WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 15 May

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From the Skyinging Center. This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the show.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm Danikit di Giorgio felling in tonight for the great

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 3>man himself, Paul Murray in the man Cave. It is

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 3>wonderful to be here again. Here is what is coming

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 3>up on the program. The justice system is broken when

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 3>it comes to youth crime. I'll tell you about the

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 3>latest bail fail. Let you leader, same old loopy Greens.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Why the minor party has learned absolutely nothing from its

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 3>election woes and the council in Victoria rewards vandals and

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>tries to erase our history by removing a graffiti Captain

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Cook statue.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>For first tonight.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 3>We do talk about youth crime until we are blue

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 3>in the face. But you know what, we're going to

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 3>keep talking about it because we've got criminal kids laughing

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 3>in our faces, committing crimes over and over and the

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 3>judges just give them a slap on the wrist and

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>send them on their merry way. And a week later,

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the same kids are back in court forget another offense,

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's deja vous.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Over and over again. And take this latest bail failing.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 3>New South Wales a teenager hit with seventeen aggravated break

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>and enter charges after an alleged six day crime spree

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>across Sydney, has been released from custody. G Real Tig

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 3>allegedly committed a string of shop break ins and midnight

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>home invasions with a group of friends in late January,

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>just two weeks after his eighteenth birthday. It's alleged the

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>group's stole luxury cars from family homes and took them

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 3>on a wild.

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Joy ride across the city. Yet here's the thing.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Despite the seriousness of the allegations, the most grievous of

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 3>which carry maximum penalties of twenty years behind bars, Teague

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 3>was granted bail in court this week after revealing he

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>had been jumped behind bars and stabbed seven times.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm sorry, but so what did the judge just

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 2>feel sorry for him?

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's not forget he's a legal adult now,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 3>he is eighteen years old.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yet we have a case where this.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Young man allegedly commits seventeen aggravated break and enters over

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>six days, and off he goes. And this is just

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>another example of failures in the justice system which falls

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 3>so short of community expectations and I've got to say

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 3>the legal system is broken, and not just in New

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 3>South Wales but across the country. There are judges and

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 3>magistrates appointed by our politicians who think a soft approach

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>is best and how has that worked out well? One

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 3>fourteen year old in Melbourne was bailed for the fiftieth

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 3>time last year fifty times in New South Wales, and

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>eleven year old boy faced a children's court for the

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>seventieth time in his life at just the age of eleven.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 2>In Melbourne's North.

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 3>This week, three ride share drivers were left traumatized after

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.279
<v Speaker 3>fourteen's allegedly went on a carjacking rampage.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Police watch from above. Three fifteen year old boys accused

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 4>of violent carjackings dump a stolen car. They tried to

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 4>run but were quickly cornered in a hillside court. It

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 4>wasn't over a police had another teen and another stolen

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 4>car to hunt down.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>The four fifteen year olds are accused of holding the

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 3>ride share drivers at knife point and assaulting them, and

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 3>one victim even had to be hospitalized for their injuries.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 3>The Victoria Police airwing had to be called in, so

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 3>yet another expense on the taxpayers tab every eighteen minutes

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 3>a car is stolen in Victoria, So really, this is

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>just your average run of the.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Mill crime night in that state.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>And guess what one of those accused teens was yesterday

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>granted bail. Fifteen year old boy charged over a string

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 3>of terrifying weekend carjackings linked to yet another five and

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 3>who allegedly texted his co accused to delete messages while

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>he was being interviewed by police, has been bailed on Saturday.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 3>The boy was charged with aggravated carjacking with a machete,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>destroying a mobile phone, handling stolen goods, driving without a license,

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 3>and possessing cannabis.

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 2>And here's the thing.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>In opposing bail, the prosecution said the boy had been

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>linked to a further five carjackings since his arrest. They

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 3>also alleged the youngster used his mother's phone during his

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 3>police interview on the weekend and was in contact with

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 3>his co accused where messages such as no comment and

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 3>delete messages were allegedly exchanged, and yet Magistrate Julia O'Donnell

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>still granted bail. The legal system is stuffed. Laws surrounding

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>juvenile criminals mean we can't name the kids we don't

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 3>know what the kids look like, and no wonder the

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>cycle of crime continues. It's a big joke for these kids,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and the joke is on us. And the question has

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>to be asked, where on earth are the parents? Where

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 3>are the parents when four fifteen year old boys allegedly

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 3>are able to steal cars and hold three.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 2>People at knife point?

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 3>Did it not occur to mum or dad or a

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 3>guardian that these kids weren't home under adult supervision?

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're fifteen years old.

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 3>For goodness sake, enough is enough and gee, the politicians

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 3>are weak. The new South Wales Attorney General Michael Daily

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 3>would not even be drawn on whether that decision involving

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the eighteen.

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Year old past the pub test. I mean, Michael, it's simple.

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>It's really not that hard to think about because it

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't pass the pub test. These kids are not innocent angels.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 3>They know exactly what they are doing. Lock them up

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 3>and teach them a less.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>The Greens have a new leader, but it won't surprise

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 3>you to know it is still the same activist radical Greens,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>just with a new face. This dangerous brand just continues

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 3>for another year. Queensland Senator Larissa Waters was elected unopposed

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 3>for the role and have a listen to her mission statement.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 5>We stand firm always on social justice and human rights,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 5>whether that's First Nations justice, whether that's a free Palestine,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 5>whether that's peace and human rights. Globally, we will always

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 5>be there calling out atrocities. I'm calling today for a

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 5>progressive Parliament and a politics with heart. That's what we

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 5>desperately need. Let's meet people where they're at and let's

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 5>actually work to deliver the services and the support that

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 5>people need and that the planet needs. Now we want

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 5>to see action on the climate crisis.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>It's terrific. It's really really terrific, isn't it.

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 3>It really tells you everything you need to know about

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>this party. And if that's the sentiment, it's clear that

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>they have learnt nothing from Adam Bant losing his seat

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 3>and the poor results for the party in the federal

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>election and of course the recent elections in Queensland and

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>the Act. As I said, it's the same Greens with

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 3>a different face. Pro Palestine, anti Israel, anti Australia, dangerous

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>to the prosperity of this country, fueled by climate alarmism

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>and run by a bunch of socialists. Now, if you

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know much about the new leader, well this sums

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 3>it up.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 5>The liberals and the colon gas industry are doing everything

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 5>they can to slow down action on the climate crisis.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 5>They're freaking nuclear, which, as we all know, would simply

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 5>prolong coal and gas, and they're pouring time and money

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 5>into undermining the transition to renewables. Right now, hard working

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 5>people are paying way too much for the basics, while

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 5>one in three big corporations pays no tax at all.

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 5>The major parties are tinkering around the edges of the

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 5>problems that people face.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good to know. The future of the Greens is

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 2>so secure. Now. Look, I will say this though.

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Larissa Waters is probably the better option out of Marine

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Ferruki and Sarah Hanson Young. But that's just the issue

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 3>because Ferruki is staying on as deputy. Now, this is

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 3>a woman who wants reparations for Pakistan, wears a kefire

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>on the Senate floor, and has proudly boasted anti Israel sentiment.

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 6>The coalition is morally bankrupt when it comes to Palestine,

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 6>and Leba has shown itself to be heartless, gutless cowards.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 7>Today bring the people's protest into Parliament three Free Palestine.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 7>Albanesi government has been complicit in the genocide in Gaza

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 7>and they have failed to take strong action against Israel's war.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Crimes and does harmas need to be dismantled.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 6>Listen, there's a situation with Hamases.

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Surely you're able to say where you'd like to see

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>them gone, and.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 6>It's not up to me to say who should be

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 6>gone or not.

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and look, based on her comments today, it is

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a truer life that she was not elected.

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 6>Later, migrant and multicultural communities have in the tens of

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 6>thousands across Sydney, across Brisbane, across Melbourne backed our strong

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 6>stand against the genocide in Gaza. To the right wing media,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 6>to the billionaires, to the big corperations and to the

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 6>Albanesi government.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.359
<v Speaker 2>This is our message.

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 6>We are not going to take a step backwards on

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 6>action on climate, on the environment, on housing and justice

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 6>for Palestine.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Again, it's terrific, isn't it.

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is she the member for Gaza, Who does

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 3>she want to be in the Australian Senate because clearly

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 3>more anti Israel's sentiment is to come. She does not

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 3>represent the values of our country. She certainly does not

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 3>represent us as Australians who are actually proud of this country.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>She represents herself her own activist causes Palestine and Pakistan.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Yet apparently she wants to be taken seriously.

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 6>Welcome to Positive Affirmations Election edition with me, Marie Faruki.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 6>Now let's relax. You are capable of achieving your goals.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 6>You radiate green positive energy. You are always growing and learning,

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 6>especially when university and death is free.

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh don't know about you at home, but I'm really

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>feeling that Marine Faruki positive energy, feeling those vibes, feeling

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 3>zen all of a sudden, It's really uplifted.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Me for the evening. A fact, I really hope that.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 3>You at home are really riping those vibes of the

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 3>deputy leader of the Greens Party.

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Wonderful, wonderful and look, this is a woman.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Who could have been leader of the party today. I

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 3>mean this is the funniest part because there were reports

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 3>the former Green Senator now independent Lydia Thorpe, had been

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>using a Greens First Nation's faction to meddle in the

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>minor parties leadership battle. The Australian Greens First Nations Network

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 3>agitated for Senator Marine Ferruki to be elected through widespread

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>emails and a formal endorsement.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Last week. In fact one, senior Green Sauce Eve told

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 2>The Australian Lydia Thorpe wants back in the Greens.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 3>There's no secret in that. I mean good grief, I

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 3>mean she's denied it.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 2>Today. Lydia Thorpe says she's not going back to the Greens.

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 3>But can you imagine the craziness of Thorpe re entering

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 3>what is already clearly a very bizarre party. Now, Sarah

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Hanson Young had been considered as the only other genuine

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 3>alternative for leader. But as in this Sarah Hanson Young,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 3>on the eve of the election, have you sold out

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 3>your environment credentials?

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Throw it up and stinking in that attention? Salmon, salmon jay.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 3>It really was slim pickens over at the Greens, wasn't it,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>And looked despite losing three of their four Lower House seats,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Labor will have to rely on them to get legislation

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 3>through the Senate. But Adam Bant is gone and clearly

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.239
<v Speaker 3>it is the same old loopy Greens.

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>What a cluster. Let's bring our Paneling.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Now joining me is Liberal National MP Henry Pike and

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Liberal MP Andrew Wallace. Great to see you both. Thank

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you so much for joining me on the show this evening.

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with the Greens. Of course, Larissa Waters elected

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 3>as Greens later, as I said, it's the same old, loopy,

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 3>weird Greens, except with a new face.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Andrew will start with you. What do you make of

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:31.119
<v Speaker 2>this appointment?

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Ah, look, what do you say? I mean?

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 8>These guys just clearly they haven't learned their lesson. You

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 8>vote for the Greens, you get someone like Lydia Thorpe.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 8>That's really the outcome of it all. And look on

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 8>my own electorate, the Greens lost pretty significant primary vote.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 8>People have had enough of this extremist group of this

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 8>political party.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And clearly we've seen the result.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 8>They lost seventy five percent of their members in the

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 8>House at the last election. Sadly we've still got one

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 8>Green left in the House.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But people are speaking.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 8>People have had enough of the militant approach that has

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 8>been taken by the Greens. This is not the political

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 8>party of Bob Brown of yesteryear. The Greens need to

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 8>get back to their basics and if they want to

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 8>have an environmental party. That's what they should be doing.

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 8>Sticking to that. People have had enough, they've had a gutfall.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I think of this.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 8>Is that they've been demonstrating over the recent years of

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 8>Adam Bant when he was the leader.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, I completely agree with you. I mean, long

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 3>gone are the Bob Brown days. This is a very

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>dangerous new brand of Greens is completely irrelevant to Australian culture,

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>so far removed from our values.

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Here is a bit more of what Larissa Waters had

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to say at a press conference today.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 5>We've got a lot of work because people are really

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 5>hurting and the planet is hurting, and we need a

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 5>parliament that actually delivers for people and has the courage

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 5>and the boldness and the heart to deliver some help

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 5>to people. So I'm calling today for a progressive parliament

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 5>and a politics with heart.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Henry, what on earth is a progressive parliament? But what

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 2>exactly does that entail?

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Where does that fit into the overall scheme of things

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 3>in politics in this country.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm not sure what she's doing calling for a

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 9>particular type of parliament. At this point in time. We've

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 9>got the parliament the is trailed people have delivered to us,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 9>and thankfully for me and Andrew, there are three less

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 9>Greens in the Lower House that we'll have to listen

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 9>to on a daily basis. So you know, I think

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 9>it's a pretty good outcome and I'm actually pleased that

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 9>the Greens are doubling down on their unpopular policies which

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 9>has seen their vote decimated across so many areas. And

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, certainly in my electric we saw a fall

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 9>in the first preference for the Greens as well. Deliver

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 9>up more of that, please, that's my message to the Greens.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 9>Deliver up more of the same and see your vote

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 9>to decline.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We would love to have that outcome, and.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 9>We'd love to be rid of these people who are

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 9>living in clearly a different world with different priorities to

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 9>mainstream Australia.

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely, it's so far removed, very loopy and quite frankly,

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 3>very strange. Now, look, we've got a lot to talk

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 3>about because there's been the Liberal leadership this week.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>You now have a new leader in the Liberal Party.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 3>But look, there have been many takes on Susan Lee's

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 3>appointment as Liberal leader, with some actually saying that she's

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 3>perhaps too far left have a listen.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 10>I just feel she's too far to the left. She's

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 10>going to lose a lot of the members from the

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 10>Liberal Party because they won't head down the path that

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 10>conservative values of the Liberal Party what it was founded on.

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 10>That's my opinion about Susan and I think there's too

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 10>many moderates in the party. They will keep dragging them

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 10>back to the left of politics.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 3>And look, many Liberals felt that the natural candidate would

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 3>have been Andrew Hasty. I even personally think that Andrew

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Hasty would have been a wonderful leader. You can see

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 3>him as a future prime Minister's shame he was hidden

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 3>throughout the selection campaign, but of course he ruled himself

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 3>out this week. But he hasn't been sheepish in his

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 3>support for the new leader.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 10>She has my support, and I also I'm supporting Tedo

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 10>Ryan and our deput leader.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They've got a big job ahead and if we don't

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>get our act.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 9>Together as a party, we're going to face an even

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 9>more challenging election in three years time.

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Andrew, what do you make of, firstly, the criticism by

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the likes of Senator Pauline Hansen. How confident are you

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 3>that Susan Lee will be there between now and the

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 3>next election, or is she just a placeholder for somebody

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 3>like Andrew hasty to come in and swoop in at

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 3>the last minute.

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, Dneiker, I think that we have to really rally

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 8>behind both Susan and Ted.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>They were elected as our leaders just a couple of

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>days ago.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 8>It's really good to see Andrew say that he's behind them.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we are all behind them.

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 8>We just can't be in a situation where we have

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 8>some people who are going to snipe from the sidelines.

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 8>We've got to really get behind her, get behind Ted.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 8>I think Susan and Ted demonstrate our best.

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Opportunity to really rebuild the brand.

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 8>I think one of the significant parts of Susan's capabilities

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 8>will come about through bringing everyone together but really trying

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 8>to work with her colleagues in policy development. I think

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 8>that's going to be crucial because over the next particularly

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 8>over the next eighteen months, we are really going to

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 8>need to be creating that case, listening to the Australian people,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 8>but then developing good policies to meet people where they are.

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Susan will do that well. Because

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Susan.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 8>Will be a very collaborative leader and more to her

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 8>arm and we've really got a lot behind her.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>So but Andrew, you know, I mean, look, there has

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 3>been as a sense some criticism that the thing is

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 3>is that there needs to.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Be a DIFFERENTI and there needs to.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Be yeah, but to be fair though, there needs to

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 3>be some different policy that this is a problem. During

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the election campaign there wasn't a differentiation in policy. It's

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Susan le going to come forward and really make that

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 3>stark difference. Do you think, I mean, particularly when it

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to say nuclear, when it comes to net zero,

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 3>are we actually going to see policy moving forward that

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to put the party in a more electable

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 3>winning position.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is the thing.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 8>So this is why I think Susan has the opportunity

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 8>here to be very successful, because I believe she will

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 8>listen not just to her colleagues. I believe she'll listen

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 8>to where people, you know, average Australians where they're at.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, I think that she will be

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a collaborative leader.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 8>She'll be she's our first woman leader of the Liberal Party.

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 8>It'll be a change in dynamics, no doubt about that.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 8>But look, I'm really excited about the next three years.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 8>I think that this is an opportunity for us to

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 8>really dig down into policy development, and that's something that

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 8>I think we have struggled with for a number of years.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Henry, what's your view on this? Is this

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 3>the right way forward now for the party? And what

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 3>do you think that Susan Lee needs to take forward

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 3>now to put that party the party in an electable

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 3>winning position.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I think anyone who underestimates Susan will do so

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 9>at their peril. She will be formidable as our opposition leader,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 9>and I think she's going to really surprise a lot

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 9>of people, including Senator Hanson. And in fact, I've had

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 9>a lot of support already from people. I've been out

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 9>in my community. I've been out of cancer counts and

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 9>wanting tea yesterday, and a lot of women in my

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 9>area very excited about the prospect of having a formidable

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 9>woman leading our party. And also I'm excited about the

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 9>approach that she's taking to the leadership and that the

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 9>collaborative approach that she he wants to adopt in terms

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 9>of developing those policies. We want to get back to basics.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 9>We want to have a policy platform at the next

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 9>election that reflects Liberal values and I'm very confident that

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 9>with Susan and Ted we're going to have that and

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 9>I think the Australian people are going to be quite

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 9>happy with what we have to offer.

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I like that term back to basics and I think

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 3>that's really what it's about and having that putting together

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 3>a policy platform that will resonate with voters that's not complex,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 3>not difficult to understand.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's good.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I found it interesting today though, of course Liberal MPs

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 3>are trying to scramble for a spot on Susan Lee's

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 3>front bench. It's now been reported in the Daily Telegraph

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>that Andrew Hasty and Angus Taylor may actually be considering

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 3>a move to the back bench. Hasty to spend time

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 3>in his electric in wa and Taylor if he's not

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>asked to continue on as Shadow Treasurer.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, I remember earlier this.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Week you said here on Sky News that you know

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 3>he's got to lick his wounds, perhaps for twenty four hours,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 3>but that you really do need Taylor to come back

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and more fighting, more than ever. To lose those two

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to the back bench I think would be absolutely diabolical

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>for the party. How confident are you that they will

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 3>get key roles and that they won't just want to

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 3>just self retire themselves out of the spotlight.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 8>Look, I don't think that they'll want to go and

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 8>sit on the bench. I think that these two gentlemen

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 8>have got a lot to offer the party and the

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 8>Australian people. We are we've been really decimated in this

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 8>last election. We need to ensure that our best people

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 8>are not only on the park, but are very actively

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 8>on the park and playing very important roles on the park.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 8>That's the only way we're really going to get ahead

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 8>is if we are working together as a team and

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 8>we have our best people out there.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And the reality is we just cannot.

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 8>Afford to have two of our best performers sitting in

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 8>the bleachers. They need to be out in the park

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 8>working hard with the rest of us. And I think

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 8>they've got extraordinary.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Talent and we need them out there with us.

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Henry, what do you think I mean? It would?

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 3>As I said, I think it would be remiss of

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Susan Lee not to give some of their best performers

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>in the Liberal Party, people like Angus Taylor, Andrew Hasey

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 3>An even Senator just into nampajimp price to not give

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>these people key roles, put them front and center and

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 3>get them to know the Australian public. Let the Australian

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 3>public get a feel of them between now and the

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 3>next election.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be such a waste to have

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 2>talent on the back bench. Were you surprised by these reports?

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 9>Oh? What's a bit surprised by those reports? But I

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 9>think Susan's been absolutely clear that she is very keen

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 9>to have a cabinet that reflects the whole breadth of

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 9>the Liberal Party, including those individuals, and I think that

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 9>they've been clear today and clarifying their remarks to make

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 9>it clear that they're available for selection. So I think

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 9>that we're going to have a good, unified team moving

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 9>forward with our best people putting their talents where we

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 9>need it, and that is taking on the Labor Party.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 9>Of course, we're facing a significant challenge in this new parliament.

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 9>They're going to have more than double the members we have.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 9>We've all got to work three times four times harder

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 9>than we have in the past, and I think we're

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 9>going to need every hand of the wheel on this one.

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 9>And I'm certain we'll have a better result the next

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 9>election with the united effort of our entire team.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh look, fingers crossed. Now, Look, I want to talk

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 2>about the ongoing.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 3>Issues of such between the Liberals and the Nationals because

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Susan Lee and Nationals leader David little Proud held their

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 3>first formal talks to set up a coalition agreement between

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 3>the parties today, but greater representation for the Nationals and

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the coalition leadership team and the direction of climate policy

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 3>remain unresolved.

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Andrews.

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 3>This goes back to my earlier question because David Little

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Proud made it very very clear in his press conference

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 3>this week that the Nationals will continue to support nuclear

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 3>and he strongly put the case forward to drop net

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>zero by twenty fifty to pull all Australia out of

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the ridiculous Powis agreement. I think it's a great move

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>on his part. But how the issue is, is the

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Liberals really going to support particularly dropping out a net

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 3>zero by twenty fifty and would you continue with your

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 3>nuclear policy. I mean, this is where you could really

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 3>be at odds with the Nationals here.

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 8>Look, there's always a possibility for that, but I think

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 8>that both parties will need to formulate their own positions

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 8>in the first instance, and that will come about through

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 8>this cathartic process that we're going through right now, and

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 8>then hopefully we'll all be coming together as a coalition.

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that we know if the.

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 8>Liberal Party decide to go their own way and the

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 8>National Party decided.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>To go their way, you know we're never going to

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>get anywhere.

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 8>The only way we can we can serve the Australian people,

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 8>The only way we can hold the Labor Party to

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 8>account is in a coalition. The only way we can

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 8>govern is if we are in a coalition. So there's

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 8>going to need to be quite a lot of soul

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 8>searching on both sides of the fence, there's no doubt

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 8>about that. But ultimately these discussions will be had by

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 8>the party room, the Joint party room as well, and

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 8>you know, we will have to land a position on

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 8>this and I'm not going to ventilate what that might

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 8>be today. There's a lot of water to go under

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 8>the bridge, both behind closed doors as that should be,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 8>and then you know, will come out with a unified You.

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Still support nuclear? Are you still for nuclear?

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Look I do support nuclear. I think that.

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 8>The country can't go down a route of eighty two

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 8>percent renewables. We need dispatchable, need dispatchable, full time, reliable,

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 8>affordable power, and we know that we can't get all

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 8>of those things with putting all our eggs in one

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 8>basket of renewables.

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, Ultimately, ultimately.

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 8>Whether it's nuclear, whether it's an emphasis on gas, whether

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 8>it's all of the above with renewables as well, those

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 8>are things that we've got to discuss.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, you.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 8>Can't get around the iron clad rules of physics and science,

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 8>and that is that we just cannot provide a part

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 8>time you can't provide for a full time economy.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Well we're going, but we're going broken backwards under this

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 3>renewal pal Literally we cannot. We don't know how to

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 3>keep the lights on during heat wave, during cold snaps.

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 2>We've got absolutely no idea.

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 3>You don't need to look to Spain and Portugal in

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 3>recent weeks to give you an example of exactly where

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 3>this is going. But in terms of the coalition agreement, Henry,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 3>you know that the Nationals, I've got to say, really

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 3>propping up the Liberal Party right now because the Nationals

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 3>aren't the ones that lost a tremendous amount of seats,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>So how critic is it that they really thrash this

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 3>out and get back to being a team.

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 9>The National Party are an absolutely critical part of our team.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 9>And you know, for for a coalitionist like myself, you know,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 9>we Andrew and I are both part of the merged

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 9>party up here in Queensland. We we really respect the

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 9>role the National Party plays both as sort of a

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 9>conscience of the coalition but also to provide those regional

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 9>and rural voices into the joint party room. So I

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, we totally understand and expect the National Party

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 9>to be very vocal to drive a hard bargain in

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 9>these negotiations, you know, when we respect the positions that

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 9>they bring. But you know, obviously there's a lot of

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 9>discussions is going to have to occur over the course

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 9>the next couple of weeks, including you know how many

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 9>cabinet positions each party is going to get in the

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 9>shadow cabinet. These are all part of the course. I

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 9>don't think anyone who's predicting a divorce of the you know,

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 9>the long standing marriage between the Liberal and the National parties.

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 9>I think are dreaming. You know, this is just part

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 9>of the course. We've got some discussions to have given

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 9>the results that we've had a couple of weeks ago,

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 9>and I think, you know, it's healthy and good for

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 9>us to have those discussions.

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Henry, I'll ask you the same thing. Do you still

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 2>support nuclear.

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 9>I think it would be a big mistake for the

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 9>Coalition to abandon our nuclear policy. I think that we

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 9>were brave enough and I think we made the right

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 9>call in coming out in favor of having a nuclear

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.959
<v Speaker 9>industry here in Australia. I do think that there may

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 9>be some tinkering to that policy.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It may take a different.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 9>Form, the model may be shifted slightly, but I certainly

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 9>would be in favor of maintaining that we've made the

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 9>hard yarns and making the case for it. I don't

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 9>think it was the major factor in our election defeat,

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 9>and I think that if you're fast forward another ten

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 9>or fifteen years, I think you'll find that both sides

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 9>of the Parliament are supporting nuclear energy in Australia.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, if power.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Can I just jump in there to on that point.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 8>You know, you asked me whether I support nuclear and

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 8>I said I do, but we've also got to recognize

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 8>that there's a lot of people in Australia who still

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 8>are not confident about how nuclear operates, whether it can

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 8>be done safely, etc. Yeah, we need to be able

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 8>to sell that better. Yes, and you know this is

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 8>not just a matter of rinse and repeat. I think

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 8>we do need to listen very very carefully to what

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 8>the people of Australia have told us over the last

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 8>two weeks.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 3>No, I think that's a fair point. It has to

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 3>be sold much better than it did. And well it

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 3>disappeared really in the last few weeks of the campaign.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean the only people person mentioning nuclear was Anthony

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Albin Easy in those last few weeks.

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 2>It certainly wasn't the coalition.

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 3>But look, it's an important discussion because, as we said,

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 3>we're going broken backwards under renewables.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Henry Pike Andrew.

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Wallace, good to chat with you both. Thank you so

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>much for joining me on the show this evening. We'll

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 3>stay with us coming up after the break from one

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 3>wokee council to another. A Victorian council is refusing to

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 3>replace a graffiti in Captain Cook statue and a Sydney

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Council blaming climate change for banning large events in parts.

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Try and make sense of that. We'll chat with Linda

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Scott and Kristin Abraham next.

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the program. Joining me now to chat.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 3>More of today's top stories is former Labour councilor Linda Scott,

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 3>who joins me here in the man Cave, and libertarian

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 3>commentator Kristin Abraham.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Hied to both of you. Thank you for joining me

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 2>on the show.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, look, I want to start with the New South

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Wales bail fail because I spoke about this earlier on

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 3>in the show and just how our justice system is

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 3>really failing us. We learned today that a teenager charge

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 3>with seventeen aggravated break and ender charges has been released

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 3>from custody because quote, he was jumped behind bars. Look, Linda,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>this putting this issue aside. Okay, this isn't just a

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 3>New South Wales problem. This youth crime is a state

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 3>is a country wide problem. Half of the battle is

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the justice system, because time and time again we just

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 3>see repeat offenders. They go in and out of the courts,

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 3>they're given a slap on the wrist, off they go

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 3>and that cycle of crime continues over and over again,

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 3>has the justice system let us down?

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 6>Look?

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 11>I think time after time in these terrible debates, and

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 11>let's acknowledge here, you know, the communities are really suffering

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 11>from the impacts of crime. Coalition governments or oppositions jump

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 11>to bail laws when actually we should be talking about

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 11>the whole spectrum of the justice system, including what it

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 11>can contribute to prevention. When people go to jail so

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 11>often in Australia, they come out sadly more at risk

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 11>of offending than when they went to jail, and I

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 11>think we've really got to look at the evidence for

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 11>what we can do throughout the justice system to prevent

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 11>these kinds of problems. Young people reoffending is a problem

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 11>in many hearts of Australia, but looking at what can

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 11>prevent that surely is the most cost effective, best thing

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 11>we can do for our communities and state governments should

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 11>be doing that, not just jumping on bail laws and

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 11>other things to re imprison people when indeed that might

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 11>not end up being the best solution for the community

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 11>to keep them ste I mean, how.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Many times can we go oh, well, yeah, okay, he's young,

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 3>she's young.

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't madam.

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 3>And you've got a kid who was eleven years old

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 3>and was facing courts for the seventieth time at the

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 3>age of eleven.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>How many times are you can you go, that's all right,

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's young.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I just think, Kristen, lock him up, teach them a

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 3>lesson and see what happens.

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>What do you think? And also the other question is

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 2>where are the parents in all of this?

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Linda, we're past the point of prevention for some

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 12>people and we need action now for what is going

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 12>to happen next. We have a term like bail failed

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 12>to describe our judicial system across Australia. How crazy is that.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 12>I've recently been talking to a children's court registrar and

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 12>she was saying that the reason why these young people

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 12>keep getting released on bail is because they lack the

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 12>resources to keep them safe while in jail or while

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 12>in Remand so what I say is that there is

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 12>a simple solution to this. Make safer jails, make harder bails.

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think. Look, I'm on the same

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 3>page with you, Kristen on this. I think, how many

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 3>more times can we just keep going, Oh, it's all right,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter slap on. The recycle of crime continues.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 3>There has to be some sort of deterrent to stop

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 3>these kids from reoffending. And look, none of us have

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the answers here, but you know, you sit and you

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 3>read the same stories over and over again and you

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 3>just end up shaking your head, and so something has

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 3>to happen.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Look, I want to talk about the Captain Cook memorial

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 3>that was vandalized last year by cowards in Melbourne.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to be replaced.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 3>After the obiously woke Yarra Council unanimously voted to remove it. Now,

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 3>this has been in storage since January last year after

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 3>those thugs toppled the granite plinth, damage the bronze bust

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 3>of Cook and scrawled Cook the colony all over at Kristina.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 3>This is happening in your home state. What on earth

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 3>is happening at that council. I think this is rewarding vandalism.

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 12>It does appear to be rewarding of vandalism Danaka. But

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 12>can you imagine if they're doing this to the Captain

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 12>Cook statue, what they're going to do to the Daniel

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 12>Andrews statue once that gets erected. Look, I know I

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 12>can only imagine what's going to happen. But in terms

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 12>of the Captain Cook statue, I think the only way

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 12>to look at this is from a libertarian perspective. I

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 12>don't think that rate payers or tax payers should be

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 12>paying for statues or CCTV or security guards to monitor

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 12>these statues. If communities and actual communit and it is

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 12>not World councils want certain statues in their areas, then

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 12>those certain statues should be erected and they should stay.

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 12>And then in five years, ten years time, if they

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 12>want to change the statue, then so be it. But

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 12>I think the purpose of government is not to erect

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 12>statues here and there and spend our money. The purpose

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 12>of government is to make sure that all the bills

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 12>get paid or maybe balance a budget for once.

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I totally agree.

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think that money being spent erecting statues

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Willy Nearly is absolutely ridiculous. But I look at it

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 3>from the perspective of this is our this is our history, Linda,

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and I just think bending to the will of vandals

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 3>surely cannot set a good example to the community. I mean,

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 3>vandalize what doesn't align with your political agenda, and oh

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 3>that's okay, no problems, We're going to get rid of it.

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 11>Look, I'm out of local government now, if you know.

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 11>But I'll never not defend out great five hundred and

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 11>thirty seven local governments across the country, each one of

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 11>them very different and doing different things for their different communities,

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 11>but very important. On statues, I think the real question

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 11>is this are the things that we put in our

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 11>public domain representative of our communities. Famously, in the city

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 11>of Sydney, when I was a counselor, I called out

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 11>that there were more statues of birds than there were

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 11>of women. I was wondering around the city one day

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 11>with my teenage son, who kind of looked up and went,

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 11>this is a bit of a sausage party this city.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 11>It actually obviously really caught on because I moved that

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 11>there be more as statue parity, like I think the

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 11>mayor of this council has said, we don't want to

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 11>tear down historic statues, or in this case, the city

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 11>is seeing such high costs from repeated vandalism that actually

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 11>the mayor's and the council's decision is the best use

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 11>of public money and This is an important consideration that

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 11>councils do need to take into account, is to not

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 11>put the statue back up because it will continue to

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 11>be vandalized. That's a good financial decision the best interests

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 11>of the right payers of this council. I think looking forward,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 11>we've got to have different statue representations. We can't just

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 11>have handless Yeah, but we've got all these other women

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 11>who are also part of our history who we don't

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 11>know about because they're not in paintings, they're not in

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 11>our history books, they're not in our statues.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 2>We can't have about community.

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 11>After statue of the same old men.

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 12>Linda, we keep talking about community, and what about if

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 12>these vandals that are so passionate about the community, whether

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 12>they're denying our colonial past, if they actually contributed to community,

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 12>they spend half of the passion they have to vandalize

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 12>actually contributing to supporting women, to supporting youths you know,

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:51.479
<v Speaker 12>that are at risk, or all those kind of things.

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 12>We're kind of changing this into a topic of let's

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 12>have more statues to balance the books, when in actual fact,

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 12>we have an issue of vandalism here, and we have

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 12>an issue of tax payers and rate payers paying for

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 12>these statues that clearly the community doesn't want. So we

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 12>are conflicting issues in this one.

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough choice.

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 11>I condemn the vandalism that clearly shouldn't happen. It's not

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 11>in the public interest. But we can't just keep pretending

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 11>that the only significant person in Australia's history is someone

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 11>like Captain Cook. He's significant, but it's not the whole story.

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 11>And we've got to have public art in our public

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 11>spaces that tell the whole of Australia's history, not just

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:36.399
<v Speaker 11>one part of it.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I want to move on to other White Council

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 3>news now because Sydney's Council. Sydney Council's reputation as a

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 3>fun police has been reinstated this week as it moves

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 3>to ban large events in public parks and well for

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 3>what reason do you ask, Well, according to Lord Mayor

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Clover Moore, it's due to climate change. Yes, you heard it,

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 3>that old chestnut in an effort to protect grass from damage.

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean we've really heard it all now? Is that

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 3>climate change? Willy nilly just gets thrown around at every event.

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 3>A Linda, you're the former Deputy Lord mayor and a

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 3>former counselor of the City of Sydney yourself, what's your

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 3>response to this climate change.

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, my predecessor, Counselor Ollie Arkins, moved a motion

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 11>to activate these green spaces in the City of Sydney

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 11>to make sure that they were able to have more festivals,

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 11>more fun, more engagement. And I was really sad to

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 11>see that Lord Mayor cloven More voted that motion down.

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 11>I think it is disappointing because the City of Sydney

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 11>should be a place where there's incredible festivals and fun

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 11>and engagement. It creates fun, but it creates jobs, it

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 11>creates economic activation as well. I moved that there'd be

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 11>more green space overall, and I think this is part

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 11>of the problem. You've popped lots more people in Sydney,

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 11>but you haven't opened up more green space. And I

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 11>think that makes it difficult because people want to have

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 11>a vestable but also walk their door and you know

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 11>that they're the advance.

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 2>This is the thing they're Kristen.

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're there to be used and now apparently

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 3>they can't be used because of climate change.

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 2>But how do you make sense of that?

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 12>So grass getting damaged. Is climate change?

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 9>Is that?

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 12>Is that the main point here, because I think there's

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 12>grounds keepers to be able to maintain grass, or every

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 12>forty year old man at home is probably really obsessed

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 12>with their grass at the moment. But that doesn't sound

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 12>like climate change to me. I think that I've been

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 12>banging on about this forever in a day in terms

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 12>of councils sponsoring or creating these kind of festivals themselves,

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 12>and you know, whether that's a twilight market or a

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 12>street festival or whatever that may be, but then denying

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 12>permits for private businesses and private organizations that want to

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 12>have those events. If they are going to compete with

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 12>those kind of markets, they shouldn't be the ones that

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 12>are responsible for approving those permits, and they should If

0:41:56.400 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 12>they are responsible for approving those permits, they should be

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 12>goven to a strict criteria. Will it bring economic prosperity

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 12>to the community, will the benefits outweigh the cons of

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 12>the grass getting damaged? And is it an event that

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 12>is worthwhile doing. If they answer yes to all of

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 12>those things, then the permit should be approved. But they

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 12>do need to stop competing with these kind of businesses.

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Can I also just say that.

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 11>I mean, climate change is real, but the City of

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 11>Sydney is a council with a surplus. They can invest

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 11>in drainage that would solve the problem.

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Although it is completely it's a false Well, you know.

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 3>What, maybe Clover Moore actually just needs to get back

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 3>to the basics herself of rates, rubbish and rhads. I

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 3>think that she should really stick to the basics and

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 3>stop driving everybody nuts.

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have to take a quick break coming up.

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Will you back more with this fight up debate after this, Well,

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:53.439
<v Speaker 3>welcome back to the program. I'm still here with former

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Labor councilor Linda Scott and libertarian commentator at Kristin Abraham. Now, look,

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.760
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about Anthony Alberne, because he's revealed the vision

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 3>for his second term in government and he has, well

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 3>to the detriment of us, introduced a brand new slogan,

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 3>have a look.

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 13>I think that during the campaign as well, we had

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 13>progressive patriotism if you like, is one way that it's

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 13>been called. You know, we spoke about doing things the

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:20.439
<v Speaker 13>Australian way.

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 14>He used a really interesting phrase a moment ago, progressive patriotism.

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 14>I'm not sure whether I've heard that from you before?

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 14>Were you conscious of that as a factor through the campaign,

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:31.879
<v Speaker 14>and is it going to be something that guards you

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 14>now in this second term?

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 13>What's conscious of it?

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Wow?

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 3>Progressive patriotism Mark Kristen, Well, there's lots of ways to

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 3>interpret that.

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 2>One is that a good slogan for Olbow to be

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:44.919
<v Speaker 2>trotting out?

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 12>Look, I'll pay credit where credit is due. I'd rather

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:52.800
<v Speaker 12>have a united country under labor than a divided country

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 12>under labor. The thing about laboring, what they're really good

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 12>at is they're good at coining phrases. They're good at

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 12>educating voters, and I say educating voters and making them

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 12>care about what they're the new thing that they're trying

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 12>to talk about. It is a good thing that we

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 12>are talking about patriotism. It's sad that we have to

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 12>put the word progressive in front of it because they

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 12>think extremists on either end has ruined that word. But

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 12>my biggest problem here is that the Liberal Party are

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 12>still in the locker room squabbling amongst themselves, and Anthony

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 12>Albinizi is out here changing the narrative and directing the

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:32.799
<v Speaker 12>people where to go, and we will end up with

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 12>an entrenched Labor government if the Liberal Party don't get

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:36.919
<v Speaker 12>onto the field very soon.

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 3>No, look, I totally agree on but I think the

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:42.479
<v Speaker 3>coalition will broadly need to get together pretty quick because

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 3>you could say earlier this week that Anthony Alberanzi the

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 3>team they're trying to move forward, while we've got the

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Libs still trying to get themselves ready. Progressive patriotism, Linda,

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:55.320
<v Speaker 3>you're a fan of that one.

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 11>Look, I think the Prime Minister is uniting garverning with

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 11>a record majority, the largest majority government Labor has ever

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 11>seen in the history of this country. As the oldest

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 11>political party in Australia. That in itself is remarkable. But

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 11>he's very aware with humility that he's got a job

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 11>to do, and his job is to unite the country

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 11>and deliver the reforms that he's committed to.

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I do think it, though.

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 11>Is a lovely thing for Australians to reflect about what

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 11>makes this place so special. And there are many of

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 11>the things that the Prime Minister spoke about during the campaign,

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 11>Medicare or farm the pharmaceutical.

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Which was a benefit, it was a lie the whole time.

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 11>Making sure that we stand up to the interests of

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 11>the pharmaceutical companies, making sure that we stand up to

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.959
<v Speaker 11>the against the interests of people that want to tear

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 11>apart these great systems, the National Disability Insurance scheme. You know,

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 11>these are great government schemes that well every day.

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So don't even get me started on a couple and

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.359
<v Speaker 3>that is a behemoth scheme that has been blown out

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 3>by all sorts of issues.

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 2>For Aasmelionsact scheme.

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:07.240
<v Speaker 11>The fact is Australians have voted for these kinds of schemes.

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 11>They've voted for good progressive government in record numbers. We've

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 11>got a coalition that is, you know, still one day

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 11>after the election of their new leader having ministers shadow

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 11>ministers undermine her. They've got Greens that you know, have

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 11>only just come to view about who their leader should be,

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 11>having had three quarters of their party room not re elected.

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 11>You know, the Prime Minister is progressive and a sensible.

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm all for patriotism, but I do not believe we

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 3>have seen a lot of patriotism in this country more

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 3>broadly for the last few years, or even since October seven,

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three. I think that's when a lot of

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 3>issues started here. I'm all for patriotism, but prove it.

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Don't come out and say we're all for patriotism if

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 3>you cannot actually unite this country, and Albo has not

0:46:57.600 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 3>done that over the last three years. Now, look before

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 3>we go, we've got to go to the US, because

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 3>there are so many things wrong with singing and host

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Jake Tappers and you tell all on the cover up

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 3>of Biden's cognitive decline, starting with the simple.

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Fact that he actually wrote it.

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Because remember when he yelled at Lara Trump for simply

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 3>mentioning Biden's cognitive decline.

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 15>I think you were making a stutter, and I think

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 15>you have absolutely no standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline.

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 15>I would think that somebody in the Plump family would

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 15>be more sensitive to people who do do not have

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 15>medical licenses diagnosing politicians from Afar. Plenty of people have

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 15>diagnosed your father from Afar, and I'm sure it offends you,

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 15>your father in law from a far. I'm sure it

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.280
<v Speaker 15>defends you. You don't have any standing to say.

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 7>Noticing what I'm saying.

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 15>You just talked about a cognitive decline.

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I have one last question for you.

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 6>L You can't im on.

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Stage, and it's very concerning to a lot of people

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.479
<v Speaker 2>that this could be the leader of the free world. Okay,

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:56.359
<v Speaker 2>that is all I'm saying.

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 7>Genus, thank you, La, Sorry for Joe.

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it. Kristin.

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, the liberal media now are just coming out

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 3>trying to cover themselves up when they supported Biden the

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 3>whole time.

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 12>They showed their true colors on just pushing whatever narrative

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 12>they've been fed rather than actually doing what journalism is

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 12>meant to be. It's sad that Joe Biden will be

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 12>remembered as sleepy Joe compared to his you know, decades

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 12>in politics. But everyone in that administration and his family

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 12>should be held accountable for trying to hide this from

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 12>the American public and then trying to get him re

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 12>elected when they knew they knew he was in cognitive decline.

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 12>And all those journalists should have their jobs re evaluated,

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 12>but they won't because that media is biased.

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree, and I agree.

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 3>I think people like doctor Jill Biden are all culpable

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 3>in this, and they let it go for too long.

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, we've run out of time.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Kristin Abrahams and Linda Scott, nice to catch up with you.

0:48:57.600 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for joining me. That's it from me.

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Paul will be back in the man Cave on Sunday,

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 3>but stay with us. Up next is a late debate.

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Goodnight,