WEBVTT - SuperCoach AFL Trade Period Recap! Caleb Daniel, Jack Macrae, Bazlenka, and more! 0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.680 Hello, and welcome to the official Supercoach AFL show. Al 0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:13.560 Paydon here with some Supercoach experts gathered together for We're 0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.400 calling this the first episode of twenty twenty five because 0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.360 twenty twenty four season is done and dusted. It's all 0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.560 about next year and we have some really interesting players 0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.880 to talk about with the conclusion of the AFL trade period, 0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:28.800 so we get stuck into that in a second with 0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.720 my very good friends Patch. Great to have you back. 0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.960 Did you enjoy the Yeah, supercoachy year. Did you enjoy 0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:36.400 the trades? 0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.360 No, it was terrible. It was the period goes for 0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.680 both too long and not long enough, and it's just 0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.800 I wish I could have tinned out like I did 0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.800 most years, but it's my job now so or it's 0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.479 our job now, but anyway, it was. It was fine. 0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:52.919 We get lots of super Coach stuff out of it, though, 0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.920 and that's fun, so I'm keen to talk about that. 0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.840 Yeah, exactly, This is the good part and very excited. 0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.840 It's going to be some big changes, new things coming 0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.080 for twenty twenty five. Just all will be unveiled over 0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.720 the course of time, but a little teaser today is 0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.880 a brand new member of the podcast team. Chloe Williams 0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.000 you've probably seen her on the social has been doing 0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.160 some great work for us this year in a super 0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.400 coach base, currently ranked one hundredth in super Coach NBL. 0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:17.600 But we're not going to talk about that. We're talking 0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.560 about Supercoach AFL. Chloe. Great to have you on board. 0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.720 Happy to be here, patch already style my happy New 0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.920 Year jokes. I don't really have anything left in that regard, 0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.880 but yeah, a bit more of an NBL expert at 0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.200 the moment, but much more comfortable with AFL. 0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.200 Let's be honest, excellent, that's what we will get into 0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.920 the next already, just stealing all of your thunder Thank sorry, great, great, 0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.440 so welcome to be part of the team, but great 0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.000 to have you on board. So we've seen plenty more 0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.320 of Chloe around the traps over the next twelve months 0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.720 and going forward so with a fresh new look and 0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.920 everything for twenty twenty five. If you're out there, subscribe 0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.720 on Spotify, Apple, wherever you listen to podcast. Leave a 0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.240 rating and review to help other people find the show, 0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.840 and let's get into the exciting world. Wasn't very exciting 0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.520 for about a week trade period, and then It got 0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.240 very exciting for about five minutes last night, and then 0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.640 we get to dissect what it all means for super 0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.120 Coach in twenty twenty five. And I think this could 0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.399 be one of the more relevant trade periods that we've 0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.280 had for a while. We like to talk about it 0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.320 each year that a new club can create new opportunities, 0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.160 and usually there's one or two. Last year, we had 0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.320 a guy called Brodie Grundy, you don't if you remember him, 0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.040 sounds familiar, who was an interesting case for us coming 0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:24.880 into the season at a new club. And then you know, 0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.799 James Jordan was a good example of someone who goes 0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.120 to a new team, gets a good role, some more 0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.960 opportunity and was a handy sort of value pick for 0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:33.119 us at the start of the year. But I think 0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.840 there could be plenty more names this year that we 0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:40.079 might be looking at picking. So it spoiled for choice, yeah, exactly. 0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.800 And one thing that when I was making some notes 0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.360 about this earlier is a lot of these could be 0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.280 potentially in the Ford line, which I was very worried 0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.440 about at the end of this season, thinking, you know, 0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.840 we didn't have a great list of players to choose 0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.560 from this year and then we're going to lose a 0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.320 bunch with DPP changes, so that could be really handy 0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.200 if a few of these guys come in as forwards 0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.200 for us. But we'll go through some names. We've got 0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.239 him under different headings, and let's just go back with 0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.680 some forwards and debate because I think we can. There 0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.680 will be some contentious classifications, but we'll start. I think 0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.519 with the guy that I saw the fans and beat 0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.440 me to the punch boy about one second on Twitter 0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.399 last night as soon as the deal went through to say. 0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:18.040 Got to be first. 0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.560 Yeah, well I was actually working and he wasn't, so 0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.839 give him. He has a had a needge on me there. 0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:29.120 But Caleb Daniel now a Kangaroos player, does that mean 0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.000 he's someone we want to pick in our super coach teams? 0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.120 Because he was very cheap at the end of the season. 0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.520 And if he's cheap, and I mean, the thing that 0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.440 just made me want to go and pick him straight 0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.640 away is Marty passed. His manager was on trade radio 0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.440 and the quote from him was, he'll play half back. 0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.240 He wants to be free and happy. 0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:48.160 Don't we all? 0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:49.200 Don't we all? 0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.600 Caleb? He's the first pick for mine. He's just like, 0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.160 it's a no brainer. 0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.320 I guess it could be the twenty twenty five version 0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.040 of Danes Orco the half back in the forward line, 0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.520 with an even better price point as well. So I'm 0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:01.240 totally on board. 0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.720 Yeah, well, I mean to me, it sounds like Jack 0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.040 Zebel about three years ago. He was forward at the 0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:08.600 start of the year in Super Coach, price to like 0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.400 two hundred and fifty K, and then he went to 0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.680 half back and averaged over one hundred. He averaged forty 0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.400 nine point nine this year. Daniel in fifteen games, but 0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.200 he was the sub in eight of those, so his 0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.040 price is going to be way way down. He finished 0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.960 the year priced at two hundred and fifty two K. 0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:25.560 He was actually under two hundred K with a couple 0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.040 of rounds to go and just had a couple of 0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.479 good games to finish the year. But so that's just 0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.320 a bit of an indication. Doesn't mean that's exactly where 0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.280 we started next year, but he will be very, very cheap. 0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.520 So if he is, if he was eligible, well that's 0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.120 the thing. I mean, he was a mid forward this year, 0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:38.359 but he was sort of I mean, he was the 0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.839 sub more than anything. So I'm not really sure we're 0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.400 champion DH all plump him for next season. But I 0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:44.760 mean he's going to be cheap wherever he is. 0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.560 Yeah, I mean I think probably all starting regardless of 0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.200 even if he's mid only. I think the value there 0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.160 is too good and the DPP will come if he's 0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.120 playing off half back and if he's taking kick ins 0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.440 at North that's oh that's cash money. 0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.479 Well yeah, I mean I mentioned Ze, but we know 0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.320 what they wrong at North yea with a good friend 0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.960 Zach Fisher this year. Even it's to put up some 0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.680 good scores at different times of the year. But you know, 0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.400 obviously Cheesels mckirch's Aaron Hall back in the day, like, yeah, 0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.960 we know what that can be like. So yeah, tick 0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.640 tick tick for Caleb Daniels. So we love him. But 0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.240 I mean the Bulldogs actually have generated plenty of good 0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:24.680 potential picks for us guys getting out of the Bevo atmosphere, Yes, exactly, 0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.880 and maybe you know, giving themselves a consistent role like 0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.200 we think Daniel will and another one Bailey Smith probably 0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:35.039 the biggest name potentially that changed clubs and he will 0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.320 be one of the most popular picks I think next year, 0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.520 just because after missing a year with a knee injury. 0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.080 He's going to come in at a massive discount and 0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.880 you would think Chloe walks straight into the Geelong midfield. 0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.120 Yeah, I definitely think he'll walks straight in there. And 0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.240 I guess for me four forty eight. You know, it's 0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.200 one of those value sort of price tags. That's what 0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.120 he was priced at this year anyway, one of those 0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.440 value price tags that most of the time you're a 0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.000 bit fifty to fifty on. But I think with what 0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.679 we've seen him do, most people will be one hundred 0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.440 percent and plus the potential forward eligibility as well. 0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.440 Yeah, so he was mid forward at the start of 0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.040 this year and because he didn't play with Hume, he 0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:09.840 will be that again next year. So again, yeah, that's 0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.160 going to be a massive help to fill out our 0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.159 four lines. And if he gets a thirty percent discamp 0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:15.840 for not playing it all this year, that brings him 0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.120 under four hundred k properly. So yeah, it's going to 0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:20.000 be very hard to pass up. 0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.120 Yep. Absolutely, I'm another guy in the forward line who 0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.479 gets a change of scenery. Shae Bolton, you're loving Shay 0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.120 your premiership player at the Tigers heads West for a 0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.160 bumper hand of draft picks. Didn't have a great year 0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.920 this year, only average seventy seven point two from. 0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.240 The Richmond did that well, you may may have missed that. 0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:39.520 No, can you film me in? 0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:40.400 Can you give me just. 0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.599 The blow by blow of the entire season from a 0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.279 Richmond perspective for us? 0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.600 Maybe a super Coach plus special some stage over. 0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.120 The Breaz the sixth part of one hour episodes breaking 0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.479 down Richmond season. But no, he's someone that can play 0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.720 football quite well and can score Supercoach points quite well. 0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.440 Ow would you be interested? I'm bringing him in. 0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.040 I think it really does depend on what the forward 0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.920 line looks like next year for options, because he gonna 0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.000 lose a few players like Zorko, you mentioned Heeney, guys 0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.520 like that. You know Joe Corwell won't be available as 0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.400 a forward next year. Flanders. I'm not really sure where 0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:20.520 he's going to be positioned, but tpp. But so he 0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.760 could be one of the players we might consider, and 0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.280 he will be. I think he'll be unders for what 0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.560 he can do, so will be priced that he's seventy 0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.360 seven average this year, he averaged ninety six point seven 0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.040 the year before, and he's sort of been more in 0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.440 the eighties kind of guy in a few years before that. So, 0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:36.880 I mean, where do you think he fits in at 0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.680 Frio because we know he can play that actual classic 0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.680 mid forward role and your King goals is probably where 0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.240 he gets a lot of his points from. But obviously 0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.600 getting some CBA's definitely helps. Yeah, that I sort of 0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.200 feel like, I think he'll score higher than he did 0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.680 this year, but can he get back up to that 0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.200 ninety close to one hundred when that freo midfield's pretty 0:07:59.200 --> 0:07:59.720 hard to crack? 0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.000 L Chloe and I were looking at the Center Bounce 0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.080 attendances for Frio earlier, and it's not pretty if you're 0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.840 not one of just long with his favorites. So yeah, 0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.960 it was it was basically Sarrong, Ray Shaw, Young five 0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.400 and was it Johnson was the last one I was 0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:19.120 getting a few minutes. 0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.640 Yeah, well, well behind those other groups. 0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.120 Yeah, it's basically if he picks his four, they're the 0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.600 four little rotate through with the ruck and unless say, 0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.560 you can get into that, or unless they change the 0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.240 way they set that up, yeah. 0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.320 I might make a bold call and just say I'm 0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:39.680 not going to go there. I don't think. Okay, on 0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.959 the way you know, I just don't think that he'll 0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.000 consistently hit that hundred, just because I don't know if 0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.840 there will be that balance between goals and CBA's. I 0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.320 think it'll either be heavily relaying on goals and you 0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.960 know how we all went with that Charlie Kurno towards 0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:56.520 the end of the year. It doesn't always work out 0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.280 the best, even if they are a great player. 0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.520 So yeah, consistency you mentioned there is the thing like 0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.600 looking up his twenty twenty three season when he did 0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.000 average nearly ninety seven, he had four scores over one 0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.000 hundred and forty and three under sixty, So you know, 0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:11.360 are you prepared to ride that. 0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.960 Sometimes maybe good, sometimes maybe not good. 0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.720 Yeah, And the problem is he'll probably he'll get cheap 0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.040 at some stage and then he'll put out a couple 0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.040 of these massive scores and that's when you'll be really tempting, 0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.319 but then you've probably missed them. 0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.000 So yeah, I think we can get forwards that will 0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.800 be definitely playing midfield minutes. I would rather put my 0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:29.240 eggs in. 0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.640 That basket to play briefly play Devil's avocado, though you've 0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.839 got he might be three under three field, Kay, which 0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.680 if we don't have any other good primos, we might 0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.080 have a forward line of Bailey Smith, Caleb Daniel if 0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.319 his Ford eligible, Shaye Bolton, a few other names we'll 0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:45.600 get to. 0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.320 Yeah, the little teaser there. 0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.920 Yeah, maybe, but I think. 0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.480 I think he's on the watch list. But yeah, probably, 0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.760 there's definitely a few question marks around there. But I think, 0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.400 you know, just from a pure footy perspective, I think 0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:02.880 Freer I've got a great player. Obviously they played a 0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.520 pretty heavy price for him, but they're you know, they 0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.400 sort of think they're coming into the window and he 0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:08.880 he could. 0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.800 I think he's in that role as an X factor 0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.240 up forward and you know, some games he'll go one 0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.120 to eighty and some games he'll go forty. That's just 0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:18.080 how it'll roll. 0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.920 Yeah, yeah, that's what he's like. I mean, we before 0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:22.920 we get off the Bulldogs. Jack McCray is another one 0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.000 that super coach favorite, who again was a mid forward 0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.120 this year. Have to check on his numbers to see 0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:30.480 where he played a game. You know, it was used 0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.160 as the sub four times. So hard to know whether 0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.000 if he gets forward eligibility next year going into this 0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.679 and Kilda midfield, is he is he back. I mean, 0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.040 he averaged seventy two to seventy three this year, It 0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:44.720 was ninety nine last year, and then you know one 0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.840 hundred and twenty fifteen years before that. But he is, 0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:49.200 you know, the wrong side of thirty. 0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.760 I think it's hard to tell personally, just because, first 0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.280 of all, I'll just say thanks to Bevo for the 0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.360 price drop bringing us into thee. But at the same time, 0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.360 you have to wonder why was there that shift away 0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.120 from the midfield and will he be able to replicate 0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.120 his previous form in that role. Obviously we all questioned 0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.400 Bevo at times, but what was his reasoning really for 0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.760 taking McCray out of that role? Is there a secret 0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:14.200 there that. 0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.280 You can but yeah, no, you know, if he wasn't 0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.319 you've got your Bond and chi Law and liber in there. 0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.440 And if McCray sort of dropped out of the top 0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.680 three or four, does he automatically become a gun meet again? 0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.800 Well, I don't know, does he get the chance to 0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.920 do that role? You know, they've they've got Jack Steel 0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.280 in there. You know, they had a Crouch in there 0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.800 that's it's now no longer part of it. But their 0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.160 midfield has been criticized of being very one paced. For 0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.839 a few years now, they've spoken from a recruiting level 0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:44.520 about trying to bring pace in and all the players 0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.320 they bring in a quick Jack McCrae is not quick, 0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:50.760 as I say that as someone who is also not 0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:56.120 quick game respect game, but I don't know if he 0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.480 slides into the first rotation at every center bounds. I 0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.040 don't know if he and Jack Steel split time, if 0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.480 mccrage plays forward, or if he's on a wing, if 0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:09.520 he plays backup rock play, who knows. I trust Ross 0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.680 almost as much as I trust Luke Beveridge, and that's 0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:13.280 not a lot. 0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.280 Looking at Jack mcgray's CBA number, so in twenty twenty 0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:17.880 one he had seventy seven percent, and that's when he 0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:19.640 was one of the top mids in the comp, and 0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.040 then they've gradually dropped over the last few years, sixty 0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.319 four percent, thirty six percent. In this year is twelve percent, 0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:26.439 So you think he's going to improve on that. 0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.240 I think that especially. It kind of depends because you 0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.160 hit the nail on the head with the pace issue 0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.280 that they've got at the Saints, But then they did 0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.400 have seb Ross playing that role, So it's whether they 0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.120 want to directly replace him, or whether they are looking 0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.840 to change things up, which I think will probably be 0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.240 the decider in whether or not we see him at 0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:43.880 an optimal amount of center bounces. 0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.960 So yeah, preseason, which I guess to try to engage 0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.920 what they do there, because you think Philip, who would 0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.800 be probably a starting CBA mid you'd think to it, 0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.240 and he's someone we will be looking at very closely. 0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.760 Oh yes, yeah, I'm interested what McCray does to the 0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.200 make cup of the side. But even then, you know 0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.920 they might value someone like a Hugo Garcia in that 0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.600 mid forward role a little bit more because he's quicker, 0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.920 layers more tackles like maybe that's yeah, it'll be interesting 0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:13.920 to see. I think you're right, Chloe, it'll be a 0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:14.680 pre season wise. 0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.480 Yeah, they've invested in him, so you think they've got 0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.400 something in mind. But now the other we've been sort 0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.800 of bearing the lead here because the most exciting name 0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.480 of the entire trade period. I don't know who to 0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.640 go to here first, because I know you're both absolutely 0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:32.600 massive events. Sure, James Peedling, now an Adelaide crow, has 0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:37.040 shown some serious supercoach scoring potential in glimpses at the 0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.160 Giants again, someone who's plenty of times he's been used 0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.280 as the sub, got a bit of a decent running 0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:42.719 towards the end of the year and put up some 0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.040 pretty good numbers. Again, question marks weird exactly does he 0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:50.040 go into the Crow's lineup. But yes, there's a lot 0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.480 of people very very keen on me. 0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.120 I am very keen. It's me. Yeah, Well you spoke, 0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:58.880 you know, after that running out of three games in 0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:00.199 around the middle of the year where he's up, and 0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.880 I've written down his scores since, like post that game, 0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.920 all the way to their semi final elimination. He scored 0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.640 ninety three, one point thirty three, ninety three, one hundred 0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.280 forty ninety seven, ninety nine and sixty six in that 0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.480 last game where I think he got I don't want 0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.360 to say tagged, but got some attention after playing very 0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.520 well early and then the Giants fell apart. But I 0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:28.040 am if he's forward eligible nearly picked ahead of Daniel. 0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.200 Well, he's another one here, so he's mid forward this year, 0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.280 so and again being the sub so many times, it's 0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:33.520 really hard to know. I'll have to wait and see 0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.880 whether he retains it. What if he's in the midfield, 0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.600 he'll be So he finished the year what fourteen K, 0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.400 so you would be around there four one hundred and 0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:41.040 four to fifty K. 0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.840 Maybe that's a much harder self. Yeah, in the midfield, 0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.440 I again, it'll be a pre says and watch and 0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.120 again with the Saints, the Crows have just been so 0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.000 bad at having a one paced midfield that's boring to watch, 0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:56.080 boring to pick apart from supercoach perspective, he offers something 0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.240 slightly different, but also I don't know if I trust 0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.160 Matthew nicksdag actually change it. So I don't know. 0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.280 What do you think, Chloe, Well, it kind of comes 0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.520 down to would you think that he would go above 0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.680 Saliga and Sam Berry who made a late emergence in 0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.920 that midfield at the end of the year, and someone 0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.000 like a Rory Laird potentially as well, just to kind 0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.600 of take over that role. I did have the same 0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.880 scores noted down that you had in the one the 0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.920 game round twenty when he got one hundred and thirty 0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.640 three twenty cbas, when he got one hundred in round 0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.480 twenty two sixteen cbas and then when that forty popped 0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.040 up in round twenty three, five Cbas and then obviously 0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:36.800 there were times he was the sub as well, which 0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.160 I think led to such a volatile scoring and a 0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.440 potentially great price point. But most games where he played 0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.520 a full game, we saw great scoring potential, which is 0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.800 why I'm such a fan, and I do personally think 0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.280 that he will slot into that Adelaide midfield and hopefully 0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.680 we'll be getting what we want. If he is just 0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.040 a mid option, I'm probably with you there where it 0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.160 would take a little bit more convincing, but as a 0:15:58.160 --> 0:15:59.520 forward one hundred percent. 0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.600 Yeah, it depends on rookies and structures and all that else, 0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.480 but from a mid perspective, but yeah, I yeh comes 0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.400 down to as much watching Matthew Knicks as it does 0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.760 James Peeling in the preseason. So I trust Peteling, I 0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:12.920 don't trust Matthew Nicks. 0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:14.320 There will be a lot of players as well, kind 0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.240 of around that four hundred markets. It's seeming like depending 0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:18.480 on how prices look, But. 0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.320 Even I think that you have to kind of. 0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.040 Yeah, it'll it'll be a big decision which players to 0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.080 pick from that group, because some of them will obviously 0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.520 has always proved to be great value, and then others 0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.880 might not quite cut it, but I think definitely Peteling 0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:33.400 high on the watch list. 0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.800 Yeah yeah, if you take out all those sub games 0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.960 every ninety two point five, so yeah, and then you're 0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.240 probably going to get in priced at sixty five. And 0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.240 do you get like, you know, six weeks of ninety 0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.600 scoring out of him and then cash him in kind 0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:46.840 of thing. 0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.560 God, I didn't realize the twenty three five podcast was 0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:50.160 are rated? 0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:56.560 Oh keep talking dirty to me? Well, there were the five, yeah, 0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.920 five names that we really really like, and then there's 0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.560 a few other well lots of that we can talk 0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.640 about as possibilities. Dan Houston one of the I don't 0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.080 know if I really want to get Dan Houston's name 0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.080 again for a while. How many twists and turns out 0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.360 took during the trade period, how many stories we published 0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.800 about Dan Houston when nothing was happening, but the trade 0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:16.040 thankfully did actually happen. 0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.320 And in the end, if it hadn't happened, I would 0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.359 have gone twelve but something, even if it was like 0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.520 a tree or a bush or just some graph. But 0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.320 the amount of times I had to like find different 0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.080 photos of Done Houston and try and be like, have 0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.479 we used this one in the last week? I don't know. 0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:35.040 We've used twelve this week, so anyway he's moved. He's 0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.640