WEBVTT - Sharri | 22 April

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry Good Evening.

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Tonight, exclusive Liberal party intel shows the election is much

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 3>closer than the poll suggests. I'll share these confidential details

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and Liberal strategy for the final week in a moment.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Plus, we'll hear tonight from.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>The director of Freshwater Strategy, the polling company behind the

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Liberals campaign, and radio legend. Ray Hadley would join me

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 3>on the desk to speak about Minique Ryan's shocking day

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 3>where she refused to answer questions on three separate occasions.

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>We've got new footage coming.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Up, and we'll cross live to the Vatican as crowds gathered.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>To mourn Pope Francis.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>On the show tonight, Bronwin, Bishop Dave Shama, Steve Price

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 3>and more.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>But first tonight.

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Exclusive inside information into the state of this election and

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the truth about the polls. Polling booths are now open,

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Australians are casting their votes and the election is anyone's

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>to win. Now Tonight, I'm going to tell you how

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the polls you're reading in the news are wrong when

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 3>it comes to this federal election and what's really going

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 3>on here. Most national polls have been showing Labor ahead

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>and some have even pointed to majority government for Labor.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>But this is a fantasy. Now.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 3>You need to remember that the polls are simply a

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 3>national survey of around one three hundred or so voters.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like a thumb in the wind to see the

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>national mood, and.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>The national polls pick up general trends and shifts in sentiment,

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 3>but in terms of accuracy for the election outcome, they

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 3>are categorically not the right tool for this particular election.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 3>Because this, more than any other is it's a hyper

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 3>localized election. It doesn't matter what the national opinion is

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>from one thousand or so voters out.

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Of eighteen million registered voters.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>It matters how the voters in the seats that are

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 3>in play will vote, and the Liberals are polling around

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>six hundred people in individual seats. Labor would be doing

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 3>the same. So you look at six hundred voters per

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 3>seat compared to one thousand people nationally, and when you

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 3>look at the results from this, there's no question Peter

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Dutton is absolutely in the game. Liberal strategists are comparing

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 3>this election to nineteen ninety eight, when John Howard lost

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the two party preferred vote at forty nine percent to

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Beasley's nearly fifty one percent, but howard one majority government. Now,

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 3>this election could be a case where Labor wins the

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>two PP vote the two party preferred vote, but Dutton

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>either has more seats or there's a hung parliament. A

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>likely outcome right now is that Dutton and alban Esi

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>both win seats in the highest sixties, and then it

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 3>would be who has the highest number and who can

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>negotiate to form government.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, Labor does.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Have the advantage here because the Greens and the Teals

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 3>would help Albanesi to form a radical green left government.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>It'd be even more out of step with Australia's Judeo

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Christian values than the Albanesi.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Government currently is.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 3>A good outcome for Peter Dutton would be reaching seventy

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>seats or more, which would.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Mean he'd have to pick up thirteen.

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Seats and the coalition currently holds fifty seven.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Now it's a big ask, but.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 3>This all depends on how the next week and a

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>half of campaigning goes. Now here's some insight into Liberal

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 3>parts strategy. I can reveal that the vast majority of Liberals'

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 3>election spend is geared up from today onwards.

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>That's millions of dollars.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Dutton's team has held back the vast majority of their

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>election spending until now. Their view was that Easter would

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>be a reset and voters would start thinking about the

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 3>election when polling booths open. Now this could be a

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 3>genius movel. They could have just left their election spending

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 3>too late to make a difference. We know that Labour's

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 3>aggressive attack ads have taken a hit on Dutton's personal standing,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>never mind whether they're true or not, and we'll yet

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>to see whether the Liberals advertising spend on television and

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>online hurts Alvin Easy in turn. But either way, right

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 3>now the election is still highly competitive. One strategist said

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 3>to me that at the moment the Liberals are within

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>touching distance of being able to form a government, but

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 3>there's work to do. This is an important reminder that

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 3>the narrative suggested by the National polling that you keep

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 3>reading about that it's impossible for the coalition to win

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 3>and that Labor will form a majority government.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 2>This is inaccurate.

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>It's why I have spent the time digging into the

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 3>difference between the published polling and the internal research to

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 3>bring you this information because it is crucial both Dutton

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and alban Easy know this. They know it's tighter than

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>is being publicly suggested. And Peter Dutton even this morning

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>spoke about the twenty nineteen election when all the polling

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>said Bill Shotten would be Australia's Prime minister. It was

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 3>utterly wrong.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 4>I think if you have a look at the twenty

0:05:55.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 4>nineteen pole result, where all the public published polling was

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 4>pointing one way, the reality is that there was a

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 4>different outcome. Now I'm not going to go into the

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 4>private polling, but you'll see where the government's spending money

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 4>at the moment in their seats. They're defending seats at

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 4>the moment, they're not on the offensive. So I think

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>there's a bit more of a sophisticated view in relation

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 4>to the polling and what's happening at the moment. Australians

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 4>are hurting. That's the reality.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 3>So Dartan, they're saying that their private polling is different

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 3>and reflects a different outcome to the published polls.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 2>It's also what National's.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Leader David little Proud said in an interview last week

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the national polls are reflective of the

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 5>hyper local campaigns are taking place. There, and I think

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 5>to your point, it's exactly about cost of living about

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 5>in particularly as you get out of the inner suburbs

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 5>where there is not necessarily a bigger cost of living crisis.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 5>As these you get out further out, they're not feeling

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 5>it as much. And I think what's important is that

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 5>while we're not walking away from the national polls and

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 5>what they reflect, what we're what we're seeing now we're

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 5>internal polling, is that as you get out where Australians

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 5>are struggling and we're saying to them, we're going to

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 5>give you a tax cut of twelve hundred dollars an

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 5>individual twenty four hundred family.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Now Anthony Alberanezi is getting cocky, but he knows this

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>election is much tighter than the perception in the media,

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>and he even warned publicly that, like Dudden said, this

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 3>could be a repeat of twenty nineteen when everyone said

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Shorten was going to win.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 2>But did it. I remind colleagues that twenty nineteen.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 6>The book is paid out and guess what that didn't occur.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>That was a very unwise thing to do. Now here's

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>something else.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>It's also worth keeping in mind that the pollsters behind

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 3>News poll are Pixis Polling and they do the polling

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>and research for the Labor Party.

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm not saying newspoles inaccurate.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying it's worth keeping this in mind that

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 3>the polsters behind it are being paid by Labor, probably

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 3>millions of dollars.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 3>The Liberal Party's polling is done by Freshwater Strategy, where

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the polster Mike Turner is considered the best in the business. Now,

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 3>where Labor is spending its money also unpicks the narrative

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 3>that it's confident of winning government. Labour's financial spend shows

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 3>it's putting money and resources into holding onto very safe seats.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Coalition analysis of Google and YouTube advertising spends shows that

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Labor is spending the most on safe Labor seats and

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 3>these include Wills held by Peter Khalil on a margin

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 3>of four point six percent, where Labour spent one hundred

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 3>and twenty nine thousand dollars in the past month, Chisholm

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 3>held by Labour's Koreina Garland. This is on a margin

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>of three point three percent and Labour spent one hundred

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and sixty thousand dollars the seat of Hawk as well,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 3>margin of seven point six percent and Labour spent one

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eleven thousand. McEwen considered a safe seat again,

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Labour spent one hundred and ten thousand, and then Bruce

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 3>held by Julian Hill and a margin of over five percent,

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and Labour spent one hundred and nine thousand, and on

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 3>it goes. Now, this advertising spend is on digital advertising.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>It's how political parties now reach young voters who aren't

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 3>consuming traditional media just as much.

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, as you know, they're online the whole time.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 3>A coalition Sauce said that, and this is the coalition

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Sauce quoted in the Australian. They said that Labor is

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 3>sandbagging in seats they claim they're not worried about and some.

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Of these are very safe labor seats.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Gorton, Hawk, McEwen and the ALP is pouring hundreds of

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 3>thousands of dollars into retaining. Now in some seats, liberal

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 3>internal research shows that there are huge swings towards the coalition.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>It's been this way for months now, so big the

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>liberal strategists are describing it as historic. So the message

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 3>is this election is not over. Voters in key seats

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 3>are unhappy with alban Easy understandably so, and the polls

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>were disastrously wrong in twenty nineteen and again in the

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 3>recent American election, when many are predicted the result either

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be known for a week or more. All they

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 3>said Kamala Harris would win. Now, Australian polsters aren't more

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 3>sophisticated than the American sephologists.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And despite the.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Sand and the hourglass quickly trickling, we're only on day

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>one of voting. The election isn't written in stone, and

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 3>at this point the outcome is still up for grabs.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're going to cross.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Live to Vatican City shortly, but now for more analysis

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 3>on how the election's going, let's bring in former Speaker

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 3>of the House ronman Bishop and Sky News host Steve Price.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to you both.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Roman, What are your thoughts on what I've just said

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>there about this disconnect between the national mood that the

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>polls that we see pushed forward in the media that

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 3>give alb and Easy that confidence boost.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>He needs, you know, compared to what the.

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Individual's seat by seat research is showing in such a

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 3>hyperlocal campaign.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, first point, I've always been working on the likelihood

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 7>of winning thirteen seats for the Opposition to be able

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 7>to form government. The second thing is that I've been

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 7>saying for some time like you, that the polling itself

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 7>has become a tool of campaigning yes, and by pushing

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 7>out this view that Albert Easy is winning, he's so

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 7>far in front they expect to push people into accepting

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 7>that and going along with it.

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>So so true, it's.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 7>Not to be believed that this is exactly the way

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 7>it's all going. Those individual seats are very different, and

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 7>it was famously Tip O'Neill, the former Speaker of the

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 7>United States Congress, who said that all politics is local,

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 7>and very much in these seats a local issues that

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 7>are going to be relevant to the finish. So I

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 7>think that Peter Dutton has got to be very forceful

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 7>coming forward in these last days and push the fact

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 7>that whatever Albanezi has offered you is usually off in

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 7>the future. What the opposition is offering is relief from

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 7>the cost of living now, and the reduction in the

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 7>petrol tax is first and foremost that clicks in immediately

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 7>and affects the cost of everything, absolutely everything, because this

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 7>country runs on diesel. So and the fact that he

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 7>needs to point out what's in the wings, what they're

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 7>going to give Australian people should they get back. And

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 7>I just think that everything about Albanesi and his campaign

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 7>is fake, even down to what has happened today. I'm

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 7>pleased there's been a pause to recognize this.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 2>It's going to come to that in a moment actually.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 7>But I just find Alberanzi to be so professing today,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 7>but refusing to take an oath on the Bible to

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 7>be sworn in as prime minister somehow just doesn't rest easily.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 2>And the attacks on tourney out of it. Absolutely all

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>this rejection of religion.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 7>Yes, and suddenly it's vital, But to me it's important

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 7>for other reasons, which we'll discuss its.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Going exactly in a moment, the political reasons behind him

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 3>doing that. Steve, you know, I want to get your

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 3>thoughts on what I've had to say about the state

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 3>of play.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 2>At the moment.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean one of the main seats where the coalition

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 3>is really looking to pick up what were.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Very safe labor seats is Victoria.

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, do you see this mood, this rejection of

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the prime minister continuing in your state.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 8>It was really interesting what you said at the beginning

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 8>of the program, because what I picked up today and

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 8>you made the point that the Liberal Party had held

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 8>back a lot of their campaign funding and now they're

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 8>going to let it loose. In the last week and

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 8>a half, listening to three AW, the main talkback radio

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 8>station in Melbourne to day, in every ad break from

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 8>around about seven in the morning until around midday, there

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 8>was a Peter Dutton voiced ad talking about what he

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 8>was going to offer Victorians. Now three OW is slightly

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 8>less conservative than my old station two GiB in Sydney,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 8>and it's got a massive audience. The for show rates

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 8>twenty percent, their morning show rates fourteen to fifteen percent,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 8>and their audience and I know because I used to

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 8>run the joint. It's all spread through the outer ring

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 8>suburbs of Melbourne where all those seats you just mentioned are,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 8>and they're now hammering, hammering, hammering the positive messages from

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 8>Peter Dutton on that radio station. They would have spent

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 8>tens of thousands, if not over one hundred thousand dollars

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 8>in one day. And that's going to happen over and

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 8>over and over again. And I think Victoria is still

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 8>a place to keep your eye on and Brommin talks

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 8>about thirteen seats and so do you you know there

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 8>could be eight, nine, ten seats in Victoria alone if

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 8>you believe what you're hearing on the ground and as

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 8>you said, voting today.

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 3>If that's true, Steve, if the swing really is on

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 3>in Victoria, then you know, pushes the size of Dutton's

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 3>when up much more because he's going to pick up

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 3>a few in New South Wales. I mean, you say

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>that is getting more difficult, but he's going to pick

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>up a few South Wales potentially one in a couple

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>of other states. So if it is that big in

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Victoria that he's in a position to form minority government.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 8>The labor brand here is so toxic. And I've said

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 8>it to you before, but it happened again last weekend

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 8>where we find out that during COVID, Daniel Andrews, the Premier,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 8>was telling us he was taking medical advice. There's now

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 8>documents that show that he was the one who decided

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 8>to have a curfew where no one could go out

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 8>of their house after nine o'clock at night and couldn't

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 8>go out before five o'clock in the morning. That was

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 8>a decision taken by a labor politician. The only labor

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 8>politician still in power who was in the cabinet that

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 8>made that decision is the current premier. So the people

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 8>of Victoria don't like labor and they're not saying, oh well,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 8>Anthony Albanize is different to what Dan Andrews and just

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 8>Cinder Allen the life. They are saying, do we really

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 8>want this mob to be in charge of us again?

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>That is such a scat and all that big exclusive

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 3>revealed by the Herald son that you know, instead of

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 3>getting health advice, he got advice from polsters, literally polsters.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>You know there are young I don't know children, but

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 3>teenagers who committed suicide. Their mental health issues were so

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>bad Brunwan during the COVID lockdowns as a result of

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the decisions Daniel Andrews took for his own popularity against

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 3>health advice.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely and we all really thought that that what was

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 7>going on at the time. I have to say, but

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 7>to now to have the proof of us and no

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 7>wonder you've got builders who won't build a house for him,

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 7>more other people who won't leaving associate with people. I

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 7>just feel that Victoria was served so badly under labor

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 7>that that feeling still there. It does remind me a

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 7>bit of nineteen ninety when Andrew Peacock won nine seats

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 7>in Victoria. It was New South Wales that let him

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 7>down and not winning that election, and New South Wales's

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 7>time won't be letting the Coalition down.

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>No, there's still plenty of seats or not as many

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>of course, but still plenty to pick up in New

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 3>South Wales. Steve, I want to get your reaction, you know,

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 3>returning to the Pope's passing what I spoke about with Brunwin.

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 3>The Prime Minister today said there'll be a pause in campaigning,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 3>a pause in the hostilities. You know, he suddenly cares

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 3>about Catholicism when he's mocked it in the past.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 2>The hypocrisy here.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, as Bromin said he refused to take the oath

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 8>on the Bible when he was sworn in as Prime Minister.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 8>If you go back and look at the history of

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 8>Anthony Albanesi in his relationship with religion, I'm not sure

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 8>you're going to find a very staunch Catholic. I mean

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 8>he certainly he mocked Tony Abbott, he called him the

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 8>mad Monk I mean to suddenly decide that the death

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 8>of the pope means that you're suddenly yourself a staunch Catholic. Look,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 8>maybe Anthony and Albaneze he's had a late life conversion

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 8>to religion. But if you'd ask me a question a

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 8>two weeks ago whether I thought Anthony Alberanezi was particularly religious,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 8>I would have said no.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he's never said that he is religious. Brow

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 3>this would have been politically advantageous for him, as you

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 3>were about to say before, one in five Australians are Catholic,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 3>and it would have given him more time to prepare

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>for the debate tonight.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 2>And of course he doesn't want.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 3>There to be any campaigning days because that works in

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Darden's advantage.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 7>It also gave him good pictures. But on that question

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 7>of the porting of the campaign, I approve of that

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 7>because this is a country where the dominant religion is Christian. Yes,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 7>this country was founded on Christian values and principles, and

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 7>I think it is appropriate, and I'm saying this is

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 7>a Protestant. I think it is appropriate that the marking

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 7>of the Pope's passing is recognized in this way to

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 7>say that this is who we are as a people

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 7>in the nation, and I think that's very important.

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I agree with you, And we gave a lot

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 3>of coverage on the show last night to the Pope's passing,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 3>which happened just before we went to air, because religion

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>is important and he is not only an historic figure,

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 3>but he was incredibly inspirational to billions of Catholics around

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 3>the world and other.

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 2>People as well. And we're going to cross live to

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the Vatican in a moment.

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>As I said, Steve, I want to ask you now,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>let's show this video Max Weifer.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>You might remember him.

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 3>He's the Israeli influencer who showed those nurses making those

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 3>very offensive and he submitted comments about Israelis that they'd

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 3>kill Israelis if they went into the hospital. They've now

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 3>been charged and they're making their way through the court system. Well,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Max Weber has captured another Australian doing the Nazis.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Have a look at this. What's good man?

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>What's that juice?

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 8>Why you.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 5>Pokustanding people?

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 2>We didn't pakistanding before we free purchased there.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure why we've blurred his image. But if

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 3>you've got a Max Viifa's Instagram account. You can see

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 3>the full thing there, Steve. We don't know who this

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 3>individual is, but you know, just appalling the prevalence of

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 3>this sort of attitude online at the moment and how

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 3>people are embracing the hitless salute.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 8>It's appalling and it does remind us soon as you said,

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 8>this is going through the court, so you go back

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 8>to the original vision video that he captured and it

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 8>gave us a very stark insight into just how bad

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 8>the anti Semitism has become in our country. And I

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 8>think it's shocked. I mean, we have seen over and

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 8>over and over and over again just how bad it is.

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 8>It's interesting that it's not been a part of the

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 8>election campaign really. I mean, of all the debates that

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 8>we've had, I haven't seen someone nail the Prime Minister

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 8>on how weak the government was post October seven. And

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 8>they never really came out and slammed as hard as

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 8>they should have what was going on around the suburbs

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 8>of Australia. I don't believe they have anyway. I think

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 8>Peter Dutton was much tougher and much harder on that,

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 8>and I just hope somebody gets the opportunity to ask

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 8>Anthony Alberanezi before election day, do you think now today,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 8>right now, before we go to the polls on the third,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 8>that you've done enough to support the Jewish people of Australia.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely.

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 7>How can he possibly say that when Drayfus has preferenced

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 7>the Greens, you possibly believe that there's been any sincerity

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 7>in anything that Albinizi has had to say about the

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 7>antisemitism in this country. When the senior person in the

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 7>law in this country, who is a Jewish person himself,

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 7>is preferencing the hideous Greens.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Says it all massive betrayal. And absolutely we've seen in so.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Many seats today because finally today of course we see

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 3>everyone's how to vote cards and we're seeing in so

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 3>many seats, well, the Greens aren't preferencing labor. Second, so

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 3>why couldn't Mike Dreyfus, as the attorney journalist, as you say,

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 3>is the most senior Jewish member of the government, why

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 3>couldn't he come out and say I'm not going to

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 3>preference the Greens.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 7>Second, it is because Alberanizi has told him he can't

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 7>and he's weak enough to give in.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 3>And then on that you know, as I spoke about

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 3>last night, Josh Burns was blocked from coming on my

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 3>speak about this, and then Steve Price today will again

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 3>revelations in The Australian that Josh Burns Anthony Alberaneze has

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 3>stopped Josh from taking questions at a press conference also

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>about this issue.

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 8>And Josh had the guts and courage to have an

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 8>open ticket where he's not preferencing anybody, which he would

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 8>have been criticized internally for making that decision, but good

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 8>on him he did it. But Drafa, says Roman points out,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 8>I mean that is just a scandal that he would

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 8>preference a party like the Greens that have marched in

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 8>all of these pro Palestinian rallies weekend after weekend after weekend.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 8>Their own members of Parliament have stood up there and

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 8>been absolutely appalling in some of the things they've said.

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 8>So Labour's got form on this and people have got

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 8>to realize that.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, all right, Steve Price, Broman, Bishop, thank you

0:24:55.840 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>both so much. Now, it's been an emotional twenty four

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 3>hours for Catholics around the world with Pope Francis's passing.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 3>There's been an outpouring of grief in the Vatican as

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 3>crowds have gathered to pay their respects, and today we

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 3>also saw footage of the Pope it is coffin for

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>the first time. Now, this may be confronting to look out,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 3>so just a warning there, and it is surreal to

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 3>see these images of the Pope in his coffin. Now,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 3>let's bring it now, news cop European correspondent Sophie Ellsworth.

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 3>She's in the Vatican City and joins us live. Sophie,

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much for your time talk us through

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 3>what's happened today in the past twenty four hours since

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Pope Francis passed away.

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, Sharrier, as you can see, it's a beautiful day

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 9>here at Vatican City and there's thousands of people streaming

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 9>into the Italian capital to remember Pope Francis. There's so

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 9>many people continuing to flock to the city.

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>The crowds are building very quickly.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 9>We've had airports in a dated with people flying in,

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 9>hotel bookings going crazy. There's a real buzz around here, Sharry,

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 9>despite it being a very somber time and many people

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 9>very saddened by the passing.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Of Pope Francis.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 9>Many people are here also to celebrate his life and

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 9>also celebrate the work he did leading the church for

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 9>twelve years. So there's people arriving here at the moment

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 9>with flowers. There's lots of family members gathering together. There's

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 9>worshipers who have arrived in groups. But we're seeing that obviously, Shary.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 9>There's several days to the funeral yet, but the crowds

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 9>are already enormous. So people are thinking of coming to

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 9>Vatican City for the funeral, they need to make their

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 9>arrangements pretty quickly because this place is really filling up.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 3>So yes, as you just said, the funeral is still

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 3>to come or be held on Saturday, twenty seventh of April.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 3>What can you tell us about those details and whether

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 3>or not the Vatican will fulfill the Pope's wishes to

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 3>have a more pared back procession, So.

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Sharry, we don't know one hundred percent sure.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 9>The last I heard when I checked here with Vatican

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 9>everyone saying Saturday is the most likely day for the funeral,

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 9>but was still waiting for details on that. But yes,

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 9>he has made his wishes very clear that he wanted

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 9>a scale back you know, commemoration.

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Of his life. He didn't want the big fan bed.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 9>It traditionally goes with the funerals of pontiffs, so we're

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 9>waiting to hear those details, but they are being thrashed

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 9>out as we speak, Shari, So many people are waiting

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 9>to hear exactly when it will be the details of

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 9>it and the arrangement that he will want. But tomorrow

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 9>his body will be for viewing at inside Saint Peter's Basilica,

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 9>where many people are expected to stream here again hoping

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 9>to catch a glimpse of him ahead of the funeral,

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 9>most likely on the weekend.

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Now, Sophy, turning to the next pope and the process

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 3>that will happen in terms of how that pope is chosen.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Can you talk us through a bit about that process

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 3>and also who the leading candidates are, at least what's

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 3>being reported in the media.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Sharry.

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 9>So there's basically they will start the process, the conclave process,

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 9>between sixteen and twenty days after the death of Pope Francis,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 9>so there's still some time for this official process to begin.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 9>There's one hundred and thirty seven cardinals who are eligible

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 9>to vote. They must be under eighty years of age,

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 9>so they will gather together at the Sistine Chapel and

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 9>thrash out their voting in terms.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Of pointing in new pontiff.

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 9>Now, there are a couple of key candidates and one

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 9>of them is Filipino Cardinal Tagli. Now he's one of

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 9>the names that keeps being bandied around. He's very progressive,

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 9>like Pope Francis was on who is in the running

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 9>for this to take over.

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:03.719
<v Speaker 1>From Pope Francis.

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 9>And also the Vatican Secretary is another one, Petro Harlon.

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 9>His name is also being very much in the media here.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 9>He's been described as a safe set of hands. He

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 9>is the Vatican Secretary, so he's also another contender. But

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 9>look Sherry, it's a complicated process. I hope to do

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 9>it quite quickly because it's not a good look for

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 9>the Vatican if this process does take a lot of time.

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 9>But of course everyone is waiting to get through the

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 9>funeral before.

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>That official process does take place.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, Sophy Elsworth, thank you so much for joining

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 3>us live from Vatican City. Now, just a quick update

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 3>to the Ben Robert Smith appeal, where the Victoria Cross

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 3>recipient is calling for a retrial for the defamation finding

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 3>as well to be set aside over what he claims

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 3>is misconduct. Now, the case is set for the May

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 3>first and May second, so late next week and nine

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 3>journalist Nick McKenzie will take the stand and he'll face

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 3>cross examination. This is all over the audio recording that

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 3>we revealed where Nick McKenzie said he'd been actively briefed

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 3>on Ben Roberts Smith's legal strategy.

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I shouldn't tell you.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 9>I've just preached my newthics in doing that, like this

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 9>is where like this is position there if they knew.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>That, impet you that.

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 3>And The Australian also reports that Robert Smith's lawyers have

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>subpoenaed the ABC for any communications between Nick McKenzie and

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the Media Watch program. That's after Media Watch host Linton

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Besser put forward McKenzie's.

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Version of events.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 3>We'll continue to update you on this story, particularly.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Next week, but for now still to come.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 3>The director of Freshwater Strategy, the polling company behind the

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Liberals campaign, will break down where the election's up to. Plus,

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Ray Hadley will fire up about Minique right, and I'll

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 3>show you the new footage where she refused to take

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>questions on three separate occasions.

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Today, Ray Hadley and that footage after this quick break

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 2>welcome back. Well you would have seen this by now.

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Minniku Ran turning her back on Laura Jay's

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>this morning.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, we don't want to interrupt, but we just

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we are well in the interest of fitters transparency.

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 3>We just thought maybe we just want to know how

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 3>your campaign's going.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>This morning's going well.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, Lauren.

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 4>I am here to engage your photos.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Through a prepole.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a little litery.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so I'm not sure that it's really ideal for

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 7>you to be interrupting the process.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Have you had any other have you ready?

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, this was live on air and it quickly made

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>the news. So you'd think Minnie Ran would have learnt

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 3>her lesson after that, but sadly not, because then she

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>refused to speak to The Australian Today as well.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I towers play so arre.

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You from Movie Australia. We're not taking it that way through?

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Can I details that I can refer?

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, she's right there. Why can't she speak for herself?

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 3>But that wasn't aw Here's another clip where Minnie Grin

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 3>refused to engage with a voter about her own voting record.

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>In parliament rather engage.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Experts. There's lots of one.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 9>Excuse me, I just refer you to the next website

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 9>that statements.

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>As we just stick to.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Talking to.

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm a voter too, I would refer you to her website.

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 2>So much for transparency.

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 3>And on that note, Ray Hardley joins me, Now, Ray,

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 3>what is wrong with these deals?

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 2>And how frustrating is Manique rayt Well, it's.

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 10>One thing to say too, that a light for Laura Jays,

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 10>who is an outstanding journalist and the Australian journalist. Look,

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 10>I'm here to talk to my constituents, but then we're

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 10>one of the constituents. What to put a question to us?

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 10>She refused that as well as polite as Laura isn't

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 10>the main I think she may be wanting to ask

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 10>her about the clandestine stealing of election posters in the

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 10>dark of night, allegedly by someone very close to her.

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 10>So look, if she is returned to Parliament, it will

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 10>be one of the great disgraces to conduct yourself in

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 10>that fashion two weeks out from the election and not

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 10>allow questioning from a journalist or even your constituents. But

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 10>there's another story breaking this afternoon Tonight, James Willis from

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 10>the Telegraph had just published that Nikola Boola has now

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 10>confirmed that she paid the four non English speaking gentlemen

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 10>to put up core flutes around the seat of Bradfield

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 10>in northern Sydney. She's also refusing to exceeded the request

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 10>from the power company to take the core flutes down.

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 10>She says, no, legally, I'm not going to take them down.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 10>She's confirmed she paid for it.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 10>This is a woman she hasn't been to Parliament yet.

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 10>She lost last time and she hopefully will lose this

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 10>time as well, who, of course, is most notoriously known

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 10>for making sexually inappropriate comments to a nine year old hairdresser.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 10>And she's brazen.

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>She's bold.

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 10>She's out there and now admitting that she paid for

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 10>these blakes who told people in the street where they're

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 10>putting up to you know, I can't use the expression,

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 10>but everyone knows what they said to them in the

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 10>most derogatory way. She's paying these oaths, these thugs to

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 10>abuse her constituents. If she wins, that'll be a bigger

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 10>disgrace than Menique Rhyan, I would think.

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 2>And that story's on the Telly website now.

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 3>But then we learn that Clive Palmer is preferencing the

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 3>deals over the coalition.

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what's wrong with this guy?

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 10>Well is a gift that keeps on giving Clive. I've

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 10>often said that people are under more pressure than his

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 10>belt buckle. But in relation to Clive, I only fell

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 10>based over apex. I thought, now it must be a misprint.

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 10>Someone's got a a at, so to speak. But it's right.

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 10>In fact, one of his candidates has now withdrawn and

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 10>he's lending their support to the liberal candidate in that area.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 10>I just don't know, given that he's a mining magnate,

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 10>given that he gets back to his money from that

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 10>and other interests, how he could support the Teals is

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 10>beyond me. I mean, please, Clive, I know you've never

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 10>listened to me, but for once in your life, do

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 10>the right thing and change that immediately.

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Please.

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, reprint the heart of vote cards, which is what the.

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 10>One one nation have done.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>They've done.

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 10>Good luck to them.

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.720
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, looking at the Teals, what's your sense

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of how many of them will lose their seats this election?

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 3>Because the TiAl movement really was a rejection by many

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Conservatives of Scott Morrison.

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I like Scott Morrison. You like Scott Morrison. You know

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the public did it?

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, you know they'd been there for a while,

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 10>so they decided the public that twenty twenty two was

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 10>the end of the section for him. But look the

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 10>teals while ever they have the taint of funding from

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 10>Climate two hundred drooped around their neck. They can't be

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 10>taken seriously. It's what I say all the time. They say,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 10>not as we do, but do as we say. And

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 10>by the way, I did hear your introduction about the polls,

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 10>which I was most interested. I did a piece this

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 10>morning on the Daily Telegraph website about all of this.

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 10>And you don't have to go back to John Howard

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 10>in twenty nineteen. Scott Morrison, from the day the election

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 10>was called in April until the day it was run,

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 10>lost every poll, not just the news poll. There are

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 10>six or seven polls conducted by repidable companies. He lost

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 10>every one. It was fifty two, forty eight, fifty one,

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 10>forty nine all the way through, and then a Galaxy

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 10>exit poll on the day of the election scored it

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 10>fifty two to forty eight to Bill Shorten. Now I'm

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 10>not going to bag Poles was they're trying to do

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 10>their best with the information supplied to them. But if

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 10>we and I've been guilty of it on this program

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 10>in another area of saying, oh, the Poles aren't looking good,

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 10>I had to give myself an uppercut when I went

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 10>through the twenty nineteen results to say, well, hang on

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 10>a sec. Morrison was never going to win. But he won.

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 2>But it's like everyone forgets that.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.760
<v Speaker 3>It's like there's this case of voter amnesia where journalists go, oh,

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Peter Dutton's running out of time. You know, even at

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 3>very credible publications, Oh, Peter Dutton's running out of time

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 3>because the Poles say he's.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Going to lose.

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know that's not an accurate reflection necessarily. I

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 3>think it's still probably looking like I hung Parliament at

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 3>this point.

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't look.

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 10>I don't think that, even me allowing for the Poles

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 10>being wrong, that Peter can rule a majority. I think

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 10>the best he can hope for the minority complete show

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 10>that would be a shock and still the favorite option

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 10>is Anthony Albanezi minority. But you know, I think after

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 10>the first week we all took a deep breath and

0:37:57.760 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 10>thought that wasn't a great week, and then the second,

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 10>then the third. But you know, I went past a

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 10>polling birth today in the Hills area to have a

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 10>bit of a look around. The place was packed. I've

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 10>never seen so many people pre polling as I saw today.

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's a safe liberal seat you out that

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 10>way with Alex Hawking command. But the number of people

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 10>who were out there, and that's one of the keys

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 10>to the last couple of elections, the number of pre

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 10>poll votes that are taken. People have got used to that.

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 10>The only que up even for a sausage sandwhich at

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 10>the public school on a Saturday morning, they go and

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 10>do it now when they've got a bit more.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Leisure time, convenient the case. But yeah, it has changed.

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not a snapshot in time on that particular day.

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 3>It is now the majority of voters vote in advance

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 3>that was at the last election.

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 2>It'll be even bigger now, right, Great to see you.

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 3>We'll see you next week and it'll be her last

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 3>show until before the election, so we'll.

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Get a final prediction then.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, I can only keep my fingers crossed. I think

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 10>people know what I'm hoping for. Whether I get my

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 10>wishes another thing still to come.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Dave Sharma will give his verdict on the latest contest

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 3>between alban Easy and Dutton, plus how safe labor seats

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 3>could fold the coalision. Freshwater Strategy director Leo Shanahan will

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 3>join us next. Welcome back, and joining me now is

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 3>director of Freshwater Strategy, Leo Shanahan.

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Leo, great to see you.

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank Sure, of course, yours is the company that does

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 3>the polling for the Liberals, but you specifically aren't the pollster,

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 3>as I said earlier in the show.

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 2>That's Michael Turner.

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 3>But I want to ask you about this disconnect between

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 3>what we're seeing in the national polls and what the

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 3>seat by seat analysis is telling us about where this

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 3>election is up to.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, I mean, I'm not going to go into

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 11>seat by seat I don't honestly, I don't know, but

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 11>I would say this the national polls. There's nothing wrong

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 11>with the national polls as such that you know, they're

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 11>done by very good pulses. I think that sometimes interpretations

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 11>of national polls, though, can lead people into thinking there

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 11>are certain there's necessary trends on seat by seat basis

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 11>that don't necessarily exist. As you've said in your editorial.

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 11>It can be a much more difficult fight on a

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 11>seat to seat basis, much more hand to hand combat.

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 11>I guess we're seeing in this election for seats that

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 11>perhaps have higher margins that fall outside of the classic

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 11>electoral landscape. So you might have a swing of say

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 11>five percent, but seats at ten percent plus might actually

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 11>be targets in this election. And I think that's changed

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 11>a lot in recent elections. The electoral landscape has meant

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 11>there's all these seats all over the place that are

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 11>targets that perhaps weren't in the past.

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 3>And even seats right next to each other might have

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 3>completely different local issues. And one could be a target

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 3>seat for the Liberal Party, but one right adjacent to

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 3>it would be even if it's marginis smaller, you know,

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't hope to win.

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, And I think that's a lot to do with

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 11>the sitting members and the makeup in those the small

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 11>differences that occur in those seats, and not on a

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 11>demographic basis, but sitting members, the work they've put in

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 11>their recognition matters a lot.

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:20.959
<v Speaker 3>Cost of living, as we know, is the biggest issue

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 3>affecting Australians right now, and it's followed in your research

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 3>at some distance really housing consistently.

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, and.

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Most voters believe that Australia is heading in the wrong direction.

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 3>That's fifty five percent of Australians.

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 2>So Leah, given this, these are the critical issues this campaign.

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Why hasn't the Coalition been able to fully capitalize on this?

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 11>I think for starters, the Coalition has actually done pretty

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 11>well to be in this position, and at times I

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 11>think people need to sit back and recognize that fact

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 11>that what you know, they're being asked to do is

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 11>something that hasn't been done since pre war in Australia,

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 11>which is great to pressure. Yes, exactly. So. I think

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 11>that though a couple of factors have helped Labor and

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 11>the run into the campaign. The interest rate cut I

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 11>think undeniably helped. That was, you know, something that people

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 11>could recognize, it's money in the pocket. I think competing

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.720
<v Speaker 11>arguments around tax as some people have gone, well, they've

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 11>got this, they're offering this tax cut, they're offering this

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 11>tax cut. Is there any real difference between the two.

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 11>And I think that as well, the framing of Peter

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 11>Dutton by the Labor Party at times, this Trumpian notion

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 11>hasn't really helped, So I think those are factors that

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 11>have hurt.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the Madi scare and other campaigns.

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 11>And as you said, healthcare is still a major issue

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 11>in this country and rightly so.

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Now your research or freshwater research rather shows the Liberals

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 3>picking up some safe labor seats. Can you tell us

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 3>what the seats are that the targeting here?

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean look on our last model, which was

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 11>public polling we've done, which we do as well with

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 11>the Financial Review. We had seats like Ashton, Chisholm, McEwen

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:20.399
<v Speaker 11>in Victoria, Gilmore Patterson w A. Bullwinkle in NT which

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 11>is hard to poll, but Bengari's it definitely you know,

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 11>obviously a target there Ryan in Queensland. So these were

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.760
<v Speaker 11>seats which you know we've made clear on the swing

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 11>to be projected, the coalition could could well pick up,

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 11>but it should be set. On our national polling, the

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:42.439
<v Speaker 11>coalition is short of seventy seats as well. It's picking

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:46.280
<v Speaker 11>up only about five or six sorry, but it's short.

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, it gets to around sixty six on

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.800
<v Speaker 3>your national based on the uniform swing. Yeah, but obviously

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 3>that's the national pole and not the seat BA seat

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:58.240
<v Speaker 3>research that we've been speaking about tonight. All right, Leah Shanahan,

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 3>great to see you, Thank you very much for the insights.

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank surey all right, quick break now, and then Dave

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Sharma will give his verdict on alban Ezi and Dutton's

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 3>latest clash, and in it Albanizi is pressed on his

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 3>deal with the Greens. That's after this quick break. Welcome back,

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 3>and I'm joined now by Liberal Senator Dave Sharma.

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Dave, great to see you. Now.

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 3>While we've been on air tonight, there was another debate

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 3>between Peter Dutton and Anthony Alberizi and Channel nine. I

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 3>obviously didn't watch it, but I'm told that it is

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 3>that it was such a dull and boring debate, but

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 3>that this was one of the key moments when Albanizie

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 3>was pressed on the preference deal with the Greens. Have

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 3>a look, will you do a deal with minority parties?

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.959
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister, No, mister Dutton, not.

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 4>With the Greens, but with independence. And that's not a

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 4>truthful answer from the Prime Minister there. This is it's

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 4>not that the Labor Party will fall ou themselves to

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 4>do a deal with the Greens. It's just it's just

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:04.879
<v Speaker 4>you preference them.

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Preference truth put forward, put forward by Peter.

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Dave Sharma.

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 3>The reality is, of course Albanesi would do a deal

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 3>with the Greens. If there's a hung Parliament, will have

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 3>a radical Green left government.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 6>Of course, you would, just as Julia Gillard did in

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 6>twenty ten. And I would point out that Anthony Alberanesi

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 6>is doing deals with the Greens in nearly every seat

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 6>around the country right now, preference deals. You've had people

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 6>like Mark Dreyfus and Mike Freelander, senior members of the

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 6>Australian Jewish community who've been pleaded with by leaders in

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 6>the Australia Jeish community not to preference the Greens, but

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 6>they've gone ahead and done it anywhere anyway. And that's

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 6>a Labor headquarters direction and instigation.

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Another moment tonight that's been reported is that Anthony Alberesi

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 3>was accused by Peter Dutton.

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Dutton said to him, you.

0:45:56.680 --> 0:46:00.399
<v Speaker 3>Can't lie straight in bed, so it really went him

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 3>about this, this lying that Albanesi keeps being untruthful in

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the campaign. I heard Andrew Clonelle on a earlier tonight

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and that was even something that he was frustrated about,

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 3>because you know, this can't become a feature of campaigns

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 3>moving forward.

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about this, Well, I.

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 6>Think Peter Dunden was right to call this out. I mean,

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, I've found it incredibly frustrating during one of

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 6>the first debates, and Anthony Alberenesi repeated this tonight. Is

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 6>claims that the previous coalition government cut health and education. No,

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 6>the previous coalation government didn't increase at the rate of

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 6>spending that labor hoped it would be increased at, but

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 6>a dollar amount that is increasing year on years, Peter

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 6>out and pointed out is not a cut in anyone's

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 6>terms and terminology. But Anthony Alberanesi repeats that, you know,

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 6>they repeat the many scare lie. You know, it seems

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 6>like they have no record to run on because the

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 6>only thing they can try on, the only thing they're

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 6>trying to campaign on is you know, a fear of

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 6>Peter Dunnen and the Liberals. But you'd think first term

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 6>government would have some records to point to, some achievements

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 6>they could offer up to the electorate, some prospect of

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 6>what they might do better in the next term. But

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 6>there is none of this from Anthony Albanezy. I mean,

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 6>the record is terrible and he has no vision for

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 6>the next three years.

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Now, you were, of course the Liberal MP in Wentworth

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 3>in Sydney's East, which you lost at the last election

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 3>to the allegri Spender, and now of course you're a

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Liberal senator. You must be following the Wentworth contest closely.

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 3>How do you see it going at the moment between

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Spender and Ronox, the Liberal candidate.

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, a couple of things.

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 8>Look.

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Firstly, the Teals and associated groups so like you know,

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 6>Climate two hundred and the Smart Energy Council and Danny

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.240
<v Speaker 6>Lick and others are spending a fortune year and that's

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 6>clearly you know, that's repeat of twenty twenty two. One

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.800
<v Speaker 6>thing I've noticed though, is that the Teal candidates across

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:57.959
<v Speaker 6>the country seem to be quite happily fiarting laws, whether

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 6>it's tearing down their opposite's campaign materials, whether it's putting

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 6>up their own campaign materials on osgrid property which is

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 6>illegal or at least unauthorized. They seem to take the

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:12.320
<v Speaker 6>view that the laws don't apply to them, which suggests

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:14.840
<v Speaker 6>to me that they are worried because they're throwing the

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 6>kitchen sink at this They've thrown out the rule book,

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 6>and I think they know that they don't have a

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 6>record to run on. You know, they were elected with

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 6>this great hope that they would do politics differently. Instead,

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:27.280
<v Speaker 6>they've turned out to be some of the most cynical

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 6>operatives and they've achieved nothing in the Parliament.

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think many people would argue with

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 3>you about that, but just specifically how you think Wentworth

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 3>is going at the moment and whether it is winnable

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 3>for the Liberals at this election.

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 6>I think it's absolutely winnable. I think we've got a

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 6>strong candidate in Ronox who's been working hard to get

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 6>to know the community or introduce yourself as a political

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 6>candidate to the community. I think parts of this electorate

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 6>are very unhappy with the Albanezy government. The Jewish community

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 6>because of this government's demonization of his and it's fairly

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 6>into combat antisemitism. But also many people who are dealing

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.319
<v Speaker 6>with high interest rates, infation, all those sorts of things.

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Cust of living is an issue everywhere, all right. Dave Shamoor,

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 3>out of time, so great to see you again. And

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 3>that's all we've got time for right now, here's Paul Murray.