WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 23 September

0:00:02.690 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you, Shari. I'll well

0:00:07.940 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and truly take that. Thank you very much for watching tonight.

0:00:11.020 --> 0:00:12.820
<v Speaker 1>We've got a very big one ahead here. In the

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>man cave tonight, the leader of the most popular political

0:00:15.740 --> 0:00:19.070
<v Speaker 1>party in the country, Pauline Hanson, in the man cave tonight.

0:00:19.430 --> 0:00:21.270
<v Speaker 1>The great Megan Kelly joins us to discuss a whole

0:00:21.290 --> 0:00:25.290
<v Speaker 1>bunch of matters, everything from Prince Harry... to CNN getting

0:00:25.329 --> 0:00:28.170
<v Speaker 1>brand-new owners. The wokeness may well be ending, the great

0:00:28.190 --> 0:00:30.070
<v Speaker 1>Megyn Kelly. And, as always, I've got to show you

0:00:30.150 --> 0:00:32.110
<v Speaker 1>what they did while you were working, the idiots on

0:00:32.270 --> 0:00:35.349
<v Speaker 1>social media. Now, we're at a busy show, apart from

0:00:35.370 --> 0:00:37.690
<v Speaker 1>just our conversation with Pauline, normal debate, all the rest

0:00:37.729 --> 0:00:40.670
<v Speaker 1>of it. And just before we were deciding what we

0:00:40.700 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>were going to lead the show with, the Australian newspaper

0:00:42.979 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>has dropped quite a breaking story. This is all to

0:00:46.860 --> 0:00:49.379
<v Speaker 1>do with social media and the social media ban that

0:00:49.460 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister is trying to shove through the parliament...

0:00:51.860 --> 0:00:54.980
<v Speaker 1>that supposedly they will get the help of the Greens

0:00:55.020 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to get through. But remember, we've all been told that

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.660
<v Speaker 1>it's all about one thing and one thing only.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.100
<v Speaker 2>Protecting Australians from illegal material and protecting children from harm

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.619
<v Speaker 2>should be a bipartisan priority. The draft digital duty of

0:01:10.670 --> 0:01:13.030
<v Speaker 2>care is the next logical step in our battle to

0:01:13.069 --> 0:01:14.550
<v Speaker 2>keep our kids safe online.

0:01:14.670 --> 0:01:18.410
<v Speaker 1>And we'll require digital platforms to document the measures taken

0:01:18.930 --> 0:01:22.690
<v Speaker 1>to address harm to Australian users. Now, despite the fact

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.990
<v Speaker 1>that kids are already banned from the system, we've gone

0:01:26.010 --> 0:01:28.010
<v Speaker 1>through in chapter and verse what all of this plan is,

0:01:28.230 --> 0:01:30.910
<v Speaker 1>but the government is absolutely clear that even though the

0:01:30.930 --> 0:01:33.130
<v Speaker 1>minister has a big red button to be able to

0:01:33.170 --> 0:01:37.110
<v Speaker 1>ban whatever she considers to be harmful, no definitions as

0:01:37.130 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to what that is, just you have to trust the minister,

0:01:39.890 --> 0:01:42.700
<v Speaker 1>we are told over and over again nothing to do

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:48.180
<v Speaker 1>with censorship. It's not about censorship. It's about giving people control.

0:01:48.220 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>What did these leading national organisations hear today from the

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:52.820
<v Speaker 2>Leader of the Opposition?

0:01:53.980 --> 0:01:54.310
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:01:55.190 --> 0:01:56.410
<v Speaker 2>No to your pleas.

0:01:57.170 --> 0:01:59.210
<v Speaker 3>And what did these leading national organisations hear?

0:01:59.230 --> 0:01:59.930
<v Speaker 4>They heard no.

0:02:01.170 --> 0:02:04.170
<v Speaker 2>They heard no and they heard a strawman argument about

0:02:04.220 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>political censorship.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.630
<v Speaker 1>OK, well, Prime Minister... is currently in New York. He

0:02:09.730 --> 0:02:13.510
<v Speaker 1>is in part discussing Australia's attitude when it comes to

0:02:13.550 --> 0:02:17.670
<v Speaker 1>big tech and this latest supposed saving of everyone from

0:02:17.710 --> 0:02:21.310
<v Speaker 1>the evils of the internet. I say that we rearrange

0:02:21.350 --> 0:02:23.460
<v Speaker 1>the order of this evening's program because this is the

0:02:23.500 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>lead story on the Australian's website right now. They've got

0:02:25.900 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a reporter there and guess what? Albo said the quiet

0:02:29.260 --> 0:02:32.290
<v Speaker 1>bit out loud. that the digital duty of care is

0:02:32.310 --> 0:02:37.770
<v Speaker 1>to address polarisation misinformation. Remember the laws they tried to

0:02:37.810 --> 0:02:40.130
<v Speaker 1>pass through the parliament that got rejected by even the Greens,

0:02:40.169 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which were the misinformation laws? Quote, Anthony Albanese has cited

0:02:45.340 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the rise of misinformation and disinformation to justify Labor's proposed

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:56.220
<v Speaker 1>digital safety regime. Departing for the government's previous insistence that

0:02:56.260 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the laws are strictly aimed at bolstering online protections and

0:02:59.940 --> 0:03:03.410
<v Speaker 1>user empowerment. Speaking on the sidelines of the UN General

0:03:03.470 --> 0:03:05.830
<v Speaker 1>Assembly in between selfies with the Prime Minister.

0:03:06.190 --> 0:03:06.470
<v Speaker 5>P.S.

0:03:06.490 --> 0:03:08.470
<v Speaker 1>Can we all stop the selfie thing when you're the

0:03:08.510 --> 0:03:12.570
<v Speaker 1>leader of the country? Anyway. He described Labor's proposed digital

0:03:12.669 --> 0:03:15.790
<v Speaker 1>duty of care as, quote, a very positive move in

0:03:15.870 --> 0:03:21.890
<v Speaker 1>response to political polarisation. Speaking at an event which was

0:03:21.930 --> 0:03:24.830
<v Speaker 1>hosted by the Coalition for Children's Rights and Protection in

0:03:24.850 --> 0:03:27.329
<v Speaker 1>the Age of AI, hosted at the UN headquarters in

0:03:27.370 --> 0:03:31.710
<v Speaker 1>New York, Mr Albanese pushed back against the criticism, insisting

0:03:31.930 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the measures were, quote, the opposite of government control. It's

0:03:34.980 --> 0:03:38.740
<v Speaker 1>about giving everyone control over their own lives. But then

0:03:38.860 --> 0:03:43.620
<v Speaker 1>he proceeded to tie the reforms to misinformation, disinformation and

0:03:43.660 --> 0:03:49.300
<v Speaker 1>increased polarisation, saying digital services were having an impact on...

0:03:49.770 --> 0:03:52.470
<v Speaker 1>our entire society and how it functions. I've got one

0:03:52.490 --> 0:03:55.770
<v Speaker 1>more quote here. People are moving away from the centre

0:03:56.290 --> 0:03:59.250
<v Speaker 1>and more and more to the extremes, be they left

0:03:59.430 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or right. And that is why we think this is

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:09.300
<v Speaker 1>a very positive move that we are putting forward. Okay. Now,

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>no doubt we will be told that we have taken

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.910
<v Speaker 1>something out of context, that the reporter didn't hear anything.

0:04:14.220 --> 0:04:17.220
<v Speaker 1>I'm going off the reporting that's come via The Australian

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.850
<v Speaker 1>and what's happening in New York. But let's make it

0:04:20.930 --> 0:04:24.589
<v Speaker 1>very clear. On this channel, on our air, with my

0:04:24.630 --> 0:04:28.390
<v Speaker 1>colleague and dear friend Laura Jays, the communications minister, well,

0:04:28.770 --> 0:04:33.370
<v Speaker 1>had a completely different justification for the laws. Remember, I've

0:04:33.390 --> 0:04:34.750
<v Speaker 1>been willing to give them a bit of slack on

0:04:34.790 --> 0:04:38.690
<v Speaker 1>the concept that these laws are simply about opting out

0:04:38.830 --> 0:04:42.270
<v Speaker 1>of the algorithm. Of course, the big red button that

0:04:42.290 --> 0:04:45.370
<v Speaker 1>the minister, the just trust me powers of the minister,

0:04:45.730 --> 0:04:48.170
<v Speaker 1>are now being invoked by the Prime Minister, I repeat,

0:04:48.290 --> 0:04:53.210
<v Speaker 1>about misinformation. Is he belling the cat? Did he misspeak?

0:04:53.570 --> 0:04:54.969
<v Speaker 1>I think we all know what they'll try to do

0:04:54.990 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the next 24 hours. But a reminder about what

0:04:57.630 --> 0:04:58.450
<v Speaker 1>the Minister had said.

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>No, this isn't about misinformation.

0:05:01.260 --> 0:05:05.060
<v Speaker 2>This is about basic safety standards that Australians should expect

0:05:05.100 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 2>from an industry that is selling them and their children products.

0:05:09.610 --> 0:05:12.870
<v Speaker 1>It's not about misinformation, says the Minister. It is about misinformation,

0:05:12.910 --> 0:05:18.150
<v Speaker 1>says the Prime Minister. Which one do you believe? Now,

0:05:18.390 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what do two federal treasurers and an economist have in common? Well,

0:05:23.420 --> 0:05:25.180
<v Speaker 1>apart from the fact that I'm sure they're wonderful at

0:05:25.500 --> 0:05:28.420
<v Speaker 1>dinner party, they all have a view when it comes

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:32.090
<v Speaker 1>to debt. Now, as you know, Australia, one T for

0:05:32.210 --> 0:05:34.930
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in debt that we are in right now.

0:05:35.250 --> 0:05:39.180
<v Speaker 1>The Conversation, which is the website linked to... lots of universities,

0:05:39.220 --> 0:05:42.380
<v Speaker 1>their sort of news service. They provided a helpful little

0:05:42.420 --> 0:05:46.250
<v Speaker 1>graph and they decided to colour it in colours of

0:05:46.570 --> 0:05:48.390
<v Speaker 1>red for the Labor Party, blue for the Liberal Party,

0:05:48.450 --> 0:05:50.370
<v Speaker 1>red for the Labor Party, blue for the Liberal Party,

0:05:50.550 --> 0:05:53.270
<v Speaker 1>red for the Labor Party, making it seem like, you know, Labor,

0:05:53.290 --> 0:05:54.950
<v Speaker 1>like the end bit, it's not that bad. We're now

0:05:55.050 --> 0:05:59.850
<v Speaker 1>at 1.1T for trillion dollars. Now, of course, remember the

0:05:59.870 --> 0:06:03.239
<v Speaker 1>very reason why so much went up under the blue

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>team was because when Joe Hockey was hired to be

0:06:07.020 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the treasurer of this country as part of the Abbott

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.340
<v Speaker 1>government in 2013, it was about doing something about debt

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.980
<v Speaker 1>and deficit. It was about doing something about an unbalanced budget.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:22.460
<v Speaker 1>It was about doing something about forever national deficits. But

0:06:22.500 --> 0:06:26.260
<v Speaker 1>remember what the reaction was? Of course, Labor and the

0:06:26.339 --> 0:06:30.380
<v Speaker 1>internal enemies, they went nuts because any attempt to actually

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>change the government off the gorging of spending, well, we

0:06:34.980 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all know where that went. The result was that we

0:06:37.580 --> 0:06:41.580
<v Speaker 1>created a politics that exists to this day, to this day.

0:06:43.380 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that if you do anything other than grow government spending,

0:06:46.460 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>then somehow you are hurting the poorest amongst us. And

0:06:49.339 --> 0:06:52.170
<v Speaker 1>just a reminder, by the way, while it was Labor

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.170
<v Speaker 1>and the internal critics of the then government, chiefly the

0:06:56.230 --> 0:06:59.510
<v Speaker 1>ghost who, of course, became Prime Minister. Did I say that? Well,

0:07:00.610 --> 0:07:03.650
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the only example of the Labor Party not

0:07:03.690 --> 0:07:06.210
<v Speaker 1>doing its bit to help fix the problem, the problem

0:07:06.470 --> 0:07:09.670
<v Speaker 1>that the government at the time was overtly hired for.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Because remember, during the pandemic, yes, there is that big

0:07:13.500 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>spike in debt. Well, of course, that's because hundreds of

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people are literally only in employment now because

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:26.060
<v Speaker 1>of JobKeeper and that was a vital program, right? But remember,

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.830
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party wanted that debt to be even bigger.

0:07:28.850 --> 0:07:32.790
<v Speaker 6>They wanted $ 1. 5 billion to go to an airline. At

0:07:32.850 --> 0:07:35.989
<v Speaker 6>one point, they were even talking about purchasing the airline

0:07:36.030 --> 0:07:37.970
<v Speaker 6>when it was up on the blocks and in a

0:07:38.010 --> 0:07:41.490
<v Speaker 6>world of trouble. Don't forget as well, they went nuts

0:07:41.570 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 6>about any suggestion that pandemic welfare should be winding up.

0:07:48.820 --> 0:07:51.260
<v Speaker 6>So again, we now sit in this world of politics that.

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Exists to this day, that anyone who wants to even

0:07:56.460 --> 0:08:00.370
<v Speaker 1>begin a conversation about balancing the books without raising taxes

0:08:00.390 --> 0:08:02.620
<v Speaker 1>is And, of course, that means there's only two options.

0:08:03.020 --> 0:08:07.020
<v Speaker 1>You increase the revenue or you have to reduce the spending. Or, as,

0:08:07.060 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, it is endlessly said by the Labor Party,

0:08:09.820 --> 0:08:13.670
<v Speaker 1>and remember the game that you are even apparently responsible

0:08:13.730 --> 0:08:16.950
<v Speaker 1>for the forever money promises that they make five or

0:08:17.010 --> 0:08:19.430
<v Speaker 1>ten years down the track. What's the word that they

0:08:19.470 --> 0:08:25.250
<v Speaker 1>have been able to very successfully use since 2014? Cuts. Cuts. Cuts.

0:08:25.370 --> 0:08:25.610
<v Speaker 2>Cuts.

0:08:25.670 --> 0:08:25.870
<v Speaker 7>Cuts.

0:08:25.990 --> 0:08:27.190
<v Speaker 1>Cuts. Cuts. Cuts.

0:08:27.250 --> 0:08:27.770
<v Speaker 7>Cuts. Cuts.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.380
<v Speaker 1>Now, the problem of this politics is that it means

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:39.650
<v Speaker 1>that we are in forever deficit. Again, Australia isn't a business,

0:08:39.670 --> 0:08:41.150
<v Speaker 1>but if it was run as a business and you

0:08:41.190 --> 0:08:42.580
<v Speaker 1>were telling people you're going to lose money for the

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>next 40 years, what do you think would happen? The

0:08:45.620 --> 0:08:49.530
<v Speaker 1>Intergenerational Report has shown... for the entirety of this government,

0:08:49.850 --> 0:08:53.710
<v Speaker 1>that every single year between now and, well, not quite

0:08:53.730 --> 0:08:55.689
<v Speaker 1>the end of time, but certainly, what, the best part

0:08:55.730 --> 0:08:58.750
<v Speaker 1>of 40 years away, we will be having a deficit.

0:08:58.990 --> 0:09:01.430
<v Speaker 1>The deficit means every single year it's added to the

0:09:01.470 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>previous debt, which means $ 1 trillion will one day become 1.2, 1.5. Now,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.699
<v Speaker 1>I mention all of this again tonight because I want

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:17.030
<v Speaker 1>to show you something that is frightening, which is... The

0:09:17.070 --> 0:09:20.990
<v Speaker 1>problem with debt is that while lefties think no one

0:09:21.030 --> 0:09:24.870
<v Speaker 1>will ever call it in, there's still a minimum monthly repayment,

0:09:24.890 --> 0:09:28.620
<v Speaker 1>like on a credit card, right? This could be monthly, quarterly, annual,

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>however they work these things out. Did you know right now,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.260
<v Speaker 1>right now with just a T for trillion dollars, before

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.340
<v Speaker 1>the next 40 years of deficits that take it to

0:09:39.660 --> 0:09:41.980
<v Speaker 1>one and a half, push it towards two T for

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars... that according to this work done by the

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:55.430
<v Speaker 1>Parliamentary Budget Office, Defence $ 61 billion, Medicare $ 50 billion, interest

0:09:55.590 --> 0:09:58.609
<v Speaker 1>on debt, that's the red line, third down, $ 42 billion.

0:10:01.450 --> 0:10:08.910
<v Speaker 1>The PBS, the pharmaceutical benefits scheme, $ 24 billion. That's the problem.

0:10:09.150 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>That has been my whole point the whole time, is

0:10:12.740 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that if you just forever spend and you scare the

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>bejesus out of anyone and everyone who says, okay, we've

0:10:19.340 --> 0:10:21.530
<v Speaker 1>got to find a way to somehow bring this bring

0:10:21.570 --> 0:10:25.750
<v Speaker 1>this plane back down, well, then the politics has played

0:10:25.770 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that it currently is. And if you end

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.300
<v Speaker 1>up with a massive debt, then the cost of paying

0:10:31.340 --> 0:10:34.980
<v Speaker 1>off that debt becomes the single biggest thing the government does,

0:10:35.059 --> 0:10:38.260
<v Speaker 1>meaning people go to work to pay tax just to

0:10:38.330 --> 0:10:41.469
<v Speaker 1>pay the interest bill on the debt, not even to

0:10:41.510 --> 0:10:43.689
<v Speaker 1>pay it off. Now, that would be crook if it

0:10:43.730 --> 0:10:46.710
<v Speaker 1>is your lifestyle. Imagine that as a way of organising

0:10:46.910 --> 0:10:52.390
<v Speaker 1>a freaking country. There's more to this story. In fact, today,

0:10:54.450 --> 0:10:59.810
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chalmers on a podcast was starting to notice that

0:10:59.910 --> 0:11:02.230
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, because when they go up here, they go

0:11:02.250 --> 0:11:04.500
<v Speaker 1>up all the way around the world as well, and

0:11:04.620 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are starting to rise, which means just like

0:11:07.100 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 1>you paying off your house and the interest rates going

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>up 15 times since this mob came to power, the

0:11:14.580 --> 0:11:18.809
<v Speaker 1>interest bill on the debt will rise again. in the

0:11:18.850 --> 0:11:22.090
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years, meaning, have a look at this.

0:11:22.770 --> 0:11:25.690
<v Speaker 1>This is the Treasurer talking about that today.

0:11:26.670 --> 0:11:30.670
<v Speaker 8>The big problematic influence on the mid-year update is, at

0:11:30.690 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 8>this stage, likely to be billions of dollars extra to

0:11:35.540 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 8>service our borrowing costs.

0:11:38.580 --> 0:11:43.820
<v Speaker 1>Ding, ding, ding. Paying attention, Australia? Paying attention. Buy now,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>pay later is not a strategy for your own life,

0:11:47.860 --> 0:11:51.730
<v Speaker 1>let alone running a country. We spend more money today

0:11:52.290 --> 0:11:56.170
<v Speaker 1>servicing debt than paying for the medications that keep people

0:11:56.230 --> 0:12:00.770
<v Speaker 1>alive because they're discounted by the taxpayer. That number that

0:12:00.790 --> 0:12:02.090
<v Speaker 1>we currently pay is $ 42 billion.

0:12:02.130 --> 0:12:02.370
<v Speaker 7>Treasury.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:10.660
<v Speaker 1>has proposed, projected, sorry, that it'll go up by 8.8% annually,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so the best part of 10% every year for the

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.730
<v Speaker 1>next 10 years. While we continue to run a deficit

0:12:16.770 --> 0:12:19.390
<v Speaker 1>for 10 years, we add to the debt for 10 years.

0:12:20.630 --> 0:12:23.349
<v Speaker 1>And this government knows that somebody else is going to

0:12:23.390 --> 0:12:25.390
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for it. Now, their attitude when it

0:12:25.429 --> 0:12:27.110
<v Speaker 1>comes to climate change is we've got to do something

0:12:27.130 --> 0:12:28.869
<v Speaker 1>now because we don't want the kids to have to

0:12:28.929 --> 0:12:31.870
<v Speaker 1>pay for it. But when it comes to the finances

0:12:32.010 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>of the country, bugger it, let's just get re-elected.

0:12:37.110 --> 0:12:37.329
<v Speaker 2>A $ 7.

0:12:37.170 --> 0:12:39.209
<v Speaker 1>2 billion announcement today. $ 5 million. $ 10 million.

0:12:39.210 --> 0:12:39.670
<v Speaker 6>$ 200 million.

0:12:39.670 --> 0:12:40.390
<v Speaker 1>$ 3 billion.

0:12:40.390 --> 0:12:40.950
<v Speaker 3>$ 350 million.

0:12:40.950 --> 0:12:41.530
<v Speaker 1>$ 2 billion. $ 37 million.

0:12:41.530 --> 0:12:41.930
<v Speaker 9>$ 842 million.

0:12:41.929 --> 0:12:42.059
<v Speaker 2>$ 2.

0:12:41.929 --> 0:12:42.290
<v Speaker 1>4 billion.

0:12:42.290 --> 0:12:42.420
<v Speaker 2>$ 8.

0:12:42.290 --> 0:12:42.970
<v Speaker 1>5 billion. $ 4. 8 billion.

0:12:42.970 --> 0:12:43.470
<v Speaker 2>$ 1 billion.

0:12:43.470 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 7>$ 3.

0:12:43.470 --> 0:12:45.330
<v Speaker 1>4 billion. $ 2. 8 billion. $ 200 million. And that was just

0:12:45.410 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>one election campaign. let alone the inevitable one that's coming up,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.540
<v Speaker 1>let alone the one that was there before that. Now,

0:13:12.620 --> 0:13:16.170
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned it was two treasurers and an economist. We've

0:13:16.190 --> 0:13:19.510
<v Speaker 1>dealt with one treasurer, the current passenger of the Australian economy,

0:13:19.570 --> 0:13:21.209
<v Speaker 1>and if he ever touches the wheel, he sends it

0:13:21.250 --> 0:13:23.970
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong direction. But I now want to talk

0:13:23.990 --> 0:13:26.170
<v Speaker 1>about Chris Richardson. He's the bloke who is very well

0:13:26.220 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>known as the chief sort of commentator, very available to

0:13:29.179 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the media, and he has now said it is time

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to end this politics of handouts because of exactly what

0:13:36.620 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about here. the long-term consequences of running up

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.060
<v Speaker 1>the credit card bill. It's boring, it's eat your vegetables,

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.900
<v Speaker 1>but fair dinkum, this stuff matters. Talk about a tipping point.

0:13:46.940 --> 0:13:49.710
<v Speaker 1>Richardson said the party is over when it comes to

0:13:49.750 --> 0:13:52.790
<v Speaker 1>governments in the populist era using cheap debt to fund

0:13:52.870 --> 0:13:57.410
<v Speaker 1>handouts to increasingly grumpy voters. We are seeing a shift

0:13:57.570 --> 0:14:00.030
<v Speaker 1>now in the normal cost of money. This is because

0:14:00.580 --> 0:14:04.370
<v Speaker 1>in America they owe $ 40 trillion. But the thing about

0:14:04.390 --> 0:14:07.140
<v Speaker 1>the new normal is that it's the old normal. The

0:14:07.179 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>last 20 years has been unusual. Can we go back

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to that debt graph that shows us how things have

0:14:13.380 --> 0:14:15.620
<v Speaker 1>gone red, blue, red, blue over the years? What's he

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.390
<v Speaker 1>talking about about the past 20 years? Governments that have

0:14:19.790 --> 0:14:23.410
<v Speaker 1>put the foot down on spending because the political environment

0:14:23.450 --> 0:14:29.530
<v Speaker 1>does not allow anything other than. two treasurers and an economist.

0:14:29.570 --> 0:14:31.910
<v Speaker 1>We've done one treasurer, we've done an economist. Let's talk

0:14:32.350 --> 0:14:35.910
<v Speaker 1>about another treasurer, my mate Joe Hockey. He had a

0:14:35.930 --> 0:14:39.380
<v Speaker 1>great conversation with Laura Jays a couple of days ago

0:14:39.420 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>here on News 24. And it is a little bit

0:14:42.100 --> 0:14:44.420
<v Speaker 1>of a reminder about how far the country has drifted

0:14:44.540 --> 0:14:46.940
<v Speaker 1>from the time when he and the Abbott government was

0:14:47.100 --> 0:14:51.109
<v Speaker 1>hired to fix a problem that was a fraction of

0:14:51.150 --> 0:14:55.010
<v Speaker 1>the problem that it is today. He also appeared on

0:14:55.030 --> 0:14:58.470
<v Speaker 1>the ABC where he as a man not seeking re-election

0:14:58.510 --> 0:15:01.410
<v Speaker 1>to office, to remind us all that how we feel

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>about debt, deficit and the consequence for the next generation

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.260
<v Speaker 1>is how people should be thinking. He was asked a

0:15:09.580 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal question. And can you imagine the people, if they

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>were actually paying attention in the control room over there,

0:15:16.580 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they would have been spitting out their chips.

0:15:21.260 --> 0:15:26.060
<v Speaker 10>Do you believe meaningful fiscal reform can happen in Australia

0:15:26.620 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 10>when it costs people something?

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:30.380
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:15:31.540 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.690
<v Speaker 11>There's going to have to be a crisis now. There's

0:15:34.710 --> 0:15:38.730
<v Speaker 11>going to have to be a financial crisis and people

0:15:38.810 --> 0:15:41.710
<v Speaker 11>will only take the medicine when they, you know, feel

0:15:41.770 --> 0:15:44.650
<v Speaker 11>really ill about it. And I think this is coming

0:15:44.690 --> 0:15:46.410
<v Speaker 11>right across the world. I mean, we are now on

0:15:46.450 --> 0:15:52.150
<v Speaker 11>the threshold of income tax, which is the biggest source

0:15:52.190 --> 0:15:56.110
<v Speaker 11>of revenue for government. Income tax is being exceeded by welfare.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.390
<v Speaker 11>The problem is governments have no restraint when it comes

0:16:00.430 --> 0:16:01.090
<v Speaker 11>to expenditure.

0:16:02.710 --> 0:16:05.369
<v Speaker 1>That's the point. We must do everything to fix the

0:16:05.410 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>planet because someone think of the children. We've got to

0:16:08.140 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>do something about the out-of-control spending because can someone think

0:16:10.740 --> 0:16:14.070
<v Speaker 1>of the vacant children? Now, I know in Leftyland, their idea,

0:16:14.110 --> 0:16:16.490
<v Speaker 1>modern monetary theory, nobody will ever call it in, but

0:16:16.530 --> 0:16:18.590
<v Speaker 1>you still have to pay off the interest, and the

0:16:18.630 --> 0:16:20.810
<v Speaker 1>interest is now more than we spend on the pharmaceutical

0:16:21.210 --> 0:16:25.290
<v Speaker 1>benefits scheme. And because of interest rates rising, because all

0:16:25.310 --> 0:16:29.470
<v Speaker 1>of these countries keep running up debt, including, yes, the

0:16:29.510 --> 0:16:32.730
<v Speaker 1>United States, but well and truly Australia, the interest rate

0:16:32.770 --> 0:16:35.210
<v Speaker 1>bill on $ 1 trillion goes up while we promise to

0:16:35.250 --> 0:16:38.430
<v Speaker 1>have deficits for the next 40 years, making $ 1 trillion.

0:16:38.100 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 9>$ 2 trillion.

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:44.650
<v Speaker 1>This matters. It truly does. And Joe Hockey predicted that,

0:16:44.690 --> 0:16:47.870
<v Speaker 1>as you just heard there, income tax, the vast amount

0:16:47.890 --> 0:16:49.750
<v Speaker 1>of money that the government gets, more than anything else

0:16:49.790 --> 0:16:53.650
<v Speaker 1>comes from people pay as you go, right? Those people

0:16:53.670 --> 0:16:57.210
<v Speaker 1>will now just be paying for welfare. That's it. So

0:16:57.490 --> 0:17:00.310
<v Speaker 1>how else will the government fund itself? A prediction into

0:17:00.330 --> 0:17:03.490
<v Speaker 1>the future from Joe Hockey. I thought this was frightening,

0:17:03.590 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but probable.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.020
<v Speaker 11>They're going to look at other areas of tax. And inevitably,

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 11>that comes to capital. Rather than income, they'll be taxing capital.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.220
<v Speaker 11>And you can see the day when governments will start

0:17:16.270 --> 0:17:19.969
<v Speaker 11>to look at death taxes and taxes on the family

0:17:20.030 --> 0:17:22.690
<v Speaker 11>home because they're running out of money because they're spending

0:17:22.710 --> 0:17:23.070
<v Speaker 11>too much.

0:17:25.090 --> 0:17:27.869
<v Speaker 1>Two things I liked about Donald Trump at the United

0:17:27.930 --> 0:17:33.489
<v Speaker 1>Nations today. The first was he's absolutely clear about his

0:17:33.530 --> 0:17:36.149
<v Speaker 1>agenda of stopping Iran having a nuclear bomb.

0:17:36.540 --> 0:17:36.730
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:17:37.369 --> 0:17:40.470
<v Speaker 1>The political consequences of the war is going to virtually

0:17:40.550 --> 0:17:45.500
<v Speaker 1>decimate the Republicans in their control of two-thirds of the

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>American government. He's going to lose the Senate. He'll probably... Sorry,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going to lose the House. He's probably going to

0:17:51.300 --> 0:17:54.420
<v Speaker 1>lose the Senate. That's a giant handbrake. But he looked

0:17:54.460 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the world in the eye and said, I don't care today.

0:17:58.770 --> 0:18:03.110
<v Speaker 7>I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence

0:18:03.170 --> 0:18:06.050
<v Speaker 7>to the election when it comes to Iran.

0:18:06.990 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't even enter my mind. Then there was the

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.140
<v Speaker 1>whole AI thing, which apparently now is SI.

0:18:15.220 --> 0:18:17.670
<v Speaker 7>The very same people who said we'll all be dead

0:18:17.750 --> 0:18:21.510
<v Speaker 7>in 12 years because of global warming, a name since

0:18:21.590 --> 0:18:25.070
<v Speaker 7>reborn to climate change because the planet was cooling, not warming,

0:18:25.690 --> 0:18:29.030
<v Speaker 7>and nobody was dead. These are the same people that

0:18:29.090 --> 0:18:31.510
<v Speaker 7>are now saying that AI is going to kill us all,

0:18:31.570 --> 0:18:34.650
<v Speaker 7>that robots are going to attack us, and that everything

0:18:34.710 --> 0:18:35.370
<v Speaker 7>is going to be.

0:18:35.310 --> 0:18:37.210
<v Speaker 1>A total disaster. Same group of people.

0:18:37.850 --> 0:18:41.490
<v Speaker 7>From this point forward, all of United States documents, and

0:18:41.540 --> 0:18:44.540
<v Speaker 7>hopefully the world's, will be changed to use the much

0:18:44.580 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 7>more accurate term, super, as opposed to artificial. So it's superintelligence.

0:18:52.660 --> 0:18:58.940
<v Speaker 7>Welcome to the new world of superintelligence-SI. SI. Let's see

0:18:58.980 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 7>if that goes.

0:18:59.980 --> 0:19:03.340
<v Speaker 1>It sounds much better. Alright, the leader of the most

0:19:03.380 --> 0:19:05.459
<v Speaker 1>popular political party in the country is Pauline Hanson. She's

0:19:05.500 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in the man cave right now. Lovely to see you, mate.

0:19:07.260 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>How are you?

0:19:07.980 --> 0:19:09.140
<v Speaker 3>Good, yeah, really good.

0:19:09.180 --> 0:19:11.379
<v Speaker 1>Very good, alright. The handbag. Can you just show us here?

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I have to.

0:19:12.500 --> 0:19:13.050
<v Speaker 1>But you love it.

0:19:13.140 --> 0:19:16.070
<v Speaker 4>You know, you talk about News 24, alright? You know

0:19:16.109 --> 0:19:18.310
<v Speaker 4>how big issue now is? Look at this one.

0:19:20.290 --> 0:19:21.889
<v Speaker 1>Fake news. Fake news.

0:19:21.930 --> 0:19:23.409
<v Speaker 4>We're getting a lot of that at the moment.

0:19:23.450 --> 0:19:24.870
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is it. Well, I've got to ask, right?

0:19:24.910 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Straight up.

0:19:25.430 --> 0:19:25.650
<v Speaker 12>Okay.

0:19:25.670 --> 0:19:25.750
<v Speaker 7>Yep.

0:19:27.180 --> 0:19:29.250
<v Speaker 1>It seems that people are trying to play sort of

0:19:29.270 --> 0:19:33.350
<v Speaker 1>30-year-old games against you, right? Like the idea that Channel 9,

0:19:33.350 --> 0:19:36.350
<v Speaker 1>in a report about Trump's America, goes and sends somebody

0:19:36.369 --> 0:19:40.230
<v Speaker 1>to the KKK. What do you think of Pauline Hanson? Like,

0:19:40.369 --> 0:19:43.350
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty long bow that they're trying to draw, right?

0:19:43.570 --> 0:19:46.710
<v Speaker 4>They did it to me in 1998 in the 60

0:19:46.710 --> 0:19:48.350
<v Speaker 4>Minutes interview that they did, and I think it was

0:19:48.390 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Charles Woolley. I've done a few of them. but I

0:19:50.260 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 4>think it was Charles Woolley. And they tried to associate

0:19:53.220 --> 0:19:56.180
<v Speaker 4>us with the KKK. It's an absolute bloody joke. There's

0:19:56.220 --> 0:20:00.500
<v Speaker 4>no association whatsoever. And I came to spend the money,

0:20:00.820 --> 0:20:04.790
<v Speaker 4>although Elbow just gave them all $ 67 million and $ 16

0:20:04.750 --> 0:20:05.889
<v Speaker 4>million to Channel 9.

0:20:05.890 --> 0:20:06.650
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes.

0:20:06.670 --> 0:20:09.610
<v Speaker 4>So great spend of taxpayers' dollars to send them over there.

0:20:10.130 --> 0:20:11.189
<v Speaker 4>to follow up this rubbish.

0:20:11.290 --> 0:20:13.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is the thing where... I want to tell

0:20:13.050 --> 0:20:15.230
<v Speaker 1>people about this. There was some sort of news fund

0:20:15.350 --> 0:20:19.250
<v Speaker 1>which was given to a whole bunch of organisations, including Nine,

0:20:19.750 --> 0:20:22.109
<v Speaker 1>to help hurt their journalism. So, of course, you know,

0:20:22.130 --> 0:20:24.710
<v Speaker 1>there was no way they were giving the political favour back.

0:20:25.030 --> 0:20:26.709
<v Speaker 1>But I want to talk about the opinion polls when

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.140
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the Prime Minister because they are pretty

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.619
<v Speaker 1>crook at the moment. Last night, the News24 Pulse poll,

0:20:32.740 --> 0:20:35.500
<v Speaker 1>it showed dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister at 62% right now.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.260
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the male voters, it's 64%. Female voters,

0:20:41.420 --> 0:20:49.530
<v Speaker 1>it's 60%. Millennials, it's 61%, let alone boomers and Gen X. And, yeah,

0:20:49.570 --> 0:20:51.970
<v Speaker 1>he's in a world of trouble with virtually every single.

0:20:52.010 --> 0:20:52.750
<v Speaker 4>He's on the nose, Paul.

0:20:52.970 --> 0:20:53.470
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, every day.

0:20:53.490 --> 0:20:55.570
<v Speaker 4>I just came back from the Hentyfield Day. I opened

0:20:55.630 --> 0:20:59.609
<v Speaker 4>it up yesterday at Wagga Wagga. And they're really hurting

0:20:59.670 --> 0:21:01.470
<v Speaker 4>out in the bush. It was great to be there.

0:21:02.090 --> 0:21:05.689
<v Speaker 4>Great reception, but they are so over the Labor Party.

0:21:05.810 --> 0:21:08.330
<v Speaker 4>There's so much on the nose. They're not even happy

0:21:08.369 --> 0:21:11.129
<v Speaker 4>with the coalition government at all. They're not addressing the issues.

0:21:11.170 --> 0:21:13.130
<v Speaker 4>They've had plenty of time to address the main issue

0:21:13.190 --> 0:21:15.990
<v Speaker 4>out there, which is the water. And it's getting to

0:21:16.050 --> 0:21:18.690
<v Speaker 4>the stage now, even the rice growers, they aren't producing

0:21:18.750 --> 0:21:22.060
<v Speaker 4>enough rice in this country. And all the environmental flows

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 4>and all the rest of it is going in the environment.

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing townships, businesses, industries shutting down because we haven't

0:21:27.300 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 4>got the water. It's been a scam, and I want

0:21:29.300 --> 0:21:31.540
<v Speaker 4>a Royal Commission into the Murray-Darling Basin.

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.370
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and rightly so. But, I mean, when it comes

0:21:33.380 --> 0:21:35.550
<v Speaker 1>to the PM, he's off overseas right now. We've got

0:21:35.570 --> 0:21:39.810
<v Speaker 1>a whole week of him trouncing about overseas. Very surprising, right?

0:21:39.830 --> 0:21:41.950
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's saying one thing to us publicly about

0:21:42.010 --> 0:21:44.930
<v Speaker 1>the social media stuff. and something else that's happening behind

0:21:44.950 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the scenes where, oh, you know, it's about misinformation and

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.899
<v Speaker 1>it now is about all of the censorship issues that

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they've been pushing back against. And how do you feel...? Yeah,

0:21:52.300 --> 0:21:52.740
<v Speaker 1>you go.

0:21:53.180 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Paul, he's worried about it. And as he made his statement,

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 4>he said, we've got to, you know, look after this

0:21:58.020 --> 0:22:01.010
<v Speaker 4>because people are drifting now to the extreme right. Well,

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.370
<v Speaker 4>who's he talking about? Or the extreme left. It's about control.

0:22:04.470 --> 0:22:07.110
<v Speaker 4>It's about censorship. And that's what they want to do.

0:22:07.470 --> 0:22:11.609
<v Speaker 4>And slowly, cunningly, they want to bring in the misinformation, disinformation.

0:22:11.630 --> 0:22:12.250
<v Speaker 9>This is it.

0:22:13.060 --> 0:22:16.020
<v Speaker 4>People may not know this, it was the coalition government

0:22:16.460 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 4>in 2019 wanted to bring in the Misinformation Disinformation Bill.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.790
<v Speaker 4>And it was only due to One Nation that we

0:22:21.850 --> 0:22:24.310
<v Speaker 4>actually informed the people about this to stop it. And

0:22:24.330 --> 0:22:27.470
<v Speaker 4>it's about controlling people. We're heading down the path with

0:22:27.510 --> 0:22:30.909
<v Speaker 4>the under-16-year-olds and control what they do there. With the

0:22:30.990 --> 0:22:33.530
<v Speaker 4>hate speech laws, I put up a bill for freedom

0:22:33.570 --> 0:22:36.010
<v Speaker 4>of speech to be implemented in the Constitution.

0:22:36.369 --> 0:22:36.950
<v Speaker 1>I've done that.

0:22:37.130 --> 0:22:39.570
<v Speaker 4>That was knocked back by them. So everything is about

0:22:39.630 --> 0:22:45.590
<v Speaker 4>control the people. This stinks of... Marxism and communism. It's

0:22:45.650 --> 0:22:48.949
<v Speaker 4>about controlling the people, your thought process. And once you

0:22:48.970 --> 0:22:50.770
<v Speaker 4>do that, we've lost our democracy.

0:22:50.790 --> 0:22:53.540
<v Speaker 1>But also the idea, right, and even for people who

0:22:53.580 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>might be, you know, full Labor rights or sort of

0:22:55.660 --> 0:22:58.139
<v Speaker 1>super lefties who go, oh, I trust Annika Wells. Well,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>let's imagine there's a One Nation government and it's Barnaby

0:23:00.900 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Joyce who's the communications minister. Would you trust the person

0:23:03.460 --> 0:23:06.179
<v Speaker 1>you politically are on the opposite side of? to be

0:23:06.260 --> 0:23:09.219
<v Speaker 1>able to, whenever they want to, to declare something to

0:23:09.270 --> 0:23:12.090
<v Speaker 1>be harmful that doesn't have to pass any other test.

0:23:12.109 --> 0:23:15.490
<v Speaker 1>It's just something the minister themselves comes up with. But

0:23:15.530 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about Albo getting a Global Citizen Award?

0:23:18.460 --> 0:23:21.220
<v Speaker 1>How do you reckon that goes down in the... real

0:23:21.260 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>streets and suburbs of Australia where you can't pay your bills.

0:23:24.609 --> 0:23:27.050
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, correct. If they want to give it to him, well,

0:23:27.070 --> 0:23:29.790
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the team lining up must be that

0:23:29.830 --> 0:23:33.210
<v Speaker 4>bloody hopeless because people know how they feel about Albanese.

0:23:33.550 --> 0:23:35.510
<v Speaker 4>He's the worst Prime Minister we have ever had in

0:23:35.530 --> 0:23:38.690
<v Speaker 4>this country, wherein, you know, we really are in a

0:23:38.730 --> 0:23:41.540
<v Speaker 4>recession and it's only government spending that's keeping our heads

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.620
<v Speaker 4>above water. And, Paul, I just hope that we get

0:23:45.700 --> 0:23:49.699
<v Speaker 4>some control in that parliament, whether it's balanced power or

0:23:49.740 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 4>opposition or even government. I'm telling people, I'm going to

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.500
<v Speaker 4>go for it. I'm going for it. We have to

0:23:54.540 --> 0:23:57.350
<v Speaker 4>have a huge change in this country. They all say, oh, well,

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.270
<v Speaker 4>we're going to run it in the country. They say, well,

0:23:59.609 --> 0:24:01.470
<v Speaker 4>we intend to get rid of people's superannuation.

0:24:01.950 --> 0:24:02.710
<v Speaker 1>That's a lie.

0:24:02.930 --> 0:24:06.189
<v Speaker 4>Another lie from Fire the Liar, and that's exactly what

0:24:06.230 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 4>they're doing. So we're not going to do that, but

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 4>I want to give, you know, prosperity back to the country.

0:24:12.859 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 4>I want to get industries, manufacturing, I want to get

0:24:15.020 --> 0:24:17.619
<v Speaker 4>people interested, get off to the backsides and go and

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.899
<v Speaker 4>start businesses to create jobs in this country. And I

0:24:20.940 --> 0:24:23.340
<v Speaker 4>want to, you know, get people into our own housing.

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:25.810
<v Speaker 4>So much that we want to do. But we have

0:24:25.850 --> 0:24:28.709
<v Speaker 4>to start and show the people. We've told people to

0:24:28.790 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 4>rein in their spending... and they can't pay for the groceries,

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm shocked at how much it costs, even myself, one person,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 4>let alone a family, and trying to keep a roof

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 4>above their heads. We have to prove to people government

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.830
<v Speaker 4>will be reining their spending in. We are going to

0:24:45.010 --> 0:24:48.030
<v Speaker 4>cut and slash and burn any wastage that's going on.

0:24:48.150 --> 0:24:50.310
<v Speaker 4>We have to prove to you we can do it

0:24:50.369 --> 0:24:52.129
<v Speaker 4>first before we expect it of the people.

0:24:52.310 --> 0:24:54.970
<v Speaker 1>But also, I mean, I literally just spent 10 minutes

0:24:55.310 --> 0:24:58.470
<v Speaker 1>going through this, right, which was showing everyone... about debt,

0:24:58.619 --> 0:25:02.100
<v Speaker 1>the explosion towards the T for trillion. The Treasurer today

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.780
<v Speaker 1>is saying, well, global interest rates mean, well, their repayments

0:25:05.980 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>grow as well. And Australia now spends more money on

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just servicing the debt than we do the PBS. I mean,

0:25:13.020 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this is... That's right. So the medicine that is needed

0:25:16.100 --> 0:25:20.780
<v Speaker 1>here is really obviously quite significant, but the politics that's

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>been in place since Occy tried to do something, what,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:28.050
<v Speaker 1>12 years ago... has been if you suggest the redeployment

0:25:28.090 --> 0:25:30.629
<v Speaker 1>of anything other than a dollar that the government has spent,

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.780
<v Speaker 1>they'll turn around and say, cut, cut, cut, cut, cut, cut, cut. See,

0:25:33.820 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Hanson wants to cut, cut, cut everything, and Pauline

0:25:36.260 --> 0:25:38.780
<v Speaker 1>Hanson wants to throw, you know, poor people out of windows.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You know all the game that's coming.

0:25:40.380 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do.

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 4>It means.

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.020
<v Speaker 1>So how do we have a conversation about speeding?

0:25:44.260 --> 0:25:47.770
<v Speaker 4>And, of course, they voted against, you know, pay rises

0:25:47.810 --> 0:25:50.330
<v Speaker 4>and all the rest of it, and the tax cuts. Well,

0:25:50.350 --> 0:25:53.150
<v Speaker 4>your tax cuts, I'll tell you now, $ 5 a week.

0:25:53.330 --> 0:25:54.230
<v Speaker 4>That's really been.

0:25:54.270 --> 0:25:55.410
<v Speaker 1>And they're already gone.

0:25:55.490 --> 0:25:58.130
<v Speaker 4>But they used that as a scheme to say, we

0:25:58.510 --> 0:26:01.490
<v Speaker 4>didn't support tax cuts. Well, we did support that tax cut.

0:26:01.570 --> 0:26:04.970
<v Speaker 4>One Nation did. But this is how cunning and how...

0:26:06.609 --> 0:26:08.909
<v Speaker 4>You know, they would do anything to say to the

0:26:08.950 --> 0:26:12.070
<v Speaker 4>people how we want to destroy it. So I've got

0:26:12.090 --> 0:26:14.370
<v Speaker 4>a different way. I've been a businesswoman most of my life.

0:26:15.020 --> 0:26:17.139
<v Speaker 4>And I think in government what people have to understand

0:26:17.340 --> 0:26:19.340
<v Speaker 4>is that you run it like a business, all right?

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 4>If you can't afford it, you don't have it. You

0:26:21.380 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 4>have to save up for it, same as governments. And

0:26:24.100 --> 0:26:28.250
<v Speaker 4>nothing changes, you know. The bureaucrats are still there, but

0:26:28.609 --> 0:26:31.690
<v Speaker 4>we change the legislation. We say, right now, mate, this

0:26:31.770 --> 0:26:33.909
<v Speaker 4>is the law, this is what you do, go and

0:26:33.970 --> 0:26:36.130
<v Speaker 4>implement it. And if you can't implement it, then move

0:26:36.170 --> 0:26:38.010
<v Speaker 4>aside and let someone in who will be able to

0:26:38.050 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 4>do it.

0:26:38.590 --> 0:26:42.130
<v Speaker 1>So what would be an example of government spending... That's

0:26:42.350 --> 0:26:45.430
<v Speaker 1>not about the frontline services. It's not about all of that.

0:26:45.470 --> 0:26:48.740
<v Speaker 1>What's an obvious area to just see later?

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Get rid of the climate change department. That's about $ 30

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.300
<v Speaker 4>billion a year. The Aboriginal industry will be gone. I'll

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 4>have a royal commission into that and also the climate

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.540
<v Speaker 4>change department. I think there's a lot of scamming that's

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.300
<v Speaker 4>been going on. The subsidies that have been paying out

0:27:02.340 --> 0:27:06.370
<v Speaker 4>to these multinational companies, both of them did it. Even

0:27:06.410 --> 0:27:09.770
<v Speaker 4>the coalition government did it. They were building these transmission lines.

0:27:10.150 --> 0:27:13.050
<v Speaker 4>And these companies at that time, when you're only getting 1%, 2%

0:27:13.050 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 4>of the bank on interest, they were paying up to 8%

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.060
<v Speaker 4>interest on these companies, encouraging them to go and build

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.100
<v Speaker 4>these transmission lines. So that went nowhere. That needs to

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 4>be an investigation. NDIS, I'll be going after the scammers

0:27:26.980 --> 0:27:28.660
<v Speaker 4>for the waste of money. You won't be getting paid

0:27:28.660 --> 0:27:32.540
<v Speaker 4>$ 195 an hour. You'll be realistic to $ 80 to $ 120

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.260
<v Speaker 4>an hour that the general public pays for that service.

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 4>So get rid of the scammers. And so all the arts, ABC, gone. SBS, gone.

0:27:42.980 --> 0:27:46.030
<v Speaker 4>We'll just keep those in rural and regional areas. That's important.

0:27:46.869 --> 0:27:50.130
<v Speaker 4>All these handouts. And another one that I learnt yesterday

0:27:50.190 --> 0:27:53.260
<v Speaker 4>from in the bush, You've got all these religious organisations.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Listen to this, right? Because you're a registered religious organisation,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 4>you go and set up your own businesses, you compete

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.020
<v Speaker 4>against them and you don't pay tax because you're a

0:28:04.060 --> 0:28:07.740
<v Speaker 4>religious organisation. So guess what, Paul? I've started the process.

0:28:07.820 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm coming after you. That's going to be gone.

0:28:10.180 --> 0:28:12.980
<v Speaker 1>As it should be. I mean, this is the thing.

0:28:13.300 --> 0:28:17.389
<v Speaker 1>People just have this sense of... deep frustration that the

0:28:17.430 --> 0:28:20.110
<v Speaker 1>way that we've gone for too long, enough, right, enough,

0:28:20.270 --> 0:28:24.230
<v Speaker 1>so that we need a big change. Now, today the

0:28:24.270 --> 0:28:26.710
<v Speaker 1>obsession was whether there has or hasn't been a conversation

0:28:26.750 --> 0:28:29.149
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes about what may or may not happen,

0:28:29.210 --> 0:28:32.939
<v Speaker 1>depending on whether One Nation or the Libs end up

0:28:32.980 --> 0:28:35.890
<v Speaker 1>being close to government. Can you tell us, has there

0:28:35.910 --> 0:28:38.190
<v Speaker 1>been a conversation? Has there been an eye to eye

0:28:38.210 --> 0:28:40.590
<v Speaker 1>between yourself and Angus Taylor? Is there a map that's

0:28:40.630 --> 0:28:42.670
<v Speaker 1>a little bit orange and a little bit blue? Because

0:28:42.710 --> 0:28:44.470
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say, there's a version of this that's

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.460
<v Speaker 1>around every week, but what's actually happened?

0:28:46.780 --> 0:28:48.860
<v Speaker 4>I haven't spoken to Angus Taylor. I spoke to him

0:28:48.900 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 4>on the phone about a month ago for about two minutes.

0:28:51.820 --> 0:28:53.340
<v Speaker 4>Apart from that, I haven't spoken to him since 2019

0:28:53.340 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 4>when he was the environmental minister and created a lot

0:28:57.700 --> 0:28:59.500
<v Speaker 4>of the rubbish that we're in now.

0:28:59.320 --> 0:28:59.780
<v Speaker 3>At the moment.

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.610
<v Speaker 4>But I think we're on the same playing field that

0:29:03.770 --> 0:29:06.690
<v Speaker 4>we've You know, we agree we've got to get rid

0:29:06.710 --> 0:29:09.500
<v Speaker 4>of the Labor, Greens toxic government that we have at

0:29:09.540 --> 0:29:12.300
<v Speaker 4>the moment. And I honestly do believe they will work

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 4>with us. Get rid of those ones in there, the moderates,

0:29:16.780 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 4>that have this elitist attitude in the Liberal Party and

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 4>they've got to wake up to themselves because they're not

0:29:22.860 --> 0:29:24.700
<v Speaker 4>going to get there without One Nation. We're not going

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 4>to get there without them. So we've got to work

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 4>together for the people. That's what I'm about, Paul.

0:29:29.540 --> 0:29:32.570
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, obviously, though, if we're talking about There's

0:29:32.570 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>150 seats.

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:33.330
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:29:33.330 --> 0:29:35.930
<v Speaker 1>You've said before you're going to want to run in

0:29:35.930 --> 0:29:36.890
<v Speaker 1>150 places, right?

0:29:36.890 --> 0:29:37.230
<v Speaker 4>We are.

0:29:37.230 --> 0:29:40.300
<v Speaker 1>We are. Which means there might be a particularly conservative

0:29:40.340 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>member of the Liberal Party or a conservative member of

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.540
<v Speaker 1>the National Party that if they lose to One Nation,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.020
<v Speaker 1>they're out, and it might be a far more left-wing

0:29:48.380 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of MPs that stick around for the Liberal Party,

0:29:50.740 --> 0:29:52.900
<v Speaker 1>or vice versa, where all the moderates get flushed and

0:29:53.180 --> 0:29:55.810
<v Speaker 1>the more conservative ones turn up. So when you talk

0:29:55.850 --> 0:29:59.430
<v Speaker 1>about working together, it's... Obvious and logical, the preferences.

0:29:59.670 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 4>preferencing each other prior to the agreements that definitely last,

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.570
<v Speaker 4>then Labor, and then you look at the preferences. I've

0:30:07.590 --> 0:30:11.020
<v Speaker 4>commissioned for another... cartoon to be put out we're going

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.340
<v Speaker 4>to put it out and this is about preferences this

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.180
<v Speaker 4>will explain to you the voters out there especially Victoria

0:30:17.540 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 4>so we're putting that out very soon because your voting

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.590
<v Speaker 4>system is slightly different in Victoria with full preferential voting

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.430
<v Speaker 4>New South Wales it's not so we're going to have

0:30:27.910 --> 0:30:30.450
<v Speaker 4>one for New South Wales state election and I think

0:30:30.510 --> 0:30:33.630
<v Speaker 4>that's it the matter people don't understand the preference system

0:30:33.870 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 4>I want to empower you to understand how to use

0:30:37.700 --> 0:30:40.709
<v Speaker 4>your vote wisely. You control your vote. Don't dare come

0:30:40.750 --> 0:30:42.390
<v Speaker 4>up and say to me, where are my votes going?

0:30:42.650 --> 0:30:46.460
<v Speaker 4>You mark the paper. Understand how the preference system works.

0:30:46.700 --> 0:30:49.140
<v Speaker 1>And for those that are half listening... She's been saying

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.060
<v Speaker 1>this the whole time.

0:30:50.140 --> 0:30:50.460
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:30:50.620 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>The whole time, which is, look, yes, there's a how

0:30:52.300 --> 0:30:54.830
<v Speaker 1>to vote that will be produced, the preferences, Greens at

0:30:54.870 --> 0:30:56.810
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, Labor above that, but it's up to you.

0:30:56.870 --> 0:30:58.130
<v Speaker 1>If you want to move it around, you do what

0:30:58.150 --> 0:30:58.810
<v Speaker 1>you want, right?

0:30:58.830 --> 0:30:59.010
<v Speaker 7>Correct.

0:30:59.090 --> 0:31:01.370
<v Speaker 1>So this idea... So I've got to say, but that's

0:31:01.430 --> 0:31:06.270
<v Speaker 1>the Canberra bubble games. By the way, congratulations, you're in

0:31:06.310 --> 0:31:08.730
<v Speaker 1>the top four of the most powerful people in the country,

0:31:08.750 --> 0:31:10.410
<v Speaker 1>according to Financial Review.

0:31:10.530 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Right, and I run my own household too.

0:31:12.290 --> 0:31:13.830
<v Speaker 1>I'm very powerful. You're going to hang that up in

0:31:13.850 --> 0:31:17.570
<v Speaker 1>the office or the dunny? Where does that go? Yeah, yeah.

0:31:18.150 --> 0:31:23.140
<v Speaker 4>Look, Paul, it's not about... If you're a person of influence,

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.820
<v Speaker 4>it depends on how you use that, you know, the

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:29.060
<v Speaker 4>influence that you have. And I get so much satisfaction

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.570
<v Speaker 4>out of there that I've saved people from being deported

0:31:31.620 --> 0:31:34.870
<v Speaker 4>out of this country. I've got a vaccine, not a vaccine,

0:31:34.930 --> 0:31:38.290
<v Speaker 4>but a medication for children that were dying for spinal

0:31:38.590 --> 0:31:42.010
<v Speaker 4>muscular atrophy. I've got that introduced. I have dozens of

0:31:42.170 --> 0:31:47.060
<v Speaker 4>children's lives saved. That's where my power is, in the

0:31:47.100 --> 0:31:49.180
<v Speaker 4>position that I hold, and that means more to me

0:31:49.220 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 4>than some list that people say, how influential you are.

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 4>So I have so much... I'm so grateful to hold

0:31:56.700 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 4>the position that I have, and if my name... Get

0:31:59.980 --> 0:32:02.750
<v Speaker 4>doors open, things done. I tell my staff, just tell

0:32:02.770 --> 0:32:03.930
<v Speaker 4>them you work for my office.

0:32:03.950 --> 0:32:05.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, excellent.

0:32:05.210 --> 0:32:07.830
<v Speaker 4>I get on the phone myself. I want action. I

0:32:07.870 --> 0:32:08.969
<v Speaker 4>want action for this country.

0:32:09.090 --> 0:32:09.830
<v Speaker 1>That's what people want.

0:32:09.890 --> 0:32:10.350
<v Speaker 4>I'm a doer.

0:32:10.660 --> 0:32:12.550
<v Speaker 1>Senator, so good to see you again. Thank you. See

0:32:12.570 --> 0:32:16.070
<v Speaker 1>you later. Pauline Hanson, all right. Plenty of more questions

0:32:16.110 --> 0:32:18.209
<v Speaker 1>with her between now and the next election, but, geez,

0:32:18.230 --> 0:32:20.660
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be fun, isn't it? That's rock and roll.

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I love it. All right, quick break. Back with more here.

0:32:23.100 --> 0:32:25.700
<v Speaker 1>Lots to discuss, lots to debate this evening here, including

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.570
<v Speaker 1>a bit of reaction to the conversation we've just had here.

0:32:27.610 --> 0:32:34.390
<v Speaker 1>Don't go anywhere. Thank you so much for watching. I

0:32:34.410 --> 0:32:35.790
<v Speaker 1>tell you what, the Man Cave's the place to be,

0:32:35.810 --> 0:32:38.170
<v Speaker 1>the hottest ticket in town. We, of course, have none

0:32:38.190 --> 0:32:40.210
<v Speaker 1>other than the wonderful Linda Scott, who agreed with everything

0:32:40.550 --> 0:32:41.410
<v Speaker 1>that Pauline just said.

0:32:41.430 --> 0:32:41.870
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:32:41.950 --> 0:32:43.630
<v Speaker 1>She had the same seat. You got the red shirt.

0:32:43.670 --> 0:32:45.930
<v Speaker 1>I get it. You're on team now, all right? Sean Bill,

0:32:45.950 --> 0:32:48.290
<v Speaker 1>of course, is the One Nation Senator in New South Wales.

0:32:48.350 --> 0:32:50.070
<v Speaker 1>Nice to check in with the boss, no doubt, in

0:32:50.110 --> 0:32:52.690
<v Speaker 1>between here. So let's talk about the Libs, though, because

0:32:52.930 --> 0:32:56.010
<v Speaker 1>they put the beginnings of an energy plan on the table.

0:32:56.350 --> 0:33:00.100
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say, it's nothing different to me than

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.070
<v Speaker 1>where I already knew them to be, which was If

0:33:02.110 --> 0:33:05.070
<v Speaker 1>we can, let's get to nuclear. If we can, let's

0:33:05.090 --> 0:33:07.930
<v Speaker 1>keep coal going. Let's get as much gas to back

0:33:08.010 --> 0:33:10.530
<v Speaker 1>in everything else as possible. But the big thing that

0:33:10.550 --> 0:33:12.870
<v Speaker 1>was interesting to see was they're going to get rid

0:33:13.010 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of the climate targets from legislation. Now, that would require

0:33:18.180 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a majority in both upper and lower, all right? We'll

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.420
<v Speaker 1>all see what happens in the next election. But this

0:33:22.460 --> 0:33:24.620
<v Speaker 1>was part of the trick that Albo put in place,

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.420
<v Speaker 1>which was that it's sort of a landmine there if

0:33:27.460 --> 0:33:31.060
<v Speaker 1>there ever was a change in government. Sean... Do you

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think that that is enough for people to go, I

0:33:34.060 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>prefer the Liberal version of it than the One Nation

0:33:36.260 --> 0:33:36.780
<v Speaker 1>version of it?

0:33:38.550 --> 0:33:40.850
<v Speaker 5>I like when anyone comes out and says that they

0:33:40.870 --> 0:33:43.450
<v Speaker 5>want to do more to scrap net zero. And, look,

0:33:43.490 --> 0:33:45.930
<v Speaker 5>to see the Liberals coming further and closer to that,

0:33:46.110 --> 0:33:47.270
<v Speaker 5>I think it's great because at the end of the

0:33:47.310 --> 0:33:49.470
<v Speaker 5>day you need to get everyone on the same page

0:33:49.950 --> 0:33:54.430
<v Speaker 5>to make that change. But call me sceptical, but I

0:33:54.490 --> 0:33:56.950
<v Speaker 5>did not see anywhere in there a promise to exit

0:33:56.970 --> 0:33:57.570
<v Speaker 5>the Paris Agreement.

0:33:57.830 --> 0:34:01.180
<v Speaker 1>This is the big difference between the two. It's... And

0:34:01.220 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that matters.

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.580
<v Speaker 5>I think that really matters because if you cannot commit

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.030
<v Speaker 5>to leaving the Paris Agreement, you've sort of got one

0:34:07.050 --> 0:34:08.529
<v Speaker 5>foot on one side of the fence, one foot on

0:34:08.550 --> 0:34:09.890
<v Speaker 5>the other. Just come out and say, we will leave

0:34:09.910 --> 0:34:12.230
<v Speaker 5>the Paris Agreement, we fully commit to scrapping net zero,

0:34:12.630 --> 0:34:15.130
<v Speaker 5>we'll get rid of those legislative targets. That's what One

0:34:15.170 --> 0:34:17.270
<v Speaker 5>Nation is pledging and I think that's where we need

0:34:17.290 --> 0:34:18.250
<v Speaker 5>to get the whole country.

0:34:18.390 --> 0:34:20.340
<v Speaker 1>So, Linda, I talk to plenty of people behind the

0:34:20.380 --> 0:34:22.140
<v Speaker 1>scenes who say when it comes to people under the

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:26.060
<v Speaker 1>age of 50 that the worldview of One Nation and

0:34:26.300 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the Coalition on these areas in and around climate change

0:34:29.380 --> 0:34:30.980
<v Speaker 1>It means you don't have to do anything, but you'll

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:31.580
<v Speaker 1>win an election.

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 10>Well, look, whoever wins the election, I think, is up

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.020
<v Speaker 10>to the people and the polls at the moment. As

0:34:37.060 --> 0:34:39.259
<v Speaker 10>you've already said, Paul, show that, you know, there's a

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 10>pretty even split between, you know, One Nation and the

0:34:43.890 --> 0:34:46.509
<v Speaker 10>Liberal Nationals and Labor. So I think we've all got

0:34:46.530 --> 0:34:48.850
<v Speaker 10>to take this really seriously and look at people's policy.

0:34:49.770 --> 0:34:52.430
<v Speaker 10>I think the Liberals' policy that is effectively the same

0:34:52.469 --> 0:34:54.350
<v Speaker 10>policy they took to the election is a bit of

0:34:54.390 --> 0:34:57.930
<v Speaker 10>a rehash. It's a dangerous policy. It's already been rejected.

0:34:58.980 --> 0:35:01.460
<v Speaker 10>And so, you know, they're persisting with this argument.

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Paul, but it's already been rejected.

0:35:03.660 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Great, do it again, boys.

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:06.460
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's already been rejected.

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 10>By the Australian people in sort of record terms, but,

0:35:09.060 --> 0:35:10.580
<v Speaker 10>you know, what they do is a matter for them.

0:35:10.620 --> 0:35:11.050
<v Speaker 4>And I will say.

0:35:11.060 --> 0:35:13.190
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't it be rejected, though? This is my thing, Senator,

0:35:13.230 --> 0:35:16.370
<v Speaker 1>which is why... And again, we've talked to Matt Canavan,

0:35:16.730 --> 0:35:18.470
<v Speaker 1>lots of people saying, look, as soon as it becomes

0:35:18.510 --> 0:35:21.569
<v Speaker 1>about a price issue, people understand and we've seen how

0:35:21.610 --> 0:35:25.390
<v Speaker 1>that has been clear in the past. But obviously, we're now...

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.660
<v Speaker 1>further down a road of a whole bunch of technologies

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.310
<v Speaker 1>being built or supported. I'm just talking about it from

0:35:31.350 --> 0:35:35.890
<v Speaker 1>a raw politics perspective, right? It's still 55-45. Those that

0:35:35.910 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>are on the 55 and sort of the centre-left are saying, well, look,

0:35:38.380 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>climate change is the line in the sand where one

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.549
<v Speaker 1>nation and the Libs can't grow any further. The economy

0:35:43.810 --> 0:35:47.690
<v Speaker 1>is the reason Labor is being held back. So how

0:35:47.710 --> 0:35:51.070
<v Speaker 1>do you get around that presumption that there is a

0:35:51.090 --> 0:35:52.830
<v Speaker 1>block of people who, even if it was to keep

0:35:52.870 --> 0:35:55.250
<v Speaker 1>the same government that's created all the garbage that they have,

0:35:55.590 --> 0:35:57.340
<v Speaker 1>as long as they're the right ones on climate change,

0:35:57.380 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's fine?

0:35:58.010 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so what's happened is Labor's lies have caught up

0:36:00.140 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 5>to them because they weren't just promising action on climate change,

0:36:02.780 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 5>they were promising cheaper electricity bills. And they persisted with

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.460
<v Speaker 5>the lie that intermittent power, these swindle factories that they've

0:36:09.500 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 5>rolled out across the entire country... with the cheapest form

0:36:11.700 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 5>of power. And it's just not true. And they've been exposed.

0:36:14.510 --> 0:36:16.989
<v Speaker 5>They've been caught out. So we've called them out. And

0:36:17.010 --> 0:36:19.250
<v Speaker 5>I think One Nation has been consistent on that. We've

0:36:19.270 --> 0:36:21.370
<v Speaker 5>been relentless on that. We've been holding them to account

0:36:21.410 --> 0:36:23.029
<v Speaker 5>on that. And again, that's what's starting to cut through

0:36:23.050 --> 0:36:26.270
<v Speaker 5>because the cheaper bills haven't arrived. And if you want

0:36:26.310 --> 0:36:28.270
<v Speaker 5>to get cheaper bills, you're just going to have to change.

0:36:28.510 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 10>That's just a massive confusion of how pricing and economics

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.430
<v Speaker 10>works generally. And I'm sure you're smart enough to know that.

0:36:34.550 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 10>I mean, obviously CSIRO authority after authority says that the

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 10>most expensive forms of energy are nuclear power and coal-fired power.

0:36:44.250 --> 0:36:46.550
<v Speaker 10>and that renewable wind firepower are cheaper.

0:36:47.390 --> 0:36:50.950
<v Speaker 3>So... Wind power is... You know that prices.

0:36:50.969 --> 0:36:51.290
<v Speaker 1>To say.

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.340
<v Speaker 10>You know that prices go up for a range of reasons.

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.859
<v Speaker 5>But you also know... Labor is running away from wind power.

0:36:57.880 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Can we just point that out? Labor is running away

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 5>from it.

0:37:00.420 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 10>There are no new projects in Australia currently. So, I mean, again,

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:07.129
<v Speaker 10>it sort of calls into question... why the Coalition would

0:37:07.210 --> 0:37:09.590
<v Speaker 10>rehash an old policy that addresses that anyway.

0:37:09.630 --> 0:37:10.330
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about.

0:37:10.570 --> 0:37:14.990
<v Speaker 10>But... No, no, I mean, they're proposing to ban wind energy,

0:37:15.090 --> 0:37:17.709
<v Speaker 10>but there's no projects currently in the pipeline for that.

0:37:18.210 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 10>But expert after expert, research after research, not just here

0:37:22.140 --> 0:37:24.739
<v Speaker 10>in Australia but around the world, shows that these forms

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 10>of energy are the cheapest forms of energy.

0:37:26.580 --> 0:37:29.379
<v Speaker 5>Back when we had coal-fired power, we had a glass industry.

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>We can't go backwards, though, right? We had.

0:37:31.870 --> 0:37:35.049
<v Speaker 10>Prices don't go backwards. That's just not economics. And I

0:37:35.070 --> 0:37:36.650
<v Speaker 10>know you're smart enough to understand that.

0:37:36.670 --> 0:37:38.590
<v Speaker 5>They've wiped out the jobs, they've wiped out the industry

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 5>because you can't run a country on intermittent swindle factories.

0:37:42.340 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But also, my issue has been ever since we started

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, let alone when it became politically... up

0:37:48.420 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or down as an issue to discuss, right, which was

0:37:51.420 --> 0:37:55.860
<v Speaker 1>the cost of transition was the building of stuff, right?

0:37:56.219 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>And that number is a trillion dollars, right? Oh, it

0:37:59.260 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit closer to what's half a

0:38:00.540 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. Well, then the nuclear side of things, okay, well,

0:38:02.980 --> 0:38:07.910
<v Speaker 1>we found this, you know, left-wing estimate that it's $ 600 billion.

0:38:07.950 --> 0:38:12.709
<v Speaker 1>The point is any choice about energy requires an awful

0:38:12.730 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of money to either establish it or... to keep

0:38:16.820 --> 0:38:19.860
<v Speaker 1>it going. That's what sends me crazy is the talking

0:38:19.930 --> 0:38:22.550
<v Speaker 1>point about, well, let's just cut out the middle 20 years,

0:38:22.890 --> 0:38:26.990
<v Speaker 1>because the middle 20 years is really difficult for people.

0:38:27.370 --> 0:38:29.990
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we could have a different politics

0:38:30.050 --> 0:38:33.170
<v Speaker 1>around this. But again, past couple of elections have gone

0:38:33.190 --> 0:38:35.009
<v Speaker 1>the way that they have. The government may think that

0:38:35.050 --> 0:38:37.150
<v Speaker 1>they've just been handed some sort of way of get

0:38:37.210 --> 0:38:39.450
<v Speaker 1>out of jail free card. I know certainly plenty of

0:38:39.489 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>people who Talk to me in the regions. They would

0:38:41.700 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>suggest it to be quite the other, quite the opposite,

0:38:44.180 --> 0:38:45.850
<v Speaker 1>and obviously lots of people who send me emails. So

0:38:45.870 --> 0:38:47.390
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of other quick things, because we could

0:38:47.410 --> 0:38:52.470
<v Speaker 1>go all night. We will go all year on this topic, okay? GetUp,

0:38:53.530 --> 0:38:57.410
<v Speaker 1>very successful at some elections, terrible at others, virtually missing

0:38:57.710 --> 0:39:00.250
<v Speaker 1>in some, right? They're back in another form. We've seen

0:39:00.270 --> 0:39:03.859
<v Speaker 1>them for a while, specific focus coming in on One Nation. Jeez,

0:39:03.890 --> 0:39:05.620
<v Speaker 1>they were helpful in Farah, weren't they?

0:39:06.180 --> 0:39:09.739
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for the free advertising. I mean, I feel

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 5>sorry for GetUp and the way... And, look, I feel

0:39:13.420 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 5>sorry for the Labor Party and the Greens because every

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 5>cent that GetUp takes away from a blue-haired barista is

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.629
<v Speaker 5>another dollar that Labor and the Greens can't effectively use.

0:39:21.710 --> 0:39:24.390
<v Speaker 5>And GetUp's track record, we've seen. They went after us

0:39:24.450 --> 0:39:27.529
<v Speaker 5>in Farah. They looked at us in Secret Harbour. They

0:39:27.590 --> 0:39:29.290
<v Speaker 5>tried to get Pauline at the National Press Club.

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't work.

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 5>So good luck to them. They have every right to

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 5>do it.

0:39:33.100 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Good luck to them. It's not going to work. Thank

0:39:34.500 --> 0:39:37.049
<v Speaker 1>you for the free advertising, GetUp. Last week, Linda, we

0:39:37.070 --> 0:39:40.870
<v Speaker 1>talked about meta glasses and there has been quite a

0:39:40.890 --> 0:39:42.870
<v Speaker 1>move since. There's been a lot of conversation about none

0:39:42.890 --> 0:39:48.790
<v Speaker 1>of this in and around national security issues. Business, infrastructure,

0:39:48.850 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of local councils are coming out against it. So

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of going to be like smoking where

0:39:53.940 --> 0:39:55.740
<v Speaker 1>it's legal but you can't do it anywhere?

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:57.779
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean, again, I think, you know, the inner west,

0:39:57.820 --> 0:40:01.089
<v Speaker 10>Mayor Darcy Byrne has banned this week metaglasses from their

0:40:01.140 --> 0:40:03.529
<v Speaker 10>pools and their change rooms. I just don't know a

0:40:03.630 --> 0:40:07.310
<v Speaker 10>person who could disagree with that. These are practical safety

0:40:07.350 --> 0:40:09.810
<v Speaker 10>measures that local governments are having to take to protect

0:40:09.850 --> 0:40:13.730
<v Speaker 10>their communities. Again, you know, I think they are a

0:40:13.870 --> 0:40:17.489
<v Speaker 10>worrying trend forward in the kind of privacy war that

0:40:17.590 --> 0:40:21.170
<v Speaker 10>people are pushing onto people. I know you've got a pair.

0:40:21.710 --> 0:40:24.270
<v Speaker 4>Friends of mine have pairs. I understand they're, you know.

0:40:24.310 --> 0:40:25.069
<v Speaker 1>It makes you sound so creepy.

0:40:25.250 --> 0:40:27.589
<v Speaker 10>No, no, but, I mean, I understand people use them

0:40:27.790 --> 0:40:30.210
<v Speaker 10>and they love them. But I do think, as I

0:40:30.250 --> 0:40:32.860
<v Speaker 10>said last week, Paulie, you've got to have limitations on

0:40:32.910 --> 0:40:35.500
<v Speaker 10>where you can use these things to protect people's privacy.

0:40:35.540 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 10>And as a parent, I am honest about this, I

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:38.940
<v Speaker 10>do worry about it.

0:40:39.060 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, my thing is, is that, again... I understand. I

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.069
<v Speaker 1>completely get all of the restrictions in and around all

0:40:44.090 --> 0:40:45.509
<v Speaker 1>of this. I would like to see the same when

0:40:45.550 --> 0:40:49.230
<v Speaker 1>it comes to some of the smart cars that are around,

0:40:49.310 --> 0:40:53.009
<v Speaker 1>the ability for them to be turned again into surveillance,

0:40:53.050 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it, right? Like it's an absolute

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>kick from right in front that I will never disagree

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.580
<v Speaker 1>with about some of the places this stuff's being banned from.

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I just hope that the commitment to privacy extends in

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of other areas too. We could go all night, gang,

0:41:05.140 --> 0:41:07.580
<v Speaker 1>but I've got Megyn Kelly in a moment or two's time.

0:41:07.620 --> 0:41:09.690
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Hanson at the top. What a bookend. I like

0:41:09.710 --> 0:41:11.390
<v Speaker 1>this one. Thank you, guys. All right, quick break. Back

0:41:11.410 --> 0:41:14.290
<v Speaker 1>with more Megyn Kelly next to talk about, among other things,

0:41:14.710 --> 0:41:18.460
<v Speaker 1>CNN getting new owners who don't hate Donald Trump. I know!

0:41:23.180 --> 0:41:24.420
<v Speaker 1>It's that time of the week to talk to our

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.790
<v Speaker 1>favourite person in the world, the one, the only, the

0:41:26.850 --> 0:41:28.549
<v Speaker 1>wonderful Megyn Kelly. Lovely to see you, mate.

0:41:29.330 --> 0:41:29.930
<v Speaker 3>You as well.

0:41:30.650 --> 0:41:33.350
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm loving watching, as my friend Rita Panahy would say,

0:41:33.469 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>lefties losing it over CNN getting a new owner who,

0:41:36.700 --> 0:41:41.339
<v Speaker 1>God forbid, is pro-Trump. The Trump derangement TV era is

0:41:41.420 --> 0:41:43.739
<v Speaker 1>coming to an end, at least for them.

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 12>I mean, it's truly moving the deck chairs around on

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.950
<v Speaker 12>the Titanic. Like, what are we, what are we getting

0:41:49.989 --> 0:41:52.950
<v Speaker 12>upset over people? There's no place to go but up.

0:41:53.370 --> 0:41:56.410
<v Speaker 12>So like maybe the new guy will have some ideas

0:41:56.630 --> 0:41:59.430
<v Speaker 12>that you can implement to get a couple of viewers back.

0:41:59.930 --> 0:42:02.049
<v Speaker 3>But to be honest, do I really believe that's going

0:42:02.070 --> 0:42:06.310
<v Speaker 3>to happen? No, I don't. I don't believe that. Those

0:42:06.330 --> 0:42:07.180
<v Speaker 3>are All of.

0:42:07.180 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 12>Those are outdated models that are already failing. And the

0:42:10.860 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 12>answer is not to bring in new ownership now. All

0:42:13.340 --> 0:42:16.989
<v Speaker 12>the viewers are gone. They left cable news. They're not

0:42:17.010 --> 0:42:19.830
<v Speaker 12>even gettable anymore. It's not like, oh, we'll win them

0:42:19.850 --> 0:42:22.930
<v Speaker 12>back over from MSNBC or from Fox.

0:42:23.310 --> 0:42:24.170
<v Speaker 1>No, they're gone.

0:42:24.210 --> 0:42:29.010
<v Speaker 12>And they've realized there's a much easier, better, more seamless

0:42:29.050 --> 0:42:31.710
<v Speaker 12>place to get their news in the digital lane, and

0:42:31.730 --> 0:42:32.630
<v Speaker 12>that's where they're getting it.

0:42:32.690 --> 0:42:36.850
<v Speaker 3>So The wound was self-inflicted. It was inflicted by Jeff Zucker.

0:42:36.950 --> 0:42:40.730
<v Speaker 12>He absolutely ruined CNN because of his personal beef with Trump.

0:42:41.180 --> 0:42:43.859
<v Speaker 3>He got rid of all objectivity.

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 12>And CNN paid a very, very high price for allowing

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 12>him to do that.

0:42:47.660 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 3>It's not correctable.

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:52.219
<v Speaker 12>This is now, I think, the third sort of person

0:42:52.660 --> 0:42:55.700
<v Speaker 12>or ownership change. they brought in to change it. First,

0:42:55.739 --> 0:42:58.060
<v Speaker 12>it wasn't an ownership. It was Chris Licht, who they

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 12>brought in from the Stephen Colbert show to make this

0:43:00.660 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 12>thing more fair and balanced, which you could question the choice,

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:04.940
<v Speaker 12>but I do think he tried.

0:43:05.090 --> 0:43:05.430
<v Speaker 3>He tried.

0:43:05.450 --> 0:43:08.069
<v Speaker 12>He got rid of Don Lemon, got rid of Brian Stelter,

0:43:08.370 --> 0:43:09.810
<v Speaker 12>tried to have a Trump town hall.

0:43:10.710 --> 0:43:12.230
<v Speaker 3>The natives revolted.

0:43:12.250 --> 0:43:14.950
<v Speaker 12>The CNN natives, the ones who had grown up there

0:43:14.969 --> 0:43:17.170
<v Speaker 12>were like, Trump town hall.

0:43:17.510 --> 0:43:19.529
<v Speaker 3>I'm disgusted. We're out.

0:43:19.870 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 12>They threw this huge hissy fit. Chris Licht, He got

0:43:23.010 --> 0:43:25.950
<v Speaker 12>beaten up just for doing like tiny changes, like the

0:43:26.010 --> 0:43:28.790
<v Speaker 12>ones I mentioned about Lemon and Stelter. People freaked out

0:43:28.930 --> 0:43:31.890
<v Speaker 12>that they didn't want it. Then they brought in this

0:43:31.930 --> 0:43:35.830
<v Speaker 12>guy from the New York Times to run CNN. So again,

0:43:36.010 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 12>a liberal, but that guy at least seems kind of fair.

0:43:39.219 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 12>Like he doesn't seem like a complete nut. And they've

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.060
<v Speaker 12>been slightly more fair since that guy took over than

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.020
<v Speaker 12>they were during the Jeff Zucker years. But it's still terrible.

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:53.100
<v Speaker 12>They still obviously lean far left. Their coverage and their

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.879
<v Speaker 12>story selection reflects that. The audience knows it. They've already

0:43:55.900 --> 0:43:59.310
<v Speaker 12>telegraphed with all these same anchors that they hate, hate

0:43:59.950 --> 0:44:01.630
<v Speaker 12>anybody who's in the center or right of center.

0:44:02.110 --> 0:44:04.989
<v Speaker 3>So they're not forgiven. They didn't own it. The same

0:44:05.110 --> 0:44:05.730
<v Speaker 3>anchors there.

0:44:05.770 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 12>Am I suddenly supposed to think like, The Jake Tappers

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.980
<v Speaker 12>of the world are like open-minded to Trump and his agenda.

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.060
<v Speaker 3>Okay. And now it's going to be new owners.

0:44:14.780 --> 0:44:18.210
<v Speaker 12>Who actually are more open-minded to Trump world, but it's

0:44:18.430 --> 0:44:20.850
<v Speaker 12>too late. And by the way, if you're still a

0:44:20.890 --> 0:44:25.569
<v Speaker 12>cable news watcher who wants a cable operation that's more

0:44:25.630 --> 0:44:27.930
<v Speaker 12>fair to Trump, you have it.

0:44:28.469 --> 0:44:32.180
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to leave Fox News. Fox for years.

0:44:31.900 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 12>Now, not only has been fair to Republicans, not always

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 12>to Trump, but more so to these days than the others.

0:44:39.580 --> 0:44:42.900
<v Speaker 12>But Fox understands you got to put some bells and

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:46.020
<v Speaker 12>whistles on this thing. You got to make the screen pop.

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.299
<v Speaker 12>You got to keep things dynamic and they know how

0:44:48.340 --> 0:44:50.910
<v Speaker 12>to do it. They've been doing it for 30 years now.

0:44:51.550 --> 0:44:53.980
<v Speaker 12>And like the others have never gotten it.

0:44:54.310 --> 0:44:57.810
<v Speaker 1>Never. Oh, I agree. Now I need my weekly dose

0:44:57.930 --> 0:45:00.730
<v Speaker 1>of Prince Harry hot takes. Apparently he wants to make

0:45:00.910 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>another documentary about his mom. To be honest, what's left

0:45:04.700 --> 0:45:06.580
<v Speaker 1>to say, but would you watch?

0:45:07.420 --> 0:45:12.260
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, you and I are watching that together. Yes, yes,

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I will watch it. Yes, of course I will.

0:45:15.660 --> 0:45:19.850
<v Speaker 12>But I agree with you. He shouldn't do it. And

0:45:19.870 --> 0:45:21.989
<v Speaker 12>there's definitely something very sad about it. I mean, they

0:45:22.050 --> 0:45:25.910
<v Speaker 12>made a documentary, William and Harry, for her 20th, the

0:45:26.130 --> 0:45:28.750
<v Speaker 12>20th anniversary of her death. So it's a little odd

0:45:28.890 --> 0:45:32.779
<v Speaker 12>and feels somewhat exploitative. And now on the 30th. And

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:35.760
<v Speaker 12>then how about on the 40th? Like, this is getting weird.

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:36.020
<v Speaker 1>Like.

0:45:36.739 --> 0:45:37.140
<v Speaker 3>You did it.

0:45:37.780 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 12>As adults, we wanted to hear what you had to

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:42.569
<v Speaker 12>say about it, and you did that. And now this

0:45:42.610 --> 0:45:48.630
<v Speaker 12>just feels like a desperate ploy to provide something on

0:45:48.670 --> 0:45:51.489
<v Speaker 12>your Netflix first look deal, because we all know that

0:45:51.530 --> 0:45:53.370
<v Speaker 12>the funds are running low. You've been slapped with a

0:45:53.390 --> 0:45:56.130
<v Speaker 12>major judgment in the UK that you cannot afford. You

0:45:56.170 --> 0:45:59.259
<v Speaker 12>now have two palaces, one in the UK, one in

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 12>Malibu or Montecito, and you need cash.

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:07.610
<v Speaker 3>So it just feels very commercial. and lowbrow.

0:46:08.330 --> 0:46:11.210
<v Speaker 12>Now, if somebody wants to make a documentary about Princess

0:46:11.230 --> 0:46:15.540
<v Speaker 12>Diana and it's the future King of England, her son,

0:46:16.780 --> 0:46:19.899
<v Speaker 12>Prince William, I guess I'd feel more comfortable about that

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:23.910
<v Speaker 12>because he obviously has a sense of duty, decorum, and

0:46:23.969 --> 0:46:25.170
<v Speaker 12>doesn't need a dime.

0:46:26.050 --> 0:46:27.450
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think he will.

0:46:28.090 --> 0:46:30.430
<v Speaker 12>And I think the two grifters should stay as far

0:46:30.489 --> 0:46:35.250
<v Speaker 12>away from Princess Diana's legacy as humanly possible, lest they

0:46:35.290 --> 0:46:38.690
<v Speaker 12>screw it up, lest they remind us of the things

0:46:38.850 --> 0:46:42.219
<v Speaker 12>about Diana that maybe weren't all that laudable, like her

0:46:42.300 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 12>brother is doing right now, because his memoir has just

0:46:46.100 --> 0:46:48.500
<v Speaker 12>brought up a lot of bad stories and forced people

0:46:48.540 --> 0:46:51.140
<v Speaker 12>to say, well, what was the full version of that?

0:46:51.180 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 12>And that doesn't always reflect well on Diana. So if

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:58.130
<v Speaker 12>Harry does what's best for Diana... he will keep his

0:46:58.190 --> 0:47:00.410
<v Speaker 12>mouth shut and stare at a picture of her and

0:47:00.930 --> 0:47:03.930
<v Speaker 12>explain to Lilibet and Archie who she really was, as

0:47:03.989 --> 0:47:08.270
<v Speaker 12>opposed to rejiggering the money wheel and exploiting his mother's

0:47:08.330 --> 0:47:09.649
<v Speaker 12>memory yet again.

0:47:11.510 --> 0:47:13.410
<v Speaker 1>Perfect as always, Megan. Lovely to see you. We'll see

0:47:13.430 --> 0:47:16.370
<v Speaker 1>you again next week here on News 24.

0:47:16.370 --> 0:47:17.049
<v Speaker 3>Great to be with you.

0:47:18.260 --> 0:47:21.149
<v Speaker 1>She is the best. Strength of love to everyone who

0:47:21.330 --> 0:47:23.330
<v Speaker 1>knew or was a fan of Angry Anderson. Sadly, we

0:47:23.370 --> 0:47:26.230
<v Speaker 1>lost him today. We'll be talking about it more in

0:47:26.250 --> 0:47:29.210
<v Speaker 1>greater detail tomorrow night, but I wanted to recognise that

0:47:29.270 --> 0:47:31.190
<v Speaker 1>as the big news tonight. More in a sec here

0:47:31.270 --> 0:47:39.259
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Murray Live. What a busy show it's been tonight.

0:47:39.340 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It has been jam-packed. We'll do it again tomorrow. A reminder,

0:47:42.140 --> 0:47:43.940
<v Speaker 1>all of the highlights of this and every other program

0:47:43.980 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at News24 is on our website, news24. com. au. You work hard,

0:47:48.460 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't, but you still have to pay taxes to

0:47:50.460 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 1>pay for them and the people who make bad social

0:47:52.380 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 1>media videos, like this one, who is a Greens candidate

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.740
<v Speaker 1>who's manifesting an election win.

0:47:59.840 --> 0:47:59.900
<v Speaker 2>OK.

0:48:16.700 --> 0:48:20.380
<v Speaker 1>They published that, right? They chose to put that on

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:24.250
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Okay. There's a Victorian Labor MP for the

0:48:24.270 --> 0:48:26.870
<v Speaker 1>seat of Eltham. What's their contribution with just a couple

0:48:26.890 --> 0:48:28.350
<v Speaker 1>of months to go, hopefully, of that government?

0:48:29.890 --> 0:48:34.379
<v Speaker 2>Who would win in a battle between CommEdge and Extrapolis 2?

0:48:34.380 --> 0:48:38.020
<v Speaker 9>Look, the CommEdge 2.0 has the new capacities and a

0:48:38.100 --> 0:48:40.730
<v Speaker 9>bunch of new features compared to the CommEdge. We've got

0:48:40.750 --> 0:48:42.650
<v Speaker 9>to remember there's two different types of comment. So if

0:48:42.670 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 9>there's two types of commenters versus the extra two, it's

0:48:44.900 --> 0:48:45.720
<v Speaker 9>definitely the commenters.

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:46.780
<v Speaker 3>There you go.

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 8>You've heard it straight.

0:48:50.930 --> 0:48:53.090
<v Speaker 1>Election in November. It's up to you, Victoria. It's up

0:48:53.110 --> 0:48:55.089
<v Speaker 1>to you, Australia, as always. We'll see you again tomorrow night.