WEBVTT - Credlin | 9 November

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:06.590
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:08.350 --> 0:00:10.490
<v Speaker 2>Chris Kenny, I've got a mug to show my audience

0:00:10.550 --> 0:00:12.629
<v Speaker 2>in just a moment. We'll get to that. But first

0:00:12.670 --> 0:00:14.710
<v Speaker 2>of all, welcome to the program. Here's what's coming up

0:00:14.810 --> 0:00:18.500
<v Speaker 2>on Credlin tonight. Labor's on the ropes in Victoria, or

0:00:18.820 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 2>are they? Polling today points to an electoral wipeout for Labor.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.990
<v Speaker 2>Another fatal CBD stabbing puts crime back in the spotlight.

0:00:28.290 --> 0:00:30.610
<v Speaker 2>But that's not the full story. I'll give you my

0:00:30.790 --> 0:00:34.370
<v Speaker 2>analysis shortly. A joint campaign has kicked off today, too,

0:00:34.430 --> 0:00:37.790
<v Speaker 2>involving the Herald Sun and News 24. We'll take a

0:00:37.830 --> 0:00:41.250
<v Speaker 2>closer look at what's needed to fix Victoria. And tonight

0:00:41.270 --> 0:00:45.659
<v Speaker 2>we're going to focus on hospitals and ambulances. Plus, Chris

0:00:45.700 --> 0:00:51.100
<v Speaker 2>Bowen accused of pushing climate propaganda, giving businesses and community

0:00:51.140 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>groups a little kit and telling them they've got to

0:00:53.820 --> 0:00:57.970
<v Speaker 2>sell net zero ahead of his UN climate summit. And

0:00:58.030 --> 0:01:01.130
<v Speaker 2>on the campaign trail today, crime was a major focus

0:01:01.170 --> 0:01:05.410
<v Speaker 2>for both parties, promising to prioritise safety.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.900
<v Speaker 3>Under a Liberals Nationals government, we'll recruit 3,000 more police

0:01:10.340 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 3>and then we'll ensure that the police stations that we

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 3>have promised will be open will be open because the

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.980
<v Speaker 3>Victorian community deserves it and needs it.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.770
<v Speaker 4>Victorians have made it very clear that they pay for

0:01:20.830 --> 0:01:23.709
<v Speaker 4>our police stations and they expect them open.

0:01:25.690 --> 0:01:29.569
<v Speaker 2>But first, another day, another poll. Only today we've got

0:01:29.750 --> 0:01:32.990
<v Speaker 2>two of them. One's a national poll, the other specific

0:01:33.090 --> 0:01:37.229
<v Speaker 2>to Victoria, and both are a shocker for Labor. Let's

0:01:37.250 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>start with the national one. This one's from Redbridge and

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>it's published in the Australian Financial Review this morning. Now,

0:01:43.140 --> 0:01:46.340
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't that long ago that Labor's fall to a 26%

0:01:46.340 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>primary was seen as a one-off. But poll after poll now,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.460
<v Speaker 2>has Labor this low? which shows that it's now the

0:01:54.580 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>trend and that's catastrophic. Now, what would concern Labor strategists

0:01:59.220 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>here is the two-factor hit in these numbers. Now, what

0:02:03.140 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>do I mean by a two-factor hit? Well, this is

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.989
<v Speaker 2>a hit, the first one, that you can do something about,

0:02:09.050 --> 0:02:12.270
<v Speaker 2>and the other one's a hit that you can't. First,

0:02:12.290 --> 0:02:15.510
<v Speaker 2>the hits that you can fix. For Labor, it's the

0:02:15.650 --> 0:02:19.450
<v Speaker 2>economic pain in these low polling numbers that is hurting them.

0:02:20.100 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Last week's rate hike, definitely, that's reflected in this poll.

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.609
<v Speaker 2>So too are the data like the massive drop in

0:02:26.830 --> 0:02:31.210
<v Speaker 2>auction clearances reported over the last six months since the

0:02:31.250 --> 0:02:35.290
<v Speaker 2>failed federal budget. There's been a less than 60% clearance

0:02:35.370 --> 0:02:39.850
<v Speaker 2>rate at house auctions nationally. Buyers are just not buying,

0:02:39.870 --> 0:02:42.290
<v Speaker 2>and the vendors then are left in limbo. And it

0:02:42.370 --> 0:02:47.669
<v Speaker 2>impacts everyone in the property sector chain. Real estate agents,

0:02:48.030 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the people who do maintenance on these properties, the banks

0:02:50.750 --> 0:02:54.940
<v Speaker 2>that approve the loans, everyone. And that's the first problem

0:02:55.260 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>in today's national poll for Labor. Here's the second. And

0:02:58.260 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 2>this one's much harder to fix, if not impossible. And

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 2>that's trust. Because, yes, part of Labor's poll dive is

0:03:06.139 --> 0:03:09.540
<v Speaker 2>economic pain, but it's also the character of the Albanese

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.270
<v Speaker 2>government and the prime minister himself in particular. Just one

0:03:14.290 --> 0:03:17.829
<v Speaker 2>in five voters say they trust Anthony Albanese, meaning four

0:03:17.889 --> 0:03:22.310
<v Speaker 2>out of five voters do not. And trust is incredibly

0:03:22.370 --> 0:03:25.810
<v Speaker 2>hard to get back. Voters might forgive a lie if

0:03:25.830 --> 0:03:29.429
<v Speaker 2>there's genuine remorse after it's been uncovered, but not where

0:03:29.470 --> 0:03:33.500
<v Speaker 2>there's no remorse, no sorry, And no admission of fault.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.990
<v Speaker 2>And definitely not when it happens time and time again.

0:03:38.890 --> 0:03:41.610
<v Speaker 3>Can you rule out any changes to negative gearing and

0:03:41.670 --> 0:03:42.770
<v Speaker 3>capital gains tax?

0:03:42.810 --> 0:03:42.970
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:03:43.590 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 6>How hard is it for the 50th time? You know,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 6>I stepped off the stage. I didn't fall over on

0:03:58.920 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 6>my backside.

0:04:00.490 --> 0:04:01.260
<v Speaker 3>I do not have a.

0:04:01.260 --> 0:04:04.230
<v Speaker 2>Card as a member of Marrickville Golf Club.

0:04:04.690 --> 0:04:05.630
<v Speaker 7>I haven't spoken.

0:04:05.650 --> 0:04:09.070
<v Speaker 6>And I've been coming here for decades and using this club.

0:04:10.850 --> 0:04:13.350
<v Speaker 2>Now, what's also worth noting tonight in the Redbridge poll

0:04:13.770 --> 0:04:17.630
<v Speaker 2>is the significant increase in support for the coalition. Let's

0:04:17.670 --> 0:04:19.870
<v Speaker 2>not forget when Angus Taylor took over the leadership at

0:04:19.890 --> 0:04:22.510
<v Speaker 2>the start of the year from Susan Lee, the Liberal

0:04:22.529 --> 0:04:27.539
<v Speaker 2>Party's primary vote was 15%. In this poll... The coalition's

0:04:27.580 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>up four points to a solid 25% primary. Now, sure,

0:04:31.700 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a long way to go. But credit where it's due,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the Taylor-led opposition's managed to claw itself back from the

0:04:39.100 --> 0:04:43.609
<v Speaker 2>abyss and start to rebuild after the disastrous tenure of

0:04:43.690 --> 0:04:46.970
<v Speaker 2>Susan Lee. Now, partly that's because there's been a strong

0:04:47.370 --> 0:04:50.750
<v Speaker 2>economic narrative from the opposition leader, and that's been missing

0:04:50.810 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 2>for some time, but also because finally the Liberals have

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>taken off the gloves of when it comes to the

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister and his character. A good example of this

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.290
<v Speaker 2>is the scandal around the Marrickville Golf Club and that

0:05:04.290 --> 0:05:08.150
<v Speaker 2>$ 6 million grant that Albanese gave to his golf club mates.

0:05:08.830 --> 0:05:11.130
<v Speaker 2>In the whole scheme of things, given this is a

0:05:11.210 --> 0:05:15.350
<v Speaker 2>government that loves to waste billions, $ 6 million is not

0:05:15.390 --> 0:05:18.529
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money. But what turned this small story

0:05:18.850 --> 0:05:21.710
<v Speaker 2>into a big one, as we showed you here on

0:05:21.790 --> 0:05:25.429
<v Speaker 2>Credlin night after night, is how quickly the Prime Minister

0:05:25.529 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 2>turned it into an own goal. Because what he told

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.460
<v Speaker 2>the Parliament and what the official documents told me were

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.540
<v Speaker 2>two very different things. That he had nothing to do

0:05:36.580 --> 0:05:39.350
<v Speaker 2>with the club, but he did. That the grant was

0:05:39.510 --> 0:05:43.100
<v Speaker 2>all about the sewerage when it wasn't. that the Prime

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:48.870
<v Speaker 2>Minister said was the decision maker, the infrastructure minister, that

0:05:48.890 --> 0:05:52.250
<v Speaker 2>the process was run arm's length by public servants, that

0:05:52.270 --> 0:05:57.380
<v Speaker 2>it was all above board, when instead Labor Party operatives

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 2>made the political call on taxpayer millions.

0:06:02.300 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 8>The idea for the grants program originate with you or

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.500
<v Speaker 8>with the PM and his office or in Labor Party HQ?

0:06:10.770 --> 0:06:14.890
<v Speaker 9>Election commitments, for this specific grant, there is an election

0:06:14.930 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 9>commitments process that all political parties run as we lead

0:06:18.270 --> 0:06:19.620
<v Speaker 9>into the election campaign.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 8>Was Labor's head office involved in that process?

0:06:25.380 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely.

0:06:26.260 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely, because it's an election commitment process. It's a

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:30.739
<v Speaker 9>political process.

0:06:32.580 --> 0:06:34.300
<v Speaker 2>Now, as you've heard me say here often, it's not

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the crime but the cover-up that gets you caught in

0:06:38.140 --> 0:06:41.059
<v Speaker 2>the end. And it's a lot easier for ordinary voters

0:06:41.100 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 2>to understand and follow a $ 6 million rip-off and those

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.140
<v Speaker 2>lies to the Parliament than it is to follow some

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.420
<v Speaker 2>of the more complex examples of Albanese government rorts. So

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.539
<v Speaker 2>that's the first poll, that's the national poll. The other

0:06:55.580 --> 0:06:59.260
<v Speaker 2>big poll today is the Demos Premier National Poll and

0:06:59.300 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>it was published this morning in the Herald Sun. With

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.260
<v Speaker 2>just three weeks now until polling day and just over

0:07:05.300 --> 0:07:09.490
<v Speaker 2>a week before pre-polls open, these numbers are catastrophic for

0:07:09.530 --> 0:07:13.090
<v Speaker 2>Ben Carroll. So let's go through them now. Out in front,

0:07:13.110 --> 0:07:16.170
<v Speaker 2>you've got a 33% primary. That's for the coalition. That's

0:07:16.190 --> 0:07:19.380
<v Speaker 2>the Liberals and the Nationals led by Jess Wilson. For

0:07:19.460 --> 0:07:23.780
<v Speaker 2>One Nation, it's a 21% primary. And way, way back

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>in the pack at just 18%, you've got Labor. Now, 18%,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:34.050
<v Speaker 2>if reflected on polling day, means Labor's gone. Or are they?

0:07:34.780 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Because the poll also records very strong numbers for the Greens.

0:07:37.980 --> 0:07:43.060
<v Speaker 2>They're up at 17%. And given the Greens' preferences end

0:07:43.140 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>up with Labor about 90% of the time, add the

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.790
<v Speaker 2>17 and the 18 together, you get around 35%. Meaning

0:07:51.830 --> 0:07:55.410
<v Speaker 2>this Victorian election is a long way from being won

0:07:55.650 --> 0:07:56.370
<v Speaker 2>by the Liberals.

0:07:56.710 --> 0:07:57.270
<v Speaker 10>Good, yes.

0:07:57.990 --> 0:08:00.610
<v Speaker 2>And you'd most certainly prefer to be Jess Wilson tonight

0:08:00.650 --> 0:08:01.510
<v Speaker 2>than Ben Carroll.

0:08:01.550 --> 0:08:02.100
<v Speaker 11>But won?

0:08:02.890 --> 0:08:06.460
<v Speaker 2>Not by a long shot. Over the weekend, I was

0:08:06.690 --> 0:08:08.809
<v Speaker 2>out and about on the ground in the Geelong seat

0:08:08.870 --> 0:08:12.890
<v Speaker 2>of South Barwon. Now, it's a must-win marginal for the Liberals,

0:08:13.270 --> 0:08:17.030
<v Speaker 2>with their candidate Libby Pettis, a local businesswoman, mum and

0:08:17.050 --> 0:08:20.970
<v Speaker 2>a former champion athlete, and she's up against a former

0:08:20.990 --> 0:08:25.230
<v Speaker 2>ex-Dan Andrews staffer, one of the ultimate sort of Labor

0:08:25.270 --> 0:08:29.570
<v Speaker 2>insiders from Melbourne. In this seat, they want Labor gone.

0:08:29.890 --> 0:08:33.030
<v Speaker 2>That was the clear message from conversations on the weekend.

0:08:33.530 --> 0:08:37.740
<v Speaker 2>But not everyone's decided where their vote will go. That's

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.700
<v Speaker 2>the big job there for Libby and every other Liberal

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>between now and polling day. If you want to change

0:08:43.580 --> 0:08:45.260
<v Speaker 2>the government, if you want to get rid of Labor,

0:08:45.580 --> 0:08:50.380
<v Speaker 2>you have to put the Liberals first. Sure, put Labor last, sure,

0:08:50.990 --> 0:08:52.910
<v Speaker 2>but that won't mean they are thrown out of office,

0:08:52.990 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>given that cosy preference deal with the Greens and some

0:08:56.740 --> 0:09:00.420
<v Speaker 2>of these so-called independents. The Liberals have to get a

0:09:00.460 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>strong primary vote swing to them, around 8%, to throw

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.580
<v Speaker 2>out Labor. It's also worth noting about today's Victorian poll,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a big reversal in those numbers for Ben Carroll

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.940
<v Speaker 2>personally too. Back in September, the last time voters were polled,

0:09:16.500 --> 0:09:19.429
<v Speaker 2>Carroll was ahead of Wilson as preferred Premier, 32 to 31. Well,

0:09:19.450 --> 0:09:23.990
<v Speaker 2>not anymore. Wilson's now ahead 36 points to his 28.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.340
<v Speaker 2>And she's the only party leader in Victoria now with

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:34.730
<v Speaker 2>a positive rating in the poll overall. As a Demis

0:09:34.929 --> 0:09:38.370
<v Speaker 2>pollster told the Herald Sun today, Ben Carroll's new leader

0:09:38.429 --> 0:09:42.950
<v Speaker 2>bounce has not only faded, he says, it's reversed. And

0:09:42.990 --> 0:09:47.350
<v Speaker 2>his personal ratings are now deeply in negative territory, not

0:09:47.390 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 2>all that far from where they were under Jacinta Allen.

0:09:52.130 --> 0:09:54.410
<v Speaker 2>Now what's more is that Wilson's now picking up voters

0:09:54.750 --> 0:09:59.950
<v Speaker 2>from within traditionally Labor demographics. And two prime examples here

0:10:00.300 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>are where the coalition's now moving ahead with low-income households

0:10:06.179 --> 0:10:11.540
<v Speaker 2>and has drawn level with Labor amongst renters. With a

0:10:11.540 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>toxic Labor brand now in Victoria and, of course, federally

0:10:14.970 --> 0:10:18.870
<v Speaker 2>in Canberra, certainly with the Prime Minister, I'll tell you what,

0:10:18.890 --> 0:10:23.370
<v Speaker 2>those Labor strategists are in a world of pain. Frankly,

0:10:23.970 --> 0:10:27.309
<v Speaker 2>they deserve it. Because when you lie, like Labor does,

0:10:27.350 --> 0:10:30.990
<v Speaker 2>when you use taxpayer money to corruptly buy votes or

0:10:31.070 --> 0:10:35.670
<v Speaker 2>trade favours with union mates, eventually the electorate works you out.

0:10:36.309 --> 0:10:38.329
<v Speaker 2>I just hope in the case of Victoria, with just

0:10:38.370 --> 0:10:41.270
<v Speaker 2>three weeks to go, it's enough time for people to

0:10:41.429 --> 0:10:46.010
<v Speaker 2>understand how to throw out the most corrupt government Australia's

0:10:46.050 --> 0:10:51.220
<v Speaker 2>ever seen. Because then, Albo, They are coming after you.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:58.110
<v Speaker 2>I don't give you anything. Here's a Christmas present idea

0:10:58.170 --> 0:11:02.650
<v Speaker 2>for you. This lovely red mug for your morning coffee.

0:11:03.230 --> 0:11:05.050
<v Speaker 2>I picked up one on the weekend. Do you know

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:09.530
<v Speaker 2>what it says? Three mugs on a mug. I love it.

0:11:09.860 --> 0:11:13.100
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely love it. It's a daily reminder of the Andrews,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.020
<v Speaker 2>Allen and Carroll governments. Don't ever forget what they did

0:11:17.059 --> 0:11:19.980
<v Speaker 2>to Victoria and why they've got to be thrown out

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.580
<v Speaker 2>in three weeks' time. If you want one of these mugs,

0:11:22.620 --> 0:11:24.420
<v Speaker 2>if you want one of your own, well, here's how

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.819
<v Speaker 2>you can buy one if you're interested. Don't wait too long.

0:11:28.100 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 2>I can guarantee you, Allen, Andrews and Carroll, these mugs

0:11:33.380 --> 0:11:40.950
<v Speaker 2>will soon be a collector's edition. head to the Liberal

0:11:40.970 --> 0:11:44.450
<v Speaker 2>Party website, get one. Honestly, put it in the pool room.

0:11:44.470 --> 0:11:46.429
<v Speaker 2>You'll be able to sell it on eBay for a

0:11:46.550 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of money in a few years' time. Let's head

0:11:48.540 --> 0:11:50.699
<v Speaker 2>to Canberra now for the headlines with our political reporter,

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Ruben Spargo.

0:11:52.590 --> 0:11:53.050
<v Speaker 10>Good evening.

0:11:53.330 --> 0:11:55.860
<v Speaker 8>The opposition leader is pledging to cut federal red tape

0:11:55.890 --> 0:11:59.700
<v Speaker 8>by 25% in the coalition's first term if it wins

0:11:59.770 --> 0:12:03.239
<v Speaker 8>the next election. A so-called red tape razor gang will

0:12:03.260 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 8>be tasked with combing through government regulations line by line.

0:12:07.380 --> 0:12:10.980
<v Speaker 8>Angus Taylor claims the overhaul could deliver $ 40 billion in

0:12:11.100 --> 0:12:12.860
<v Speaker 8>annual savings for businesses.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 3>So in just over a decade, the cost of complying

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 3>with federal regulation has more than doubled.

0:12:19.340 --> 0:12:21.260
<v Speaker 10>The Liberal and National parties will.

0:12:21.130 --> 0:12:24.750
<v Speaker 9>Undertake an ambitious program of regulatory reform.

0:12:25.110 --> 0:12:28.750
<v Speaker 8>Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously outlined Labor's own plan to

0:12:28.790 --> 0:12:33.540
<v Speaker 8>revive stagnant productivity growth, promising to cut regulatory costs by

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:34.980
<v Speaker 8>more than $ 10.

0:12:34.300 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 10>Billion a year.

0:12:35.420 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 8>A Senate inquiry is underway into the Albanese government's proposed

0:12:39.500 --> 0:12:43.350
<v Speaker 8>digital duty of care legislation. Senators are set to question

0:12:43.370 --> 0:12:47.100
<v Speaker 8>the e-safety commissioner over the bill tomorrow. The Coalition is

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.540
<v Speaker 8>again warning against government overreach.

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.229
<v Speaker 1>And I've raised concerns that that could mean that material

0:12:52.270 --> 0:12:55.290
<v Speaker 1>which is critical of the government's climate change on net

0:12:55.309 --> 0:12:56.070
<v Speaker 1>zero policies.

0:12:56.610 --> 0:13:00.010
<v Speaker 2>Could technically be shut down if this power was abused. Right.

0:13:00.050 --> 0:13:02.950
<v Speaker 5>Now, I'm not talking about the quality of those arguments, right?

0:13:03.190 --> 0:13:03.410
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:13:03.710 --> 0:13:05.110
<v Speaker 5>You could sit on any side of this debate.

0:13:05.130 --> 0:13:08.190
<v Speaker 2>It's the power. It's the unlimited nature of the power.

0:13:08.270 --> 0:13:12.380
<v Speaker 8>Jewish and Muslim organisations are backing a separate Greens proposal

0:13:12.429 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 8>to make tech giants legally accountable for harmful content targeting

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.700
<v Speaker 8>people because of their race or religion.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:24.020
<v Speaker 2>All right, that new federal polling today revealing that voters

0:13:24.059 --> 0:13:27.069
<v Speaker 2>are losing trust in the Prime Minister. And the Marrickville

0:13:27.150 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Golf Club scandal, we revealed it first here on the show,

0:13:30.980 --> 0:13:36.110
<v Speaker 2>has been a key driver of discontent. The latest data

0:13:36.130 --> 0:13:38.890
<v Speaker 2>from the Resolve Political Monitor shows that only 20% of

0:13:38.929 --> 0:13:43.270
<v Speaker 2>those polls say they trust what Anthony Albanese says. And

0:13:43.290 --> 0:13:46.220
<v Speaker 2>we have to factor in Labor's primary vote, down to

0:13:46.250 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a record low 26% in the latest Redbridge polling. As

0:13:50.340 --> 0:13:52.380
<v Speaker 2>the coalition, we saw a move in there as far

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>as I said, 25%. It's now moving closer and closer

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.380
<v Speaker 2>to the government. Here to discuss the detail, Redbridge Group

0:13:59.420 --> 0:14:02.750
<v Speaker 2>Australia Director, Cos Samaras. Well, Cos, this is a bit

0:14:02.790 --> 0:14:05.830
<v Speaker 2>like the grand final season for you and I. We've

0:14:05.850 --> 0:14:08.170
<v Speaker 2>got this big poll obviously in Victoria. We'll get to

0:14:08.210 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that in a tick. But this is a damning indictment.

0:14:12.690 --> 0:14:15.770
<v Speaker 2>on character for the Prime Minister. And I mentioned at

0:14:15.790 --> 0:14:17.569
<v Speaker 2>the top of the show, there's things you can fix

0:14:17.630 --> 0:14:22.010
<v Speaker 2>in polling and there's things that are very hard, like character,

0:14:22.610 --> 0:14:24.989
<v Speaker 2>and this is starting to feel like it's baked in.

0:14:26.250 --> 0:14:28.910
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, if we look at what's going on at the moment,

0:14:28.950 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 12>the coalition's picked up a significant amount of support and

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 12>it's largely due to the state of the economy. So

0:14:35.740 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 12>I've always had a hypothesis that sooner or later most

0:14:41.220 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 12>voters will start basically complaining about what's happened to them

0:14:45.460 --> 0:14:47.940
<v Speaker 12>in the past and worried about what's going on right now.

0:14:48.540 --> 0:14:51.700
<v Speaker 12>So five interest rates rises later.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 7>We've seen the consequences of that.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.620
<v Speaker 12>And, you know, to the benefit of the coalition, they

0:14:57.970 --> 0:15:00.670
<v Speaker 12>are gaining ground because of the economy. And that's the

0:15:00.730 --> 0:15:03.790
<v Speaker 12>area they need to focus on. And so I think

0:15:03.830 --> 0:15:07.390
<v Speaker 12>that what we're seeing here is probably a trend that

0:15:07.410 --> 0:15:11.050
<v Speaker 12>we're going to see into next year unless the economy

0:15:11.070 --> 0:15:11.650
<v Speaker 12>turns around.

0:15:13.270 --> 0:15:16.390
<v Speaker 2>So they don't buy Jim Chalmers' argument that this is

0:15:16.430 --> 0:15:18.890
<v Speaker 2>all to do with the Iran war or Ukraine or

0:15:18.930 --> 0:15:19.820
<v Speaker 2>it's not our fault?

0:15:20.820 --> 0:15:21.700
<v Speaker 7>They've got mixed views.

0:15:21.740 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 12>They'll say it's the overseas conflict because, of course, the

0:15:25.180 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 12>petrol bowser doesn't lie to them. They know what's happened

0:15:27.660 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 12>over the last six months. But they also would say, well,

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.860
<v Speaker 12>you know, politicians are not really doing enough to actually

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.500
<v Speaker 12>fix this problem either. They just, you know, put them

0:15:38.540 --> 0:15:41.140
<v Speaker 12>all in the one basket. They push that basket into

0:15:41.180 --> 0:15:44.190
<v Speaker 12>a room. And on the front of the door is

0:15:44.230 --> 0:15:47.130
<v Speaker 12>a sign called decision makers, all of them. And so

0:15:47.150 --> 0:15:50.250
<v Speaker 12>if you're an incumbent, you're in trouble, right? Trump will

0:15:50.290 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 12>tell you that. In this country, the riots in Italy,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 12>in France, these are all to do with inflationary pressures

0:15:58.860 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 12>on people.

0:15:59.620 --> 0:16:02.270
<v Speaker 7>And you would not want to be in government right now.

0:16:04.100 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that the only dead weight in the 26% primary?

0:16:06.580 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Because that is a sort of suicidal number for Labor.

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>They need a primary at least with a good strong

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.460
<v Speaker 2>three in front of it. What else is driving those numbers?

0:16:16.070 --> 0:16:18.270
<v Speaker 12>Well, lack of vision I think is probably the other thing.

0:16:19.590 --> 0:16:22.830
<v Speaker 12>Most Australians know they are living in a world that

0:16:22.870 --> 0:16:25.570
<v Speaker 12>is now far more complex than they grew up in.

0:16:26.790 --> 0:16:29.290
<v Speaker 12>For a lot of them, particularly the younger ones, they've

0:16:29.410 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 12>never seen anything like it. And so they know that

0:16:32.460 --> 0:16:36.490
<v Speaker 12>the fix is complex. and it needs leadership. And that's what's,

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.870
<v Speaker 12>I think, missing across the political spectrum. I think the

0:16:40.270 --> 0:16:42.470
<v Speaker 12>coalition is getting a little bit better at it, but

0:16:42.510 --> 0:16:45.290
<v Speaker 12>they really need to focus on their brand equity, which

0:16:45.350 --> 0:16:47.650
<v Speaker 12>is the economy, and they seem to be doing that

0:16:47.670 --> 0:16:50.460
<v Speaker 12>over the last month or so, and it's bearing dividends

0:16:50.500 --> 0:16:50.780
<v Speaker 12>for them.

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.100
<v Speaker 2>Talk to me about Victoria. I know you're in the

0:16:54.140 --> 0:16:57.660
<v Speaker 2>field at the moment. You'll have some analysis tomorrow out

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.030
<v Speaker 2>and published in relation to a Victorian poll. Is there

0:17:01.070 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 2>any headwinds? for Labor Victoria coming out of Labor Canberra

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>or vice versa?

0:17:10.380 --> 0:17:12.220
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, look, I think what's going on in Victoria is

0:17:12.260 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 12>pretty clear. I think that Labor's primary is in the

0:17:15.700 --> 0:17:19.699
<v Speaker 12>low 20s. I think they've gone backwards since they've swapped leaders.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 12>It's not to say that the previous administration was going

0:17:23.140 --> 0:17:25.979
<v Speaker 12>to fare any better in this campaign, but the more

0:17:26.220 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 12>Victorians switch onto the campaign.

0:17:27.859 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 7>The more they're basically moving away from Labor.

0:17:30.810 --> 0:17:32.990
<v Speaker 12>And what we are seeing is also a decline in

0:17:33.130 --> 0:17:36.550
<v Speaker 12>One Nation support and all of that's flowing to the coalition.

0:17:37.130 --> 0:17:40.090
<v Speaker 12>So right now, based on our analysis, and we've got

0:17:40.130 --> 0:17:43.380
<v Speaker 12>a pot coming up again this week, the coalition's winning

0:17:43.690 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 12>what we would define as a lot of these sort

0:17:45.740 --> 0:17:48.740
<v Speaker 12>of three-way contests. There's at least 35 of them, that

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 12>is 35 state seats in Victoria that are genuinely three-way contests.

0:17:54.100 --> 0:17:57.030
<v Speaker 12>But in the early part of this year, half of

0:17:57.070 --> 0:18:00.220
<v Speaker 12>them will be one by One Nation. But because the

0:18:00.270 --> 0:18:03.609
<v Speaker 12>coalition's increased its primary, it's now winning most of them.

0:18:04.030 --> 0:18:06.750
<v Speaker 12>And so with a primary in the low 30s, they

0:18:06.770 --> 0:18:10.630
<v Speaker 12>could get well over 50 seats. And for your viewers, though,

0:18:10.869 --> 0:18:14.010
<v Speaker 12>not in Victoria, the magic number's 45.

0:18:14.010 --> 0:18:15.710
<v Speaker 7>And that's the new paradigm we're now living in.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:17.820
<v Speaker 12>And this is why I think the federal numbers are

0:18:17.900 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 12>also getting very close to that Victorian paradigm.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.540
<v Speaker 7>And so those in Labor at a federal level will

0:18:22.580 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 7>be very worried.

0:18:25.220 --> 0:18:27.209
<v Speaker 2>We'll see what happens because I think everyone on election

0:18:27.250 --> 0:18:29.729
<v Speaker 2>night will have their own take on this and it'll have,

0:18:30.210 --> 0:18:34.010
<v Speaker 2>I think, national ramifications, particularly for the Canberrans or those

0:18:34.050 --> 0:18:35.570
<v Speaker 2>based out of Canberra. Cos, thank you. Good luck with

0:18:35.590 --> 0:18:38.489
<v Speaker 2>the poll tomorrow. I'll certainly be covering it here. All right,

0:18:38.510 --> 0:18:40.550
<v Speaker 2>let's go to the other news around the country. We'll

0:18:40.570 --> 0:18:44.060
<v Speaker 2>bring in our political contributor, Chris Yeoman. Chris, just this

0:18:44.130 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 2>point on trust with the Prime Minister, I made the

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 2>point at the top of the show, you know, often

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>it's the little things that voters can understand. They can

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>digest what $ 6 million look like. Two or three billion

0:18:55.619 --> 0:18:58.389
<v Speaker 2>or hundreds of millions is a lot of money. But

0:18:58.410 --> 0:19:01.250
<v Speaker 2>when they look at the Prime Minister's mates literally over

0:19:01.270 --> 0:19:04.609
<v Speaker 2>the back fence of his investment property in Marrickville getting

0:19:04.630 --> 0:19:08.590
<v Speaker 2>a $ 6 million grant, not a lot of transparency, some

0:19:08.650 --> 0:19:12.730
<v Speaker 2>dodgy responses from the Prime Minister in the Parliament, and

0:19:12.780 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that's just another reason on top of all the other

0:19:15.300 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 2>lies where they don't trust the bloke anymore.

0:19:21.250 --> 0:19:24.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Peter, it's a cumulative thing, and we've seen big

0:19:24.130 --> 0:19:26.790
<v Speaker 1>things and small things, and I'm sure that you're right,

0:19:26.830 --> 0:19:29.340
<v Speaker 1>that the golf club has resonated with people and it

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.500
<v Speaker 1>fits a pattern of behaviour. But I think if I

0:19:31.540 --> 0:19:33.619
<v Speaker 1>could pick out two things that they know that he

0:19:33.660 --> 0:19:35.980
<v Speaker 1>went to the last election saying he wouldn't change, it

0:19:36.020 --> 0:19:38.340
<v Speaker 1>was negative gearing and capital gains tax. And what they've

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.090
<v Speaker 1>seen now is their lifestyle has been directly, materially affected

0:19:42.530 --> 0:19:46.050
<v Speaker 1>by the decisions of government for the worse. Now, we've

0:19:46.090 --> 0:19:49.010
<v Speaker 1>seen what happens to governments that do that to people.

0:19:49.030 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>We saw it just recently. in the United States where

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:57.870
<v Speaker 1>people blamed President Trump's war on their lifestyle becoming materially worse.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:02.030
<v Speaker 1>And I think in the long run, it's that lie

0:20:02.070 --> 0:20:04.830
<v Speaker 1>that's going to weigh most heavily with the government, that

0:20:04.990 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>breach of promise that is doing things in the electorate,

0:20:08.780 --> 0:20:10.619
<v Speaker 1>they're going to feel for a very long time. And

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.510
<v Speaker 1>we are a long way from finished with prices rising.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.530
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to energy then. This report today that Chris

0:20:18.550 --> 0:20:24.270
<v Speaker 2>Bowen's got a so-called information integrity unit buried in his

0:20:24.330 --> 0:20:27.750
<v Speaker 2>department and that it's issued a kit to business and

0:20:27.790 --> 0:20:34.170
<v Speaker 2>community groups, basically a propaganda kit to spruik how Australia

0:20:34.230 --> 0:20:37.340
<v Speaker 2>is doing on climate targets and emissions, et cetera, all

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 2>ahead of the UN COP summit in Turkey. I mean,

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.340
<v Speaker 2>this is a wellion. I mean, I've never heard of

0:20:43.380 --> 0:20:47.659
<v Speaker 2>a so-called integrity unit basically to tell people what to

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.290
<v Speaker 2>say and what to think and to shut down people

0:20:50.330 --> 0:20:52.510
<v Speaker 2>like you, Chris Ullman, who want to put the facts

0:20:52.590 --> 0:20:52.930
<v Speaker 2>out there.

0:20:54.740 --> 0:20:56.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Peter, and the thing that's funniest about it, if

0:20:56.619 --> 0:20:59.260
<v Speaker 1>you weren't laughing, you would be crying, is that the

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.220
<v Speaker 1>one thing that it's not doing is anything that has

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>integrity attached to it because all of its numbers are

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.629
<v Speaker 1>misleading in some way, shape or form, particularly when it

0:21:08.730 --> 0:21:12.010
<v Speaker 1>says that we're seeing an effect on electricity prices that's

0:21:12.030 --> 0:21:15.550
<v Speaker 1>helping to keep them lower. We're seeing precisely the opposite effect.

0:21:15.970 --> 0:21:18.330
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bowen can keep talking to wholesale prices as long

0:21:18.369 --> 0:21:21.190
<v Speaker 1>as he likes. The only measure that matters to anyone

0:21:21.390 --> 0:21:24.950
<v Speaker 1>is the retail price of electricity. That's gone up 36%

0:21:24.950 --> 0:21:27.820
<v Speaker 1>under Labor. And when they talk always about these giant

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.020
<v Speaker 1>strides they've been making around the world when it comes

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.379
<v Speaker 1>to the amount of electricity being generated, that's 20% of

0:21:34.420 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the energy system in the world. What we see with

0:21:37.030 --> 0:21:39.330
<v Speaker 1>the world's energy system, we burned more coal, oil and

0:21:39.350 --> 0:21:41.970
<v Speaker 1>gas last year than ever before in a single year

0:21:42.010 --> 0:21:45.950
<v Speaker 1>in human history. and 86% of the world's energy comes

0:21:45.990 --> 0:21:49.389
<v Speaker 1>from coal, oil and gas. So they're making nary a

0:21:49.450 --> 0:21:51.530
<v Speaker 1>dent on it. The only thing that they are having

0:21:51.590 --> 0:21:56.930
<v Speaker 1>victories with is making ever more large piles of boulderdash

0:21:56.970 --> 0:21:58.110
<v Speaker 1>that we have to jump over.

0:22:00.330 --> 0:22:04.350
<v Speaker 2>Also, the business leaders have spoken out about this propaganda unit.

0:22:04.390 --> 0:22:07.670
<v Speaker 2>You've got Twiggy Forrest saying go harder and go faster

0:22:07.710 --> 0:22:11.129
<v Speaker 2>in terms of phasing out fossil fuels. And good on

0:22:11.190 --> 0:22:14.129
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Stokes. He's saying, well, hang on, we've got a

0:22:14.190 --> 0:22:17.170
<v Speaker 2>lot of economic challenges here at home. We've got obviously

0:22:17.190 --> 0:22:20.890
<v Speaker 2>an energy challenge. We've got problems with industry leaving Australia,

0:22:21.310 --> 0:22:26.419
<v Speaker 2>some requiring subsidy because promised power outputs and reliability from

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>renewables are not there anymore. I mean, when you've got

0:22:30.460 --> 0:22:33.900
<v Speaker 2>government basically telling business what to say and we know

0:22:33.940 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that government can punish business if they don't dance to

0:22:37.619 --> 0:22:41.050
<v Speaker 2>the government's tune, This is a huge integrity worry of

0:22:41.090 --> 0:22:41.550
<v Speaker 2>its own.

0:22:43.510 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, if Twiggy Forrest wants to do something about

0:22:46.490 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel developments and to shut them down, you know

0:22:49.300 --> 0:22:51.460
<v Speaker 1>where he can start, Peter? He can start with a

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:56.780
<v Speaker 1>liquefied natural gas import terminal that he's building in Port Kembla,

0:22:56.820 --> 0:22:57.619
<v Speaker 1>Squadron Energy.

0:22:57.660 --> 0:22:58.250
<v Speaker 10>He owns it.

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>It's building it. He rails against export terminals on the

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.260
<v Speaker 1>West Coast and is setting up business to import natural

0:23:05.300 --> 0:23:08.090
<v Speaker 1>gas on West the East Coast, and guess what price

0:23:08.109 --> 0:23:09.649
<v Speaker 1>we're going to pay? We're going to pay the international

0:23:09.690 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>price of gas, of Twiggy Forest's gas. And by the way,

0:23:12.230 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what happened to all that green hydrogen that he promised?

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.859
<v Speaker 1>How much taxpayer money got funnelled into that and how

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:23.060
<v Speaker 1>much has been returned? I think Twiggy Forest lacks all

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.350
<v Speaker 1>credibility when it comes to these kinds of debates, and

0:23:26.390 --> 0:23:29.109
<v Speaker 1>at least Kerry Stokes understands how things work in the

0:23:29.210 --> 0:23:31.450
<v Speaker 1>real world and he's trying to get people to focus

0:23:31.950 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on that. So spare us... The billionaires who are telling

0:23:35.140 --> 0:23:36.740
<v Speaker 1>us how we should live our lives and what we

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.350
<v Speaker 1>should do, and they are never, ever affected by the

0:23:39.390 --> 0:23:41.590
<v Speaker 1>price of electricity. He would not know what his electricity

0:23:41.630 --> 0:23:41.970
<v Speaker 1>price is.

0:23:43.990 --> 0:23:46.290
<v Speaker 2>You don't miss Chris Yeoman. I'll give you another one

0:23:46.310 --> 0:23:48.740
<v Speaker 2>to bowl up to now. Simon Holmes at court. We

0:23:48.780 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 2>all know him. He's the big backer of the Teals,

0:23:50.820 --> 0:23:55.260
<v Speaker 2>of course. He wants to raise $ 1. 1 billion in donations

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 2>by 2031 because he wants to get involved in what

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.740
<v Speaker 2>we've seen play out in the United States where a

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.090
<v Speaker 2>group over there claims it's shut down or prevented from

0:24:05.130 --> 0:24:07.980
<v Speaker 2>being built, perhaps is the best way to express it,

0:24:08.310 --> 0:24:12.170
<v Speaker 2>some 300-plus coal plants that He wants the same thing here.

0:24:12.190 --> 0:24:14.820
<v Speaker 2>And I know why he does, because you can see

0:24:14.859 --> 0:24:18.340
<v Speaker 2>from our power trajectory, our energy trajectory, we're going to

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 2>have to do something on coal, certainly something on gas.

0:24:21.780 --> 0:24:23.580
<v Speaker 2>The idea that we're going to get to 2030 and

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.300
<v Speaker 2>be able to turn all of this off is a nonsense.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:29.900
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it is a complete nonsense, which means that these

0:24:29.940 --> 0:24:32.180
<v Speaker 1>coal-fired power stations are going to have to stay open

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>longer than was planned. And of course, That won't do

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for people like Simon Holmes, of course. Now, to give

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.250
<v Speaker 1>him his due, he's been massively effective in being able

0:24:40.290 --> 0:24:43.830
<v Speaker 1>to marshal the millions of dollars that come from supporters

0:24:43.869 --> 0:24:47.209
<v Speaker 1>of people like the Teals to this cause. By the way,

0:24:47.270 --> 0:24:50.149
<v Speaker 1>imagine if a coal-fired power plant racked up an enormous

0:24:50.190 --> 0:24:52.260
<v Speaker 1>amount of money to give to candidates to run in

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.220
<v Speaker 1>an election. Would we have problems with that? And by

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.380
<v Speaker 1>the way, millions of dollars does pour into Australia every

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.580
<v Speaker 1>year anyway through a group called the Sunrise Project, which

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.389
<v Speaker 1>is now dispersed among all of the environmental groups, which

0:25:04.450 --> 0:25:07.010
<v Speaker 1>is why in Australia we uniquely have the case where

0:25:07.070 --> 0:25:10.090
<v Speaker 1>everyone argues for wind, solar and batteries and nothing else,

0:25:10.190 --> 0:25:12.530
<v Speaker 1>because that's how some of the money that comes into

0:25:12.550 --> 0:25:15.690
<v Speaker 1>the coffers of these environmental groups is distributed. Now, they've

0:25:15.710 --> 0:25:18.210
<v Speaker 1>been very, very successful in the past. But by the way,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.660
<v Speaker 1>does a group like this exist in China, which burns 56%

0:25:21.660 --> 0:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>of the world's coal? Wouldn't it be better if they

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.619
<v Speaker 1>spent their money somewhere where it could actually have a

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.100
<v Speaker 1>greater effect than trying to shut down the last of

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.580
<v Speaker 1>the coal-fired power plants in Australia, which are actually keeping

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.810
<v Speaker 1>prices down hand the lights on, but, you know, they've

0:25:34.830 --> 0:25:36.910
<v Speaker 1>got the money and they can spend it however they like.

0:25:36.930 --> 0:25:39.300
<v Speaker 1>But they've had a very big effect on politics in Australia.

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.310
<v Speaker 2>Too hard for them, Chris Yulman. You're both clever and

0:25:44.330 --> 0:25:46.970
<v Speaker 2>you're articulate. Keep it up. I love it. Keep it up.

0:25:47.630 --> 0:25:49.689
<v Speaker 2>Quick break. After the break, we'll go out and get

0:25:49.710 --> 0:25:51.690
<v Speaker 2>an update from Georgie Dickerson. She's been out on the

0:25:51.710 --> 0:25:55.090
<v Speaker 2>campaign trail. I promised you one every single night until

0:25:55.190 --> 0:25:58.410
<v Speaker 2>polling day. Some terrible crime over the weekend in Victoria.

0:25:58.430 --> 0:26:01.050
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that, of course. And that Herald Sun

0:26:01.130 --> 0:26:09.070
<v Speaker 2>poll today, Labor in a world of pain. Welcome back.

0:26:09.109 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we've got some drama in relation to hospitals.

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:16.230
<v Speaker 2>A very strong report today. about how bad things are

0:26:16.270 --> 0:26:19.690
<v Speaker 2>with public hospitals and ambulances in particular. We'll get to

0:26:19.730 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 2>that in a moment. But the latest from the Victorian

0:26:22.340 --> 0:26:26.590
<v Speaker 2>campaign trail marred, of course, on the weekend by another

0:26:26.690 --> 0:26:32.100
<v Speaker 2>senseless stabbing, this time involving a Chinese national, a delivery

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.389
<v Speaker 2>worker in the CBD on the weekend. Here to discuss it,

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 2>our News 24 reporter, Georgie Dickinson, who I must say, Georgie,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.590
<v Speaker 2>is playing a blinder in this campaign. I'm watching you

0:26:41.630 --> 0:26:45.530
<v Speaker 2>every day. You're absolutely everywhere. Good on you. This father

0:26:45.590 --> 0:26:48.710
<v Speaker 2>of two, this stabbing, this fatal stabbing on the weekend,

0:26:49.130 --> 0:26:50.010
<v Speaker 2>what can you tell us about it?

0:26:52.420 --> 0:26:55.300
<v Speaker 13>It was a horrific incident on the weekend, Peter, and

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 13>today politicians have really been calling out this senseless act.

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.950
<v Speaker 11>We'd heard from the opposition leader. She had said that people.

0:27:01.660 --> 0:27:04.010
<v Speaker 13>Deserve to go to work and come home safely, but

0:27:04.030 --> 0:27:06.570
<v Speaker 13>they also deserve a justice system that's going to hold

0:27:06.910 --> 0:27:07.910
<v Speaker 13>people to account.

0:27:08.210 --> 0:27:09.770
<v Speaker 11>We spoke to the police minister as.

0:27:09.710 --> 0:27:13.090
<v Speaker 13>Well, Paul Edbrook, today, who obviously condemned the incident, but

0:27:13.170 --> 0:27:15.850
<v Speaker 13>I specifically asked him if he thought that people should

0:27:15.890 --> 0:27:18.710
<v Speaker 13>feel safe in Melbourne's CBD given some of these senseless

0:27:18.790 --> 0:27:21.530
<v Speaker 13>incidents happening. that we have seen. He said, yes, people

0:27:21.570 --> 0:27:25.149
<v Speaker 13>should feel safe, that he believes crime is going down. But,

0:27:25.190 --> 0:27:28.410
<v Speaker 13>of course, that takes... Obviously, this family is now grieving

0:27:28.690 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 13>the death of their dad, their husband.

0:27:31.340 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 11>The person allegedly responsible actually appeared in court today.

0:27:34.700 --> 0:27:38.500
<v Speaker 13>He's a 51-year-old man that has been charged with murder.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.180
<v Speaker 13>He will next appear in court in April next year. Peter?

0:27:44.010 --> 0:27:48.990
<v Speaker 2>What about the Premier? He's had a shocking poll out today. 18%

0:27:48.990 --> 0:27:52.379
<v Speaker 2>primary vote there, of course. There's another one looming. I've

0:27:52.410 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 2>got some numbers there just dropping now from Resolve. But

0:27:55.500 --> 0:27:57.980
<v Speaker 2>also you've got him missing in action a couple of

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 2>days last week. His deputy had to go out on

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.340
<v Speaker 2>his own bus. He was nowhere to be found. How's

0:28:03.380 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 2>he going, Georgie?

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, of course, this is the final few weeks of

0:28:09.180 --> 0:28:11.620
<v Speaker 13>the campaign, just under three weeks to go, so you'd

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 13>probably expect the Premier to be out every day. But

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 13>today we did hear from the Premier in terms of

0:28:17.060 --> 0:28:20.060
<v Speaker 13>this latest polling, and it obviously isn't spelling good news

0:28:20.100 --> 0:28:21.340
<v Speaker 13>for Premier Ben Carroll.

0:28:21.380 --> 0:28:24.700
<v Speaker 11>Jess Wilson really... soaring ahead in these polling.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.730
<v Speaker 13>She's definitely the preferred Premier according to that latest poll

0:28:27.750 --> 0:28:28.730
<v Speaker 13>that we have seen.

0:28:29.070 --> 0:28:30.630
<v Speaker 11>But in terms of Premier, by the time.

0:28:30.450 --> 0:28:33.070
<v Speaker 13>The election does come around, he will have been Premier

0:28:33.109 --> 0:28:35.550
<v Speaker 13>for four months. We've continuously heard him time and time

0:28:35.590 --> 0:28:38.410
<v Speaker 13>again say he is a new Premier. But in terms

0:28:38.470 --> 0:28:41.830
<v Speaker 13>of if the message is cutting through to Victorian voters,

0:28:41.910 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 13>it seems Labor still has a long way to go

0:28:44.460 --> 0:28:46.580
<v Speaker 13>with just under three weeks to go. Peter?

0:28:48.100 --> 0:28:50.340
<v Speaker 2>You're going to hold up my mug again. There's three

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.260
<v Speaker 2>faces on there. It's all the one government. Three mugs

0:28:53.300 --> 0:28:55.870
<v Speaker 2>and a mug. There you go. I don't think he's

0:28:56.110 --> 0:28:59.709
<v Speaker 2>all that new. Talk to me about the announcement today

0:29:00.070 --> 0:29:05.260
<v Speaker 2>from Jess Wilson. This Good Samaritans law, if she's elected,

0:29:05.500 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 2>what will this change mean?

0:29:09.620 --> 0:29:12.530
<v Speaker 13>So in terms of this, it's named after Aidan Becker,

0:29:12.550 --> 0:29:15.610
<v Speaker 13>Aidan's Law. Aidan Becker was a young man who had

0:29:15.650 --> 0:29:17.130
<v Speaker 13>stepped in to intervene.

0:29:17.190 --> 0:29:19.930
<v Speaker 11>He was being a Good Samaritan, trying to assist.

0:29:19.970 --> 0:29:24.190
<v Speaker 13>A young teenager who was being robbed and he died.

0:29:24.310 --> 0:29:27.210
<v Speaker 13>And that's why the Coalition is trying to implement this

0:29:27.260 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 13>Good Samaritan to essentially give... More credit if there is

0:29:31.540 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 13>an aggravated assault on someone that is going to be

0:29:34.340 --> 0:29:37.370
<v Speaker 13>stepping in when the court hands down sentences to these

0:29:37.450 --> 0:29:39.890
<v Speaker 13>people responsible for those actions.

0:29:39.930 --> 0:29:41.490
<v Speaker 11>So they say that they want to bring this in.

0:29:41.750 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 13>They stood side by side with Aidan Becker's mother today

0:29:44.930 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 13>in making this announcement. Then later this afternoon, the Premier,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 13>Ben Carroll, announced that Labor would also bring in Aidan's

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 13>law as well.

0:29:53.020 --> 0:29:54.980
<v Speaker 11>He said... that it had already.

0:29:54.780 --> 0:29:56.740
<v Speaker 13>Been in the works but announced it just a few

0:29:56.780 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 13>hours after.

0:29:57.420 --> 0:29:58.620
<v Speaker 11>The Coalition did today.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 13>We pressed him on the details if it was exactly

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:02.500
<v Speaker 13>the same.

0:30:02.340 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 11>Thing and he did say it would be the exact

0:30:04.900 --> 0:30:05.740
<v Speaker 11>same law.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 13>So, Peter, it looks like no matter who wins come

0:30:08.700 --> 0:30:11.700
<v Speaker 13>November 28, that that law would then be put in place.

0:30:13.330 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, that I think we can all agree on is

0:30:15.030 --> 0:30:18.030
<v Speaker 2>a good move. Georgie Dickinson, thank you very much. Let's

0:30:18.090 --> 0:30:20.890
<v Speaker 2>go now to the Victorian political editor at The Australian,

0:30:21.210 --> 0:30:24.500
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Galloway, who joins me here. Just so we've got

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.220
<v Speaker 2>these numbers, I was just talking to Costa Maris a

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 2>moment ago. This is the Resolve poll for people at home.

0:30:28.940 --> 0:30:30.460
<v Speaker 2>It'll be in the papers tomorrow, but I've got it

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.700
<v Speaker 2>for you now. Labor's primary vote there has fallen from

0:30:33.700 --> 0:30:37.730
<v Speaker 2>27 down to 22, not as low as the 18

0:30:37.730 --> 0:30:39.990
<v Speaker 2>we saw in another poll today, but that's a huge

0:30:40.070 --> 0:30:43.790
<v Speaker 2>drop there. One Nation steady on 23. We've got the

0:30:43.850 --> 0:30:48.850
<v Speaker 2>coalition falling, sorry, increasing from 28 in the last poll

0:30:48.890 --> 0:30:52.530
<v Speaker 2>now to 30. And this is interesting because in the

0:30:52.610 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>last poll today we had a 17% lift for the Greens,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.860
<v Speaker 2>so 17 primary is huge. In this poll... They've fallen

0:31:00.940 --> 0:31:04.940
<v Speaker 2>from 15 down to 13. That surprises me. Give me

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:05.940
<v Speaker 2>your take on these numbers.

0:31:06.620 --> 0:31:09.350
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think we're seeing what I think people in

0:31:09.370 --> 0:31:13.050
<v Speaker 4>the coalition always insisted would happen earlier in the year

0:31:13.110 --> 0:31:16.410
<v Speaker 4>where we saw that kind of primary vote with One Nation.

0:31:16.110 --> 0:31:18.410
<v Speaker 2>Neck and neck. Consolidation.

0:31:18.650 --> 0:31:21.810
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the choice kind of came closer and voters kind

0:31:21.830 --> 0:31:24.900
<v Speaker 4>of actually thought about who were the two choices about

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 4>who could be premier. You're seeing the coalition's vote increased.

0:31:29.370 --> 0:31:32.510
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the problem for Ben Carroll is proving the counterfactual.

0:31:32.530 --> 0:31:37.010
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Newspoll has a four-point fall in Labor's primary

0:31:37.050 --> 0:31:40.670
<v Speaker 4>vote since Jacinta Allen. Resolve has a five-point fall. The

0:31:40.710 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Demos poll, I think, was even more than that. And

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe this would have happened under Jacinta Allen as that

0:31:46.140 --> 0:31:49.820
<v Speaker 4>choice kind of became closer towards polling day. But proving

0:31:49.860 --> 0:31:54.239
<v Speaker 4>that counterfactual is difficult. The facts stand that support for

0:31:54.270 --> 0:31:57.610
<v Speaker 4>Labor has gone down even further since the leadership change.

0:31:57.650 --> 0:31:58.790
<v Speaker 4>So it hasn't worked.

0:31:59.780 --> 0:32:02.740
<v Speaker 2>I think too, you know, the debt issues crystallise for people.

0:32:02.780 --> 0:32:06.620
<v Speaker 2>They understand it obviously. Labor's sort of saying we've got

0:32:06.660 --> 0:32:08.930
<v Speaker 2>a house in order in relation to crime and then

0:32:08.970 --> 0:32:10.930
<v Speaker 2>you have a stabbing like we had on the weekend.

0:32:11.730 --> 0:32:14.550
<v Speaker 2>They can't hide from this. It's in the headlines every

0:32:14.590 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 2>single day and I can't find anyone when I'm talking.

0:32:17.540 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Not everyone's saying they're voting Liberal when I talk to them,

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 2>but they are all saying we have to get rid

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of Labor because Some haven't landed their vote yet, but

0:32:25.820 --> 0:32:27.860
<v Speaker 2>they've made the decision to walk away.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.100
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've talked to lifelong Labor voters that are either

0:32:31.140 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 4>voting One Nation or Coalition, not voting Labor for the

0:32:34.020 --> 0:32:36.620
<v Speaker 4>first time. And I think that might explain why the

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Greens vote might be high. We'll see. But the Greens

0:32:40.700 --> 0:32:43.860
<v Speaker 4>have been very bullish in the inner city and could

0:32:43.900 --> 0:32:48.970
<v Speaker 4>win up to three Labor seats later. and, you know,

0:32:49.330 --> 0:32:51.930
<v Speaker 4>and defend Richmond against Labor, which Labor has been going

0:32:52.190 --> 0:32:55.380
<v Speaker 4>hard after. Labor's been saying on that point, you know,

0:32:55.420 --> 0:32:57.300
<v Speaker 4>voters will come home to us when there's this kind

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.580
<v Speaker 4>of right-wing threat of One Nation, but I don't think

0:33:00.620 --> 0:33:03.610
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing that materialise in the polls. Wherever you're looking,

0:33:03.630 --> 0:33:05.970
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the inner city, whether it's the suburbs or

0:33:06.010 --> 0:33:09.150
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the regions, it's just not good news for

0:33:09.190 --> 0:33:10.410
<v Speaker 4>Labor and that's their problem.

0:33:10.470 --> 0:33:12.660
<v Speaker 2>Unlikely to improve either because today's the first day of

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.460
<v Speaker 2>the Royal Commission. Nick McKenzie, the journalist at The Age

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.540
<v Speaker 2>who broke a lot of the headline stories about the corruption,

0:33:19.380 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>said he reckons by Friday Ben Carroll will think it's

0:33:22.300 --> 0:33:25.380
<v Speaker 2>the worst decision he's made to call this Royal Commission.

0:33:25.830 --> 0:33:28.550
<v Speaker 2>You watch this closely. Give me your assessment.

0:33:29.210 --> 0:33:31.310
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, the revelation is starting today on the

0:33:31.370 --> 0:33:36.150
<v Speaker 4>Gap Road project in Sunbury in Melbourne's northwest about how

0:33:36.190 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 4>the CFMEU got onto big build projects and internal memos

0:33:41.150 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 4>from John Holland raising concerns about the pressure being applied

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 4>by Jacinta Allen's office when she was the minister responsible

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 4>for these projects.

0:33:49.940 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 2>By her political office, not the department.

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.850
<v Speaker 4>Yes, asking them, you know... can you guarantee that you

0:33:55.870 --> 0:33:59.070
<v Speaker 4>can kind of manage this relationship with the CFMEU? This

0:33:59.110 --> 0:34:03.620
<v Speaker 4>was shortly after or during them taking over civil work.

0:34:03.660 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 4>So the AWU used to always do these projects. The

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.259
<v Speaker 4>CFMEU built apartments.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:09.940
<v Speaker 2>But there's been a long turf war about some of

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>these unions in Victoria. Yeah. And the harder left the

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 2>unions are, the more they've profited under the left faction

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.229
<v Speaker 2>of Dan Andrews and Jacinta Allen.

0:34:19.510 --> 0:34:20.150
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's the question.

0:34:20.210 --> 0:34:23.300
<v Speaker 4>The CFMEU then was, you know, one of the strongest

0:34:23.340 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 4>support bases within the socialist left, which is Alan and

0:34:26.380 --> 0:34:30.259
<v Speaker 4>Andrew's faction. So no doubt Alan, she's not going to

0:34:30.300 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 4>be called this side of the election, but no doubt

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.370
<v Speaker 4>she will be called. And you could only watch that

0:34:35.550 --> 0:34:39.830
<v Speaker 4>opening hearing and today's hearing to really realise that the

0:34:39.850 --> 0:34:44.009
<v Speaker 4>Royal Commissioner and the senior council assisting have Alan in

0:34:44.050 --> 0:34:48.250
<v Speaker 4>their sights, you know, the kind of project's And the

0:34:48.290 --> 0:34:52.350
<v Speaker 4>questions they're already asking that, you know, Jacinta Allen is

0:34:52.650 --> 0:34:55.910
<v Speaker 4>an early target, so to speak, for them. And no

0:34:55.930 --> 0:34:56.910
<v Speaker 4>doubt she's going to be called.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.419
<v Speaker 2>I know from federal analysis there are some key seats

0:35:00.460 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 2>in the Melbourne metro area that are really impacted by

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.900
<v Speaker 2>Chinese language speaking voters. Story today that there's been a

0:35:07.940 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 2>real push by Labor and the coalition to speak in

0:35:11.460 --> 0:35:16.020
<v Speaker 2>Mandarin to a lot of these communities. That's absolutely going

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:16.900
<v Speaker 2>to move votes, isn't it?

0:35:17.380 --> 0:35:24.020
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think across the board, whether it's Indians, Chinese, Italians, Greeks,

0:35:24.340 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 4>the Liberals have been doing a lot better at this election,

0:35:27.980 --> 0:35:34.030
<v Speaker 4>actually reaching voters where they are and speaking to those communities. But, yeah,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.910
<v Speaker 4>it's been especially apparent, you know, on those Chinese language platforms.

0:35:38.310 --> 0:35:40.370
<v Speaker 2>That's where Dan Andrews pushed really hard. I know he

0:35:40.410 --> 0:35:43.210
<v Speaker 2>did a lot of stuff even for the federal election

0:35:43.230 --> 0:35:46.330
<v Speaker 2>when he was not the Premier. I wonder how effective

0:35:46.350 --> 0:35:47.069
<v Speaker 2>he'll be this time.

0:35:47.420 --> 0:35:49.580
<v Speaker 4>Well, Labor's been doing this stuff well, I would say,

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.529
<v Speaker 4>for successive elections and when it pertains to the Chinese community,

0:35:54.010 --> 0:35:56.950
<v Speaker 4>helped along by some of the decisions that were made

0:35:56.989 --> 0:36:00.310
<v Speaker 4>at the federal level, particularly by the Morrison government. But

0:36:00.350 --> 0:36:02.170
<v Speaker 4>it's not about, you know, it doesn't have to be

0:36:02.210 --> 0:36:05.110
<v Speaker 4>about changing positions on foreign policy. I think the Liberals,

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's fair to say, have also just been

0:36:07.060 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 4>terrible at speaking to these communities, sometimes questioning.

0:36:10.580 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't agree more.

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes questioning their loyalty as Australian citizens, just really, you know,

0:36:15.290 --> 0:36:19.470
<v Speaker 4>really unintelligent stuff. So I think what the Victorian Liberals

0:36:19.489 --> 0:36:24.580
<v Speaker 4>have done at this election, you know, could be used

0:36:25.140 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 4>as a bit of a roadmap for the part, for

0:36:28.020 --> 0:36:30.500
<v Speaker 4>the coalition federally and in other states.

0:36:31.020 --> 0:36:32.340
<v Speaker 2>I know you're flat out, I know you're busy with

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.819
<v Speaker 2>the election campaign. This is your, as I said to Cos,

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of like your grand final like mine. So

0:36:37.380 --> 0:36:39.900
<v Speaker 2>I'm really pleased you could join me tonight. Have fun.

0:36:39.980 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Anthony. All right, quick break after the break.

0:36:42.370 --> 0:36:45.129
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget, actually, before I go, Paul Murray's got Jess

0:36:45.150 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Wilson live in the studio tonight, 9 o'clock. They'll be

0:36:48.219 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 2>taking questions on a whole range of issues. You know

0:36:50.540 --> 0:36:54.660
<v Speaker 2>the drill, crime, state debt, potholes, all of those things. Actually,

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're in the studio. I think they

0:36:55.780 --> 0:36:59.100
<v Speaker 2>might be in a pub. But you'll watch that at

0:36:59.100 --> 0:37:01.470
<v Speaker 2>9 o'clock. It'll be fantastic viewing. After the break, we're

0:37:01.489 --> 0:37:03.330
<v Speaker 2>going to get into the issues with a hospital system

0:37:03.370 --> 0:37:08.050
<v Speaker 2>about to collapse, an ambulance that called but never arrived

0:37:08.430 --> 0:37:15.620
<v Speaker 2>and patients die. That's up next. Welcome back. Coming up,

0:37:15.700 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 2>James Ashby will discuss Pauline Hanson set to appeal her

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.620
<v Speaker 2>loss to Green Senator Maureen Faruqi in the High Court.

0:37:23.219 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 2>The panel, as I said, after this next guest, but

0:37:25.820 --> 0:37:29.739
<v Speaker 2>now to revelations. The state of Victoria's health system is

0:37:29.820 --> 0:37:34.009
<v Speaker 2>close to collapse. Today, three leading health figures have laid

0:37:34.090 --> 0:37:38.570
<v Speaker 2>out the challenges facing Victoria's struggling system, and they argue

0:37:38.690 --> 0:37:41.670
<v Speaker 2>that there are key changes they say are needed to

0:37:41.850 --> 0:37:45.469
<v Speaker 2>fix it, as part of the Herald Sun's Fixing Victoria

0:37:45.570 --> 0:37:50.340
<v Speaker 2>series that's running throughout the week. AMA Victorian President Dr

0:37:50.380 --> 0:37:53.540
<v Speaker 2>Simon Judkins is one of the voices in the campaign.

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.860
<v Speaker 2>I'm pleased to say he joins me now. Dr Judkins,

0:37:56.900 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 2>thank you for your time. You say today that the

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:03.890
<v Speaker 2>health system's never been more stretched, probably stressed too, but

0:38:04.050 --> 0:38:07.090
<v Speaker 2>stretched than it is now, and you point to long

0:38:07.170 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 2>stays in that emergency and in other circumstances. Explain how

0:38:12.900 --> 0:38:17.450
<v Speaker 2>this plays out more broadly, particularly in relation to public hospitals.

0:38:18.969 --> 0:38:21.310
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thanks very much for that. And thanks so much

0:38:21.330 --> 0:38:22.009
<v Speaker 5>for having us on.

0:38:22.090 --> 0:38:24.930
<v Speaker 14>And thanks to Alex, who put the great article together

0:38:24.950 --> 0:38:27.790
<v Speaker 14>with Harold Sun. Look, I think there are a number

0:38:27.830 --> 0:38:31.810
<v Speaker 14>of indicators that we have been very concerned about that

0:38:31.830 --> 0:38:34.069
<v Speaker 14>just indicates how stretched that hospital system is.

0:38:34.150 --> 0:38:36.219
<v Speaker 5>And a lot of that is mentioned in the article.

0:38:36.900 --> 0:38:40.270
<v Speaker 14>Things like patients spending a day in our emergency departments

0:38:40.330 --> 0:38:44.230
<v Speaker 14>waiting for an inpatient bed. So these are patients who

0:38:44.250 --> 0:38:47.910
<v Speaker 14>get seen in the ED, often on an ambulance ramp,

0:38:48.790 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 14>people with fractured hips, people with appendicitis, people with strokes,

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 14>who we know within a very short period of time

0:38:54.180 --> 0:38:56.900
<v Speaker 14>that they need hospital admission, but they subsequently spend a

0:38:56.900 --> 0:39:00.430
<v Speaker 14>day in an emergency department waiting for that inpatient bed.

0:39:00.450 --> 0:39:02.710
<v Speaker 14>A lot of these are elderly patients who are confused

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.900
<v Speaker 14>with infections. And so it wasn't that long ago, 10

0:39:05.890 --> 0:39:08.540
<v Speaker 14>years ago, we thought, we declared that we wanted 24-hour

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.860
<v Speaker 14>stays in emergency departments a never event because there was

0:39:12.900 --> 0:39:16.420
<v Speaker 14>absolutely no reason why a patient should stay for 24

0:39:16.420 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 14>hours in an ED. And we know that it's detrimental

0:39:19.180 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 14>to care. We know it's a real signal of system dysfunction.

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 14>And now across Victoria, in fact, across many parts of Australia,

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 14>We have hundreds in the last quarter, I think we've

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 14>had three and a half thousand patients spending more than

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:35.489
<v Speaker 14>24 hours in emergency departments waiting for inpatient beds. So

0:39:35.530 --> 0:39:40.029
<v Speaker 14>it really is a sign of system failure, leads to

0:39:40.070 --> 0:39:43.850
<v Speaker 14>things like ambulance ramping, obviously, delays in ambulance and getting

0:39:43.890 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 14>out to communities. and patients spending delays to surgery. So

0:39:48.180 --> 0:39:51.630
<v Speaker 14>it really is an indicator of a system that's working

0:39:51.790 --> 0:39:52.790
<v Speaker 14>beyond its capacity.

0:39:54.469 --> 0:39:56.970
<v Speaker 2>So just so people can follow this at home, Simon,

0:39:56.989 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of course, if you've got someone in the bed who

0:39:59.219 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 2>isn't vacating the bed, not being put out to a ward,

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you've got someone presenting in an ambulance, they can't be admitted.

0:40:06.989 --> 0:40:11.950
<v Speaker 2>So the ambulance technicians are keeping them alive and keeping

0:40:11.969 --> 0:40:14.589
<v Speaker 2>them going in the back of the ambulance. And then

0:40:14.610 --> 0:40:16.489
<v Speaker 2>you've got the log jam where that ambulance is not

0:40:16.550 --> 0:40:19.069
<v Speaker 2>freed up to go on the road. I guess one

0:40:19.090 --> 0:40:20.980
<v Speaker 2>of the problems, and it was explained to me when

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.140
<v Speaker 2>I spoke to a few people today before this interview,

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 2>that we've got the movement of people out of hospitals

0:40:26.820 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't really occur, that inpatient transport, on the weekends.

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 2>So if you've not moved out by Friday, you're likely

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.580
<v Speaker 2>to still be there on Monday. Now, if you're not

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:38.900
<v Speaker 2>coming out of the ward and going home, you're not

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 2>coming from the ED up to the ward and you're

0:40:40.980 --> 0:40:44.990
<v Speaker 2>not coming out of the ambulance into the ED, surely

0:40:45.070 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 2>one of the quick solutions is money immediately available to

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.770
<v Speaker 2>have inpatient transfers to get people out of the wards

0:40:52.130 --> 0:40:55.830
<v Speaker 2>and home, especially our elderly, over weekends.

0:40:57.350 --> 0:40:59.609
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's interesting you say it's a quick solution because

0:40:59.630 --> 0:41:02.930
<v Speaker 14>we've been talking about this problem for decades. You know,

0:41:02.950 --> 0:41:04.990
<v Speaker 14>we've advocated for a long period of time that healthcare

0:41:05.030 --> 0:41:07.940
<v Speaker 14>is not Monday to Friday, nine to five. It's 24

0:41:07.940 --> 0:41:10.620
<v Speaker 14>hours a day, seven days a week and needs to

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:12.180
<v Speaker 14>be on weekends. And we need to get to a

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.259
<v Speaker 14>point where we have access to the same resources over

0:41:15.340 --> 0:41:18.060
<v Speaker 14>weekends than we do on Friday.

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:19.700
<v Speaker 5>I think Danny Hill made that very good point.

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.950
<v Speaker 14>If you get admitted on a Friday, your length of

0:41:21.969 --> 0:41:23.790
<v Speaker 14>stay in hospital is going to be much greater than

0:41:23.930 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 14>if you get admitted on a Monday or Tuesday. And

0:41:26.660 --> 0:41:28.700
<v Speaker 14>so to get people out of hospital at the other end,

0:41:28.780 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 14>it is quite complex.

0:41:30.180 --> 0:41:33.620
<v Speaker 5>But it also involves, obviously, access into aged care facilities.

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:37.500
<v Speaker 14>It involves access to NDIS packages and other community packages.

0:41:37.540 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 14>But it also means those allied health staff that you

0:41:40.460 --> 0:41:43.260
<v Speaker 14>need to get people out of hospital need to be available.

0:41:43.300 --> 0:41:46.299
<v Speaker 14>So we need the physios, the OTs, the pharmacists to

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.260
<v Speaker 14>be able to, you know, get people out of those

0:41:48.300 --> 0:41:49.969
<v Speaker 14>hospital beds and back into community.

0:41:49.989 --> 0:41:52.870
<v Speaker 5>So it is a real problem. It's been a problem

0:41:52.890 --> 0:41:53.810
<v Speaker 5>for a long period of time.

0:41:55.570 --> 0:41:58.069
<v Speaker 2>Is it Just a case of more money, Simon, or

0:41:58.130 --> 0:42:04.380
<v Speaker 2>is it political will? Is it ministers and departments absolutely

0:42:04.420 --> 0:42:08.910
<v Speaker 2>getting across what practitioners, what experts at the health end need?

0:42:09.710 --> 0:42:12.210
<v Speaker 2>What's driving the problems in Victoria?

0:42:13.950 --> 0:42:15.310
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I wish we knew.

0:42:16.219 --> 0:42:20.439
<v Speaker 14>Look, I don't think necessarily it's a matter of just money.

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.339
<v Speaker 14>I think we need to be innovative and we can

0:42:23.380 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 14>see some of this stuff happening. I mean, we do

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.340
<v Speaker 14>see things like having aged care clinicians or what we

0:42:28.380 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 14>call geriatricians working in emergency departments and in-reach programs into

0:42:32.860 --> 0:42:37.029
<v Speaker 14>aged care facilities to ensure that people can get the

0:42:37.070 --> 0:42:40.170
<v Speaker 14>healthcare that they need within that facility. And that's also

0:42:40.230 --> 0:42:44.549
<v Speaker 14>involving our GPs and getting GPs funded properly so they

0:42:44.590 --> 0:42:47.290
<v Speaker 14>can do their job in community and see complex patients

0:42:47.330 --> 0:42:49.310
<v Speaker 14>in aged care facilities and make sure that they don't

0:42:49.410 --> 0:42:52.850
<v Speaker 14>end up on an ambulance trolley on a Saturday night

0:42:53.630 --> 0:42:55.410
<v Speaker 14>at 11 o'clock at night with something that could be

0:42:55.510 --> 0:42:58.530
<v Speaker 14>fixed by care being able to be delivered in that facility.

0:42:58.590 --> 0:43:02.130
<v Speaker 5>So, you know, it's a complex... There's lots of complex...

0:43:02.510 --> 0:43:03.859
<v Speaker 5>There's lots of innovative solutions.

0:43:03.890 --> 0:43:05.980
<v Speaker 14>They do need to be funded and they do need

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 14>to be spread across the whole healthcare system.

0:43:10.219 --> 0:43:11.500
<v Speaker 2>All right. I've got to leave it there, but thank

0:43:11.540 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 2>you for what you do, Simon. You and All In Medical...

0:43:14.500 --> 0:43:17.739
<v Speaker 2>practitioners and professionals around the state and around the country.

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:23.230
<v Speaker 2>All right, quick break. That Fix Victoria project is throughout

0:43:23.250 --> 0:43:25.250
<v Speaker 2>the week in the Herald Sun. Lots of other issues

0:43:25.270 --> 0:43:27.350
<v Speaker 2>will be covered. One thing to say, the government's got

0:43:27.370 --> 0:43:29.750
<v Speaker 2>to change. Another thing, to have a plan to fix

0:43:29.830 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 2>it should that happen. Pauline Hanson headed to the High Court.

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 2>That's after the break. And James Ashby will join me,

0:43:36.500 --> 0:43:43.850
<v Speaker 2>of course. Panel up next. Let's bring in my panel

0:43:43.910 --> 0:43:47.370
<v Speaker 2>on Monday night, One Nation's National Director, James Ashby, and

0:43:47.430 --> 0:43:51.050
<v Speaker 2>the Head of Advocacy for Women's Foreign Australia, Stephanie Bastian.

0:43:51.110 --> 0:43:56.050
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to you both. James, 18C, you're headed now. Can

0:43:56.070 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 2>you confirm you are headed to the High Court?

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, we learned last Thursday that we've at least been

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 15>granted that hearing now in the High Court. I think

0:44:05.860 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 15>it's the first time 18C has ever been heard by

0:44:08.500 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 15>a full bench.

0:44:10.070 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 10>Of the High Court.

0:44:11.340 --> 0:44:15.260
<v Speaker 15>And look, this has been a legacy leftover from Labor.

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.500
<v Speaker 10>It came in in the 70s. It's only just gotten worse.

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 15>I think for the most part, people accept the fact

0:44:21.020 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 15>that no one wants to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate

0:44:25.700 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 15>anybody under that Act. But I think given so many

0:44:29.739 --> 0:44:33.589
<v Speaker 15>people live by grievance in their life, this legislation has

0:44:33.650 --> 0:44:37.230
<v Speaker 15>led to what it has, where where unfortunately it's going

0:44:37.250 --> 0:44:40.150
<v Speaker 15>to be tested. Andrew Bolt, your colleague there at News24,

0:44:40.550 --> 0:44:43.049
<v Speaker 15>has been through the same thing that Pauline Hanson has.

0:44:43.489 --> 0:44:46.090
<v Speaker 15>The only difference is this has cost several million dollars.

0:44:46.610 --> 0:44:51.089
<v Speaker 15>And I might just say the insurance scheme that's designed

0:44:51.110 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 15>to cover parliamentarians has not kicked in for Pauline Hanson.

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 15>So she's had to foot every single dollar so far.

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:01.020
<v Speaker 15>We're still arguing with that insurance cover that's supposed to

0:45:01.060 --> 0:45:03.219
<v Speaker 15>protect all parliamentarians at a federal level.

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:08.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, poor old Pauline. Pity she's not a Victorian politician

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.900
<v Speaker 2>because I've just found out today, of course, that taxpayers,

0:45:11.940 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 2>this was an admission by the Victorian Premier, that taxpayers

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:19.060
<v Speaker 2>are putting up the legal costs, paying the bills of

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Dan Andrews and Jacinta Allen ahead of this Royal Commission.

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 2>And that's as crook as crook, isn't it, Stephanie?

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:28.339
<v Speaker 7>Oh, absolutely.

0:45:28.420 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 16>I mean, everything they're doing is just costing Victorians more money.

0:45:31.940 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 16>It's absolutely a thing. They should be footing their own bill.

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:37.340
<v Speaker 16>They're the ones that ran the government into the ground.

0:45:37.620 --> 0:45:40.790
<v Speaker 16>There's corruption, there's debt. They should be accountable. That should

0:45:40.810 --> 0:45:43.170
<v Speaker 16>be up to them to defend, not the taxpayer.

0:45:44.969 --> 0:45:51.969
<v Speaker 2>What about the $ 36, 000 for the coffee cart bill? for

0:45:52.050 --> 0:45:55.110
<v Speaker 2>Australians who are sitting there over in Turkey for the

0:45:55.310 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 2>UN COP conference, James.

0:45:59.550 --> 0:46:01.219
<v Speaker 10>Taxpayers are overpaying for these things.

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.660
<v Speaker 15>Look at the national debt that we've got here. We've

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:07.460
<v Speaker 15>got over $ 1 trillion. I hate saying that. It's not

0:46:07.500 --> 0:46:10.580
<v Speaker 15>a word we've become too familiar with until recently. And

0:46:10.620 --> 0:46:13.340
<v Speaker 15>yet we still continue to waste money on sending people

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:16.899
<v Speaker 15>over to these, well, they are, they're junkets. And every

0:46:16.940 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 15>time we send somebody over to them, it costs taxpayers

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:21.810
<v Speaker 15>more and more money because they sign us up to

0:46:21.850 --> 0:46:23.730
<v Speaker 15>more of these detrimental agreements.

0:46:24.489 --> 0:46:26.100
<v Speaker 10>I'm sorry, we shouldn't be going to half of them.

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Spot on. And it's 800,000 in hotel rooms, 1.3 on

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:36.760
<v Speaker 2>office supplies, 2.2 overall. As I said, $ 36, 000 for coffee.

0:46:36.780 --> 0:46:38.989
<v Speaker 2>You've got to get a mug like this, though. That's

0:46:39.010 --> 0:46:43.090
<v Speaker 2>what they need to have. Steph Bastien. Dan Andrews' statue,

0:46:43.130 --> 0:46:45.010
<v Speaker 2>we found out a little bit more about that today.

0:46:45.030 --> 0:46:47.770
<v Speaker 2>He wanted it to have all of the government. I

0:46:47.810 --> 0:46:50.189
<v Speaker 2>won't blame him, but I'm sure he was privately asked.

0:46:50.610 --> 0:46:53.470
<v Speaker 2>He wanted it to have all of this anti-theft stuff

0:46:53.610 --> 0:46:56.219
<v Speaker 2>built into the bronze, but also that it had to

0:46:56.260 --> 0:47:01.020
<v Speaker 2>be 10% larger than life. So he loomed over all

0:47:01.060 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the other statues out the front of the Premier's office.

0:47:04.890 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 16>Look, doesn't that really just sum up Daniel Andrews and

0:47:07.820 --> 0:47:09.739
<v Speaker 16>his government and their priorities?

0:47:09.900 --> 0:47:12.140
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the fact that they wanted this bigger than

0:47:12.219 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 2>everything else.

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 16>He ran one of the worst governments in the Victorian

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:19.380
<v Speaker 16>history with all the COVID corruption, the expenditure, the lockdowns,

0:47:19.900 --> 0:47:23.910
<v Speaker 16>you had all the union corruption. It's just been one

0:47:24.030 --> 0:47:26.410
<v Speaker 16>bad thing after another with this government. He wanted the

0:47:26.650 --> 0:47:30.109
<v Speaker 16>biggest statue of all. Over 70% of Victorians didn't want

0:47:30.130 --> 0:47:33.710
<v Speaker 16>the statue. So I'm glad they've canned this thing, but

0:47:33.730 --> 0:47:35.270
<v Speaker 16>we're still waiting to hear what it's going to be

0:47:35.310 --> 0:47:36.770
<v Speaker 16>replaced with. We've still got to spend the money.

0:47:36.790 --> 0:47:40.230
<v Speaker 2>No one wanted to steal it, by the way, Credlin.

0:47:40.590 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 10>They didn't want to steal it.

0:47:41.510 --> 0:47:41.820
<v Speaker 2>Pardon?

0:47:41.969 --> 0:47:42.980
<v Speaker 10>They wanted to destroy it.

0:47:46.140 --> 0:47:47.779
<v Speaker 2>I reckon as soon as it was announced there was

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.420
<v Speaker 2>a run on angle grinders at Bunnings, I certainly would

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.940
<v Speaker 2>have got one myself. I've saved that money, but that

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 2>would have been the case. Absolutely. Absolutely. Got to leave

0:47:57.500 --> 0:47:59.779
<v Speaker 2>it there. Thank you to you both. I'm out of time.

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:02.469
<v Speaker 2>I'll ask you a question on something that came to

0:48:02.510 --> 0:48:05.149
<v Speaker 2>me for next week. I'll hold that one over. That's

0:48:05.190 --> 0:48:08.510
<v Speaker 2>it for me. Busy, busy time in this Victorian election campaign.

0:48:08.910 --> 0:48:10.859
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you tomorrow night. Here's Andrew Bolt.