WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 6 April

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>From the Skyinging Center. This is Paul Murray Live. All

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I may welcome into the man Cave, hardcore politics on

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday night, just the way we like it, piping

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>hot piles and lots to fire up about this evening.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>In State of the Race, which we like to do

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>each and every week, Cosamaras and man who's got the numbers,

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the man who's got the experience when it comes to politics,

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and other than the great Michael Kroger. Lee Hansen. Yes,

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Pauline's daughter running for the Senate. She's running against Jackie

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Lambi and Tasmania, so I'm more than happy to give

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>her as much time on the air as possible. Also,

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>what a week we have here on Sky News. On

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night, seven point thirty in prime time, the Prime

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Minister versus the Alternative Prime Minister in the People's Forum,

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>one hundred undecided voters in Western Sydney. We'll get their

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>chance to ask whatever they want, not what the media

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>has decided. The next day, again in primetime, Jim Chalmers

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>versus Angus Taylor about the economy, and in the middle

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of the day via the National Press Club, a conversation

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about energy with blackout Bowen or the man who would

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like to send us into a nuclear age at some

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>point in time. Ted O'Brien, three massive days, three debates,

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>full coverage, each and every night here at nine o'clock,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the same time on the East coast. Now

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that that daylight saving business has gone for the bin,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you hear. There's an awful lot to

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>get to tonight before I get to the polls. And

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>yes they have strengthened in terms of the government, but

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>as always, devil is in the detail. Let's have a look.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Twenty seven days to go, or more importantly, just sixteen

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>until the first votes will be cast in this election.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>More than half of four people expected to vote early.

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why it matters. That's why the first couple of

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks particularly matters. I do like how the Prime Minister

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>keeps talking about trying to fend off American style politics

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and then has a Trump style rally, signs and awe

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in Brisbane today where unsurprisingly he had more of your

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>money to spend.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Today I announced that Labor will make batteries thirty percent

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>cheaper for Australian homes, more businesses and community facilities that

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>means saving around four thousand dollars on the cost of

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>installing a tiberial battery, and it means slashing your power

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>bills permanently.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Where have we heard a version of this before? By

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, does he understand how offensive it is to

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>stand in front of the national flag? Doesn't have a

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>policy of standing in almost everything. But anyway, it's election

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>time and Gido Mantrick, you're supposed to forget the past

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>three years and their priorities about what symbols best represent

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>our country because remember he's definitely not work As for

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the alternative Prime Minister, well he was all over the shop.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But this weekend again at Tasmania. Spend a bit of

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>time there, spend a bit of time in the Northern

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>territory as well. His big announcement today at his election rally.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>The first of this campaign was to focus on cutting

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the number of students who are clogging up our immigration system.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Our international student numbers are up by sixty five percent

0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>under this government over the last twelve month.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 4>We want to.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Provide support to original universities and we put in place

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 3>at cap which will be thirty thousand lower than what

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Labor has in place or eighty thousand, lower than what

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 3>the numbers were just a couple of years ago.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the most popular segment on the program, certainly when

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes to people watching it, but not to my

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and friends in the wider media. This is about

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>how the media spun it for labor this weekend, always

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt. These are the hard hitting

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>questions that the Prime Minister copped this weekend from a

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>press pack who have the feeling they're dealing with him

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for another three years and done when an upset the

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>apple cart?

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 5>What role do you think climate change is playing, if any,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 5>in exacerbating those impacts?

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>A day after mayor thirdness, of course May the fourth behaved.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 6>What are you willing to do beyond what's already man

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 6>back down under thousands of accounts affected at Brant and Australian.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 5>Super Have you been briefed on it?

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>What's the government's respond As for the media traveling with

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the alternative Prime Minister, Well, I saw my own eyes

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when we were in Brisbane at our pub tests. They're

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>not big fans of the alternative Prime Minister, so they

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>love nothing but the hard questions for him. You see,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>if you keep him on defense, he can't get on

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>an attack. And if he doesn't go on attack, then

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>everything stays the way that it is and Albo gets

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>another three years.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 7>Can you guarantee that Australians will know what waste and

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 7>efficiency changes would be made for the election and will

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 7>it be like doze and a surprise after the We.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 8>Have given few details, whether it is how your gas

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 8>plan is going to get electricity bills down or how

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 8>you're going to spend the health and education budgets. Why

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 8>is there is delay on letting voters into the secret?

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Did the coalition government at the time blunder when it

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>allowed the sale?

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 7>Given that response from voters, in particular female voters, which

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 7>the coalition is struggling to get attraction with, will you

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 7>reconsider your policy?

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>By the way, quick note to the people in charge

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Libook campaign. So that lady's standing behind Peter

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Dutton Senator, did you sent a nampaginper price. Let's get

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 1>her front and center. She knows how to argue something

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>from sixty forty yes, pulling it back to sixty forty zero.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to see more from her in the next

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>little while. She's an absolute powerhouse and anytime she wants

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to come on the show, she is more than welcome. Yes,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of course. In the same way I did not care

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>about the Prime Minister falling off the stage. I will

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not pretend that there was not an incident where the

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>alternative Prime Minister was kicking the footy with a bunch

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of kids. The cameraman got too close and he got

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>bandageges up as if it was some sort of a

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>head wound from a sniper. I'm not sure why such

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>an extensive amount of bandages were needed, but Jesus was

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a big over cell, wasn't it again. I'm sorry that

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody got hurt. That's the way that it is. But

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we needed to pretend that there was

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a gunshot wound a little much anyway.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>As you've seen many times, I didn't care when it

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>was the Prime Minister falling off the stage. I don't

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>care when it's Peter Don't accidentally kicking your footy to

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the cameraman. What I do care about is it of course,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister lied, remember, went on radio and pretend no,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't fall off the stage. No attempt from that.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to pet it up small things, but

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>it is the way.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 4>That it is.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I would like somebody to tell me

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>why is there a double standard for when our leaders

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>must turn up to natural disasters? You see, of course

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Buteze literally delayed the election, forced to budget all

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>because he wanted to be seen to be part of everything.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>When it came to x tropical Cyclone Alfred in Queensland.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>He was even doing pointless press conferences just to somehow

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>get in the middle of those news days when we

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>were worried about what was going to be happening. There

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>now an event that actually had more rain in certain

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>parts than Tropical Cyclone Alfred. Are the floods that had

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>been thumping, thumping central Queensland. Now the size of Texas

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is the amount of how much water and how much

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>flood damage is around there. Well, the Prime Minister finally

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>turned up, but it was a week a week after

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dutton was there. Now I thought we had to

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>live in some sort of a scenario where the second

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>even a hint of trouble is coming that the Prime

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Minister must be there. If not he is not caring. Well,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that standard's ridiculous, But I also think turning

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>up a week week after the event is taking place

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is well not good enough. But it didn't. He was

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there last Monday, and there was a couple of days

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>after we had started talking about what was happening. But

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that he was there and relatively quickly. Of course,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the reality here is that because many of these people

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are good Queensland folk who probably aren't going to voe

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>labor anytime in their life, and there's not enough population

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and there wasn't rolling television coverage were the Prime Minister

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>just thought he could put it into the who cares basket,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>eventually turning up as he did. But my point is this,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>The tumbleweeds start rolling when it's a labor politician who's

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>late to turn up to a flood or a fire,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but if it's a Libs it's a sign that they

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>don't care. Let's get to the polls. And the latest

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is striking when it comes to the change that a

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>month has been in Australian politics. Literally the fifth of

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>March is when we were talking about a headline that

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>said that the Coalition was within striking distance of twenty

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>key marginal seats. Tonight, the sixth of April News poll,

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Labor extends its pole lead over the coalition and is

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>now edging towards a majority government, not the minority that

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone saw and was basically still the bookie's favorite. But

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>now if they keep this growth up, they're able to

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>improve themselves. Well guess what, there is a chance they

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>could end up with seventy six seats or more. As

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for the primary vote, now, I'm going to compare this

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to the current primary vote which is up on the

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>News poll site, and compare it to where it was

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at the last election. Labor Liberal Greens exactly the same

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>vote as it was in the twenty twenty two election.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>So that was one of the lowest primary votes in

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Labor history. But clearly it was a bad night for

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party, losing a whole collection of seats. If

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that gets repeated, then again there's a level of status quo.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But a couple of things worth noticing here, And I

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>want people to start talking about one nation. Now. One

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>nation got five percent at the last Fed election. It

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is now up two percent nationally one week into a

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>federal election campaign. And that number is pretty significant that

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it is now up two points. Now they're going to say,

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a margin of era means two points up, two points down.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But every poll relentlessly tells us that one nation is

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>doing better than it did three years ago. And if

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this poll is right, there's no change for the Libs,

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Nats or the Greens. The conversation becomes preferences, the

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>preferences of one nation, the role of one nation getting

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>extra Senate seats, the preferences of the other and independent vote. Now,

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the Palmer vote is not strong enough yet to know

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly which way it's going to go, but the suggestions

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>are that I think four percent or something close to

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it at the last election. It's now around two the

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>overall headline though, fifty two forty eight. That is after

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the first full week of campaigning. Now a lot of

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>people are going to say that's it, game over. There's

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>no way these things turn around. Well, they always turn around,

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as Peeder Gredlin very correctly showed you after the twenty

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>ten election the twenty nineteen election, often fifty two to

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>forty eight at the start ends up becoming fifty to

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty and then maybe ever so slightly fifty one forty nine.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So this thing is not over. But we cannot pretend

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that the trend is not the Liberal Party's friend. Instead

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it is going okay for the Prime minister. Right now, however,

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>let's actually start to drill down a little deeper, because

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like to have a look at this,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>which is Labour's primary vote in terms of key states,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just that it's not an overall national election.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It is one hundred and fifty one separate elections, and

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>then of course there's the elections within the elections. Have

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a look at this now, I'm going to show you

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the primary vote from the last election. This was the

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>national vote, the New so Wales vote, the Victoria vote,

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the Queensland vote, and the marginal seats. Okay, apparently nothing

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>has changed according to news poll. But something has changed

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Resolve poll. Now, don't worry.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to remember all of the colors and

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>remember all of the numbers. I've done that for you.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the latest one. Now, this one is polls

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that lead up to March. So if we're to believe

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the past four weeks, all of these poles have got

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>better for Labor, all of them have got worse for

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the Libs. But only ever so slightly like one up,

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>one down, but that's enough to start pushing you from

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty to fifty to forty one forty nine. And even

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>if it becomes two points, that's where we end up

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>with fifty two forty eight. But let me give you

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>an idea here, and I'm sorry, I'm going to keep

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this graphic up for a little while because I need

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to use mc glasses to have a look here. Nationally,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Labour Party down four points since the election. Labour Party

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>down three points in New South Wales, Labor Party down

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>five points in Victoria, Queensland down two points. The Libs

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>up one point nationally, three in New South Wales, two

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in Victoria, down one in Queensland. The Green's basically the

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>same or up one nationally and in New South Wales.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Pay attention to one nation because they're up two points nationally,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>one point in New South Wales, two points in Victoria,

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>five points in Queensland. That's really important for Malcolm Roberts

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>who's going for his Senate spot. But as for the Independence,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they're up every where, just one point in Queensland, four

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>points in Victoria, six points in New South Wales and

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>four points as well. So the picture here is essentially

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>big enough drop for it to be significant when it

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Labor Party, where the vote is falling

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from two points in Queensland to four points nationally

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>five points in Victoria. Now remember we talk a lot

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>about Victoria because the failure of the local state government

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is really bleeding into a problem for the Labor brand.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>So while Labour might be able to hold on to

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>most of what it's got, maybe three out of the

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>four in Western Australia, it might be able to either

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lose one or pick one up in South Australia. It'll

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much be the same when it comes to Queensland

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>unless those Green seats start moving around and there are

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>three of those available. A deterioration in the vote in

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales will deliver theoretically based on the mats

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>places like Benelong or Gilmore, so there'd be a couple

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that would be moving up there. Potentially in Tasmania that

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>seat of Lions, but we'll all wait and see what

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>happens there. But if the Labor vote is down five,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the LIB vote is up to, the one Nation vote

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is up to in Victoria, well we could be talking

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>about maybe four seats on a bad night, five on

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>a really bad night six. But of course the government

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>would be saying that these are March numbers and everything

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>got better for us. So maybe they hold the line

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and only lose four seats or three seats. Anything better

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>than that would be certainly close to an overperformance compared

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to where the Labour Party has been for the past

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>few years because of what is happening in Victoria. So

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>watch this space. This is the week when we are

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>going to start to learn just how many candidates are

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on all of the ballots right around the country, because

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>after the rolls close, and I believe that happens tomorrow,

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>then the candidates lock off. Now that's generally speaking, when

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>someone tries to drop some bad news, particularly against one nation.

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens at multiple elections. They're not able to

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>drop their candidates or to move them. But barring that

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one nation in a pretty interesting position. Look for some

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>conversations about that. We should also start to get a

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a sense this week, definitely next week, but

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>probably this week about preferences. Does Labor put the Greens

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>last anywhere? Do they put them second everywhere like they

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>normally do? What does it mean when the Liberal Party

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>turns around and puts the Greens last, meaning they could

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>help Labor in a two way contest between Labor and

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the Greens, a couple of seats in Victoria, maybe some

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of the suburban fringes in Brisbane. So ironically, by taking

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the principal stance against the Greens, the Libs could end

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>up in a scenario where Labour's going to save a

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of seats and while there's no grand difference in

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the way they're going to vote between a Green and

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party, when Labour's talking about majority versus minority

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as the most likely game that we're playing right now,

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>preferences are going to matter in the next little while.

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Now let's talk about blokes, because one thing that has

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>apparently changed over the past few weeks and certainly over

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the past few years is the difference in the sex

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>between men and women and which way they are going

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to vote. Now, there was a very weird little headline

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on this that isn't necessarily what's inside the numbers. The

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Dad vote crucial to Labour's polling rebound. But let's have

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a look at the polling rebound that has been put

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in place now. According to this the Labor vote with

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>blokes has gone from twenty five percent to twenty nine percent,

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal vote's gone from forty two to thirty eight,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the female vote has gone from twenty seven to twenty nine,

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Liberal vote has gone from thirty four to

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty six. So the headline is the dad vote. Well

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what about the subheadline of women that the female vote

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has gone up by two points for the Liberal Party

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in the polling that has taken place. Now again they've

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>done this to March. We know there has been a

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>change in the past couple of weeks. Again that one

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>nation number. Have a look at the change. Have a

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the Green's number. They are down two points

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>with women that vote again being split in an increase

0:15:56.000 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>between the Labor Party and the Liberal Party the Independence. Interestingly,

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the year they were going okay,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they're now ever so slightly back when it comes to

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>blokes right now, So pay attention, it's all there. We'll

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>break it all down with these two blokes, the guys

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>who of course we talk to each and every week

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the state of the race. None

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of them Cos Samarus from the Redbridge Research Organization and

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>with Michael Kroger, of course, a legend of the Liberal

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Party in Victoria. Gentlemen, Hello, lots to get to, lots

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of data, lots to dive through. Let us deal with

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the obvious first, which is the headline. First, Michael, we

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>know things have been getting worse for the coalition or

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there I say better for labor. But now we go

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>from a Liberal Party lead in newspoll to a trail.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you've still got a month to go. Those who

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>say election over have never been through an election before.

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But your thoughts on News poll first, and then we'll

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>go through all of the permutations we normally do on

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday night.

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, mate, I remember at the twenty two campaign when

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 9>Albow couldn't name the unemployment rate, people rushed up and said, oh,

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 9>it's finished, it's over.

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Morrison's won.

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 9>I said, oh, there's a long way to go, and

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 9>so it is with this this four four weeks to go.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 9>We've done one week, so there's a long way to go.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 9>I looked at this, I look at the News poll

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 9>this way. For a long time people were asked the question.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 9>Peter Dutt was in front of the poles, people were

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 9>asked the following question basic, which is do you think

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 9>the Albanezi government's any good or not on a whole

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 9>range of issues that we know about. And the basic

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 9>view of people from the Voice onwards was he's not

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 9>very good, he's not very strong, and it's a terrible

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 9>government and that reflected in the polls. Now they're considering

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 9>a different question, which is about the fact that you know,

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 9>people think, oh, hang on, didn't I just put this

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 9>bloke into office. He's only been there five minutes, which

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 9>is the perennial question that first of my positions get,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 9>which is, but we haven't given this bloke much of

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 9>a go So the electorate to generis they give nearly

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 9>every prime minister two goes. They haven't gave gos GoF

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 9>Whitlam two goes in nineteen seventy four, which was really

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, General SolV them. So the trick for the coalition,

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 9>the campaign's skill for the coalition and the next four

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 9>works is to remind people why over the last eighteen

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 9>months they basically thought this goverment was no good. And

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 9>you've seen some negative ads starting today in Victoria and

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 9>federally very good ads pointing out to people hang on,

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 9>this blow promised, the earth is delivered hell and it's

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 9>time to vote him out. So, as I said, I

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 9>think that pole, I think the pole reflects people thinking, well,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 9>hang on, we've just put.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 4>This bloke in.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 9>They have to be convinced to put him out, and

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 9>I think they will ultimately.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Because on the primary, if we're looking at a scenario

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>where nothing has changed, this is nationally. Nothing has changed

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for Labor, nothing's changed for the Greens, nothing's changed for

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the coalition. The only other change is the one nation

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>factor that I always talk about because it keeps turning

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>up here and also the others. Again, your thoughts on

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>where we sit compared to your insights about the fact

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that look, whatever they had lost they have now regained,

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't gone forward on where they were in

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty two that being the government.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 5>All they've done is they've brought back the voters they

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 5>lost to minor parties over the last eight eight months.

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 5>The thing that we've been seeing with the Labor Party

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 5>is that it was losing support to minor parties, primarily women,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 5>primarily women in their thirties and the outer suburbs of Regents.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 5>They've brought them back really successful campaign they've been running

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 5>to a very deliberate campaign targeted these people to stabilize

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 5>their primary voter. So we can see that reflected in

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 5>the News poll. We can see that reflected in our

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 5>polling we published with the News Limited yesterday and other

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 5>pulses as well. Flip side to that, the coalition. Okay,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 5>so in late twenty twenty two, UAPD registered pulses didn't

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 5>really remove the question about UOP too, about I reckon

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 5>the middle part of twenty twenty three, and you really

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 5>didn't see the full effect of that removal until about

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 5>the middle part of twenty twenty three. What happened about

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 5>time coalition vote started to grow up into the forties,

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 5>you know, and we well know commenting how they've been

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 5>able to stabilize their base. Now that's a that's a com'

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 5>that's really a The reason that happened was because UAP

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 5>voters were choosing the coalition. Now that Clive is back

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 5>in the race, three percent that he's picking up in

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 5>the polls, it's come straight off the coalition. So the

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 5>Coalition is now down to thirty six and so the

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 5>two party preferred vote is favoring labor because of course,

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 5>once you lose votes to minor parties, you don't get

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 5>all of the back. So we are still dealing with

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 5>a very fractured, volatile electorate and of course that's in

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 5>them before we talk about Victoria.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you for previewing that. I will get to

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it in a second. I know you blokes are hanging

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on that because it is I mean again again, the

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>national number, the preferred I mean, all of that stuff, right,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got to dig down, You've got to dig down,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>and that is where these blokes are. But I just

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>want to ask again because I am quite fascinated, and

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Pauline's a friend, and we've had One Nation on plenty

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and James Ashburn I've got Leon a little bit later, right.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I think One Nation's offering in twenty five very different

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>than even where it was ten years ago, litt alone,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the twenty years ago, littlone, all the way back to

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. Because when somebody puts their hand up in

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a focus group or in one of these groups and says,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm thinking about one nation, there's a

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>caricature of the one nation voter. But we also know

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that there is this change, particularly around younger blokes and

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>younger blokes wanting to be a little bit harder. Have

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you seen described to me again, have you seen any

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>change in the person who puts their hand up to

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>say one nation? Because that's why I keep talking about this,

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that if we talk about young blokes and where they

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>might be going, I think a portion, a slice, a

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>little somewhere is going to one nation. That's right.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 5>And so if we look at who's likely to go

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 5>and vote for minor parties, whether it's the liberal side

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 5>or the labor side, losing votes to minor parties, overwhelmingly

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 5>the people that are under the age of forty five.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 5>So if they're leaving the coalition to go and vote

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 5>for one nation, they're most likely, not exclusively, but most

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 5>likely to be millennials and gen z in the outer

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 5>suburbs and regions. And this is exactly what's going on

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 5>with the coalition's primary vote at the moment. They're losing

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 5>these voters if historically got no allegiances to the l

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 5>ANDP flip side. Of course, the same applies to Labor.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, they've got a whole bunch of young voters

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 5>sitting on their pile that equally don't have any law

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 5>to them. And this is how volatile this next generation

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 5>is going to be. And why you know, in twenty

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 5>ten we had eighty odd seats go to preferences. In

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two we had over a hundre and thirty.

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 5>This election is going to be over one hundred and

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 5>forty and driving that is of course the growth of

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 5>this generation. Right, So twenty ten there's only like fifteen

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 5>percent of the voter's roll. They're now up to forty

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 5>three percent.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And basically, I mean there's a sort of the fifty

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to fifty line, which means we start digging into I

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do love. By the way, look you know nineteen seventy

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>eight Gen X, right, proudly gen X. But and now

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got people sort of my age trying to pretend

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that they're cusps. Millennials don't know, Be proud of what

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you are, all right, Where the line is, that's just

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>what you don't get. It's not a star sign with

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>cancer with Leo rising. You just are what you are,

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>right and X is where we are. But basically, if

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to put a meat cleaver at the fifty

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>percent zone of the electoral role. It's fifty now basically

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 1>equal above fifty, equal below. Demographically, yes, the more millennial,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just saying that number there, right, so those

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>who sit wherever you sit, that's the halfway point. Michael. Also,

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to think about, you know, apart from

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>policy reasons, the type of things where again a younger

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>bloke might end up in a one nation. Those cartoons

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have been amazing for years, right, Like they take the proverbial.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>They've been going for years. I think, if possible, they

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>should be used a lot more as ads during a

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>campaign because at least they're taking the proverbial. But also

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember that conversation that I always bang on about,

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>which was the night before the twenty nineteen election, where

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about preference and preference discipline. Right now,

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Hanson is one hundred percent out there saying I

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can't stand Albo. She's out there saying don't vote Labor.

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Their game, generally when it comes to how to vote,

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is just to say, look one for us, and then

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you do what you want after your preferences are you're right,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But what's the mathematical game you play when you see

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>that one nation number. Do you just take the fifty

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to fifty aud you say it's a bit more sixty forty.

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>What's your sense of that, because again I know it's

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fractions of fractions, but that's the game.

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So invariably it's fifty fifty to fifty five forty

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 9>five sixty forty depending on the election. It also depends

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 9>on the state eight and it also depends on whether

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 9>one notion handing and had to vote cards. They tend

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 9>to hand out more how to vote cards in Queensland

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 9>than they do elsewhere where, I mean trade for example,

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 9>Trumpet of Patriots will hand out probably know how to

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 9>vote cards and the overwhelming majority of seats in this country,

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 9>so their preferences spray. The voter is probably a conservative voter,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 9>but without a direction, they tend to spray their their votes.

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So and the advertising's all over the shop. He's not

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>doing it, he's not doing well what he did to Shorten.

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, no, no, no, that's absolutely correct. I'm not quite sure

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 9>what he's on about, but he's not about something. Be

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 9>kind of your fellow Australian and all that stuff. But

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 9>they tend to be taking votes off the Liberal Party

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 9>and for everyone vote, you only get half a bit

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 9>more than half back, So that's the calculation. It's damaging

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 9>to the coalition side, which is why the Coachline when

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 9>it's best is a center right party, not a right

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 9>party or a center party.

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 4>It's a center right party. How it taught us that

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 4>over the decade.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 9>So you have to you have to and that's why

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 9>Turnable didn't do any well because he couldn't keep the right.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 4>He could keep the center, but not the right.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 9>So you have to have policies which are across that sweep.

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 9>But as I said, the main issue with these minor

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 9>parties on the right is they don't don't hand out

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 9>how to vote cards, and if they did, you'd probably

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 9>find them preferencing the Liberal party. Liberal Democrats tend to

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 9>hand out and they preference us, but those that don't

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 9>the vote sprand that damages us.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>This is also the factor with the teals right is

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that if they're able to get so generally speaking, the

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>way that works with the major party is that the

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hardcore seats that you know you're going to win, you'd

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of hundred members that might move from

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that side of town over to the side of town.

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit more of a fight, right, That's

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>how you end up physically with the people who can

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>stand there. And now that we've got three weeks of

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>early voting, that they're at all of those centers all

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of those days. The membership makeup of things like one

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Nation isn't physically big enough to do that. And because

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't have, say, the lower House representation, you don't

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>get people moving from the safe seat to the vulnerable seat.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>In previous elections, Palmer has been able to find people

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that are willing to do it. But obviously when it

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>comes to the teals, if you've got people coming from

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hardcore places that are safe and they're not involved, it

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ends up making it look like they've got thousands of

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>volunteers in each and every one of these local seats.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the game that they play. It's part

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of why they look sometimes a little more popular than

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they actually end up being. But also if every second

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>house has got one up, got a poster up, then

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you start to think, well, that's the way everyone's going.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>These are the little mind games that play. All right, lads,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Victoria, I'll give you what you want. A

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 1>nice juicy chat about Victoria. AD has just dropped by

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party, and I'm going to say great, good

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>attack Ads. It's just surprising that it's a week in.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>But they are hammering home what we know in the polls,

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>which is that the Allen government is a massive problem

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>for the labor vote. And alban EASi he's part of

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that Liberal camp which will be rolling out on television,

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>not just online.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 6>Albo and Allen are double trouble for Victoria. Labour's budget

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 6>shows ten years of deficits and Victoria has the worst

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 6>debt of any state. Victorians are paying more for mortgages

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 6>and the biggest rent rises in over a decade. Crime

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 6>is at an all time high, and both labor governments

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 6>cut funding for Victorian roads. Don't double down on failure.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 6>We can't afford three more years of labor.

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good, Pretty good, cause does it hit where they

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>need to hit, which is to say they are one

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and the same.

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, pretty close. I mean they'll put that on their

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 5>bunting and their sideage. Right, And we've got some numbers

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 5>coming up this fuck with this coming week in news

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 5>limited that will probably suggest to tech campaigns well researched

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 5>too so yes, it is a problem for Labor and Victoria.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 5>And I know there's a lot of optimism going around

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 5>the Labor limit at the moment, but I would caution

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 5>those individuals and to think long and hard about what

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 5>actually is going to happen in the start of Victoria.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 5>And I do think some elements of the press gallery

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 5>in Canberra got a bit of a blind spot about

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 5>or really how bad it is for the Lobal brand

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 5>and Victoria.

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I refuse to believe that they're the most plugged in

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>people in the entire compan They noted the mood of

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the suburbs. I mean, I've seen them with my own eyes,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the way they just connect with the average Australia, and

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I just yeah, I've got one hundred percent. Look, here's

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing, Michael, that ad you've seen plenty. What do

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you like about it? What do you feel nervous about it?

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it offensive to Essendon supporters? No doubt somebody will say,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with the exclusivity of red and black, what's your thoughts?

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 9>It's a very good ad, you know. Our of course,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 9>to remind people didn't appear with just In A. Allen

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 9>when he came to Victoria last week. He appeared with

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 9>the Western Australian premier in the South Australian Labor premier.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 9>Do you labor premiers came here, didn't appear with just

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 9>Indy because she was busy in Parliament or some.

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Other lame excuse.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 9>He's got appear with Allen in Victoria sooner or later,

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 9>because it's just going to be more and more obvious

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 9>to people that he's disassociating, disassociating himself from the Labor

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 9>brand of Victoria, the Liberal Parties reminding everybody of the

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 9>association whether the Labor appears physically, whether they appear physically

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 9>together or not.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 4>So it's a very good ad.

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 9>I might also add this though, when you look at

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 9>the polls we've just discussed. The Labor primary vote in

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 9>Victoria's down around six percent. It looks like now not

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 9>all of that will go directly to the Liberal Parties.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 9>We saw in the word Rebi election there primary vote

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 9>was down more than sixteen percent and ours was up

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 9>only three and a half. So you can't say all

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 9>of that'll come to us. But if you're down six

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 9>percent in Victoria, you've got to be up somewhere else

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 9>in the rest of Australia. So you know, I don't

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 9>accept that Labour's primary voting Victoria is thirty three or

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 9>thirty two.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Or three one below.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 9>It's below thirty and that means the Liberal Party probably

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 9>wins four. And there's a whole lot more Bruce, you know,

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 9>me McNamara and Hawk and Dankly, we've discussed Victoria could

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 9>be a wipeout for Labor.

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 4>It could be a wipeout for Labor.

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 9>Elbow nothing has done nothing so far to stem that bleeding.

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 9>For as long as he does not appear with just Cendra,

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 9>Allen is just going to remind everybody as to how

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 9>toxic she is and how toxic the Labor brand is

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 9>in Victoria.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Incidentally, you know, because the I always talk about the

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>ugur boogerads, right, the black and white and the scary

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>music and all the reds, all the versions of it

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that exist. What are you blokes seeing in Victoria about

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>how negative the ads are? Obviously that's a pretty hard

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>one and the Libs should run that because there's the

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Polly and the research that's the case. But is the

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>black and white speaking music about Peter Dutton being deployed

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>by Labor on maths. I know you blokes, you know

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like me, spend too much time in the nerdy end

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of politics. But if you happen to turn on you know,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>FM radio, what's the sort of stuff you hear from

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Labor Because.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, look I would say about negative advertising and how

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 5>it bounces with that millennial gen Z generation, right seeing Victoria,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 5>particularly in Melbourne, they close to fifty percent of the

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 5>voters roll and they really hate the Jopoli, right, they

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 5>really hate the jobs and so they you know, at

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 5>the moment, I'm looking to vote for someone other than

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 5>the Labor Party, There's no question about that. And we

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 5>saw that in Worry. But you know, they just sprayed everywhere.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 5>Now that's going to be less of a problem for

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 5>the coalition in seats where the coalitions vote is naturally high.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 5>So seat like Chisholm where the Liberal primaries are like

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 5>close to forty just naturally and they can just pick

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 5>up three or four percent every one. Seat. Where it's

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 5>going to be problem for them is in a seat

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 5>like Hawk for example, where their primary naturally is in

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 5>the high twenties. Labor could drop six seven percent. It

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 5>will spray everywhere and it won't be still enough. So

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 5>I think on a bad day, Labour still loses enough

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 5>seats to plunge Elbow into minority government. That's if, of course,

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 5>Dutton doesn't make any gains in any other part of

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 5>the country. Really bad day, people just wake up that

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 5>morning when they're voting, whether they're voting early or whether

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 5>they're voting on the day or election day, and just go,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 5>you know what, I'm going to see a very strong message.

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 5>And this is where the negative campaign and that ad

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 5>is actually aimed at, and that is to basically just

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:21.719
<v Speaker 5>keep people's attention focused on an unpopular state Labor government.

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 5>If they are thinking about that government they're voting, they

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 5>will deliver more seats to the Coalition than we are discussing.

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 5>If they are thinking about Dutton, and let's say that

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Labor campaigns worked, the negative campaign gets done, then that

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 5>will be down to about three seats instead. So this

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 5>is the contest we're in.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what I love. I love it. It's into the detail,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it's into the weeds, and it's exactly where we like

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to be. And of course, no doubt there'll be news

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>every day between now and early voting, let alone full voting,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>which will be the disastrous decisions of that labor government.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember in the lead up to this election, they want

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to let criminals back into the schools. But as long

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as I had an ankle, bracelet right. Do not underestimate

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this state government's ability to try to dig itself out

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of trouble, but only dig deeper, ironically to China. Quick

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>break back with more here on Paul Murray Live, Loss

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk about more with these fellas and then can

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the door to do what the mum's done for a while,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Lee Hanson, she's running for One Nation in Tasmania. Hardcore

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>politics on a Sunday night, Thanks for watching, Thank you

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>so much for watching. Started the race Sunday Night where

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>we just get all hardcore about politics and we love

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>every second of it. Don't forget what a week we've

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>got to here, People's Forum Tuesday, Treasurers Wednesday, and then

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the battle around Blackout Bowen on Wednesday. That's ahead of

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>well more pub tests, more fun that we're going to

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be having and must watch TV each and every night.

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The analysis starts five o'clock all the way through to

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>reader at eleven. So thank you very much for watching

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 1>us during this election. It is when we all come

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>alive and we fire up as we do this evening

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with Michael Kroger, who is just very comfortable as the

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of daylight Savings Dane. He's just got the chill

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 1>factory's got the puffa ja get ready to go because

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's always twenty two degrees at his joint, always twenty

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>two degrees of imagining there with red Bridge, and they've

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>got more info as always coming in the papers in

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the next few days. Now, I want to talk to

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>some degree about the gender stuff. Now, I was fascinated

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>by this pull apart that was done by the nine newspapers.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Now they put a pole out only last week, so

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that they were comparing the male female vote

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to March when in other factors a little up, a

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>little down. I'm surprised that they sort of held the

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>number there. But again because your sense of these things

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are things as stark as we've seen in other poles

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>at other times, where basically blokes leading to the right,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>women leaning to the left. But again, according to this analysis,

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the primary vote of the Liberal Party is higher than

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the primary vote of the Labor Party with women. And

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were the ones who had the problem right.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Look, har can only on what the data we're

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 5>seeing and data that I look at for a news

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 5>poll and other pulses as well. It is definitely women

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 5>who are who have moved, and they moved from the

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 5>minor parties back to the Labor Party. The problem with

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, some of some of the ways some of

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 5>these some of these poles are reported is it's as

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 5>if we're still dealing with a two horse race. We're

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 5>not right. And you know, whether these blokes moved or not,

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 5>I can almost guarantee you if they have morthed, they

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 5>didn't move to Labor, they would have moved to one

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 5>nation or uop from from the Liberal Party. And that's

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 5>that's the only thing that we're seeing that's actually hitting

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 5>the Liberal Party in a very big way right now

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 5>is attrition to its right flank. And that is all

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 5>that's going on.

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael, again, this is this gender conversation, the politics in

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and around it. Certainly it's something that the deals play

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on hard. I mean, how do you start to if

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you notice a problem. Let me put it this way. Actually,

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.959
<v Speaker 1>if you notice a problem, set of numbers and there's

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.280
<v Speaker 1>just you can put a circle around over fifty fives.

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You know under forties men women sub How do we

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>start to know as viewers that headquarters have noticed there's

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a problem and they're trying to corterize the wound.

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, you notice when they come up with specific policies

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 9>directed towards a particular gendered group or community group or

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 9>you know, ethnic group, that's when you know that they

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 9>feel as a concern.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of this stuff is exaggerated.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 9>I don't know whe's trust this data because I think

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 9>the sample sizes.

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Are are not huge.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 9>What do we know for certain, which is rich women

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 9>are tending to vote teal or Green. The rich, inner city,

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 9>college educated female vote is voting left. In other words,

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 9>you know that working class men have in the Western

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 9>world in the last decade moved to the right. The

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 9>working class generally are moving to the right. Young people

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 9>who were given, you know, benefits of having the university

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 9>debts written off, blah blah blah blah blah, social activism, etc.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 9>Are tending to go to the left. There's a breakdown

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 9>the two party system here Australia's case as identified, but

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 9>not in America. Whereas we said the other day, ninety

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 9>nine percent of people voted for either the Democrats or

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 9>the Republicans. There are reasons for that, but largely the

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 9>two party system is still at play there. So they're

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 9>the things I know for certain. But these mine shifts

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 9>from one pole to a next with small numbers I

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 9>tend not to take a huge amount of notice of.

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 9>I think most policies of the major parties directed towards

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 9>the electorate as a whole, such as cost of living

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 9>et cetera, et cetera, because that's where the votes all.

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Right, a couple of other ones before we're done here,

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Josh Burns. Josh Burn's a Labor MP

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>who we all expect to go in hard against the Greens.

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Why because, of course there are a significant number of

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Jewish voters. He too, I believe, is a Jewish man,

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and we all know the way the Greens have played

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years. But he's done an interview

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend suggesting that he's going to add I

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>quote hedges bitch bets when it comes to the Greens,

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>which means the preference world where Labor should be putting

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>them last. And maybe a door is going to be

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>open here because if it ends up in a two

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>way fight between the Liberal Party and the Labor Party

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for his seat, those Green preferences will matter. Now, Michael,

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you've been strong on this for the past couple of years.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You've said this is one of those seats that's a

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>littanus test. This week is probably when we start to

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>get a bit of an idea about the how to

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>votes that start to come out ahead of voting in

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of weeks time. What did you read

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:57.720
<v Speaker 1>into hedging his bets?

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 9>Okay, so what's happening within the Labor Party is this.

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 9>I'm sure Burns and his supporters would like to preference

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.399
<v Speaker 9>the Liberal Party ahead of the Greens, but Albo won't

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 9>let him.

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 4>That's what's happening here.

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 9>Albo and Albo's henchmen have said, we can't preference Peter Dutton.

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 4>You can have license to.

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 9>Issue a fifty to fifty card. You know, if you

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 9>want to vote liberal he's too liberal and he's too green.

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 4>You make up the decision. Now.

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 9>I think that's a disastrous decision by Labor. I know,

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 9>Michael Danby, the previous member Labor in that seat, which

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 9>is Melbourn. Port's tried on a couple of occasions to

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 9>issue a vote to Liberal had to vote card and

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 9>he was ticked off by head office on election day

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 9>on at least one occasion. Burns saying he's going to

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 9>do fifty to fifty is very damaging to him because

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 9>he'll lose whatever Jewish voters he's got left if he's

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 9>signed to say to Jewish voters the Dutton position on

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.439
<v Speaker 9>the Middle East and the Green's position on the Middle

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 9>East are morally equivalent. That's what he's trying to tell

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 9>Jewish voters and just other voters in Macnaum.

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 4>That will enrage people.

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 9>That is a gutlas's decision by this bloke and the

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 9>Labor Party, and it's a stop.

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 4>It's an insult to Jewish people.

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 9>It's like, OK, there's a lot of Jews there, so

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 9>we better pretend we're fifty to fifty there. But elsewhere

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 9>in the country we're giving a second preface of the Greens.

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean that will do Labor a lot of damage.

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 9>I think Burns is going to come third. He got

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 9>thirty one point seven seven percent of the primary vote

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 9>at the twenty two election. He's going to drop into

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 9>the mid twenties. He's going to lose four or five

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 9>percent primary vote from the Jewish vote. Labour's votes also down,

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 9>you know, four or five percent. Add that together, he's

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 9>probably down. He's probably down six percent.

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Because wouldn't there be that a perfect scenario that if

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Danby wanted to run like the former Labor blow

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>did in the seat of Paran at the state level,

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>where you just say no, no, I want to come back

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>around with this. I'm willing to stand up to get

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ten percent so I can throw that away from the

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>people that are going to take this stand. That would

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 1>put the seat well and truly in play.

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, look, I've definitely put it now in the coffin

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 5>of the incumbent laboring feet about that. I think what's

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 5>going on a little let's be honest here. What's going

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 5>on here is labor's stuck between a rock and a

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 5>hard place. They know that a very significant portion of

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 5>those planning to labor in other parts of let's say

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Melbourne and Brisbane for example, I do like the idea

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:22.439
<v Speaker 5>of a green minority labor government, right, and we've got

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 5>we really start on the weekend for a news limited

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 5>that actually showed that. And so they're worried about seats

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 5>like Wills. They're obviously trying to grab the federal sy

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 5>to Brisbane back and so they've got other geopolitical considerations

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 5>to play here, and you know, the calculated decision as well.

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 5>We'll give them as much of a leeway as we can,

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 5>but at the end of the day, we've got an

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 5>election to win. And you know, yes, okay, Josh would

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 5>like to put the Green's last, but we're not gonna

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 5>lead him because we want to win Wills. We want

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 5>to win Brisbane, we want to win government.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll stand by it. We'll see what happens. Thank you, lads.

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate it. Well, you know, like a kid

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>who's eating too much ice cream, I can't get enough.

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Bring in more. We'll talk to you guys again next

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>week and we continue the conversation of politics. Source it

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>all sprinkles too, drop a flake, got okay, the fact

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>guy's getting away with them all right, moment or two's time.

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Lee Hanson, daughter of Pauline, she's running for parliament. We'll

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>find out why next. I was fascinated to see a

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago that Lee Hanson, the daughter of Pauline,

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:35.879
<v Speaker 1>is going to be running for the Senate, running for

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Hanson's One Nation at the upcoming federal election. She

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>will be doing so in Tasmania. Now. One Nation's done

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty well there, but it hasn't been able to get

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a Senate seat for a while. Why the Lamby effect?

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But I reckon with a Hanson on the ballot, it

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>might be about to change. She joins us now from

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>our Hobart studio. Lee, good luck, congratulations and welcome to

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the fight.

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 7>Thank you, Hi, Paul, how are you good?

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>So you've seen what they've done near mum. You've seen

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how they put her through the ringer and you've gone yep,

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>me too.

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 7>Why Look, I've asked myself that good question. Mum for

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 7>ten years or so now has been asking me to

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 7>put my hand up and give it a go. And

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 7>it hasn't been something of interest to me, purely because

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 7>of what I went through as a child and seeing

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 7>what she's been through the impact it's had on her

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 7>and the family. But I suppose at the point now

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 7>I'm a mother myself. I had two young children and

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 7>unfortunately I am concerned about their future and I don't

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 7>have confidence in the current politicians and the current system

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 7>that I feel I actually need to put my hand up.

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 5>It's time now over.

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I am again it's your candidacy and it's not about others.

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But I have to talk about the Lamby effect. Right

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>where she's sat there for years and basically she's perfected

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this act of being, you know, the last one on

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the bandwagon to say that she's going to fight for

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this and fight for that. But then her own candidates

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 1>at the state election, we'll open that they don't have

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>any policies. Right, She's essentially saying, Look, it's up to

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone else to come up with ideas. I'll just pick

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the ones that people like or dislike. Why is that

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>type of representation what Tasmania doesn't need more of?

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 7>Look, the representation Tasmania needs is people that actually genuinely care.

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 7>And that's what I have to offer, and that's what

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 7>one nation has to offer. I've lived in Tasmania for

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 7>over thirteen years. I married to Tasmanian. I'm raring my

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 7>children in Tasmanian. I've been a community member of Tasmania

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 7>for some time. And the fact that I care, the

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 7>fact that I want to listen, the fact that I

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 7>will be getting out there and understanding beyond my own experiences,

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 7>and we have solid policies on offer from one Nation

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 7>and Taylor making them or tailor make tailoring them to

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 7>the Tasmania needs is what I have to offer, and

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 7>that's the point of difference beyond any other candidate that's

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:54.280
<v Speaker 7>currently running.

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about some of those ideas, certainly ones

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that I have seen heads at nodding at a barbecue.

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>There's things like income splitting where if one person's at home,

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one person's working well, rather than paying the full amount

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of tax on the one wage, split it across two

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and surprisingly it starts to go down. What's the stuff

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that you think if people hear about they're going to

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>connect to.

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. Look, one Nation has some really strong policy. So

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 7>dual income splitting, as you said, can saved two to

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 7>ten thousand dollars on average for families, which is great.

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 7>We've also got removing the GST from building materials to

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 7>promote more housing in the community, in affordable housing. Currently,

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 7>I can't foresee that my children will ever own their

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 7>own home and that is great concern for us within

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 7>Tasmania as well as across Australia. Fuel excise was actually

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 7>one nascent cut. Fuel excise was one Nation's policy, So

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 7>that will help reduce the cost of living as well.

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 7>Removing the bureaucracy, the nineteen billion dollar over bureacracy and

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 7>governance span through siloed thinking in governant bodies as well,

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 7>so we have a range of policy that will benefit Tasmania.

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 7>I ask that people take a look on the One

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 7>Nation website and I will be putting out those messages

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 7>over the coming days and weeks as well.

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>What's been the single most repetitive and annoying question you've

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>been asked from Breakfast TV to this moment right now

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about candidacies. I've got to guess what it might be.

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But what's the one that you go, Okay, great, can

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we just get this one out of the way and

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>then I'll run in my own right?

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 7>Well, why I'm running once? What I've seen mum being

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 7>through is a big one.

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Good.

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.720
<v Speaker 1>When are you going to disagree with mum? What happens

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 1>when you disagree with mum? Do you love that one?

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? Yeah, I've had that one, which is quite interesting.

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, look, I offer a new generational view. I

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 7>have debates with my mother all the time. I've had

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 7>them with her my whole life.

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 5>That's what mother.

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 7>Daughter relationship or parent child relationships are, right, So that's

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:54.359
<v Speaker 7>not going to change. But that's how you push each

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 7>other's thinking. And Mum respects my views, so I definitely

0:47:57.280 --> 0:48:02.720
<v Speaker 7>get that one. But no, I I have some tremendous

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 7>values and qualities that my mother has passed me, so

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 7>I stand by her, and here I am as well.

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely stealing the spine a wonderful thing that hand from

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>a parent to a kid and then they grow into

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>their own and they stand on their own as you're

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>going to do now. All right, socials, how do people

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>stay in touch? How do people learn more about your candidacy?

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 1>In the next of the wall?

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, absolutely, look, have a look on the One Nation website.

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 7>You'll find information about myself about my background. Please, I

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 7>need help from my fellow Tasmanians. I can only help

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 7>you if you help me. So I ask for as

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 7>much the port as I can possibly get. I need

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 7>to get signs up. I need to start hitting the

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 7>road next couple of days. If anyone can put a

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 7>sign up or help me on handing out how to

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 7>vote cards and polling boots. Or volunteer. Please reach out

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 7>to my email address, which is Lee dot Hanson at

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 7>one Nation dot org dot au. Mum's coming back down

0:48:57.239 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 7>to the state over the coming weeks and we're going

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 7>to start coming around the state and speaking at venue,

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 7>so watch out for those dates. Keep an eye out

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 7>for the media releases as well.

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. Thank you very much, Lee, All the best

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to you. Well, why are you going to get the

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>word out? Is you welcome here anytime? All right? And

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got plenty of time between now and the election.

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>All the best to your late Lee Hanson there running

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 1>for One Nation in Tasmania. Fingers crossed. She's going to

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be an excellent addition to the Parliament. That's our show

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>for tonight see tomorrow. Here's the Royal Report.