WEBVTT - Sharri | 19 May

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News. This is Shari.

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Good Evening, Caleb Bond filling in for Sharry Marxon this week.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 2>He's what's coming up tonight. A Liberal MP says what

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>voters are thinking. The Liberal Party must abandon Net zero.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Will Susan lay listen though my analysis In a moment

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Joe Barden is diagnosed with an aggressive form of cancer.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>I'll discuss that with Kosher Garda shortly and a major

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>breakthrough in ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas. Is an

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 2>end to the war finally in sight now, in amongst

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 2>all the finger pointing and blame games and whatever else

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>that there's been since Labour's thumping election win and consequently

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 2>the Liberal Party's thumping loss, I think I read the

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 2>most clear eyed and sensible analysis in The Australian today

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>from the lnp's Garth Hamilton. He's come to the conclusion

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 2>that the party has become too invested in blank Czech politics,

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>from things like NIT zero to the NDAs Hamilton wrote,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I could include defense spending on helicopters we've decommissioned and

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>submarines we've canceled. I could speak to our management of

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the federation that sees the states compete only for budget blowouts,

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 2>new taxes, bureaucratic latency, and record low housing approvals. The

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>point is that we've changed, We've lost the economic argument,

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.199
<v Speaker 2>that is the hard truth, and this is a huge

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.919
<v Speaker 2>problem for the Liberal Party and the Coalition as a whole.

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you back or support something from a moral standpoint,

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>like net zero or the NDAs because you think it'll

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>look like the right thing to do, but in doing so,

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>you are committing yourself to decades of uncontrolled spending. And

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>it is on that count that the Liberals lose out

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>because it means they can't point to themselves as better

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 2>economic managers, which has traditionally been their strong suit. So

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you can try to win what you might call the

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Teal people with softer climate and softer social policies, but

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>that hasn't really worked because you've only won one seat,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and that was more to do with a good candidate

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>in Tim Wilson than anything else. And you may will

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 2>actually lose another seat to another Teal which we'll talk

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>about a little bit later. And then at the same

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>time you lose people, and there are plenty of them.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 2>In fact, arguably a majority of Australians who say, well,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>this mob is not really that different to that mob,

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>so why would I bother changing the manager. I mean,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you're both taking us to a trillion dollars of debt,

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>so really, what's the difference. And of course the things

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>that were different, like nuclear energy were hidden away. On

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 2>net zero, Hamilton wrote, what I do know is that

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I cannot support any policy that demands a blank check

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and defers the costs of today onto the taxpayers of tomorrow.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>On how the Liberal Party ended up in such a malaise,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 2>he wrote, the best thing about Peter Dutton was that

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>he brought peace and stability to our party. The worst

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>thing about Peter Dutton was that he brought peace and

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 2>stability to our part. We needed to rid ourselves of

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 2>some of that baggage. We needed to have a few

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 2>internal policy fights to test our resolve. Thomas Jefferson believed

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 2>every generation needs a new revolution, and I believe the

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 2>new generation of Liberals need that too. And he's clear

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that he doesn't want to relitigate the past. Mistakes have

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 2>been made. We all know that. But the Liberal Party

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 2>now needs to have the fights that it never really

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 2>had after it lost government. In twenty twenty two. We're

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a center right party. He writes. If we move towards

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>smaller government, balanced budgets, the individual above the state, we

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>will be headed in the right direction and Australians with

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a mind to follow us, mind to tomorrow sorry, will

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>follow us. This won't be an easy path, and I

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>have no doubt we've many policy fights ahead, but it's

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 2>time to acknowledge the peace the Liberal Party enjoyed in

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the last term, the unity and stability we praised ourselves for,

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>came at a cost, and so it's time to get

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>serious now. I mean, there are clearly divisions still. Susan

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Lee only won the leadership by four votes. So have

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>it out, fight, knock your heads together, come up with

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 2>something that actually makes sense. People couldn't really give two

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>hoops about left or right, or up or down or

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>anything else. They just want good policy that makes them

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 2>feel better off now. Robert Menzies set out in nineteen

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty four in his We Believe Statement, that liberals believe in,

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>amongst other things, the individual liberty, that the class war

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 2>is a false war. That improved living standards depend on

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>high productivity and efficient service, that economic power and policy

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 2>are not designed to control people's lives. The great human

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>freedoms they believe in, and religious and racial sorry tolerance

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 2>among our citizens, and they are all as noble and

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>relevant today as they were then. And that is what

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the Liberal Party has to BELI. It is their mission statement,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 2>straight from their founder. Now there are some who think

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the answer to the Liberal Party is to drag it

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>further to the left to become effectively the Teals, But

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 2>there are two problems with that. One, it won't work

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>because the Teals already exist, and it wasn't the inner

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>city where the Liberals' hemorrhage seats at this election. It

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 2>was in the suburbs where the battlers live. You won't

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>win battlers back by going all ev Climatista on them. Two,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 2>if the Liberal and National Coalition breaks up, which is

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>very much on the table, then the Nats are never

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 2>going to come back and join with a party that

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>has moved its ethos even further away from them, further

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 2>than they are now. And the Nationals, by the way,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 2>haven't lost a lower House seat since two thousand and seven,

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>So if the Libs wanted a mate to help them

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>form government and that's what they've always needed from the Nationals.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Then the Nats would have some serious demands to make,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>just as they will now. The coalition going dropping NED

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>zero is not reckless and nor is it a mass

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>vote killer. People are now far more concerned about the

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 2>cost of living than they are about climate change or

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>anything else. Even young people have been hit by reality

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to some degree. Mission Australia's twenty twenty four Youth Survey

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>found fifty six percent of respondents age fifteen to nineteen

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 2>were concerned about the cost of living number one, making

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 2>it far and away the most important issue, if not

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 2>climate change in the environment of its perch, which was

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three the top concern for forty four

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 2>percent of young people. Last year it dropped to twenty

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 2>seven percent. And this was pretty funny too. A quality

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>and discrimination was knocked out of the top four issues

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 2>for young people, replaced by violence, safety and crime. What

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>more do you need to know about where the electorate

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>is even young people that we're told the Liberal Party

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 2>needs to win back, and yes they do, but the

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 2>fact is you don't win elections by looking like the

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>other guy. You can't just price match every policy like

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a whipper snipper at Bunnings. You need to be

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>different and you need to have a vision for the future,

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>a better.

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I must say it's been positive, if not a little amusing,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>to see so many media outlets now waking up to

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the reality that the illicit tobacco market has exploded into

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>a runaway success for organized crime. Now regular viewers and

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>readers will know that I've been banging on about this

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>four years, that the price of legal cigarettes is far

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 2>too high due to extortionate tax that the federal government

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>charges on tobacco. I mean the tax on cigarettes has

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 2>tripled in a decade, from forty seven cents per stick

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fifteen to a dollar forty today. I mean,

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 2>an average packet of sigis will cost you in the

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 2>order of fifty dollars. It's just outrageous, and it has

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>precious little to do with health. It's because the government

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>wants to squeeze as much money as it can out

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 2>of poor old smokers. And I warned that that would

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>lead to a booming illegal market, and of course that

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what's happened. You can buy an illegal packet

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>of diaries in almost any dodgy tobacco, hordes of which

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 2>keep popping up across the country every week for less

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>than twenty bucks, and the war between the various gangs

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to control this market has already killed at least two people.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>An innocent woman, Cape Tangney, was killed in Melbourne earlier

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>this year after thugs involved in illicit tobacco fire bombed

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the wrong house and gangland figure Sam Abdul Rahim, known

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>as the Punisher, who was allegedly involved in the illicit

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>tobacco trade. He tried to muscle in so the other

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 2>players were after him, was executed in January. Now sixty

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Minutes and four Corners both ran investigations within a day

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 2>of each other a couple of months ago. Today, it

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 2>was the Sydney Morning Herald which pointed out that there

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 2>are now twenty odd tobacco shops on King Street in

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Utown in Sydney, compared to just a handful a decade ago,

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 2>which is odd seeing is that fewer than one in

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 2>ten people smoke now compared to vastly bore a decade ago.

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And the article notes that while Melbourne has been the

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>center of most of the violence in the illicit cigarette trade,

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Sydney has had two alleged tobacco related fire bombings this

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>month in Auburn and Mount Pritchard, and police are worried

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>about where things are headed. The war has spread into

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 2>South Australia too. Again, I told you so. I mean,

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 2>there was no way it was simply going to stop

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>in Melbourne without the illegal market being stopped in its tracks.

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>And the only way to do that is to stop

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>taxing it so much, so much that it turns people

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 2>to the illicit product. I mean, they're not doing it

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 2>because they want to be petty criminals. They're doing it

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 2>because they're addicted and they can't afford the legal one.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you expect them to do? Even people within

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the Victorian Police are now asking the federal government why

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>they can't at least freeze the tax.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Jason Kelly from Victoria, Please, mister, thank you for the presentation.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 4>A lot of members of the community just don't understand

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 4>why we can't pause the tax or at least reduce

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 4>the tax, because the illicit market and organized crime are

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 4>really reaping the benefits.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 5>And it's a really tough one. I get that. So

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 5>the difficulty we have with that proposal involves raising the

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 5>white flag on this question and basically allowing criminals to

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 5>dictate the legal price and the revenue arrangements that the

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 5>Commonwealth would have.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 2>The SMAH said that nearly forty percent of tobacco consumption

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 2>across Australia was illicit last year, according to an Industry

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Commission report by FDI Consulting, an increase of twenty eight

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 2>point six percent on twenty twenty three. A whopping seventeen

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 2>point six billion dollars of revenue has been wiped off

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the federal budgets. Forward estimates all lost tobacco tax in

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the past year alone. The Media Economic Update, which of

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 2>course we got at the end of last year, downgraded

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.599
<v Speaker 2>tobacco excise revenue by two point eight billion this financial

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>year and ten point seven billion over the four years

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>to twenty seven twenty eight, ostensibly because so much of

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the market is being lost to the untaxed product pushed

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>by organized crime gangs. March federal budget that wiped another

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 2>one point three billion dollars off this year's tobacco tax

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and another six point nine billion to twenty eight twenty nine,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>not because they've stopped smoking, because they found a cheaper

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>product that's funding organized crime and all. It's grizzly activity.

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 2>So I'm glad that people are starting to wake up.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>But this has been coming four years. I've been talking

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 2>about it for years, and the federal government has done

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 2>nothing to stop it. They've kept doing exactly the same thing,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 2>increasing the tax and then wondering why it gets worse.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's take that to my panel tonight, Sky and News

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>contributor Joe Hildebrand and host Steve Price. Steve, of course,

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>you've borne the brunt of most of this down in Melbourne.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean more than one hundred fire bombings you've had

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>at tobacconists. You've got insurance companies now refusing to ensure

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>people who live in buildings that have a tobacconist down

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of them, and the federal government just won't

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 2>move on this. It is so stupid.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, they don't understand.

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 6>I mean there's a fire bombing of a tobacco shop

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 6>every night pretty much in Melbourne. And that's been going on, Caleb,

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 6>I now think probably for four or five years. I mean,

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 6>it is bloody dangerous. And I tell you what, there's

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 6>shopping strips. I mean, you mentioned how many of these

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 6>tobacco joints are around up and down say Chapel Street

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 6>in windsorom Brand. Every second shops a tobacconist, and you

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 6>could just walk in there and obviously clearly purchase an

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 6>illegal product.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, the police have not.

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 6>Got the resources to shut those shops down. They don't

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 6>seem to have the will either, and the state government

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 6>certainly doesn't have the will neither.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>There's camera.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 6>It's a dangerous criminal activity that they just refuse to

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 6>accept as happening. And you're quite right, we could all

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 6>see this coming. I mean, who's going to go into

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 6>the Ida or to Woolies and pay fifty seven dollars

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 6>for a packet of cigarettes. No one's going to do

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 6>that if they know they could walk next door and

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 6>get the same packet, as you said, for twenty bucks.

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 2>And I feel so sorry, Joe for the states, because

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, the states get saddled with having to enforce

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>all of this, but it's not their fault.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>The federal government is so greedy that they say, well,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 2>we want more and more tax, But the reality now

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>is the tax is going backwards because everyone is buying

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the illegal stuff. Anyway, you would think even from the

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 2>bottom line, the budgetary bottom line, they'd start to go on,

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 2>hang on, this isn't working well.

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 7>As the good Minister said, you know, we can't let

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 7>organized crime dicta comphouse revenue menage is the government which

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 7>I think actually so of bells the cut on this

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 7>that this is a huge money spinner for the government.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 3>It used to be.

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 7>I remember when all these taxes and the plane packaging

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 7>and everything was brought in, back when I think Tanya

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 7>plipper Set was Health Minister, and the argument was that

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 7>that tobacco actually cost the country, cost the tax payer

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 7>so much money in medical in medical expenses, hospital stays,

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, people being off from work because they're sick.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 7>And I remember noticing a few years ago in one

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 7>of the budget lockups that the amount of money that

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 7>the government was now getting from tobacco xcize was now

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 7>outpacing how much smoking actually cost the community.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 3>So from then on it obviously became a cash cow.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 7>I think another problem for the government is that at

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 7>the exact same time as the tobacco taxes were skyrocketing,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 7>they were cracking down on vaping as well, which is

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 7>how a lot of people were because I think a

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 7>lot of the reason it's going down is because some

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 7>people are quitting. But again, the easiest way for pretty

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 7>much every smoker I know to quit has been to

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 7>transition to vaping, and they were making that harder putting

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 7>up more regulatory hurdles at the same time.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>So it was a perfect store.

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>It's just stupid stuff.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 8>Of course, I talked earlier about the sorry stell what

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 8>happened to the crackdown on vapes, these things that come

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 8>into the country that are supposed to be illegal. At

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 8>Mark Butler announced, I don't see any crackdown on vapes.

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>But this is the thing as well. They missed a

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>trick there because they could have regulated it in the

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>same way they do cigarettes and said, well, we understand

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>that the illegal cigarette market already exists. Of course there's

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be an illegal vape market, but they said, no, no,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>we'll ban it. It'll all be fine.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Work, don't smoke illegal cigarettes, buy, doesn't regulated, vote exactly,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 7>And that was.

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 2>And the market was doing that, but the governments of

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 2>everything they touched, they bagger up. Now. The other thing

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I talked about at the top of the show, of course,

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is that the Liberal Party and how they're going they

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>could decide what their philosophies will be going forward, and

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting to see the divide. I talked about what

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Garth Hamilton had to say and and I think it's

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>some of the best analysis I've seen so far. On

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the other side, this was Senator Jane hu mo onscar

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Us today.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 9>I have a personal opinion on that, of course, and

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 9>that would be that the election has sent us a

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 9>very clear message what it is that they want in

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 9>their government. Abandoning net zero. I don't necessarily think is

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 9>consistent with that.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Steve, do we really believe that everyone went

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 2>out and voted for labor because they couldn't be at

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the idea of net zero not existing? I don't think

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>they had anything to do with it.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 6>No one's marching in the street for net zero. I

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 6>don't care what any labor minister says or what Chris

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 6>Bowen rattles on about. It's simply that's not the issue.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the Liberal Party you got to wake up

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 6>to themselves, and Jane and Hume needs to as well.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, have a look at the train wreckage around

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 6>the country. I mean, put to one side for a

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 6>moment that awful election loss and how devastating that was.

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 6>Hav A look at Wa the Liberal Party basically doesn't exist.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I got.

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 6>They've got two or three members in the state parliament.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Basil's emplast is trying to fix that up. In South

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 6>Australia and Adelaide, the federal Liberal Party don't have one

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 6>seat in yours of my old hometown Color. I mean

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 6>that is just something that growing up in South Australia,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 6>you could never imagine.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That that would be the case. In Victoria, the state oppositions.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>They pretty much lost every booth in Adelaide, let alone

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>every seat, which is just extraordinary.

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 6>I mean I grew up in the seat of Sturt

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 6>that was always a Liberal seat. I mean Adelaide had

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 6>a divide, as you know, the eastern suburbs and the

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 6>inner southern suburbs were always Liberal territory Port Adelaide and

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 6>the western suburbs were different.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>But I mean the.

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 6>Victorian state opposition they spent all of their time throwing

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 6>more a deeming out of the party and not worrying

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 6>about trying to win an election. Dan Andrews won three

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 6>elections in a row in Victoria. The Liberals never got

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 6>within a sniff, So it's not hard to work out

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 6>what's gone wrong here. The Liberal brand is completely stuffed

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 6>and if they don't realize that themselves, how is it

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 6>ever going to be fixed.

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the point, Joe, is that it's not just

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 2>about dropping net zero or having net zero, it's about

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the effect of doing so. And if you can say

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>by dropping net zero, we can wind back whatever plans

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 2>they might be for renewable energy, whatever they can sell

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 2>and say, look, this will result in a reduction in

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>your power bills for instance, that is the point of

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 2>going down this road, right.

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I thought it was a really interesting article by

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 7>Garth Hamilton. But to be honest, I think even talking

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 7>about net zero is a problem for the Liberal party.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 7>I think the reason why this election was such an

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 7>emphatic win for Labor is because Labor moved to and

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 7>held the center. And I know that's something that a

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 7>lot of people on the right refuse to believe, but

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 7>that is what was.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>The center really worried about net zero.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 3>They don't care either way. This is the whole point.

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 7>So the mistake that both the left and the right

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 7>make on this issue, just as they make on indigenous issues,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 7>is thinking that everybody else cares about them as much

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 7>as they do. One side cares about them in a

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 7>very very positive way, the other side cares about them

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 7>in a very negative way, and you can swap them

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 7>around whatever. The point is, the vast majority in the people,

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 7>people of middle in the middle, do not give a

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 7>rats And that is why when Peter Dutton and the

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 7>Liberal Party started arguing about Welcomes to Country in the

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 7>last week of that campaign, I was just going, for

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 7>the love of God, it's already dead.

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 3>What are you doing?

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>That was my point.

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 7>We're talking about most people don't aren't marching in the

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 7>street for welcomes to Country or marching the street against

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 7>Welcome to Country. They just want a party that is

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 7>going to fix their kitchen table problems, and whichever party

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 7>has the most credibility, whichever party they believe can do that,

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 7>they will vote for.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 3>They don't care what color it is.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 7>And Peter Dutton lacked credibility and the Colors lack credibility

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 7>in terms of their policy plans and the detail around it.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 7>And at the same time they were talking about other stuff,

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 7>cultural issues that no one cared about.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 2>And that was my point is people don't really care

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>about left and right, but they care about good policy

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that it makes them feel like they're better off. And

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 2>if you can sell the message that by dropping it

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 2>zero you can make power bills lower, that's where you

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 2>go with it. But we'll see what they do. And

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>of course they're still got to worry about whether the

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Nats want to be coalition with them either, and that's

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that they will be asking about now. Joe,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 2>you had a peace out in the Telly today talking

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 2>about exactly how much I know you can't believe I'm

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>giving you a g out of you, but talking about

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 2>exactly how much Labor hates the Greens. And you can

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 2>understand from many perspectives why, but your source said, when

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>a matter before the Senate is poised almost evenly, the

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Greens are powerful for ten minutes. They can't create anything,

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>but they sure can kill things. And this will be

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 2>the question now that they have the absolute balance of

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 2>power in the Senate, what are they going to do

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 2>with it? And how does Labor work with them.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's not necessarily that the Greens have increased their power.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 7>Labor has actually picked up Senate seats, So the fear

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 7>that I think people on the right has is that

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 7>Labor just needs the Greens and nobody else, So there's

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 7>still a whole bunch of cross benches. And indeed, the

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 7>Coalition if they do not want the Greens to be

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 7>dictating policy terms to Labor, and I can promise you

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 7>Labor is not Labor will tell them to go jump

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 7>more times than not. Then the Coalition can very simply

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 7>do what it refused to do in the last Parliament

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 7>and negotiate with Labor on those same bills to make

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 7>sure that they don't get LEFTI fied or GREENO fied,

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 7>or redified or tritified by the Greens, because the Greens

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 7>they're terrible negotiators anyway.

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 3>They are obstructionists.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 7>They did terrible damage by blocking the housing policy, and

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 7>they are also a party that depends upon progress not

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 7>being made. And this is why Labor SMARTlab people absolutely

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 7>despise them.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 3>People at the top of the party despise them.

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 7>The PM despises them because all what they actually want

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 7>is a permanent state where people can be upset angry

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 7>about stuff, so they go out and protest and they

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 7>lodge their vote with a protest party. Any progress that

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 7>actually gets paid hurts the Greens. So that's why they're

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 7>so utterly disingenuine, disingenuous, and why I can promise you

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 7>that labor genuinely hates them.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, Steve, we're getting the budget down your way in

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Victoria tomorrow, and then the new treasure of Jaqueline Simes,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of course, who've famously got her staff to tell treasury

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 2>staff not to use economic terms because she couldn't understand them.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>So we know that it's all going to go really well,

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>but you won't believe what they're trotting out now to say, Look,

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 2>you've got to stick with us tag a over this.

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 10>From the first of January next year, if kids under

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 10>the age of eighteen, well, kids will be able to

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 10>travel free anywhere across Victoria thanks to the responsible decision

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 10>making we have done as part of setting tomorrow's state budget.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 2>So we find out today that the debt won't have

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 2>a two in front of it, so it'll be under

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 2>two hundred billion, so that's fantastic. But we'll give the

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>kids free public transport and that'll say Victoria.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 6>Steve, well, some of our Telvis Center, Allen and Jacqueline

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 6>Simes that kids don't pay to write on public transport anyway.

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's all great to give them free. I

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 6>catch trams and trains around all the time, and none

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 6>of these kids pay. They don't tap their my key on.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 6>They just get on the tram and get off the

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 6>other end. They wouldn't give a rats whether it was

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 6>free or not, because they don't pay now and on

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 6>the debt, I mean ten years ago, I looked this

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 6>up for you today, Caleb. Ten years ago, the Victorian

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 6>government debt in twenty fourteen fifteen was twenty two point

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 6>three billion dollars. As of twenty twenty four to twenty

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 6>five this year or twenty five twenty six, it's going

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 6>to be.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>One hundred and sixty eight point five.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Billion in ten years.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, a quick little tip for the Victorian by the way,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 7>if you're going to deliver a budget handout to win

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 7>the next election, try giving it to people who are

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 7>old enough to vote.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 6>I know, is it is a very good We'll hang

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 6>on so no, no it's not, No, it's not.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>The pearents are the ones.

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 6>That pay for this card that the kids currently have

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 6>to pay for to catch the tram and the train.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>To school.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 6>It's about seven hundred bucks per family, but they don't

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 6>pay anyone.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, isn't that what you do with

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 2>your pocket money. I was expected to do that with

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 2>my pocket money if I wanted to get around on

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>public transport. But I told this story last night on

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 2>air that I was on a train from Warregal to

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne a few months ago and the inspector Bloke, well,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I've got to make who lives in Warregor And Inspector

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloke comes down on the train and he says to

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.479
<v Speaker 2>these kids, you know, stop being so rowdy. And they

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>said to him, look, we don't have Marque cards and

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 2>he said, I know that, but please don't vape on

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 2>my train. So that's where we've seen you. I think

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly that's where we seem to be get. Steve Joe,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for your time. Now, the Prime

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Minister is back to his favorite past time, which is

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 2>holding court with foreign leaders, this time over at the

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Pope's inauguration, the first Australian PM to go to the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 2>inaugural mass since we established diplomatic relations with the Holy

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 2>See in the seventies. By the way, and our but

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>easy clearly charmed the European Union because they're now keen

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 2>to strike a new defense deal with Australia. He was

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 2>European Commission President Ursula Vondaline meeting with Alban Easy.

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 11>We do not only see you as a trading partner,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 11>but we see you as a strategic partner.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We would be very pleased if.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 8>We could to develop such as security and Defense Partnership tool.

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>To help break down what this is supposed to look like,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 2>what this deal might look like. I'm joined now by

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 2>a Director of Strategic Analysis Australia, Michael Shubridge. Michael, based

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 2>on what we've heard so far, and we know that

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the EU has done deals with a number of other

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.959
<v Speaker 2>nations recently, what would they be expecting of us and

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 2>what should we be expecting of them?

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 12>Well, Caleb, I think the EU's expectations are really very simple.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 12>They would be expecting Australia to have looked at what

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 12>they agreed with Japan and South Korea recently, and they've

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 12>just signed another defense and Security Corporation agreement with the

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 12>UK and it's a broad framework that says let's work

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 12>more closely together. The mystifying thing to me is that

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 12>The Prime Minister seemed to be either very badly briefed

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 12>or not have remembered what the brief would have told him,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 12>because he sounded like he was mystified by the whole thing,

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 12>and it was at a very early stage. It's very

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 12>likely that the text that the EU would propose would

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 12>look almost exactly like the publicly available texts that they've

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 12>signed with Japan and South Korea, just with replace all

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 12>putting Australia instead.

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 2>If that's the case, an elbow's not across it. I mean,

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 2>what was he talking to them about. What was the

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 2>point he went all the way there? Surely he went

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>there to do a deal.

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think this is the problem really when he

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 12>does these visits, he seems to think just having the

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 12>meeting is the out come, and maybe agreeing to meet again.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 12>And I've certainly met plenty of diplomats in our Foreign

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 12>Affairs department that think meetings are the outcome. But really,

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 12>when the Prime Minister talked about it, he talked about

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 12>maybe we have negotiations on it within NATO. Well, NATO

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 12>is an entirely different organization to the EU. It just

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 12>sounds disinterested in security.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 2>And also nothing to do with US. It should be

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 2>noted I've often said that I hate meetings. I think

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 2>that the preserve of people who want to look like

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 2>they're being productive without actually being productive, because you can

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 2>gasbag about stuff that could have just been put in

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 2>an email. But to the broader defense policy hearing, you know,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess we can't just rely on the US anymore.

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 2>And of course the moves that Trump has made in

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>recent months has forced outfits like the EU to look

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 2>after themselves a little bit more and increase their spending.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Same with the UK, etc. We're no different.

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 12>Well, that's right, So that there could be some meat

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 12>around this EO Australia Security Corporation as the EU starts

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 12>spending one hundred and fifty billion euros and new fund

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 12>they've just put together, that could be some opportunities for

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 12>Australian defense companies.

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>But I think we've got.

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 12>To keep pretty low expectations about what Europe and Australia

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 12>might do together. One reason that occurs to me why

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 12>mister Albanezi was reluctant to even talk about this is

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 12>if he had read the agreements that have been ended

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 12>between the EU with Japan and South Korea. He would

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 12>see that they're agreeing that really Russia and China are

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 12>a common challenge for Europe and our part of the world,

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 12>and he wants to run a mile from that characterization.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Why would you run a mile from that characterize that? Well,

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.239
<v Speaker 2>we know why to pander to China, but honestly, if

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>you want to protect your country, we can't run a

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>mile from that characterization. We know it's going on. It's

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>something we all have to stand up against. And how

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>could we expect allies, be they in Europe or the US,

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>or the UK or anyone else, to stand by us

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>if we're not willing to acknowledge the same things that

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 2>they are. Well, I agree with you, Caleb.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 12>And really, if mister Albanezi was thinking security was important

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 12>and wanted to build a relationship with the EU, he

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 12>could have pulled out a draft text where he had

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 12>written Australia instead of Japan and said we'd be ready

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 12>to sign this today. But instead we hear about it's

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 12>at a very early stage and we'll have further chats

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 12>and am I go on for some time. It's all

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 12>just the way he behaved in his first term. If

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 12>I can have meetings and more words with no outcomes.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a good day.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Just very quickly before we go, Michael, Speaking of meetings,

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Elbow also met with a lot of mis Zelenski and

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 2>discussed Oscar Jenkins, of course, the Aussie who's been sentenced

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 2>in Russia. What should we expect out of that.

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, I'll tell you what. If mister Abenezi could actually

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 12>deliver the forty nine old tanks that we've promised to

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 12>give Ukraine in October last year, he might get President

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 12>Zelenski's attention and full cooperation.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think that'd be a.

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 12>Good thing for him to do. But really, there is

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 12>some possibility that Oscar Jenkins could be rolled into a

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 12>Ukraine Russia prisoner swap that happened with some British nationals

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 12>earlier in the war. But I really think it's about

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 12>engaging with Ukraine, supporting them and delivering on our promises

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 12>like getting tanks there in under a year.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, Michael, thank you so much for your time. Still

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to come. Labour Slam's criticism of their capital gains tax

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 2>as a scare campaign, I'll tell you why that's ridiculous.

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 2>But first, Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis since shock Waves through

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>American politics. Kosher Garda will join me live next.

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>We learned today that former US President Joe Biden has

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>been diagnosed with a quote unquote aggressive form of prostate

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 2>cancer that spread to his bones. Donald Trump posted online

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Milania and I are saddened to hear about Joe Biden's

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>recent medical diagnosis. We extend our warmest and best wishes

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to form a first Lady Jill Biden and the family,

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 2>and we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery. With me.

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Now is Sky and news contributor Kosher Gada Kosher. What's

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>been the reaction across America to this news?

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 13>Where to be douquieleb Certainly, as you said, it's shark

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 13>waves around the country just because of the nature and

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 13>elite stage of the diagnosis where it's metastasized for his bones.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 13>I think, you know, the first reaction is genuine sympathy,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 13>bipartisan words of support from Donald Trump as you just

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 13>played there, to Kamala Harris and everyone in between. Because

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 13>these kinds of events sadly are relatable to many people

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 13>can sympathize with it on a human level, and it

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 13>has a way I guess one silver lining is it

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 13>has a way of bringing a very divided country together,

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 13>if for a brief moment. The other side of it,

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 13>of course, is that given who Biden was and is,

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 13>naturally there is a political element to the story, and

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 13>that is that this does further tarnish his legacy. For sure.

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 13>This is going to be one more thing of how

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 13>he's remembered that he had this and various health conditions

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 13>festering when he decided to run, and everything that went

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 13>down from there. It's raising questions about transparency, who knew what,

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 13>when did they know it? And this wasn't kept or

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.719
<v Speaker 13>this was kept for the American people and the implications

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 13>of that. And there's also a little bit around policy,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 13>not so much because of the cancer, but the cognitive

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 13>decline on various documents that he signed, from executive orders

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 13>to pardons. Do they have legal legitimacy is a question

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 13>that people are raising whether or not anything comes of that.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 13>So it's certainly created a bit of a firestorm politically.

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 13>In addition to the human aspect of.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>It, Well, you'd have decides far from a conspiracy theory

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 2>to wonder why if he's been diagnosed with stage four

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 2>prostate cancer now, so it's well advanced. So he absolutely

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 2>had it towards the end of his presidency. You are

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the president of the United States, so you would have

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the best doctors and medical advice and whatever available to you.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>How did they not pick this up?

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely? And I think that is the elephant in the room.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 13>It's very hard to believe that they didn't because they're

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 13>constantly being monitored, and obviously he was under the care

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 13>of many doctors. There were Parkinson's doctors at the White

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.959
<v Speaker 13>House logs show had been visiting for a while. Obviously

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 13>he would have been having regular physicals as well. So

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 13>I think that is an inconvenient reality that is out there,

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 13>and it is the Democrat Party and the media, who

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 13>are already suffering from all time low levels of trust,

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 13>have certainly taken a big hit tonight as the story

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 13>continues to unfold.

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and it's sad as well because of all the cancers,

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 2>to have prostate cancer, if it's found early, is very

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 2>easy one to treat these days. Now, Israel seems open

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to ending the war with Hamas, that is, if the

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 2>terrorist organization agrees to put down their arms and going

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to egg style, and it's a stack shift from Nitan

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Yahoo because he's previously said that Israel will keep fighting

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 2>until Hamas is completely extinct. But they've lifted the aid band,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 2>so there's there's food and drink and whatever going into

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 2>the place now, and they seem to be softening their

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 2>tone a little.

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 13>Seems to be that way, though twenty four hours is

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 13>a lifetime in a war zone, so much more wood

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 13>to chop. Still, there's two dynamics happening in real time.

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 13>So one, the Israelis have intensified their military operation, both

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 13>with the ground game and air strikes. Several Hamas leaders

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 13>reportedly were taken out over the weekend, and coupling that

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 13>with the blockhead of food and water and everything else

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 13>is really putting maximum pressure on them. And simultaneously, the

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 13>diplomatic its continue to be underway, though they haven't always

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 13>been successful. That is continuing with the US playing a

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 13>mediation role and other actors from Europe and else where

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 13>are coming in there and trying to basically negotiate primarily

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 13>release of the remaining hostages in exchange for a ceasefire.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 13>So those two dynamics, it sounds like, at least based

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 13>on reports, there's been a bit of a breakthrough where

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 13>there are certain restrictions that Hamas was not letting up

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 13>on which now they are, and they've agreed to these

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 13>talks in Qatar with no preconditions. And if true, then

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 13>that looks like hopefully this thing is moving, the needle

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 13>is moving in the right direction and moving towards some

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 13>sort of seizing of this conflict, because certainly it's gone

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 13>on for far longer than anybody.

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Wants very quickly kosher. The breaking news out of the

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>UK ton Art is that the European Union in the

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 2>UK have agreed to a post bricks at what they're

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 2>calling reset deal, which appears to encompass security and defense.

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 2>But the major deal, or the magic part of it

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that's being lauded, is a twelve year agreement to allow

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 2>phishing access for a boats in UK waters. Many people

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 2>might be asking what was the point of Brexit.

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 13>The Brexit heres certainly are asking that and are not

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 13>very happy in general, but the fishing trade in general, software,

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 13>border checks, travel, all of that, and then the big

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 13>thing is a European Court of Justice. The ECG apparently

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 13>has some sort of sphere of influence still on domestic

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 13>matters that's the one that's riled up many people on

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 13>the Brexit side. I think Nigel Farage and the Reform

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 13>Party are certainly going to use this to their advantage

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 13>and push that it's sort of a surrender and that

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 13>the deal should be much different from that, and that's

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 13>going to have a big play in their political cycle.

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 2>And they're already doing well, so I'm sure they won't

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 2>mind a bit more ammunition. Kosher, thank you so much.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 2>As always still to come, Labour slam's criticism of their

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 2>capital gains text as a scare campaign. I mean seriously

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 2>more coming up with the panel after this, plenty of

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 2>more to get through, so let's jump straight into it

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 2>with my next panel. A Journey Media is Lisa Godard

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and Strategies director Cameron Milner. Now Susan Lee had an

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 2>article in The Australian over the weekend mapping out what

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 2>her time as opposition leader will look like and it

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 2>was pretty light of policy, but I guess that's to

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 2>be expected when so much is still being debated within

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the party. They have quite a few fights to have.

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Of course, I pointed out Garth Hamilton was saying earlier

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 2>and it did give a few hints those such as

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 2>this paragraph. We have lost the trust of women, and

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 2>we have not convinced younger Australians that we have a

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 2>plan to provide a fair go for their generation. We

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 2>need to focus on renewing the compact we have had

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 2>with Australians who live in cities, helping them deal with

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 2>a rapidly changing economy and rising prices. And Cameron, she's

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 2>quite right on.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>All of that.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 2>But the question is do you go down the road

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of well, we'll stick with knit zero and nothing much

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 2>will change, or do you actually say we need to

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 2>have a shakeup to make it look like we're not

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the same as the other one.

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think the thing too is words have kind

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 14>of echoed some of men's he's forgotten people. I think

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 14>there was a bit of power battlers for the verbs

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 14>in there as well.

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 3>So the Liberals are getting back on track.

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 14>If they're going to have a huge internal fight and

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 14>talk about themselves next three years, they'll lose the next election.

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 14>If they get back to being the party of blow taxation,

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 14>individual freedoms and as John Howard said over the weekend, aspiration,

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 14>then I think they're going to be back on track,

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 14>and she's talking that to language. She didn't put Alba

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 14>under a lot of early pressure going forward.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 2>So she talks about having lost the trust of women.

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 2>But the question is is how do you specifically win

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 2>back women. You've now got a female leader, But I

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know that that in and of itself encourages women

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 2>to vote for you. In some cases, you might say

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that it actually counts against you. Certainly anecdotally, there are

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 2>plenty of women who'll say that, how do you actually

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 2>regain the trust of women?

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 11>Caleb, You and I can answer that tonight. We'll have

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 11>jobs with the Liberal Party by tomorrow morning. What I

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 11>think is that they really need to start to look

0:38:59.800 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 11>at it.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not just this women issue.

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 11>We all have cost of living problems, whether you're male

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 11>or female. You were out there at the grocery store.

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 11>You were all suffering at that price points. I just

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 11>don't think they hammered home that message hard enough and

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 11>this idea. Look, it's great that Susan Lee is now

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 11>the first female leader of the Liberal Party.

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Great.

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 11>I don't believe in quotas. I don't think that we

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 11>should rejoice at the fact that we're celebrating this based

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 11>on gender. However, she is there now. Whether that will

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 11>be a turning point for voters and female voters, I

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 11>don't know if it will. If you look to the US,

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 11>if you look at the votes that Kamala Harris was

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 11>getting compared to Biden, she had fewer female voters backing

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 11>her in.

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know how much how.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 11>Much you can back in this idea that you put

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 11>a woman in the leadership position and all of the

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 11>women are going to follow behind like the pied piper

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 11>and everyone behind her. I just don't think it's enough.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 11>They do need to come up with some policies that

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 11>actually cut through and y's what she has said on

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 11>the weekend. Great, but it is such high level messaging

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 11>that if they don't find a way of making the

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 11>average Australia and go, you know what that relates to

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 11>me and I can see how that will change my

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 11>life for the better, then they will stay out for

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 11>the next three six years or more.

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I tend to agree with Peter Kreedlin,

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.720
<v Speaker 2>of course, who said multiple times, look that the issues

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 2>that women care about are fundamentally the same issues that

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 2>men care about, because we're all living in the same world,

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and we have the same households and the same families,

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 2>so we all see the same things, and there's probably

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 2>an argument to be made. You know, all the people

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 2>out there don't come for me for saying it, because

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 2>it is true. I'm not saying that it should be

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 2>otherwise or whatever. But the reality is that women still

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 2>do perform a lot more of the household duties than

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 2>men do, and so you could make the argument that

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 2>things like cost of living women would be even more

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 2>acutely aware of because they're looking at those numbers every day. Anyway,

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 2>if I can work it out, or anyone else can

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 2>work it out, we'll see where we go. Now, Cameron,

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you're in the UK right now. You've written in The

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Nightly today that the UK Labor Party is a warning

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 2>for Australia's Labor Party and also a ray of hope

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 2>for the Liberals. Why is that.

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 14>Kis Starmer and Anthony Abanze both scored about two thirds

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 14>of the parliament in the most recent elections ten months

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 14>on Starma though is panicking, he's soiling the sheets of government.

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 14>I wrote my column today because reform went a VI

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 14>election and one about six hundred and fifty seats out

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 14>of sixteen hundred in local councils. So reform Nigel Faraja's

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 14>party from the right has taken labor vote and taken

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 14>conservative vote and built themselves as a second horse against labor.

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 14>There are people in labor now talking about not being

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 14>a government for two or three terms.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 3>They're talking about.

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 14>Losing in four years time because red wall labor seats

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 14>are going to reform and Kis Starmer is seen as

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 14>someone who's weak and not up to it. That sounds

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 14>familiar probably to a lot of viewers with Albanese as well.

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 14>So the lesson for labor isn't it how many seats

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 14>you won only two weeks ago. It's what voters think

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.720
<v Speaker 14>of you on a daily basis. You'll lose the trust

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 14>of voters. You're going to lose the next election.

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Quite right now. The super tax. Newly minted Assistant treasure

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Malino has been trying to sell the policy. He

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 2>says that he doesn't affect that many people.

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.240
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think at the heart of it, we're talking

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 15>about accounts that have gone above a certain threshold, very

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 15>very large accounts, a very small slither of accounts, and

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 15>so I think what we really got here is whether

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:20.959
<v Speaker 15>or not those accounts should receive full concessional treatment or

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 15>slightly less concessional treatment.

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 2>And DEPITYPM Richard Marles has even gone as far as

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to call criticism of the policy a smear campaign.

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 16>It was taken to the Australian people within the last month, So,

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 16>I mean what we've seen here is the Liberals, in

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 16>a desperate attempt to find something to talk about, run

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 16>a smear campaign in relation to this. But fundamentally, this

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.800
<v Speaker 16>is a policy which has been it is something.

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Period of time.

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, desperate smear campaign. The reality is it's not indexed.

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 2>They could index it if they wanted to, but they're

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 2>not going to index it. So the three million dollars,

0:42:58.080 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 2>as we know, a twenty two year old today on

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 2>an average wage, you throw on an average wage for

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the rest of their life, Lisa will have three million

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 2>dollars in this souper by the time they are sixty four.

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 2>If it was really about being fair, it indicts it.

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 2>You can't call it a smear campaign.

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 11>No. And the way they're getting through with this messaging

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 11>is to put in us and them, So don't worry

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 11>about it. It's just the rich end of town. It's

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 11>the top end of town. Average Josies don't need to

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 11>worry about it. The smear campaign should have come from

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 11>the Liberal Party during the election campaign. That's when they

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 11>should have made this front and center and explained to

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 11>the younger voters. So they're trying to win over, this

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 11>is how this will impact you as you put your

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 11>money into supernow by the time you retire, this is

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 11>how this will impact you.

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 3>But they didn't do it.

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 11>They didn't play the long game and explain it to

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 11>the younger voters that they need to win across. And

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 11>so right now Miles can stand there and say, well,

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 11>you know you're throwing a mud but really there's nothing

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 11>you can do to stop it.

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Cameron very quickly, Ol.

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.479
<v Speaker 14>Look, I agree with Lisa entirely. This is the scare

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 14>campaign the Liberal Party missed. This is Labour's big new

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 14>tax on savings and it should have been a huge

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 14>scare campaign. And for the Corio neecapit it be crying foul.

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 14>I mean it could meet. I mean, this guy's finishing

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 14>off his industrial mates, so he's playing it pretty hard anyway.

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 14>But no, this is a Liberal scare campaign that should

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 14>have been in the election and Lisa's absolutely.

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, Lisa Cameron, thank you for your time. Don't go

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 2>anywhere a cash strap. Victorian government still loose with the

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>check book ahead of tomorrow's budget. Will take a look

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 2>at that with Saxon Davidson from the Institute of Public Affairs.

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 2>The seat of Bradfield in Sydney, formerly held by Paul

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Fletcher for the Liberal Party have to go to a

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 2>recount now is less than one hundred votes in it.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 2>This is how we called it for Nicolette Buller on yesterday.

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:39.800
<v Speaker 2>There are no votes left.

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 17>My caveat on this is that in this seat we

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 17>can still see Deesel CAPTAREI and winning on a recount,

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 17>but all the votes in so we're saying.

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Nicolett Buller, she's in front.

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:53.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a game at the moment for climate two hundred.

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:57.720
<v Speaker 2>So let the recount begin, but it could be another

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Liberal seat to the Teals. Let's return to Victoria. There

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 2>is budget which is being delivered tomorrow by the Labor government.

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 2>For more analysis, I'm joined now by research fellow at

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the Institute of Public Affairs, Saxon Davidson and Saxon Now

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 2>apparently there's going to be a surplus posted, So that's fantastic,

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that's lovely. We've been reassured that debt will not exceed

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 2>two hundred billion dollars given the forward estimates last year,

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 2>or one hundred and eighty eight billion dollars. So that's

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.720
<v Speaker 2>terribly reassuring too, isn't it. And my tongue is firmly

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 2>in my check.

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 17>Well, this surplus is almost certainly an illusion because the

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 17>calculations for this surplus will not include any of the

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 17>various boondoggles spending on infrastructure projects, most prominently the suburban

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:46.280
<v Speaker 17>rail loop. So no, I'm not reassured in the slicest

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 17>about the financial situation Victoria finds itself in what.

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 2>Is surprise, And of course there is more spending in

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 2>this budget, things like free public transport for kids, which

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 2>is odd because you know, that's the kind of thing

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 2>that you would expect to maybe try out as an

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 2>election policy. But they're a year and a half away

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 2>from a state election and they're already throwing this stuff

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 2>out the Allen government. Does that indicate that they may

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:10.800
<v Speaker 2>be worried?

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 17>I think it shows just how desperate this government is.

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 17>We saw a very similar policy from the Miles government

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 17>in Queensland just before they lost to the LMP. And

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 17>this government is under pressure considering that they are behind

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 17>in the polls, and by all reports and rumors they

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 17>are under internal pressure from a potential spill as well.

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, and the difficulty here is, of course, it's basically

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 2>impossible for Labor to get the budget back on track.

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Even if you had a change of state government. With

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 2>debt hurdling towards two hundred billion dollars, how are you

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 2>ever going to undo that?

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 17>It would require drastic change cuts to government wide spending,

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 17>not just what we're seeing in the surplus that will

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 17>be announcing the budget tomorrow. We had the IPA released

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 17>to Rapport a couple of years back, calling for one

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 17>percent all of government spending reduction until the budget is

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 17>and structural surplus. But until that happens, I believe that

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 17>the budget in Victoria will be in structural decline.

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, Labour's Productivity Commission is investigating what lowering the company

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 2>tax rate would do to Australia. You know, it's an

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 2>effort to kick start the shocking productivity growth we have.

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 2>We have one of the highest corporate tax rates in

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the world. At thirty percent, I can't see an argument

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 2>not to lower it.

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.800
<v Speaker 17>It would be a small and positive step into increasing

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 17>business investment here in Australia.

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, the truth of it is that there

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 2>is far.

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 17>Too much red tape for businesses to be confident to

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 17>invest in Australia and increase productivity. And this lowering of

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 17>the corporate tax rate may just be replaced with this

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 17>incoming super tax, which will be a huge halting to

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 17>individual investment into Australia. So I believe that there's too

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 17>much red tape and too many other taxes that could

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 17>be incoming for productive to increase.

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a good point. I've always thought that the less

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 2>you ask for, the more you will get. Surely it

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 2>would attract more business to Australia. It almost certainly would.

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 17>But there are very there are very much more things

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 17>that could be done after this if Australia wants to

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 17>increase its productivity, like Jim Chalmers said the day after

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 17>the election, but without further change, I doubt that that

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 17>will happen even after a corporate a corporate tax removal

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 17>or decrease.

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Saxon, thank you so much for your time, and you

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:35.359
<v Speaker 2>know Once we've dealt with corporate text, we should took

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 2>about the rest of the tech system as well. I mean,

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Brad could creep again. Why is this stuff that they

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't talk about during the election campaign, the liberals that is.

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 2>That's all I've got time for today. Up next, Paul

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:46.439
<v Speaker 2>Murray Live Sticker Round.