WEBVTT - Abbie Chatfield: Drama, dating and Donald Trump 

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Something to Talk About, the Stellar podcast.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sarah Lamarquin, your host, and every week I sit

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>down with some of the biggest names in the country

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>because when Australia's celebrities are ready to talk, they come

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to Something to talk about. Being investigated by the Australian

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Electoral Commission was not on Abby Chatfield's BINGO card for

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, but after interviewing Anthony Albanesi and former

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Green's leader Adam Bant on her podcast HiT's a Lot,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Abby found herself at the center of several conversations about

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the recent federal election campaign.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>In fact, some.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Days at scene there were more headlines written about Abby

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>than they were about either the Prime Minister or then

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Opposition leader Peter Dutton.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>When women do more than one thing, they're deemed as

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>inft at all the.

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Things they do.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 3>But when men do more than one thing, it's like, wow,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>he's a footed player, can read an autocube.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Whereas women.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 3>If I am on reality TV show, I host a

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 3>reality TV show, I have a podcast, I do radio,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 3>I do all these things, then I must be good

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>at nothing. Because if I'm a reality TV show host,

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I can't only think about politics. If I think I

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 3>don't have politics, how could I be funny enough to

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 3>have a radio show. If I have a radio show,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll be actually this influencer. And it feels like people

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 3>think it's a zero sum game.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Today Abby sits down with me in the Something to

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Talk About studio to unpack her decision to speak out

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about politics and the double standards in play when it's

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a young, famous woman on the Internet who dares to

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>do so. We also talk about life and love as

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>she prepares to turn thirty, what it's like to be

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a very public feud, whether or

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not we might see her mum on The Golden Bachelor.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Abby Chatfield, Welcome back to the Stellar podcast.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Thank you back again for our yearly catch up.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say this is how I get to

0:01:57.840 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you once a year.

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>It seeks down.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We have a little conversation with annoying microphones in the way,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>but then it's the cover of Stellar. So it has

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>been almost a year between Stellar covers. A lot has

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>been going on, a lot to unpack you and me.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>But I want to actually throw forward a little bit

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 1>because later this month June you've a milestone birthday coming.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Up, thirty thirty.

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, how are you feeling about the Big

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>three zero?

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So excited. I've never been one to be scared about aging.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 3>I've never really understood people that are freaked out about it.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 3>I actually I've even tried to because of societal pressure

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>and expectations. Everyone's like, oh, don't ask my age. I

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>go why, I'm happy that I've made it to thirty.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Very exciting, And I don't know. I love aging because

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 3>every year you look back and how they say, if

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>you cringe it yourself a year ago, then you're making progress.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Like every year, I think that I get better and smarter,

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>as everyone does. I think you learn more, you understand more,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and you look back at things you did a year

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>ago and you go, wow, what basic thought or what

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.559
<v Speaker 3>a basic thing that I did, or you know, even emotionally,

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 3>what an awful relationship I was in four years ago

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 3>because I hadn't done.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 4>The work or whatever.

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>And I'm excited to be thirty. I'm everyone in my

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 3>lives is their thirties are the best.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 4>So I can't wait.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Thirties are great.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think something else that happens with a lot

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of people when you have a birthday is apart from that,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly for women, it's like, oh my goodness, I'm running

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>out of time of getting old or where's the time gone?

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that a lot of people think what have I

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>been doing? But for you, Abby, I know it always

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>looks different from the outside, but they're surely that couldn't

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be one of the when you have that cringe, god.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Cringe moment.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine one of the things for you, surely

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is not I haven't done enough stuff.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, definitely not that. That definitely is not a thought

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 3>that crosses my mind. Because his whole career was kind

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 3>of an accident.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>I was a property analyst and then I went on

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 3>The Bachelor as a joke and then this all kind

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>of happened. So it's sort of like when you and

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>this might say depressing, but when you have no goals

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 3>to reach, you can't really fail at those goals. Not

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>in that you should do nothing, but in that everyone

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, people ask me, what are you going to

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 3>do in five years?

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 4>What's next? Ta da da, and I go, I'd love

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 4>to know.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea, And yeah, I've been so lucky

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>to do so many different things just for yapping.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Because you would never have been able to brew Dick

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>five years ago if somebody had said that to you.

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Where are you going to be in five years?

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Because five years ago was when The Bachelor was I

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 3>just finished airing was covid?

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, it was covid five years ago?

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 3>And I just started the podcast and I thought, you know,

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe I got a hundred listens whatever something to do

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 3>in lockdown and yeah, now it's going really well, and

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I interviewed the Prime Minister. It's crazy and the formula

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of the Greens Adam band and it's just a very yeah,

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm very happy with all that I've done, and I'm

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>very excited for a holiday in between all that I've done.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 4>To come back and possibly do more.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, good way to spend a thirtieth birthday, I

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>think is a holiday? Yes, But that partly why I

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to speak to you today was because of a

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of issues that came up during the federal election

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and I thought I'd really love to sit down and

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>chat to Abby about some of this. And I've got

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>a few headlines here that came up, for instance, during

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the election, and Abby when you just said, couldn't.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 2>Have predicted anything.

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>When you look back to your unexpected career and being

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>catapulted into the spotlight after being the runner up on

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the Bachelor in the twenty nineteen series, very few people,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I imagine yourself included, would have predicted that I would people

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>like me would want to sit down with you in

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, and the first thing I want to

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about is politics, your.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Role and commentary around the federal election.

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I I mean, very exciting that we get to talk

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 3>about this, but I just want to say before anyone

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 3>has to go with me, everyone is acting like I think.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:56.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm a political expert.

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's like she thinks she's she thinks she's she gonna

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>get to politics at it.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 4>And it's just it's not that I think I'm a

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 4>political expert.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>It's that I have a big platform and I have

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>certain beliefs and I just voiced those beliefs. So everyone

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 3>holds me to the standard of being a political expert

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>or a political commentator quote unquote. If I wanted to

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 3>do that, I would get into a newsroom, or I

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 3>would I would get into politics.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 4>I would try to get into politics.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to use my platform to talk about

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 3>politics because it was a very important time and currently

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 3>globally with the far right movement getting bigger and bigger.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Although it's at the time, let's say at the time

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>earlier this year, it wasn't looking good in terms of

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>far right fascist movements overtaking the world.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 4>And now slowly like Canada has rejected it. We've rejected it.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it was Romania, so another slowly we're seeing

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 3>a rejection of it. But at the time it was

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 3>more panic induced. It wasn't that I thought I was

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 3>some political expert. Just before we get into this, I

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>just want to clarify that because everyone seems to, oh,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>you're an expert on everything.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 4>Now it's like, no, I just have ADHD and talk

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot well.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>When I just introduced you for this episode of the

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Stellar podcast, I did not identify you as political commentator.

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>When people listen to it's a lot the artwork is

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not shot with Parliament Housing Canberra in the background, but

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you are daring to weigh into these issues. I will

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>just touch upon some of those headlines I mentioned a

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>few minutes ago. Here just a sample, because quite frankly,

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you generated probably more headlines than Anthony Alperansi or Peter

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Dudd and put together. Abbi Chatfield joins Green's push to

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>keep Dunn out in new ad. Abbi Chatfield post to

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be probed by Australian Electoral Commission. Abbi Chatfield cleared of

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>wrongdoing by AEC after interviewing Anthony Albanesi on her podcast.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Abbi Chatfield despairs as her political hero, Greens leader Adam

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Bant faces election defeat. ABC believe Abbi Chatfield is the

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>way to go for Australia's political debates.

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, as I say.

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>The fact that you became a player, not because you

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>were saying Okay, here's political commentator, here's political heavyweight.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Abby Chatfield's verdict on it.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>You were using a platform to interview people, make commentary.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>No one's saying that anyone has to agree with anyone,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>but the oxygen.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>That it created. How did that sit with you?

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 3>It's so annoying because what happens is, as you probably

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 3>know more than anyone, I feel as though there's this

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>thing with me, in particular with the mainstream Australian media

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>where I do anything and suddenly it's as though like

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 3>I was saying before I think that I'm an expert,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>when it's actually just.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Journalists.

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that term lightly when it comes to daily mail

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 3>people who are writing articles knowing that we'll get engagement,

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 3>because if there's a headline saying that I seem to

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 3>think that I know anything about politics, it'll get negative

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 3>engagement and maybe positive engagement as well for people that

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 3>like me and follow me, but mainly negative engagement. And

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 3>there's this flooding of headlines about me, then people think

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 3>that I'm an expert about They think that I think

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that I'm an expert actor, so I'm there writing all

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the articles about myself, when in reality, I just wanted

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 3>for my audience to understand the literal basics of the election,

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 3>like how preferential voting works, or.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 4>The difference between labor and liberal.

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Because around this time I was also doing Married at

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>First Sight recaps, so I had this whole new audience.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 3>And I would have done it regardless, but I think

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>it was really good to bring an audience that hadn't

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 3>ever thought about the election that were coming for pop

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 3>culture stuff and for them to realize, oh, I shouldn't

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>just do I don't know a throw I shouldn't do

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 3>a throwaway vote. I shouldn't just go, oh, labor and

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>liberal the same, it doesn't matter. I should think about independence.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>I shouldn't listen to American oric saying that it's a

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 3>wasted vote if you go it from an independent or

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Greens or a smaller party, a minor party. So it

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 3>was me just trying to get my audience to understand

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 3>basics and understand even just that there is a vote compass,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>very basic stuff, and then suddenly it's turned into this

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 3>and the AEC stuff was just a whole other level

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>of I believe discrediting smaller voices, but also discrediting outspoken

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 3>young women. And it seems to be in media. When

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 3>women do more than one thing, they're deemed as inept

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>at all the things they do, but when men do

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 3>more than one thing, it's like, wow, he's a footy

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 3>player and he can read an AUTOQ, whereas women. If

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I am on reality TV show, I host a reality

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 3>TV show, I have a podcast, I do radio, I

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 3>do all these things, then I must be good at nothing.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Because if I'm a if I'm a reality TV show host,

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 3>I kin't only think about politics. If I think I

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>don't even have politics. How could I be funny enough

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>to have a radio show. If I have a radio show,

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 3>i'll be Actually it's an influencer. And it feels like

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 3>people think it's a zero sum game. And this is

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 3>why these headlines frustrate me so much, because it's positioning

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 3>me as having an ego about politics, but also as oh,

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 3>she's trying to be an expert on something new. It's like,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 3>I just I'm literally asking questions. I'm interviewing people as

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 3>you are now. I'm literally inquiring, And yeah, it's quite frustrating.

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 3>And like I said, the AEC thing was the most

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 3>frustrating and made me very feel really targeted, as I

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 3>feel that I'm oft an a scapegoat for a lot

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 3>of these center right or right wing or conservative or

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 3>older audiences in terms of the media because of how

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 3>the media portrays me as being the spokesperson on things

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.599
<v Speaker 3>and they go, oh, she's talking again, you know what

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's this weird cycle. So that's how I

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 3>felt about the certain line.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of fascinating threads of that chat that

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to pursue. One of them would be the

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>gender aspect that you raised there and Hannah Ferguson, the

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>founder of Cheek Media. She recently addressed the National Press

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Club and she said influenza has been the dirtiest word

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of this campaign. The agenda is clear to undermine our intelligence,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to pain us as untrustworthy. There's nothing wrong with being

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>an influencer, but the label is intended to cause significant

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>reputational damage. The impact is deeply misogynistic. Would you agree

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>with that gender aspect of it? Do you think there

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is a sexist or potentially even misogynistic component to the response? Yeah.

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I wrote an article about this in twenty twenty, actually

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 3>about how influencer is. At the time, I felt as

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 3>though it was a very gendered insult, almost as times

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 3>gone on. Personally, if someone wants to call me influencer

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and as an insult, I don't personally care, but I

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 3>do care about the impact on other women and on

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the industry as a whole. So it's kind of like

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 3>the whole idea of slutshaming. This is how I see it.

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't personally care if someone calls me a slut

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>because I go, well, I don't have any shame in

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 3>sleeping with lots of people, right I personally have no shame,

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 3>but I don't like slut shaming in terms of how

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 3>it impacts women and how it is a patriarchal idea

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 3>that's really enforced. Same with influencing, it seems to be

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.479
<v Speaker 3>throughout time whenever women dominate industries, it's then discredited and undermined,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 3>even things like teaching and nursing, incredibly important industries the

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 3>backbone of our society really that is continue undermined in

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 3>terms of their pay package, in terms of where they're

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 3>treated by patients and parents, and the disrespect they get.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 4>And I believe.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>That's because it's predominantly women that are doing it, and

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 3>it's also assumed that women should be the natural caretakers

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to influencing. I don't think that just

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>discrimination is as intense as it is towards women who

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 3>are literally saving lives and literally educating in the future.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to claim that I'm on the same

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 3>level as a teacher or nurse, but I do think

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 3>it's a similar repeated notion that women are dominating. We

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>earn more money than men in this industry. We have

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 3>a louder voices, we have bigger platforms. Women are the

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>main spenders and the main engagers in podcasting and in

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>social media, so then it's seen as lesser value.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 4>It's also funny.

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 3>I think Hanna said it's on her podcast or it

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>may be in her press club, and it is also

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 3>my friend so love her so much. She I think

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 3>she was saying maybe it was over dinner with me.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember when she was saying this.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Because she's the same all the time. She's wonderful at

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>the time.

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 3>But Mark Boris, for example, he would never be called

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 3>an influencer. He's a business owner first, for sure. But

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>there are many business owners. For example, Brittany Lee Saunders,

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 3>she has that incredible business fate. I think think women

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>call her the business owner, but I think everyone sees

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>her as an influencer or a YouTuber. It's kind of

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 3>like that's the lowest common denominator. And I think in

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>this election that was even more so the case. These

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 3>far right men who are posting about restricting abortion access,

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>or these men that are doing mocking videos of me

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 3>which was all over my for you page, that are

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 3>far right, and they're blatantly openly misogynistic. They openly don't

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 3>want women to have rights and immigrants to have rights

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 3>and people who are pressed have rights, First nations people,

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Yet they're not called influencers. They called commentators, they called

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>media personalities. Yet me, someone who's hosted TV shows, radio,

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I've done every medium you can do, Yet I'm an

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 3>influencer when it comes to politics. So it is quite

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 3>reductive and dismissive. But personally, my theory is anyone that

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 3>has an issue with influences for a sexist reason, I think, well,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 3>if you're offered money to post on the Internet, you

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>would take it and you would then be an influencer.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think with a.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Lot of these men it comes from jealousy of not

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 3>being able to hone in on that aspect. Obviously, others

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 3>don't like influences for other reasons whatever. When it comes

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 3>to the sexism and misogyny, I think that it's a

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>very easy way to discredit women and also undermines how

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 3>much intelligence and full thought and planning and kind of

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>business mind it takes to have a following that is

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 3>dedicated and engaged enough to monetize or a podcast, and

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about before how much effort it takes it

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>in the podcast people. Actually, so you rock up and

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 3>you yap and you go home, and it's hours and

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>hours and hours of work, and it's work that.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 4>We enjoy doing, but it's not just nothing.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 3>And then I think, sorry, I'm going I'm going on,

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>but I have so many thoughts about this.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Then I think about, you.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Know, the whole idea of we'll influencing isn't a real

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>job and it should be dismissed because you could quote

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>don't work, which okay, I've had a nine to five job.

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 3>I've done radio, TV, everything that I could do, and

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I would say I will. I personally work more hours

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 3>doing this job. That doesn't mean that I work more

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>hours than everyone else has a normal job. Personally, how

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 3>I operated in a nine to five I would sleep

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 3>on night boss's desk and I would go for lunch

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>from one till four. So personally, my work ethic is

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 3>better doing influencing. That doesn't mean it's a harder job,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 3>but I do work. But also if someone thinks I

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't work, that's fine. My issue then comes with why

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>do we then have to work ourselves to a bone

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 3>to prove the way worthy of having a platform or

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>having a voice. I think it's fine to think the

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 3>influencers don't work enough because the pay is completely out

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 3>weighs the actual hour's input.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 3>But when you say that influencing isn't a real job,

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>even though I mean the ATO fucking thinks it does.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.959
<v Speaker 4>Jesus Christ, the ATO is on my back all the time.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>But it really makes out like our only worth comes

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 3>in a real job, only exists if you're working yourself

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to the bone.

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Which is a whole other conversation about capitalism.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 3>But I'll let you ask me other question because I've

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 3>been talking for forty five minutes.

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, everything you say, there's like five other things that

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask about.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>But I'll go back actually to.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>When you was saying you wrote about this five years ago,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>about the sexism inherent in the way that we dismiss

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>women or try to put labels on Well, you're getting

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Big for your boots.

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>There as somebody that feels sometimes closer to one hundred and.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Thirty than turning thirty.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I remember when Julia Gillard became Prime Minister in twenty ten,

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>and in that time she would sometimes she had a

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>morning tea where there were god, I mean, race yourselves

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>people from women's media quote unquote there who were being

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>called mummy bloggers at the time. So fifteen years ago

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that was the parlance blogger, is this mummy blogers that?

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And I remember writing about it thinking well, why is

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that any different to you previous prime ministers like John

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Howard going and having mourning tea with the Australian cricket team.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a photo opportunity. They're talking about serious issues.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>They're going on speaking to different high profile figures and

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>as you say, that's an exchange of ideas. Is that

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>this not what we want from our elected representatives. We

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>want them to be representing the entire country, which by

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the way includes a few women. Maybe what everyone will

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you may want to remember, So mummy blogger, I feel

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was weaponized in the way that the phrase influencer has

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>been during this recent federal election.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 4>That's really interesting.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I was in grade ten when that was happening, so

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.959
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know about this bummy blogger era. You're so

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 3>right about politicians need to speak to the everyday Australian

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 3>and we put a threshold on who was allowed to

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>be engaged in political conversation that only allows a certain

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 3>group of people to be engaged and aware of politics,

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's what mainstream media want and what

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the two major parties want. And when we have people

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 3>like quote unquote mummy bloggers or influencers speaking to their audiences,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 3>people get threatened because then the public can understand how

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>much their vote actually counts. And it feels like when

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 3>we exclude certain groups people, particularly women in this instance,

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 3>but all different marginalized groups, and we exclude them where

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 3>making their vote count a little bit less. Because the

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 3>way that a lot of young people vote, I do't

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 3>know if it still happens, but when I mean fifteen

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>years ago, is that long ago. But things have changed

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 3>very rapidly with social media in terms of what the

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 3>kids do in these days, and I love it. I

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 3>think they're slightly more engaged. But I think when I

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 3>was a teenager and even in my early twenties, all

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 3>my friends voted how their parents voted, and how their

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 3>parents voted is how their dad voted, So really a

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 3>household was almost led by the male corporate vote, which

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 3>is what these press conferences usually were filled with people

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 3>that read the Financial Review or you know.

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 4>The Australian.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 3>And now we have more engagement so I feel like

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 3>it's distributing that power of the vote more so to

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 3>every single person. And the reality is everyone had an

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 3>issue with me talking about the election, but no one

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 3>could say anything that I said that was wrong. It

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>was very like I said, it was preferential voting, it

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 3>was year four, the government stuff, you.

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 4>Know that not everyone remembers or knows.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I had to do a little refresher to make sure

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 3>all my worting was correct, obviously with like minority government

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and hung Parliament and making sure it's all correct.

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 4>But the reality is everyone.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Should have access to this information and everyone should understand

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 3>how much the policies actually tangibly affect them, rather than

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 3>just thinking that politicians are for that middle aged, corporate

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 3>group of people. Because the reality is the actions of

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 3>politicians and political parties impact everyone, but they impact young

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 3>people the most because we're going to be here for

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 3>the longest time out of everyone here. So I think

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 3>it's very interesting the way that it makes me suspicious

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 3>when there is a resistance to having every day Australians

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 3>being involved in politics.

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And coming up is getting married something Abby and her

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>partner Adam Hyde is starting to think about.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 2>As you and I are speaking. It's June.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Next month the newly formed Anthony Albanezi government will see it.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Parliament will resume for the first time in July. So

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the recent weeks has been a lot of

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>very closely contested seats and one of the high profile

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>casualties was somebody that you just mentioned, Green's leader, Adam

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>bann Abby. What I actually wanted to ask you about

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>was the way that some people would respond to that news,

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>whether that's great news or bad news for them personally,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>dependent on their political allegiances, rather than thinking about that

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>would go oh great, Abby, Chatfield's going to be devastated,

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's their first reaction.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're obsessed.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 3>It's really sad, But I think it's really funny because

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Adam bent is a lovely man. He's so great, he's wonderful.

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 3>In Australia, we don't have a system like the US.

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 3>It isn't like this cult of personality thing with Trump,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 3>for example, even sometimes Democrats, even Harris to a certain degree,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 3>had that and Obama had that for sure, but not

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 3>as insidious as Trump. But people have a really touchment

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>to individuals. We're in Australia. You know, when I was

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 3>in that era with Gillard and Abbott and all of

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 3>all of this chaos. I remember when I was there

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 3>was a year we had three prime ministers in a

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 3>year or something. We don't have that attachment to individuals.

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 3>So it is funny people will go and crying about

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Adam Bent still a comment still today anything I got

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>a dancing video cry about Adam Bant. I think Adam

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Ban was a great leader of the Greens. Adam Bent

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 3>lost his seat. That's that's upsetting for him. The Greens

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 3>aren't non existent, and my main motivation is to deter people,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 3>not deterbeoble is too. People think about the impacts of

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the major parties and I would hope that a minority

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 3>government would exist soon so that could also come in

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the form of supporting independence. I'm not and this is

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 3>the mistake I think a lot of people on the

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 3>right make is because they are particularly Trump supporters, Australian

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump supporters. They are in they are under the influence

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 3>of a cult like personality. Some of them are actually

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 3>in a cult and they think that everyone else exists

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that way with politicians. I'm not a fan girl of

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Adam Bant. I like the Greens policies and he was

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the leader at the time, so I have no personal

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 3>feelings about it. Even the headline then it's is Abby

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 3>show's despair. I think I uploaded an Instagram story going

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 3>guys on freaking out. It's all I did, in between

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 3>four hundred other stories, and then telled on too like

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm some overly emotional again, overly emotional, hysterical woman who's

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 3>sobbing about Adam Bant.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 4>That sucks.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Larisa Waters is an incredible Greens leader. She has been

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 3>a lawyer, she's a woman, she is a single parent,

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I believe currently and I met her.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 4>And she's from Queensland. Like May, I think it's fabulous.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 3>So having new leadership isn't something of the Greens, isn't

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 3>something that makes me cry or upset. I was trying

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 3>to get progressive policies on the table for Australians. It

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 3>wasn't that I had a sports team that was going

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 3>to win. And it's not the NROL Grand it's not

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the side of Origin. It's I felt as though Green's

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 3>policies would help and the Greens did well in the

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Senate considering, and I'm not crying about it as much

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 3>as they'd love. It's bizarre that the first thought is

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get Abby Chatfield. That's because of headlines

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 3>like this. It reinforces their ideas that I am emotionally

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 3>invested in things. Both sides think that I think that

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm an expert and that I'm emotionally invested in the outcome.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 3>But the reality is I'm trying to reduce harm during

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 3>an election year that I think was really pivotal in

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 3>our history.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it is also emblematic of the fact that

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we are living in hyperpartisan times where there is often

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a lack of humanity or grace shown for anyone that

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>has a different view, and I think that you can

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>see that bubble up at election times and election nights

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and in the days after, where people will go ha

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>ha ha, your side loss, like it is a football

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>game example, that you just gave what about for you?

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Then on the other sides, So I watched, I was

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>glued to all of the media platforms on election night,

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and when Peter Duddan conceded, I thought there were a

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of great speeches that night on all sides of

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the political divide, and I personally thought that Peter Dunn's

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>concession speech was fantastic, Yes, and I'd love to ask

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you about that, Abby, how you feel about that And

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think that we as a society show enough

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>grace when the other side doesn't win. Whoever we feel

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>because we all saw globally what happened in twenty twenty

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in the US when Donald Trump wouldn't concede. I think

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was never necessarily huge Bill Shorten fan,

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>but I thought his concession speech in twenty nineteen against

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Scott Morrison was incredibly gracious. I just think I'm just

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it quite partisan. Yes, it's important in

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a leader, even if they're about to pack out the door.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So again, very long adhd worded question here, but I

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>did want to ask you about that notion about it

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>being a football game and about this hyperpartisanship, because I

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely think that the two sides can.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Give as ugly as each other.

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think that the concession speech from Dutton was good, great, wonderful,

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 3>and as you said, it's very important that there is

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a calm and dignified exit for the sake of that

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 3>party in particular.

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 4>No matter which side of the island is.

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 3>I do think though of this idea that both sides

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>can be as bad as each other is interesting and

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 3>quite frustrating for me, to be honest, because one side

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 3>is saying they want to restrict women's access to abortion,

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 3>they don't want to care about climate change, they don't

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 3>think that they should be welcome to country. They think

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:55.239
<v Speaker 3>that we shouldn't give any assistance or mine to our

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 3>First Nations people as a systemically oppressed. They want to

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 3>get rid of trans writes there's.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 4>A real need.

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 3>It feels like far right, far far right people is

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 3>who I'm talking about, Not people who are liberal voters,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 3>center right, you know, but far right people come into,

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 3>for example, my comments and say the most horrific things.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I'll reply with saying this is disgusting, and I'll get

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 3>told that I'm fueling the war between the two sides,

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 3>or that I'm making the divide greater, when the reality

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 3>is there is often it's often provocation from people who

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 3>are trolling on the internet and who are harassing people online,

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 3>and they believe that their.

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 4>View is as equal as someone else's.

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe that someone who was transphobic or someone

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 3>who thinks at First Nations people don't deserve equal rights.

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think their view is equal to the view

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 3>of someone that does believe people deserve equal rights.

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't believe it's someone.

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that that is a crazy thing for

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 3>me to feel, particularly when it comes to Maga. In

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the I think there's much more of a partisan divide.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I think Australia because of our preferential voting, I think

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 3>and I hope, and even from my point of view,

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone that is still supporting Trump is genuinely

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 3>I think they are a deeply bad person. I think

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 3>it is at this point not acceptable. I think people

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 3>who are supporting Dutton are not that way.

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that they have regular ways of voting. They

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>may have their own self as interest. I don't agree

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 3>with some of the things, a lot of the Liberal

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Party policies, but there are some policies that I was like, yeah, sure,

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Like they're increasing the mental health medicare sure. There were

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 3>some policies that I was like, yeah, sure, that's fine.

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>It isn't as extreme in Australia, and I think it

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 3>is because of preferential voting, because in the States they

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 3>can kind of get away with going, well, you have

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 3>to choose between these two, that's all you've got, and

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 3>neither you're going to be on the woke left or

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 3>are you going to be on a maga. In Australia,

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 3>we can kind of, I mean, by definition to our preferences.

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 4>So it's kind of.

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that both sides are as bad as

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 3>each other, because one side is if we' talk about

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 3>far right extremists, I'm not talking about people like I

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 3>said that a CenTra center right or you know, things

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 3>like that in Australia. But I think at this point

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>people that are Maga or maga esque in their thinking.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 3>At this stage, they're supporting mass deportations of US citizens,

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 3>they are anti the constitution, they I have elected a

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 3>convicted felon. It's I think it's very different. And the

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 3>hate quote unquote, the hateful left is always reactionary to

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 3>someone saying something that is genuinely dangerous. But I do

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 3>think there's more middle ground and gray area in Australia

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 3>than the US.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 4>I think the US is it's not going to go well.

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, if someone will was listening to this

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and they said, oh no, no, no, I've been completely.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Booted off Twitter.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day, which is now known as x

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm mentioning that because that became somewhere that I think

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>really just it's.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>An absolute cess pit now.

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But I think there was a time going back to

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>even those gillardeas I was talking about, where I saw

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that were center left that became

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>very disenfranchised and disillusioned with the progressive side of politics,

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>because that was a lot of trolling and a lot

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of what we would now demonize as quote unquote woke.

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Just for the record, I actually hate.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>The phrase woke, and I hated the phrase politically correct.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just a way of silencing people. Yes,

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 2>are trying to stand up for issues.

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely do know that there will be a

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that go, no, no, no, I've been

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>victimized by progressives. So that's why I just always think

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting the humanity of it. Yes, in the US,

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there was during the US presidential combat, which I agree

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>with you, Aby, I think, thank god it is very

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>different here.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but there were our peds being.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Written by people saying I went on a blind date,

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>turned out that he was a Trump voter, and I

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>left the blind Date, and I remember thinking, oh gosh, like,

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't think me as a person at this

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>point in my life would ever feel that there's not

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>more to a person than that.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 2>What about for you?

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you?

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 2>As you say, Dunne was a different character.

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Dunne was different.

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I think with Trump supporters, people who support Trump, he

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>has bragged about sexually assaulting women. If you could look

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 3>past that, he is an incredibly racist, misogynistic man. He

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>took out a whole ad in the New York Times,

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I believe, with the Central Park five calling for their

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 3>execution five innocent black men. He refused to lease out

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 3>his properties to black people in the US. So there

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 3>is history of very clear racism. Sexy and we said

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that all Mexicans are rapists. He's currently deporting children who

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 3>are are without any safety, and there are ice frays

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 3>going on and US citizens are being sent without due

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 3>process to al Salvador. I think that is I don't

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 3>think that's a safe person to be around. I would

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 3>not want to be around someone that supports a felon

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 3>proven to be liable for rape, brags about sexual assault.

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't that's not someone that I think is safe

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 3>for women to be around. I don't think women should

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 3>date Trump supporters. I think it's or I don't think

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 3>you can have or people that support Andrew Tape, people

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 3>that support uh I mean Jordan.

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 4>Peterson, I mean yeah, Jordan Peterson.

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 3>At this stage, I think these far right people people

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 3>are actively dangerous to women, and I don't think that

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 3>anyone should be dating someone who's a misogynists. I don't

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 3>think you should be if they're a woman. It's like

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't ask a trans person data transphobe. You wouldn't

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 3>ask a gay person to date a homophobe. You wouldn't

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 3>ask a person of color data racist. So why are

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 3>we okay with women dating misogynists. It's not okay. It's

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 3>very dangerous in fact, So I would definitely navidate someone

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 3>who even was a political personally. I think that's a

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 3>huge privilege to be a political But if you're a

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Trump supporter, you're either incredibly uneducated or you're a bad person.

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 4>That's my personal opinion. I don't think it's okay.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 3>In terms of Dutton, though, I think a lot of

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 3>like I said, a lot of Australians vote the way

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 3>their parents vote, and with mandatory voting. There are a

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of people in Australia and mistiffers from the US

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 3>as well. People vote passionately. In the US, we vote obligatory,

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 3>which I think is wonderful. I think it's good that

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 3>we're forced to be involved in this. In terms of

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Dutton supporters, it's a similar thing, but.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Not as extreme.

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 3>I think that everyone should date whoever they want to,

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 3>and political voting is an indication of moral values, and

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 3>I think that if you differ on certain policies. I mean,

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 3>someone could say I'm going to vote for Dutton because

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that's super policy, taking super out as good,

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 3>but I don't believe anything else. I'd say, Okay, so

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 3>you don't understand that policy or how that could impact

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 3>housing prices, and you're super in the future, that's workable,

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean.

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 4>But I yeah, I think it's.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Completely reasonable to not want to date someone who is

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 3>politically dangerous to you.

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 2>I am conscious of times. So there's so many other

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 2>things I.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 4>Wanted to ask you about.

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It's right, there are just so many other political questions

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask, But I did want to also

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>move on to something else that's made news recently with yourself,

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>which is actually just with Clement time forward. Oh yes,

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the writer who recently went after you on her newsletter,

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think and said, this is why we have Australian

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>influences like Abby Chatfield profiting from the performance of being

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 1>politically engaged and presenting herself as a voice of feminist

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>and political authority while railing against anyone who demands more

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>from her than shallow aphorisms and platforming genocide supporters. Unquote,

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you responded on TikTok, I don't really need to rehash

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>what you said, you well, because you will obviously give

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>me a more updated version.

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>With all of those headlines and the way that's something

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, there's so much hate around it from a

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>public point of view, what's a light for you being

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a story like that.

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I feel like I'm in the middle

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 3>of stories like that all the time, so it's kind of,

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately my norm, but it's never enjoyable or pleasant. The

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.959
<v Speaker 3>reason why I felt the reason why I started talking

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 3>about what Clement tin have been saying was kind of

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 3>by accident.

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 4>I was talking about something.

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Else in general, the way that there is this expectation

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 3>of if you are speaking about one topic, for example,

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the election or something political, then it seems to make

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 3>people have this I don't want to say in fighting

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 3>because that feels like again, like a right wing It's

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 3>kind of like the way that the quote unquote woke

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 3>thing where you go that feels like a catchup that

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 3>isn't really right. But there's this idea that if you

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 3>aren't doing everything, then you're performing. If you aren't, if

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 3>you aren't all day, every day talking about every single

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 3>topic there's possible, then you're performative. And that then discourages

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 3>people from speaking about political issues. And people can say

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 3>that isn't true. I know influencers, I know musicians, I

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 3>know actors.

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you do as well.

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 3>People are too scared to speak about things even as

0:38:56.239 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 3>basic as climate change because there will be people that

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 3>are saying that it isn't good enough, and they'll go

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 3>through with the fine tooth com and find all the

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 3>reasons why you're performative. And there seems to be more

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 3>focus on finding if someone is performative verse focusing on

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.439
<v Speaker 3>people that aren't doing anything at all, aren't speaking at all,

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 3>or are being outright dangerous and the reason why the

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Clementines Clementines comments were so distressing to me. It wasn't

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 3>that she had the opinion that I shouldn't have had

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Apaneese in the podcast. I understand that opinion. The

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 3>reason I had him on the podcast, like I was

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 3>saying before, was to give my audience access to his policies.

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 4>I asked the questions.

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 3>I had an hour with the Prime Minister to cover

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 3>every single election topic, and I am very proud of

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 3>how I did that podcast. People have demanded that I

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 3>apologize for it. I am proud of how I did

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 3>the podcast. I think the podcast did what I wanted

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to do, and that was convert people who either didn't

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 3>vote at all, who said I'll just cop the fine,

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 3>people who voted liberal, or people who were so a

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 3>political they would just go I guess I like the

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 3>look of this person's poster.

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Whatever.

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 3>The point was to engage you more politically, not for

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 3>me to debate the Prime Minister.

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 4>But I understand the criticisms. I totally hear it. I

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 4>get it.

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 3>But my issue isn't the criticisms. And I think this

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 3>happens a little bit, not too often, but what Clementine

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 3>was doing was It's ironic the way that she is

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 3>assuming malicious intent from an outspoken woman in media. I

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 3>find it very ironic that she's also believing these headlines

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 3>that I'm making myself a feminist voice, I'm making myself

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.280
<v Speaker 3>a political I'm just speaking about my opinions.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 4>He is my true opinions. I don't know anyone that would.

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Voluntarily get trolled violently all day, every day for a

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 3>fucking Instagram post.

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 4>I could do.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.839
<v Speaker 3>The most listened to podcast I've ever done was an

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 3>interview with an ex Loveland contestant, and then it comes

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 3>to maths Freecaps.

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 4>I could do that so easily every week.

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I could do Love Island, Married at First Sight Batch,

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I could do all of them all year long, and

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 3>I'd be I own more money than I am now.

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 3>But the reality is my podcast is entirely and you

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 3>get this with ADHD. I can't speak about things unless

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 3>unless I'm obsessed, or I'm interested, or there's something there

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 3>that I want to talk about. So my issue wasn't

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 3>her critique on the podcast with Anthony ALBERNIZI many people

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 3>had the same critique, and I was okay with that,

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 3>but it's when it comes to demanding that I apologize

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 3>with something that I had a reason for doing that podcast,

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 3>but also when it comes to her lying about me.

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 3>That was when I was really frustrated because I didn't

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 3>realize what she'd been saying, and it wasn't just a newsletter,

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 3>it was her sub stack, her newsletter, Instagram stories also

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>about Hannah Ferguson as well. She'd called me an idiotic narcissist.

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 3>She said that I didn't prep my own podcast. She'd

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 3>said that I parrot uncredited sound bites or something similar,

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 3>essentially saying that I'm a complete fraud.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 4>I don't have any thoughts of my own.

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm a deeply basic thinker and a very smart self promoter.

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 3>All these things that were attacking my character, which I

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 3>am not okay with. You can take my work all

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 3>you like, but I'm not sure why as a prominent

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 3>feminist voice currently, you're deciding to spend to include me

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 3>in newsletters, substacks, all these things, because I didn't do

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 3>my activism exactly the way that you would like me to.

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 3>The critique is fine, the personal attacks are not, and

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the personal attacks in themselves calling me a narcissist repeatedly

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 3>call me, giving me a personality diagnosis, saying that I

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 3>change my personality every week.

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 4>It's just different podcast topics.

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 3>But okay, it kind of instills this idea of like

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 3>a hysterical, outspoken woman in me. Yeah, and that I

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 3>do too many things again, and it's very ironic, this

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 3>whole thing. And there are things that Clementine has done

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:08.919
<v Speaker 3>that I don't agree with it all, but I haven't

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 3>said anything about it, and I won't say anything about

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 3>it in depth because I don't have any interest in

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 3>discrediting a woman who most likely experiences.

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 4>And has experience for longer than me.

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 3>The same trolling that I get from right wing weirdos,

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 3>because all you're doing is giving them them more fuel

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 3>in order to troll me people who have genuine critiques,

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:32.360
<v Speaker 3>is not trolling. But the reality is he got on

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the left and the right control and this idea that

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 3>because I'm not doing things perfectly, that I'm an idiotic nasist,

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know anything, I'm brain dead, I'm a deeply

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 3>basic thinker. All these they're just insults. It's not actually

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 3>critiquing my work, and it's really it was really hurtful

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 3>because then after that the right wing comments come in,

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 3>saying nothing better than a cat fight, climbat clement time

0:43:57.600 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 3>two feminist fighting. See, you can't even agree with each other.

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 3>And that's why I hadn't spoken about her ever, and

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 3>the things that she's done that I don't agree with,

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 3>and even to this day, she's done things since and

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:06.479
<v Speaker 3>I've seen that I've gone.

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 4>People have asked me to comment on that. I'm not

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 4>commenting on it.

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to comment about her work. She can

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 3>comment about mine, but I certainly would never comment about

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 3>her having a personality disorder or anything like that. And

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:24.839
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's just, yeah, deeply ironic that she

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I also think there's a space in feminism for people

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 3>to have quote unquote basic thoughts, because, as we were

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 3>talking about before, to get people in, you can't start with.

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 4>The finals of agenda studies.

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Course, there are people who don't even know what the

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 3>patriarchy is women or people don't even know what domestic

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 3>labor is, basic basic things, and that isn't their fault.

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 3>It's because society isn't teachers. So personally, if she thinks

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 3>that my thoughts are based, that's okay, but I'm not

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 3>sure why there's so much anger and vitriol behind a

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 3>basic thought. I see influences all the time that are

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 3>fashion influencers or they do other things, and they have

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 3>basic takes on feminism, but they're correct. I'll do a repost.

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 3>I go, reshare, I'm not angry at them for having

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.359
<v Speaker 3>a quote unquote basic thought. I go, how amazing. Now

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 3>we have the women who are engaged in this fashion

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 3>influences post understanding that financial independence is important, for example,

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 3>or that our coercive control exists, or.

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 4>The basics of DV. That makes me happy.

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 3>The more people that are involved in this conversation makes

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 3>me happy if they aren't saying things that are incorrect

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 3>or damaging. And while Clementine would say that me having

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Abernese in the podcast is damaging, there are two

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 3>different goals that we have. I was trying to bring

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 3>in more people to understand to keep Dutton out, and

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't agree with Anthony Auberneze's stance on Gaza or

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the labor Hardi stance on Gaza at all. Peter Dutton's

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 3>stence was much worse, and I just wanted to keep

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Peter Dutton out for a myriad of reasons, and I

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 3>think it's interesting to other than that it's just attacking

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 3>my personality. But everyone then hears those things and they

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 3>assume malice. Even in the language it is used around

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.240
<v Speaker 3>me by some people who believe that I'm a nassist

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 3>on the left and say that I'm performative. Everything that

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I do is over analyzed. Even those stories that I

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:38.280
<v Speaker 3>posted about Clementine. It was like, there was one comment

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 3>that I saw on someone's post going the way she

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:44.479
<v Speaker 3>victimized herself and then didn't add the next day proves

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 3>that she's performative. That doesn't prove anything. That proves that

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I had a contractual obligation. And these are the same

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 3>people that would have an issue with influences quotquot not working.

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:55.719
<v Speaker 4>I have work to do. I have to do work.

0:46:56.719 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 3>I can't pause that work because I'm feeling incredibly depressed,

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.879
<v Speaker 3>having a PTSD trigger. I have to post the thing.

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 3>I have to do it. It's also scheduled already, so

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna unschedule it. But even the wording of

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 3>like she victimizes herself, rather than saying she's upset about something,

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 3>it's this assumption again, and it comes to the far left,

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 3>and I'm honestly file lift a bit much. It comes

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 3>from a certain part of left. It isn't even on

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the spectrum. It certain people online that I want to

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 3>find evidence that I'm an awful, awful person, and I

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 3>am really beyond sick of it. It feels like because

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I am, I do get this media attention that I'm

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 3>punished for it by all sides, and everyone says, see,

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 3>you're not perfect, and I go, I never said that

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I was. So I'm just posting what I'm interested in

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 3>or what I care about, and I will apologize for

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 3>things if I feel that I need to. But having

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Alberanezi on the podcast, I know personally changed thousands

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of votes. I got fat thousands of dms from people

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 3>somewhat my friend's dad, who's a truck driver in Queensland

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 3>who's voted Liberal and One Nation his whole life, he

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:11.280
<v Speaker 3>voted for the Labor Party and in my opinion, voting

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 3>for the Labor Party in this election was preferred over

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the Liberal Party in my opinion and also in the

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 3>opinion of left wing politics. I don't think that I

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:24.399
<v Speaker 3>have the power to change the liberal voter to vote

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Greens or Victorian Socialists. I wish that I did, but

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 3>I also interviewed a Victorian Socialists. I also interviewed someone

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 3>from the Greens. And the strategy that I had was

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 3>to go from labor to Greens to socialists, to ease

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 3>the minto the water like frogs. And I just felt

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 3>that it was important to this election. Talk to Anthony alberneasy.

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 3>But it is hurtful coming from a prominent feminist because

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 3>then it turns into headlines. I saw a headline on

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 3>Facebook that was like feminist cat fight, and it's like

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 3>very demeaning. And that isn't comn Time's fault, but it

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 3>is something that she should have considered and that I

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 3>have considered when I haven't caught he out. The things

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 3>that I would say are deeply damaging, but I'm not

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 3>going to go into them.

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Last time we spoke, we spoke about your relationship with

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Adam Hyde, your partner.

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 2>You've been together for a while now.

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>When we spoke last year, was saying you felt a

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more optimistic about it than you had normally in

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a relationship. Sounds like good reason for that, because you're

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>still together coming up to thirty. Love to ask you

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>about going into thirties. Very old fashioned question here, but

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you will no doubt get it. Are you starting to

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think differently about relationships? So people starting to say, when are.

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:43.839
<v Speaker 2>You going to put a ring on it?

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Abby and Adam, Well, my friends are not really. My

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 4>first friend got married a couple of weeks ago.

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 3>My friends are all in their mid thirties, normalmen, So

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 3>my friends aren't really adhering to that kind of societal norm.

0:49:57.120 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 4>So not really. And I have a single mother, so

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 4>my mum isn't really doing it.

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Mum is doing the God my friend Sue's got a grandchild,

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:08.280
<v Speaker 3>isn't that lovely? She's doing subtle quote unquote subtle hints.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think that I like, I mean, I think

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:16.399
<v Speaker 3>that I've always been like, if I get married, great,

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 3>if I have kids great, whatever, we'll see what happens.

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'm still kind of in that. But if I

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.280
<v Speaker 3>was gonna marry have kids with anyone, it would be Adam.

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 3>He's just been I mean, yeah, it's like a year

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and a half now, a year and a bit, I

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 3>don't know, and he moved in recently, and it's all

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 3>just been so great, and it's really quite jarring in

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a little ways seeing what a healthy relationship is like

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 3>from the inside, Like it's quite makes me go WHOA.

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 4>So I guess I'm thinking of relationships differently.

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 3>In that I see this relationship from the inside and

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, oh, I shouldn't have ever been with any

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 3>of those losers before, Like that was a big mistake

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 3>on my behalf. So uh, yeah, it's it's been. It's

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 3>been great. I said to Adam, and I said, I'm TikTok.

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I think I was saying that, you know, I had

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 3>an epiphany about our relationship and about relationships in general.

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 4>And I've realized the more that I'm with Adam, the.

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 3>Less that I feel like I need to be with him,

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 3>But it's more that I want to be with him more.

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I want to more.

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:20.799
<v Speaker 3>But that's something I'd never had in a relationship, And

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 3>in that from that, I know that I mean, hopefully

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Adam night to get the fit ever touch would but

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 3>if we weren't together. This relationship has changed my outlook

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 3>on relationships in that I understand that I should only

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 3>be in a relationship if it's genuinely benefiting me in

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 3>more than one aspect of my life because the amount

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:45.200
<v Speaker 3>of work I've been able to do and the amount

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:48.439
<v Speaker 3>of you know, friendships I've been able to dive deeper into,

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and the amount of more time I have having a

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:53.799
<v Speaker 3>happy relationship first, having this thing that drains you when

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about it and thinking about and you're anxious

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and it's awful. It's like, I either need to be

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 3>alone or be with Adam. It was kind of my

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 3>two options at this point in a good way. In

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 3>a oh A romantic relationship isn't necessary. It is a

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 3>wonderful odd on, but my value and my actual life

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:17.080
<v Speaker 3>benefits more when I'm not worrying about the toxic, shitty relationships.

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 3>So the options are a perfect one, none at all,

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 3>and Adam and I are wonderful.

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 4>So that's how it's changed. I love that for you.

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Abby. You mentioned your mom there.

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's been rumors she might be popping up on

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Bachelor.

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Don't do that to me, but I mean, I'm okay.

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Abby's going to answer that, but I'm

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just saying, I mean, we've saw what you, being runner

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 1>up on The Bachelor six years ago has done for

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the Australian media.

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 2>It's never been the same since.

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, love to see that happen again with the

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>next generation.

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, yeah, time will tell. Don't make me

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 4>do that.

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 3>But I guess that's kind of an answer, isn't it.

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 3>But I work for Warner Brothers, so I'm not going

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:54.280
<v Speaker 3>to say anything.

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Abby.

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday, all the best for your thirtieth.

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 2>I will look forward to seeing you again, mama. And

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll do this again in.

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>A year, will we in a year one? And I

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>turn one hundred and thirty one.

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:07.399
<v Speaker 2>And you can hear more.

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 1>From the fabulous Abby Chatfield on It's a Lot wherever

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts.

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for joining us today.

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch this episode by following the link

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in our show notes, and make sure you're following something

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, because we'll be back with another exclusive

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>guest next week.