WEBVTT - Danica De Giorgio | 19 September

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Why On Sky News Australia. This is to Nika de Georgio,

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to the show coming up tonight. Labour

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>tries to sell an uncosted emissions reduction target with no

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>clue about what it means for your power bills. Plus

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>i'll explain why it's time for the coalition to get

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>serious and dump net zero, and the debate over a

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>big Australia continues. Is it time to close the door

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and say where full? But first tonight, now is the

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>time for the coalition to get serious and dump net

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>zero by twenty fifty pull out of Paris, set the standard.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Get us off this magical carpet ride fantasy. Because Labor

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is out there peddling an uncosted twenty thirty five emissions

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>reduction target with absolutely no clue what it means for

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>your power bills and how much it will cost you.

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>And this really sums up where it's energy plan.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that there's no particular advice that flows from that

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>about the good There we go, Thank you, I'll be

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>on all someone's going to someone's going to jump in

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 2>and hold it.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>There we go, someone hold out it very good? Well,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>there it is the energy plan is quite literally falling over,

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and this fumbling exchange by the Minister in charge is

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>all the proof you need about the con we are

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on and how quickly we need to pull the pin.

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an estimate of projection for when the

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 1>prices will get cheaper?

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, i'd put you to the modeling, the AMC model yesterday.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>That's not a political promise, it's a statement of modeling

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>by expert agency.

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>So is there an idea of when we won't need

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 3>subsidies when that money?

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, again, we've already, we've already, we've already made decisions

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>about subsidies and they're levels at different points, and that

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>work will continue.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So the minister doesn't know. How about the Prime Minister?

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Does he know what's going on?

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>There's modeling is out there. The modeling that you've quoted

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 4>is modeling, which is the.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Can you guarantee that you will get the policy settings

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 5>right moving forward that prices will one hundred percent fall

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 5>for Australians they're struggling with their bill.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, I can guarantee that the cheapest form of new

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 4>energy is renewables. The cheapest form of new energy is renewables.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 4>The modeling is that it's not government modeling, it's modeling

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 4>that's been done by the energy market operator.

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So let me get this straight. We have been warned

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>time and time again by experts and AEMO that we

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>will not breach our emissions reduction targets as it is

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>via an experiment of transmission lines, giant wind turbines, green hydrogen,

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>solar farms and batteries. Labor has been told it cannot

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>even get to forty three percent by twenty thirty. It

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>has had some sort of bizarre come to Jesus moment

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and thought to increase it to sixty two to seventy

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>percent by twenty thirty five. Make that make sense now?

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>This is an economic and environmental disaster. The energy sector

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>has become reliant on subsidies taxpayer funded, of course, and

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens when those subsidies end. The costs go up.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It's so diabolical. Labour's former climate advisor, Ross Garno recently

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>warned that supersizing subsidies for solar and wind projects won't

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>get us to twenty thirty targets and risks blowing a

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>hole in the country's budget just to quote by failure.

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yet Labor comes out yesterday with an uncosted plan, and

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bowen can't even put a figure on what it

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>means for your energy bills.

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 3>When do you expect energy prices will be achieve under

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>this plan?

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Well again, you know, Well, you'll have a default market

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>offer out in a few months that will reflect how

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the market's going. What will show is continued impact. As

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I said, sixty thousand people have reduced their bills by

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>up to ninety percent. That's just in you know, since

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the first of July.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you expect we'll always need to have subsidies in

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 3>order to.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Have I think I've answered that question.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And the best bowl and can do his point to

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the modeling, Well, gee, remember the last time Labor told

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>us about what the modeling said.

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 4>Reducing power prices by two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Reducing power prices by two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 5>By twenty twenty five, two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 5>a year.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 4>Two hundred and seventy five dollars a year.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And yet fast forward to after this year's election, that

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>modeling that told us our bills would be two hundred

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five dollars cheaper was suddenly irrelevant.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 4>It's reputexas modeling, it's reputexas.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Modeling co ownership of that modeling.

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 4>It's reputexas modeling from that time. It's reputexas modeling based

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 4>upon the circumstances at that time.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's all bit of con isn't it. Yet? We

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>are bending over backwards financially and environmentally, despite omitting one

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>percent of global emissions. Why are we the ones doing

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the heavy lifting to save the world from the alleged

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>climate change doomsday armageddon? And for what? It's not going

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to stop the rain, it's not going to stop the sun,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's certainly not going to do anything for our bills.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yet we are spending like crazy to get there.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 4>Two billion dollars for the Clean Energy Finance Corporation New

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 4>Net zero five billion dollar fund, one point one billion

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 4>dollars to encourage more production of clean fuels in Australia,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 4>forty million dollars to accelerate the roll out of curbside

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 4>and fast ev charge.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Fifty million dollars to support Australis sporting clubs reduce their

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>bills and emissions at the same time two billion dollar,

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollar fund one point one billion dollars forty

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 2>million dollars.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm bliming. It's like a game of the price is right.

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>According to the IPA's analysis of budget documents, spending on

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>climate change and net zero in the most recent federal

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>budget reached around nine billion dollars annually, up from around

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>six hundred million a decade earlier, an unbelievable fifteen fold increase.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>A Business Council of Australia report found cutting emissions by

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent or more would carry a price tag of

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>up to five hundred and thirty billion dollars. Yes, Chris

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Bowen is still lying to you. What will the total

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>cost of net zero be by twenty fifty, Prime Minister.

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, it depends what figures you look for. If you

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:41.119
<v Speaker 4>look for investment for twenty thirty five, the Business Council

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 4>of Australia saying that the cost will be around about

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 4>four hundred to five hundred billion dollars. If you ask

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 4>for what our policy is, yessay, we announced it an

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 4>additional eight point three billion dollars of investment, meaning our

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 4>total investment is seventy five billion dollars.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Canion ab Yeah, six hundred billion was the cost of

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton's plan. Yesterday we announced an eight point five

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar investment that takes total government expenditure to around

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>seventy five billion what will be the.

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Total cost of net zero by twenty fifty in.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Terms of the budget. That's seventy more than seventy five

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars that we've outlined the total cost of not

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>achieving net zero as his outline in the National Risk assessments,

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>many times more than that. We've got a bit of

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 2>noise coming in. I think that's a good rap.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys. Noise coming in. That's it. By off, he

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>goes press conference over, he's done, he's had enough for

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the day. Doesn't want to answer questions, not serious at all.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And look, the reality is Labor is doubling down on

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>climate targets while we are shutting down coal plants with

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.679
<v Speaker 1>no plan B for energy generation to keep the lights

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on in this country, and the cost will, inevitably, as

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we've been warned, be passed on to us as consumers

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on top of every other cost under this government. The

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Coalition and Susan Lee now have a real opportunity to

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>set the standard and put Australia's energy future first. Here

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>was Susan Lee today.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 6>We don't believe in setting targets at all, from opposition

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 6>or from government because the reality is that energy policy

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 6>is not about a target that is never going to

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 6>be reached.

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, within minutes of that press conference ending her office

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>release to clarification saying we don't support setting targets in opposition.

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>We do recognize the importance of targets in government when

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we have the full information in front of us. But look,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I think she should have just stuck to what she

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>actually said in that press conference. The fantasy targets are

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>never going to be reached and that is coming from

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>experts across this country. We need energy that is cheap

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and reliable and not one based on a lie. I mean,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's no coincidence countries around the world are dumping net zero,

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to give voters a choice at

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the ballot box, get rid of it. The majority of

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>liberal or national parties across the country have now voted

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to abandon net zero. And bear in mind these branches

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have done this by themselves. They've said enough is enough.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Staying in Paris is holding the country back. And if

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to differentiate from labor, do it today. Start

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>campaigning today against net zero, make a difference, build a platform,

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and gee, get us off this costly fantasy as soon

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Let's go straight to Shadow Cabinet Secretary Andrew Wallace. Now, Andrew,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>good to see you. What do you make of the

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister and Chris Bowen out there today with all

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>these tricky figures, all the while actually avoiding the elephant

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>in the room one what will this cost us? And two?

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>How much will our power bills come down under this

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty five target?

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, Tanika, you'll have to excuse me for the big

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 7>smile on my face, but I can just see Chris

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 7>Bowen saying, oh, you're not going to get me on

0:09:58.280 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 7>that one again. And I'm not going to talk about

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.479
<v Speaker 7>how the policies are going to reduce power prices.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Ninety seven times.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 7>They told Australians in the lead up to the twenty

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 7>two election that they were going to see a two

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 7>hundred and seventy five dollars price reduction in their power prices,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 7>and we're paying thirteen hundred dollars more so, he wasn't

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 7>going to have his little feet on the sticky paper.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 7>I can assure you of that.

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But look.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 7>What happened over the last couple of days. What happened

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 7>yesterday we saw an uncosted basically a fantasy on the

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 7>part of the Labor Party. You know they have emissions

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 7>reduction has not altered one bit. They have flatlined since

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 7>the coalition lost government. So the government has been spending

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 7>billions and billions and billions of dollars and they haven't

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 7>altered the dial. That is the reality. And Australians are

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 7>paying through the nose for power while fat cats, fat

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 7>cats and multinationals are getting richer.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>No. Look, you're absolutely correct, and you're right. The minister

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>in charge today I didn't want to answer the questions.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He heard a noise apparently and even scurried off. I mean,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that's how much he cares about the energy future in

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this country and all the while we're going broken backwards

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>because of it. Look, I just want to ask you

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Prime Minister's failure to secure a treaty with

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Papua New Guinea. This comes after China has urged p

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and G not to sign any bilateral treaty that quote

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>prevents a sovereign country from cooperating with a third party.

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But Andrew, this was the second Pacific security agreement with

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Australia to have collapsed. While the Prime Minister spent the

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>last week over there, could anything have been done in

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>your view to actually have gotten these agreements over the line.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Could more have been done?

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 7>Well, Look, the Coalition absolutely support these types of bilateral

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 7>security arrangements between Australia and our Pacific island friends. You know,

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 7>we want to these arrangements and agreements succeed. But the

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 7>reality is the government there's spin units were out there

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 7>talking about how the defense arrangement between Australia and Papua

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 7>New Guinea this week was done and dusted and it

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 7>was great. It was going to be signed off by

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 7>the Prime Minister. Last week it was a similar security

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 7>arrangement with Australia and van Uatu worth five hundred million dollars.

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 7>The problem is they hadn't actually been signed yet. Now,

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 7>anybody who has been in business would know that you

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 7>don't spook about something until the deal is done, until

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 7>the ink has dried, And the Labor Party have demonstrated

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 7>once again that they all talk and no action in

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 7>relation to foreign policy. Now, can you imagine what Penny

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 7>Wong would have said, what the Prime Minister Anthony Albanezi,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 7>what he would have said if the shoe was on

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 7>the other foot, If we had have come out there

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 7>and made these the grandiose announcements and yet come back

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 7>empty handed, we would have had on our face. And

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 7>that's exactly what the Prime Minister in Penning wom have got.

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Now, yeah, you're not wrong. I mean, if the she

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was on the other foot, can you imagine the carry on?

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's gone over there, was meant to sign

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>at least two of these deals and has come back

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>empty handed. I just find it extraordinary. Andrew, Before we

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>go tonight, where are you joining us from?

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 7>I am at the Calandra RSL at the Function Center.

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 7>We are celebrating Fisher's Night of Nights tonight.

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>We've got a.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Sellout crowd, three hundred and thirty local constituents here. We've

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 7>got Chris cob warming up in the background. I don't

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 7>know if you can hear him, and we're going to

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 7>have an absolutely fantastic night celebrating the community of Fisher

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 7>and the great place it is to work, rest and play.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh how good's that? Well, it looks like it's going

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a wonderful night ahead. Andrew Wallace, always appreciate

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>your time. Thanks so much as always for joining me

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Well, I want to return now to

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that con that is l it was twenty thirty five

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>emissions reduction targets. Joining me is Adam Morrison, the Energy

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>program director at the Center for Independent Studies Aidan, good

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to see you, thanks for joining me. I just want

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to remind our viewers of what the Energy Minister and

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister said today when they were asked when

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>prices will be cheaper under this plan.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Have a listen, Well, i'd point you to the modeling,

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>the AAMC modeling YESTERA, that's not a political promise, it's

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>a statement of modeling by expert agencies.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's modeling is out there. The modeling that you've

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 4>quoted is modeling, which is there.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Aiden, So the Prime Minister and the Minister don't know

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>when power prices will be cheaper under the twenty thirty

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>five fantasy. Therefore none of us actually know what it means.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But they keep referring to the modeling. What does the

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>modeling actually tell us.

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 8>That particular document they're referring to, the aemc's latest Residential

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 8>Retail Electricity Price Trends are p that. Actually it is

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 8>one of the most odd and bizarre and I think

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 8>it has been now politicized documents because the AMC used

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 8>to do the Market Commission used to do excellent work

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 8>doing that retail price trends report. They had a proper

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 8>terms of reference and it was anchored in an actual year,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 8>and it was forward projected with all the components. But

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 8>now it just stopped. As soon as the Labor government

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 8>took office. It was stopped. The Ukraine War was the excuse,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 8>and then they kept that excuse running from of the

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 8>year in twenty twenty three and they didn't produce it,

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 8>and then just in time for the election late last year,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 8>they did produce it in an entirely different format that

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 8>had no resemblance to the actual terms of reference. And

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 8>they've just been able to basically say, repeat all the

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 8>crazy assumptions in their policies, like that consumers will buy

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 8>hundreds of billions of dollars worth of equipment and then

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 8>give them back freely to the grid, and assuming all

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 8>those unrealistic things, including hydro bidding in at a tenth

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 8>the cost they generally bid into the grid.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>They've been able to.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 8>Produce a tiny reduction from a price that's now higher

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 8>than what it was when that plan was that when

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 8>that report was last written. So it's an absolutely absurd,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 8>absurd and I think, frankly, very politicized piece of work

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 8>that the muck Commissioner has produced there. And so I'm

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 8>really interested to see them drawing attention to it, because

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 8>we should lookt that document very fairly and squarely, and

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 8>it has been absolutely wroughted and rigged to produce a

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 8>thin slither of a price reduction that we all know

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 8>is completely impossible because it assumes all their fantasy assumptions

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 8>come true. So if that's all they've got, they've got nothing.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this is a fantasy. And you mentioned hydrogen,

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And it was only this week that Chris Bowen said

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that green hydrogen would be a niche, a niche power

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>player in our overall aim to get to net zero.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what happened with that? That's going to be

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that the big star of the show. It's just been

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a con from the beginning. But this plan released yesterday,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>aiden it's uncosted. Chris Bowen claimed today that total government

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>expenditure for net zero is seventy five billion dollars. Do

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you think that that figure is correct?

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 8>Look, this is a totally new number. I can't see

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 8>that in any official documents, so it's just something plucked

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 8>out of the air so far as I can tell,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 8>unless they can point to some other sources. So I

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 8>don't know why we would take it seriously it is.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 8>I mean for government direct expenditure, it's still a lot

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 8>of money. We shouldn't be cheering that on, I don't think.

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 8>But they've judged so badly and so poorly what this

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 8>would cost in the past. There was never meant to

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 8>be under their original Powering Australia plan. Whatever it takes subsidies,

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 8>which is what we now have to build renewable energy.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 8>There are no projects moving forward without whatever it takes

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 8>subsidies being signed individually, and Chris Bowen is the individual

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 8>who signs off on each one of those. We never

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 8>get to know what the price is and the cost

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 8>for is for each project, so I take it very

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 8>lightly those numbers. It's a large number. We shouldn't be

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 8>cheering about it, but I can't see where it comes

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 8>from at all.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's been plucked out of the never never clearly,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and I've got to say, you know, we're spending so

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>much money as it is. I had a laugh today

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Aid and Chris Bowen recruited cricket captain Pat Cummins for

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>a fifty million dollar funding announcement over four years to

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>help five hundred sporting clubs tackle climate action. Yet how

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>many cricket clubs around the country actually utilize solar panels?

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Have a listen? Yeah, I reckon it's probably be low

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent, well aiden below ten percent for a fifty

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>million dollar investment. How financially reckless is this race to renewables.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think what we're seeing here is the adoption

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 8>of Darryl Kerrigan economics, where it's all about the vibe

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 8>really and there's no substantial analysis about whether this is

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 8>the right thing to be done or the cost is

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 8>going to pay off. And we're seeing that repeated over

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 8>and over again. Where again you mentioned hydrogen. The CSIRO's

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 8>modeling that got released just late last night actually shows

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 8>that we do depend on green hydrogen to be a

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 8>very large share and they've made it very clear that

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 8>they assume all that's going to start working again. So

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 8>there's a huge contradiction there between that niche statement and

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 8>the CSIRO today basically assuming for their modeling that supports

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 8>that announcement that all that is going to start working

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 8>again suddenly. So it's just a completely unhinged attached from reality.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 8>There's an complete credibility gap now opening up in all

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 8>these claims.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah now is you know they're recruiting cricket captain Cricket

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Australia to try and sell the con further seriously and

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>meanwhile our power price as they're still going in the

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction, and that is key to this argument. Adam Morrison,

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>good to see you. Thank you so much for joining

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>me on the show. We're coming up after the break.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll get stuck into the big Australia debate with my

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>panel plus Victorian taxpayers hit with a big bill to

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>cover policing at pro Palestine protests. That's next. Welcome back. Well,

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken a lot about mass migration in the last

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, particularly after the March Is for Australia, where

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>every day Aussies were tarnished with the racist brush just

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>because a small group of neo Nazis rocked up to

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the events. And this is the problem. When you raise

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the issue, you were labeled as some sort of far

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>right wing nutcase when the facts and the truth are

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>right in front of our faces. And I want to

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>point out how captured the left wing media are when

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this issue. This week, the editor of

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the Sydney Morning Herald, Bevin Shields pender note titled talking

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>about immigration is uncomfortable but essential Now he says it.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>He's right there in what he says. We need to

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation. It was not front and center at

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the last election, and it's always an issue that brings

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>up the R word racism. I mean, look what happened

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to justinto nampajimp Price. She made comments about Indian migrants,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>which sure was sloppy, but raise an important issue. Labor

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>claimed racism and the Liberal Party went into panic mode.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>We just cannot seem to have a civilized debate. But

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in his September twelve email to subscribers, BEVN. Shields said, quote,

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>migration has been and continues to be undoubtedly good for Australia.

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We are a culturally and financially richer country for it. Well,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>let's unpack this. In my opinion, I believe that migration

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in recent years has failed in Australia. In fact, I

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>would say multiculturalism itself has failed. And it's not always

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>been like this. We are a multicultural nation. The majority

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>of us come from migrant families. I come from a

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>migrant family, So I'm not sitting here today being a hypocrite.

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But that ship has sailed that we are a migrant

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>rich culture. Why well, firstly, we have allowed people into

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>this country some whose values are incompatible with a Western democracy,

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and based on what we have witnessed here since October seven,

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, the complete fraying of our social fibers,

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we have control over the multicultural culture

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we are trying to create here anymore, because hatred has

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>been imported and we are all paying the price for it.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Bevern Shields then went on to say the Herald also

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>has a great history of advocating for a big Australia,

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and that is the problem. Big Australia is getting even bigger.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>High migration suits labor. Politically, it's the only thing propping

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>up our Ponzi scheme, economy labor has let migration numbers

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>saw out of control, with more than one point one

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>million people coming here since twenty twenty two. BEVN. Shields

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>then went on to say, there is a wealth of

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>evidence that there is little to no link between immigration

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and challenges such as housing affordability, cost of living and

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>social cohesion. But we can't hide from the reality that

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>many people believe it to be the case. Absolutely, we

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>can't hide the reality when it is the reality. Big

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Australia is a big problem and if you want the evidence,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>have a listen to economist leaf Fan Nonsolin.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 9>So our protivity growth stinks and unfortunately the easiest leave

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 9>it a pull, and that's one we've been pulling for

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 9>the last twenty years is just ramping up immigration and

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 9>just growing that growing the economic pies quickly she can

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 9>by adding people but not tearing about the slice of

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 9>the pie. And unfortunately our economy has become overly reliant

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 9>on this population fete Australia's population if you go by

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 9>the ABS population clock, can you basically look at the

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 9>number at now, which is about twenty seven point seven

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 9>million minus where we're at the turn of the century

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 9>around out of the time of the Sydney Olympics are

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 9>populations grown by eight point seven million people nationally. That's

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 9>forty six percent. That is the strongest growth in the

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 9>advanced world. Anybody who lives in a major city in

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 9>Australia has felt this right. We fell at it with

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 9>housing becoming increasingly extensive, harder to harder to buy, also

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 9>poorer equality because nowadays you know, people have to live

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 9>in apartments instead of houses. It's further out if you're

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 9>in a house, and you.

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't need an economist to tell you that, you're experiencing

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>this yourself as your children and grandchildren. Rents are up,

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>housing affordability is at its worst level in more than

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>two decades, and building approvals are at decade lows. Too

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>many Aussies cannot afford to buy a home and incomes

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>are going backwards. Yet migration remains double pre pandemic levels.

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, net overseas migration for the March quarter was

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>just over one hundred and ten thousand. That's one thousand,

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and twenty three arrivals each and every day

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>between the start of the year and the end of March.

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where are we going to put all these people?

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So this premise that migration continues to be undoubtedly good

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>for Australia, in my view, is absolutely wrong. Yet the

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>SPS will tell you there are a number of driving

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>forces between far right anti immigration mobilization in the UK

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>and Australia. Far right. Has the SBS gone and spoken

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to everyday mums and dads who can't get a roof

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>over their heads? Are they far right too if they

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about mass migration? Then Over at the ABC,

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>an opinion piece this week claimed social cohesion is not

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>threatened by diversity itself. It is undermined when people feel

0:24:59.920 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it excluded. Cohesion cannot be built by restricting who comes

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to this country or demanding newcomers assimilate overnight. It emerges

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>when all people feel they belong. What rubbish? Diversity is

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not our strength. As former Prime Minister John Howard made

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the point, the idea that every culture is equal is nonsense.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Here he was speaking with former Deputy PM John Anderson

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 10>I think that we made a mistake in and it

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 10>was politically motivated. I think both sides of politics, particularly

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 10>the labor parties, saw merit in cultivating support from different

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 10>esthny groups. We don't want that.

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 11>Particularly when those ethnic groups are unable to leave behind

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 11>and ancient hatred.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And that is a very problem. The quiet Australians have

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>been left behind by this bolting horse that is a

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>captured ideology as well as self loathing under the guise

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of healthy and sustainable multiculturalism. Now there was a time

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>when migration was our strength, but now absolutely flooding the

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>country with migrants on a daily basis is a sheer

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>lazy way to prop up the economy and our social

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>fibers are buckling because of it. It is not the

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>same Australia we grew up in. We deserve a debate

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>on population and migration. And the sooner the mainstream media

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>wake up to this and start asking the hard questions,

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the better. And unless someone can actually convince me about

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the merits of a big Australia, I'm sorry, but please

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>put up the sign we are full, johny me. Now

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is my panel in New South Wales Independent MP Tanya

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Mahalik and former New South Wales Police Minister David Elliott

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>hight To both of you, thanks for joining me. Look,

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to start tonight with population. As I just mentioned,

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>their net overseas migration for the March quarter was just

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred and ten thousand. That's one two hundred

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three arrivals each and every day between the

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 1>start of the year and the end of March. And

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>today we find out that nearly one quarter of retirees

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>could be renters within the next two decades, as entire

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>generations locked out of home ownership, transition out of the

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>workforce and directly into poverty. David, that is frightening in itself.

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The reality is is we have not planned for a

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>big Australia yet either side of politics don't seem to

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>want to have the debate. Why well, you're right.

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean for Bevin Chields to say, you know, it's

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 5>uncomfortable to have a debate about this means that he

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 5>has no position to be the editor of a newspaper.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 5>Debate is debate, and whether it's uncomfortable or comfortable, we

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 5>need to have it. So he's a buffoon, quite frankly,

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 5>for being putting that position forward. And if he wants

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 5>a big Australia, well then how about he started advocating

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 5>for a bigger defense force, the biggest police force, a

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 5>bigger prison system, because that's what comes with a bigger Australia.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 5>But the reality is we are now going backwards when

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 5>it comes to public infrastructure, when it comes to public works,

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 5>now coming going backwards when it comes to the investment

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 5>into our communities because the taps are being turned off

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 5>and that's that's bad, particularly in a city like Sydney,

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 5>but we're also seeing it in the other capital cities.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 5>Now I accept, I accept that not everybody can be

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 5>a homeowner, but one in four retirees renting. That's something

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 5>that maybe BEV and Shields might want to consider having

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 5>a look at, because, as I said, a big Australia

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 5>is going to mean that these problems become bigger.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, and nobody ever voted for a big Australia

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, Tanya. Yet, as I said, two and

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty three arrivals a day since the start of the

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>year to the end of March, no wonder every day

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Assie's are frustrated.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think every day Australians have really had a

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 3>gutfull of essentially paying more and more tax to accommodate

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 3>people from overseas. I mean, this is the real issue

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 3>here is if you want a big Australia, well, it

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 3>means that we all have to pay more tag to

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 3>be able to provide the housing that's needed, the schools

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that are needed, the hospital infrastructure that's needed. Who's paying

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 3>for it. We're paying for it. And the problem we

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 3>have is we've got a whole generation of young people

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>in particular who don't appreciate or understand that they are

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 3>probably never going to own a home. They don't understand

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 3>that if we keep these levels of migration coming into

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Australia twelve hundred a day, that's a ridiculous amount of

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 3>people coming into Australia. We already can't meet housing targets

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 3>for the Australians that we have here, we can't meet

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 3>or provide that level of housing supply. And what people

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 3>don't understand is our taxes that are going to have

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 3>to prop up these levels of migration. I just want

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 3>to add if I can. Labor Party has always been

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 3>a about big Australia. I think they don't even apologize

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 3>for this, from the days of Hawk and Keating and

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 3>even now with alban Ezi, they are and Tony Burke.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 3>They are all about migration. They see this as a

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>vote winner. John Howard is quite right in the comments

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 3>that we heard earlier, him saying that's how they see

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 3>themselves staying in government.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you because it suits labor politically

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a high migration system. I mean, look what

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Tony Burke did in the lead up to the election,

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>where you know everyone got a citizenship. It's all deployed

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>by labor. Now, look, I want to talk to you

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>about this astonishing cost. Victorian taxpayers have been slugged more

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five million dollars in security and police expenses

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for Melbourne CBD protests. That's according to a Parliamentary Budget

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Office report seen by The Herald Sun, finding that from

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>October twenty twenty three and last month, almost twenty four

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand police shifts have been taken up by protest activity.

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>That's fourteen point nine million dollars in salary costs. David,

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as a former police minister yourself, how do you feel

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>hearing those sorts of figures.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, I can tell you that's a lot of money.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 5>That's a lot of money forfeited from rank and file

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 5>police officers. That's a lot of money forfeited for from

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 5>upgrading facilities. It's a lot of money forfeited taken away

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 5>from new resources and air wing and of course all

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 5>the other things that we need to run an effective,

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 5>modern democratic police force. So I mean, what price democracy?

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 5>What price? What price freedom of speech? And I accept that,

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 5>and there should be we should be celebrating the fact

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 5>that we can have these celebrations. But when they're saying

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 5>the same thing time and time again, and what does

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 5>disturb me is that these protests have included a calls

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 5>for violence, and they've included the burning of the Australian

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 5>national flag. So they're not necessarily a law abiding citizens.

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 5>They're not people campaigning for higher pensions or against higher

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 5>education fees. These guys are people that are advocating for

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 5>a way of life that is not the Australian way

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 5>of life. So yes, allow them to have one or two,

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 5>encourage them to be part of public discord. Of course

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 5>it might be uncomfortable for BEV and Shields, but everybody

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 5>else can cover it. But I do think that we

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 5>need to I do think that we need to get

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 5>serious about how the opportunity cost of these protests.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, and it's not just flags being burned, of course,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's death to the IDF every week. And it's the

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>same awful anti Israel slogans that we see time and

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>time again, Tanya. And it's happening here obviously in New

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>South Wales as well in Sydney. And the key here, Tanya,

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is that it's all at the expense of taxpayers.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, taxpayers, like always are just expected to pay the bills.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Twenty five million dollars is an extraordinary amount that Victorians

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 3>have been forced to pay to prop up these ridiculous

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 3>week in, week out protests. David's right. I mean, how

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, one or two protests here and they're ak sure.

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 3>But the idea that this becomes a business model I

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 3>think for some of these organizations where every week they

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 3>rally people to come down for these ridiculous causes as if,

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>as you quite rightly say, Danika, things that don't even

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 3>affect us here in Australia, but it matters for overseas

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 3>and Australians are forced.

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>To pay for it. The problem here, of course is

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>when you do.

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Have somebody that does step up and say and say

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 3>and says no, like Premier Min's did when he actually

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 3>said no to the Harbor Bridge march a couple a

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 3>month or so ago. What happened the courts over Inadhi

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and decided that they wanted it anyway. So this is

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 3>a problem we have in Australia. But I've got to

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 3>say it's time to actually make these protesters and organizations

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 3>pay for the costs of all the police that are

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 3>forced to be there to help manage these rallies and protests.

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 3>That's the big issue.

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>They've got to pay up. I couldn't agree more with you.

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>We're sick to death of our money being paid towards

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these awful, awful slogans being chanted, you know, terrorist flags

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>being waved across the Harbor Bridge. Enough is enough. I

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're spot on now. Look I want to go

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to the US because late night talk show hosts Jimmy

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Kimmel he was given a big goodbye Nara by the

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>ABC after these factually incorrect and quite frankly, really stupid

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>comments following the death of Charlie Kirk have a listen.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 12>He had some new lows over the weekend, with the

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 12>Maga Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 12>Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 12>everything they can to score political points from it.

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>David, did the network make the right decision to get

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of him.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah they did, but not because of the fact that

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 5>he had a political opinion. They should have got ridden

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 5>because he was factually incorrect. He misled, he misled the audience.

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 5>MAGA have not advocated that this guy was anything but

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 5>one of them. In fact, I think it's been quite respectful.

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 5>We've highlighted. Yes, he came from a Republican family. Yes,

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 5>he had in a childhood around firearms, but he clearly

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 5>had a conversion on the Raid of Damascus, and he

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 5>was in a relationship with somebody who was transgender, So

0:34:54.840 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 5>that brings into obviously fair assumptions of actual persuasion, which

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 5>is fine. But he clearly was no longer a Republican,

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 5>a conservative, or an advocate for Charlie Kirk. So if

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 5>anybody suggesting that what was being put out by the

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 5>Republican Party in the conservative media was incorrect is not right.

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 5>What was incorrect was what we just saw cost that

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 5>Bokey's job.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, exactly, I mean, good riddance to him and

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not to mention the fact that his ratings were constantly

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on the decline as well.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 5>So it's a good excuse sometimes, you know.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That's just well it is. But I mean, you know

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the way it goes, is it. Tanya Mahalk David Elliott,

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>good to see you both. Thanks so much for joining

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>me on the show. As always, coming up after the

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.919
<v Speaker 1>break live to London, Donald Trump has given some frank

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>advice to kir Starmer on how to stop the boats.

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That's next. Welcome back. Joining me now is National's Deputy

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>leader Kevin Hogan. Kevin, thank you for joining me. I

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about Labour twenty thirty five target. Here

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>was Chris Bowen today professing that the regions are on board.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Have a listen, farmers get it.

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 2>The National Party doesn't get it, but farmers get it now.

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Are there issues around making sure community consultation is fit

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 2>for purpose?

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 10>Yep?

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Are there issues about making sure communities genuinely benefit from

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 2>the renewables in their region. Yes, But this idea that

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 2>somehow people who live east of the Blue Mountain support

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>action on climate changing people in the west oppose. It's

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 2>just not right, it's just not true. I know the

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 2>National Party doesn't get it, but their communities get it.

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So there you go, Kevin. The Minister thinks that the

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Nationals have no clue apparently what's going on in regional Australia.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>What's your response, Saniker?

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 11>If that wasn't so serious, it'd be a funny joke.

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 11>I mean, blackout bow And seriously, so, I mean, when's

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 11>the last time you've seen him with farmers on the

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 11>ground in a regional community. He doesn't his you know,

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 11>he does no consultation with this stuff. You know, he's

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 11>a joke and what he just said was a joke.

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 11>And you know, the biggest joke actually, I mean, I'm

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 11>sure you saw this, Taniki yesterday, The biggest joke of

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 11>all was the Prime Minister was asked quite seriously when

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 11>he was announcing his emission's reduction target. He was asked

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 11>by a journalist, you know, have you done the moody?

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 11>What is the cost going to be for your power bill?

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 11>The press pack laughed because and then he laughed. He

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 11>thought everyone thought this was a joke. I mean, seriously,

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 11>he's you know, stating what his a mission reductions target

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 11>is and he thinks been asked a question about what

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 11>this will do to power bills as a joke. We

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 11>know it's a joke because obviously they said two seventy five,

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 11>three years ago, your power bill in twenty twenty five

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 11>would be two hundred and seventy five dollars low. Then

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 11>it wasn't two hundred and twenty two. That's a joke.

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 11>But the fact that he treated that question as a

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 11>joke shows how seriously in trouble we are with this

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 11>government energy cost of energy and their emissions reductions targets.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when the minister in charge of our energy green

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>thinks it's a laughing joke, we are in serious trouble

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely now. Look Susan Lee today maintained that the coalition

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>will not support the twenty thirty five target, but maintains

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that the coalition will not form their own position while

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it conducts this energy review. But if you won't back

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>these targets, surely as a team you cannot hide anymore

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>from making a decision on this Paris agreement.

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 10>Kevin.

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and look, Denika, we don't want to hide from

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 11>making a decision. I don't know, you you know, there'd

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 11>be people maybe yourself, who are frustrated that we haven't

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 11>arrived there yet. But I think what happened yesterday is

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 11>one of the reasons that we do need to do

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 11>our review because what we want to do, as you know,

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 11>Senator Matt Carnavant is leading the review for us as

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 11>the Nationals, because what we want to do is when

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 11>we land on a position is explain exactly why and

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 11>when people say, well, what does it mean for power prices,

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 11>we want to tell you. We want to be able

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 11>to say what we think the government's policy will mean.

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 11>Is this for your power bill? This is what it

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 11>means for industry. This is why smelters and big manufacturer

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 11>is asking for subsidies X, Y and z and give

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 11>a number. And if we say, okay, our plan is

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 11>going to be different from that zero twenty fifty. We

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 11>want to have the cost analysis done and I think

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 11>that's important. I think it's important to say that with

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 11>facts and figures, we're getting very serious independent analysis done

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 11>on this because we want to give the Australian people

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 11>and the Australian voters the figures behind this about why

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 11>we've done it. So I think yesterday highlights why the

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 11>review is important because they can't tell us what it

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 11>means for prices. They can't tell us what it means

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 11>for industry.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean, to be fair, Kevin, there be

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>some saying, well, we just want to know what the

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>coalition are doing here because our prices keep going up.

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you understand it from a consumer perspective?

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 11>I do, and we need to arrive at a position

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 11>as quickly as we can. But I do also make

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 11>the point. And so you know, it's two and a

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 11>half years to the next election. We took an energy

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 11>policy to the election, you know, to the last election

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 11>with our obviously with our nuclear proposal fully costed and

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 11>did all that analysis. What we take next listion will

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 11>be done as well. But I think this review internetzero

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 11>twenty fifty is important because what we do want to

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 11>tell the Australian public and the Australian energy consumer and

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 11>business who will going brope because I can't pay their

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 11>energy bills. We want to give them the facts and

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 11>figures behind it, which this goverment won't do. They'll tell you,

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 11>they'll tell you their emission reductions targets.

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 13>I mean.

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 11>The other thing here, Danika, which is scary as well

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 11>with what they announced yesterday, it's going to beyond energy.

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.919
<v Speaker 11>They'll be coming into the agricultural sector next because they'll

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 11>be looking for reductions within agriculture. What's that going to

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 11>do to food prices? We want that analysis done as well.

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Good point. Yeah, no, look, it's a fair point, Kevin Hogan.

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got to leave it there. Really appreciate you joining

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>me on the show. Thank you so much for your

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>time this evening. Well let's move on now, because US

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump has demanded the hostages in Gaza be

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 1>returned before he has discussions with the Israeli Prime minister. Here.

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>He was speaking at a joint press conference alongside so

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Kiir Starmer in the UK.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 13>I want an end. I want the hostages released. That's

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 13>what the people of Israel want, they want, and we

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 13>want the fighting to stop. Hamas said that they're going

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 13>to put the hostages up as bet. They're going to

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 13>put the hostages in front of any attack, and that's

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 13>pretty brutal. We haven't heard that one in a long time,

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:15.919
<v Speaker 13>so we have to remember that. So I have a

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 13>disagreement with the Prime Minister on that score.

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Jomie now is Sophie Ellsworth News Corps Europe correspondent and

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Sky News contributor, Sophie. Thanks for joining me. You've been

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>following this visit. Keir Starmer is about to of course

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>recognize a Palestinian statehood, something Trump disagrees with. But what

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>have the pair discussed on the Middle East during this visit.

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 14>They're great to be with you, Jeneica. Look, they had

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 14>this meeting yesterday at Checkers, the Prime Minister's country estate

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 14>here in Buckinghamshire, and they did discuss their disagreement on

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 14>what is happening in the Middle East in terms of

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:56.800
<v Speaker 14>Sakiah recognizing Palestinian statehood, and President Trump was very clear

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 14>that this is something that he fundamentally disagrees Sakia. On

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 14>Nasakia did say that, you know Hamasa terrorists, this war

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 14>should end. But they are completely different on where they

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 14>are in terms of the Palestinian statehood recognition, which the

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 14>UK will recognize in the coming days. So despite them

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 14>having a very successful meeting here yesterday in the UK,

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 14>this is one of the main issues that they have

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 14>been unable to agree on.

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Well. It's interesting because another issue that they don't agree

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on is Donald Trump telling Britain it should call out

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the military to control its borders. I mean, obviously the

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>border is a big issue. But here's what he said.

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 13>I told the Prime Ministry I would stop it. And

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 13>it doesn't matter if you call out the military, it

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 13>doesn't matter what means you use. But it's going to destroy.

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 13>It destroys countries from within, and we're actually now removing

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 13>a lot of the people that came into our country.

0:42:58.480 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 13>It's a very hard chore.

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, Sophie, he's not wrong, or perhaps just look to

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Australia for the blueprint on how to do it. It

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 1>worked for Tony Abbot.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 14>It did work for Tony Abbott. But the difference Heredaneka

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 14>is it's only a very short distance from France to

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 14>England and it's very easy to jump on a boat

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 14>and get across here and come into the country illegally.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 14>And we've seen that through the numbers alone. There's more

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 14>than thirty thousand legal migrants that have come to the

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 14>UK up until the start of September. That's well up

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 14>on the same time last year when it was about

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 14>twenty three thousand. So mister Trump has said he's managed

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 14>to stop illegal migration. He made it very clear to

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 14>Sakia that he should do the same, but they do

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 14>have a web of legislation that they have to repeal

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 14>to ensure that they can actually return these migrants and Danika.

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 14>They've introduced the one in one out scheme with France

0:43:56.120 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 14>where basically they return one illegal migrant in exchllegal migrant

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 14>and they've only seen a couple as part of this

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 14>one in one out program successfully happened, So it really

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 14>has been something that the Sakis government has failed miserably

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 14>on Jamika.

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's been a real failure for labor over there, clearly,

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Sophiel's worth. Good to see you as always, thanks for

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>joining me on the show. Coming up after the break,

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the winners and losers of the week, including the ABC

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>journo who had a run in with Donald Trump, plus

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Wildlife Warrior Robert Irwin steals the show on Dancing with

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>the Stars. That's next. It is that time of the

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>week where we sought the winners from the losers, and

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 1>helping me to do that is Sky News contributor James Bolt.

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>James lovely to see you. Who's your winner this week?

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.280
<v Speaker 15>My winner of this week is John Lyons, the ABC

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 15>journalist who got into a yelling match with Donald Trump. Now,

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 15>if you have seen it, you'd be thinking to yourself,

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 15>why did I pick this guy as a winner of

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 15>the week. Surely I meant loser. But if you haven't

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 15>saying it, take a look at what happened.

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 2>He's appropriate, President Trump that a president in office should.

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Be engaged in so much bitsiness activity.

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm really not.

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 13>My kids are running the business and you know at

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 13>the activity. Where are you from. I'm from the Australian

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 13>Broadcasting rage, Paul Horn and pro right the Australias.

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You're hurting Australia right.

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 13>In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 13>now that they want.

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 15>To get along with me.

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>You know your your leader.

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 13>Is coming over to see me very so I'm going

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 13>to tell him about you.

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You said a very bad tone.

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 15>Well, Nika, there's some moments in life where you realize

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 15>you're currently in the best story you have. John Lyons

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 15>is going to be telling that at dinner parties for

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 15>the rest of his entire career. He's going to be

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 15>the center of every conversation because he's one of the

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 15>journalists that Donald Trump screamed at. Everyone dreams of it.

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 15>He got to live it. I've got to say congratulations

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 15>to him.

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, whether or not he actually wants that title or not,

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but I agree this is his this is his big

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 1>moment and it's probably the only moment he'll ever get.

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Working for the ABC, I would say, James, now, look,

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I had to give my winner this week to Robert Irwin. God,

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that guy is a legend. He had an incredible debut

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>performance on this season of Dancing with the Stars in America.

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>He did the jive to a very outback themed set.

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Have a look at this, James. He actually scored the

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>highest mark of the night at fifteen out of twenty.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 1>One of the judges claimed that it was the best

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>first dance that they'd ever seen on the show, and

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think, good on him. He gives it a go.

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 1>He's not a shame to What about you, James, Can

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you jive? What are your skills?

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 13>Like?

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 15>Congratulations to him. I mean I wish I could dance

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 15>like that, because I got to say for someone like this,

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 15>he's he's talented, he's handsome, he's charismatic, he's got some

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 15>good comment many bones, and now you're telling me he

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 15>can dance as well, it's actually unfair to the rest

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 15>of us.

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>He's putting everyone to shave. I say, now, James, You'll

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>loser this week is people who watch videos out loud

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in public places.

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 15>Yes, and for a very good reason. Their time is up.

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 15>I've seen a really good Sky News the Contract article

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.320
<v Speaker 15>on this because we have finally got the tip from

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 15>Instagram of how to deal with these awful, awful people.

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, excuse me, what do you watch it? Oh? Nice?

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Can I watch? It's coming in two minutes? Oh two minutes. Oh,

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's got time for me to watch them.

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 11>For sure, because I thought you wanted to share where

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 11>you were watching with us.

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Sure, you can totally hear it.

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 12>I'll turn it down.

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 15>We've all been captured in these situations where you just

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 15>cannot believe someone would be so rude in public transport,

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.279
<v Speaker 15>bus arlie in that case, a restaurant. But now we

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 15>have the tip. Just ask them if they can watch

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 15>over their shoulder and they will turn down the volume.

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I love it. You know what. It reminds me of

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>when people choose so loudly in public, and it literally

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:13.800
<v Speaker 1>sends shivers up the back of my spine. So I

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>love this solution. I think it's brilliant. Now, look, I

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>had to give my loser this week to Fatima payment

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>after making these comments about Charlie Kirk.

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 16>Charlie Kerre got shot and he's IRIP. Whatever you want

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 16>IRIP to stand for. Some people will say it's not peace.

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:37.280
<v Speaker 1>So fill in the blanks. People, fill in the blanks.

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I think she's a disgrace. I don't know why she's there,

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, James, were almost out of time, but

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd love your opinion on it.

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 15>I just think the assassination at Charlie Kirk and what

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 15>we learn about the alleged assassin shows what happens when

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 15>we stop seeing people on the other side of politics,

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:56.319
<v Speaker 15>as say a father of two, and start seeing him

0:48:56.320 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 15>as a political enemy. So it's unfortunately Fatima of pain

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 15>doesn't see this, but I think we should all sit

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 15>down to be a little bit kinder to each other.

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Spot on, Well said, James Bolt, Nice to have you on.

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining me on the show

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this evening, and thank you for your company. That's it.

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back again seven pm on Sunday night. But

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:18.240
<v Speaker 1>up next is a Friday special Paul Murray Live from Narrabai,

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>good night,