WEBVTT - Rick Morton on Bill Shorten’s NDIS overhaul

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>From Schwarz Media. I'm Ashlin McGee.

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 2>This is seven am. There are two things to know

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>about the National Disability Insurance Scheme. The first is that

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>it makes such a huge difference to so many lives,

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>and the second is that it's wildly expensive and getting

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 2>more so every year. So how to reconcile those two things. Well,

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the government is trying to do just that with a

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>new piece of legislation that's been shrouded in secrecy for months.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Today the Saturday Paper is.

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Rick Morton on the holes in that legislation and why

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>could hand the Disability Agency extraordinary new powers.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's Wednesday, June five.

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Rick.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>The NDAs is one of the biggest schemes we've ever

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>had in this country. Can I ask you first about

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>this state of the INDAS today?

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it is an extraordinary scheme and there's

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>nothing like it anywhere else in the world where the

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 3>first jurisdiction to kind of come up with an insurance

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 3>model for people with profound and severe disabilities who need

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 3>support living their lives. It's not welfare. It's a scheme

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to actually, you know, give them support workers, help them

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>get out of the house, purchase new wheelchairs, therapy, things

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>like that. And it's a little over a decade old now,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 3>it began in twenty thirteen, and it's had a few

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 3>teething problems. I think it's fair to say. And certainly

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 3>one of the elements that has been the kind of

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.639
<v Speaker 3>lightning rod for every discussion has been that it's growing

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>massively in.

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Cost is the ABC can reveal forecasts will show the

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 4>cost of the NDS rivaling that of Medicare within three years,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 4>more than thirty billion dollars annually.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Expect that.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>And then, of course, when you've got a big bucket

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>of government money, you've got dodgy contractors, dodgy providers.

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 5>Wroughters are on notice. For too long they've been using

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 5>the NDS to line their own pockets while people living

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 5>with the disability and their carers are short changed.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>That's the backdrop to wear we're at now. And so

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>by the time Bill Shorton gets into government with Albanesi

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 3>as Prime Minister, it's his second time around as a minister,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 3>he is fully of the view that there needs to

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>be reformed.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 6>The National Disability Insurance Scheme is here to stay. It

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 6>is not going away. But and this is important, we

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 6>don't need to get it back on track.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>It's not completely beyond redemption, but it needs to get

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 3>back to the original focus of what the Indians is

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>meant to be, which is kind of like really good

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>thorough support for the five hundred six hundred thousand people

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 3>most in need out of a population of about four

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 3>million people who have some form of disability.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 6>In Australia, the NDAs has changed lives of hundreds of

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 6>thousands of Australias of disability and their families.

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 3>And the NDOS review was finally released in the first

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 3>week of December last year. However, since the NBAS Review,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the government went a little bit quiet. They hadn't actually

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 3>responded to the NBAS Review, and then all of a

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>sudden in March, the Minister for the NBAS Bill shortened

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of surprises disability advocates when he gets up in

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Parliament and introduces legislation that amends quite significantly the National

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Disability Insurance Scheme with the promise of allowing disabled people

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 3>co design and consultation on the finer aspects of it.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 7>Down the track, first reading a Bill for an Act

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 7>to Amend the National Disability Insurance Scheme at twenty thirteen

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 7>and for related purposes.

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm called the Honorable Minister.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Nobody had seen the bill at this point. Those who

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 3>had half an hour earlier were forced to sign non

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>disclosure agreements. But of course Shorten gets up into the

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>House Representatives to talk about all of this, and he

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 3>essentially says, you know, we need to make the NDO

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>secure for future generations. We need to make it safer

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 3>for people who use NDA support services.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 6>And I can respect nervousness which might be caused by

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 6>this discussion. I just want to reassure these people who've

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 6>battled hard to create an Indie Eyes and to get

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 6>their packages of support, we will work with you to

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 6>make sure that people are getting the right support in.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>The right way.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 6>Under this government, this scheme will continue to grow.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 3>And so I've been talking to people as I've been

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>getting their heads around there, but particularly you know, disability

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 3>advocates who are involved in the Participant Reference Group on

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the National Disability Insurance Scheme but also National Disability Legal Services,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and they've got some pretty significant concerns right.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>So as people are getting to spend a bit more

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 2>time with the legislation and get into a bit more

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>of that detail. What kinds of things are they discovering there.

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the main issue is that a they're worried

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 3>about why we're doing the legislation right this second, because

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>what it does is kind of sets in concrete a

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of new powers for the government and the National

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 3>de Disability Insurance Agency which runs the NDAs. A really

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>good example of that is this new needs assessment. It's

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 3>a new way for the agency to issue orders, to

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>get reports and an assessment based on a tool that

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 3>we don't know what it is yet. We don't know

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>who's going to administer that tool, so it's some kind

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>of it's not a medical assessment, but similar to if

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>you're doing it like an ADHD diagnosis test or an

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>autism test, but it's something for all disability which doesn't

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 3>really exist. And importantly, what this new legislation does is

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of says that we're going to come up with

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 3>a budget, an NBA support budget, based on an outcome

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>of that needs assessment, but we don't know any of

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 3>that detail. Now. This particularly concerns people because it does

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 3>have some kind of eerie similarities to a twenty twenty

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>one push from then coalition government to introduce mandatory what

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>they called independent assessments. So essentially they said, well, you

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>can't use your treating doctor or you're treating therapist anymore.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get government appointed independent asscesses to tell

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 3>us what your functional need is and they're going to

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 3>tell the NDAA how much support you need. The concern

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 3>here is that the drafting here is so bad that

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 3>there are a bunch of perhaps unintended consequences where the

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 3>needs assessment doesn't look like it can be reviewed if

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 3>someone gets it wrong. And of course the bill was

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 3>almost immediately referred once they got to the Senate to

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the Community Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry. And then when

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 3>you get to the Villamante Disability Legal Service submission, and

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>they again they represent clients who are kind of fighting

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 3>the National Disability Insurance Scheme, their submission is one of

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the most daming that I've ever read in any inquiry.

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 3>They eventually go on to say that this kind of

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 3>needs assessment model that has been introduced in this legislation

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>and the way in which it seems to tie automatically

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 3>into a budget tool decision. Villamanta said that if this

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>were to get up, this would be the NDAs equivalent

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 3>of robodet in the sense that we're talking about automated

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 3>decision making based on inputs that aren't really controlled or

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>reviewable by unknown needs assessors and you don't really have

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 3>much say in the matter.

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Rick, We've just talked about how there was this big

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 2>review into the NDIS, but just to clarify, this legislation

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 2>isn't a response to that review.

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>This is separate.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, the review gave twenty six recommendations, and this legislation

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>focuses on giving the government and the NDAA more power

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 3>and all of the good stuff, quote unquote. It's not

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>here yet, it's promised, it's not delivered, and now we're

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>being promised again that that's going to happen and that

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>we just have to wait for it. But this bill

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 3>has come first. And that's the key issue that a

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of people have with this at this current point

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 3>in time, which is like why are we doing this now?

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think a really good example of that is

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 3>that there is this discussion about primary and secondary disabilities.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 3>I won't go into the full background, but currently under

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the NDIS, they've been quite inconsistently with the current law

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>giving people access to the NDIS and then deciding what

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 3>funding they will get based only on a primary disability.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>So if you're someone with a spinal cord injury who

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 3>also has a serious psychosocial mental health disability, they might

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 3>say your spinal cord injury is your only disability, and

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 3>they just ignore the secondary ones because to them, they're like, well,

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>we gave you access under spinal cord, so we're going

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>to give you some support workers to help you feed yourself,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>get dressed, shower, all those sort of things, but we're

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.559
<v Speaker 3>not going to help you with any of the social

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 3>anxiety when you have outings or something like that. Now,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>that's not what they're saying in public, like even in

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the Parliament when Bill short And got up to talk

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 3>about it, he says, your needs assessment will look at

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 3>your support needs as a whole, and we won't distinguish

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>between primary and secondary disabilities any longer. But the bill

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>explicitly and repeatedly states that only impairments for which a

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 3>person meets the criteria should be assessed, which means if

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 3>you've got a lower level disability that wouldn't otherwise get

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 3>you in the NBAS. In addition to a quote unquote

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>primary disability. It's just not forming part of the assessment

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>under the way this bill is currently drafted. So when

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>you take all these things together, the changes that are

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 3>posed in the new legislation create what some people are

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 3>saying is is kind of like stunning new matrix of

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 3>uncertainty that disabled people or their cares or family or

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 3>guardians will be expected to navigate, and it explicitly ties

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 3>failure to do that to increased punishment or consequences if

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 3>you get it wrong.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>After the break, focus on debts and compliance and what

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>that could mean for people on the ndis Rick, You're

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>someone who spent years of your life covering Robodeat, and

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure your ears prick up at any kind of

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 2>legislation that talks about retrieving debts. What do we know

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 2>about the powers in this legislation to pursue debts in

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the system.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 3>This is the stuff that kind of really gets my

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 3>spider sense tingling these days, because I've got a long memory.

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>And so when I was covering this in twenty twenty one,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 3>I received in the coalition at the time, Stewart Robert

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>and then Linda Reynolds were trying to get this new

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 3>legislation up and fall through independent assessments. The minister denies

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 3>there's been a lack of consultation. He says independent assessments

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 3>are part of the scheme's original design.

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 6>Now is the time to do the last piece of

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 6>the build. We're now on the second trial of independent assessments,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 6>will continue to engage draw.

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 3>I received a leaked copy of the internal drafting of

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 3>the new legislation at the time under the coalition, and

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I had all the NBIA agency directors and branch managers

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 3>commenting on what they wanted and how it was going

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 3>to work. And one of the people commenting on that

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 3>was one of the architects internally of ROBODEBT, and they

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 3>were very enthusiastic at the time about trying to get

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 3>up an explicit link. In fact, this is one of

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 3>their comments that the debt that the agency was raising

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>was against the disabled person, not against the third party provider,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>because that's too hard for them to get back again

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to the person receiving the NDA support money. And then

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.599
<v Speaker 3>later on they kind of go further by saying my

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 3>reading of this is that it provides a clear legislative

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 3>basis for stopping future payments until we have received previously

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>requested information and documentation. That was a separate section where

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 3>there was a new information gathering power which we've seen

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 3>resurrected under this new bill. So there's a new power

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 3>under this legislation that Bill Shorton's put before the Parliament

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that allows the CEO to demand any information that they

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 3>see fit literally anything if they're making a decision about

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 3>revoking someone's access. And so taken together, you know you've

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 3>got the ability to raise debts against people. You've got

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 3>the ability to demand information from people and then revoke

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 3>their access to the scheme which has never existed in

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 3>that form in the NDAs before. And you've got these

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>sections from twenty twenty one which were essentially a wish

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 3>list from the agency, which they never got at the

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>time because the opposition led by Bill Shorten, not led

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 3>by but the campaign was led by him as the

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 3>opposition spokesman on NDIS matters.

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 6>For the past eight years, we've seen a successive Liberal

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 6>governments have continuously gone low when Australians are demanding the

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 6>high road for people with disability. We cannot forget that

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 6>this is the government who will legally forced thousands of Australians,

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 6>many of whom were extremely disadvantaged, to repay back money

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 6>they never owed in the robodebt scandal. There's been colossal

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 6>wistmanagement of the NDIS at the very top, and it's

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 6>people of disabilities who are being required to pay for

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 6>the mistakes of others.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 3>They killed that reform and they killed independent assessments, and

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 3>of course now we're seeing some elements of that reform

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 3>back on the table.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 2>You've been talking to a whole lot of people right

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>across the disability sector about what this new legislation would

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>mean for them if it passes. Can you talk me

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 2>through what it would mean for someone who is on

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a care package? Play me out a hypothetical.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 3>This is pretty easy to do, actually, because we already

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 3>see some pretty dodgy behavior from the agency now. So

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're a person at a disability and you've got

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 3>an NDAs funding package and they've given you under the

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 3>new legislation, they've given you. Some of it is stated support,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 3>whether you have to spend it on certain things, so

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 3>it's like you have to spend it on an ot

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>therapist or a speech pathologist. But then some of it's

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 3>flexible where it's like, well, you know, we've given you

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>a you know, let's say ten thousand dollars that you

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 3>can spend on things that are important for your disability

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 3>that help you function in the world. Now, if at

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 3>a later date you've spent five thousand dollars of that

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>on respite, and because the respite brochure includes other things

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 3>like horse riding or something like that, and the agency decides, well,

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 3>actually that's not appropriate, even though they haven't done the

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 3>full investigation into what you spent the money on that

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>was not an approved NDA support. You need to pay

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>that money back. So they're raising a debt against you

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 3>even though you have already paid for the service. And

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 3>so you don't have that five thousand dollars anymore. And

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you made that decision in perfectly good faith. Suddenly this

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 3>compliance measure clause money back from you. If they don't

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 3>want to raise it dead against you, they can decide that, actually,

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 3>you're not capable of managing your own plan anymore, and

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 3>they've got to make it agency managed. So they're going

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 3>to restrict your choice in control. I don't want to

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>be alarmist, but it's almost like a casualist debit card

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>in that sense for NDS support plans if they think

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 3>you've done the wrong thing. Now, Bill Shorten and the

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Department of Social Services have come back to me on

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 3>this and said, no, no, no, we sort assurances it

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 3>will only ever be used in extreme cases, particularly around fraud,

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 3>which is what they're really worried about, and people spending

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 3>money on the wrong things, and no one argues that

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you shouldn't do something about that. But the problem is,

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 3>as it's been put to me by legal academics and

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 3>legal aid people, is that the legislation doesn't say that

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 3>it gives the power hole US bowlers to the agency.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 3>So really what we're talking about here is that if

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>this law gets passed and in the future, the CEO says, hey,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>we need you to give us all of your medical

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 3>history and also every time you've ever visited a certain

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 3>type of clinic, and if you don't, we're going to

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 3>turn off your support package or kick you off the

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 3>scheme altogether. And you know, let's say you've got a massive,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 3>profound cognitive impairment, or you don't have family around you

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and you don't respond to that request, or you can't

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 3>get those documents within ninety days. It's quite likely or

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 3>possible that you can get kicked off the scheme or

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>lose your funding and support and you've got nothing. People

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 3>have been crushed by the bureaucracy and we've seen it

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 3>happen time and time again within the existing infrastructure.

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>So what's Bill Shorten had to say about all of this, Well, you.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Know, he says there's no where EGO involved in this,

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 3>so he's kind of foreshadowed that there's going to be

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of different amendments still coming to this legislation. Now.

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Bill Shorton says that you know, never in the history

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 3>of modern Australia has a government done more work with

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 3>disabled people, more consultation with disabled people to come up

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>with a way to help support them. Shorten a lot

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 3>of his legacy is tied to the NBAS and now

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that he's the minister years down the track, there is

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>so much writing on this moment, this legislation, this reform

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 3>in terms of how we see the rest of that legacy.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Player Rick, we've been talking about how much the NDIES

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 2>costs and how much it's projected to growing cost and

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of course that's why the government is promising some kind

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 2>of reform. I think that sort of everyone agrees that

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>has to happen. So if we're talking about a context

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>of cost savings, what's wrong with focusing on compliance?

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the problem with compliance and I think

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Robott is the extreme version of this, right, But the

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 3>problem with compliance in general is that it's really actually

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 3>quite expensive, but also the cost to people is extremely

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 3>harmful when it's weaponized and change needed to happen. But

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 3>my concern had always been that it's going to be

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 3>people on the NDAs who were promised something who are

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 3>going to have that ripped away. And the fear is

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 3>what happens after Bill shorten, what happens with the next government,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>what happens when compliance becomes the easy way to get

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>money back. When you start to see fraud and roughting

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 3>and compliance issues, suddenly everything looks like fraud and roughting

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and compliance issues, when really what you're looking at it's

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 3>compliance brain. People thought everyone in Robodett were criminals, and

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 3>when you get compliance brain, you see them wherever you go.

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 3>And the NDIS is a place where you can't afford

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 3>to get that wrong, because they're talking about people who

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 3>are already fighting this kind of crazy bureaucracy. And constantly

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 3>being told that they're a burden on the system when

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 3>they just want to live lives and contribute to society.

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's what the NDIAS has allowed them to do.

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 3>When it works well for people, it works so well.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 3>And when it doesn't, it's typically because people don't have

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the capacity in their own lives to fight for themselves.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>And this is certainly what disabili advocates worried about, is like,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 3>you know, talk is cheap, and we've got a culture problem.

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 3>And now we've got this legislation before we've got all

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the other stuff that we were promised. What's going to

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 3>happen down the track?

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Rick, Thanks so much of your time.

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 3>Thanks that.

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Also in the news today, Defense Minister Richard Miles is

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 2>announced a timeline for allowing non Australian citizens to serve

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 2>in the Australian military. Miles said that as part of

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 2>a plan to grow the number of recruits new Zealanders

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>have been residents for more than twelve months, we'll be

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>able to serve from July this year, followed by Americans,

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Canadians and UK citizens from January next year. And the

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales government says it's concerned by an indigenous

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 2>hip hop artist song being played in schools. The song,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 2>by rapper and activist Birds, is written from the perspective

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>of an Indigenous warrior and refers to Captain Cooker's White Devil.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 2>It was used as a school bell at a school

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>in Sydney's South during Reconciliation Week. The New South Wales

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>education departments launched an investigation, with Premier Chris Mins.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Declaring that rap songs in general probably not.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>The best for New South Wales schools.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>My name's Ashley McGhee. That's all from the seven AMTM

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for today. Thanks for your company. We'll see you again tomorrow.