Speaker 1: I'm the Skyinging Center. This is Paul Murray Live. OHI
Speaker 1: thank you very much for watching this Wednesday. What a
Speaker 1: show I've got for you tonight. The pettiness of Albo
Speaker 1: is on display every day, but today in particular in
Speaker 1: Parliament it's fight night when it comes to debate time.
Speaker 1: Stephen Conroy, Bromwin Bishop and the best in the business,
Speaker 1: the wonderful Megan Kelly joins us from the United States.
Speaker 1: But first, something that is rare. Let us begin with
Speaker 1: some good news. Now, as we know, September the first
Speaker 1: means the end of winter. But there's a chance. According
Speaker 1: to Bureau, and they always get it right, don't they,
Speaker 1: that next week is going to be a lot warmer
Speaker 1: than it traditionally is some hot August nights. As Neil
Speaker 1: Diamond once Sang will be on their way next week.
Speaker 1: Bring it on. You know that Super Cuty, the teenage
Speaker 1: Australian who won gold at the Olympic Games. And after
Speaker 1: winning gold at the Olympic Games in skateboarding, all she
Speaker 1: wanted was a duck.
Speaker 2: You have to ask for my parents if I like one,
Speaker 2: was if I could get a pet duck, because duck's
Speaker 2: a really cute, and I really wanted a pet duck.
Speaker 1: Well, thanks to the good people, the breakfast team of
Speaker 1: the entire radio station of Triple Him on the Gold
Speaker 1: Coast today she got a duck. Oh you want a duck.
Speaker 3: So we thought you'll bring you some ducks.
Speaker 4: Holy duck, there's more duck.
Speaker 5: Now we know you're not allowed to keep a duck
Speaker 5: right now because you're about to head on bods, No.
Speaker 6: One of these you're putting the overhead locker.
Speaker 1: Why did you want to duck?
Speaker 2: Because I've been wanting one since I was like really
Speaker 2: younger and then they're really cute and I just love animals.
Speaker 1: I told you it was good news. My thoughts are
Speaker 1: with who have has to clean that studio? Well, anyway, congratulations.
Speaker 1: The third bit of good news is Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: bouncing back. There's lots of different bits of data, but
Speaker 1: there's also a pep in this step. Let me explain now,
Speaker 1: as we all know, we love the dancing Donald, but
Speaker 1: the dancing Donald hasn't been around for a little while.
Speaker 1: You know, getting shot at might slightly change you. But
Speaker 1: as you know, the Democratic National Committee is taking place
Speaker 1: as we speak. A giant advertorial, a giant yawn a giant. Yeah,
Speaker 1: guess what surprise surprise. Barack Obama says, hopes back, and
Speaker 1: Michelle Obama says, Trump's racist blah blah blah. But frankly,
Speaker 1: this thing has really I mean, these people are now
Speaker 1: so arrogant, so arrogant that they think they're going to
Speaker 1: slam dunk this thing that they're now basically doing I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: dick jokes and making references that they hope that the
Speaker 1: Republican vice presidential candidate someone in his family gets raped.
Speaker 1: This weird obsession with crowd sizes Jennie Vance calls pregnancy
Speaker 1: resulting from rape inconvenient.
Speaker 3: Inconvenience is traffic.
Speaker 4: I mean, it is me to go through this.
Speaker 1: These people are sick. What the suggestion that his wife
Speaker 1: or his kids or somebody is just that's as low
Speaker 1: as they are, right. Oh, but they're the compassionate people,
Speaker 1: the joyful people, the freedom people, the people who are
Speaker 1: all United police. These are dirty players like anyone else
Speaker 1: in politics, but this particular generation of people running the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party as dirty as they have ever been. Remember,
Speaker 1: they were ruthless enough to get rid of a president,
Speaker 1: not because he was melting before all of our eyes,
Speaker 1: but because he wasn't going to win and power is
Speaker 1: more important than principle, despite the fact that, of course
Speaker 1: they always say principle is more important. But also for
Speaker 1: the media, it's an opportunity for them to basically hang
Speaker 1: with their mates. This is a home game. This is
Speaker 1: then covering their favorite football team going into a Grand final.
Speaker 7: The Democrats should be congratulated for this night.
Speaker 1: It was well produced. It's done the impossible every time
Speaker 1: because he's been great every time and then finds a
Speaker 1: way to be great again. That's different. It's one of
Speaker 1: the best conventions and speeches I've ever seen by anybody
Speaker 1: in any circumstance. Yawn. But guess what. The numbers don't lie,
Speaker 1: and fewer people are watching this one than the last
Speaker 1: time because of course, COVID meant they had to keep
Speaker 1: Joe in the basement, which meant no convention in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: So with let's compare it to twenty sixteen, twenty million
Speaker 1: watch on the first night, great cool, thirty something minion
Speaker 1: watch a football game, thirty something medi inm watch the Olympics.
Speaker 1: So it's a good number. It's not amazing, but it
Speaker 1: is down. It's DOWND by almost a quarter when Hillary
Speaker 1: was the absolute golden child of presidential politics. But talking
Speaker 1: about the low road, and I'll get to the good news,
Speaker 1: but the low road that these people take on their
Speaker 1: way to saying vote for us because we're better people.
Speaker 1: In one of the many hype videos about how evil
Speaker 1: and ugabuger Donald Trump is, there was this reference to
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. Jeffrey Epstein. Oh, there you go. Did you
Speaker 1: miss it? Just a little clip? Oh, there he was.
Speaker 1: He was associated with Jeffrey Epstein. And remember evil, awful
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. Well, what I find particularly despicable about this
Speaker 1: is that if any proximity to Jeffrey Epstein, knowing or
Speaker 1: unknowing to the other behaviors happening in Jeffrey Epstein's life
Speaker 1: is a reason why someone should certainly not be the president,
Speaker 1: but certainly gets put into the bad person category. Could
Speaker 1: somebody explain to me how a bloke who didn't just
Speaker 1: fly on Jeffrey Epstein's plane the low lead to express
Speaker 1: but according to people who worked there, he went to
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's Ireland. Bill Clinton is going to be the
Speaker 1: major speaker in the next twenty four hours. It is
Speaker 1: a disgrace what they forgive when it comes to this bloke.
Speaker 1: Meghan Kelly on that and a lot more in a set.
Speaker 8: To me, this is so stupid, especially when you have
Speaker 8: Kamala Harris running on. I know the sexual predator type.
Speaker 8: Trust me, when I see Donald Trump, I've dealt with
Speaker 8: his tape before. You're having his type speak at your
Speaker 8: convention on Wednesday night.
Speaker 1: Seeing its sister, Seeing its sister, It is amazing the
Speaker 1: free passes that they give themselves while turning around and
Speaker 1: plant claiming that the people who have done far less
Speaker 1: than they have done are of course the evil, awful deplorables,
Speaker 1: et cetera, etc. So what did I say today? The
Speaker 1: third part of the good news was what's happening in
Speaker 1: and around Trump? Now, Yes, we meet here in the
Speaker 1: middle of August. There are many weeks, many months before
Speaker 1: the presidential election formally takes place. The first Tuesday in
Speaker 1: November will be in the United States when that takes place. Well,
Speaker 1: it's because the old Trump seems to be back, the
Speaker 1: one that's very quick on his feet. You see, while
Speaker 1: they were doing the dick jokes today at the Democratic
Speaker 1: National Committee, he was going to places to talk about
Speaker 1: law and order because for a huge number of Americans
Speaker 1: it's the number one issue. It's certainly something that has
Speaker 1: gotten worse under Democrat control, as governors or people like
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris try to bail people out after getting involved
Speaker 1: in riots. But what is amazing is how they tried
Speaker 1: to make it seem like this wasn't an event about
Speaker 1: law and order, it was an event about white supremacy.
Speaker 1: The Reuters News agency was the one who decided to
Speaker 1: run with this that Trump pushes tough on crime agenda
Speaker 1: with town with historic links to white extremism. The suggestion
Speaker 1: that Howell in Michigan, which way back when had some connection,
Speaker 1: if not was very significant connection to the KKK. That
Speaker 1: there's a secret message being sent through the television. So
Speaker 1: somebody decided to ask Donald Trump about this very thing,
Speaker 1: and Donald had perhaps the best answer he has had
Speaker 1: all year, and spiking the ball right back down the
Speaker 1: throat of the regime media that are trying to pretend
Speaker 1: that an announcement about law and order is secretly about
Speaker 1: the KKK. This was brilliant.
Speaker 2: Thank you for.
Speaker 9: This who was here in twenty twenty one, Thank.
Speaker 1: You, Thank you everybody, that's what we want. Boom. But
Speaker 1: that's not just the only reason why those of us
Speaker 1: would like to see Trump win Harris lose. Are feeling
Speaker 1: a little better tonight than maybe even twenty four hours ago.
Speaker 1: Who knows what will be in a week's time. I
Speaker 1: know there are plenty of people on the incidet who
Speaker 1: sort of take the little thing and say, see they
Speaker 1: were wrong on this. No middle of August. Who knows
Speaker 1: what's happening tomorrow, But tonight, according to the bookies, Trump
Speaker 1: used to be way up in terms of the chance
Speaker 1: of winning the presidency when it was Biden, and then
Speaker 1: he went well, way down, but certainly under fifty percent. Well,
Speaker 1: apparently what Kamala Harris is being embraced by all and sundry.
Speaker 1: Guess what is happening. The money is moving Trump's way
Speaker 1: now again, anything below say fifty five or above fifty
Speaker 1: five is a coin toss, But the coin toss at
Speaker 1: this stage tonight would fall Trump's way. Now, this is
Speaker 1: extraordinary because I went looking for hang on, well, what's
Speaker 1: the evidence here? Did you? Some Republican billionaire put a
Speaker 1: lot of money on to try to change the odds,
Speaker 1: to change the narrative people do that stuff. Well, actually,
Speaker 1: let's say let's have a look at the key states
Speaker 1: that matter, those swing states. Now, remember, essentially, for Trump
Speaker 1: to win, he's got a win Pennsylvania, He's got a
Speaker 1: win Georgia, he's got to win Arizona. It'd be nice
Speaker 1: to have Nevada. Now, the most recent five poles in
Speaker 1: the state of Pennsylvania, they go from Harris having a
Speaker 1: big lead to Trump having a little lead and holding it.
Speaker 1: But that's multiple poles in a row, all taken last weekend.
Speaker 1: What about in Georgia were either it was a tie,
Speaker 1: Harris a little bit up, Trump a lot up, back
Speaker 1: to a tie, and then the lefty New York Times
Speaker 1: pole says that Trump is back way up in Arizona.
Speaker 1: When Harris had just taken over there, it was a
Speaker 1: little lead for her at two points, but then Trump
Speaker 1: up by three, up three, and yes, not up by much,
Speaker 1: but still up by one in Arizona. So Nevada again,
Speaker 1: all of these poles since the change of candidate. It
Speaker 1: was Harris up by two, but then it was Trump
Speaker 1: by three, Trump by three, and then Trump by one.
Speaker 1: So again we are where we are tonight right now,
Speaker 1: sitting together on the twenty first of August Australian Eastern
Speaker 1: Standard time. But the bookies say that he is a
Speaker 1: slight favorite to win the pole. Show how he could
Speaker 1: do it. His attitude today in front of the reporters
Speaker 1: was the guy who people fell in love with in
Speaker 1: Siek and thought so hard for in twenty twenty. But
Speaker 1: there may be a huge boost which is bigger than
Speaker 1: the money and bigger than the polls. Rfk Jor originally
Speaker 1: a lifelong Democrat who at one point tried to take
Speaker 1: on Joe Biden, but essentially they, according to him, rigged
Speaker 1: the primary, so he was pushed aside. He ended up
Speaker 1: running as an independent. He's had great difficulties getting onto
Speaker 1: as many state ballots as possible. The Democrats to this
Speaker 1: very minute are trying to sue to get him off.
Speaker 1: But his vice presidential pick did a podcast in the
Speaker 1: past twenty four hours and she's now saying we have
Speaker 1: two options. One we stay in the race Harris could win,
Speaker 1: or we get out and we backed Trump and we
Speaker 1: beat Harris.
Speaker 10: There's two options that we're looking at, and one is
Speaker 10: staying in forming that new party, but we run the
Speaker 10: risk of a Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris and Waltz presidency
Speaker 10: because we draw votes from Trump, or we draw some
Speaker 10: how more votes from Trump, or we walk away right
Speaker 10: now and join forces with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Now without boring him and showing you too much of
Speaker 1: the detail. When Biden was the candidate, basically two thirds
Speaker 1: of the support for Kennedy was Democrats. When there was
Speaker 1: a change to Harris, most of those people started to
Speaker 1: go back towards the Democrats, and that's how she got
Speaker 1: into a position of being slightly above, slightly below, but
Speaker 1: basically back where the generic Team Blue was. So currently
Speaker 1: Kennedy has about again two thirds of support that traditionally
Speaker 1: would come from Trump, one third left from the Democrats.
Speaker 1: So in races that are down to one or two points,
Speaker 1: five points up for grab in Arizona, four in Georgia,
Speaker 1: six in Michigan, five in Nevada, four in North Carolina,
Speaker 1: if it followed that sixty forty split, it would put
Speaker 1: Trump not just a little in the lead, but way
Speaker 1: back in the lead. Not as full on as he
Speaker 1: was when it was Biden, but we would be back
Speaker 1: to a race where Trump was in front and it
Speaker 1: was still Trump's to lose as opposed to what we
Speaker 1: are being told day in, day out, narrative, narrative, narrative
Speaker 1: because hardcore Democrats all decided to meet in one room
Speaker 1: for four days, that that's three hundred million Americans. It ain't.
Speaker 1: And while fewer people may be watching it on television,
Speaker 1: plenty of other people will be watching it online. But
Speaker 1: those people too, by their millions, watching Trump doing interviews
Speaker 1: all over the place, and they are waiting potentially to
Speaker 1: see Robert Kennedy give them the green light to back Trump.
Speaker 1: If that's the case, it's not just game on. Trump's
Speaker 1: back in the lead. But it is the middle of August.
Speaker 1: We will all wait and see what happens. Megan Kelly
Speaker 1: in a few minutes time back here though, Oh the Teals, look,
Speaker 1: spare me the teal tears. Okay, now you may well
Speaker 1: have seen in the past twenty four hours, Treaty Macintosh
Speaker 1: from our Canbe Bureau went and had a look at
Speaker 1: how often the Teals end up voting with the Greens
Speaker 1: in the Parliament. Unsurprisingly, for a lot of them, it's
Speaker 1: a lot of the time.
Speaker 5: Your voting record is those Tom's pointed out sixty six
Speaker 5: percent on coalition motions Labor fifty two, Greens thirty. It
Speaker 5: was quite different than some of the other cross benches.
Speaker 5: Sophi Scomps, she was the highest amongst teals voting with
Speaker 5: the Greens motions.
Speaker 1: And you see, with the exception of Rebecca Sharky, who
Speaker 1: is not a teal, the rest of them were in
Speaker 1: the high fifties or the low sixties, or even some
Speaker 1: in the mid sixties. So when that story was out
Speaker 1: and about to stop it from being able to be
Speaker 1: yet another truth about the cashed up Greens who pretend
Speaker 1: to be former Liberals despite the factor by their own
Speaker 1: admission they very rarely, if ever, have voted for the
Speaker 1: Liberal Party in the past few years, that they are
Speaker 1: the place for the disaffected Liberals to come. It's just
Speaker 1: new face on the Greens, another option on the left. Well,
Speaker 1: today the tears were out and about trying to change
Speaker 1: the subject from their voting record, and much of the
Speaker 1: media help them do this because they were out and
Speaker 1: about talking about just how tough and terrible parliament is,
Speaker 1: about how awful and evil and adversarial and yelly and
Speaker 1: code blokey Parliament is.
Speaker 6: Mister Dutton recently name calling labeling denigrating words in the
Speaker 6: media is unacceptable.
Speaker 4: To call colleagues idiots is unacceptable.
Speaker 6: I'm told I need to toughen up.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty tough.
Speaker 6: And as others have said, some who have been in
Speaker 6: this place too long, who I think have lost touch
Speaker 6: with what is acceptable behavior outside this place, and think
Speaker 6: that because you describe this place as a bubble, somehow
Speaker 6: it condones a different standed of behavior.
Speaker 1: It doesn't please. This passive aggressive garbage works because there
Speaker 1: are plenty of people inside the media who want politics
Speaker 1: to look a lot more like the Teals than it
Speaker 1: currently does with the Liberal Party or the Labor Party
Speaker 1: or anyone else. But the reality is that Australia does
Speaker 1: not think like the Teals all right, It just doesn't
Speaker 1: now the parts of Australia that they represent, well, we
Speaker 1: know that pretty much they line up and most likely
Speaker 1: will back them at the next federal election. But for
Speaker 1: the extreme majority of Australians who do not live in
Speaker 1: those parts of Australia, we have a different view of
Speaker 1: their new cool brand of politics, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: when they want to, it's okay if they yell in
Speaker 1: the Parliament or they abuse people in the parliament.
Speaker 3: Put your masks on from repeated infection. Order we hurt
Speaker 3: you in silence.
Speaker 6: You can hear me in silence.
Speaker 1: Order stop being racing. Seriously, Jane him who's doing her
Speaker 1: best to try to take on the Teals, particularly in Victoria.
Speaker 1: They'll be hard to move because they they are of
Speaker 1: the left. Much of Victoria increasingly, certainly the wealthier bits
Speaker 1: is of the left. She calls it exactly as I do,
Speaker 1: which is this is a stunt. This is garbage, and
Speaker 1: I'll give you the proof of why it's garbage.
Speaker 11: Next, we should make sure that this is one safe
Speaker 11: space where you can have as robust debate as you need,
Speaker 11: because that's what the country deserves. This sounds to me
Speaker 11: like a political stunt, potentially done for electoral convenience because
Speaker 11: the Teals have run out of an agenda.
Speaker 1: Good work, Love you, l J. But the real reason
Speaker 1: they ended up talking about this today, apart from changing
Speaker 1: the subject on how they're actually voting and whom they
Speaker 1: are voting within the Parliament, is that the government is
Speaker 1: already addressing parliamentary behavior. In fact, they have introduced a
Speaker 1: piece of legislation to the Parliament this week about the
Speaker 1: standards of Parliament. So they're either trying to pretend that
Speaker 1: because of us they've brought this legislation in, or they're
Speaker 1: trying to pretend here's the problem, and then magically we
Speaker 1: get to own the solution. Federal MPs could be fined
Speaker 1: up to five percent of their salary and kicked off
Speaker 1: powerful parliamentary committees and even suspended from Parliament on new
Speaker 1: laws to be introduced by the federal government. These codes
Speaker 1: set out expectations for behavior, including requirements to foster respectful
Speaker 1: and inclusive workplaces and a prohibition on bullying, harassment, sexual harassment,
Speaker 1: and assault and discrimination. Okay, fine, no one has a
Speaker 1: problem with any of that. Now. This is of course,
Speaker 1: not about what happens in question time, not about what
Speaker 1: happens in parliamentary debate. It's about what happens behind the scenes,
Speaker 1: what happens in the offices. And of course, as we
Speaker 1: have shown you, while the left and dominant and narrative
Speaker 1: and access medias would all like to pretend it's, oh,
Speaker 1: it's all one party with a problem, there was, of course,
Speaker 1: at the very height of all things to do with
Speaker 1: what was happening behind the scenes in parliament. A couple
Speaker 1: of years ago, a bunch of brave women I think
Speaker 1: it was fifty five of them who came forward to
Speaker 1: talk about the culture ins either Labor party.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 1: Of course, no one lost their job, no one followed up,
Speaker 1: There was no special four corners investigation on all of this.
Speaker 1: But if the laws had been put in place the
Speaker 1: governor is now wanting for the workplace, there would be many,
Speaker 1: many current and former labor MPs that may will find
Speaker 1: themselves on the wrong side of this. I have to
Speaker 1: say current or former, because we've never been told whether
Speaker 1: the fifty five staffers were talking about people who are
Speaker 1: in the Parliament now or formerly, how high in the
Speaker 1: ranks or how lowly in the backbenches. But remember they
Speaker 1: said this. He is a man who punches the wall
Speaker 1: next to a female staffer's head, calling her when she
Speaker 1: passes news on that he doesn't want to hear. He
Speaker 1: is a man who calls his female colleague a pig
Speaker 1: dog when she disagrees with him, and says in front
Speaker 1: of all of the staff, that's why no one wants
Speaker 1: to He is a married man who plied a young
Speaker 1: woman with drinks until she had no idea what was happening.
Speaker 1: He promised others at the gathering that he would get
Speaker 1: her home safely, but before putting her into a cab,
Speaker 1: he had sex with her with no ability to consent. Now,
Speaker 1: isn't it interesting that the Teals, of course, want to
Speaker 1: pretend for all of the reasons, which is, we exist
Speaker 1: because we are what the Liberal Party could and should be,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that generally speaking, most of their voters
Speaker 1: of people have never voted Liberal in their life. Zally Stagger,
Speaker 1: by her own admission, had said that she had not
Speaker 1: voted Liberal in all the time that she had been
Speaker 1: in the electorate, which meant she didn't even vote for
Speaker 1: Malcolm Turnbull when she had the opportunity. Well, of course,
Speaker 1: the only way they get into Parliament is with the
Speaker 1: preferences of Greens and Labor. You see, if you actually
Speaker 1: have a look, there are some of the Teals which
Speaker 1: have a primary vote which is in the forties. Those
Speaker 1: people are, in terms of the results, people who have
Speaker 1: got a strong claim to being somebody who truly represents
Speaker 1: a movement in their electorate. Otherwise it's a maths game.
Speaker 1: Now the seat of North City is about to disappeared.
Speaker 1: Only a quarter of people actually voted for the Teal
Speaker 1: less than thirty percent, for the one in Western Australia
Speaker 1: just over a third of people in the seat of
Speaker 1: Goldstein and in Wentworth again just over a third. So
Speaker 1: they will take the preferences of the people whose former staffers,
Speaker 1: fifty five of which have listed all of their behavior.
Speaker 1: They stay in a media cycle by pretending that it's
Speaker 1: only a Liberal Party problem because there is a media
Speaker 1: that wants to push that narrative. Why because the Liberal
Speaker 1: Party has a problem with women. Why do they want
Speaker 1: to push that narrative right now? Because in the two
Speaker 1: party preferred right now in the polls, more women are
Speaker 1: backing the Liberal Party than the Labor Party. Olbo has
Speaker 1: been all over the place for the past couple of
Speaker 1: weeks in parliament. Now I don't know what he assumed
Speaker 1: this two weeks was going to be about. But Australians well,
Speaker 1: so many have had enough. It's no surprise that I've
Speaker 1: never had stocked for this bloke. And now, according to
Speaker 1: the resolved political monitor in the City Morning Herald, the Age,
Speaker 1: Brisbane Times, all the other nine years papers, fifty one
Speaker 1: percent of Australian So the Prime Minister's performance is poor
Speaker 1: or very poor. Only a third of the country says
Speaker 1: good or very good. Perfect example about how this Prime
Speaker 1: Minister gets things wrong but also likes to rub the
Speaker 1: noses in it of the people who dare stand in
Speaker 1: his way was an event last night in Canberra, a
Speaker 1: black tie event allegedly in support in terms of the
Speaker 1: Prime Minister's attendance of the agriculture We decided to make
Speaker 1: a joke making reference to a decision that his own
Speaker 1: government had made that is going to bankrupt people in agriculture,
Speaker 1: particularly in Western Australia. I'm talking, of course about the
Speaker 1: ban on live exports, huge issue in Western Australia, so
Speaker 1: much so that even the Teal in Western Australia who
Speaker 1: was for it is now against it. Western Australian farmers
Speaker 1: are mighty pissed. And remember this is a government which
Speaker 1: is staring down the barrel of a minority government. And
Speaker 1: if they're able to move a lot of seats in
Speaker 1: Western Australia, they're going to need an awful lot of
Speaker 1: people on the cross bench to stay in power. The
Speaker 1: farmers have promised they are going to fight and fight
Speaker 1: like Helen as well they should, so understandably, there were
Speaker 1: people who were deeply offended by a Prime minister who
Speaker 1: stood up in front of some of them just last
Speaker 1: night and made a joke that rubbed their nose in
Speaker 1: their businesses being canceled.
Speaker 12: When we had been a beautiful Australian beef. Are not
Speaker 12: the live expert. We've made sure it.
Speaker 1: Was dead, Yeah, we made sure it was Yeah. We know.
Speaker 1: We saw the vote and the farmers are fired up
Speaker 1: and even the teal who was for it is now
Speaker 1: against it. There is a great fear about what politically
Speaker 1: this is going to mean in Western Australia watch this space.
Speaker 1: But he's there in the little bubble, protected by so
Speaker 1: many others who think doesn't matter, mate, no matter what happens,
Speaker 1: you'll still be the PM. Sure to be a minority government,
Speaker 1: but don't worry. Lives no chance, lives no path. Well,
Speaker 1: of course in question time this bloke is nowhere to
Speaker 1: be seen on the fundamental issues right now about the
Speaker 1: vetting that goes into the types of people that come
Speaker 1: into the country and from where they come. Question of
Speaker 1: the question of the question, clear answer after answer after answer.
Speaker 1: P week, Will the Prime ministers admit that this visa
Speaker 1: for Volte scheme was only done to shore up votes
Speaker 1: in the seats of Watson, McMahon and Black. Slam It
Speaker 1: doesn't this go to his true character?
Speaker 7: Mister, Why is Australia heading our tourist visits to gardens
Speaker 7: from the terrace controlled warzone in an average of twenty
Speaker 7: four hours and in some cases as quickly as one hour,
Speaker 7: while bypassing all the usual checks, including those the former
Speaker 7: coalition government used in Syria? Will the Prime mister admit
Speaker 7: that the government's visa for vote scheme was only done
Speaker 7: the shore up boats and the seats of Watson, McMahon
Speaker 7: and Blacks.
Speaker 1: This arrogant, clueless, weak and rattled Prime Minister is now
Speaker 1: breaking glass in case of emergency. Like all governments when
Speaker 1: they have no defense, he trots out exactly what they
Speaker 1: always trot.
Speaker 12: Out under visited versus from when they were in government,
Speaker 12: as the previous government did under the previous government.
Speaker 1: Oh, we won't talk about our responsibility, our systems, our choices.
Speaker 1: Let's find a way to pretend that somehow it's the
Speaker 1: Liberal Party's fault. What's happening right now?
Speaker 12: And Mark Riley is also report on Channel seven that
Speaker 12: Hamas didn't take over the occupied Palestinian territories in the
Speaker 12: Gaza Strip since October seven. They are actually there beforehand
Speaker 12: when those opposite were granting eight thousand a thousand visitor
Speaker 12: visas from people from the occupied Palestinian territories.
Speaker 1: The arrogance of this bloke always on display and again
Speaker 1: trying to pretend nothing to see here when there's plenty
Speaker 1: to see here in what Australian sea they don't like,
Speaker 1: No wonder fifty one percent of the country very poor
Speaker 1: when it.
Speaker 3: Comes to that bloke.
Speaker 1: As we foreshadowed last night, it did big decisions about
Speaker 1: to be made when it comes to aged care, where
Speaker 1: more people are going to have to pay more of
Speaker 1: their own money, principally to stay in their own home.
Speaker 1: When it comes to home care, all yes to go
Speaker 1: into aage care facilities. Excellent reporting which has been done
Speaker 1: in the Financial Review over many months here is worth
Speaker 1: referring to. With Philip Koree in particular. Remember he told
Speaker 1: you that this was due to come in January, then
Speaker 1: got delayed. Well, he's got some of the details of
Speaker 1: the negotiations happening inside the Financial Review. Was revealed that
Speaker 1: one of the proposals put to the Opposition during their
Speaker 1: negotiations was to lift the lifetime contributions cap for residential
Speaker 1: care from the current level of seventy six to one
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety thousand. So the most you'd have to
Speaker 1: pay seventy six thousand, and well that would go up
Speaker 1: to one hundred and ninety thousand. The cap would be
Speaker 1: abolished all together for home care, meaning there would be
Speaker 1: no limit on how much you may have to pay
Speaker 1: to try to stay in your home. And remember half
Speaker 1: of four people with access to age care receive it
Speaker 1: in the home via the home option. The Coalition balked
Speaker 1: at the idea. It's understood the government has wound some
Speaker 1: of these changes back significantly to secure a deal, but
Speaker 1: we don't know what that number is. We don't know
Speaker 1: who this applies to. Watch and see huge story developing
Speaker 1: as we speak right now in Camber. Don't be distracted
Speaker 1: by there or anyone else's bs. Another thing this week
Speaker 1: has been again the government making curious decisions, but we
Speaker 1: all know why they're making certain decisions. There was a
Speaker 1: gold mine which was due to start in New South Wales,
Speaker 1: but of course the discovery of sacred sites in and
Speaker 1: around this area meant that of course it was knocked
Speaker 1: on the head. But a site that is almost ten
Speaker 1: times the size of this has been approved. But I
Speaker 1: don't understand how when the map that is currently in
Speaker 1: the Museum of Australia that shows us the indigenous nations
Speaker 1: all prior to why arrival seventeen seventy would suggest that
Speaker 1: there's not a part of the country that does not
Speaker 1: have some sort of emotional or sacred connection. But if
Speaker 1: you want to put solar panels on land, that will
Speaker 1: be the best part of what ten times more, well,
Speaker 1: that's completely okay by this government. If you want to
Speaker 1: have a gold mine and part of the gold mine
Speaker 1: may have some disruption to part of the water flow
Speaker 1: and are not acceptable if it has too many cables
Speaker 1: connected to it. Not acceptable if you want to put
Speaker 1: a giant solar farm in the middle of the Northern Territory,
Speaker 1: because that's what a bidin there is asking you to do.
Speaker 1: Guess what, Dick. The development of the area of the
Speaker 1: Nissawa's mind was about eleven hundred hectares, it's eleven kilometers
Speaker 1: and that was significant aboriginal area. But the sun cable
Speaker 1: twelve thousand hectare or one hundred and twenty kilometer solar
Speaker 1: farm apparently will not disturb any cultural so do we
Speaker 1: have to look at the map again. There is a
Speaker 1: lot to get to, including MP's behavior, teal tears, and
Speaker 1: what's going on in America. Lots to get to. Fight
Speaker 1: Night begins next with Bromin, Bishop and Stephen Conroy. Then
Speaker 1: Megan Kelly, I'm glad you're watching. Don't go anywhere. You're
Speaker 1: gonna love Tonight show? All right, Fight Night, Wednesday Night.
Speaker 1: Let's get just to night. You took your distance back.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. Let's get into it right now. Carry
Speaker 1: over Champ as always is Bromwin, Bishop and in the
Speaker 1: other court and other than the man who's just here
Speaker 1: to help, which is why he's in Canberra trying to
Speaker 1: write their best gags he can for Anthony Alberanezi at
Speaker 1: agricultural events is none other than the onond of all
Speaker 1: Stephen Conroy. So let's get into the visa fight here
Speaker 1: where Bromwin, it is amazing that the government is on
Speaker 1: the stickiest of sticky paper here. It is by their
Speaker 1: own actions they have not found the way to pivot
Speaker 1: like we have talked about in the parts a week
Speaker 1: or so where the Libs have been able to get
Speaker 1: one hundred percent about vetting instead. Literally today in question
Speaker 1: time it was all I know you are, but what
Speaker 1: am I?
Speaker 13: Unfortunately, what is happening here is that Albanezi and his ministers,
Speaker 13: who are under threat at risk, are prepared to sacrifice
Speaker 13: the strata's security and proper vetting for votes and that
Speaker 13: is despicable, quite frankly.
Speaker 1: So we're in a scenario where what's the number, but
Speaker 1: the seven thousand have been rejected but the government accepted,
Speaker 1: well that's it. But the government tries to turn around
Speaker 1: and say, oh, that process works. But as they admitted today,
Speaker 1: the process that is playing out is hardly the highest
Speaker 1: possible bar to get people into the country.
Speaker 13: They don't want the HASSLVA. They want the quickest way
Speaker 13: they can get in there to meet the demands of
Speaker 13: the leaders of the Muslim vote movement so that they
Speaker 13: can and hopefully get their second preferences. I guess where
Speaker 13: they're running candidates or not to run and them.
Speaker 1: Because Stephen, the issue is is that even if you
Speaker 1: would disagree with every word that Robin has just said,
Speaker 1: Australia is taking a seemingly disproportionate number of people from
Speaker 1: guards are compared to other countries. Now, there are reasons
Speaker 1: why the Arab League has made the decisions it has
Speaker 1: about the countries in and around, but in terms of
Speaker 1: places like Spain, the UK, the US, our number is
Speaker 1: way higher and it feels like the government is on
Speaker 1: the stickiest of sticky paper. Why can't they get off it?
Speaker 14: Well, firstly, not surprising. I don't agree with any of
Speaker 14: the quite frankly wildly rabid suggestions logical.
Speaker 3: There's nothing logical.
Speaker 14: Contribution, you have no facts, you have no acts to
Speaker 14: support a.
Speaker 1: Single We've seen in the Parliament every day.
Speaker 3: Rabbit opinion, your rabbit opinion. So just to move on
Speaker 3: for a.
Speaker 1: So why can't they get conversation help?
Speaker 14: Look, they've been the government have wanted to and I
Speaker 14: think firstly, Peter up and I think has correctly just
Speaker 14: slightly walked back when he addressed his room meeting this week.
Speaker 14: So I think that was the correct decision. You and
Speaker 14: I talked about that last week. So I think he's
Speaker 14: taken away the major boneus contention around where he went.
Speaker 14: Now we're down a question of the visa processing and
Speaker 14: whether or not the government have been too fast. So
Speaker 14: the government have rightly said we are prepared to take
Speaker 14: some refugees. We're not taking tens of thousands were I've
Speaker 14: not been critical of the size or the lack of size.
Speaker 14: I'm not passing judgment on that, but they've made the decision.
Speaker 3: There are some citizens who of Gaza who should be.
Speaker 14: Able to come to Australia, and now part of the
Speaker 14: exit process is that they seek the government seeks advice
Speaker 14: from the Israeli government, and nobody gets through without the
Speaker 14: Israeli government, and their process is giving some advice to
Speaker 14: our government because by definition we're not on the ground,
Speaker 14: so we turn to the people who perhaps would know
Speaker 14: the best, which is the Israeli government. So the people
Speaker 14: that have made it through some of the process have
Speaker 14: also made it through an Israeli government.
Speaker 1: Vet. But what the fashion that you just have, because
Speaker 1: again it feels like they don't want to say something
Speaker 1: around this.
Speaker 3: Well, look, I.
Speaker 14: Haven't watched Question Time today, I haven't seen where where
Speaker 14: the debate moved to.
Speaker 3: But those are just the facts.
Speaker 14: This idea that's been put forward by the coalition that
Speaker 14: purely and simply they're.
Speaker 3: Just opening the door letting them all in.
Speaker 14: Well, firstly, quite I think the majority haven't even made
Speaker 14: it into the country. Some have correctly been rejected, and
Speaker 14: I think that was at seven thousand, the number that
Speaker 14: you said seven thousand have been rejected.
Speaker 3: So this is not some free for all. There is
Speaker 3: a betting process.
Speaker 13: That was admitted today Paul, that much of it is automated.
Speaker 1: It's not correct, it's not it's not the.
Speaker 13: Traditional proper vetting that has gone on historically. And basically
Speaker 13: they've been given tourist visas not to come and look
Speaker 13: at thee the Opera house unless it was to look
Speaker 13: at the place where the riots took place.
Speaker 1: Well, and and the government's own admission is because that's
Speaker 1: a faster process, but that's not a tourist visa is.
Speaker 13: Not in Australia.
Speaker 1: Is interesting, correct.
Speaker 13: So the reason is you're asking why are they're on
Speaker 13: the sticky PA is because there's a cover up going on.
Speaker 13: Percent there's stuff they simply don't either admit to or
Speaker 13: disclosed it.
Speaker 1: Well, because Stephen to me again, right, if the Prime
Speaker 1: Minister believes that everything that is being done is the
Speaker 1: right thing to do, give a speech, walk out in
Speaker 1: front of a press conference and go all right, here's
Speaker 1: how this works everyone. Let me explain the process. All right,
Speaker 1: here's the flow chart from here to here to here
Speaker 1: to here to hear. None of that's a state secret because,
Speaker 1: as you say, some of that information being shared with
Speaker 1: with other countries, other processes. Then turning around and say,
Speaker 1: by the way, about a meeting with this bloke, that bloke,
Speaker 1: that person to work out how to make sure that
Speaker 1: it's the safest process possible. But he's not doing that,
Speaker 1: and that's because he's surrounded by a bunch of people,
Speaker 1: including the people that report on this, who are all saying, mate,
Speaker 1: it's just it's only a Sky News primetime thing. No
Speaker 1: normal person seeing this. You and I both know plenty
Speaker 1: of normal people. Plenty of normal people see this one.
Speaker 11: No.
Speaker 14: I mean this is This is an issue which has
Speaker 14: caused Labor in the past significant electoral damage, and so
Speaker 14: finding the best way through is what Labor is attempting
Speaker 14: at the moment now. As you know, Paul, in the past,
Speaker 14: I've been very critical of key officials who work inside
Speaker 14: Home Affairs and immigration, and my understanding is this will
Speaker 14: quite a shock, is they haven't actually known the answer
Speaker 14: to a range of these questions. So one of the
Speaker 14: dangers if you're a politician, is if the Department gives
Speaker 14: you wrong or partially correct or accidentally wrong.
Speaker 3: Information, and it can be any of the above.
Speaker 14: And the Minister goes out and gives a sort of
Speaker 14: speech that you're given Well, the consequences because of the
Speaker 14: Department has given you incorrect information are quite severe for
Speaker 14: the minister.
Speaker 13: Are you and really suggesting the department setting him up?
Speaker 3: Saying the Department don't.
Speaker 1: Come off it. They should be able to know.
Speaker 14: Perhaps you didn't know, Paul, I repeat my understanding from
Speaker 14: behind the scenes is the Department haven't known all these answers,
Speaker 14: and so it is very dangerous to mislead Parliament and
Speaker 14: it is very.
Speaker 1: Way happen. Yeah, all right, Okay, there's other stuff and
Speaker 1: it's I'm not shutting it off, so please don't send
Speaker 1: me that complain emails. I just want to get to
Speaker 1: other stuff as well on top of this before we
Speaker 1: get to meet and Kelly, we just happen to have
Speaker 1: a former Speaker of the House here, We happen to
Speaker 1: have a significant combatant from the labor side when it
Speaker 1: comes to the Senate, right, the MP behavior stuff trying
Speaker 1: to essentially make an MP responsible for everything that happens
Speaker 1: inside their office because to some degree they are a
Speaker 1: boss of all of those people, yet they don't necessarily
Speaker 1: employ them because it's the finance to part up all
Speaker 1: of this stuff. We know it's going to happen here.
Speaker 1: I for the Libs vote against us, then they're voting
Speaker 1: for the horrible thing, so most likely they're going to
Speaker 1: wigh this thing through. How do you think this works
Speaker 1: in practice? Because if somebody complains to the person who
Speaker 1: doesn't actually about the behavior of the person who doesn't
Speaker 1: actually pay them, and it's a one judge panel, that's
Speaker 1: most likely going to find on the side of the
Speaker 1: complainert and you end up with a red card career
Speaker 1: over right.
Speaker 13: Well, it's very curious, I think to combine members and
Speaker 13: senators together with non members and senators in the same organization.
Speaker 13: There is the Privileges Act, and it's a very serious
Speaker 13: privileges process is a very serious process, and that's where
Speaker 13: if a complaint is made, it's up to the presiding
Speaker 13: officer in whichever chamber to make a decision as to
Speaker 13: whether there's a primer facy case to refer it to
Speaker 13: the Privileges Committee. And individuals have the right to submit
Speaker 13: to the Privileges Committee as well. This proposal talks about
Speaker 13: three commissioners or semi commissioners or something who will make
Speaker 13: a decision and then they will report members or Senators,
Speaker 13: as I understand it, to the Privileges Committee, which then
Speaker 13: in a sense take to why the presiding officers role
Speaker 13: it currently exists. Now, it's important to know that the
Speaker 13: Parliament is the master of its own destiny and for
Speaker 13: that not to be the case means that you don't
Speaker 13: get full and free exchange of ideas.
Speaker 1: Yes, so I.
Speaker 13: Think to see how it's going to work in practice,
Speaker 13: I'm not really very sure at all, but no doubt
Speaker 13: there'll be some debate about it. Now the Jenkins Report
Speaker 13: has to be taken seriously, yes, And at the moment
Speaker 13: if someone makes a complaint, they make it to Finance
Speaker 13: and they put up a case as to why they
Speaker 13: should get compensation, and lots of people have well.
Speaker 1: And also under the Jenkins reforms, in many, if not
Speaker 1: all workplaces, it's two years retrospective and you're able to
Speaker 1: bring something up within two years or whatever the incident
Speaker 1: was in a place like Parliament House where there's going
Speaker 1: to be a lot of people moving around, and a
Speaker 1: lot of different reasons why people sometimes want to go
Speaker 1: after people. I'm fascinated about just how this is going
Speaker 1: to work against Stephen. We want a safe, responsible workplace.
Speaker 1: I'm not finding some sort of dog whistle for you know,
Speaker 1: let's go back to the eighties here, But it feels
Speaker 1: like what the intention may be, which way will be
Speaker 1: fine and good and great, But this is a place
Speaker 1: where when the consequences are for whatever reason, you end
Speaker 1: up having some sort of emotional bust up with the staffer,
Speaker 1: and then the staffer within two years of leaving your office,
Speaker 1: turns around and says, oh, I used to throw this,
Speaker 1: that and the other, and as soon as you get
Speaker 1: a red card, you're done. You're gone.
Speaker 14: Look, I think that you're correct for Jenkins report, and
Speaker 14: Bromwin was correct. Needs to be taken very seriously. There
Speaker 14: is no easy solution to this. I think I'm not
Speaker 14: as convinced as Bromwin, having not been a presiding officer,
Speaker 14: that the decision rests with should rest with the presiding officer.
Speaker 14: I'm more come or with the process being proposed. I'm
Speaker 14: very concerned about the vexatiousness question, but there's one aspect.
Speaker 3: It's often lost because of the House of Reps.
Speaker 14: Is not often in very close to a minority governed,
Speaker 14: or one vote difference. In the Senate, many many votes
Speaker 14: are decided by what one vote. Many pieces of legislations
Speaker 14: decided by one vote. The idea that you can suspend
Speaker 14: somebody can easily be weaponized along the way, and so.
Speaker 3: I'm uncomfortable with that aspect.
Speaker 14: The fines, the penalties, no problem, but the removing an
Speaker 14: elected representative from the parliament is actually concerning when it
Speaker 14: comes to legislative outcomes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, one hundred percent, guys appreciate it. Fascinating to how
Speaker 1: the chet Let's have another one next week. Looking forward
Speaker 1: to it. All, right, but we need to talk about
Speaker 1: with Megan Kelly straight up to the brakes. She's very fine,
Speaker 1: up to right, very fine. The Democratic National advertorial is
Speaker 1: taking place in Chicago right now. A person who, like
Speaker 1: the rest of us, is rolling her eyes but has
Speaker 1: to pay attention because that's kind of the job. Wonderful
Speaker 1: making Kelly in the United States rockstar. How but let's
Speaker 1: talk about what's happening outside of the venue. Because the
Speaker 1: protesters addressed as either abortion pills, or people who say
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden and Kamala Harrison killers and should.
Speaker 3: Go to hill.
Speaker 8: So it's just your average Democratic national convention where you
Speaker 8: could kill your baby or kill your balls with a
Speaker 8: visectomy in like a to go truck, you could you
Speaker 8: could swing by the days of rage Palestinian protesters who
Speaker 8: are promising to entice the police into fighting so badly
Speaker 8: that they wind up with bruises as they're back to
Speaker 8: school outfits, so they're having themselves a normal one. So
Speaker 8: far inside the arena, we have Joe Biden telling us
Speaker 8: he's not angry at all.
Speaker 4: Angry, and so all of his.
Speaker 8: Body language and tone suggests that he's a very angry man.
Speaker 8: And we know why they shoved him out of this role.
Speaker 8: I would have done it myself if I had been
Speaker 8: a Democrat. I did not think he could do it
Speaker 8: four more years. I don't blame them for shoving him out,
Speaker 8: but he was shoved out, and now they want to
Speaker 8: pretend that it was voluntary. And you have crazy, crazy
Speaker 8: Nancy Pelosi with her Joe biden Stein gooed Joe.
Speaker 4: Meanwhile, she was one of suck the knife and twisted it.
Speaker 8: There's no person more responsible for asking him than Nancy,
Speaker 8: But she wants us to believe she's totally teamed Joe
Speaker 8: and she praised every night.
Speaker 4: Their relationship is still in tech. The whole thing is.
Speaker 8: Just debauchery and fraud. That's what I've seen so far,
Speaker 8: just the celebration of killing babies in the womb. And
Speaker 8: this is again not a pro choice, pro life comment.
Speaker 8: It's if you pro choice, that's fine, but you shouldn't
Speaker 8: be out there celebrating the murder of your child.
Speaker 4: Killing of your child.
Speaker 8: At least normal people know abortion is at least the
Speaker 8: ending of a potential life.
Speaker 4: To be very charitable to the pro choice side, to
Speaker 4: be out there.
Speaker 8: Celebrating its dressed up what's nest like, dressed up like
Speaker 8: a little scalpel and walk down like with the little remains.
Speaker 8: I mean, it's just in such bad taste to be
Speaker 8: marching around Chicago as an abortion pill. And they want
Speaker 8: us to believe that they're the pro family party. So
Speaker 8: we're going to celebrate abortions, and we're going to celebrate vasectomies,
Speaker 8: and then we're going to swing by the Palestinian protesters
Speaker 8: who are throwing bloody shoes in the faces of Joe
Speaker 8: Biden and Kamala Harris pictures. So I don't know what
Speaker 8: they're really trying to telegraph other than very extreme.
Speaker 1: What's your sense about where the protests go? Because my
Speaker 1: thought was that if it was the issue, that that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden would be sort of the not where they
Speaker 1: were most angry, because this was the person who's in
Speaker 1: office right now. But do you think that they are
Speaker 1: going to ramp it up and some of the knots
Speaker 1: that was on display in day one by that final
Speaker 1: die because they clearly want the nine and sixty eight moment.
Speaker 1: I want the moment, as you say, to get into
Speaker 1: the fought with police to remind people, hey, you know,
Speaker 1: done full for the donefold full of the lawns, stay angry.
Speaker 1: Do you think that they'll remind what I currently owe?
Speaker 1: There is a die of crazy coming this week.
Speaker 8: Well, we heard that they were going to go at
Speaker 8: it their hardest the first night, and the fourth night,
Speaker 8: the night that Joe Biden was speaking, and then the
Speaker 8: night that Kamala Harris is speaking. And if last night
Speaker 8: is any indicator, eh, yeah, really not a news story. Yeah,
Speaker 8: slightly annoying. You didn't really like make a lot of
Speaker 8: news headlines. Not that I'm looking for them too, I'm
Speaker 8: just saying this was their promise, then it didn't really happen.
Speaker 8: And honestly, like the mayor of Chicago is a far
Speaker 8: left socialist, but my money is usually on the Chicago PD.
Speaker 4: I lived in Chicago for five years.
Speaker 8: The Chicago p D does not f around, and I
Speaker 8: would be shocked if they were not able to handle
Speaker 8: this influx of protesters who have been there for quite
Speaker 8: some time. I was just in Chicago last October and
Speaker 8: they were out there. Then this is post the Israel responds,
Speaker 8: I mean the attack on Israel and then the Israeli response,
Speaker 8: and they were all over the place and the Chicago
Speaker 8: PD had them well in hand. So if they managed
Speaker 8: to escalate to the point where they lose control, you know,
Speaker 8: law enforcement, I'd be shocked.
Speaker 1: Now, you know, the all of these parties when they
Speaker 1: have their conventions, we all know that it's not really
Speaker 1: about anything serious. It's just about the fields, the vibe,
Speaker 1: and we know that the vibe has got them to
Speaker 1: a place where maybe they're winning. But on the issues
Speaker 1: which remained, things like the economy, in immigration that ain't
Speaker 1: budging no matter what has happened with the froth and
Speaker 1: bubble of it all, and she made a massive strategic
Speaker 1: mistake on Friday when she came out with what was
Speaker 1: allegedly economic policy. But you know, the establishment people of
Speaker 1: the New York Times and the Washington Post went, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is garbage. Let alone people who know even more
Speaker 1: about it, who say yeah, this is garbage. And then
Speaker 1: in one of the you know, I think grand total
Speaker 1: of ten minutes where she's been off the teleprompter, she says,
Speaker 1: ord'll the store pay for itself. I reckon that if
Speaker 1: people were sitting and waiting for the wobble of who
Speaker 1: has she changed from what she was, we have seen no.
Speaker 1: And in the period of time after the advertorial to
Speaker 1: the debate, she's in a world of trouble when it's
Speaker 1: talking about the number one issue.
Speaker 4: The economy.
Speaker 8: Right, she got panned from the left and the right
Speaker 8: on what was universally cried as gimmicks, a gimmicky speech
Speaker 8: on Friday about how she, with the hand of the
Speaker 8: federal government, is going to single handedly change.
Speaker 4: Prices at the grocery store.
Speaker 8: Meanwhile, the grocers generally have a one percent profit margin.
Speaker 8: How is she going to stop them? From their price
Speaker 8: gouging make them operate at a loss. That's not what's
Speaker 8: going to happen. Her infletion is what's caused increased prices
Speaker 8: at the grocery store and the gas pump.
Speaker 4: And she's trying to dodge.
Speaker 8: It by saying it's these evil, corporate, greedy people who
Speaker 8: are trying to exploit the poor working class. That's not
Speaker 8: what happened. They spent too much The Fed printed too
Speaker 8: much money, and they drove up the cash influx in
Speaker 8: the economy, which leads to Inflation's that's what we're dealing
Speaker 8: with over here. And she can blame it on the evil, corporate,
Speaker 8: greedy people all she wants, but there's only so much
Speaker 8: she could clip the wings of the grocers without making
Speaker 8: groceries disappear.
Speaker 4: Lovely, Not to talk to you, all right, See next week.