Speaker 1: On scorn lids Australia. This it's the Reader Paney Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panihy Show.
Speaker 3: Coming up tonight, we're ending the week with a bang.
Speaker 3: Joining me shortly, the Great Douglas Murray with some sage
Speaker 3: words of advice for Kamala Harris, who had an absolute
Speaker 3: train wreck.
Speaker 2: Of an interview today. We'll look at that later in
Speaker 2: the program.
Speaker 3: Also joining me tonight, Gary Hardgrave, Kosha Gator and Kimsey's
Speaker 3: Schofield and we never neglect left He's losing it tonight
Speaker 3: featuring a crazed woman attacking a Greek restaurant in New Jersey,
Speaker 3: tearing down the Greek flags because she thinks they're Israeli flags.
Speaker 4: There's genocide and I don't stand for Zionism.
Speaker 2: I'm Mark Claire. I don't support it.
Speaker 4: There's a jenocide, you know that, right, They're killing children.
Speaker 5: What's a purpose?
Speaker 4: You proud of your heritage?
Speaker 5: You're understanding of genocide?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: But first, Tanya Plebisc's decision to effectively block a billion
Speaker 3: dollar gold mine is looking even more daft, as a
Speaker 3: prominent anthropologist and historian casts further doubt on the Indigenous
Speaker 3: dream time story used to justify the band for decades.
Speaker 3: Doctor Philip Clark has researched Aboriginal history and culture to
Speaker 3: support Indigenous people in their land rights claims. He spent
Speaker 3: three years conducting extensive research into the cultural significance of
Speaker 3: the proposed Regious Mind site for the company and found
Speaker 3: no record of the blue banded bee story, which was
Speaker 3: ultimately used to block the Mind's tailing's dam. He wrote
Speaker 3: to the origin of the blue banded bees as a
Speaker 3: myth narrative is more likely than not to be recent,
Speaker 3: as the earliest accounts of the story appear in the
Speaker 3: media from early twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2: If this story was so culturally.
Speaker 3: Important, it is reasonable to conclude that it would have
Speaker 3: been mentioned much earlier during earlier consultations between Regius Resources
Speaker 3: and the local Aboriginal representatives. In a community environment, crucial
Speaker 3: cultural knowledge is shared in order to protect it. This
Speaker 3: comes after We're a Jury. Elder Neil Ingram also tell
Speaker 3: Tania pilivsk back in February.
Speaker 2: That the claimed blue banded.
Speaker 3: B story brought up by the We're a Jury traditional
Speaker 3: owners Central West Aboriginal Corporation who have consistently opposed the
Speaker 3: mine was false.
Speaker 2: In his evidence.
Speaker 3: To Tania Plivsek Ingram said, as a senior, we're a
Speaker 3: jury elder and coming from a traditional Galarri clan, I
Speaker 3: have never heard of this story, never seen any Oka artworks,
Speaker 3: rock engravings or traditional dances symbolizing the blue banded beet story.
Speaker 3: Joining me now for more on this Isky News contributor
Speaker 3: Gary Hardgrave, Gary, surely, surely Tanya Pliversec has to see
Speaker 3: sense and reverse this ban.
Speaker 1: Ah. Come on, read that inner city woke thread that
Speaker 1: runs straight through Tanya Plibsec doesn't want to let facts
Speaker 1: get in the way of some great little story. And
Speaker 1: the trouble is she's so paranoid about the Greens picking
Speaker 1: her off at the next election, people who aren't confused
Speaker 1: by facts, that she just wants to keep the blue
Speaker 1: banded b narrative. God, you've got to be really careful
Speaker 1: saying that, haven't you look? They make stuff up about everything.
Speaker 1: They reckon that point zero four percent of the atmosphere
Speaker 1: is in fact warming the entire planet. I mean everywhere
Speaker 1: you turn, these kind of crazy green and woke narratives.
Speaker 1: This is about appealing to people in New York at
Speaker 1: the United Nations, that the people who are doing this
Speaker 1: whole internationalist Indigenous First Nations rubbish. That we've appointed people
Speaker 1: to go and become a second ambassador to the world
Speaker 1: and I think roughly getting about the same amount of
Speaker 1: dollar per Aboriginal and Torres Straite Islander person each year
Speaker 1: in expenditure. I mean, you know this is insane. And
Speaker 1: the trouble, reader, is that it's ruining Australia before our
Speaker 1: very eyes. Between her and Chris Bowen and elbow the
Speaker 1: cliff top millionaire. You just know that Australia is in
Speaker 1: a very very bad place right now. And I am
Speaker 1: sick to death of being held up getting on with
Speaker 1: progress over these sort of fanciful yarns. It's just madness,
Speaker 1: really mad.
Speaker 3: And so many in the Indigenous community in that area
Speaker 3: are for this.
Speaker 2: Mind.
Speaker 3: From what I've seen and read, and I've spoken to
Speaker 3: elders in that area, they are as bewildered.
Speaker 2: As the rest of us.
Speaker 3: And it's costing of well paid regional jobs. It's going
Speaker 3: to cost hundreds of millions in taxes and royalties to
Speaker 3: the New South Wales government. So the cost of this
Speaker 3: decision is enormous. Now, Gary you mentioned the cliff top millionaire,
Speaker 3: and what a happy coincidence this is for the Prime minister.
Speaker 2: It just so happens that the federal.
Speaker 3: Government's one hundred million dollar roade upgrade to evoke a
Speaker 3: drive will make his drive to his new four point
Speaker 3: three million dollar beach pad much more comfortable, much quicker.
Speaker 3: And on that purchase, the Financial Review reports that despite
Speaker 3: his colleagues, labor ministers and MPs defending him publicly, privately
Speaker 3: they are very unhappy, indeed about the optics of this
Speaker 3: decision to purchase this property, the timing of it, the
Speaker 3: message it sends to the electric Gary.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely, And isn't it convenient? You know I reckon
Speaker 1: his new neighbors in that Copa Cabana area. I mean, seriously,
Speaker 1: you just want to go full on Barry Mandelow when
Speaker 1: you hear that, don't you. But when I reckon these
Speaker 1: neighbors will be delighted, right the guy. I mean normally,
Speaker 1: when you move into a new area, maybe after a
Speaker 1: week or so, you invite the neighbors in for a
Speaker 1: cup of tea. Somebody will bring a plate of SCons.
Speaker 1: This bok has bought a road, He's actually given them
Speaker 1: a road. They'll be very happy. And of course this
Speaker 1: will be the one section of the new South Wales
Speaker 1: coastline that won't have one of Chris Bowen's big windmills
Speaker 1: hanging off the coast, because you don't want to interrupt
Speaker 1: those views. So I think he's going to be a
Speaker 1: popular new addition to the Copa Kabana crue. Let'd be
Speaker 1: pretty happy. But seriously, Plato scones. Maybe a barbecue, maybe
Speaker 1: a couple of beers or something to welcome the new
Speaker 1: neighbors into your life or you into their lives is enough,
Speaker 1: And I reckon the neighbors are going to have to
Speaker 1: bring some pretty high quality orchards for the collection in
Speaker 1: the garden, just to make up for the kind of
Speaker 1: value he's already brought to the neighborhood, but it's at
Speaker 1: taxpayer expense. And the fact that he has the convenience
Speaker 1: of this new road something he announced a few months ago,
Speaker 1: may well have given him a reason to look at
Speaker 1: this property. But at the same time, he's aware of
Speaker 1: all the niggling around, negative gearing and all the things,
Speaker 1: so he's kind of clearing the decks. I think reader,
Speaker 1: in all seriousness, anybody else would have to resign. Anybody
Speaker 1: else would have to quit their job. This is one
Speaker 1: of the most embarrassing things I've ever seen a Prime
Speaker 1: minister do. And I really think he is going to
Speaker 1: have to quit over this, and the pressure should be applied.
Speaker 1: His judgment is wrong. He's off on all fronts, and
Speaker 1: the average Australian who wants a home of their own,
Speaker 1: I think is gasping. And if you're in a marginal
Speaker 1: labor seat, I think you'd be probably looking for somewhere
Speaker 1: else to go and move to as well.
Speaker 3: Right now, Gary Hardgrave, thank you so much for your
Speaker 3: time this evening. Joining me now is best selling author
Speaker 3: and political commentator Douglas Murray. Douglas, you've been in southern
Speaker 3: Lebanon in recent days, and I'll ask you about the
Speaker 3: latest on Israel's war with Hermas and Hezbolla. Shortly, but
Speaker 3: first to Kamala Harris. She has a man problem, including
Speaker 3: a black man problem, and it's got her contemplating reparations.
Speaker 6: We all know that America became great, you know, off
Speaker 6: the backs of free black labor.
Speaker 7: So my agenda, well, first of all, on the plane
Speaker 7: of reparations, it has to be studied there's no question
Speaker 7: about that, and that I've been very clear about that position.
Speaker 2: Douglass.
Speaker 3: Is that going to speak to black men? And more importantly,
Speaker 3: should the American president be contemplating reparations?
Speaker 8: And no, I mean the reparations argument was brought back
Speaker 8: about ten years ago by the writer of Tanhauzie Coats really,
Speaker 8: who kicked the latest round of it off in a
Speaker 8: piece of distinguished himself with an even less impressive piece
Speaker 8: of research and writing. But the minute he started that
Speaker 8: off again, there were this wild idea went around once
Speaker 8: again in America, that and indeed around the rest of
Speaker 8: the world, that some people are owed money by dint
Speaker 8: of their racial heritage, and that somehow the country therein
Speaker 8: should pay them cash. The interesting thing about this is
Speaker 8: rita is that firstly, it's about as divisive a racial
Speaker 8: policy as anyone could come up with. I mean, first
Speaker 8: of all, how do people think actually that race relations
Speaker 8: in America that have been steadily improving for many decades
Speaker 8: would be improved at this stage if one section or
Speaker 8: need all other sections of the tax paying community had
Speaker 8: to just give large amounts of cash to another section
Speaker 8: of the community, to another community. How do they think
Speaker 8: that that would go down exactly. And the second thing is,
Speaker 8: by the way, so also it's impossible because you have
Speaker 8: to get don't get Camala said that people can't the
Speaker 8: black people in America can't get xerox machine before the
Speaker 8: last selection to do a copy of their passport with
Speaker 8: identity at the polls. So how exactly do they think
Speaker 8: they're going to do the genetic and DNA and family
Speaker 8: tree heritage testing to find out exactly who should be
Speaker 8: paid reparations. And then thirdly, the people who have actually
Speaker 8: looked into this, which is just such a weasy way
Speaker 8: for camera to try to try to dodge this one.
Speaker 8: The people who have quite look into it, like the
Speaker 8: state of California. Even radical Gavin Newsoon in California has
Speaker 8: not instituted the reparations that were suggested because the suggestion
Speaker 8: that his committee came up with was that millions and
Speaker 8: millions of dollars should be given to people of African
Speaker 8: American heritage, and it wasn't going to work. I mean,
Speaker 8: it would bankrupt the state, but it also just wouldn't work.
Speaker 8: So people have looked into it reata they really have,
Speaker 8: and nobody has come away thinking that this divisive policy
Speaker 8: is remotely a good idea. Kamala Harris is simply pandering
Speaker 8: at the moment to a part of the vote. I think,
Speaker 8: among other things, it's terrible. It's not just pandering, it's
Speaker 8: also putting a victim mentality into a community that does
Speaker 8: not need that. It needs to have sections of it
Speaker 8: by no means all of it, sections of it needs
Speaker 8: to be raised up. They do not need promise of
Speaker 8: a massive cash bonanza someday down the road if they
Speaker 8: vote Democrat.
Speaker 3: Well, last time around twenty twenty, we had the BLM
Speaker 3: rights raging throughout that year, and the lead up to
Speaker 3: the election.
Speaker 2: Race is again an issue.
Speaker 3: Democrats are desperate for it to be an issue, and
Speaker 3: their media mouthpieces, I've got to say, particularly in the
Speaker 3: fast few days, have really turned up the heat on
Speaker 3: this issue, maligning minority pities who are considering voting for Trump.
Speaker 3: Here is the views Sunny Houston and MSNBC anchor Joyry.
Speaker 9: We've got to reach those ridiculous, crazy black men that
Speaker 9: did vote for Trump.
Speaker 2: We've got to reach those people.
Speaker 10: This race will be far too close because unfortunately we
Speaker 10: do have a fascist ground swell in parts of this country,
Speaker 10: mainly among white men, let's be clear, but in small
Speaker 10: pockets among black and brown men too. This happens to
Speaker 10: be a global phenomenon.
Speaker 3: There you go, black and brown men being fascists. Shame, though,
Speaker 3: can be an effective tactic, Douglas, will it see black
Speaker 3: and Hispanic voters switch back to the Democrats or perhaps
Speaker 3: stay home and not participate in the vote.
Speaker 1: Well, you're right.
Speaker 8: Shame can be a useful tool, not necessarily when it's
Speaker 8: wielded by joy Read. For instance, you just saw there
Speaker 8: is called absolutely everybody a fascist. She's now onto calling
Speaker 8: black men fashions if they disagree with her. I think
Speaker 8: a lot of people can see through this. I've always
Speaker 8: been bewildered by the way in which it's accepted in
Speaker 8: America that you can talk about racial groups and the
Speaker 8: way they should vote in this way. And it's something
Speaker 8: I don't think that any other really of the democracies
Speaker 8: have is And it's obviously it's partly or largely because
Speaker 8: of America's specific racial history, but it's a really remarkable thing,
Speaker 8: the way in which people are allowed to just say,
Speaker 8: you know, black people should vote like this, you know,
Speaker 8: Latinos should vote like that. It's like you know women
Speaker 8: should vote, they say why who for what reason? And
Speaker 8: I think what you see there is just an attempt
Speaker 8: to just sort of get everyone in place. It's a desperate,
Speaker 8: desperate thing for Austin and Reading others to do. But yes,
Speaker 8: they will use any term against any people, any individuals,
Speaker 8: any group just to get their way, to make people
Speaker 8: vote the way that they think they have to vote.
Speaker 1: I think that.
Speaker 8: Anyone from the communities they're speaking about should feel indignant
Speaker 8: like that. If I was told, you know, white British
Speaker 8: people of Scottish English descent have to vote a specific
Speaker 8: way or we'll call you all fascists, I think I'd
Speaker 8: feel kind of rebellious about that, actually, And I think
Speaker 8: a lot of people in America from those communities too.
Speaker 11: Well.
Speaker 3: They certainly didn't react too well to Barack Obama writing
Speaker 3: them about being sexist if they don't vote for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: Before we move on to other issues.
Speaker 3: It's looking increasingly likely that Kamala Harris is going to
Speaker 3: appear on Joe Rogan's program podcast, whose.
Speaker 2: Audience is massive.
Speaker 3: If you were advising her, would you recommend that she
Speaker 3: be a guest on the Joe Rogan Experience no.
Speaker 2: No, I would not.
Speaker 8: You know, she has ducked all of the difficult interviews
Speaker 8: that she could have done.
Speaker 1: The plan.
Speaker 8: The fact that the Democrats are currently putting her out
Speaker 8: there is actually a sign that she's not doing well
Speaker 8: or she's not doing as well as she should be
Speaker 8: doing in the polls. The Democrat plan has been hide
Speaker 8: Kamala from the cameras to any extent that you can,
Speaker 8: and specifically, don't get her onto anything where there could
Speaker 8: be details expected. You can get her on the view,
Speaker 8: you can get her on a couple of other just
Speaker 8: sort of puff pieces. You can get her on the
Speaker 8: cover of Vogue, of course, but whatever you do, don't
Speaker 8: get her anywhere. Joe Rogan is an extraordinarily talented podcast
Speaker 8: or an interviewer, and he's he's interesting because, among other things,
Speaker 8: he just follows things where they lead. Now, I sometimes
Speaker 8: disagree with where he follows them, and certainly where many
Speaker 8: of his guests have followed them, but the point is
Speaker 8: it's an extraordinarily free rolling conversation. Kamala Harris hasn't been
Speaker 8: exposed to a free rolling conversation in her time in
Speaker 8: elected office, and that's because when she rolls frankly, she
Speaker 8: rolls all over the place. And what's more, I mean,
Speaker 8: I'm sure her team will be we'll say cut, cut, cut,
Speaker 8: you know, after an hour. But if this was going
Speaker 8: to be one of Joe Rogan's mega podcasts where he
Speaker 8: runs to three hours fairly easily, what are the odds
Speaker 8: that Kamala Harris will not say at least one thing
Speaker 8: during those hours which is so off the beaten track
Speaker 8: and makes so little sense that it's actually a massive
Speaker 8: liability for her and her campaign. I would say very high,
Speaker 8: very high. So you know, maybe she is toying with it,
Speaker 8: but wow, is it a bad idea because nobody, among
Speaker 8: other things, nobody can put up with hearing someone talking
Speaker 8: about the sort of banalities and the and that there's
Speaker 8: completely inexact policies or claims of policies to come. Nobody
Speaker 8: could listen to that for three hours. I'm not sure
Speaker 8: if Kamala Harris could even do it for three hours,
Speaker 8: I mean, off saying anything important.
Speaker 3: That would almost be impressive if she for three hours
Speaker 3: just trots at the talking points. They grew up in
Speaker 3: a middle class family, her childhood, her time as a prosecutor,
Speaker 3: just keeps giving the lines that would be unburdened by Yes,
Speaker 3: all of that. Now, Douglas, you've just been in southern
Speaker 3: Lebanon with the idea if you've seen some of the
Speaker 3: Hezbola tunnels with your own eyes, you wrote that in
Speaker 3: a single square kilometer they found more than one hundred
Speaker 3: tunnel shafts. It's apparent, Douglas, that hes Bulla and their
Speaker 3: Iranian backers have spent a considerable fortune on this terror infrastructure.
Speaker 8: Well, I went into southern eleven and highly see this infrastructure.
Speaker 8: Hes Bla we now know from documents or discovered in
Speaker 8: the last month, verified by all the main newspapers, Hesbela
Speaker 8: was actually intending to do an October seventh style attack
Speaker 8: from the north of Israel, from southern Lebanon into the
Speaker 8: north of Israel. And you can see the tunnel network
Speaker 8: it has set up in order to do such an attack,
Speaker 8: and you can see the places where they've stored the
Speaker 8: rockets and much more. The thing about this that's extremely disturbing,
Speaker 8: among others, is that all of this happened literally right
Speaker 8: under the watchtowers of the so called UN peacekeeping force uniform.
Speaker 8: And this is just for anyone who actually wants peace
Speaker 8: in the region and says, you know, why can't the
Speaker 8: wars stop and so on. This is why I was
Speaker 8: in southern Leven and normally Israel eighteen years ago now,
Speaker 8: when the two thousand and six Hesbolar War came to
Speaker 8: a close and the United Nations resolution was that one
Speaker 8: of the prerequisites to stopping the war was that Hesbela
Speaker 8: would not be allowed to build up its terror infrastructure,
Speaker 8: including of long and short range rockets, in the south
Speaker 8: of leban For the next eighteen years, the UN did
Speaker 8: less than nothing to ensure that resolution was abided by. Instead,
Speaker 8: they literally watched as Hez Ballard dug its terror tunnel network.
Speaker 8: They literally watched as Hez Bala stored munitions where they
Speaker 8: were meant not to. They literally watched the UN peacekeeping
Speaker 8: forces literally watched as Hez Blah five thousands of rockets
Speaker 8: from that allegedly demilitarized area into Israel. It's all there
Speaker 8: visibly on the ground. And it's a shocker to me
Speaker 8: that countries like Australia and Britain and others who pay
Speaker 8: for these peacekeeping forces did not spend eighteen years say
Speaker 8: saying we demand that Hez Ballard, don't do this because
Speaker 8: they're breaking the resolution, and there will be war again.
Speaker 8: And eighteen years later, after eighteen years of completely ineffective
Speaker 8: UN peacekeeping, here we are again. And I think it
Speaker 8: is a tragedy, a tragedy for the people of leban
Speaker 8: and a tragedy.
Speaker 1: For the people of Israel.
Speaker 8: And this is on the UN's watch, and the UN
Speaker 8: has plenty of criticisms that can be made of it.
Speaker 8: But this sort of thing is what makes you wonder
Speaker 8: whether the United Nations doesn't go the way of the
Speaker 8: League of Nations at this stage, What can you do
Speaker 8: with an organization that is willing not only not to
Speaker 8: stop war where it can, but not even to abide
Speaker 8: by its own binding resolutions.
Speaker 3: Will Israel ultimately defy the US and hit those Iranian
Speaker 3: nuclear targets. Is there any doubt that Iran's going to
Speaker 3: attack again, either directly or through its proxies.
Speaker 8: I don't know. I don't have any special interl on it,
Speaker 8: as it were, but I can tell you this that
Speaker 8: the tens of thousands of Israeli families who are now
Speaker 8: in their second year away from their homes from the
Speaker 8: North of Israel, their second year of their children, having
Speaker 8: their education thwarted.
Speaker 1: These people have to.
Speaker 8: Be allowed to return to their homes, and they can
Speaker 8: only return to their homes if hes Bulah and their
Speaker 8: back is in Iran back off or are destroyed. And
Speaker 8: it seems to me that there is no other way
Speaker 8: Israel cannot anyone in any other country except the displacement
Speaker 8: of its citizens in some kind of permanent way under
Speaker 8: rocket fire, and the rocket fier is constant. Again, the
Speaker 8: international press does not focus on this, but I can
Speaker 8: tell you Rita every time I'm there, Every time I'm here,
Speaker 8: and specifically from Haifa northwards, there's rockets all the time
Speaker 8: being fired by Hesbolan act by Iran. It doesn't make
Speaker 8: the international news. Somebody's killed here, somebody's killed there, and
Speaker 8: then you know, you read the BBC in the evening
Speaker 8: and you'll learn that something happen in Gaza, and yeah,
Speaker 8: I mean, it's just astonishing to me, this ignorance and
Speaker 8: desire to ignore what has been going on, which is
Speaker 8: the revolutionary government in Iran has spent all these years
Speaker 8: sending billions, perhaps a billion dollars a year to Hesbula
Speaker 8: alone to build up their terror infrastructure in order to
Speaker 8: attack Israel. The revolutionary government is the head of the snake,
Speaker 8: and I don't know what Israel is going to do
Speaker 8: about it. I wish it weren't the case. It looked
Speaker 8: like Israel would have to do it alone, because the
Speaker 8: Iranian revolutionary government should be the pariah of the region,
Speaker 8: and from the Gulf States, Saudi Arabia to Jerusalem, it's
Speaker 8: recognized as that. Why does Washington not recognize that too
Speaker 8: and act accordingly, either to end the regime of them
Speaker 8: all is or at least to cripple them, as happened
Speaker 8: in Donald Trump's time in the Oval Office, all them
Speaker 8: and their economy, to make sure they cannot raise money
Speaker 8: to spread terror across this whole region. And what's more,
Speaker 8: one final four colonize this whole region. All the muppets
Speaker 8: from Columbia and elsewhere who pretend they care about colonization,
Speaker 8: it's the Mullers that are colonizing this whole region, whether
Speaker 8: it's Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and they want all of
Speaker 8: Israel too. This is that Mullers are a revolutionary colonialist power,
Speaker 8: and anyone should try to stop them in their aims.
Speaker 3: Douglas Murray very well said in day, thank you so
Speaker 3: much for a time this evening.
Speaker 8: It's a great pleasure.
Speaker 4: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Still to come.
Speaker 3: An extended version of Letty's Losing It, plus the top
Speaker 3: five moments from Kamala Harris's car crash interview on Fox News,
Speaker 3: and the colocal.
Speaker 12: Gator joins me next, welcome back.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for lefties losing it Now.
Speaker 2: They're stupid. There is spectacularly stupid. And then there is this.
Speaker 3: Watch this leftist TikToker lose her mind and vandalize the
Speaker 3: flag display at a Greek restaurant in New Jersey because
Speaker 3: she thought the Greek flag was the Israeli flag and
Speaker 3: apparently that entitles her to act like this.
Speaker 2: Now a month to come back and for three palestign two.
Speaker 4: Three palestign.
Speaker 5: Look what you're looking at?
Speaker 4: You know down well, there's a genocide.
Speaker 5: You're not in a genocide.
Speaker 2: No, stop it, you're taking it.
Speaker 5: I'm taking it now.
Speaker 2: I believe this one.
Speaker 5: Take this one down right here. I don't stand for this.
Speaker 4: There's genocide, and I don't stand for Zionism. I'm mont Claire.
Speaker 2: I don't support it.
Speaker 4: There's a genocide, you know that, right, They're killing children
Speaker 4: that's a purpose of your heritage.
Speaker 5: You're understandings a genosigh?
Speaker 3: Right, Yeah, that guy's face says it all. Now, let's
Speaker 3: see how this lefty losing it reacts when told that
Speaker 3: she's attacking a Greek restaurant and tearing down Greek flags.
Speaker 4: But this is this is not okay, this is freaky.
Speaker 5: Who's this?
Speaker 1: This is greeky? What really wreaky?
Speaker 8: Yeah?
Speaker 4: Oh I know it's Israel?
Speaker 2: My bad?
Speaker 4: Really yeah, it's really nice.
Speaker 5: Okay, well brought it back?
Speaker 3: Do you want your flag displayer? Just store down back? Unbelievable.
Speaker 3: Just as unbelievable is the fact that that idiot chose
Speaker 3: to post that on social media. It's almost funny until
Speaker 3: you realize these people vote, and when it comes to
Speaker 3: their vote, you know they ain't voting for Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Democrats count on low information voters consume trash like this.
Speaker 10: If Donald Trump does win, there won't be a Democrats
Speaker 10: go back and figure out how to get more voters
Speaker 10: and figure out how to change your positions. There will
Speaker 10: be camps, There will be Project twenty twenty five. There
Speaker 10: could be arrests of people like Adam Schiff. There could
Speaker 10: be Nancy Pelosi being hauled off to jail.
Speaker 3: There will be camps. Project twenty five. They are unraveling.
Speaker 3: As for Nancy Pelosi being hauled off to jail, you
Speaker 3: mean like the lawfare that's been unleashed on Republicans in
Speaker 3: recent years, the sham cases.
Speaker 2: Against Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Democrats shamelessly weaponize the justice system and then they play
Speaker 3: the victim.
Speaker 2: This is classic cry bully behavior.
Speaker 3: Let's go to the lefty lunatic asylum that is MSNBC.
Speaker 3: Now Here is Mara Gay from The New York Times
Speaker 3: claiming that men who listen to Joe Rogan need therapy
Speaker 3: and could be fascists.
Speaker 10: All men are just at home listening to Joe Robin
Speaker 10: being angry or being recruited to fascism.
Speaker 1: Some just need therapy, like we all do.
Speaker 2: I go to therapy. That's great, Good luck with the therapy.
Speaker 3: But perhaps take a class in English as well, so
Speaker 3: you know what word was like fascism actually made and
Speaker 3: a math class wouldn't go Australa there. Remember this is
Speaker 3: the sa Mar Gay who said this on a MISSMBC.
Speaker 10: Somebody tweeted recently that actually, with the money he spent,
Speaker 10: he could have given every American a million dollars.
Speaker 13: Got it, let's put it up on the screen. When
Speaker 13: I read it tonight on social media, it kind of
Speaker 13: all became clear. Bloomberg spent five hundred million on ads,
Speaker 13: US population three hundred twenty seven million. Don't tell us
Speaker 13: if you're ahead of us on the math. He could
Speaker 13: have given each American one million dollars, and I've had
Speaker 13: lunch money left over. It's an incredible way of putting it.
Speaker 10: It's an incredible way of putting it.
Speaker 1: It's true.
Speaker 2: It's disturbing, It's true.
Speaker 12: Yeah, it'd be true.
Speaker 3: Oh, for America's population was three hundred and twenty seven
Speaker 3: not three hundred and twenty seven million. These are the
Speaker 3: people who think that your moral and intellectual superiors, and
Speaker 3: they're idiots. Why don't we now check in on how
Speaker 3: a COVID conscious person travels.
Speaker 2: For some people, it's always March twenty twenty.
Speaker 9: Now I travel as a COVID conscious person. First, I
Speaker 9: use Kalvixel nasal spray before going to the airport, and
Speaker 9: a mask in the uber, of course, and I always
Speaker 9: a mask in the airport. When I get on the plane,
Speaker 9: I wipe down as much as I can with Chlorox wipes.
Speaker 9: And I use my pure enrichment air purifier for the plane.
Speaker 9: I wait a little bit to eat after everyone else
Speaker 9: gets their snacks, and I plan to do as much
Speaker 9: of my activities outside as possible. When I get home,
Speaker 9: I wear a mask and test a few days in
Speaker 9: a row.
Speaker 1: And that is that.
Speaker 3: Today was a bad day for the Kamala Harris campaign.
Speaker 3: Her interview on Fox News was a train wreck, a
Speaker 3: hot mess on a number of levels.
Speaker 2: In Bretbear, she.
Speaker 3: Faced a real interviewer who asks pertinent question about the
Speaker 3: border inflation, her record, and she floundered. She was evasive,
Speaker 3: she was incoherence, she was sometimes nonsensical. Whoever in her
Speaker 3: team thought she was ready for a real interview should
Speaker 3: be sacked immediately. Let's have a look at some of
Speaker 3: the more notable moments. I could pay you the whole interview,
Speaker 3: but we don't have the time.
Speaker 14: Your campaign slogan is a new way forward, and it's
Speaker 14: time to turn the page. You've been vice president for
Speaker 14: three and a half years. So what are you turning
Speaker 14: the page from.
Speaker 7: Well, first of all, turning the page from the last
Speaker 7: decade in which we have been burdened with the kind
Speaker 7: of rhetoric coming from Donald Trump that has been designed
Speaker 7: and implemented to divide our country more than seven ourself people.
Speaker 14: They tell the country is on the wrong track. They
Speaker 14: say the country is on the wrong track. If it's
Speaker 14: on the wrong track, that track follows three and a
Speaker 14: half years of you being vice president and present by
Speaker 14: and being president. That is what they're saying, seventy nine
Speaker 14: percent of them. Why are they saying that? If you're
Speaker 14: turning the page. You've been in office for three and
Speaker 14: a half.
Speaker 7: Years, and Donald Trump has been running for office, but.
Speaker 1: You've been the person held the office.
Speaker 12: You and I both know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: You and I both know what I'm I actually don't.
Speaker 1: What are you talking about?
Speaker 3: No one knows what you're talking about, Kamala, You and
Speaker 3: Biden have been in power for almost four years. The
Speaker 3: Democrats have been in power twelve of the last sixteen years.
Speaker 3: But everything is Donald Trump's fault. Apparently, where turning the
Speaker 3: page from Trump?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 3: What's she as she tries to filibusta and mislead about
Speaker 3: what the Biden Harris administration's record on illegal immigration has been,
Speaker 3: But for once, for once, her nonsense is called out
Speaker 3: because this interviewer knows the facts.
Speaker 14: How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your administration has
Speaker 14: released into the country over the last three and a
Speaker 14: half years.
Speaker 7: Well, I'm glad you raised the issue of immigration because
Speaker 7: I agree with you it is it is a topic
Speaker 7: of discussion that people want to rightly have and you
Speaker 7: know what I'm going to talk about.
Speaker 14: Yeah, but do you have just a number? Do you
Speaker 14: think it's one million, three million?
Speaker 1: Brett.
Speaker 2: Let's just get to the point, Okay.
Speaker 7: The point is that we have a broken immigration system
Speaker 7: that needs to be repaired.
Speaker 14: So your Homeland Security secretary said that eighty five percent
Speaker 14: of apprehension.
Speaker 1: I'm not finished. We have a we have.
Speaker 14: A refreshment of six million people have been released into
Speaker 14: the country.
Speaker 2: And let me just finish.
Speaker 14: I'll get you the question. I promise you.
Speaker 1: I was beginning to answer.
Speaker 14: And when you came into office, your administration immediately reversed
Speaker 14: a number of Trump border policies.
Speaker 7: Within hours of taking the oath. Was a bill to
Speaker 7: fix our immigration system, Yes, ma'am.
Speaker 14: It was called the US Citizen Citizenship Act of twenty.
Speaker 1: Exactly twenty one. It was essentially but I wad a.
Speaker 7: Citizenship for the finished I finished responding for you, but
Speaker 7: you have to let me finish.
Speaker 14: You had the White House and the House and the Senate.
Speaker 7: Responding to the point you're raising, and I'd like to finish.
Speaker 7: We recognized from day one that to the point of
Speaker 7: this being your first question, it is a priority for
Speaker 7: us as a nation and for the American people.
Speaker 2: Just waffle, no answers.
Speaker 3: She doesn't have anything significant, substantial to say about these
Speaker 3: critical issues. Now what youre as Kamala gets all hated
Speaker 3: up ranting and writing about Trump wanting to lock up
Speaker 3: the's political opponance, isn't that precisely what the Democrats have
Speaker 3: actually been doing.
Speaker 7: He has talked about locking people up because they disagree
Speaker 7: with him. This is a democracy and an inner democracy.
Speaker 7: The president of the United States, in the United States.
Speaker 2: Of America should be willing.
Speaker 7: To be able to handle criticism without saying he'd lock
Speaker 7: people up for doing it.
Speaker 3: And on the question of emboldening and enriching the Iranian regime,
Speaker 3: this is what Harris had to say.
Speaker 14: Critics just say that you either relaxed or failed to
Speaker 14: enforced sanctions on Iran, allowing all of this money to
Speaker 14: flow into Iran like Billings.
Speaker 2: Let's go back to Donald Trump.
Speaker 7: Hold on, we're pulled out of who pulled out of
Speaker 7: a deal?
Speaker 3: And the final highlight or should that be low light,
Speaker 3: is when Redbar asked Kamala when she finally noticed that
Speaker 3: Joe Biden had some issues with cognitive decline.
Speaker 2: She is momentarily speechless.
Speaker 14: Called Donald Trump he's misguided. You say, now he's unstable. Stable,
Speaker 14: he is unstable, he's not well. You say he's mentally
Speaker 14: not stable. Let me ask you this, and you told
Speaker 14: me many interviewers that Joe Biden was on his game,
Speaker 14: that ran around circles on his staff. When did you
Speaker 14: first notice that President Biden's mental faculties appeared diminished?
Speaker 7: Joe Biden, I have watched from the offers to the
Speaker 7: situation room, and he has the judgment and the experiment
Speaker 7: and experienced to do exactly what he has done in
Speaker 7: making very important decisions on behalf of the American people.
Speaker 3: Then why you the presidential candidate? None of it makes
Speaker 3: any sense joining me now? Is Sky News contributor kosher?
Speaker 3: Geta kosher? She took a big gamble being interviewed by
Speaker 3: someone like Brettbaar, who you've got to say, it's not
Speaker 3: like she was interviewed by Sean Hannity or Tucker Carlson
Speaker 3: or Greg Gutfeld.
Speaker 2: You would expect that a presidential.
Speaker 3: Candidate could handle a tough interviewer who plays it straight
Speaker 3: down the line, and she flound it.
Speaker 11: She did take a gamble, and that is the million
Speaker 11: dollar question. You could see she did not want to
Speaker 11: be there. She couldn't get out of there fast enough,
Speaker 11: and she did it because she has to in this
Speaker 11: race is very, very very tight, and the momentum is
Speaker 11: with Trump, and historically there is president where they begrudgingly
Speaker 11: at the Democrat candidate begrudgingly will give one Fox News
Speaker 11: interview when there's twenty thirty days left. Obama did it,
Speaker 11: Hillary did it. It used to be with Bill O'Reilly.
Speaker 11: So maybe she has to do that because they have
Speaker 11: a big audience, a lot of independence, and actually, frankly
Speaker 11: Democrats watch Fox News. But she was not prepared. She
Speaker 11: was not prepared to me. The big takeaway is she
Speaker 11: remained substance free. She does so by philibustering, using filler words.
Speaker 11: She said multiple times, let's be clear, let's be clear.
Speaker 11: She's never clear, and she hides behind others like she
Speaker 11: likes to hide behind the legislative branch because everything was like,
Speaker 11: I will follow the law Congress needs to act, So
Speaker 11: she shifts blame without ever weighing in on her position. Yes,
Speaker 11: she doesn't pass laws, but she can weigh in on
Speaker 11: which laws she thinks are.
Speaker 1: Better or not.
Speaker 11: And she wouldn't do it. And he had her dent
Speaker 11: to write.
Speaker 3: And he knew the facts when she brings up nonsense
Speaker 3: about this was the first thing we addressed and we
Speaker 3: had this bill.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, that bill was just.
Speaker 3: Going to create a pathway citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants.
Speaker 3: That's not going to solve the border crisis. And he
Speaker 3: knew that level of detail. And I've seen so many
Speaker 3: interviews with her where that's not followed up.
Speaker 2: There really is very frustrating to watch.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 3: You might remember this Donald Trump's debate with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: There was a point where one of.
Speaker 3: The moderators fact checked Donald Trump when he talked about
Speaker 3: increasing crime rates.
Speaker 14: It's happening at levels that nobody thought. President Trump, as
Speaker 14: you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is actually
Speaker 14: coming down in this country. But excuse the FBI, there
Speaker 14: were defrauding statements they didn't include the worst cities. They
Speaker 14: didn't include the cities with the worst crime.
Speaker 1: It was a fraud.
Speaker 3: Well that fact checked in h too well, because the
Speaker 3: FBI has now admitted to excluding tens of thousands of
Speaker 3: crimes in their statistics, releasing massively revised crime data showing
Speaker 3: violent crime is up, not down. Kosher pity the tens
Speaker 3: of millions who would have seen that debate and assume
Speaker 3: the moderator was being accurate.
Speaker 2: That's not the case.
Speaker 11: Yep, that's how it goes. It reminds me of just
Speaker 11: in August, the buer of labor statistics came out with
Speaker 11: the revision that the new job growth was actually ober
Speaker 11: inflated by eight hundred thousand. Now this homicides over inflated
Speaker 11: by eighty thousand, and the big splashy media events. They
Speaker 11: will put that out there, and then there might be
Speaker 11: a small correction like this that comes out later that
Speaker 11: people will never see. Maybe Trump will find a way
Speaker 11: to get that cut through. It's either incompetence by these
Speaker 11: agencies BLS or FBI all the way to something more sinister,
Speaker 11: where maybe it's deliberate. Consider in the business of narrative
Speaker 11: shaping rather than actually stating facts. The truth might be
Speaker 11: somewhere in between.
Speaker 3: Well, we know back in twenty they were complicit in
Speaker 3: pushing the absolute line. They knew better than anyone that
Speaker 3: it was a lie, that Hunter Biden's laptop wasn't real,
Speaker 3: that it was some sort of Russian disinformation. And we
Speaker 3: saw that in the presidential debate between Biden and Trump,
Speaker 3: where Biden said it's Russian race information, and of course
Speaker 3: it wasn't. And that would have possibly made a significant
Speaker 3: difference if there was clarity around that issue.
Speaker 11: Yep, fifty one intelligence agency. So that's where there was
Speaker 11: when that became a headline, intelligence officers who signed a
Speaker 11: letter saying that it's not correct, and people hide behind
Speaker 11: that fact. And as you said, Biden did hide behind
Speaker 11: it in the debate. Leslie Stoll famously in the sixty
Speaker 11: minutes interview said, yeah, can't verify it. It's unverifiable. A
Speaker 11: laptop is unverifiable. And that's why Trump didn't do the
Speaker 11: sixty minutes interview because he never got that apology.
Speaker 3: Now, the US Border Patrol Union has announced on behalf
Speaker 3: of its sixteen thousand members that it is strongly endorsing
Speaker 3: Donald Trump for president. He is Border Patrol Agent Paul Perez,
Speaker 3: who is in charge of one of the Union's local chapters.
Speaker 1: If we allow borders are harris to win this election.
Speaker 12: Every city, every community in this great kind free is
Speaker 12: going to.
Speaker 1: Go to hell.
Speaker 2: How important is this endorsement.
Speaker 3: And it's been very interesting to see the Union movement
Speaker 3: who is siding remaining with the Democrats you expect them
Speaker 3: all to be with the Democrats, and which ones are
Speaker 3: not endorsing either candidate, and with a few that are
Speaker 3: siding with Trump.
Speaker 11: I think there's a cumulative effect with all these endorsements.
Speaker 11: On a micro level, generally, I think endorsements the media
Speaker 11: covers them a lot. I don't know how much they
Speaker 11: shift voters, whether it's Taylor Swift or whether it's you know,
Speaker 11: a person over here. However, cumulatively it does matter because
Speaker 11: you get an overall picture of where the mood of
Speaker 11: the country is in different figures, cultural figures, or leaders
Speaker 11: in this case of law enforcement coming in. And it's
Speaker 11: just a reminder because the Border Patrol has endorse Trump
Speaker 11: every time he's run now sixteen and twenty. His signature
Speaker 11: issue is immigration and the border. That is what put
Speaker 11: him in the White House in twenty sixteen, and the
Speaker 11: Kamlaw campaign is trying to somehow claim that issue and
Speaker 11: say that she's the only one who's prosecuted transnational You
Speaker 11: know that line that she keeps saying of people crossing
Speaker 11: the border, it's flat, it's falling flat. And this endorsement,
Speaker 11: I think sort of is just one more thing that
Speaker 11: Li's a bear, that she is not the one who's
Speaker 11: stronger the border.
Speaker 1: He is.
Speaker 3: And the Trump camp has put out yet another ad.
Speaker 3: This one's got attention.
Speaker 8: Kamala supported taxpayer funded sex changes for presidents.
Speaker 1: Surgery for prisoners.
Speaker 7: For prisoners, every transgender in me in the prison system
Speaker 7: would have access.
Speaker 1: Now, no, I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to
Speaker 1: Kamala supports transgender sex changes in jail with our money.
Speaker 4: Kamala even supports letting biological men compete against our girls
Speaker 4: in their sports. Kamala is for day dim President Trump
Speaker 4: is for you.
Speaker 1: I'm Donald J.
Speaker 2: Trump and I improved this message. These ads are colorful.
Speaker 3: How impactful is the social media game? These short punchy
Speaker 3: ads both sides. Kamala's camp is cashed up, so they're
Speaker 3: really spending enormous amounts. It's been reported she's raised something
Speaker 3: like a billion dollars, So if Trump had that kind
Speaker 3: of money, it would all be over. But how do
Speaker 3: you say the two campaigns traveling at the moment.
Speaker 11: I think the social media ads and the shorts is
Speaker 11: a big thing, just because such a huge swath of
Speaker 11: the electorate doesn't watch cable news anymore, and we know that,
Speaker 11: and in the media industry, those who were ahead of
Speaker 11: the game on digital are doing well and those that
Speaker 11: are behind are speaking to a certain you know, the
Speaker 11: baby boomers and the people that still watch linear TV
Speaker 11: and only linear TV.
Speaker 2: So it's a big deal.
Speaker 11: Democrats typically and under Obama, we're really strong with this
Speaker 11: and Republicans have never been good at these kinds of tactics,
Speaker 11: including Trump last two times. So I think his team
Speaker 11: has lifted their game over this and everything from the
Speaker 11: podcast to these ads that he's doing. It's important. And
Speaker 11: on that issue, the trans issue and the cultural thing,
Speaker 11: it's not a top five issue like on a macro
Speaker 11: level compared to the economy and immigration, but it is
Speaker 11: really really important to parents in suburbs, and that suburban
Speaker 11: mom vote is one where Trump has always been a bit.
Speaker 3: Soft with And here's the one question I was hoping
Speaker 3: Brett would ask that he didn't get to, is what
Speaker 3: is a woman? Could Kamala answer that question?
Speaker 1: That would have been great.
Speaker 3: Kosher Gator, thanks for your time. Pleasure still to come.
Speaker 2: Fans in shock over the depth of pop.
Speaker 3: Star Liam Payne. Kinsey Schofield has the details.
Speaker 2: Next Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey Schofield Kinsey.
Speaker 3: There's been some further revelations regarding the interaction between Nicole
Speaker 3: Kidman and Selmahayak at a fashion show in Paris. The
Speaker 3: two seem to clash after they were asked to pose
Speaker 3: for photographs. The interaction has prompted a social media storm.
Speaker 2: Here's some of what happened.
Speaker 1: One more Please leadies, please.
Speaker 4: They touch I think yes, please advice.
Speaker 12: If you don't need it?
Speaker 2: Oh then Nicole say, don't touch me. Well, what can
Speaker 2: you tell us about this?
Speaker 1: Well?
Speaker 6: From what I am hearing, Nicole just did not want
Speaker 6: to continue to take photos. She felt like they had
Speaker 6: enough of her. She was ready to move on to
Speaker 6: the next thing. Selma clearly being very gracious to the photographers,
Speaker 6: giving everybody the right angle and she wanted to continue
Speaker 6: to pose with Nicole, and she was booting.
Speaker 5: It out of there. You know, I don't know.
Speaker 6: I don't know if there was any anger involved here
Speaker 6: or if she was just over it.
Speaker 5: You have to wait in long lines to get into
Speaker 5: those shows. You have to pee, you know.
Speaker 6: Sometimes you have to sit there and smile while the
Speaker 6: while the outfits are absolutely hideous.
Speaker 5: Maybe she was just over it.
Speaker 2: I don't blame her. I don't blame myrtle.
Speaker 3: Now that has been femal developments in RFK Junior's affairs,
Speaker 3: Saga actress wife Cheryl Hines appears to be giving him
Speaker 3: another chance after the latest scandal in golf the former
Speaker 3: presidential candidate.
Speaker 2: What can you tell us about this?
Speaker 6: Yeah, well, well we know his mother recently died. I
Speaker 6: do believe that that's why we are seeing Cheryl by
Speaker 6: his side.
Speaker 5: She is allegedly a very nice.
Speaker 6: Woman, despite the fact that he cheated on his other
Speaker 6: wife with her, his first wife with her. But I
Speaker 6: have to tell you this is getting wild. New York
Speaker 6: Magazine reporter Olivia Newzy the one that RFK Junior allegedly
Speaker 6: cheated on Cheryl with his fither restraining order against her
Speaker 6: former fiance, and in these court papers, her former fiance
Speaker 6: claims that she described this relationship as toxic, unhealthy, stupid, psychotic, crazy,
Speaker 6: indefensible with a seventy year old sex addict talking about
Speaker 6: RFK Junior who told Olivia that he wanted to possess
Speaker 6: and control her and impregnate her.
Speaker 5: So typical Tuesday for the Kennedy family.
Speaker 2: Damn y it is.
Speaker 3: That's classic Kennedy behavior right there.
Speaker 14: Now.
Speaker 2: We had some terrible news early this morning.
Speaker 3: Pop Styli in Pain from One Direction has died, aged
Speaker 3: just thirty one years old. He fell from a third
Speaker 3: floor hotel room in Bonaserre's. It's just a shocking bit
Speaker 3: of news. What more can you tell us about this, Kinsey.
Speaker 6: I'm trying to be super careful about this because I
Speaker 6: have heard the worst of the worst. But I'm not
Speaker 6: going to say it until we have it confirmed. But
Speaker 6: I can tell you on Wednesday, on the afternoon of
Speaker 6: Liam's death, there was a nine to one one call
Speaker 6: made to report an aggressive mail in the hotel. Witnesses
Speaker 6: claimed Liam had been acting erradically in the hotel lobby
Speaker 6: earlier that day, smashing his laptop. Somebody had to apparently
Speaker 6: carry him back to his hotel room. People are asking
Speaker 6: who is that a liability? Those questions will be asked.
Speaker 6: Shortly after five pm, several witnesses saw him fall out
Speaker 6: of his hotel room from the third floor.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 6: It described as extremely serious injuries. Medics confirmed his death
Speaker 6: on the spot. This is a brutal story, and what
Speaker 6: a waste. He was such a young, talented man. And
Speaker 6: he's got a little boy named Bear.
Speaker 3: Oh oh, that's tragic. I didn't know he had a child.
Speaker 3: We'll wait to get confirmation on precisely what happened there.
Speaker 3: Nowlet's move along to Harry and Meghan Ginger and the Winga.
Speaker 3: They've reportedly bought a holiday home in Portugal after being
Speaker 3: evicted from Frogmore Cottage by King Charles. Are they going
Speaker 3: to be spending a bit of time in Portugal? That's
Speaker 3: an interesting place to buy a holiday home.
Speaker 5: You know, a prince in Portugal.
Speaker 6: Oh the perks of marrying a prince who just had
Speaker 6: a payday from his deceased great grandmother. Remember we talked
Speaker 6: about on his fortieth birthday how he was expected to
Speaker 6: inherit millions, and all of a sudden he shows up
Speaker 6: with a new beachside home in Portugal.
Speaker 5: Yeah, don't you know. I don't I think that good
Speaker 5: for them.
Speaker 6: I'm sure that they are looking for an escape because
Speaker 6: no one really likes them right now.
Speaker 5: So I understand, yeah.
Speaker 2: The Portugal might like them now before you go.
Speaker 3: There are various theories about why Megan Markle was excluded
Speaker 3: from People Magazine's fiftieth anniversary cover.
Speaker 2: What happened there?
Speaker 3: There's Oprah, there's there's a lot of people that I
Speaker 3: don't know.
Speaker 2: Do we expect her to be on?
Speaker 10: There?
Speaker 3: Can see Serena Williams there, John Legend, a few of
Speaker 3: them mates.
Speaker 6: Oh mean yeah, exactly, John Legend, Christy Tiekins, one of
Speaker 6: her good friends, Oprah Winfrey. Serena Williams does a backflip
Speaker 6: anytime Megan Markle calls her up and asks her for
Speaker 6: a favor on her podcast she's on. We expect her
Speaker 6: to be on Harry's New Polo Show. I think that
Speaker 6: and also readA. Megan Markle is People Magazine's number one
Speaker 6: source for information on Megan Markle.
Speaker 5: So I do think people expected her to be on there.
Speaker 6: But you know, Meghan Marko typically is associated with negative commentary,
Speaker 6: and this is supposed to be a celebration of People magazine,
Speaker 6: which is why we might not see her on the cover.
Speaker 3: Kindy so I Fiel, thank you so much for your time,
Speaker 3: and that's it from May. I'll see you tomorrow night
Speaker 3: for Lefty's Losing It at nine thirty.
Speaker 2: Good night,