 1: and in fact has declared war on both of them,
Speaker 1: war on agriculture, war on mining, and all for the
Speaker 1: most ideological and idiotic reasons. I've long said you can
Speaker 1: define every aspect of this Albanesi Labor Teals government by
Speaker 1: the three eyes ideology, idiocy, and incompetence. This isn't me
Speaker 1: making up some wild prediction to scare the Bejesus out
Speaker 1: of everyone. This is the simple, unadorned truth that was
Speaker 1: delivered this week at ironically a gala dinner in Canberra
Speaker 1: for the mining industry. Only the day before, also in Canbra,
Speaker 1: farmers from across the nation protested furious about Labour's anti
Speaker 1: agricultural policies, including the ridiculous destruction of the live cattle trade.
Speaker 1: But it was at the gala dinner for mining where
Speaker 1: the mask was finally ripped off. The event was the
Speaker 1: Minerals Council at Parliament House, and rather than it being
Speaker 1: what it should have been, a celebration of the wonderful bounty,
Speaker 1: the billions that blessed this nation courtesy of mining, it
Speaker 1: was a declaration of war. Minerals Council Chief Executive Tanya
Speaker 1: Constable stood up front of the Prime Minister and directly
Speaker 1: blamed him and his government for triggering conflict and within
Speaker 1: the industry. And she said that Labour risk a return
Speaker 1: to the sort of mining tax wars we saw between
Speaker 1: the big resource companies and the Gillard government. First of all,
Speaker 1: Constable took aim at Labour's insane and ideological new workplace laws,
Speaker 1: saying quote, under these new workplace laws, conflict has been
Speaker 1: brought upon us. It is a deliberate design feature of
Speaker 1: these laws. Conflict is coming to every workplace, in every industry,
Speaker 1: great work. Tony Burke Constable went on to explain how
Speaker 1: the mining sector is quote under siege and being quote
Speaker 1: punished for its success by the Albanese government. What sort
Speaker 1: of a government, you might ask, I certainly do. What
Speaker 1: sort of a government other than a hard core, ideologically
Speaker 1: driven socialist government punishes economic success. Any sensible government, of course,
Speaker 1: rewards and encourages success for the good of us all
Speaker 1: but not this mob. Tanya Constable, Headliminal's Council, went on,
Speaker 1: citing not only the quote reckless industrial relations change. She
Speaker 1: also mentioned the raids on mining royalties and new regulations,
Speaker 1: but above all labor, the Teals and the Greens environmental policies,
Speaker 1: which of course are based entirely on left wing environmental
Speaker 1: and indigenous ideology. Quote. Any attack on the Pilborough, Constable
Speaker 1: pointed out defiantly is an attack on the entire mining sector,
Speaker 1: just like an attack on Queensland coal revenues is an
Speaker 1: attack on the entire mining sector. Make no mistake, this
Speaker 1: is war and if Labor and the Teals are returned
Speaker 1: to power, left wing ideology wins that war and we,
Speaker 1: the everyday people and families of Australia will lose big
Speaker 1: time billions. What to do? Vote them out. If you
Speaker 1: happen to live in the beautiful suburbs of Perth, for example,
Speaker 1: like the wargious electorate of Curtain along the river there,
Speaker 1: vote this socialist enabling teal is Kate Cheney out at
Speaker 1: the next election. Her presence in Parliament, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: threatens the prosperity of your kids. If you're in Peerce,
Speaker 1: vote Labor Art has luck. Vote labor Art. Albany is
Speaker 1: the only one power at the last election because of
Speaker 1: the Teals and because of seats that flip from the
Speaker 1: Libs to Labor in wa. Flip them back if you
Speaker 1: want your kids in this nation to have any chance
Speaker 1: of a prosperous future. But instead of reassuring the miners
Speaker 1: and arrogant Anthony Albanesi simply told them to get on
Speaker 1: board with his agenda or the world wouldn't bother investing
Speaker 1: in them, or words to that effect. The height of
Speaker 1: Hubri's condescension and socialist arrogance. Don't believe me about Labour's
Speaker 1: ideological insanity. Why did they ban the live sheep trade?
Speaker 1: Ideology pure and simple. Why did Plibasset block the development
Speaker 1: of a gold mine worth potentially a billion dollars Aboriginal
Speaker 1: song lines that even the local Land Council dismissed as nonsense.
Speaker 1: Ideology pure and simple. Why did Albanezi block the development
Speaker 1: of the Jabaluki uranium mine worth the gain potentially billions
Speaker 1: more dollars to hand the land over to the Kakadu
Speaker 1: National Park to ensure quote his words, it can never
Speaker 1: be mined. Ideology pure and simple. There's more, it never stops.
Speaker 1: The red tape, the green tape, the black tape. These
Speaker 1: idiots are strangling the life out of our most important
Speaker 1: and successful businesses and investment overseas investment because of ideological
Speaker 1: climate regulations, ideological indigenous regulations, and ideological union regulations, red, green,
Speaker 1: and black tape angling the life and prosperity of our nation.
Speaker 1: Have a listen to the outrageous arrogance of alban Easy
Speaker 1: in casually dismissing the rejection by the EPA of a
Speaker 1: thirty billion dollar wood side gas project out at the
Speaker 1: sea off the coast of Wa, which would have brought
Speaker 1: in five billion dollars a year in tax alone. How
Speaker 1: many hospitals, schools could that have provided? Why was it rejected?
Speaker 1: Ideology and idiocy because of wait for whale song lives?
Speaker 1: How much does the PM care about this travesty? Not
Speaker 1: a whit it's your.
Speaker 10: Government supportive of that Woodside Browns project.
Speaker 20: Well, we of course have environmental laws in place that
Speaker 20: allow for proper environmental assessments. We support the resources sector,
Speaker 20: of course, subject to those environmental approvals.
Speaker 1: Environmental approvals, what a farce. As Senator Susie McDonald is worn,
Speaker 1: one of the greatest threats to future investments in our
Speaker 1: resources sector is activist law fare, and Labor supports this
Speaker 1: stuff to the hilt. Add on to that the fact
Speaker 1: that if labor wins power along with the Greens, the
Speaker 1: Greens will insist on a climate trigger being inserted into
Speaker 1: all our environmental laws, which means any project generating a
Speaker 1: certain level of carbon emissions will come under threat. The
Speaker 1: Institute of Public Affairs calculates based upon twenty twenty two
Speaker 1: Climate Trigger Bill proposed by the Greens that the cost
Speaker 1: of the Australian economy will be more than two hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty seven billion. That's over a quarter of a
Speaker 1: trillion dollars in lost investment. Take note, wa, the state
Speaker 1: most damaged will be yours, with a potential loss of
Speaker 1: one hundred and twelve billion of investment. Queensland your next
Speaker 1: sixty seven billion down the toilet. We already have safeguard mechanisms,
Speaker 1: renewable energy targets, the National greenhouse Gas and Energy Reporting Screen,
Speaker 1: and now mandatory climate reporting laws strangling investment in this
Speaker 1: land of ours. No nation can survive that sort of
Speaker 1: suicidal insanity. If the alban Easy government remains in office
Speaker 1: after the next election, and if the Teals a single
Speaker 1: one of them are voted back into power, and thanks
Speaker 1: to Tony Burke's regressive, retrogressive industrial relations laws, if all
Speaker 1: of that happens, your children grandchildren will never ever enjoy
Speaker 1: the lifestyle. The meat pie is the footy that every
Speaker 1: Australian has taken for granted. Be warned, as has been said,
Speaker 1: we undermine mining at our peril. Well, let's get on
Speaker 1: to Alex Antik, one of the great senators here who
Speaker 1: will be appearing also with Outsiders Live. They're at seatback.
Speaker 1: Get your tickets, Get your tickets. So tell your Brisbane
Speaker 1: fifth and sixth Alexandik we can't wait to see you there,
Speaker 1: and Brizy we might have a beer or two together
Speaker 1: with Reeter and James, you know, the four of us,
Speaker 1: and we'll shoot the breeze. But before that, tell us
Speaker 1: what on earth is happening with this insane misinformation disinformation nonsense,
Speaker 1: this orwelly and garbage being foisted on us by the
Speaker 1: Albanezy government.
Speaker 21: Yeah, well right, First of all, that gathering sounds like
Speaker 21: a hate crime waiting to happen right there. But look,
Speaker 21: putting that aside, it is it is a shocking, shocking
Speaker 21: piece of legislation. This I thought, in my time in
Speaker 21: Parliament I'd seen the worst that could be possibly shoveled
Speaker 21: up with the guillotines and non debated Digital ID Bill,
Speaker 21: But this so called Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill in itself,
Speaker 21: I think is even worse. And you know it's easy
Speaker 21: to get pulled into platitudes about how bad this is,
Speaker 21: but in essence, what this bill, if it's passed, is
Speaker 21: going to do is shut down free speech for Australian
Speaker 21: non mainstream media digital content providers, so there will be
Speaker 21: no avenue to escape that drag net.
Speaker 1: So to give your.
Speaker 21: Listeners and you watch a viewers some sort of idea.
Speaker 21: This bill has been out for public consultation in an
Speaker 21: exposure draft earlier in the year. It was widely canned.
Speaker 21: It had something like twenty three thousand submissions back to
Speaker 21: the Minister, none of which were really released. But that
Speaker 21: doesn't happen unless people are worried. What we've got now
Speaker 21: is the new version, which may also be equally as
Speaker 21: bad if not pruned around the edges. And what it's
Speaker 21: going to do is create, allegacly a framework for misinformation.
Speaker 21: That is information online which is shared, which is said
Speaker 21: to be reasonably verifiable as false and misleading and causing
Speaker 21: serious harm. Now that all sounds like gobbledy group, because
Speaker 21: frankly it is. And the finder of fact, which may
Speaker 21: will be the Administrative Review Ibunal Akma whoever it is,
Speaker 21: you know, there are mechanisms will ultimately tell people online
Speaker 21: what they can and can't say. And to make it
Speaker 21: even more hilariously paradoxically incredible, the Government in their explanatory
Speaker 21: memorandum used the example of public health as a COVID
Speaker 21: period as an example of where misinformation was spread. And
Speaker 21: the example they used to show misinformation was the fact
Speaker 21: that people were spreading Donald Trump's statement about injecting bleach
Speaker 21: to defeat COVID and how.
Speaker 1: Dangerous that was.
Speaker 21: Of course, that was completely completely debunked. I mean, only
Speaker 21: this government could use misinformation in order to prosecute the
Speaker 21: case of misinformation, but highlights the point exactly. Misinformation ultimately
Speaker 21: is in the eye of the beholder, and we've seen
Speaker 21: it time and time again. I mean my freedom of
Speaker 21: information application last year which highlighted the Department of Home
Speaker 21: Affairs actively sending people Australians who had posted things online
Speaker 21: back to the parent companies Facebook and Twitter at the
Speaker 21: time in order to point the finger at them for
Speaker 21: sharing misinformation, much of which was actually ultimately designed to
Speaker 21: be true. So this is going to become a ministry
Speaker 21: of truth. It's going to become an absolute death nail
Speaker 21: for freedom of speech in this country. And without freedom
Speaker 21: of speech, there's no freedom at all.
Speaker 2: James Well, I mean, Alex, you know what is the
Speaker 2: coalition then going to do to actively oppose this because
Speaker 2: it will get up through the House, certainly, But what
Speaker 2: about in the Senate And does the coalition here have
Speaker 2: a bit of a free speech problem because of course,
Speaker 2: you know, the e Safety Commissioner was something that was
Speaker 2: developed under the Morrison government. What is the is the
Speaker 2: Coalition going to not just say this is bad but
Speaker 2: actually actively campaign against those who say, but you need
Speaker 2: to do something about misinformation because as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 2: it's a non problem. And there's plenty of the submissions
Speaker 2: to the bill said this is already being managed by
Speaker 2: voluntary regulation and you know, platforms and things, you do
Speaker 2: not need this central Minister of Truth, whether it is
Speaker 2: ACMA or the Art or whomever.
Speaker 21: Yeah, and it is going to give enormous powers to AKIMA,
Speaker 21: the Media Authority, in order to set up codes, in
Speaker 21: order to codify the landscape. So look, it looks on
Speaker 21: the surface to be saleable, but ultimately it's not. And
Speaker 21: look this came out on Thursday, so your position that
Speaker 21: the Coalition will reach hasn't yet been through the party
Speaker 21: room and adopted and taken yet. But look, I don't
Speaker 21: see how we can't oppose this. Frankly, I certainly won't
Speaker 21: be voting for it. I can tell you that right now,
Speaker 21: and I know there'll be many others that share my concerns,
Speaker 21: as they should, because ultimately this will serve as a great,
Speaker 21: big wet blanket over the top of free speech. And
Speaker 21: I mean, the thing that really stands out about this
Speaker 21: is how much the left of politics in this country
Speaker 21: seemed to adore this kind of cosmopolitan authoritarianism. In twenty
Speaker 21: twenty four, the Greens Party of Bob Brown and the
Speaker 21: Labor Party of Bob Hawk would have this wouldn't have
Speaker 21: even reached the minister's table, Franklin, this would have been
Speaker 21: waved off. But we're dealing with a very different beast now.
Speaker 21: The critical part to this will be the cross bench
Speaker 21: in the Senate and the Australian Greens, Frankly, and the
Speaker 21: test here is on for the Australian Greens. People have
Speaker 21: to understand from the left of politics, this might all
Speaker 21: seem great when you are apparently clamping down on cookers
Speaker 21: and whatever other pejorative terms they use, but the pendulum
Speaker 21: can swing very quickly, and these mechanisms start off as
Speaker 21: a sword and end up as a shield or vice versa.
Speaker 21: So politics should be running a million miles from this
Speaker 21: if we are to be taken credibly as a free
Speaker 21: speech country. Already out there, as many of you have
Speaker 21: probably seen in the social media world, people are saying,
Speaker 21: once again as they did through the COVID period, what
Speaker 21: is going on in Australia region.
Speaker 6: They are, but I don't think the Greens and the
Speaker 6: left in general have much to fear because they know
Speaker 6: the bureaucracy always sides with them. Yes, it could change,
Speaker 6: but we're talking about disinformation and lies. And yet this
Speaker 6: week we had the Biological Reality Bill, which I would
Speaker 6: have thought every MP could back because we're talking about
Speaker 6: biological realities, but of course the Greens and Labor combined
Speaker 6: to vote against it. And interestingly, there were four Liberal
Speaker 6: senators Alex your colleagues, who also voted against this bill.
Speaker 4: How is that?
Speaker 6: How do we continuously have liberal MPs crossing.
Speaker 1: And just spell out what the bill was saying.
Speaker 6: Well, it's a biological reality bill. It's basically affirming biological realities.
Speaker 6: You're protecting women's sex space rights.
Speaker 7: Women shouldn't be controversial.
Speaker 6: But you've got liberal senators who continuously tend to vote
Speaker 6: against these measures, or in this occasion they didn't vote
Speaker 6: against it.
Speaker 7: They just weren't there to vote for it. They were
Speaker 7: missing in action.
Speaker 21: Yeah, and look, in many cases, pople are paired, that's
Speaker 21: the first thing. So this was actually a bill to
Speaker 21: amend the Sex Discrimination Act. And of course, as many
Speaker 21: of your viewers would know, the Sex Discrimination Act was
Speaker 21: amended in twenty thirteen under the Gillard government in order
Speaker 21: to remove the definition of man and woman. Wow, not
Speaker 21: exactly controversial, ould have thought, And Pauline was seeking to
Speaker 21: effectively flick the switch back to the twenty thirteen position,
Speaker 21: which I think is eminently sensible frankly, And look, that
Speaker 21: is the question people. These are often taken as conscience votes.
Speaker 21: Inside the Liberal Party, we have a mechanism to do
Speaker 21: that whereby people can cross the floor and there isn't
Speaker 21: the same sort of collective meltdown that we have in
Speaker 21: the Labor Party. But ultimately, this is the very nub
Speaker 21: of why it is that we see the case tickle
Speaker 21: and giggle, which many people would be familiar with. I mean,
Speaker 21: the fact that the definition of women is not there
Speaker 21: inside the legislative framework allows these platforms to be targeted
Speaker 21: sometimes you know, by people that say they are transgender
Speaker 21: or whatever. The case may be, so I think it's
Speaker 21: a very important position. I'm looking it other ways to
Speaker 21: adopt a similar sort of approach, and we'll look to
Speaker 21: talk about that in the near future. But it really
Speaker 21: does need to be addressed. It's as simple as that.
Speaker 1: And also might of.
Speaker 21: Course issue I think into it.
Speaker 1: I carry on, yeh.
Speaker 21: I'm just going to say, in relation to the twenty
Speaker 21: thirteen Sexual Discrimination Act amendments, many people would never have
Speaker 21: foreseen what came of that down the track ten years later.
Speaker 21: The same can be said for combating misinformation. This information here.
Speaker 21: We don't even know where this is going to end
Speaker 21: up at this stage.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, and Alex, you of course famously went around asking
Speaker 1: all those politicians and bureaucrats what is a woman? And
Speaker 1: none of them seemed to be able to answer. It
Speaker 1: is the point. Can't wait to see you at c pack, Alex.
Speaker 1: And in the meantime, please tell the party room that
Speaker 1: they must not only oppose the Misinformation Bill, but they
Speaker 1: must promise to repeal it when you get into government
Speaker 1: next year after the break James's Donkey votes. And then
Speaker 1: we'll speak to Noah Tishube about what's happening over there
Speaker 1: in israel a tick.
Speaker 2: Hello, you're watching out Cider's. I'm James Borrow here as
Speaker 2: always with Rowan Dean and Rita Panahe And in a moment,
Speaker 2: I'm going to talk about the eating the Cats memes
Speaker 2: flooding the internet and explain why they just might win
Speaker 2: Trump the election. But first, Kamala Harris, as handlers have
Speaker 2: finally let her do another interview, just her second since
Speaker 2: she became the Democrats candidate. And let me tell you,
Speaker 2: I think it is starting to become a parent why
Speaker 2: they are so keen to keep Kamala Harris under wraps
Speaker 2: until polling day. You see, it turns out that Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris just isn't very bright and so instead of being
Speaker 2: able to provide thoughtful answers to questions, all she is
Speaker 2: capable of is reciting set speeches like an rehearsed beauty
Speaker 2: pageant contestant. On Friday, Harris did an interview with local
Speaker 2: Philadelphia news anchor Brian Tart in the West Wind state
Speaker 2: of Pennsylvania, and let's just say we did not see
Speaker 2: a lot of nimble, intellectual footwork here. Have a look,
Speaker 2: for example, at what happened when Harris was asked what
Speaker 2: she would do to bring down prices, which have gone
Speaker 2: up something like twenty percent for food over the course
Speaker 2: of the Biden Harris administration.
Speaker 1: When we talk about bringing down prices and making life
Speaker 1: more affordable for people, what are one or two specific
Speaker 1: things you have in mind for that.
Speaker 14: Well, I'll start with this, I grew up a middle
Speaker 14: class kid.
Speaker 2: On a second, where have we heard that before?
Speaker 22: Do you believe Americans are better off than they were
Speaker 22: four years ago?
Speaker 14: So I was raised as a middle class kid.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, we've saw it at the debate. So spontaneous,
Speaker 2: so genuine, and I'm sure that struggling Americans are glad
Speaker 2: that she grew up middle class, the daughter of two
Speaker 2: prominent academics. But what does that have to do with
Speaker 2: the price of bilk at costco. Let's go back to
Speaker 2: the interview and see some more of her answers. See
Speaker 2: if you can figure out how she is going to
Speaker 2: bring prices down.
Speaker 14: My mother raised my sister and me. She worked very hard.
Speaker 14: She was able to finally save up enough money to
Speaker 14: buy our first house when I was a teenager.
Speaker 1: I grew up in a.
Speaker 12: Community of hardworking people, you know, construction workers and nurses
Speaker 12: and teachers, and I try to explain to some people
Speaker 12: who may not have had the same experience. You know,
Speaker 12: a lot of people will relate to this.
Speaker 14: You know, I grew up in a neighborhood of folks
Speaker 14: who are very proud of their lawn.
Speaker 18: Ah.
Speaker 2: Yes, construction workers in Berkeley proud of their lawn. That
Speaker 2: was amazing. I particularly love, though, again, how the fact
Speaker 2: that her neighbors growing up took care of their gardens
Speaker 2: might somehow magically bring down inflation. But as they say,
Speaker 2: there's war. There was this mess of an answer when
Speaker 2: she was asked about trying to appeal to Trump voters.
Speaker 23: What do you understand his appeal to be and how
Speaker 23: do you speak to his voters or maybe people who
Speaker 23: just share his values but are open to something else.
Speaker 12: I based on experience and a lived experience. No, in
Speaker 12: my heart, I know, in my soul, I know that
Speaker 12: the vast majority of us as Americans, have so much
Speaker 12: more in common and what separates us. And I also
Speaker 12: believe that I am accurate in knowing that most Americans
Speaker 12: want a leader who brings us together as Americans, and
Speaker 12: someone who professes to be a leader who is trying
Speaker 12: to have us point our fingers at each other.
Speaker 2: You know, I think I'm gonna have to take back
Speaker 2: what I said before. Did I say that she had
Speaker 2: pre prepared answers? No way. Did you see her grasping
Speaker 2: for words here? It's like she never prep for this
Speaker 2: very basic question at all. I mean, it's just amazing
Speaker 2: to me that after Joe Biden's word salads, the Democrats
Speaker 2: have put up someone just as inarticulate to replace him.
Speaker 2: Though perhaps that's the point, just to have a figurehead
Speaker 2: in power. Who then the same cabal that's been running
Speaker 2: the show into this running the country into the ground
Speaker 2: at home and into endless wars abroad.
Speaker 1: Well, they can just keep the show on rolling.
Speaker 2: But then there there was.
Speaker 12: Also this look, we don't have enough housing in America.
Speaker 12: We have a housing supply shortage. And what that means,
Speaker 12: in particular for so many younger Americans, American dream is elusive.
Speaker 14: It's just actually not attainable.
Speaker 2: The American dream is unobtainable. Kamala bubblahlah. You've been in
Speaker 2: power for three and a half years. This happened on
Speaker 2: your watch. But of course Harris still has a plan
Speaker 2: for the future. Right.
Speaker 12: My approach is about new ideas, new policies that are
Speaker 12: directed at the current moment. And also, to be very
Speaker 12: honest with you, my focus is very much in what
Speaker 12: we need to do over the next ten twenty years
Speaker 12: to catch up to the twenty first century around again capacity,
Speaker 12: but also challenges.
Speaker 2: Does she even know what she is talking about? She
Speaker 2: sounds like Bart Simpson doing a book report where he
Speaker 2: hasn't read the book beforehand. Anyway, speaking of Harris not
Speaker 2: knowing what she was talking about, check out this clip
Speaker 2: of US soldiers serving over sives who took issue with
Speaker 2: her statement at last week's presidential debate that there are
Speaker 2: no troops in combat zones sex to the successful world
Speaker 2: peace creating foreign policy of the Biden Harris administration.
Speaker 14: Well, I will tell you I agreed with President Biden's
Speaker 14: decision to pull out of Afghanistan.
Speaker 4: Four presidents said they.
Speaker 14: Would, and Joe Biden did, And as a result, America's
Speaker 14: taxpayers are not paying the three hundred million dollars a
Speaker 14: day we were paying for that endless war. And as
Speaker 14: of today, there is not one member of the United
Speaker 14: States military who is in active duty in a combat
Speaker 14: zone in any war zone around the world.
Speaker 13: The first time this is but let's.
Speaker 2: Understand, so what are we right now? And you know,
Speaker 2: I'm not sure the Washington postern picked up on that,
Speaker 2: but anyway, there was one other part of the debate
Speaker 2: we still need to talk about, and oh, yeah, I
Speaker 2: think you know what I mean.
Speaker 3: In Springfield, they're eating the dogs the people that came in.
Speaker 3: They're eating the cats, they're eating they're eating the pets
Speaker 3: of the people.
Speaker 2: That live there. They're eating the pets of the people
Speaker 2: that live there. Now, this was of course lashed onto
Speaker 2: by the corporate media who just were appalled and said
Speaker 2: there was no evidence that anyone's cat or dog has
Speaker 2: been eaten by a Haitian migrant in Springfield, Ohio, a
Speaker 2: town of sixty thousand that has been forced to take
Speaker 2: a further twenty thousand Haitian migrants brought into the country
Speaker 2: by again the Biden Harris administration, and whose presence has
Speaker 2: led to massive spikes in car accidents, including deadly ones
Speaker 2: of all sorts, of other issues with people with prices
Speaker 2: of their homes going up as NGO's fund the migrants rent,
Speaker 2: and a host of other problems. But the claim about
Speaker 2: the eating the cats became a viral meme and even
Speaker 2: a song. People are now doing TikTok dances too.
Speaker 4: They're eating the dogs.
Speaker 5: They're eating the cats, eat the cat, eat eating the cat.
Speaker 4: They're eating the dogs.
Speaker 5: They're eating the cats, eat the cat, eat the cat.
Speaker 2: Olympic gold medalist Gabby Thomas even did her own number.
Speaker 4: They're eating the dogs.
Speaker 5: They're eating the cats, eat the cat, eat eating the cat.
Speaker 4: They're eating the dogs.
Speaker 5: They're eating the cats, eat the catty're eating the cats.
Speaker 5: They're eating the dogs, eat the cat, eat the cat.
Speaker 2: And here's the thing, now even weird. Tim Waltz, Kamala,
Speaker 2: Harris's running mate, talked about it, and his audience responded
Speaker 2: in kind.
Speaker 13: You tell me you had this on your Bengo card
Speaker 13: and they're eating cats and they're eating cats.
Speaker 2: Were concerned, and you know what, I think this is great.
Speaker 2: It shows the cutthrough of this moment because eating the
Speaker 2: cats has become the latest version of let's go branded.
Speaker 2: Remember that it's a shorthand that allows people to talk
Speaker 2: about and acknowledge the horrible consequences of the Biden Harris
Speaker 2: administration's open border policies, which have seen innocent Americans murdered, raped,
Speaker 2: and brutalized by illegal immigrants across the country, gangs, the
Speaker 2: whole thing. It makes people also think about why the
Speaker 2: Biden Harris administration imported hundreds of thousands of Haitians and
Speaker 2: dropped them in communities like Springfield, Ohio and other places
Speaker 2: across the country, when no one ever asked for or
Speaker 2: wanted this to happen, at least in those places they
Speaker 2: didn't get a vote. It gets to the fundamental truth
Speaker 2: that the corporate media won't acknowledge these things and will
Speaker 2: call you racist if you do, even as they string
Speaker 2: together cherry picked facts to make things look wonderful under
Speaker 2: the Democrats, when of course they aren't. It's the one
Speaker 2: moment from the debate people remember, and in the end
Speaker 2: that's an advantage for Trump.
Speaker 1: Great stuff. Thanks James Well joining us now is as
Speaker 1: I promised. Noah Tishby New York Times bestselling author and
Speaker 1: Israel's first Special Envoy for combating anti Semitism now always
Speaker 1: great to see you. Thanks for coming on Outsiders again.
Speaker 1: I wanted to ask you. Wanted to ask you a
Speaker 1: bit about the tunnel. It's a horrible subject and people
Speaker 1: feel quite rightly distressed about discussing it. But we've seen
Speaker 1: you hostages who survived the most appalling events are then killed,
Speaker 1: you know, shortly before being rescued. It's just the grimmest,
Speaker 1: vilest thing. And yet we've got these idiots around the
Speaker 1: world calling for a cease fire. Whereas far as I'm concerned, Noah,
Speaker 1: the Israel Defense Force should get in there, finish the job,
Speaker 1: get the hostages out, and wipe out her mass off
Speaker 1: the face of the earth. That's my idea. Tell me
Speaker 1: your thoughts on the matter, Noah.
Speaker 13: That is obviously that should be your idea if you
Speaker 13: support democracy and everything that we hold dear in the West.
Speaker 13: But some people don't think that. Here's what people need
Speaker 13: to understand. We just got exposed to the horrificness of
Speaker 13: the conditions in Hamas tunnels. People need to wrap their
Speaker 13: brains around the fact that there are hundreds and hundreds
Speaker 13: of kilometers underneath Gaza Gaza. Instead of turning into a
Speaker 13: beautiful beachfront resort Taiwan type of a place, turn into
Speaker 13: the most fortified zone on earth with hundreds of miles
Speaker 13: on Tramas tunnels. These places are horrific. They're tiny, they're
Speaker 13: full of humidity. The people that have been there have
Speaker 13: purported dehydration, suffocation. It's claustrophobic. This is something that you
Speaker 13: need to understand. Nobody should ever go through.
Speaker 1: Ever.
Speaker 13: I was at an event a few weeks ago and
Speaker 13: somebody asked me in the audience, where do I think
Speaker 13: the hostages are? And I looked at him and I said,
Speaker 13: I don't know where they are, but I can tell
Speaker 13: you that right now, they're in the Holocaust. This is
Speaker 13: what we need to understand. These hostages. One hundred and
Speaker 13: one people right now are going through the Holocaust. And
Speaker 13: if you wonder to yourself, what would you have said
Speaker 13: in World War Two if you learned about the Holocaust.
Speaker 13: This is where you need to look in yourself in
Speaker 13: the mirror. You need to call for the release of
Speaker 13: release of the hostages right now without any equivocation. Hamas
Speaker 13: is a terrorist, jihadi organization. This is not about anything else.
Speaker 13: It's not about borders, it's not about politics. It's about
Speaker 13: eliminating as many Jews as they possibly can and taking
Speaker 13: down the state of Israel. And they're doing it right
Speaker 13: now through the hostages and through the psychological warfare that
Speaker 13: they're waging us on the Israelis. And the Americans and
Speaker 13: anybody that is exposed to these videos and see what
Speaker 13: is actually happening down there.
Speaker 6: Tell me about this psychological warfare, because we know her
Speaker 6: Maas filmed these hostages, filmed them before they kill them.
Speaker 6: Some of them had horrific injuries when they were captured,
Speaker 6: and they must have suffered terribly for all those months
Speaker 6: that were held and just before the rescue, as you've mentioned,
Speaker 6: they have been executed. Tell me about how they're employing
Speaker 6: these tactics and what impact it's having on the Israeli population.
Speaker 13: Well, let's just talking. And they were executed with a
Speaker 13: gunshot to the back of their necks. That's what happened.
Speaker 13: So these six people have survived for eleven months in
Speaker 13: subhuman conditions and then we're secuted in cold blood. What's
Speaker 13: happening now is a trauma for the collective of the
Speaker 13: Jewish people in the state of Israel and anybody that's
Speaker 13: paying attention. A part of Hamas's strategy is a psychological warfare,
Speaker 13: which is exactly what they're doing. They're filming the hostages,
Speaker 13: they're making them say certain things, they're writing scripts for them.
Speaker 13: They're very very media savvy, so hostages that have returned
Speaker 13: are reporting that they set them down, they told them
Speaker 13: to brush their hairs. One of the hostages was actually
Speaker 13: rebelling against it and she's like, no, I'm not going
Speaker 13: to do that, and are putting them against a backdrop
Speaker 13: and telling them what to say. One of the hostages
Speaker 13: was reporting that she started crying at some point and
Speaker 13: the Hamas terrorists were saying, why are you crying? What
Speaker 13: do you think? Why do you think I'm crying. They're
Speaker 13: making them say all these things to actually put pressure
Speaker 13: on the Israelis when the pressure needs to be on Hamas,
Speaker 13: on the terrorist organization that started this thing. Because again,
Speaker 13: when people are when these terrorists are saying what they want,
Speaker 13: the people in the West need to listen. So if
Speaker 13: you hear in Iran, you hear death to Israel, you
Speaker 13: know the death to America is sure to follow. And
Speaker 13: you know that it's to Australia and to Europe. You
Speaker 13: know that they are after our way of life and
Speaker 13: they're using Israel and they're using the Jewish people. This
Speaker 13: is just a step for the rest of the world.
Speaker 13: And I know this might sound like warmongering, but it's true.
Speaker 13: The West need to listen to what Hamas is saying
Speaker 13: and put the pressure where it belongs on Hamas, the
Speaker 13: Islamic Republic of Iran that is responsible for everything that's
Speaker 13: happening right now in the world.
Speaker 2: And Noah, these tunnels, which of course were built in
Speaker 2: no small part with Western aid money, were under Rafah
Speaker 2: where where these horror, horrible executions were talking about took place.
Speaker 2: And yet just weeks ago, months ago, the bodied administration
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris were telling Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government
Speaker 2: not to go into Rafa. Now, don't tell me that
Speaker 2: they wouldn't have known in their national security briefings that
Speaker 2: they're were hostages being held there and that this was
Speaker 2: the epicenter of this Hamas evil. What do you make
Speaker 2: of the way the Biden Harris administration has been conducting
Speaker 2: itself in this circumstance. What does it portend if they
Speaker 2: win in November?
Speaker 13: Sadly, I believe that this is not just the Biden
Speaker 13: Harris administration. This is a lot of governments in the
Speaker 13: West and a lot of people that aren't getting the message.
Speaker 13: They are subjected to Twitter rage. They started basically a
Speaker 13: campaign all eyes on Rafa. They started this online campaign
Speaker 13: that we know who's behind it, and we know who's
Speaker 13: paying for it and sponsoring it, and activists and influencers
Speaker 13: and celebrities in Hollywood personnel have tried to have actually
Speaker 13: taken this on all eyes on Rafa to prevent ISRAELI
Speaker 13: are we from getting into Rafa when we knew that
Speaker 13: the hostages were there? So they're trying to prevent Israel
Speaker 13: from going into a rescue operation to save these hostages.
Speaker 13: And we know these hostages were slaughtered in Rafa, that's
Speaker 13: where they keep them. So I do believe that Israel
Speaker 13: needs to be able to do whatever it has to
Speaker 13: to rescue these hostages and to eliminate Hamas. The Palestinian
Speaker 13: people deserve better than Hamas. We need to stand united
Speaker 13: against jihadism. This is the one thing that the West
Speaker 13: has to understand and unite against.
Speaker 1: Now, Tish, we agree one hundred percent with you. Israel
Speaker 1: needs to get in there, finish off ha mass wipe
Speaker 1: them out. Nothing less than that will do. And all
Speaker 1: those Western nations and governments like our own, shamefully here
Speaker 1: in Australia, the disgraceful Alban easy Wong government trying to
Speaker 1: stop arms as the British are doing stopping arms to
Speaker 1: Israel and support calling for CEA spires when there is
Speaker 1: only one solution, Noah, and that is to finish off
Speaker 1: a mass eliminate them off the face of the earth
Speaker 1: very quickly ten seconds. Noah.
Speaker 13: I think everybody can be very brave and talk about
Speaker 13: not responding the way that Israel has responded just because
Speaker 13: they're far away from these people. Just remember Rafa Gaza
Speaker 13: is very close to Tel Aviv. So just remember, if
Speaker 13: you're sitting in Sydney and somebody is thirty kilometers away
Speaker 13: from you, you're going to try and eliminate them.
Speaker 1: No tissue, thanks so much. After the break, Canberra Clown
Speaker 1: Show loves to talk about Kennetick.
Speaker 2: Roll Up, Roll Up.
Speaker 1: It's the Canbra Clown Show where this week's clown of
Speaker 1: the week goes to one of our most popular clowns
Speaker 1: here underneath the Burley Griffin Big Top, and that is,
Speaker 1: of course, Senator Tim Oolaroo, who also goes under the
Speaker 1: stage name of Senator Tim ares Rock. Tim's favorite clown
Speaker 1: show is pretending he's a local Soviet commissar in some
Speaker 1: obscure corner of Stalin's Russia. Yes, Commissar Ularu. Sorry, Senator
Speaker 1: As chooses to call Australians who hold the political point
Speaker 1: of view at odds with his own conspiracy theorists from
Speaker 1: the dark swamp of the Internet. Here he is responding
Speaker 1: to the democratically elected One Nation Senator, the fearless Malcolm
Speaker 1: Roberts by labeling what he has to say as misinformation.
Speaker 1: And what was Malcolm Roberts saying? He was simply calling
Speaker 1: for a royal commission into COVID. Listen to how Tim
Speaker 1: Ayre's responds.
Speaker 23: The people who propagate those conspiracy theories are either unwitting
Speaker 23: dupes who are silly enough to believe that kind of
Speaker 23: material that you find in the sort of swamp of
Speaker 23: the dark recesses of the Internet, or they are deliberately
Speaker 23: seeking to do social harm. And I don't know which
Speaker 23: category Senator Roberts falls into, but he falls into one
Speaker 23: of them because there is no alternative there misinformation misinformation.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, the clown Act known as the Canned Republic Circus
Speaker 1: Sorry Service is up to its old tricks this week,
Speaker 1: firing dollar bills out of a cannon to see just
Speaker 1: how much of it they can waste. Your dollar bills
Speaker 1: of course, wait for it, The Department of infrat Structure
Speaker 1: paid fifteen thousand dollars of your money for comedian Celia Pacola,
Speaker 1: who plays an infrastructure department Boffen in the ABC comedy
Speaker 1: Utopia to speak to the real life Department of Infrastructure,
Speaker 1: life imitating art and you pay for it. In the
Speaker 1: Canberra Clown Show, here she is with a young Jim
Speaker 1: Chalmers look alike.
Speaker 24: I'm task oriented. What does that mean exactly?
Speaker 1: Task orient How men you here at a lot?
Speaker 7: What does it actually mean to you?
Speaker 1: That simply means that I'm oriented to the task show
Speaker 1: I delegate with clearly. Now I'm not sure if that
Speaker 1: was the spoof or if that was the real thing.
Speaker 1: You'd never get to be able to guess. Speaking of
Speaker 1: task orientated, there's none so orientated towards their task of
Speaker 1: sucking up to footy fans as our prime minister. Here
Speaker 1: he was last week with a hawk scarf around his neck,
Speaker 1: showing his undying, eternal and unwavering support and loyalty to
Speaker 1: that particular team. And here there he is showing his undying,
Speaker 1: eternal and on wavering support and loyalty to a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of other teams. It seems not everyone was impressed, however,
Speaker 1: with Channel nine's Tony Jones saying the Prime Minister made
Speaker 1: him sick.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: I was almost sick yesterday, said Jones on air, when
Speaker 1: I looked at the Hawthorne Club song and their front
Speaker 1: and center was the Prime Minister, Anthony ALBANIZI he has
Speaker 1: no interest in AFL and there he was. He's got
Speaker 1: the scarf around his name. Just go away, said Tony Jones.
Speaker 1: Clearly not a fan, Jones, I mean, Albo is a
Speaker 1: fan of lots of things, and this week he became
Speaker 1: a fan of internet censorship for young people. He's the
Speaker 1: benign sounding sales pitch and and includes a reference, of
Speaker 1: course to footy.
Speaker 24: This one is for the mums and dads.
Speaker 20: I know you're worried about the impact social media can
Speaker 20: have on young children and Selma. That's why we'll introduce
Speaker 20: legislation this year for a minimum age for social media.
Speaker 24: I want kids to have a childhood.
Speaker 20: I want them off their devices and onto the footy
Speaker 20: field and onto the netball kutz. I want them to
Speaker 20: have real experiences with real people.
Speaker 24: Together, we can get this done.
Speaker 1: Is it really so benign or is it more Soviet
Speaker 1: style suppression of free speech even with the confines of
Speaker 1: the family home. Is this about empowering parents or is
Speaker 1: it about dis empowering them? Remember it was former Human
Speaker 1: Rights Commissioner Gillian Triggs who famously bemoaned the fact that
Speaker 1: people could say whatever they wanted around the kitchen table.
Speaker 1: Take the Internet away from kids and young teenagers just
Speaker 1: at the age where they are becoming curious about the world.
Speaker 1: And where do they then get all their information from
Speaker 1: when mum and dad are too busy? Why the state
Speaker 1: of course from left wing politicians and authoritarian are parachecks
Speaker 1: like Tim Ayre's or our communications minister whose orwelly and
Speaker 1: job title obscures the fact that her man jobs seems
Speaker 1: to be shutting down the means of communicating freely.
Speaker 22: I'll start from this position first. The reason why we're
Speaker 22: doing this is to protect children. That's the first reason
Speaker 22: why we're doing it. If we need to take on
Speaker 22: big tech during it, then absolutely the government's committed to
Speaker 22: doing that. We need to make sure that we get
Speaker 22: the enforcement regime right. We need to make sure we
Speaker 22: get the implementation right. There is no government or regulator
Speaker 22: in the world who has done this to the point
Speaker 22: where we can just take it off the shelf and
Speaker 22: say we'll implement this. That's why, And it is an
Speaker 22: unusual thing for governments to be intervening at this level.
Speaker 22: But again the why is important. It's about the safety
Speaker 22: and the health of young Australia.
Speaker 1: Enforcement safety. You got that no other government in the
Speaker 1: world has done this for the obvious reason that it
Speaker 1: is undoable. But like pushing water up hill or changing
Speaker 1: the weather by killing fighting cows, I always believed that
Speaker 1: somehow they can do the undoable, defy logic and common
Speaker 1: sense and damn the consequences. Elon Musk has correctly, my opinion,
Speaker 1: declared to the world that the Australian social media censorship
Speaker 1: is fascism, the reason being, as blind Freddie knows that
Speaker 1: an age limit can only work with a digital ID,
Speaker 1: and therefore this entire process is simply a sneaky little
Speaker 1: window into getting us all signed up to a digital ID.
Speaker 2: And what's wrong with that?
Speaker 1: Well, let Malcolm Roberts explain.
Speaker 25: Here's an example of what could and does go wrong.
Speaker 25: Remember when this labor government demanded a my gov account
Speaker 25: was needed in order to register for a director's ID.
Speaker 25: Remember that wasn't so long ago. The process was outsourced
Speaker 25: to accent you, who immediately treated the exercise as a
Speaker 25: data harvesting opportunity, a landfall, a win for and started
Speaker 25: demanding applicants for a director's ID also provide details of
Speaker 25: their bank accounts, superannuation accounts, center link account, many care number,
Speaker 25: a tax return, the driver's license number, and their passport number.
Speaker 25: Yet the only thing the enabling legislation allowed for was
Speaker 25: the tax for a number one, and they harvested seven.
Speaker 1: See it's all about authoritarian digital technological control. This is
Speaker 1: not about protecting kids. Because if our governments really did
Speaker 1: care about protecting kids, then why on earth is a
Speaker 1: book like this one, which details adult sexual activities with
Speaker 1: graphic illustrations worthy of the Karma Sutra, not only widely
Speaker 1: available to young kids in our public schools, but wait
Speaker 1: for it being shortlisted for the Prime Minister's Awards. Yes,
Speaker 1: what was that again about kids getting out and playing footy. No,
Speaker 1: the real agenda here is government control of the family,
Speaker 1: the fam, the state replacing mum and dad. That is
Speaker 1: what is at stake. His Senator Alexanderkho, we just had
Speaker 1: on the show warning of what inevitably comes hidden in
Speaker 1: the same package.
Speaker 21: It's not going to stop for kids on social media.
Speaker 21: It's going to be used for everything in your digital life,
Speaker 21: facial scans, fingerprints, and who knows what other data will
Speaker 21: soon be needed just to simply exist online. You can
Speaker 21: kiss your privacy goodbye, and you can kiss goodbye your
Speaker 21: freedom of speech.
Speaker 1: Now, bizarrely and completely unexpectedly, I was astonished by one
Speaker 1: other senator who spoke up against this insidious social media
Speaker 1: restriction bill in Parliament, and that was former Greens and
Speaker 1: now Independent Senator Fatima payment Now not someone whose political
Speaker 1: views I share at all on well anything, I especially
Speaker 1: loaded her or borrent views on Israel in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: But this is the very essence of wy free speech
Speaker 1: is so important and so precious. Free speech allows us
Speaker 1: to challenge and then disagree or agree on specific ideas,
Speaker 1: rather than to focus on objectionable personalities or political partisan dogma.
Speaker 1: And I never thought I'd say it, but what Senator
Speaker 1: Fatima Payman said and did in Parliament this week was
Speaker 1: very clever. Most commentators, particularly conservative commentators, chose to mock
Speaker 1: and ridicule her speech and totally missed the point. Payman
Speaker 1: was creatively using the jargon of young people to warn
Speaker 1: them of the very real threat this social media bill
Speaker 1: poses to them. Hopefully they, in turn will raise the
Speaker 1: topic of censorship of the Internet, of the appropriate use
Speaker 1: of the Internet where it belongs around the kitchen table
Speaker 1: with mum and dad. Now, I didn't understand a word
Speaker 1: of what Fatima said, but I sincerely hope at least
Speaker 1: some kids out there got the message loud and clear.
Speaker 19: They must have brain rot from watching too much Kaisanat
Speaker 19: and forgot about their plans to ban social.
Speaker 7: Media for kids under fourteen.
Speaker 19: If that becomes law, you can forgore skull emoji all
Speaker 19: about watching Duke Dennis or catching a dub with the
Speaker 19: bros on fort Chat?
Speaker 7: Is this Prime Minister serious?
Speaker 1: Hyperbol the world of extreme exaggeration? According to Julia Gillard,
Speaker 1: hype early Now Donald Trump here he is never listen.
Speaker 1: He got angry in the debate, he said.
Speaker 26: People said that I was angry at the debate angry.
Speaker 26: I was angry, and yes I am angry because he
Speaker 26: allowed twenty one million illegal aliens invading our communities. Many
Speaker 26: of them are criminals, many are criminals.
Speaker 2: I'm angry, Rita.
Speaker 7: He's just a classic.
Speaker 6: He's he's a funny, funny guy. We're never gonna have
Speaker 6: a president as funny as that one, and the media never.
Speaker 7: Give him credit for the last. Seriously, the comedy.
Speaker 2: Here's an amazing sense of humor, amazing sense of timing.
Speaker 2: I mean he has a very sort of kind of
Speaker 2: New York almost Force Belt kind of comedian sort of style.
Speaker 2: Almost a little bit Jackie Mason in there somewhere. This
Speaker 2: is the thing. This speech he gave and the speeches
Speaker 2: he's been giving since the debate have been phenomenal. The
Speaker 2: only thing I want to was, where was that Donald
Speaker 2: Trump at the debate?
Speaker 6: Whoart he treated the debate almost with this day, not
Speaker 6: just the fact that it was three against one, but
Speaker 6: the fact that she was up there.
Speaker 7: She's running for president. I think, yeah, I think.
Speaker 1: But there were so many missed opportunities, There were so
Speaker 1: many moments.
Speaker 6: But he's never been good at that night. But he's
Speaker 6: not a politician. Yeah, Vvick was up there, even j
Speaker 6: D was up there. They would have hit those points, certainly.
Speaker 1: Did the brilliant kind of I don't know what he's saying.
Speaker 1: He doesn't.
Speaker 2: The latest polling though shows now you know your cars pulling.
Speaker 2: The Atlas Interactive poll, which is one of the best
Speaker 2: polls in the business, is now saying that Trump is
Speaker 2: ahead on the popular vote. And now I know it's
Speaker 2: the electoral votes that counts, but really you need about
Speaker 2: three points on the general as a Democrat to get
Speaker 2: over the electorals. So there's a lot of things that
Speaker 2: are starting to break Comp's way, and I think it
Speaker 2: comes back to everybody certainly being allowed to talk about
Speaker 2: the number one issue, which.
Speaker 1: Is my great of the exactly and I agree, I
Speaker 1: agreed totally with each Everybody missed the point, going oh,
Speaker 1: he's exaggerating, he's crazy, and all this sort of stuff.
Speaker 1: So many comments completely missed the point, which is why
Speaker 1: you were sided by the way, this is a new
Speaker 1: one hundred percent correct chains. This is allowed people to
Speaker 1: discuss a very delicate subject, the immigration and cultural differences,
Speaker 1: without being accused of.
Speaker 2: Why are why is a town of sixty thousand people
Speaker 2: getting twenty thousand people from a very well remember.
Speaker 6: What happened when Martha's Vineyard, with all its resources and riches,
Speaker 6: had like fifty legal They ship them out whilst clapping
Speaker 6: them and saying how wonderful and tolerant they were, so
Speaker 6: you a fairly low socioeconomic town having twenty thousand suddenly
Speaker 6: taking their resources, the services.
Speaker 1: And to pretend that this cannot completely alter your life
Speaker 1: if you're a young person.
Speaker 2: Remember the same people, the same people who are in
Speaker 2: charge of importing all of these migrants and telling them
Speaker 2: they're great for Springfield, are the same ones who took
Speaker 2: the jobs out of Springfield exact sent them will received.
Speaker 1: That's it for outsiders this week. We'll see you next Sunday.
Speaker 1: In the meantime, let's have a listen to how Donald
Speaker 1: Trump won the forthcoming election. In my opinion, the
Speaker 3: Atamanating depends of the people that live there.