WEBVTT - ROUND 18 REVIEW: "THE CLUB ISN'T CONVINCED": Dragons beat Tigers but has Dean Young done enough?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, welcome back everyone to another edition of Code NRL

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts on a Monday, where we break down the big

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>stories from the weekend. That's going to include answering some

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>important questions that are popped up, like is the Bunker

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ruining Rugby League? The Dragons at any hope of getting

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>off from the wooden spoon? Are the Tigers doomed to

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>forever miss the eight? And what's going on with Cody

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Walker's temperament? And can you get it under control? Today?

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Fatima Kadou Brent Reid. My name's Alex,

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>also known as NRL Soapbox. Let's get into it. Fatima,

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you wrote an article a couple of weeks back which

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I loved talking about some of the blunders and how

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is that have happened in the Bunker? Firstly, how are you?

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And then breakdown for us what's going on with the Bunker?

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I am, well, do you love the article because you

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>hate the Bunker?

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally, yeah, saying what I want to hear.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, here's the thing, I actually don't hate the Bunker,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Like this is my theory on it, Like I understand

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>that it is like a store point. It is a

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>pitch point for coaches, players, fans. I get that, but

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I just keep thinking, like, if we didn't have Bunker,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>like Wayne Bennett and you want to blow it up,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>can you imagine what would happen if we saw the

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 2>same mistakes that we see on the weekend. There'd be

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>an absolute riot much in every single game. So, and

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 2>here's the thing in the Bunker's defense. Yes, I did

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 2>write an article pointing out I think you know, we

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 2>even called it blunder around.

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It might have been last week.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.279
<v Speaker 2>They do more often than not get the right cause.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Have they had a bit of dodgy ones in the

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>last couple of weeks?

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Last week in particular, we saw the Tom Jenkins

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>one of Tom Jenkins tries, it might have been his

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>second one, where there was just so much going on,

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>but for whatever reason, we only saw the Bunker focus

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 2>on the put down, which was fine, but it was

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a double movement but wasn't an obstruction. So those kinds

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of incidents are incredibly frustrating. But is it ruining the game?

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting rid of the Bunker. I'm saying that

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it's ruining it in terms of its cause it's making

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>decisions terrible decisions in consequential moments ninety eight. That success

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>rate is great. Well congratulations.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I hate the argument. Hate it.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a ridiculous argument. What major sport in

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 4>the world doesn't have technology. We've got a World Cup

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 4>going on right now. Yeah, there's VAR being used. Some

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>people are frustrated by it. But you look at the

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Frans game yesterday. Was it the VAR ruled Penley clear?

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Penley decided the game? You know, I think it's I

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 4>hate the.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Argument, but let me lay issue is in the bunker.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 3>The issue is in the technology. It's this is not

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 3>the issue.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what I'm not saying, that's the issue either

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>read in the bunker. Yeah, well I'm not saying that's

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the issue. I'm saying the officiating through the bunker, like

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not using the technology. Probably, So the bunker is

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a concept. Is the referee and the tech. Well, they're

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>making so many mistakes. You make that decision.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>You look at that decision on Tom Jenkins, one decision

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 3>they got.

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 4>Wrong, whatever night it was where it's a clear double movement.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 4>They use the technology, right, it was just a bad decision.

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you can't er Yeah, that's yeah. Sorry, you go,

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a human error.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 4>That's a human mistake, right, and you're not going to

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 4>eliminate them. That's why the bunker will never be one

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent because it will never get everything right because

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 4>humans are involved.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Humans aren't perfect.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Humans make mistakes, right, But we're getting a lot more

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 4>right now than we ever got in the past.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I think it's saved referees in general.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 4>I would say, right, it's save referees from a lot

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 4>of heat and a lot of criticism because when referees

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 4>got decisions wrong in the past, the on field referee, right.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 3>They a lot of flack over it.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Now it's the bunk of the cops of flat Yeah.

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think the idea that we peel back the bunker,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, I would say the Samarius. Maybe, maybe you

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>can dilute the power a little bit, right, maybe.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying here's what I'm saying. Really, I'm saying.

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that we get rid of the technology.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying we actually get the technology to work so

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that fans aren't throwing their hands up in the air,

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>going what the hell's going on with our game technology?

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>When something's written. I'm not saying the technology is not working.

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I am also saying work. I meant in the interpretation

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of that technology the senior match official. So what I'm

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>saying is just when something when I see something's ruining it,

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean I'm saying remove it. I'm saying improve it.

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So work out how those senior officials. Do you need

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to have three in the box? Do you need to

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>do something to make sure blunders aren't happening?

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 3>This is the Jimmy Graham argument. You need three people.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm suggesting three gibbering fools to babies.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Forgive me ready for being discontent with incompetency. You know what,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's just let it slide the game.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 4>You've got to learn to live with it, right, Because

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 4>it's like this whole argument about consistency.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Everyone goes, oh, there's no consistency.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>You're never going to get it because look at us

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 4>arguing now about the bunker, right, we're not consistent on it.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Human beings have different opinions, they view things different ways,

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 4>so you're never going to get consistency.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit like the bunker. You're never going to

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 3>get perfection.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Right, What we need is for them the bunkers there

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 4>to eliminate the Howler the great.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.559
<v Speaker 1>It's not eliminating it, but reading.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>That's the problem, right, that's the human being problem. That's

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 3>a that's a problem where the people in the bunker

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 3>have got to get it right.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 4>And they're smart guys, like I think it was Adam

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Jingo one wrong with the weekend.

0:04:58.240 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't it.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Adam g has been referring if it was Adam job yaps.

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Forgive me if it wasn't. But the guys who were

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>in the bunker have been in there for a long time.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 4>They've been around the game a long time. They've a

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>fish over of the game a long time, right, they

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 4>know the rules. Yeah, for some reason the heat of.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 3>The moment that they get the odd one wrong.

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 4>And you said it before, I think it's ninety eight

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 4>percent right, right, So why the vast majority they are

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>getting them right?

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Sadly, they are occasion going to get it wrong.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's move on. Let's talk about the Dragons upset

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>against the West Tigers. There's two big storylines coming out

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>from here. But the first one is the Dragons have

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>once again secured two points in a game of footy,

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So Dragons fans will be absolutely dancing for joy this week.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Here's a key question, though, and I've got some I've

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>been doing a bit of research on the Dragons, but

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw this to you guys first for Tima,

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>can the Dragons avoid the spoon? Oh?

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>How many points behind are they? I should I should

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>know this.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I think two wins behind someone?

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Two three wins here? What there's eight games?

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Eight?

0:05:55.680 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Nine games left? Probably not no, but I know they've

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>only won two games since dem Young took over. But

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 2>I must admit they've been playing with a lot of effort,

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of spirit, especially the last couple of weeks.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 2>And the bar is probably so low to begin with

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>for them anyway. But there has been some improvement.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they have been improving.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>They have been improved, and if you're a Dragons fan,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 2>that's like a little glimmer of hope to hold on to.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's some encouraging news for Dragons fan. So I

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>did a bit of research the last five games. What's

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really changed is their actual ability to score tries. So

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for the previous eleven games they were averaging, which is abysmal.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>You're never going to win a game of rugby league.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>With this two point two tries a game, you're never

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>going to win with that, even if you had the

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>most premium defense. Now they're getting up closer to four

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>tries again, so actually they're actually in the contest and

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>if you analyze their last five games, they've outscored their

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>opponents three times, so they're actually now looking like a

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>footy team that can contest and compete in the game.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>When you're scoring two tries a game, you're no chance.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So Dean Young's done something. Reading your take, do you

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Dragons can avoid the spoon?

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think they can. I think they're going

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 4>to win what three the Titans have won four games,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 4>they won two. I think they will win probably three

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 4>more games at least to go past the Titans. And no,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they can. I don't think they can

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 4>avoid it. I agree with you, they'd be better, but

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 4>they couldn't have got much worse. If you and Marenzac

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Day they were an abomination and they weren't going to

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 4>go backwards from that, you know, I think that that

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 4>coaching decision, it's really intriguing, right because they've taken forever

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 4>and doesn't look as though they're close to making a decision.

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Deans won a couple of games, and you would have

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 4>thought he's helped his cause, but they're taking the time

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 4>of it, which makes me think they're still not convinced.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Is really is there anybody else that obviously Ben Hornby's yeah, yeah.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>So is it a two horse race basically between Ben

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Hornby and Dan Young?

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, it feels that way.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean I haven't followed it closer enough for team,

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 4>but it feels like it's a two horse race. And

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, if Ben can win another game or two,

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 4>I imagine Dean sorry, can win another game or two,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 4>would imagine it's his job.

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 3>But you know, look, I mean the Tigers.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Obviously they beat the Tigers, credit to them, but the

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Tigers down on troops, so many players out there battling

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 4>at the moment.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>So it was a good win.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 4>But I'm not surely going to face too many easier

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>games than that the next what they got left eight games?

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 4>Eight games?

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose the source of comfort for Dragons fans

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is that your team went from an abomination to just incompetent.

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>They're getting somewhere that's.

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Better.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they are better. I mean they are.

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 4>They are having to go and some of those young

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 4>they've got those young forwards. Everyone's talking about the young

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 4>forwards and they're having a dip. No, I'll probably win

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 4>another game or two. I'm just not sure they'll win three.

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 4>That's the that's fair issue.

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, who hasn't been incompetent in the last couple

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 2>weeks of our homes No, No, but that's another thing

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>as well, you know. And he was forced to shifted

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>out to the win because I think Tyrol Slone went

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>down with a hamstring injury. And you know, after the

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>game he said, I actually enjoyed it. Scored two tries.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the final ten minutes he might have had

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 2>a game high one hundred and seventy seven meters whatever. Young,

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, he kicked goals. Yeah, So you know, whatever

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Dean Young's done there, because he was clearly off it,

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 2>yeah right, and maybe you know, maybe he was carrying

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a shoulder injury, I think, but you know,

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>there was obviously something wrong there. So Dean Young's managed

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 2>to turn whatever was going on with our homes around

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 2>and that's all I think positive signs for Ded and

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>his job applications.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>If you view Dean Young over the past five games,

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he's done something. Whether it's enough, who knows, but he

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at least done something with this team. Let's move to

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers, though, who started the season was so much promise.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, ready, you were really backing them and so

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and obviously they've been hammered by injury. There's been big

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>news about player movements and all that kind of stuff.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Are the Tigers once again going to miss the finals?

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Sadly it looks that way.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 2>He's put down the cool aide.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't put it.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 4>Look, I'm not willing to put a complete line through them.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 4>It's a pencil line. Look can rubout because all is

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 4>pretty good and they've got a pretty good drawer right

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 4>on the run in. They're just their injuries is just

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 4>piling up.

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 3>That's the problem.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 4>I know they've got Dewey back back next game, but

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Twiles back, but they're just losing Bloke's hand over fist

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 4>and that's the problem with the moment. Typically on their edges.

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean it was similar. Farming might be back in

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 4>the next week or two, but they've lost him quite

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 4>Piers Paul, you know those guys have been great from

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 4>the year. Durin Buller doesn't look at his best. That's

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 4>the worry. So benj you's got to find a way

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 4>to ignite them again. I don't think I'm not going

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 4>to officially put a line through them, right, it's just

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 4>a pencil.

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm putting a line for them. I think. I

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>know they're only one win out of the eight, but

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they just are losing games they should win, beating the Dragons,

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's got to happen, and they haven't done it. So

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they've had the misfortune of injuries and then they're just

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>not getting the results.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, and ready alluded to the run high, but

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I was just having a look that final three weeks

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>his Rooster's Cowboys penrith. Yeah, I don't start backing, you know,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>grabbing some wins in the next.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Couple of weeks.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>It might be you know, all over for them before

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 2>they even get to their to their run home. I

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>did have a look at this. They're conceding at stack

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>of points. I think only the Dragons and the Eels,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and the Eels have been abysmal defensively this year are

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>conceding more points than them. So that's been it Shan.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>When you have injuries, it you know, ruins your defensive

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>combinations and systems and the rest of it. But they've

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>just had, you know, very little resilience in defense. They

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 2>have fade outs in the you know ladder parts of

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>each halves which are hurting them. So yeah, that's the

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good point. Like so the Tigers, the

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>games I've watched when they played well, is that their defense.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>They've executed the game plan that Benji set and defended

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>very well. It's just not consistent enough, yes, And which

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to play top eight footy and finals footy,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be consistent and they're just not doing that.

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 2>And they're just not doing that.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think if you look at the ladder, I mean,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 4>you said the one win out the eighth, but if

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 4>you actually take the buyers out, the two were out

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 4>of the eighth.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's a problem for him as well.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, They've got to somehow find a way to win

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 4>two more games and the Cowboys or Manly or Cronulla,

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 4>and at the moment that the way they're playing, that

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 4>would seem almost impossible.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 3>But I'm giving them a little sniff a little bit

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 3>of hope. I think it's going to be a man Benji.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>We trust it's going to be a cruel irony of

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>once again the West Tigers finishing ninth.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I reckon it started so well. That's a frustrating thing.

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 4>They've played so well early doors, but that just the

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>injuries that just decimated them.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Decim Yeah, but the injuries have decimated them, but their

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>defense has also just not been there, not consistent enough.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to another result from the weekend where

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we thought it would be much more of a contest,

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>which is the rabbit O's and the Panthers. That rabbits.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>We can blame bunkers or referees or anything like that,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but I want to talk about Cody Walker's temperament. That

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>brain snap that he had was a bigger brain snap

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>than the bunker if I'm being honest. Now, I think

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it's got to this point where we need to ask

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this question, is Cody Walker's temperament losing South's games?

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 4>But I don't think Cody Walker's temperament cost him that game.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 4>And when he came back in the game, they're in it.

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 4>They're in the game at a half time it was

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 4>twelve to ten, wasn't it. So you know it was dumb, right,

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 4>No one's going to dispute that it was stupid. It

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 4>was a dumb thing to do. And Cody owned it

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 4>after the game, got to give Hi kudos for that

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 4>right in front of the press conference, put his hand

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 4>up so that I shouldn't have done it.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 3>It was silly, and.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 4>Apologized for it. But I don't think that costs in

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 4>the game. I mean, there was twelve I think it

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 4>was twelve turn at a half time, wasn't it.

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But the game regular is the game of momentum,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're not going up against an insignificant side. You're

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Panthers with it. They might have

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>a few names out, but they're still a very good team. Yeah.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 4>But I would say they had themndum and a half time.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 4>They come back into that game, they were gone, right

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 4>it was twelve mil or whatever, and they got back

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 4>to twelve ten.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but he burned to try.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I would say they actually had them a mentum go

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 3>in a half time.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but they could have had more. He burned a try.

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>We did, and so the.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Game you say that, but if that try gets scored

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 4>maybe the half plays out differently. We don't know how

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 4>much try costs him, right, But you know Cody, Look,

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Cody's had that in him for a long time.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, He's never quite gone that far to be that silly.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 4>And Cody's a point in his career where he's probably,

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 4>like I said, I reckon, there's a sense of frustrating.

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 4>He plays plays a little bit of a sense of

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 4>frustration at the moment because what is he thirty five?

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 4>He's Look, he's at the latter stage of his career.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 4>It's probably a year left in him, and he can't

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 4>do what he used to be able to do. He's

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 4>still a damn good player. So Cody doesn't play South,

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 4>doesn't win a lot of games this year, like Cody

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 4>is a difference maker for him, him on the trail.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 4>So you know, unfortunately with Cody, he's not going to

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 4>change now, right, That's that's who he is. And I

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 4>think we've accepted that for a long time. And this

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 4>is the one time I would argue, or the one

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 4>significant time it's just gone too far. He's always had

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit in him, but it's just gone too far, right,

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 4>And I would say Cody acknowledged that and accepted it. So, yeah,

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 4>he's obviously that it's a game, Britt, But Cody wins

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 4>more games for southsek loses by the length of was straight.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a credit to Cody to take responsibility for

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a stupid mistake, but it isn't a mistake in isolation,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think he can I don't think he

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>can afford any longer to be making this mistakes. He

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that much time left in his career and

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Souths needs to make the eight. He can't be blowing

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>like blowing his temper like that and having a tantrum.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And we've accepted a part of his game because Souths

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>will winning, but if they're going to if they don't

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>make the eight, or if they start losing games as

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a result of him being thrown off, I think it's

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely worth worthy of conversation.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, Cody, Cody acknowledge that, code acknowledge that after

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 4>the game that was the wrong thing to do. I

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 4>think Cody Cody knows that as much as as much

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 4>as anyone.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, But.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Again, I'll say it, Cody wins more games for Southsea loses, Yeah,

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 4>by a mile, I mean Cody doesn't often cost some

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 4>footy games. Cody often wins the footy games.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he does often within footy games. But if they're

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>losing footy games, it's also I'll tell you what, you

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can guarantee Cody Walkers having a entrum. And so I

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know why teams don't just send like that. Every

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>team should have signed a Reed Marti role who just

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pisses off Cody walker Oh, guarantee they'd lose way more games.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe on let's go to let's talk about Knights versus

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Dolph Dolphins. And really the reason why this Newcastle win

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was so important is in the context of the season,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we had. What were the Dolphins on was it seventh

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>straight or eight straight wins? Something ridiculous? Right, they were

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on a hot streak. Yeah, and now that's happened through

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the origin period. So both teams had origin players out.

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But you would argue, in some ways Newcastle not having

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Kaylen Ponger is much more consequential than the outs that

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins had. It was a tight contest. But what

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I really want to talk about is two things. Is

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that it was actually a tale of two teams really

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>rising to the surface. For different ways. The Dolphins have

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely recovered their season when they started poorly and looked

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>like a top four, maybe even top two team. But

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Knights. I want to talk about the Knights here

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and how they're not just that they've secured this win,

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but where they find themselves on the ladder. They're in

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the top four now. Dylan Brown ice is the game,

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>which is what halfbacks need to do, no matter their

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>price tag. He's ice the game, won it for his team.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>So here's my question, fifteam or I'll go to you.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Is Dylan Brown so far proving his value well?

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 2>When you look at where they sit on the ladder,

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 2>And like I said, I think it was his first

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 2>ever career build goal, so when it mattered, he stepped up.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting there was so much talk about Dylan Brown

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and whether you know, the Knights had overpaid or because

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 2>you know where it was almost like a panic contract

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 2>for them considering the state they were in. But there's

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>been very little talk about how well Dylan Brown's gone

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 2>in that role. And you know, I just think he's

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>only just sort of, you know, scratching the surface of

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 2>his potentials. So yeah, right now, you would say, considering

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 2>they're a good chance of finishing in the top four. Yeah,

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>they've got a number seven who can ice games and

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you could say yep, but he's an only one. I

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>mean Sandin Smith was pretty put in that game as well.

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 2>So they made a couple of very as recruitment decisions

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the Knights, and it's paying off when they need it to.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Very good reading. Do you reckon he's worth the price

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>tag at the moment?

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the debate around Dylan Brown wasn't over

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 4>whether he's a good player or not, right, it was

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 4>about the length of the deal and the amount it

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 4>was worth. Right, ten years, thirty men or whatever. It's

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 4>probably a ratchet's in there, so it's probably gonna worth

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 4>hell of a lot more than that, right. There was

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 4>no debate whether I mean the only debate bait was

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 4>whether we could play half back and lead the team

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 4>around the park. I think he's been a great I

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 4>think he was always going to be a great buy

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 4>for them. I think the thing the difference in Newcastle

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 4>isn't so much Dylan Brown, it's their forward pack. I mean,

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 4>that was the question mark we all had over the

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Knights was whether they had a forward pack that could

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 4>give these brilliant outside backs the space and time to

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 4>create havoc.

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, the Ford packs be Trey Mooney has been one

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 3>of the buyers of the year.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 4>Their forward pack's been unbelievable this year. You know, Dylan

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Lucas become an elite player. Jacob Sephiinis did his hamming

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I think at the weekend's been great fu him. So

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, Dylan Brown was always going to be good

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 4>if that forward pack aimed up, and he's been great.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he has been great. What do you reckon, guys?

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to be the best halfback they've had

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>since Joey? Because I've looked through their halfback list. It's

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>not it's not actually are hard Yeah, it's a low bardon.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Itive us a name.

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So you got when I was doing some reading, we've

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>got Mullen, Jared Mullen.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 3>He was pretty good.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, his win rate was around forty five in the

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>end for them. Hodkinson was there in a terrible time,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so his win rate was terrible. There. When you go through,

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you go Jesus might actually findly be a good halfback

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>signing for the Knights.

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Ye, but yes, I was going to say, if he

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, if a top four finish for the Knights

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 2>is sort of the new thing for them under Dylan Brown,

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 2>then yeah, I guess he.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Is okay, And then I reckon that one person that's

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>been missing in this conversation. Yes, the forward pack has overperformed,

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the backs are on fire. But is Justin Holbrook going

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to be Coach of the year taking the Newcastle Knights

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>from Wooden Spoons? Too? Very likely? Finals? Maybe even top four?

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 3>You know what.

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I was in the car of the way home here,

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 4>so I listened to this game and I was actually

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 4>thinking the same thing, like, if you're doing the coach

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 4>of the Year rankings right now, he's got to be

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 4>in the top two, doesn't he. I mean, he's been

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 4>unbelievable what he's done there. I mean, I and obviously

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 4>deserves to mention he always does, probably Christian Wolf, right,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 4>but aside from those two foz I did one yesterday.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's in the mix. But Holbrooks, what he's.

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Done is amazing up there, amazing. Yeah, he's probably he's

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 4>the front runner right now. I record for Coach of

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 4>the Year. He has to be.

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the boys look like they're having fun every time

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they talk about and they talk about how much fun

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they love him. They talk about that Wholebrook doesn't say

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you were You don't win to be happy. You're happy

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>because you just if you're happy, you'll start winning. So

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he's brought a different culture around the team. He's obviously

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>much more relational with the players. If Manly and everyone

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>knows I reveal my bias on here that I'm a

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Manly fan. If the Manly Boys didn't screw their coach

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Bulldogs game in the Eels game, we might

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be talking about here and foreign as coach of the year.

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there any chance it goes to Christian Wolfbo for

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>team maybe?

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, that turnaround that he managed to achieve has

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 2>been absolutely incredible. I do like Justin Holbrook as a

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>top contender. For me, it's still ivan theory and.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>One result that didn't get enough attention over the weekend

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because it just keeps bloody happening is the Brisbane Broncos

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have lost again. Reading what is going on up there, well,

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we.

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Can now officially call us a full blown crisis.

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 4>Well state in the right now. And you know, injuries

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 4>have played a part. There's a sort of things that

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 4>have played played a part of the way they're going.

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, it's it's it's a bad scene, man. The

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 4>sixteenth out of seventeen teams in the comp the team

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 4>that won last year's Grand Final, and you know, obviously

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>there's been all sorts of talk about the coach and

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 4>the relationship with the players and all that sort of stuff.

0:21:58.400 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 4>You know, I don't know when they're winning the next

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 4>game Bridge, and I think the next game is against

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Penrith's right, they got the Buyer then Penrith.

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I think they're probably not going to win that game.

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 3>That's nine in a row.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 4>It's now officially probably the worst Premiership defense in general history.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a disaster.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I agree with I think it is

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>generally the worst title defense that we've seen. That they

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>are playing a businessly. I'd like to say this though.

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>The last two games we've seen the Broncos at different

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>times this season just look horrendous, playing the most insipid

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of footy. But the last two games they've actually

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>put in the effort. I generally think they had a

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>real chance of winning that one, except for the dumb

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>eras that they would make. In the Sharks twenty there

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>were just so many stupid play the ball errors. So

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it does actually look like the team is playing for

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the coach ready.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're playing for something, because I agree with you,

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 4>they put some effort in the last couple of weeks,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 4>whether it's playing for the coach or playing for themselves,

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 4>or playing for their teammates, to playing for the jersey

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 4>they're having to go. Yeah, I don't think there's any

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 4>doubt about that. They're just not good enough. And when

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 4>you're a team, a club like Brisbane Broncos, doesn't matter

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 4>who's out.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, they shouldn't be.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 3>You need to compete, you need to be in the mix.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 3>And efforts not enough.

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It's inexcusable, no matter what the depth is, no matter

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what injuries there are, past leaves, okay, that's a big deal.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>To leaves, that's a big deal. A bunch of injuries,

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal. It's inexcusable for the defending premiere

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is to lose eight in a row like something's going

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>wrong at Brisbane. I don't know what the answer is

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to fix it, though, any suggestions from the from the

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>brain struck, well, I don't know what.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 4>The answer is on the right, you know, I'm not

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 4>in the building, so I don't know what the problems are. Well,

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 4>we've all heard some of the problems and some of

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 4>the suggestions and what the problems are. But it feels

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 4>to me like they just right now they just need

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 4>the season to win, to sit down the off season,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 4>work through the issues because there are issues there, right,

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 4>there's no doubt there's issues there. Work through the issues,

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 4>and you know, start next season a new frame of mind,

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 4>because at the moment, it just feels like they're just

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 4>they're just eyeing off the holidays.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it looks like they're flushing the season.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because the season there's season's over.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Madge puts on a brave face up for every game,

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 4>says I love these guys. I know what they can do.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm a Broncos fan. What was that the

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 4>first game I grew up watching them. They're not winning

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 4>eight in a row. I'm sorry, it's not happening. Yeah,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 4>So Madge is a bit delusional.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>On that front.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 4>So I just need they just needed to They just

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 4>need someone to come in. They need to hit the

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Goldie and chill out a bite, come back to the

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 4>preseason and find the hunger again.

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>One piece of news that I might have missed with

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>some fans are talking to me about it. I wasn't

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>quite sure of the answer is who replaced Ben TiO

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for the defensive assistant coach.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 3>They didn't.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they replaced him from MEMBERY. I think

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Madge took on more responsibility. I don't think he got replaced.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 4>No one, no one. They didn't bring anyone in.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's never good.

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but again, you know they're having they're having a goal.

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anyone could say they're not.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 3>They're not.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 4>They're not trying right, But there's just something going wrong.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 4>There's just something wrong there. It just doesn't smell right.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>All right. That wraps up another episode of Code and Arel.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll catch you next Monday. But hey, before you go,

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.239
<v Speaker 1>we want to hear from you. So if you've got

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>an opinion, a take, you disagree, you agree, you just

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:06.479
<v Speaker 1>hate me, you can either reach out to me at

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>NRL Soapbox, I'm online everywhere, or make sure you reach

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>out to us at codenol dot com. Today we want

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to start hearing your input and bring it into the show.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Have a great week, guys, See y