Speaker 1: Welcome, wait to play well, it's great to have your company.
Speaker 2: I'm James macpherson with Liz Staer and Joe Hildebrand coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. A pro Palestinian protester takes his message to
Speaker 2: a NASCAR event, talk about the wrong crowd.
Speaker 1: We'll show you what happens a little later.
Speaker 2: Plus, when we look at the papers, New South Wales
Speaker 2: to ban retail trading on Anzac Day and new data
Speaker 2: reveals twenty percent of Queenslanders have switched to interest only mortgages.
Speaker 2: We'll get to all of that soon, but first, the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister today appointed a Special Envoy for Anti Semitism,
Speaker 2: saying that nine months of anti Semitism is enough. Think
Speaker 2: of how the Jewish community must feel. Jewish lawyer and
Speaker 2: businesswoman Gillian Sigal will take on the three year appointment.
Speaker 2: His Anthony Albanezi making the announcement today, I.
Speaker 3: Have spoken with members of the Jewish community who have
Speaker 3: not felt safe members of the Jewish community. His children
Speaker 3: are worried about wearing their school uniform in our capital cities.
Speaker 3: That's not acceptable. We're not having enough discourse in Australia
Speaker 3: which is civil and the sort of slogans which are used,
Speaker 3: have caused great damage and often come from a position
Speaker 3: of ignorance.
Speaker 2: Well, Liz, you can accuse this government of a lot
Speaker 2: of things, but you can't accuse them of being on time.
Speaker 2: Anti Semitism has been rife since October seven, which begs
Speaker 2: the question, why is Anthony Albanezi suddenly woke up to
Speaker 2: the issue now?
Speaker 4: This is just such a cheap pr move by the
Speaker 4: Albanesi government that which he's talking about has been I
Speaker 4: would argue, aided and are bettered by his government. That
Speaker 4: is the most vocal members of the Albanzi government who
Speaker 4: have shown themselves to be more than complicit in pushing
Speaker 4: the pro Palestine argument, most notably our Foreign Minister Pennywong.
Speaker 4: He's done absolutely nothing, and the Jewish community, along with
Speaker 4: the rest of us here in Australia, still have absolutely
Speaker 4: no answers as to why we have not seen any
Speaker 4: strong police pushback even when it was called for. Why
Speaker 4: the laws that we already have in place regarding racism, discrimination,
Speaker 4: hate speech, not one of them has come into play.
Speaker 4: Nobody's been prosecuted, much less properly charged and convicted for
Speaker 4: the crimes that we've seen on our own streets perpetrated
Speaker 4: toward Jewish Australians. Why none of those have come into play.
Speaker 4: So obviously good move, smart move by the Albanese government,
Speaker 4: but very much wanting nine months on when there's been
Speaker 4: pretty much outright silence. And also this isn't so reassuring
Speaker 4: when in the same breath he's promised and envoy for Islamophobia. Yeah,
Speaker 4: it's like you're trying to have your cake and eat
Speaker 4: it too. You're still straddling the fence. You're still not
Speaker 4: coming out with anything strong, comprehensive and conviction laden that
Speaker 4: Jewish Australians can point to and say, actually, our Prime
Speaker 4: minister is on side, he does feel our suffering and
Speaker 4: he's actually making a genuine stand for us.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I did note that, Joe, that he made that announcement
Speaker 2: and then he couldn't help himself but say, and in
Speaker 2: due course we will be appointing a specially in well
Speaker 2: or Islamophobia as well.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Look, I mean I suppose it does get a little
Speaker 6: bit tie and when you know it's coming and you're
Speaker 6: just sort of waiting for it. But having said that,
Speaker 6: he has prioritized this, this is the one he has
Speaker 6: announced first and that's significant. Obviously, this is not something
Speaker 6: he has done by accident. I think it's something that's
Speaker 6: taken a lot of political courage to do. Let's not
Speaker 6: forget that he's made this announcement just days after it's
Speaker 6: become clear that a movement called Muslim Vote is going
Speaker 6: to target some of Labour's most senior MPs in some
Speaker 6: of its safest seats, even though he's come out and
Speaker 6: said that anti Semitism is going to be our first priority.
Speaker 1: I agree with you it's taking political courage.
Speaker 2: But isn't that the devastating thing here that it requires
Speaker 2: political courage to come out and take a stand on
Speaker 2: something so basic as ensuring the safety of a part
Speaker 2: of the community who've done nothing to deserve the intimidation.
Speaker 2: Of course not, but it's political courage rather than just
Speaker 2: do the right.
Speaker 6: When you're doing something with political courage, you are doing
Speaker 6: the right thing. You are not doing it. It's what
Speaker 6: I'm saying is it's not politically convenient for him. In fact,
Speaker 6: it could politically hurt him. Well, job, do the right thing,
Speaker 6: and that's what he's done. That's what I'm saying. That's
Speaker 6: exactly what I'm saying he's already months ago he said
Speaker 6: that from the he was way out ahead of a
Speaker 6: lot of people, certainly everyone on the sort of crazy
Speaker 6: left and some of even his coll legues when he
Speaker 6: came out and said no, from the River to the
Speaker 6: Sea is not just a benign chant. It's a call
Speaker 6: for genocide or the eradication of the state of Israel. Again,
Speaker 6: he can't be seen to just be taking one side
Speaker 6: over the other. It is a difficult path for him
Speaker 6: to tread. He has to be seen to be treating
Speaker 6: both sides fairly. But again, the fact that he came
Speaker 6: out so strongly about from the River to the Sea,
Speaker 6: which was on the front page of the Daily Telegraph,
Speaker 6: and good on the Telly and good on Albow for
Speaker 6: coming to crips and agreeing with each other. And then
Speaker 6: you've got him coming out and announcing an anti Semitism envoy.
Speaker 6: I'm not aware of this position existing anywhere else in
Speaker 6: Australian political history or anywhere else previously in the world.
Speaker 6: He's come out and done this. He's done it against
Speaker 6: what would be the sheer political convenience of it, the
Speaker 6: sheer political maths in terms of the number of Jewish
Speaker 6: voters versus Muslim voters, and in the face of an
Speaker 6: openly hostile threat to some of his safest seats. So
Speaker 6: I think, you know, you've got to give him credit
Speaker 6: for it. He's come out and done it, and to
Speaker 6: just say, oh, well, now it's just too little, too light,
Speaker 6: because do you think this.
Speaker 4: Is because that they've realized that they're months and months
Speaker 4: of shilling for Muslim votes in Western Sydney, now that
Speaker 4: there is a Muslim themselves running and I believe the
Speaker 4: ground as an independent, as an independent yep putting their
Speaker 4: hand up and saying well, actually, if you want someone
Speaker 4: to represent the Muslim community, no one's better than me.
Speaker 4: Probably has a good point there, And Labour's realized, Okay,
Speaker 4: all of that is now laid Adam or no, no,
Speaker 4: this fellow who's now running as an independent in Western Sydney.
Speaker 4: So Labor realizes all the shilling for votes that we've
Speaker 4: done by either keeping Mum or allowing some of our
Speaker 4: even front benches to be overtly pro Palestinian, all of
Speaker 4: that is laid to waste because this guy's now put
Speaker 4: his hand up and no Muslim or someone who's Propealestinian
Speaker 4: and is feeling disenfranchised right now, he's going to vote
Speaker 4: for any labor member over one of their own. Do
Speaker 4: you think that now that they've realized okay, all of
Speaker 4: that is going to waste, we might as well now
Speaker 4: start playing the other side and being like, okay, well
Speaker 4: here's an anti Semitic envoy, and not at all.
Speaker 6: I mean, the last thing you would do if someone
Speaker 6: was coming after you on the back of a supposed
Speaker 6: Muslim vote out there, the last thing you do is
Speaker 6: a point of former President of the Executive Council of
Speaker 6: Australian Jury as an anti Semitic envoy. It's the it's
Speaker 6: the that would be no, but.
Speaker 4: You would if those seats are lost to us now
Speaker 4: is not giving up on those seats.
Speaker 2: The other question, what is, what is Jillian Siegel going
Speaker 2: to advise Anthony Albanezi that he wouldn't have Andrew.
Speaker 6: Giles as well as.
Speaker 1: He could.
Speaker 6: I think he could.
Speaker 2: But I mean, what's she going to say, prossecute hate crimes,
Speaker 2: don't allow incitement.
Speaker 1: To buy, use the laws that we already had again synagogues.
Speaker 6: I think with you know, with things like for example,
Speaker 6: you know, when it comes to ongoing debate about you know,
Speaker 6: banning groups like his book career as well. And also
Speaker 6: again we've had this conversation so many times that the
Speaker 6: problem is, and this is why it's so important that
Speaker 6: Anthony Alberaneze came out to define what a phrase like
Speaker 6: from the River to the Sea actually means. Because people
Speaker 6: are chanting this, they're saying, hey, but I'm not saying
Speaker 6: kill Jews or hurt Jews or you know, and I'm
Speaker 6: just saying from the river to sea, I'm just channing
Speaker 6: a nice little nursery.
Speaker 5: Ryan.
Speaker 6: And so when he gets on the front foot and says, no,
Speaker 6: when you say this, you are calling for the eradication
Speaker 6: of the Jewish stuffy.
Speaker 4: It was very late in the game.
Speaker 6: Yes, he did well, he's come to it anyway, and
Speaker 6: he's done it now. And in politics, you know often
Speaker 6: you know better late than never is the best result
Speaker 6: you're going to get. But I think he's done something
Speaker 6: that's clearly good. I think you should be commended for it.
Speaker 6: I wasn't aware of anyone even calling for this before
Speaker 6: he announced for it, so I think he's actually gotten
Speaker 6: ahead of this. Well, he's certainly gotten ahead of this
Speaker 6: issue in terms of how he's decided to handle it.
Speaker 6: He's handled someone with immaculate experience and impeccable credentials in
Speaker 6: this area.
Speaker 2: One more observation is this another case of Anthony Albanezi
Speaker 2: not wanting to take a strong stand himself, and he's
Speaker 2: got a habit of this, so he defers to an
Speaker 2: advisor committee of board. I'm just taking a device and
Speaker 2: that way he can be a little bit hands off
Speaker 2: any big statement.
Speaker 6: But again, Anthony Albertez, he still can't get into his
Speaker 6: electorate office because it is being besieged by crazy trots
Speaker 6: and pro Palestinian activists who are accusing him of genocide,
Speaker 6: like he has taken us down. And again he came
Speaker 6: out in you know, contradiction to some of his own
Speaker 6: colleagues much love colleagues and colleagues who are fantastic people,
Speaker 6: and you usually think it was the other way around,
Speaker 6: and said, no, that's wrong. From the river to the sea,
Speaker 6: it's not a benign statement. It is a call for
Speaker 6: the extermination of the Jewish state. So he has actually
Speaker 6: done these things, and he's done them to no political
Speaker 6: advantage himself. I mean, there are no like to put
Speaker 6: to put it really really bluntly there's maybe one seat,
Speaker 6: which is Josh Burns's seat of McNamara, where Jewish votes
Speaker 6: would help Labor get elected. I can't think of a
Speaker 6: single other seat in Australia where Jewish votes would help
Speaker 6: a Labor MP win or retain a seat at No,
Speaker 6: it's not. That's what that is the whole point. That
Speaker 6: is what I'm saying. That's right, and that's what he's doing.
Speaker 6: That's what I'm saying. There is no advantage, there's no
Speaker 6: political advantage in him doing this.
Speaker 2: Let me disagree with that Jewish votes. Mainstream Australians are
Speaker 2: just jack of this. So absolutely votes which will which
Speaker 2: may come on board, because that's right, Australia are pretty
Speaker 2: ticked off with.
Speaker 6: Absolutely nonetheless make it, nonetheless make it more difficult in
Speaker 6: all these seats in southwestern and Western Sydney which are
Speaker 6: being deliberately and openly target by single issue Muslim votes.
Speaker 6: The clues in the name pro Palestinian candidates. And faced
Speaker 6: with this threat that has emerged just days barely a
Speaker 6: week ago, he's come out and said no, not that
Speaker 6: we're going to be even stronger pro Palestinian from the
Speaker 6: river to the sea. Oh, we better hold on to
Speaker 6: these seats. He's come out and said, no, I'm sticking
Speaker 6: to my guns. We're going to confront anti Semitism in
Speaker 6: this country, and we've got to do it by pointing
Speaker 6: extremely high profile Jewish community leader to root it out
Speaker 6: and stamp it out.
Speaker 4: Well, I don't know about I don't know about sticking
Speaker 4: to his guns. I think we're all very surprised to
Speaker 4: discover he has those guns at all. I stand by
Speaker 4: what I said. I think this is a brilliant pr
Speaker 4: move by Alban Easy and well he knows it. But
Speaker 4: let's take a moment to hear from Dillian Sigal herself.
Speaker 4: She is a very experienced lawyer, she's a chancellor at
Speaker 4: uns W and she actually has a litany of accomplishments.
Speaker 4: I couldn't list them off here because it's a short show.
Speaker 4: But here she is saying a little bit today.
Speaker 7: Anti Semitism erodes all that is good and healthy in
Speaker 7: a society as such, it poses a threat not just
Speaker 7: to the Jewish community, but to our entire nation.
Speaker 4: Indeed, well said, I don't think there's much to add
Speaker 4: to that. I mean, that was just a little bit
Speaker 4: of what she said today. But brilliantly said it is.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I'm I'm obsessed by and again you know, I've
Speaker 6: been ready a book about Stalingrad, of all things. It
Speaker 6: is incredible how specific anti Semitism is as a particular
Speaker 6: racial obsession, and all the sort of crazy eyealogus to
Speaker 6: go along with it. But anyway, if you thought that
Speaker 6: Albanesi government was a plane crash, that I would ever agree.
Speaker 6: I would say it's flying high and soaring to ever
Speaker 6: new heights. But anyway, Boeing, this is an amazing story
Speaker 6: that Liz, you have been all over like a cheap suit.
Speaker 6: Boeing has agreed to plead guilty in its seven three
Speaker 6: seven Max criminal case. You remember, these planes were falling
Speaker 6: out of the sky. Boeing has now acknowledged that it
Speaker 6: wasn't exactly frank and fearless in forthcoming all the airlines
Speaker 6: safety credentials and whether it met all the necessary safety regulations.
Speaker 6: And we've got a grab of the CEO of Boeing
Speaker 6: apologizing last month to the families of people who diet.
Speaker 1: Have a listen.
Speaker 8: I would like to apologize on behalf of all of
Speaker 8: our boweling associates spread throughout the world, past and present.
Speaker 1: For your lossnse.
Speaker 8: The doage, and I apologize for the grief that we
Speaker 8: have caused, and I want you to know we aren't
Speaker 8: totally committed in their memory, the work and focus on
Speaker 8: safety for as long as long as we're employed by bonding.
Speaker 8: So again I'm sorry.
Speaker 6: Now, of course, you can't put a price on the
Speaker 6: grief and the suffering that they're victims of those Boeing
Speaker 6: crashes have gone through, except you can, because the airline
Speaker 6: has been fined three hundred and thirty one million dollars
Speaker 6: a story, and that's a two hundred and forty four
Speaker 6: million US as a result of this. And again, Liz,
Speaker 6: you made the point that when you actually break it
Speaker 6: down to the number of lies lost, that's not exactly
Speaker 6: a huge amount of money, especially for a massive multinational
Speaker 6: company line.
Speaker 4: And it's very called comfort for the families of those
Speaker 4: three hundred and forty six people who died in those
Speaker 4: two crashes. And basically what the CEO Dave Calhoun just
Speaker 4: said there was shown up in the proceedings of that
Speaker 4: very case to be an absolute lie. Here's Senator Josh
Speaker 4: Hawley basically saying, you guys haven't improved your safety mechanisms
Speaker 4: and processes since those crashes of twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen.
Speaker 4: So what do you have to say to that, mister ceo?
Speaker 9: You don't recognize the bowling that has airplanes falling out
Speaker 9: of the sky, that has had two Max's crash, that
Speaker 9: has had pieces of doors out of the sky, that
Speaker 9: have had whistleblowers comb before. I've sat right where you
Speaker 9: have sat and told us. These are your employees who
Speaker 9: have told us that when these are the engineers. By
Speaker 9: the way, are you an engineer?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 9: They are, and they have said that they're not listened to,
Speaker 9: that they're retaliated against, that they're threatened. That's the reality
Speaker 9: of Boeing today. That's your company that you have created.
Speaker 9: Now I don't recognize it either from the company it
Speaker 9: used to be decades ago, but under your leadership, that's
Speaker 9: what Boeing is, and you're being rewarded for it handsomely.
Speaker 9: Handsomely don't you think there's something wrong with that? Why
Speaker 9: haven't you resigned?
Speaker 4: Why haven't you resigned? Indeed, if that is not a
Speaker 4: fireable offense, what on earth is? And it's no small
Speaker 4: matter for Boeing to now plead guilty to this conspiratorial
Speaker 4: They call it a criminal conspiracy to defraud the US,
Speaker 4: because that is essentially what they've pleaded guilty.
Speaker 6: To try, because that didn't tell the truth to the FAA.
Speaker 4: Hang on a minute, we had a settlement over this.
Speaker 4: You guys broke the terms of that settlement. So now
Speaker 4: we're coming back and we're going to find you even more.
Speaker 4: And this is very complicated for Boeing now because to
Speaker 4: plead guilty to a conspiracy to defraud the US would
Speaker 4: normally bar them from having defense contracts. And just last
Speaker 4: year they signed an over two hundred and twenty two
Speaker 4: billion dollar deal No sorry, I'm talking in millions. It
Speaker 4: was an almost twenty three billion dollar deal with defense
Speaker 4: US Defense Department to supply them with.
Speaker 6: However, much more even just the original CROD. I just
Speaker 6: cannot get my head around how even the most cold blooded,
Speaker 6: sociopathic airline CEO could think it would be a good
Speaker 6: business decision to cut corners on safety and not be
Speaker 6: forthcome to the fai as to you know, I say, oh, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 6: which's right, Yeah, it's fine, yeah, totally fine to fly,
Speaker 6: Like wouldn't you know that the minute something like this happens,
Speaker 6: then that's it. Your reputation is absolutely shot, and we've
Speaker 6: seen so many airlines fail to recover from well.
Speaker 2: It's actually worse than that, because when these accidents originally
Speaker 2: happened in Ethiopia and then in Indonesia killing as you said,
Speaker 2: three hundred and forty six people in twenty twenty one,
Speaker 2: rather than press charges, Boeing were effectively put on a
Speaker 2: kind of probation and as long as they met safety
Speaker 2: standards and reported well and things improved, then after a
Speaker 2: number of years it would all sort of be forgotten.
Speaker 2: But in May of this year, after we had a
Speaker 2: door come off mid flight of an Alaska airline, we
Speaker 2: had a wheel come off one of their planes on
Speaker 2: a runway I think it was in Atlanta. There were
Speaker 2: numerous other issues. Then the prosecutors said, you've broken the
Speaker 2: terms of that probation. Nothing has improved, and so then
Speaker 2: they were given this sweetheart deal where rather than charge
Speaker 2: you with criminal manslaughter, we'll offer you the opportunity to
Speaker 2: plead guilty to misleading air safety regulators, which they took.
Speaker 2: You mentioned the fine that they paid two hundred and
Speaker 2: forty three million American.
Speaker 1: To put that in perspective. So that's for the death
Speaker 1: of three hundred and forty six people.
Speaker 2: Trump paid three hundred and fifty five million for manipulating
Speaker 2: his property records in order to get a bigger loan.
Speaker 2: So if you're a victim you lost a loved one
Speaker 2: on one of these flights, you would absolutely be.
Speaker 1: Irate that Boeing have been allowed to get away with it.
Speaker 4: They shouldn't have been given this sweetheartd deal where the
Speaker 4: government basically said, look, if you just plead guilty to
Speaker 4: conspiracy criminal conspiracy to defraud us, then that's okay. We'll
Speaker 4: just give you another slap on the wrist. Of course,
Speaker 4: for a company like Boeing, any sizeable fine is simply
Speaker 4: pocket change. And like you say, the people related to
Speaker 4: those whose lives were lost, this is just it is
Speaker 4: completely unbelievable. More needs to be done to pursue this.
Speaker 4: By the way, because just this year, in the earlier
Speaker 4: months of this year, two of their whistleblowers mysteriously died.
Speaker 4: One was found in his car in the middle of testifying.
Speaker 4: He was due to go back the next day and
Speaker 4: continue testifying for them. He worked for them for several
Speaker 4: decades and had said when I was there and I
Speaker 4: was trying to be a whistleblower, and I was writing emails.
Speaker 4: They'd never email me back, they or would just meet
Speaker 4: with me in person, And it was always subliminally communicated
Speaker 4: to him, stop sending these emails, stop leaving a paper trail.
Speaker 4: He was found dead in his truck in a car park.
Speaker 4: Another one passed away. Suddenly he was fit as a fiddle,
Speaker 4: friends and family say, and within two weeks he suddenly
Speaker 4: passed away. He came down with what all the mainstream
Speaker 4: meter is calling a mystery illness, and he was suddenly gone. Obviously,
Speaker 4: I don't know what these cases are, but it seems
Speaker 4: very suspicious to me, especially when those who were acting
Speaker 4: in a lawyer capacity for both those gentlemen said, well,
Speaker 4: they both made incredibly powerful enemies, ie being Boeing. So
Speaker 4: I just think for those families it should have gone
Speaker 4: to a proper criminal trial. They should have been tried
Speaker 4: for manslaughter because it was proved time and time again
Speaker 4: that it was due to their absolute negligence and lack
Speaker 4: of care for the people boarding their flights that this
Speaker 4: was ever able to have.
Speaker 6: I think it actually speaks to the difference, and I
Speaker 6: think the Trump comparison is actually a really good one.
Speaker 6: The difference between a company or an institution or an
Speaker 6: entity that is completely interwoven with the US government, with
Speaker 6: the US economy more generally. I mean, it's a huge employer.
Speaker 6: It's headquarters in Seattle is obviously just a huge, iconic
Speaker 6: kind of you know, industry leading thing that you know,
Speaker 6: half the city's been around Boeing and Microsoft, Think and Starbucks.
Speaker 6: And you also have, like you said, these multi billion
Speaker 6: dollar defense contracts, which if the government was to crack
Speaker 6: down on Boeing as hard as it had on say
Speaker 6: Donald Trump, suddenly would have to tear up all these
Speaker 6: defense contracts start start from ground zero, go with someone else.
Speaker 6: And so it is that very much that too big
Speaker 6: to fail mentality, where if you know the old you know,
Speaker 6: if you are a million the bank of million dollars,
Speaker 6: it's your problem. If you are in the bank one
Speaker 6: hundred million dollars, it's the bank's problem.
Speaker 1: Well, let's stay in the United States.
Speaker 2: You think legislation to increase penalties for people soliciting miners
Speaker 2: for prostitution would be a no brainer. I mean, no
Speaker 2: one would agree that behavior should go on If someone
Speaker 2: tries to do that, jail them for the longest time.
Speaker 2: At the moment, in California, if you solicit a miner
Speaker 2: for prostitution, it's two days jail, one year maximum, and
Speaker 2: a ten thousand dollar fine. So the Republicans want to
Speaker 2: increase the penalties to four years jail and a twenty
Speaker 2: five thousand dollars fine, And yet that is being opposed
Speaker 2: by LGBTQ activists who claim that upping the severity of
Speaker 2: fines for those who solicit minus for prostitution would disproportionately
Speaker 2: affect the LGBTQ community.
Speaker 1: Have listened to this.
Speaker 10: We are particularly concerned that the harsher penalties proposed in
Speaker 10: this bill will disproportionately impact marginalized communities, especially members of
Speaker 10: the LGBTQ community, who already suffer from systematic biases within
Speaker 10: the criminal justice system, particularly when it comes to sexually
Speaker 10: based offenses. Studies have shown that LGBTQ people, particularly gay
Speaker 10: and transgendered individuals, are more likely to be charged with
Speaker 10: sex offenses compared to their hetero sexual counterparts. For instance,
Speaker 10: LGBTQ individuals are nine times more likely to be charged
Speaker 10: with sodomy. Measures like SB fourteen fourteen lead to higher
Speaker 10: rates of incarceration, longer sentences, and increase difficulties in fighting, housing,
Speaker 10: and employment.
Speaker 2: Listen to that, and I simply could not believe what
Speaker 2: I was hearing. I mean, how does anyone make sense
Speaker 2: of an argument like that.
Speaker 4: I'm sure the LGBTQ community, I'm saying, please stop talking
Speaker 4: on our behalf. That is the opposite of standing up
Speaker 4: for them. I mean, they're literally pointing the finger at
Speaker 4: this community saying, if you are going to punish people
Speaker 4: for having sex with miners, then you're disproportionately punishing people
Speaker 4: belonging to the LGBTQ community. If that doesn't make you
Speaker 4: just absolutely incredulous. And yet here's the senator who tried
Speaker 4: to bring this bill. There were amendments passed. Her name
Speaker 4: is Senator Grove. She was trying to include sixteen and
Speaker 4: seventeen year olds in this bill because of course, obviously
Speaker 4: officially they two are miners. Well, it was a real
Speaker 4: bonfight to try and get this across line, and she
Speaker 4: wasn't quite successful. Here she is explaining, who would have
Speaker 4: thought in the state of California it would be this
Speaker 4: hard or this difficult to protect miners seventeen and below
Speaker 4: from men that purchased them for sex.
Speaker 11: Take a look at this today in the Public Safety Committee,
Speaker 11: they allowed us to charge a wobbler instead of a
Speaker 11: full felony. For those that are fifteen and below, it
Speaker 11: can be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor. But
Speaker 11: it also excluded sixteen and seventeen year olds from those provisions.
Speaker 11: The sixteen and seventeen year olds now have to prove
Speaker 11: two crimes. They were bought and sold, trafficked into the industry,
Speaker 11: and that's the only way you can go after the
Speaker 11: perpetrator who initiated this whole process by negotiating to buy
Speaker 11: them for sex in the first place. It shouldn't be
Speaker 11: that difficult.
Speaker 6: That's it.
Speaker 11: People that buy children for sex in the state of
Speaker 11: California should go to prison.
Speaker 4: It is just I'm really answer to that. It should
Speaker 4: be that straight forward. The prosecutors in California have already
Speaker 4: come out saying, well, given those are the preconditions of
Speaker 4: actually prosecuting or having a chance of prosecuting someone who's
Speaker 4: soliciting sex from the sixteen seventeen year olds, it's going
Speaker 4: to be almost impossible to prosecute You've just created too
Speaker 4: many loops for us to jump through in order to
Speaker 4: bring a case against any of the people who are
Speaker 4: committing that crime.
Speaker 1: It just beggars below.
Speaker 4: It is just even a controversial bill.
Speaker 6: It is just staggering and just a bit of pr
Speaker 6: advice to the Californian lgbt QIA plus community. Saying that
Speaker 6: banning people from paying for underage sex is going to
Speaker 6: disproportionately affect your community does not help your cause. That's
Speaker 6: that's not a good line. That's not a good hill
Speaker 6: to die on. That's not a good you know. I
Speaker 6: would just keep that out of the media real life
Speaker 6: as they.
Speaker 4: Started reeling off the stats to provide.
Speaker 6: But it got worse, does my head in man? The
Speaker 6: left does this, You wouldn't believe it. But North America
Speaker 6: appears to be a hot bed no pun intended for
Speaker 6: these sorts of weird, strange grain areas over the border.
Speaker 6: Up north in Canada also known as Australia with snow,
Speaker 6: there is a skinny dipping club which hosts naked events
Speaker 6: and they provide get this free memberships for kids under eighteen.
Speaker 4: How is this legal?
Speaker 2: I don't get I do not get them, and I
Speaker 2: do not fourteen and don't need to be companied, and.
Speaker 6: Do not need to be companied by an adult. Men
Speaker 6: are also allowed. We are told into the women's changing rooms,
Speaker 6: so just like the UK, and if they're in a
Speaker 6: couple and can walk around with I don't even want
Speaker 6: to say it on television.
Speaker 4: We found something you finally won't reach.
Speaker 6: You know those big military style cars that they you
Speaker 6: know that celebrities like Arnold Schwarzenegga drives around what's the
Speaker 6: name of them, Hummers, That's the word I was looking for.
Speaker 4: I know that anyone would get that because it basically
Speaker 4: says they can use the women's change rooms if they're
Speaker 4: in a couple and can walk around without being sexually aroused,
Speaker 4: visibly sexually aroused. So they're advertising how is this legal
Speaker 4: in Canada? Though, We're just going to create a nudist club. Basically,
Speaker 4: kids under fourteen, you don't over fourteen, sorry, you don't
Speaker 4: even have to be accompanied like kids that young would
Speaker 4: have proof of age anyway. You don't really have many forums,
Speaker 4: you don't.
Speaker 6: I think if you're combining this week what's happening in California,
Speaker 6: it could be a bit of a recipe for some
Speaker 6: un towards.
Speaker 4: I mean, I'm just wondering where is where is the
Speaker 4: state that should not be legal?
Speaker 2: Well, the state says that in decent exposure to someone
Speaker 2: sixteen or under is ajailable. But I suppose if you're
Speaker 2: exposing yourself to a minor who has gotten free membership
Speaker 2: of your naturalist club then somehowlists that's what they call it,
Speaker 2: the young Naturalists, then somehow you therefore exempt from being
Speaker 2: charged with indecent exposure.
Speaker 6: But I can't give consent to sexual arct. So I
Speaker 6: just what is going on in America and North America.
Speaker 1: It doesn't even sensible.
Speaker 6: Part what is going on in America.
Speaker 4: Indeed, so the Dems have today come out punching hard.
Speaker 4: President Brighton is saying, we will not support this act,
Speaker 4: this bill that the Republicans have put up, it's called
Speaker 4: the Save Act. They're trying to ensure that people who
Speaker 4: are illegally in America will not be able to vote
Speaker 4: in the coming election, and the Democrats won't have.
Speaker 6: A bar of that.
Speaker 7: Hmm.
Speaker 6: I wonder why that is.
Speaker 4: Here's a tweet from Speaker of the House Mike Johnson.
Speaker 4: He's obviously a Republican himself. He says, it should alarm
Speaker 4: every American citizen that the sitting president of the United States,
Speaker 4: who has opened our border to over nine million illegals,
Speaker 4: just announced that he would veto our bill to prevent
Speaker 4: non citizens from voting.
Speaker 1: As you know, voter ID is not required.
Speaker 4: In the States.
Speaker 6: And here's the thing.
Speaker 4: If these illegals do vote in the election, and they
Speaker 4: can do so as simply as later on, if someone's
Speaker 4: actually chasing them up about it, which is highly unlikely,
Speaker 4: they can produce as little as an electricity bill to say, well, no,
Speaker 4: I thought I was a citizen. I wasn't doing this
Speaker 4: knowingly as an illegal case dropped. It is that simple.
Speaker 4: But in the first instance, who would be prosecuting anyway?
Speaker 4: Who is going to be following up any number of
Speaker 4: votes that someone thinks might be illegitimate. So this is
Speaker 4: the fears that everyone has been saying all along. That's
Speaker 4: why you're letting these millions of people pore over the border.
Speaker 4: You're shoring up votes for the future. And the Dems
Speaker 4: were like, oh, that's ridiculous. Illegals can't vote in the
Speaker 4: election despite the fact that there's no ID required, and
Speaker 4: they know full well that the laws surrounding this are
Speaker 4: so thin you could sip tea through it. In regards
Speaker 4: to even if I catch you out and I say,
Speaker 4: hang on a minute, you're an illegal.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't have voted.
Speaker 4: All you have to do is plead ignorance and you're
Speaker 4: off the hook.
Speaker 6: Yeah, but you do. You have to be a citizen
Speaker 6: to register to vote, and only registered voters obviously can
Speaker 6: take part in elections. So I think this is largely
Speaker 6: an argument about what happens when you actually present at
Speaker 6: the polling booth. And it goes back to, obviously the
Speaker 6: civil rights movement and the voter registration movement of the
Speaker 6: sixties and fifties and six is where the opposite was
Speaker 6: kind of happening, where once all people were enfranchised, and
Speaker 6: black people obviously were enfranchised to vote in Southern states,
Speaker 6: they were being discouraged from doing so, or not sort
Speaker 6: of disallowed from doing so, I suppose, or very heavily
Speaker 6: discouraged from doing so by the prevailing white authorities, and
Speaker 6: that was how they managed to keep getting elected. There
Speaker 6: was very low voter tone out from Black Americans, and
Speaker 6: of course that's when you had the sort of civil
Speaker 6: rights movement and the convoys all coming down and command.
Speaker 2: Harris made that argument right that laws it's very difficult
Speaker 2: because so that's what they say, we would be able
Speaker 2: to be most likely to.
Speaker 6: Have the documents necessary, less likely to have the idea
Speaker 6: on which is such.
Speaker 1: A racist argument.
Speaker 2: But the Democrats have said it would put two big
Speaker 2: a burden on people rocking up to the voting booth
Speaker 2: with appropriate id. But the thing that made me laugh
Speaker 2: was they also argue that to demand proof of citizenship
Speaker 2: to vote would be to imply the voting.
Speaker 1: System lacks credibility.
Speaker 2: I would have thought the first point of order in
Speaker 2: safeguarding democracy, and remember the Democrats have made this election
Speaker 2: all about safeguarding democracy is to make sure that the
Speaker 2: elections are credible.
Speaker 1: So the people that are least credible in all of
Speaker 1: this obviously are the Democrats.
Speaker 4: Indeed, and before we move on, doctor Phil recently everyone
Speaker 4: who knows doctor Phil it needs no interruption, was talking
Speaker 4: to Joe Rogan recently most listened to podcast in the
Speaker 4: World about a much darker side of what they're seeing
Speaker 4: happen at the border with these illegals flooding over and
Speaker 4: the children that are also coming over with them.
Speaker 1: Here's that crap.
Speaker 5: These children that are coming in with someone that says
Speaker 5: I'm their mother and uncle or whatever, we have no
Speaker 5: way of verifying them.
Speaker 12: We do not.
Speaker 13: We used to under President Trump, we had rapid DNA
Speaker 13: testing that's been done away.
Speaker 5: Are they given money for these people that are released
Speaker 5: into the country.
Speaker 13: So it's our taxpayers that's ultimately facilitated the travel. But yes,
Speaker 13: travel is facilitated, and they are given all the necessities
Speaker 13: that they needed.
Speaker 5: But that could be a trafficker.
Speaker 13: There's a very good possibility that they're being trafficked, that
Speaker 13: they're going into the sex industry, or they're being forced
Speaker 13: into the sweatshops.
Speaker 5: And we know that, we knowingly are spending our tax
Speaker 5: dollars to sell children into sex traffic.
Speaker 4: That was doctor phil talking to the president of the
Speaker 4: National Border Patrol and he said to him, why have
Speaker 4: you not come out and said this before. And the
Speaker 4: president of the National Border Patrol said, nobody has asked
Speaker 4: me this kind of pointed questions, and hey, if it
Speaker 4: cost me my job, it costs me my job. This
Speaker 4: is what we are seeing happen on a daily basis,
Speaker 4: and nobody is saying anything. What on earth kind of
Speaker 4: reasoning would they have been given to do away with
Speaker 4: the rapid DNA testing.
Speaker 6: They can do it there.
Speaker 4: They can do it on the spot to prove know
Speaker 4: this child is a relative of mine.
Speaker 2: Well, there would have to be something wrong with your
Speaker 2: brain to allow the American border to be as it is.
Speaker 2: And it turns out America's got a president who's obviously
Speaker 2: got something.
Speaker 1: Wrong with his brain.
Speaker 2: Even in New York, Partners is reporting that a disease experts,
Speaker 2: specifically in Parkinson's disease, has been visiting the White House.
Speaker 2: In fact, one such expert visited eight times in the
Speaker 2: last eight months. Now, of course, Joe Biden denies that
Speaker 2: he has any problem. He says that he undergoes a
Speaker 2: neurological exam every day as he goes about his business
Speaker 2: as the president every day. But numbers of neurologists, none
Speaker 2: of whom have treated the President, but who have observed
Speaker 2: his behavior, all agree he is exhibiting symptoms that would
Speaker 2: be consistent with Parkinson's disease. So White House spokesperson Kareem
Speaker 2: Jean Pierre was asked about these visits to the White House.
Speaker 14: Her response, every year, around the presence physical examination, he
Speaker 14: sees a neurologist. That's three times, so that is answering
Speaker 14: that question.
Speaker 4: No, it is, it is you're asking me.
Speaker 14: I also said to you, Ed, I also said to you.
Speaker 14: For security reasons, we cannot share names.
Speaker 2: She got the most difficult job in the United States.
Speaker 2: Surely that's the toughest rong thing that I could not
Speaker 2: make any sense out of what she said about.
Speaker 6: And again she's obviously got it sort of sort of
Speaker 6: I don't know, sort of like sort of a send.
Speaker 6: She's almost got to sort of telepathically go into this
Speaker 6: phantom universe inhabited by Joe Biden's deranged understanding of the
Speaker 6: world around him, and then try to retranslate that back
Speaker 6: into the real world in a form of words that
Speaker 6: the press pat will finally accept. And of course she
Speaker 6: just can't. So she just if you listen, you can
Speaker 6: listen to all this stuff. She just ties herself up
Speaker 6: to say, you know, if you're asking me. On the
Speaker 6: twenty seventh month of August twenty twenty three, did a
Speaker 6: bird fly in a northeasterly direction down Pennsylvania Avenue at
Speaker 6: the same time that a single plumb fell from a
Speaker 6: tree in New York. I can categorically say no, and
Speaker 6: she's just making up these christ questions.
Speaker 4: I just have to believe that she laughs about her
Speaker 4: job behind closed doors, and it's just like, honestly, day
Speaker 4: after day, this job is killing me before we go,
Speaker 4: I mean, why would you question this guy's mental capacity?
Speaker 6: Here?
Speaker 4: He is just casually yelling at some MSNBC host, being like, well,
Speaker 4: if the Dems don't want me to run, why won't
Speaker 4: they just challenge me?
Speaker 15: Come on, give me a break, come with me? Why
Speaker 15: why I'm going to show frustrated, but by the leap. Now,
Speaker 15: I'm not talking about you guys, but about the elap
Speaker 15: and the party who they know so much more with
Speaker 15: any of these days, I don't think I run against
Speaker 15: me and now for president challenge man to convention.
Speaker 6: Oh my god. You could just hear all his aides going,
Speaker 6: holy shit, we forgot about the phone in the toilet.
Speaker 6: He's on it again. He's calling. Radio hosts are looking all.
Speaker 1: This is MSNBC.
Speaker 2: I'm a bug's blaming the elites. Next you'll be saying,
Speaker 2: drain the swamp. We're going to go to a break.
Speaker 2: When we come back, we'll look at what's making news
Speaker 2: in tomorrow's papers Instagram, welcome back, will a bit making
Speaker 2: news tomorrow. Let's look at what the papers are saying, Joe,
Speaker 2: You've got the Daily Telegraph.
Speaker 6: Yes, first of the greatest newspaper in the nine universe,
Speaker 6: the Daily Telegraph and the big splash mark of respect.
Speaker 6: And it's an exclusive of course. Retail trade will be
Speaker 6: banned on Ane's a Day from next year with Premier
Speaker 6: Chris Mins. Just when you couldn't love him anymore, Liz
Speaker 6: Stora movie, just stop a creeping commercialism. Opening a Day,
Speaker 6: he said, brings all Australians together. And the premiers also
Speaker 6: moved to band music vessels in April twenty fifth. We
Speaker 6: knew about that already. And he's hit out at an
Speaker 6: alban Esy government policy. See he just keeps getting better
Speaker 6: and better, doesn't he. Least this allowed public servants to
Speaker 6: swap their Anzac Day public holiday with another day. That
Speaker 6: is outrageous.
Speaker 4: Got to give him this one.
Speaker 6: I just say, your camera up anyone.
Speaker 4: Anyone who makes this move has got to have some
Speaker 4: semblance of patriotism about them. So well done, man's I
Speaker 4: hope this becomes a trend.
Speaker 1: I think all premiers should do. This means it is
Speaker 1: as the lack.
Speaker 4: Of respect, especially with this whole narrative of colonialism, and
Speaker 4: we're so ashamed, and let's tear down and graffiti war memorials.
Speaker 4: As that kind of emotive argument is made only younger
Speaker 4: generations and seems to be gaining a lot of ground.
Speaker 4: That is when our leaders need to make it very clear. No, no,
Speaker 4: this is a day of respect where we honor our
Speaker 4: fall and it's not a time to go to Westfield
Speaker 4: and have a great day having brunch and buying up
Speaker 4: big at Zimmerman. This is a day for people to reflect,
Speaker 4: to spend time with friends and family and enjoy the
Speaker 4: life that these guys died to give us.
Speaker 1: And then go to the pub and play too.
Speaker 6: That is the only authorized commercial activity getting drunk and
Speaker 6: losing your money on tour.
Speaker 2: I think currently it's there's no retail allowed until morning pm,
Speaker 2: right right, without meaning for the whole day, but it's
Speaker 2: pretty much the only day that we all agree is
Speaker 2: sacred and a.
Speaker 6: Good Friday.
Speaker 4: Or what.
Speaker 1: Frida I'm all for good Friday, I'm I'm not sure.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure there's universal support Friday being held as
Speaker 2: wholly whereas the whole notion agrees him.
Speaker 6: Beasley famously said some twenty five years ago, if it
Speaker 6: might have been in the nineties, So the Anzac Day
Speaker 6: was actually Australia's true national day. That was the day
Speaker 6: when we were really born. It was the forging of fire,
Speaker 6: the fire of polit league, that we were actually that
Speaker 6: we truly sort of became a nation.
Speaker 1: He would have been a good prime minister.
Speaker 6: He would be well. He is called in the labor
Speaker 6: parties known as the best prime minister. We never had
Speaker 6: another story on the front page of the Daily Tabor
Speaker 6: worth noting, by the way, how serious the Anzac Day's
Speaker 6: story is. If we can pull up the front page
Speaker 6: of the Telly again the giant splash head mark of respect.
Speaker 6: In any other context that would always be a play
Speaker 6: on words of someone called Mark. But in this case
Speaker 6: it's not just go to show on the top left
Speaker 6: hand corner. City slows to forty kilometers an hour. A
Speaker 6: clover More driven push to cut speed limits to just
Speaker 6: forty kilometers an hour around sitting has been slammed as
Speaker 6: lacking evidence and harmful to businesses, amid concerns limits could
Speaker 6: be further dropped around. I mean, why not, why just
Speaker 6: make it thirty kilometers an hour. I want to make
Speaker 6: it twenty kilometers an hour so the bicycles can overtake us.
Speaker 6: This is madness.
Speaker 2: When Clover Moore came to power five percent of in
Speaker 2: a CBD roads, we're at forty percent now.
Speaker 1: It's where forty one was an hour five.
Speaker 2: Percent when you go about now it's seventy percent. And
Speaker 2: there is a lot of concern that this is just incrementalism,
Speaker 2: and she really wants to get it down to thirty percent,
Speaker 2: and probably you'll end up only being allowed to ride
Speaker 2: a bike on one of her.
Speaker 1: Precious bike ways.
Speaker 6: Wow, I dear right.
Speaker 2: Vacant, because no one wants to be in a city
Speaker 2: where you're stuck in traffic.
Speaker 6: People just end up.
Speaker 4: Getting rid of their cars because it doesn't turn out
Speaker 4: to be the most convenient way to travel if you've
Speaker 4: got to crawl along at forty k's an hour. But
Speaker 4: I do wonder if this is just massive revenue raising as.
Speaker 6: Well, because I've been done by we're talking.
Speaker 4: About this this article named Glebe Forest Lodge. These are
Speaker 4: high residential areas. No one's tuning around them, but there
Speaker 4: are a lot of people living in apartments in those areas.
Speaker 4: This isn't the CBD we're talking about anymore. You have
Speaker 4: trade quite a ways out of that and are now
Speaker 4: making everything forty ks. Those living in those areas will
Speaker 4: be like a night man.
Speaker 2: People just residents, but business owners have said there's a
Speaker 2: lot of you know, trucks and delivery drivers that have
Speaker 2: to commute through all of those areas.
Speaker 1: This is just going to slow business step.
Speaker 6: There's a certain bloke in a blue Ford Falcon station
Speaker 6: wagon who's constantly driving through those areas well over forty
Speaker 6: degrees o k is an hour and it's just honestly,
Speaker 6: you're already stung enough. Interestingly, this will cause the people
Speaker 6: to rise up already. This is happening in Gaula, which
Speaker 6: is the first inland country town of South Australia. Some
Speaker 6: local has gone around changing all the fifty kilometer an
Speaker 6: hour speed limit signs to eighty and has even added
Speaker 6: a sign to them saying note the new speed limit changes.
Speaker 6: It was done by ah authority. So that's what's going
Speaker 6: to happen. But what would you turn forty into four?
Speaker 2: People of in a Sydney are going to rise up.
Speaker 2: Don't repaint the traffic signals. Vote clover more out of
Speaker 2: office pan front page of the Courier Mail reads revealed
Speaker 2: Ossie households in survival mode home stress fire sale. Twenty
Speaker 2: thousand Queensland families have been forced to sell their homes
Speaker 2: in distress sales in the past year, with one in
Speaker 2: five mortgage holders switching to survival mode interest only payments.
Speaker 2: And of course we've had thirteen rate rises with the
Speaker 2: RBA set to meet again in August and no one's
Speaker 2: tipping rates are going to come down, Joe. All the
Speaker 2: hot news is that it will probably go up, maybe
Speaker 2: not in August, but in the meeting after that. Twenty
Speaker 2: percent of people going to interest only mortgages because they
Speaker 2: can't afford the full repayments.
Speaker 6: There's absolutely terrifying and every time there's a new rate
Speaker 6: I almost feel it in my guts. But this story
Speaker 6: is really the one that's captured my imagination. This blues
Speaker 6: out of his depth. I thought, what's going on here?
Speaker 6: The picture lead in the Courier Mail New South Wales
Speaker 6: serial pest as that guy keeps running across the field
Speaker 6: of the Melbourne Cup. Is that the guy who keeps
Speaker 6: jumping onto the court of the Australian Open No it's
Speaker 6: Jerome Law, the Blues origin player much more serious pest.
Speaker 6: Here's the ultimate embarrassment of being rescued by a young
Speaker 6: life saver in floral budge smugglers yesterday as the cocky
Speaker 6: Blues took time out to play at a water parke.
Speaker 6: They are just spoiling for a fight, aren't they.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to look out what was.
Speaker 2: More embarrassing that he had to be saved from the
Speaker 2: surf or he was wearing the floral bungee smugglers.
Speaker 6: Well, I think that is the point that the Courier
Speaker 6: Mail is very much trying to make. You'd run the ground,
Speaker 6: wouldn't shameless tribalism that you see North Perhaps.
Speaker 4: Were there though, and captured the whole thing. You just
Speaker 4: never know who's watching. To the front page of the
Speaker 4: Australia Now Appointment, the ACU wanted to keep quiet. Well
Speaker 4: they are unsuccessful, obviously because we're reading all about it.
Speaker 4: Administrators that the Australian Catholic University authorized a secret one
Speaker 4: million payment to its new Dean of Law after she
Speaker 4: was stood down from the role three months into her tenure,
Speaker 4: in circumstances believe to be the result of her outspoken
Speaker 4: views on abortion. I think it's safe to say that
Speaker 4: she would have been against it, this being a cu no.
Speaker 1: An advocate for the problem.
Speaker 2: But she's not only been stood down from that role,
Speaker 2: she was then later reassigned another role at the university
Speaker 2: on quite a large wage.
Speaker 4: So well this was done, Willia dollars is quite a
Speaker 4: nice welcome back.
Speaker 2: Well, yes, she was paid a million dollars I believe
Speaker 2: as compensation for being removed from that role. Then she's
Speaker 2: been given another role with a pretty hefty pay rise
Speaker 2: at a time when according to The Australian, the university
Speaker 2: is reporting the financial losses of thirty.
Speaker 5: That new role.
Speaker 6: Part of that new role, incidentally is professor emeritus of
Speaker 6: not talking about abortion.
Speaker 1: Indeed, it does seem.
Speaker 6: That way, and quickly the Anten Years band aid solution.
Speaker 6: Thank you very much, anten Years great newspaper. They're obviously
Speaker 6: watching us last night and they basically said exactly what
Speaker 6: we said about the the curfew move in Alice Springs.
Speaker 6: So there you go, you're welcome.
Speaker 2: We're going to go to a break when we come back,
Speaker 2: a pro Palestinian protest and choose us the wrong audience
Speaker 2: to make his stand that's coming up in a moment.
Speaker 1: We know.
Speaker 2: There's an old adage in show business know your audience.
Speaker 2: That advice might have helped this unlucky pro Palestinian protester
Speaker 2: who chose a NASCAR event to.
Speaker 1: Make his stand. Here's what happened. But Liz like a report.
Speaker 1: It's okay. He's learned his lesson. His next protest will
Speaker 1: be at a rodeo.
Speaker 4: Not straddling very precariously a fence. Well in news that
Speaker 4: will surprise absolutely no one. Wooby Goldberg of America's much
Speaker 4: loved show The View proved once again what we already know,
Speaker 4: and that is there is absolutely no situation in which
Speaker 4: they will not vote for Biden.
Speaker 1: Have a watch.
Speaker 12: I don't care if he's cooped his pants. I don't
Speaker 12: care if he can't put a sentence together. Show me
Speaker 12: he can't do the job, and then I'll say, okay,
Speaker 12: maybe it's time to go now. He had a bad
Speaker 12: night the first time that he went out and debated
Speaker 12: with Kamila Harris, and everybody wanted him to quit there
Speaker 12: and say you can't talk to women like this, So
Speaker 12: you're doing this wrong, you're doing that wrong. He came back,
Speaker 12: said you know what, I got it and gave four years.
Speaker 12: So yeah, I have poopy days all the time, all
Speaker 12: the I stepping so much pool you can't even imagine.
Speaker 6: Unbelievable.
Speaker 4: So clearly, according to Wooby Goldberg and the Ladies on
Speaker 4: the View, hooping your pants and being unable to form
Speaker 4: a sentence does that you can't do the job of
Speaker 4: Commander in chief president of the United America.
Speaker 6: This is the Left helping. Like, up until now, we
Speaker 6: all just thought Joe Biden was mened. No one had
Speaker 6: an image of him wearing an adult diaper. And now,
Speaker 6: thanks to Whoopy just freestyle and just you know a
Speaker 6: bit of word association, now everyone's got an image of
Speaker 6: Joe like dropping in his dast.
Speaker 4: And she's like, that's fine, that's normal.
Speaker 6: Like you it all the time myself.
Speaker 2: It all takes it arrangement syndrome right where you'd rather
Speaker 2: give the nuclear codes to a man with dementia than
Speaker 2: vote for Trump.
Speaker 1: I mean, it doesn't get any more ridiculous.
Speaker 4: Oh, the Dens know what's good for them. They will
Speaker 4: put somebody up. It is literally just a matter of time.
Speaker 4: Don't worry, whoopee, you will not have to vote for
Speaker 4: someone who is keeping their pants and unable to form
Speaker 4: a center.
Speaker 6: Michelle Obama, she's continent.
Speaker 1: We're gonna go now. That's it from us, but stick around.
Speaker 1: Coming up in just a moment is the readA Penny
Speaker 1: Show