WEBVTT - Why David Pocock was booted from parliament's sports club

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Darni. Last week we spoke to you about your story

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Australian Parliament's Sports Club, how I was registered

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>as a lobby group and sponsored by the gambling industry.

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So apart from everyone else reporting on that and not

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>giving you any credit, what's happened after you broke that story?

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 2>It blew up in a way that I didn't expect

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>it to.

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Danielle say it is Kriik's media reporter and no stranger

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to a scoop.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>We spoke on Monday about this club that organized the

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 3>special games of sport between politicians and journalists and offers

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>corporate memberships that start reportedly at a cost of two

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 3>and a half thousand dollars. Amongst those corporate members who

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 3>is responsible Wagering Australia, which is a peak body for

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 3>the gambling industry that represents companies like sports Bet.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Darney reported to this sponsorship by the gambling industry and

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the questions around lobbying. We're making some MPs who attended

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>very unhappy.

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>And in my piece we had a quote from David Pocock,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>who's an independent senator for the ACT, who was really

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 3>critical of the relationship that the club has with the

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 3>gambling lobby. So he took that to a Senate estimates

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>hearing with Foreign Minister Penny Wongo's representing the PM.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, I know you want to get a grab ar,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 4>but I don't know that the Parliamentary Sports Club is

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 4>a lobbying firm.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 2>That it might not.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 3>Basically, it was this back and forth over whether the

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 3>parliament Sports Club was a lobby organization and the function

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>that it had, and some of the transparency around that.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Is it's a Parliamentary sports club and it's not well

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 4>and it may be required the under the Code of

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Conduct or whatever, the Code of lobbying what's called the

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Register of Lobbyists to register.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I accept that that clip goes around the internet and

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 3>by Thursday he had been booted from the club.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 2>This is when the story really.

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Blows up, the idea that this ex Wallaby could be

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>booted out of the sports club.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Vaniel James and you're listening to seven AM today,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Danny sayid, I'm the sports club that's just not cricket.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, October seventy. There are a lot of peculiarities

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about this story, but this one sort of does my heating.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So imagine booting one of the all time great back

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>railers from your team. What did the club organizers say

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about why he was booted?

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>So the club organizer is a blow called Andy Turnbull,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 3>and he said that David Pocock's position was untenable after

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>he had raised the issue in Senate Estimate. So he

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 3>gave a statement to Kriikee and he essentially said that

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 3>David Pocock, raising it in the manner that he did,

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>suggested that he had brought up the club into disrepute.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>There ended up being a number of leagues of messages

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 3>between Andy Turnbull and David Pocock, and he actually describes

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 3>the sports club as the most a political organization in

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the Parliament, and he wrote to David Pocock, sadly, this

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>week you've see our twenty years of serious effort to

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>bring a harmonious and fun environment to a small part

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 3>of each sitting day. You chose a cheap shot that

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 3>will have no effect on the outcome of your anti

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 3>gambling campaign. I'm sorry, it's reach's point, but you have

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 3>left me with no choice. Very stern, very stern, very stern.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>It's I'm picking up my bat and ball and I'm

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>going home. Then there's the Prime Minister and his relationship

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.839
<v Speaker 3>to the club, into Pocock, into Turnbull and he gets

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>asked about it on Friday morning up in Brisbane and

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>he says, the club presidency comes with the gig, David

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Pocock being David Pocock, getting himself in a story. You know,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 3>this is a voluntary organization. The inference being he is

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 3>accusing him of grandstanding, he's accusing him of being attention seeking.

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>And then he says, the amount of time I have

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>spent on the Australian Parliament Sports Club this year is zero.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 4>I have participated in zero events in terms of sports,

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 4>just because I'm a bit.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Busy, because I'm just a little bit busy, which he

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>of course is as the PM. But past chairs of

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the organization are people like Mel Braff and who's the

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 3>current director, people like Barnaby Joyce and Mick McCormack. It's

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily a thing that comes by default when you're

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 3>the PM. And that is really really fascinating. This idea

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>that Albanizi has sort of raised of well I don't

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>get a choice is just part of it's just part

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 3>of it. The third part is the amount of time

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I've spent on the Australian Parliament Sports Club this year

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 3>is zero. That's not strictly true, because he spoke at

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.679
<v Speaker 3>the season launch of the sports club at the Press

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Club two months ago, and we have photographs of him speaking,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 3>and there are a number of other speakers, people like

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>stakeholders and industry bodies. Kay Campwell, who's the SEO of

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Responsible Wagering Australia Capitol Brief reported was at that event

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So do you think the Prime Minister is mistaken or

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>misleading when he says he's had zero involvement.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I think he's trying to minimize his relationship to the

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 3>club quite reason because obviously this is such a hot

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>button issue. I think it's slightly misleading in the spirit

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 3>of it in terms of passing and partists. I think

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 3>it is misleading. So suggest he spent zero time on

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the club. I don't have any information to contradict the

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 3>idea that he has participated in zero events, but to

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 3>suggest that he's spent no time on it, that he

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 3>doesn't think about it, that he has no real substantive

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 3>relationship with it, which is what he's trying. In my

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>view to suggest here, I think that's misleading.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So putting that aside when it comes to David Pocock,

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>does he have a point? I mean Pocock would have

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>known about the sponsorship when he was playing in the club.

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Right yeah, And I think this touches on a really

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 3>interesting sort of discussion that also negates a lot of

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the arguments around the substantive impact blobbing here, right the

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 3>idea that David Pocock a would have known about the

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 3>sponsorship reasonably he would have and casual sports social sport

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>especially is a great tool for relationship building and it's

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>a really positive thing and there are lots of benefits

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 3>it does. It fundamentally does a really good thing for

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>relationships across the various people that work in Parliament House.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>That's why he's sort of been inclined to stay in

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the club and didn't resign voluntarily, and he sort of

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 3>wants there to be some sort of sporting for him.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, as wall we have seen the impact of that.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 3>The interesting part is this counter argument that comes from

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the likes of Andy Turnbull who say there's an unwritten

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>rule that you don't talk shop while you're playing sport

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>and that there's no real lobbying going on here. The

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 3>fact is that you form these relationships while you're playing sport,

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 3>and that's the point of the thing. You can't have

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 3>an organization that is based in relationship building that is

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 3>a positive thing, and simultaneously have that relationship building have

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 3>no impact. Otherwise your organization's pretty useless. That's the admission

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 3>you're making.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Coming up a club without a ball thief Danny. It

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a great headline for the club when they booted

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>David Pocock, So what's been the fallout?

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>This is fascinating.

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>So a number of fellow mostly tier independent MPs have

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>followed his lead, so a Legraspender and Sophie Scomp's went

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 3>with him, and Nick Ryan had already quit at this

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 3>point by the time we had published and Alegraspender called

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 3>his ejection of disgrace. She said the sports club should

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.679
<v Speaker 3>be about politicians love of sport, not their sad addiction

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 3>to the gambling lobby. I can't be a part of

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 3>a club that promotes the gambling lobby because it's such

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 3>a big headline and again completely in congruous for a

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>punter to see one of the only sort of able

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 3>sportsmen in Parliament. There's a couple of others kicking her,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 3>but certainly one of the fittest and fastest in the.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Parliament be booted out of the club.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 3>The Prime Minister is still called it absurd that it's

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>this sort of nefarious lobbying organization, but he suggests that

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>David Pocock should be allowed to play, and all of

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>a sudden, Andy Turnbull follows the PM's suggestion on Friday afternoon,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 3>who sort of walks back some of that snark we

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 3>talked about and says, well, participation should be open to everyone.

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Who am I to argue at the Prime Minister and

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>invites David.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Pocock back, So he's back in No, he.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Has come out and said that he won't redoin until

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>the club undertakes a transparent, open process to consider all

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 3>current and future sponsorships. There are rumblings that we're hearing

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 3>about what's going to happen sort of on the twenty

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>eighth or so in a couple of weeks when the

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Parliament comes back and sits again. Is David Pocock just

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 3>going to show up on the lawns outside of the

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Senate wing? What do you do when you know this,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 3>this hulking back rower comes up to you and he says,

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to play place.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to tell him no?

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>And so what is the club said? I mean, are

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they war gaming this possibility?

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 2>I imagine they are.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 3>But now they have deregistered the club as of Monday.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.239
<v Speaker 3>They say that they've deregistered the club on the basis

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 3>of advice they've taken from the Register of Lobbyists.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 2>There's a bit of a weird.

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Element here where the Register of Lobbyists is run and

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 3>maintained by the Attorney General's Department. The reason that Anie

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Turnbull gives for the club being registered as a lobby

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 3>organization in the first place is because he says he

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 3>got advice from a very senior member of the Attorney

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 3>General's Department suggesting that he should register the club as

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 3>a lobby group. And so there's at some point somewhere

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>some conflicting advice being given to if any Turmberle is

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 3>of course telling truth that there's somewhere there's some conflicting

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 3>given to the Parliamentary Sports Club from the Attorney General's Department.

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 3>And I'd be really really interested to see that advice

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>laid out in full.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So Darnie, through your reporting, you've gone ahead and you've

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>blown up a sports club. I hope you proud of yourself.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is likely to happen now? In

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of reform.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a real shame that it's that it seemed to

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>have this effect because also I didn't I didn't realize

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 3>until this afternoon that the Parliamentary Sports Club is also

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 3>responsible for the infamous Polly's Verse Press cricket match which

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Purben has been trying to get me in for

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>a number of years. I still play great cricket. Now

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 3>that might be off the cards, I'm afraid. But in

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 3>terms of reform, I'm really I really don't know. I'm

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:49.359
<v Speaker 3>really curious to see whether sort of the more informal

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>types of sports that have played at Parliament House. There's

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 3>a long running squash competition, for example, at Parliament House

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>that sort of is very not corporate. I wonder whether

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 3>those sorts of things will take more precedence or whether

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 3>things will just carry on as usual and David Pocock

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 3>will just be forced to throw rocks at windows in

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Parlament House on the lawns and that's going to be

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>his new sporting pursuit.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's a much bigger and far more

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>seriously ship behind all of this, Darney, and that's the

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>government's willingness to address the bigger issue of their inaction

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on evidence based gambling reform. What sense do you have

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of where that's at at the moment.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I think there's been lots of moving parts that sort

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 3>of effect whether or not we see movement on gambling

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 3>advertising reform. And it is things like sports rights, it's

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>things like new television deals being broken. It's things like

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the gambling lobby itself having a presence in Parliament House

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>as it does. But the government hasn't responded to the

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Murphy report, which was ordered back in September twenty twenty two.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 3>There's not really a sense that the government's going to

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 3>do anything in the immediate term. We are coming up

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>to the Spring racing Carnival, which is one of the

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>big It's betting Christmas for the betting companies and for

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 3>the lobby. I will believe it when I see it

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 3>at this point. This government previously started to commit to

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 3>partial bans on gambling advertising sort of in the lead

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 3>up to the twenty twenty five election, then went back

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 3>on that and said that there wasn't going to be

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>anything to laughter the election. We're now a solid six

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 3>months post election, so I don't anticipate there to be

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 3>any significant change. Noting, of course, the government line that

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 3>they've done more on gambling arm than any government since federation,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>which is their sort of routine talking point.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>That is in a sense true.

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 3>They've made a number of changes around things like self

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 3>exclusion registers and whatnot, a number of self regulatory changes

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 3>for gambling companies. A lot of those aren't being adhered

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 3>to anyway, so I'll believe it when I say it.

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Dannie, thank you so much for your time.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much for having me, Daniel.

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>As always, you can read Dannisaya It's reporting at krikey

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot are you. There are many many exclusives there.

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Also in the news, a protest group behind regular pro

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian rallies has won a case in the Supreme Court

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>against the new South Wales government. The Palestine Action Group

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>challenged laws introduced earlier this year with stop protesters from

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>gathering around places of worship. Lawyers from the group organizer

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh Lees, successfully argue that the laws gave police too

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>much power, including the move protesters on even when there

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was no reason to believe worship has felt obstructed, harassed

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or scared. And an Australian soldier has died in a

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>training accident in Townsville. The soldier died after a vehicle

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>rollover on Wednesday evening. In a statement, the Department of

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Defense confirmed the death. Two other soldiers were injured in

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the accident but have since been dis charge from hospital.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel James. This is seven am. Thanks for listening.