WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 15 May

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Lately, welcome the Late Debates.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, good evening and welcome to the Late Debate. I'm

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 2>James Macpherson with Denika de Giorgio and Joe Hildebrand coming

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 2>up tonight the North Sydney Toilet that if it goes ahead,

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>we'll have a world heritage view. You will not believe

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>where council want to put Alo plus When we get

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to the papers, the Canberra bureaucrats who are rushing to

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 2>book quantus flights on the taxpayer dollar wouldn't have anything

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 2>to do with double status points, would it. Plus On

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the front page of tomorrow's papers. Ugly scenes at the

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 2>University of Sydney as the Student Representative Council vote for

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the eradication of Israel. All of that a little later,

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>but first, just when you thought the world could not

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>get any crazier, along comes the animal rights group Peter.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>They are demanding the Brisbane Broncos change their name because well,

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>apparently by calling themselves the Bronco they're glorifying rodeos or

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Rodeo's or something. Now, I know what you're thinking, what

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of donkeys, But I promise you they're not

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>horsing around haven't listened to this statement that they trotted

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>out earlier today. They said Peter is asking the Brisbane

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Broncos to retire Buck, that's their mascot, and move away

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>from imagery such as Bucking Broncos, which glorifies Rodeos. Bucking

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Bronco imagery glorifies Rodeos, one of Queensland's cruelest and most

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 2>backward undertakings. The team could adopt the name the Brisbane Boomerangs,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 2>after the impressive aboriginal weapon, a nod to the team's

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 2>fostering of indigenous talent and commitment to equality. Now, just

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>on that suggestion before we talk about whether or not

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they should ditch the Bronco mascot. If they were to

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>call themselves, you know, the Boomerangs, to be more animal friendly.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Wikipedia says the boomerang was used to kill animals by

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>inflicting injuries that lead to their demise. Designed to fly

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>straight and with significant force, striking an animal with enough

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 2>power to break bones, puncture vital organs, or cause severe

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>head injuries. I think injuries here applies to the people

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 2>at Peter.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>That is quality research, That is quality debating, that that is.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Would you go from broncos to that actually kills me,

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that kills animals, that's right.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 3>So this is Peter being Peter. Right, So they do

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 3>this stuff. Who says vegans don't have a sense of humor.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>So what they do is they go around trying to

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>find and yes, we know what you're up to, and

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 3>we're doing it anyway because it's just too funny.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:33.839
<v Speaker 1>But they go around.

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 3>Making the most ridiculous, outlandish suggestions or demands of what

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>they want people to do, knowing that it will be

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 3>seen as so absolutely beyond the pail and absurd that

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 3>people will talk about it. And then Peter gets all

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>its little mentions and it gets its messagecross by light.

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 3>So they've come after us before. I think they came after.

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I think they came after hunters and collectors and said

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 3>that the banns and collectors should change their names to

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess grazers and collectors or whatever. And they even

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>came after Tasmania. They came after the Tasmanian government and

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 3>demanded that they change the name of Eggs and Bacon Bay.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>So there is an idyllic little bay in Tasmania called

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Eggs and Bacon Bay.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And Peter obviously.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Doing a bit of gurgling as you were with the

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>uses of the boomerangs.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh here's something we can get on top of.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>So they're doing it again, and we've walked right into

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>their noodle arm little vegan weak need protein free trap.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.399
<v Speaker 4>Or their vegan weirdness, the absolutely vegan weirdness. Actually they've

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 4>done it. You forgot about the Western Bulldogs. They also

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 4>after you can't forget the Western Bulldogs in the AFL

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 4>last year, they said that they wanted the AFL team

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 4>to be renamed the Western Mutts. Would you believe can

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 4>you imagine the West the Western Mutts versus the West Coast.

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Eggless because they said they're bread promoting breathing in paired

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>dog breeds and.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 4>They said that that was offensive. And they also wanted

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 4>the Western Bulldogs to change their mascot as well. So look,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, look, this is just another example of yet

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 4>again the perpetually outraged that Peter. You know what they're

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 4>going to come after next. They're going to go through

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 4>every single team, the Tigers. I don't think the Sharks

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 4>are safe at this point, are they? I don't know,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, But at the rate that Peter are

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 4>going any animal team are.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Gone, the Saint George I Llawarre team, I mean that

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>glorifies the slanging of dragons. Well, and wait till they

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>find out the dolphins mascot spends the entire game out

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>of water. If they won't be happy with that thing

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 2>about this though, right, surely this affects their funding because

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 2>most of their funding comes from donations. If you saw

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>someone from what is the Ethical Treatment of Animals people

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 2>for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, they're out collecting money

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 2>so we can fight for animal welfare, and you've been

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>reading that they've been going on with this rubbish, you

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>would have thought, if this is the biggest problem with

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>animal welfare in this country, that the Broncos mascot might

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 2>glorify rodeos, then maybe animals are doing pretty well and

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Peter don't need my donation.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.679
<v Speaker 3>It's just the way that Peter gets all this attention

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>right across the globe. Like, imagine how many countries they're

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 3>doing this too, all at.

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The same time while we're still banging about it.

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 3>And it doesn't means they get massive, massive amount of

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 3>media coverage.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It means they get a super high profile.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 3>It means that they suck funding that might otherwise go

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>to RSPCA, which actually does really good stuff on a

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>humane society or whatever. But and they get massive celebrity

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 3>endorsements like Pamela Anderson. I think, quite famously rocked up

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 3>in the Nerds that I'd rather go naked than wear fur.

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>She was a big Peter ambassador.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 3>The good news is, though, is that it goes both

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 3>ways because just as Peter demands, you know, it makes

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 3>demands off what other people can name things. I'm told

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>that Peter Kreedlin has now written to Peter and demanded

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 3>cease using her name.

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, I actually disagree with you. I actually think

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 4>it puts people off more. To be honest, I think

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 4>people look at them and just go, you're a bunch

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 4>of absolute weirdos. Seriously. I mean I know that the

0:05:55.320 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Broncos told them to buck off. Oh, I thought that

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 4>was quite clever. People get put off by this nonsense, seriously,

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 4>because what they're actually doing is they're ramming it down

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 4>our throats. Now, if you're going to be an activist organization,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 4>I'm happy for you to say this is my cause,

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 4>this is what I'm about. But when you start making

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 4>ludicrous suggestions like these. I think it actually puts people on.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>I think the problem is they know it's ludicrous. All

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 3>it does is get everyone talking about it.

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully we're talking, but it doesn't Oh well, Peter, great, terrific,

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 4>you're doing great. It doesn't go yet it's clapp let's

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 4>clap for them. I think it just puts them off.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe if you're already donating to Peter, you're probably

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>not going to be put off by this because you're

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>already down that.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 3>If you're vegan or whatever, you probably think it's funny.

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 3>It's probably the only thing you think is funny.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk vegan.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's move from that to South Australia, because they have

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>got some big problems in South Australia. Late a statistics

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>show sixty three percent of adults are either overweight or

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 2>obese and thirty five percent of children are either overweight

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>or obese. So it's a large issue for South Australia

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and the government have decided to do something about it.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 2>From July first, they will ban advertising of junk food

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and sugary drinks on all public transport. Now. The Australian

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Association of National Advertisers has obviously, as you would imagine,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>opposed this because it'll affect their revenue, of course. But

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>the biggest problem here is the lack of nuance. For instance,

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>junk food under the definition provided by the South Australian

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Government would include processed food. So get this, Danika, you

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>would be unable to advertise a ham and sealad sandwich

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>because ham is processed. Or what about this if the

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Make a Wish Foundation put up an out on a

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>bus and the advertisement for Maker Wish Foundation featured a

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>kid with say a sponge cake celebrating a birthday, that

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.239
<v Speaker 2>would be illegal because that would be promoting unhealthy foods.

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Or what if there was a food festival being held

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in Adelaide, they wouldn't be able to advertise their food

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 2>festival with a picture of pastry. So it's a good ee, dear.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I suppose to try to help better health in Adelaide,

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>but there's zero nuance with these laws. And that's the problem.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Once you start trying to outlaw every little thing that's

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 2>still hurt society, you end up just having large swathe

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>laws that become ridiculous.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and look, let's be very clear, you do not

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 4>have to be a Rhodes scholar to know what the

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 4>difference between a ham and salad sandwich and say, chocolate

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 4>and Lolly's is I think you could. You don't have

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 4>to be a road what difference perhaps in the calories

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 4>the amount of sugar in both of those. But look,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 4>this is another example of why people don't trust leaders,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>because once you start enforcing blanket bands, you can't do this.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 4>You can't do that. We're back to the COVID years.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 4>It may as well be back to the COVID years.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 4>But also how much how much ham are people actually eating? Yeah?

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 4>But how much is a lot? Because Okay, if you're

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 4>eating a couple of kilos a day, I'd go you

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 4>are absolutely overdosing on the processed meat. But if you've

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 4>got a couple of slices in your sandwich, come on,

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 4>I just think it's ridiculous. Look, please, let adults be adults.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Let adults make their own decisions in their own lives.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Let adults make decisions for their own children. And what

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 4>are they going to do next? Band junk food? Are

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 4>they going to go?

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 4>You know McDonald's needs to be banned? Is Goozman and

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 4>gomes ay? They are in the firing line. Now you

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 4>know where does it end, Because once you open the

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 4>door to these sorts of blanket bands, that door gets

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 4>further open.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean obviously because this was done by South Australian

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Premier Peter Malanauskus.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Under his watch, he can do.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 3>No wrong because he is one of the two most

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 3>handsome premiers.

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>In the nation of Australia. And so of course, you know,

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say, oh, this is absolutely bloody ridiculous.

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Where are they doing it? Oh what a fantastic idea.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 3>This is going to improve health outcomes for kids for

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>generations to come. But I think if it is just there,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 3>if it's just the government saying well, no, this is

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>what we decide we're going to accept just for our

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, our sites public.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're not going to ban it. I like

0:09:57.920 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it better than a wealth tax.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>And then a sugar tax, because that actually targets people

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 3>who are less wealthy, because of course people who are

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>poorer are from lawa sarchio economic backgrounds are more likely

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 3>to have to buy junk food or less healthy food

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>because it's cheaper and easier, and that just ends up

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 3>penalizing them when they're already being penalized by life.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>The problem with your labor mates though, is now that

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>South Australia are doing this, there's pressure on Mark Butler

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 2>to do something nationally. And as Denika said, where do

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 2>you stop? And not just like ban junk food, but

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>if you're not going to advertise on public transport, I

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>mean kids let access advertising about junk food on social media,

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>it's everywhere you're going to ban that. Are you going

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>to ban junk food being used to sponsor sporting things?

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And are you going to ban parents who? I mean

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 2>after all its parents who buy the food, right, correct?

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 2>So should we start removing children from homes where mum

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 2>and dad are buying them kick kats? But this is

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>what point do you draw a line?

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 4>At what point do you draw a line? But at

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 4>what point do you take your fingers out of parents lives?

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Stop telling parents how to pair its, make the decisions

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 4>for themselves. They know their kids best. They're the ones

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 4>that know their children in and out. Stop dictating to

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 4>parents what they should and shouldn't be doing. Well.

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit like when they started banning all unhealthy

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 3>foods from school canteens. Little word to the wise, the

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 3>kids still know it's out there. Yeah, Like even if

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 3>you don't advertise chocolate, as soon as a kid gets

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 3>a hold of the good stuff, that's all they want

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of their lives.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And they know it's there, and they.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Will beat you into submission day in day out. Obviously,

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm still suffering from quite a bit of personal trauma.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I just gave my five year old a packet of oreos,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Like they just they get it and they wear you

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>down and they find a way because they're evil, manipularly

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 3>little terrorist masterminds who know how to find your weak

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 3>spot and then crush it and break.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You as a human. I'm just going to stop.

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 4>But you might be in trouble see under South Australian

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 4>under a blanket bad But you could be in trouble.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Right well, maybe it might be one less thing that

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to worry. So it's like the social media,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is it?

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Like what I say to you know, we say to

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>my fireelf. For example, my mum.

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Says to her, well, if you eat all that chocolate,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 3>you're going to get diabetes. And I actually had to

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 3>bring her into work to Sky News and she was

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>talking to Mel the makeup lady downstairs, and she just

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 3>goes up to Melon and says, do you have chocolate

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 3>every day and.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Says, I'm actually I do, yeah, I mean the you

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have diabetes.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>The biggest you hear is parenting, right. You know when

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 2>you go to kmart you have to pay for anything.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>You have to weave through this maze of stuff that

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>is all aimed at kids. It's all like kinder Surprises.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And all that.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>It's all the whole levels will grab. You've just got

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 2>to learn to parent and learn to say no. It's

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>not that difficult, unless which case it's impossible. You'll do

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 2>whatever they want. Empty. Albanezi on Tuesday was sworn in

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>for his second term as Prime Minister along with his

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 2>new cabinet, and what got everybody talking was the absence

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 2>of a Bible when he took his oath the Catholic

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister. Rather than swearing on a b I will,

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 2>as his tradition, chose to take a secular affirmation. Here's

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>what he did on Tuesday. I, Anthony Norman Albanese, do

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 2>solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and truly serve the conwell of Australia, her Land and

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>her people in the office of Prime Minister projers. Now,

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>legally it makes no difference, but politically and culturally there's

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>questions being asked, particularly since Anthony Albanese made a pretty

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>big deal of his Catholic faith prior to the election,

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and more recently was talking about how proud his mother

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 2>would be that he will be the first Australian Prime

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Minister to attend the inauguration of a pope. So why

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't he swear his oath on the Bible. He is,

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 2>as I said, a Catholic. Well, here's the explanation he

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 2>gave today.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 6>I believe in a separation of church and state, so

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 6>I choose, for example today, I've always chosen to do

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 6>an affirmation because I think that as the Australian Prime Minister,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 6>I represent people of every faith and no faith, and

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 6>so that for me, that's a personal decision. Other people

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 6>who swear on the Bible or the Qur'an Nle's case

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 6>is perfectly up to them. It's a personal choice.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>But now there's a few points we could make about this,

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>But let me just make one point. He said he

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>refused to swear on the Bible because he believes in

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the principle of the separation of church and state. Here's

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>my question, where did he get that principle from. Well,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that principle was not existent until Jesus said, render unto Caesar,

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>what is Caesars? And unto God what is God's? The

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>principle of separation of church and state. Religion and state

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 2>did not exist anywhere in the world until Jesus made

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 2>that claim. That principle, which he says was his guiding principle,

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 2>is actually in the Bible that he refused to swear

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>on Albanese. He probably just doesn't know quite enough of

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>what he believes. If he knew it, he wouldn't have

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 2>had a problem.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Very well played again, although I think he is being

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>very genuine to see he didn't make a huge deal.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean the fact that the pope died in the

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 3>middle of the election campaign. Obviously he had to put

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 3>out a statement about that and comment on it a lot.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It emerged, It emerged publicly, and against I can tell

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you it was actually against his wishes.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 3>He actually asked the journo not to run the story.

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 3>But the journo did anyway, and it wasn't me, but

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 3>that he'd been going to Mass again. So it started

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>being and he's been raised to Catholic obviously, you know,

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 3>like we all do. You lapse, you go off and

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 3>do other stuff, and then you often come back to

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>it later in life. And he started doing that, and

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>he'd been spotted at you know, the big Catholic Church

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Canberra and and so and so that was written about

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and I read that he's back, but I don't think

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 3>it is something because I actually had him on my

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 3>podcast and tried to get him to talk about him

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 3>going back to the faith of you know, his own Catholicism,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>because it was clear that he wrote.

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>The statement about the Pope dying himself. You can just

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>tell sometimes when it's them and not their their minions

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>doing it.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 3>And and he just wouldn't talk about it, just even

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 3>to me, who you know, even on a podcast, it's

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 3>really intimate and blah blah blah chatting away. He just

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of talks generally about importance of the Pope and

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 3>blah blah blah. So I think it actually is something

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 3>he does like to keep quite private and considers quite personal,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>which I respect. The other thing, of course, is that

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 3>if you're swearing an allegiance to the if you're swearing

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>an allegiance on the strong part, imagine the Bible they

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 3>bring out. It would be a Church of England, it

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 3>would be this, It would be the King James version,

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't that? And so obviously it's a true Catholic. He

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 3>could only swear on the revised standard version about James.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 3>That's a pretty Bible both.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 2>You could swear on the message versions. Yeah, I'm not

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 2>questioning Albanese's faith. His suspicion faith is certainly a matter

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>for him. But I mean, when you swear the oath

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>of allegiance, that's not on behalf of the Australian public.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>That's your promise to the highest authority that you know

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of that you are going to do a good job.

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 2>So I still don't understand him saying, will I represent

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 2>people of all faiths and no faiths? Therefore I don't

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 2>swear on the Bible. But it's not about everybody else.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 2>It's about you and what you consider to be the

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>highest authority that you can promise your fidelity.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and look, I hate to be skeptical about a

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 4>person's religion. You never want to be skeptical, and I'm

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 4>not being skeptical. If the Prime Minister is a true Catholic,

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 4>as he says he is, then that's totally fine. But

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 4>the problem I have with this is that the Prime

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Minister himself actually made this almost into an election issue

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 4>when he paused campaigning on the day that the Pope died. Now, firstly, look,

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 4>I've got to be honest, I think it was a

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 4>bizarre decision. I don't know why you need to pause

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 4>campaigning on the day that the pope died, but to me,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 4>it seemed like it was a deliberate attempt to win

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 4>over Catholic voters. Now why do I think that this

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 4>was absolutely ridiculous, Well, because he cancels campaigning on that day,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 4>and then about an hour later, he held a press

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 4>conference in which he was asked about his Catholic faith.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 4>At that press conference and he said, well, I have

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 4>three faiths actually, the Labor Party, the Catholic faith and

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 4>the South Sydney rabbit Os. And that in itself sounded

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 4>like a sheer slogan to me. So again, I'm not

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 4>questioning that he is a Catholic, but he didn't even

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 4>go to a Good Friday service. You might remember he

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 4>did not go to church on Good Friday. So if

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 4>you have that devout why didn't you go to church?

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>No one likes the bad news days. Everyone just wants

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Sunday.

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 4>Well, it doesn't matter, but Peter doesn't. It doesn't win

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 4>church on Good Friday. So if you are such a

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 4>devout Catholic, why didn't you go? That's the question.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that Look, I don't think I don't think he

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>is a I don't think he's like a huge in evautiation.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 3>But again, like of course you would pause, but with

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 3>the Pope queen. Imagine if Queen Elizabeth had died and

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 3>you still.

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Keep I personally think it's different. I don't. I think.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Look again, it.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Worked for him electorally, but it's still.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 4>He was He was an election, but I think it

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 4>was an electoral point. It was deliberately to win over

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 4>the Catholic vote. I don't think. I personally do not

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 4>think he needed to put during it during the middle

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 4>of it, because.

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 2>The pope his agenda was to win over the Catholic vote. Yeah,

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense then for when he's on your podcast,

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Joe and you ask him to go into his faith,

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>not to them.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 3>And again just that like because some people the whole

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 3>thing of Albow saying it was raised with three faced

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the Australian Labor Party, Catholic Church in the South sitting

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 3>rabbitis that is the oldest cliche in the book. That

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 3>is that is him talking about his childhood and how

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 3>he was raised and he was.

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 4>It's an election, but it's just proved it was all electoral.

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>That has been a slogan that has been around about him.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like all the day.

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 4>That the Pope died.

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Then it's like because it's for truth.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 3>Justice in the American wife, it doesn't mean But why

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 3>say it on the day of the Pope's driver died.

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 4>If you're not if you say if you're going to

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 4>cancel or I'm going to cancel campaigning because I'm a

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Catholic and we need to respect this. Why whip out slogans.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Because it's something that is just universally known about him

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and has been for his entire life.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm like very I'm very sceptical.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm very very skeptical. Now, look we've got to talk

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 4>about the Greens leadership because today, of course they elected

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 4>their new leader after Adam Bant lost his seat, which

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 4>was obviously some of the best news. The only good

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 4>news I've got to say out of this campaign, but

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Larissa Waters, who is a Queensland Senator, has been elected.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 4>She was elected unopposed. She ran against Marine Ferouki, who

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 4>remains as the deputy. I mean, God helped the Greens,

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 4>but also Sarah Hansoon Young. But when she held her

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 4>press conference today, the first thing that I thought was, well,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 4>here we go. It's the say Greens, but with a

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 4>different face. Have a listen.

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 7>We've got a lot of work to do because people

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 7>are really hurting and the planet is hurting, and we

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 7>need a parliament that actually delivers for people and has

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 7>the courage and the boldness and the heart to deliver

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 7>some help to people. So I'm calling today for a

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 7>progressive parliament and a politics with heart.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Now, if someone can please explain what a progressive parliament

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 4>looks like, that would be absolutely fantastic because I think

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 4>that the Greens have a very different view on what

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 4>progressive parliaments look like, based on their track record over

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 4>the last three years of anti Australia, anti Israel and

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 4>bizarre climate alarmism. And it looks like we have another

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 4>three years Underliverous the waters of the same old rhetoric.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 7>Where the Greens. So, of course we stand firm always

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 7>on social justice and human rights, whether that's First Nations justice,

0:21:55.920 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 7>whether that's a free Palestine, whether that's peace and human rights. Globally,

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 7>we will always be there calling out atrocities, calling out

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 7>a genocide and standing strongly on social justice and human rights.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 4>Again, as I say, it is the same old Greens,

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 4>the same old loopy Greens, except under a new leader,

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 4>a very dangerous brand. It's certainly the Bob Brown days

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 4>are long gone. Now we've got to talk about Marine Ferruki,

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 4>who has remained as the Deputy. Now we know that

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Marine Ferruki, for example, has in the past she's worn

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 4>a kefire in the Senate. She's also called for reparations

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 4>for Pakistan, and she's been particular very anti Israel in

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of her sentiment. And that didn't stop.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 5>Today migrant and multicultural communities have in the tens of

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 5>thousands across Sydney, across Brisbane, across Melbourne backed our strong

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 5>stand against the genocide in Gaza and for us telling

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 5>the truth about what is happening.

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 4>So here we go again. It's the same old from

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 4>the Greens. I don't think anything based on that press

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 4>conference is going to change, even though they have a

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 4>different leader. And it's very bizarre when you've got somebody

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 4>like Sarah Hanson Young, who's probably one of the more

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 4>well in this case, maybe a bit more sensible, though

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 4>I think Larissa Waters is well probably the most sensible

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 4>out of those three. The other interesting aspect.

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 2>To come out of all that, did you just use

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Greens and sensibility?

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 4>I know, but I mean I'm trying that twice.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the journey looking for is at least crazy.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Well probably least loopy, I mean lease loopy. Out of

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 4>the three would have to be Larisa Larissa Waters. But

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 4>what I thought, but what I found interesting today was

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 4>that Lydia Thorpe there was reports that the Independence she

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 4>used to she used to be a Greens. Of course

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 4>that she apparently, according to sources who told the Australian,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 4>wants to go back to the Greens. So you've already

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 4>got an absolute cluster. Can you imagine if Lydia went back,

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, good green.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 2>It drives me nuts, is Larissa Warters, God blessed it.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 2>She says, you know, we're going to bring back heart

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 2>to politics, and it's this this moral pre as if

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 2>we are the righteous ones, the Labor Party, the Liberal Party,

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 2>Pauline Hanson, none of them have heart, but we we

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>have heart. Well, I would say the Greens have got

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 2>so much heart that there's room for a little more,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, thinking, and they're very soft hearted before, so minded.

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was trying to avoid. The other thing

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that she said that got my attention was she says

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>we are the Greens, so we are very firmly always.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 2>She got outside of and I was expected to say

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the environment, but then she started talking about social justice,

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>human rights. And so they've missed a great opportunity, I

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>think to reset here, because there's no question they were

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 2>punished electorally. They lost four of the three of their

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>four seats in the Lower House. They were punished because

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>of their divisiveness. People saw that heard that rejected that.

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 2>They had a beautiful opportunity here with Adam Bant gone

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 2>to reset and put front and center the environment, that

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>if they were serious and sensible about the environment, a

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of pe people would listen to them and pay attention.

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 2>But as you said, it's just the same old Greens

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 2>with a different face in chart.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're not actually interested in the environment, to be honest,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 3>they're there. They are purely interested in extreme left identity politics.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 3>You've got the Victorian Greens currently tearing themselves apart over

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 3>trans issues. And I think someone someone recently got booted

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 3>out of the party for some comments they made years ago,

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 3>for about saying, oh, you know, maybe this could conflict

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>with you women's rights in some you know, some sectors.

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>They're they're just bonkers and they I mean, if you

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and they and they're far they're so far gone from

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>being the part of the environment. All the people who

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>were the.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Greeny green Greens have basically been purged. There's a couple

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe left, one or two in you But Sarah Hanson

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 3>Young is actually the most moderate of that triumvirate. And

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 3>uh and even though she would have the highest profile

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 3>you would think and be the most obvious candidate for leader,

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 3>she she obviously never going to get it because the

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 3>extreme hardliners have so completely got a stranglehold on the party.

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 3>We don't know what the exact numbers are because, of course,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 3>for all the Greens talk about transparency, they don't reveal

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 3>how their elections work, what the final numbers were for

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 3>each candidate, how their state conferences or their party machinery works.

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 3>They don't let anyone in. It is completely shut down

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and blacked out. And speaking of being blacked out, the.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Greens are also racist because of.

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 7>Course, we will give you the numbers in the Senate

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 7>to pass good reforms that helps people and helps the planet. Okay,

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 7>people elected us to get done, and that's what we

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 7>intend to do.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 3>And so if you just saw that clip there, no,

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 3>you weren't watching two polar bears fighting in a snowstorm.

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 3>You're watching something even whiter, which is the blondeheaired, blue

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 3>eyed Larissa Waters. They love their identity politics in the Greens,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and they love to point out institutionalized racism and they

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 3>support critical race theory. And there they have elected the

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 3>whitest possible candidate of the three women who were running

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 3>for the leadership, and they locked out the one woman

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 3>of color, Marine Farouki, who has already raised accusations of

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 3>racism about this country and in this country, and her

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 3>very own party has shown that they are still not ready.

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>To have someone of color lead them.

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it has anything to do with

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the fact that half of their current party room now

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 3>has double barreled hyphenated surnames.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's just a coincidence. I don't know, but I.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Am sick of the abject racism of the Greens rearing

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 3>its ugly head in this country, which, as Laura Tingle

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 3>already told us, is racist because an invisible Peter Dutton

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 3>is hovering around at house auctions and making people think

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 3>things that they don't want to think about, you know,

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 3>foreign buyers buying up their homes. And the Greens have

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 3>demonstrated just how incredibly racist they are by overlooking a

0:27:55.800 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 3>historic opportunity to put Marine Ferouki leader, the first woman

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 3>of color as a leader of a major party in

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 3>this nation. And the Greens have turned their noses up

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 3>at history, and they have deprived Australia of what would

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 3>have been, without doubt, the funniest three years all our

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 3>ancient history, because Marie Ferruki as leader would have just

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>made amazing. It would have been the funniest thing, and

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't even do that.

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>So maybe if Marine Ferruki had had the courage to

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 2>say on insiders that HERMAS should be disbanded. Do you

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>remember she refused to say whether or not they could

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 2>be disbanded. She might have had a chance of leading

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a political party. Thank god she's only the deputy, but

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I agree had she been for us for months. Let's

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>go to the UK now, where the transgender debate has

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>been front and center in the news for quite some

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>time now. Remember the Tavistock Gender Clinic was closed down

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>after a scathing review by doctor Hillary Cass on the

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 2>treatment of children with gender dysphoria. She found that many

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 2>were being pushed towards sex changes by this affirmation model,

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 2>where if a child believed that they were in the

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>wrong body, they were automatically assumed to be right and

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 2>encouraged to take action regarding that. Well, the clinic was

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 2>closed down, and then the Health Secretary was streeting. He

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>came out and told Parliament that puberty blockers should be

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>banned completely because there was no evidence that they were safe.

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>In fact, there was evidence that they were quite harmful.

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>And of course, then more recently, the UK Supreme Court

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>ruled that the definition of a woman is biological therefore

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>men claiming to be women are not. So you would

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>have thought that the whole transgender issue in the UK

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and radical gender theory was starting to return to assemblance

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>of normal, where biology was being recognized and supported. But

0:29:55.400 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 2>we read this headline in the UK Telegraph today trans toddlers.

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Now just those two words should get your attention because

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that seems an absolute anomaly. Trans toddlers allowed gender treatment

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 2>on the National Health Service. The article reads that children

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 2>are not given powerful drugs such as pubity blockers at clinics,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>but are offered counseling and therapy along with their family.

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Up to ten children of nursery age are currently being

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 2>treated in the UK, according to data, while as many

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 2>as one hundred and fifty seven children aged nine or

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>younger have been referred to these gender clinics now. The

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 2>government originally proposed a law that would make it illegal

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 2>for children under the age of seven to receive any

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of treatment, even counseling, regarding gender theory, but that

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>was scrapped after consultation with transactivists groups. As the article says,

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 2>no children are being given drugs, but they are persisting

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 2>with this affirmation model, where if a child's says I

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.479
<v Speaker 2>think I'm the opposite gender to my body. Then they

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 2>are believed to be telling the truth and they are helped,

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>at least socially to start to transition that way. I

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>couldn't believe this, Danika. Do you know currently there are

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 2>six two and twenty five children on a waiting list

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>in the UK to have gender treatment. That's twelve percent

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>up on last year. Doctor Hillary Cass said, Cognitively, how

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:35.239
<v Speaker 2>does a nursery aged child able to process anything to

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 2>do with gender? They don't have the comprehension to have

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with a health professional, let alone the communication skills.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 2>If you're eighteen and you believe you're in the wrong body,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>well then okay, that's a problem that you have, I

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>would argue, respectfully, if you're eight and arguing you're in

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the wrong body, that's a problem that your parents have.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this is I actually find this whole story

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 4>extremely disturbing because they said nursery age children or toddlers

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 4>are receiving this sort of treatment. Now they can't talk,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 4>some of them probably can't even eat, they can't think

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>for themselves, and yet what they're receiving some sort of

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 4>gender affirming care or being primed for for potential puberty

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 4>blockers at a certain age. I'm sorry, but I'm going

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 4>to be up front. The parents should be locked up

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 4>for this, because I think that is an absolute disgrace.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Your child can barely speak.

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>For goodness, I mean, they're older than they're not said

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it said.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Correct me if I'm wrong. It was nursery agent, toddlers

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 4>and three.

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Three and four years, that's right, okay, but three and four.

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 4>But you still can't think for yourself with three.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's ridiculous, but I can't speak any I

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 3>want to. People can rest on that and then and

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 3>they're not getting it's only talking like it's self stilly.

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 3>They're not getting any actual medical interventions or any treatment.

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 4>But the fact that the thought is there, and the

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 4>fact if a parent took a child of that age

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 4>to any sort of clinic, that the parents should be

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 4>locked up. I think that's an absolute disgrace.

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the problem is that we don't know

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 3>how much of this is contagion, as Richard Dawkins described it,

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and how much of it is genuine. So I've spoken

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 3>to people who were clearly trans and new from a

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 3>very young age that they were, and even they sort

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 3>of said, but just because you know it doesn't mean

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 3>you should actually begin doing anything.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You should you need to be able to hear it.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 3>But by the same token, there are clearly kids who

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 3>are very young who are tomboys or boys that will

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, will muck around dressing up in girls clothing.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 3>And the problem is, I think if you have carers

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 3>or there who leap on that and say, oh my god,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 3>do you think you might actually be a girl, and

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the kid thinks, oh, yeah, maybe I don't know whatever,

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 3>And if they think that maybe that's a way to

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 3>get special attention, or whether they just don't know what

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 3>they're saying or whatever, you end up sort of pushing

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>them down this absolute last way that they actually don't

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 3>need to be on. So I think you can just

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, it is just ridiculous to be intervening, I think,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 3>in the kid's idea of their gender or their sexuality

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 3>or anything like that, which obviously they don't actually have

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.479
<v Speaker 3>any idea of at all at such a ridiculously young age.

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And all the studies saying most kids, if they start

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 2>thinking these thoughts when they're little, most of them just

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>grow out.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right exactly.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 2>But when they through the power of suggestion, and you're

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a parent, you know the power of suggestion is incredible

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to little kids.

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I go back to the Oreo story.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>There you go, it's incredibly dangerous. I would have thought

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 2>to be encouraging an affirmation model for confused kids. That's

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 2>a kids and be confused.

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's right.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 3>The last thing you want is to give an incentive

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 3>or provide social reward for kids saying a certain thing

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 3>which could end up leading them down a path for

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 3>their life.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>It could be really, really difficult.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 3>And again, if kids are definitely feeling that way, I

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 3>think you probably know. I think you don't actually have

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 3>to sort of flip a coin and say maybe maybe,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 3>but yeah.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 2>And I guess that's the point of that story. There's

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 2>been a lot of progress, I would argue, back towards

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 2>normality when it comes to gender issues in the UK,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 2>but still a long long way to go. And of

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 2>course Australia as a whole other story, big story.

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It's in the.

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Papers tomorrow here in Australia, but it's being reported overseas

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 2>already out of the US that rogue communication devices have

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>been found in Chinese solar power inverters. Now, US authorities

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 2>have found radios and other communication devices that seem to

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 2>have been hidden in these power inverters that are used

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 2>to connect solar panels and wind turbines to the grid,

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and these communication devices would get around the firewalls that

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 2>have been put in and technically could enable the Chinese

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to shut down the energy grid in the USA. Other

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 2>anomalies have been found in batteries and in electric vehicle

0:35:55.840 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 2>charges that have been exported from China to the United States.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Mike Rodgers, who's the former director of the US National

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Security Agency, he told Reuters, we know that China believes

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 2>there is value in placing at least some elements of

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 2>our core infrastructure at risk of destruction or disruption. I

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 2>think that the Chinese are in part hoping that the

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 2>widespread use of inverters limits the options the West has

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 2>to deal with this security issue. Now the Daily Telegraph

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow Denika are reporting this on their front page because

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>of course China creates most of the inverters that we

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 2>now rely upon as we go down a renewable zone.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Really great, this is a major security issue totally.

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 2>We're insisting on renewables. Renewables come from China. China is

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 2>a foe. We're likely going to have conflict with them,

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and yet no one seems to be doing anything about it.

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 4>And this is just another string in the renewables only

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 4>experiment is and it's going really, really well, James. And

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 4>this is another reason why it's going so well well.

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go to a break. When we come back,

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>we will look at what's making news tomorrow, including Canberra

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Burich perhaps rushing off to buy Quantus flights. I wonder

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 2>why we'll tell you to start with the break. Welcome back.

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll take our summary of tomorrow's headlines, starting with the

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Northern Territory News, which never lets us down. They always

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 2>have a great front page. Tomorrow's is no exception. The

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 2>headline reads this means war. You can take our fireworks,

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 2>but you'll never take our freedom. Do that properly, Joe.

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 2>I would have done it with a.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Freedom take our fireworks, but you can never take our freedom.

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 2>That's how I should have done it. The article reads

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales authorities have engaged in an act tantamount

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 2>to a declaration of war on the Northern Territory's freedom.

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 2>They've threatened to scuttle our beloved Territory Day by seizing

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 2>around forty six tons of our fireworks. Now, apparently this

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 2>is fireworks that was on its way to the Northern Territory,

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 2>where Territorians on their day are allowed to set off

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 2>fireworks however, whenever and to the extent that they like,

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and every year. Joe Hildebrand was telling me about this

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>before the program, and I was like.

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you for real?

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I went online.

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's also stories about like.

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Last year, thirty people injured when fireworks just went crazy.

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 3>People they lose fingers, hands, you know, it's always a disaster,

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Buildings burned down.

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It is just absolute carnage.

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 3>And if anyone dares suggest that maybe everyone in the

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Territory shouldn't be allowed to let out fireworks for just

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 3>one day a year, whenever and wherever they want, there

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 3>is it.

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Like what are you talking about? How dare you? No way?

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, this is absolutely sacred.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 2>So illegal fireworks on the way.

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 3>To the illegal So they're illegal in everywhere else in

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the country except in the Northern Territory on Territory Day,

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and that's when everyone can.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Just go hell for lace. It's just like there are

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>no rules and you would have said the Chief Minister

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>there and her Mel Gibson brave heart attire and it

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is just the most absolutely ridiculous, insane thing in the world.

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And it just makes me so proud to be in Australia.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Have you been there for?

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Have I been there for territory? I'm not sure. I've

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>had my wife, had my wife lived.

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just you sounds like so excited about this yet,

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:13.720
<v Speaker 2>amos yah, Yeah, yeah.

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I love the territory. I've been their heats.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 3>My wife worked there for five.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Years mysteriously without me, now that I think about movement,

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and so she just knows all about it. So every

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>time was territory. Every journal up there go right here

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we go and yeah, anyway, there you go. In tradition,

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>don't dare touch it.

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 4>I know what We're going. From one exciting story to

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 4>a bizarre story on the front page of the Canberra Times.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Surge for double status. Public servants are lining up flight

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 4>bookings to take advantage of Quantus's double status credit period,

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 4>with previously unreleased figures showing bookings surging during the week

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 4>long promotions. Analysis by the camera times of public servant.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 4>Domestic flight booking data finds that daily average bookings with

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Quantus rose by twenty percent in the latest double status

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 4>credit period in March twenty twenty five. The release of

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 4>the data obtained through freedom of information comes as a

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 4>re elected Albanezi government moves to crack down on travel

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 4>spending departments, with flights and hospitality spending part of the

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 4>promised six point four billion dollars in savings announced since

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.439
<v Speaker 4>the election. That's just I mean, that's just.

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Just a pure coincidence, Denika. Look, you're so cynical. You've

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 3>but you know what, You've been working in the media

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 3>too long.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm way too long.

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm way too cynical of everything at this point. And

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:30.720
<v Speaker 4>you question everything, Joe, everything.

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 3>It just so happens that the exact same time that

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 3>public servants suddenly need to do urgent face to face

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 3>business meetings. I'd be done over.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 4>It has to be done.

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Just happens to coincide when Quantus is of double status

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>status Qua.

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's nothing about that.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>You conspiracy theorists, you'll see, no.

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 2>No, highly So people understand there's a difference between frequent

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 2>flyer points.

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Correct and double status and status are actually the ones

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:57.479
<v Speaker 4>that they're the hard ones.

0:40:57.520 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That's one I really.

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Really want because when you get it up to those,

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 4>when you climb the status platinum, the benefits you gave

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 4>you get into the loud. You just get your benefits,

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 4>so much playing for you. Yes, so you actually want

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 4>to get your status credits over your frequent flyer points.

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right, you can't add that's the thing. So you can't.

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Actually you don't actually keep your status gets the clues

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 3>in the name if you don't get enough status credits,

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 3>and that involves you physically having to get on the plane.

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Points you can do all sorts of stuff. You can

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 3>go to coals and get your fly bys or whatever

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 3>it is, and you can accumulate points EASi as pie,

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 3>but the status credits you actually have to be on

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 3>the plane and take the trip yourself in order to

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 3>get them all.

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 4>And you also get more luggage allowance, which is always

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 4>very handy.

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 3>That's good to see public servants finally showing some initiative.

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, seems to be less than a coincidents Joe's.

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Look at that increasing productivity.

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Joe, honestly, just the cynicism here onto the eyes now

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and a couple of great little yarns, Proboo has said

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.760
<v Speaker 3>to PM So the Prime Minister said that his first

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 3>visit this year would be to Indonesia, where the Russians

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 3>are coming in and the Russians are going to build.

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 3>They have asked the Indonesians if they can use one

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 3>of their air force baces.

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, we don't know if they are just because elbow

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:14.439
<v Speaker 2>won't see.

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it's been established that they did ask and

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 3>that was reported, and that was neither confirmed nor denied

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 3>by the government. I can tell you it ain't gonna happen,

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 3>but there you go. I can exclusively reveal that your

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 3>National security correspondent on the late debate, it is not

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 3>going to happen, Todd.

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we've got your back.

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Pmtel's Proboo Anthony Alberanezi has thrown Australia support behind Indonesia's

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 3>bid to join one of the world's biggest trade agreements,

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 3>as he again downplayed concerns over Jakata's ties with.

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Moscow see James.

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 3>He downplayed them, so fine, nothing to see here and

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 3>see here, but yes, I am reliably informed that that

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 3>the Indonesians have been convinced that to allow the Russians

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 3>to use any of their military facilities would be a

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 3>very very bad idea.

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Just quickly as the laborman on the pen, when is

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 2>ALBANIZI going to see Trump? Is he got a trip

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 2>to America schedule?

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>He has to he has to wait too.

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 3>He was very lucky to get a phone call scheduled,

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 3>and the phone call happened to be scheduled just twenty

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 3>four hours after Trump and answered all those taffs things,

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 3>so he was able to get on the phone.

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Before pretty much anyone else. But you have to, I mean,

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it just takes so much to organize a trip to

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>see the president. Like you can't just say everyone's going

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>on coming over. Yeah, yeah, but Trump's going.

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 4>To see everybody, i mean, prop to the Middle East

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 4>of the moment.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Trump has to make time to see them.

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 3>So you know, obviously the UK is going to have

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 3>more sway, you know, Ukraine even is going to have.

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 4>From ourbo from Australia is not going to have any sway.

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh some obviously, you know, you know it won't be

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 3>up there with you know, China, India, you know, all

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:45.479
<v Speaker 3>these mega superpowers, we're still just you know, a little

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 3>old Butler. Yeah, and another concerning story on the front

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 3>page of the Odds No Israel. Sydney UNI students turn

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 3>their backs on Jewish peers. I thought it wasn't about

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 3>anti simmon. I thought it was just about you know,

0:43:58.000 --> 0:43:59.359
<v Speaker 3>free guards. I wasn't about being.

0:43:59.320 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Jewish, was it.

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Scores of students at the nation's oldest university turned their

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 3>backs on Jewish peers who were pleading for support to

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 3>stamp out anti Semitism on campus and defending the existence

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 3>of a Jewish state. That would seem to put the

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 3>lie to the idea that this is just against those

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 3>genocidal evil Zionus and not about Get.

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 2>This, a student representative council said, it wasn't anti Semitic

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to call for the elimination of the state of Israel.

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 2>But again it just where the Jews go if they

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 2>don't have.

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 4>It again once It just shows once again is how

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 4>cowardice and how hopeless the universities have been since October seven,

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three. And if you were a Jewish student,

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 4>can you imagine how fearful you would be on campus

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 4>that now you're actually going you know what this is?

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 4>This is just terrible. You go there to learn, you

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 4>go there to learn, you don't get. You don't go

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 4>there to be subjected to this sort of nonsense.

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I went there to smoke bombs and

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>have sex.

0:44:55.840 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 4>But well, I mean no, But we're talking about and

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 4>he Israel's sentiment here. That's very very different, Joe.

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>It's very different from what I was doing. And it's

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 1>quite creepy. I think, what is I think there's always.

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Been creepy what you were doing.

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 3>It's being student radicalism. Now we were having a great time,

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 3>but there's always been student radicalism, and I was crazy.

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>How can Mark.

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Scott, the device chancellor tolerate a student representative?

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Cansel?

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.839
<v Speaker 2>They're erectly calling for the elimination of Israel, turning their

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 2>back on Jewish Yes, that's explaining to be about student

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 2>welfare and allowing that sort of stuff to take place

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:29.479
<v Speaker 2>on camp.

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.919
<v Speaker 1>That's right. But the SRC is not a university body,

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a student. But yes, you're absolutely right, there are.

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Things kick those students out.

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they don't belong in your instage, that's true.

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Look, he has been trying to and they've been

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 3>really frustrated. I know people who work for Mark Scott

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 3>and Mark himself and that they're very frustrated to find

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.439
<v Speaker 3>the actual mechanism, the actual legal mechanism they can deal

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 3>with all this appalling behavior and.

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Just very quickly off target.

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 3>ALPS Green undershoot Labelable Underscore undershoot it's two thousand and

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty renewable energy target by fourteen percentage points due to

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 3>delays in delivering big solar and wind projects. Property Global

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Consulting Consultancy would McKenzie to warn the short form may

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 3>imperil the Albanzi government's pledge to slash emissions this decade,

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 3>as if Labour would ever fail to mat a pledge

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:17.959
<v Speaker 3>ahead of an electric Now.

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 2>There you go. We to go to a break when

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 2>we come back. The North Sydney toilet that if it

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.919
<v Speaker 2>goes ahead, we'll have a world heritage view. We'll show

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 2>you where that toilet is destined to be located right

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:30.240
<v Speaker 2>after the break.

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:34.839
<v Speaker 2>I spent a lot of time on the Sunshine Coast

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:36.879
<v Speaker 2>and it's famous for its Loo with a View which

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 2>has an amazing outlook onto the Milula Bar Beach. But

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 2>that's nothing compared to the Loo with a View that

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 2>North Sydney Council are proposing at McMahon's point. Look at

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.320
<v Speaker 2>this map here you can see there's the harbor of

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the bridge. You can see the arrow there pointing to

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:57.879
<v Speaker 2>this spot which has a World Heritage Listed view. North

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Sydney Council proposing to build a tour toilet there. If

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 2>the toilet goes ahead. This is what you'll be able

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 2>to see from the toilet. That's not a bad view

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 2>at all. If you need to do a quick well,

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 2>go to the toilet fast. Of course, there's outrage about this.

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 2>How on earth could they build a toilet there, especially

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 2>when there's a toilet block in existence about a one

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 2>minute walk from there. But there are other toilets in

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Sydney that also have magnificent views, not least of which

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:28.839
<v Speaker 2>the Glenmore Hotel, which got a wonderful review on trip

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Advisor from someone who went to the toilet there. This

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 2>is at the Rocks at Sydney. So here's the review

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 2>on trip Advisor. Best view from a urinal in Sydney.

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.439
<v Speaker 2>The reviewer wrote, went to the men's room and there

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:43.280
<v Speaker 2>right next to the end urinal was a large window

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 2>which affords the user amazing views over circular Key the

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:50.279
<v Speaker 2>urinal also overlooks another bar, so their patrons may be

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 2>able to see you too. I don't know, go for

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 2>a drink and if you're a bloke, a tinkle, but

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 2>forget about ordering food. So the food didn't come out

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 2>so well. But apparently the view we at the Glenmore

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 2>that's currently the lou with the view. But McMahon's point

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 2>may have an even.

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.399
<v Speaker 3>I have spent many, many, many a long hour at

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 3>the Glenmore Hotel Europe. It is one of the best

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 3>pubs in Sydney. It's right there in the rocks and

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 3>there's a rooftop bar on the very top that you

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 3>go after and if you and the problem is if

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 3>your food doesn't come all to go get drinks you

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 3>have to go down about three flight stairs and then

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 3>go back up.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 4>And it's better than looking at graffiti and ridiculous ads

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:28.879
<v Speaker 4>on the back of the toilet door.

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh it's fantastic. You're just seeing that, you know. Unfortunately

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 3>they chew's a bit of a bugger. But anyway, now

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:37.280
<v Speaker 3>this is another from.

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Dear that could have gone.

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>From peeing to sleeping.

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Ryanair, you may know, is a super super low budge

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 3>airline that operates in the UK and Europe, and it

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 3>is basically a bus with wings and rhyanas passages. Bizarre

0:48:57.160 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 3>sleeping position has been labeled extremely angerous. It's been labeled

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 3>the Ryan Air mattress. Get it, but check out this guy.

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 3>That's his feet on the seats there and then he's

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 3>got his head under the chair the seat in front

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 3>of him, which you wouldn't want to be a female.

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Flights, however, you can get comfortable, do whatever you come on.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 4>That's ridiculous.

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:21.800
<v Speaker 2>That's it from stick around. Coming up in just a

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:23.839
<v Speaker 2>moment is the Reader Penalty show. Good Night,