Speaker 1: On scoring lis Ostrodio.
Speaker 2: This is the Reader Panalty Show. Good evening and welcome
Speaker 2: to the readA Panety Show. Coming up tonight.
Speaker 3: Opposition leader Peter Dutton declares war on leftist activist journalists
Speaker 3: after another hit piece is published in the Nine Papers.
Speaker 2: The Great Professor Ian Plymer will join me.
Speaker 3: To discuss Chris Bowen's latest green scheme, and straight from Texas,
Speaker 3: Alex Stein with the latest US news. Kin zis scofil
Speaker 3: with the celebrity news that you want to hear, including
Speaker 3: Jerry Seinfeld pining for a return to dominant masculinity, and
Speaker 3: as always, Left is losing it tonight featuring this alleged
Speaker 3: comedian here' Israel.
Speaker 2: I had to get that off my chest.
Speaker 4: The rage just builds up and I just have to
Speaker 4: learn it now every couple of hours.
Speaker 3: But first, let's go to this investigation from the ABC
Speaker 3: and yes we give them credit when they deserve it.
Speaker 3: They report that hundreds of thousands of Australian households are
Speaker 3: being charged electricity prices based on their single biggest point
Speaker 3: of usage across an entire month, fueling claims power firms
Speaker 3: are using sneaky tactics to gouge customers. The ABC found
Speaker 3: so called cost reflective tariffs such as time of use
Speaker 3: and flexible rates are using a customer's single highest point
Speaker 3: of demand for power could be as little as thirty
Speaker 3: minutes to calculate how much they pay for a whole month.
Speaker 3: So someone could be away from home traveling for four weeks,
Speaker 3: but they come back on the thirty first and do
Speaker 3: their laundry, run the dishwasher, do a bunch of things
Speaker 3: that uses power, and that single high usage period will
Speaker 3: be extended for the whole month. Doesn't sound too fair.
Speaker 3: Let's bring in Sky News contributor pro McSween pro all
Speaker 3: these smart meters we've all paid a fortune for. We're
Speaker 3: supposed to make things easier and more accurate, not be
Speaker 3: a means to our rip off consumers.
Speaker 5: Well, they're smart ass computer computers, I think.
Speaker 2: Actually.
Speaker 5: I mean, when you think about it, you almost need
Speaker 5: to have a PhD to work out the convoluted bills
Speaker 5: that you get. It's really hard to understand. And now
Speaker 5: we see that they're really trying to rip us off
Speaker 5: with these new so called smart demand payments and fees.
Speaker 5: You know, it just feels as a consumer that everybody
Speaker 5: is out to get you, to trick you, to manipulate,
Speaker 5: con you, to get more money out of you, and
Speaker 5: it's just it's no wonder people are so depressed and
Speaker 5: so furious. There's so much anger in the community.
Speaker 3: And I think it's because we're struggling to pay a way,
Speaker 3: you know, to just survive. And when you know that
Speaker 3: entities like this government, also insurance companies, health insurance companies,
Speaker 3: they're all conning you in some way to get more
Speaker 3: and it's just getting tiresome and really deflating.
Speaker 5: I've got to say.
Speaker 3: Absolutely now to the left's latest attempt to sme Opposition
Speaker 3: leader Peter Dutton, and it is a curious tactic. They
Speaker 3: keep trying to portray him as someone who was soft
Speaker 3: on crime, soft on borders. The Sydney Morning Herald published
Speaker 3: what they hope would be a hit piece. It certainly
Speaker 3: was a hit piece. I don't know how much damage
Speaker 3: he did, though. They accused Dutton of releasing two men
Speaker 3: convicted of accessory to murder at one hundred and two
Speaker 3: convicted sex offenders during his time as Minister in charge
Speaker 3: of Immigration and Home Affairs. Dutton wasn't having it through
Speaker 3: He posted this odd ex is that I canceled more
Speaker 3: than six three hundred v more than any minister since Federation.
Speaker 3: The cancelation power was exercised within the limits of the constitution.
Speaker 3: Important point that one mister Albanesi watered down the law
Speaker 3: under Direction ninety nine. And that's why you are seeing
Speaker 3: the complete failure by this government and the happless Andrew Giles.
Speaker 3: Only you and Lauren Tingle. I think that you there
Speaker 3: is David Crow, You and Laura Tingle would run this
Speaker 3: pathetic line spoon fed by the government.
Speaker 2: Ouch. This is you don't often see.
Speaker 3: Australian politicians hitting back like this, let alone opposition leader.
Speaker 3: But proof this tactic Labor have of trying to blame
Speaker 3: Dutton for their immigration detention woes.
Speaker 2: Do you think it's an effective.
Speaker 3: Strategy because I would have thought most people, whether they
Speaker 3: like Peter Dutton or loathe him, would consider to be
Speaker 3: pretty tough on crime, tough on borders.
Speaker 2: In the eyes of some people, too tough.
Speaker 5: Well, red this is because they're terrified of him. You know,
Speaker 5: they're attacking the man because he's a very strong leader
Speaker 5: and he's got their measure and so they're running scared.
Speaker 5: You can imagine there's sphincters going nineteen to the dozen
Speaker 5: when they enter the Parliament. You know, this is a
Speaker 5: man who isn't going to let the lies, the obfiscation,
Speaker 5: the cunning of people who really just want our politicians
Speaker 5: to perform, and he's not going to let them get
Speaker 5: away with it. And you know, sadly Alban Easy knows
Speaker 5: that he and Giles have totally stuffed the Immigration Act up,
Speaker 5: and you know they're going to try and do everything
Speaker 5: in the book that they can to take the pressure
Speaker 5: off themselves. It's so childish, as you know, when you're little,
Speaker 5: kids used to blame oh he started, Oh she started it.
Speaker 5: You know, so childish. And the people can see through
Speaker 5: all this. We know who's to blame for all of this.
Speaker 5: It started when Labor were elected. We knew they were
Speaker 5: weak on immigration. Our borders will be porous and it's
Speaker 5: all coming true.
Speaker 3: Fears of an American style weaponized justice system are growing
Speaker 3: right here in Australia. It's not just a US phenomenon.
Speaker 2: The Act.
Speaker 3: Chief Justice Lucy McCallum has come under fire for comments
Speaker 3: she made where she bemoaned the principle of innocent until
Speaker 3: proven guilty in rape trials. She said there's an intractable
Speaker 3: problem in that our overriding task and function is to
Speaker 3: ensure an accused person has a fair trial. The Australian
Speaker 3: reports her comments have shocked many members of the bar.
Speaker 3: One barrister said, it's not a problem. It's the principle
Speaker 3: of the whole justice system. A fair trial is not
Speaker 3: an intractable problem. It's an essential mechanism that's relied upon
Speaker 3: to ensure justice is done. And another barrister said, is
Speaker 3: she a judge or a law reforming politician.
Speaker 2: It's not a bad question.
Speaker 3: Through Activist judges are certainly a problem in this country.
Speaker 3: It's not something that's discussed too often. But when they're appointed,
Speaker 3: they're appointed for life. I don't think they have to
Speaker 3: step down until they're in their seventies.
Speaker 2: And it worries.
Speaker 5: It's so worrying because where it's the separation of powers,
Speaker 5: because all of these judges are now political appointments, and
Speaker 5: you just wonder who's bidding she's doing. You know, even
Speaker 5: if she's very clean and not doing anyone's bidding, you
Speaker 5: have to wonder about her impartiality and the impact of
Speaker 5: what she's saying in a court room when she was
Speaker 5: quoted as saying something to a rape complaint when entitled
Speaker 5: to think you might be lying until you prove you're not.
Speaker 5: I mean, it's just astounding that this kind of commentary
Speaker 5: is coming from the Chief Justice, and we all have
Speaker 5: to be extremely concerned. I know, in America, you know,
Speaker 5: the president stacks the courts over there and they have
Speaker 5: you know, I guess everybody has to question then the results.
Speaker 5: You know, they know what's going to happen, whether they're
Speaker 5: left leaning or not. But in this case in Australia,
Speaker 5: I think we are all alarmed by a commentary and
Speaker 5: I'm glad that the legal fraternity is standing up and saying,
Speaker 5: hang on a minute, this is not right.
Speaker 3: Well, I can tell you here in Victoria have had
Speaker 3: a labor government in power for so long. They have
Speaker 3: got their people everywhere, and some of the attorney generals
Speaker 3: have been very clever in appointing fairly young judges, so
Speaker 3: they're sitting on the bench for thirty odd years, maybe
Speaker 3: even longer. Now, let's talk about what's happening on university campuses.
Speaker 2: Students at the University of Sydney have.
Speaker 3: Been subjected to lectures like this have a listened to
Speaker 3: what I'm about to play you. This lecturer is talking
Speaker 3: about her Mass being wrongly accused of rape. According to her,
Speaker 3: they didn't rape people, they didn't murder babies on October seven.
Speaker 2: Have a listen this.
Speaker 6: Article that was written by the New York Times. Scream
Speaker 6: without words, screams without words, how her Mus weaponized sexual
Speaker 6: violence on October seventh is one that time and again
Speaker 6: was proven wrong that witnesses they supposedly had said they
Speaker 6: never you know, that never.
Speaker 7: Happened to them.
Speaker 6: The sources were attracted all kinds of things to prove that,
Speaker 6: you know, that this story was really you know, it
Speaker 6: was not a real story, that a lot of what
Speaker 6: was in this article.
Speaker 7: Was not true.
Speaker 2: You can see how the Western.
Speaker 6: Media has suppressed coverage of the atrocities. They've used this
Speaker 6: kind of fake news about her Mus beheading babies and
Speaker 6: mass rates, all in order to shore up support for Israel,
Speaker 6: and they have distorted events.
Speaker 3: Thankfully, Prude, there is a quiet fight back happening on campus,
Speaker 3: or at least from one academic. Listen to what happens
Speaker 3: when a pro Palestinian activist interrupts a lecture here.
Speaker 8: The University obviously has security here to stop us talking
Speaker 8: about Palestine in your class, which is genuinely sort of
Speaker 8: outside the usual activity out of this university. If you're
Speaker 8: opposed to the genocide in Palestine, you know there's a
Speaker 8: ralliant Thursday, one pm. You can come along to that one.
Speaker 3: I just love that pro That is a fight back,
Speaker 3: just peacefully and quietly, just I think blasting. It was
Speaker 3: Beyonce there, but you know, pick whatever song you want
Speaker 3: and just drown them out. I mean, the entitlement of
Speaker 3: these absolutely loopy leftist activists. Not only have they got
Speaker 3: these encampments, not only are they pressuring students, scaring some
Speaker 3: of them away from lectures, but those who are showing
Speaker 3: up to lectures are getting interruptions like that.
Speaker 5: Well good on him, as you say, but it's they
Speaker 5: don't even look like their university students, you know, their activists.
Speaker 5: They look like activists who have just joined the party
Speaker 5: and you know, decided that they're going to add.
Speaker 2: To the disruption.
Speaker 5: But you know, you look at those other students sitting
Speaker 5: in that auditorium who just want to learn, and you
Speaker 5: know you have these morons coming in and imposing their
Speaker 5: views on these poor innocent students who you know, sadly
Speaker 5: have probably been used to having this kind of grooming
Speaker 5: since so a little ki. You know, we've had generations
Speaker 5: now of kids who have been subjected to activist teachers,
Speaker 5: and now it seems to be happening in universities. I mean, God,
Speaker 5: take up a trade. Don't subject yourself to university anymore.
Speaker 2: I think, yeah, there's a point to the degree. I
Speaker 2: would just be rethinking it now.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump was found guilty on all accounts in his
Speaker 3: New York hush money trial last week. Law professor Jonathan
Speaker 3: Turley was inside the courtroom for the trial, and he
Speaker 3: gave this analysis to Fox.
Speaker 9: News in defense of some of those jurors. They may
Speaker 9: have not seen any alternative but conviction. I mean, keep
Speaker 9: in mind, this judge allowed the government to repeatedly tell
Speaker 9: them that it was a fact that an election violation
Speaker 9: occurred and that Trump had ordered it. Judge Murshan stayed
Speaker 9: absolutely silent during that statement, over and over again, even
Speaker 9: though it violated his instruction. And to this day we
Speaker 9: won't know what the jury really decided on the conspiracy.
Speaker 9: I was in that courtroom listening to thirty four guilty verdicts,
Speaker 9: but they didn't say what the jury thought had happened.
Speaker 9: They were unanimous only that some crime, some secondary crime occurred.
Speaker 9: Judge Mshan did not require them to reach unanimity on
Speaker 9: what that crime was. So it's going to go on
Speaker 9: appeal and the appellate court won't know any more than
Speaker 9: we have in terms of knowledge as to was this
Speaker 9: an election violation, another falsification of documents, a tax violation.
Speaker 9: That's just simply not in the record.
Speaker 3: This sham trial prew the polls taken after the conviction
Speaker 3: of showing that Trump is still headed back to the
Speaker 3: White House.
Speaker 2: I mean, if it's via jail, it's.
Speaker 3: Really not having an impact because those who have taken
Speaker 3: notice of what's happening. No, there was no substance to this.
Speaker 3: This were charges that were manufactured purely to get Trump.
Speaker 5: Well, it's totally back to fire big time. And of course,
Speaker 5: now how's barden ganna look that he's been going to
Speaker 5: be beaten by a felon. You know, you have to think, Wow,
Speaker 5: isn't that great? You know, not a good way to start.
Speaker 5: But anyway, look, the whole thing is just a total jug.
Speaker 3: Well, I think part of the whole strategy here was
Speaker 3: to go to November election with Trump as a convicted
Speaker 3: felon and to have that hanging over its his head.
Speaker 3: But it's not having the impact they thought. In fact,
Speaker 3: convicted felon was trending on social media with all the
Speaker 3: Trump backers saying I'm voting for a convicted felon. Proudly, oh,
Speaker 3: proum McSwain, thank you for your time. Tonight, nager Minister
Speaker 3: Chris Bowen is tweeting like a petulant teenager.
Speaker 2: Today he tweeted this.
Speaker 3: It has been six hundred and seventy one day since
Speaker 3: Peter Dutton first said the L ANDP would go down
Speaker 3: the path of risky reactors. Six hundred and seventy one days.
Speaker 2: Still no detail.
Speaker 3: Now in itself wouldn't be so bad, except yesterday he
Speaker 3: tweeted the same thing. Only well, six hundred and seventy days,
Speaker 3: and he tweeted the same thing.
Speaker 2: The day before. In the day before you get.
Speaker 3: The idea, he has a counterp happening. I told you
Speaker 3: it was adolescent joining me now as esteemed geologist Professor
Speaker 3: Ian Plymer.
Speaker 2: In between these tweets, Professor.
Speaker 3: Chris Bowen has also announced that his government is funding
Speaker 3: low interest loans to help Australians get solar panels and batteries.
Speaker 3: This is more market manipulation. Someone is making money out
Speaker 3: of this, surely in but I do worry about the
Speaker 3: amount of market manipulation we are seeing in the renewable market.
Speaker 10: Well, Chris Bowen is a Liberal Party asset. I just
Speaker 10: maybe keep tweeting and tweeting and tweeting because that shows
Speaker 10: what he's really about. In terms of loans. That's a
Speaker 10: youphul mession for we have totally stuffed up. The average
Speaker 10: consumer is bleeding, and we have to show that we
Speaker 10: are concerned. Now, his party once was concerned about the
Speaker 10: little man, was once concerned about the worker.
Speaker 2: But not now, No, absolutely not now.
Speaker 3: President Joe Biden has recently been praising Kenya's incredible renewable
Speaker 3: energy supply.
Speaker 2: Let's have a look.
Speaker 11: Ninety percent of Kenya's electricity comes from clean energy. As
Speaker 11: far as it apply, over one million homes are powered
Speaker 11: by one energy a loan. That's where as applause too.
Speaker 3: Well, gee, that sounds wonderful, but he left out a
Speaker 3: few things there in didn't he doesn't Kenya have fairly
Speaker 3: frequent blackouts and needing backup energy sources to add to
Speaker 3: the greed.
Speaker 2: Is that really something we want to emulate.
Speaker 10: Well, I left out a lot of things. Most Tenyu's
Speaker 10: electricity comes from geothermal and from hydro and when they're
Speaker 10: running short of power they get it in from neighbors like
Speaker 10: Uganda and Ethiopia. And Kenya is a very very poor
Speaker 10: country and they now are getting a loan of sixty
Speaker 10: five million and a grant of five million to go
Speaker 10: towards net zero. Now you cannot do that with a
Speaker 10: poor country. This is a country that lives off agric culture,
Speaker 10: and agriculture needs fertilizers. You cannot make fertilizers with net zero.
Speaker 10: They also have food insecurity, they have nutritional problems, They
Speaker 10: have a massive amount of preventable disease. They are in
Speaker 10: debt which is sixty eight percent of their GDP. They're overpopulated.
Speaker 10: They have a high fertility rate, yet they have a
Speaker 10: low longevity, and that longevity is about sixty four point
Speaker 10: six compared with the global averages seventy one point seven.
Speaker 10: And anyone in Australia can expect to live twenty years
Speaker 10: longer than any keenion. So this is the end result
Speaker 10: of green policies pushed by Western elites. They kill economies.
Speaker 7: The only way that.
Speaker 10: The sixty five million can be paid back is for
Speaker 10: keen to get further in debt, and they are already
Speaker 10: in big debt. They have to have money to purchase
Speaker 10: electricity from the neighbors you gander an ethyapaier. They have
Speaker 10: to have hard current. They don't have significant cold deposits.
Speaker 10: They don't have significant old oil deposits. They are dependent
Speaker 10: upon energy which is cheap and reliable, and that is
Speaker 10: not renewables. That is perhaps geothermal and perhaps hydra But
Speaker 10: the problem in today's world is that with a copper
Speaker 10: price so high, this means that in a poor country
Speaker 10: people steal the copper wiring to be able to sell
Speaker 10: it to get food. You cannot impose Western net zero
Speaker 10: onto poor countries. And this is green murder, which is
Speaker 10: at top which is a title of one of my books.
Speaker 10: These policies kill people, and he should be better advised
Speaker 10: that he shouldn't be interfering with the energy policies of
Speaker 10: a strangling poor country and end up killing people and
Speaker 10: increasing poverty. So this to me is the window into
Speaker 10: green policy. They do not care about people. They do
Speaker 10: not care about having low longevity, They do not care
Speaker 10: about killing people. All they care about is being an
Speaker 10: unelected elite with power over you and everyone else.
Speaker 3: Well, this green scheme is nothing new. There's a vintage
Speaker 3: clip that is doing the rounds again, Professor, featuring former
Speaker 3: Vice President Al Gore. This is when he was only
Speaker 3: thirty four years old. He was already in politics and
Speaker 3: making green predictions about what was going to happen in
Speaker 3: the near future. The CBS report from nineteen eighty two
Speaker 3: predicted widespread disruption of agriculture and twenty five percent of
Speaker 3: Florida ending up underwater due to the burning of coal
Speaker 3: and oil, Professor, No matter how catastrophically wrong these dooms
Speaker 3: sayers are, they keep getting a platform, keep setting the agenda,
Speaker 3: keep making the policies. That's more than thirty years ago,
Speaker 3: and there seems to be no accountability whatsoever for these
Speaker 3: predictions that are never eventuated, never even come close to eventuating.
Speaker 10: Well, this is perfect for Gore. He's become a climate
Speaker 10: multi billionaire. He's made a fortune out of frightening people
Speaker 10: witness and he also owns water side property. He lives
Speaker 10: in one so if he was really serious, you're going
Speaker 10: to live on the mountains. He's not, So he's the
Speaker 10: leader of the green scam. He looked very young and
Speaker 10: useful in that clip. He's now a little bit older
Speaker 10: and a multi billionaire. He can have a face if
Speaker 10: he can do anything. Because he has been scaring the
Speaker 10: world for decades. People have bought the cool aid and
Speaker 10: people are struggling. Perhaps you to Gore, So he's like
Speaker 10: shaming in the other people predicting the end of the world.
Speaker 10: And I suggest that when they come and knock on
Speaker 10: your door and tell you you've got to live a
Speaker 10: poor life and you've got to give up your life
Speaker 10: to save the planet, I think you sew the dog
Speaker 10: under them because for two thousand years people have been
Speaker 10: predicting the end of the world and they never got
Speaker 10: it right. So why should Gore be right? And history
Speaker 10: has shown in the forty odd years since that clip,
Speaker 10: history has shown that those people who cry wolf, who
Speaker 10: try to scare us witness always get it wrong.
Speaker 3: And he has been richly rewarded as as you mentioned,
Speaker 3: even what an Oscar for the scare mongering. So it's
Speaker 3: been very good deed in climate he was acting thank
Speaker 3: you for your time. Still to come a bumper edition
Speaker 3: of Lefty's Losing It and Alex Stein will bring us
Speaker 3: the latest from.
Speaker 2: The US.
Speaker 3: Welcome back. Now it's time for Lefties losing it. And
Speaker 3: you think there was enough weapon grade crazy on the
Speaker 3: View from the miserable Wackadoodle hosts, But no, the ladies
Speaker 3: of the View are keen to prove that misery loves.
Speaker 2: Company, and they invite other.
Speaker 3: Lefties to lose it on their program, including the first lady.
Speaker 12: Can you imagine if we put any more Republicans on
Speaker 12: the Supreme Court? No, if we will lose all of
Speaker 12: our rights.
Speaker 2: Not hysterical at all.
Speaker 3: We will lose all our rights still will we are
Speaker 3: what We're going to lose. Our free speech, freedom of religion,
Speaker 3: freedom of assembly, all gone, because we know how much
Speaker 3: Republicans hate freedom.
Speaker 2: But brace yourself. The gas lighting and projection is about
Speaker 2: to be turned up to atomic levels.
Speaker 4: There have been people that have thought President Biden shouldn't
Speaker 4: even debate President Trump just due to the fact that
Speaker 4: he Donald trumple gaslight he overtoks there are no guardrails
Speaker 4: so stalks.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I happen.
Speaker 4: To believe it's really important more than ever to have
Speaker 4: a debate with guardrails. What is the strategy that the
Speaker 4: president has going into this?
Speaker 2: Any tips you'd have.
Speaker 4: For a debate that we could pull off where we
Speaker 4: could actually hear our candidates.
Speaker 12: You know, they built that in where they're going to
Speaker 12: turn off those mics so that somebody can't ramble or
Speaker 12: scream at somebody, you know, not that my husband would
Speaker 12: be the one doing that, And so that's already been negotiated,
Speaker 12: and you know, I think, but I think that American
Speaker 12: people deserve a debate because you need to see your choices.
Speaker 13: You need to.
Speaker 12: See Trump, and you need to see the president and
Speaker 12: you need to see the differences and my husband's and
Speaker 12: you're going to see how smart he is and the
Speaker 12: experience he has. And then you'll see somebody who, like
Speaker 12: you're saying, I'm going to use Joey's words, can't put
Speaker 12: a sentence together.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's the President Trump that can't put a sentence together.
Speaker 2: Note this, blankeh.
Speaker 11: Anyway, the best way to get something done if you
Speaker 11: if you hold near and dear to you that you
Speaker 11: like to be able to.
Speaker 14: Anyway.
Speaker 11: From from Charlotte assumed me from Charlotte one another and
Speaker 11: joan shng gang SHV my passway Shangha fifty times one
Speaker 11: hundred and fifty nine billion dollars.
Speaker 7: Let the idea that.
Speaker 11: Los Angeles and uh and uh what am I doing here?
Speaker 3: Yeses, doctor Jill, it's Trump who can't put a sentence together.
Speaker 2: You said you were quoting Joy Beja with that comment.
Speaker 3: Now, I don't care how desperate you are for material.
Speaker 3: Why would anyone quote the thoroughly kooky and miserable Joy.
Speaker 3: But I'm glad to report she did have a rare
Speaker 3: moment of joy when she heard Trump was convicted.
Speaker 1: Well, my reaction was I was at cast of buying,
Speaker 1: you know, ten buckses of curing coffee, and my wife
Speaker 1: started to buzz and I got so excited I started
Speaker 1: leaking at it.
Speaker 2: You gross.
Speaker 3: That is a lefty losing it now to a comic
Speaker 3: that is about as funny as an ingrown toenail.
Speaker 2: Here is Nina Carufe Israel. I had to get that
Speaker 2: off my chest.
Speaker 6: The rage just builds up and I just have to
Speaker 6: learn it now every couple of hours.
Speaker 9: What did you say?
Speaker 15: He's real?
Speaker 3: Remember when stand up comics were funny, when they were
Speaker 3: more interested in getting laughs rather than applause for some
Speaker 3: daft political point. I guess a woman in a hijab
Speaker 3: and stilettos is a little bit funny. Not exactly sure
Speaker 3: how that he's consistent with modesty culture, not the modesty
Speaker 3: culture that was forced on me and he ran anyway, Now, anyway,
Speaker 3: I regret to inform you I have more of Nina's
Speaker 3: champagne comedy. My biggest fear is that I find a
Speaker 3: guy who fall in love and we get married, and
Speaker 3: he finally sees me.
Speaker 2: Without making jab right, and then the first time see
Speaker 2: without it, he's like disappointed us. He's like, that's what
Speaker 2: you've been covering.
Speaker 3: Now that we've seen a number of lefty women humiliate themselves,
Speaker 3: let's find a sane, rational, highly intelligent woman who umiliate
Speaker 3: a lefty man. Here is Megan Kelly and a confused
Speaker 3: Dan Abral.
Speaker 16: There's wrongdoing here, right, There was definitely wrongdoing. Whether it
Speaker 16: should have been a crime as a separate.
Speaker 7: What's the wrongdoing? What's the wrongdoing?
Speaker 10: All right?
Speaker 16: Number one, it's paying one hundred and thirty thousand dollars
Speaker 16: to a porn star to keep her quiet. That's to
Speaker 16: try to protect your campaign. Can we at least agree
Speaker 16: that's wrong, that's not illegal. No, No, I just said
Speaker 16: moral versus lee wrong.
Speaker 2: Are we talking moral?
Speaker 16: I made it clear, I'm priest. I'm making it clear
Speaker 16: for a minute. I'm talking about morality versus legality.
Speaker 7: Right, there's no doubt that he engaged in right, I'll
Speaker 7: tell here's my response to that.
Speaker 13: And I said this on my show the other day.
Speaker 13: I don't know what kind of weird marriage these two have,
Speaker 13: same as I didn't know what kind of weird marriage
Speaker 13: Billet and Hillary Clinton had, So I don't know what
Speaker 13: their covenant is in terms of what he's allowed to
Speaker 13: do on the outside of his mega.
Speaker 7: I don't mind the same.
Speaker 3: He doesn't mind the six That was about the most
Speaker 3: sensible thing he said. What does Megan Kelly schools this clan.
Speaker 2: By the end of it, you may even feel a
Speaker 2: little bit sorry for you.
Speaker 16: Are now crossing the line into legal products.
Speaker 13: Right, aren't That's no, absolutely not right, incorrect at every level.
Speaker 16: Again, no matter what it's for, right, even if it's
Speaker 16: illegal conduct, you can just put it it's an legal expense.
Speaker 7: Right, This wasn't This wasn't illegal.
Speaker 13: There's nothing illegal about paying hush money for an NDA
Speaker 13: it's done.
Speaker 16: There's not when you're doing it to protect your campaign.
Speaker 7: It is. That's the difference.
Speaker 17: What law?
Speaker 2: What law are you citing?
Speaker 7: Dan Camp and finance laws you're not allowed to do.
Speaker 7: You don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 2: What you're wrong.
Speaker 7: Explain to me, tell me what I'm going to say.
Speaker 7: You're spending thirty.
Speaker 13: I get because you're saying that there are limits to
Speaker 13: the campaign contribution somebody could make, and this is exceeded them,
Speaker 13: and then they hit it. I understand that's his theory. However,
Speaker 13: this has been wrong from the start. It does not
Speaker 13: amount to a campaign contribution if it is the kind
Speaker 13: of payment that could ever be made side of the standard.
Speaker 16: The standard is substantiality. It's not substantial yesterday wrong.
Speaker 13: Okay, I guess we're Supreme Court president on this.
Speaker 3: She's citing Supreme Court precedent. His most compelling argument is,
Speaker 3: let's agree to disagree.
Speaker 2: If this was a genuine crime, they wouldn't have to.
Speaker 3: Manufacture laws, revive misdemeanors past the statute of limitations or
Speaker 3: to get Trump now. Just a couple of days after
Speaker 3: his conviction on trumped up charges, President Donald Trump was
Speaker 3: in New Jersey for UFC three h two. Let's have
Speaker 3: a look at how he entered the arena forty one.
Speaker 18: Then I should end UFC CEO Jada Way Donald Trump.
Speaker 18: There's in the building and a bought a president. In
Speaker 18: an extending ovation from the assembled masses, there are real two.
Speaker 3: Can you imagine the reception of Joe Biden would have gone?
Speaker 3: And I really should have given a trigger warning to
Speaker 3: any lefties watching.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, but there's more.
Speaker 18: Lewis also in the build Gerald, President Donald.
Speaker 3: That's New Jersey, by the way, a strong Democrat state,
Speaker 3: a state that has voted for the Democratic candidate in
Speaker 3: every presidential election since nineteen ninety two. But yesterday they
Speaker 3: were chanting f Joe Biden and we want Trump. And
Speaker 3: the UFC fighters were also keen to acknowledge Trump. Here
Speaker 3: is middleweight Sean Strickland right after his win.
Speaker 15: President Trump, you're the man rowing to the damn traves.
Speaker 8: Do what they're doing new.
Speaker 15: I'll be donating you.
Speaker 8: My man, Let get one.
Speaker 3: And here is Kevin Holland running to Trump right after
Speaker 3: his first round win.
Speaker 18: Didn't stop the fight, did sting? Whether it's a pujo? Yeah,
Speaker 18: submission leading you he's not broken.
Speaker 7: Is he protesting?
Speaker 10: But his own broke?
Speaker 7: It's all broken. He's some solid of stuff.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's limp.
Speaker 15: It's limp by his side, even though he's pro Josey,
Speaker 15: he's only picking the other nut.
Speaker 3: And even the goat who Beeve new Gemmetov I can
Speaker 3: never say his name. Arguably the greatest fighter of all time,
Speaker 3: never lost a fight, the longest reigning UFC lightweight champion ever.
Speaker 2: He was backing Trump. That was a surprise for a
Speaker 2: lot of people.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is the host of Prime Time with
Speaker 3: Alex Stein on Blaze TV. The encouragible text on himself
Speaker 3: Alex Stein, Alex, what do you make of what happened yesterday?
Speaker 2: Did you think Trump would get a reception like.
Speaker 3: That in New Jersey two days after being declared a
Speaker 3: convicted felon?
Speaker 14: Well, Donald Trump doesn't look like a prisoner. He looks
Speaker 14: like the warden walking around there, just you know, totally
Speaker 14: like a boss. You'll be in a pampin a blamp,
Speaker 14: and I know what that's all about.
Speaker 7: But you know, it's sad.
Speaker 14: It's like, it's not surprising that people in New Jersey,
Speaker 14: you know, love him because you know he just had
Speaker 14: a rally. I think there are seventy thousand people, and
Speaker 14: that might be a low estimation. But listen, the only
Speaker 14: people that are going to vote for Joe Biden are
Speaker 14: probably illegal immigrants and dead people. But could there's enough
Speaker 14: dead people that they still might be able to figure
Speaker 14: out a way for Joe Biden to win. But America
Speaker 14: wants Donald Trump. America needs Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Well, the polls after this conviction, and there has already
Speaker 3: been a few poles and I saw one from the
Speaker 3: Swing states, they're still showing he is well in front
Speaker 3: in some of the polls.
Speaker 2: He's strengthened his position.
Speaker 3: So is there just this distain for what happened in Manhattan?
Speaker 2: Many Americans aware.
Speaker 3: That these chargers really were created to get Trump there
Speaker 3: there was no real basis to them.
Speaker 14: Well, of course, Riada. I mean, New York has a
Speaker 14: terrible bail reform or criminals that have done violent crimes
Speaker 14: get out of jail within twenty four hours, So I mean,
Speaker 14: I think it's You could probably argue that Donald Trump
Speaker 14: is the first person to get convicted of a crime
Speaker 14: in New York City in twenty twenty four And I
Speaker 14: know that sounds like I'm joking, but seriously, they don't commit,
Speaker 14: they don't convict any of these criminals, and they all
Speaker 14: let him out on the street. But they want to
Speaker 14: throw Donald Trump in jail. So and Donald Trump said
Speaker 14: He's not afraid to go to jail. I wouldn't be
Speaker 14: surprised if he goes in there as a secret service.
Speaker 14: He gets out in a month, and he's going to
Speaker 14: be a hero.
Speaker 3: If they actually put him in jail or even home detention.
Speaker 3: I think those record amounts of donations we saw, the
Speaker 3: voter turnout is going to be nothing like they've seen
Speaker 3: before because it's one thing to persecute and prosecute him,
Speaker 3: but to actually, I don't know, even home detention, I
Speaker 3: think would be aligned that if they cross, is going
Speaker 3: to have all sorts of unintended consequences for them, well
Speaker 3: unintended in their eyes. Now, after Donald Trump's conviction, Joe
Speaker 3: Biden tweeted this.
Speaker 2: He said, no one is above the law.
Speaker 3: I guess unless you're a member of the Biden family,
Speaker 3: or the Clinton family, or perhaps Barack Obama. There are
Speaker 3: a few exceptions to that rule. Joe's some the crackaddled
Speaker 3: whore enthusiast hunter Biden is going to trial this week
Speaker 3: for felony gun chargers. That's an actual crime, Alex, not
Speaker 3: one that they manufactured just to target him. Hunter is
Speaker 3: pleading not guilty to all three counts relating to owning
Speaker 3: a firearm while using drugs. How is this case been
Speaker 3: reported in the US. Is there much coverage of.
Speaker 7: US There's not much coverage at all.
Speaker 14: And they would basically call it Russian disinformation, just like
Speaker 14: the fifty two FBI agents that said the laptop was
Speaker 14: Russian misinformation. But let's be real, I wouldn't be surprised
Speaker 14: if they convict him, he gets a guilty pleay, and
Speaker 14: then his dad immediately pardons him. So you know, we
Speaker 14: have a two tier justice system. Hunter Biden is never
Speaker 14: going to go to jail yet Donald Trump will. So
Speaker 14: it's just an unfair, corrupt system. And I think people
Speaker 14: are starting to wake up to it. You know, during
Speaker 14: the pandemic, people were waking up to it, But now
Speaker 14: they're really really really starting to understand, or at least
Speaker 14: I hope they're starting to understand how crazy things are.
Speaker 3: Well, there was some polling before this Manhattan trial that
Speaker 3: showed trust in the justice system was at called lows,
Speaker 3: and I'd love to see some polling on that question
Speaker 3: now because it would have to be even lower.
Speaker 2: What are you doing out, Oh no, you've got kitty cat.
Speaker 2: That's a new cat. That's a calico tortoiseshell.
Speaker 7: Yes, this is a.
Speaker 14: Crazy Well did you know the Japanese Navy would always
Speaker 14: have a calico cat on their battleships for good luck?
Speaker 14: So yes, this cat's bring me good luck. And Donald
Speaker 14: Trump's going to win the presidency in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 3: I did not know that I also have a calico
Speaker 3: cat called Crayon. So just information that nobody asked for. Now,
Speaker 3: broadcasters including Megan Kelly and Mark Levine have They've been
Speaker 3: among pundits who say that the Republicans have got to
Speaker 3: play the Democrats at their own game. They cannot take
Speaker 3: the high road, they cannot take this principal stand that
Speaker 3: we're not going to sink to their level. If the
Speaker 3: Democrats are going to use law fare, the Republicans should
Speaker 3: do it as well and target the likes of Biden
Speaker 3: and Clinton and Blincoln. What do you say to that,
Speaker 3: Alex Should the Republicans use those same tactics, because right
Speaker 3: now there's not much of a disincentive for the Democrats
Speaker 3: to stop what they're doing.
Speaker 2: It's working for them.
Speaker 14: Well, Rita, you're one hundred percent correct that they you know,
Speaker 14: it sounds retaliatory to be like that, but Donald Trump
Speaker 14: said that he was going to throw Hillary Clinton in jail.
Speaker 14: She deleted thirty three thousand emails, you know, you know,
Speaker 14: demolished your servers while we're on those servers classified information.
Speaker 14: And he didn't go after her. And I think that
Speaker 14: was a fatal error because you know, he tries to
Speaker 14: be a gentleman. He tries to play by the rules,
Speaker 14: but the Left doesn't play by the rules. And when
Speaker 14: the game's rigged, the only way to win is to,
Speaker 14: I guess cheat back. And I'm not saying it's cheating
Speaker 14: to throw a criminal in jail, but I guess you
Speaker 14: have to play their games if you're going to want
Speaker 14: to try to win the game.
Speaker 3: I think it's exactly the same with cancel culture. They
Speaker 3: only stop when it comes for them as well. Well,
Speaker 3: So as long as it's just affecting their ideological opponents,
Speaker 3: they're not going to stop. So I think Meghan Kelly
Speaker 3: is absolutely on the money on this one. Alex Stein
Speaker 3: Thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 14: Always a pleasure. Rida tell Creon I said hello.
Speaker 2: Still to come.
Speaker 3: Caitlin Clark under attack for white privilege.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, a woke Romeo and Juliet.
Speaker 3: Production is slammed as being an insult to Shakespeare. You're
Speaker 3: watching the Rita Penny Show. Will be joined by Kinsey
Speaker 3: Schofield in a second. But first, don't I have an
Speaker 3: exciting opportunity for you.
Speaker 2: It's the opportunity to ask me anything. Yes, you better
Speaker 2: believe it.
Speaker 3: You can ask me those questions you have always wanted
Speaker 3: to know. You'll also have the chance to ask any
Speaker 3: of your Sky News hosts anything you like as part
Speaker 3: of a video series.
Speaker 2: On the Sky News Australia App.
Speaker 3: Send your questions through to Ask Me Anything at skynews
Speaker 3: dot com dot Au and Ask Me Anything is available
Speaker 3: exclusively for supporters of Sky News Australia with a five
Speaker 3: dollars monthly subscription to our app. If you don't have
Speaker 3: the app already, get it it is.
Speaker 2: Well worth it.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is Royal and Entertainment Report at Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey,
Speaker 3: Let's start with the WNBA words. You won't hear me
Speaker 3: saying too often. But star Caitlin Clark, who's only twenty two,
Speaker 3: is getting people interested in the WNBA in and a
Speaker 3: massive way. Her performance is breaking viewership records, she's breaking
Speaker 3: on cored records. But her success is inviting hostility from
Speaker 3: other players.
Speaker 2: All sorts of comments are made and.
Speaker 3: Here on court a bitch and she cops what we
Speaker 3: call in Ossie rules a hip and shoulder.
Speaker 15: And Clark, I mean that's clear and all which was called.
Speaker 15: The question is will they call it unnecessary Kennedy Carter.
Speaker 3: But it's not just other players who are hating on Clark,
Speaker 3: some in the media claiming her success is because of
Speaker 3: her race and because she's straight.
Speaker 4: There is a thing called pretty privilege.
Speaker 2: There is a thing called white privilege. There is a thing.
Speaker 4: Called tall privilege, and we have to acknowledge that.
Speaker 13: And so the part of it is about race.
Speaker 3: Kinsey, can you believe the hostility this girl is facing
Speaker 3: for the crime of getting people interested in the WNBA.
Speaker 3: You'd think the players in particular would be grateful.
Speaker 17: Yeah, I mean, I think Kennedy Carter just proved that
Speaker 17: she's as trashy as her mama spelled her name. And
Speaker 17: to dramatically recreate Charles Barkley's rant y'all petty? He said,
Speaker 17: you women out there, y'all petty man. He said, these
Speaker 17: girls are hating on Haitlyn Clark. They should be thanking
Speaker 17: her for getting them on private charters, all the money
Speaker 17: and visibility she's bringing to the w NBA. What she's accomplished,
Speaker 17: she said, give her her flowers.
Speaker 2: And stop being petty.
Speaker 17: And he even thanked her for bringing all of this
Speaker 17: new money and shine to the WNBA, something that you
Speaker 17: and I would never be talking about typically.
Speaker 2: No, absolutely now.
Speaker 3: Comedian Jerry Seinfeld had an interesting interview recently where he
Speaker 3: called out the pro Palestinian protesters or trying to cancel
Speaker 3: these comedy shows. And he also can say ask for
Speaker 3: a return to traditional masculinity, especially in public figures.
Speaker 19: Have a listen in that era again, it was JFK,
Speaker 19: it was Muhammad Ali, it was Sean Connery, Howard Gosell.
Speaker 19: You can go all the way down there. That's a
Speaker 19: real man. I'm going to I want to be like
Speaker 19: that someday. Well, no, I never really grew up. It's
Speaker 19: that's a I mean, you don't want to as a
Speaker 19: comedian because it's a childish pursuit, but I miss a
Speaker 19: dominant masculinity. Yeah, I get the toxic but still I
Speaker 19: like a real man.
Speaker 2: He likes to say real men, the return of real men.
Speaker 2: I think he would have a lot of support, and
Speaker 2: not just amongst men.
Speaker 17: I agree with you, and it's nice to see someone
Speaker 17: that had that's achieved as much as he has be
Speaker 17: so level headed about it all. You know, there's an
Speaker 17: element of courage there because a lot of people are
Speaker 17: so fearful of being canceled today a special I mean,
Speaker 17: especially about this topic, to be a strong masculine man.
Speaker 17: I mean typically that people are scolded for that. So
Speaker 17: the fact that he's brief enough to say it's okay,
Speaker 17: and look at some of these heroes of the past,
Speaker 17: you know, there were wonderful people. I think that that
Speaker 17: takes a lot of courage.
Speaker 3: Now, the bitter breakup of Hollywood heavyweights Brad Pitt and
Speaker 3: Angela Jolie, it's taking another ugly turn. The kids seemed
Speaker 3: to be in open rebellion against their father. Fifteen year
Speaker 3: old Vivian is the latest child to drop Pitt from
Speaker 3: her jolly pit last name in a playbill for her
Speaker 3: new musical. Eldest daughter, Zahara told classmates at in college
Speaker 3: that she too was just Jolie. There was no pit
Speaker 3: in her name. And Shiloh has gone one step further.
Speaker 3: On her eighteenth birthday, she filed paperwork to drop Pitt
Speaker 3: from her name. Legally, that's telling kin Z to do
Speaker 3: that as soon as you turn eighteen and legally able
Speaker 3: to do so.
Speaker 17: Yeah, and we don't hear a lot from Brad's camp.
Speaker 17: He seems to be tight lipped and keeps his circle small.
Speaker 2: A lot more.
Speaker 17: Leaks from Angelina's squad, but we do hear that Brad
Speaker 17: is heartbroken over this. Shiloh going as far as having
Speaker 17: it legally changed is apparently really hurtful to Brad Pitt. Obviously,
Speaker 17: there's still a lot of animosity when it comes to
Speaker 17: this family separation. Angelina alleges that there was physical and
Speaker 17: mental abuse and abuse of alcohol throughout the process. But
Speaker 17: you know, you can't help but think about I mean,
Speaker 17: just it looks dysfunctional. Unfortunately, it makes them all look
Speaker 17: like is there ever any peace here? Because they're constantly
Speaker 17: in the headlines for the most negative topics.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely, it has ended very badly.
Speaker 3: Indeed, now Spider Man star Spider Man star Tom Holland
Speaker 3: is starring in what The New York Post is calling
Speaker 3: a woeful production of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet on the
Speaker 3: West End.
Speaker 2: Here is the review. I love this part.
Speaker 3: They said, the stripped down Shakespeare's show is a dreary
Speaker 3: and pretentious slog that's about as passionate as an economics lecture.
Speaker 2: Another considered opinion was no.
Speaker 3: Attention is paid to either the text or the author's
Speaker 3: original intentions, merely flashy look at me staging and also
Speaker 3: like this one two and a half hours of my
Speaker 3: life that I will never get back. But it did
Speaker 3: give me time to mentally redecorate my home. But because
Speaker 3: of Tom Holland's star power, the place three month run
Speaker 3: is voice completely sold out, So it's sold out before
Speaker 3: anybody even saw it, So I guess the reviews don't matter.
Speaker 17: I mean, and if you are able to get a ticket,
Speaker 17: they're at least four hundred dollars a pop. My favorite
Speaker 17: line from that review was, if you want to go
Speaker 17: gack at a celebrity, be my guest, but ambient is cheaper.
Speaker 17: I think Tom Holland is a big enough star he's
Speaker 17: got so many people that just absolutely adore him. That
Speaker 17: sitting in that theater, even for two and a half hours,
Speaker 17: being so close to him, I think they're going to
Speaker 17: appreciate it. But hopefully he pursues something much different in
Speaker 17: the future.
Speaker 2: Well, I think he's going to do another play. That
Speaker 2: could be a rumor.
Speaker 3: Before you go, I've got to ask you about John
Speaker 3: Lennon's son, Sean on o'lennon. He's finished reading Prince Harry's
Speaker 3: memoirs Spare and he tweeted a review.
Speaker 2: Of his own.
Speaker 3: It wasn't long, it was just spare me, that was
Speaker 3: his response.
Speaker 2: I quite like that. Sean is a really interesting character.
Speaker 3: He's becoming quite a commentator.
Speaker 2: On all sorts of issues on social media.
Speaker 19: Well.
Speaker 17: Yeah, and when there was some pushback, he came back
Speaker 17: at people like he was going back and forth fighting
Speaker 17: for his opinion, and he said he did have empathy
Speaker 17: over Harry's loss because he lost a parent touty young age.
Speaker 17: But he said that's why he was so disappointed with
Speaker 17: his outlook. He was hoping he'd be smart, smarter, and
Speaker 17: he called Harry an idiot and a buffoon. So he
Speaker 17: just earned a Twitter follower in.
Speaker 3: Me, Kid cisco Field, thank you for your time this evening,
Speaker 3: and that's it from May up.
Speaker 2: Next is news not. I'll see you at eleven tomorrow.
Speaker 2: Good night,