Speaker 1: On scaring US Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Wader Panekey Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the readA Panekey Show coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. Three vote arrivals in a week. Daniel Wilde
Speaker 3: with the latest on local international politics. All cross to
Speaker 3: Israel to speak to Emily Schrader about the reaction to
Speaker 3: Australia's shock un vote, and joining me tonight is the
Speaker 3: always insightful Yank Army Horowitz and making his Sky News
Speaker 3: debut is popular Australian comically dangerously heteronormative, UNPC toxic white
Speaker 3: male Isaac Butterfield.
Speaker 4: But first, the.
Speaker 3: Albanezer government plans to spend a whopping extra twenty four
Speaker 3: billion over the next four years, including a generous three
Speaker 3: hundred dollars in power build discounts for every household from
Speaker 3: Turacta Turidden and three hundred and twenty five dollars for
Speaker 3: small businesses, a move that the Treasury says will reduce
Speaker 3: inflation by zero point five percent next year. This looks
Speaker 3: very much like an election budget, and there are certainly
Speaker 3: winners and losers. What fears the short term boost lack
Speaker 3: long term benefits. Let's bring in Daniel Wilde from the
Speaker 3: Institute of Public Affairs. Daniel, your verdict on the budget
Speaker 3: and how exactly will are we fighting inflation by injecting
Speaker 3: billions and billions of taxpayer money into the economy.
Speaker 5: Well, that's right. This is a bad budget. It lacks
Speaker 5: vision and ambition for the future of Australia. Basically, the
Speaker 5: entire debate has been about whether we means test or
Speaker 5: don't means test a three hundred dollars subsidy. We're facing
Speaker 5: much bigger economic problems. What this also reinforces RITA is
Speaker 5: that this is a redistributionist government. It's not a growth government.
Speaker 5: It is a government that has focused on its narrow
Speaker 5: sectional interest, not on the betterment of the nation as
Speaker 5: a whole. In terms of the lack of ambition, their
Speaker 5: own forecast have real GDP growth in the twos for
Speaker 5: the next five years. Contrast that to the Hawk era
Speaker 5: it were three and a half percent growth every single year.
Speaker 5: So this government has given up on the idea of
Speaker 5: economic growth and they're reverting to nineteen seventy style politics.
Speaker 3: The Prime Minister has hit back at the critics who
Speaker 3: are calling the energy rebates wasteful and targeted.
Speaker 6: We are providing in this budget taxpayer tax cuts for
Speaker 6: every single Australian taxpayer, but also energy bill relief for
Speaker 6: every household. It's the most efficient way for it to
Speaker 6: be delivered.
Speaker 3: Now, there's a lot being said about this energy bill
Speaker 3: relief and who should be entitled to it, but I
Speaker 3: think again we're missing the point. We wouldn't need energy
Speaker 3: bill relief if we weren't pushing up the cost of
Speaker 3: energy deliberately. These are policies that have led to this.
Speaker 3: It hasn't happened because we've run out of gas and
Speaker 3: oil and coal.
Speaker 5: That's right, it's the tail wagging. The dog is treating symptoms,
Speaker 5: not causes. And the cause of the energy bill increases
Speaker 5: is net zero and the decommissioning of coal fire power.
Speaker 5: I mean, we know this from the data. We can
Speaker 5: go back to two thousand and seven when Kevin Rudd
Speaker 5: came in. All of the subsidies came in. Since two
Speaker 5: thousand and seven, energy bills have gone up by nine
Speaker 5: percent per year on average. If you contrast that from
Speaker 5: nineteen ninety to two thousand and seven, it was just
Speaker 5: three percent per year, so they've gone up at triple
Speaker 5: the rate as a result, of whether it's the carbon
Speaker 5: tax or the subsidies or net zero, So you have
Speaker 5: to treat the underlying problem rather than putting a band
Speaker 5: aid on it.
Speaker 3: Staying on the budgets, let's shed some light on some
Speaker 3: of the hidden winners and losers. Were cash splashed on
Speaker 3: everything from plant based proteins to sympathy orchestras. The government
Speaker 3: is going to be spending one point five million of
Speaker 3: your money to make it easier to understand labeling on
Speaker 3: food items such as veggie burgers and tofu sausages, three
Speaker 3: million on seafood origin stickers, plus two hundred and six
Speaker 3: Exteen million will be spent on arts and culture, including
Speaker 3: five point two million. Four orchestras in Canberra and Darwin,
Speaker 3: Dan dos Cambra. Need any more orchestras and why can't
Speaker 3: they pay for it themselves?
Speaker 5: Well, they don't need more orchestras for sure, but they're
Speaker 5: getting a lot more public servants in the budget, tens
Speaker 5: of thousands and more public servants with pay rises. Look
Speaker 5: there's another three key winners out of the budget. There's
Speaker 5: the environmental activists with the EPA. They're getting more money
Speaker 5: to shut down the economy. Those who want to censor
Speaker 5: the Safety Commission, they get more money to shut down
Speaker 5: freedom of speech. And of course everybody's favorite billionaire, TWiki Forest,
Speaker 5: is getting even more money from the government.
Speaker 4: To he needs the money, he's having it.
Speaker 7: He needs proven technologies that we're all going to pay for.
Speaker 3: How do they justify something like that, How do they
Speaker 3: justify giving one of Australia's richest individuals this sort of assistance.
Speaker 5: Well, I mean their argument is it's all to do
Speaker 5: with the new green renewable superpower. Look, I think Astralians
Speaker 5: we'll see through this, and it doesn't make sense when
Speaker 5: you're talking about people doing it tough with the cost
Speaker 5: of living, then you've got policies that are giving tax
Speaker 5: credits to someone like Twiggy Forests.
Speaker 7: It just doesn't add up.
Speaker 4: It does not.
Speaker 3: And Budget week is hectic in Canberra, but not so
Speaker 3: hectic that labor MPs can't find time to do stupid
Speaker 3: TikTok videos. You can see Dan, I don't even want
Speaker 3: to ask you about that clip.
Speaker 4: They just got to stop doing stuff like that.
Speaker 3: Just stop with the TikTok Instagram videos.
Speaker 4: Their own work. They're cringe wordy.
Speaker 3: Thank you now, will the Abenezi government's weakness on borders
Speaker 3: see a return of boats and the people smuggling trade.
Speaker 3: In the past week, three boats have been picked up.
Speaker 3: Six boats in the past six months have made it
Speaker 3: all the way to Australia since the jam Patterson, the
Speaker 3: Shadow Home Affairs Minister, is blaming the policies of the
Speaker 3: Albanesi government.
Speaker 1: Under the Labor government, error monitoring and on sea surveillance
Speaker 1: are down by twenty percent and twelve percent, respectively. So
Speaker 1: it's no wonder that boats are slipping through and it's
Speaker 1: a result of discoverment being weak when it comes to
Speaker 1: operation sovereign borders. They have undermined operations sovereign borders at
Speaker 1: every opportunity, including abolishing temporary protection visas, reducing these flying hours,
Speaker 1: and planning the cut over four hundred million dollars out
Speaker 1: of the budget over the next three years.
Speaker 3: I don't think it's a coincidence that every time Labor
Speaker 3: is in power this becomes an issue.
Speaker 5: No, that's right, James Patterson's spot on. Look, there's a
Speaker 5: couple of things here. There's a big chunk of the
Speaker 5: Labor Party that does not believe in sovereign borders. They're
Speaker 5: open borders people. They don't believe in turning boats back.
Speaker 5: They never have, they never will. The other issue here is, look,
Speaker 5: it gets to the bigger problem of the entire migration system,
Speaker 5: not just the illegal rivals, but the actual program. The
Speaker 5: budget confirms that the major already of our economic growth
Speaker 5: is still going to be underpinned by this unplanned mass
Speaker 5: migration that's sending us backwards in terms of a per
Speaker 5: capita situation. So Australians are getting poorer because of Labour's
Speaker 5: mass migration program, and we're also less secure because of
Speaker 5: their soft borders approach.
Speaker 3: Now, statue of former Tasmanian Premier William Crawber has been
Speaker 3: vandalized a day before a court ruling about whether it
Speaker 3: should be taken down. The statue in Hobart's Franklin Square
Speaker 3: was badly damaged, with its legs cut halfway through. And
Speaker 3: this statue is not just in danger from the criminal vandals,
Speaker 3: but also the vandals in the Hobart City Council who
Speaker 3: also want to topple.
Speaker 5: It well exactly. And you know we've seen this before
Speaker 5: with the you know, statues of Captain Cook and others
Speaker 5: where you know, these people just don't know Australian history.
Speaker 5: They're taught that Australia is a bad country, that we're
Speaker 5: not worth defending, that our culture is not worth preserving,
Speaker 5: and so no wonder they act like this. These are
Speaker 5: the downstream consequences of a of a broken education system
Speaker 5: and of our main institutions of our society, whether it's
Speaker 5: going to the football or anything else where. But continually
Speaker 5: toward Australia is based on stolen land and that were
Speaker 5: not a good country. Well, this is what happens.
Speaker 3: This is and this whole controversies over Crowther, who was
Speaker 3: a surgeon who was noted for his work with the poor,
Speaker 3: but there were allegations back in eighteen sixty nine that
Speaker 3: he stole found and stole the skull of an Aboriginal corpse.
Speaker 3: He denied it completely, but because of those allegations in
Speaker 3: eighteen sixty nine, they want to topple his statue. Now
Speaker 3: to this report from the ABC, and this is an
Speaker 3: important story about Chinese police being allowed to come to
Speaker 3: Australia with permission from the Australian Federal Police and question
Speaker 3: a woman and then take her back to China for
Speaker 3: trial in what is seen as a major breach of
Speaker 3: Chinese Australian police protocols. She was targeted as part of
Speaker 3: an anti corruption program called Operation fox Hunt. Now Dan,
Speaker 3: the Chinese Communist Party, says fox Hunt is all about
Speaker 3: targeting people who have committed serious financial crimes. But there
Speaker 3: are human rights groups who say this is a way
Speaker 3: to silence dissidents and critics of the regime.
Speaker 5: I don't know the details of this particular case, but
Speaker 5: on the face of it, it's concerning China, as we know,
Speaker 5: is not a country with the rule of law. It
Speaker 5: doesn't have transparency or the legal safeguards. So even if
Speaker 5: the accusations are correct about financial wrongdoing and serious crimes,
Speaker 5: I don't think anyone could have confidence that they were
Speaker 5: going to be dealt with in an appropriate manner. So look,
Speaker 5: on the face of it, I don't think that this
Speaker 5: should be happened. Of Australian residents being taken to China.
Speaker 5: We don't know what's going to happen to them.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, I'm just shocked because we've got Australians in
Speaker 3: Chinese prisons and we know how they're treated, and the
Speaker 3: fact that once you're charge you've got something like a
Speaker 3: ninety nine point nine percent conviction rate and the methods
Speaker 3: they use are also something to worry about. Now, let's
Speaker 3: talk about this painting of King Charles the Third. He
Speaker 3: has unveiled the official portrait, as is the first one
Speaker 3: since the coronation, and you can see his Majesty is
Speaker 3: wearing the uniform of the Welsh Guards in a striking
Speaker 3: oil painting striking. Indeed, this portrait was commissioned all the
Speaker 3: way back in twenty twenty, when King Charles was still
Speaker 3: a prince. It's divided opinion, but I've got to say, Dan,
Speaker 3: I absolutely love it. I've got a shock initially, but
Speaker 3: the more I look at it, the more I think
Speaker 3: it's a really special piece of art.
Speaker 4: Well, what's your take on it? Are you a hater?
Speaker 5: I'm not a hater, but when I first saw it,
Speaker 5: I got to say I didn't quite get it.
Speaker 7: It's a bit too avant garde for my taste.
Speaker 5: May able to grow on me over time, but look,
Speaker 5: I think it is good to see the King back
Speaker 5: official duties. We know he was very unwell for a
Speaker 5: penty of times. It's good to see that.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 5: Look, maybe this will maybe it will grow on me,
Speaker 5: but I'm not going to hold my breath.
Speaker 3: Okay, well, we're not going to have a big fight
Speaker 3: over it. But I think just keep looking at it
Speaker 3: and you.
Speaker 4: Will see the.
Speaker 3: Deep beauty within.
Speaker 4: Daniel Wylle, thank you so much of your time this evening.
Speaker 7: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is filmmaker and journalist Army Horowitz. Army
Speaker 3: President Joe Biden is notorious for repeating lies, verifiable lies,
Speaker 3: over and over again, and the latest example is the
Speaker 3: claim that inflation was at nine percent when he took office.
Speaker 8: I think inflation has gone slowly up. This wasn't nine
Speaker 8: percent when I came in, and it's now down around
Speaker 8: three percent and bringing down in fleshing was nine percent
Speaker 8: when I came to office.
Speaker 9: Nine per infletion was actually one point four percent when
Speaker 9: Biden was sworn in.
Speaker 3: Why does he keep doing these? I mean, these are
Speaker 3: things you can check that, they're not just matters of opinion.
Speaker 10: No, it's uh, well, he was right in the sense
Speaker 10: that it was nine percent a year after he came
Speaker 10: into office. Now, on the inflation itself made many many lies.
Speaker 10: For example, that inflation was because of the of the
Speaker 10: of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, when a simple math
Speaker 10: equation shows you the majority of the inflation actually came
Speaker 10: prior to the invasion of Ukraine. I mean, we can
Speaker 10: go on and on. We could talk about how his
Speaker 10: uncle was eaten by cannibals. Yes, that was something he
Speaker 10: actually claims to be a fat We could talk about
Speaker 10: he's arrested in Delaware for civil rights violations, and frankly,
Speaker 10: the worst of all when he continuously says that his
Speaker 10: son was killed in Afghanistan when his son actually tragically
Speaker 10: died of cancer afterwards.
Speaker 2: But despicably, he loves to trot that out.
Speaker 10: When he's to talking to families who lost kids in wars,
Speaker 10: he continues to trot out that particular life particularly despicable
Speaker 10: and terrible. No, but of course he's never gonna be
Speaker 10: called on it because he's parroting what the mainstream media
Speaker 10: wants to hear. This one is again the issue with
Speaker 10: the verifiability is if you're gonna lie, Joe, lie, is
Speaker 10: something that can't be checked, that would be my suggestion
Speaker 10: to you, A little gift for you.
Speaker 2: That's all. That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 3: It's just incredible. Yeah, inflation was once nine percent, but
Speaker 3: during your term when you inherited office, the inflation was
Speaker 3: almost a rock bottom, So it's just such a bold
Speaker 3: face lie. US Vice President Kamala Harris. Though she's not
Speaker 3: doing much for the passare, she's expressing her appreciation for
Speaker 3: young activists during a recent interview, praising their approach and
Speaker 3: how aren't waiting around for the older generation to solve
Speaker 3: big issues.
Speaker 4: She highlighted things like.
Speaker 3: Their readiness to tackle policies on gun violence and climate change.
Speaker 3: But Ami, these are strange comments to be making at
Speaker 3: a time when college campuses are overrun by these young
Speaker 3: activists disgracing themselves and disgracing these institutions of higher learning.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 10: I also, if you call, I also recently took a
Speaker 10: tour around a campus with my American flag and fifteen
Speaker 10: of these great youth people she's referring to attacked me,
Speaker 10: viciously grabbed my flag.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 10: I think she needs to take a look around. Is
Speaker 10: she praising the people who attacked me? She's praising the
Speaker 10: people who won't allow Jews to.
Speaker 2: Go to class on campus.
Speaker 10: Yeah, she needs to be clear about what she's referring to.
Speaker 10: And by the way, I think she also needs to
Speaker 10: take a look at the poll numbers because the eighteen
Speaker 10: and twenty nine vote, which overwhelmingly went for Biden and
Speaker 10: Kamala Harrison last election, seems to be eroding significantly because
Speaker 10: even then, even the eighteen and twenty nine and by
Speaker 10: the way, if you know, anybody's under twenty nine and
Speaker 10: they don't know anything, right, but even those people are
Speaker 10: smart enough to realize that this country's being driven into
Speaker 10: the ground and the responsibility live directly with this administration,
Speaker 10: which by the way.
Speaker 2: Happens to include Kamala Harris.
Speaker 10: So, yeah, I think she needs to recheck her little
Speaker 10: tour of the campuses and maybe she recanted. I don't know,
Speaker 10: I doubt it.
Speaker 3: Well, a law school in Boston is facing a backlash
Speaker 3: after graduates smeared red paint on their hands and held
Speaker 3: them up during their commencement ceremonies. Pro Palestinian students use
Speaker 3: this symbol of bloody hands in to protest the death
Speaker 3: toll in Gaza Army. You know perfectly well what this means.
Speaker 3: Tell my audience, what those red hands symbolize? What event
Speaker 3: are these graduates glorifying?
Speaker 10: Yeah, so, there was a there was a lynching in
Speaker 10: Romala a number of years ago where a jew was
Speaker 10: murdered and ripped apart by Palestine animals, and one particular
Speaker 10: thug animal beast took his bloody hands and he put
Speaker 10: them out the window famously and photographed it.
Speaker 2: I assume you're referring to that.
Speaker 10: That is the most disgusting display of savagery that I
Speaker 10: could imagine.
Speaker 2: But I think that.
Speaker 10: These students need to pay attention to the more to
Speaker 10: the news. We've been saying this for a while, but
Speaker 10: even the United Nations has recanted and finally said, Okay,
Speaker 10: we were lying for a long time about this war
Speaker 10: in Gaza, and they came the terms and reduced the
Speaker 10: number of civilian casualties.
Speaker 2: By fifty percent. Rita.
Speaker 10: We all knew those numbers were lies, but everybody kept saying, well,
Speaker 10: look what the mainstream media is saying, the UN is
Speaker 10: saying it. And now, finally, after the damage has been
Speaker 10: done to Israel's reputation, they finally came out and said, oh,
Speaker 10: we got it wrong. Actually, these reeling numbers are right,
Speaker 10: and shockingly, Hamas numbers are wrong. Maybe those those idiots
Speaker 10: on that campus that graduation to look at the fact
Speaker 10: that Israel has foty war historically low civilian casualties two
Speaker 10: civilians for every one militant as opposed to and by
Speaker 10: the way, and that's when you have the most densely
Speaker 10: populated place on planet Earth where Kamas is hiding. Civilians
Speaker 10: are using civilians as shields for themselves. And if you
Speaker 10: compare that to the NATO number so Afghanist five to one,
Speaker 10: maybe those people should look at those numbers and maybe
Speaker 10: rethink their idiocy.
Speaker 2: On graduation day.
Speaker 3: Let's talk about Snopes. Snopes, this so.
Speaker 4: Called fact checking site.
Speaker 3: We've been embarrassed again having to correct a fact check
Speaker 3: about Ashley Biden, the daughter of US President Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: her diary. The disturbing claims in that diary are now
Speaker 3: listed as true, not unproven Army. If this was a
Speaker 3: banker's diary detailing inappropriate showers with her dad and all
Speaker 3: sorts of other allegations, we never stop hearing about it.
Speaker 3: This would be well known across the board. But the
Speaker 3: contents of this diary have been memory holder that so
Speaker 3: many in the media have declined to report anything about it.
Speaker 10: Yeah, the big issue here really is the fact checkers
Speaker 10: themselves and Snopes and PolitiFact USA. Today, I would like
Speaker 10: I think one of the great accomplishments of the left
Speaker 10: was their ability to take over that entire industry and
Speaker 10: then branded as unbiased right above the political frame. And
Speaker 10: people have taken that and frankly done a great job
Speaker 10: with branding, because regular people look at these organizations Wikipedia
Speaker 10: and Snopes and politifacts so forth as fact and the
Speaker 10: reality is so far from that. I can tell you
Speaker 10: personally I have had with all of those fact checking organizations.
Speaker 10: I have run into the issues with them when they
Speaker 10: have lied baldly about things that I have said. I
Speaker 10: have forced several of them to recant, but of course,
Speaker 10: once it's released, the damage is done. And you know,
Speaker 10: you know when they're a lot, when all the mistakes
Speaker 10: are all in favor of liberals and none of the
Speaker 10: mistakes are favorite conservatives.
Speaker 2: That really is the answer how they're lying.
Speaker 10: If it was even half half, I could see how
Speaker 10: could they make many mistakes? But no, what the reality
Speaker 10: is is that what they are. They look at what
Speaker 10: they want things to be and assume that must be
Speaker 10: in actual fact, they basically have weaponized their bias. And
Speaker 10: again it's been a very very successful branding exercise, and
Speaker 10: they've sold to the public as you can look at
Speaker 10: us as unbiased when it couldn't be.
Speaker 2: Further for the truth.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, and it's so dangerous because it is gas lighting
Speaker 3: on a mass scale, calling themselves fact checkers when they're
Speaker 3: often amongst the most biased activists in the industry.
Speaker 4: Ami Horowitz, thank you so much for your time. This
Speaker 4: evening always a pleasure. Still to come a.
Speaker 3: Massive addition of lefties losing it, and I'll be joined
Speaker 3: by possibly Australia's most popular comic. He's got more than
Speaker 3: two million followers on YouTube alone. You're watching the Raid
Speaker 3: of Patty Show and now it's time for lefties losing it,
Speaker 3: and I think we're ready to hear more pronouns and
Speaker 3: expressions of gender identity.
Speaker 4: Are you homo flexible?
Speaker 3: Perhaps your pan or TRIXI now, I don't know what
Speaker 3: any of these words mean either.
Speaker 11: Hi, my name's queen and my pronounce are the thumb
Speaker 11: When I post about my gender identity and my sexuality.
Speaker 11: When I say that I don't want any labels, that
Speaker 11: is not an invitation for you to speculate on who
Speaker 11: I am or what I am. It's not a guessing
Speaker 11: game for you to play over whether I'm a girl
Speaker 11: or a boy, But what's in my pants? Or if
Speaker 11: I'm pan or buy or trixiic or homoflexible or gray,
Speaker 11: romantic or anything else. You don't need to fully understand
Speaker 11: the nuances of gender identity or sexuality to know that
Speaker 11: each person knows who they are better than you ever will.
Speaker 3: Yes, there are new identities and pronouns popping up up
Speaker 3: every hour, it seems, But how many things can you
Speaker 3: identify as at the same time?
Speaker 4: See if you can beat this millennial list.
Speaker 12: I am a weight, transmasculine, fem, non binary, temporarily mostly
Speaker 12: able bodied, neurodivergent, obsessive, compulsive, chronically ill, culturally Jewish, unitarian, universalist,
Speaker 12: non monogamous, DEMI low, romantic, great ammo best, actual survivor
Speaker 12: of acute and complex trauma, millennial and cat parent in
Speaker 12: mental health recre.
Speaker 3: DEMI low, romantic, chronically ill, Unitarian, universal cellist, transmasculine. I've
Speaker 3: lost track already. Let's see now from a lefty who's
Speaker 3: been losing it for.
Speaker 4: Some time now.
Speaker 3: One time Oscar nominee when she was known as Ellen Page,
Speaker 3: star of the hit film Juno, but she has since
Speaker 3: transitioned to Elliot Paige and enthusiastic transactivist who claims that
Speaker 3: being LGBTQIA plus plus plus is not niche.
Speaker 4: I don't call it niche. You know, queer things niche.
Speaker 13: Thirty percent of young people identify as LGBTQ plus. I'm like,
Speaker 13: I'm sorry, this is not niche. You tell really specific
Speaker 13: stories about like cis het people. I'm not calling that
Speaker 13: on a plant niche.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Yeah, I'm sure.
Speaker 3: I read a good book about that by Abigail Schreier
Speaker 3: Irreversible Damage, the transgender craze reducing our daughters. But page
Speaker 3: is right. There are a lot of young people identifying
Speaker 3: as anything other than just an ordinary girl or boy.
Speaker 4: I mean, who wants to be ordinary?
Speaker 3: I'm reminded of this classic clip from a Washington DC
Speaker 3: Pride rally in twenty two, where journalist Savannah Hernandez ask
Speaker 3: people how they identify.
Speaker 14: I am gender queer, trans mask and what's trans mask?
Speaker 14: Trans mask is like people under the non binary umbrella
Speaker 14: identifying like or hunting mask masculine?
Speaker 2: Yeah, what about you?
Speaker 15: I'm trance and uh on, my sexuality is unlabeled. I
Speaker 15: use him pronounced yeah, and I use the pronounce tell us.
Speaker 3: What you guys identify as we're asking everyone.
Speaker 9: Here today gay, okay, sis, what is it?
Speaker 16: Sis?
Speaker 12: Gender maya?
Speaker 1: There we go.
Speaker 4: I don't know gender, gender neutral or gender fluid.
Speaker 6: I think that's what they say.
Speaker 17: I don't know.
Speaker 4: I'm confused.
Speaker 3: We're all confused, lady. Let's see if there is any
Speaker 3: more clarity with some others at the rally.
Speaker 6: Oh, she pronouns are he him?
Speaker 18: Sometimes you say, I don't give it.
Speaker 2: I guess you could call me gay.
Speaker 3: I'm homo flexible.
Speaker 9: Really, I do like some women, but mostly men than
Speaker 9: see her it.
Speaker 13: I feel like, honestly, honestly, it should not be a
Speaker 13: bad pain.
Speaker 3: Like I've talked to me, go with the in them.
Speaker 3: I'm like, well, in the grammar of things, how would
Speaker 3: you want to represent yourself?
Speaker 13: I was like, I mean, I guess it, because it's
Speaker 13: like you're.
Speaker 11: It, You're the it.
Speaker 3: I'd be careful before referring to people as it. Not
Speaker 3: everyone is going to appreciate it. But that was Washington, DC.
Speaker 3: It's it's a strange place. Only four percent voted for Trump.
Speaker 3: Surely we wouldn't have that sort of confusion in Texas.
Speaker 3: They she uh they here non binary, trans.
Speaker 4: Mask bisexual, I'm just trans I'm the game.
Speaker 9: Mail put yeah, gamail put transgender Ian.
Speaker 4: I'm a seys she her probably not binary.
Speaker 7: Yeah, would be the best.
Speaker 4: What about you?
Speaker 3: Bye? Hellos, boil bye bye bye bye.
Speaker 4: I like frugs, not people. I'm sorry.
Speaker 13: I like Prigg's not people.
Speaker 3: I like frogs too. Now, to Democrat Storwart and strategist
Speaker 3: James Carville, losing it over Trump increasing is lead in
Speaker 3: the latest polls, particularly in those crucial swing states.
Speaker 16: In Trump's war ahead than he's ever been. It's gone
Speaker 16: the wrong way. It's not working. Everything that we're throwing
Speaker 16: is spaghetti at a wall, and none of it is.
Speaker 2: Sticking me included.
Speaker 16: And it's hard when you starting your eightieth year and you,
Speaker 16: you know, like anybody, also have an opinion of myself.
Speaker 2: And the opinion I've come to.
Speaker 4: Is I don't matter.
Speaker 16: And you know, we've got to try to think of
Speaker 16: something different because.
Speaker 2: What we're doing is really really not working.
Speaker 3: I don't know how about trying to formulate policies that
Speaker 3: don't destroy the country. That could be an idea about
Speaker 3: not becoming some sad add copy of a Banana republic
Speaker 3: where the ruling party tries to jail their main political rival.
Speaker 3: How about not being lefties losing it on.
Speaker 4: A daily basis.
Speaker 3: That might see a bump in Biden's numbers, because you know,
Speaker 3: things are pretty grim when even CNN can't hide the
Speaker 3: truth anymore.
Speaker 18: Look the sun Belt battleground sex. Frankly for the Joe
Speaker 18: Biden campaign, these numbers are an absolute disaster. The smallest
Speaker 18: leaders in Arizona for Donald Trump. He's up six. Look
Speaker 18: at this nine in Georgia thirteen and Nevada. My goodness, gracious,
Speaker 18: my god, that is a huge lead. No Democrat has
Speaker 18: lost that state since John Kerry lost it back in
Speaker 18: two thousand and four. How about these great late battleground sets.
Speaker 18: This is something that the Joe Biden campaign.
Speaker 2: Can work with.
Speaker 3: Yes, the Joe Biden team can work with that. But
Speaker 3: why is Trump doing so well in those Sun Belt
Speaker 3: states like Nevada, Georgia, and Arizona. You're going to love
Speaker 3: this answer from CNN. The CNN audience probably didn't like it,
Speaker 3: but you will.
Speaker 4: When you're looking into the number.
Speaker 1: Why do you think Biden is doing better in the
Speaker 1: Great Lakes and Trump is doing so much better than
Speaker 1: the Sunbelt?
Speaker 18: Yeah, the Trump coalition is changing. That's basically what's cooking here.
Speaker 18: This is at least one of the big reasons why
Speaker 18: so this is among likely voters in these in all
Speaker 18: these battleground states we just spoke about. Back in twenty twenty,
Speaker 18: eighty four percent of the Trump campaigns, the Trump coalition
Speaker 18: was white. Look where it is now, it's seventy eight percent.
Speaker 18: The non white portion of the Trump coalition. It was
Speaker 18: thirteen percent in twenty twenty. Look at this now, it's
Speaker 18: nineteen percent. So the Trump coalition is becoming more diverse.
Speaker 18: And of course those Sun Belt battleground states are more
Speaker 18: diverse than the Great Lake battleground station.
Speaker 4: You're looking at the Nevadas in the Arizona SA.
Speaker 18: Of course, if you look at Nevada, Arizona heavy Hispanic population,
Speaker 18: Georgia heavily African American population, with the Michigan does have
Speaker 18: some black voters in it, but Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are
Speaker 18: heavily heavily white.
Speaker 3: Yes, Trump's non white vote has jumped around fifty percent
Speaker 3: and the white of the state. The better Joe Biden
Speaker 3: is doing, doesn't that smash the media's tired old narratives.
Speaker 3: Now to North Carolina, where some leftist students lost it
Speaker 3: at Duke University's commencement ceremony on Sunday because the guest
Speaker 3: speaker was Jerry Seinfeld, who has the audacity to be white, male, heterosexual,
Speaker 3: and even worse, he is a Jew who supports Israel.
Speaker 3: The lefties couldn't handle that. Some of them got up
Speaker 3: and walked off as the crowd booed j I'm pretty
Speaker 3: sure the crowd were booing all those lefties who were
Speaker 3: walking off, But I do wonder what Seinfeld could have
Speaker 3: said that would be so objectionable that you couldn't possibly
Speaker 3: stomach it. You had to get up and walk off
Speaker 3: and miss a massive milestone in your academic career. This
Speaker 3: is possibly the most controversial parts of the speech. I'm
Speaker 3: about to play you and a trigger warning for the
Speaker 3: crazy people.
Speaker 19: Privilege is a word that has taken quite a beating lately.
Speaker 19: Privilege today seems to be the worst thing you can have.
Speaker 19: I would like to take a moment to defend it.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 19: A lot of you are thinking, I can't believe they
Speaker 19: invited this guy.
Speaker 6: Too late.
Speaker 19: I say, use your privilege. I grew up a Jewish
Speaker 19: boy from New York. That is a privilege. If you
Speaker 19: want to be a comedian. My point is we're embarrassed
Speaker 19: about things we should be proud of, and proud of
Speaker 19: things we should be embarrassed about. So on my staff
Speaker 19: in the nineties we had a lot of Harvard guys.
Speaker 19: They were fantastic, but I could never understand why these
Speaker 19: guys were so embarrassed about being from Harvard. They would
Speaker 19: never talk about it, they would never mention it. I'm
Speaker 19: not talking about Harvard now, I'm talking about the way
Speaker 19: it used to be. You're never going to believe this.
Speaker 19: Harvard used to be a great place to go to school.
Speaker 3: I'm joined now by comedian Isaac Butterfield, who has kicked
Speaker 3: off his twenty twenty four world tour in Australia. In
Speaker 3: two days, he will be at the Capital Theater in Bendigo.
Speaker 3: You can grab your tickets now, but be quick because
Speaker 3: he sells out very quickly. Indeed, he's not only funny,
Speaker 3: but he is one of the best at handling Heckler's one.
Speaker 7: Year of the day since I did my last show,
Speaker 7: Shout your Mouth, I remember you?
Speaker 2: How do I remember you? Where do I know you? From? Kim?
Speaker 2: I remember we had quite a weed interaction you.
Speaker 3: Made an absolute yourself.
Speaker 7: Everyone in the room hated you.
Speaker 19: You left, we thought you perished, we celebrated, and yet
Speaker 19: your return has come.
Speaker 3: Izac Butterfield, Welcome to the program. Proud work is very good.
Speaker 3: It's very important these days for stand up, isn't it
Speaker 3: the crowded way?
Speaker 7: It certainly is. It gets this new audience in that
Speaker 7: I've never seen stand up before. And that right there,
Speaker 7: that poor woman she's.
Speaker 3: Been It wasn't mean to she wasn't living a heckler.
Speaker 7: I am one of the worst people alive. I'll tell
Speaker 7: you that right now, reader.
Speaker 3: But it's fun.
Speaker 7: It's a good time to get involved with the crowd,
Speaker 7: and they come along and it's funny. You know, the
Speaker 7: people who sit in the front roads, they pay the
Speaker 7: most for the tickets, and they're the most interested, and
Speaker 7: they're the first to buy. And then I go out
Speaker 7: there and I'm like that horrible and mean, and it's
Speaker 7: just part of It's what keeps it fun and new
Speaker 7: for me, because I go out every night and I
Speaker 7: do similar material and I'm working on new bits and
Speaker 7: preparing for a special But to go out there and
Speaker 7: find someone to ruin their day, that's what makes it fun.
Speaker 3: They love it. They all want to be part of
Speaker 3: those viral clips.
Speaker 4: They love it.
Speaker 3: Now you've only got only got a world tour, but
Speaker 3: you've got a book which I'm very interested in because
Speaker 3: the title alone, Better Man, a manifesto on modern masculine.
Speaker 4: Now, that's going to trigger people.
Speaker 3: Right then and there immediately.
Speaker 4: Are you out Jordan Peterson?
Speaker 7: Maybe a horrifically bogan verger of Jordan Peterson. No, not
Speaker 7: at all. This is I didn't want to write, you know,
Speaker 7: I didn't want to write something that was trying to
Speaker 7: make me look like I was writing a biography. I'm
Speaker 7: only thirty. I know it looks like I'm a bit older.
Speaker 7: There's a harsh win where I live. It's important for
Speaker 7: younger people to understand that, particularly they they come from
Speaker 7: sixteen years old to a little bit older, that those years,
Speaker 7: the formative years, they're going to encounter a lot of
Speaker 7: different problems, issues and different ideas. And this book isn't
Speaker 7: so much this A lot of people are saying, oh,
Speaker 7: this is a far right comedian saying this not at all.
Speaker 7: In fact, a lot of the opinions you probably see
Speaker 7: in this book are very much in the middle. The
Speaker 7: first chapter is all about mental health. There's a chapter
Speaker 7: in the middle about marrying your best friend, which I
Speaker 7: did with my wife and we get along like a
Speaker 7: house on fire and have done for ten years. There's
Speaker 7: a chapter about my son when he was born and
Speaker 7: what you know you go through mentally to prepare for that.
Speaker 7: And there's also me being a horrible person in there
Speaker 7: as well. Don't worry about that. But it's important, I think,
Speaker 7: for young dudes to not just hear these things on
Speaker 7: the building side or in the footy club or wherever
Speaker 7: they happen to be, wherever they get their information from,
Speaker 7: to receive it from someone who's gone out and done
Speaker 7: all these shows and traveled the world and met these people.
Speaker 3: And it's still young and relatable because you appeal to
Speaker 3: that demographic very strongly.
Speaker 4: I've got a seventeen year old sons. I know that.
Speaker 3: Do you think there is a crisis in masculinity in
Speaker 3: not just Australia but the West. We have boys growing
Speaker 3: up just hearing negative messages, the toxic masculinity. They're going
Speaker 3: to be this, they're going to be that, And I
Speaker 3: do wonder what the impact that has on their psyche
Speaker 3: as they've grow into young men.
Speaker 7: There's definitely horrible men, But to say that masculinity is
Speaker 7: inherently toxic is ridiculous. You would never say that about
Speaker 7: mean women being toxic feminine people. Yeah, I think it's
Speaker 7: just one of those they get thrown around and they
Speaker 7: don't see the damage that it does. Like dudes can
Speaker 7: deal with it, older men can deal with it. But
Speaker 7: we are seeing a distinct line in the sand at
Speaker 7: younger people's preschools wherever they happen to be, or kindergartens.
Speaker 7: It's the boys versus the girls. These boys are going
Speaker 7: to grow up to be these horrible people and it's
Speaker 7: just not the case. Absolutely, And I feel like that
Speaker 7: creates an enemy between these two genders, one of the
Speaker 7: many or two of the many genders.
Speaker 4: And there are so many.
Speaker 3: Well, let's have a look look at some of that,
Speaker 3: because let's do some lefties together. It feels strange and
Speaker 3: weird because it's something I do by myself.
Speaker 4: It's a solo thing.
Speaker 3: But let's start with the veep Kamala Harris, she just
Speaker 3: started swearing.
Speaker 13: We have to know that sometimes people will open the
Speaker 13: door for you and leave it open.
Speaker 3: Sometimes they won't, and then you.
Speaker 4: Need to kick that door down. Steals my language. She's
Speaker 4: just comedic goal.
Speaker 3: She gives so much material, but the left in general do,
Speaker 3: and yet comics are so shy about using that rich material.
Speaker 3: Why is that. I know a lot of comics lean
Speaker 3: left themselves, but when the left are giving you this craziness,
Speaker 3: surely it's if you're interested in being funny, you're going.
Speaker 4: To utilize it.
Speaker 7: Yeah, being a left wing comedian is a smart business
Speaker 7: decision because you're going to end up on you know,
Speaker 7: the Channel tens or wherever you want to be, to
Speaker 7: be on the Melbourne Comedy Festival road show. You're going
Speaker 7: to be on these big platforms and they're going to
Speaker 7: push you because.
Speaker 3: You flick specials that are awful.
Speaker 7: There are some very good ones, there's some very bad
Speaker 7: ones as well. But also we know that comedy is subjective.
Speaker 7: We know that people don't want to come and see
Speaker 7: if they're an older person, so they are left wing themselves,
Speaker 7: they probably don't want to come and see me. And
Speaker 7: that's fine. Some people just aren't good people, they aren't
Speaker 7: funny people. But other people do enjoy that, and I
Speaker 7: think if there's a nice mix then it's fine. But
Speaker 7: if you see, if you walk through Melbourne right now,
Speaker 7: you go to the comedy clubs, I would be absolutely shunned.
Speaker 7: They would not want me.
Speaker 3: Which it's crazy because you have such an enormous following.
Speaker 3: You've got more than two million followers on YouTube, Beloon.
Speaker 3: I know you've got massive followings on other social media sites,
Speaker 3: but that I look that up and I checked some
Speaker 3: really high profile Aussie comics. I couldn't find a single
Speaker 3: one that came close to your following. Jim Jeffries has
Speaker 3: got three hundred thousand, and he had his own show
Speaker 3: in the US, so you know he had really high profile.
Speaker 3: But so there is obviously a market for your type
Speaker 3: of comedy. It's just the comedy world seems to be
Speaker 3: dominated by leftist types.
Speaker 4: Now, I want to play you a couple of.
Speaker 3: Clips involving pronouns, and this one has a pronoun threat
Speaker 3: which I enjoyed.
Speaker 17: E there, you can either respect my trans homies or
Speaker 17: I can identify as a problem. And if I catch
Speaker 17: your being disrespectful, your pronouns are going to be was
Speaker 17: were thank you for coming and have a nice day.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure if our death threats are a way
Speaker 3: to have folks, embrace your neo pronouns.
Speaker 7: My wife.
Speaker 4: Let herself go a little bit.
Speaker 7: She likes to dress up. It's interesting. And this is
Speaker 7: the thing with TikTok is you're seeing some of the
Speaker 7: most insane people of all time having a platform to
Speaker 7: reach so many differently. At least people, you know, one
Speaker 7: hundred years ago would be on the streets, people will
Speaker 7: pass them and tiptoe around them and all that type
Speaker 7: of stuff. But now they have a platform to the masses,
Speaker 7: and we're seeing it right there.
Speaker 3: We are, and we do not embrace any sort of
Speaker 3: acts of violence on this program, except if it's delivered
Speaker 3: by a cat.
Speaker 11: Hi, my name is Aaron.
Speaker 15: I use her pronouns, and I am.
Speaker 3: That is one of the all time great clips ever.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, you can say what you want
Speaker 3: about social media, but that eight seconds of twenty four
Speaker 3: carrot gold there is max it all worth.
Speaker 7: I've never been a fan of cats, but that that's good.
Speaker 7: That's positive. A headway with cats, ah, I do.
Speaker 3: But now, another thing I don't understand with comics these days,
Speaker 3: because a lot of them seem to be looking for
Speaker 3: applause saying, you know, a woke, little little pronouncement, yes,
Speaker 3: but not fun not funny. Funny doesn't seem to be
Speaker 3: the priority anymore. And I hear a lot of comics
Speaker 3: talk about it, Well, we don't want to punch down,
Speaker 3: this punching down concept, but you look at who's powerful.
Speaker 3: All the big institutions where you're talking about, Hollywood studios,
Speaker 3: sporting leagues, celebrities, corporates, they're all woke. So surely if
Speaker 3: you are taking those on your punching up.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I think in comedy it is all about. In
Speaker 7: my personal opinion, I throw punches wherever they'll land. Oh
Speaker 7: king here, it doesn't matter whatever's going on. All right,
Speaker 7: people are coming and they're paying money to laugh to
Speaker 7: for an hour, to forget about their lives, whether their
Speaker 7: good lives, bad lives, are indifferent. And if you don't
Speaker 7: give that to them, if they don't spend their entire
Speaker 7: time barely laughing, the abs walking out, they hurting, then
Speaker 7: you haven't done your job.
Speaker 3: That's my I don't care if you're offensive, even if
Speaker 3: you're offensive about things that I care about, as long
Speaker 3: as it's funny. If you're offensive without the laugh, then well.
Speaker 2: I got told.
Speaker 7: Well basically last year I got canceled for an aboriginal joke. Now,
Speaker 7: I have been doing aboriginal jokes since I started doing
Speaker 7: comedy because I grew up playing rugby league with a
Speaker 7: lot of Aboriginal fellows. And this is just how we
Speaker 7: used banter, I guess you would say. Now, I eventually
Speaker 7: got taken to the Human Rights Commission in Queensland because
Speaker 7: of that joke, and it's still before the court.
Speaker 5: Center.
Speaker 7: It's a whole thing that's happened. I got served papers
Speaker 7: because of a joke. One lady complained and then I
Speaker 7: had to front the commission. Wow, so this is where
Speaker 7: this is going. Like I know, a lot of people say,
Speaker 7: you know, there's no such thing as cancel culture. Cancel culture.
Speaker 7: That's cancel culture right there. That is Yeah, that's venues
Speaker 7: not booking you because they don't want to deal with
Speaker 7: the backlash because you're getting taken to a government organization.
Speaker 3: Well, the process is part of the punishment when it
Speaker 3: comes to the Human Rights Commission.
Speaker 4: I don't know about your case.
Speaker 3: I've got to confess I don't know the details of
Speaker 3: that one, but I know about other cases where that's
Speaker 3: very much the dynamic.
Speaker 4: Isaac Butterfield, thank you. So much for time. This evening
Speaker 4: still to come.
Speaker 3: President Joe Biden backtracks on his commitments to Israel.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Berneza government meanwhile, is accused of supporting terrorism, welcome back.
Speaker 3: The White House is set to scale back its support
Speaker 3: of Israel and its war against Haamas. The Biden administration's
Speaker 3: decision to puuse a shipment of arms marked a significant
Speaker 3: turning point which can have a lasting impact on the
Speaker 3: administration's relationship with Israel. Joining me now is TV host
Speaker 3: and journalist Emily Schrader. Emily, there are deep divisions in
Speaker 3: the Democrat Party over President Biden's response to this conflict.
Speaker 3: Do Israelis still feel that the US has their back,
Speaker 3: that they've got them alongside them as they fight to
Speaker 3: eliminate Hermas Well?
Speaker 9: First of all, Rita, thanks for having me on. Always
Speaker 9: a pleasure to be here in regards to what's going
Speaker 9: on in the United States. And do Israelis actually feel
Speaker 9: that America has their back? I think the vast majority
Speaker 9: of Israelis feel that the American people have their back,
Speaker 9: But when it comes to the Biden administration, I think
Speaker 9: we've seen a sharp turn and a turn that quite frankly,
Speaker 9: is not surprising given this US administration's foreign policy from
Speaker 9: day one on other states as well, be it Russia, China,
Speaker 9: or the Islamic Republic of Iran. There's been a very,
Speaker 9: very weak foreign policy from the Biden administration, and I'm
Speaker 9: not surprised at all to see that he's sort of
Speaker 9: cowtowing to the more extremist elements within the Democratic Party.
Speaker 9: Now this is despite the fact, of course that it's
Speaker 9: particulabarly going to lose in the election, so he's pandering
Speaker 9: to people who really are not going to have his back,
Speaker 9: even electorally in the long term.
Speaker 3: Well, he does seem to be focused on domestic issues
Speaker 3: even when making these calls on foreign policy. And we
Speaker 3: keep hearing about a two state solution a fantasy right now.
Speaker 3: But at Douglas Murray, who will join me on the
Speaker 3: program tomorrow and night, had this take on the two
Speaker 3: state solution that is actually motivating Biden's decision making.
Speaker 7: He believes famously in the two state solution, which is
Speaker 7: a Minnesot from Michigan, and he's trying he's trying to please,
Speaker 7: he's trying to please a few hundred thousand people in America.
Speaker 7: I don't think he's going to please anyone.
Speaker 3: It Emily, Do you agree with that that so much
Speaker 3: of what we're seeing from the Biden administration is motivated
Speaker 3: by holding onto those couple of crucial states that have
Speaker 3: large Muslim populations who are very, very energized about this
Speaker 3: particular issue.
Speaker 9: I think that that is one of the problems that
Speaker 9: the Biden administration is facing in one of their misjudgments
Speaker 9: in terms of policy. But I do think that the
Speaker 9: problem actually runs much deeper than that, because the policies
Speaker 9: that we've seen are being implemented by the people that
Speaker 9: Biden has hired. And the people that Biden has hired,
Speaker 9: including in the National Security Council, are people who have
Speaker 9: associations with Students for Justice in Palestine, I had associations
Speaker 9: with the Muslim Brotherhood, people who have had very very
Speaker 9: weak policies of appeasement towards terrorist organization, whether it's Commas
Speaker 9: or the Islamic Republic of Eyon itself. And this is
Speaker 9: the consistent trend that we have seen from this administration,
Speaker 9: a type of moral cowardice when it comes to dealing
Speaker 9: with not just the Israel Hamas war, because that's only
Speaker 9: one element of the evil that we're facing today. But
Speaker 9: in terms of dealing with terrorist organizations as the whole
Speaker 9: across the entire world, we do need someone to be
Speaker 9: a moral authority on these issues, and frankly, I much
Speaker 9: prefer that it be the United States, for example, than
Speaker 9: say China or Russia, or god forbid, the Islamic Republic.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 3: Well, the Australian government has been accused of supporting terrorism
Speaker 3: after voting for United Nations resolution calling for the Security
Speaker 3: Council to admit Palestine as a member state. The decision
Speaker 3: has understandably at right mini here in Australia. We've had
Speaker 3: more than seventy years of bipartisanship before this. But what
Speaker 3: has the response being to this decision in Israel? Is
Speaker 3: there a sense of betrayal that a once staunch ally
Speaker 3: has voted with Israel's enemies.
Speaker 9: I think that the statements of Pennywong and the actions
Speaker 9: of Australia and the United Nations are very problematic. I
Speaker 9: do think there's a sense of betrayal on the ground
Speaker 9: here in Israel. Of course, Australia is not the only
Speaker 9: nation to sort of tiptoe around this issue and pay
Speaker 9: lip service to the Palestinian cause in perhaps ways that
Speaker 9: they really shouldn't be. I think that the fact we're
Speaker 9: even discussing a Palestinian state in the aftermath of October seventh,
Speaker 9: one of the biggest terrorist attacks we've ever seen, the
Speaker 9: highest number of Jews who have been killed since the
Speaker 9: Holocaust in one day. To respond to that by saying, oh, well,
Speaker 9: maybe we should talk about Palestinian statehood is insanity, especially
Speaker 9: when you're still dealing with a US and European and
Speaker 9: many other countries designated terrorist organization in the Gaza Strip
Speaker 9: who is still in control after all the international pressure
Speaker 9: that's been placed on Israel to stop their actions, their
Speaker 9: defensive actions in a just and moral and legal war.
Speaker 9: It's outrageous. It's outrageous to be placing the responsibility on
Speaker 9: the State of Israel for this. The entire international community,
Speaker 9: including Australia, should be united against TAMAS, and there should
Speaker 9: be no other discussion about a Palestinian state or negotiations
Speaker 9: or anything else until this Hamas terrorist organization is completely eliminated.
Speaker 9: They are unable to rule the Gaza Strip anymore and
Speaker 9: all of the hostages they have taken are returned home. Instead,
Speaker 9: we hear endless chatter about the Palestinian cause, and one
Speaker 9: State Tuesday twenty states, I don't care about that. We
Speaker 9: don't care about that right now. What we care about
Speaker 9: is getting our hostages home and that should that should
Speaker 9: be the priority for every single world leader as well.
Speaker 9: It's not even a political issue. You can support Palestinians
Speaker 9: and still support exactly what I said. In fact, you should.
Speaker 9: An actual pro Palestinian policy is against Haamas, it's against
Speaker 9: Islamic jihad, it's against the Islamic Republic, and it's actually
Speaker 9: supportive of the civilians who are not engaged with terrorism,
Speaker 9: which is not what we're seeing from the international community.
Speaker 4: We see the.
Speaker 9: Propping up of hamas, including unfortunately by the US administration.
Speaker 9: The only impact they're having by withholding some of these
Speaker 9: munitions that are more precise by the way that would
Speaker 9: actually prevent more civilian casualties is that you're going to
Speaker 9: see more bloodshed as a result of that. This is
Speaker 9: a misguided policy from the US administration, and it's a
Speaker 9: misguided approach from any of the nations, especially Western democratic
Speaker 9: nations who have historically been allied with Israel, like Australia,
Speaker 9: to use this war in this situation to somehow advance
Speaker 9: the issue of a Palestinian state, which is completely separate
Speaker 9: from what we see going on in the Gaza strip
Speaker 9: right now.
Speaker 3: Well said Emily Schreide. Thank you so much for your
Speaker 3: time this evening. Thank you. That's it for me tonight.
Speaker 3: Newsnight is up next. I'll see you at eleven tomorrow.
Speaker 4: Good night,