1 00:00:10,039 --> 00:00:13,440 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm 2 00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:17,480 Speaker 1: James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody. What a really interesting time. 3 00:00:18,160 --> 00:00:20,960 Speaker 1: I want to do a couple of things today and 4 00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:23,800 Speaker 1: I think you'll find both of them very interesting. First 5 00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:28,320 Speaker 1: of all, a great response, I might say maybe a 6 00:00:28,360 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 1: storm of response might be the right phrase for last 7 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:34,879 Speaker 1: week's show on Crypto with Jackie Clark. Now, what we 8 00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:39,280 Speaker 1: did in that show was basically a skeptics corner, okay, 9 00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:44,239 Speaker 1: So we put up somebody from institutional Australia, from the 10 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 1: conventional world of Australian investing, an ASX board director, a 11 00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:54,400 Speaker 1: family office member, accountant to give a view on crypto. 12 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 1: And obviously it was a very skeptical view. And it's 13 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 1: interesting because nearly I think the tempo of the Money 14 00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:06,959 Speaker 1: Pazza's audience has changed, become much more receptive I think, 15 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:11,039 Speaker 1: and enthusiastic in many ways about crypto, though Maney remains skeptical, 16 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:15,280 Speaker 1: including Jackie, and she had some very strong points. Now, 17 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:17,120 Speaker 1: what I want to do today is put the other 18 00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 1: point of view, okay, and again it's institutional Australia. I 19 00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:23,680 Speaker 1: could easily get someone from crypto to talk about crypto. 20 00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 1: Why would I do that? If I ask someone in 21 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:29,600 Speaker 1: real estate to talk about whether it's a good time 22 00:01:29,640 --> 00:01:31,880 Speaker 1: to buy property, what would they say? If I ask 23 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:33,960 Speaker 1: a gold miner, is it a good time to buy gold? 24 00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 1: What will they say? This is not the nature of 25 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:39,000 Speaker 1: the exercise to get people from the crypto world to 26 00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 1: talk about it. It's to get people who are conventional 27 00:01:42,080 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 1: investors with a lot of respect from our audience and 28 00:01:45,319 --> 00:01:48,800 Speaker 1: from me, to take a view on crypto. Jackie's view 29 00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:53,320 Speaker 1: was very skeptical, as she also in some ways did 30 00:01:53,360 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 1: not go into great detail on it, and I understand 31 00:01:56,960 --> 00:01:59,600 Speaker 1: why because that is a typical response. I don't go 32 00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 1: if I don't believe in gold mining, I don't go 33 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:05,760 Speaker 1: so deep best to understand all the aspects of gold mining. 34 00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:08,640 Speaker 1: And it's the same with crypto. So who could we 35 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 1: get to talk about it? And also, very usefully, because 36 00:02:12,040 --> 00:02:13,360 Speaker 1: it's the last show of the year, we're going to 37 00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:16,200 Speaker 1: also have a quick wrap on how the year has gone. 38 00:02:16,240 --> 00:02:20,800 Speaker 1: But first, the most interesting organization I think institution in 39 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:24,360 Speaker 1: Australia in relation to crypto is not a major crypto 40 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:27,000 Speaker 1: player or a major crypto exchange, believe it or not, 41 00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 1: it's AMP, and AMP plays that role for the simple 42 00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:35,960 Speaker 1: reason they were the first, are the first major financial 43 00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:39,280 Speaker 1: institution as super fun if you don't mind to invest 44 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:44,000 Speaker 1: in crypto. They invested twenty seven million dollars a few 45 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:48,639 Speaker 1: months ago in crypto, substantial investment in many people's eyes, 46 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:50,680 Speaker 1: you can say, is a percentage of AMP is tiny. 47 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: It's twenty seven million. It's twenty seven million, and they 48 00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 1: put it into crypto, and I want to know why 49 00:02:56,240 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 1: they are enthusiastic about it. The ideal person, absolutely ideal 50 00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 1: person to talk for AMP is an old friend of 51 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:05,679 Speaker 1: the show, an old friend of mine, Shane Oliver, the 52 00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:07,600 Speaker 1: chief economist. I know him for a long time. He's 53 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:08,600 Speaker 1: been on the show before. 54 00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 2: How are you, Shane, I'm good, James, thanks for having 55 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:13,000 Speaker 2: me back. 56 00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:15,880 Speaker 1: I never thought i'd have you on the show explaining 57 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 1: why your organization spent fifty seven million dollars on crypto. 58 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:23,400 Speaker 1: And I think it's absolutely fascinating that you did. I 59 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:26,600 Speaker 1: think it's very plucky that AMP did. It's now we 60 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:31,880 Speaker 1: see sometime later JP Morgan is in there, Walmart is 61 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 1: in there making investments in crypto, putting money behind it 62 00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:40,480 Speaker 1: first and foremost. Can you explain to our listeners, some 63 00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:44,440 Speaker 1: of who are crypto fans, some who remains skeptical, why 64 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,840 Speaker 1: AMP put twenty seven million dollars into bitcoin. 65 00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 2: I certainly can, and you might some might say that 66 00:03:53,040 --> 00:03:55,840 Speaker 2: I'm in this skeptical camp too, And I have written 67 00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 2: notes on crypto over the years, starting back class decade. 68 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:02,800 Speaker 2: But I guess even I always thought that there was 69 00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:06,360 Speaker 2: some potential element of value in there, and that relates 70 00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:09,440 Speaker 2: to two things. The use of the blockchain that underpins 71 00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:15,440 Speaker 2: crypto for smart contracts and various uses, and that is 72 00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:18,080 Speaker 2: already evident, and that, particularly in the case of some 73 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 2: cryptos like Ethereum and Solana and so on, potential uses 74 00:04:22,200 --> 00:04:25,279 Speaker 2: an alternative currency, central bank, digital currencies and so on. 75 00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:29,680 Speaker 2: And also with a bitcoin increasing use as a store 76 00:04:29,720 --> 00:04:33,599 Speaker 2: of value alternative to gold. So I know all the 77 00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:37,440 Speaker 2: reasons for skepticism about bitcoin. In fact, I've got a 78 00:04:37,440 --> 00:04:39,600 Speaker 2: list in front of me from the last Oliver's Insights 79 00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:41,920 Speaker 2: I wrote on it, which was earlier last year. It's 80 00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:46,440 Speaker 2: coin itself. Yeah, it's unlikely it become useful for everyday transactions. 81 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:48,040 Speaker 2: You can't buy a cup of coffee, whether or if 82 00:04:48,080 --> 00:04:50,039 Speaker 2: you do, you'll pay, it'll take you a lot of time, 83 00:04:50,080 --> 00:04:53,039 Speaker 2: it'll be slow and all that sort of stuff. It's volatile, 84 00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 2: it's hard to value because it doesn't generate rents and 85 00:04:57,800 --> 00:05:02,160 Speaker 2: dibdends like other assets, and of course it's been associated 86 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:05,520 Speaker 2: with nefarious activities. Are often thought that way. But even 87 00:05:05,520 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 2: though I'm skeptical, I think we as an organization AMP 88 00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 2: has responsibility to its members, fiduciary responsibility to look at 89 00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:15,599 Speaker 2: all options, and it could be an emerging asset class. 90 00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 2: It has been around now since what two thousand and nine, 91 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,039 Speaker 2: and so it seems like it's becoming part of the 92 00:05:22,080 --> 00:05:26,679 Speaker 2: furniture in terms of the investing worlds. It's increasingly getting 93 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:31,320 Speaker 2: acceptance from regulators. They're taking it seriously and regulatory framework 94 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,520 Speaker 2: is being put around it. So it's moving from the 95 00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 2: wild West, if you like, to some degree into the mainstream. 96 00:05:37,160 --> 00:05:41,280 Speaker 2: There's a whole generation out there of digital savvy young 97 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 2: people investors who are becoming investors, and they're more familiar 98 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:47,520 Speaker 2: with this. They're probably thinking. In old days they might 99 00:05:47,560 --> 00:05:49,880 Speaker 2: have thought, well, i'm skeptical about the government, I'm skeptical 100 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:52,520 Speaker 2: about inflation. I want something which is a bit of 101 00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:55,239 Speaker 2: a hedge against that on a long term basis. Previous 102 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:58,160 Speaker 2: generation might have gone gold is for me. Now some 103 00:05:58,240 --> 00:06:00,960 Speaker 2: of those people are saying maybe bitcoins for me, and 104 00:06:01,040 --> 00:06:06,320 Speaker 2: Bitcoin by free nature has resisted the temptation to weaken 105 00:06:06,400 --> 00:06:08,320 Speaker 2: some of the protocols around it, you know, in terms 106 00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:10,839 Speaker 2: of the about proof of work and proof of stake 107 00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:14,400 Speaker 2: and all that sort of stuff that other cryptocurrencies have 108 00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 2: gone down that path. Bitcoin todd with it to some degree. 109 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:18,560 Speaker 2: But I think Bitcoin probably has held back a little 110 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:21,080 Speaker 2: bit because of this view that it wants to be 111 00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:24,240 Speaker 2: seen as something that's difficult to get hold of and 112 00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:27,040 Speaker 2: that preserves its value to some degree. We all know 113 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:29,200 Speaker 2: that there's something there's a limit on the amount of 114 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:31,160 Speaker 2: bitcoin that it can ever be mine to twenty one 115 00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:34,360 Speaker 2: million bitcoins, and we're well through that, and so that's 116 00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:37,280 Speaker 2: going to limited supply. But because of all those things, 117 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:40,240 Speaker 2: you got this. I can understand the skepticism argument. Yes, 118 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:43,600 Speaker 2: you've got to be cautious, but I can also understand 119 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:46,680 Speaker 2: that it's becoming part of the investment universe, and therefore 120 00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 2: we thought we had to consider it. We had a 121 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:52,200 Speaker 2: lengthy debate. I put up all the skeptical arguments is 122 00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 2: to expect that I might in the end even I 123 00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:57,360 Speaker 2: decided we should have a look into this, and we 124 00:06:57,400 --> 00:06:59,440 Speaker 2: did in May last year. As you say, we invested 125 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:01,719 Speaker 2: twenty seven million dollars in bitcoin when it was then 126 00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:05,520 Speaker 2: priced at sixty two thousand. It was less. It was 127 00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:09,040 Speaker 2: about point zero five percent of our super funds, so 128 00:07:09,279 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 2: less than point one percent. Probably close too point one 129 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:13,640 Speaker 2: percent now because it's gone up in value. 130 00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: But it seems to me that between the lines, the 131 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:20,080 Speaker 1: most compelling argument you've put forward is it a fear 132 00:07:20,120 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: of missing out. 133 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:23,760 Speaker 2: No, I wouldn't say that's the argument. I think the 134 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:25,760 Speaker 2: main argument was that it was becoming part of the 135 00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:28,680 Speaker 2: investment universe, and it's moving from the shadows from the 136 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:32,440 Speaker 2: wild West into the investing universe. And the last year, 137 00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 2: I want I think one of the big factors in 138 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 2: our minds was the approval of ETFs by US regulators 139 00:07:37,240 --> 00:07:39,960 Speaker 2: on this front in regards to bitcoin. So Trump only 140 00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:42,720 Speaker 2: came along after we'd made the decision in May. And 141 00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:44,840 Speaker 2: you can argue that when you think about it, it 142 00:07:44,880 --> 00:07:47,880 Speaker 2: does offer some diversification. It's not perfectly correlated with shares, 143 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:50,240 Speaker 2: and there is some tendency for it as a growth 144 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:52,680 Speaker 2: asset to go down when shares run to trouble and 145 00:07:52,680 --> 00:07:55,360 Speaker 2: it goes up by more than shares when shares do well, 146 00:07:55,520 --> 00:07:58,200 Speaker 2: but it has an imperfect correlation with shares. 147 00:07:58,360 --> 00:08:00,000 Speaker 3: What is your view on it? 148 00:08:00,360 --> 00:08:02,880 Speaker 1: If we accept it to an asseid class and you 149 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,680 Speaker 1: have clearly and you have put your money where your 150 00:08:05,720 --> 00:08:08,560 Speaker 1: mountains if you like AMP, what's your view? Is it 151 00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:11,240 Speaker 1: correlated or is it non correlated? It started as a 152 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 1: sort of libertarian completely anti establishment thing where people would say, oh, 153 00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:18,680 Speaker 1: I don't trust the banks, I don't trust the government, 154 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:21,360 Speaker 1: et cetera. It moves and moves towards the mainstream, that's 155 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:24,120 Speaker 1: beyond doubt. If the US is talking about a strategic 156 00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:28,240 Speaker 1: reserve with crypto, then it is core mainstream. But I 157 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:30,040 Speaker 1: want to ask you, as an acid class, do you 158 00:08:30,080 --> 00:08:33,360 Speaker 1: see it or do you know yet whether it's correlated 159 00:08:33,520 --> 00:08:35,920 Speaker 1: or non correlated? In other words, is it a gold, 160 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 1: a digital gold that we can depend on when things 161 00:08:39,160 --> 00:08:43,040 Speaker 1: go wrong, or is it simply correlated where it just 162 00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:45,400 Speaker 1: flies up when the market's hot and flies down when 163 00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 1: the market's cold. 164 00:08:46,480 --> 00:08:48,880 Speaker 2: Look, I think there is an issue that as time 165 00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 2: goes on it becomes more institutional, it'll be put into 166 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,640 Speaker 2: the growth bucket potentially, and therefore there might be some 167 00:08:54,679 --> 00:08:58,440 Speaker 2: correlation with share markets, and gold has that to some 168 00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:00,520 Speaker 2: degree as well. You think about the initial phases of 169 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:04,200 Speaker 2: the GFC, gold went down, and it's partly because you 170 00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:06,160 Speaker 2: can see a little bit on the In the last weekend, 171 00:09:06,960 --> 00:09:10,440 Speaker 2: US starts dropping bombs on Iran, investors are a little 172 00:09:10,440 --> 00:09:12,920 Speaker 2: bit nervous they can't sell shares because the share market's closed. 173 00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:15,200 Speaker 2: There was some downwards pressure on bitcoin at that point 174 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:18,240 Speaker 2: in time, and I think the correlation when I last 175 00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 2: looked at it was something like zero point four percent 176 00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:23,080 Speaker 2: against the share market. It's not one percent, so it's 177 00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:25,520 Speaker 2: not correlating one for one, but there is some correlation 178 00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:27,640 Speaker 2: there with the share market. And that's partly because as 179 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 2: it becomes more institutional, then investors see it in that 180 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:33,600 Speaker 2: particular bucket as a growth asset and when they want 181 00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:35,720 Speaker 2: to sell shares, so crypto might get a bit of 182 00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:38,199 Speaker 2: the selling pressure. But in a broader sense, there is 183 00:09:38,240 --> 00:09:40,240 Speaker 2: another way of looking at it, and that is because 184 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:43,040 Speaker 2: it has the limited supply. I suspect that over time 185 00:09:43,040 --> 00:09:46,280 Speaker 2: it probably offers more of an inflation hedge than shares 186 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:49,720 Speaker 2: to because of that limited supply, you could always say 187 00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 2: we should also be skeptical of gold. It's only got 188 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:54,160 Speaker 2: value because we believe it has. 189 00:09:54,040 --> 00:09:57,080 Speaker 3: Become accumulated historical. 190 00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 2: Historical experience that it's got value. But these days it 191 00:10:01,160 --> 00:10:03,920 Speaker 2: doesn't do much. It's not used in teeth. You can 192 00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:06,959 Speaker 2: use ceramics, so the porcelaina whatever it is in your 193 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:09,200 Speaker 2: teeth these days, so it's a bit different. It's used 194 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:12,280 Speaker 2: in jewelry. But interestingly, that's a tiny fraction of the 195 00:10:12,320 --> 00:10:16,880 Speaker 2: actual demand for gold, and there's little relationship between drill 196 00:10:16,960 --> 00:10:18,040 Speaker 2: demand and the price. 197 00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:21,240 Speaker 1: So you're seeing that it's just a speculative. 198 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:25,160 Speaker 2: No, it's a I think it's become what's happening here 199 00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:28,319 Speaker 2: is that bitcoin is almost becoming like a digital version 200 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,080 Speaker 2: of gold. It's a store of value. It's not necessarily 201 00:10:31,160 --> 00:10:34,320 Speaker 2: speculative where people just buy into it on the grounds 202 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 2: that it may go up, but obviously people hope that 203 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:40,079 Speaker 2: will occur over time. But you can say, we do 204 00:10:40,160 --> 00:10:45,839 Speaker 2: have gold in our portfolios because it's in their commodity exposure. 205 00:10:46,160 --> 00:10:49,320 Speaker 2: So if bitcoin is becoming part of the mainstream, maybe 206 00:10:49,360 --> 00:10:51,480 Speaker 2: this case to have bitcoin in there as well. 207 00:10:51,600 --> 00:10:54,000 Speaker 1: And the case is more so than it's a store 208 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:57,880 Speaker 1: of value rather than it's a bit respeculative option. 209 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:02,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, I would think so, no doubt. Most people say, Okay, 210 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:04,840 Speaker 2: so it's two thousand and nine, it's gone up exponentially, 211 00:11:05,240 --> 00:11:06,800 Speaker 2: maybe that'll continue. I think you've got to be a 212 00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 2: little bit careful there. There's the old disclaimer that all 213 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:12,040 Speaker 2: fund managers use. Past performance is not a guide to 214 00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:14,480 Speaker 2: future performance. It was a new asset class when it 215 00:11:14,520 --> 00:11:16,240 Speaker 2: came along in two thousand and nine. If you look 216 00:11:16,280 --> 00:11:19,200 Speaker 2: at it from each look at every four years, it 217 00:11:19,240 --> 00:11:22,079 Speaker 2: goes through a cycle. Each trough to trough in that 218 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:24,600 Speaker 2: cycle has seen a slowing in the rate of increase 219 00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:27,560 Speaker 2: in the value of bitcoin, or each peak to peak 220 00:11:27,679 --> 00:11:29,360 Speaker 2: is sen a slowing in the rate of increase, and 221 00:11:29,400 --> 00:11:31,920 Speaker 2: I think that's normal. It's just like a startup company. 222 00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 2: Initially you can make huge gains a lot of risk 223 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:37,360 Speaker 2: around that, but it will slow down over time. But 224 00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:40,960 Speaker 2: I think ultimately it settles down to providing probably somewhat 225 00:11:40,960 --> 00:11:44,040 Speaker 2: steadier gains, although I yeah, we get to see the 226 00:11:44,040 --> 00:11:46,600 Speaker 2: downcycle which will come of course in bitcoin, but it's 227 00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:49,040 Speaker 2: part and parcel of that new asset class. 228 00:11:49,400 --> 00:11:52,080 Speaker 1: Why do you think no other super fund has followed 229 00:11:52,120 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 1: you into the market. It's been quite a while now, 230 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:58,120 Speaker 1: four five months, but extremely lucrative. Right, you had forty 231 00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 1: percent on this particular investment, but most of your peers 232 00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 1: institutionally remain so cautious that they will do it. 233 00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 3: Let's put it that way. 234 00:12:09,880 --> 00:12:14,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, we undertook the investment in May. I think by 235 00:12:14,280 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 2: the time it was formerly announced it was November December 236 00:12:17,840 --> 00:12:21,600 Speaker 2: or thereabouts, but that's still six seven months ago. I 237 00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:24,000 Speaker 2: suspect that over time you will see some of those 238 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:26,640 Speaker 2: super funds invest I think a lot of them had 239 00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:28,240 Speaker 2: probably said we're not going to do it and didn't 240 00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:30,960 Speaker 2: even have any plans. I suspect you probably find there's 241 00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:33,079 Speaker 2: a couple out there who probably do have plans. 242 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:34,640 Speaker 3: Are you guessing or do you know? 243 00:12:34,880 --> 00:12:37,319 Speaker 2: I'm purely guessing here. I don't have any inside information 244 00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:38,559 Speaker 2: about other super funds. 245 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:40,040 Speaker 3: All right, okay, And just one other thing. 246 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:43,559 Speaker 1: Having put in twenty seven million and having made what 247 00:12:43,640 --> 00:12:46,200 Speaker 1: forty percent, do you think AMP will put in more? 248 00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 2: Like As with all asset classes, they're all the precise 249 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:52,600 Speaker 2: exposers always under review, and we will continue to review 250 00:12:52,640 --> 00:12:56,800 Speaker 2: our exposure to bitcoin along with other assets. So I 251 00:12:56,840 --> 00:12:58,280 Speaker 2: can't indicate either way on that. 252 00:12:58,640 --> 00:13:01,080 Speaker 3: You can't hold it out, though I'm. 253 00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:01,560 Speaker 2: Not gonna roll it out. I'm not going to roll 254 00:13:01,559 --> 00:13:02,160 Speaker 2: it in. It sounds like. 255 00:13:04,559 --> 00:13:07,360 Speaker 1: You're used to talking to journalists, that's clearly obvious. 256 00:13:07,640 --> 00:13:09,559 Speaker 3: Or we'll take a short break. We'll be back in 257 00:13:09,600 --> 00:13:09,959 Speaker 3: a moment. 258 00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:18,880 Speaker 1: Hello, Welcome back to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. I'm 259 00:13:18,960 --> 00:13:22,479 Speaker 1: James Kirby and I'm talking to Shane Oliver, chief economist 260 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:25,800 Speaker 1: of AMP, specifically in this first section of the show 261 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 1: about crypto, and of course Shane works for AMPS, the 262 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:32,960 Speaker 1: chief e columnists there and they were the first financial 263 00:13:33,000 --> 00:13:37,640 Speaker 1: institution super fund in Australia to make an investment in crypto. 264 00:13:38,160 --> 00:13:42,720 Speaker 1: It's interesting, Shane, self managed super funds way ahead of 265 00:13:42,760 --> 00:13:45,520 Speaker 1: you in that respect. There's a billion according to the ATO, 266 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 1: there's a billion dollars in SMSF funds in crypto. So 267 00:13:50,400 --> 00:13:52,320 Speaker 1: in that respect it should be no surprise that a 268 00:13:52,360 --> 00:13:56,480 Speaker 1: major fund would sooner or later go into crypto. Now, 269 00:13:56,480 --> 00:13:58,960 Speaker 1: I just want to bring in now some of the 270 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:01,480 Speaker 1: issues that came up in the first show, and I'm 271 00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:04,480 Speaker 1: going to just read the question which is from Scott, 272 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:07,720 Speaker 1: but it also reflects observations by Vince and Henry and 273 00:14:07,800 --> 00:14:11,720 Speaker 1: Dean and Stephen and many others who came in and Basically, 274 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:15,280 Speaker 1: they wanted to take what Jackie Clark said, some of 275 00:14:15,320 --> 00:14:20,480 Speaker 1: her skepticism, if you like, about crypto, and they tackled 276 00:14:20,480 --> 00:14:22,200 Speaker 1: it and said that she was the wrong person to 277 00:14:22,240 --> 00:14:25,560 Speaker 1: talk about crypto. That I totally disagree with that she 278 00:14:25,760 --> 00:14:28,920 Speaker 1: is the right person. She is a classic example of 279 00:14:28,960 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 1: someone who is skeptical and doesn't want the organizations or 280 00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:36,360 Speaker 1: the institution she represents to go in there. That's why 281 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:39,080 Speaker 1: I have Shane on today. His organization has gone in there. 282 00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:41,920 Speaker 1: So there was a couple of observations there that some 283 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:43,800 Speaker 1: of them are on technicus as I say, which I 284 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 1: don't think we need even go into, because there is 285 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:50,520 Speaker 1: still an element I think Shane of belief that if 286 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:53,280 Speaker 1: you don't believe it, you don't need to know that. Honestly, 287 00:14:53,320 --> 00:14:55,000 Speaker 1: you don't need to know the technicals. But why should 288 00:14:55,040 --> 00:14:58,760 Speaker 1: you go deep into understanding its complexities if you don't 289 00:14:58,760 --> 00:14:59,680 Speaker 1: believe it in the first place. 290 00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:02,520 Speaker 2: Wait, you don't need to. You can take the approach 291 00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:07,840 Speaker 2: of just investing broadly. I'm not an investor in individual things. 292 00:15:08,280 --> 00:15:09,840 Speaker 2: You had a question in there which you haven't asked. 293 00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:11,720 Speaker 2: Do I have it personally? No, I don't have it personally. 294 00:15:11,720 --> 00:15:12,920 Speaker 3: It was on my list story. 295 00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:15,520 Speaker 2: But then I don't have BHP or CBA or any 296 00:15:15,560 --> 00:15:18,360 Speaker 2: other thing. Personally, I'm a macro guy. I invest in 297 00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:20,880 Speaker 2: the big picture, and so therefore I have my money 298 00:15:20,880 --> 00:15:23,840 Speaker 2: and Super and it's in AMP funds, and might have 299 00:15:24,080 --> 00:15:27,120 Speaker 2: some money outside Super and his index funds. But obviously, 300 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:30,040 Speaker 2: when you buy a property, it's a specific investment, like 301 00:15:30,040 --> 00:15:31,800 Speaker 2: the family home, the one I'm sitting in right now. 302 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:33,880 Speaker 2: But that doesn't prove that I have a negative or 303 00:15:33,880 --> 00:15:36,360 Speaker 2: positive view on it or not supportive of the decision 304 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:38,640 Speaker 2: by AMP. The fact that I haven't bought it individually, 305 00:15:38,640 --> 00:15:41,600 Speaker 2: but because I haven't bought other things individually either. But 306 00:15:42,200 --> 00:15:46,400 Speaker 2: I think, just on that SEMSF observation, we had members 307 00:15:46,440 --> 00:15:48,600 Speaker 2: over the last few years have been asking should you buy, 308 00:15:48,640 --> 00:15:50,360 Speaker 2: and Crypto always get a little bit worried because by 309 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:52,440 Speaker 2: the time they ask, it's usually when crypto has gone 310 00:15:52,480 --> 00:15:54,560 Speaker 2: up in value double to or forty percent. No one 311 00:15:54,560 --> 00:15:57,000 Speaker 2: of course was asking when it collapsed eighty percent through 312 00:15:57,000 --> 00:15:59,840 Speaker 2: one of those downturns. But so it doesn't surprise me 313 00:15:59,880 --> 00:16:03,280 Speaker 2: that SMSF investors are already in there because we had 314 00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:06,080 Speaker 2: members who are interested, and that indicated to us that 315 00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:08,360 Speaker 2: we should be looking at it, which we did. But 316 00:16:09,400 --> 00:16:12,040 Speaker 2: I've lost track of your original question here because you've 317 00:16:12,080 --> 00:16:14,320 Speaker 2: raised a few points there, But hopefully that's covered it. 318 00:16:14,760 --> 00:16:15,880 Speaker 3: I did really a few points. Look. 319 00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:18,280 Speaker 1: One of the things, obviously was a lot of the 320 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:23,760 Speaker 1: crypto people when someone is skeptical about it, the crypto enthusiast. 321 00:16:23,800 --> 00:16:26,160 Speaker 1: If you don't see you don't understand this, you don't 322 00:16:26,200 --> 00:16:27,520 Speaker 1: understand this, you don't understand how. 323 00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:28,040 Speaker 3: It all works. 324 00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:31,520 Speaker 1: I don't understand CSL. CSL is one of the top 325 00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:33,880 Speaker 1: ten companies in Australia. I don't understand what they do. 326 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:35,520 Speaker 2: We've had that one from Central Banks as well. They 327 00:16:35,520 --> 00:16:37,360 Speaker 2: don't understand it. On the one hand, I think if 328 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:40,360 Speaker 2: you don't understand it and you don't feel comfortable, then 329 00:16:40,400 --> 00:16:43,920 Speaker 2: you shouldn't invest as an individual. That's true, but then 330 00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:46,280 Speaker 2: it is also true you don't have to fully understand 331 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:49,320 Speaker 2: everything to invest in it. And in my super funds 332 00:16:49,400 --> 00:16:52,160 Speaker 2: or my investments outside super well, I haven't bought specific stocks. 333 00:16:52,160 --> 00:16:54,240 Speaker 2: There are some companies in there which I won't understand 334 00:16:54,280 --> 00:16:56,920 Speaker 2: their model and what they're doing and why, but I 335 00:16:56,960 --> 00:16:59,680 Speaker 2: don't need to. And that's the key here. If you've 336 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:01,840 Speaker 2: got all your money invested in bitcoin, then I think 337 00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:03,680 Speaker 2: you should understand it. But if you've got a well 338 00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:06,880 Speaker 2: diversified portfolio, you just see it part of the investment universe. 339 00:17:06,920 --> 00:17:08,919 Speaker 2: You just got some exposure in there, just like you've 340 00:17:08,960 --> 00:17:11,360 Speaker 2: got some exposure of other things, then you probably don't 341 00:17:11,400 --> 00:17:13,840 Speaker 2: need to have the same degree of understanding. And it 342 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,080 Speaker 2: is a little bit technical when you get into it. 343 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:18,600 Speaker 2: I've in the interests of finding out what it was 344 00:17:18,760 --> 00:17:21,119 Speaker 2: several years ago. I've read a lot about bitcoin, but 345 00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:23,960 Speaker 2: I don't consider myself an expert. And if you put 346 00:17:23,960 --> 00:17:25,800 Speaker 2: me up head to head with some of the people 347 00:17:25,840 --> 00:17:27,560 Speaker 2: who might be listening to this, who spend a lot 348 00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:30,040 Speaker 2: of time, then they would run rings around me, And 349 00:17:30,080 --> 00:17:32,480 Speaker 2: that's fair enough. I don't disagree with that. 350 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:34,480 Speaker 1: It's very interesting you see that. So there was always 351 00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:36,800 Speaker 1: that traditional response, if you don't understand it, don't buy it. 352 00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:40,200 Speaker 1: But really there's a point of which that stops. CSL 353 00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:42,800 Speaker 1: would not be where it is today if everyone, yeah, 354 00:17:42,840 --> 00:17:44,720 Speaker 1: it didn't buy it because it didn't understand it. 355 00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:47,040 Speaker 2: That's right. Sometimes you do have to have a bit 356 00:17:47,040 --> 00:17:49,320 Speaker 2: of faith in these things. And I think the broader 357 00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:52,200 Speaker 2: issue is if you don't understand it, you're fair enough. 358 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:54,520 Speaker 2: Maybe you look into it. That's one way to go 359 00:17:54,560 --> 00:17:57,000 Speaker 2: about it. The other approach is you don't understand it, 360 00:17:57,000 --> 00:17:58,960 Speaker 2: but you think there might be something in it, then 361 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 2: have it as part of a broad diversified portfolio. Don't 362 00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:02,919 Speaker 2: just put all your eggs into it. 363 00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:06,280 Speaker 1: Very interesting and of course now people can obviously everyone 364 00:18:06,320 --> 00:18:09,120 Speaker 1: listening news now that you don't have to go off 365 00:18:09,119 --> 00:18:12,120 Speaker 1: to some bitcoin exchange and go through all the red 366 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:14,600 Speaker 1: tape if you like to get involved. You can just 367 00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:17,320 Speaker 1: buy an ETF and the ets are regulated. 368 00:18:17,440 --> 00:18:19,679 Speaker 2: That's incredibly important because it was one of the reasons 369 00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:21,440 Speaker 2: I think a lot of people were skeptical because they'd 370 00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:24,280 Speaker 2: heard it about all the problems on the exchanges, money 371 00:18:24,280 --> 00:18:25,840 Speaker 2: being hacked and all that sort of stuff, and the 372 00:18:25,840 --> 00:18:28,560 Speaker 2: exchanges running into trouble, that this is issue a few 373 00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:30,560 Speaker 2: years ago. I think that was when it was part 374 00:18:30,560 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 2: of the wild West, and that's now starting to change, 375 00:18:32,840 --> 00:18:35,399 Speaker 2: which is good. And by the way, we haven't actually 376 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:39,200 Speaker 2: bought bitcoin, the physical bitcoin. You don't have physical bitcoin. 377 00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:40,360 Speaker 2: We bought futures. 378 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:42,679 Speaker 3: Was that because that was the only way to do it, chin. 379 00:18:42,840 --> 00:18:45,720 Speaker 2: Or No, It's just the easiest way. As a super fund. 380 00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:47,240 Speaker 2: It was just an easy way for us to do it. 381 00:18:47,280 --> 00:18:50,160 Speaker 2: I mean oftentimes we'll buy we don't buy physical shares, 382 00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:52,680 Speaker 2: will often buy futures on them or maybe the ETF. 383 00:18:52,800 --> 00:18:54,960 Speaker 2: So it's just another way of getting exposure. It's an 384 00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:56,920 Speaker 2: easy way to get in and out. It's quite liquid. 385 00:18:57,480 --> 00:18:59,680 Speaker 2: That's just start and parcels the way we do things. 386 00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:02,640 Speaker 2: Those features are obviously tied to bitcoin, so it's effectively 387 00:19:02,680 --> 00:19:03,600 Speaker 2: Bitcoin exposures. 388 00:19:03,640 --> 00:19:06,160 Speaker 1: So yes, course, yes, yeah, yeah, but it's just it's 389 00:19:06,200 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 1: just a particular structure, all right. 390 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:08,760 Speaker 3: Andrew said. 391 00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:11,840 Speaker 1: The reason that Jackie Clark and allegedly the Governor of 392 00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:15,000 Speaker 1: the Reserve Bank and many others who should know better 393 00:19:15,640 --> 00:19:18,080 Speaker 1: say they don't understand bitcoin is that they want to 394 00:19:18,119 --> 00:19:20,119 Speaker 1: think of it as an investment that should have an 395 00:19:20,160 --> 00:19:25,280 Speaker 1: intrinsic value. It's not, and it doesn't. Bitcoin itself may 396 00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:29,399 Speaker 1: not survive, but now we know how it works, the 397 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:32,840 Speaker 1: genie won't go back into the bottle. Bitcoin or whatever succeeds. 398 00:19:32,840 --> 00:19:35,639 Speaker 1: It will be better understood when its price goes up 399 00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:38,639 Speaker 1: at the same time as intrinsically valued investments go down. 400 00:19:38,800 --> 00:19:43,040 Speaker 1: This is a core sticking point with many expert investors, 401 00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:46,520 Speaker 1: this lack of intrinsic value. You got over that, how 402 00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:47,960 Speaker 1: did you get over that at a MP. 403 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:52,480 Speaker 2: As a long time investor and someone in the investment community, 404 00:19:52,520 --> 00:19:54,119 Speaker 2: it does worry me a little bit. It's it's an 405 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:56,160 Speaker 2: easy to value a property or a share or whatever 406 00:19:56,200 --> 00:20:00,000 Speaker 2: you because there's that that that rent that is delayed 407 00:20:00,960 --> 00:20:05,520 Speaker 2: physical rents, literally rents or dividends. But there's lots of 408 00:20:05,560 --> 00:20:09,840 Speaker 2: investments that we have that don't have that. Warren Buffett, Berkshire, 409 00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:13,560 Speaker 2: Hathaway doesn't pay dividends. So there's lots of examples of 410 00:20:13,600 --> 00:20:16,800 Speaker 2: investments out there that don't have paid dividends. You can say, well, 411 00:20:16,840 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 2: don't have intrinsic value, so how can you possibly value them? 412 00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:22,359 Speaker 2: So there are ways around it. Yes, it is a 413 00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:25,560 Speaker 2: sticking point, and I can understand why people have expressed 414 00:20:25,600 --> 00:20:27,520 Speaker 2: that concern, and I've written it down as a reason 415 00:20:27,560 --> 00:20:30,760 Speaker 2: for skepticism in my own notes on this. But I 416 00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:32,880 Speaker 2: think there are rays around it, and you just need 417 00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:35,439 Speaker 2: to accept that there are other investments in your portfolio 418 00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:37,240 Speaker 2: where they're not paying dividends. 419 00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:39,679 Speaker 1: Yeah, Okay, we'll take a short break and we'll be 420 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:46,160 Speaker 1: back in a moment. Now, San this is a great 421 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:47,880 Speaker 1: time to have you on the show because it's the 422 00:20:48,040 --> 00:20:54,440 Speaker 1: last episode of the financial year, and we have talked 423 00:20:54,480 --> 00:20:59,000 Speaker 1: on and off over many years. I wonder has there 424 00:20:59,040 --> 00:21:02,040 Speaker 1: been a year it looks like super funds are coming 425 00:21:02,080 --> 00:21:05,240 Speaker 1: in with a return of around nine percent. Inflation in 426 00:21:05,280 --> 00:21:09,240 Speaker 1: our society, in our economy has dropped nicely, the share 427 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:11,400 Speaker 1: market is looking like ten percent plus. 428 00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:14,600 Speaker 3: Can you recall a year Maybe you just disagree with this. 429 00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:17,679 Speaker 1: Entire contention, but can you recall a year where the 430 00:21:17,760 --> 00:21:21,840 Speaker 1: results were so unconvincing? They're so good that they're unconvincing 431 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:23,280 Speaker 1: because I cannot see how they are. 432 00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:27,639 Speaker 2: So I think there's been lots of views like that. 433 00:21:27,680 --> 00:21:30,560 Speaker 2: To be honest with you, the old line that chares 434 00:21:30,760 --> 00:21:33,000 Speaker 2: climb a wall of worry, that there's so many things 435 00:21:33,080 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 2: to worry about, and yet the share market's done well, 436 00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:37,440 Speaker 2: we can't believe it. I think twenty seven en was 437 00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:40,560 Speaker 2: an example of that that Trump talk over and shares 438 00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:43,840 Speaker 2: did pretty well. Twenty twenty was another fantastic one. We 439 00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:45,720 Speaker 2: had a pandemic and the share market at one point 440 00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:48,879 Speaker 2: there fell thirty percent I think thirty five percent. Global 441 00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:51,840 Speaker 2: Australian shares were down by and yet we had okay. 442 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:54,920 Speaker 2: It turned out okay in the end, once investors look 443 00:21:54,960 --> 00:21:56,560 Speaker 2: through it. And I think the same thing's happening this 444 00:21:56,600 --> 00:21:59,000 Speaker 2: time around. Put Trump aside, he's a lot of the 445 00:21:59,080 --> 00:22:02,840 Speaker 2: source of uncertain whether you like him or not, is irrelevance. 446 00:22:03,040 --> 00:22:04,800 Speaker 2: So I might say he's tariffs. Ultimately he might be 447 00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:06,359 Speaker 2: good for the US. I might say what he's done 448 00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:08,200 Speaker 2: in the Middle East might be good for the global 449 00:22:08,440 --> 00:22:11,359 Speaker 2: economy in the worlds. But the dust still has to 450 00:22:11,359 --> 00:22:14,040 Speaker 2: settle on that. But by the same token, in a 451 00:22:14,080 --> 00:22:17,200 Speaker 2: big picture sense, we've come into an environment where inflation 452 00:22:17,359 --> 00:22:19,880 Speaker 2: was a problem. In twenty twenty two, we had inflation 453 00:22:19,920 --> 00:22:22,480 Speaker 2: in Australia over eight percent, in the US a nine 454 00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:25,359 Speaker 2: ten in Europe. We've got it down so eventually all 455 00:22:25,400 --> 00:22:28,080 Speaker 2: those countries have inflation somewhere around two to three percent, 456 00:22:28,119 --> 00:22:31,480 Speaker 2: including in Australia, and so we've gone from a world 457 00:22:31,480 --> 00:22:35,200 Speaker 2: of high inflation fears of that interest rates would even 458 00:22:35,240 --> 00:22:37,639 Speaker 2: have to go higher. Now we've gone to a world 459 00:22:37,800 --> 00:22:41,280 Speaker 2: with lower inflation. And we've done that at environment where 460 00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:44,240 Speaker 2: we've managed to avoid a technical recession, if you like. 461 00:22:44,320 --> 00:22:46,560 Speaker 2: We've come close, and there's risk there. But even if 462 00:22:46,600 --> 00:22:49,600 Speaker 2: you look at Australia unemployment what four one four point 463 00:22:49,600 --> 00:22:51,959 Speaker 2: two percent still very low. Similar story in the US, 464 00:22:52,640 --> 00:22:56,000 Speaker 2: so that's why the share markets are celebrating. The environment 465 00:22:56,480 --> 00:22:58,719 Speaker 2: hasn't been so bad. And then, of course you overlay 466 00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:01,600 Speaker 2: Trump on that he caused constant nation with his tariffs 467 00:23:01,600 --> 00:23:03,800 Speaker 2: in April, but then he's backed off a little bit. 468 00:23:03,920 --> 00:23:06,960 Speaker 2: Some people say Taco Trump always chickens out. Maybe not. 469 00:23:07,320 --> 00:23:08,800 Speaker 2: I think that issue will come up again. 470 00:23:08,920 --> 00:23:11,679 Speaker 1: What about the earnings. Maybe re earnings are better than 471 00:23:11,720 --> 00:23:12,960 Speaker 1: we think of. Inflation's falling. 472 00:23:13,000 --> 00:23:15,439 Speaker 2: Well, maybe that is the case. They've certainly surprised in 473 00:23:15,440 --> 00:23:17,800 Speaker 2: the US coming to the last reporting season. For the 474 00:23:17,840 --> 00:23:21,080 Speaker 2: March quarter, the expectation was four percent earnings growth turned 475 00:23:21,080 --> 00:23:23,359 Speaker 2: out to be about ten or eleven percent earnings growth, 476 00:23:23,760 --> 00:23:26,800 Speaker 2: and so US companies just kept surprising. On the upsides, 477 00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:30,640 Speaker 2: Australian earnings have been negative, but there is an expectation 478 00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:33,920 Speaker 2: of some improvements. We are setting the Reserve Bank cut 479 00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:36,879 Speaker 2: interest rates in Australia. We've now got inflation at the 480 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:40,160 Speaker 2: lower end of comparable countries. Remember all that nonsense last 481 00:23:40,240 --> 00:23:42,560 Speaker 2: year people were building out we've got an inflation problem 482 00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:44,919 Speaker 2: relative to everybody else. We haven't. When you look at 483 00:23:44,920 --> 00:23:47,240 Speaker 2: it on a graph, it's about the same, or we're 484 00:23:47,280 --> 00:23:50,840 Speaker 2: at the low end which is good. So I think 485 00:23:51,040 --> 00:23:54,159 Speaker 2: share markets are seeing that. And when the share market 486 00:23:54,200 --> 00:23:56,879 Speaker 2: thinks of lower interest rates, it thinks that's more people 487 00:23:56,880 --> 00:23:59,080 Speaker 2: putting their money in shares because they're getting less on 488 00:23:59,160 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 2: bank deposits. The valuations on shares start to improve, and 489 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:05,720 Speaker 2: so I can sort of understand why markets have gone up, 490 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:08,560 Speaker 2: even though it's surprised. The strength of it has surprised me. 491 00:24:09,200 --> 00:24:11,000 Speaker 2: And I wouldn't have thought we would be doing this 492 00:24:11,080 --> 00:24:14,600 Speaker 2: well on Liberation Day, if that's what you want to 493 00:24:14,640 --> 00:24:16,800 Speaker 2: call it, Donald Trump's Liberation Dates. 494 00:24:17,200 --> 00:24:19,480 Speaker 3: Yes, I know it was awfully hard, but here we go. 495 00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:21,159 Speaker 3: I have to ask you, how do you see the 496 00:24:21,240 --> 00:24:22,160 Speaker 3: year ahead? Financially? 497 00:24:22,200 --> 00:24:25,240 Speaker 2: Year ahead, I'm at risk of getting surprised again because 498 00:24:25,359 --> 00:24:28,280 Speaker 2: I reckon returns will slow down. I would have thought 499 00:24:28,280 --> 00:24:29,760 Speaker 2: they would have slowed down a year ago. I didn't 500 00:24:29,760 --> 00:24:31,840 Speaker 2: think they'd be this good. I thought they would be okay, 501 00:24:31,920 --> 00:24:33,639 Speaker 2: But I was thinking, I think a year ago, if 502 00:24:33,680 --> 00:24:36,840 Speaker 2: you look at my report in July, I was looking 503 00:24:36,840 --> 00:24:39,200 Speaker 2: for something more six or seven percent now of super funds, 504 00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:41,320 Speaker 2: and now you're going to get what is probably around 505 00:24:41,440 --> 00:24:44,000 Speaker 2: nine I think chat West the other day financial year 506 00:24:44,040 --> 00:24:45,840 Speaker 2: to date eight point five percent up to May. It 507 00:24:45,840 --> 00:24:47,840 Speaker 2: looks like Journe's turned out to be a reasonable month. 508 00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:50,199 Speaker 2: Touch Wood we still got a few days ago, but 509 00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:53,959 Speaker 2: I reckon returns will slow down to around six seven percent. 510 00:24:54,280 --> 00:24:56,280 Speaker 2: The valuations are a little bit of a concern. The 511 00:24:56,320 --> 00:24:59,000 Speaker 2: p's in the US where we around about twenty five 512 00:24:59,040 --> 00:25:01,520 Speaker 2: times for IT earnings. In and Australia we were about 513 00:25:01,640 --> 00:25:04,879 Speaker 2: nineteen or twenty times for earnings. That's above longer term averages. 514 00:25:05,240 --> 00:25:07,840 Speaker 2: Bond yields are still relatively high, so there's not a 515 00:25:07,880 --> 00:25:10,480 Speaker 2: great equity risk premium in there if you compare the 516 00:25:10,520 --> 00:25:13,400 Speaker 2: earnings yield implied by those pes to the bond yields. 517 00:25:14,080 --> 00:25:16,760 Speaker 2: But by the same token, I think if we avoid 518 00:25:16,760 --> 00:25:20,000 Speaker 2: a recession, and I probably I think we probably will, 519 00:25:20,160 --> 00:25:23,640 Speaker 2: then it turns out okay. So I think somewhere along 520 00:25:23,640 --> 00:25:25,920 Speaker 2: the way we'll get another bet of worries about tariffs. 521 00:25:26,359 --> 00:25:28,840 Speaker 2: Historically in the last twenty years, July is a good 522 00:25:28,880 --> 00:25:31,680 Speaker 2: month for shares, but we know that August and September 523 00:25:31,680 --> 00:25:35,240 Speaker 2: are often a bit rough seasonally, and I suspect that 524 00:25:35,240 --> 00:25:38,280 Speaker 2: that could be tariffs. The tariffs come back into the headlines, 525 00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:41,640 Speaker 2: you could get more vulnerability or more volatility coming out 526 00:25:41,640 --> 00:25:44,480 Speaker 2: of the Middle East, but you've got to be careful 527 00:25:44,480 --> 00:25:46,960 Speaker 2: about that one. The lesson from the events of the 528 00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:51,000 Speaker 2: last few days that unless there's a disruption to oil supplies, 529 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:54,200 Speaker 2: then eventually markets will just move on to something else. 530 00:25:54,240 --> 00:25:56,480 Speaker 2: And that's what's happened here. Even though I think the 531 00:25:56,600 --> 00:25:59,119 Speaker 2: risks were very high, but it all depended on what 532 00:25:59,160 --> 00:26:02,880 Speaker 2: Iran does. Run back down, but they probably concluded let's 533 00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:04,560 Speaker 2: live divide another day. 534 00:26:04,680 --> 00:26:05,800 Speaker 3: Very content response. 535 00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:09,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, it was a contained response, and they self interest 536 00:26:09,240 --> 00:26:12,280 Speaker 2: lay a role there. I think regime survivability was the key, 537 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:15,680 Speaker 2: so that could come back as an issue and cause volatility, 538 00:26:15,760 --> 00:26:19,840 Speaker 2: But I think the broader picture is one of constrained 539 00:26:19,840 --> 00:26:23,240 Speaker 2: growth globally. We hear from the IMF and Well Bank 540 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:25,399 Speaker 2: it's going to be somewhere like two to three percent growth, 541 00:26:25,400 --> 00:26:27,840 Speaker 2: but it's not recession. And if it's not recession, then 542 00:26:27,880 --> 00:26:31,240 Speaker 2: earnings can continue to grow or at least grow. Interest 543 00:26:31,320 --> 00:26:33,840 Speaker 2: rates probably continue to come down. We're going to see 544 00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:36,600 Speaker 2: I think four cuts in Australia, the next one in 545 00:26:36,680 --> 00:26:40,240 Speaker 2: July and then another three after that August, November, and February. 546 00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:43,199 Speaker 2: That will help our market put money in the hands 547 00:26:43,240 --> 00:26:46,399 Speaker 2: of people with a mortgage and those money will go 548 00:26:46,440 --> 00:26:48,000 Speaker 2: and spend that. And I know a lot of people hear 549 00:26:48,040 --> 00:26:50,000 Speaker 2: that and say, well, I'm a self fund of retire 550 00:26:50,000 --> 00:26:52,040 Speaker 2: read relying on money from bank interest. But the amount 551 00:26:52,080 --> 00:26:55,399 Speaker 2: of money in household dead is double, roughly double the 552 00:26:55,480 --> 00:26:58,200 Speaker 2: value of people with bank deposits. The value of money 553 00:26:58,359 --> 00:27:01,440 Speaker 2: in bank deposits, so aims to those with the mortgage 554 00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:04,200 Speaker 2: is actually swamps by two to one the losses. 555 00:27:04,280 --> 00:27:07,000 Speaker 3: So it's twice I see what you mean, Yeah, twice 556 00:27:07,040 --> 00:27:07,479 Speaker 3: to speak. 557 00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:10,520 Speaker 2: And our family twenty five to forty five with a 558 00:27:10,560 --> 00:27:13,400 Speaker 2: couple of kids is far more sensitive to changes their 559 00:27:13,440 --> 00:27:16,920 Speaker 2: income than a fifty five sixty five year old person. 560 00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:18,760 Speaker 2: I'm going to char I'm sixty, but I don't change 561 00:27:18,760 --> 00:27:22,240 Speaker 2: my spending that much given my income. But mortgage is 562 00:27:22,320 --> 00:27:24,800 Speaker 2: under control. That sort of stuff. My mother goes on 563 00:27:24,840 --> 00:27:27,600 Speaker 2: the cruises and that doesn't change much with interest rates, 564 00:27:27,640 --> 00:27:29,800 Speaker 2: But it does for younger. 565 00:27:29,560 --> 00:27:31,359 Speaker 1: Families because they're so funly chuned. 566 00:27:31,520 --> 00:27:33,440 Speaker 2: So there's so famly tuned. You get a slight rise 567 00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:35,360 Speaker 2: at interest rates, they got less money to spend. That's 568 00:27:35,400 --> 00:27:38,600 Speaker 2: bad for the economy. Cut interest rates, they suddenly get 569 00:27:38,600 --> 00:27:40,800 Speaker 2: relief and they could spend a little bit more they 570 00:27:40,800 --> 00:27:43,320 Speaker 2: won't go bond because spend a lot. But I think 571 00:27:43,359 --> 00:27:45,960 Speaker 2: all that points to an okay environment. But as I 572 00:27:45,960 --> 00:27:48,440 Speaker 2: said at the start, the valuations are a little bit stretched. 573 00:27:48,480 --> 00:27:50,160 Speaker 2: That's going to constrain things a little bit. That's why 574 00:27:50,200 --> 00:27:52,639 Speaker 2: I say six seven percent return from super funds, not 575 00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:55,320 Speaker 2: another year of nine or ten or something. 576 00:27:55,520 --> 00:27:56,720 Speaker 3: Okay, interesting logic. 577 00:27:56,840 --> 00:28:02,080 Speaker 1: So the temple, the fundamental GDP if you like economic temples, healthy, 578 00:28:02,280 --> 00:28:06,280 Speaker 1: but the evaluation, because valuations are stretched, that puts a limit. 579 00:28:06,359 --> 00:28:08,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, they are a little bit of stretch, but there's 580 00:28:08,920 --> 00:28:13,040 Speaker 2: the problem with valuations. They're useful guides, but they're not 581 00:28:13,119 --> 00:28:16,119 Speaker 2: very good to time markets with. And a lot of 582 00:28:16,119 --> 00:28:17,720 Speaker 2: people have been saying for the last few years now 583 00:28:17,720 --> 00:28:19,920 Speaker 2: the chairs is too expensive and blah blah blah, and 584 00:28:19,960 --> 00:28:22,399 Speaker 2: they keep going higher. That's because your earnings come in 585 00:28:22,440 --> 00:28:25,199 Speaker 2: and they turn out okay, particularly in the US. But 586 00:28:25,359 --> 00:28:28,240 Speaker 2: valuation is very hard to time markets. So it's a 587 00:28:28,359 --> 00:28:31,040 Speaker 2: risk factor there. At least the market's vulnerable should something 588 00:28:31,080 --> 00:28:32,800 Speaker 2: go wrong. But as we saw in the Middle East, 589 00:28:33,400 --> 00:28:35,840 Speaker 2: that turned out not to be the event, and it 590 00:28:35,880 --> 00:28:38,200 Speaker 2: remains to be seen what happens with tariffs. But I 591 00:28:38,280 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 2: reckon this is the big one with Trump. If you 592 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:42,640 Speaker 2: think about the next financially, it takes us up to 593 00:28:42,680 --> 00:28:45,160 Speaker 2: June next year. He's going to want to get his 594 00:28:45,320 --> 00:28:47,880 Speaker 2: party doing well in the midterms. He doesn't want to 595 00:28:47,880 --> 00:28:50,400 Speaker 2: see a massive defeat for the Republicans because it will 596 00:28:50,400 --> 00:28:53,040 Speaker 2: look bad on him. So he's probably going to as 597 00:28:53,120 --> 00:28:56,120 Speaker 2: time goes by through the next financial year, which takes 598 00:28:56,160 --> 00:28:58,120 Speaker 2: him in the run up to the November midterms in 599 00:28:58,160 --> 00:28:59,960 Speaker 2: the US, he's probably going to want to do things 600 00:29:00,040 --> 00:29:02,440 Speaker 2: a more market friendly. And that's why I think he's 601 00:29:02,480 --> 00:29:04,840 Speaker 2: loaded his tariffs up front and sort of get some 602 00:29:04,920 --> 00:29:06,760 Speaker 2: of the bad news out of the way early, and 603 00:29:06,800 --> 00:29:08,840 Speaker 2: then if he gets more friendly as we come up 604 00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:10,479 Speaker 2: to the midterms. 605 00:29:09,960 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 1: Okay, we will see, we will see terrific. All right, Look, 606 00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:15,240 Speaker 1: thank you very much. I have one last thing I 607 00:29:15,280 --> 00:29:17,520 Speaker 1: wanted to just in terms of questions of correspondence, and 608 00:29:17,560 --> 00:29:20,120 Speaker 1: we had a lot, and thank you everyone for the corresponding. 609 00:29:20,120 --> 00:29:20,880 Speaker 3: It was very thoughtful. 610 00:29:20,920 --> 00:29:23,000 Speaker 1: I thought on Crypto and as I say, I thought 611 00:29:23,000 --> 00:29:27,000 Speaker 1: it deserved a second twist, and having had if you 612 00:29:27,200 --> 00:29:28,960 Speaker 1: like the bare case on, I wanted to put the 613 00:29:28,960 --> 00:29:31,280 Speaker 1: bookcase on. I think that would be very useful. Of Course, 614 00:29:31,320 --> 00:29:34,400 Speaker 1: I have crypto people on in the future for them 615 00:29:34,400 --> 00:29:36,360 Speaker 1: all in the past. But I wanted this debate if 616 00:29:36,400 --> 00:29:39,960 Speaker 1: you like to come from outside crypto per se in 617 00:29:40,360 --> 00:29:44,120 Speaker 1: conventional investment markets, which is I think the best way 618 00:29:44,160 --> 00:29:46,840 Speaker 1: to debate it. All right, terrific. One last thing I 619 00:29:46,880 --> 00:29:49,840 Speaker 1: wanted to just read for you. It's from Pete and 620 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:53,000 Speaker 1: he says, I have my money puzzle bingo card in 621 00:29:53,040 --> 00:29:56,800 Speaker 1: front of me and it has only three things. Number One, 622 00:29:57,240 --> 00:30:01,560 Speaker 1: taxing upon realized gains and super funds is staft. Number Two, 623 00:30:01,920 --> 00:30:04,520 Speaker 1: all the brokers say the Commonwealth Bank is overpriceding yet 624 00:30:04,560 --> 00:30:08,160 Speaker 1: it hasn't fallen. Number Three the three million super tax 625 00:30:08,240 --> 00:30:09,600 Speaker 1: and super is not indexed. 626 00:30:09,880 --> 00:30:13,280 Speaker 3: Can you believe that? Do I win? Says Pete. Pete, 627 00:30:13,320 --> 00:30:16,440 Speaker 3: You're you're in the winner's enclosure. I think that's for sure. 628 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:18,960 Speaker 3: Very keen alert. 629 00:30:18,960 --> 00:30:21,320 Speaker 1: Listening there from Pete. Thank you Pete, and thank you 630 00:30:21,400 --> 00:30:24,640 Speaker 1: everyone for listening. Keep the emails Rolling the money Puzzle 631 00:30:24,640 --> 00:30:27,360 Speaker 1: at the Australian dot com dot u. Shane Oliver, chief 632 00:30:27,360 --> 00:30:29,960 Speaker 1: economist at AMP, put you onto the gun there today 633 00:30:30,280 --> 00:30:33,360 Speaker 1: in two different ways. Thank you very much, really good, 634 00:30:33,480 --> 00:30:36,200 Speaker 1: very clear, articulate response of course to all the questions, 635 00:30:36,200 --> 00:30:38,080 Speaker 1: which is what I would expect from you. Thanks a lot, 636 00:30:38,120 --> 00:30:39,040 Speaker 1: we'll have you on again. 637 00:30:39,240 --> 00:30:40,400 Speaker 2: Thanks Jans, take care,