WEBVTT - #185 Peter Dutton: The Election Week Interview - The Coalition’s Policies & Australia’s Future with Labor

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Hi, my Boris and this is straight Talk. Peter Dutton.

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to straight Talk. Mate.

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Great to be with you. Mark.

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you been a bit hectic.

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 2>It's been a bit on there's no sleep at the moment,

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 2>but we're just going twenty four to seven until Poles

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>closed on Saturday night.

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Did you ever have any concept of how I use

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 3>it hectic? How sort of crazy this is like running

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 3>for you know, the leader of the party as opposed

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 3>to just your normal seat.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any sense for it?

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Look, I've been around. I've served four Prime ministers, so

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I've seen different campaigns, and I've been in the leadership

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 2>group and watched it pretty you know, sort of ringside

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 2>for a long time. But until you're in the ring

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>and you're just going round after around it, it can

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 2>be exhausting. But it's also exhilarating, mate. I mean, we've

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.959
<v Speaker 2>met some just amazing people. We're up in towns full

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the other day on Anzac Day meeting with young diggers

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>up there in the RSL and you know what, selfie's

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and all that sort of stuff, But you're standing there thinking,

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>you know what this young blow twenty one, twenty two

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 2>years of age has such a love for our country

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>that he's prepared to trade his life to keep my kids,

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 2>my grandkids safe in our country. And all of that

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>provides you, I think, just with fuel and the tank

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 2>to think, you know what, this is worth fighting for

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 2>and we're in a great country and I need to

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>step up and make sure we protect our country and

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 2>get it back on track.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You got the fight still in you?

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent? Yeah, yeah, I never never give in,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 2>and I've always had that as my maximum over life,

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that you just double down and you

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>stand up for what you believe in, and there's no

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 2>sitting on the fence. You need to tell people and

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 2>be clear about what your values are, what you stand for,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 2>and if you try and please everyone in this job,

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you end up, I think, standing for nothing. And there

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>are good and bad people on both sides of politics,

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>but the worst ones of those that get to the

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>end of their career and nobody can tell you what

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 2>they stood for or what they believed in. What's the

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>point of public service if you can't stand up for

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the values that you really strongly believe in, and what

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>are w'here to?

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Anything is surprised.

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Just the negative campaigns and the lies that have come

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>from Labor in this campaign. As I said, I've been

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>in Parliament almost twenty five years and the you know,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, politicians can be accused of telling FIBs or

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 2>lies or whatever, but I've never seen a leader look

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 2>down the barrel of the camera like this one and

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 2>he just lies, just flat out tells people black is white,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and even when he's pulled up on it, he dances around.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, I've seen different Labor and Liberal leaders

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 2>get caught out, and most of them respect the truth

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>and adhere to that, but this is a different scenario.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So I've been really surprised by the depth of the lies.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think though, I've got an incredible faith in

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the Australian people, and I think over the last four

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 2>or five days, people are starting to say, actually, you

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 2>know what, that doesn't add up what he's saying, and

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I know that not to be true what I just

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 2>heard him say. And we've seen it because we've had

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 2>four debates now and people have done their research, and

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I think as we get closer to the election, momentum

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>is starting to swing back towards the Liberal Party and

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 2>I think that will by six PM on Saturday Night.

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>See is in a very strong position in which I

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>think we can win.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>This is funny.

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I've been through a lot of elections too, and not

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 3>in the same capacity as you, but as a voter,

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think I've ever heard anybody be called

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>a lie I don't think people have challenged a proposition

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 3>that you know, opposing people have put up. But I

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>don't really ever.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Remember hearing anyone call anyone a liar.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 3>And actually, one of the things that has come out

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 3>of this whole campaign from both sides is that I've

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 3>actually heard you say that the Prime Minister is weak,

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 3>yet he's somehow surged ahead of you guys in the

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>polls so called post talk about that at a moment,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>but it looks as though at least the media of

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 3>putting him as a winner.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't reconcile that stuff.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean a couple of points. One is, you

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>don't lead the left of the Labor Party for twenty

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 2>years if you don't have some mungrel in you, so

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 2>there's no question about that. But weak in the sense

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 2>that he hasn't been able to stand up, for example,

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>to Kevin Rudd, who wanted demanded to go to the

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 2>United States as our ambassador and has been a failure.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Really weak in the sense that he wasn't prepared to

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>explain the detail of the Voice to the Australian people,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>even though it was promised, but he never had any

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>intention of doing that. Weak in the sense that they've

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>made decisions to spend a lot of money when they

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>should have been taking the foot off the accelerator so

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 2>that interest rates didn't stay as high as they have.

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 2>They've gone up on twelve occasions, they've only come back

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 2>once and that's only by point two five of one percent.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And weak in the sense that he hasn't been able

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>to stand up and make the decision to invest into

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 2>keeping us safe as a community, and people feel less

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>safe in their communities. And I think we're less safe

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 2>as a country because the government's taken money out of

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 2>defense as well in a very uncertain period. So I

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 2>think there's that element to it if you step back though,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 2>as as best I can, and i'm as assay sort

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>of in the arena. But what they've done is they

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 2>have just plastered a negative campaign against us over the

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 2>course of the last few weeks. Why would they do that?

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Their campaign can't be look vote for labor at this

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>election because you're paying three hundred bucks a month less

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 2>for your groceries, you're paying two hundred dollars less a

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 2>month for your electricity bill, or two hundred and seventy

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 2>five dollars less, or you're paying one hundred and fifty

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars less a month for your insurance premiums. Gas has

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>gone up by thirty four percent, electricity is up by

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty two percent, groceries up by thirty percent, and people

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 2>know in their own budgets that they're struggling to keep

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>their heads above water. So they had to go negative

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>because they can't talk the achievements of the last three

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>years and how people are better off. Thirty thousand small

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 2>businesses have gone broke. So that's why I think we've

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 2>seen the level of negativity, the depth of that negativity,

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and the labor lies. It probably just talks about Medicare.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Block building rates are down by eleven percent under his watch.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>People are paying forty three dollars out of pocket to

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 2>go and see a GP. In some cases they're canceling

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 2>or not making appointments to go to see a doctor

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>because they haven't got the forty three bucks to fork

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 2>out out of their budget for a doctor's visit, and

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean that's if you listen to their campaign,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>they've been the greatest friend of medicare ever. It's just

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.119
<v Speaker 2>not the reality.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 3>But then, how does he is it a reflection on

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the voting population or how is it that he's able

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>then to swap over the national poles which is different

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 3>to seat by seat pole, but the national poles that

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the media keep trotting out. How's he been able to

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 3>swap it over from the coalition being ahead, let's say

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 3>beginning of January late last year, to accordingly according to

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the current.

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Position being looking as though that you're behind. Is he

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just a good politicians?

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a tricky politician. I think he's demonstrated that.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>And the negative campaign has had an impact. I do

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>think though over the last four or five days, and

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 2>you can see this in the internal track polling, it

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>is starting to shift and people are starting to see

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 2>through the negative campaign. The campaign is starting to and

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>momentum starting to come back. We've seen it on the

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>pre pole as well. Talking to marginal seat members and

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>candidates in our key seats. There's a really positive sentiment

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 2>on pre polling since it's opened now, that'll be some

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party voters coming out early, particularly older Australians, older

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Astralans who are really worried about unrealized capital gains tax,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>They're worried about where the economy is going. They're worried

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>that kids and grandkids can't get housing. So there'll be

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 2>that element to the voter sentiment at the moment. But

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>there are still you know, a lot of people who

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>are undersided, a lot of people who don't take much

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 2>interest in politics at all, will start to switch on

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 2>over the next few days. And I think there are

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people who have listened to the Labor

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Party pitch and may have been taken first up by it,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>but now realize, hang on it, that doesn't make sense.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Medicare is not going to see a doctor, is not

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>cheaper than it was a few years ago. And am

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I better off today than I was three years ago? Well,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of families know, And it's not just

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a referendum. This election is not just a referendum on

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the campaign of the last few weeks and who's held

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>more babies and you know, who's visited more seats or

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>done more flights or anything like that. This is a

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>referendum on the last three years, and I don't think

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>people forget that. And it's also about, well, are you

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 2>better off in three years time having re elected a

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>labor Green's government, or are you better off with labor

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 2>being out of power and the Liberals managing the economy

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>effectively again and keeping us safe and realizing the dream

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of home ownership again.

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 3>So I received a text last night, interesting enough and

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 3>unsolicited and more random than anything from Jeff Wilson.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And you're going to.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Say, Clive Palmer for a second.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I've got a few of those says. I haven't had

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a few of those trumble to Patriot once now. But

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I received this text from Jeff Wilson. Jeff Wilson runs

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 3>a fund and he's a very successful guy here in Sydney.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.239
<v Speaker 3>And he sent me a copy of a paper about

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 3>unrealized gains capital gains in super funds and the proposed

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 3>tax on those gains.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, wow, that's knowing I was.

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Seeing you today, that is a really important point I

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 3>need to put to you.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>And I said to Jeff, I would put it to you.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 3>He's a good friend of mineus that have put to you,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.599
<v Speaker 3>and he's actually prepared a white paper on it, or

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 3>his organization prepared white paper on it, which I might

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>actually send over to you. But where everyone's forgotten about this,

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think the amount is three million dollars

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 3>if you have in your super fun because you've worked

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>hard and you've been out to contribute over a million years,

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, enough money to get over three million dollars

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>worth of assets, but you haven't sold them.

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>They just value did that.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Under the proposal by the Labor Party, which is what

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Jeff was bringing to my attention last night again, was

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 3>that you'd be paying tax on that. And I don't

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 3>know how you paid tax on an unrealized game. I

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>don't we get the money from him to pay tax

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 3>on something as unrealized because you don't have the cash

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 3>because you haven't realized the game. Can what's the position

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 3>of the Liberal Party of the coalition on this stuff?

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>So, Mike, we opposed it straight away when the government

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>proposed it, and they've tried now, I think, to sort

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>of push the boundaries on this. They've done research on

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 2>abolition of negative gearing and cutting out the discount on

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>capital gains, tax on the sale of an asset held

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 2>for longer than twelve months as well. So I think

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>there is a broader issue here of credibility. So the

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 2>prime went to the last election saying no changes to

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>super tax, and of course this change then came in,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and I equate it to you know, if you're a

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>way journal, if you're a tradee or you working for

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>a boss, it's like charging you tax, like you're having

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to pay the tax office the tax before you get

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 2>paid your wage for that week. And if you're in

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a superfund and you've got a farm in that super fund,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>which many rural families do, or if you're a family

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe second third generation family with a block of shops

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 2>or a couple of units, or if you've got shares

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>that have just done really well, you've picked a couple

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of cracking shares that have taken off. For that twelve

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 2>month period, you might have seen an increase in value

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 2>in the block of flats or in the price of

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>your shares, you haven't realized the gain. So if the

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 2>price has gone from a all are up to five dollars,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>you're taxed on that capital gain, and the next twelve months,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the shares might come back. There might be a crash.

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>The valuation that you've had to pay for again for

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the building that you've got in your superfund might show

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that prices have come off, or perhaps you've got vacancies

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>and the yield's gone down in relation to the shops

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 2>that you've got to. It could be anything, right. You

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 2>could have a development application that's approved. You've sunk a

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of money into getting the development application and it

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>increases the price of the block of land that you're

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>holding or whatever it is. You're going to pay tax

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 2>under Labour's model, and it raises a few billion dollars,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>so they know that it's really going to hurt. And

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're in a superfund and you haven't got much

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>cash in the super fund, if you are a farmer,

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>for example, and you've got limits as to how much

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 2>money you can put on depending on how old you

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>are as to how much money you can put into

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>that fund, you might be forced into a position where

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you've got to sell the asset to pay the tax bill.

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And it just it's I just think it's unjust and

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 2>it's unfair and it's also nonsense. Well, it's absolutely it is,

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>but it captures like people might say, now, oh, you

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>know three million bucks and you're super fund if only,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 2>but this will capture with inflation people over the coming years.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not not index, so the three million doesn't go

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>up each year, so this will capture more and more

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>tax payers each year. And as I say, if you're

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>if you've inherited some money and you've put it into

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 2>your super or you've just listened to the financial advisors

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>who have said, okay, pile as much money as you

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 2>can into super because it's a safe asset class. You're

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 2>you're now going to come within scope over the course

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>of the next few years. Like we've fought really hard

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 2>against this, Labor and the Green strongly support it. And

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>again I think it gives a window into Labour's thinking.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 2>It's it's that we can take money away from you

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>because we think you've done too well. And that's sort

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>of the socialism that's at operation. That's at the heart

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 2>of the operation of Labor and Green's parties. That it's

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>well three distribution. And Jeff Wilson, who I know well

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 2>also I'm in one of the smartest financial minds in

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the country. He's horrified by all of this, and most

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>financial advisors are poor keating, poor keeting would be he

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't he wouldn't recognize it in terms of what the

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party's proposing here. And it provides a disincentive as well,

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of financial advisors will be saying to

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 2>younger people, look, actually I wouldn't be putting that much

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>money into supernow because it's just risky. We don't know

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>whether the three million is going to be brought down.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 2>If Labor needs to create more tax and more revenue,

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe they'll drop the three million down to two million

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>dollars and you'll be captured by that. So the whole

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>idea of that Super is that it's a safe place

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to invest and it's going to provide for your retirement.

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 2>But if you take away that certainty, younger people are

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 2>just going to say, well, actually, no, I'm not going

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to tip money into Super. And you know, we sold

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, a car or a boat instead of spending

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>that money, we're going to dump it into Super. Those

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>people stopped doing that, and I think that's you know,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that that is a really bad outcome. Not

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>enough people are talking about it, and as I say

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>it also then says, well, if Anthony Albanezi told you

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>before the last election that there were no not going

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>to be any tax changes around super he's saying the

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 2>same thing now around the family home. But we know

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>that they've done the work on what negative gearing abolition

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 2>looks like and what the abolition of the CGT fifty

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 2>percent discount looks like as well, So that you know,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>I think gives a window into the thinking of the

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party and that they'll always want a tax more

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>because I always want to spend more. But that's what

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>puts interest rates up as well.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I hope you don't mind if I just I don't

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>want to labor this this point, but it's quite important

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>to someone like me. I think about the kids, the

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty year old kids, let's call them, even the fifteen

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 3>year old kids, but maybe they're not voting. But let's

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>say your grandkids or my grandkids in my case, or

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 3>we could be thinking about young people who are just

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 3>turning twenty getting the first job they're going to work

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 3>for forty five years, and they're going to be putting

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 3>the money into this great thing that look, you know,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 3>let's give it a keyping a great thing that the

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Keyting came up with in the nineties, a great thing,

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 3>and it's about building up enough wealth so you can

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>retire comfortably, because every Australian works their butt off and

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 3>they deserve to retire comfortably. And the whole regime about

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>this is having concessionary concessional tax rates on your superfund

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>and the money the super fund made. That's the whole premise.

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 3>A kid who's twenty in forty five years time will

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 3>probably will have to have more than three million dollars

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 3>worth assays it's be.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Able to live comfortably, no doubt about that.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 3>And so that person right now want to get their

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 3>act together and think about what they're going to do,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 3>because if this goes through, this is a next extential

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 3>threat to what was originally designed by Jim Chalmers's greatest

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 3>person in his life, Paul Keating. And I just can't

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 3>believe that they're actually even talking about it or considering it.

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Is this a real risk of getting a pass by

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 3>it through Parliament?

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes, and again it wasn't. Nothing was mentioned about

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 2>it before the election. It's one of the key broken

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 2>promises And to your point too, which I think is

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 2>really well made, that the reason that we've got a

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>concessional taxation arrangement that is people paying low attacks in

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 2>SUPER when the money's compounding and you're earning and building

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that nest eck up is because it's your money ultimately,

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Whilst the boss takes it out before you see it

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 2>and sends it off to your super fund, it's your

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 2>money and you can't access it. So the price that

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>we as a government are saying to you for putting

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>that money aside not being able to use it to

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>buy a boat or go on a holiday or whatever

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 2>it might be, is that we're going to tax you

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 2>at a lower rate because we want you to be

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 2>self sufficient in retirement because we've got an aging population,

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 2>more people on pensions, and your point is spot on,

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 2>where you've worked your guts out your whole life. We

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 2>want you to be able to enjoy your retirement and

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 2>SUPER is part of the way in which you're going

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to be able to do that. But the government just

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>up ends all of that logic and thinking that keeping

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>first had in mind, and it's just a tax grab.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's even worse than that because you're saying to somebody, Okay,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have to pay a valuer during the

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>course of every financial year to work out whether the

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 2>asset's gone up or down during the course of that year.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Then the cost of valuers for real estate, they charge

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 3>a percentage of the valuation, well on.

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Thousands and thousands of dollars. So the values will be

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 2>happy because they're going to be paid to do these

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 2>desktop audits or whatever. I don't know the level of detail.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 2>The government hasn't released how much money you'd have to

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 2>spend in an average super fun to comply with the

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>new change. And there are as I say, like that

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 2>you get fluctuations in different assets that you've got in

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>your superannuation, whether it's shares or whether it's real property

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.239
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it might be. So I think there's a

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 2>real problem here, and I think it shows the difference

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 2>between the two parties. The Liberal Party will always be

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 2>better economic managers because most of us come from a

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>business background. Most of us know how to manage money.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>We've started businesses, we've worked really closely in my case

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 2>with with Peter Costello and with John Howard. And part

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of the reason that the economy suffering at the moment

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>is because there are now four budgets where the government

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 2>has made decisions that have just made life much harder,

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and people feel that in their own household budgets.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about that tax on.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Assets of a super inneration fund, I feel as I'm

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 3>playing a game of Monopoly and i just landed on

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the chance square and I've left it up my chance

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 3>card and it says pay tax. It's like a prosperity taxes.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 3>It's like I've been prosperous for the twelve months as

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 3>a result of the advice that my advisor has given

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 3>me as to what I should be buying.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Investing has done well as a result of that prosperity.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>You got to pay tax. It doesn't mean I made

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 3>the money. I didn't earn the dough. It's not too

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 3>different what Dan Andrews put into Victoria for farmers who

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 3>have had their land rezoned, where the land's gone from

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>being a farm worth one price to being resigned for

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 3>housing become much more valuable, and Dan Andrews went and

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 3>taxed them before they sold on. These poor bloody farmers

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 3>have been forced to sell their property to pay the tax.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 2>That's right. They haven't got the cash, the lazy cash

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 2>sitting around to pay the uplift tax like that. It's

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 2>and I just I mean, this is a really interesting

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 2>coint as well, because if Labour's logic is that that

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 2>can apply within superinnuation, well why not outside of super Yeah,

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 2>so if you're scar yeah, it's really scary, but it

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 2>would generate them a lot of money. People would pay

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of tax. And again I sort of bring

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 2>it back to the basic point that if you're a

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 2>trading and you're getting you know, however much a week,

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 2>a thousand bucks a week, you're being asked to pay

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>the taxman the turn of dollars a week before you

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 2>get the thousand, you know, or before you get the

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred. And it's wrong in principle, and it discourages

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>investment and it undermines the certainty about investing in this country.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 2>And that is that's exactly what we've seen in Victoria

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 2>where businesses have just pulled money out. They've gone to

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Adelaide or they've gone to Sydney or Brisbane and they're

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 2>employing workers there. And the Labor Party's devastated the Victorian

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 2>economy and you know a lot of Victorians are very

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 2>angry about it.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Rightly, so it's very interesting.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I have a lot, I got quite a lot of

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 3>branches down in Brisbane, Victoria, and I used to go

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 3>down there and they'd always say to me, you know,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Dan Andrews is Dan Andrews that, And then I say,

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 3>but how come we keeps getting in? But now, what's

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 3>interesting that the mood has completely swung against Dan Andrews

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and his successes in Victoria in terms of labor Party,

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 3>like completely swa yes, yeah, I think that's right. And

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 3>because people eventually worked out that Andrews was just running

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the joint into the ground and he was a big spender,

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 3>like a massive spender. And now he's turned the place

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 3>into it a tax haven for government. And what I

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 3>mean by that is not tax over for consumers, but

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 3>government there, like the property market in Victoria's suffered because

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 3>if you own an investment, you pay land tax on

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 3>the first fifty after the first fifty thousand dollars of valuation,

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>whereas New South Wales as something like one point one

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 3>five or something like that, one point one five million,

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and people are house prices going down. A real estate

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 3>investment down there is at an all time low as

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 3>a result of that.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's put my houses.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 3>That means a collecting less stamp duty and they're getting

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 3>into a bigger hole, and the hole is getting deeper

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and deep and deeper.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you see that?

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that a mentality? Is that a Labor Party mentality?

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>It eventually gets them.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 2>It is it's a jealousy thing. And it's if you

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>have a look back through the history of this country

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 2>where there's only so much tax that people who work

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 2>hard can pay, and you get to a tipping point

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 2>where they say, you know what, I'm just withdrawing my

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 2>effort and I'm not going to build that house or

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to build that block of units. And

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 2>it's almost what's happened in the construction sector with the

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>involvement of the CFM. I mean, the CFMA has donated

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>about twelve million dollars to the Labor Party since Anthony

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Alberanezi became leader, and so they've let the CFM you

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 2>just run right. In the building sector, productivity is down

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>to about two and a half days a week, which

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>means it takes twice as long and twice the cost

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>to build an apartment block. And in Victoria, all of

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>that capital is being withdrawn and moved to other states,

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 2>to New South Wales for example, as you point out,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and at a time when we should be seeing an

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 2>encouragement to invest into say housing, when we need more

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 2>houses coming online, people are just saying, well, the taxes

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 2>are too great, and I'm not being I'm just not

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be this sort of soft target any longer.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 2>And my point before about if it's logical for Jim

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Chalmers and Anthony Open easy to tax you in that

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 2>way in superinnuation, why not in your other investments, and

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 2>why not on your house. If your house is worth

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>more than you know, a million dollars and my house

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>is only worth five hundred thousand dollars, then you know,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 2>the logic is that you should pay tax so that

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 2>I can be subsidized in another way. I mean, that

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 2>is just socialism. It's and it's withdrawing the encouragement, the

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 2>incentive for entrepreneurialism and for people to invest and grow

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>their businesses. And and that ultimately means that less tax

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 2>is paid, more public servants, you know, become employed. And

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that's happened over the last few years,

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>particularly in Victoria.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 3>So someone else raised another interesting point with me. Well

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 3>known economy, so I won't drag him into the conversation,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 3>but he raises his point with me. If you look

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>at the the credit rating of New South Wales compet

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 3>to Victoria Victoria, Victorians have to pay a higher regist

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>rate on money that Victoria and government borrows relative to

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 3>what we have to do here in New South Wales

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 3>because the credit rating New South Wales is higher than

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 3>the credit rating Victoria. And I see today that stand

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 3>and Pause are concerned about the long series from now on,

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the long series of deficits we're going to have, which

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 3>means have I either got to raise the money in

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.239
<v Speaker 3>the markets, go and borrow money as a country, and

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 3>we keep hearing this number of a trillion or a

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 3>trillion plus in debt and either that or we've got

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 3>a tax more or both in order to fund the deficit.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Stand Pause are a pretty tough organization. They don't muck

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 3>around and once you get a downgrade from them, it's

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 3>very hard to get regrader back up. In Australia as

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 3>a country, not stay by state, but as a country

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 3>has enjoy a triple A rating for a long long time,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 3>which is a rare thing. Like lot many countries in

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the world have this, which means we pay the lowest

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 3>as a country when we borrow, we pay the lowest

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 3>possible interest rate, which is great, which I means, you

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 3>know more, we feel more encouraged that we can borrow

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 3>more money. But if we keep borrow money, STANDPOD is

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 3>going to get nervous because investors will sue them. That's

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 3>what happened during the GFC if they don't properly rate

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 3>a country. In other words, they think you're spending too much.

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'd like to ask you this. I know you're

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 3>not the treasurer, but doesn't matter. You're the leader of

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 3>the party.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>And I know you understand economics.

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 3>What is the danger of running deficits year in year

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>out for a ten year period, having to tap the

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 3>markets all the time, when already we have an example

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 3>of what's happening in Victoria.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Victoria, we have that example.

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 3>But when already the stand and poor rating Agency, the

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 3>Global Rating Agency, is already starting to think of this.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>What's the danger of that?

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 3>And what will what will you, as your elader of

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 3>your party do to try and manage this?

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Well mark that the risk compounds each year, as you

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>point out, because you've got a thirty billion dollar deficit

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 2>one year, and add that on top of the debt

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 2>that you've already got. So it goes, you know, from

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>a trillion dollars up and this government projects it will

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 2>go to one point two trillions. So they have deficits

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 2>in every year that they forecast, and it's like having

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 2>your credit card maxed out each month and pretending that

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 2>if you get sick or you lose your job, or

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 2>you need to replace the fridge it's broken down unexpectedly,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to be able to do that. At

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 2>some stage, you can't do it. And your point is

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 2>exactly right in terms of standard and poor now in

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of what they've said, so they're basically firing shot

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 2>across the bout to say, look, we think, you know,

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 2>we think labor government's spending a lot of money. They

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 2>talked about off budget funds, So these are all green

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 2>energy funds that they're continuing to fund in the tens

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>of billions.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Of dollars which do not appear in the budget.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 2>That's right, So they're off budget and they're still though

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 2>taken into account in terms of our credit worthiness. So

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the point is that Australia becomes much riskier and the

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 2>price you pay for those borrowings, as you point out,

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 2>goes higher, and it becomes this vicious cycle, and as

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>your credit rating deteriorates, you're paying more and more for

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 2>the bank. No different than if a person with a

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>bad credit rating goes to borrow money from the bank,

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to someone who's got an impeccable credit rating.

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>You'll pay different interest rates because the risk is higher

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>if you've got a bad track record. And this also

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 2>happened with the Reserve Bank governor, who's independent from the government,

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 2>who has been warning the government over the last few years. Look,

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 2>if you keep spending money like you are, and this

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 2>is the biggest spending government in the last forty years,

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 2>you're going to end up with higher interest rates. Well

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>guess what they've gone up twelve occasions since the government's

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>been elected. Come back by quarter, as we said before,

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think people thought, oh, well, you know, if

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>it's come back by point two five, there'll be another

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty five points next month and another fifty points of

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 2>the month after. That hasn't happened because now guarantee, well,

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 2>well there's not And as we know, with what we're

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>seeing internationally at the moment, the uncertainty in Europe and

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>in the Middle East and the tariff debate, the talk

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 2>of a global recession is real and if that happens,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 2>we don't have any money in the bank to pay

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 2>for what we need to pay for to get through

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 2>that rainy day. One of the things that we had

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>going for is going into COVID, was that we'd got

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the budget back into balance after years and years of

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>labor deficits after Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard, and it

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 2>took us a number of years, and it's exactly history

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 2>repeating itself, given that it happened for John Howard as

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 2>well when he came into government after the Keeping years.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>They had ninety six billion dollars of debt in those days,

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money in ninety ninety six, and it

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>took them year after year to go through the budget

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>find where the waste was cut, the waste out, trimmed

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>down on spending where you can still provide the essential services,

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 2>but got the budget back into balance and then put

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it into surplus. And then they created the Future Fund

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 2>and that Future Fund still sits there today. Labour's never

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 2>created a future fund because they never run surplus budgets.

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 2>They got two surpluses at the start of this term

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 2>only because of the fact that we put the budget

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>into a good position when they came into government. But

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 2>then for every year after that, as we pointed out before,

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>there's just read ink in every projection, so it's putting

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 2>us in a weaker position. And I think that's what

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>the credit agencies are saying now, and we need to

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>heed that advice and make sure that we spend money wisely.

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.479
<v Speaker 2>The other point, of course, is that if you're somebody

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 2>at the moment who's just taken a second job, maybe

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 2>a shift at the bottle or at the survey on

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 2>a Saturday night, because you just can't pay the bills,

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you ought to know that when you're paying that tax

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>from your second job and from your first job, maybe

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>your third job as well, that your taxes are being

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 2>spent wisely. And if you've trimmed back every dollar of

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>discretionary spend in your own household budget or as a

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 2>small business, you know every cost has gone up, your

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 2>sales have gone down, and your profit margins are really tight.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 2>You want to know when you're paying tax that the

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>federal government is spending that tax wisely, and at the moment,

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think people believe that that's the case under

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 2>this government. So we have to spend money wisely because

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 2>ultimately the government has no money, only the moneys they

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 2>collect in taxes from hard working Australians.

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for those people who wanted somebody to address that,

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 3>or someone who has addressed that in the past, or

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 3>you need to go as on YouTube and have a

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 3>look at Kerry Packer addressing your Senate and saying you

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 3>guys don't really know how to spend the money that

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to raise for everybody, and actually that's existed forever. Yeah,

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's a really important point. We should

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 3>not be seduced during these campaign means into thinking, oh, wow,

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 3>there's something more and it for me. There's a bit

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 3>more money for me, there's a bit more money for me,

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 3>when in actual fact, you be people got to be

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 3>very very careful because ultimately it's got to come from somewhere.

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 3>And we did talk about standard paus, we did talk

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 3>about the borrowing of money.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You did mention something very interesting.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 3>To me, and I'm reminded of another conversation with it,

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 3>because I'm talking to conoms all time. Another economists conversation

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the other day and he was talking about the Howard period.

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 3>And of course John Howard still around today, extraordinarily one

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 3>of the one of the icons of the Liberal Party,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 3>but a great manager of this country, him and Costello.

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 3>But you know he was at the helm and in

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety six and just prior to that period, during

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 3>the Keating Hawk period, interest rates got up to extraordinary heights,

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 3>as did inflation. But post ninety six, right through to

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty right up until the COVID period, the inflation number

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 3>in Australia sat between two percent and three percent for

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty odd years as a result of what John Howard.

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Did after that period of Kiding Hawk.

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 3>That's Howard and Costello a great team and they were

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 3>in government for a long long time and they didn't

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 3>go right through to twenty twenty, of course, but that

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 3>momentum carry through for that period, right through a GFC.

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we had a blip in the GFC, but

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>we got under control. I worry that we're heading through

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 3>We're heading through another tumultuous high inflation period. We might

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 3>get one or two reductions, but it could come back very,

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 3>very quickly. I'm worried about that process happening again. Does

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 3>that something that goes through your head and your parties

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 3>and your senior advisors then your party. Do you feel

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 3>a responsibility to sort of bring back that low inflation

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 3>period to Australia like we had for twenty odd years

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 3>because Australia is one of the few countries of the

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 3>world was able to do that.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Very few countries could do it.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 2>The answer is yes, and it's instinctive because this is

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the reason that we've got prices just going through the

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 2>roof right across the economy. We're at blue Scope the

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 2>other day. The biggest manufacturers of steel in Australia, color bond, roofing,

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.919
<v Speaker 2>steel frames for housing. They're paying three times the cost

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 2>for electricity now and three times the cost of gas,

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and obviously they're huge energy users. They've got furnaces and

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 2>pumping out steel and products that we used to build

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>homes and buildings, and it's three times the cost of

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 2>their same factory in the United States. Now it's unsustainable.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 2>You go to brickworks, same story, three times what they're

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 2>paying in the US. So those two core elements to construction, brick,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 2>send and steel. We're paying the highest cost really in

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the world. It's not sustainable, and so inflations everywhere across

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the economy, and it's been driven by a number of things.

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Core inflation is twice that of our g seven countries. Now.

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Just spend a moment on that. When you think, why

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 2>haven't interest rates gone further down when they've gone down

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 2>in the United States and down in the UK and

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:35.439
<v Speaker 2>down in Canada, in Europe absolutely and New Zealand, why

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 2>have they dropped there and they started to drop six

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 2>months before here. Why have we had the biggest drop

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 2>in living standards in our country's history over the last

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 2>three years and why are we living with the lowest

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 2>living standards compared to comparable nations at the moment. Well,

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a bit to unpacked there, but one of the

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 2>reasons I think is because the government has been running

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>an inflationary budget. They've been fueling inflation, which is why

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 2>that core inflation rate is still held very high, and

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 2>that's why interest rates aren't coming down, and this is

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 2>what the Reserve Bank governors warned about. But also the

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 2>energy policy, which has just been a train wreck it's

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>actually just been a wrecking ball through the economy. Haven't

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>heard from Chris Bahin for a long No, he's witness protection.

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm serious.

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't trying to be funny, but I don't think

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I've seen Chris Bones pop up anywhere.

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>No, for three months.

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 2>No, they've had him out of the public eye because

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 2>when people see him, they just know straight away he's

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 2>the bloke along with Anthony Alberanezi that's driven my power

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>prices up by over thirty percent. Now again, we were

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 2>talking with We're down an hour today with Andrew Constance,

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and we went to small business owned by two brothers,

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 2>started it from scratch and it's a pretty big footprint.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 2>They've got fruit and vege, but they also do grocery

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 2>lines and they've got meat and and dairy, et cetera.

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 2>They were saying there that they're just about to negotiate

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 2>their contracts, et cetera, and their power prices are up

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 2>by about forty percent. Now, if your power bill goes

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 2>up by six or eight thousand dollars a month, and

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 2>your wage bill's gone up, your rent's gone up, the

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 2>cost of every other input you know, you're running delivery

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 2>trucks around, et cetera. All of that is either consumed

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>by the business absorbed by the business, which is more

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and more unlikely because the profit margins just aren't there.

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>What's happening is the cost increases have been passed on

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 2>and it's not just there on the shop floor. If

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you go back through the supply chain, the farmer is

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 2>paying a lot more for fertilizer now because there's a

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of gas used in the generation of fertilizer, and

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the jars that they're buying to put the fruit in

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 2>ultimately that end up on the shelf. The glass manufacturer

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>under the Renewable's Only policy of Chris Bonne and Anthony,

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 2>they're paying more for the manufacture of those glasses. So

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 2>every point in the supply chain, the farmer, the cold storage,

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 2>the processing plant, the energy that's used to provide the

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>processing or manufacturing of food or clothing or motor vehicles,

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, all of that has increased under this

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 2>government and that's applied across the economy. So a few

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 2>of the things that we've said, Okay, what do you

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 2>do about that? Well, I think the way in which

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 2>we can fix the problem up as John Howard did

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 2>with the keating problem. Is the twenty five p cent

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>a leter cut in fuel tax. That means straight away

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 2>across the economy. So the delivery truck drivers, the fishing,

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 2>charter business, the pensioner, the Uni student, the trade's running

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 2>three or four trucks around the mums and dads. You

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 2>come down by about fourteen dollars a tank. And if

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.439
<v Speaker 2>you're a two car family, that's saving you money straight away.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>So removing a week every week and it removes some

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 2>of the cost pressure out of that family budget or

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that small business budget. Then we say, okay, we'll give

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 2>you twelve hundred dollars back of tax that you've paid.

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Twelve hundred dollars tax rebate for people on incomes up

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to one hundred and forty four thousand dollars.

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.919
<v Speaker 1>It is means tested, it's means tested, and it.

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Means for a two income average household are twenty four

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars back. So that's the immediate relief to help people. Now,

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 2>what do we do then to fix up the broader

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 2>problem that Chris Barlin and Anthony Albanezi you created. We

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 2>have a huge export market for our gas, for our

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 2>natural gas fantastic because it creates revenues and royalties and

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 2>taxes being paid. But we can divert some of that

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 2>which is being exported now or beyond the reserves of it,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 2>and increase the amount of gas that we're producing, flood

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the market, flood the domestic market with that gas, and

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>bring the price down, and we cap the price, and

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 2>we say to those companies that you're going to be

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 2>required to sell that into the austrain market. Now, the

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 2>independent analysis that's been done by Frontier Economics, probably the

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 2>best economists in the country on energy policy, they say

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 2>that that will bring gas down by twenty three percent

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the wholesale price. So that means Blue Scope paying less

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.240
<v Speaker 2>for their gas. It means that the local Chinese shop

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 2>paying less for their gas. It means the gas used

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 2>in the production of electricity comes down and cost as well,

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 2>So the cost of electricity can come down for households,

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 2>but for businesses as well. And if we fix up

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>that energy disaster that they've created and ultimately bring in

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 2>our base load power, which we believe should be nuclear

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 2>zero mission's nuclear, that on the analysis brings our electricity

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 2>costs down by forty four percent and that's how we

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 2>can be competitive as a country again, and how we

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 2>can reduce the cost of groceries and reduce the cost

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 2>of all of those household budget items at the moment

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 2>that are just crushing families.

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good point you're doing.

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 3>It's all very well to say we will reduce the

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 3>cost of living, but you've got to actually have some policies,

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 3>and you've just announced a number of policies there that

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 3>they all make sense to me, particularly the fuel exise.

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I just can't believe that twenty five cents elita.

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if for some reason the price of oil

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 3>dropped by twenty five cents and petrol at the bowser

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 3>become twenty five cents less, if for some reason that happened.

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>People would be sort of cheering and going up.

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 3>It should be going crazy, and they say it's only

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be there for two weeks. Everybody, you're trying

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 3>to work out how to store the the petrol up. Correct,

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 3>But this thing is an ongoing thing, or are you're

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 3>saying it?

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Do it for twelve months and then we assess it,

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 2>which is exactly what we did during COVID with job Keeper.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 2>We said Okay, we need to address the economic circumstances

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that we now face. But we didn't legislate job keeper forever,

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and we're not still paying that because that problem has passed.

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 2>And so our argument is, what's our vision for our country. Well,

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 2>it's to help people right now, get them through the

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 2>next twelve months, the next twenty four months. With the

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 2>gas solution. We believe that that can have a big

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 2>impact by the end of this calendar year. So that

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 2>can start to relieve some of the pressure of the

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 2>costs in businesses by the end of this calendar year.

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And if we need to extend the fuel excise, well

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 2>we can assess that at the time. And if petrol's

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 2>at two dollars under US, it comes down to a

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 2>dollar seventy five. If petrol the oil price drops and

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the petrol price comes down to a dollar dollar fifty,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:28.320
<v Speaker 2>it's a dollar twenty five under US. And the fixed

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 2>cost of the excise, which is at fifty point four cents,

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Now that applies whether PETREL's you know, fifty cents a

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 2>leter or it's five dollars a leter. But the problem is,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 2>because it's been indexed, it's growing off a bigger base

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:46.280
<v Speaker 2>each year, so it actually grows at a much faster

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 2>rate as the years go by. This is the argument

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:52.399
<v Speaker 2>relation to beer excise as well, I might say, And

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 2>it grows off a bigger base because it's growing off

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 2>fifty cents not thirty cents each year, and so it

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:00.919
<v Speaker 2>becomes a bigger tax each and every year year. And

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 2>it's the one way in which you can help across

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the economy, as I say, and it's targeted. It helps

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the UNI student, it helps the pensioner, it helps the

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 2>self under retiree, it helps the small business owner. And

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 2>that's you know, that's the thinking that we've applied to it.

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 2>But you need to fix the problem up. And part

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 2>of our solution, part of our thinking, as it was

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 2>for the how governments, what changes can you make to

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 2>modernize and to actually provide some relief to the cost

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 2>pressures Because what a strains don't want, but what they're

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>going to get if we end up with an urban

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 2>easy ban labor Green's government, They're going to spend more money.

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Interest rates are going to go up higher. And the

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 2>thirty four percent increase in gas now that's just going

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to continue to go up over the next three years

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 2>because the system is going to become more and more costly.

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Is you need to roll out the twenty eight thousand

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 2>klimeters of new poles and wires, which is their energy policy.

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:58.919
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be tens of billions of dollars which

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you'll end up you're starting to pay that now in

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 2>your power bills. You look at the breakdown of your

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 2>power bill. Now you look at the chargers and look

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 2>at the network charges. You're already paying. That is a

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 2>big part of your electricity bill now.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 3>So just explain to us, because none of us know

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 3>how it works in parliament. If it's an Albanizi band

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 3>or Labor and Greens sort of let's call it the

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 3>coalition government going forward? In practical terms, how does it work?

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 3>So let's say the Greens have got something they're really

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 3>desperate to push through. What do they walk up to

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 3>Albanisi or Chris Baron and say, listen, where he's supporting you?

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Can you get this through and we'll do a deal.

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 3>What's the padder look like down there and the mothership

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 3>down there in camber? What would happen sort of thing?

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Greens have already been transparent in terms of

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 2>what their shopping list looks like, at least the first

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 2>couple of items. One is they want an into fossil fuels,

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 2>so that means no gas, no coal. A company like

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Rio Tinto last year paid about ten billion dollars worth

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 2>of company tax and royalty. So without that money, we're

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 2>not paying for schools and hospitals. But that's that's the

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 2>first issue.

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And biggest taxpayer on mining companies.

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 2>And and there's there's insatiable demand for our product, for

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 2>our commodity, you know, whether it's iron ore or whether

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 2>it's coal, or whether it's you know, critical minerals, et cetera. Otherwise,

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.359
<v Speaker 2>there's there's insatiable demand for that around the world. But

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 2>they want to close that down. That's their first want,

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and they've been very open. I mean, Adam Bant, you know,

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:44.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't give him credit for much because I don't

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 2>believe in the Green's philosophy, but he's been very clear

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 2>that their first you know, then their next request is

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 2>an abolition of negative gearing, and oh sure, and and

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 2>that that they've been upfront about that. Now that will

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 2>be on the table with the labour part. Jim Chalmers

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 2>has already done the research himself to ask Treasury to

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 2>model it and how much money would they get back

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 2>if they abolish negative gearing. So we know that they're

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 2>open to it.

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't worked that bitterly. What happens is bank go

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:15.720
<v Speaker 1>up to knock on the door of the Prime Minister.

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, they'll sit down in negotiations and if there's

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:23.439
<v Speaker 2>not a clear decision on Saturday night then and that's

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 2>remember back to what happened with Julia Gillard when when

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanzi was a senior minister and negotiating with the

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Greens to find a compact between Julia Gillard and the Greens.

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what happened then. And this is why the

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister, even in his own seat, is putting the

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.919
<v Speaker 2>Greens number two, and the Greens have put him number

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 2>two as well. I'll always preference the Labor Party ahead

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of us.

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Is this what you mean by when you vote Labor

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 3>you're endorsing Greens and effectively voting for the Greens.

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Correct. In other words, you are voting for the Greens policies.

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And if you're voting one for the Green, two

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.439
<v Speaker 2>for the Labor candidate, three for the liberal candidate, Well,

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that will only ever go to the labor candidate. And

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 2>that's the that's that's how they that's how they win,

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 2>because you can't just mark the ballot with with number one.

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 3>So, Peter, one of the things that I've been surprised

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 3>about and somewhat disappointed, to be honest with you, is

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:24.919
<v Speaker 3>that there has been a bit of a personality game

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 3>going on in this campaign. And yeah, you're a hardened

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 3>ex copper and businessman, so you know, I don't know

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 3>what you did, what you did wrong in your life

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 3>to have to do both become be a policeman first

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 3>and put up with all that, and then have to

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 3>become a business a small business, I have to put.

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Up all that.

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 3>But you know, you get fairly hardened after all that.

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 3>But irrespective, I sort of know what it's like because

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 3>you worry about your family. You do have wife and

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 3>kids and stuff like that. Who aren't part of all that,

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 3>of course, and it's never asked to.

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Be either, by the way, And.

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 3>How do you feel right now about the personal attacks

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 3>on you? Because I actually thought, remember the old miss

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Potato and anice sort of stuff. I mean, I have whatever,

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:16.439
<v Speaker 3>big deal, but it's got much more personal from every level, Nelly,

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 3>how do you feel about that?

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 2>It does? And back to the earlier point about the

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 2>negative campaign, the personal attacks, because they haven't got a

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 2>good track record to talk about and that so their

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 2>campaign can't be how well you've done under labor over

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 2>the last three years. So in a two horse race,

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 2>their objective is to try and kill off the other horse,

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's why they run the personal attacks against me.

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 2>If I'm being honest, it puts fuel in my tank

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 2>because it just makes me more determined to succeed. And

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean in business and in life. As a police officer,

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, I've been in some pretty tough situations, and

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I've delivered death messages to parents of kids who have

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 2>overdose or have been killed in a car accident, and

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 2>all of that really pales. Makes what I'm going through

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and the pressure that I'm under you seem pretty manageable.

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:16.399
<v Speaker 2>And I've been in responded to domestic situations where women

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.760
<v Speaker 2>are within an inch of their life and kids are screaming,

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 2>And you think back to those circumstances a detective taking

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:29.240
<v Speaker 2>statements from rape victims, and people have been exposed to terrible,

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:34.319
<v Speaker 2>terrible crimes, and part of the motivation for why I

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 2>got into politics was to protect people like that and

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that we had less victims and not more.

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 2>And yes, maybe that sort of makes you harden because

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 2>of those experiences, but it makes me more determined to

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 2>succeed for our country because we do live in the

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 2>best country in the world, and we beat ourselves up

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 2>over it, and we're told at school now, our kids

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 2>are told, you know, be ashamed of our history and

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 2>our play in the world's not legitimate. And all of

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 2>these people who are teaching our kids that within the

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 2>education system, which is a small proportion of teachers, but

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 2>still the ones that we've sent out marching out on

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the university campus is attacking Jewish kids, etc. And then

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 2>they're turning around and lecturing our kids, you know, in

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a business course or something. It's a bit of a

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 2>screwed up world at the moment. But for me, not

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 2>that it's water for ducks back, because you know, you

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 2>do take the attacks and you're only human and all

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of that, but it does mean to me, you know,

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 2>you know what it's worth fighting for because you want

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to stand up and fight for what you believe in

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and what is right. I don't need to tell lies

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to achieve success at this election, and happy to run

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 2>on my track record. And yes, there is a huge

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 2>price that your family pays, and I'm really conscious of

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:56.359
<v Speaker 2>that because my kids, my wife, you know, they haven't

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 2>put their name on the ballot paper, but they've got

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 2>the same surname as me, and they suffer, you know,

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 2>the attacks online. Harry, he's a second year chippy, came

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 2>with me on the campaign a couple of weeks ago

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and you know, just gets bombarded with crap online. But

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:15.839
<v Speaker 2>again he's stoic and resilient enough. And we're a tight

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 2>family unit where we've supported each other through everything. So

0:51:20.400 --> 0:51:24.719
<v Speaker 2>so they want you to succeed and and you know,

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm really proud of what they've been able to put

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 2>up with as well. But it shouldn't it shouldn't be

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the case, but it is, and that's the reality of it.

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And I'm just I'm fortunate that they're you know, they're

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 2>strong characters. See them through it as well, and they're

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 2>proud of what I do. And they know the person

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 2>that I am, and they know the crap that they

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.760
<v Speaker 2>read online is nothing like the person I am, and

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think that makes them more passionate about making

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 2>sure that they help me to succeed because they know

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that the lies that are being told just don't equate

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.359
<v Speaker 2>with the dad that they know or the husband. I know.

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It's funny.

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 3>I've got to know you a little bit, fortunate enough

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:06.479
<v Speaker 3>to have a dinner with you and my good friend

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:09.400
<v Speaker 3>David Coleman some time ago, and then I've had you

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 3>in podcasts, and one of the great things about podcasts

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:13.759
<v Speaker 3>I get to know people without having to spend twenty

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 3>years with them. But I get it on pretty quickly,

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and you come across as that quiet but sort of

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 3>quite stoic, defender style person. You might not be the

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:32.800
<v Speaker 3>huge personality in smiling and you're not Hollywood, but.

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 2>That's an understatement. But not the flashy, not the flashy guy,

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 2>but but you are.

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>There's a sense, it seems to me that there's in you.

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:44.399
<v Speaker 3>And maybe it could have been the reason you became

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 3>a policeman perhaps, or you were you worked as a

0:52:48.280 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 3>police person because you seem like you have a protective

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 3>element around you, like you want to not protect us

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 3>in a silly way, but you want to make sure

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 3>that our rights are well observed. All of our rights

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:08.840
<v Speaker 3>well observed and manage, whether economic rights, whether they're personal rights.

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 3>When you're a policeman out person rights. But now as

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 3>a leader of a party, it's economic rights, personal rights, society,

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 3>social rights, every other right.

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:19.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a stack of them.

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 3>It seems to me that you have that as an

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 3>underlying theme in your DNA and your personality, but not

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 3>in a flashy way. It's just get the job done.

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. It's sort of a right and

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:38.280
<v Speaker 2>wrong thing, and justice or not. I have a again,

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, sort of influenced by what you've seen in life.

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I worked in the sex offender squad as a detective

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 2>for a period, and when you see young girls who

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 2>have their lives destroyed, or you see them later in life,

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and maybe they didn't make a complaint about being sexually

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 2>assaulted when they were twelve years of age, but you're

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 2>now talking to them in they're thirty years of age,

0:53:57.719 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 2>and I remember it clearly. In many of those is

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 2>where they hadn't been able to form proper relationships, they

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 2>changed their patterns of life of you going to the

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 2>car a different way, or not going out of a

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 2>night time. And I saw the impact on people in

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 2>that way, and I a strong believer all of my

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 2>life that, particularly for kids growing up, that you should

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:25.360
<v Speaker 2>be able to enjoy the sanctity of your childhood. You

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 2>should be able to enjoy that freely and not to

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 2>be encumbered with that, you know, that weight of having

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 2>been poorly treated, and whether it's sexual assault or whether

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 2>it's physical assault, or you know, just brought up in

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 2>a very difficult circumstance. And so yeah, so that's sort

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 2>of the moral compass for me, and similarly in life,

0:54:51.440 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 2>it's probably part of the good part of the reason

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I joined the Liberal Party. My old man was a

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:58.839
<v Speaker 2>bricklayer builder and worked his guts out his whole life.

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 2>And in those keeping years you'd spoke about before with

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the high interest rates. I mean, we'd sit around the

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 2>kitchen table of a nighttime and I'll probably tell you

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:09.919
<v Speaker 2>the story before, but you know, I'd write out the checks,

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Mum and dad had sign them, and you write paid

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:13.839
<v Speaker 2>on the invoices and staple them to the statement and

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 2>file them, et cetera. So the discussions around that kitchen

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 2>table some months where you know, we don't have money,

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 2>we don't have money to pay those bills or we

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 2>don't have work over the coming weeks to you know,

0:55:27.120 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 2>to bring money in. And Dad worked hard and so

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 2>did mum, and they did well later in life when

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 2>we were older, but only because of their hard work.

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 2>And so for me, now you know, a guiding principle

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I suppose influenced by that time, was it kills me

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 2>to see a small business person who's working seven days

0:55:47.239 --> 0:55:49.360
<v Speaker 2>a week, going home doing book work of a nighttime

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and just being smashed. And thirty thousand small businesses have

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 2>closed over the last three years. More small businesses have

0:55:55.800 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 2>closed in our country under Anthony Albanisi in the last

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 2>twelve months that any twelve month period in our country's history.

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 2>And I just think it's completely unfair. So I want

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to do anything I can to help turn around the

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:10.879
<v Speaker 2>economy and to manage the economy well so that there

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:14.959
<v Speaker 2>can be a better environment where people can work hard

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:19.600
<v Speaker 2>and be rewarded for it. And it's a similar approach

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 2>that we've taken in relation to the twenty five per

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:23.879
<v Speaker 2>cent a letter cut on fuel as we discussed, and

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the twelve hundred dollars back and then providing the change

0:56:27.560 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 2>around the energy system. That's all in my mind designed

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to do the right thing and to provide a productive environment.

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:38.279
<v Speaker 2>And I've been heavily influenced by John Howard and my

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 2>political life, and I think he adopted that same principled

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:46.240
<v Speaker 2>approach and that's what would guide me as Prime minister.

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Some of the things you talked about then gave me

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 3>one word I can think of that sort of describes

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:57.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those things that you have a view against. Unfairness, yes,

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 3>or the system should be as fair as posses, and

0:57:01.000 --> 0:57:03.800
<v Speaker 3>that means in a broader sense for everybody, the broader community,

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 3>but also in depth it should be really actually fair

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 3>like it shouldn't be you shouldn't be able to rud

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 3>it in other words, you know, And that's sort of

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 3>not a principle that's always been associated with liberal although

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 3>as you said, Howard was very much that type of person.

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It's more more a little bit more towards labor.

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Actually, you know, that's how they that's they're doing it originally,

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, because I grew up in the West suburb

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the Sydney where everyone voted for labor. But over time

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I think labor's lost its way. I don't think labor

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:33.680
<v Speaker 3>as the same Labor Party as it was when I

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 3>was a kid, where they were looking after the working class.

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Or and working lives.

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean someone who's just earning a living just

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 3>enough to get by. I'm to have people who work

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:44.280
<v Speaker 3>to earn the money I have to actually go to

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 3>work and works. Working class is someone who goes to work.

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I consider myself still working class. I might have assets,

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 3>but I go to work every day and I still work.

0:57:53.280 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 3>And working class has lost a lot of respect and

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:04.919
<v Speaker 3>fairness and everybody, whether you're someone with a three million

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 3>dollars of assets in your superannuation fund which you worked

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:11.760
<v Speaker 3>your whole life as part of the working class to accumulate,

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:14.240
<v Speaker 3>it is unfair that you have to pay tax on

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 3>that at a higher rate than it was originally envisaged

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 3>when they first seduced you into putting money.

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Into subites which you can't take out.

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't take out, so it's unfair.

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 3>So sort of that theme of unfairness is that something

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 3>and as you're the boss of the party, is that

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 3>something you look for in terms of all your party members?

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 3>You want to have that sense of fairness for all

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Australian citizens, whether it's being safe walking home from school

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 3>to your home, young girl, young boy, Whether it's being

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 3>concerned about someone sort of you know, lobbying a missile

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 3>over the country and in relation to our borders. Whether

0:58:58.240 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 3>it's amount of money we pay for our own gas

0:59:00.640 --> 0:59:03.919
<v Speaker 3>which is crazy. Whether it's the interest rate you're paying

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:06.120
<v Speaker 3>your mortgage after you were encouraged to go and borrow

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 3>as much mon as I possibly could during COVID. And

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 3>you know when issues are extraordinarily though now it's extraordinarily high.

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that that on fairness something that perhaps you guys

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 3>stand for it? It looks like it's nearly a new

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 3>position for the Liberal Party under your leadership, and it.

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Goes back to the howadays.

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:25.479
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree with that, and I made the point

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 2>when I came into the leadership of the party that

0:59:27.680 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see us as the party of big business

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 2>any longer. Coals and wallies and others can take care

0:59:32.280 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 2>of themselves. Our task, I think as a Liberal party

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 2>is to take care of the small business person. And

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, the mum who's working part time at home

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:46.960
<v Speaker 2>in a micro business, in a back bedroom or in

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 2>a garage, and that business, you know, the aspiration is

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to take that business to be listed one day, Or

0:59:54.000 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 2>how do we help the cafe owner who wants to

0:59:57.680 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 2>buy a second cafe, Or how how do we help

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the person who's worked really hard, sacrificed border rental property,

1:00:07.440 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 2>has three kids once to end up with three rental

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 2>properties so that they can leave one to each of

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>their kids, or to their grandkids, whatever it might be.

1:00:14.480 --> 1:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>It is that fairness. As immigration minister. You know, I

1:00:17.080 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>get a bad rap sometimes about being too hard as

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.080
<v Speaker 2>immigration minister. But the approach that I took there was

1:00:22.080 --> 1:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>that I canceled about six thousand visas of people who

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 2>were here as non citizens who had committed rape and

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>pedophilia and had been involved in biker gangs and distributing drugs,

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and I allowed in twelve thousand Yezdi women, for example,

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>who are being slaughtered by Isis and iol. They've become

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>amazing Australians. And for me, that was how the migration

1:00:45.440 --> 1:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>system should work. You should say to people who were

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>taking the piss frankly, that you're not here to commit

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 2>crimes against Australian citizens. And if you do that, out

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 2>you go. But we bring in good people and in

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>my mind that is about fairness. And I think to

1:01:02.480 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the point you made before that the Labor Party at

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the moment under this Prime Minister, given that he's so

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>far left, is to how do you please inner city

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>green voters in Sydney and Melbourne, And they've forgotten about

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>people in the suburbs. And that's why at this election

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a big move going on in the

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>out of metro areas, in regional areas where people feel forgotten.

1:01:20.800 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 2>And it also bleeds into the housing debate as well

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>because one of the things that and again it is

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 2>a fairness thing, I feel a guilt that our generation

1:01:29.640 --> 1:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>had to work hard and save but got into housing.

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Housing was much cheaper, interest rates were much higher, as

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:38.360
<v Speaker 2>you pointed out, you know, depending on when you were born.

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>But I want young Australians to get into housing and

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I want them to be able to climb that property

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>ladder and renovator house, or build an extension and sell

1:01:52.400 --> 1:01:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that house for a profit down the line, or use

1:01:54.520 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the house as an asset to start a small business

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and get a loan from the bank. And we're locking

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>people out of housing at the moment.

1:02:02.680 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>A big part of that is that's unfair.

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's completely unfair and it's actually I think it

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 2>generates over time a lot of resentment between homeowners and

1:02:10.960 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Novision absolutely and the government. The Prime Minister's happy for

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>people to rent for life, right, because that's what happens

1:02:17.720 --> 1:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>in parts of Europe and in parts of the United States.

1:02:20.880 --> 1:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>And unless you are left a home by a family

1:02:25.320 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in parts of Europe, you've really got a buggerall chance

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 2>of home ownership. And I don't want that for our country.

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 2>I want people to have a choice, and I want

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>them to have stability, because if they buy a house,

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>it gives them a stable environment, and they don't you

1:02:40.720 --> 1:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>know that, I'm not a prospect of being kicked out.

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>If they're they're tenants. They'll start a family then, and

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>they'll start a small business if that's their choice, or

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 2>they'll use the increased value in the house to then

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>buy some shares and secure their margin loan, or to

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>purchase another property or whatever it might be. It gives

1:03:01.560 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 2>them choices, and if they've paid the house off by

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>the time they've retired or their mortgage has been paid down,

1:03:07.000 --> 1:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>it gives them the sort of retirement that we spoke

1:03:09.200 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>about before, where they've got dignity after having worked all

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of their lives. It gives them options to travel and

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe help their kids or grand kids out if they're

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>in need. And the governments bought in a million people

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>over the last two years, which is a seventy percent

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:26.960
<v Speaker 2>increase on any two year period in our country's history.

1:03:27.240 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 2>So we've just flooded the market with buyers for homes,

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and of course all of those people want a house

1:03:33.200 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>for their kids and their grandkids, and they're locking Ozzie

1:03:36.360 --> 1:03:37.919
<v Speaker 2>kids out of housing at the moment, and that's why

1:03:37.920 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>we're saying that we want to cut migration for two

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>years until we can get on top of the housing problem.

1:03:44.480 --> 1:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>We've also said that for interest on the first six

1:03:47.720 --> 1:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty thousand dollars dollars of your mortgage Japan,

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>your own correct correct that that becomes a tax deduction

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>for first time buyers for the first five years, and

1:03:55.920 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that'll help average way journals around about one thousand dollars

1:04:01.640 --> 1:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a month. So it helps with your application to the

1:04:03.800 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>bank because you can service your loan, and it also

1:04:06.440 --> 1:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>helps you service the liane when you take the mortgage

1:04:08.960 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>out after you've settle a property, and it takes just

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a bit of pressure out it also increases supply because

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>it's only for new homes, and that will drive the

1:04:19.880 --> 1:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>market to build more homes to meet that demand. And

1:04:22.600 --> 1:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>we put five billion dollars in on the supply side

1:04:24.680 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>to create five hundred thousand new homes so that we

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:30.919
<v Speaker 2>can bring more houses into the market, so that we're

1:04:30.920 --> 1:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>not just increasing demand for houses as labor has done

1:04:34.440 --> 1:04:37.120
<v Speaker 2>over the last couple of years. So, if I think

1:04:37.120 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>about it, the principle behind that is about equity and

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:46.080
<v Speaker 2>fairness and allowing people the opportunity and the option if

1:04:46.080 --> 1:04:48.280
<v Speaker 2>they choose not to buy a house. Fantastic, but I

1:04:48.320 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>don't want people to be locked out of housing as

1:04:50.640 --> 1:04:51.440
<v Speaker 2>they are at the moment.

1:04:52.040 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It's funny.

1:04:54.520 --> 1:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>The liberal party of the coalition becoming the party of fairness.

1:04:58.680 --> 1:05:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who would have thought that labor would abandon

1:05:02.880 --> 1:05:08.040
<v Speaker 3>that position and that liberal would move into that position.

1:05:09.160 --> 1:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Who would have thought?

1:05:09.960 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 3>And I know, there's nothing no one's really talked about this,

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>but you know, because it's been a bit of a

1:05:15.120 --> 1:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>personal attack on you most of the narrative, unfortunately, and

1:05:20.240 --> 1:05:22.600
<v Speaker 3>no one's really had an opportunity to sort of dig

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 3>into Peter Dart as to what drives him and actually

1:05:26.160 --> 1:05:28.919
<v Speaker 3>that's I think that's the one word that comes out

1:05:28.960 --> 1:05:32.360
<v Speaker 3>of talking to you. You're not flashy, you're not bitter

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>flash you know, you're not Hollywood, you're not you know, Polish,

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Speaker 3>and that you haven't been through two or three election cycles,

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:43.440
<v Speaker 3>you haven't been the prime minister. You know you're sort

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:46.760
<v Speaker 3>of new to the show in that regard. But at

1:05:46.800 --> 1:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, that whole concept of fairness

1:05:49.280 --> 1:05:53.320
<v Speaker 3>is a pretty critical one for every cohort of voter.

1:05:53.840 --> 1:05:56.920
<v Speaker 3>If you're twenty to thirty, you want a fair guy.

1:05:57.160 --> 1:05:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

1:05:57.840 --> 1:05:59.440
<v Speaker 3>If you're thirty to forty, you want a fair go

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>forty if you and it goes on. There is not

1:06:02.240 --> 1:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>one category that doesn't want a fair shot at it.

1:06:05.640 --> 1:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>And it doesn't matter what it is they want to achieve,

1:06:07.400 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>whether they want to have a small business, they don't

1:06:08.680 --> 1:06:10.439
<v Speaker 3>want have a small business, they want to travel, where

1:06:10.440 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 3>they want to pay less tax, where they want to

1:06:12.120 --> 1:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>earn more money, they want to work three jobs. Fairness

1:06:14.920 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 3>cuts across every category in every single cohort. And I

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:23.560
<v Speaker 3>think I think that's I'm glad we talked about it.

1:06:23.560 --> 1:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad I had an opportunity talk to a second

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:27.200
<v Speaker 3>time because I didn't really get that the first time,

1:06:27.840 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>but the second time.

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>The more you talk, the more I'm getting that out

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of you.

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important. I think we should just cover

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>this off, Petter, if you don't mind. The narrative right

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:40.360
<v Speaker 3>now is Labor are going to win. There's no point

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:43.160
<v Speaker 3>even turning up put your vote in. There's going to

1:06:43.200 --> 1:06:45.560
<v Speaker 3>be a you know, a Green's Labor sort of coalition,

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>let's call it that after the election on Saturday. But

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:53.200
<v Speaker 3>that's the and the polls, the national polls in Inmo

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:55.920
<v Speaker 3>indicating that. But what are you seeing when you go

1:06:55.960 --> 1:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>to the the various electorates. You see something different, A.

1:07:00.960 --> 1:07:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Very different picture on the ground really is. And I

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 2>think you'll see this turning up in the papers over

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the next few days because Labors started to retreat back

1:07:11.320 --> 1:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>to defending some of their seats that are at risk,

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and there are a number of particularly in Victoria, in

1:07:15.400 --> 1:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales, in WA and even in Queensland now

1:07:19.160 --> 1:07:21.959
<v Speaker 2>as well. So you watch where the Prime Minister visits

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>seats over the next few days. They're defending seats. The

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>feedback from our marginal seat campaigners and people who have

1:07:28.160 --> 1:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>been around the block a few times through a few

1:07:30.600 --> 1:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>elections is that the mood at pre polling has been

1:07:33.440 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>much more positive than it was at the twenty twenty

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>two election. Remember what happened in twenty nineteen. The book

1:07:39.720 --> 1:07:42.120
<v Speaker 2>is paid out on Bill Shorten to be the Prime

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Minister before election day on a Friday, and he ended

1:07:46.760 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 2>up even though the national polls were showing that he

1:07:49.400 --> 1:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>would win, he ended up losing and the Coalition won

1:07:53.440 --> 1:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that election, and.

1:07:54.480 --> 1:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a big part of the loss.

1:07:56.640 --> 1:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, of course you talk about native gearing, Cabrigaine, Saxon,

1:08:00.840 --> 1:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Frankin credits going exactly.

1:08:02.520 --> 1:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>And this again like this is a long term This

1:08:05.400 --> 1:08:07.080
<v Speaker 2>is a long held view of the Labor Party in

1:08:07.120 --> 1:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>relation to negative gearing and capital gains tax discount, et cetera.

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:14.200
<v Speaker 2>They see it as the rich getting a benefit off renters.

1:08:14.640 --> 1:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>It's the same reason they've got contempt for small business

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>people or for employers. They've got a militant union thinking

1:08:22.040 --> 1:08:24.559
<v Speaker 2>that you employ people and you're there to exploit them,

1:08:24.600 --> 1:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>not that you're there employing people and you're giving them

1:08:27.360 --> 1:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>a wage which is helping them put their kids through

1:08:29.160 --> 1:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>school and payoff payoff their mortgage, and you're taking care

1:08:34.120 --> 1:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>of your employees, which is the case for most employers,

1:08:38.600 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that's the thinking. So in some of those seats now

1:08:41.840 --> 1:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think you'll see this play out over the

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>next few days. There is a change in sentiment and

1:08:46.439 --> 1:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>there is a momentum that's coming back to the Liberal

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Party over the course of the last four or five days,

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:53.719
<v Speaker 2>and it comes up in the seat by seat poling,

1:08:53.760 --> 1:08:56.559
<v Speaker 2>which the national polling doesn't pick up because you've got

1:08:56.800 --> 1:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>a really popular local member who's sitting and has really

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:03.639
<v Speaker 2>worked hard. In the next seat, you've got somebody who

1:09:04.040 --> 1:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>has just been lazy, hasn't worked hard, and you've got

1:09:06.160 --> 1:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>a candidate, a Liberal candidate who's door knocked ten thousand

1:09:09.240 --> 1:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>homes and they've got a real following. And so when

1:09:11.960 --> 1:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>you look at its seat by seat, there is a

1:09:14.160 --> 1:09:18.120
<v Speaker 2>pathway to victory for us by Saturday night. And I

1:09:18.160 --> 1:09:20.599
<v Speaker 2>honestly believe that that's where it's tracking, that's where it's trending.

1:09:21.200 --> 1:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>And there's also there's also the question people have to ask,

1:09:25.920 --> 1:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know this has been asked at elections and

1:09:28.960 --> 1:09:31.720
<v Speaker 2>been a famous campaign theme over a long period of

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>time here and other parts of the world. Are you

1:09:34.240 --> 1:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>better off today than you're worth three years ago? I

1:09:36.600 --> 1:09:38.599
<v Speaker 2>don't know any Australian that I've met over the course

1:09:38.600 --> 1:09:42.360
<v Speaker 2>of this campaign who says thumbs up. Absolutely. In fact,

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the opposite people to say, look, it's really tough and

1:09:44.760 --> 1:09:50.479
<v Speaker 2>we've gone backwards. Everything's gone up, and everything will go

1:09:50.640 --> 1:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>up even further if there's another three years of labor

1:09:53.040 --> 1:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>and particularly if they're in in coherites with the Greens

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>as well. And I don't want that for our country.

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I want a better way forward. We are better economic managers.

1:10:03.200 --> 1:10:06.759
<v Speaker 2>We have the ability to manage money and to spend

1:10:06.760 --> 1:10:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it wisely to bring pressure down on inflation, so we

1:10:10.120 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>can bring interest rates. If we can bring interest rates

1:10:12.000 --> 1:10:15.360
<v Speaker 2>down by a couple of percent, that will create a

1:10:15.360 --> 1:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of headroom for families pretty quickly. But if labor

1:10:19.439 --> 1:10:21.799
<v Speaker 2>spends money like they've spent over the last couple of years,

1:10:22.479 --> 1:10:25.599
<v Speaker 2>particularly with the Greens urging them on, then that will

1:10:25.640 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>see inflation stay higher for longer. And even if interest

1:10:28.240 --> 1:10:32.599
<v Speaker 2>rates stay high without going up compared to what they

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:35.400
<v Speaker 2>could come down under a liberal government, then that's going

1:10:35.439 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to really put a lot of families to the wall.

1:10:37.000 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I was talking to a yesterday up in Robertson, where

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:42.559
<v Speaker 2>the Lucy Wicks is running for us. He's going to

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>mate of his who didn't want to speak to us.

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:47.639
<v Speaker 2>But one of these stories conveyed, he reckons he's twenty

1:10:47.680 --> 1:10:50.639
<v Speaker 2>five points zero point two five one percent away from

1:10:51.160 --> 1:10:52.960
<v Speaker 2>losing his house. If they go up by another twenty

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>five points, he's done and he just won't be able

1:10:56.200 --> 1:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>to meet the repayments. And I have to hand you know,

1:10:58.360 --> 1:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>they'll sell the house. And that I think is a

1:11:02.320 --> 1:11:06.479
<v Speaker 2>more common story than what the bookies and others are

1:11:06.479 --> 1:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>picking up at the moment. And I think a lot

1:11:08.800 --> 1:11:11.519
<v Speaker 2>of those people say, you know what, I may not

1:11:11.840 --> 1:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>like every part of the Liberals policy, or I may

1:11:14.200 --> 1:11:16.719
<v Speaker 2>not like Peter Dutton for this reason or that reason,

1:11:16.760 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>but I know that he'll be a strong leader, and

1:11:19.040 --> 1:11:22.519
<v Speaker 2>I know that he's got the business experience and the

1:11:22.640 --> 1:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>experience in the defense portfolio and the health portfolio and

1:11:25.920 --> 1:11:29.599
<v Speaker 2>the immigration portfolio and home affairs to make the decisions

1:11:29.640 --> 1:11:31.719
<v Speaker 2>that need to be made for our country, to fix

1:11:31.760 --> 1:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the economy and get inflation down and help address the

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 2>cost of living standards, and also to keep us safe.

1:11:37.200 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>We live in a very uncertain time and we have

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:42.679
<v Speaker 2>to invest in defense and also into protecting our borders.

1:11:42.680 --> 1:11:45.040
<v Speaker 2>So I've been really big on this. Over the course

1:11:45.040 --> 1:11:47.719
<v Speaker 2>of the campaign, we've announced a seven hundred and fifty

1:11:47.720 --> 1:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>million dollar plan to set up task forces to crush

1:11:52.120 --> 1:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the biker gangs and other gangs who are involved in

1:11:55.880 --> 1:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the tobacco wars and the illicit tobacco, the gangs who

1:11:59.280 --> 1:12:01.280
<v Speaker 2>are buying the car off kids who steal them out

1:12:01.280 --> 1:12:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of your house, and the kids who are buying drugs

1:12:04.840 --> 1:12:07.479
<v Speaker 2>off the bikes to and to fuel that, to pay

1:12:07.520 --> 1:12:10.840
<v Speaker 2>for that, to pay for that drug habit, they're breaking

1:12:10.840 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 2>into your house. So I'm going to reduce crime across

1:12:14.520 --> 1:12:17.679
<v Speaker 2>communities as well as keeping us safe in the regions,

1:12:17.720 --> 1:12:19.679
<v Speaker 2>and we've got the ability to be able to do that.

1:12:20.080 --> 1:12:26.040
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting you you mentioned hardworking liberal members in some

1:12:26.120 --> 1:12:29.679
<v Speaker 3>of the various electors you've been visiting, and I medally

1:12:29.720 --> 1:12:34.599
<v Speaker 3>thought of three. I thought of first off, I thought

1:12:34.600 --> 1:12:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I was Gott Young, Scott Young in the city of

1:12:38.080 --> 1:12:40.439
<v Speaker 3>ben Long. I mean, my god like the guy, and

1:12:40.479 --> 1:12:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I did have him on the show, but he did

1:12:41.880 --> 1:12:43.679
<v Speaker 3>work for many years ago. But that's your realment.

1:12:43.840 --> 1:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I got him.

1:12:44.760 --> 1:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to highlight how the type person is, even

1:12:49.400 --> 1:12:53.759
<v Speaker 3>though he's been sort of harangued as a Chinese whatever

1:12:53.800 --> 1:12:55.439
<v Speaker 3>he's more ousy than anybody.

1:12:55.479 --> 1:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>That great blow.

1:12:57.600 --> 1:12:59.800
<v Speaker 3>But the guy when he was working for me, he

1:12:59.920 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 3>was ridiculously had he probably would have been the longest hour,

1:13:03.560 --> 1:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>spent the most hours working my organization of any other

1:13:05.920 --> 1:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>person of his equivalents in our organization. And he's doing

1:13:09.400 --> 1:13:15.200
<v Speaker 3>that right now in his electric Roeknox who was on

1:13:15.280 --> 1:13:21.000
<v Speaker 3>here today and rose incredibly talented and unbelievably bloody hard worker.

1:13:21.439 --> 1:13:23.960
<v Speaker 3>And you mentioned Andrew Constance, who's always been a favorite

1:13:23.960 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>of mine. Andrew's incredibly hard working guy like and supremely

1:13:28.880 --> 1:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>decent and good, like really good, high good values like.

1:13:35.160 --> 1:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean for those sort of people to be in

1:13:37.439 --> 1:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>government for me anyway. And I don't know the other

1:13:40.120 --> 1:13:42.519
<v Speaker 3>people who are going against. I'm not having a crack

1:13:42.520 --> 1:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>at the people are going against. I'm just talking about

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:48.479
<v Speaker 3>those individuals. Yeah, three Liberals got it. But there's three

1:13:48.520 --> 1:13:51.479
<v Speaker 3>people I know and I can say genuinely say I've

1:13:51.520 --> 1:13:54.640
<v Speaker 3>known him for a long time. They are brilliant and

1:13:54.880 --> 1:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>hard working. I mean, Australia is about hard work, and

1:13:59.160 --> 1:14:02.120
<v Speaker 3>you work hard and get paid well and you pay

1:14:02.160 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 3>some tax, but you shouldn't get penalized for your hard work.

1:14:05.600 --> 1:14:09.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's part of our DNA and that's fair, that's fairness,

1:14:09.760 --> 1:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and that's those three people are exactly I mean David

1:14:14.160 --> 1:14:17.320
<v Speaker 3>com is another good example. But they're exactly the types

1:14:17.360 --> 1:14:19.439
<v Speaker 3>of people we want, we want. I would I see

1:14:19.520 --> 1:14:21.320
<v Speaker 3>government and they're in your team.

1:14:22.160 --> 1:14:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm so proud to have them in my team. And

1:14:24.240 --> 1:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>there are many more. But you look at somebody like

1:14:26.280 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Scott Mum started with nothing, great migrant story again, just

1:14:31.080 --> 1:14:35.439
<v Speaker 2>worked hard, has built himself up. Would be like he's

1:14:35.520 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>just door knocked on literally thousands of doors, and the

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:42.479
<v Speaker 2>people he speaks to just say, wow, what an impressive

1:14:42.479 --> 1:14:46.160
<v Speaker 2>young guy. And he has a real shot in Bentelong.

1:14:46.200 --> 1:14:48.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough seat, but I think you can win.

1:14:48.320 --> 1:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Roe Knox is, I mean, she's smart, talented, a great

1:14:53.400 --> 1:14:58.040
<v Speaker 2>intellects just like exactly the sort of person you'd want

1:14:58.280 --> 1:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>in a seat like Wentworth and in the Parliament. And

1:15:02.240 --> 1:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Constance. You look at what he did over you know, bushfires,

1:15:06.320 --> 1:15:11.240
<v Speaker 2>and and he is like he bleeds for his community

1:15:11.320 --> 1:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and he's he's really passionate about helping people, particularly you know,

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>people who are in their darkest hour. And he's proven that,

1:15:18.200 --> 1:15:20.439
<v Speaker 2>like he's just he's got those runs on the board

1:15:20.520 --> 1:15:23.439
<v Speaker 2>and he's a great candidate in Gilmourn. And similarly David Coleman,

1:15:23.760 --> 1:15:28.920
<v Speaker 2>who's now our shadow Foreign Affairs spokesman, he would represent

1:15:28.920 --> 1:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>our country on the world stage like very few people could.

1:15:32.000 --> 1:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>He's he's got a great talent, and he's worked hard

1:15:35.080 --> 1:15:38.599
<v Speaker 2>in his local community. He's respected by all the multicultural groups,

1:15:38.640 --> 1:15:41.479
<v Speaker 2>and and he's built up his margin over a period

1:15:41.479 --> 1:15:45.799
<v Speaker 2>of time, which reflects the fact that people locally respect him.

1:15:46.120 --> 1:15:48.559
<v Speaker 3>So you've covered off your policies and you know you've

1:15:49.400 --> 1:15:51.720
<v Speaker 3>magically weaved it into our discussion, which is you know,

1:15:51.840 --> 1:15:53.560
<v Speaker 3>that's your job, and you've done a good job of

1:15:53.640 --> 1:15:56.720
<v Speaker 3>dub You know, every opportunity you had to weave into

1:15:57.160 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>into the discussion. You know, those those ideas. One of

1:16:01.080 --> 1:16:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the things I expected you would. So one of the

1:16:04.200 --> 1:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>things I thought i'd do is ask you to comment

1:16:06.160 --> 1:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>on some of the labor's policies. But you know, I

1:16:08.800 --> 1:16:12.479
<v Speaker 3>don't want to look like, you know, a flag waving liberal.

1:16:12.880 --> 1:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>So I went into artificial intelligence, went into AI and

1:16:16.400 --> 1:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind telling him, went into co pilot. Copilot's

1:16:18.720 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 3>my favorite AI place to go, And I asked co pilot,

1:16:24.640 --> 1:16:28.160
<v Speaker 3>what are the five main policies of the lay party

1:16:28.479 --> 1:16:32.400
<v Speaker 3>at that Anthony Alberanezi has expoused over the past three

1:16:32.439 --> 1:16:35.439
<v Speaker 3>months and I'm going to put the five to you

1:16:36.160 --> 1:16:38.639
<v Speaker 3>because he's not here to put him to the audience,

1:16:38.640 --> 1:16:39.240
<v Speaker 3>so I'm going to put.

1:16:39.160 --> 1:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Him to you and if you like, you can make

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a comment on him.

1:16:42.360 --> 1:16:44.760
<v Speaker 3>And this is our last part of the discussion of

1:16:44.760 --> 1:16:47.080
<v Speaker 3>the first one is housing and it goes the ten

1:16:47.120 --> 1:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar Housing Australia Future Fund names too. It's a

1:16:49.880 --> 1:16:52.120
<v Speaker 3>future fund aims to build one hundred thousand homes for

1:16:52.160 --> 1:16:54.040
<v Speaker 3>first time buyers out of the next decade. The initiative

1:16:54.040 --> 1:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>is part of a broader housing strategy including Help to

1:16:56.680 --> 1:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Buy a scheme and the National Housing Cord which targets

1:16:59.400 --> 1:17:03.080
<v Speaker 3>one point two million new homes in Australia by twenty

1:17:03.200 --> 1:17:03.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine.

1:17:04.920 --> 1:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Would you care a comment, Well, just if you look at.

1:17:09.080 --> 1:17:12.439
<v Speaker 2>The actions as opposed to the words their signature housing policy.

1:17:12.840 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Whilst it's got some houses under construction at the moment,

1:17:15.040 --> 1:17:17.439
<v Speaker 2>not one has been completed in three years, so not

1:17:17.479 --> 1:17:20.400
<v Speaker 2>one house has been brought to market. They've fueled demand,

1:17:20.439 --> 1:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>as we said before, they've just put a million buyers

1:17:22.800 --> 1:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>into the market, million renters and they've made it harder

1:17:26.000 --> 1:17:29.679
<v Speaker 2>for Australians. Their focus is on community housing as opposed

1:17:29.720 --> 1:17:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to providing support to first home buyers. They talk about

1:17:33.160 --> 1:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the five percent deposit policy. It was actually introduced by

1:17:35.760 --> 1:17:38.919
<v Speaker 2>the Liberal government and we want to continue that policy.

1:17:39.600 --> 1:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's common ground between the two parties now on

1:17:43.000 --> 1:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>that issue. In relation to the fund that you spoke about,

1:17:46.880 --> 1:17:50.600
<v Speaker 2>this is in part what Standard and PAU has talked about,

1:17:50.600 --> 1:17:55.240
<v Speaker 2>these off budget funds, and that's in part what's contributing

1:17:55.240 --> 1:17:59.400
<v Speaker 2>to the risk of our credit rating at the moment.

1:18:00.120 --> 1:18:04.920
<v Speaker 2>And the government's talking about putting one hundred thousand dollars

1:18:06.320 --> 1:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>into building a home. You can't do a renovation, you know,

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:14.519
<v Speaker 2>for ten thousand dollars, and you don't get much of

1:18:14.560 --> 1:18:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a renovation anymore for one hundred thousand.

1:18:16.760 --> 1:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Dollars with the price the bathroom, kitchen.

1:18:19.640 --> 1:18:22.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's right, And so I don't know what sort

1:18:22.560 --> 1:18:24.479
<v Speaker 2>of homes are going to build for one hundred thousand dollars,

1:18:24.479 --> 1:18:27.080
<v Speaker 2>but it obviously and they haven't outlined the detail, but

1:18:27.479 --> 1:18:30.559
<v Speaker 2>it's obviously some sort of subsidy that they subsidize the

1:18:30.600 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>construction of a home. So I don't think frankly, I

1:18:34.080 --> 1:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>just don't think it'll ever happen, but it sounds flashy

1:18:37.040 --> 1:18:39.320
<v Speaker 2>when you've got a ten billion dollar you know, future

1:18:39.320 --> 1:18:42.439
<v Speaker 2>housing fund. I just think, look at the reality of

1:18:42.479 --> 1:18:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the last three years and housing. The housing crisis is

1:18:45.960 --> 1:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>just really I think it's been devastating for a lot

1:18:49.040 --> 1:18:51.960
<v Speaker 2>of young strains. Young younger strains are putting off having kids,

1:18:52.320 --> 1:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and older Australians parents and grandparents, even though they've worked

1:18:55.880 --> 1:18:58.640
<v Speaker 2>hard provisioned for their own retirement, are staying in the

1:18:58.640 --> 1:19:00.920
<v Speaker 2>workforce longer now because go to help the kids with

1:19:01.000 --> 1:19:05.360
<v Speaker 2>monthly repayments or with the deposit. So that's the you know,

1:19:05.560 --> 1:19:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that'll be my critique of their policy.

1:19:07.240 --> 1:19:09.519
<v Speaker 3>The second thing that day AI can't come up with

1:19:09.520 --> 1:19:14.200
<v Speaker 3>this cost living, it says Labour's modest is obviously about

1:19:14.200 --> 1:19:17.200
<v Speaker 3>as unbiased as you can get because it's unless the

1:19:17.200 --> 1:19:19.640
<v Speaker 3>AI is hallucinating, which can do from time time. But

1:19:20.640 --> 1:19:23.679
<v Speaker 3>it says the cost living Labor's modest tax cuts. Tax

1:19:23.720 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 3>cuts start in twenty twenty six, twenty twenty seven, that's

1:19:26.560 --> 1:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>next year, and they are designed to provide gradual relief,

1:19:29.360 --> 1:19:32.599
<v Speaker 3>doubling and value by twenty seven twenty eight. What would

1:19:32.640 --> 1:19:35.879
<v Speaker 3>you have to say about Labour's cost of living measures.

1:19:36.000 --> 1:19:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the contrast here is that Labour's saying seventy

1:19:39.040 --> 1:19:40.680
<v Speaker 2>cents a day by way of a tax cut, is

1:19:40.720 --> 1:19:43.400
<v Speaker 2>starting in fifteen months time. So let's say you know,

1:19:43.439 --> 1:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>four dollars ninety let's say five dollars a week, two

1:19:45.880 --> 1:19:48.439
<v Speaker 2>hundred and sixty dollars a year. That's what they're promising

1:19:48.439 --> 1:19:51.559
<v Speaker 2>you by way of tax cut. Our alternative is to say,

1:19:51.800 --> 1:19:53.719
<v Speaker 2>starting from day one, we want to lower a petrol

1:19:53.760 --> 1:19:56.360
<v Speaker 2>by twenty five cents a lead, so you're saving fourteen

1:19:56.400 --> 1:19:59.000
<v Speaker 2>dollars a tank, twenty eight dollars a week for two

1:19:59.040 --> 1:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>car family fourteen fifteen hundred dollars a year, and that

1:20:04.560 --> 1:20:06.840
<v Speaker 2>then is followed up by the twelve hundred dollars tax

1:20:06.880 --> 1:20:09.000
<v Speaker 2>rebate if there are two of you and the family

1:20:09.360 --> 1:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty four hundred dollars for the year. So you end

1:20:12.360 --> 1:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>up with a net benefit over that period of depending

1:20:16.880 --> 1:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>on the family circumstances. But let's say thirty nine hundred dollars,

1:20:20.680 --> 1:20:23.120
<v Speaker 2>it takes you a lot of weeks at five dollars

1:20:23.720 --> 1:20:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a week under mister Albaneze's plan to match what we've

1:20:26.200 --> 1:20:30.360
<v Speaker 2>got on the table, and as I say, we then

1:20:30.400 --> 1:20:32.120
<v Speaker 2>fix the system up so that we can bring the

1:20:32.120 --> 1:20:35.559
<v Speaker 2>prices down. Mister Albaneze's promising one hundred and fifty dollars

1:20:35.960 --> 1:20:39.559
<v Speaker 2>energy rebate but not fixing the root problem. So he

1:20:39.600 --> 1:20:41.920
<v Speaker 2>promised before the last election energy costs it come down

1:20:41.960 --> 1:20:44.559
<v Speaker 2>by two hundred and seventy five dollars and they've gone

1:20:44.640 --> 1:20:47.400
<v Speaker 2>up by thirteen hundred dollars. So we want to fix

1:20:48.120 --> 1:20:50.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's a bullet on a a band aid

1:20:51.040 --> 1:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>on a bullet woe. We want to fix the underlying

1:20:54.000 --> 1:20:57.519
<v Speaker 2>problem as well as provide immediate relief and the seventy

1:20:57.560 --> 1:20:59.880
<v Speaker 2>cents a day, five bucks a week in fifteen months time.

1:21:00.360 --> 1:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I just think if you're out there talking to families

1:21:02.080 --> 1:21:05.080
<v Speaker 2>at the moment of deciding not to ensure their car

1:21:05.160 --> 1:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>because I just can't afford to pay the premium, I

1:21:07.320 --> 1:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>think that'd so you know what, I'll probably take the

1:21:08.880 --> 1:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>help now.

1:21:10.040 --> 1:21:12.720
<v Speaker 3>And the third point that Ai gave me was on

1:21:12.880 --> 1:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>energy and it says the Labor Party wants to continue

1:21:16.160 --> 1:21:20.400
<v Speaker 3>to invest in renewable energy projects and this aligance with

1:21:20.479 --> 1:21:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Labour's climate goals focusing on reduction of emissions and transitioning

1:21:25.040 --> 1:21:26.439
<v Speaker 3>to cleaner energy sources.

1:21:27.680 --> 1:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Have you got to comment on well, we're all in

1:21:29.520 --> 1:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>favor of.

1:21:31.560 --> 1:21:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Zero missions by twenty fifty or reducing our missions and

1:21:35.160 --> 1:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>being responsible. And we're an exporter and were export to

1:21:38.760 --> 1:21:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Europe and other countries, and there'll be a requirement ongoing

1:21:41.720 --> 1:21:46.320
<v Speaker 2>for us to have sensible policies in place. But this,

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:48.320
<v Speaker 2>as I said before, like it has been a wrecking

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:51.400
<v Speaker 2>ball going through the economy. And have a look at

1:21:51.439 --> 1:21:53.519
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in parts of Europe, or what happened when

1:21:53.680 --> 1:21:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine was attacked by Russia. Germany and France and other

1:21:57.840 --> 1:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>countries were all of a sudden worried about energy security.

1:22:02.040 --> 1:22:04.439
<v Speaker 2>There are reports out of Spain at the moment. I

1:22:04.439 --> 1:22:07.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know the cause of those blackouts there, but no

1:22:08.120 --> 1:22:11.799
<v Speaker 2>economy can function without reliable power. And the Prime Minister

1:22:12.000 --> 1:22:15.559
<v Speaker 2>and Crispylon want to pretend that solar and offshore wind

1:22:16.800 --> 1:22:20.360
<v Speaker 2>and green hydrogen that'll keep the lights on. It just won't.

1:22:20.720 --> 1:22:22.519
<v Speaker 2>And this is why people have got solar panels at

1:22:22.520 --> 1:22:26.599
<v Speaker 2>the moment starting to find that they're being penalized because

1:22:27.880 --> 1:22:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the sunshines during the day and they can pump energy

1:22:30.400 --> 1:22:33.400
<v Speaker 2>into the network and they were paid a reasonable tariff

1:22:34.439 --> 1:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>not too long ago. But now the battery technology hasn't

1:22:38.800 --> 1:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>got to a point where it can store energy to

1:22:41.160 --> 1:22:44.400
<v Speaker 2>keep the fridges running or the air conditioning unit running overnight.

1:22:45.040 --> 1:22:47.720
<v Speaker 2>And we have to have a base load power and

1:22:47.800 --> 1:22:50.160
<v Speaker 2>we have to firm up the renewable power. We need

1:22:50.200 --> 1:22:53.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to seven power. The hospitals need it, cold

1:22:53.200 --> 1:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>rooms need it, mining needs it to pay its access

1:22:57.640 --> 1:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>every part of our society. Energy is the economy, and

1:23:00.720 --> 1:23:03.639
<v Speaker 2>so yes, I mean they're signed up to a renewables

1:23:03.680 --> 1:23:06.439
<v Speaker 2>only policy, but it's killing the economy. And that's what's

1:23:06.680 --> 1:23:08.839
<v Speaker 2>if you ask, if you ask me what's the biggest

1:23:08.880 --> 1:23:11.760
<v Speaker 2>single factor as to why grocery prices have gone up

1:23:11.760 --> 1:23:14.400
<v Speaker 2>by thirty percent, I think it's the energy policy. And

1:23:14.439 --> 1:23:16.439
<v Speaker 2>as I say, it's not just your power bill at

1:23:16.439 --> 1:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>home that's going up. It's the farmer, and it's the

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:22.000
<v Speaker 2>cold storage provider, and it's a transport operator, and it's

1:23:22.120 --> 1:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody who's paying more and more for electricity and gas.

1:23:25.400 --> 1:23:28.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's why we want to address gas and electricity

1:23:28.280 --> 1:23:29.360
<v Speaker 2>costs and bring them down.

1:23:29.560 --> 1:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>The fourth one that says is education.

1:23:31.600 --> 1:23:35.320
<v Speaker 3>So AI says, Education says an expansion of free TAFE

1:23:35.360 --> 1:23:38.160
<v Speaker 3>programs is set to benefit over six hundred thousand Australians

1:23:38.160 --> 1:23:41.400
<v Speaker 3>addressing skill shortages and boosting workforce participation.

1:23:41.800 --> 1:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>That'll comment on that well.

1:23:43.200 --> 1:23:45.719
<v Speaker 2>As we've discussed before, nothing the government does is free.

1:23:46.120 --> 1:23:50.720
<v Speaker 2>So for somebody to be paid to go to do

1:23:50.840 --> 1:23:54.759
<v Speaker 2>a course, another taxpayer is paying that. So somebody who's

1:23:55.840 --> 1:24:00.200
<v Speaker 2>just finished their degree or just finish their apprenticeship, they're

1:24:00.200 --> 1:24:02.479
<v Speaker 2>the ones who are paying for it through their taxes. Now,

1:24:03.040 --> 1:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm a really strong supporter of young Australians deciding what

1:24:07.479 --> 1:24:10.360
<v Speaker 2>is best for them. If that's UNI, that's great, But

1:24:10.400 --> 1:24:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you're not a failure if you don't go to UNI,

1:24:12.000 --> 1:24:15.640
<v Speaker 2>which is sort of the labor ethos. You should be

1:24:15.720 --> 1:24:17.720
<v Speaker 2>encouraged to do a trade if that's what's important. What

1:24:17.720 --> 1:24:19.799
<v Speaker 2>we've said is we're going to set up and invest

1:24:19.840 --> 1:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>further into austral and trade colleges instead of the TAFE model.

1:24:23.400 --> 1:24:26.559
<v Speaker 2>It allows kids in year ten and eleven and twelve

1:24:27.040 --> 1:24:31.000
<v Speaker 2>to start to start their apprenticeship and get some of

1:24:31.000 --> 1:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>that underway. By the time they leave school they can

1:24:33.720 --> 1:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>get paid for part of it. They're developing skills and

1:24:36.360 --> 1:24:38.920
<v Speaker 2>in addition to that, we're putting twelve thousand dollars into

1:24:38.960 --> 1:24:43.559
<v Speaker 2>a wage subsidy for trainees and for apprentices so that

1:24:44.240 --> 1:24:48.000
<v Speaker 2>employers see them as more attractive and will employ more apprentices,

1:24:48.040 --> 1:24:50.599
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the construction sector as well.

1:24:51.040 --> 1:24:54.760
<v Speaker 3>And the final one is health. Labor has committed this

1:24:54.840 --> 1:24:57.040
<v Speaker 3>is going to be is going to wrankle yours Medicare.

1:24:57.080 --> 1:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>But Labor has committed eight point five billion dollars to

1:24:59.800 --> 1:25:03.400
<v Speaker 3>meet aiming to have ninety percent of GP visits that's

1:25:03.520 --> 1:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>visits to the doctor bulk build by the end of

1:25:05.880 --> 1:25:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the decade. I presume he means twenty thirty. This includes

1:25:10.960 --> 1:25:13.960
<v Speaker 3>funding for urgent care, clinics and women's health initiatives.

1:25:15.880 --> 1:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>What do you say about.

1:25:16.800 --> 1:25:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, some of some of the government's claims at the

1:25:20.120 --> 1:25:22.280
<v Speaker 2>moment in relation to health, as it pointed out before,

1:25:22.320 --> 1:25:25.120
<v Speaker 2>it is completely overblown. So when I was Health Minister,

1:25:25.200 --> 1:25:27.679
<v Speaker 2>the bulk building rate was eighty four percent. It went

1:25:27.760 --> 1:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>up and the Prime Minister makes this point that it

1:25:30.080 --> 1:25:32.160
<v Speaker 2>went up over the course of COVID because more people

1:25:32.160 --> 1:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>were doing telehealth consults, et cetera, getting vaccinations. It went

1:25:36.120 --> 1:25:39.439
<v Speaker 2>up to eighty eight percent. Today it's at seventy seven percent,

1:25:39.520 --> 1:25:42.720
<v Speaker 2>so down eleven points and Australians are finding it hard

1:25:42.720 --> 1:25:44.880
<v Speaker 2>to get into a doctor. So you know, as a dad.

1:25:44.920 --> 1:25:48.000
<v Speaker 2>As somebody who uses a health system, obviously myself, I

1:25:48.040 --> 1:25:50.160
<v Speaker 2>want to make sure that we can have a really

1:25:50.200 --> 1:25:54.360
<v Speaker 2>strong primary care network because that stops people from going

1:25:54.400 --> 1:25:57.680
<v Speaker 2>to hospitals and presenting an emergency departments. It means that

1:25:57.720 --> 1:26:00.960
<v Speaker 2>there's early detection of cancers and it means you can

1:26:01.000 --> 1:26:03.439
<v Speaker 2>be treated much earlier. And blokes in particular, I might say,

1:26:03.439 --> 1:26:05.960
<v Speaker 2>should go to the doctor more regularly. Women are much

1:26:06.000 --> 1:26:09.680
<v Speaker 2>better at going to the doctor more regularly. And we

1:26:09.760 --> 1:26:13.160
<v Speaker 2>need to invest in training of gps because we've got

1:26:13.200 --> 1:26:16.240
<v Speaker 2>an aging workforce. More gps are getting older and retiring,

1:26:16.280 --> 1:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>and also it's less attractive as a specialty compared to

1:26:19.880 --> 1:26:24.479
<v Speaker 2>obstetrics or gynecology or to other specialties where people can

1:26:24.479 --> 1:26:27.320
<v Speaker 2>make more money, so we've got to properly pay the doctors.

1:26:27.320 --> 1:26:31.120
<v Speaker 2>So we support additional investment into medicare and we've been

1:26:31.240 --> 1:26:34.000
<v Speaker 2>very clear about that. We've doubled the number of psychology

1:26:34.040 --> 1:26:37.360
<v Speaker 2>sessions which labor cut in half, because particularly for young

1:26:37.439 --> 1:26:41.400
<v Speaker 2>kids with complex psychological needs, we need to get them

1:26:42.040 --> 1:26:45.559
<v Speaker 2>with more support, not less. And we've made a big

1:26:45.560 --> 1:26:48.400
<v Speaker 2>investment into GP training and we've worked with the Australian

1:26:48.439 --> 1:26:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Medical Association and the Royal Australian College of General Practice

1:26:52.040 --> 1:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to come up with that plan. So a very strong

1:26:55.080 --> 1:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>supporter of general practice and there's probably some similarities between

1:27:00.080 --> 1:27:02.479
<v Speaker 2>labors at at the moment and US. I just think

1:27:02.520 --> 1:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>we can manage the economy more effectively, which means that

1:27:04.840 --> 1:27:09.400
<v Speaker 2>we can ultimately invest more into into health and that

1:27:09.439 --> 1:27:14.559
<v Speaker 2>can help keep people healthier and detect particularly those those

1:27:14.600 --> 1:27:18.280
<v Speaker 2>cancer types earlier, which means the survival rates are much higher.

1:27:18.920 --> 1:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>But just so anyone listening or watching can get it clear,

1:27:22.920 --> 1:27:23.960
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to smash.

1:27:23.720 --> 1:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Medicare, no where where's that coming from.

1:27:26.200 --> 1:27:28.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's their scare campaign and they ran it. Remember

1:27:28.880 --> 1:27:31.559
<v Speaker 2>they ran it before Tony Abbott got elected, and they

1:27:31.600 --> 1:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>ran it before Scott Morrison got elected. They ran it

1:27:33.720 --> 1:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>before John Howard got elected, and before Malcolm Turmer was elected.

1:27:39.240 --> 1:27:40.920
<v Speaker 2>There was this medi scare campaign that we were going

1:27:40.960 --> 1:27:44.479
<v Speaker 2>to privatize Medicare. I remember older Australians coming up to

1:27:44.560 --> 1:27:47.080
<v Speaker 2>us on the booth crying saying I voted for you

1:27:47.120 --> 1:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>for all of these years, why are you going to

1:27:48.280 --> 1:27:50.479
<v Speaker 2>sell Medicare? And it proved to be a complete and

1:27:50.560 --> 1:27:56.639
<v Speaker 2>utter fabrication, like they were misleading and lying to elderly

1:27:56.800 --> 1:28:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Australians scaring them and that that is out of their

1:28:00.400 --> 1:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>campaign again. Now, I just think Australians realize it's a

1:28:04.120 --> 1:28:07.800
<v Speaker 2>con job and that the Prime Minister is saying all

1:28:07.840 --> 1:28:11.599
<v Speaker 2>of this because he can't get re elected on his

1:28:11.640 --> 1:28:15.400
<v Speaker 2>track record and throw the mard. Run the scare campaigns,

1:28:15.680 --> 1:28:18.519
<v Speaker 2>tell the lies. That's how you get elected, and that's

1:28:18.560 --> 1:28:20.960
<v Speaker 2>what this election is about. And I intend to make

1:28:21.000 --> 1:28:23.479
<v Speaker 2>sure that that's not the case. And I want to

1:28:23.520 --> 1:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>stand up for our country. I want to make sure

1:28:25.000 --> 1:28:27.519
<v Speaker 2>that we're safe and secure. I want to make sure

1:28:27.520 --> 1:28:29.680
<v Speaker 2>we can get our country back on track as well

1:28:29.720 --> 1:28:32.720
<v Speaker 2>as the economy and help people live their lives again.

1:28:32.960 --> 1:28:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to We've had seven we've had seven consecutive

1:28:36.200 --> 1:28:39.840
<v Speaker 2>quarters so twenty one months of negative household growth. That is,

1:28:40.200 --> 1:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>households have been and recived for almost two years under

1:28:43.240 --> 1:28:45.559
<v Speaker 2>this government. And as I said earlier, the biggest drop

1:28:45.600 --> 1:28:49.960
<v Speaker 2>in living standards that the strains have experienced and people

1:28:50.040 --> 1:28:52.160
<v Speaker 2>know it, and they're the stories we've heard, the tears

1:28:52.640 --> 1:28:55.400
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen when we've spoken to family, so working

1:28:55.400 --> 1:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>their guts out and just going backwards at the moment,

1:28:57.400 --> 1:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and people aren't better off today. Than they were three

1:29:00.080 --> 1:29:03.000
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and people can't afford three more years of

1:29:03.040 --> 1:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>a bad government will end up like Victoria. But at

1:29:05.720 --> 1:29:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a national level, when you get a second term, the

1:29:09.840 --> 1:29:12.840
<v Speaker 2>first term looks bad, but the second term is when

1:29:12.840 --> 1:29:16.640
<v Speaker 2>they really consolidate the bad decisions and lock in the

1:29:16.680 --> 1:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>debt that might be paid off for a generation. And

1:29:20.120 --> 1:29:23.439
<v Speaker 2>let's change the government now and get to get things sorted.

1:29:24.080 --> 1:29:26.760
<v Speaker 3>And just as you get, helped me out because you know,

1:29:26.800 --> 1:29:30.400
<v Speaker 3>you're a political scientist, and I don't mean in terms

1:29:30.439 --> 1:29:32.519
<v Speaker 3>of academy, but you are a political scientist and that

1:29:32.520 --> 1:29:36.559
<v Speaker 3>there's the game you work in. Just an observation and

1:29:36.600 --> 1:29:39.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe you can help me out though it seems to

1:29:39.760 --> 1:29:41.719
<v Speaker 3>me what most people aren't.

1:29:41.520 --> 1:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Thinking about is for this election is that.

1:29:45.400 --> 1:29:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Labor is about big government because they take the view

1:29:50.200 --> 1:29:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and rightly wrongly. I know where my position is, but

1:29:53.720 --> 1:29:56.639
<v Speaker 3>you know everyone will have a different position. But big

1:29:56.680 --> 1:30:01.439
<v Speaker 3>government movements like labor the view that government make the

1:30:01.479 --> 1:30:07.759
<v Speaker 3>best decisions for everybody. So you're how you live your life,

1:30:08.400 --> 1:30:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll sort it out. I'll build the rules around how

1:30:11.840 --> 1:30:13.680
<v Speaker 3>you live like COVID is a good example, which is

1:30:13.720 --> 1:30:17.400
<v Speaker 3>what happened to Victoria. We as a government are better

1:30:17.439 --> 1:30:20.040
<v Speaker 3>making decisions about how you live your life. Therefore, as

1:30:20.040 --> 1:30:22.360
<v Speaker 3>a result of that, we will build governor bigger and

1:30:22.360 --> 1:30:25.439
<v Speaker 3>bigger and bigger if you vote us in. But you're

1:30:25.439 --> 1:30:28.200
<v Speaker 3>going to have more rules, more regulation. For a small business,

1:30:28.200 --> 1:30:32.160
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna have to buy, buy more, many more rules.

1:30:32.200 --> 1:30:33.840
<v Speaker 3>As to hey, you're going to ministry your business. You

1:30:33.840 --> 1:30:35.280
<v Speaker 3>know you've got to collect the tax. You've got to

1:30:35.320 --> 1:30:39.240
<v Speaker 3>do this, You've got to do that. Whereas the liberal

1:30:39.320 --> 1:30:43.200
<v Speaker 3>program has been obviously government, you've got to have rules,

1:30:43.240 --> 1:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>but smaller government.

1:30:47.360 --> 1:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And the vote for.

1:30:50.200 --> 1:30:53.599
<v Speaker 3>Labor in my opinion, and if you are someone who's

1:30:53.600 --> 1:30:55.200
<v Speaker 3>going to vote for labor, in my opinion, you are

1:30:55.280 --> 1:30:58.280
<v Speaker 3>voting for big government. And by voting for big government,

1:30:58.320 --> 1:31:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the job of someone in working government is to make

1:31:00.800 --> 1:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>more rules. That's what governments do. They govern, They make rules,

1:31:04.720 --> 1:31:06.719
<v Speaker 3>and they make more rules and more rules and more rules.

1:31:07.120 --> 1:31:08.600
<v Speaker 3>And when it comes to working out whether I'm on

1:31:08.760 --> 1:31:10.840
<v Speaker 3>better off today, get better what it was, say three

1:31:10.920 --> 1:31:12.800
<v Speaker 3>years ago, I just know there's a lot, a whole

1:31:12.800 --> 1:31:14.080
<v Speaker 3>lot more rules around.

1:31:13.960 --> 1:31:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Than it was three years ago. But just take economic society. Yes, and.

1:31:21.040 --> 1:31:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Is a liberal party still stand for let's call it

1:31:24.479 --> 1:31:27.599
<v Speaker 3>smaller government relative to what Labour does.

1:31:27.680 --> 1:31:30.120
<v Speaker 2>The short answer is yes, and I think you're right

1:31:30.200 --> 1:31:34.759
<v Speaker 2>in your analysis. It's just a philosophical and ideological difference

1:31:34.800 --> 1:31:36.160
<v Speaker 2>between the two parties.

1:31:35.800 --> 1:31:37.519
<v Speaker 1>And everybody can make their own decision about course, so

1:31:37.520 --> 1:31:38.559
<v Speaker 1>they should know of course.

1:31:38.600 --> 1:31:41.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so look at our The Liberal Party approach is

1:31:41.600 --> 1:31:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to knowing that we're spending taxpayers money to pay the

1:31:44.600 --> 1:31:47.639
<v Speaker 2>wages of public servants in Canberra, is to make sure

1:31:47.640 --> 1:31:50.320
<v Speaker 2>that the money is spent efficiently. So let's get the

1:31:50.320 --> 1:31:52.840
<v Speaker 2>best bang for our buck, and let's make sure that

1:31:52.880 --> 1:31:55.960
<v Speaker 2>we're employing people who are making it easier for you

1:31:56.040 --> 1:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>to navigate government services or get the services that you

1:32:00.800 --> 1:32:04.040
<v Speaker 2>are relying on from government. One of the reasons I

1:32:04.120 --> 1:32:08.599
<v Speaker 2>think that we've established a lot of inefficiency and why

1:32:08.600 --> 1:32:11.080
<v Speaker 2>we're passing a lot of cost onto the end user,

1:32:11.600 --> 1:32:13.640
<v Speaker 2>say in the construction sector, I think is a good

1:32:13.680 --> 1:32:17.719
<v Speaker 2>good example. The Labor government will always try and police

1:32:17.720 --> 1:32:20.599
<v Speaker 2>a unions. So the CFMUU has donated twelve million dollars

1:32:20.600 --> 1:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>since Anthony Albanezi became Labor leader. They've let the CFMU

1:32:26.720 --> 1:32:31.240
<v Speaker 2>largely go untouched. The CFMU workplace now is at about

1:32:31.240 --> 1:32:34.439
<v Speaker 2>two point four days a week, so and as we

1:32:34.439 --> 1:32:38.759
<v Speaker 2>said earlier we discussed this, you end up paying twice

1:32:38.800 --> 1:32:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the amount to construct a building. And it's why the

1:32:41.840 --> 1:32:44.559
<v Speaker 2>cost of a two bedroom unit has gone up so

1:32:44.640 --> 1:32:48.479
<v Speaker 2>dramatically and why it's cost a lot of people additional

1:32:48.479 --> 1:32:51.240
<v Speaker 2>holding costs. So the developer buys the block of land.

1:32:51.680 --> 1:32:56.639
<v Speaker 2>The government used to approve that development application in say

1:32:56.720 --> 1:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>three months, It now takes three years or six years,

1:33:01.120 --> 1:33:05.200
<v Speaker 2>and so the costs of that interest ultimately get paid

1:33:05.760 --> 1:33:08.559
<v Speaker 2>by the young couple who's buying the two bedroom unit.

1:33:09.120 --> 1:33:12.120
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why that's blown out is because government

1:33:12.200 --> 1:33:15.120
<v Speaker 2>has expanded and when you bring new public servants on,

1:33:15.160 --> 1:33:17.479
<v Speaker 2>they look for new things to do. That's their job exactly,

1:33:17.760 --> 1:33:22.360
<v Speaker 2>and they they don't find efficiency, They find reasons to

1:33:22.479 --> 1:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>prolong the discussion and we need to consider more factors,

1:33:26.400 --> 1:33:29.360
<v Speaker 2>and we need more reports, and you need to pay

1:33:29.360 --> 1:33:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the consultants more and more, and that's what's driven up

1:33:31.680 --> 1:33:34.760
<v Speaker 2>the cost and the labor. Governments employed an extra forty

1:33:34.800 --> 1:33:38.439
<v Speaker 2>one thousand public servants in Canberra and to put that

1:33:38.479 --> 1:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>into perspective on a per capita basis, and it's a

1:33:41.320 --> 1:33:43.400
<v Speaker 2>really interesting graph. I think it was in the Economists

1:33:43.439 --> 1:33:46.439
<v Speaker 2>just recently, but Australia has the highest number of public

1:33:46.439 --> 1:33:49.759
<v Speaker 2>servants per capita compared to any other country, including European countries,

1:33:50.840 --> 1:33:55.240
<v Speaker 2>in the world, and that means that it's grown at

1:33:55.240 --> 1:33:58.400
<v Speaker 2>about three times the rate under this government compared to

1:33:59.240 --> 1:34:02.639
<v Speaker 2>when Julia Gillard and Kevin rud were and government last.

1:34:03.080 --> 1:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>So that is a pretty phenomenal growth number. Now, if

1:34:06.439 --> 1:34:08.639
<v Speaker 2>you're talking a wage bill there of over seven billion

1:34:08.680 --> 1:34:11.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars a year, you think what you can do for that.

1:34:11.360 --> 1:34:13.719
<v Speaker 2>You can drop petrol by twenty five cents. A letter

1:34:13.720 --> 1:34:16.679
<v Speaker 2>costs you six billion dollars a year. You can provide

1:34:16.720 --> 1:34:20.040
<v Speaker 2>permanently permanently, You could provide more support to defense, You

1:34:20.040 --> 1:34:23.800
<v Speaker 2>could give more funding to roads, you could provide more

1:34:23.800 --> 1:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>support in age care. There are a lot of things

1:34:26.240 --> 1:34:28.080
<v Speaker 2>you can do for that money. And if you can

1:34:28.439 --> 1:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>deliver a more efficient service and you can make it

1:34:31.240 --> 1:34:34.360
<v Speaker 2>easier and less costly to deal with government, you end

1:34:34.479 --> 1:34:38.200
<v Speaker 2>up reducing the overall costs that have to be complied

1:34:39.120 --> 1:34:42.880
<v Speaker 2>or paid for to comply with the government regulations. And

1:34:42.920 --> 1:34:46.879
<v Speaker 2>that's a big difference between the two parties. The Commonwealth

1:34:46.880 --> 1:34:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Public Service Union, of course applaud the Albanezi government for

1:34:50.000 --> 1:34:53.080
<v Speaker 2>employing more public servant in camera because they get to

1:34:53.120 --> 1:34:55.320
<v Speaker 2>clip the ticket and they get to collect the union

1:34:55.320 --> 1:34:59.559
<v Speaker 2>fees and then the CPSU pay the union fees to

1:34:59.640 --> 1:35:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the Labor Party to help them campaign. That's their business model.

1:35:04.800 --> 1:35:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I just I want an efficient public servants service, and

1:35:07.840 --> 1:35:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I want a smaller government, and I want people to

1:35:10.320 --> 1:35:12.680
<v Speaker 2>be able to make decisions that are right for them

1:35:12.680 --> 1:35:14.639
<v Speaker 2>and right for their families and right for their businesses.

1:35:14.680 --> 1:35:18.639
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not interested in having to tell you whether

1:35:18.640 --> 1:35:20.479
<v Speaker 2>you turn a left or right coming out of your bedroom,

1:35:20.520 --> 1:35:24.240
<v Speaker 2>or whether you allowed to serve up that cereal in

1:35:24.280 --> 1:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the morning, or whether you're allowed to, you know, do

1:35:27.720 --> 1:35:29.040
<v Speaker 2>this or that in your life. I want you to

1:35:29.120 --> 1:35:32.599
<v Speaker 2>make those decisions. And that's the big difference between the

1:35:32.600 --> 1:35:36.240
<v Speaker 2>two parties. The Labor Party believes in a control you,

1:35:36.400 --> 1:35:38.160
<v Speaker 2>command and control model, and that's.

1:35:38.240 --> 1:35:40.400
<v Speaker 3>They believe they're better off at making decisions than we

1:35:40.479 --> 1:35:41.400
<v Speaker 3>are as individuals.

1:35:41.479 --> 1:35:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and again because it's a trust thing. They don't

1:35:44.000 --> 1:35:47.719
<v Speaker 2>trust business owners because they think they're there to exploit workers.

1:35:47.720 --> 1:35:52.559
<v Speaker 2>As we said before, they want to give a model

1:35:52.600 --> 1:35:56.120
<v Speaker 2>where people can rent for life, because that means that

1:35:56.920 --> 1:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>you know you've got you're not empowered a landlord who's

1:36:02.160 --> 1:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>got that subservient relationship. They want the super funds to

1:36:05.240 --> 1:36:09.400
<v Speaker 2>own the houses that people live in and give them

1:36:10.120 --> 1:36:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a rent for life model. And they're just the fundamental

1:36:14.160 --> 1:36:15.639
<v Speaker 2>differences between the two parties.

1:36:16.040 --> 1:36:18.559
<v Speaker 3>And then that sort of takes us around sort of

1:36:18.600 --> 1:36:21.280
<v Speaker 3>that territory of socialism, because that's sort of the philosophy

1:36:21.280 --> 1:36:25.400
<v Speaker 3>of socialism. Yes, and all these things, apart from being efficient,

1:36:26.600 --> 1:36:29.040
<v Speaker 3>costs end up costing us more money. So may the

1:36:29.040 --> 1:36:33.679
<v Speaker 3>whole business cycle inefficient. Just so I'm clear, though, any

1:36:33.680 --> 1:36:36.840
<v Speaker 3>public servants listening to this doesn't mean that if Dunton

1:36:36.880 --> 1:36:38.519
<v Speaker 3>gets in he's going to go and fire everybody.

1:36:38.720 --> 1:36:40.240
<v Speaker 2>No. Look, I mean look at what we did again

1:36:40.240 --> 1:36:43.400
<v Speaker 2>when we were in government. We found efficiencies and we

1:36:43.439 --> 1:36:45.840
<v Speaker 2>did reduce the overall number of public servants as we're

1:36:45.880 --> 1:36:51.360
<v Speaker 2>proposing at this election as well. But we're at a sensible,

1:36:51.400 --> 1:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>sustainable model and trying to get that balance right. As

1:36:53.960 --> 1:36:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I say, where people are working harder and paying more tax,

1:36:57.640 --> 1:36:59.720
<v Speaker 2>they want to know that it's being spent efficiently. And

1:37:00.479 --> 1:37:02.800
<v Speaker 2>if they think we're just employing public servants in Canberra

1:37:02.880 --> 1:37:05.559
<v Speaker 2>to please the Union as the Labor Party is done,

1:37:05.640 --> 1:37:08.280
<v Speaker 2>well that's not an efficient use of your money. If

1:37:08.280 --> 1:37:12.000
<v Speaker 2>you're making an application to be a pension or if

1:37:12.000 --> 1:37:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you're working in the Department of Defense, you want to

1:37:15.400 --> 1:37:18.680
<v Speaker 2>know that they're the most streamlined process is going. And

1:37:19.080 --> 1:37:21.400
<v Speaker 2>we should be encouraging the state governments and the councils

1:37:21.400 --> 1:37:24.559
<v Speaker 2>to do that as well, and encourage them to be

1:37:24.600 --> 1:37:28.160
<v Speaker 2>efficient in the taxes that they're applying and the public

1:37:28.160 --> 1:37:29.880
<v Speaker 2>servants that they're employing in the way in which they

1:37:29.920 --> 1:37:33.320
<v Speaker 2>spend their taxes as well. And sometimes the commwealth government

1:37:33.360 --> 1:37:37.120
<v Speaker 2>can incentivize state governments to try and cut waste and

1:37:37.320 --> 1:37:43.160
<v Speaker 2>try and condensed timelines for approvals, etc. Not abandoned environmental considerations, etc.

1:37:43.479 --> 1:37:47.280
<v Speaker 2>But it takes sixteen years in our country now for

1:37:47.320 --> 1:37:50.519
<v Speaker 2>a mind to be approved. What's happening there? All those

1:37:50.520 --> 1:37:53.960
<v Speaker 2>companies like Rio are just taking money. They're putting it

1:37:53.960 --> 1:37:57.080
<v Speaker 2>into Africa, They're putting it into Asia and North America.

1:37:57.400 --> 1:38:00.639
<v Speaker 2>We lose the jobs, we lose the taxes. We would

1:38:00.720 --> 1:38:05.439
<v Speaker 2>end up being more environmentally responsible in that mining operation

1:38:05.560 --> 1:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>than what would happen in Africa, and so we don't

1:38:09.200 --> 1:38:14.519
<v Speaker 2>improve the overall missions across the world, and we do

1:38:14.560 --> 1:38:18.120
<v Speaker 2>ourselves out of huge revenues, and we could be building

1:38:18.520 --> 1:38:23.640
<v Speaker 2>more schools or we could be providing more GPS. That's

1:38:23.680 --> 1:38:26.160
<v Speaker 2>they're the fundamental differences I think between the two parties.

1:38:26.840 --> 1:38:30.040
<v Speaker 3>So, Peter, the elections on in four days from now,

1:38:33.320 --> 1:38:34.720
<v Speaker 3>it's the last run home. You've got to take one

1:38:34.800 --> 1:38:37.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred meters Togo. It looks like there's a you know,

1:38:37.840 --> 1:38:39.519
<v Speaker 3>you've got to catch up. You got to really put

1:38:39.560 --> 1:38:41.439
<v Speaker 3>this stride out. What are you going to say to

1:38:41.439 --> 1:38:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Australians now? Why vote for the Coalition.

1:38:45.840 --> 1:38:48.160
<v Speaker 2>We're going to work hard right up until election night

1:38:48.200 --> 1:38:50.720
<v Speaker 2>because I believe we can win the election, and I

1:38:50.760 --> 1:38:53.479
<v Speaker 2>believe we can win it because not just of the

1:38:53.520 --> 1:38:55.920
<v Speaker 2>track record of the last three years and how hard

1:38:55.960 --> 1:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that's been for a lot of families, but probably more

1:38:58.000 --> 1:39:00.519
<v Speaker 2>importantly because of what we've got on off and that

1:39:00.720 --> 1:39:04.880
<v Speaker 2>is a positive plan. It's about providing immediate assistance and

1:39:04.960 --> 1:39:06.760
<v Speaker 2>it's the twenty five cent a letter cut, it's the

1:39:06.760 --> 1:39:10.479
<v Speaker 2>twelve hundred dollars back. It's fixing up the energy system

1:39:10.600 --> 1:39:15.439
<v Speaker 2>straight away, and it's fixing the economy so that the

1:39:15.439 --> 1:39:17.800
<v Speaker 2>economy can be working for people, not that people are

1:39:17.840 --> 1:39:21.320
<v Speaker 2>slaves to the economy. I want to create an environment

1:39:22.040 --> 1:39:26.080
<v Speaker 2>where we can support families and help small businesses grow again,

1:39:26.120 --> 1:39:28.920
<v Speaker 2>where we can bring inflation down so that we can

1:39:28.920 --> 1:39:31.880
<v Speaker 2>bring interest rates down, and we can be a safe

1:39:31.880 --> 1:39:34.280
<v Speaker 2>society as well. I want people to be safe in

1:39:34.280 --> 1:39:35.720
<v Speaker 2>their own homes. I want them to be safe in

1:39:35.760 --> 1:39:38.120
<v Speaker 2>their communities, and I want us to be safe as

1:39:38.160 --> 1:39:41.880
<v Speaker 2>a country in a very uncertain century. And we have

1:39:41.960 --> 1:39:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the experience to be able to do that, and we

1:39:43.960 --> 1:39:46.880
<v Speaker 2>have the capacity. When you look at the front bench

1:39:46.920 --> 1:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and Angus Taylor and Jane Hume and others who are

1:39:50.000 --> 1:39:54.760
<v Speaker 2>very accomplished people in their own business lives, etc. They

1:39:54.800 --> 1:39:56.800
<v Speaker 2>bring a lot of experience to the table as well.

1:39:56.920 --> 1:39:59.559
<v Speaker 2>And we have the ability to clean up this mess

1:39:59.600 --> 1:40:01.920
<v Speaker 2>of the last three years and help bring down the

1:40:01.960 --> 1:40:07.320
<v Speaker 2>cost of petrol, of power, of electricity and gas, and

1:40:07.360 --> 1:40:11.320
<v Speaker 2>we can help rebuild the economy. And that's exactly what

1:40:12.040 --> 1:40:15.360
<v Speaker 2>liberal governments have done after bad labor governments before.

1:40:16.000 --> 1:40:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Better done.

1:40:16.880 --> 1:40:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Thanksgiving our audience a better sense of who Peter Donte

1:40:19.960 --> 1:40:20.400
<v Speaker 3>really is.

1:40:20.479 --> 1:40:21.640
<v Speaker 2>My pleasure. Mark, Thank you very much.