WEBVTT - Sharri | 4 February

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News. This is Sharry Good Evening.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump withdrawals funding from UNRA after meeting with Benjamin Natanyahu.

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Would Peter Dutton do the same. His new Foreign Affairs

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Shadow minister joins me tonight. Transport Minister Joehlen resigns overtaking

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>taxpayer funded chauffeurs to wineries. There's now pressure on Housing

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Minister Rose Jackson. I'll speak about this scandal with Bronwyn

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Bishop and Holly Hughes.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Also it's tonight.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>A former AFP senior commissioner questions why the government isn't

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>cracking down on Islamic terror and only neo Nazis. He'll

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 2>join me on the show live. Plus we'll look at

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>how the core claim in Antoinette Latoufe's case perpetuates a

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>dangerous anti Semitic trope about Jews controlling the media. This

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>is Aitabachos's private emails about two are read in court.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Patrick will be on the show, but first tonight.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton is channeling Ronald Reagan's famous challenge to Jimmy

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Carter in nineteen eighty. The times have changed, but the

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>issues remain the same. Ronald Reagan in the presidential debate

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>forty five years ago, asked voters these very simple questions, Are.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 3>You better off than you were four years ago? Is

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 3>it easier for you to go and buy things in

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 3>the stores than it was four years ago?

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Those questions help deliver Reagan a landslide victory because the

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>most critical issue to any voter at any time is

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>providing for their family and their families prosperity and security.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 2>That never changes and it's what this upcoming federal election

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>boils down to as well or Peter Dutton today called

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 2>on the Prime Minister to apologize to Australians for breaking

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>his premise that they'd be better off under his government.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 4>My questions to the Prime Minister. Under this week Alberanzi

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Labor government, interest rates have increased twelve times, energy bills

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 4>have risen by one thousand dollars, living standards have collapsed,

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven thousand businesses have gone and solvent, and we're

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 4>in a record breaking household recession. Will the Prime Minister

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 4>now apologize for promising Australians they would be better off

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 4>and admit that they can't afford another three years of

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 4>this week Albanzi Labor government.

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Of course, there was no apology. There never will be.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Now there's no question that in focus group research, cost

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>of living is the top issue all day, every day,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and on this topic, Alberzi has breached the trust of

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Australian voters last election. As you know, he made solving

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the cost of living crisis his camp pain mantra.

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Costive living increases, costive living, costive living pressures, living living,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 5>cost of living, the cost of living, cost of living,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 5>cost of everything, living, cost of living issues. Bear in

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 5>mind the cost of living pressures.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Albanese's squarely blamed Scott Morrison for the cost of living crisis,

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact at that point in time there'd only

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>been a single rate rise. Yet now that he's Prime

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Minister and there's been a dozen rate rises during his

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 2>time in office, he takes no responsibility.

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is illogical.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>It was Morrison's fault back then, but it's not Albanese's

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>fault now. Before the last election, Albaneze promised a new

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>era of transparency and he pledged to own up to

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>his mistakes and.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 6>If I get something wrong, I'll line up to it.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Yet have we seen him own up to anything just

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>one thing, of course, not it's always someone else's fault,

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>especially the cost of living crisis, which is because of

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>overseas factors the Middle East War, Ukraine and now Donald Trump.

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>No one mentioned homegrown inflation, and Albanezi wouldn't answer either

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of these. Following questions today in Parliament.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 7>Prime Minister, by what percentage has the cost of food

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 7>increased since the election of the Abeneze Labor government.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 8>Can the Prime Minister provide a single example of an

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 8>Australian family that has received a two hundred and seventy

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 8>five dollars cut to their power bill as was promised

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 8>before the last election nearly one hundred times.

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister just hopes these questions will all go

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>away if he keeps.

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Insisting that everything is looking great.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Optimism, as I told you last night, is his new phrase.

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 5>We do need hope and we need optimism, and as

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 5>we begin the parliamentary year, that's precisely what I have.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 5>Optimism for the year ahead and optimism that we can

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 5>create a better future for Australia.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 2>But voters aren't feeling so optimistic. Families are feeling the pain,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 2>which is cumulative. The Albenzi government is well aware the

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>cost of living crisis is the single most critical issue.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>To mainstream Australians.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 2>It's why Albinizi is desperate for a rate cut, and

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>if he gets one at the next RBA board meeting,

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>it may prompt him to call the election. The RBA

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 2>meets on the eighteenth of February and the first of April,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and then again in late May. Economist Judith Sloan wrote

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>last week that despite Albanesi and Charmers saying they respect

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 2>the independence of the RBA, a lot of nudging has

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 2>been going on for some time. She writes, when Chalmers

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>declared last year that high interest rates were smashing the economy,

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>he was in effect telling the bank what to do,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and here was Charmers making that very point.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 9>The combination of global economic uncertainty and higher interest rates

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 9>is smashing household budgets and slowing our economy considerably.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 2>Now that might have been a subtle hint, but some

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>current and former labor politicians and also union leaders have

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>been far more direct. As rates rose over the past

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of years.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 10>We're outside the Reserve Bank of Australia today, and that's

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 10>because working people are urging them to cut interest rates.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 11>Now we have headline inflation right in the middle of

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 11>the RBA's target band, which gives them maximum room to

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 11>move in terms of bringing interest rates down. Of course,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.679
<v Speaker 11>that decision is up to the independent Reserve Bank.

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 6>The Reserve Bank is putting economic dogma over rational economic

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 6>decision making hemmering households, hemmery mums and dads with higher rates,

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 6>causing a collapse in spending and driving the economy backwards.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, the rates decision by the RBA in February and

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>April will put its.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Independence to the test.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>It's thinking reflected through the board minutes will be under

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the spotlight. There's no question Michelle Bullock is under considerable

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>pressure to bring down rates before the election. She's Labour's

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>appointee after all, and there's a lot writing on this

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>rates decision. As far as the Prime Minister is concerned, well,

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>he thinks it could mean the difference between him winning

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>or not. But even if the rates come down and

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi promises life will be more affordable, well, who would

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>believe him this time? He's like the boy who cried Wolf.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>He's lost the trust of voters. Yet Albinizi keeps insisting

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>privately and publicly that he's on track to win government,

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 2>despite the polls clearly trending in Dutton's direction. The Australians

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Chambers wrote that the Prime Minister is immersed in

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>self belief.

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'd call it self delusion.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Like with the Voice, he thought Australians loved him and

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>loved his vision, but they rejected him, and they rejected

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the Voice.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>This election is a repeat.

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Albanesi is insisting that voters really like him, they think

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 2>he's a nice guy, even as they desert him and

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>his weak leadership. In truth, Albanzi has no reason to

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 2>be confident. When he won the election last time, it

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 2>was with one of Labour's worst primary votes in Australian history,

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>despite the chaos of the coalition era, and Labour's appeal

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 2>has only catapulted since then, and Albanzi's his own personal.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Appeal is at its lowest level.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>His net favorability is as low as Scott Morrison's was

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 2>prior to the twenty twenty two election. As the polls show,

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 2>and as we all know anecdotally, the momentum is now

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>in Dutton's favor and he is feeling Peter Dutton cautiously

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>optimistic while acknowledging the hard road ahead.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 4>I am ready for the election. I believe it'll be tough,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 4>It'll be always hard for it, but I do believe

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 4>that we can win and that will be a decision

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 4>for the Austrange people.

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>The election not yet cold, but Dutton is already treating

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 2>this like it's the election campaign, fronting the media every day. Meanwhile,

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>we know alban Ezi has one eye on retirement, his

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 2>wedding to Jody and the cliff top mansion he bought

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 2>with her in Copacabana. Alban Easy was never personally desperate

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 2>to become prime minister. He didn't believe it was his

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>one and only destiny in the same way that other

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>leaders have always believed it was theirs. Alberizi has one

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 2>foot out the door already, and it's why if he

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>does lose the election, it's unlikely he'd fall into a

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>bitter depression like prime ministers past, because the.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Job meant the world to them.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 2>For Albanize, this was an unexpected ascension to the top

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>job for a radical left wing political activist, and our

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>country is the worse for it.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump has met with Israeli Prime minister Benjamin nettan

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Yahoo and Elon Musk as well joined in for a chat.

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 12>The fact that this would be President Trump's first meeting

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 12>with a foreign leader since his inauguration is telling. I

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 12>think it's a testimonial to the strength of the Israeli

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 12>American alliance. It's also a testimonial to the strength of

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 12>our personal friendship.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>It absolutely is their own personal friendship. It's had rocky times,

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>but it's been back on track for a long time now,

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 2>and the strength of the Israel American alliance under Donald Trump,

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that alliance has been returned. America will be a solid

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 2>friend of Israel. This meeting the first foreign leader to

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>meet with Donald Trump, Benjainette Nyau. This is a signal

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of how the US sees Israel. It's a signal of

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>how important that partnership is. And in the next twenty

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>four hours, Trump is expected to sign an executive order

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>withdrawing the United States from the UN Human Rights Council

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 2>and prohibiting future funding for ANRA.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That is leadership.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>There are other ways to ensure funding and aid gets

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 2>to Gaza.

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.119
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't about.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Cutting off eight It's about UNRA as the vehicle for

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it and UNRES links to terrorism are well established. The

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>latest proof is that British Israeli hostage Emily Demari was

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>held captive in UNRA facilities. She was deprived medical care

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>despite two gunshot wounds. She's spoken of how her muss

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 2>is running those UNRA facilities in Gaza and the response

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>from UNRA, oh, there'll be an investigation. Yet another one.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Yet Penny one continues to send tens of millions of

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>your taxpayer dollars to UNRA in a move that is

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 2>now indefensible. It's further proof that she is Australia's worst

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>ever foreign minister. And joining me now to discuss this

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister David Coleman. David, thank you very

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 2>much for your time.

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you are now.

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister, as I just said, this is

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>your first nighttime interview on Sky News. As I just

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>spoke about there. Donald Trump says he will cut off

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>funding to UNRA. What's your view on this? If there

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 2>is a Dutton government, would you do the same.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 9>Yes, we would, Shahi, UNRA should not be funded. Those

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 9>links to October seven were established by the fact that

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 9>nine un employees were terminated for suspicion being involved in

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 9>those hideous evil attacks, It should not be funded. The

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 9>federal government sent sixty million dollars to UNRA, including six

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 9>million dollars since October seven. Now, of course, we all

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 9>want humanitarian aid to get to people who desperately need

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 9>it in Gaza. We all want that, but that cannot

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 9>be through UNRA. It is utterly unacceptable and we would

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 9>not continue you that if we were elected.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>David, what do you think it says about Penny Wong

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and the Albanesi government that they still haven't stopped funding

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>UNRA even after hearing that the hostage Emily de Maari

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>was held captive in UNRA facilities.

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 9>Well Shari that funding should not be going to UNRA.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 9>The United States doesn't provide a funding to UNRA because

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 9>of the extremely grave concerns about its conduct. And if

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 9>Penny Wong or Anthony Albanizi have intelligence or information that

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 9>says that UMRA is an appropriate organization to which to

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 9>provide these funds, they should release it. If they have

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 9>better information than the United States about UNRA, they should

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 9>release it, but they haven't done that. We do, want,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 9>of course, aid to get to the people of Gaza,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 9>but certainly not through UNRA.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there are other methods that we've se spoken

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>about it at length on the show of doing that. Now

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>you've suggested reforming are the United Nations bodies as well?

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Which body is in particular and what needs to be done.

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 9>Also, I think if you go back to first principles

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 9>with the UN, if you look at the first words

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 9>in chapter one of its charter talk about the role

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 9>of the UN is to create peace and security for

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 9>the world. Now, plainly that's not occurring. We're seeing shocking

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 9>violence in the Middle East, We're seeing shocking violence in

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 9>Ukraine and so many other places around the world. So

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 9>it is self evident and logical to say that the

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 9>UN needs to be scrutinized. The UN does need to

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 9>be reformed. Its primary goal of establishing peace and security

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 9>is a very noble goal that I think we could

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 9>all agree with, and that's where its primary focus should be.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 9>So if if we are elected, seeking to ensure that

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 9>the UN does the best job but absolutely can on

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.479
<v Speaker 9>its core responsibility will be a big focus for us.

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So important.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Look, there's also reports from the United States that Donald

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Trump is set to transfer one billion dollars worth of

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>military arms to Israel.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Look, this sort of attitude.

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>That we're seeing from Trump, as I just said, his

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>meeting with Nadi Yaho, the first foreign leader, this couldn't

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>be more different from the hostility we've seen from the

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Albanesi government.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 9>What do you think, Look, I think the conduct of

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 9>the Albanesi government towards Israel has been appalling. To abandon

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 9>a twenty year plus bipartisan position in relation to a

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 9>two state solution and basically to say that Australia is

0:16:53.560 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 9>now supportive of unilateral recognition was outrageous, completely inappropriate. Labor

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 9>and Coalition governments have supported that position for more than

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 9>twenty years. Republicans Democrats alike have supported In the United States,

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 9>President Biden didn't change his position, but Labor did. And

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 9>the worst thing, Shari, the worst thing is this wasn't

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 9>done for some high principle or for some a principle

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 9>of improving the situation in the Middle East. This was

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 9>done by the Labor Party because of votes in a

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 9>few Green's Labor seats. And to abandon such fundamental principles

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 9>for such tawdry, sordid political motives tells you everything you

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.479
<v Speaker 9>need to know about the Albanese government.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it speaks a lot to its lost morality. David Common,

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate your time on this sitting week.

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much.

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Now on New South Wales, Transport Minister Joe Halen has

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 2>resigned and after a string of damaging revelations about her

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 2>use of taxpayer funded vehicles. This included summoning a chauffeur

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 2>to her holiday house to then take her and her

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>friends to a boozy three hour lunch in the Hunter Valley.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>It was a four hundred and forty six kilometer round trip. Now,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Joe Halen refused to resign after journalist Linda Silmalis in

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>The Sunday Telegraph first broke this story on the weekend

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>and Joe Halen arrogantly claimed it was all within the rules.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>She also insisted to the Premiere that this was just

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a one off incident, but it wasn't. Today there was

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 2>news and it was broken as well by the Daily

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Telegraph and Ben Fordham of another trip to a winery

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>last year with her husband, and when it turned out

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 2>that she breached the trust of the Premiere, she had

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>to go.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 10>From the very minute I was appointed a minister I

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 10>have worked my ass off. I've made some mistake. Yes,

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 10>people aren't perfect. I did not break the rules, but

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 10>I acknowledge that that's not the only test here. I've

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 10>let the public down and I'm very sorry for that.

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Joe Halen used to work for Anthony Alberanzi and there

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>was a view that his power as Prime Minister offered

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 2>her some protection as she faced difficulties over the past.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Year in the role.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Now this doesn't reflect well on alban Easy Housing. Minister

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Rose Jackson hasn't resigned either, and she also caught the

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 2>Schaffir driven car on the Australia Day Long weekend. In fact,

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the whole trip was for her fortieth birthday. To discuss

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>let's bring in our panel Farmer, Speaker of the House

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Bronwin Bishop and Liberal Senator Holly Hughes.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you both, Bron.

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 2>When the fact that she thought she didn't have to

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 2>resign when this firse broke, and you know, just the

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 2>arrogance of saying, loh, this is all within the rules,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 2>despite the public outrage, it's incredible.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think the fact of the matter is that

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 13>this was her personal enjoyment. Boothy luncheon in the Hunter Vlley,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 13>something which should have been paid for. Personally, I found

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 13>myself in the position where I used a helicopter to

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 13>go to work. I was a guest speaker at a fundraiser.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 13>The precedent for that was set by Wayne swan keip

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 13>On earlier, who in two thousand and nine spent eight

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 13>thousand dollars taking a charted flight to a Labor Party fundraiser.

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 13>But of course different rules for socialists, different rules for

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 13>everybody else. But when it comes to this instance, it's

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 13>different from all of that. It's difference because this is

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 13>for going to a party and just having a good time,

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 13>and that is totally different. And I think that means

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 13>and his interview on two GBN, in which I did

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 13>listen to, was really scratching to try and find a

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 13>way around it. But of course she hadn't come clean

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 13>with him.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 2>No exactly. And then there were more revelations. Holly chris

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Mens is from the right faction of the Labor Party,

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Joe Helen's from the left, yet she supported him in

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the leadership contest, and perhaps there was that sort of

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>politics playing into it. You know, this is a brilliant

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 2>story my friend don A Cordwell edits a Sunday Telegraph.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 2>She put it on the front page on Sunday. Linda

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Somalis broke it. But you know, if it wasn't for

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>that journalism, these labor politicians are getting away with this

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of misuse of taxpayer funds.

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 14>It's certainly a government of doers. I say, not as

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 14>I do, and we know that's how labor governments act.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 14>They love to get that stout in the trough. And

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 14>as you said, miss Halen or I think she's better

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 14>known as Van Halen now worked for our easy and

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 14>probably learned the benefit of a freebie while she was there.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 14>And you know, to be fair to her as the

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 14>Transport minister, the trains weren't running, so you know, maybe

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 14>this was her only option.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, she probably just didn't want to drive so she

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 2>could drink at the wineries, it was probably, and didn't

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 2>want to pay her for her own car. Now there's

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 2>more bad news in the polls for Albanesi. There's this

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>essential poll in the Guardian which showed that sixty three

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 2>percent of voters think the Prime Minister is out of

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 2>touch with everyday Australians actually surprised it's not higher than

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>sixty three percent, and despite Albanese's effort to attack Peter Dutton,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 2>the opposition leader led the PM on the question of

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 2>decisiveness fifty six percent compared with forty three percent. And

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>then the poll also showed that sixty four percent of

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 2>people agreed that Albanezi changes his opinion depending on who

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 2>he thinks is listening.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Rowan, that's not a surprise, is it.

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 13>No, it's not. I keep saying with him for twenty

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 13>years in that chamber and nobody ever said he was

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 13>a leader, and we just see proof of it every day.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 13>But I thought an interesting part of that survey was

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 13>also that a combination of forty percent of people who

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 13>thought that anti Semitism was a major issue and forty

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 13>three percent thought of minor issue, means eighty eight percent

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 13>of people think it is an issue exactly only thirty

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 13>percent of people didn't, And I think that says a

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 13>lot about why it is a major issue in this campaign.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 13>It is not something that is not relevant to the debate.

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 13>And that decisiveness, which Peter Dutton is showing very much,

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 13>has shown up because of the attitude he's taken on

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 13>this issue exactly.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a question of national security ultimately, which

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 2>does affect all Australians.

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Holly, what's your perception.

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Of you know, it's the start of the last parliamentary

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 2>fortnite before the election. What's your perception of the mood

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>among the government and the Labor senators that you I'll see.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 14>Look, I think what's really interesting, you know with that poll,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 14>is that Australians are looking for someone of conviction. They're

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 14>looking for a politician who actually stands for something and

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 14>they know what they stand for. They might not always agree,

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 14>but they know where they stand with you, and with

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 14>alban Ezi, you know, when you stand for nothing, you'll

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 14>set you know, fall for everything.

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So and I think he.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 14>Demonstrates that regularly. I really do think in the Senate

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 14>we have the same motion today that went to the

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 14>House with regards to anti Semitism. You could see on

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 14>Labor faces how much they didn't want that motion. They

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 14>really don't want to be talking about it. It's something

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 14>that they know they have absolutely abjectally failed in to

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 14>show any leadership and it's led to this escalation of

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 14>events that we've seen. And you can just see they don't.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 14>They don't want to talk about that. They're not quite

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 14>as cocky as they were towards the end of last

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 14>year's So I'm not quite sure you know what they're

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 14>saying in their center party room, but certainly in our

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 14>chamber they're not sort of demonstrating the same cockiness they

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 14>weren't towards the.

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>End of last year. And I'm going to speak about

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 2>those anti seventies emotions with cam Red in a bit

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 2>later in the show. By the way, now let's turn

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to this video of Sam Kerr that came out overnight,

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 2>because it is really quite extraordinary that you you don't

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 2>usually see video like this.

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 15>Here it is did you stay on the phone long

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 15>enough to even speak someone?

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. Okay, but they wouldn't do that.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 15>Though they wouldn't do that, you should have spoken.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>To the.

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 16>Honestly, we have stupid.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 6>And white Okay, so stupid.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 16>I'm over this.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the world problem.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Wait on the call, Wait on the call.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 15>Wait all right, I'll go over at the moment. Then

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 15>at three seventeen, you're under rest of criminal damage because

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 15>there's an allegation that you smashed that taxi window. You're

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 15>also under rest for racial aggravated public order for those

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 15>comments that you've said.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 2>So she was already under arrest when she made those

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>comments brun when stupid and white. And yet there are

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 2>people who are suggesting today that this isn't racism.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 13>Only on the airBC. Everybody else who's quite sensible knows

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 13>that that was a racist thing to say. And to

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 13>suggest that you cannot insult somebody bit in a racist

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 13>way because they're Caucasian or white is just a nonsense.

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 13>And personally, I was just so embarrassed. And so this,

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 13>this woman who'd been lauded, being made famous, made a

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 13>great hero for young girls here.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>In this world model exactly, and here she.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 13>Is using this foul language and behaved in a very

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 13>abusive way. And just thinkcause it's okay, I'm afraid it isn't.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 13>And she's apparently by not being included in the team,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 13>which they're insisting is because of her knee injury two

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 13>years ago. I suspect it might be otherwise.

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 2>It shows though I think it's fascinating wholly. I mean,

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 2>obviously there was damage to the taxi window on various

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 2>other things, but we've seen on the streets of London

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>such horrific anti samitism. Police don't take any action on that,

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 2>but you know they are in this instance. What do

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>you think about that inconsistency?

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 14>Well, I mean, I think we've seen on the streets

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 14>of Sydney all sorts of behavior that in any other

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 14>circumstance police would have acted, particularly to pro Palestinian rallies,

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 14>the use of terrorist organization flags, some of the hate

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 14>speech that we've heard, and there's been no action whatsoever.

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 14>But that video of Sam Kerr, if that's not the

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 14>end of her career with certainly the Matilda's I don't

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 14>think she'll be doing any more Wheetbix commercials anytime. So

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 14>it's just embarrassing as an Australian, it's embarrassing as a woman,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 14>and it's embarrassing to think, as Bromwin said, she was

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 14>held up as a model for young girls.

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, not a good look at all. Right, Brudwyn, Bishop,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Holly Hughes. So great to have you both on tonight.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. Sure, all right, We've still got

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot more to come on the show tonight. Labor

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 2>attacks Dutton's policy of tax deductible business launches, plus why

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the core claim in Antoinette Latouf's case perpetuates a dangerous

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 2>anti Semitic trope about Jews controlling the media. This is

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Aita Butcho's as private emails about Latouf are read in court.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to discuss all of that with Aaron Patrick

0:28:52.000 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 2>after this quick break. Welcome back, We're pro Palestinian activist

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Antoinette Leatouf has now finished giving evidence in the Federal

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Court in her unfair dismissal case against the ABC, and

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>today it was a busy day at court, with the

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>court hearing explosive statements from Ititebacho's I'm going to talk

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>about them in a moment. The court also heard about

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Latouf's self medicating with drinking. Now, this case stems from

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 2>her being let go as a fill in ABC host

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 2>after she shared a post on social media claiming Israel

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 2>was using starvation as a tool of war, simply untrue.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 2>The fact is Antoinette Leatouf is a well known pro

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Palestinian activist who is hostile towards Israel. The ABC should

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 2>never have appointed such an activist as a fill in host.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 2>They should appoint objective journalists, not activists. So the ABC

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 2>has brought all of this on themselves. Now, remember Latouf

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>was one of those who were writing all the stories

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>so called investigation important journalism, claiming that gas the Jews

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 2>was never uttered at the opera House, as if it

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 2>matters because the other phrases were so offensive, like f

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the Jews and where's the Jews?

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Her case right now is taking place against the backdrop

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 2>of horrific anti semitism in Australia. Her case is listed

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 2>for seven days of hearing in the Federal Court. That's

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 2>two days longer than her original contract with the ABC

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>was even meant for. She was only hired for five days.

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>And the cost of all of this isn't a laughing matter.

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Taxpayers are being charged hundreds of thousands of dollars with

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 2>ABC hiring Ian Neil sc Now there's going to be

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 2>no costs either, will that the ABC will be able

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 2>to recover because this is no cost jurisdiction. The Nightly

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 2>is Aaron Patrick Jones me now and been following this

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 2>case in cod Aaron, thank you so much for your time.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Now you write in The Nightly.

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 2>That Latouf's barrister argued she was fired because of the

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 2>demands of a group of people that ABC identified as

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a pro Israel lobby and you write that the implication

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 2>is that a cabal of Jews late in this case

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 2>by a group called Lawyers for Israel, can control the media. Now,

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 2>this theory, as you say, has a long and ugly history.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 2>You write in your article that you know this brings

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>up it reminds us of the old conspiracy theories of

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Jews controlling the media.

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It's so distressing to hear this.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 17>I think, Charie, that we've got to call this out

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 17>when we see it. And I was really struck watching

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 17>the opening address by her lawyers making this case that

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 17>essentially Lawyers for Israel, who were just a bunch of

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 17>Jewish lawyers, that somehow that they could control an organization

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 17>as independent, s fiercely independent as the ABC under someone's

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 17>experienced and toughness chairman Ida Buttro's And it just brought

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 17>to my mind, as you said, just these historical tropes

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 17>that come up again and again, and I was really surprised.

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 17>I was shocked. I was sort of shocked to see

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 17>it coming up in the federal court as the key argument.

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>And you write about the origin of these tropes as well.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 17>No, the anti Semitism, as you know, goes back hundreds

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 17>and hundreds of years, but the media angle of it

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 17>really got sort of currency back in very early nineteen

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 17>hundreds with books which became the basis of Nazi ideology.

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 17>And so the idea that Jews control the media and

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 17>control finance has this long and glorious history. And you know,

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 17>I've worked in the media a long a long time

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 17>for a lot of different organizations, and the whole idea

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 17>that one religious group could control something as sort of

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 17>chaotic as the media just doesn't stand up to real

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 17>world experience. And two, I think really suggests in this case,

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 17>and quite seriously suggest in a court of law, that

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 17>the Jews made the ABC, which is notorious for being sorry,

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 17>which is well known for being of the progressive side

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 17>of politics, that the Jews could force the ABC to

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 17>fire anyone strikes me as sort of echoing this this

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 17>long and bad history of this anti Semitic trope.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 2>If that was the case, John Lyed, John Lyons would

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 2>have been fired from the ABC a long time ago,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that's for sure.

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 2>The toof was never impartial on this topic. She is

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 2>a pro Palestinian activist. You know, she always has been,

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and she signed a petition wanting media outlets to give

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 2>a more you know what she CAUs balanced view on

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 2>the war. You know, the petition was so biased that

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 2>prominent journalists, even those who are antie Israel, ignored it.

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 17>Look, Antonette latoof wants to be pro Palestinian. I don't

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 17>have a problem with that. That's her right, of course,

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 17>and there's plenty of journalists serious or Peter Laylor, this

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 17>great cricketing journalist, lost his lost his commentary job over this.

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 17>But the problem problem is is that if you become

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 17>a journalist, you take it. You know, you agree to

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 17>try and accept that there are two sides to an argument.

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 17>And in this case, in a particular, the petition that

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 17>you spoke about, which was came out of the Journalist Union,

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 17>didn't seek balance. It didn't seek to real acknowledge that

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 17>their arguments on both sides and that there can be

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 17>just wars of retaliation.

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 13>No, it.

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 17>Wanted the media to take a side which was the

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 17>non Israeli side.

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, now the claim, Well, I'll get to the

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Idebacher's emails. One of the emails that emerged in the

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 2>CO proceedings was quite funny.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>She emailed the.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Managing director, David Anderson, saying, I have a whole clutch

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 2>of complaints. Can't she come down with flu or COVID

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>or an upset stomach?

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>We owe nothing.

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 17>What was going on here was this was an organization

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 17>struggling to get through a really uncomfortable situation, which is

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 17>senior leadership has found out they've got someone ideologically biased

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 17>on radio, and so they're trying to essentially deal with

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 17>this in a way that saves them embarrassment, but also

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 17>could have said Antonette latoufe embarrassment and perhaps hurt. Okay,

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 17>and so that to me was actually a really sensible

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 17>way to deal with it. If she had gotten the

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 17>cold and disappeared, she would have her reputation would have

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 17>been preserved too, and Ida Bartros wouldn't have to appear

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 17>in court this week to explain why she said that,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 17>which is going to be pretty awkward for her.

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 16>Yeah.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, the best thing is that ABC should never have

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 2>hired Antoinette in the first place, because it is in

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 2>their charter that they need to be impartial and unbiased,

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and you don't put an activist as a journalist in

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 2>if that's in your Charter. Aaron Patrick, thank you so

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 2>great to have you on the show again in twenty

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>twenty five.

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 17>Good to see again, Terry.

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Now still to come.

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Why doesn't the Albaneze government want to talk about the

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 2>threat from radical Islam? A former senior AFP superintendent will

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 2>join me live. Plus the debate over tax deductible business lunches.

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>That's next after this quick break. Welcome back. We're in

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the final parliamentary fortnite before the election and cost of

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 2>living is the biggest issue, but Albanzi is trying to

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 2>claim everything's all rosy.

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 7>Prime Minister, by what percentage has the cost of food

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 7>increased since the election of the Albanese Labor government.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 5>What we know is that inflation is now at two

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 5>point four percent, not one, but two budget surpases back

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 5>to back surposes. If they had their way, they wouldn't

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 5>be cheaper medicines. If they had their way, it wouldn't

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 5>be cheaper childcare.

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 17>The Prime Minister was asked the question about his promise

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 17>to make Austrains better off.

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 12>That cannot strain to opposition policy or the previous government.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Sky News political reporter cam Redden joines me. Now,

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 2>cam as I've said before, this is the mount everest

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of broken promises and cost of living, and voters know it,

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and Albanesi also knows it. How is this now going

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to play out? How is he going to handle this

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 2>in the campaign?

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 18>I want to give you one statistic, Shary, and it

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 18>comes from the Bureau of Statistics. In addition to all

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 18>the inflation data we get every month and every quarter,

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 18>the Bureau of Stats now records the cost of living

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 18>index is what they call it, and essentially what this does,

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 18>and it records things like insurance and things like mortgage

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 18>repayments and the interest that's paid on that as it's

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 18>gone up, so it actually includes a few more real

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 18>things for working people, and it says is a pretty

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 18>accurate reflection of the cost of living. It's gone up

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 18>since the election seventeen point one percent, so since the

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 18>election to today, that's how much the collective cost of

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 18>living has gone up for workers, people that go out,

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.439
<v Speaker 18>do their job, pay their bills. That's the difference. Now

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 18>we're in this strange political limbo land, if you like,

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 18>where two things are kind of true at once. The

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 18>government can say, look, you look at the headline rate

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 18>of inflation, it has come down, that's true, But the

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 18>Coalition is pointing to the pain that's already in the system, saying,

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 18>look at how much prices have already gone up, and

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 18>from a political sense, they want voters to punish the

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 18>government for that. So really, where we're at now, Shari

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 18>is people have a choice to make. They can decide, well, okay,

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 18>we are better off now numerically in terms of things

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 18>could have been potentially worse. And that's the government's argument.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 18>Look at the recessions around the world. We didn't go

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 18>into that. But the coalition wants to really seize on this, saying, hey,

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 18>you're doing it tough. Look at how tough you've been

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 18>doing it for the last couple of years, and now's

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 18>your chance to make the government pay. So that is

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 18>really the political combat when it comes to cost of living,

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 18>which is by far and away the number one issue

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 18>when it comes to swinging.

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Votes, absolutely, and it's coming up in both the research

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 2>for the Labor Party and the Liberal Party.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And look, politicians need.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Research because they don't get out there enough and talk

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 2>to real people. They think everything's fine. Albo keep saying,

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, everyone's optimistic. No one's optimistic. Now here was

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton in Parliament today attacking the Prime Minister over

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 2>cost of living.

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, the Prime Minister now apologize for promising Australians they

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 4>would be better off and admit that they can't afford

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 4>another three years of this week albanezy Labor government.

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 5>So ways down unemployment low here, that is what has

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 5>been achieved through the hard work of Australians.

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So cam Labour's attack line. You know, they turned a

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of these questions into attacking Peter Dutton's policy to

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 2>allow small businesses to claim business lunches back as tax deductions.

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 2>They attacked Dutton over and over about this. Now what

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 2>was Dutton's response to this? And do you think there

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 2>is pressure on the Coalition over this policy.

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 18>I think there's pressure for them to show their homework

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 18>when it comes to the costing Shari. This is where

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 18>there's a dispute.

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 18>We even reported today were revealed on Sky that Angus Taylor,

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 18>the Shadow Treasurer, has written a fairly pointed note to

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 18>the Secretary of the Treasury Department, Stephen Kennedy. The Shadow

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 18>treasure was ropable that they have gone and costed this policy.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 18>Now the government will say that it has put forward

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 18>a hypothetical policy to go on cost it and see

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 18>how much it would cost the budget, and Treasury has

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 18>come back with a figure as high as ten billion

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 18>dollars a year. The Opposition says no, it's more like

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 18>one hundred and twenty five million dollars. They're citing the

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 18>Parliamentary Budget Office. So you've got two departments essentially coming

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.240
<v Speaker 18>up with different figures, and the Treasurer is really daring

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 18>Angus Taylor and the Coalition to put their costings out there,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 18>which it hasn't yet done. I think, to be honest,

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 18>this is all political bunfighting. Shari, I don't think that

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 18>is a real needle mover. Where it will be interesting, though,

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:30.399
<v Speaker 18>is once we do get to the campaign in what

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 18>the coalition could add in addition to this. This would

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 18>be one measure in theory to get small businesses and

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 18>their workers, maybe help with staff retention, go out and

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 18>put some money into cafes and restaurants, so you can

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 18>see the logic behind that. Will there be more, I

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 18>think is the big question because the one attack line

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 18>the government really has on this is it's the boss

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 18>taking themselves out to lunch that's their argument. What else

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.720
<v Speaker 18>the coalition will flesh out when it comes towards policy

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 18>and other potential tax changes.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that will be key, and.

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 18>Maybe putting out some bigger carrots if you like to dangle,

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 18>rather than just this one at this stage.

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Look putting the policy aside.

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I think what it shows is that Angus Taylor is

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 2>emerging as one of the weakest links or the weakest

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 2>performers on the coalition side. You know, cost of living

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 2>is the biggest issue, and you don't see him often

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 2>doing media interviews. He is not out and about and

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Jim Chalmers you can see that he's vulnerable and so

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 2>they're choosing to attack Angus Taylor. We've got about a

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 2>minute left, Cam, but I want to ask you about

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the anti semitism motions we saw today. Dutton clearly much

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 2>stronger than the Prime Minister on.

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 18>This and where this is becoming a political problem too, Sharry,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 18>is there is a policy difference between the two major parties.

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 18>Because there's been a lot of talk over many weeks

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 18>and months now and the condemnation of these attacks and incidents,

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 18>of course, but there is a genuine policy difference. Now

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 18>we've seen another layer of the coalition's plan for these

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 18>mandatory sentences. That would include, under its proposal, sending some

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 18>people who carry out particular anti semitic refed he acts

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 18>sending them to jail for up to a year or

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 18>at least a year in some cases a mandatory minimum.

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 18>Now there would be details about what would have to

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 18>meet that threshold, but that is part of the suite

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 18>of law changes that the Coalition would seemingly bring in

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:15.879
<v Speaker 18>if it wins the next election. The government not going

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 18>down the mandatory minimum's path, and Shari, I know we're

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 18>so close to an election. So all of this has

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 18>a political implication. It's been put to me by some

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 18>in the Liberal Party that they think this language by

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 18>Peter Dutton, this proposal for tough penalties brings seats like

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 18>Wentworth for example, into play. That it might bring the

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 18>Liberal parties some political gain in areas where these attacks

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 18>have taken place. That's the brute reality of the politics

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 18>of it. But the policy difference is where there's a

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 18>bit of a rub here for voters. I think too.

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that's no question that a lot

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 2>of voters will be supporting it, but I don't think

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 2>That's why Dutton's doing and I think you can tell

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 2>when he speaks he genuinely cares about this issue. Is

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 2>not doing it for the politics.

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:43:57.760 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 2>You can just see that I've spoken to him about

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 2>this issue so many times and there's no question that

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 2>it's genuine Camerand and thank you, really appreciate your time tonight.

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up after the break of former AFP Detective

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 2>superintendent joins me to explain why Albanize's waffle over not

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:19.800
<v Speaker 2>knowing about the caravan with explosives just makes no sense.

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back.

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's bring in now former AFP Detective Superintendent of

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.799
<v Speaker 2>counter Terrorism David Craig. Thank you David for your time. Look,

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister claims he can't answer questions about when

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 2>he found out about the caravan of explosives. He says

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 2>it would compromise an investigation, despite Premier Chrismins happily revealing

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 2>he was briefed on January the twentieth.

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there any accuracy.

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 2>To this claim that it would compromise operational matters?

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 16>Thanks Sherry. Look, I can answer that question coming from

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 16>having been involved with or in charge of Australia's largest

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 16>Cana terrorism investigations, and I can tell you with some

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:07.479
<v Speaker 16>authority that there is no conceivable way that a date

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 16>the Prime Minister was briefed would compromise any cataterrorism investigation.

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.280
<v Speaker 16>The content of that briefing may, but not the data

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 16>of it.

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 2>So he's just hiding behind this because clearly there's a

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.240
<v Speaker 2>problematic answer. Either he wasn't brief as some media reports

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 2>have suggested.

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And if that is the case, do you think it.

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Could possibly because me because the agencies didn't trust him

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 2>with that information.

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 16>I would hope that's not the case, Shari. I certainly

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 16>know that the Sensitive Investigations Overside Board of the AFP,

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 16>which is chaired by Deputy Commissioner. I know a lot

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:48.919
<v Speaker 16>of the people that sit around that board, and they

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 16>would not, in any circumstance have looked at a caravan

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 16>laden with explosives outside Sydney with target addresses in it

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 16>as not worthy of briefing up unless they've been told

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 16>I'm not interested, or it only brief us on particular dates.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 16>This is a very significant matter. The AFP would have

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 16>taken it extremely seriously and I don't know really why

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 16>the Prime Minister would be saying he can't reveal when

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 16>he was breathed.

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Exactly one hundred officers assigned to investigating it now. David

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Albanesi and Penniwang often speak about white supremacists and the

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 2>threat of neo Nazi is a very real threat, but

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 2>you don't often hear them speaking about the threat of

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 2>radical Islam. Why do they ignore one form of anti Semitism?

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 16>As an investigator, Shari is a detective, it's very hard

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 16>for me to answer that with any logic at all. Absolutely,

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 16>the hard right is been a threat to the Jewish community,

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.720
<v Speaker 16>and quite rightly, the government has taken some positive measures

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 16>this week. That's brilliant. But what they need to do

0:46:57.000 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 16>is do the same for the radical Islamic leadleaders that

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 16>are promoting violence in our society. I would like to

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 16>see the same proactive measures taken by this government that

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 16>would promote the effective and proactive work of the police

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 16>to bring those to justice that promote this evil hatred

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 16>of the Jewish people.

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 2>When you have the Prime Minister not taking a strong

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:27.879
<v Speaker 2>enough leadership position on anti Semitism, what message does that

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 2>center law enforcement?

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think?

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 16>Look, I think that there's a visible dichotomy between what

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 16>has happened with the new South Wales Police and the

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 16>strong leadership of Premier Ins He has been forthright and

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 16>saying that he wants to catch the bastards behind this.

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 16>He's given a lot of impetus and a lot of

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 16>higher power to the police for them to undertake their

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:53.800
<v Speaker 16>duties come to the federal side. And we're just seeing,

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 16>as I said the other day, a spineless approach of

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 16>it's okay, it's not such a big matter, and that

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 16>sends a message to the police that well, maybe this

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 16>government's not so interested in this, so we can concentrate

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 16>on other matters. But I can tell you now that

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 16>there is no bigger matter to deal with now than

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 16>anti semitism in Australia, and it's escalation. It is escalating,

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 16>and it will end up with a loss of life

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 16>if we don't do something to arrest it.

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent. That's what we need to prevent. That's

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 2>why we're fighting so hard against this. David Craig, really

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.720
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your time. Thank you everyone for your company tonight.

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you tomorrow at eight. And here's Paul Murray