WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 20 April

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Burray live. Indeedly Caleb.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to humans, I am a wagu plus nine,

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever the rating is, whatever the maximum one is for

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a little muscle movement. Very well marveled. That'd be me,

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, Welcome to the show. Lots to get to

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>tonight here in the man Cave. Now tonight, before we

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>get into the politics, we're going to talk about something terrible.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It's been happening, particularly in New South Wales, an awful

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that have been drowning. It's been a

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit warm. People need to settle down and be

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>careful around water, especially people who for some reason still

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>do the rock fishing. I'm going to explain that in

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a second Sunday Night, definitely on a public holiday. Hardcore

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>politics to night of course, the state of the Race,

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Cos Samaras with the numbers, Michael Kroger with the opinion

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>on it all. And this time next week I'm going

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to be living a dream because I am going to

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>be in beautiful Cowghoolie in Western Australia. If you would

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like to join us in the room. And I know

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's the nullable muster up the road. But that's okay,

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>do this said, and I turned around, come back, say

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ourtown at skynews dot com dot AU. Next Sunday night

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>will be in Cowgooley in mighty Western Australia. Let's fill

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the room ourtown at skynews dot com dot A. You now,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>as I say, before I get to the politics, and

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's the main focus, particularly on a Sunday night.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.919
<v Speaker 1>There have been half a dozen people who have died

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the waters off New South Wales this easter. Now

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they claim it's because the weather is ever so slightly warmer,

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>so people are going back and they're going to places

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that are frankly unpatrolled. There's not as many life savers.

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are even shut down because of course

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer the official swimming season. But also there

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are too many people and I mean too many people

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>who are going rock fishing. Now, if that's how you

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>get your kicks, if you don't have the safety vest,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have the equipment, because inevitably, what Mother

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Nature will do is produce a wave out of nowhere

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that could knock you off your feet. Apart from the

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that you could end up banging your head and

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>then like some people washing into the water, you could

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>just get washed into the water with very little ability

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to fight back. This is a matter of life and

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>death in Australia. We love our water, but we are

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>at times not prepared for it. Here's the Life Savers

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>today on TV after a pretty bad weekend, which of

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>course still has another day to go day away from

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the rocks at the edges. Rivers can also be dangerous.

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, we want people to stay safe, we want

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 2>people to be able to go home at the end

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>of the Easter break.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, reality is the Easter break flows pretty quickly into

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Anzac Day. A lot of people will obviously have the

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>public holidays of Friday, Sunday, Monday. Then they're going to

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>take Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday off in order sugar another long

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>weekend when it comes to Anzac Day, so lots of

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be close to the water. And

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 1>just the past couple of days there have been house

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>this fifty rescues up and down the coast of New

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>South Wales. It could be a similar story somewhere else,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's just a warning to everyone. As relaxed as

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we are, we can't be relaxed about the reality that

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>humans and water sometimes it doesn't mix.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Today alone, there have been fifty rescues, with another one

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred lives saved since Good Friday, thirty of them involving

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the Westpac Rescue helicopter. Close calls today including a rock

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 3>fisherman at Bass Point on the South coast and another

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 3>at a voca further north at Coffs Harbor. Three swimmers

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 3>were pulled from the water by life savers.

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Please take it easy and thank you to those in

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the volunteer and professional services who are there to help.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>We honestly are a better place because of your service

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and something that all of us should never take for granted.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>All Right, election, thirteen days until we know whether the

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>government gets rehired or there is a new broom coming

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>through Canberra. Just two days until the first votes are cast.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And in an election when apparently there are a huge

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>number of undecideds, does that mean they will all rush

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>vote early to get it done. Do they wait till

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the end? Do the hyperpartisans make the most of these

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>few extra days regardless of whether it's a public holiday

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>or not. The services are going to be open Tuesday,

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday and Thursday, so we'll all be keeping a very

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>close eye on what's happening. But voting starts in the

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five election in just two days' time. This

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>week we'll also have another debate that one is of

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>course going to be over on Channel nine on the

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>same day that voting does begin. Now, today, the Prime

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Minister lived up to his each way albo tag that

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>we have given him, which is he says that Peter

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Dutton is injecting too much machismo, he's too matcho, he's

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>too blokey. He said this today while going onto the

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>footy show in Rugby League Territory and passing the football.

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if Tony Abbott had done this toxic mathculinity. But

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's albo, oh, it's just him being a good

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>bloke right. Hence why we say each way albo. It

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>applies in a campaign as much as it does in governance. Now,

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, play are spending when it comes to this government,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but thankfully they've held off for the past couple of days.

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But Mark Knight, the excellent cartoonist for The Herald's Sun, well,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he decided to link the excessive spending and excessive promises

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>of Anthony Aberne. Is he with the holiday? It's Easter

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>time and I hope the Easter Bunny is paid you

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>all visit this weekend. Of course, there is another bunny

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>traveling around the country at the moment.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Delivering handouts to absolutely everybody, and.

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>That would be the Prime Minister.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 5>Do I've called the Easter ol Bunny easy like that?

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, you might see him hopping through your neighborhood as

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>he goes from an electric to electric during his campaign.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Giving handouts to anybody who's close by.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the full cartoon that is in the Herald

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Sun today. I like Mark Knight, always feel us always

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>on point and a very good point that the Prime

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Minister considers himself to be the Easter Bunny right now.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course he's spent plenty of money since January.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 4>A seven point two billion dollar announcement today five million

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 4>dollars ten million dollar, two hundred million dollars, three billion dollar,

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and fifty million dollar, two billion dollars, thirty

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 4>seven million dollars, eight hundred and forty two million dollar,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 4>two point four billion dollars, eight point five billion dollar,

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 4>four point eight billion dollar, one billion dollars three point

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 4>four billion dollars two point eight billion dollars two one

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 4>hundred million dollar, one hundred and fifty million dollar, one

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar, two hundred and forty five million dollars, six

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 4>million dollars, three million dollars, ten billion dollars.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Never gets old, but you'll find a new way to

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>add to it, no doubt in a couple of days

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>when there's sort of attention on the election, but certainly

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the votes start being cast, there will be no doubt

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>more promises over the next thirteen days two until the

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>voting begins. As for Peter Dunnan, he's been at many

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>religious services, including one in Sydney's West on Friday, apparently

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>attended by twenty thousand people. What a huge number of

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>people that were there and a perfect sign again of

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>his focus when it comes to wider community is the

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Christian Maronite community, I believe is the one behind that one.

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He went to the Easter show, as did the Prime Minister,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>which means, oh, the politicians can work out who was

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>cheering and who was booing and what's the metaphor if

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they're standing in front of this one or that one,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>will they walk past a write you know? How it

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>works anyway, as for an a fficial Easter message, and

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>again happy Easter to everyone who marks the occasion for

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>its religious significance. This is what the alternative Prime Minister

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>had to say in his Easter message today.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 6>Remember what is important in life and what is important

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 6>his family, our friends, and our society, our community, and

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 6>doing whatever we can to make sure that the future

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 6>of this great country will always be exactly that.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Now we know the media have spun as hard as

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they can, certainly for months, but definitely for the weeks

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of this election in favor of the Prime Minister. Now,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>if the polls are right, the Prime Minister's headed to

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>another term in Parliament as the Prime Minister, be it

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>minority or maybe even slim majority. Potentially that would be

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary if he was able to achieve that. So you

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think that a few hard questions might be coming the

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>way of the Prime Minister, but of course not. The

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>media is there to get him re elected, not to

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>hold him to account. We passed the halfway point in

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the campaign. The polls are increasingly positive for Labor. That's

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>positive for the coalition. You must confident now if you're going.

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 6>For the fining two weeks better report today than your

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 6>campaign chair as welcome the baby girl, pretty the world.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>How much eternity leaders are you going to get? And

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>any message for new parents? Yeah, I mean be still

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>my beating heart. We're even giving a little shout out

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to the campaign chairs now. Of course, for Peter Dunton,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the government is more than happy to you fill the

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>media with as much info as possible to say he

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>can't get out of first gear because if he gets

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>out of first gear, he might be able to pull

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>off the miracle win and we can't have twenty nineteen

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>all over again. So here are the questions of the

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>alternative prime minister. It's but the difference.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Do you regret hitching your wagon to nuclear and do

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 6>you think you've done enough to sell it this campaign?

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 5>So far?

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>On your small business lunch policy, you've only mentioned it

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>once in three weeks, so you still committed to it?

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 5>And why aren't you talking about you visited more.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Than ten petrol stations on this campaign.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Why haven't you visited a single proposed nuclear power sign.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Why should members of the Australia's multiple your community vote

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 2>for you giving you a hard stance of immigration? Well,

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 2>why is it so hard for you to just say

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 2>climate change and acknowledge that it exists.

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't you love this? How many times have we said

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>over the fifteen years we've been together here about immigration,

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's not about what people believe in, it's not

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what they look like, it's not from where they come from,

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as obviously anywhere that anyone comes from, they agree.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>In the egalitarian Australia, they agree the law of the

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>land is more important than a near religious law. We

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>fully accept people to love who they want to love,

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>marry who they want to marry, all the normal stuff, right.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>We respect in fact revere women in this country, and

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the men who are decent would die for the women

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in their lives, not cause them trouble, and anyone who

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>does is a low life. But of course any conversation

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>about immigration, they try to turn it into some sort

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of a conversation about race. No, no, no, it's about

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the reality that if so many people can't afford a house,

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if so many people can't find a place to live,

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>why would you tip another million people on on top

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of that, extending every queue and every state ambulance Ramping

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>is a problem, meaning when you call triple o they

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>may or may not turn up, and even if you

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do get in the back of an ambulance, you're not

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get into the hospital. Ycus is not enough beds. No, no,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>let's tip another midion in do you like how they

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>deliberately and intention They know that, but they deliberately and

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>intentionally try to link the word immigration to race, because

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of course that is the way that the modern left

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>likes to talk about things, like in the United States,

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't talk about the difference between legal and illegal immigration.

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Ten million people crossed into the country over its borders

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>through the southern border, more likely than coming down from Canada.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>The American government wants to get rid of the people

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>who came in illegally. But no, no, no, they're racist

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>because they're all migrants. Know there is an absolute difference,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And anyone who knows people that have come to the

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>country know the people who waited, filled out the forms,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>did the homework and pass the tests think very poorly

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of those who come in illegally. So it is a

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated issue, but it is not that difficult to understand

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>why Australians want a pause in more people being added

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to every version of the queue that exists in Australia.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But my phone went kaboom on Thursday night when the

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>host from the ABC well yet again showed their political colors.

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Now Here is a scenario where Clara, now the Housing Minister,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>was well doing what she normally does, which is carrying

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on like a two bob watch, trying to show that

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>she's the future of the Labor Party. Look at her,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>she's a girl boss. Here she is whacking the Libs

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>around the face. Although significantly higher. That's sorry, they were

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 5>Short of what the coult That's not right, Michael.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Labour not going to be at one point two. That's

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the point, Labor. Under Claire's watch, we're.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 6>Delivering fewer homes than we've had for well over a decab.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's absolutely untrue again Michael.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And they get to deliver a single hope, that's true.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>Let's sell well, we all fund so sure for that's it.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>You're not getting an ounce so you'll announcer.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Out of me.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 6>Through the Affordable Housing Bond aggregator, we've supported thirteen thousand

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 6>homes old run.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So did you build thirteen?

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 7>Did you build.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Thirteens higher than? And then today all the rooms are

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that tried to do so. But when the liberal spokesperson

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>tries to fight back and dare interrupt clueless Clear O'Neil,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the absolutely independent host who, as you see, never pulled

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>up Claire O'Neil. Look what she did to the lips.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 2>We are building fifty five thousand social and affordable homes

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>over five years, twenty eight thousand, twenty eight thousand of

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 2>those home Resmarchaels, what would.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Your mother say hearing you interrupt her? Just I've been

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>interrupted the entire time.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Just please, it's okay. I'm unflappable, Sarah. I've done this

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 2>my third run at this this.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Week, darlily An. They always spit the poor. We show

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you the receipts. They will all keep marching on and

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>doing what they do. Now, I think the biggest thing

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that happened in politics this weekend happened on the Sunshine Coast,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and it happened with Clyde Palmer Clyde Park via the

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Trumpeter patriots made their announcement when it comes to preferences. Now,

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>this is what he said, and he is going to

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>put essentially all sitting MP's last. I'll explain why that is.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>A massive boost for the Labor Party and a big

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>problem for the coalition. In a second, it's dumb and dumber.

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 8>It's tweedled, dumb and tweedled. It's B one and B two.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 8>That's why the Trumpet of Patriots has placed every sitting

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 8>Labor member last in every Labor held seat, and every

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 8>sitting Liberal member last and every Liberal health seat.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, Trumpeter Patriots is the new version of

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the United Australian Party. The United Australian Party, which had

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>been deregistered in between the last two elections, did have

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of members, So why it was the

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>registered Who knows who cares? But the reality is Trumpet

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>of Patriots is the one that's doing all the ads.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the one with the yellow colors. It is the

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>one that is the Clyde Palmer Party in twenty twenty five.

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Now again, the simple maths here is that yes, there

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are more Labor seats than there are Liberal seats. But

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.119
<v Speaker 1>what about the margins by which each party is attacking

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>or defending. That's when this preference deal starts to absolutely

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>work in favor of the Labor Party. Let me explain.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>These are the seats of the Labor Party is currently

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>holding under two percent, being along Gilmore Means his Lions

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and Lingiari the United Australia Party, which of course now

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is the Trumpet Patriots. It got more than two percent

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in each and every one of those seats, meaning that

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if those were immediately sent back towards the Libs, it

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>could be the difference between Labour holding onto a seat

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>or losing a seat. In the seats of four percent,

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>there essentially is no major change, but in Robertson, Patterson,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Boothby and Chisholm up to almost four percent, particularly in

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Patterson would matter. But essentially it is really those first

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>few seats that end up being the main areas that

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the Labour Party would become nervous about. Well, guess what,

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a larger number of seats that are held

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>by the Liberal and National Party under the two percent margin.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So by going against the sitting MP in Deacon Sturt, More, Canning,

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily Bass Casey and Dixon, which of course is

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dutton's seat, all of those suddenly could become vulnerable. Now,

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>if people do follow the how to vote card, then

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you are talking about a significant number that is going

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to be moving against the sitting MP, which numerically is

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be more relevant in the wafer thin margins

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>held by the Liberal Party than the waf of thin

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>margins held by the Labor Party. In fact, if you

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>have a look at the four percent margins Banks, Longman,

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>BONNERI like Ar't Hughes and Flynn, but particularly in Flynn

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and Banks and Longman and Hughes. Now that was where

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Craig Kelly was running as the United Australian Party leader

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the last election. All of those again could have significant

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>impacts on the Liberal Party's ability to defend a seat.

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So put simply, by putting everyone last, it's going to

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage the Labor Party because they have fewer seats in

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the margins where the Trumpeter Patriots vote could be decisive.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>If people follow those how to vote cards, the Trumpeter Patriots'

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>preferences could hurt up to seven Labor MPs, but could

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt up to seventeen Liberal and National Party MPs. Now

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by putting everyone last, it means that he is preferencing

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Teals before Labor and before Liberal in many different seats.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the Teals are running against Liberals would help

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for Teal candidates who'd like to defeat a Liberal candidate,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but in fairness, it could hurt the sitting six Teal candidates.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>What I find odd about this is not it's a

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>bug of the whole system. It's that very obviously they

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>know their numbers, very obviously, they know their margins, so

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>very obviously they know which of the two political sides

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it was going to hurt. Now, this is the same

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>essential messaging that in the twenty nineteen campaign went full

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>bore against Bill Shorten Phil Bore. So it's coming from

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the right. So for it to hurt the Liberal and

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>National Party either in the two headed contest when it

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to Liberal labor, or to hurt when it comes

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Teals trying to take over from a lib.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It is essentially going to be a very significant issue

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>here because preference discipline with people who vote one Nation

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>or vote Trumpeter Patriots or vote Libertarian, is going to

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>be the difference between a close election or one hell

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of a blowout. Remember this is what the leader of

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the Trumpeter Patriots said on Saturday after the preference decision

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>had been made. So very obviously you would suggest that

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>she is coming from the right of Australian politics.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 2>And Australia needs many of the policies of the Trump

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>administration which will be effective in bringing Australia back on track.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But when you go to the website of the Trumpeter

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of Patriots and you have a look at the how

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to votes in the different seats, the wanna be Teals

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>are preferenced second more than anyone else in the goes

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Trumpeter Patriots straight to Teals in cap on the mid

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>North Coast of New South Wales, and amazingly in the

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>seat of Bradfield, where the number one option apart from

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Trumpeter Patriots for Trumpeter Patriots voters, as instructed by the

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Trumpeter Patriots, is to vote for the Teal And this

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>is the Teal candidate who is going to get the

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>preferences from Trumpeter Patrients in Bradfield.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 9>How do I let my friends know that Community Independence

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 9>aren't a party?

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 5>Well, we know how to party. I think that's probably

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 5>worth nice. I think that, yeah, it's a really good question.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of is the desiituation out there about that,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 9>and I think that I think it's really hard right

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 9>because I just don't think that people understand what we're

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 9>doing here.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Now. I don't want to start another blood feud with

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Clive Palmer. Much louder voice and more money that many

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of us could ever dream of, and we're buried the

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>hatchet a long time ago, So Clive, I'm not trying

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to start a new fight here, Okay. All I'm trying

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to understand is, well, yes, you talk about the UNI Party,

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's no difference between the Liberal Party and the

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party. The difference of this decision is that it

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>will result in potentially much fewer Liberal MPs, which could

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>result in much more labor MPs. It could result in

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>teals replacing liberals and would that not take the country

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>further away from the stated goals of the Trumpeter patriots?

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Or am I missing something? You got my number? You

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>can text me if you want, or we'll come on

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the show and talk about it. I'm not shilling for

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party here. It's just this is a terrible government.

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>This is a terrible government that deserves to be pushed

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>right to the edge, if not over it. These preferences

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>could well save them. I don't get it. As for

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the election, is it closer than we think? Well, who

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>do you trust if you trust the book is The

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>answer is no, hell no. In fact, because the latest

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>odds sports bet Liberals at four dollars thirty the Labor

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Party of twenty two lad Broke's better dollar twenty tab

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at a dollar twenty blowouts basically and by the way

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think in sports bet it's basically the same money

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>between a majority or a minority right now for Labor.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So things in terms of the bookies absolutely going Labour's

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>way tonight theatest news pole has dropped. It is exactly

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the same even including the primary votes than last week,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>which either means the coalition has steadied the bleeding. But

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>if nothing else, obviously it's in a world of paine

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>at fifty two forty eight. And I want to ask

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>our stats guys tonight, Okay, if it's fifty two to

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>forty eight, why are we looking at other poles telling

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>us that the Labour Party could still lose half a

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>dozen seats. Surely if they're nationally above, they should be

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>above everywhere else. Of course, the answer is swings and

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it. But how look at that

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>primary vote? Remember the last election one nation got five

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote. It's now up to seven percent.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's consistent in all the polls that they are higher

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>than they were last time. That's why Pauline Hanson, being

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive, very anti Albanezy, is telling everyone preference the

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Libs before you get to Labor. I'm saying you put

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party up there at number two. Why because

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way to defeat the Labor Party. Once

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you send your vote out across fifteen different candidates, there's

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a chance statistically that you don't end up changing the seat.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>You just end up sending your vote on a very

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>long walk. However, this is the stuff that's going to

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>really start to hurt Liberal supporters. But stick with me.

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you some hope. In a second all right,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>cost of living, Labour's winning that one thirty one twenty eight,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone else neither undecided, both equally tax. Labor is leading

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the coalition thirty three to twenty five on the question

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of would be better at handling lowering taxes helping Australiers

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>by their first House twenty nine to twenty four, relatively even,

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>but still Labor in front. In health, it won't surprise

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you that it's forty two twenty two as for the

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>overall economy. Now again I don't understand how one people say.

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>They say one thing about tax, they say another thing

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>about cost of living. But when it comes to the

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>overall economy, Coalition leading Labor thirty four to twenty nine,

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and on defense thirty five to twenty three in favor

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the coalition. Meantime, according to the Yuga pole that

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>dropped this weekend, and again we're all about the data,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>We're all about the grains of sand on the beach.

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This is how nothing will be a surprise when voting

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>starts on Tuesday. Labor is apparently in an eighteen month

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>high in their primary vote. Why because they say it

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>is equal. Now the Coalition, which got close to forty

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in this poll is now down to thirty three. The

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Labour Party is basically where they were at the last

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>election at thirty three. Paul In Hansen still at seven. Remember,

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to devote one nation or anything else

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on the right of center, then clearly you should prioritize

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the government that you want after the candidate that you want.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise Labour sticks around two party preferred fifty three forty

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>seven according to you gov. Also Redbridge now you can

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>see what you're going to see here is four different lines.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>The most recent is the most recent poll, the one

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>below that is the week before that, the week before that,

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and then where we started things about four and a

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>bit weeks ago. You can see for Labor it's got

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>better as the four weeks have gone. For Coalition it

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>has got worse over the past four weeks. But and

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I said there was a raise of hope. Let's talk

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 1>about cost of living. Because cost of living, which has

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>been the number one election issue and has been for

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the past how many years we're banned on about it?

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>How many night? It's why because it's where Australians are.

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>The ABC is starting to notice this because you know

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that vote compass thing which basically put in the information

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that tells you you're going to vote green. Well, it

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is showing that the most important issue is cost of living,

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>followed by economy and finance, government operations, then climate change, housing, healthcare, immigration,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>gender equality which is a less than one percent issue,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or even retirement benefits and social services according to their compass.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Why does this matter because cost of living, yes, slightly

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>leaning in favor of the government. In the news polet

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in the Freshwater pole. It is slightly leaning in favor

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of the coalition. This means the coalition's messaging should be

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing and one thing only every day between now

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and the election. Which is the shopping list of things

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that will happen if you vote for the Liberal Party.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Number one twelve hundred dollars, automatic tax return, Number two

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five cents, harving of the petrol tax. Number three,

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>instant asset right off for businesses up to thirty thousand dollars.

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Number four put them in whatever order they want. Tax

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>deductibility for people that are paying off their first home.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>There are people there who are still soft and still

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>able to move. But the pole that did worry me

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the most today in terms of if we're going to

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>keep the government or get rid of them, was this

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>detailed run through. In the red Bridge polling, the question

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was what would you say the biggest hesitations or concerns

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>for only for labor or Anthony Abernesi. The dark red

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is the most recent pole, the pink is the one

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>before that. So let's go off the most recent numbers

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>forty seven percent. And remember these are all out of

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred. They don't all add up to one hundred.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Lack of action on cost of living seat, that's the

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for the Libs. The shopping list of what is available,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ram at home with every ad you've got for the

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>next little while. Now that's forty seven percent. Management of

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy, lack of progress in their first term. There

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>links to the union movement and just twenty four percent

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of people saying it's Anthony Albanese's personality as leader. Now

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>these are apparently people in swing seats, so again it's

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>not about the hard cores that are in hardcore Red

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>or hardcore Blue. This is in the question Mark territory.

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>The problem for the LID in this polling up by

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ten points. Peter Dutton's personality as leader is the biggest

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>hesitation for people as to why they wouldn't vote coalition

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or for Peter Dutton as the leader of the coalition

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>forty five percent. Our lack of policy detail. Did they

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>leave it too late to tell us what they were

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>planning to do? The coalition's too close to Trump basically

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>because we would follow the examples being set by Trump

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty four percent. The performance of the Morrison government thirty

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>two percent. Their plan for nuclear power in fact, more

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>people saying the reason not devote liberal is because of

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the last government, not the plans of a future government.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that with Michael Kroger in a moment

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>or to time. Lots to unveil, lots to pull apart

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>with them, and the way that we like to do

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it each and every Sunday night is to get right

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>into the detail, and we like to call it none

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>other than the State of the Race. We'll take a

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>quick break, we'll be back with them as we get

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>into the data, into the detail, and I really do

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>want to have a conversation about those polls that are

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>turning around and telling us about what's going to hold

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>people back Tomorrow and night on the show, we're going

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to go deep into the muck that is social media.

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>But enough for me. Let's get to the detail. Thoughts

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>ports going ONews dot com dot Are you stay of

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the race this Sunday night here on Pulmurray Life. Thanks

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>for watching, Thank you so much for watching. Let's get

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>into it now. Let's go hardcore, especially on a Sunday night.

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Happy Easter to Costam Marius from the Red Bridge Organization

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and none of them, Michael Kraeger thank you, sir, Happy

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>East to you the liberal legend out of Victoria. Lots

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to get to, including an awful lot of data to

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>play with tonight, and I will get into this preference

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>stuff because it is going to matter. We're down to

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.239
<v Speaker 1>fractions of fractions and votes start on Tuesday. All right,

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>let's get to this here, because what if anything is

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting you in all of the data that we're around

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, is anything moving about and in what direction?

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's just a continuation of the coalition losing a

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 5>lot of votes to minor parties, very significant numbers. So

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 5>even in our track which you you put up there

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 5>just before, I mean it's eleven percent dropping victory alone

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 5>in primary vote and a lot of it just going

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 5>to minor parties. And it's happening nationally. It's happening very

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 5>big numbers. And then the preferences are not coming back

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 5>to them. And you know, we could talk about, you know,

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 5>with the impact that that parton might have in that space,

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 5>but it's going to be pretty tough for Peter Dutton

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 5>and his team to get anywhere near close to be

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 5>able to negotiate with that cross bench. It's looking pretty grim.

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I look on all of this data, you can

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>only really conclude one thing, which is it's a conversation

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>about majority or minority when it comes to labor. But Michael, again,

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>same stuff about this data. Are we now in a

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation where we are discussing you know, there's always a

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>chance or as possibility, but we are now talking about

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>majority minority here or on a day, this and that

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of it.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, the pole has been wrong before on many occasions.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 7>We know if that poll is right, then Alberici probably

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 7>wins with the minority government. But I just can't help

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 7>but thinking that's right. I mean, look at Victoria for example, Paul. So,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 7>the labor primary vote dropped four percent at the last

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 7>election in Victoria, right, but in twelve of its seats

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 7>the swing again the primary vote again dropping in labor,

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 7>was five to fourteen percent. So there are number of

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 7>seats eight nine, ten percent and Scullon was fourteen percent

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 7>if you've got Holt, Fraser, Gorton, Carewell, Scullon. So what

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 7>does that mean. It means that the swing against labor

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 7>was very heavily in its own safe seats. So given

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 7>that Labor have run a very traditional campaign, which is

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 7>the usual in medicares under attack again, it's going to

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 7>be sold, bashed, you know, slashed and burned, et cetera,

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 7>as the usual campaign of lies. That appeals very much

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 7>to Labour's base. So I wonder whether Labour's vote, say

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 7>in Victoria and maybe nationally, is returning to the Labor

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 7>Party in its safe seats and not so much in

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 7>the marke Tools and that's where Peter Dutton would be

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 7>very much alive. The second thing I'll put to cause though,

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 7>is a month ago, because you had the Coalition four

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 7>percent in front in two party preferred terms and you've

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 7>got the nine behind. So do you think there's been

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 7>a six and a half percent swing two party preferred

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 7>against the Coalition in the last month, Because that's a

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 7>man's number.

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 5>And this pole that we're talking about is in key seats,

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 5>not in the safe seats, So these are marginal seats.

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 5>It's not in your halls, not in your phrases, and

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 5>it's not because the Labor Party is picking up votes.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 5>It's because Peter Dutton and the Coalition are losing to

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 5>the minor parties. We've been talking about this now for

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 5>a few weeks it is a phenomenon that we see

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 5>across the country, whether it's it's state elections in West Australia,

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 5>whether it's in Queensland, whether it's in other states as well.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 5>You know where would be by election was a really

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 5>good example of that. The Ages now lose a stack

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 5>of votes to minor parties, but the other major party

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 5>doesn't pick it all up. So that's fundamentally the challenge here,

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 5>and we're looking at a very polarized electric you're either

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 5>plant you're batting for the blue team or you're batting

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 5>for the red team. If you're upset with one or

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 5>the other, you don't go on swap. And that's what's

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 5>going on here.

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Also because because again there's a lot of this

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>data that will appear in other places at other times,

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to jump ahead of anything where

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it might be so yell out f I am. But

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>something I'm noticing in those waves A right, what we

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>were talking about before about how Labour's vote gets better

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>over the past four weeks. The vote goes down over

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the past four weeks. The Greens vote in the most

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>recent and the one before has exploded. I mean it

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>has gone straight through the roof in some of these seats.

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that what determines that two party preferred conversation, because

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly if the Greens are up, the preferences are up.

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that the X factor in these twenty seats that

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>according to this the Greens they're up a very significant amount.

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, gen Z, they're up to thirty three percent, and

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 5>so people in their twenties in all these seats. This

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 5>is where their growth is occurring for the Greens. And

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 5>this is where the impact of these younger generations are

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 5>having on the coalition. So if we look at all

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 5>those generations, the Coalition does not win gen Z, Millennial

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 5>or gen X. It only pulls off a win with

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 5>baby boomers by a considerable margin by ad but they're

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 5>no longer a dominant force in this country when it

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 5>comes to politics and voting. So it's gen Z that's

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 5>inflicting a lot of damage on the coalition then, but

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 5>also millennials leaving the coalition and going to minor parties

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 5>as well.

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, But then again, the stuff that might be a

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>little counterfactual of feeling like the winds are blowing in

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>both directions when people see a demographic this and that

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that says younger men are more conservative than ever before.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>But we see they're part of a generation that seems

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to be again leaping further to the left than a

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>previous ones. So which is is there a myth out

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there that young blokes are conservative and therefore there's going

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to be some sort of eruction here or it is

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>just a sub section of a sub section here.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, subsection of a subsection. But the young blokes we're

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 5>talking about actually anti establishment, right right, So that's why

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 5>they like Trump, you know, so yeah, bugging them all,

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 5>that's right, and they go for right wing populist leaders

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 5>around the world. But they're a subsection, they're not the

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 5>whole group. But that's absolutely the case. They still have

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 5>young men that are far more reactionary and supportive of

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 5>right wing populist leaders around the world than women in

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 5>the same age categories.

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Can we bring up the graphic which shows the primary

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>vote from newspaper here, because I'm just doing the quick

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>mats in my hip here. If we're talking about preference

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>discipline again, this is why it really matters. If you're

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's thinking about something other than a major party,

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I say, you have to pick who you think is

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be the government with your number two vote. Otherwise,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if it goes for a long walk, well there's a

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>chance that the current mob stays in the primary vote.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Labour's thirty four, Greens twelve put it together at forty seven.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's imagine there was one hundred percent preference discipline, there

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>won't be with one nation supporters of the Liberal National

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's forty one. So again, Michael, this is what's got

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to be the concern here, which is especially the decision

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>of trumpet patriots to take the bug of them all.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>But there are more Liberals that are in tighter fights

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>than Labor MPs. Now it's not suggesting that the Labor

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Party is going to go and take a whole bunch

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of Liberal seats, but it is a major decision, and

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say, I'm not sure why the trumpet Patriots,

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously coming from the right, is going to

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>help facilitate the statistical removal of more people closer to

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>what they believe, rather than in places like Bradfield where

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>they're going to preference the Teal first, that's number two

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 7>Mate, mate, Remember this, Not everything in life can be explained, So.

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel I mean, obviously twenty nineteen, seriously, but

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I get twenty nineteen serious tens of minutes of dollars

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 1>on Bugger Shorten. Twenty twenty two was buger the system.

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Now he's doing buger the system again. You would agree

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>with me that that's very bad news for the Lips, right.

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, yes, oh, you know, if he's preferencing two to

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 7>a teal in Bradfield and preferencing against sitting Liberal members,

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 7>of course that's going to harm us because we're the

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 7>ones that need to win seats. And if you look

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 7>at one nation, one nation, sorry, if you look at

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 7>Palm Trump not Australian.

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Australian Party, the Palmer Party, the.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 7>Yellow whatever it's called. Yeah, it was the UAP in

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty two. We got sixty two percent of their preferences.

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 7>So in a seat where he is preferencing to labor

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 7>or a teal, you can assume that those people are

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 7>going to get a lot more than thirty eight percent

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 7>of their preferences. So is it going to dan me

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.800
<v Speaker 7>jus Y said, will damage this to how much? You

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 7>don't know? I mean, is a trumpet of Patriots voter

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 7>likely to want a preference second a teal or labor who,

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 7>as you've as you've poured out, vehemently opposed the Trump administration.

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 7>They to test the Trump administration. So this will bewilder

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 7>some of his own supporters, but quite frankly, it won't

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 7>be the first time Parmer supporters have been bewildered.

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Mate well, judging by the comments on the Trumpet Patriots

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook page in the past twenty four hours, including a

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of candidates that have been blowing up. So cos

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that part factor because in most of

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the polls it would suggest that they're about half of

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>where United Australia Party was same time three years ago.

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But Clyde Palmer, in his defense says, different brand, different issue,

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.479
<v Speaker 1>different people, It's still Team Yellow. Okay. Tell me about

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the Trumpet Patriots vote, particularly in those twenty marginals.

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say there's a bit of a civil

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 5>lining here for the coalition will. What we do know

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 5>through analysis of voters behavior when they're handed aheat of okard,

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 5>if you're voting for a minor party, you are least

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 5>likely to follow that out of okard. Then you're voting

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 5>for a major party. So what we know, for example,

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 5>fifty or give or take, coalition and labor voters will

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 5>follow the head of Oakard absolutely to the number. The

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 5>other fifty percent don't, but when it comes to minor

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 5>parties they will follow it based on their own beliefs.

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 5>So I still think that where they are staffing those

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 5>polling places, and that's the other critical factor here, is

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 5>he going to staff the polling boops where they're staffing them,

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 5>I think that will still preference very strongly to the

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 5>coalition because the types of people that are voting for

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 5>Partner's Operation are coming off the coalition. They're going to

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 5>go back at about sixty to seventy percent. But again

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 5>that's that thirty percent he's not getting that the colleges

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 5>are not getting back and that's where it hurts them.

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but also what about in that Teal factor, like

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>again Bradfield north of Sydney. Now, look, the Teal got

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>done by twenty points in terms of primary vote last time. Right,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just assumed that because that's the one who's getting

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>more money, getting the media attention, sort of getting the

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>full Teal treatment, And it's not a sitting Liberal MP.

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But again those sorts of factors in those seats, it's

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be fascinating because, as I say, in a

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>sitting teal Monique Ryan last right in a potential Teal

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>seat like A one, and much higher in Bradfield number two.

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So we'll all see where it lands. But then this

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>brings us to the other preference question, which is the Greens. Now,

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as I noticed in this if the Greens have been

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>surging in the past couple of weeks, which is that

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>data inside of Redbridge, then their preferences matter why because

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they get the discipline when it comes to Labor, don't

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you love, Michael, how the media works. The Labor Party

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>came out and has preferenced them, not fourth, not sixth,

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>not seventh, not eventually before they've done it. Number two.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They're basically the full hand pass. The full pass has

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:29.959
<v Speaker 1>been made to the Greens. The controversy nothing, yeap.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 7>So we've talked before on this show about Albanesi preferencing

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 7>in the Greens and would he do it? Would he

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 7>do it? And he's always member, he's always battered it away.

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 7>Today you know the organization when there's sort of faceless

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 7>people in Canberra who know nothing to do with him.

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think, I think a lot of people

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 7>in this country today who follow these things are absolutely

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 7>gobsmacked by Mark Dreyfus, the Attorney General, who is Jewish,

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 7>who has preferenced the Greens second. That will not help

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 7>by the way, Josh Burns in the seat of Macnamara

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 7>in Victoria, because any Jewish voter who was even thinking

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 7>about voting for Verns would look at Mark Drafts and

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 7>think what the Jewish Attorney generals is preferencing the Greens

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 7>second in his own seat. So that won't help them.

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.879
<v Speaker 7>But if preferencing the Green's going to help the Labor

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 7>Party nationally, know, I mean, people you talk about the

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 7>vote surging, it seems to be around twelve percent, which

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 7>is what it's been for in the last election as well.

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, remember this, a lot of young people are

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.760
<v Speaker 7>so appalled by the Greens and they're sort of anti

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 7>Semitism that that they've fueled through the behavior of some

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 7>of their MPs like Jennifer Leong, etc. There's a lot

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 7>of young people that don't want to be associated with

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 7>a party that many people believe these days have racist undertones. So,

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 7>you know, younger people with gen Z and millennials and

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 7>others who think it's trending to support the Greens. A

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of those people that I've speaked were having second

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 7>thoughts because they don't like this whole sort of pro

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 7>Palestinian bent by the Greens, which the undercurrent of which

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 7>many people believe is you know, has fueled a lot

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 7>of social division in this country by Bant and others

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 7>supporting the demonstrations being so critical of Israel Netanyahu. They

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 7>seem to take every way, you know, every opportunity to

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 7>criticize Israel. So I don't think the Greens of giving

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 7>preferences getting preferences from labor is going to go well

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 7>amongst a lot of moderate labor voters.

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll find out from these blokes but that

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they think a debate in the middle of a holiday

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>slash slightly blood week for many Australians will actually matter.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And let's get into those other polling data as well

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>about what is the reason why you wouldn't end are

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>voting for the Libs or for Labor. Fascinating and big

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 1>changes there or a quick break back with more state

0:41:53.880 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>of the race. Hardcore politics this Easter Sunday, this show,

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>this bloke next week, Western Australia. If you can get

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to Cawgooley. We're plugging it hard because we want to

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>fill the joint with as many people as possible. We

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>know it's not a town of amnion people, okay, so

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we know we're not going to get the mega crowds

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've had in all other places, but we want

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>as many people there as possible. Okay. So if you

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>can get to Cawgooley in Western Australia next week, ourtown,

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Goenies dot com. That are you. If you're watching,

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>you know someone there, give them a call. Many times

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we go and do our town. Somebody says, I've been

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a fan. I watch you every night, but I didn't

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>know you were coming. Well, come on, here's the chance.

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Ourtown at skydews dot com dot Au. Back to Coross

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Samaras from Redbridge and of course a legend around these

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:40.959
<v Speaker 1>parts are on sky Newson. Of course some Liberal Party

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in Victoria and none other than Michael Kroger. So Michael,

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>another debate this one Tuesday. It does happen first day

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of voting, but it is still a place where a

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people certainly are think news of wils I

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know about Victoria school holidays. It's still one of

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>these gray weeks, one of the wobble weeks. And I've

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>got a feeling that I, judging by the journalism of

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Channel nine sixty minutes all the way through to the

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>way they do their questions each and every night, they're

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have one objective and one objective only, and

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that is to go for the kill on Peter Dutton.

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That said, what do you think of the third debate?

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, all these debates take on increasing importance. The closer

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 7>you get to the election, the more important they are.

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 7>As every day passes, people are paying more and more attention.

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 7>You know, Tuesday they start voting, so and they'll be

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 7>heavy pre pole voting because you used to have an excuse,

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 7>you needed an excuse to vert early. Now that doesn't

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 7>seem to worry about that so effectively, these polls are

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 7>open for a week and a half, So yeah, the

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 7>debate's very important. There's a couple of other debates during

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 7>the week as well. Keith Wallahan's debating the men before Mensies,

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, there's a health debate on Wednesday with Anne

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 7>Rust and so all these debates are very important. There's

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 7>absolutely no doubt about it. Can I just go back

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 7>to a point I was making before. I've just seen

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 7>something on the Australian website. This guy Jason Clare right,

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 7>the Minister for Education, who's the member for Blaxland in

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 7>New South Wales. He's he's put the Greens second, it's

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 7>crazy on his how to vote card, and the Greens

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 7>candidate the word extreme probably doesn't define him properly. He's

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:19.959
<v Speaker 7>on the record of saying Zionism is Nazism. He thinks

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 7>Jews that believe in the homeland of nazis really mister Claire,

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 7>you've put this Blake second on your had to vote card.

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 7>That's sick, Jason, that is sick. You shouldn't be doing that.

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 7>And this is where ALBANIZI right, this is the danger

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 7>of this Blake right, he's running a mark, he's desperate

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:43.720
<v Speaker 7>to win, and he's done a deal with these extremists

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 7>to get him back into government. You know, as rich

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 7>I said, whatever it takes, whatever it takes, that was

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 7>his famous book title, and that's what Albanese is doing.

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 7>In Anthony Alberze is Prime ministers country. Shame on you.

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, Cole. I want to talk about Rare, not Redbridge,

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a resolve political monitor. Sorry, I got to keep a

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 1>million different things starting with R in my head here right,

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of swear words as well. Work them out,

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Work them out. Now. This is really fascinating because again

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 1>it shows the march of where things are now. I'm

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not totally sure whether this again is about undecided voters,

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>whether this is about marginal seat voters, or whether this

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is just across everyone. So you've got the lovers and

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the haters in there. Okay. So the number one reason

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>why someone would be hesitant about voting for Labor or

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Abernezi not enough action on cost of living, followed

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.359
<v Speaker 1>by the management of the economy For the Libs number

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>one issue Peter Dutton's personality as leader and a lack

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of policy detail. What do those polls tell you about

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what you hear from voters when you ask them, so,

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think you know?

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 5>I think what we're seeing is they are just trying

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 5>to find excuses as to why they're going to vote

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 5>for labor, and it's really got to do with a

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 5>global situation, right we shouldn't really discount just the impact

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 5>that the tariff wars are having on the mindset of

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.879
<v Speaker 5>these voters. I mean, if you're these voters that we've

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 5>been talking about now for some time, you know, at

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:18.879
<v Speaker 5>our suburban regional voters who have been financially struggling. I've

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 5>endured a pandemic, You've enjoyed twelve interest rate rises, You're

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 5>barely keeping your head above water, and suddenly the global

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 5>economy is going in all sorts of places you never imagined.

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 5>You're least likely to vote and incumber down.

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:36.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is what's going on here.

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Same impact that nine to eleven had in two thousand

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:45.760
<v Speaker 5>and one, with the same impact that the other global

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:49.280
<v Speaker 5>events that were quite seismic have had. Even the pandemic,

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 5>the onset of the pandemic had a great effect on

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 5>inflating incumbents numbers, And I think we shouldn't really discount

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 5>what's going on here. So when we ask people these questions,

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 5>they're just going to hang their hat on whatever they

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 5>can be hang their had on. What we know for

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 5>our research over the last couple of weeks, though, is

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 5>that they are bringing this up the global situation on

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 5>a regular.

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Basis, Yeah, which is why obviously as well, you start

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear, you know, both sides talking about it a lot. So, Michael,

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you keep doubt in the air? How do

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you keep the question up so that they don't fall

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on one side of the fence.

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 7>So, Mate, a lot of elections in recent years the

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.280
<v Speaker 7>polls have been wrong, and there have been some elections

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 7>where the vote has changed even up to polling day.

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:42.720
<v Speaker 7>The Victorian state election in twenty ten, everyone thought label

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 7>were going to win, and then in the last four

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 7>or five days the vote swung for the Liberal Party

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 7>and Ted Bailey was elected Premier in Victoria. We all

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 7>remember Election night twenty nineteen. We all turned up to

0:47:54.840 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 7>whatever studio we were on, ready to ordain prime to

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 7>Bill Shorten, well lo and behold, well we all shocked.

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 7>And I'll tell you there's one thing I know about

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 7>Saturday Week. There's one thing that on Saturday Night you'll

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.760
<v Speaker 7>be able to quote me when you say to people,

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.839
<v Speaker 7>I didn't expect that, because that's what's going to happen

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 7>in a lot of these seats on Saturday Week. You're

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 7>going to look at them and think, my god, I

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 7>never saw that coming.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree. And here's the thing. Nothing is inevitable, right

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for the labor people who think, oh we're on our

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 1>way to works eighty hair goods. This nothing's locked in

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. Yes, lots of evidence, lots of trend all

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it. No one's going to look the

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>other way. But nothing is inevitable. And that preference discipline again.

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a fascinating chat, lads. I love this chat. I

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>love it because we're doing outown next week. We'll do

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it Monday on next week. Thank you so much. Of

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a great time and happy is it to you both?

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's our show for tonight. Stand by for

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Report.