Speaker 1: This is outside, Good morning, and welcome to outsiders. The
Speaker 1: show that is to woke, virtue signaling and identity politics
Speaker 1: gone bonkers. What certain members of the modern church are
Speaker 1: to teaching the sanctity and purity of the Christian faith.
Speaker 2: The Bible indicates that Jesus was bisexual, saying he had
Speaker 2: a special love for John, and Jesus's last words implored
Speaker 2: his mother to regard his love John as his partner,
Speaker 2: their son in law, part of her family.
Speaker 3: Yes, and while we're making a mockery of the teachings
Speaker 3: of Jesus, why not make a mockery of religious art
Speaker 3: At the same time.
Speaker 2: Christian art shows John and Jesus physically close, embracing, cuddling,
Speaker 2: lying upon each other.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, what did they ever do this?
Speaker 4: Why did they ever do this without certain other religions?
Speaker 4: I don't know, but you know, not only does he
Speaker 4: take the name of Jesus in vain if you go
Speaker 4: on here, he actually also takes my name in vain too.
Speaker 2: James, the first King of England, justified his own bisexuality
Speaker 2: with reference to Jesus being gay. Priests, bishops, philosophers, and
Speaker 2: theologians have agreed.
Speaker 5: Do they have it. What is he talking about?
Speaker 1: More LGBT vicar. Meanwhile, we wait for the end of days,
Speaker 1: let's grab the latest outside of news. I think James
Speaker 1: is right. I imagine the vicar probably wouldn't be out there
Speaker 1: mocking other religions in quite the same way. Now, speaking
Speaker 1: of really bad news out of Melbourne yesterday, this is
Speaker 1: just a shocking story. I heard late last night that
Speaker 1: Mount Scopus, the Jewish school, the Burwood campus there had
Speaker 1: this die graffiti on the walls of it. Yesterday I
Speaker 1: heard it from various members of the Jewish community in
Speaker 1: Melbourne and in Sydney, Utterly appalled, very scared, worried, disturbed.
Speaker 1: Where is the political leadership, Where are the authorities in
Speaker 1: this country who are now going to crack down? We
Speaker 1: need to see arrests rita, we need to see people
Speaker 1: being prosecuted for this sort of behavior. It's gone on
Speaker 1: since October ninth. Shamefully in this country we haven't seen
Speaker 1: any arrests. We haven't seen I believe there should be
Speaker 1: deportations if people are on here on visas who are
Speaker 1: stirring up this sort of anti Semitism. When are the
Speaker 1: authorities going to crack down it's now unacceptable. You cannot
Speaker 1: have a school children Australia Ossie school kids going to
Speaker 1: a school where profited on the wall in large letters
Speaker 1: is the words jew die reta.
Speaker 3: It's disgusting, it is, and it's the experience we've seen
Speaker 3: across much of Europe before October seven. We've talked about
Speaker 3: it on this program in countries like France and Belgium,
Speaker 3: where there was this hostility towards the Jewish community so
Speaker 3: much so that Jews were hiding signs of their Jewishness.
Speaker 3: And we're seeing that now in Australia, where people are
Speaker 3: reluctant to show a Star of David necklace or where
Speaker 3: the kip are because they may be attacked and that
Speaker 3: it should never come to that. And Jewish schools have
Speaker 3: such enormous security, and they had it again before October seven,
Speaker 3: which tells you about the fears that are there and
Speaker 3: why those fears were completely rational and sound, because we're
Speaker 3: seeing it come out now, seeing really ugly behavior be
Speaker 3: normalized and rationalized by some politicians. And there's some on
Speaker 3: the left who really need to speak out very very
Speaker 3: loudly now and just calmed down their constituents and we
Speaker 3: know who their constituents are. These aren't conservative people, we
Speaker 3: know where they come from, and their leadership needs to
Speaker 3: take a stand and say this is not acceptable. There
Speaker 3: is no justifications for it.
Speaker 4: Well, look, there's an awful lot to say about this,
Speaker 4: and none of it, unfortunately, is good. And I'm sorry
Speaker 4: that we have to start out with such a downbeat,
Speaker 4: dark story on a Sunday morning here. But the thing is,
Speaker 4: too we cannot ignore the fact that the political context
Speaker 4: of this is one in which we have a government
Speaker 4: here which has uniquely been supine in the face of
Speaker 4: anti Semitism. Sure Ethnobousy will sometimes talk a strong game
Speaker 4: about this, but then he always might sit by and
Speaker 4: also Islamophobia and also this, and also that, and tries
Speaker 4: to have a bet each way.
Speaker 5: And we know why he is doing this.
Speaker 4: Number one, because of course he's got all these Greens
Speaker 4: and you know, hard left people within his own party
Speaker 4: who are dragging him to the left. Number two, because
Speaker 4: there are multicultural constituencies that he needs to keep on
Speaker 4: side because otherwise Zell desert him for independent candidates in
Speaker 4: the next election, and he can't afford to lose any
Speaker 4: of them, you know. And the third thing is that
Speaker 4: there is this general sort of attitude out there that
Speaker 4: somehow everything Israel does is wrong. And because it kind
Speaker 4: of is this confluence of three sort of terrible sort
Speaker 4: of streams of thought, you know, classic anti Semitism, classic
Speaker 4: anti Westernism, and of course you know, the glorification of
Speaker 4: every sort of third world revolutionary movement. This is a
Speaker 4: three historical forces all conflict on Israel here, and this
Speaker 4: is why we have this situation where absolutely nothing Israel
Speaker 4: done is you know, is ever acceptable, and everything they
Speaker 4: do is a target and he needs to say no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 4: he needs to do like what Joe Biden did. Even
Speaker 4: Joe Biden was smart enough in the US to say
Speaker 4: that with the criminal court put out that word for
Speaker 4: Netanyahu's rest, they said, no, that's ridiculous, absolutely no way. Albanize, well,
Speaker 4: I'm not going to comment on that sort of it's
Speaker 4: that sort of it's that sort of outrageous, disgusting double
Speaker 4: two sided game that he's trying to play, and it
Speaker 4: leakes book week and you know, it says, remember the
Speaker 4: other day when Albinizi was at that rally for women's
Speaker 4: rights and domestic violists and he said, well, I'm the
Speaker 4: Prime Minister, and everybody made the comment they said, well,
Speaker 4: Prime Minister, if you have to remind people that you're
Speaker 4: in charge, you're not. And all of this is reminding people.
Speaker 4: The ICC, this is the other things are reminding people
Speaker 4: that actually he's not in the driver's seat anymore. It's
Speaker 4: these hard left groups, it's the Greens, it's a Muslim.
Speaker 3: Ran I tend to disagree on one point because I
Speaker 3: think his personal politics lines up to this. He's been
Speaker 3: a member of the socialist left faction all his political life.
Speaker 3: He's been bragging about fighting Tories as a man in
Speaker 3: his fifties. You know, this is a student activist who's
Speaker 3: now sitting in the lodge. And that false equivalency, that
Speaker 3: that nonsense about both sides. He can never just condemn
Speaker 3: anti Semitism. He has to bring in Islamophobia, even if
Speaker 3: there's none apparent. It's apparent in the response to the
Speaker 3: ic C. It's precisely what the ICC has done by
Speaker 3: charging three Hamas leaders as well as Nettinnahu and the
Speaker 3: Defense Minister, that they're saying, well, they're all sort of
Speaker 3: the same, you know, they're all similar criminals in the
Speaker 3: eyes of the ICC, they've all got arrest warrants. And
Speaker 3: for the Prime Minister to decline to condemn that unequivocally,
Speaker 3: for the Foreign Minister to seemingly approve of it with
Speaker 3: a statement through DEFAT, which DEFAT released a statements talking
Speaker 3: about the independents of the ic see and how they
Speaker 3: support the art. What are they thinking. Even Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: with his cognitive decline, with the completely bewildered state he
Speaker 3: is in ninety percent of the time, even his administration
Speaker 3: had the good sense to come out and immediately condemn it.
Speaker 1: Absolutely well. It's the failure of leadership in this country,
Speaker 1: the failure of labor leadership, as Rita says, while you
Speaker 1: had Albanizi wandering around saying, oh, I can't possibly comment,
Speaker 1: as I'll be detailing later in clown show, appropriately any
Speaker 1: Wong was rushing out there saying, oh no, no, We've
Speaker 1: got to listen to the ICC, or words to that effect.
Speaker 1: Utterly disgraceful. But a group of Jewish women have called
Speaker 1: out on Penny Wong to show some proper leadership in
Speaker 1: the light of what has happened this week as well.
Speaker 1: We saw the appalling footage that was released to those
Speaker 1: poor Israeli girls, those Jewish girls being held by these
Speaker 1: disgusting creatures of her mass commenting about making them pregnant,
Speaker 1: about how beautiful they were before raping them, and who
Speaker 1: knows what else. We saw that footage, and following that footage,
Speaker 1: a group of Jewish women in Australia came out and said,
Speaker 1: where is Penny Wong and where are the women of
Speaker 1: labor standing up for we Jewish women and supporting us.
Speaker 1: So many people have failed to stand up and show
Speaker 1: that leadership, particularly from the women's movements equally at the
Speaker 1: same time, and I'm sorry, I'm going to have to
Speaker 1: repeat this again and again and again. On this program.
Speaker 1: We warned about ANOIR, the United Nations Relief and Works
Speaker 1: Agency years ago. We encouraged Julie Bishop to stop funding
Speaker 1: it with Australian dollars. She took that advice and stopped
Speaker 1: doing so. Pennywong immediately restarted that funding, then canceled it,
Speaker 1: then restarted it again with the help at the urging
Speaker 1: and the behest of the Teals. I will waive this
Speaker 1: piece of this letter of shame again and again because
Speaker 1: the Teal women, all of them, called for the refunding
Speaker 1: of UNWAH. We learned this week that some of the
Speaker 1: bodies of those girls and women and hostages for bodies
Speaker 1: were found in a tunnel in a building belonging to Anoir,
Speaker 1: according to Israeli Defense Force reports. Hang your head in shame.
Speaker 1: Left lefties, all of you, hang your head in shame.
Speaker 1: You're an utter disgrace. We need or some authority in
Speaker 1: this country. We need people to be arrested for the
Speaker 1: anti Semitism and put in jail or deported. That must happen.
Speaker 1: Anything less than that is an absolute disgrace. And for
Speaker 1: all you politicians who supported the refunding of UNOIR, shame
Speaker 1: on the lot of you. Now, let's also talk about
Speaker 1: a lot slightly lighter note. I used to be on
Speaker 1: the Green and Transfer with Jane Carrow and Dean Madigan.
Speaker 1: Dean Madigan's popped up in the news again.
Speaker 5: Jane's Oh, dear Madigan. Yeah, this is actually really not
Speaker 5: one of them so much, but.
Speaker 4: The funniest things I've seen. It's one of the most
Speaker 4: fantastic sort of self ownership sort of examples I've seen
Speaker 4: in a long time. Here, d mad again has gone out,
Speaker 4: and she has gone and said, done this whole video
Speaker 4: about how Peter barely made it through university and he
Speaker 4: failed all these courses.
Speaker 5: Let's have a look at this.
Speaker 6: In his first here he seeks subjects.
Speaker 7: Guess how many hated.
Speaker 8: Dot in the past.
Speaker 4: Now, the Hilary's thinking about this is that's not Peter
Speaker 4: dunnee university transcript. That was actually from a parody, fake
Speaker 4: news article from years ago that she found and decided
Speaker 4: that she was going to go and put that out
Speaker 4: there as Peter Dunne's transcript and say, oh, he didn't
Speaker 4: go to university. And then also the other thing too,
Speaker 4: is that Paul Keating. Of course he famously dropped out
Speaker 4: of school at fourteen, and wouldn't expect to see d
Speaker 4: having a swipe at Keating.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, never mind that either she fell full a
Speaker 3: parody or whatever. That was the guy who put up
Speaker 3: that transcript, and you know, put that up and had
Speaker 3: to be fact checked by community notes on x formerly Twitter.
Speaker 3: So that was amusing. There were a couple of fact
Speaker 3: checks there, but just the whole notion that this would
Speaker 3: let's just say, if it was true and that was
Speaker 3: Peter Dutton's transcript, that that kind of would embarrass him
Speaker 3: and make him unfit to be a prime minister. You
Speaker 3: mentioned Paul Keating, there are so many other great leaders
Speaker 3: whose academic record is nothing to write home about academic results,
Speaker 3: as we have seen with the CAVS academia, because there's
Speaker 3: a lot of very qualified academics who are completely cuckoo
Speaker 3: and it would never ever allow them to have any
Speaker 3: power in government. So did he use it to try
Speaker 3: to embarrass Peter Dutton itself just shows me how out
Speaker 3: of touch it'd have to be with ordinary Australians who
Speaker 3: don't use someone's academic results to determine their suitability for leadership.
Speaker 1: Absolutely well, as you're right if you look at what
Speaker 1: is going on in our universities. I dropped out of
Speaker 1: the A and U out of law at the A
Speaker 1: and U. I don't regret a single day of it.
Speaker 1: The kids who are duped into going through many of
Speaker 1: these university courses and the stuff that they are coming
Speaker 1: out with speaks for itself. Meanwhile, while the Victorian police
Speaker 1: should be out there arresting people for scrawling to die
Speaker 1: on the walls of a Jewish school, instead the Victorian
Speaker 1: Police RITA are out there doing something far more important,
Speaker 1: which is attending a smoking ceremony.
Speaker 3: Well, not just a smoking ceremony, this is the Police
Speaker 3: Commissioner Shane Darton doing a apology, landmark apology for the
Speaker 3: Stolen Generation. Now, if the Victorian police are going to
Speaker 3: apologize for anything, particularly Shane Patent, it should be for
Speaker 3: what they actually did, which was shooting Robert Pullas during protests. Absolutely,
Speaker 3: for arresting grandmothers on park benches or harassing them and arresting.
Speaker 1: Strangling, running over them.
Speaker 5: The list is long.
Speaker 3: We play you the video here, But no, instead of that,
Speaker 3: Shane Patton, it was only a couple of weeks ago
Speaker 3: telling us in the Herald Son that I am not woke,
Speaker 3: is now apologizing wholeheartedly for the for the police force's
Speaker 3: role in the Stolen Generation.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, James, we learned that Victoria is the worst place
Speaker 1: in the country to do business in, according to according
Speaker 1: to an article Australian Bureau Statistic Starter compiled by the
Speaker 1: Institute of Public Affairs. What's this story, James, Well, yeah.
Speaker 4: The story as well as you would expect. Victoria is
Speaker 4: high tax, high regulation, hard to start a business, hard
Speaker 4: to keep a business going.
Speaker 5: That's why we go to the CBD.
Speaker 4: All these businesses are shut up and closed up of
Speaker 4: the entire city. The entire state is now basically organized
Speaker 4: as far as I can tell reading. You live there
Speaker 4: for the benefit of the public service, and that's it.
Speaker 5: And the ones you show.
Speaker 4: Up to work and try operating in a retailer or
Speaker 4: a coffee shop when all of the public services are
Speaker 4: home zooming and checking on their sourdough starters. But this
Speaker 4: is the real thing, you know, This is the thing.
Speaker 4: Andrews left Victoria in an absolute mess. This guy was
Speaker 4: an absolute hardcore socialist. He has destroyed the economy, he
Speaker 4: has left it with a huge amount of debt. He's
Speaker 4: broken the spirit of the place, and no wonder it's
Speaker 4: hard to do business.
Speaker 3: And we had a poll come out this week in
Speaker 3: the nine Papers, the Age newspaper, and a poll showing
Speaker 3: the Libs well in front. If that poll's accurate, it's
Speaker 3: nothing for the big Libs to be happy about. It's
Speaker 3: because there is just so much pain in Victoria at
Speaker 3: the moment. That the state debt the highest of any
Speaker 3: state in the country, and those state taxes are biting hard.
Speaker 3: They're soaring land tax, for example, and they're just hooked
Speaker 3: on property.
Speaker 5: Taxes, the chi investment out of the state.
Speaker 1: Oh.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, they've made it clear if you're a property investor,
Speaker 3: go invest elsewhere because and a lot of buyers advocates
Speaker 3: are now telling their clients that. But you look at
Speaker 3: this starter that's in today's Sunday Herald Sun. The number
Speaker 3: of businesses that have packed up a left Victoria again
Speaker 3: the highest of any state, more than three thousand. And
Speaker 3: then you compare that to say, Western Australia they had
Speaker 3: one thousand extra businesses. South Australia had seven hundred and
Speaker 3: forty five.
Speaker 1: Queensland Wales lost, New South Wales lost.
Speaker 3: Two thousand six times. Victoria tops the list.
Speaker 1: Victoria tops the lists. No surprises there. But these labor governments,
Speaker 1: these left wing governments, are not doing businesses any favor.
Speaker 1: They're not doing mainstream Australia any favor, they're not doing
Speaker 1: small business as any favor. And there're certainly not doing
Speaker 1: the Jewish people of this country many favors that I
Speaker 1: can see either. Now they've called an election in the UK.
Speaker 1: Rishi Sunac wanted out into the rain. Strange choice. Someone
Speaker 1: on Twitter mentioned that maybe they got their cloud seeding wrong.
Speaker 1: That day. But anyway, standing there in the pouring down
Speaker 1: rain announcing that he's going to an early election, joining
Speaker 1: us from London as always is Esther Kraku. Esther, great
Speaker 1: to see you. Thank you so much for staying up late.
Speaker 1: We do appreciate it.
Speaker 5: Now, tell us what's.
Speaker 1: The mood in London about this new election that we've
Speaker 1: got in a month's time?
Speaker 9: So nobody expected call it a snap election on July fourth,
Speaker 9: and certainly not outside in the pouring rain, you'd think
Speaker 9: on a salary of one hundred and eighty thousand quid
Speaker 9: he could afforded.
Speaker 10: Apparently that's the case. Anyway.
Speaker 5: The question now is why now?
Speaker 9: Because actually the most rational to abdure for the Tories,
Speaker 9: given how terrible I've been pulling for months on end.
Speaker 9: Now I mean to close the gap in concerns in
Speaker 9: the Labor Party, but there is the Labor about the
Speaker 9: twenty lead consistently.
Speaker 10: For every year.
Speaker 9: Now a political thing to wait until the American elections because.
Speaker 1: Okay, sorry, es that we've just got a bad line there.
Speaker 1: Someone's jumped in, probably Kirs Starmer's tampering with your internet there.
Speaker 1: We'll get back to us for Esther shortly retain James.
Speaker 1: I was not astonished to learn that in the United States,
Speaker 1: twenty five states have now blocked or banned puberty blockers
Speaker 1: for miners. Now, we've been talking about this on this
Speaker 1: show for six or seven years, and I have been
Speaker 1: how that for doing so. But now twenty five states,
Speaker 1: James out and have said no to all this kind
Speaker 1: of gender surgery, gender blockers for youth.
Speaker 5: And here do you talk about England?
Speaker 3: They forget the NHS the NHS as well, so we've
Speaker 3: got the NHS.
Speaker 4: We've had France also has issued a huge report on
Speaker 4: exactly this from the French Parliament urging exactly the same move.
Speaker 4: Twenty five states in the United States have all gone
Speaker 4: down this road.
Speaker 5: Reading.
Speaker 4: The question that I have in all of this is,
Speaker 4: you know, the tide is obviously moving on this. Everybody
Speaker 4: has woken up to some of the really horrible things
Speaker 4: that are happening and have happened in the name of,
Speaker 4: you know, fighting transphobia or affirming trans kids, whatever that means.
Speaker 4: But instead, you know, here in Australia, there is so
Speaker 4: little data. They don't talk about it. They won't tell
Speaker 4: you how many people they've followed up on. There's this
Speaker 4: huge veil of silence on what's happening here in Australia.
Speaker 4: You know, you talk to the new South Wales gover,
Speaker 4: they don't want to talk about it. You talk to
Speaker 4: the Fens, they don't want to talk about it. This
Speaker 4: is a scandal of epic proportions that needs to be exposed.
Speaker 1: Well, we're not talking about it, James Our E Safety
Speaker 1: Commissioner Julia L. Grant has tried to suppress discussion on
Speaker 1: this very topic.
Speaker 5: Rita.
Speaker 1: We had here on the show Billboard, Chris Chris Elston
Speaker 1: who raised the whole issue to do with transgenderism, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera, and now Rita, he's again the E Safety Commissioner.
Speaker 1: They're coming after him, and a judge as well is
Speaker 1: basically trying to force him to say what he believes
Speaker 1: to be false.
Speaker 3: That's it that a transgender, a biological woman who now
Speaker 3: identifies as a man, who's transitioned. The judges said that
Speaker 3: they have to respect the new pronouns and that was
Speaker 3: the whole point of that tweet that E Karen JULIANMANK
Speaker 3: Grant took down. I mean, there are so many abusive, vile,
Speaker 3: ugly threatening posts. I receive them probably every day if
Speaker 3: I bothered to look at them. And yet she took
Speaker 3: down that one where this person was misgendered. So that
Speaker 3: just tells you about the politics of this woman. She
Speaker 3: is a far left activist that the Coalition government was
Speaker 3: stupid enough to appoint under Malcolm Turnbull. And here we are,
Speaker 3: so it really is and Billboard Chris has said he's
Speaker 3: not going to be abiding by this ruling. And we
Speaker 3: are an outlier. Now Australia is an outline. You've seen
Speaker 3: change in the UK, You've seen the change in Scandinavia,
Speaker 3: twenty five states in the US. Australia is now alone
Speaker 3: in just covering its eyes, blocking its ears and pretending
Speaker 3: all this evidence doesn't exist and that what we're doing
Speaker 3: is sound. So we're going to have lawsuits, We're going
Speaker 3: to have class actions in this country coming up with
Speaker 3: these poor kids who've had irreversible treatments, who've been left sterile.
Speaker 3: We've got all sorts of health compl occasions because authorities
Speaker 3: were too scared to not affirm whatever gender that's.
Speaker 1: And this is how orwellian is. You have this Ease
Speaker 1: Safety Commissioner who's running around making up basically going to
Speaker 1: a judge and then forcing some character to say that
Speaker 1: a man is a woman when that person is convinced
Speaker 1: that it is not. That is not the case. So
Speaker 1: it's pure black mirrors. It's pure or well and that
Speaker 1: is the Alban Eazy government at work. Let's go back
Speaker 1: to London chat to Esther about rishi Soon next July
Speaker 1: fourth election. Sorry Esther, we lost you there. Carry on,
Speaker 1: we missed most of that. So just talk us through
Speaker 1: what the mood in London at the moment about this
Speaker 1: upcoming election.
Speaker 9: Yeah, so Rihi Soon announced a snap general election on
Speaker 9: July fourth of this year. No one really understood the
Speaker 9: rush now for it. I mean he was standing outside
Speaker 9: of Downing Street in the pouring rain and the rest
Speaker 9: of us were wondering on one hundred and eighty thousand
Speaker 9: quid salary. I think you can't afford an umbrella. But
Speaker 9: apparently the logic here is that, you know, the Tories
Speaker 9: are not going to be able to close that twenty
Speaker 9: point lead that the Labor Party had been able to
Speaker 9: sustain for the last year, basically since list trust is
Speaker 9: collapsed and it doesn't look like the markets are going
Speaker 9: to look more favorable After the summer, there were hopes
Speaker 9: that the Bank of England will reduce interest.
Speaker 10: Rates in August, but it doesn't even.
Speaker 9: Look like they will reduce it by any considerable margin
Speaker 9: at most sort of, you know, twenty five basis points.
Speaker 10: So really it's looking like this.
Speaker 9: Is the best shot that rich Snak has now there
Speaker 9: were there there was a bit of noise in the
Speaker 9: Conservative Party to hope to wait until December after the
Speaker 9: American elections, because you know, a Trump presidency looks a
Speaker 9: lot better with a Sunak premiership as opposed to a
Speaker 9: Kirstarmer premiership. We remember, you know, the London mayor Cidi
Speaker 9: Khan had strong words for Donald Trump, and Donald Trump
Speaker 9: doesn't forget he's a very petty character. And we still
Speaker 9: haven't secured a free trade deal with the Americans, so
Speaker 9: it would have made sense to wait till December. But
Speaker 9: Richie Sunac I think he suspects they're going to be
Speaker 9: more scandals coming out of the Conservative Party, more defections
Speaker 9: to labor, which would only beg in his position. And
Speaker 9: then they also questions about really kind of the policy
Speaker 9: direction that Rishisunak is going. Liz Trust is urging him
Speaker 9: to drop net zero, which I think would help. But
Speaker 9: the Conservative Party have a much bigger problem at their hand,
Speaker 9: which is, you know, the whole kind of policy agenda
Speaker 9: is completely off. I mean, yes, Boris Johnson became more
Speaker 9: and more unpopular after the net zero kind of fiasco.
Speaker 10: He became so enthralled in net zero.
Speaker 9: Many people were saying that it was basically because of
Speaker 9: his wife, Carrie Johnson, who was also very passionate about
Speaker 9: environmental issues, and which is not something he actually campaigned
Speaker 9: on when he became Prime minister. So many Conservatives were
Speaker 9: very shocked by that. But the Conservatives have a massive problem.
Speaker 9: I mean, there's a huge exodus of really long standing
Speaker 9: MPs that are leaving the party. Many younger MPs as well,
Speaker 9: many under the age of fifty five are actually have
Speaker 9: said they're planning on standing down. So really the Conservative
Speaker 9: Party is got it from the inside out by its
Speaker 9: own party. And I think this is why Rishisa decided
Speaker 9: to call the election now, to kind of get it
Speaker 9: over with and to soften the blue as much as possible.
Speaker 3: Is it also to save his job? Is that part
Speaker 3: of the reason? And was there any talk about him
Speaker 3: being replaced? Because I just don't know why you would
Speaker 3: go to a general election and have a certain defeat
Speaker 3: and not at least give yourself a chance by perhaps
Speaker 3: having a new leader who might reinvigorate the base.
Speaker 9: Well, Rishisunac has been dealing with a lot of sort
Speaker 9: of murmurings of a vote of no confidence, particularly after
Speaker 9: the local council elections back in earlier this month, and
Speaker 9: this is another reason why people are speculating that you
Speaker 9: haven't seen the two most popular Conservative politicians at the
Speaker 9: moment out and about and doing a lot of media.
Speaker 9: That's Kemmy Beadenoch and Penny Mordant who are likely to
Speaker 9: succeed Rishie Sunac, alongside maybe sort of Pretty Patel and
Speaker 9: other kind of long standing Conservative MPs.
Speaker 10: And that does make sense. But at the end of
Speaker 10: the day, I think knows that no matter what he does,
Speaker 10: it's all lost for the Tories at this point.
Speaker 9: I mean, choosing between Richie Sunac and Kirstarma is like
Speaker 9: choosing between colera and dysentery, and both are extreme and
Speaker 9: unfortunately we have a very very sad choice ahead.
Speaker 4: Though I mean, like as you say, they do seem
Speaker 4: to have a sad choice here, but through the last
Speaker 4: few hours we've seen news at Richie sunak now at
Speaker 4: this very late hour in the day, wants to kick
Speaker 4: off a debate on national service.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 4: I mean, this is a government that hasn't been able
Speaker 4: to implement you know, simple Rwanda solution here and now
Speaker 4: they're going to try and get everybody's side it for
Speaker 4: national service. How badly do they want to lose by here?
Speaker 9: Yeah, it's clear that Richie sunac Is is really clutching
Speaker 9: at straws. I mean to talk of national service when effectively,
Speaker 9: you know, as a percentage of our GDP armed force spending,
Speaker 9: Armed forces spending has been halved since the eighties, we're
Speaker 9: seeing a shortage of recruiting people into the armed forces.
Speaker 9: It's laughable that he thinks that any young person will
Speaker 9: sign up for national service. But the whole kind of
Speaker 9: you know, policy agenda of the Conservative Party is.
Speaker 10: Completely non existent.
Speaker 9: I mean, it would be nice if they were actually conservative,
Speaker 9: if anything, but in name only. But for the last
Speaker 9: fourteen years the Conservatives have basically been kind of like
Speaker 9: a poor man's Blair Act.
Speaker 10: They haven't really done anything very conservative.
Speaker 9: A lot of the things that people had issue with
Speaker 9: under the last labor government have really exacerbated under the
Speaker 9: Conservative government. They've not funded you know, law, the judicial system.
Speaker 9: They've not funded our prisoners, they've not funded our armed forces.
Speaker 10: You know, immigration has gone through the roof.
Speaker 9: One point two million people have come to this UK
Speaker 9: as the UK and suttled in this country over the
Speaker 9: last two years alone, which is the size of Birmingham.
Speaker 9: There's so many things that have worse than under the
Speaker 9: Conservative Party that they really have nothing to go on.
Speaker 1: Wow, Hester Craiker, great to chat to you as always.
Speaker 1: It's going to be a fascinating four weeks and we'll
Speaker 1: check in with you again soon. Thanks so much for
Speaker 1: staying up and chatting to us here outside. It's coming
Speaker 1: up after the break, Greats Reality Check, plus a lot
Speaker 1: more happening again on Counts Away, Kinetic.
Speaker 3: And you're watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Dean, James Morrow.
Speaker 3: And I'm readA panny here. You may know me from
Speaker 3: such programs as the reader Pane. He show Monday to Thursday, eleven,
Speaker 3: Monday to Thursdays at eleven and Left is Losing It Friday.
Speaker 1: Nights at nine Third Never Missing.
Speaker 3: Now talking about Left is Losing and let's talk about
Speaker 3: the weapon grade lunacy of the Biden administration, which extends
Speaker 3: to President Biden's judicial nominees.
Speaker 1: If you thought.
Speaker 3: Judges couldn't be infected with a woke mind virus that
Speaker 3: strips an individual of all rationality, logic, and judgment, then
Speaker 3: you haven't been paying attention. Here is Judge Sarah Netburn
Speaker 3: of New York, who Biden wants to promote to the
Speaker 3: US District Court. What share a Senator Ted Cruz of
Speaker 3: Texas subjects her to some tough questioning.
Speaker 5: In your court?
Speaker 11: What matters more the rights of individuals or your political ideology?
Speaker 12: I apply the law to the facts.
Speaker 5: I asked a question which matters more?
Speaker 12: Well, my political ideology doesn't matter at all?
Speaker 5: Okay?
Speaker 11: So I don't believe you, and I think this case
Speaker 11: demonstrates that you are willing to subjugate the rights of
Speaker 11: individuals to satisfy your political ideology. This case involves a
Speaker 11: male defendant who raped a nine year old boy.
Speaker 5: Was he guilty of that?
Speaker 12: Yes? The petitioner pled guilty to that.
Speaker 11: Okay, So he raped a nine year old boy. He
Speaker 11: also raped a seventeen year old girl. Was he guilty
Speaker 11: of that?
Speaker 12: He pled guilty.
Speaker 13: The petitioner pled guilty of that crime as well, So
Speaker 13: was he guilty? I hope so because she pled guilty
Speaker 13: to it.
Speaker 3: Did you notice that Judge Netburn calling the ripe person pedophile,
Speaker 3: a he and then a she. You know where this
Speaker 3: is going.
Speaker 11: One year after being released again, he was convicted of
Speaker 11: having child pornography.
Speaker 5: Is that correct?
Speaker 13: I'm unclear on exactly the timeframe that you're at, but
Speaker 13: the petitioner was convicted of distributing child pornography.
Speaker 11: Child pornography that was images of adults violently.
Speaker 13: Raping children, abhorrent conduct, okay, for which there are real victims.
Speaker 11: And this individual six foot two biologically a man. A
Speaker 11: minute ago you said that when this man decided that
Speaker 11: he was a she, You said this individual was quote
Speaker 11: I wrote it down sober and entirely a female. That
Speaker 11: phrase struck me as remarkable. Did this individual have male genitalia?
Speaker 12: I think what I said, or at least.
Speaker 5: That is a verbatim quote entirely a female?
Speaker 12: Sorry, what I meant to say was hormonally a female.
Speaker 11: Okay, but that's not entirely. Did this individual have male genitalia?
Speaker 12: Yes?
Speaker 11: So you took a six foot two serial rapist, serial
Speaker 11: child rapist with male genitalia. And he said, you know,
Speaker 11: I'd like to be in a women's prison. And your
Speaker 11: answer was that sounds great to me. Let me ask
Speaker 11: you something. The other women in that prison, do they
Speaker 11: have any rights?
Speaker 3: Yes, this judge, this Biden judicial nominee, recommended a serial
Speaker 3: rapist and pedophile William McLain who now calls himself July
Speaker 3: Justine Shelby, b hous with female inmates. Never mind the
Speaker 3: risk to the vulnerable female population, never mind the higher
Speaker 3: risk that this monster will re offend, never mind the
Speaker 3: rights of the women locked behind bars with a serial
Speaker 3: rapist with a penis who now calls himself July Justine Shelby. Oh,
Speaker 3: we don't have the grab.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 3: There was just more of Ted Cruz going after this judge,
Speaker 3: and it was glorious. But let's also here now from
Speaker 3: Senator Ted John Kennedy from the Great State of Louisiana,
Speaker 3: because he also had some gentle questioning for this judge.
Speaker 14: Because it's only hypothetical that Miss Shelby, mister McLean would
Speaker 14: reoffend again after he's already raped a ninety year old
Speaker 14: boy and a seventeen year old girl and there's been sinning,
Speaker 14: shut out, pouring through the mail. You said there's no
Speaker 14: chance you'll reoffend again, Did you say that.
Speaker 12: Senator Kenny. I based my decision on the record.
Speaker 14: You're really a political activish, laun't you.
Speaker 12: I am not, sir.
Speaker 3: Yes, she is a political activist, no business being a judge.
Speaker 3: But there are too many of them. And if you
Speaker 3: think watching that this madness could never happen here, that's
Speaker 3: just crazy American antiques Australia.
Speaker 10: It is not like that.
Speaker 3: Well think again, It's already happening here right now. In
Speaker 3: Victoria's biggest female prison, there is a male sexual predator,
Speaker 3: pedophile with a penis who nevertheless identifies as a woman.
Speaker 3: I was contacted by women at the Damefulless Frost Correctional
Speaker 3: Center in twenty twenty two, distraught about a violent male
Speaker 3: predator with a history of attacking women and children being
Speaker 3: in their facility. They had started a petition saying we
Speaker 3: feel threatened, unsafe, distressed and traumatized with this current situation.
Speaker 3: But sadly they're ignored by the prison authorities. They're ignored
Speaker 3: by the labor government in Victoria and the equally gutless,
Speaker 3: morally lost liberal opposition in Victoria. The only difference between
Speaker 3: US and the US is that we don't have the
Speaker 3: likes of Senator Cruz and Kennedy fighting back against this lunacy.
Speaker 1: Thanks reta extraordinary story. Well, joining us now to discuss
Speaker 1: Labor's anti nuclear should be nuclear nuclear as likes this
Speaker 1: out anti nuclear lunacy along with its secretive nature positive plan,
Speaker 1: which we exposed on the show here National ZMP David
Speaker 1: Gillespie joins us here in the studio. David, great to
Speaker 1: have you here with us on Outsiders, as always pleasure.
Speaker 1: We've heard all sorts of nonsense from Labor about nuclear. Now,
Speaker 1: why is nuclear so important in your opinion? It certainly
Speaker 1: is in my opinion, But why is it so important
Speaker 1: in your opinion now for Australia going forward.
Speaker 15: Because we're shutting down we're making our baseload energy system
Speaker 15: unviable economically through the national electricity market, which is not
Speaker 15: a market anymore. It's just a complex set of regulations, rules,
Speaker 15: mandates and subsidies that make coal power stations unviable. That's
Speaker 15: why people are closing them down early, because they can
Speaker 15: make money out of the subsidy go around.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 15: If we're going to replace them, well and good. But
Speaker 15: this myth that we can do it with multiple renewables
Speaker 15: that are overbuilt, totally unreliable, They're never there when you
Speaker 15: want them. We have too much at the moment in
Speaker 15: the middle of the day, is just a crazy concept.
Speaker 15: No one in the world is trying to do what
Speaker 15: we are doing. That's why we need nuclear because it
Speaker 15: is a proven technology, it's clean, and in the places
Speaker 15: that deploy it at scale, they have the cheapest electricity.
Speaker 15: And if the green machine thinks that the carbon footprint
Speaker 15: is the most important thing for an energy system, nuclear
Speaker 15: wins by a country mile. And the rest of the
Speaker 15: world's work that out, except this weird little country on
Speaker 15: the bottom of the Earth has an energy system that
Speaker 15: no one else is trying to do. They start in Germany,
Speaker 15: they started in other places in Europe, in America, in Texas, everywhere,
Speaker 15: they've all worked out the same thing. It just doesn't work.
Speaker 15: It's okay to have renewables as part of your mix,
Speaker 15: but you can't make it the essence of the system.
Speaker 15: That's why we need it now, and we'll get the
Speaker 15: very best technology that the world has got is available
Speaker 15: for us if we remove these ridiculous prohibitions, James.
Speaker 5: Tell us, then you know what is it?
Speaker 4: The ways in which the various authorities here seem to
Speaker 4: be putting their finger on the scale to make nuclear
Speaker 4: look really unattractive. I've seen estimates that the government uses
Speaker 4: in a nuclear power plant, for example, only has a
Speaker 4: life of thirty years, when in fact nuclear plants tend
Speaker 4: to go sixty seventy years plus. It seems that there's
Speaker 4: a deliberate effort by some who are making policy here
Speaker 4: to cook the books to make nuclear look far less
Speaker 4: economically viable than it is. Also with the assumed price
Speaker 4: of carbon things like that.
Speaker 15: Yes, they are doing that. They are putting parameters into
Speaker 15: the formula for levelized cost of energy, which may nuclear
Speaker 15: look expensive. Like you said, a thirty year lifespan, they
Speaker 15: have a design life of sixty years.
Speaker 5: And how long does the solar panel last?
Speaker 15: By the way, well, in that time you're lucky. The
Speaker 15: efficiency drops off over time, but twenty years would be
Speaker 15: a good lifespan. And the thing is, all the other
Speaker 15: parameters they put in are magnified for coal and fossil
Speaker 15: fuels and reduced for renewables. But the biggest misleading thing
Speaker 15: about all those integrated system plan plans and the gen
Speaker 15: cost report is it's a cost of generation only what
Speaker 15: everyone what you pay at the plant or at the
Speaker 15: bottom of the solar panel or the wind farm is
Speaker 15: what the generation cost is. But what you pay your
Speaker 15: power plug and it's on your bill is the full
Speaker 15: the levelized full system cost. Okay, not just the generation.
Speaker 15: So the lelized full system cost includes your poles and wires,
Speaker 15: all your inverters, all your green scheme costs, which is
Speaker 15: another huge cost, but.
Speaker 3: They never factor that in.
Speaker 15: When they never do, that's why they just cherry pick
Speaker 15: levelized cost of energy as though the capital cost of
Speaker 15: building a unit is related to the costs that you pay.
Speaker 15: But it's a totally different thing.
Speaker 3: We all see that because we all see our bills
Speaker 3: going up whilst we're told renewables are the cheapest form
Speaker 3: of energy, and we're having greater renewables, this market interference,
Speaker 3: the tax paying money that's going into it. But on
Speaker 3: top of that, we've got what's happening with our landscape,
Speaker 3: because we've got this beautiful landscape being scarred with what's
Speaker 3: six hundred thousand.
Speaker 5: Yes, hectares.
Speaker 3: Yes, you're going to be devo to more windmills, wind.
Speaker 15: Farms exactly, that's the plan. In Queensland, there's been a
Speaker 15: total expose of a crony development scheme. It's called State
Speaker 15: Code twenty three, whereby anyone who wants a DA for
Speaker 15: a wind farm gets assisted under that. It doesn't go
Speaker 15: through EPBC Act and or they get given discrasch, a
Speaker 15: chick and flick process. Sometimes these applications don't even have
Speaker 15: to go to the local council. Just the CEO can
Speaker 15: apply it. I'm informed by people in Queensland, and they
Speaker 15: can then land bankert and wait for us suckers called
Speaker 15: consumers to build them these unnecessary poles and wires everywhere
Speaker 15: criss crossing the country, and then they can turn up
Speaker 15: and they can blow up the sides of mountains. Stephen Nawokowski,
Speaker 15: who was a former Greens candidate and Green's activist, he
Speaker 15: has uncovered this. It's just absolutely astounding. There are one
Speaker 15: hundred and ten projects in Queensland alone that aren't most
Speaker 15: people aren't aware of, but they've all been approved under
Speaker 15: this State Code twenty three.
Speaker 3: Would any of them be to your knowledge commercially viable
Speaker 3: if not for the market interference, the tax pay dollars.
Speaker 12: They're going to.
Speaker 1: No, No, you've answered your own question. Read absolutely not quickly, David.
Speaker 1: We spoke with Professor and Plumber on the show recently
Speaker 1: about the glen Core plan to put carbon store it's
Speaker 1: under blow it into aquifers and get the Great Artesian
Speaker 1: Basin as there some kind of dumping ground for carbon dioxide.
Speaker 1: Complete madness, lefty stuff. It appears we've had a bit of.
Speaker 5: A win on that.
Speaker 1: One those things we're winding back, is that the case.
Speaker 15: Yes, the Queensland System of Assessment did apply the APBC
Speaker 15: Act for this. Fortunately due to activism by the local
Speaker 15: member for Flint, Colin Boyce, who chase the corridors of
Speaker 15: power in Bridgin and this it's been knocked back because
Speaker 15: even in their application they said it would affect the aquifer.
Speaker 1: It's not a.
Speaker 15: Confined little side thing. It is all connected to the
Speaker 15: Great Artesian Basin, and Colin and many others, many landholders
Speaker 15: agricultural organizations put up the red flag and said hang on,
Speaker 15: this is madness. But then again this other tick and
Speaker 15: flick process means you can bulldoze six hundred thousand hectares
Speaker 15: at least of Christine remnant vegetation.
Speaker 1: So what happened to nature positive? Nature positive doesn't apply
Speaker 1: to the lefty stuff, does it?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 1: Nature positive?
Speaker 15: This is coming to you from the home of motherhood statements.
Speaker 15: This is a backdoor way of getting the green agenda.
Speaker 15: The dark green extreme green end is the problem with us,
Speaker 15: US wicked people who use energy. We've destroyed the world,
Speaker 15: so we have to rewild. It is code for turning
Speaker 15: at least a third of our agriculture and productive land
Speaker 15: back to gum trees. And it's married that's nature Repair
Speaker 15: bill that has gone through the house. You will be
Speaker 15: able to get biodiversity credits, which again are like these
Speaker 15: latter day modern day tulip certificates that get traded for
Speaker 15: lots of money. Industrial people who are limited by the
Speaker 15: safeguard mechanism have to buy credits or pay big fines.
Speaker 16: So this.
Speaker 15: Restoring our rivers and THEODO biodiversity credits out of restoring
Speaker 15: nature are all going to make agriculture suffer.
Speaker 1: And what are the nationals doing to stop this? Because
Speaker 1: it's the farmers in rural Australia are really going to suffer.
Speaker 1: From as madness.
Speaker 15: Yeah, well, look we are objecting in every forum that
Speaker 15: we can talk about. The restoring our rivers means seven
Speaker 15: hundred and fifty giga liters of water won't be available
Speaker 15: for irrigation and growing food, and restoring nature will drive
Speaker 15: industrial conglomerates to buy farmland and lock it up as
Speaker 15: biodiversity credits. So farmland will become more expensive, but will
Speaker 15: there'll be less of it. Instead of farmers buying farmland,
Speaker 15: people running a coal mine or a furnace or a
Speaker 15: smelter will buy these credits and you'll make.
Speaker 5: Totally.
Speaker 4: But this is this is a heart of This is
Speaker 4: why there's an opposition to nuclear because with all the
Speaker 4: renewable stuff, there's all these treatable credits and all of
Speaker 4: these opportunities for people to make money and make derivatives
Speaker 4: and sorts things, whereas with nuclear you're just building a
Speaker 4: big atomic boiler and there's none of that opportunity.
Speaker 5: Is that the problem here.
Speaker 15: That is the existential problem. The whole rational for the
Speaker 15: renewable expansion is that it's low carbon, but we know
Speaker 15: it's not low carbon. It's mineral intensity. It's land destroying,
Speaker 15: it's sea destroying. It threatens our food security at land
Speaker 15: and sea. These wind farms off the Illawarra and Port
Speaker 15: Stephens are actually over fishing grounds. So there you go.
Speaker 1: So we're destroying our farmland, we're destroying our fishing land.
Speaker 1: We're destroying our oceans, our rivers, and they were even
Speaker 1: trying to destroy the water under the ground. This is
Speaker 1: the left at work in this country. This is what
Speaker 1: labor are doing. This is what the teals are doing.
Speaker 1: You voted teals. You're helping destroy the country, not make
Speaker 1: it better. In my opinion, this is an opinion show.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, David. You'll ask me for chatting
Speaker 1: to us with your opinions here on outside as we
Speaker 1: lack in eighteen you're watching Outsiders with Rita Panahee, with
Speaker 1: James Morrow and myself Rwandan, and thank you so much
Speaker 1: for watching us every Sunday morning. We certainly do appreciate
Speaker 1: being with you. Net Zany, we've just been talking about
Speaker 1: the zaniness of net zero. Couldn't go past this one
Speaker 1: Singapore Airlines who decided that the turbulence they experience and
Speaker 1: tragically one person died in that turbulence over Thailand and
Speaker 1: India in a Singapore Airlines flight, the pilot and others
Speaker 1: are blaming climber change. Of course the pilot is couldn't
Speaker 1: be anything else, could it. Anyway, James fascinated to learn
Speaker 1: that apparently the climate is homophobic.
Speaker 4: Well not just the climate, but apparently climate change is
Speaker 4: really homophobic. I mean, woo, climate, the climate change hates
Speaker 4: gay people. And I was reading this sort of headline.
Speaker 4: We had this headline here and they'd say that apparently
Speaker 4: same sex couples are at greater risk of experiencing the
Speaker 4: effects of climate change than everybody else, And I thought,
Speaker 4: oh my god, there's got.
Speaker 5: To be some sort of joke.
Speaker 4: Why because they're more likely to have beach houses or
Speaker 4: something like that. Well, actually, I just read the press
Speaker 4: release from the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law,
Speaker 4: which apparently is doing about as good a job as
Speaker 4: the UCLA School.
Speaker 5: Of Medicines these days.
Speaker 4: It is because gays are more likely to live in
Speaker 4: coastal cities, which are more likely to be impacted by
Speaker 4: climate change. So let's break break down the assumptions.
Speaker 3: There climate change disproportionately impacts wealthy people.
Speaker 4: Well, exactly, that's exactly right, But yes, so, but they
Speaker 4: have to figure out. They had to figure out a
Speaker 4: way to get people really revved up about climate change
Speaker 4: because you know the Rainbow agenda.
Speaker 3: Well, we also had Rachel Levine as they call themselves
Speaker 3: these days, saying that climate change disproportionately impacts black people.
Speaker 3: So this CLI course dread not only homophobic, it is racist.
Speaker 5: Wait till they.
Speaker 4: Find climate change is all tweets, it'll be all over
Speaker 4: from climate change.
Speaker 1: Now, as we mentioned earlier with Esther, Liz Trust has
Speaker 1: come out and said that Rishi Soon actually abandoned net zero. Now, Libs,
Speaker 1: I keep telling you here coalition Scott Morrison should never
Speaker 1: have gone in for net zero. That was an idiotic
Speaker 1: thing to do. But Libs take a leaf out of
Speaker 1: what Liz Trust is saying and go into then exhalation
Speaker 1: and say net zero it's finished. It's been a disaster.
Speaker 1: Crispo and equals net zero equals disaster. It's a very
Speaker 1: simple cell. Anyway, what do you make Liz trusts?
Speaker 4: Well, I mean I make of this the same thing
Speaker 4: I make of it here. But I think that there's
Speaker 4: you know, a broader problem that both the Tories in
Speaker 4: the UK have and that the Liberals and the Coalition
Speaker 4: have in Australia, which is that you know, they don't
Speaker 4: have the unity within the party to come out and
Speaker 4: see these sorts of things that need to be said. Yeah,
Speaker 4: number one net zero. But like also look at how
Speaker 4: people like soel A brave Man and Kevin bad Not
Speaker 4: got knocked around by the Party in the UK, you
Speaker 4: know months ago. This sort of moderate impulse in these
Speaker 4: parties winds up taking them in.
Speaker 5: The wrong direction.
Speaker 4: And we know here, you know, it's very simple get
Speaker 4: us out of that zero. There's other big issues that
Speaker 4: they can do. Peter dunt And could say, you know,
Speaker 4: rather than going back and forth on migration numbers, see
Speaker 4: we will take x number this number and they will
Speaker 4: be people who are going to contribute to this economy.
Speaker 3: Can I say something slightly controversial here?
Speaker 5: Well, good, I think that we don't know anything.
Speaker 3: Party is much with something they're very proud of. It's
Speaker 3: something John Howard used to talk about, this broad Church philosophy.
Speaker 3: It is their greatest weakness because as James just said,
Speaker 3: they have no unity, they have no party discipline. They
Speaker 3: don't take sensible decisions often because there are three or
Speaker 3: four bedwetters who are going to go out and cause trouble.
Speaker 3: They took ten months to come to a decision on
Speaker 3: the Voice for that reason, when it should have been
Speaker 3: evident to them within ten minutes, evident to any conservative
Speaker 3: with any conviction, why you would be against a race
Speaker 3: based referendum with what the Voice was proposing, enshrining that
Speaker 3: sort of racial privilege into the constitution. The Liberals and
Speaker 3: their broad church strategy is an absolutely negative force that
Speaker 3: is holding them back if you want to have party
Speaker 3: unity and discipline where you can come out and say
Speaker 3: we are against this because it's bad for the country.
Speaker 3: This is our policy. This is how we're different from later.
Speaker 4: Even though this week, you know, reader, you mentioned John Howard.
Speaker 4: He came out this week and said, you know, the factions,
Speaker 4: the factions are killing the party.
Speaker 5: And it's not just one particular faction.
Speaker 4: It is the moderates for example here New South Wales
Speaker 4: who have basically turned the entire party into this green program.
Speaker 4: This week we had Christpians in New South Wales. You're
Speaker 4: talking about that Zini. He had to come in and
Speaker 4: step in and keep the Auiran call fire hour going.
Speaker 4: Why because Matt Kean, when he was Energy Minister wouldn't
Speaker 4: do that because he was all about the big renewable
Speaker 4: energy zones.
Speaker 10: And we had the.
Speaker 3: Liberal leader in New South Wales was his name speaking.
Speaker 1: We never win an election saying that.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, renew nuclear is too far down the track.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, support lifting the ban, but we're going to
Speaker 3: go full bore and renewables a week phys ever going
Speaker 3: to provide you with base load power. We know why
Speaker 3: they're not for nuclear, and you touched on it earlier
Speaker 3: because if you have nuclear, if you've got reliable, cheap
Speaker 3: baseload power that is a mission free why would you
Speaker 3: need renewables?
Speaker 4: Would you need why would you need renewable subsidies? That's
Speaker 4: when it comes to you.
Speaker 1: It's all good.
Speaker 3: The billionaires are invested very heavy, and I'm.
Speaker 4: Sorry if we could spend you know, twelve billion dollars
Speaker 4: for Snowy Hydro two point zero, because.
Speaker 5: That's the bill.
Speaker 4: Now that's Malcolm and I can have an eight billion
Speaker 4: dollar nuclear play.
Speaker 1: And the machine is stuff, Lawrence. The snow machine is
Speaker 1: stuck in them out again.
Speaker 5: Great work, Turnbull, great work.
Speaker 1: Put that one on your CV Snowy two completely disaster.
Speaker 5: Push the water up here in the machine shom getting.
Speaker 1: Up stack in the tunnel. What a brilliant lot you are,
Speaker 1: you renewables mob, absolute joke. I'm not allowed to give
Speaker 1: financial advice, but don't. That's the renewables.
Speaker 5: After the break.
Speaker 1: What's more coming up here on outside is you would
Speaker 1: be hello, you're watching outsiders with the rita. You will
Speaker 1: earn nothing and you will be panahe James. Now is
Speaker 1: your time Morrow? And myself row and build back better. Yes.
Speaker 1: This week the great James Bond villain himself, Klaus Schard,
Speaker 1: announced he is stepping down from running the World Economic Forum,
Speaker 1: the global quasi fascist organization he's set up all the
Speaker 1: way back in the seventies, in which, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: the world's billionaires get to do business face to face,
Speaker 1: behind closed doors and over a glass of bubbly with
Speaker 1: questionable politicians, woke bureaucrats, elitist bankers, and celebrity crack pots
Speaker 1: without worrying about messy things like, you know, democratic mandates.
Speaker 1: At the annual Davos meeting every year, held high up
Speaker 1: in the Swiss Alps, in what genuinely has all the
Speaker 1: appearances of an Ian fleming baddie's lair. Armed police protect
Speaker 1: the elites from having to rub shoulders with awkward people
Speaker 1: like journalists, as they set about drawing up plans literally
Speaker 1: to reshape the planet to their own liking, using the
Speaker 1: two favorite fear mechanism of choice, the COVID pandemic and
Speaker 1: clime change, hoping to bring about what was talented for
Speaker 1: a while. As the Great resets.
Speaker 16: Our existing fragmented global architecture is not fit anymore for
Speaker 16: purpose in the twenty first century. It's high time for
Speaker 16: a great reset. We need a great reset set real shape,
Speaker 16: a much more resilient system for Seposcorona here.
Speaker 1: Oh well, I've held a very dim view of this organization,
Speaker 1: as you know for many years.
Speaker 16: Now it's historical moments, the time not only to fight
Speaker 16: severe virus, but to shape the system.
Speaker 17: We have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity
Speaker 17: to learn lessons in research ourselves on a more sustainable path.
Speaker 17: It is an opportunity we've never.
Speaker 5: Had before and may never have a game.
Speaker 17: So we must use all the leaves we have at
Speaker 17: our disposal, knowing that each and every one of us
Speaker 17: has a vital role to play.
Speaker 18: Now is the time to think what history would say
Speaker 18: about this crisis. What is it that would make it
Speaker 18: so that history would look at this crisis as the
Speaker 18: great opportunity for reset?
Speaker 19: The Great Reset is a welcome recognition that this human
Speaker 19: treasuredy must be a wake up call. It is imperative
Speaker 19: that we reimagine, rebuilt, redesign, reinvagorate, and rebalance our world,
Speaker 19: rebalancing investment, harnessing science and technology, and advencing the transition.
Speaker 5: To net zero emissions.
Speaker 19: All elements of the Great resets are fundamental to building
Speaker 19: the future we need.
Speaker 1: But Charlatan's the Great Racet. It is, in my view,
Speaker 1: essentially an attempt to dismantle capitalism and replace it with
Speaker 1: a form of corporate socialism, whereby, as far as I
Speaker 1: could tell, global governance bodies such as the United Nations,
Speaker 1: World Health Organization, the IMF, and others in cahoots with
Speaker 1: global mega corporations such as Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, and
Speaker 1: so on, would harness digital technology to impose a new
Speaker 1: financial framework to their advantage, where concepts like equity, social governance,
Speaker 1: diversity inclusion, and of course net zero emissions could potentially
Speaker 1: overrule or bypass the wishes of voters in democratic sovereign nations.
Speaker 1: In other words global fascism. Klaus is a huge.
Speaker 20: Fan of China and envisages China taking a leading role
Speaker 20: in world governance, and he also boasts how his acolytes
Speaker 20: such as Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Addrn have penetrated the
Speaker 20: cabinets of Western governments.
Speaker 1: Does not sound all that democratic to me.
Speaker 16: What we have to confront it's a deep systemic and
Speaker 16: structural restructuring of our world. And since we take some
Speaker 16: time and so the world we'd look differently after we
Speaker 16: have con sources transition process.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: Oh, and let's be honest. Class has never been one
Speaker 1: for looking on the bright side.
Speaker 16: I see the need for a great reason. So people
Speaker 16: assume we are just going back to the good old
Speaker 16: world which we had and everything we'll be normal again.
Speaker 16: This is uh, let's say fiction will not happen.
Speaker 1: Then there was his precious Fourth Industrial Revolution, yet another class,
Speaker 1: as many dire warnings, full of dystopian slogans, which is
Speaker 1: going to change what it means to be human.
Speaker 7: Apparently the false Industrial Revolution will impact our lives completely.
Speaker 7: It will not only change how we communicate, how we use,
Speaker 7: how we consume, it will change and actually as our
Speaker 7: own identity.
Speaker 21: Look at things like artificial intelligence exactly, robots look at
Speaker 21: things like gene editing exactly.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm opening a whole new horizon for medical science.
Speaker 16: And you see the difference of sis fose Industrial Revolution
Speaker 16: is it doesn't change what you are doing. It changes you.
Speaker 16: If you take a genetic editing just as an example,
Speaker 16: it's you who are changing. And of course this has
Speaker 16: a big impact on your identity.
Speaker 1: Yes, I imagine it does, mister Scribe. You can count
Speaker 1: me out if it's all the same of your fourth
Speaker 1: in that revolution and your Great Reset. Here's Mike Morano
Speaker 1: from Climate Depot, Climate skeptical organization.
Speaker 22: We didn't get to vote on whether gas powered cards
Speaker 22: were we banned. We didn't vote for vaccine mandates. We
Speaker 22: didn't vote for lockdowns. We didn't vote to have churches clothes.
Speaker 22: We didn't vote to have schools closed. We didn't vote
Speaker 22: for mask mandates. We didn't vote for banning of meat.
Speaker 22: But all of this is happening because at these meetings
Speaker 22: like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations, they
Speaker 22: meet and they work with government corporate collusion to bypass democracy.
Speaker 22: And then simple sentence, the Great Reset is basically making
Speaker 22: the once free West copy the same model as a
Speaker 22: China one party Chinese authoritarian rule.
Speaker 1: Couldn't have put it better myself. Here's the UK MP
Speaker 1: Andrew Bridgen commenting on the World Economic Forums claim that
Speaker 1: we own the science.
Speaker 23: A representative of the World Economic Forum told the audience
Speaker 23: at Dabos that my quote, we.
Speaker 5: Own the side.
Speaker 24: You know, we own the science and we think that
Speaker 24: the world, you know, should know it.
Speaker 23: What steps is the government taking to ensure that scientific
Speaker 23: research in the UK is impartial, objective and ethical, regardless
Speaker 23: of who's funding it.
Speaker 1: Yet he's the likely next Prime Minister of Britain. Kis
Speaker 1: Starmer labor saying he prefers Davos to Westminster.
Speaker 25: Let's just ask you quickly, you have to choose now
Speaker 25: between Davos or Westminster.
Speaker 26: Davos why because Westminster is too constrained and you know
Speaker 26: it's closed and we're not having many Once you get
Speaker 26: out of Westminster, whether it's Tavos or anywhere else, you
Speaker 26: actually engage with people that you can see working with
Speaker 26: in the future. Of Westminster is a tribal shouting play.
Speaker 1: No, kre Westminster is your democratic system. Davos is an
Speaker 1: elite can clam narration of people difference, and there, in
Speaker 1: a nutshell you have the problem.
Speaker 5: Of course, cooperation.
Speaker 1: Between big business and heads of government to ensure smooth
Speaker 1: relationships and hopefully better outcomes for all of us is
Speaker 1: one thing, but what happens when cooperation becomes collusion. What
Speaker 1: is most sinister about the World Economic Forum is how
Speaker 1: it slides or even hides its real agenda behind all
Speaker 1: those woke slogans the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the Great Reset,
Speaker 1: climate justice, stakeholder capitalism, or of course remember this classic
Speaker 1: you will own nothing and you will be happy. That
Speaker 1: line became a standard joke, and the World Economic Forum
Speaker 1: dropped it pretty sharpish. Well, who can forget the doozy
Speaker 1: of build back better?
Speaker 4: Build back better was for several years the go to
Speaker 4: phrase for every globalist politician who didn't.
Speaker 1: Actually have anything to offer the electrac and then when
Speaker 1: it failed, they simply rebranded build back better as the
Speaker 1: Great Reset.
Speaker 27: It's a very pertinent question to ask, how do we
Speaker 27: build that better?
Speaker 5: To build back better or whatever.
Speaker 13: We have a chance to reset the clock and build
Speaker 13: back better than before.
Speaker 5: To build back better than before.
Speaker 3: Remember the terrible damage of COVID.
Speaker 13: As we try to build back from this global pandemic.
Speaker 13: Do mine calls it build that better, build back better,
Speaker 13: building back better.
Speaker 26: We do things differently to build back better.
Speaker 5: We're going to build it back better.
Speaker 2: Build buck better, building back better, our economy.
Speaker 5: Build back better.
Speaker 19: All elements of the Great Reset are fundamental to building
Speaker 19: the future we need.
Speaker 15: This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset.
Speaker 16: It's a big effort to Some would say to build patal.
Speaker 16: We would say, to really have agreason.
Speaker 5: They please said conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Let's see how they slid. Build back better became the
Speaker 1: Great Reset just like that. But the problem is that
Speaker 1: behind all these benign sounding slogans are very scary, very
Speaker 1: dangerous and draconian actions being taken, undemocratic ones all around
Speaker 1: the world. There's every chance that we are teetering on
Speaker 1: a whole new world courtesy of this cronyism fascism, and
Speaker 1: it is a very very ugly world.
Speaker 8: Indeed, everywhere you look, small and medium sized farms being
Speaker 8: gobbled up by these corporate mega farms because they can't
Speaker 8: keep up anymore, they can't comply with these endless streams
Speaker 8: of regulations that are coming down. We're seeing that in
Speaker 8: China now where these giant, mechanized, corporate, big government controlled
Speaker 8: mega farms are displacing all these little small family farms
Speaker 8: that families have been farming for hundreds of years, in
Speaker 8: some cases longer.
Speaker 1: Hey, you don't have to.
Speaker 8: They're moving them all off their little plots of land
Speaker 8: and moving them into these big, horrific megacities that they
Speaker 8: have built. And we're going to see that all over
Speaker 8: the world with the decimation of small farm So if
Speaker 8: they're not bankrupted by economic forces, the governmentself will shut
Speaker 8: them down.
Speaker 1: I keep warning Australian farmers and rural communities if you
Speaker 1: keep on pandering or playing lip service to the climate
Speaker 1: change net zero renewables agenda, that is your future. Indeed,
Speaker 1: the Dutch have just finally turfed out Prime Minister Mark Ruta,
Speaker 1: supposedly a conservative but actually one of those golden young
Speaker 1: global leaders whose cabinet had been proudly penetrated by Klaus
Speaker 1: and his cronies. The Dutch farmers revolted, the public joined in.
Speaker 1: Rutter is now gone because of voter discussed at the
Speaker 1: way they were forcing farmers off the land because of
Speaker 1: climate change and net zero. So now that Klaus is
Speaker 1: heading out to pasture, unlike all those cows that the
Speaker 1: WEF want to see cold. Who will take over the
Speaker 1: World Economic Forum? Well, there are plenty of Bond style
Speaker 1: characters waiting in the wings, the aforementioned dreadful Mark Ruta,
Speaker 1: for one. Then there's the current president of the WEF,
Speaker 1: Borga Brenda, who's got all his lines off. Pat here
Speaker 1: he is that this year's Davos, explaining quite casually how
Speaker 1: the world's economies will go move beyond GDP measurements in
Speaker 1: favor of climate change and diversity.
Speaker 28: The future of Growth initiatives supported by a new framework
Speaker 28: that looks beyond GDP. Growth will be a two year
Speaker 28: campaign to help policymakers and economists share new ideas and
Speaker 28: best practices to balance growth with innuation, inclusion system nobelas
Speaker 28: and resilient squats.
Speaker 1: And then there's that old rascal Tony Blair who's clearly
Speaker 1: clearly got his eye on the top job. Back in
Speaker 1: the days he listened to him spooking vaccines as hard
Speaker 1: as he could.
Speaker 27: And you're you're eligible, and you've got no health recenting
Speaker 27: off being vaccinated. You're not just irresponsible, I mean you're
Speaker 27: an idiot. I'm sorry, I mean that's truthfully you are.
Speaker 27: I mean, because this omicron variant is so contagious. You know,
Speaker 27: if you're unvaccinated and you're in circulation, you're going to
Speaker 27: get it.
Speaker 1: Tony's a big fan of all this dystopian stuff as well.
Speaker 1: Forget digital ideas on Tony's moved on. He's out there
Speaker 1: flogging biometric ideas. You know, black mirror stuff where they
Speaker 1: scan your eyeballs or fingerprints or take your DNA every
Speaker 1: time you want to buy a chocolate bar to check
Speaker 1: your having gone past your allocated car and credit.
Speaker 27: I was then I remain even more convinced today, particularly
Speaker 27: with biometric technology, the world will move to biometric ID
Speaker 27: and they'll do it because in the end, it's.
Speaker 5: Better for people.
Speaker 27: It's not about Look, the amount of information government's going
Speaker 27: to have on you is going to be minimal compared
Speaker 27: to what your local supermarket has on you.
Speaker 1: Ah, that's reassuring. But my favorite on the casting couch
Speaker 1: to replace Klaus is Klaus's own daughter, Nichole Schwab. I mean,
Speaker 1: let's face it, the elites love nothing more than a
Speaker 1: bit of nepotism to keep matters all in the family here.
Speaker 1: She is hard at work living up to her father's dreams.
Speaker 29: This crisis has shown us that first of all, things
Speaker 29: can shift very rapidly when we put our minds to
Speaker 29: it and when we feel the immediate emergency to our livelihoods.
Speaker 29: And second that clearly the system I mean you mentioned
Speaker 29: it earlier.
Speaker 12: That we had been for is not sustainable.
Speaker 29: So I see it as a tremendous opportunity really to
Speaker 29: have this great reset.
Speaker 1: She certainly got all the jogging Dwan pat exciting times
Speaker 1: ahead for the World Economic Forum, But finally, could there
Speaker 1: be a one word explanation as to why Klaus is
Speaker 1: stepping down right now? That one word being Trump. Here's
Speaker 1: Conservative Heritage President Kevin Roberts speaking at Davos, Yes, at
Speaker 1: Davos this year, issuing at fairly blunt warning to the assembled.
Speaker 30: Elites President Trump, if he's the next president. For that matter,
Speaker 30: I think whoever, the next Conservative president, is going to
Speaker 30: take on the power of the elites, which I mentioned earlier.
Speaker 30: But the thing that I want to drive home here,
Speaker 30: the very reason that I'm here at Davos, is to
Speaker 30: explain to many people in this room and who are watching,
Speaker 30: with all due respect, nothing personal, but that you're part
Speaker 30: of the problem. President Trump, if in fact he wins
Speaker 30: a second term, is going to be inspired by the
Speaker 30: wise words of Javier Malay, who said that he was
Speaker 30: in power not to guide sheep, but to awaken lions.
Speaker 1: Yes, the hope of the free democratic world in preventing
Speaker 1: this globalist, elitist, quasi fascist, corporate climate, alarmist technocracy from
Speaker 1: stripping us of all our freedoms, may well rest with
Speaker 1: just one man, Donald Trump. Well, we mentioned at the
Speaker 1: top of the show the disgusting events in Melbourne yesterday,
Speaker 1: horrible graffiti at a Jewish school. The rise in anti
Speaker 1: Semitism since the atrocious October seventh attack has been a borrence.
Speaker 1: This Tuesday, I'm pleased to say, at seven pm on
Speaker 1: Sky News Australia is premi premiering a new documentary called
Speaker 1: Never Again The Fight against Anti Semitism, and it's presented
Speaker 1: by my good friend Josh Friedenberg. This documentary examines the
Speaker 1: alarming rise of antisemitism in Australia and its impact on
Speaker 1: our country and on our democracy. Just one of the
Speaker 1: featured guests is former Governor General Sir Peter Cosgrove.
Speaker 31: Watching What's Happening Today in Australia. Hitler would be giving
Speaker 31: thumbs up to those radical elements who are trying to
Speaker 31: breach this great pillar of Australia's national character. Hitler would
Speaker 31: be proud.
Speaker 1: Joining us now is the co CEO of the Executive
Speaker 1: Council of Australian Jury, Alex Rivchin, who himself also appears
Speaker 1: in this documentary and is also the author of the
Speaker 1: Seven Deadly Myths Anti Semitism from the Time of Christ
Speaker 1: to Kanye West. Alex, great to have you back on Outsiders.
Speaker 1: Hope you are well. You tell us a bit about
Speaker 1: your role in the documentary, but before we do that,
Speaker 1: I got to get your comments on the graffiti at
Speaker 1: the Mount Scoper School in Melbourne yesterday last night jew
Speaker 1: die was the words but.
Speaker 32: Up there, well, it's a horrific thing, you know, to
Speaker 32: see members of the Jewish community have to drive past that,
Speaker 32: Students that go to the school, parents that send their children.
Speaker 32: They're a place where their children, they believe are safe.
Speaker 32: And to know that someone went there and daubed the
Speaker 32: words jew die on the walls of that school, it's
Speaker 32: an awful thing. People will dismiss it as mere graffiti,
Speaker 32: but it's not It's a threat conveyed very publicly, very graphically,
Speaker 32: very vividly to the Jewish community, and it's the latest
Speaker 32: in what we've seen for seven or eight months now
Speaker 32: on a daily basis, assaults, intimidation, harassment, attacks on the
Speaker 32: Jewish community on our right to live in this country
Speaker 32: freely and peacefully as Jews and as Australians.
Speaker 4: James Alex, I want to ask you, what do you
Speaker 4: think about the way the Prime Minister and the government
Speaker 4: has been responding to this tidal wave of horrific anti Semitism,
Speaker 4: particularly around the way it seems very often the Prime
Speaker 4: Minister when he talks about anti Semitism he has to
Speaker 4: caveat it by saying in all other sorts of forms
Speaker 4: of discrimination, and the way in which he unlike other
Speaker 4: leaders such as Joe Biden, even I've come out against
Speaker 4: the ICC the Criminal Court and it's moved to arrest
Speaker 4: Benjamin Nett Yahoo. Do you think that there's a weakness
Speaker 4: at the top here that is creating a vacuum where
Speaker 4: these sorts of things can occur.
Speaker 32: I think the Prime Minister's response has been inadequate from
Speaker 32: the beginning, and from my dealings with the Prime Minister
Speaker 32: over the years, and also with the Foreign Minister and
Speaker 32: members of the cabinet. I don't believe that they enjoy
Speaker 32: seeing this surgeon anti semitism in our country. I know
Speaker 32: they're concerned about it, but there's a difference between expressing
Speaker 32: certain views privately, expressing solidarity with the community, and acting publicly.
Speaker 32: These are our national leaders. These people have been elected
Speaker 32: to lead on critical issues, and when we have a
Speaker 32: crisis of anti Semitism in this country, where one segment
Speaker 32: of our popular is under threat their livelihoods, their security,
Speaker 32: their future in this country, it requires bold, outspoken, determined leadership.
Speaker 32: We've seen it from the Premier in New South Wales,
Speaker 32: Chris Mins. He has been exemplary. But at the federal level,
Speaker 32: whether it be the Education Minister being sluggish, flat footed
Speaker 32: and ambivalent when it comes to what's happening on our campuses,
Speaker 32: the Foreign Minister and the Prime Minister, they haven't done.
Speaker 3: Enough reta well this crisis in anti semitism. Do you
Speaker 3: acknowledge that this is predominantly, if almost not all, completely
Speaker 3: a far left issue, that this is something that is
Speaker 3: not both sides of politics, because that's something that's said often.
Speaker 3: Of course, there are people on the far right who
Speaker 3: may also be anti Semitic where they don't have institutional power.
Speaker 3: We're not talking about academia, corporations, the celebrity activist class.
Speaker 3: What we're seeing in this country and elsewhere in the
Speaker 3: West seems to be well, it is very much a
Speaker 3: leftist movement.
Speaker 32: At the political level. I agree with you entirely, reader,
Speaker 32: and the standard bearers, the supposed great defenders and advocates
Speaker 32: against racism around the world tend to be of the left,
Speaker 32: and the reality is that they don't care about Jews.
Speaker 32: In their construction and their understanding of racism. They view
Speaker 32: it as something inflicted by the privilege and the powerful
Speaker 32: on the weak, and they view the Jews as being
Speaker 32: uniformly white, wealthy, powerful, and these are things associated with
Speaker 32: perpetrators rather than victims. So they are unable and unwilling
Speaker 32: to see the Jews as being victims of this surgeon
Speaker 32: racism in our society. But in terms of you know,
Speaker 32: at a grassroots level, the actual perpetrators of anti semitism,
Speaker 32: a lot of it, as we see on the university campuses,
Speaker 32: is coming from the left, absolutely no doubt. But we're
Speaker 32: also seeing the far right realize that this is an
Speaker 32: antisemitic moment in the world and in our country, and
Speaker 32: they're stepping into the breach. There's an opportunity there because
Speaker 32: there's been that absence of leadership, there has been failure
Speaker 32: from the very top to denounce this hatred that is
Speaker 32: taking control of our society, and every malevolent actor, from
Speaker 32: religious extremists to the far right to the far left,
Speaker 32: will therefore embrace this anti Semitic opportunity. But again, you
Speaker 32: know to your question, at a political level, the further
Speaker 32: left we tend to go, the worse. The actions on
Speaker 32: anti Semitism have been. The Greens have been shockingly appalling
Speaker 32: in what they've done. When you see state members of
Speaker 32: their parliament talking about Jews that aren't even hide it
Speaker 32: in words about Zionism anymore. They talk openly about Jews
Speaker 32: and their tentacles reaching in and controlling aspects of society.
Speaker 32: All of the conspiracy theories, all of the myths that
Speaker 32: have pervaded for centuries and now common speak for the
Speaker 32: far left. Jews and money, Jews and power, Zionus lobby, disloyalty,
Speaker 32: all of these things are now everywhere, and those on
Speaker 32: the far left in the human rights community supposedly who
Speaker 32: believe that they stand against racism, they need to have
Speaker 32: a very good look at themselves.
Speaker 1: But Alex, it's not only the fi left, I would argue,
Speaker 1: it's the broader left in general. We have seen pretty
Speaker 1: much the Federal Labor Party you mentioned. We've had a
Speaker 1: group of Jewish women who've come out begging Penny Wong
Speaker 1: to actually say something about those that horrific video of
Speaker 1: the young Jewish girls. We won't go into it or
Speaker 1: show it. It's too disturbing. A group of Jewish women
Speaker 1: in Australia have said, why isn't Penny Wong speaking out
Speaker 1: about that. We've had the recent vote at the United Nations.
Speaker 1: We've had activity after activity where Labour seems to kind
Speaker 1: of be saying, well, you know, we're not one hundred
Speaker 1: percent behind Israel at all. And I think that gives license,
Speaker 1: doesn't it. If you don't have strong leadership at the
Speaker 1: top of the government, the federal government, you are going
Speaker 1: to make that's a license to people beneath who are
Speaker 1: anti Semitic to go right. I'm going to have my
Speaker 1: moment now.
Speaker 32: I agree with you entirely, and you know, as you mentioned,
Speaker 32: with the Australia's votes at the United Nations in support
Speaker 32: of Palace in statehood in support of a Palestinian state
Speaker 32: seven months after the army of the Palestinian State in
Speaker 32: Gaza inflicted the most grotesque, brutal in human horrors on
Speaker 32: a people that we've seen since the Holocaust era. To
Speaker 32: even be talking about creating a Palstadian state in this time,
Speaker 32: it's scandalous. So it shows that the government is capable
Speaker 32: of acting decisively and boldly when they want to, but
Speaker 32: unfortunately it's in the wrong direction. And again I agree
Speaker 32: with the sentiment ron. When you have leaders who have
Speaker 32: influence and power and status like Penny Wong not doing enough,
Speaker 32: being too ambivalent, always seeking to equate a Slamophobia with
Speaker 32: anti Semitism when the two have nothing to do with
Speaker 32: each other, it does signal to those throughout civil society
Speaker 32: and the grassroots that this is okay, that anti Semitism
Speaker 32: is a permitted, tolerable form of hatred.
Speaker 1: And I add to that, Alex and I love your
Speaker 1: thoughts the Anthony Alminiz. You're refusing to condemn the ICC,
Speaker 1: the International Criminal Court from seeking a restaurantce for Benjamin
Speaker 1: Nettan Yahoo and comparing the government, the democratically elected government
Speaker 1: of Israel with the Hamas Butcher's rapists and murderers in
Speaker 1: the one breath, and Anthony Albanizi had no words to
Speaker 1: say about it.
Speaker 32: It shouldn't be difficult for a prime minister to condemn
Speaker 32: what's just happened at the ICC when you've got this
Speaker 32: rogue prosecutor in the same breath seeking arrest warrants for
Speaker 32: the butchers of Gaza, who are now underground, surrounded by
Speaker 32: hostages held in all violation of humanity and international law,
Speaker 32: who just inflicted the horrors of October seven, and they're
Speaker 32: equated with the democratically elected leaders of the state that
Speaker 32: is fighting these terrorists. It should not be difficult to
Speaker 32: condemn this and also to see the national interest for
Speaker 32: them in a strained point of view to denounce this
Speaker 32: sort of an encroachment. The ICC was formed to go
Speaker 32: after despots and tyrants in failed states, not with countries
Speaker 32: that are liberal democracies with independent judiciaries capable of taking
Speaker 32: action against their own citizens. And if Israel threatened this way,
Speaker 32: then Australia could be in the future when we're caught
Speaker 32: upon to fight terrorism as well. So the fact that
Speaker 32: you know, the United States have denounced this firmly, They've
Speaker 32: spoken about the need to impose sanctions against the ICC
Speaker 32: to restrain it. But in Australia here we've had virtually
Speaker 32: nothing od it about it is thoroughly disappointing.
Speaker 1: Alex Rivkin always great to chat to you, Thanks for
Speaker 1: coming back on Outsiders, and Alex will be featuring in
Speaker 1: that documentary. Josh Friedenberg's documentary must watch seven pm this
Speaker 1: Tuesday night never again is its title the Fight against
Speaker 1: Anti Semitism. And that's with as I said, Josh Merg
Speaker 1: presenting that watsmore coming up here on Outsiders back in
Speaker 1: a ticked with James's donkey vote.
Speaker 4: Hello, you're watching out Cider's I'm James Morrow here as
Speaker 4: always with Rowan Dean and Rita Panahy. And of course
Speaker 4: the huge should I even see huge story this week
Speaker 4: has to be Donald Trump going deep into the heart
Speaker 4: of minority Democrat country in the Bronx, New York to
Speaker 4: speak to tens of thousands of enthusiastic supporters. But you
Speaker 4: know what, while the rally itself was big news, leading
Speaker 4: to this fantastic new York Post front page Uptown Funk.
Speaker 4: I think everyone's kind of missing the point if they
Speaker 4: don't look at what Donald Trump actually said at the
Speaker 4: rally and then contrast it really properly with what Joe
Speaker 4: Biden is out there saying, because only then will you
Speaker 4: understand not only why tens of thousands of locals came
Speaker 4: out for Trump on a Thursday afternoon, but why Trump's
Speaker 4: message is eating away at the democrats traditional stronghold of
Speaker 4: voters in the black and Hispanic communities. Let me break
Speaker 4: it down for you. Trump empowers minorities. He doesn't pander
Speaker 4: to them. Biden, on the other hand, tells them they're
Speaker 4: victims and that everything bad that happens to them is
Speaker 4: someone else's fault. Don't believe me, Let me prove it
Speaker 4: to you. Let me show you a little bit. First
Speaker 4: of all, of Joe Biden speaking at the historically black
Speaker 4: Moorhouse College the other day.
Speaker 5: In the US, you missed.
Speaker 33: Your high school graduation, you start a college just as
Speaker 33: George Floyd was murdered, and there was a reckoning on race.
Speaker 33: It's natural to wonder the democracy you hear about actually
Speaker 33: works for you. What is democracy if black matter being
Speaker 33: killed in the street. What is democracy? Betrayal of broken promises,
Speaker 33: slowly black communities behind. What is democracy? You have to
Speaker 33: be ten times better than anyone else to get a
Speaker 33: fair shot.
Speaker 4: Got that Joe Biden is saying is if you're black,
Speaker 4: you're a victim. Automatically forget democracy. The system, he's saying,
Speaker 4: has ringed against you and even trying to kill you.
Speaker 4: Any one of you as a black American, he's saying,
Speaker 4: could wind up getting killed by the cops, just like
Speaker 4: George Floyd. Even if one like Floyd, you led a
Speaker 4: perfectly blameless life, and you have to work ten times harder,
Speaker 4: by him said, to get ahead. Gee, how inspiring. Now, though,
Speaker 4: let's have a look at what Donald Trump had to
Speaker 4: say in New York.
Speaker 34: It doesn't matter whether you're black or brown, or white,
Speaker 34: or whatever the hell color you are.
Speaker 5: It doesn't matter.
Speaker 34: We are all Americans and we're going to pull together
Speaker 34: as Americans.
Speaker 4: Now, Remember, if you listen to the media, they'll tell
Speaker 4: you that Donald Trump is the one dividing people, that
Speaker 4: he's the one who's talking down democracy nonsense. He's the
Speaker 4: one there with the message that it doesn't matter who
Speaker 4: you are, you can make it in America, Biden is
Speaker 4: the one out there dividing people by race and more importantly,
Speaker 4: more sinisterly telling Black Americans that they are victims, disempowering them,
Speaker 4: saying that anything bad that happens to them again is
Speaker 4: not their fault, but rather it's the system. And look,
Speaker 4: this was part of the theme of the whole speech.
Speaker 4: America is in a lot of trouble, Trump said. New
Speaker 4: York is in a lot of trouble thanks to really
Speaker 4: identifiable problems, from defund the police to open borders. Well,
Speaker 4: New York was once the greatest city in the world,
Speaker 4: and now thanks to the Democrats, Trump says, and he's right,
Speaker 4: it's a dump. But his message is together, we can
Speaker 4: fix it.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 4: All of this that Trump says represents a message that
Speaker 4: the elite, who in the age of the Internet are
Speaker 4: no longer able to gatekeep is getting through to members
Speaker 4: of the minority groups the elite used to be able
Speaker 4: to control, or think they controlled, people like this guy.
Speaker 8: You said, You've always voted Democrats, but this year it's
Speaker 8: going to change.
Speaker 1: Why is that Because I've seen.
Speaker 15: The churm go put a word with the by nominics
Speaker 15: with the Democratic Party I've been Democrat all.
Speaker 1: My life and Donald trumk who just have the right answers.
Speaker 1: He's speaking on illegal immigration, all.
Speaker 3: The money pouring out of a country.
Speaker 15: People losing a job, the economy is standing and yet
Speaker 15: sixty years old, I realize now that we have to
Speaker 15: support Donald Trump and make things better.
Speaker 5: And then there was these voters.
Speaker 10: It's too much crimes. Everything is going downhill. The economy
Speaker 10: is going bad. The food is expensive.
Speaker 1: It's like affordable housing is too not for everybody.
Speaker 12: It's just horrible.
Speaker 1: I want food to go cheaper. I want gas cheaper.
Speaker 1: When I came and he was a president, was a
Speaker 1: lot cheaper than it is right now.
Speaker 35: Now we're becoming the Bronx second class citizens. We have
Speaker 35: this influx of migrants. They're coming in and they're getting everything.
Speaker 35: Everyone in the Bronx in the city of New York
Speaker 35: is forgotten.
Speaker 4: There you go, and no wonder. Given all that, there
Speaker 4: was such a freak out by the rest of the media.
Speaker 4: The New York Times practically had kittens reporting that out
Speaker 4: of trope rally, the Bronx chance of build the wall,
Speaker 4: Oh my god, the horror. Though this CBS reporter was
Speaker 4: forced to concede that the rally looked like America.
Speaker 3: What else really stood out to you about the rally?
Speaker 24: I will say this, this rally did look a lot
Speaker 24: like America. There was a lot of Asian voters there.
Speaker 24: There were a lot of Hispanic voters, a lot of
Speaker 24: black voters there, which is not typical for a Trump
Speaker 24: rally that I go to when I'm in Wisconsin or Michigan.
Speaker 4: My favorite bit of the media freak out, though, was
Speaker 4: this CNN correspondent who looked like she was going to
Speaker 4: need about eight Sonyon blancs to recover from the deal
Speaker 4: of being out there with real Americans.
Speaker 19: What was the crowd like, What kind of response did
Speaker 19: he get?
Speaker 11: Well, certainly a bigger crowd than I think Democrats would
Speaker 11: like to be, particularly given.
Speaker 12: This as one of the lewest counties from.
Speaker 3: The entire country.
Speaker 24: One of the things that I found was that there
Speaker 24: were a lot of people here that were actually from
Speaker 24: the Bronx.
Speaker 5: Gotta do the dance there too, don't we.
Speaker 4: But anyway, marked my words, this speech that Trump came
Speaker 4: gave was a turning point for the campaign. He took
Speaker 4: his message again into the heart of the Bronx and
Speaker 4: doing so and getting such a good reception, while Democrats
Speaker 4: in the media fume is a sign that momentum is
Speaker 4: really on his side now and Paul's agree. They indicate
Speaker 4: that Trump has cut Biden's lead in New York State
Speaker 4: to single digits while his share of the minority vote
Speaker 4: keeps growing. Now, I'm not sure Trump can actually take
Speaker 4: New York, which hasn't voted for a Republican since nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty four when Ronald Reagan trounced Walter Bondale. There's a
Speaker 4: name for your pub trivia. Winning every state but Minnesota,
Speaker 4: as well as Washington, d C. But I am now
Speaker 4: more convinced than ever that Trump can win this thing
Speaker 4: overall in November.
Speaker 1: Let's hope. So thanks James. Great stuff. Now talking about
Speaker 1: all things American. The interesting story of Joe Biden's daughter.
Speaker 1: She had a diary piece for Itta and people talked
Speaker 1: about it.
Speaker 5: Wasn't real?
Speaker 1: Was it fake? She's now admitted that the diary.
Speaker 5: Was real, knew it.
Speaker 3: But there were fact checkers or just basically leftist activists
Speaker 3: who call themselves fact checkers, who claimed this diary was well,
Speaker 3: whether it was legitimate or not was still up in
Speaker 3: the air. We knew it was real because people were
Speaker 3: being charged for stealing it when they found it. And
Speaker 3: there's been what was in the diary Reata all sorts
Speaker 3: of This is the thing. If this was a diary
Speaker 3: that belonged to Evanka Trump, we would know the contents
Speaker 3: of every side out, particularly when some of these really
Speaker 3: quite ugly disturbing allegations in their things about She wrote
Speaker 3: about showering with her father.
Speaker 1: And trying to avoid showering with her father and it's inappropriate, but.
Speaker 3: She used the word inappropriate. So and Joe Biden is
Speaker 3: an ourd about this. Can you imagine if this was
Speaker 3: on a Trump's daughter and this was in her writing
Speaker 3: her diary and this account of her.
Speaker 1: Very specific allegations.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying those accusations are true, but it's.
Speaker 1: What she wrote. What she wrote, and she refers to
Speaker 1: the medium molested as a child, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1: It's its shocking stuff. And as Reta says, every newspaper
Speaker 1: in the world should be all over this stuff. But
Speaker 1: of course, James, he's a Democrat.
Speaker 5: He's a Democrat.
Speaker 4: It's really important, though, to note this whole thing that
Speaker 4: we're talking about, because, yeah, what a family. You know,
Speaker 4: the Washington Post the other day, they came home with
Speaker 4: a big story about how basically they had an editorial
Speaker 4: and they said, this election is too important for us
Speaker 4: to go out and report the truth. And they basically said, yeah,
Speaker 4: we're to do everything we get to ensure that. You know,
Speaker 4: it's not the truth. But you know, democracy dies in darkness. No, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 4: democracy dies when you've got a leading newspaper that's deciding
Speaker 4: we are going to make one side win and one
Speaker 4: side news and information from voters that might make them reconsider.
Speaker 3: This is how they plan to fortify the election. Yes,
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty, it was a concerted effort and this
Speaker 3: was part of it. I mean, then they had the
Speaker 3: entire social media platforms that had Twitter, that had Facebook.
Speaker 3: This time around, with x formerly Twitter being owned by
Speaker 3: Elon Musk, it's going to be a different story. But
Speaker 3: let's not forget Mark Zuckerberg, the man who owns or
Speaker 3: majority owns meta Facebook and Instagram. He put four hundred
Speaker 3: million of his own personal money into helping.
Speaker 5: To fortify We don't know where.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about it more after the break Candra Clown
Speaker 1: Show and more discussion with James and Read and row.
Speaker 5: Roll Up, Roll Up.
Speaker 1: It's the freakiest, wackiest, craziest show on Earth. It's the
Speaker 1: Canberra clown Show where these days the clowns have to
Speaker 1: hand out free cash to the public to get them
Speaker 1: to pay any attention.
Speaker 7: You don't need to apply.
Speaker 1: There's no forms to fill in. Anybody who gets an
Speaker 1: energy bill will automatically get three hundred.
Speaker 21: Dollars taken off their bill throughout the next financial year.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's three hundred dollars of your hard earned cash
Speaker 1: being given to hard done energy bill pays like this
Speaker 1: typical average oussie office worker. Yep, three hundred dollars of
Speaker 1: your tax dollars go to him for each and every
Speaker 1: household this bloke has. Or indeed, this typical average OSSI
Speaker 1: small business person yep, three hundred dollars for each and
Speaker 1: every household he has. Or this humble harbourside homemaker yep,
Speaker 1: three hundred dollars of your money for each and every
Speaker 1: household this bloke has. Meanwhile, as you and I sit
Speaker 1: around shivering in front of the telly with the heating
Speaker 1: turned down, waiting for our three hundred dollars Reba, we
Speaker 1: learned that the Alboso circus this week went full Monty
Speaker 1: Python and it's now Anthony Albanese's flying circus. According to
Speaker 1: the Australian Quote, taxpayers will fork out four hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty million dollars for two new Boeing seven three seven
Speaker 1: business jets to ferry around Anthony Albanesian Key government ministers.
Speaker 1: The flights and their trip details will be kept secret
Speaker 1: on security grounds. Boeing says the seven three seven eighths
Speaker 1: have three times the cabin space of a typical private jet,
Speaker 1: carrying at least nineteen passengers on journeys of up to
Speaker 1: twelve two hundred and twenty kilometers without refueling.
Speaker 5: Wow, that's a.
Speaker 1: Lot of carbon emissions, folks. Each BBJ seven three seven
Speaker 1: Max is fitted with a unique interior specifically designed to
Speaker 1: fulfill your flying knee. Very nice, But it wasn't until
Speaker 1: midweek that we got Albozo's finest performance today of his
Speaker 1: incredible Disappearing Moral Authority Act, in which whatever moral authority
Speaker 1: albo once had literally disappears before our very eyes. This
Speaker 1: occurred when the International Criminal Court, led by the odious
Speaker 1: UK Prosecutor Karreem Khan, a body which Australia foolishly signed
Speaker 1: up to back in the Howard years, announced it was
Speaker 1: seeking arrest warrants not only for the leaders of hamas
Speaker 1: they should have done that on October the eighth, by
Speaker 1: the way, but disgustingly, they are also seeking in a
Speaker 1: arrest warrant for the democratically elected Prime Minister of Israel,
Speaker 1: Benjamin Nataniello, and his defense minister. Many in the western
Speaker 1: world were appalled, even Joe Biden. Here's Republican Speaker of
Speaker 1: the US House of Representatives, Mike Johnson.
Speaker 36: America should punish the ICC and put Kareem Khan back
Speaker 36: in his place. And if the ICC is allowed to
Speaker 36: threaten Israel's leaders, we know that America will be next.
Speaker 36: There is a reason that we've never endorsed the International
Speaker 36: Criminal Court because it is a direct affront to our
Speaker 36: own sovereignty. We don't put any international body among or
Speaker 36: above American sovereignty, and Israel.
Speaker 5: Doesn't do that either.
Speaker 36: Congress is reviewing all of our options right now. We
Speaker 36: have some very aggressive legislation that we're going to push
Speaker 36: as quickly as possible. It will impose sanctions, and if
Speaker 36: the ICC moves forward with its absurd warrant, arrest or request.
Speaker 36: This will this is going to be an even bigger
Speaker 36: international problem.
Speaker 1: Now, that is moral clarity and that is leadership. But
Speaker 1: here at Anthony Albanese's flying circus, we simply got this.
Speaker 31: Well.
Speaker 21: I don't comment court processes in Australia, let alone court
Speaker 21: processes globally of which Australia is not a party.
Speaker 1: What an absolute farce. Firstly, there is nothing wrong with
Speaker 1: commenting on overseas court cases. But more importantly, because Australia
Speaker 1: is a paid up member we finance the iccc ICC,
Speaker 1: it is critical that our leaders either support or denounce
Speaker 1: that appalling decision. And sure enough, one labor leader couldn't
Speaker 1: wait to leap into the limelight, Pennywong, the clown.
Speaker 25: In relation to the International Criminal Court, whether or not
Speaker 25: war ont are issued will be a matter for the court.
Speaker 25: Australia does have an interest in the multilateral system, in
Speaker 25: the United Nations system, continuing to be strong and robust
Speaker 25: and have the faith of the international community, and that's
Speaker 25: what we will always advocate for.
Speaker 5: Hmm, love the jar.
Speaker 1: That certainly sounds to me like Pennywise the clown supports
Speaker 1: the decision. She certainly did not condemn it, and that
Speaker 1: is of course in keeping with every single action taken
Speaker 1: by Alban Easy and Wong, who will always take the
Speaker 1: opposite side to whatever is in Israel's best interests. And
Speaker 1: speaking of which, the Israeli Defense Force released videos and
Speaker 1: images this week showing the entrance of the Hamas tunnel
Speaker 1: system where the bodies of four dead Israeli hostages were
Speaker 1: all discovered last week inside a United Nations Relief and
Speaker 1: Works Agency building. Yes, that's right, the tunnels with the
Speaker 1: dead bodies were inside a building owned by the organization
Speaker 1: I have for seven years been warning you about on
Speaker 1: this show, ANOIR, the very same organization that Penny Wong
Speaker 1: restored aord Australian taxpayer funding two, which she did at
Speaker 1: the specific urging of the Teel members of Parliament. Yes,
Speaker 1: a leg responder Kate Cheney, Zoe Daniels, Monique Ryan, Zarie Stegel,
Speaker 1: Sophie Scamps and Kylie Tink all proudly signed this shameful
Speaker 1: and disgusting letter. Every single Jewish voter in Australia should
Speaker 1: be appalled and horrified. Here in Australia, the only clear
Speaker 1: and unequivocal condemnation of the ICC came from Peter Dutton.
Speaker 37: I think this is one of the most shameful acts
Speaker 37: of the Prime Minister. The Jewish community is completely utterly bewildered,
Speaker 37: and I think Australian's of good faith bewildered as well
Speaker 37: as their Prime Minister doesn't have the ability or the
Speaker 37: wit to be able to stand up for what is
Speaker 37: in our country's best interests and to stand shoulder shoulder
Speaker 37: with our allies, including the United States, to condemn an
Speaker 37: obvious anti semitic by the ICC.
Speaker 5: The ICC should reverse their.
Speaker 37: Decision and the Prime Minister should come out today to
Speaker 37: call for that instead of continuing to remain in hiding
Speaker 37: or continuing to dig a deep hole for himself.
Speaker 1: Yes, as I said here at the Albanzy Clown Show,
Speaker 1: whatever moral authority this man once had literally disappears before
Speaker 1: your very eyes.
Speaker 6: What would the eagles say?
Speaker 5: Yes?
Speaker 1: Well, here on Outsiders we are often critical of all
Speaker 1: parts of government, but it seems some parts of government
Speaker 1: can't take much criticism jams. Why would that be?
Speaker 4: Oh well, apparently this is kind of amusing here, But
Speaker 4: the Prime Minister went on a podcast with Australian National
Speaker 4: University and he complained that some segments of the media
Speaker 4: are cheerleaders, apparently for Peter Duffin. But of course it
Speaker 4: all comes down to it all comes down to the
Speaker 4: fact that I mean, I would like to invite him out.
Speaker 4: He's referring to this show because we're very critical of
Speaker 4: Coalition very often on a lot of things. But he
Speaker 4: wouldn't like those criticisms. But but it comes down to
Speaker 4: this really sort of thin skinned nature that the Prime
Speaker 4: mister has. I've never seen it in all my years
Speaker 4: watching and covering Australian politicans. Prime minister who is so
Speaker 4: thin skinned.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 4: He has called out plenty of journalists myself included on
Speaker 4: the floor of Parliament for stories that he doesn't like
Speaker 4: because he finds him embarrassing.
Speaker 3: He got upset with you over Viennetta game. He's untruth
Speaker 3: about this memory of having Viennetta with his mom when
Speaker 3: Vanneta wasn't even invented.
Speaker 5: It was a light.
Speaker 4: Story anyway, the middle of this whole campaign, it was
Speaker 4: funny and it was became, you know, the biggest deal ever.
Speaker 5: So well, let's.
Speaker 1: Lain about people who complain about him.
Speaker 21: You do have a blurring of news from opinion as well.
Speaker 21: There are some journalists who more stenographers in particularly the
Speaker 21: right wing media than actual journalists. There are cheers squad.
Speaker 21: Some of the transcripts that you read from Peter Dutton
Speaker 21: essentially is him just saying, yes, I agree with particular
Speaker 21: radio commentators or TV commentators.
Speaker 4: Opinions. This guy he's the prime minister. I mean I
Speaker 4: know that in his Commonwealth car he doesn't have a
Speaker 4: phone where he can get news about you.
Speaker 5: How about people? But you might have a radio. I
Speaker 5: wonder if he's listened.
Speaker 4: To Radio National completely, the ABC watched Insider, he watched
Speaker 4: Q and A.
Speaker 3: But this is it. You've got a prime minister going
Speaker 3: on university radio whyy like some teenage girl when the
Speaker 3: overwhelming majority of the Australian media lean's left and has
Speaker 3: given him a golden run, and yet he still finds
Speaker 3: time to complain he should be counting his lucky stars
Speaker 3: that he has had such an easy run from the
Speaker 3: bulk of.
Speaker 1: The He also complains that Peter Dutton agrees with some
Speaker 1: radio commentators or TV commentators. Yes, that's because the commentators,
Speaker 1: particularly on radio, are talking directly to the public and
Speaker 1: getting feedback. And if the leader of the opposition can't
Speaker 1: agree with a large number of people in the country,
Speaker 1: then there's a problem. Clearly Albo has pretty much the
Speaker 1: same problem. I'm not sure how many people agree with
Speaker 1: him on talkback radio. It's a joke UCLA. We've talked
Speaker 1: about they've got a novel approach, James to admissions.
Speaker 4: Yes, so there's just been this huge blow up where
Speaker 4: it's been revealed basically they have completely different standards for
Speaker 4: people who are black versus white, versus Asian, and to
Speaker 4: the point now where you know all sorts of examples,
Speaker 4: people are failing them within the within the the medical school,
Speaker 4: and people are now concerned that this is actually going
Speaker 4: to affect the practice of medicine.
Speaker 3: Worried about when those old school doctors retire because this
Speaker 3: new lot coming through who've got the Dei philosophy behind them.
Speaker 3: So people are getting in who shouldn't get in, and
Speaker 3: people are being rejected, particularly Asian students. In fantastic g
Speaker 3: joke because.
Speaker 1: That's it for outsiders. We'll see you next Sunday. Don't
Speaker 1: forget Tuesday night, seven pm Josh Fridenberg's anti Semitism documentary
Speaker 1: Never Again. See you next week