WEBVTT - Credlin | 15 September

0:00:02.690 --> 0:00:08.390
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:08.890 --> 0:00:11.230
<v Speaker 2>Good evening. Welcome to the program. Here's what's coming up

0:00:11.350 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>tonight on Credlin. 16 potential terror attacks disrupted since Bondi.

0:00:16.860 --> 0:00:21.220
<v Speaker 2>So why has our terror threat level remained unchanged? Former

0:00:21.260 --> 0:00:24.380
<v Speaker 2>Home Affairs boss Mike Pizzulo joins me on the growing

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>threat of terrorism. The battle over biological sex, gender identity

0:00:29.340 --> 0:00:32.300
<v Speaker 2>and women's rights... And the laws that critics say are

0:00:32.420 --> 0:00:35.270
<v Speaker 2>silencing debate. We'll speak to the author of a new

0:00:35.310 --> 0:00:38.220
<v Speaker 2>book which sounds the alarm for Australia at a time

0:00:38.229 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>when the rest of the world is changing course. And

0:00:42.270 --> 0:00:45.710
<v Speaker 2>as anti-Semitism takes hold across the West, one of Britain's

0:00:45.750 --> 0:00:49.510
<v Speaker 2>leading historians has a warning for Australia and a message

0:00:49.530 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>about how we defend free speech while confronting extremism. Lord

0:00:54.880 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Roberts joins me later. And Pauline Hanson today returning

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.180
<v Speaker 2>serve to her critics.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I've always put my foot in my mouth and why

0:01:04.700 --> 0:01:06.300
<v Speaker 3>I come out and say things. I'm not the most

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.020
<v Speaker 3>eloquent speaker in how I deliver something, what I say.

0:01:09.540 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 4>That upsets a lot of Indigenous Australians.

0:01:13.420 --> 0:01:17.070
<v Speaker 3>I don't... Well, then I regret saying that because I

0:01:17.130 --> 0:01:19.150
<v Speaker 3>don't want to upset people.

0:01:21.130 --> 0:01:23.750
<v Speaker 2>But first, last night while I was here on air,

0:01:24.170 --> 0:01:27.630
<v Speaker 2>the Senate voted to establish an inquiry into the Albanese

0:01:27.650 --> 0:01:32.949
<v Speaker 2>government's controversial community grants program... labelled by critics as nothing

0:01:33.050 --> 0:01:36.750
<v Speaker 2>more than a pork barrel fund. Analysis by the Centre

0:01:36.770 --> 0:01:41.490
<v Speaker 2>for Public Integrity has found that 73% of projects approved

0:01:41.750 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>under this taxpayer-funded scheme were in Labor-held seats or key

0:01:45.940 --> 0:01:49.900
<v Speaker 2>marginals that the government was campaigning to win at last

0:01:49.940 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>year's election. An invitation-only scheme, this is where the $ 6

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 2>million grant paid to the Marrickville Golf Club came from.

0:02:00.140 --> 0:02:03.820
<v Speaker 2>a grant that we now know has many close links

0:02:04.300 --> 0:02:07.580
<v Speaker 2>to the Prime Minister, although it seemed he didn't want

0:02:07.660 --> 0:02:11.029
<v Speaker 2>voters to know about that connection, did he?

0:02:12.270 --> 0:02:17.730
<v Speaker 5>In 2012, I've been advised that I got honorary membership.

0:02:17.750 --> 0:02:21.390
<v Speaker 5>Someone made a decision. I don't have a card. I

0:02:21.430 --> 0:02:23.089
<v Speaker 5>don't go to the club.

0:02:23.090 --> 0:02:24.650
<v Speaker 6>14 years ago.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 5>But I make this point, Mr Speaker. If anyone wants

0:02:30.660 --> 0:02:34.810
<v Speaker 5>to join what is affectionately known as Royal Marigold, what

0:02:34.850 --> 0:02:38.989
<v Speaker 5>they need for two years' membership is $ 5. We'll get

0:02:39.010 --> 0:02:40.329
<v Speaker 5>them two years' membership.

0:02:41.030 --> 0:02:41.910
<v Speaker 6>For two years!

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:49.019
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the multi-million dollar homes he's owned close by.

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.630
<v Speaker 2>One property that he still owns today, rented out now

0:02:53.690 --> 0:02:57.290
<v Speaker 2>while he's living in the lodge, worth around $ 3 million,

0:02:57.710 --> 0:03:02.130
<v Speaker 2>is just 200 metres from the club. Yesterday, the Prime

0:03:02.150 --> 0:03:05.210
<v Speaker 2>Minister was pushed hard about what role he had in

0:03:05.250 --> 0:03:08.250
<v Speaker 2>the allocation of $ 6 million to a golf club where

0:03:08.290 --> 0:03:11.330
<v Speaker 2>he's described by the local mayor, Darcy Byrne, as the

0:03:11.410 --> 0:03:13.389
<v Speaker 2>club's most famous patrons.

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 7>The Prime Minister sits in the Expenditure Review Committee of

0:03:16.980 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 7>Cabinet— that' s the Budget Committee— and he chairs Cabinet. When this funding

0:03:21.540 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 7>allocation for the Marrickville golf course came into either meeting

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 7>for sign-off, did the Prime Minister declare he was, in

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.190
<v Speaker 7>the words of the local mayor, the golf club's most

0:03:32.270 --> 0:03:36.270
<v Speaker 7>famous patron and neighbour? Did the Prime Minister declare a

0:03:36.310 --> 0:03:40.050
<v Speaker 7>conflict of interest and recuse himself from the funding decision?

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.380
<v Speaker 2>Now, the PM's response to that question was this.

0:03:45.250 --> 0:03:48.010
<v Speaker 5>The question goes to cabinet processes.

0:03:48.090 --> 0:03:49.170
<v Speaker 2>I'm the decision maker.

0:03:49.230 --> 0:03:51.910
<v Speaker 5>The decision maker is the Minister for Infrastructure.

0:03:51.970 --> 0:03:53.790
<v Speaker 4>I'm not even the decision maker.

0:03:55.850 --> 0:03:57.490
<v Speaker 2>On the face of it, that might be true. But

0:03:58.210 --> 0:04:02.010
<v Speaker 2>the PM was not the decision maker, as he says,

0:04:02.710 --> 0:04:05.010
<v Speaker 2>if the decision to fund the Marrickville Golf Club was

0:04:05.060 --> 0:04:09.820
<v Speaker 2>taken during this term of parliament. But that's not what happened.

0:04:10.460 --> 0:04:13.740
<v Speaker 2>Because it was the Prime Minister himself during the election

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>campaign who announced that his government would make this $ 6

0:04:17.580 --> 0:04:22.690
<v Speaker 2>million grant if re-elected. That's right, he's now being called

0:04:22.750 --> 0:04:27.109
<v Speaker 2>out red-handed here. Here's the Prime Minister's own press release

0:04:27.490 --> 0:04:33.010
<v Speaker 2>dated April 27, 2025, confirming what I have just uncovered.

0:04:33.650 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 2>And there's nothing in the entire press release that even

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>once references the Minister, Catherine King. Well, she doesn't get

0:04:41.460 --> 0:04:46.529
<v Speaker 2>a look in. It's just Anthony Albanese alone announcing $ 6

0:04:46.029 --> 0:04:50.570
<v Speaker 2>million to the Marrickville Golf Club, the golf club, his

0:04:50.610 --> 0:04:54.330
<v Speaker 2>local neighbours. And look at that date, April 27. Well,

0:04:54.350 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>that's just seven days out from polling day. Now, how

0:04:58.940 --> 0:05:03.020
<v Speaker 2>does Albanese reconcile the reality of his own press relief

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 2>with what he said in the parliament? Listen to the

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:08.979
<v Speaker 2>parliament again.

0:05:10.350 --> 0:05:13.029
<v Speaker 5>The decision-maker is the Minister for Infrastructure.

0:05:13.089 --> 0:05:14.950
<v Speaker 4>I'm not even the decision-maker.

0:05:16.029 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so who's telling the truth here? Albanese there in

0:05:20.020 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the House or Albanese in writing via that press release

0:05:25.180 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>during last year's election campaign? Because they both can't be right,

0:05:29.140 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>can they? The other complicating factor here, of course... is

0:05:33.620 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the Prime Minister can't try and explain

0:05:35.820 --> 0:05:39.419
<v Speaker 2>this away as a decision by a faceless bureaucrat either.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.860
<v Speaker 2>Because in April last year, when he personally made this

0:05:44.020 --> 0:05:50.130
<v Speaker 2>multi-million dollar promise to his local golf club, caretaker conventions, well,

0:05:50.150 --> 0:05:53.310
<v Speaker 2>they were in operation. Meaning this was not a public

0:05:53.370 --> 0:05:57.410
<v Speaker 2>service decision. This was a political decision to fund the

0:05:57.450 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 2>golf course and a very political decision at that. But

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:06.679
<v Speaker 2>there's more, because a bit more digging confirms that Minister

0:06:06.740 --> 0:06:11.020
<v Speaker 2>King didn't even open grants from this half a billion

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>dollar fund until the 1st of September last year. That's

0:06:16.250 --> 0:06:20.609
<v Speaker 2>six months after Albanese had already promised his golf club

0:06:20.710 --> 0:06:25.089
<v Speaker 2>mates a $ 6 million check. Here it is, it says

0:06:25.170 --> 0:06:30.150
<v Speaker 2>via the Department of Infrastructure website, the major and local

0:06:30.230 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>community infrastructure program opened on 1 September 2025. And as

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.700
<v Speaker 2>we know now, critically, access to the taxpayer millions was

0:06:41.740 --> 0:06:46.270
<v Speaker 2>by invitation only. So who invited the golf club to

0:06:46.330 --> 0:06:51.030
<v Speaker 2>pick up this $ 6 million windfall and when? You've got

0:06:51.050 --> 0:06:54.130
<v Speaker 2>to assume it was Albanese or his office, don't you,

0:06:54.170 --> 0:06:57.740
<v Speaker 2>given it's his name and his name only on that

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.690
<v Speaker 2>press release announcement. But here's the kicker. Here is where

0:07:02.770 --> 0:07:06.870
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanese's got serious questions to answer now about integrity

0:07:06.970 --> 0:07:10.850
<v Speaker 2>and probity when it comes to this golf club grant.

0:07:11.510 --> 0:07:15.970
<v Speaker 2>And it centres on these admissions last week from the Minister,

0:07:16.010 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Catherine King. Admissions that I don't think she even realised

0:07:20.740 --> 0:07:25.060
<v Speaker 2>she had made. On ABC Radio, King explained that Labor

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:30.730
<v Speaker 2>first had an internal process for determining election commitments. And

0:07:30.750 --> 0:07:34.070
<v Speaker 2>it was only after the election, when the program was

0:07:34.130 --> 0:07:37.990
<v Speaker 2>set up, that she then became the person who signed

0:07:38.170 --> 0:07:42.190
<v Speaker 2>off the funding. So months and months and months after

0:07:42.230 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 2>the decision was made and then announced. Here's the minister.

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.020
<v Speaker 8>There is a process internally within the Labor Party to

0:07:51.060 --> 0:07:52.580
<v Speaker 8>determine election commitments.

0:07:54.380 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Internally inside the Labor Party, not the government, the Labor Party.

0:08:01.500 --> 0:08:04.500
<v Speaker 2>In this interview, the ABC asked King directly whether she

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.910
<v Speaker 2>knew that Albanese was an honorary member of the Marrickville

0:08:08.930 --> 0:08:13.830
<v Speaker 2>Golf Club, to which she failed to give a straight answer. Indeed,

0:08:13.910 --> 0:08:17.390
<v Speaker 2>rather than a yes or no, King said this.

0:08:18.270 --> 0:08:20.890
<v Speaker 8>First thing is the Prime Minister is not the decision

0:08:20.950 --> 0:08:23.510
<v Speaker 8>maker of this program. I am the decision maker of

0:08:23.550 --> 0:08:26.190
<v Speaker 8>the programs. The only person who would need to declare

0:08:26.250 --> 0:08:28.790
<v Speaker 8>something who would have a conflict would be me as

0:08:28.830 --> 0:08:29.670
<v Speaker 8>the decision maker.

0:08:31.310 --> 0:08:33.810
<v Speaker 2>Well, hang on, I've just revealed to you that the

0:08:33.850 --> 0:08:37.309
<v Speaker 2>decision to grant the golf club millions of dollars was

0:08:37.370 --> 0:08:42.450
<v Speaker 2>made and announced by Albanese and Albanese alone six months

0:08:42.490 --> 0:08:47.790
<v Speaker 2>before King was even involved. As King herself admitted, quote,

0:08:48.340 --> 0:08:51.479
<v Speaker 2>there's a process internally within the Labor Party to determine

0:08:51.500 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 2>election commitments. So to the important issue of conflict now,

0:08:56.620 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>because that's the crux of the issue. How can Albanese

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>deal with conflicts here, the fact that he's a member

0:09:03.860 --> 0:09:06.010
<v Speaker 2>of the club, the fact that he owns a multi-million

0:09:06.050 --> 0:09:09.770
<v Speaker 2>dollar home some 200 metres from the golf course, if

0:09:09.809 --> 0:09:14.110
<v Speaker 2>he's the only name on the announcement? Where's the probity here?

0:09:15.090 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Who would he have declared any conflict of interest to

0:09:18.820 --> 0:09:23.420
<v Speaker 2>if he's the only one making the announcement? This whole

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.420
<v Speaker 2>Marrickville Golf Club grant sticks to high heaven. This was

0:09:27.460 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 2>an invite-only slush fund worth a whopping half a billion dollars,

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.850
<v Speaker 2>with 73% of projects approved in Labor-held seats or key

0:09:36.910 --> 0:09:41.090
<v Speaker 2>marginals that Labor was desperate to win at last year's election.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>What's clear now from all the evidence publicly available that

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.089
<v Speaker 2>I've put out here again tonight is that Albanese owned

0:09:50.150 --> 0:09:53.510
<v Speaker 2>homes in a street across from the Marrickville Golf Club,

0:09:54.030 --> 0:09:57.250
<v Speaker 2>that they got a $ 6 million grant announced by him

0:09:57.290 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 2>and him alone during last year's election campaign, some six

0:10:00.740 --> 0:10:03.540
<v Speaker 2>months before there was even a fund set up and

0:10:03.580 --> 0:10:07.819
<v Speaker 2>administered to pay out the money. And now neither Albanese

0:10:07.980 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>or King can explain why the Marrickville Golf Club was

0:10:11.420 --> 0:10:15.330
<v Speaker 2>selected in the first place. This is a joke. And

0:10:15.350 --> 0:10:19.420
<v Speaker 2>the joke's on the taxpayer. Any wonder voters don't trust

0:10:19.470 --> 0:10:23.410
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister? Let's hope this new Senate inquiry gets

0:10:23.450 --> 0:10:31.330
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom of the racket. Now, look, I want

0:10:31.350 --> 0:10:35.650
<v Speaker 2>to say something about this man, Rhys Muldoon, a former

0:10:35.730 --> 0:10:40.370
<v Speaker 2>children's TV presenter on the ABC, turned fellow kids' book

0:10:40.590 --> 0:10:45.770
<v Speaker 2>author with Kevin Rudd, turned general Labor hanger-on, turned Labor

0:10:46.170 --> 0:10:50.740
<v Speaker 2>taxpayer-funded staffer, at least until this morning, when he was

0:10:50.820 --> 0:10:55.420
<v Speaker 2>finally sacked for racist comments said about Jacinda Nampajimpa Price,

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.900
<v Speaker 2>for anti-Semitic comments said about a whole host of others,

0:10:59.540 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 2>and for vile, highly sexual comments said about me. I

0:11:04.179 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>think I've demonstrated more than most, so I've got a

0:11:06.580 --> 0:11:10.939
<v Speaker 2>pretty thick skin, but honestly, when is this going to end?

0:11:12.020 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't sure I was even going to say something

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.620
<v Speaker 2>about Muldoon tonight, but I'm sick of this. I've copped

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.780
<v Speaker 2>it for years, going back to the time when Clive

0:11:19.820 --> 0:11:24.310
<v Speaker 2>Palmer attacked me publicly over IVF. And on and on

0:11:24.350 --> 0:11:27.030
<v Speaker 2>and on it went back then. It even followed me

0:11:27.090 --> 0:11:29.910
<v Speaker 2>to Victoria when I took on Daniel Andrews during the lockdowns,

0:11:30.250 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and then I copped death threats as a result. This

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.860
<v Speaker 2>has never stopped. What is it about weak men and

0:11:37.940 --> 0:11:41.740
<v Speaker 2>strong women? What is it about conservative women like me

0:11:42.179 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>and Jacinta that we're considered fair game when others get defended?

0:11:46.950 --> 0:11:51.630
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Muldoon isn't just a garden variety labour idiot

0:11:51.990 --> 0:11:54.309
<v Speaker 2>who thinks she beat opponents in the battle of ideas

0:11:54.690 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 2>by going after them personally. He's a close friend of

0:11:58.890 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister. I mean, so close in fact that

0:12:02.460 --> 0:12:05.220
<v Speaker 2>when Almanese invited just 70 people to his wedding on

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.420
<v Speaker 2>the lawns at the Lodge last year, Muldoon, well, he

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.180
<v Speaker 2>was one of them. And his comments about me, Jacinta,

0:12:12.220 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Dave Sharma and others, well, they were all out there

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.579
<v Speaker 2>on his social media feed. And I don't for a

0:12:18.660 --> 0:12:22.059
<v Speaker 2>minute believe that this was missed when he was vetted

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.940
<v Speaker 2>for his job as a Labor staffer.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:12:25.700 --> 0:12:28.940
<v Speaker 2>I don't. Because I know that Labor vet people thoroughly.

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.140
<v Speaker 2>So it's my view that someone saw these comments and

0:12:33.179 --> 0:12:36.030
<v Speaker 2>thought they could get away with them. That the target

0:12:36.070 --> 0:12:39.860
<v Speaker 2>was a conservative woman, so who cares? that giving a

0:12:39.940 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>cosy job to the PM's best mate was worth it. Now,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm all up for anyone wanting to take me on intellectually,

0:12:48.940 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to disagree with me about policy, to argue and debate

0:12:52.179 --> 0:12:54.650
<v Speaker 2>the direction in which our country should go and who

0:12:54.710 --> 0:12:58.949
<v Speaker 2>should lead it. But time and time again, opponents on

0:12:58.970 --> 0:13:03.150
<v Speaker 2>the left have made it personal. That says everything about them.

0:13:03.850 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 2>They're small minds and weak character. Now, if the left

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>think they can make me cower or that I'll give

0:13:10.700 --> 0:13:14.690
<v Speaker 2>up and walk away, well, think again. What's that saying

0:13:14.790 --> 0:13:17.790
<v Speaker 2>up where I was born and raised? As strong as

0:13:17.830 --> 0:13:21.170
<v Speaker 2>a mallee bull? Well, you bet I am. I am

0:13:21.250 --> 0:13:24.150
<v Speaker 2>not going anywhere. This only makes me want to dig

0:13:24.250 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>in and go harder. Enough said. Right, well, let's go

0:13:33.220 --> 0:13:36.420
<v Speaker 2>to the cesspit of Canberra tonight for the headlines. Our reporter,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:37.380
<v Speaker 2>Trudy McIntosh.

0:13:38.350 --> 0:13:40.990
<v Speaker 9>The Albanese government insists it won't bow to pressure from

0:13:41.130 --> 0:13:45.339
<v Speaker 9>AI giants to water down copyright laws. Companies like OpenAI

0:13:45.380 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 9>want to set up shop in Australia, promising big investment

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.220
<v Speaker 9>in return for the government retreating on copyright protections for creatives.

0:13:52.700 --> 0:13:56.620
<v Speaker 2>It's not new that there are challenges in respect of copyright.

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.940
<v Speaker 4>I don't think friends or allies make these kinds of threats.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 9>And a rare retreat from Pauline Hanson today. Apologising for

0:14:03.700 --> 0:14:06.620
<v Speaker 9>comments calling Indigenous Australians the most primitive race.

0:14:07.500 --> 0:14:10.489
<v Speaker 3>If I've offended people by using that, yes, I will apologise.

0:14:10.750 --> 0:14:13.849
<v Speaker 9>And an apology of sorts for comments about Anthony Albanese's

0:14:13.929 --> 0:14:15.650
<v Speaker 9>mother's social housing background.

0:14:16.130 --> 0:14:19.530
<v Speaker 3>I don't think my comments were derogatory towards his mother

0:14:19.750 --> 0:14:21.750
<v Speaker 3>at all. If he's taking offence to it, well, I'm

0:14:21.790 --> 0:14:22.410
<v Speaker 3>sorry for that.

0:14:22.790 --> 0:14:26.060
<v Speaker 9>The One Nation leader also defended her sweeping cuts to migration.

0:14:26.460 --> 0:14:28.860
<v Speaker 9>She concedes her plan could trigger a recession.

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>So if it's going to hit the bottom line for

0:14:31.020 --> 0:14:33.180
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months, but I think then it will improve.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.050
<v Speaker 3>People's quality of life will improve. Isn't that what it's about?

0:14:37.070 --> 0:14:38.970
<v Speaker 4>It would take the economy.

0:14:39.190 --> 0:14:42.450
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's important to bring numbers down, absolutely, but you

0:14:42.530 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do it in a way that doesn't destroy

0:14:44.460 --> 0:14:45.100
<v Speaker 1>the economy.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:46.580
<v Speaker 9>Trudy McIntosh, News 24, Canberra.

0:14:48.980 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's jump into it all now with my colleague, News24

0:14:52.340 --> 0:14:56.820
<v Speaker 2>political editor, Andrew Clennell. Welcome, Andrew. Immigration today, front and

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.300
<v Speaker 2>centre again. Talks breaking down between Labor and the Coalition

0:15:00.340 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 2>on what they might be able to agree on when

0:15:02.700 --> 0:15:06.869
<v Speaker 2>it comes to fundamental principles. But here we are, One Nation,

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.410
<v Speaker 2>the only party still with an actual policy out there

0:15:10.450 --> 0:15:13.550
<v Speaker 2>on the table publicly. Where is this up to? We

0:15:13.590 --> 0:15:16.390
<v Speaker 2>were promised that speech from Tony Burke, this big reform speech,

0:15:16.830 --> 0:15:20.870
<v Speaker 2>almost about two months ago now. What are insiders telling you?

0:15:20.890 --> 0:15:24.350
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think it's just bizarre. I mean, I've heard,

0:15:24.370 --> 0:15:26.510
<v Speaker 6>and it's been denied to me, but I've heard from

0:15:26.530 --> 0:15:29.330
<v Speaker 6>a pretty reputable source that Tony Burke and Jim Chalmers

0:15:29.350 --> 0:15:31.740
<v Speaker 6>were at loggerheads because, of course, all the measures affect

0:15:31.770 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 6>the budget and the economy. And we know treasurers from

0:15:35.050 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 6>Scott Morrison on have relied on the immigration numbers to

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:42.540
<v Speaker 6>prop up their budgets. But then it became a story of, oh,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 6>we've got to reach agreement with the opposition. But that's

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.260
<v Speaker 6>only part of the measures. That's measures like getting rid

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.530
<v Speaker 6>of appeal rights and in the Administrative Review Tribunal, and

0:15:50.550 --> 0:15:53.410
<v Speaker 6>that requires legislation. Not all of this requires legislation. So

0:15:53.430 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 6>whether some of it's being quietly done behind the scenes anyway,

0:15:56.030 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 6>as I suspect, to get the net migration numbers down,

0:15:59.340 --> 0:16:02.500
<v Speaker 6>that could be the case. But to not have that announcement,

0:16:02.620 --> 0:16:05.540
<v Speaker 6>it looks like inertia, it looks like division, it looks

0:16:05.580 --> 0:16:11.350
<v Speaker 6>like incompetence. especially because Tony Burke jumped the gun and,

0:16:11.770 --> 0:16:14.270
<v Speaker 6>you know, presumably with the permission of PMO and announced

0:16:14.290 --> 0:16:16.850
<v Speaker 6>that press club speech. That's the worst look. If it

0:16:16.890 --> 0:16:19.310
<v Speaker 6>wasn't for that, maybe you could kind of get away

0:16:19.330 --> 0:16:21.510
<v Speaker 6>with it for a little bit, but it looks like

0:16:21.550 --> 0:16:27.950
<v Speaker 6>they just can't get their you-know-what together. So I think

0:16:27.990 --> 0:16:30.830
<v Speaker 6>they need to hurry up and do it. Now, Albanese's

0:16:30.870 --> 0:16:32.590
<v Speaker 6>going to hunger. I wonder whether it's one of those

0:16:32.630 --> 0:16:35.010
<v Speaker 6>things they do when he's gone. How's that feel about it?

0:16:35.010 --> 0:16:37.130
<v Speaker 6>You know, they take out the trash a bit with

0:16:37.170 --> 0:16:41.900
<v Speaker 6>these things. controversial proposal, but it'll have to go to caucus.

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.620
<v Speaker 6>So don't you need Albanese at the head of that

0:16:44.700 --> 0:16:47.950
<v Speaker 6>caucus to get the changes through? What has to go

0:16:48.490 --> 0:16:51.550
<v Speaker 6>through caucus, by the way, is legislation. So you could

0:16:51.590 --> 0:16:54.090
<v Speaker 6>announce it all, our intention of the legislation, and then

0:16:54.110 --> 0:16:56.350
<v Speaker 6>I guess you're saying to caucus, well, here it is.

0:16:57.130 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 6>But I think some Labor MPs will arc up because

0:16:59.380 --> 0:17:01.860
<v Speaker 6>they'll be worried about the family reunion changes and that

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.020
<v Speaker 6>kind of thing. So I think whenever it happens, it'll

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.700
<v Speaker 6>be an issue. It'll be a problem. Now, I guess

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 6>they feel they have to do legislation on the appeal rights,

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 6>so they had to do an announcement. Otherwise, you can

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.550
<v Speaker 6>do a lot of these things without an announcement, Peter.

0:17:15.690 --> 0:17:19.330
<v Speaker 6>Tony Burke could have just quietly gone away issuing ministerial directions.

0:17:20.330 --> 0:17:21.889
<v Speaker 6>I wonder if that would have been a better.

0:17:21.650 --> 0:17:25.260
<v Speaker 2>Approach in a lot of respects. I think that's the

0:17:25.300 --> 0:17:27.580
<v Speaker 2>problem for them. They need him to make an announcement

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.419
<v Speaker 2>to claw back the vote that they're losing to One

0:17:29.460 --> 0:17:31.860
<v Speaker 2>Nation or or have been losing to One Nation. That's

0:17:31.900 --> 0:17:34.540
<v Speaker 2>why he was selling it in as this big speech. And, look,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you're right to point to the summit season at the

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.739
<v Speaker 2>end of the year because that will be a big

0:17:38.780 --> 0:17:42.340
<v Speaker 2>distraction with the Prime Minister out of the country. What

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.340
<v Speaker 2>are their messaging on a lot of these issues? They're

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.090
<v Speaker 2>fighting fires almost every week in relation to One Nation.

0:17:48.109 --> 0:17:51.490
<v Speaker 2>And I think on something like migration, they do need

0:17:51.510 --> 0:17:54.380
<v Speaker 2>it to go through caucus, at least in principle. even

0:17:54.420 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>without the leech, because you've got to hold sort of,

0:17:56.790 --> 0:17:58.909
<v Speaker 2>you know, all the frogs in the wheelbarrow and a

0:17:58.950 --> 0:18:00.750
<v Speaker 2>lot of them will be a bit antsy, those in

0:18:00.810 --> 0:18:04.590
<v Speaker 2>green seats, those with high migrant populations, about how Labor's

0:18:04.670 --> 0:18:07.909
<v Speaker 2>changes will be read amongst the Labor faithful. But that

0:18:07.950 --> 0:18:10.710
<v Speaker 2>gets harder because, what, he's got five or six trips

0:18:10.770 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 2>before Christmas.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.500
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, how's that going to affect the polls? You know,

0:18:16.540 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 6>they're already, I mean, I know it's a long time

0:18:18.580 --> 0:18:21.700
<v Speaker 6>until an election, Peter, but you get a rate rise

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:26.179
<v Speaker 6>next week. He takes off to about five summits. You

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:27.810
<v Speaker 6>think that's going to be good news for the Labor

0:18:27.830 --> 0:18:30.810
<v Speaker 6>Party in the polls against One Nation as well as

0:18:30.850 --> 0:18:34.689
<v Speaker 6>the Libs? So we're in for an interesting period down here.

0:18:36.070 --> 0:18:37.890
<v Speaker 2>All right, talk to me about Pauline Hanson. Not many

0:18:37.930 --> 0:18:40.689
<v Speaker 2>politicians ever apologise, but she's better than the PM. I'll

0:18:40.730 --> 0:18:43.260
<v Speaker 2>give her that. She's admitted she got this wrong today.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.669
<v Speaker 2>She says, I'm not always great at articulating my points,

0:18:46.750 --> 0:18:48.750
<v Speaker 2>but she certainly cuts through. The polls will tell you

0:18:49.210 --> 0:18:52.690
<v Speaker 2>she mightn't be articulate, but the punters understand exactly what

0:18:52.770 --> 0:18:56.230
<v Speaker 2>she's saying. This won't impact her, I don't suspect, at all.

0:18:58.730 --> 0:19:01.900
<v Speaker 6>No, I don't think so. But, I mean, I do

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 6>think what is interesting is the apology because I reckon...

0:19:05.180 --> 0:19:06.690
<v Speaker 6>You'd be able to count on one hand the amount

0:19:06.710 --> 0:19:09.630
<v Speaker 6>of apologies Pauline Hanson's given since she won the seat

0:19:09.670 --> 0:19:11.510
<v Speaker 6>of Loxley here in 1996.

0:19:11.510 --> 0:19:14.350
<v Speaker 2>Or any politician, Andrew, any politician.

0:19:14.810 --> 0:19:16.550
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'll tell you what, a lot more of them

0:19:16.590 --> 0:19:18.730
<v Speaker 6>are doing it these days, Peter, because they think it'll

0:19:18.780 --> 0:19:20.980
<v Speaker 6>work for them. But I think.

0:19:21.060 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>The bloke in the top job hasn't. He's never apologised. Yeah, yeah.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:26.630
<v Speaker 4>I think....

0:19:28.180 --> 0:19:30.980
<v Speaker 6>There might have been one time he apologised, wasn't there?

0:19:31.020 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 6>I'll have to look that up for our next cross.

0:19:33.869 --> 0:19:34.590
<v Speaker 2>I think that....

0:19:36.940 --> 0:19:39.350
<v Speaker 6>I think it's more a sign of a bit of

0:19:39.420 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 6>political astuteness from her team that they're just trying to

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 6>kill off issues, you know, just, oh, let's get rid

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:46.620
<v Speaker 6>of this, do the apology.

0:19:46.619 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Deny oxygen.

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 6>I think they're doing it.

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:48.719
<v Speaker 2>It's about denying oxygen.

0:19:48.780 --> 0:19:51.939
<v Speaker 6>They're doing a lot of very astute things. You know,

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 6>where's the Liberal Party? Because every Monday of a sitting week,

0:19:55.660 --> 0:19:57.850
<v Speaker 6>past few weeks, One Nation have an announcement, a front

0:19:57.869 --> 0:20:00.770
<v Speaker 6>page announcement. They grab the agenda on that Monday, which

0:20:00.830 --> 0:20:03.570
<v Speaker 6>is always a bit of a soft news day. And

0:20:04.190 --> 0:20:06.449
<v Speaker 6>I think they're playing things pretty smart politically at the

0:20:06.470 --> 0:20:07.540
<v Speaker 6>moment and media-wise.

0:20:09.260 --> 0:20:11.180
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing is they're nimble, right, and you're

0:20:11.300 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 2>right to point out that Monday because Monday is when

0:20:13.260 --> 0:20:15.180
<v Speaker 2>the Cabinet is on for the government but it's also

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.710
<v Speaker 2>when Shadow Cabinet is there for the Libs and they're

0:20:17.750 --> 0:20:20.970
<v Speaker 2>both constrained about what they drop out on the Monday.

0:20:20.990 --> 0:20:22.750
<v Speaker 2>They drop more of their stuff on the Tuesday once

0:20:22.770 --> 0:20:25.590
<v Speaker 2>they've got everyone to agree. Well, One Nation could do

0:20:25.630 --> 0:20:27.629
<v Speaker 2>their Cabinet meetings over the phone. I mean, they could

0:20:27.650 --> 0:20:30.090
<v Speaker 2>do them on the Sunday night around a barbecue. They're

0:20:30.109 --> 0:20:33.690
<v Speaker 2>clearly doing some internal discussion. Do they have cabinet meetings? Well,

0:20:33.750 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 2>you never know. They look like they've got the rack

0:20:35.380 --> 0:20:38.300
<v Speaker 2>together more than in years past, Andrew. So they're dropping

0:20:38.340 --> 0:20:42.100
<v Speaker 2>stuff out. I read their papers. I'm sure you do too.

0:20:42.180 --> 0:20:45.220
<v Speaker 2>There's a level of detail in their documents that hasn't

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.570
<v Speaker 2>been there in the past. So I think they're taking

0:20:47.609 --> 0:20:49.190
<v Speaker 2>it up a gear and I think they are setting

0:20:49.210 --> 0:20:51.490
<v Speaker 2>the agenda at the start of sitting weeks. Hey, I've

0:20:51.530 --> 0:20:54.650
<v Speaker 2>got to ask you about these golf club grants, that

0:20:54.770 --> 0:20:57.850
<v Speaker 2>golf club grant, but there's a half a billion dollars

0:20:58.109 --> 0:21:01.649
<v Speaker 2>of Labor grants there elsewhere. It's now going to a

0:21:01.869 --> 0:21:05.340
<v Speaker 2>Senate inquiry. I just revealed then, the Prime Minister says

0:21:05.380 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>in the Chamber yesterday that he wasn't the decision-maker. Well,

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I can prove, in fact, that he put the announcement

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 2>out on the 27th of April, a week out from

0:21:13.420 --> 0:21:17.020
<v Speaker 2>polling day, and that Minister King did not establish her

0:21:17.140 --> 0:21:20.389
<v Speaker 2>process for until another six months down the track on

0:21:20.430 --> 0:21:23.310
<v Speaker 2>the 1st of September. And then she called for those

0:21:23.350 --> 0:21:27.379
<v Speaker 2>that were invited to put their paperwork in. So, you know,

0:21:27.470 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>he announced exactly the same sum that she basically signed

0:21:31.380 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>off six months later. You can't tell me that he

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 2>didn't make the decision.

0:21:34.660 --> 0:21:38.939
<v Speaker 6>Minister King is very close to Anthony Albanese. That's all

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 6>I'll say.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's covering up.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.260
<v Speaker 6>She's one of his closest... She's one of his closest...

0:21:46.580 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 6>people in the parliament. So I don't know if that's

0:21:48.540 --> 0:21:50.350
<v Speaker 6>how it occurred or how it occurred, but what I

0:21:50.380 --> 0:21:53.830
<v Speaker 6>do know, and I think Albanese claims it was previously

0:21:53.890 --> 0:21:55.750
<v Speaker 6>in Linda Burnie's seat or something, but it was down

0:21:55.770 --> 0:21:58.750
<v Speaker 6>the road from him, it was his old place. Now,

0:21:59.390 --> 0:22:00.429
<v Speaker 6>he put the press release out.

0:22:00.470 --> 0:22:02.030
<v Speaker 2>I don't care where it was. He put the press

0:22:02.050 --> 0:22:02.350
<v Speaker 2>release out.

0:22:02.390 --> 0:22:03.010
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, exactly.

0:22:03.050 --> 0:22:03.850
<v Speaker 2>Only his letterhead.

0:22:03.970 --> 0:22:04.250
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:22:04.450 --> 0:22:05.380
<v Speaker 2>Only his letterhead.

0:22:06.020 --> 0:22:08.379
<v Speaker 6>But, look, the point I'm trying to make is we

0:22:08.420 --> 0:22:10.580
<v Speaker 6>all know that there was a lot of talk about

0:22:10.780 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 6>in the Qantas... issue, favours for Qantas. King was the

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:19.570
<v Speaker 6>minister and Albanese was the PM. And it's his former portfolio,

0:22:19.630 --> 0:22:21.810
<v Speaker 6>transport and infrastructure, so he knows it back the front.

0:22:22.470 --> 0:22:25.450
<v Speaker 6>And there's a perception in this place that he guides

0:22:25.510 --> 0:22:29.430
<v Speaker 6>Catherine King pretty closely in that portfolio, just as there's

0:22:29.470 --> 0:22:32.710
<v Speaker 6>a perception that he guides Annika Wells pretty closely in communications.

0:22:33.490 --> 0:22:36.389
<v Speaker 6>And they are two ministers who will do what the

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister wants to happen. I mean, I'm sure a

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.100
<v Speaker 6>lot of them do. But what I'm saying is there

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:44.940
<v Speaker 6>is a particular relationship between Catherine King and Anthony Albanese,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 6>which is longstanding, both of the left faction for many

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.300
<v Speaker 6>years and close colleagues, very close colleagues. So what I'm

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 6>suggesting is when I hear that as a political observer,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.500
<v Speaker 6>I do tend to think that Albanese's had a hand

0:22:57.540 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 6>in that.

0:22:59.619 --> 0:23:02.940
<v Speaker 2>And I think the chronology, six months between when he

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 2>announced it and the six months later when she signed

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:10.179
<v Speaker 2>it off, tells you that, you know, that he's barking

0:23:10.660 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and she's following the bark. It's very, very clear. So

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 2>this puts paid to his comments in the House that

0:23:17.500 --> 0:23:19.460
<v Speaker 2>she was the decision maker when he announced it six

0:23:19.510 --> 0:23:22.629
<v Speaker 2>months earlier. We'll go back to this one tomorrow, I'm assuming,

0:23:22.650 --> 0:23:25.469
<v Speaker 2>in the House. Andrew Clennell, thank you. Let's go now

0:23:25.490 --> 0:23:29.670
<v Speaker 2>to that extraordinary warning from former ASIO, former current ASIO

0:23:29.730 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 2>boss Mike Burgess, where he revealed Australia's domestic intelligence agency

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 2>has disrupted some 16 potential terror attacks in the nine

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 2>months since the Bondi massacre. Now, 16 is a huge number.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Former boss of the Home Affairs Department, Mike Pozzuolo, joins

0:23:47.220 --> 0:23:51.020
<v Speaker 2>me now. Mike, thank you for your time. I think

0:23:51.020 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>16 is a lot if I'm remembering my maths from,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:59.530
<v Speaker 2>previous years in Canberra, but you're the expert. How do

0:23:59.570 --> 0:24:03.730
<v Speaker 2>you rate this level if we've got 16 disruptions? Talk

0:24:03.770 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 2>me through that. But if the threat is this high,

0:24:07.650 --> 0:24:13.260
<v Speaker 2>why is the national threat level itself not changed?

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:14.020
<v Speaker 4>Good evening, Peter.

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.420
<v Speaker 1>Well, that very first point, that last point you make

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is the first point I want to make. Mr Burgess'

0:24:19.740 --> 0:24:22.609
<v Speaker 1>statement on Friday was incredibly important. It was put out

0:24:22.650 --> 0:24:27.950
<v Speaker 1>on a Friday afternoon. the 9-11 commemorations perhaps overshadowed it

0:24:28.030 --> 0:24:29.790
<v Speaker 1>to some extent. I just want to read you out,

0:24:29.850 --> 0:24:37.380
<v Speaker 1>if I might, Peter, a couple of excerpts. Please do.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to be very, very factual here. Probable, which

0:24:40.740 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is the terrorism threat level that was lifted in August

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.140
<v Speaker 1>of 24, you might recall, 2024, Mr Burgess says, does

0:24:48.260 --> 0:24:50.980
<v Speaker 1>not tell the full story. I think that's an incredibly

0:24:51.020 --> 0:24:53.790
<v Speaker 1>important point. He says the next level up on the

0:24:53.850 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>scale is expected. And he says that would only apply

0:24:57.220 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>where we had intelligence about a specific attack and we

0:25:00.180 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do not. But we do know that the environment is degrading,

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.830
<v Speaker 1>and I continue to read, and acts of politically motivated violence,

0:25:07.869 --> 0:25:09.810
<v Speaker 1>which is a legal term, it includes terrorism, but it

0:25:09.850 --> 0:25:14.610
<v Speaker 1>also includes things like political assassinations, are becoming, quote, more

0:25:14.690 --> 0:25:19.570
<v Speaker 1>likely than probable suggests. So there's something already askew, if

0:25:19.609 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you will, Peter, in our methodology for warning the public

0:25:23.260 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and alerting the public, there's almost like a highly probable

0:25:27.140 --> 0:25:30.900
<v Speaker 1>or another layer of probability that sits between probable and expected.

0:25:31.460 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But it gets worse and it gets even more ominous

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>than the headline that you just had up in your graphic.

0:25:38.050 --> 0:25:41.180
<v Speaker 1>And I dug into this comparing it to his annual

0:25:41.220 --> 0:25:43.510
<v Speaker 1>threat assessment of only a couple of months ago, the

0:25:44.170 --> 0:25:47.710
<v Speaker 1>24th of June. And this is in plain sight. I

0:25:47.730 --> 0:25:50.670
<v Speaker 1>did a bit more research once you and I entered

0:25:50.730 --> 0:25:53.750
<v Speaker 1>into discussions about me coming on tonight. He says on

0:25:53.850 --> 0:25:59.929
<v Speaker 1>Friday that ASIO and our partners have foiled 33.

0:25:58.369 --> 0:26:01.570
<v Speaker 4>Major terrorism plots since 2014. 33.

0:26:01.570 --> 0:26:04.230
<v Speaker 1>That's the number that we thought we'd heard before. And

0:26:04.470 --> 0:26:08.690
<v Speaker 1>the Director-General defines those as imminent, serious imminent plots where

0:26:08.710 --> 0:26:11.690
<v Speaker 1>the planning is advanced. Well, guess what the number was

0:26:12.950 --> 0:26:17.140
<v Speaker 1>in June 24, in June of this year, I should say,

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>only 10 weeks ago. That number was 31. So either

0:26:22.420 --> 0:26:26.380
<v Speaker 1>the annual threat assessment that was issued by the Director-General

0:26:26.420 --> 0:26:30.460
<v Speaker 1>in June, and I commend him for his transparency. He's

0:26:30.510 --> 0:26:33.129
<v Speaker 1>the only one, along with the AFP Commissioner, and I've

0:26:33.150 --> 0:26:35.609
<v Speaker 1>come to some of the statements she's been making recently.

0:26:35.890 --> 0:26:37.930
<v Speaker 1>They're the only ones belling the cat, and I'm really

0:26:37.970 --> 0:26:40.530
<v Speaker 1>concerned that they're out there on their own. But let

0:26:40.570 --> 0:26:44.020
<v Speaker 1>me just dig into the annual threat assessment. In June,

0:26:44.100 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the Director-General said 31 major terrorism plots had been disrupted. Now,

0:26:49.340 --> 0:26:53.300
<v Speaker 1>On Friday, he said 33. What explains the two? There's

0:26:53.420 --> 0:26:56.949
<v Speaker 1>either a typographical error in one of the documents. I've

0:26:56.970 --> 0:26:58.260
<v Speaker 1>got them here, Peter. I'm going to hold them up.

0:26:58.290 --> 0:27:01.869
<v Speaker 1>I've got two documents. There's either a typographical error, unlikely.

0:27:02.869 --> 0:27:06.910
<v Speaker 1>They've maybe gone back to historical data and maybe reclassified

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.500
<v Speaker 1>some disruptions of years past and assigned a greater seriousness

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.740
<v Speaker 1>to them, a greater level of imminence.

0:27:13.820 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 4>So they've gone from 31 to 33.

0:27:14.540 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 8>Or....

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:22.379
<v Speaker 1>The other logical and only plausible explanation, and you and

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.580
<v Speaker 1>your viewers can make their own decisions on this, they

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.290
<v Speaker 1>can just go to the ASIO website, is that ASIO

0:27:28.330 --> 0:27:31.890
<v Speaker 1>and its partners have foiled two major terrorist attacks just

0:27:31.930 --> 0:27:35.889
<v Speaker 1>in the last 10 weeks because there's no other explanation

0:27:35.930 --> 0:27:37.290
<v Speaker 1>for this variation in numbers.

0:27:38.750 --> 0:27:42.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and my point about context in terms of 16

0:27:42.230 --> 0:27:45.650
<v Speaker 2>a lot is 32 a lot. I certainly don't remember

0:27:45.670 --> 0:27:49.530
<v Speaker 2>in my time working in Canberra this sort of quantum

0:27:50.390 --> 0:27:52.550
<v Speaker 2>of terror attacks at the stage you're saying that they've

0:27:52.570 --> 0:27:56.629
<v Speaker 2>been foiled. So where is the press conference from the

0:27:56.670 --> 0:28:00.260
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister and the senior ministers, or as John Howard

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>would routinely do when we had that terrible period after

0:28:04.020 --> 0:28:07.500
<v Speaker 2>9-11 and in and around the two Bondi terror attacks, sorry,

0:28:07.740 --> 0:28:12.129
<v Speaker 2>Bali terror attacks, where he would give a statement, an update,

0:28:12.150 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 2>a formal update to the parliament saying, to give the

0:28:15.100 --> 0:28:19.300
<v Speaker 2>public as much information as we could reasonably have, transparently have,

0:28:19.780 --> 0:28:23.420
<v Speaker 2>but also the reassurance that the agencies had what they

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.010
<v Speaker 2>needed to have in terms of resources and powers to

0:28:27.070 --> 0:28:30.950
<v Speaker 2>best keep us safe. We've got the bosses out there,

0:28:31.030 --> 0:28:34.450
<v Speaker 2>the agencies, we've got all this chatter that they're under-resourced,

0:28:34.470 --> 0:28:36.330
<v Speaker 2>that they haven't got what they need, and that's in

0:28:36.369 --> 0:28:39.410
<v Speaker 2>and around the Bondi Royal Commission, and we're hearing nothing

0:28:39.450 --> 0:28:42.300
<v Speaker 2>from the people that we elect to run the whole show.

0:28:44.690 --> 0:28:47.410
<v Speaker 1>Well, Peter, just to round off the two data points,

0:28:47.430 --> 0:28:49.450
<v Speaker 1>because that's going to reinforce the point you've just put

0:28:49.490 --> 0:28:53.050
<v Speaker 1>into the question, the 16 number that you talked about

0:28:53.070 --> 0:28:56.430
<v Speaker 1>at the top of this interview are of a lesser character.

0:28:56.450 --> 0:28:59.350
<v Speaker 4>That is to say early disruptions, they were serious.

0:28:59.450 --> 0:29:03.850
<v Speaker 1>But they got them early. 16 just since December. 16

0:29:03.850 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>over nine months. So what we've talked about tonight is

0:29:06.910 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>two major terrorist plots thwarted, we think, in the last

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.900
<v Speaker 1>10 weeks, and 16... I'm going to call them lesser.

0:29:14.420 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Had they come about, they would have been tragic, but

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.500
<v Speaker 1>they were caught at an earlier stage, 16 since December. Separately,

0:29:20.540 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the AFP commissioner, and the AFP, I should say, before

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.710
<v Speaker 1>her ascension to the commissioner's job, going back to January

0:29:28.730 --> 0:29:33.930
<v Speaker 1>of 24, when the new offence of violent extremist material possession, distribution,

0:29:34.110 --> 0:29:39.310
<v Speaker 1>dissemination was introduced, they've had over 40 persons charged, over 40,

0:29:39.310 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>most recently on Saturday night, a fellow trying to get

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>away to the Middle East and he was arrested at

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.570
<v Speaker 1>the airport. What is going on, Peter? Now, to your point,

0:29:47.830 --> 0:29:51.090
<v Speaker 1>I think in a parliamentary democracy, what is owed to

0:29:51.110 --> 0:29:54.730
<v Speaker 1>the public is this transparency from the agency heads is wonderful.

0:29:55.250 --> 0:29:59.050
<v Speaker 1>I really do commend the both Director-General Burgess and Commissioner

0:29:59.070 --> 0:30:01.410
<v Speaker 1>Barrett for what they're doing. What we need, though, in

0:30:01.430 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a democracy, to your point, is a ministerial statement, and

0:30:04.300 --> 0:30:07.540
<v Speaker 1>I would cover the following things. An articulation by the

0:30:07.620 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>government of what the security environment is, if it's degrading

0:30:10.940 --> 0:30:13.660
<v Speaker 1>and it's even more probable than probable, that needs to

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.270
<v Speaker 1>be stated. I would, and you'll recall this going after 9-11,

0:30:18.020 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Bali and the London bombings, the institution known as the,

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:29.590
<v Speaker 1>or the creation of the National Security Hotline, 1800 123 400.

0:30:29.590 --> 0:30:32.970
<v Speaker 1>One call, and my department, when I ran Home Affairs,

0:30:33.020 --> 0:30:36.580
<v Speaker 1>used to manage that call, that hotline. One call could

0:30:36.620 --> 0:30:39.500
<v Speaker 1>make a difference, Peter. So where is the public, if

0:30:39.540 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you like, awareness campaign? Where is it on our social

0:30:42.620 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>media feeds? Where are the ads? Where's the public communications

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:51.860
<v Speaker 1>effort behind the hotline? Where is the national security counter-terrorism exercise?

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.060
<v Speaker 1>You and I will well recall 20 years ago, and

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this is confronting, and I don't want to say this

0:30:56.620 --> 0:30:59.380
<v Speaker 1>from the point of view of alarming and causing anxiety.

0:30:59.420 --> 0:31:03.910
<v Speaker 1>But having live exercises in the street, including with actors

0:31:03.950 --> 0:31:06.830
<v Speaker 1>with fake blood and having first responders come in and

0:31:07.110 --> 0:31:10.250
<v Speaker 1>helicopters coming in with the tactical assault group, that is

0:31:10.290 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>important for the muscle memory of the first responders and

0:31:13.260 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the tactical responders.

0:31:15.020 --> 0:31:15.940
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't agree more.

0:31:15.980 --> 0:31:19.460
<v Speaker 4>Couldn't agree more. But it's also muscle memory for the community.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:24.350
<v Speaker 1>It elevates our vigilance and our awareness without that becoming,

0:31:24.410 --> 0:31:27.750
<v Speaker 1>if you like, so anxiety-causing that, you know, we become helpless.

0:31:27.770 --> 0:31:29.830
<v Speaker 1>A couple of other things very quickly. We've got to

0:31:29.870 --> 0:31:31.310
<v Speaker 1>really look at these de-radicalisation programs.

0:31:31.350 --> 0:31:32.310
<v Speaker 2>Just quickly, I've got to get to a break.

0:31:33.430 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Are they working?

0:31:34.410 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 4>And finally, duty of care.

0:31:36.260 --> 0:31:40.980
<v Speaker 1>If this violent extremist material is on social media, it

0:31:41.020 --> 0:31:41.940
<v Speaker 1>has to be taken down.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.220
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'll just underscore that point. There was an

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.450
<v Speaker 2>inquiry set up today, the parliamentary joint committee, Committee into

0:31:49.570 --> 0:31:53.370
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence and Security that they would, by Easter, report on

0:31:53.410 --> 0:31:57.570
<v Speaker 2>these DRAD programs. Mainly the discussion is what is making

0:31:57.610 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>young people so susceptible to radicalisation? Well, I want an

0:32:01.890 --> 0:32:04.820
<v Speaker 2>audit of the programs. I want to know who's delivering them,

0:32:04.980 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 2>where they are being delivered, why they are not working.

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 2>The latest stats that I went through last night show

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.500
<v Speaker 2>that they are not working. In some cases, they're making

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 2>no difference at all. That's the vast majority. In some cases,

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.330
<v Speaker 2>they are actually making the kid more radical than ever before.

0:32:20.350 --> 0:32:22.790
<v Speaker 2>So I think that has to be on the parliamentary

0:32:22.830 --> 0:32:25.890
<v Speaker 2>table as well as all the other things you went through.

0:32:25.950 --> 0:32:30.170
<v Speaker 2>Mike Pozzuolo, did you good? That's absolutely what Australians need

0:32:30.190 --> 0:32:33.050
<v Speaker 2>to hear. Thank you for your time. Right after the break,

0:32:33.610 --> 0:32:38.050
<v Speaker 2>Australians gaslit in the debate over gender ideology. Well, wait

0:32:38.110 --> 0:32:40.710
<v Speaker 2>till I tell you who my next guest has written

0:32:40.870 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 2>a book with. That's after the break. Coming up shortly,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a distinguished historian, a member of the British House of

0:32:49.980 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Lords on what Australia must do to confront antisemitism and

0:32:54.900 --> 0:32:56.239
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of other things as well. But now,

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.050
<v Speaker 2>to the debate around gender identity laws that critics say

0:33:00.210 --> 0:33:04.130
<v Speaker 2>are eroding the rights of protections historically afforded to biological women,

0:33:04.430 --> 0:33:09.730
<v Speaker 2>particularly around single-sex spaces, children and freedom of speech. Libby

0:33:09.780 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Connors is the co-author of a new book with her husband,

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:17.140
<v Speaker 2>former Greens co-founder Drew Hutton. It's called Over the Rainbow,

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:21.410
<v Speaker 2>A Challenge to Cancel Culture. It argues that laws designed

0:33:21.450 --> 0:33:25.190
<v Speaker 2>to protect gender identity have created a conflict with women's

0:33:25.410 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>sex-based rights and are increasingly forcing Australians to accept contested ideas.

0:33:31.820 --> 0:33:34.620
<v Speaker 2>I'm delighted to say Libby joins me now. Welcome to

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.900
<v Speaker 2>the program, Libby. I mean, I love that article that

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 2>was in The Australian on the weekend where you said

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.590
<v Speaker 2>this law is a political weapon. It's state-sanctioned gaslighting. It

0:33:44.630 --> 0:33:47.010
<v Speaker 2>forces us to say things we know are false. and

0:33:47.030 --> 0:33:50.390
<v Speaker 2>it punishes us for saying things we know are true. Now,

0:33:50.610 --> 0:33:53.550
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you here. Why does this new right of

0:33:53.610 --> 0:33:57.990
<v Speaker 2>someone to deny biological reality force me to accept, force

0:33:58.050 --> 0:34:02.830
<v Speaker 2>me to deny what I know is scientific biological fact?

0:34:04.610 --> 0:34:10.989
<v Speaker 10>Yes, indeed. Thanks, Peter. That was a direct quote I

0:34:11.030 --> 0:34:14.029
<v Speaker 10>took from a former sergeant of police in Victoria saying,

0:34:14.610 --> 0:34:17.330
<v Speaker 10>who of course in the course of her career had

0:34:17.370 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 10>dealt with many male offenders. And the problem is now

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 10>that under Victorian law and almost every state law in Australia,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 10>if an offender, after they've been arrested, declares that they

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:37.370
<v Speaker 10>are transgender, then it is a requirement of everyone to

0:34:39.030 --> 0:34:43.810
<v Speaker 10>respect that identity. And that's now been enshrined in Commonwealth

0:34:43.870 --> 0:34:46.469
<v Speaker 10>law under the Sex Discrimination Act.

0:34:48.969 --> 0:34:52.660
<v Speaker 2>OK, so so what's changed more broadly and not just

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.420
<v Speaker 2>legally changed, but what's changed in this country, particularly on

0:34:56.440 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 2>the left Libby, where the fight for women's rights really

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.910
<v Speaker 2>had its genesis in left politics? I'm in my mid 50s.

0:35:04.940 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 2>I felt we'd got got to a level of equality.

0:35:08.330 --> 0:35:10.470
<v Speaker 2>And I was basically going to sit back and enjoy

0:35:10.510 --> 0:35:13.070
<v Speaker 2>that equality. And now I feel like I'm back in

0:35:13.090 --> 0:35:17.750
<v Speaker 2>the 1950s fighting for women's rights all over again because

0:35:17.770 --> 0:35:23.590
<v Speaker 2>it's mainly men invading women's spaces. It's men, biological men,

0:35:23.989 --> 0:35:26.700
<v Speaker 2>coming back at women's rights, having a fight that I

0:35:26.739 --> 0:35:27.420
<v Speaker 2>thought was won.

0:35:28.590 --> 0:35:31.609
<v Speaker 10>Yes, and that's exactly how Drew and I came into

0:35:31.650 --> 0:35:33.990
<v Speaker 10>this as well, when he was cancelled in the Greens,

0:35:34.570 --> 0:35:37.420
<v Speaker 10>and then we discovered that there were more than 40

0:35:37.420 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 10>women who'd been expelled or forced to leave the party. And,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 10>of course, it wasn't only happening in the Greens. It's

0:35:46.460 --> 0:35:52.980
<v Speaker 10>been happening around the world. It's happened in different countries

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 10>of Europe with their Green parties. It's happened in the

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:01.020
<v Speaker 10>US Democrats. It's happened in the Green Party of England

0:36:01.060 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 10>and Wales. In our book, we approached prominent figures in

0:36:06.820 --> 0:36:09.580
<v Speaker 10>the UK. So we've got two chapters about what happened

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.770
<v Speaker 10>in the Green Party of England and Wales. We've also

0:36:11.790 --> 0:36:14.390
<v Speaker 10>got a chapter by Cara Dansky, an activist in the

0:36:14.489 --> 0:36:18.730
<v Speaker 10>US Democrats who's been trying to get the Democrats to

0:36:18.770 --> 0:36:23.090
<v Speaker 10>see sense. Even once they've been trounced by Donald Trump,

0:36:23.489 --> 0:36:29.660
<v Speaker 10>their inability to realise how much working Americans hate this

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.630
<v Speaker 10>set of ideas that has been imposed on the community

0:36:33.670 --> 0:36:38.110
<v Speaker 10>from above without proper discussion and debate was part of

0:36:38.170 --> 0:36:40.450
<v Speaker 10>the reason why we set about to write this book.

0:36:41.850 --> 0:36:46.660
<v Speaker 10>Essentially what's happened is that this set of ideas are

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 10>being imposed from above. So activist groups and lobby groups

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.850
<v Speaker 10>convinced social democratic parties around the world that this was

0:36:55.870 --> 0:36:58.700
<v Speaker 10>a good idea. And they said, but for goodness sake,

0:36:58.930 --> 0:37:02.460
<v Speaker 10>don't have public discussion about it. That will just trigger

0:37:02.820 --> 0:37:07.180
<v Speaker 10>a backlash. So just introduce them and, you know, everything

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:11.060
<v Speaker 10>will be fine. And tell everybody it's the kindest way

0:37:11.100 --> 0:37:16.990
<v Speaker 10>to behave. So there was consultation when they amended the

0:37:17.430 --> 0:37:21.230
<v Speaker 10>Sex Discrimination Act in Australia. A consultation process began in

0:37:21.230 --> 0:37:25.780
<v Speaker 10>2012 and was organised by the Australian Human Rights Commission.

0:37:26.420 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 10>But the final report from the Australian Human Rights Commission

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:37.089
<v Speaker 10>noted that women's groups had opposed the amendments and did

0:37:37.130 --> 0:37:41.390
<v Speaker 10>nothing about them, otherwise ignored them. So that's why it's

0:37:41.430 --> 0:37:45.230
<v Speaker 10>possible for Julia Gillard to state publicly that, you know,

0:37:45.390 --> 0:37:50.420
<v Speaker 10>she didn't expect these consequences because they weren't, that's the

0:37:50.460 --> 0:37:55.380
<v Speaker 10>way they operate. Lobby groups get control of political parties

0:37:55.989 --> 0:38:00.009
<v Speaker 10>and once they're in control, they suppress all debate and

0:38:00.270 --> 0:38:05.370
<v Speaker 10>it's having a terrible effect throughout community, throughout civil society,

0:38:05.670 --> 0:38:09.700
<v Speaker 10>which is the bedrock of our system. Our freedom to

0:38:09.820 --> 0:38:13.660
<v Speaker 10>organise and to speak in our community, in our own groups,

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:18.219
<v Speaker 10>has now been terribly compromised, particularly for women.

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:18.310
<v Speaker 8>Wow.

0:38:20.050 --> 0:38:21.870
<v Speaker 2>I do know when I was in the UK recently,

0:38:21.890 --> 0:38:25.190
<v Speaker 2>of course, they've had a number of court decisions that

0:38:25.230 --> 0:38:30.590
<v Speaker 2>have righted this wrong, that have reasserted biological identity in

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.060
<v Speaker 2>a way that we haven't in Australia. Unfortunately, it's got

0:38:33.140 --> 0:38:35.299
<v Speaker 2>worse in Australia with that decision out of the High

0:38:35.340 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Court on Friday afternoon. So it gives me hope if

0:38:38.420 --> 0:38:41.219
<v Speaker 2>the left in Britain have turned the tide and they've

0:38:41.260 --> 0:38:45.509
<v Speaker 2>now reinstated women's biological rights, A book by someone like

0:38:45.530 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you delving into the history on the left maybe will

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 2>give women and men on the left a reason to

0:38:51.940 --> 0:38:54.859
<v Speaker 2>pause and think that they do need to recast this

0:38:54.900 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. But I look forward. I haven't read your

0:38:57.739 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 2>book yet, Libby. I read the story in the paper

0:38:59.580 --> 0:39:02.460
<v Speaker 2>on the weekend. I look forward to reading it. But

0:39:02.540 --> 0:39:04.140
<v Speaker 2>I'm hoping my viewers will get out and read it

0:39:04.180 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 2>too because we've got to have a grassroots fight about

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.510
<v Speaker 2>this because I don't think the politicians are willing to change.

0:39:10.070 --> 0:39:13.169
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us tonight, Libby. The big con is there.

0:39:13.210 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 2>You must get that book. Over the rainbow. Over the rainbow.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.140
<v Speaker 2>All right, quick break after the break. The wonderful man,

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:27.219
<v Speaker 2>the historian, the British man, Andrew Roberts of Belgravia in

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:36.610
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Fart up, Panalantia, Lucy, Zelig, Jamie, Rogers. I

0:39:36.660 --> 0:39:40.049
<v Speaker 2>want to really rip into Rhys Muldoon. We'll enjoy that,

0:39:40.130 --> 0:39:42.649
<v Speaker 2>won't we, in a moment. But first, before that, let's

0:39:42.670 --> 0:39:45.689
<v Speaker 2>go to my next guest, the distinguished historian, Lord Roberts

0:39:45.730 --> 0:39:48.910
<v Speaker 2>of Belgravia, who is, as his title suggests, a member

0:39:48.930 --> 0:39:50.989
<v Speaker 2>of the British House of Lords, but it's in his

0:39:51.030 --> 0:39:54.190
<v Speaker 2>capacity as a great thinker and author of some 21

0:39:54.190 --> 0:39:56.670
<v Speaker 2>books that we're going to speak to him tonight. He's

0:39:56.710 --> 0:39:59.779
<v Speaker 2>in Australia to deliver the John Beneithen Lecture in Sydney

0:39:59.820 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow night for the Centre for Independent Studies. And on

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.330
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night in Melbourne... He'll then give the Menzies Oration

0:40:06.650 --> 0:40:09.170
<v Speaker 2>for the Robert Menzies Institute of Urban Unity. I'm on

0:40:09.190 --> 0:40:11.930
<v Speaker 2>the board. I declare that now publicly. And that's to

0:40:11.969 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 2>mark the 75th anniversary of the ANZUS Alliance. Lord Roberts,

0:40:16.860 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the program.

0:40:18.380 --> 0:40:18.739
<v Speaker 11>Thank you, Peter.

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.230
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to your speaking. We'll get to your speaking

0:40:21.250 --> 0:40:23.170
<v Speaker 2>engagements in a moment. We're delighted to have you in

0:40:23.210 --> 0:40:25.089
<v Speaker 2>the country. But I want to get a comment from

0:40:25.110 --> 0:40:28.069
<v Speaker 2>you on the news overnight about this renewed push to

0:40:28.110 --> 0:40:31.609
<v Speaker 2>dissolve the United Kingdom following that landmark meeting of First

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.620
<v Speaker 2>Ministers from Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It feels like

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 2>it was just yesterday there was a Scottish referendum to

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>leave the UK. That was lost. How serious is the

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:46.020
<v Speaker 2>latest push and what's the likely level of support amongst voters?

0:40:46.820 --> 0:40:50.390
<v Speaker 11>It's not serious in the slightest. It's true that the

0:40:50.450 --> 0:40:53.529
<v Speaker 11>three of them are nationalists, and that's the first time

0:40:53.550 --> 0:40:56.230
<v Speaker 11>this has happened, so one would expect them to get together.

0:40:56.670 --> 0:40:59.870
<v Speaker 11>The only reason that at least the Scottish and the

0:40:59.910 --> 0:41:04.110
<v Speaker 11>Welsh PMs are in power is because Labour did so badly.

0:41:04.610 --> 0:41:06.700
<v Speaker 11>It was a vote against Labour rather than a vote

0:41:06.820 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 11>for the nationalists, let alone for independence. And as you

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:17.290
<v Speaker 11>pointed out, we had a once-in-a-generation coalition in Scotland in

0:41:17.290 --> 0:41:20.569
<v Speaker 11>2014 and the Scottish Nationalists comprehensively lost it.

0:41:22.830 --> 0:41:25.740
<v Speaker 2>Let's go down to your Australian engagements if I can.

0:41:25.980 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 2>December's Bondi massacre, Jewish Australians experienced unimaginable horror and not

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:37.950
<v Speaker 2>just obviously on the beach last December but really since

0:41:38.030 --> 0:41:41.770
<v Speaker 2>the Hamas attacks of October 7. We have gone down

0:41:41.830 --> 0:41:47.029
<v Speaker 2>a path that most Australians don't recognise as being a

0:41:47.090 --> 0:41:49.029
<v Speaker 2>part of this country. I know it's been tough in

0:41:49.070 --> 0:41:52.630
<v Speaker 2>Britain as well, but it's been incredibly difficult for Jewish

0:41:52.690 --> 0:41:56.690
<v Speaker 2>Australians and all Australians actually who don't want to see

0:41:56.770 --> 0:41:59.650
<v Speaker 2>anti-Semitism on their streets like we have. How does a

0:41:59.690 --> 0:42:03.330
<v Speaker 2>liberal democracy like ours confront this sort of extremism without

0:42:03.890 --> 0:42:09.430
<v Speaker 2>losing our ability to maintain and treasure free speech?

0:42:10.489 --> 0:42:13.770
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's the key question, isn't it? And you're absolutely right.

0:42:13.810 --> 0:42:18.370
<v Speaker 11>I was at the Bondi massacre site this morning. The

0:42:18.410 --> 0:42:22.090
<v Speaker 11>obscenity of it, especially on a beautiful summer's day like today,

0:42:22.570 --> 0:42:25.730
<v Speaker 11>sunny day like today, is all the more powerful, really.

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 11>We must be able to tell the difference between free

0:42:30.380 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 11>speech and incitement to violence. And all too often, especially,

0:42:34.380 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 11>of course, in Britain, with our weekly hate marches that

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 11>the pro-Palestinian protestors movement puts out, still organises. We see

0:42:43.660 --> 0:42:48.060
<v Speaker 11>the line being crossed, phrases like from the river to

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:52.460
<v Speaker 11>the sea and globalise the intifada and having posters of

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:56.739
<v Speaker 11>paragliders and so on. That is anti-Semitic hate speech and

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.980
<v Speaker 11>that has to be cracked down on. So I'm going

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:04.700
<v Speaker 11>to be arguing for a much more comprehensive and sort

0:43:04.739 --> 0:43:06.940
<v Speaker 11>of all of society look at this. Of course, I

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:10.660
<v Speaker 11>don't want to in any way prejudge the results of

0:43:10.700 --> 0:43:12.860
<v Speaker 11>your Royal Commission inquiry?

0:43:14.860 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 2>We follow very closely what's happening in Britain and I

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:23.100
<v Speaker 2>think Australia, like so many Brits, fear you're in some

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:27.390
<v Speaker 2>sort of terminal cultural decline. That's certainly what many people

0:43:27.410 --> 0:43:30.930
<v Speaker 2>who we interview on this program fear themselves. How do

0:43:30.950 --> 0:43:37.190
<v Speaker 2>we in the West... protect our Judeo-Christian fundamentals. They feel

0:43:37.210 --> 0:43:38.170
<v Speaker 2>like they're under siege.

0:43:38.810 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, actually, we also in Britain watch what's going on

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:47.460
<v Speaker 11>in Australia. If a politician wants to make a policy popular,

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:53.060
<v Speaker 11>he or she says the Australia-style policy X, and that

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:56.739
<v Speaker 11>automatically puts it up five points in the public estimation.

0:43:56.800 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 11>So where you go, a lot of other parts of

0:44:01.219 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 11>the English-speaking peoples follow. And I'm hoping that's obviously going

0:44:04.780 --> 0:44:09.220
<v Speaker 11>to be the case with regard to anti-Semitism, because we

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:12.569
<v Speaker 11>all need, right the way across the English-speaking peoples, to

0:44:12.630 --> 0:44:18.150
<v Speaker 11>stand up for our Judeo-Christian values. They are superior in

0:44:18.290 --> 0:44:23.070
<v Speaker 11>terms of providing freedom and freedom of expression, of course,

0:44:23.170 --> 0:44:28.850
<v Speaker 11>and freedom of religion and representative institutions than our laws

0:44:28.910 --> 0:44:33.580
<v Speaker 11>and so on. than the alternatives. And when the alternative

0:44:33.660 --> 0:44:39.050
<v Speaker 11>is totalitarian China, then we really absolutely have to look

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.530
<v Speaker 11>to the system that we've got in place. You mentioned

0:44:42.570 --> 0:44:47.169
<v Speaker 11>earlier with your earlier guest about the left finally coming

0:44:47.230 --> 0:44:52.089
<v Speaker 11>round to the truth about biology. But actually it wasn't

0:44:52.110 --> 0:44:54.650
<v Speaker 11>the left. It was the Supreme Court. It was our

0:44:55.410 --> 0:45:01.270
<v Speaker 11>senior court that stated that biological sex is real. And

0:45:01.330 --> 0:45:04.630
<v Speaker 11>that comes, our legal system goes back to Magna Carta.

0:45:04.650 --> 0:45:06.029
<v Speaker 11>These are things worth fighting for.

0:45:07.530 --> 0:45:09.390
<v Speaker 2>You are right to remind me it was the courts

0:45:09.430 --> 0:45:13.620
<v Speaker 2>that then forced the left parliamentarians to adopt what the

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:16.100
<v Speaker 2>court had decided. I look forward to seeing you on

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:17.860
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night at the event in Melbourne.

0:45:18.140 --> 0:45:18.580
<v Speaker 11>Thank you so much.

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.890
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your time. All right, there's two events there.

0:45:21.930 --> 0:45:26.109
<v Speaker 2>They'll be on the screen. cis.org.au in Sydney. If you

0:45:26.210 --> 0:45:28.290
<v Speaker 2>are able to go, I encourage you to go to

0:45:28.330 --> 0:45:30.750
<v Speaker 2>that dinner there on Wednesday. But if you're in Melbourne,

0:45:30.790 --> 0:45:35.730
<v Speaker 2>come to the one at the robertmenziesinstitute.org.au. There's tickets available there.

0:45:36.170 --> 0:45:38.469
<v Speaker 2>And that one, of course, I'll be at that one.

0:45:38.510 --> 0:45:40.410
<v Speaker 2>Looking forward to it too. All right, quick break after

0:45:40.430 --> 0:45:43.859
<v Speaker 2>the break. Oh, these girls are good. These girls are good.

0:45:44.060 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Join me for my panel, Lucy and Jamie, in a moment.

0:45:51.450 --> 0:45:53.350
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's just head straight into it with my

0:45:53.390 --> 0:45:58.009
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday night powerhouse duo, Lucy Zellig, broadcaster, of course, Sky

0:45:58.050 --> 0:46:01.629
<v Speaker 2>News contributor and Sky News host. Gosh, News 24 host,

0:46:01.670 --> 0:46:04.690
<v Speaker 2>listen to me, News 24 host, Jamie Rogers. Welcome to

0:46:04.730 --> 0:46:07.609
<v Speaker 2>you both. I'm just going to let you kick off

0:46:07.750 --> 0:46:12.950
<v Speaker 2>on this guy, Rhys Muldoon, a low-life Labor pretender, best

0:46:12.989 --> 0:46:14.930
<v Speaker 2>mate of the Prime Minister, of course, front and centre

0:46:15.110 --> 0:46:19.820
<v Speaker 2>at the wedding. Sacked today for offensive comments at Jacinta Nambujo-Price.

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 2>directed it myself as well. I mean, Lucy, I am

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 2>sick of this as a conservative woman. I'm all up

0:46:27.980 --> 0:46:30.970
<v Speaker 2>for an intellectual debate. Any of these bozos could come

0:46:31.050 --> 0:46:33.370
<v Speaker 2>here any night of the week and take me head on,

0:46:33.710 --> 0:46:36.150
<v Speaker 2>but they don't. They tweet from the safety of their

0:46:36.190 --> 0:46:38.830
<v Speaker 2>dirty little bedrooms or whatever they do. This is the

0:46:38.890 --> 0:46:42.190
<v Speaker 2>hypocrisy of the left. Over to you.

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.620
<v Speaker 12>You're absolutely right, Peter. The hypocrisy stinks to high heaven.

0:46:47.260 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 12>But I don't even think that this is a conservative

0:46:49.900 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 12>or progressive issue, because at the end of the day,

0:46:53.100 --> 0:46:54.939
<v Speaker 12>if you are the type of person that can take

0:46:54.980 --> 0:46:58.839
<v Speaker 12>to social media and can speak about women in this way,

0:46:58.900 --> 0:47:03.280
<v Speaker 12>there is something deeply sick and depraved about you, Mr Muldoon.

0:47:03.739 --> 0:47:04.540
<v Speaker 2>I hope you hear this.

0:47:04.620 --> 0:47:07.950
<v Speaker 12>I think you're a vile, disgusting and despicable creature. And

0:47:07.969 --> 0:47:10.230
<v Speaker 12>there's an ancient proverb that goes to the tune of,

0:47:10.350 --> 0:47:11.469
<v Speaker 12>a man is known.

0:47:11.250 --> 0:47:12.630
<v Speaker 2>By the company that he keeps.

0:47:13.110 --> 0:47:15.410
<v Speaker 12>The fact that he was able to, Mr Muldoon, score

0:47:15.469 --> 0:47:19.129
<v Speaker 12>a highly coveted ticket to the Prime Minister's wedding where

0:47:19.190 --> 0:47:21.489
<v Speaker 12>only 80-odd people were able to go and there were

0:47:21.550 --> 0:47:25.490
<v Speaker 12>photographs of him kissing our Prime Minister tells you everything

0:47:25.530 --> 0:47:27.469
<v Speaker 12>that you need to know about the type of circles

0:47:27.489 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 12>that this man moves in. And the fact that this

0:47:30.219 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 12>man was a children's entertainer, he co-authored a children's book,

0:47:34.100 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 12>I mean, it is absolutely repulsive. But this side of

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 12>politics has form when it comes to this. The greatest

0:47:40.340 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 12>shame that I have the most resentment over is that

0:47:42.739 --> 0:47:44.739
<v Speaker 12>they had the gall to accuse the Liberal Party of

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 12>having a women problem, but now you've got a Prime

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:51.240
<v Speaker 12>Minister who voted down Mr Abbott's motion in 2012 regarding

0:47:51.300 --> 0:47:54.939
<v Speaker 12>Peter Slipper, who only addressed Parliament today in Question Time

0:47:54.980 --> 0:47:58.669
<v Speaker 12>saying that this was, quote, unacceptable. and goes on podcasts

0:47:58.730 --> 0:48:01.689
<v Speaker 12>and demeans and disrespects his wife and mocks other women

0:48:01.750 --> 0:48:04.870
<v Speaker 12>and fantasises about sleeping with other women. I mean, don't

0:48:04.930 --> 0:48:07.610
<v Speaker 12>ever let them fool you that the right side of

0:48:07.650 --> 0:48:11.010
<v Speaker 12>politics have a problem with women when that, that title

0:48:11.070 --> 0:48:12.140
<v Speaker 12>rests with them, Peter.

0:48:13.890 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I had an interview in the paper on the weekend

0:48:16.940 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 2>in the Sunday Telegraph, the Sunday Herald Sun, in the

0:48:19.700 --> 0:48:23.009
<v Speaker 2>Stella magazine, Jamie, and in it I talked to about

0:48:23.030 --> 0:48:26.009
<v Speaker 2>the fact that some of my greatest mentors and supporters

0:48:26.070 --> 0:48:29.590
<v Speaker 2>in my life, starting back with my dearly departed dad,

0:48:29.850 --> 0:48:32.700
<v Speaker 2>have been males. I've had some amazing men in the

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party, people that I've worked for mainly, but men

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I've worked with who've been in my corner. So it's

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 2>not all men. I want to make that absolutely clear.

0:48:40.540 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I've got enormous regard for good men, but I just

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:47.500
<v Speaker 2>hate this stuff in politics because I've got a thick skin,

0:48:47.860 --> 0:48:51.819
<v Speaker 2>but it's just relentless against women on the right.

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:52.980
<v Speaker 8>It is.

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:55.420
<v Speaker 13>And Peter, I should also add that men within the

0:48:55.460 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 13>Liberal Party have been really great mentors to me as well.

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 13>It was actually a male in Mike Baird that was

0:49:01.140 --> 0:49:03.379
<v Speaker 13>the one that was really encouraging me to run for

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:07.700
<v Speaker 13>Warringah and they're in my corner. But to this left hypocrisy,

0:49:07.780 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 13>could you just imagine for a moment, Peter, if it

0:49:10.739 --> 0:49:14.170
<v Speaker 13>was a Liberal staffer or a staffer of Angus Taylor

0:49:14.230 --> 0:49:16.529
<v Speaker 13>or Scott Morrison or Tony Abbott that had made those

0:49:16.570 --> 0:49:17.870
<v Speaker 13>disgusting comments?

0:49:18.330 --> 0:49:19.690
<v Speaker 12>There would be outrage.

0:49:20.210 --> 0:49:22.850
<v Speaker 13>And unfortunately, though, Peter, because you are seen as a

0:49:22.890 --> 0:49:27.430
<v Speaker 13>conservative commentator and Jacinta Jhimpu Price is a conservative woman,

0:49:27.910 --> 0:49:31.089
<v Speaker 13>There is complete silence from those on the left. The

0:49:31.130 --> 0:49:31.969
<v Speaker 13>Labor women.

0:49:31.750 --> 0:49:33.089
<v Speaker 2>Have a lot to stay for.

0:49:33.670 --> 0:49:36.610
<v Speaker 13>They've been absolutely silent when it came to standing up

0:49:36.630 --> 0:49:40.220
<v Speaker 13>for the Japanese Prime Minister regarding the Mellon situation. And

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:43.219
<v Speaker 13>now here again, when women need you to stand up,

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 13>they are there that are silent, but they're the first

0:49:45.660 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 13>ones to all be very up and proud that they're

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:49.140
<v Speaker 13>all about for women.

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.610
<v Speaker 2>Well, all it does, as I said tonight, we all

0:49:52.630 --> 0:49:55.009
<v Speaker 2>just dig in a little bit harder. We go a

0:49:55.790 --> 0:49:58.530
<v Speaker 2>little bit harder. We all get a little bit thicker

0:49:58.550 --> 0:50:04.069
<v Speaker 2>in the skin, but we don't back away, do we, ladies? Nope. Never. Nope.

0:50:04.090 --> 0:50:05.950
<v Speaker 2>I'll leave it there. I'm out of time. Thank you

0:50:05.969 --> 0:50:08.649
<v Speaker 2>for your time on Tuesday, as always. Thanks for being

0:50:08.710 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 2>in my corner. My phone is lit up like a

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:14.180
<v Speaker 2>Christmas tree. My audience, you are warriors and you are wonderful.

0:50:14.820 --> 0:50:17.020
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you tomorrow night. And my poor old mum,

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:19.100
<v Speaker 2>she's upset about it too, but, Mum, I am fine.

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:21.580
<v Speaker 2>I'll come back again tomorrow night and go harder again.

0:50:22.100 --> 0:50:23.580
<v Speaker 2>See you then. Here's the Bolt Report.