WEBVTT - Credlin | 4 November

0:00:02.690 --> 0:00:07.910
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:08.550 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Good evening.

0:00:08.980 --> 0:00:11.180
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the show. Steve Price in for Peter tonight

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 3>on a historic day in the US politics as Americans

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.830
<v Speaker 3>turn on Donald Trump in a devastating result for him.

0:00:18.350 --> 0:00:21.910
<v Speaker 3>Full coverage to come right through Credlin tonight. On that,

0:00:22.250 --> 0:00:25.729
<v Speaker 3>Democrats back in control in the US with the midterms

0:00:25.850 --> 0:00:29.380
<v Speaker 3>pulling the rug from under President Trump. Americans, just like

0:00:29.420 --> 0:00:32.979
<v Speaker 3>here in Australia, frustrated over the cost of living and

0:00:33.060 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 3>skyrocketing fuel prices. We'll get more on what this all

0:00:36.540 --> 0:00:40.910
<v Speaker 3>means for the second half of the Trump presidency shortly. Plus,

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.409
<v Speaker 3>the latest on the Victorian election campaign with Labor using

0:00:44.450 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>the cover of caretaker mode to rush through planning approvals

0:00:48.740 --> 0:00:53.309
<v Speaker 3>for a string of projects, including controversial battery farms that

0:00:53.409 --> 0:00:57.260
<v Speaker 3>many communities simply don't want. The Victorian Nationals leader will

0:00:57.300 --> 0:01:00.380
<v Speaker 3>be with us this evening. And the fallout continues over

0:01:00.420 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank's decision yesterday to lift rates to levels

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 3>not seen in 18 years amid deepening concerns we are

0:01:08.340 --> 0:01:12.610
<v Speaker 3>about to tilt into a recession. And what about this?

0:01:12.650 --> 0:01:17.110
<v Speaker 3>A Victorian council is set to install pothole cameras fixed

0:01:17.150 --> 0:01:21.330
<v Speaker 3>to council vehicles like street sweepers to detect holes in

0:01:21.350 --> 0:01:24.650
<v Speaker 3>the road. and send the information direct to repair crews.

0:01:25.069 --> 0:01:28.509
<v Speaker 3>We'll get into that with our Wednesday panel shortly. But

0:01:28.569 --> 0:01:31.660
<v Speaker 3>first up tonight, as we have been watching unfold today

0:01:31.950 --> 0:01:35.500
<v Speaker 3>with the outstanding News 24 coverage of the midterm elections

0:01:35.540 --> 0:01:39.020
<v Speaker 3>in the US, alarm bells will be ringing for every

0:01:39.140 --> 0:01:44.100
<v Speaker 3>sitting government in Australia, including two state premiers facing polls

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.010
<v Speaker 3>over the next five months and even the Albanese government

0:01:48.010 --> 0:01:51.610
<v Speaker 3>18 months away from their own electoral test. The thumping

0:01:51.670 --> 0:01:54.790
<v Speaker 3>results for the Democrats might be built around some of

0:01:54.830 --> 0:02:00.140
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump's erratic second-term behaviour and the disastrous war against Iran,

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 3>but at the heart of the protest vote, as we've

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.110
<v Speaker 3>heard all day, is the cost of living, inflation, hiking

0:02:07.140 --> 0:02:10.210
<v Speaker 3>the price of everything from food to energy bills, let

0:02:10.230 --> 0:02:13.970
<v Speaker 3>alone the never-ending spike in in fuel prices. Sound familiar?

0:02:14.530 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 3>People are hurting. They're hurting in the US, even with

0:02:17.660 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the booming economy and healthy share market, driven, of course,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>by tech stocks and AI. So when you shine that

0:02:25.260 --> 0:02:28.829
<v Speaker 3>same light on Australia... Well, you get a very ugly picture.

0:02:29.190 --> 0:02:32.790
<v Speaker 3>Yesterday's Melbourne Cup Day fifth interest rate rise in a row,

0:02:33.250 --> 0:02:36.290
<v Speaker 3>adding this year alone to a million dollar home loan,

0:02:36.470 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>extra payments of nearly $ 800 a month after tax, could

0:02:41.500 --> 0:02:45.660
<v Speaker 3>be the rise that breaks the camel's back. But here

0:02:45.700 --> 0:02:49.820
<v Speaker 3>he was again, the Treasurer, yesterday blaming everybody but himself.

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.090
<v Speaker 4>The war in the Middle East is pushing up inflation

0:02:53.230 --> 0:02:56.190
<v Speaker 4>and interest rates around the world and markets are expecting

0:02:56.490 --> 0:03:00.610
<v Speaker 4>interest rate rises now in every major advanced economy. The

0:03:00.630 --> 0:03:03.530
<v Speaker 4>war is in its ninth month and its re-escalation is

0:03:03.590 --> 0:03:07.090
<v Speaker 4>putting sustained upward pressure on inflation. It's weighing on growth

0:03:07.770 --> 0:03:10.370
<v Speaker 4>and its end can't come soon enough for the global

0:03:10.410 --> 0:03:14.450
<v Speaker 4>economy or for Australians facing cost of living pressures.

0:03:16.550 --> 0:03:19.030
<v Speaker 3>I mean, goodness sake, can someone senior inside the Labor

0:03:19.070 --> 0:03:21.590
<v Speaker 3>Party have the guts to tap this bloke on the

0:03:21.650 --> 0:03:24.889
<v Speaker 3>shoulder and quietly show him the door? Now, our very

0:03:24.990 --> 0:03:28.130
<v Speaker 3>own Cam Redden was doing their job for them yesterday

0:03:28.530 --> 0:03:31.010
<v Speaker 3>and deserves a massive pat on the back for this

0:03:31.110 --> 0:03:32.090
<v Speaker 3>zinger of a question.

0:03:32.970 --> 0:03:34.770
<v Speaker 5>You would have seen polling this week that has you

0:03:34.850 --> 0:03:37.990
<v Speaker 5>rated as the lowest performing member of the government. I'm

0:03:38.010 --> 0:03:40.430
<v Speaker 5>wondering if that frustrates you, given that the Prime Minister

0:03:40.470 --> 0:03:42.610
<v Speaker 5>and other ministers are responsible as well.

0:03:42.690 --> 0:03:43.290
<v Speaker 2>And on that note.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.340
<v Speaker 5>I'm wondering whether you've given any thought to stepping aside

0:03:46.380 --> 0:03:47.450
<v Speaker 5>and giving someone else a go.

0:03:47.470 --> 0:03:52.010
<v Speaker 3>I was watching that live and Jim didn't blink, but

0:03:52.050 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>he wouldn't have liked it.

0:03:53.850 --> 0:03:57.010
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, I'm aware of the contents of the first part

0:03:57.230 --> 0:04:01.420
<v Speaker 4>of your question. I think, as other ministers have pointed out,

0:04:01.580 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 4>when you're doing difficult things, you see that reflected in

0:04:04.100 --> 0:04:08.820
<v Speaker 4>the opinion polls. I think any Treasurer taking on difficult reforms,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.300
<v Speaker 4>which have been neglected for too long, in our tax system,

0:04:12.340 --> 0:04:17.589
<v Speaker 4>in our housing market and elsewhere. No reforming Treasurer expects

0:04:17.630 --> 0:04:22.210
<v Speaker 4>there to be some kind of unanimously positive reaction to that.

0:04:22.350 --> 0:04:25.409
<v Speaker 4>We see that play out in the polls. I've acknowledged

0:04:25.470 --> 0:04:28.810
<v Speaker 4>on other occasions in response to some of your colleagues

0:04:28.850 --> 0:04:32.770
<v Speaker 4>and counterparts in the room today, I take responsibility for

0:04:32.790 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 4>the difficult reforms that I'm pushing through the Parliament and

0:04:35.300 --> 0:04:37.779
<v Speaker 4>I'm not surprised to see that reflected in opinion polls.

0:04:39.250 --> 0:04:42.830
<v Speaker 3>Deflection and gaslighting, he's very good at it, Jim. Now,

0:04:42.870 --> 0:04:45.060
<v Speaker 3>the Victorian government, of course, they go to the polls

0:04:45.300 --> 0:04:48.420
<v Speaker 3>in three Saturdays' time. And that's going to deliver three

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.799
<v Speaker 3>weeks of ugly claim and counterclaim, dirty campaign ads, including

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.980
<v Speaker 3>one run during the cup coverage from Labor, making the

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 3>claim that a Liberal coalition One Nation government will cut

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.580
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars out of health spending. I mean, that

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.810
<v Speaker 3>was gaslighting at its best. I mean, it's certainly false

0:05:07.890 --> 0:05:11.570
<v Speaker 3>advertising in anybody's language, given that Liberal leader Jess Wilson

0:05:11.589 --> 0:05:15.590
<v Speaker 3>has consistently ruled out forming a coalition with One Nation.

0:05:16.410 --> 0:05:17.190
<v Speaker 2>There is no deal.

0:05:17.550 --> 0:05:20.140
<v Speaker 6>There will be no deal. The only way to change

0:05:20.180 --> 0:05:22.700
<v Speaker 6>the direction of Victoria is with a majority Liberals and

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.530
<v Speaker 6>Nationals government. My team will be on the ground listening

0:05:25.550 --> 0:05:28.229
<v Speaker 6>to Victorians, earning their trust every single day.

0:05:29.310 --> 0:05:31.610
<v Speaker 3>How does Labor get away with running false advertising? I'd

0:05:31.630 --> 0:05:33.850
<v Speaker 3>love to know that. We need to have legislation in

0:05:33.890 --> 0:05:37.150
<v Speaker 3>this country that actually punishes people who run ads like that.

0:05:37.410 --> 0:05:40.450
<v Speaker 3>It happens to retailers. Why shouldn't it happen to politicians?

0:05:40.810 --> 0:05:43.420
<v Speaker 3>And there's more evidence today of dirty tricks, with an

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:48.980
<v Speaker 3>AI-generated deepfake ad depicting opposition leader Jess Wilson and One

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Nation leader Warren Pickering in a Halloween skit, suggesting they

0:05:53.060 --> 0:05:56.940
<v Speaker 3>are going to Americanise the health system. I mean, personally,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.289
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone in Victoria, bar the Greens and Labor voters,

0:06:00.330 --> 0:06:03.230
<v Speaker 3>would just want to see the back of Labor. However,

0:06:03.290 --> 0:06:06.130
<v Speaker 3>it might be done, and don't rule it out, a

0:06:06.210 --> 0:06:09.630
<v Speaker 3>better one than expected One Nation result. And if that happens,

0:06:09.750 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>it might have to be some sort of joint operation.

0:06:12.900 --> 0:06:16.339
<v Speaker 3>And a desperate Labor government will also throw plenty of

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Victorian taxpayers' money around. You watch over the next three weeks.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Borrowed money, by the way. to try and bribe their

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.350
<v Speaker 3>way back to a fourth term. Now, today, the Premier,

0:06:26.390 --> 0:06:29.289
<v Speaker 3>Ben Carroll, claimed he was going to, and these are

0:06:29.330 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 3>his words, create 5,000 jobs with some nebulous scheme called

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Make It Here Fund. I mean, this is, of course,

0:06:39.380 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 3>a direct copy of the failed Labor federal campaign promised

0:06:42.690 --> 0:06:47.130
<v Speaker 3>to turbocharged the Australian manufacturing industry. Of course, the reverse

0:06:47.150 --> 0:06:51.250
<v Speaker 3>has happened, with the RBA last month revealing productivity growth

0:06:51.290 --> 0:06:54.349
<v Speaker 3>was stuck at zero. Albo chirped on back then about

0:06:54.410 --> 0:06:58.370
<v Speaker 3>Australian-made solar panels and other green schemes that have simply

0:06:58.450 --> 0:07:03.150
<v Speaker 3>not materialised. For Carroll to think any sensibly run business

0:07:03.470 --> 0:07:06.950
<v Speaker 3>would invest in this state, Victoria, then he's more delusional

0:07:06.970 --> 0:07:09.690
<v Speaker 3>than I thought he was. Victoria has taxed itself out

0:07:09.730 --> 0:07:14.100
<v Speaker 3>of relevance. But here was Ben Carroll bragging about a

0:07:14.100 --> 0:07:18.940
<v Speaker 3>$ 200 million government scheme to co-invest with, get this, the

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.750
<v Speaker 3>state government, chipping in $ 1 for every $ 2 spent by business.

0:07:23.870 --> 0:07:27.550
<v Speaker 3>Just watch that get rorted. And just where is the

0:07:27.550 --> 0:07:30.530
<v Speaker 3>$ 200 million coming from, given the state's interest rate payments

0:07:30.610 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>alone have hit $ 900, 000 an hour and counting? But here

0:07:34.700 --> 0:07:35.850
<v Speaker 3>was the Premier....

0:07:36.730 --> 0:07:39.410
<v Speaker 7>As a Premier and a Labor Premier, I'm going to

0:07:39.570 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 7>back our manufacturing sector. I'm going to make sure we

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 7>have more ego pharmaceuticals right throughout our state. That's why

0:07:48.420 --> 0:07:53.670
<v Speaker 7>I am pleased to announce a $ 350 million commitment to

0:07:53.710 --> 0:07:59.530
<v Speaker 7>create 5,000 jobs in our manufacturing industry right across our state.

0:07:59.530 --> 0:08:03.580
<v Speaker 7>$ 200 million will be a co-investment contribution with the Victorian Government.

0:08:04.050 --> 0:08:06.990
<v Speaker 7>and $ 150 million will be a grants program.

0:08:08.910 --> 0:08:12.050
<v Speaker 3>The state's broke, mate. I mean, add up. So like

0:08:12.090 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the US and the anger Americans showed today over cost

0:08:15.510 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>of living, can you believe the brand that you saw

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.780
<v Speaker 3>there on Carol's high-vis vest, Ego? Well, that's appropriate. Now,

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.460
<v Speaker 3>that is definitely the one thing voters do not want

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:34.340
<v Speaker 3>to see in this campaign. OK, from one election campaign

0:08:34.380 --> 0:08:37.780
<v Speaker 3>or potential campaign to another and the US midterm elections,

0:08:38.140 --> 0:08:40.059
<v Speaker 3>they've dominated, of course, the news cycle today.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:40.700
<v Speaker 2>Great coverage.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.540
<v Speaker 3>On News 24, with the Democrats now taking both houses

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.590
<v Speaker 3>in a swing that many say has served as a

0:08:47.660 --> 0:08:52.069
<v Speaker 3>referendum on the second Trump presidency. News 24 chief election

0:08:52.170 --> 0:08:56.429
<v Speaker 3>analyst Tom Connell has been crunching the numbers all day long. Tom,

0:08:56.470 --> 0:08:58.930
<v Speaker 3>great effort today. You had all the latest numbers. You

0:08:58.970 --> 0:09:02.570
<v Speaker 3>told us where these votes were going. They were saying

0:09:02.610 --> 0:09:04.770
<v Speaker 3>it was going to be a bloodbath for the Republicans.

0:09:05.610 --> 0:09:07.850
<v Speaker 3>Do we take it to the next level and maybe

0:09:07.890 --> 0:09:08.770
<v Speaker 3>call it a massacre?

0:09:09.780 --> 0:09:11.300
<v Speaker 8>I'm going to put it in context for you at

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.900
<v Speaker 8>the start. It's not far off a massacre, in particular seats-wise.

0:09:14.940 --> 0:09:16.550
<v Speaker 8>So let's look at a couple of different angles on this.

0:09:17.010 --> 0:09:21.510
<v Speaker 8>This is how the Senate looked beforehand, and this is after. Remember,

0:09:21.830 --> 0:09:25.020
<v Speaker 8>only 35 Senate seats are up. What's astonishing about this is...

0:09:25.370 --> 0:09:28.030
<v Speaker 8>the number of seats here that you just don't see

0:09:28.250 --> 0:09:33.810
<v Speaker 8>go blue. Texas, for example, North Carolina, Kansas, and even

0:09:33.870 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 8>the risk, believe it or not, of Mississippi right now

0:09:37.059 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 8>at 97% counted, there is a margin to the Democrats

0:09:40.740 --> 0:09:43.300
<v Speaker 8>of 28 votes. So you don't get much closer than that.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.450
<v Speaker 8>So the fact that these are states normally that have

0:09:46.490 --> 0:09:50.110
<v Speaker 8>been in many cases for decades, In one case, 1932,

0:09:50.110 --> 0:09:53.179
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to Kansas, has been Republican, have gone blue,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 8>has been telling. When we look at the overall flip

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.770
<v Speaker 8>situation as well, so you see all the flipped on

0:09:58.790 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 8>the Democrat side. that's why they're up to 54 already,

0:10:01.630 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 8>and control of the Senate. The House, a similar story.

0:10:05.140 --> 0:10:08.780
<v Speaker 8>Bigger numbers, of course. You've got 435 seats overall. We're

0:10:08.820 --> 0:10:11.860
<v Speaker 8>up to 34 that have been flipped now. So the

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 8>Democrats on track right now to get 248 seats, only

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 8>one flipped the other way. And that's despite redistricting that

0:10:18.900 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 8>was supposed to help, in particular, the Republican Party win

0:10:22.860 --> 0:10:27.220
<v Speaker 8>these seats. See, these wouldn't be vulnerable in Florida and Texas. Instead,

0:10:27.540 --> 0:10:29.619
<v Speaker 8>they've all stayed blue, the ones that were blue at

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.500
<v Speaker 8>the start of the night. You mentioned as well, you know,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.059
<v Speaker 8>what's the context of the... I think it's a fair

0:10:33.140 --> 0:10:36.059
<v Speaker 8>question to ask. Let's have a look at the swing

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.730
<v Speaker 8>as it looks right now compared to other midterm elections specifically.

0:10:41.300 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 8>So this is what you'd call a normal midterm swing.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.500
<v Speaker 8>There is normally, Steve, a swing, as you know, against

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.910
<v Speaker 8>the government today, 3%, 4%, 3.5%. This is looking like 8%

0:10:50.910 --> 0:10:53.130
<v Speaker 8>right now. Maybe it gets a bit worse, which is

0:10:53.170 --> 0:10:56.910
<v Speaker 8>basically on track with Barack Obama in 2010. Now, back then,

0:10:56.990 --> 0:10:59.050
<v Speaker 8>there was a lot of unrest. They were at the GFC,

0:10:59.500 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 8>a difficult economic time. and unhappiness with how Barack Obama

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.219
<v Speaker 8>had handled those bailouts. So this is not unprecedented in

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.770
<v Speaker 8>terms of the swing number, but it is beyond any

0:11:09.809 --> 0:11:12.590
<v Speaker 8>sort of normal check you get in a midterm election.

0:11:14.290 --> 0:11:17.310
<v Speaker 3>The anger's palpable. I mean, take us to a place

0:11:17.350 --> 0:11:21.340
<v Speaker 3>like Alaska, where I presume in Alaska the fuel issue

0:11:21.390 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 3>is something that would be quite pivotal.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:25.939
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I'll take you to Alaska right now. This is

0:11:26.100 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 8>one of the positions that's still up for grabs.

0:11:29.179 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting contest.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 8>They have the same system as us, as in preferential voting.

0:11:34.179 --> 0:11:39.310
<v Speaker 8>They call it ranked choice voting. So where are we at? 54% counted, 48% each. Now,

0:11:39.350 --> 0:11:42.089
<v Speaker 8>the two things to come in this contest, there's about 4%

0:11:42.090 --> 0:11:45.350
<v Speaker 8>that have gone to independents. That will favour Dan Sullivan

0:11:45.390 --> 0:11:49.090
<v Speaker 8>because one of those is Republican-backed. But the vote to come,

0:11:49.110 --> 0:11:53.010
<v Speaker 8>I've delved into this, it's mainly around Anchorage. So I'm

0:11:53.070 --> 0:11:55.929
<v Speaker 8>expecting at this stage, I'm not quite willing to forecast it,

0:11:56.300 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 8>I'm expecting the Democrats to pick up Alaska as well.

0:11:58.980 --> 0:12:01.660
<v Speaker 8>And look what that's from, a 12.7 per cent margin.

0:12:02.100 --> 0:12:04.220
<v Speaker 8>So that would get them yet another win. And when

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 8>you talk about some of the other areas where they've,

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.090
<v Speaker 8>you know, lost support and where that palpable anger is,

0:12:10.429 --> 0:12:13.370
<v Speaker 8>I mentioned Mississippi, which is incredible. I think that's even

0:12:13.390 --> 0:12:13.969
<v Speaker 8>on the map there.

0:12:14.390 --> 0:12:15.309
<v Speaker 2>Even Florida.

0:12:15.650 --> 0:12:18.410
<v Speaker 8>Now, this is a win in the end for the Republicans,

0:12:18.490 --> 0:12:21.230
<v Speaker 8>but they've gone from a 16 per cent margin. It's

0:12:21.290 --> 0:12:23.470
<v Speaker 8>been a very good state for the Republicans for the

0:12:23.510 --> 0:12:27.730
<v Speaker 8>past couple of decades. And yet look at the margin here, 2.9%

0:12:27.730 --> 0:12:30.010
<v Speaker 8>in the end. This was in doubt at one point.

0:12:30.070 --> 0:12:31.910
<v Speaker 8>So I think when you look at these sorts of

0:12:31.970 --> 0:12:35.510
<v Speaker 8>states turning on the Republican Party, you're getting an idea

0:12:35.590 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 8>for how much unrest there was. And Donald Trump, it's

0:12:39.380 --> 0:12:41.140
<v Speaker 8>going to be a fascinating next two years, isn't it?

0:12:42.730 --> 0:12:43.310
<v Speaker 2>It is, Tom.

0:12:43.429 --> 0:12:46.830
<v Speaker 3>And, you know, Michigan, we've seen Abdul El-Sayed. He has

0:12:46.910 --> 0:12:50.900
<v Speaker 3>been victorious. His opponent, Mike Rogers, though, yet to concede,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.700
<v Speaker 3>still thinking he may be able to get over the line.

0:12:53.740 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 3>How do you call that?

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.410
<v Speaker 8>I did call this last hour. I can see why

0:12:57.450 --> 0:12:59.370
<v Speaker 8>it's close and he might think that. But have a

0:12:59.390 --> 0:13:04.300
<v Speaker 8>look where we're at. 5.6%. 81.9% counted. That's a pretty

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.699
<v Speaker 8>significant lead at this point, and it goes beyond that.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 8>This is what we look at, votes over time. You

0:13:09.059 --> 0:13:11.660
<v Speaker 8>can see the trend here is towards the Democratic Party

0:13:11.710 --> 0:13:14.270
<v Speaker 8>if we compare this time to last time. And I've

0:13:14.309 --> 0:13:18.229
<v Speaker 8>looked specifically at what voters to come. The biggest outstanding

0:13:18.290 --> 0:13:22.270
<v Speaker 8>vote here is in Wayne County. So that's around Detroit,

0:13:22.610 --> 0:13:25.610
<v Speaker 8>and that's going at about 70-30 to Abdul Syed. So

0:13:25.650 --> 0:13:27.860
<v Speaker 8>when you look at the outstanding vote, I don't see

0:13:27.980 --> 0:13:31.179
<v Speaker 8>any path back here for Mike Rogers. So, look, I'm

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.140
<v Speaker 8>not one in my role to comment on whether people

0:13:34.179 --> 0:13:36.359
<v Speaker 8>concede or not. I leave that up to people like

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 8>you and others. But there's no path back I can

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 8>see for Mike Rogers. Abdul Osir will win that Michigan

0:13:41.900 --> 0:13:44.380
<v Speaker 8>spot with the vote to come back. And as you

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.630
<v Speaker 8>can see, it's still ticking along. It'll come in. It'll

0:13:46.650 --> 0:13:49.510
<v Speaker 8>become clear soon enough, I think, to Mike Rogers. But, yeah,

0:13:49.570 --> 0:13:53.350
<v Speaker 8>it's a very high-profile contest in the end that's going

0:13:53.370 --> 0:13:55.370
<v Speaker 8>to be won by Abdul Osir.

0:13:57.460 --> 0:13:59.700
<v Speaker 3>I'll back your call, Tom. Again, great work today. Good

0:13:59.740 --> 0:14:02.309
<v Speaker 3>on you, mate. Thanks for that. Now, the political analysis

0:14:02.410 --> 0:14:04.219
<v Speaker 3>and the host of the US report, who better to

0:14:04.260 --> 0:14:07.990
<v Speaker 3>go to than James Morrow. James, welcome. There's no disguising it.

0:14:08.059 --> 0:14:10.460
<v Speaker 3>This looks like a very tough night for Donald Trump,

0:14:10.820 --> 0:14:13.870
<v Speaker 3>although he did pop up on various media outlets today,

0:14:13.910 --> 0:14:16.110
<v Speaker 3>including in The New York Times, and then he jumped

0:14:16.190 --> 0:14:20.830
<v Speaker 3>on our affiliate Fox. Typically, he's trying to sort of

0:14:20.870 --> 0:14:24.510
<v Speaker 3>bluff his way through what must be a nightmare. Well, yeah,

0:14:24.550 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 3>he is.

0:14:24.930 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 9>It's interesting listening to some of his tone. You know,

0:14:27.860 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 9>I listened to him before.

0:14:28.620 --> 0:14:28.790
<v Speaker 10>He was.

0:14:29.270 --> 0:14:31.210
<v Speaker 9>talking on the phone to our friends at Fox. He

0:14:31.230 --> 0:14:33.550
<v Speaker 9>was going on about this, that, talking about how the

0:14:33.590 --> 0:14:36.470
<v Speaker 9>Democrats had a lot of formidable people. If he had

0:14:36.530 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 9>been on the ballot, things would have been better, all

0:14:38.980 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 9>of this sort of thing. What's interesting to me, though,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 9>I had a couple of reactions from people who were

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 9>texting me during all of this. One person said, well,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.540
<v Speaker 9>you know, I mean, so much for being a fascist.

0:14:48.580 --> 0:14:52.060
<v Speaker 9>The guy is clearly, you know, accepting the results of

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 9>the election, which, of course, we had been hearing for

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.230
<v Speaker 9>weeks and months and years. Oh, he'll never accept the

0:14:56.270 --> 0:14:57.950
<v Speaker 9>results of the election. It's going to be a civil war.

0:14:58.370 --> 0:15:00.670
<v Speaker 9>And then others saying, well, quite cynically, you know, it

0:15:00.690 --> 0:15:03.250
<v Speaker 9>sounds almost the way he's praising the Democrats, like he's

0:15:03.310 --> 0:15:04.770
<v Speaker 9>about to change his affiliation.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.860
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, in those interviews, he said, in particular

0:15:09.900 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 3>on the Fox interview, which we played at some length, that,

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.580
<v Speaker 3>you know, I've got friends in the Democrats, a couple

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.140
<v Speaker 3>of them already texted and called me, I've got a

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.780
<v Speaker 3>few more wanting to talk to me, you know, we

0:15:20.820 --> 0:15:24.860
<v Speaker 3>can do some deals. He's back in his deal-making mode.

0:15:25.620 --> 0:15:29.300
<v Speaker 3>Is that to protect his ego, given how bad this

0:15:29.350 --> 0:15:30.030
<v Speaker 3>result's been?

0:15:30.370 --> 0:15:33.150
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's partially to protect his ego, although, I mean,

0:15:33.450 --> 0:15:36.770
<v Speaker 9>when we talk about bad results, you know... like, let's

0:15:36.830 --> 0:15:40.470
<v Speaker 9>not get into a year zero situation here. The Democrats

0:15:40.490 --> 0:15:43.790
<v Speaker 9>and Republicans have traded these things back and forth, particularly

0:15:44.110 --> 0:15:48.570
<v Speaker 9>in the second term, midterms of presidencies throughout the last,

0:15:48.730 --> 0:15:52.010
<v Speaker 9>you know, well, the entire history of the American Republic, practically.

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 9>You know, back in 1988, the Republicans had a big

0:15:55.780 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 9>loss in the Senate. They lost 10 seats and they

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 9>were back in the Senate in eight years. So it's

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 9>not like a total repudiation of the entire party. It's

0:16:03.970 --> 0:16:07.650
<v Speaker 9>not catastrophic. It's not existential. It's a big loss. Let's

0:16:07.690 --> 0:16:10.770
<v Speaker 9>not try and sugarcoat it. But you do have to

0:16:10.850 --> 0:16:13.170
<v Speaker 9>think about it just in terms of where we are

0:16:13.610 --> 0:16:15.550
<v Speaker 9>in the electoral cycle with that. But in terms of

0:16:15.570 --> 0:16:18.390
<v Speaker 9>the dealmaking, it's really interesting because there's a few theories

0:16:18.410 --> 0:16:20.070
<v Speaker 9>to that. Yeah, part of it could be to try

0:16:20.090 --> 0:16:22.870
<v Speaker 9>to stab his ego. Another bit of it, though, is

0:16:22.910 --> 0:16:25.850
<v Speaker 9>that he wants to, A, not be a lame duck

0:16:25.970 --> 0:16:27.210
<v Speaker 9>for the last two years. So he's going to have

0:16:27.230 --> 0:16:29.050
<v Speaker 9>to talk to these people to try and get something

0:16:29.110 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 9>done and accomplish something you know, to secure a legacy

0:16:32.500 --> 0:16:34.780
<v Speaker 9>and agenda and also to keep his agenda from being

0:16:34.820 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 9>completely turned around. But also, you know, because there's a

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 9>lot of people on Capitol Hill, this would be a

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 9>big mistake, but they're going to do it anyway. A

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 9>lot of Democrats, all they want to do is just

0:16:42.980 --> 0:16:46.460
<v Speaker 9>get up there and investigate and impeach and indict and

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 9>all of this sort of thing, which, of course, you know,

0:16:49.100 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 9>for an electorate that just gave the Democrats a big

0:16:51.210 --> 0:16:53.830
<v Speaker 9>win because they wanted lower petrol prices would be the

0:16:53.990 --> 0:16:57.610
<v Speaker 9>stupidest thing they could do. But watch this space.

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.780
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Trump's hardly likely to sit in a dark room

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.950
<v Speaker 3>for the next two years. I mean, we'll get on

0:17:03.990 --> 0:17:06.270
<v Speaker 3>to petrol cost of living in a moment. You and

0:17:06.350 --> 0:17:09.210
<v Speaker 3>I like to always compete, you know. see that Australia

0:17:09.250 --> 0:17:12.090
<v Speaker 3>looks to what happens in American politics and what impact

0:17:12.150 --> 0:17:14.210
<v Speaker 3>it's going to have on our own politics. But let's

0:17:14.270 --> 0:17:17.990
<v Speaker 3>talk about the Iran war and the foreign policy, the

0:17:18.070 --> 0:17:21.830
<v Speaker 3>decision to go in there. He again today tried to

0:17:21.990 --> 0:17:25.870
<v Speaker 3>make the explanation forcefully that, you know, the Iranians were

0:17:25.990 --> 0:17:28.669
<v Speaker 3>two weeks away, he said, from getting a nuclear weapon.

0:17:29.010 --> 0:17:32.410
<v Speaker 3>But he did go to the last election saying, I'm

0:17:32.450 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 3>not the sort of guy that's going to get you

0:17:34.180 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 3>into these forever wars. He obviously misread Iran.

0:17:37.420 --> 0:17:39.859
<v Speaker 9>He misread Iran. He came out of Venezuela on a

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 9>high and then said, hey, we can do this. This

0:17:42.300 --> 0:17:43.740
<v Speaker 9>is actually this regime change stuff.

0:17:44.180 --> 0:17:44.689
<v Speaker 3>We can do it.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.390
<v Speaker 9>It's a bit of a snack and turned out not

0:17:46.410 --> 0:17:49.930
<v Speaker 9>to be in Iran, two very different countries. The bigger problem, though,

0:17:50.050 --> 0:17:52.810
<v Speaker 9>is not the going into Iran over the nukes. We

0:17:52.850 --> 0:17:55.139
<v Speaker 9>can debate that one way or the other. But it

0:17:55.190 --> 0:17:58.300
<v Speaker 9>has been the stalemate that he's gotten into after that,

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.699
<v Speaker 9>you know, the endless cycles of. We're going to bomb them.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 9>We're going to bomb the hell out of them. We're

0:18:03.100 --> 0:18:04.660
<v Speaker 9>going to bomb the crap out of them. And then

0:18:04.700 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 9>two days later, well, we had a chat to them

0:18:07.140 --> 0:18:08.860
<v Speaker 9>and they're fine. And, you know, there's some pretty good

0:18:08.900 --> 0:18:10.700
<v Speaker 9>people over there. We're not going to bomb them. We're

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.930
<v Speaker 9>going to talk. And so it's like, you know, that

0:18:13.990 --> 0:18:17.310
<v Speaker 9>backing and forthing while the Hormuz situation remained unresolved. Yeah,

0:18:17.710 --> 0:18:18.409
<v Speaker 9>the huge problem.

0:18:20.220 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I heard him say today that there's more oil

0:18:22.900 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 3>coming out of the Straits of Hormuz than before the

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.649
<v Speaker 3>war started. Well, why then are US diesel and petrol

0:18:29.690 --> 0:18:32.429
<v Speaker 3>prices gone through the roof, which has probably cost him

0:18:32.450 --> 0:18:34.990
<v Speaker 3>a major number of those seats that he's lost?

0:18:35.150 --> 0:18:36.820
<v Speaker 9>Well, no doubt that the cost of living and the

0:18:36.859 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 9>petrol prices has cost him a lot of votes and

0:18:40.140 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 9>cost the Republicans a lot of votes. And, you know,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.060
<v Speaker 9>means that you've got a lot of people going into

0:18:45.100 --> 0:18:47.790
<v Speaker 9>the Senate now, particularly not just the House, but in

0:18:47.810 --> 0:18:51.570
<v Speaker 9>the Senate, you know, who are really hard left nutcase radicals,

0:18:51.850 --> 0:18:53.590
<v Speaker 9>you know, and people you don't want anywhere near the

0:18:53.630 --> 0:18:56.770
<v Speaker 9>levers of power. So, yeah, that's a huge problem. There

0:18:56.810 --> 0:19:01.129
<v Speaker 9>is still there is petrol or oil flowing through Hormuz,

0:19:01.170 --> 0:19:04.379
<v Speaker 9>but it's choppy and it's inconsistent. And that's what's causing

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:05.260
<v Speaker 9>the problems in the markets.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 3>He was talking, I mean, you and I watched this

0:19:09.420 --> 0:19:13.500
<v Speaker 3>very closely. The viewers watching us who don't quite understand how,

0:19:13.820 --> 0:19:16.139
<v Speaker 3>you know, the president on the top works with the

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.810
<v Speaker 3>House and the Senate, he still has the power of veto.

0:19:18.869 --> 0:19:22.170
<v Speaker 3>Here he was talking about that veto power earlier on Fox,

0:19:22.210 --> 0:19:22.710
<v Speaker 3>I think it was.

0:19:23.690 --> 0:19:25.990
<v Speaker 11>You're now going to have to work in the last

0:19:26.070 --> 0:19:29.190
<v Speaker 11>two years with a Democratic House and a Democratic Senate.

0:19:29.650 --> 0:19:33.020
<v Speaker 11>How do you approach that and how do you look

0:19:33.060 --> 0:19:33.340
<v Speaker 11>at that?

0:19:33.740 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 10>They'll send over things that are... insane and I'll veto

0:19:36.940 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 10>them and after a couple of months of vetoes they'll

0:19:39.660 --> 0:19:42.590
<v Speaker 10>call and they'll say how do we get this stuff

0:19:42.630 --> 0:19:44.490
<v Speaker 10>done and we'll work together.

0:19:45.609 --> 0:19:47.770
<v Speaker 3>We've been talking a lot today about whether he might, James,

0:19:47.850 --> 0:19:50.540
<v Speaker 3>make some changes to his cabinet. He was pretty blunt

0:19:50.580 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>about that.

0:19:51.020 --> 0:19:51.380
<v Speaker 2>Have a look.

0:19:52.340 --> 0:19:52.980
<v Speaker 3>Do you think, Mr.

0:19:53.020 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 11>President, that you're going to make changes in your cabinet

0:19:55.300 --> 0:19:57.020
<v Speaker 11>as a result of this election?

0:19:57.060 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 10>No, I don't think so. It had nothing to do

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.630
<v Speaker 10>with my cabinet. It was just a point. Honestly, look,

0:20:02.770 --> 0:20:05.170
<v Speaker 10>I've been doing a lot of great things for a

0:20:05.210 --> 0:20:07.940
<v Speaker 10>long time, and It's just a point in time, Brett,

0:20:08.140 --> 0:20:09.980
<v Speaker 10>just a point in time. It's the way it is.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 3>Would you be feeling confident and looking after your superannuation

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.030
<v Speaker 3>if you were Pete Hesketh tonight?

0:20:18.619 --> 0:20:21.050
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, look, I think I probably would. I don't think

0:20:21.070 --> 0:20:24.690
<v Speaker 9>he's going to be making any major changes, no major reshuffles.

0:20:24.810 --> 0:20:26.850
<v Speaker 9>This is all, you know, this comes down to him.

0:20:27.130 --> 0:20:28.930
<v Speaker 9>You know, it comes down to him and his decision

0:20:28.990 --> 0:20:32.450
<v Speaker 9>to go into Iran and then the way he's conducted

0:20:32.490 --> 0:20:34.890
<v Speaker 9>it and the way he kind of ran that whole

0:20:34.930 --> 0:20:38.129
<v Speaker 9>sort of lap of rallies around the country in the

0:20:38.170 --> 0:20:40.300
<v Speaker 9>last month. you know, which felt more like an aging

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 9>rocker's greatest hits tour than did a, you know, here's

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.300
<v Speaker 9>the things we're going to do in the next two

0:20:45.340 --> 0:20:48.700
<v Speaker 9>years to make things better and make things work. And

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.500
<v Speaker 9>all of the things that were really good in this presidency,

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, he forgot about talking about, you know, the borders,

0:20:55.780 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 9>putting a knife through the heart of DEI. The economy

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.500
<v Speaker 9>did actually has been growing hugely, low unemployment, record share market.

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.970
<v Speaker 9>I mean, all these things are really good. But they've

0:21:07.050 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 9>all been overshadowed by the Iran problem.

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.090
<v Speaker 3>Just finally, what's it say about 2028 presidential campaign? Because,

0:21:15.130 --> 0:21:17.850
<v Speaker 3>as you know, once these things are over, people then

0:21:17.910 --> 0:21:23.209
<v Speaker 3>start fundraising and looking toward the next presidential election. What

0:21:23.230 --> 0:21:24.930
<v Speaker 3>does it mean on the Democrat side? What does it

0:21:24.970 --> 0:21:26.070
<v Speaker 3>mean on the Republican side?

0:21:26.310 --> 0:21:30.090
<v Speaker 9>Well, Republicans first. I mean, I think that this is

0:21:30.210 --> 0:21:33.490
<v Speaker 9>pretty bad for J.D. Vance because he is the most

0:21:33.650 --> 0:21:38.300
<v Speaker 9>avowedly Trumpian MAGA figure out there who would be in contention.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 9>So I think he will be tarred with some of this,

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 9>fairly or unfairly. Marco Rubio, I think he is the

0:21:45.100 --> 0:21:47.020
<v Speaker 9>guy to watch. I've been saying this on this network

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.179
<v Speaker 9>for quite some time. He is a guy who is

0:21:49.270 --> 0:21:55.590
<v Speaker 9>building up a real intellectual framework, a skeleton of his

0:21:55.710 --> 0:21:59.189
<v Speaker 9>vision for America, American leadership abroad, what America looks like

0:21:59.230 --> 0:22:02.220
<v Speaker 9>at home. watch him, listen to him. He's building up

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 9>a very credible case. On the left, however, they've got

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 9>a huge problem now. They have taken power, right, in

0:22:09.940 --> 0:22:13.260
<v Speaker 9>the Congress with big majorities here, and they got to

0:22:13.300 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 9>figure out what they're going to do with it. So

0:22:14.660 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 9>are they going to do all these investigations or are

0:22:16.820 --> 0:22:18.900
<v Speaker 9>they going to try and come up with something positive?

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.220
<v Speaker 9>And then they have another problem. In 2028, they don't

0:22:22.260 --> 0:22:25.380
<v Speaker 9>have Trump to run against. Running against Trump has been

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 9>the best thing for their brand. We just saw it tonight.

0:22:28.300 --> 0:22:30.859
<v Speaker 9>They've just hit their peak on that. And now they

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.610
<v Speaker 9>don't have that. They're going to actually have to come

0:22:33.670 --> 0:22:36.650
<v Speaker 9>up with this and get ideas and policies out there

0:22:36.930 --> 0:22:40.530
<v Speaker 9>that aren't crazy, that aren't socialist, that are pro-market, that

0:22:40.550 --> 0:22:45.899
<v Speaker 9>are pro-America and American. And that runs counter to the

0:22:45.980 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 9>DNA of all of these radical leftist Democrat socialists and

0:22:50.980 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 9>the El Sayeds and everybody else who've just had big

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:54.780
<v Speaker 9>wins tonight.

0:22:56.510 --> 0:22:58.710
<v Speaker 3>Great analysis, James. Thank you very much for that, mate.

0:22:58.850 --> 0:23:01.850
<v Speaker 3>And for a deeper dive into the fallout from those midterms,

0:23:02.230 --> 0:23:04.530
<v Speaker 3>you can catch the US report, of course, this Friday

0:23:04.630 --> 0:23:09.660
<v Speaker 3>from 8.30 Eastern Daylight Time. James Morrow, thank you very much.

0:23:10.570 --> 0:23:15.790
<v Speaker 3>Coming up after the break tonight, we will take another

0:23:15.830 --> 0:23:18.670
<v Speaker 3>look at the Victorian government. It's now in caretaker mode,

0:23:18.730 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 3>but not before Labor has pushed through a bunch of

0:23:21.690 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>planning approvals on a string of controversial battery farms. Locals

0:23:26.380 --> 0:23:28.540
<v Speaker 3>affected are not happy. We'll talk to the leader of

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 3>the Victorian Nationals up next. Welcome back. Steve Price in

0:23:35.180 --> 0:23:36.980
<v Speaker 3>for Peter Credlin. Just before we get an update on

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.030
<v Speaker 3>the Victorian election, I have some breaking news for you,

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:44.500
<v Speaker 3>sports news out of Sydney. The Sydney Swans have announced

0:23:44.619 --> 0:23:48.230
<v Speaker 3>publicly that one of their star players, Tom Papley, has

0:23:48.310 --> 0:23:52.850
<v Speaker 3>been charged after being pulled over by New South Wales police. Now,

0:23:53.250 --> 0:23:56.850
<v Speaker 3>the Swans, the embattled Swans, say Papley was stopped for

0:23:56.970 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 3>a roadside licence check on Monday and was found to

0:24:00.380 --> 0:24:04.140
<v Speaker 3>have been driving on a suspended licence. And a random

0:24:04.220 --> 0:24:08.570
<v Speaker 3>drug test also returned a positive preliminary result. with a

0:24:08.609 --> 0:24:11.909
<v Speaker 3>second sample now having been sent for further testing. It

0:24:11.950 --> 0:24:15.540
<v Speaker 3>was also found Papley had failed to pay a parking fine.

0:24:15.940 --> 0:24:18.859
<v Speaker 3>The Swans say he immediately informed the club and the

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.260
<v Speaker 3>AFL has also been informed. OK, it's officially second day

0:24:23.300 --> 0:24:26.379
<v Speaker 3>of the Victorian election campaign. The writs were issued yesterday

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.300
<v Speaker 3>and the leaders, all of them from all parties, are

0:24:29.340 --> 0:24:31.740
<v Speaker 3>right in the middle of it now. Both parties on

0:24:31.780 --> 0:24:35.620
<v Speaker 3>the hustings today, Labor and the Coalition. 24 days now

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.780
<v Speaker 3>until voters go to the polls. News 24 reporter Georgie

0:24:38.820 --> 0:24:41.850
<v Speaker 3>Dickinson has the latest from on the campaign trail.

0:24:42.890 --> 0:24:45.550
<v Speaker 12>Victoria's major parties are putting jobs and cost of living

0:24:45.630 --> 0:24:49.449
<v Speaker 12>pressures front and centre today as the election campaign heats up.

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.550
<v Speaker 12>The opposition is pledging $ 2 million towards food relief charities,

0:24:54.970 --> 0:24:59.850
<v Speaker 12>organisations that help to feed struggling Victorian families. The Coalition

0:24:59.890 --> 0:25:02.970
<v Speaker 12>says the funding will help the organisation meet growing demand

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 12>as more Victorians turn to food relief to make ends meet.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.419
<v Speaker 6>One in three households in Victoria are in need of

0:25:11.460 --> 0:25:14.449
<v Speaker 6>food relief. And when it comes to regional Victoria, it's

0:25:14.630 --> 0:25:18.169
<v Speaker 6>one in four in need of real food relief. Now,

0:25:18.210 --> 0:25:20.209
<v Speaker 6>while this is a modest commitment, it will go to

0:25:20.230 --> 0:25:21.510
<v Speaker 6>that urgent need now.

0:25:21.890 --> 0:25:25.090
<v Speaker 12>Meanwhile, Premier Ben Carroll is focusing on jobs, promising to

0:25:25.130 --> 0:25:29.690
<v Speaker 12>create 5,000 new manufacturing positions across Victoria through a new

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 12>Make It Here fund. Labor says the initiative will boost

0:25:32.940 --> 0:25:35.180
<v Speaker 12>local industry and strengthen the state's economy.

0:25:35.609 --> 0:25:39.090
<v Speaker 7>When Joe Hockey gave the auto industry and encouraged them

0:25:39.109 --> 0:25:41.649
<v Speaker 7>to leave, it was our government that stepped in to

0:25:41.690 --> 0:25:44.990
<v Speaker 7>make sure all of those workers went on to businesses

0:25:45.290 --> 0:25:46.870
<v Speaker 7>like Ego, like Beverage.

0:25:47.010 --> 0:25:47.649
<v Speaker 1>Like Defence.

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.820
<v Speaker 7>Our creation of 5,000 jobs has been very thoroughly tested.

0:25:53.140 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 12>But the announcement comes as another major union turns its

0:25:55.820 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 12>back on the government. The Community and Public Sector Union

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.419
<v Speaker 12>has withdrawn its support for Labor, accusing the government of

0:26:02.540 --> 0:26:07.379
<v Speaker 12>cutting around 1,000 public service jobs. while spending $ 1. 2 billion

0:26:07.500 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 12>on consultants since 2017. It's the latest in a growing

0:26:12.020 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 12>list of unions refusing to campaign for Labor, with some

0:26:15.300 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 12>actively urging voters to put the government last. And with

0:26:19.060 --> 0:26:22.770
<v Speaker 12>the election several weeks away, the growing union backlash is

0:26:22.830 --> 0:26:25.410
<v Speaker 12>becoming another headache for Premier Ben Carroll.

0:26:27.990 --> 0:26:30.310
<v Speaker 3>Certainly the campaign's hotting up. Thank you for that, Georgie.

0:26:30.350 --> 0:26:33.450
<v Speaker 3>And a reminder, of course, Victorian opposition leader Jess Wilson

0:26:33.490 --> 0:26:36.790
<v Speaker 3>will join Paul Murray live in Melbourne... for his very

0:26:36.869 --> 0:26:40.450
<v Speaker 3>famous pub test this Monday, the 9th of November from

0:26:40.770 --> 0:26:44.820
<v Speaker 3>9pm Australian Eastern Daylight Time. The alternative Premier will take questions,

0:26:44.859 --> 0:26:48.699
<v Speaker 3>of course, from voters in the audience on crime, state debt, potholes.

0:26:49.350 --> 0:26:52.370
<v Speaker 3>and many more key pressing election issues. You won't want

0:26:52.390 --> 0:26:55.490
<v Speaker 3>to miss that, the pub test Monday night. And speaking

0:26:55.550 --> 0:26:58.570
<v Speaker 3>of state politics and the rushed approvals we found out

0:26:58.609 --> 0:27:02.270
<v Speaker 3>about from the Carroll Labor Government in Victoria, signing off

0:27:02.330 --> 0:27:06.340
<v Speaker 3>on two massive, and I mean massive, battery farm projects

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.060
<v Speaker 3>worth more than $ 240 million. Now, they're in the west

0:27:10.100 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 3>of the state, Camperdown, just days before the government entered

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 3>caretaker mode. Now, the project, among others, has been fast-tracked.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.619
<v Speaker 3>through the planning rules, of course, raising serious questions about transparency,

0:27:23.070 --> 0:27:27.270
<v Speaker 3>community consultation and Labor's determination to push ahead with its

0:27:27.330 --> 0:27:30.730
<v Speaker 3>renewables energy agenda. Here to take us through it, leader

0:27:30.750 --> 0:27:35.110
<v Speaker 3>of the Victorian Nationals, Danny O'Brien. Now, should this have

0:27:35.170 --> 0:27:38.150
<v Speaker 3>happened so close to the Ritz being issued and going

0:27:38.210 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 3>into caretaker mode, Danny?

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:41.740
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't think so, Steve.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 13>I think it highlights that this government is all about

0:27:44.619 --> 0:27:47.810
<v Speaker 13>trying to push things through that it wants. particularly for

0:27:47.890 --> 0:27:50.429
<v Speaker 13>votes in the city at the expense of regional Victorians.

0:27:50.550 --> 0:27:53.450
<v Speaker 13>And not just this project, but the Mearing West Wind

0:27:53.470 --> 0:27:55.810
<v Speaker 13>Farm project as well in the northwest of the state.

0:27:56.190 --> 0:27:58.070
<v Speaker 13>This is what the government has been doing for some

0:27:58.130 --> 0:28:01.270
<v Speaker 13>time now, and that is bulldozing through and over the

0:28:01.310 --> 0:28:04.750
<v Speaker 13>views of regional Victorians and particularly farmers. This appears to

0:28:04.790 --> 0:28:06.830
<v Speaker 13>be the latest in the long string of those. And

0:28:07.190 --> 0:28:10.930
<v Speaker 13>to do it right on the knock of caretaker mode

0:28:10.970 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 13>yesterday just shows that this government has no respect for

0:28:13.859 --> 0:28:14.620
<v Speaker 13>regional Victorians.

0:28:16.020 --> 0:28:19.300
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the Mearing West wind farm. How big is

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 3>that wind farm and what has been the opposition to

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:23.700
<v Speaker 3>that from locals?

0:28:24.460 --> 0:28:27.700
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I believe there's been literally 100 formal objections made

0:28:27.740 --> 0:28:30.630
<v Speaker 13>to that. I think it's about 150 turbines over some

0:28:30.630 --> 0:28:31.830
<v Speaker 13>20,000 hectares.

0:28:31.910 --> 0:28:33.949
<v Speaker 2>It's a big, big project and.

0:28:34.710 --> 0:28:37.770
<v Speaker 13>One, again, that's not got a social licence from the

0:28:37.810 --> 0:28:41.430
<v Speaker 13>local community, one that has caused issues within the local community.

0:28:41.510 --> 0:28:44.220
<v Speaker 13>And for the government to approve it just on the

0:28:44.260 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 13>eve of an election just shows a lack of respect

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.540
<v Speaker 13>for farmers, a lack of respect for regional Victorians and

0:28:49.860 --> 0:28:53.310
<v Speaker 13>highlights everything that's been wrong about this government's transition to

0:28:53.350 --> 0:28:56.340
<v Speaker 13>renewable energy. It's been doing it at the expense of

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.940
<v Speaker 13>regional communities and it's all about winning political votes in

0:28:59.960 --> 0:29:03.450
<v Speaker 13>the city and not actually respecting our regions and working

0:29:03.490 --> 0:29:07.170
<v Speaker 13>with them to do this transition, but actually actively legislating

0:29:07.230 --> 0:29:09.390
<v Speaker 13>to force through its own agenda.

0:29:10.910 --> 0:29:13.310
<v Speaker 3>It sort of feels like, and we've seen this before,

0:29:13.350 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 3>this ramming through of projects just before an election, but

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 3>it seems like those running the Labor campaign have given

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.890
<v Speaker 3>up on regional Victoria. I mean... The state government under

0:29:24.470 --> 0:29:28.300
<v Speaker 3>Jacinda Allen most recently has not taken the bush seriously.

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:33.060
<v Speaker 3>We saw the regional communities just absolutely conned before the

0:29:33.100 --> 0:29:37.010
<v Speaker 3>last Daniel Andrews election victory when he promised to hold

0:29:37.470 --> 0:29:39.850
<v Speaker 3>a Commonwealth Games in regional Victoria. And the moment he

0:29:39.890 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 3>got back in, he just cancelled it all.

0:29:42.260 --> 0:29:43.580
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right, Steve.

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.870
<v Speaker 13>Everything that you see from the Labor government in this

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.060
<v Speaker 13>election campaign, has to be taken with a massive grain

0:29:49.100 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 13>of salt after the Commonwealth Games, after making commitments like

0:29:52.740 --> 0:29:55.790
<v Speaker 13>building a new West Gippsland hospital that never happened in

0:29:55.850 --> 0:29:58.690
<v Speaker 13>four years after Daniel Andrews committed to it. And we

0:29:58.730 --> 0:30:01.730
<v Speaker 13>can repeat that time and time again, a whole lot

0:30:01.750 --> 0:30:06.590
<v Speaker 13>of different scenarios. But we actually had the Bush summit

0:30:06.650 --> 0:30:10.410
<v Speaker 13>in Ballarat last year, both Anthony Albanese and Jacinta Allen say.

0:30:10.450 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got to do better on the transition.

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.209
<v Speaker 13>And It was literally the night, the day after, the

0:30:15.470 --> 0:30:19.490
<v Speaker 13>state government had pushed through new compulsory acquisition powers for

0:30:19.990 --> 0:30:24.210
<v Speaker 13>transmission lines and renewable projects that allowed companies to, or

0:30:24.250 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 13>the government, to make compulsory acquisition even before an EES

0:30:27.540 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 13>had been approved for a project.

0:30:29.220 --> 0:30:29.940
<v Speaker 2>We opposed that.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.180
<v Speaker 13>The Nationals and Liberals opposed it, and we'll repeal it

0:30:32.220 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 13>if we're in government, along with a whole lot of

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.510
<v Speaker 13>other things that the government has done just to steamroll

0:30:37.550 --> 0:30:38.610
<v Speaker 13>through regional communities.

0:30:40.190 --> 0:30:44.110
<v Speaker 3>So something like this battery farm at Camperdown, I'll get

0:30:44.130 --> 0:30:46.170
<v Speaker 3>you to explain exactly how big that is and what

0:30:46.210 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 3>it is, but if you were to win in three

0:30:49.300 --> 0:30:52.860
<v Speaker 3>and a half weeks' time, are you saying that there

0:30:52.890 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 3>are contracts written and unable to be cancelled in a

0:30:58.380 --> 0:31:01.900
<v Speaker 3>project like this, or will your audit of what their

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.460
<v Speaker 3>spending has been on renewable projects and where they're going,

0:31:06.940 --> 0:31:09.060
<v Speaker 3>will you be able to put a halt on this stuff?

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.100
<v Speaker 13>Well, that's the $ 64 question. We don't know the answer

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.060
<v Speaker 13>to that at this point, Steve, because there's no transparency

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.340
<v Speaker 13>around the contracts that the government has apparently signed up

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 13>to or has approved.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Certainly, if there are.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:27.990
<v Speaker 13>Any legal issues or process issues that these projects have

0:31:28.030 --> 0:31:30.870
<v Speaker 13>been signed up or have been approved under that are

0:31:30.950 --> 0:31:34.150
<v Speaker 13>incorrect or illegal, then obviously we would review those and

0:31:34.170 --> 0:31:39.030
<v Speaker 13>make decisions on them. This project, the battery projects, two

0:31:39.090 --> 0:31:42.110
<v Speaker 13>of them actually, they are among others. And there's heaps

0:31:42.150 --> 0:31:44.410
<v Speaker 13>of them right around regional Victoria. There's some in Mynecola

0:31:44.450 --> 0:31:47.340
<v Speaker 13>Woods in Gippsland. There's some in the northeast, all of

0:31:47.420 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 13>which have got significant concerns raised by local communities. And

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.860
<v Speaker 13>the government hasn't been transparent on them. We have said

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.650
<v Speaker 13>that we will review the entire Victorian transmission plan as well.

0:31:58.010 --> 0:32:00.310
<v Speaker 13>As you know, we've committed to cancel the VNI West

0:32:00.350 --> 0:32:03.700
<v Speaker 13>project because it's blown out. to a ridiculous amount of cost,

0:32:03.740 --> 0:32:06.270
<v Speaker 13>and that cost would be passed on to every single

0:32:06.310 --> 0:32:10.150
<v Speaker 13>Victorian energy consumer. So we do need a shake-up of this.

0:32:10.230 --> 0:32:13.350
<v Speaker 13>We need to make sure that we're protecting regional Victorians.

0:32:13.410 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 13>As I said, we'll repeal Labor's compulsory acquisition powers. We'll

0:32:16.820 --> 0:32:19.180
<v Speaker 13>repeal the fines they brought in for farmers who had

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 13>the temerity to stop people coming onto their land to

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.610
<v Speaker 13>progress these projects. We'll give Victorians their rights back. These

0:32:26.670 --> 0:32:30.010
<v Speaker 13>projects like the Camperdown Battery and the Mirroring West Wind Farm,

0:32:30.590 --> 0:32:34.050
<v Speaker 13>they're being steamrolled because farmers and local residents don't even

0:32:34.090 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 13>have the ability to take these to VCAT anymore because

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 13>Labor is trying to push them through. We'll give them

0:32:38.700 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 13>that right back and make sure that property rights are respected.

0:32:43.210 --> 0:32:45.570
<v Speaker 3>I presume a battery farm like that, what they do

0:32:45.670 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 3>is they store the renewable energy that would be delivered

0:32:51.260 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 3>in daylight from solar farms and wind farms at night

0:32:55.460 --> 0:32:58.100
<v Speaker 3>if the wind's blowing. And it's almost like a dam

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and the electricity sits in these battery farms. Are they noisy?

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.940
<v Speaker 3>Do they make noise if they're near a property like

0:33:06.980 --> 0:33:11.770
<v Speaker 3>a farm? Are they environmentally safe and friendly?

0:33:12.790 --> 0:33:15.370
<v Speaker 13>Well, there's certainly concerns about them and they can be noisy.

0:33:15.430 --> 0:33:17.970
<v Speaker 13>And one of these particular wind farms is within a

0:33:18.010 --> 0:33:21.810
<v Speaker 13>kilometre of the township of Camperdown. And there's been significant

0:33:21.830 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 13>opposition to it in that respect. You're exactly right. They're

0:33:26.380 --> 0:33:30.460
<v Speaker 13>designed to store the energy produced by wind and solar

0:33:30.500 --> 0:33:33.500
<v Speaker 13>farms and probably more wind farms in the southwest of

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.980
<v Speaker 13>Victoria there. But we don't have an issue with them

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.420
<v Speaker 13>per se, but it's where they're located. It's whether they're

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 13>in the right spot. It's whether they've got the the

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 13>safety and the fire ratings in particular. There are significant concerns.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.940
<v Speaker 13>We know that Melbourne's first big battery caught on fire

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 13>last year. And there are certainly concerns of farmers in

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 13>those areas as to whether these are safe and whether

0:33:55.020 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 13>they're in the right place and whether the environmental approvals

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 13>are all ticked off.

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I heard Peter Marshall from the Melbourne Fire Brigade

0:34:05.030 --> 0:34:10.230
<v Speaker 3>and CFA officers are most concerned about lithium batteries and

0:34:10.250 --> 0:34:12.070
<v Speaker 3>the potential for these things to catch fire.

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:14.589
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it certainly is a concern.

0:34:14.610 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 13>And that's one of the issues that has generated opposition

0:34:17.940 --> 0:34:21.859
<v Speaker 13>for these battery farms throughout our regions. As I said,

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 13>there's one in West Gippsland, there's proposed ones in the northeast,

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 13>all in high fire danger areas. And look, sometimes those

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 13>things can be mitigated. And we understand that. But we

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.569
<v Speaker 13>need some assurance that it has been mitigated properly, that

0:34:35.590 --> 0:34:38.730
<v Speaker 13>there will be protection for local communities and farmers. And

0:34:38.910 --> 0:34:41.470
<v Speaker 13>the government rushing these through on the eve of an election,

0:34:41.489 --> 0:34:44.569
<v Speaker 13>on the eve of caretaker, doesn't engender confidence in that

0:34:44.610 --> 0:34:45.940
<v Speaker 13>the government's got everything right.

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 2>It really does make people wonder.

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.220
<v Speaker 13>And I think they should be right in actually questioning

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:53.700
<v Speaker 13>these approvals right on the eve of caretaker mode.

0:34:55.090 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Good on you, Danny. Good to catch up. Thank you

0:34:56.739 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 3>very much, mate. After the break, plenty of reaction to

0:34:58.980 --> 0:35:01.980
<v Speaker 3>the Reserve Bank's decision that was yesterday on Melbourne Cup

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:05.690
<v Speaker 3>Day to hike rates to an 18-year high. So could

0:35:05.730 --> 0:35:09.730
<v Speaker 3>it push Australia into an actual recession? Our Wednesday night

0:35:09.750 --> 0:35:16.170
<v Speaker 3>panel up next. Welcome back, Steve Price with you. Coming up,

0:35:16.230 --> 0:35:19.430
<v Speaker 3>Peter's favourite, Kel Richards on Word. She'll be upset she's

0:35:19.469 --> 0:35:22.089
<v Speaker 3>missing that. Let's bring in the panel now. Senior Fellow

0:35:22.130 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 3>at the Menzies Research Centre, Nick Cater and Deputy Executive

0:35:25.460 --> 0:35:28.700
<v Speaker 3>Director at the IPA, Daniel Wild. Welcome to you both.

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:34.660
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned interest rates yesterday hit an 18-year high, 4.85%.

0:35:34.660 --> 0:35:37.870
<v Speaker 3>Banks have already whacked them up. That on a million-dollar

0:35:38.090 --> 0:35:41.569
<v Speaker 3>mortgage would mean that so far this year after those

0:35:41.650 --> 0:35:47.270
<v Speaker 3>five rises, you're looking at somewhere around $ 800 after tax

0:35:47.290 --> 0:35:49.890
<v Speaker 3>that you've got to find each month. Here was the

0:35:49.930 --> 0:35:54.060
<v Speaker 3>Reserve Bank Governor Michelle Bullock saying, well, it might get worse.

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>It might end up being a recession.

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 14>It is going to make people feel like it's a

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:06.310
<v Speaker 14>recession because they feel poorer. Their spending can't grow very

0:36:06.370 --> 0:36:08.870
<v Speaker 14>quickly because their incomes aren't growing very quickly. And this

0:36:08.930 --> 0:36:12.010
<v Speaker 14>is a manifestation of the lack of productivity growth.

0:36:13.340 --> 0:36:18.460
<v Speaker 3>Dan, hello. We're not going to feel like it's a recession.

0:36:18.500 --> 0:36:19.620
<v Speaker 3>We already feel that.

0:36:21.460 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, Australians are already in a recession when you look

0:36:23.820 --> 0:36:27.069
<v Speaker 15>at it on a per capita basis. People are getting poorer. And,

0:36:27.130 --> 0:36:28.790
<v Speaker 15>you know, the government says, oh, it's all to do

0:36:28.830 --> 0:36:30.870
<v Speaker 15>with international factors. It's all to do with the war

0:36:30.910 --> 0:36:32.910
<v Speaker 15>in Iran. Well, you know, if that's the case, then

0:36:32.930 --> 0:36:35.250
<v Speaker 15>how come our economy is doing worse than others? You know,

0:36:35.290 --> 0:36:38.029
<v Speaker 15>everybody's got to deal with these international factors. No one

0:36:38.090 --> 0:36:41.130
<v Speaker 15>is suggesting that the war in Iran doesn't affect Australia's economy,

0:36:41.250 --> 0:36:44.219
<v Speaker 15>our fuel, our energy and so forth. But our inflation

0:36:44.260 --> 0:36:46.700
<v Speaker 15>rate is the second highest in the developed world, behind

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 15>only Belgium. Our cash rate is the highest. As you

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.260
<v Speaker 15>point out, we've got this massive growth in government debt

0:36:53.300 --> 0:36:55.170
<v Speaker 15>sitting on top of all of this as well. And

0:36:55.190 --> 0:36:57.670
<v Speaker 15>the key driver of this is you've got massive government spending.

0:36:57.750 --> 0:37:01.690
<v Speaker 15>I mean, this is obvious. If you take one year alone, 2026,

0:37:01.690 --> 0:37:04.980
<v Speaker 15>government spending increased by 5% in real terms. The economy

0:37:05.020 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 15>only went up by two and a quarter percent in

0:37:06.620 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 15>real terms. So government spending is double that of the economy.

0:37:09.660 --> 0:37:12.570
<v Speaker 15>When you're pumping that much money into an economy that's moribund,

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.630
<v Speaker 15>you know, as the Reserve Bank governor says, there's no

0:37:14.690 --> 0:37:17.390
<v Speaker 15>productivity growth. So you're cranking up demand. You're not getting

0:37:17.410 --> 0:37:21.069
<v Speaker 15>the supply. You've got inflation. It's clear the government must

0:37:21.110 --> 0:37:22.370
<v Speaker 15>cut back on its spending.

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Nick, I mean, I appear on radio in New Zealand

0:37:26.380 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 3>a couple of times a week and their interest rate

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:31.980
<v Speaker 3>currently is around two and a half percent, something like that.

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.859
<v Speaker 3>They go to an election on Saturday. I mean, not

0:37:34.940 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a completely similar economy to ours, but not that much different.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what happened? The RBA simply made a mistake

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 3>when they should have acted earlier and they refused to

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 3>do so, unlike the Kiwis.

0:37:50.020 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what we have here is the fairy tale collapsing.

0:37:54.510 --> 0:37:57.350
<v Speaker 1>The whole Jim Chalmers, you know, it's all to do

0:37:57.390 --> 0:38:00.910
<v Speaker 1>with Tehran and Washington. That's fallen apart very quickly. I

0:38:00.930 --> 0:38:03.850
<v Speaker 1>don't think people buy that anymore. I think Michelle Bullock

0:38:03.969 --> 0:38:06.790
<v Speaker 1>used the strongest language I think she could possibly use.

0:38:06.830 --> 0:38:09.590
<v Speaker 1>She's not as free to speak her mind quite as

0:38:09.690 --> 0:38:11.450
<v Speaker 1>openly as you and I on News 24, Steve.

0:38:11.469 --> 0:38:11.540
<v Speaker 2>But.

0:38:13.660 --> 0:38:16.009
<v Speaker 1>You know, she was clearly saying, no, you're wrong. This

0:38:16.090 --> 0:38:20.029
<v Speaker 1>is a homegrown problem. And yes, it does feel like

0:38:20.070 --> 0:38:22.390
<v Speaker 1>a recession right now. A recession is when the whole

0:38:22.450 --> 0:38:26.350
<v Speaker 1>economy goes backwards. Most Australians I speak to, those in

0:38:26.390 --> 0:38:29.469
<v Speaker 1>small business or those just in jobs, feel like they're

0:38:29.489 --> 0:38:32.210
<v Speaker 1>going backwards and are fighting very hard not to. That's

0:38:32.250 --> 0:38:36.290
<v Speaker 1>what all their effort's going into. And, you know, her

0:38:36.350 --> 0:38:38.629
<v Speaker 1>warning that this is going to worsen over the next year,

0:38:39.330 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I find that really troubling when you see how hard

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:43.180
<v Speaker 1>people are doing it already.

0:38:44.580 --> 0:38:46.419
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she talks about the vibe. I get the vibe

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 3>every time I go to a supermarket or a petrol station.

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.219
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't need Michelle Bullock to be telling

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.910
<v Speaker 3>me that. I know exactly how I feel and my

0:38:54.190 --> 0:38:56.069
<v Speaker 3>salary is not buying as much as what it could.

0:38:56.670 --> 0:38:58.790
<v Speaker 3>I nearly fell over, Nick, when I read this today.

0:38:58.850 --> 0:39:01.870
<v Speaker 3>The President of the Australian Human Rights Commission has claimed

0:39:01.890 --> 0:39:08.150
<v Speaker 3>that de-radicalisation efforts should not be focusing as much on

0:39:08.350 --> 0:39:13.070
<v Speaker 3>beliefs and ideology such as radical Islam and should instead

0:39:13.110 --> 0:39:18.419
<v Speaker 3>be cracking down on The so-called online manosphere. I mean, please, Nick,

0:39:18.460 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 3>save my life.

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.230
<v Speaker 1>It's a bizarre fetish they have over this manosphere, which

0:39:25.270 --> 0:39:28.230
<v Speaker 1>I don't know much about. But, you know, look at

0:39:28.270 --> 0:39:31.189
<v Speaker 1>the terrible events of December 14. 14 last year. But yes,

0:39:31.270 --> 0:39:34.350
<v Speaker 1>both of the accused, and we have to say they're accused,

0:39:34.370 --> 0:39:37.910
<v Speaker 1>they're not, we've got a court case pending, presumably. They

0:39:37.930 --> 0:39:42.050
<v Speaker 1>were both men, sure. But they're also both radical Muslims

0:39:42.140 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>from what we gather, at least the two people that

0:39:44.300 --> 0:39:47.350
<v Speaker 1>we know about. So, I'll wait to see that court case,

0:39:47.370 --> 0:39:50.219
<v Speaker 1>whether it comes out they were motivated by being toxic

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.259
<v Speaker 1>males or whether it was because they believed in some

0:39:54.860 --> 0:39:59.479
<v Speaker 1>horrible millennialist cult of Islam that believes in shooting people.

0:39:59.820 --> 0:40:02.050
<v Speaker 1>I also feel, Steve, I should say this, I feel

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.570
<v Speaker 1>some sympathy for what a lot of Muslims feel in

0:40:05.610 --> 0:40:08.700
<v Speaker 1>this country today. that they are all being tarnished with

0:40:08.739 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this same brush because the vast majority of Muslims are

0:40:11.180 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>just ordinary, decent people, much more concerned about the cost

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:18.580
<v Speaker 1>of living now than anything that's happening in Palestine. But

0:40:18.620 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's OK, you know, we're not going to slur

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:25.180
<v Speaker 1>the entire Muslim population by calling these radical Islam, but

0:40:25.219 --> 0:40:29.310
<v Speaker 1>we are prepared to slur, what, 48, 49% of the

0:40:29.350 --> 0:40:32.689
<v Speaker 1>country who are men. We're all under that brush, I guess. So,

0:40:33.330 --> 0:40:35.410
<v Speaker 1>as usual on the left, of course, this makes absolutely

0:40:35.450 --> 0:40:35.910
<v Speaker 1>no sense.

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.339
<v Speaker 3>Let's get back to finance, Daniel. Interest rates, as we said,

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:44.020
<v Speaker 3>18-year high. Analysis by The Australian has shown that households

0:40:44.060 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 3>are actually worse off now than they were during the

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 3>global financial crisis, which this three here would remember well

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.370
<v Speaker 3>because our wages have not kept pace with the surging

0:40:54.450 --> 0:40:56.730
<v Speaker 3>home loan debt. In November 2008, the cash rate was 5.25%,

0:40:56.730 --> 0:40:59.810
<v Speaker 3>but the average owner-occupied mortgage is now 188% more expensive

0:40:59.850 --> 0:41:10.049
<v Speaker 3>than than it was back then. I mean, this has

0:41:10.110 --> 0:41:12.870
<v Speaker 3>forced hundreds of people to actually put their homes up

0:41:12.910 --> 0:41:16.290
<v Speaker 3>for sale. People are going to have to rent. Retirees

0:41:16.310 --> 0:41:18.569
<v Speaker 3>are going to end up renting. I mean, this is

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 3>just a failure, this housing policy that Labor have put

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 3>in place. It does not work.

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.980
<v Speaker 15>Well, you're right, Steve, it doesn't work. And, you know,

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.259
<v Speaker 15>you can notice this driving around your local suburbs. And

0:41:31.300 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 15>I've noticed that the number of for sale signs up

0:41:35.100 --> 0:41:36.860
<v Speaker 15>much higher than they were just a year ago. You

0:41:37.700 --> 0:41:40.250
<v Speaker 15>look at the prices, you know, the people asking a

0:41:40.250 --> 0:41:42.350
<v Speaker 15>million bucks, you go back two weeks later, they're asking

0:41:42.390 --> 0:41:45.170
<v Speaker 15>for 950. People say, well, we might wait another two

0:41:45.210 --> 0:41:47.250
<v Speaker 15>weeks and it'll be down to 900. So, you know,

0:41:47.290 --> 0:41:49.170
<v Speaker 15>this is what happens in a market. People wait for

0:41:49.190 --> 0:41:51.670
<v Speaker 15>the bottom line. to, you know, they'll wait for the

0:41:51.989 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 15>market to bottom out. But if everyone's waiting, then it's

0:41:54.060 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 15>going to take a long time for it to bottom out. So,

0:41:55.940 --> 0:41:57.900
<v Speaker 15>you know, eventually people will say, well, it's cheaper to

0:41:57.940 --> 0:41:59.620
<v Speaker 15>buy them rent, so we'll start buying them. But I

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.569
<v Speaker 15>think that's got a way to go. You've seen the

0:42:01.670 --> 0:42:03.930
<v Speaker 15>eastern capital cities go through this.

0:42:03.989 --> 0:42:04.649
<v Speaker 2>Now it's also.

0:42:05.190 --> 0:42:06.989
<v Speaker 15>Where I am in Adelaide and in Perth, it's starting

0:42:07.010 --> 0:42:09.060
<v Speaker 15>to happen as well. So it's biting very hard. And

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.180
<v Speaker 15>like I think you say, a lot of people now

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.219
<v Speaker 15>feel rushed into having to do this. They feel rushed

0:42:13.260 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 15>into having to sell their home. They're dumping their properties

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.230
<v Speaker 15>onto the market. So there's a lot more people trying

0:42:18.250 --> 0:42:20.469
<v Speaker 15>to sell their property than there are trying to buy

0:42:20.510 --> 0:42:22.910
<v Speaker 15>their property. And what does that mean for prices? Well,

0:42:22.930 --> 0:42:23.850
<v Speaker 15>they're going to have to go down.

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.420
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a tragic situation and I think the country

0:42:28.460 --> 0:42:31.660
<v Speaker 3>is really suffering under it. Nick, I'm a bit of

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 3>an expert on potholes because I live in the pothole

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.660
<v Speaker 3>capital of the world. I mean, it's worse here than

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:40.610
<v Speaker 3>in some of the war-torn countries of Iran because you

0:42:40.630 --> 0:42:43.650
<v Speaker 3>have a pothole on every road, including on major highways.

0:42:44.010 --> 0:42:46.629
<v Speaker 3>So what has the Geelong Council done? Well, they've become

0:42:46.650 --> 0:42:50.450
<v Speaker 3>the first council to install AI cameras on council trucks

0:42:50.850 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 3>to detect potholes... That's how bad it's become. But clearly

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.500
<v Speaker 3>the potholes need to be fixed by the council. What's

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.339
<v Speaker 3>the point of just taking pictures of them?

0:43:02.660 --> 0:43:05.530
<v Speaker 1>Pothole TV, Steve. I wonder how it's going to rate.

0:43:05.570 --> 0:43:07.770
<v Speaker 1>You've got to sit and watch developing potholes.

0:43:08.270 --> 0:43:09.050
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a nonsense.

0:43:09.070 --> 0:43:11.029
<v Speaker 1>They should be out there fixing it. But at the

0:43:11.070 --> 0:43:12.890
<v Speaker 1>same time, I think that they should be out there

0:43:12.910 --> 0:43:15.669
<v Speaker 1>telling people where they are so they know to slow down.

0:43:15.730 --> 0:43:18.390
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I caught a massive one on the Hume Highway,

0:43:19.030 --> 0:43:22.890
<v Speaker 1>you know, just north of Wangaratta when I came through.

0:43:23.810 --> 0:43:25.969
<v Speaker 1>A month or two back. They're all over the place.

0:43:26.010 --> 0:43:29.390
<v Speaker 1>And you do, even if you're driving a marvellous Prado

0:43:29.430 --> 0:43:32.020
<v Speaker 1>like mine, you know, you still need some warning. So

0:43:32.860 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>if they can't fix them, at least tell people where

0:43:34.540 --> 0:43:36.460
<v Speaker 1>they are. But look, I mean, just get out and

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.620
<v Speaker 1>do it. What else are councils supposed to do except

0:43:38.700 --> 0:43:40.189
<v Speaker 1>fix roads and empty the bins?

0:43:40.450 --> 0:43:40.830
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:43:42.530 --> 0:43:45.250
<v Speaker 3>Daniel, I've got an app in my car which says

0:43:45.350 --> 0:43:48.670
<v Speaker 3>pothole ahead, pothole ahead. So I start swerving. I mean,

0:43:48.690 --> 0:43:50.810
<v Speaker 3>you're on a road with a double white line in

0:43:50.830 --> 0:43:53.210
<v Speaker 3>the middle. You can't swerve out of the way. You've

0:43:53.250 --> 0:43:55.410
<v Speaker 3>got to sort of try and avoid it. The bloke

0:43:55.430 --> 0:43:58.650
<v Speaker 3>behind you thinks you're crazy. I mean, it's really dangerous.

0:44:00.430 --> 0:44:02.330
<v Speaker 15>Well, you'd probably be better off with an app telling

0:44:02.370 --> 0:44:04.370
<v Speaker 15>you when there's not a pothole. You know, that'd probably

0:44:04.410 --> 0:44:06.450
<v Speaker 15>be a bit easier, sort of getting to that point now.

0:44:06.489 --> 0:44:10.350
<v Speaker 15>So you'd never have the thing off, would you? So, no, look,

0:44:10.390 --> 0:44:14.690
<v Speaker 15>I think that this is a practical manifestation of what

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 15>happens when governments run out of money. So you look

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 15>at Victoria, this issue with debt has been very hypothetical

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 15>for a long time. I mean, we've been talking about

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.339
<v Speaker 15>it here for years and years and years, but the

0:44:24.380 --> 0:44:28.100
<v Speaker 15>punter on the street doesn't really feel it until the

0:44:28.140 --> 0:44:31.100
<v Speaker 15>services are cut. until the roads aren't fixed, until the

0:44:31.140 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 15>rubbish bins aren't getting picked up on time. This is

0:44:33.780 --> 0:44:36.009
<v Speaker 15>what happens when the government runs out of money. First

0:44:36.050 --> 0:44:38.509
<v Speaker 15>it's potholes, then it's the school can't open, then it's

0:44:38.530 --> 0:44:41.190
<v Speaker 15>the hospital is understaffed. So this is the slow march

0:44:41.230 --> 0:44:42.649
<v Speaker 15>of an economy that's not doing well.

0:44:43.969 --> 0:44:46.509
<v Speaker 3>Thousand percent correct. Good on you, chaps. Thank you very

0:44:46.530 --> 0:44:49.660
<v Speaker 3>much for that. After the break, Peter's favourite, Kel Richards

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:56.660
<v Speaker 3>with words. Welcome back. Great to be with you. And

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 3>let's bring in wordsmith and one of my favourite people,

0:44:59.780 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 3>broadcaster Kel Richards. Kel, I'm lucky to be here. Good

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 3>to see you again, my friend. I've heard the word

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.620
<v Speaker 3>lame duck used a lot today, used in regard to

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:14.060
<v Speaker 3>probably one President Trump and those election results that he's

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 3>gone through. Where does the term lame duck actually come from?

0:45:19.780 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 16>It's an odd one, isn't it? It was the Americans

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.969
<v Speaker 16>in 1860 who first applied lame duck to a politician

0:45:26.010 --> 0:45:29.270
<v Speaker 16>who'd lost control of the legislature. But they borrowed the

0:45:29.330 --> 0:45:33.569
<v Speaker 16>expression from the British because the London Stock Exchange was

0:45:33.630 --> 0:45:37.339
<v Speaker 16>talking about lame ducks back in the 1700s. And they

0:45:37.420 --> 0:45:40.940
<v Speaker 16>described as a lame duck any speculator who could not

0:45:41.020 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 16>meet their financial obligations. Now, where did the expression come from? Well,

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.650
<v Speaker 16>the lame part's not puzzling. I mean, someone who is

0:45:47.690 --> 0:45:50.830
<v Speaker 16>hobbled by the fact that he can't make his debt payments,

0:45:51.530 --> 0:45:54.850
<v Speaker 16>he's lame. But the duck part has puzzled a lot

0:45:54.890 --> 0:45:57.930
<v Speaker 16>of people. None of the experts are certain. Here's my suggestion.

0:45:58.250 --> 0:46:00.810
<v Speaker 16>If you think about a duck, it is a little fowl,

0:46:01.050 --> 0:46:04.450
<v Speaker 16>which is elegant and beautiful on the water or in

0:46:04.469 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 16>the air, but it waddles uncomfortably on the land. So

0:46:08.620 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 16>you imagine that, and it was lame, it'd be even worse.

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.779
<v Speaker 16>And in fact, some of the early citations talk about

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 16>a speculator waddling out of the stock exchange. So I

0:46:18.420 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 16>think that's the image they had in mind.

0:46:21.420 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 3>This is not meant as an insult. Mark would have

0:46:24.900 --> 0:46:28.730
<v Speaker 3>referred to what you just said as a load of poppycock.

0:46:29.350 --> 0:46:31.670
<v Speaker 3>Where's that come from? Oh, this is interesting.

0:46:32.730 --> 0:46:35.540
<v Speaker 16>It comes from a very similar sounding Dutch word which

0:46:35.580 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 16>was anglicised as And it means nonsense, rubbish, absolutely untrue.

0:46:40.739 --> 0:46:42.980
<v Speaker 16>And in fact, we might, if we were being really crude,

0:46:43.260 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 16>say that's a load of old and use a four-letter

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:48.350
<v Speaker 16>word starting with SH, which is what the Dutch original

0:46:48.450 --> 0:46:52.750
<v Speaker 16>actually means. The Dutch original word was popperkak. And the

0:46:52.790 --> 0:46:59.270
<v Speaker 16>Dutch popperkak word means doll's excrement. And I can't put

0:46:59.310 --> 0:47:02.460
<v Speaker 16>it any more politely than that. So that's what poppycock

0:47:02.540 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 16>originally meant.

0:47:05.090 --> 0:47:07.460
<v Speaker 3>I've been writing for newspapers for a long time to

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:11.660
<v Speaker 3>get sewage and sewerage mixed up. Pamela wants to know

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 3>which ones are coming out of the Marrickville Golf Club

0:47:15.820 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 3>that our friend Anthony Albanese talks about. Right.

0:47:19.180 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 16>Both coined in the same year, 1834, in England. And

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.620
<v Speaker 16>the key is this. The sewerage, with the extra syllable,

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:31.140
<v Speaker 16>is the plumbing that carries the waste. The sewage is

0:47:31.219 --> 0:47:35.290
<v Speaker 16>the waste that it carries. So it's simple when you

0:47:35.330 --> 0:47:38.980
<v Speaker 16>know it. The sewerage is the pipes and the sewage

0:47:39.060 --> 0:47:41.700
<v Speaker 16>is the stuff inside the pipes, which we won't refer to.

0:47:43.460 --> 0:47:46.720
<v Speaker 3>And Margaret wanted to know, this is a really interesting question,

0:47:46.739 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 3>when did we drop the idea that we had to

0:47:48.500 --> 0:47:49.919
<v Speaker 3>talk about our Christian name?

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:53.320
<v Speaker 16>Oh, it's very hard to nail down a date. Probably

0:47:54.140 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 16>it started in 1972 when Al Grasby became Minister for

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:03.710
<v Speaker 16>Immigration under Gough Whitlam and started the multiculturalism. push that

0:48:03.770 --> 0:48:07.180
<v Speaker 16>did this. It's hard to nail down the date when

0:48:07.219 --> 0:48:10.540
<v Speaker 16>official forms switch from Christian name to first name or

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:14.219
<v Speaker 16>given name. The argument was it was, although most people

0:48:14.260 --> 0:48:17.620
<v Speaker 16>were at least nominally Christian, it would offend minorities. So

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.609
<v Speaker 16>you had to protect minorities. And I suspect the one

0:48:20.690 --> 0:48:23.310
<v Speaker 16>minority that had to be protected the most was the

0:48:23.350 --> 0:48:26.290
<v Speaker 16>minority that Gough Whitlam himself belonged to, the atheists.

0:48:26.410 --> 0:48:28.839
<v Speaker 3>I get it. I get it now. Good on you, Kel.

0:48:28.900 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Always a pleasure to catch up with you. That's it

0:48:32.100 --> 0:48:35.330
<v Speaker 3>for me tonight. James McPherson is in the chair tonight

0:48:35.350 --> 0:48:38.270
<v Speaker 3>for Andrew Bolt. There'll be a big fallout tomorrow from

0:48:38.310 --> 0:48:41.910
<v Speaker 3>those midterm elections in the United States, so brilliantly covered

0:48:41.950 --> 0:48:43.190
<v Speaker 3>today on News 24. Here's James.