WEBVTT - Sharri | 15 July

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Shari.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the show.

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Danikiti, Giorgio filling in this week for Shari Marksen

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>coming up tonight. The nauseating charm offensive continues. Our Prime

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Minister cuddles up to China. But what did he actually

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>raise with the Chinese President?

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Today?

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Unions push for a Gillard style carbon policy to lower

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the cost of net zero. Bartaba Joyce is standing by

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>ready to fire up. Is this shaping up as the

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>first broken promise of Labour's new term? First the Treasurer

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>tells us he's relaxed about tax hikes and now it

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>seems he's open to the idea. And Donald Trump issues

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin with a fifty day ultimatum end the war

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine or face one hundred percent tariffs. But first tonight,

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hard conversations needed to be had today when the Prime

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Minister met with Chinese President Shijing Ping in Beijing. But

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>judging by the Prime Minister's press conference after, Albo is

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just cuddling up to China.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>And I'll show you that in a moment. But look

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>it was all smiles.

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Today and her boy was like watching two lifelong best

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>friends fall and over each other.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.839
<v Speaker 4>With joint efforts from both states, the Channel Australia relationship

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 4>has rouse from the setback and turned around, bringing tangible

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 4>benefits to the Chinese and Australian peoples. The most important

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 4>thing we can learn from this is that a commitment

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 4>to equal treatment, to seeking common ground while sharing differences.

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 5>I note your comments in your opening remarks about seeking

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 5>common ground while sharing differences. That approach has indeed produced

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 5>very positive benefits for both Australia and for China.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Has it really all that common ground? Anthony Albanese even

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>posting this picture of the two of them getting excited

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>by that shared common ground, except, of course, this is China.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>We are dealing with our greatest strategic threat and there

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't a lot of common ground to work with. Remember

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the live fire drills off our coasts, the spy ships

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sent our way, the military near missus, the punative tariffs

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>on Australian goods, and a lack of investigation into the.

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Origins of coronavirus.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Even today, a group of Australian TV journalists, including from

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Sky News, were blocked from getting on their bus by

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 1>local security officials before that meeting began and were told

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to hand over their footage for viewing by Chinese police,

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and luckily Australian embassy officials successfully intervened. What was that

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>again about common ground? In fact, I am willing to

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bet Anthony Arbanzi went into the meeting with President She

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>with a shopping list of grievances between our two countries,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>barely said Boom, and judging by his press conference after

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the meeting, it doesn't really leave you with much hope

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>as to how strongly he prosecuted the issue of live

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>fire drills and spy ships.

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 6>Did you seek assurances that Australia would be better informed

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 6>in future about the PLA's navy in Australian waters? And

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 6>has China asserted its right to free navigation in those waters?

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Yes to the former. And secondly, in response, of course

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 5>it was president she said that China engaged in exercises

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 5>just as Australia engages in exercises.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, look good to know what she said, So you

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>know all must be okay? Then why is the Prime

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Minister acting as a mouthpiece for the president. So the

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>journalist then sought classic for clarification.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 6>So can I just clarify on that answer that you

0:03:55.480 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 6>specifically thought that the notification was really issue that Australia

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 6>had had earlier in the year.

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 5>I said what I said at the time, which was

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 5>that it was within international law. There was no breach

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 5>of international law by China, but that we were concerned

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 5>about the notice and the way that it happened, including

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 5>the live fire exercises.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, that settles it, then, doesn't it.

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>The live fire drills were all above board, and so

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the journalists sought clarification again.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>And once again the answer was just as bad.

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 7>The military build up and what its purpose is, what

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 7>china strategic and military aims.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 5>Are, well, you would be surprised if that was brought forward.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure what you're getting out of what you're

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 5>suggesting might be. So I'm not sure the context.

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, your government's raised concerns about the military build up,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 7>the lack of clarity around what it might be used for.

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 7>Do you feel confident that China is a force for

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 7>peace in the region after this meeting or do you know.

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 5>What we did was we put forward Australia's position or

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 5>I did, which is that we want peace and security

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 5>in the region.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>The Prime minister has given a stronger position on China's

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>interests than the Australian and listening to that it makes

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you wonder how little was said by albo. The Prime

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Minister also confirmed the Port of Darwin was not raised

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>despite promising to take it back from China.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't need to sorry to jump in none. It

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 5>wasn't raised. I can't be clear.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 7>As any were any issues raised by him.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 5>I can't be clearer than to say the question I

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 5>was asked was not raised.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Look, this is a prime minister who is so scared

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of offending the Australians. A foreign editor, Greg Sheridan actually

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>summarized very well the Port of Darwin's situation today.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 8>But because Canberra is so nervous, so fearful, so hesertat

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 8>And if you want the company to sell the lease,

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 8>tell them to sell the lease. If they won't sell it,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 8>then take it back as an active government.

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Then the matter is done and.

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 8>Resolved at the moment. Because a coward dies a thousand deaths,

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 8>and Australian governments are so cowardly we're just trembling and

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 8>in terror time after time.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But this was, of course Albanesi's fourth meeting with China,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and that roundtable, as you can see there on the

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom of your screens, is still going.

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 3>The meetings today are still happening.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>And gee, it's such a strange situation because our Prime

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>minister is out there looking like the best friend of Shijingping,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>while at the same time at odds and alienating our

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>number one ally in the United States. And this visit

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>comes as the US is demanding we lift defense spending

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and clarify our position on Taiwan should China go to war. Now,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of course the US is watching this extended visit to

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>China closely, and Shijingping has the handsome boy exactly where

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he wants him. Even before today's meeting, The China Daily,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Beijing's mouthpiece, praise their handsome boy in an editorial called

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>common ground prevails over differences. It said Australian PM Anthony

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Albanesi's ongoing visit to China is not only of significance

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>for the bilateral and trade relations between the two countries,

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it also sends a message amid the changing global trade landscape.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Nothing like the kiss on the forehead from communist China,

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And why wouldn't there be I mean, remember when the

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Chinese conducted those live fire drills off our coast, and

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister went into nothing to see here mode?

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 9>Is this time just to take us down to against

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 9>China publicly against about their actions.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's important as well, and Defense have confirmed that

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 5>China did comply with the international law. This is activity

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 5>that has occurred in m waters consistent with international law.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Australian Defense were certainly.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 10>Aware.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Or how about when a Chinese ship was gathering intelligence

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>off the coast.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 5>We won't, for obvious reasons, broadcast everything that we're doing,

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 5>but we're keeping an eye on this as we do.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Of course, I would prefer that it wasn't.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>There, and obviously it's gotten worse since our ADF is

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>preparing for the arrival of Chinese spy vessels monitoring Operation

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Talisman Saber.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>But the Prime Minister again isn't fast.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 5>That would be nothing unusual that has happened in the past,

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 5>and I'll continue to assert Australia's national interest as I

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 5>do so.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's no wonder Beijing's mouthpiece was all praise for our PM,

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>even noting his extended stay in China is notably long

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>for a state leader. It went on to say, Albanesi's

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>visit shows that the Australian side has a clearer judgment

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and understanding of China than it had under previous Scott

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Morrison government. Well, of course, China is all praise for labor,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>not Scott Morrison. I mean, how dare the former Prime

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Minister asked the hard hitting questions on the origins of COVID,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the Wuhan lab, China's ambitions in the

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>South China Sea, and on the punitive tariffs imposed on

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Australian goods like lobster, barley and wine.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Everything Albo wouldn't dare touch.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Scott Morrison has responded, telling The Australian having a character

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>reference from the China Daily was never one of my

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy aspirations.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I say wear it as a badge of honor now.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>The difference between Anthony Albernesi and Scott Morrison, of course,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is that Albo is an.

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Apologist for China.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>China has eagerly responded to his weakness, throwing its support

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>publicly behind Anthony Albanesi while trying to drive a wedge

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>between Australia and the United States, and experts agree.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 2>It seemed to me that the most important the goal

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 2>of a chigin King ridin in this visit, it's to

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>divide the United States of the deliot.

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Which of course works very well for Beijing.

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And it seems as though this Prime Minister is all

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>caught up in the hype and spin. Anthony Arbernezi has

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>always been weak when it comes to foreign policy. That

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is why he can't stand up for our values on

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the world stage. That is why the PM cannot get

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with Donald Trump. That is why Australia is

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>drifting away from the US from a long standing alliance

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and straight into the arms of China, blinded by the

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Beijing pomp and ceremony with promises of free trade and.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 3>Seeking common ground.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And let's be real, China couldn't give a toss about

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>seeking common ground. China does what China wants. It's just

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>a shame the handsome man from Australia is so dizzied

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>by the red lights. Joining us now to unpack this

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is former Liberal Senator Holly Hughes and former Speaker of

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the House Bromwin, Bishop heart of both of you, thank

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 3>Me on the show.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Look let's obviously start bromwin with this meeting today between

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Shijingping and Anthony alban Easy.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Based on the.

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Comments that we just heard from Anthony alb and Easy

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at that press conference, how satisfied are you that these

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>issues were prosecuted by the Prime Minister.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 11>Quite frankly, he sounded more like the governor of a

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 11>vassal state paying homage to the dominant state rather than

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 11>the Prime minister of a sovereign state of Australia. And

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 11>I found the whole episode very concerning. Indeed, I noticed

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 11>that mister Forrest popped up and said, oh, we must

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 11>have an agreement on AI and the Communist Party of

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 11>China giving them access to all of our information. I

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 11>don't think so. We didn't see him stand up for

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.359
<v Speaker 11>Australia once. We didn't see him stand.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 10>Up for the.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 11>Diver who was damaged by the sonars from Communist Party ships.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 11>We didn't see him stand up for the pilot who

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 11>was threatened when they were doing.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 3>A surveillance flying.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 11>And we certainly didn't hear anything about the live fire

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 11>around our coastline, mapping out no doubt all the cables

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 11>that link us up and then saying twenty five percent

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 11>of our trade is tied up in China, and he

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 11>wants more.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 10>I want less.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be dependent.

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 11>I want to see our trade diversify, absolutely. And if

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 11>we don't start to do that and don't backtrack, And

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 11>you know, Richo has a good statement about socialist culture.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 11>If you're rat once, you're rat twice. And the fact

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 11>of the matter is that when it was Maurice Paine

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 11>who said, led to us where COVID came from, wham,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 11>we copped all those tariffs. There was a discussion here

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 11>today by bloggers in China about the port of Darwin

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 11>coming back to us. What did they say, Well, we

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 11>might buy your iron ore. It's the same thing. So

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 11>never mind about what Donald Trump's doing. What is China

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 11>going to do to us? The more we become dependent

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 11>upon them, we can be destroyed by means other than

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 11>a live fire That can come later. But in the

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 11>first instance, the Communist Party of China is just that,

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 11>the Communist Party dictatorship, no human rights, no individuality, none

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 11>of the things that we cherish in this nation. And

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 11>that Prime Minister sounded like the governor of a vassal

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 11>state wanting to suck up.

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 3>I think you're spot on.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>This is why here, Bronnie, I think perfectly perfectly summarized.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But Holly, this is why China could not give a

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:41.119
<v Speaker 1>toss about this common ground that both she and Albineazi

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>spoke about.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Today they do whatever they want to do, and that

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 3>is the dangerous part.

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 12>Look, Rovin's one hundred percent right when she talks about trade,

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 12>and we saw how we were impacted when there were

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 12>particularly wine lobsters were so reliant on China that as

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 12>soon as their trade was stopped, these producers had nowhere

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 12>to go. We do need to diversify those producers, need

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 12>to not get comfortable in the China basket and start

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 12>to open up their markets so they're not impacted by

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 12>the whims of a communist regime.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 10>But we need to be really sensible here.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 12>We've got Chinese inverters attached to most of the solar

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 12>panels in this nation. The ability for China to impact

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 12>our energy markets and shut us down is becoming more

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 12>and more a reality of being able to occur. The

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 12>fact they want to access to AI and materials. I mean,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 12>I'm starting to think mister Abnezi wants to saw walking

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 12>around saying mee, how soon because he is moving us

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 12>so close to China. It is actually embarrassing to be

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 12>Australian and how challenging things the geopolitical environment is at

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 12>the moment. Yet he seems absolutely unwilling to stand up

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 12>for Australians. Had no consideration for people that were in

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 12>those airplanes that had to be diverted over the live.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 10>Fire that was notified. They were notified off by Virgin pilots.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 12>This is unbelievable that this guy has any credibility standing

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 12>up there at all.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 10>That Australians need to wake up.

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 12>They need to wake up and understand what this guy's

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 12>doing because he's leading us down a very dangerous path.

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, when he was all at sea today in that

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>press conference, you look completely flustered. But the bright lights,

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the bright red lights, just keep shining and that's all

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that is important to our Prime minister. Now, look after

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>an embarrassing gaff from Treasury which saw official advice to

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chalmers about hiking taxes released, it seems the Treasurer

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is on board with the idea after all. I mean

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>yesterday he told us he was relaxed about the leak

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>today he tells us he's open to a number of

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>methods for making the budget more sustainable.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 13>When you make the kind of progress that we've made

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 13>on budget repair, two surplus's biggest ever noomenal turnaround in

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 13>the budget, and a single parliamentary term getting the Liberal

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 13>debt down by one hundred and seventy billion dollars, that

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 13>always involves a combination of measures.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And let's not forget that you can't trust a word

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this government says when it comes to monetary policy.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 5>That when you go to an election and you make commitments,

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 5>you should stick to My word is my bond?

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>My word is my bond? Run when that tap from

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this line. But look, this was always going to happen.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Was it over that the Prime Minister a couple of

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago was talking about tax reform. Now you've got

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chalmers open to this idea. Do you think it's

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on the agenda?

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 11>Look, the snake charmer is precisely that. The only fact

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 11>that you can rely on. He said before the election,

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 11>the budget's in great shape, he said after the election

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 11>it's unsustainable. Of course he wants more taxation. Of course

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 11>he's looking at ways to further tax the Australian people.

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 11>And what do we see. We'll see wealth taxes, We'll

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 11>see death TAXX.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, indeed, their Labor Party has always been in favor

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 11>of death taxes, and it has to be thought and

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 11>the Liberal Party has to be out there first and

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 11>foremost saying this cannot happen. But if you look at

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 11>what they've done, one hundred and forty four billion dollars

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.719
<v Speaker 11>in expenditure, and he's trying to tell us he's lessoned expenditure.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 11>And furthermore, it's built into the forward estimates. So we're

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 11>in a situation where we've got a I call him

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 11>the snake charmer because it's all illusion and he tells

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 11>us one thing when reality is totally another. And this

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 11>idea of productivity increase, everything they did in the first term,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 11>from industrial relations to increasing the cost of energy has

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 11>made sure that our productivity.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 10>Went that way.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 11>And unless we see look our top three expenditures that

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 11>have got to be examined. We've got the NDIS, we've

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 11>got defense, and we've got the negative. We've got the

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 11>energy policies that they're pursuing. We can't afford all three. Now,

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 11>if you stop rewiring the nation, which is trillions of dollars,

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 11>so we can afford increased defense and we can afford

0:17:58.680 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 11>the NDA is absolutely.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I also wonder was this even a leak from Treasury.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't help us think was this a deliberate ploy

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to try and soften the blow?

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 12>You sort of wondered, don't you, whether they were just

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 12>kind of softening the ground up a bit that this

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 12>is how things aren't going great. I mean, look, it's

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 12>not a good look for them. The Treasury is saying,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 12>there's no way you're going to meet your housing targets,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 12>there's no way you're going to keep the budget in

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 12>check if you don't raise taxes and reduce spending. And

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 12>I think that's you know, it wasn't one or the

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 12>other either.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 10>It wasn't tax and spend.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 3>You know in reduction.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 12>It was you know, you're going to have to raise

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 12>taxes and find a way to cut spending at the

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 12>same time, and they're just not capable of it.

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 10>But it's you know, we talk about the ndias.

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 12>Before this government came in, Bill Shorten referred to the

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 12>coalition as KABOOKI playing pearl clutches when we tried to

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 12>make changes to the ndis around sustainability.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 10>And then of course the first thing he did.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 12>Bill Shortened when he became minister was coming and say,

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 12>oh guess what, it's not sustainable. But yet through three

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 12>years of government, no one was prepared to put their

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 12>big boy pants on and do anything about it. And

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 12>I think this is what we're going to say. And

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 12>now the fact they can get everything through the Senate

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 12>with the grains, it actually looks like it could get

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 12>a whole lot worse rather than better.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 11>This is why it's so important that the Opposition comes

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 11>out and says we're abandoning net zero by twenty fifty

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 11>because it's impossible to reach and it's not desirable to reach.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 11>And if we stopped building this ridiculous rewiring of the nation,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 11>think of all the tradesmen who'd be released and would

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 11>be able to go into building.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Homesh I mean it.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 12>Distorlled red tape they've put on absolutely everything. The compliance

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 12>costs the costs of doing business, and every time businesses

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 12>turn around, they're looking at whacking another another impost on them,

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 12>and it's it's the compliance cost alone is driving more

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 12>businesses than ever out of business.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, these guys just don't know what they're doing.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why would you want to go into business

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>in this country? You wouldn't know, You just wouldn't Energy policy,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I our laws is just so many issues.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 3>I follow you.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>We run out of time. Holly, who's a rollin bishop.

0:19:58.320 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you both on probams on five.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 3>She could energize the name both on fire.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a big day. There's a lot going on, isn't there?

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And I want to get our next guest's opinion on that.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Albernezi. Of course, meeting with President Hu jing Ping

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in China today, let's bring the former Deputy Prime Minister

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and National MP Barnaby Joyce, Barbaby are good to see you.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 3>I want to play you a bit of audio.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what the Prime Minister said about what he

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>raised with she about those live fire drills and spy

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>ships off our coast.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Have a listened to this?

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 6>Did you seek assurances that Australia would be better informed

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 6>in future about the PLA's navy in Australian waters? And

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 6>has China asserted its right to free navigation in those waters?

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes to the former and secondly, in response, of course

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 5>it was president She said that China engaged in exercises

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 5>just as Australia engages in exercises.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Barnaby, he's telling us there what cheating Ping said, not

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>what he said. Does it leave you with much hope

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>about how strongly this was prosecuted?

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 14>No, it seems like the negotiation. It reminds you of

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 14>a sort of negotiations with the communist crocodile. You know,

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 14>he went in and saw them and he said, you know,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 14>did you bring up live our exercises? I guess And

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 14>what happened, Well, the communist crocodile just sort of stared

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 14>at me, And what about the port of Darwin just

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 14>sort of stared at me? And what did you actually

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 14>get out of this from the communist crocodile and a

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 14>not insensitive just sort of staring at me. And I

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 14>think that's where it is that you know, China, even

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 14>the whole way it meets you, the whole way you

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 14>walk into the room, it's telling you your place in

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 14>the world. And it's not with China. It is expecting

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 14>deference to it. The ultimate goal under sort of a

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 14>Chinese totalitarian regime is for us to be a vassal state.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 14>Now I've had concerns about this right back, even when

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 14>Tony Abbott was the Prime minist the same I've got

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 14>to change our foreign investment laws. We've got to be

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 14>really careful of Chinese state owned enterprises. This can get

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 14>out of control. I was called a bigot, a racist,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 14>a redneck xenophobe, and now I'm just called correct and

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 14>you see there. I think it's really concerning if you,

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 14>after all the hype, when we sit back and watch this,

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 14>we'll see that the communist crocodile basically said, look at me,

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 14>I'm big, I'm savage, I have the I'm I'm going

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 14>to wander around chasing you and sort of nachurally kill

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 14>things for the purpose of it, but you're going to

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 14>respect me. And the crocodile doesn't have to listen, you know,

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 14>to the person on the side of the pond. Just

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 14>just be careful. That's what I got out of this.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 14>Be really, really careful, and let's remember that we've got

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 14>to become as powerful as possible as quickly as possible,

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 14>otherwise we're in real trouble.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe the crocodile Barnaby can be the official

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>mascot of this tour. I think you're absolutely spot on there.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, look, I've got to ask you about this story.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>We know I mentioned this just before.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually labor has never been on the side of business

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>energy policy ie our laws.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Why would you want to go into business right now?

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But now the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry is

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>warning that the government's overly ambitious twenty thirty five emissions

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>reduction target will undermine the productivity, competitiveness and viability of

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>local industry. Well, there's absolutely no doubt about that, barnaby.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, unions are calling for a

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Julia Gillard style price on carbon to be considered to

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>lower the cost of net zero. G Bartabe, go figure,

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean a carbon price now, because that was just

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so popular under Gillard.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 3>It works so well, didn't it.

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 14>It was a disaster and this whole energy process in

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 14>Australi as a disaster. And leaking these two topics to Nika.

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 14>If we are to become as powerful as possible, as

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 14>quickly as possible, you better ditch net zero in a big,

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 14>big hurry. And got to understand that it won't be

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 14>a war against the weather. It won't be your capacity

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 14>to deal with the rain to be this ludicrous idea

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 14>that you can change droughts and change floods and Chris

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 14>Bowen can basically stop frosts or bring frost on or

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 14>whatever it is. The real issue that's before you is

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 14>the geopolitical circumstances of the area in which we live,

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 14>and a carbon tax is not going to help that.

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 14>It's just going to be more costs. And I was

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 14>a bit disturbed, a bit disappointed actually in Rio Tinto

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 14>because they sort of you know that they try this

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 14>dance to sort of garner favor with the government. Oh well,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 14>you know, a carbon price should be considered, but we

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 14>also want more billions of dollars of subsidies from the government.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 14>You know, this is just taxpayers money. All these billions

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 14>of dollars going to those wind towers, the indimendal power precincts,

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 14>the swindle factories, the money that you pay in your

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 14>power bill. This is really hurting Australia and I don't know.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 14>We need an epiphany across all parties to basically understand

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 14>that if we are going to hand to our children

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 14>a nation that can sustain itself, a nation that is strong,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 14>then you better redirect your priorities away from this insane

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 14>belief that from Canberra, from Parman House, we can change

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 14>the temperature of the globe.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Look, absolutely spot on, and we spoke about this earlier

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>in the week. Barnaby, obviously you're looking to introduce a

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>private member's bill.

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 3>You want net zero, you want it scrapped completely, you

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 3>are absolutely done with it.

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to mention to you that I had Pauline

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Hanson on the show last night and I spoke to

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>her about your Private Members bill, and she's offered you

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an invitation. She's saying, well, why doesn't Barnabe Joyce come

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and join One Nation? And she was very, very firm

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on that she wants you to join the party. So

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got to ask you, would you ever go to

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>One Nation? Would you ever consider it?

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 14>Look, if no, Pauline supports getting rid of net zero,

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 14>I know she does. I know Paulinbers I support that too.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 14>But it's not about changing parties or doing that. It's

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 14>about getting our nation into a strong position. I want

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 14>all parties to ditch net zero. I don't believe I'm

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 14>going to have any luck with the Labor pain and

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 14>the Greens, well you know their crocodile food. But what

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 14>we've got to We've got to get the coalition to

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 14>get out of net zero. I mean, we need we

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 14>just it isn't you know? You can't sort of wave

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 14>the flag on Australia Day, say how patriotic you are,

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 14>and then stand behind a policy which brings our nation

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 14>to its needs, which is deindustrializing our nation. We're down

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 14>to two oil refineries. We've lost our plastic industry. We're

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 14>about to lose our aliuminium industry unless I get billions

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 14>of dollars of subsidies. We've lost our manufacturing glass. We're

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 14>losing the concrete industry. We're losing our fertilizer industry. Our

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 14>grid is a joke. No one can afford it. It's intermittent,

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 14>unreliable and superly expensive. There is no manufacturing moving to

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 14>Australia or it's all talking about moving out. And we're

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 14>doing this to ourselves because we honestly, I mean, if

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 14>you close your eyes and say to yourself, I can

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 14>change the weather and just tape yourself and then play

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 14>it back to yourself, you go, that's insane. But that's

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 14>what our nation's saying that we by ourselves because China's

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 14>not on this gi. America's not on this gig. India's

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 14>not on this gig. Indonesia's not on it, Brazil's not

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 14>on it. It's not happening globally in a majority form

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 14>at all. But we in Australia believe that we can

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 14>change the rain amazing.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>And causing irreparable self harm.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Vira a system of batteries, wind farms, green hydrogen.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the list goes on.

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, these projects are either delayed or getting canceled right now,

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Barnaby Joyce. But we're just continuing on this renewables only crusade,

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. Barnaby Joyce. Good to have you

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>on as always. Thank you very much for joining me

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>on the show this evening.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate it. Well still to come.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chalmers is out spreaking his upcoming productivity round table,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but is it nothing more than a talk fest? Judo

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Banks Economic Advisor Warren Hogan will join me. Plus Alban

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Easy will not pick a side in the conflict over Taiwan.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Forum CEO Dr Ross Babbage will have the latest analysis

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that's next. Welcome back, well, Anthony Albanezi says Chinese President

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Hijingping did not raise the increasing pressure the US was

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>placing on Australia and other allies to join a conflict

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>over Taiwan. Let's bring in Strategic Forum CEO Dr Ross

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Babbage now for more on this, Ross, thanks for joining me.

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 3>How much is China looking to drive a wedge between.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Australia and the United States, And how much is the

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>handsome boy from Australia playing into Beijing's hands.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 15>Well, it's good to be with you. Look, I think

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 15>Jijinping and the Chinese Communist Party would love to draw

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 15>to push a great, big wedge between Australia and the

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 15>United States. I don't think that's going to happen, and

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 15>I think Gijinping realizes that. But I think he sees

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 15>an opportunity for easing Australia or trying to persuade Australia

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 15>to distance itself more, become less connected to the United States.

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 15>And I think that's a lot of their strategy right now,

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 15>and we'll probably see more of that sort of activity

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 15>in the weeks and months ahead.

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>How closely do you think would the US be watching

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Albanese's extended trip to China, particularly our time would

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of course it's seeking clarification on our position on Taiwan

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and wants us to lift defense spending.

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 15>Well, yes, I'm sure the Americans are looking very closely

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 15>at everything that's the Prime Minister's saying, and other members

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 15>of Cabinet and for that matter, other Australians and some

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 15>of the debates that have taken place here. They're very concerned.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 15>I think they're very concerned on two or three key fronts.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 15>Are Firstly, they're really worried about the level of defense expenditure.

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 15>They've been pretty direct, even publicly about their perception that

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 15>we need to lift our game, and I think they're

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 15>not trying to exclude themselves from this. They realize they've

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 15>got to lift their game as well, because the circumstances

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 15>that we find ourselves in the Western Pacific are much

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 15>much more dangerous than they have ever been really since

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 15>the Second World War, and because we're talking about a

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 15>situation where the set of global conflict and power and

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 15>is not on the other side of the world as

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 15>it was during the Cold War. It's right just beyond

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 15>our doorstep, just to our north. And if there were

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 15>to be a major clash or crisis in East Asia.

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 15>Let's say over Taiwan. It's very likely if that developed

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 15>into a major conflict that we ourselves would be intimately involved.

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 15>We would be attacked a number of our facilities and

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 15>other things would be affected very soon, and we need

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 15>to be prepared for that. And the Americans realize that,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 15>and they realize that not just for our interests, although

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 15>they're concerned about that, but for their own interest too,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 15>because they see Australia as playing a critical role in

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 15>helping the United States conduct its own operations in the theater.

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and look no doubt about it.

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's discuss the reports in The Australian Today that former

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister and ORCUS skeptic Malcolm Turnbull discussed the packs

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>problems with Pentagon.

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Policy chief Eldridge Colby.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It says the pair are understood to have canvassed arranged

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of topics about which mister Turnbull has spoken in recent weeks,

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>including the need for Australia to reclaim greater sovereignty and

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>independence in world affairs by standing more firmly on its

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>own two feet. Ross, I know that you are actually

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a colleague and you're a friend of Elbridge Colby. Do

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you think that Malcolm Turble's interventions are helpful right now?

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 11>Oh?

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 14>Look, I think.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 15>Bridge Colby's a very professional and he understands Australia very well.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 15>In fact, he really likes Australia a lot. And in fact,

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 15>he said that in the testimony he gave to in

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 15>his confirmation hearing in the US Senate, he made it

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 15>very clear in fact that of all the allies the

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 15>United States has, he regards Australia as the closest, and

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.719
<v Speaker 15>he has greater for this place and for a lot

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 15>of Australians, And so he likes talking to Australians. And

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 15>I'm not at all surprised that we've had a former

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 15>Prime Minister who, of course champion in the case for

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 15>a French submarine to be bought by Australia and developed here.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 15>When that was overturned, I think he, you know, there's

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 15>a sense of real regret in his mind, perhaps if

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 15>been a degree of a grudge almost against Scott Morrison

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 15>for leading the charge in developing the Orchestra Plan. So look,

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 15>I think it's Bridge Colby can understand the dynamics that

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 15>are happening here. He has been immersed in East Asian

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 15>security planning and thinking for a long time. And I

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 15>know how you know, we've been tik taking with each

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 15>other for many years and reading each other's material. He

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 15>is he will just put this in the right context

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 15>and he would see this conversation with Malcolm Turnbull or

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 15>a set of conversations has really just been part of

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 15>the bigger mosaic and he talks to a lot of

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 15>Australians and that's as it should be.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look fair enough. Will be interesting though to see

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 3>what happens from here on in. There's a lot at stake.

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ross Babbage, thank you very much for your time

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this evening, really appreciate it.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's move on now.

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>We spoke earlier about Jim Chalmers being open to new

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>taxes suggested in an accidentally leaked memo by the Treasury.

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>For more on this, I'm joined by Judo Banks, Chief

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Economic Advisort, Warren Hogan.

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Warren, good to see you.

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>As always, Treasury is worried about the sustainability of the budget,

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>projecting deficits for the next four years. Is there a

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>real urgency here for change? Why would this be the

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>advice at this stage to raise taxes.

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, good evening.

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 16>I think the leak, while looking a little bit like

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 16>Paul Keating's banana a public speech, was more likely to

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 16>be inadvertent, and of course this is advice for the

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 16>new government. But it does highlight that the fairly rosy

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 16>picture painted of our government finances at the pre election

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 16>budget may not be as rosy as implied. And of

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 16>course I think there is also some concern here that

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 16>there could be adverse economic circumstances for this country which

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 16>could see our budget deterior rate quite rapidly in an

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 16>environment whereas you've just been discussing, the call on the

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 16>budget for things like defense and potentially other things is

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 16>going to only grow from here. So I'm quite concerned

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 16>about this. I don't think it was intentional, but I

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 16>think it may have a similar effect in focusing our

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 16>community on the government needing to tighten up. But most

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 16>alarming is the suggestion that the way to deal with

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 16>this is to raise taxes. It is not to raise taxes.

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 16>We need to look at what spending can be cut

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.919
<v Speaker 16>in order to accommodate new requirements around defense and so forth.

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 16>After eight years of government spending growing at a tremendous rate,

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 16>fastest rate we've seen in a generation or more. And

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 16>of course the government's share of the economy growing to

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 16>record levels.

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, record government spending, as you said, certainly hasn't helped. Now.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Labour's Economic Roundtable is coming up next month, with the

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>government set to host business leaders over three days in

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>an event focused on resilience, productivity and budget sustainability. Warren,

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this a serious attempt to think about how we

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 1>lift productivity which as we know it's had its worst

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>performance in fifty years, or should we be adopting a

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>degree of cynicism over this?

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 14>Yeah?

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 16>Well, I am very concerned that it's not going to

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 16>be too different to what we saw in the previous

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 16>parliament with the Job Summit, which was really just a

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 16>policy exercise to tighten up industrial relations and in fact

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 16>work against productivity. Because I think I'm concerned about with

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 16>the productivity discussion is what we've seen from this government

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 16>in terms of industrial relations, in terms of growing the

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 16>size of government and funding increasing amounts of activity in

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 16>our economy through their care economy strategy, whether it's NDI health, childcare.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 16>This is undermining key planks and pillars of what gives

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 16>us productivity. So I don't see any of these key

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 16>strategic economic policies that the government's been running for the

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 16>last three years on the table. And of course this

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 16>idea that you just raised taxes to fix the budget

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 16>is going to be even more hurting for productivity in

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 16>this country. So I am not at all confident that

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 16>we're going to get a serious conversation about reform or

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 16>of course restoring productivity, which is essence needs to be

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 16>about trying to get our economy working as efficiently as

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 16>it can be and not being directed by government and

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 16>government funding.

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Now let's talk tariffs. Donald Trump's three month deadline

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>came up last week. South Korea and Japan got slapped

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>with twenty five percent tariffs and their allies of the

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>US look at Brazil at cop fifty percent. That will

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>certainly kill trade Warren Trump has alluded that the baseline

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tariffs could change, could go up and down. The Prime

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Minister is in China, now, how important is it to

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ensure free trade but at the same time look after

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>our own interests.

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 16>Well, we've fared well out of the tariff policies so far,

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 16>having attracted just the baseline with a couple of industries

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 16>hit with higher tariffs which were applied to all countries

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 16>still an Aliminium being the main ones. But we've got

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 16>to be very careful here because I think it's pretty

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 16>clear that this tariff policy is really geopolitics. We saw

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 16>that last week where countries like Vietnam and the Philippines,

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 16>really important countries geopolitically for the United States, got let

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 16>off quite lightly with twenty percent tariffs, whereas Brazil part

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 16>of the Bricks consortium of nations supporting the access of alignment,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 16>China and Russia and Iran of course being here with

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 16>a fifty percent tariff. So we are in the good books,

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 16>and as we all hope to remain in the good books,

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 16>I think the Prime Minister needs to tread very carefully.

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 16>And of course we see those baseline tariffs go up,

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 16>we will more than likely be hit with them. So

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 16>this has got a long way to play yet, and

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 16>I think the next week is critically important.

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and plus we'll see if you know, pharmaceuticals could

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 3>now be on the.

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Cards for us as well. Warren Hogan always love to

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>see you. Thank you so much for joining me on

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the show this evening. Really appreciate it. Coming up after

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the break, the renewables only fantasy hits another hurdle as

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:45.439
<v Speaker 1>another green project is acted in Victoria. That's next, Well,

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the renewables only fantasy has hit another hurdle. Another green

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>project has been axed after the offshore wind developer Blue

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Float Energy abandoned its plans for one of Victoria's most

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>advanced offshore wind projects.

0:38:58.160 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 3>After failing to secure a buye.

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now is Deputy Nationals Leader Kevin Hogan. Ge Kevin,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to keep count of the number of projects

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in recent months that have either been axed or delayed,

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and all the wild coal is being driven out and

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>there are no plans on how to keep the lights

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on in this country.

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 9>No, it's actually quite scary, as we know, Danika, this

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 9>sum we've said about three or four now major wind

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 9>turbine projects basically don't add up. So what the people

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 9>who are the proponents of this have worked out with

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 9>their spreadsheets is it doesn't work. Wind turbines especially exceptionally

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 9>expensive on the offshore win ones. You know, I'm sure

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 9>ones have high maintenance class I have a twenty year

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 9>lifespan there's a lot of wear and tear with sold

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 9>air et cetera. So they're not adding up. And you know,

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 9>we know Labour's renewable only policy is an experiment with

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 9>our energy grid with eighty percent by twenty thirty, which also, Donika,

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 9>no reputable independent analyst is saying that they're going to

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 9>reach that. So I think they have to start to

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 9>be honest with us about that as well. But look,

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 9>their plan an experiment with our energy system and it's

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 9>very dangerous.

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's costing us all money at the same time,

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and our power bills keep going up.

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Nothing seems to be changing now.

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Look, Australian business leaders are pushing for the Prime Minister

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to lobby for deeper trade ties with China during his visit. Kevin, Look,

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>how do we strike a balance here, because obviously diversification

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is so important. We've seen what China's done to us

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.479
<v Speaker 1>in the past with the tariffs. We've got tariffs also

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>coming from the US as well. How do we strike

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a balance here and while looking after our own interest?

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, look, it's delicate, Janika, I think that, you know,

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 9>I think it's great that the Prime minist So I

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 9>think the guy I support the fact that the Prime

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 9>Minister is in China. They are a very important trading

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 9>partner of ours, and I think that's healthy. I mean,

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 9>we were in government when we sign the Chinese Free

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 9>Trade Agreement, We're in government when President Ggping addressed the Parliament.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 9>So the relationship has had ups and downs, but I

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 9>support the fact that the Prime Minister is there. You'll

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 9>talk about diversifications important, but I'd also bring in national

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 9>security issues as well. I wish I saw the same

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 9>exuberance that Prime Minister Albanese has with the Chinese president

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 9>with the with the American president. They're a very important

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 9>allied national security partner, an economic investor in our country

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 9>as well. So it's unfortunate we don't see the same

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 9>exuberance for the President of the United States that the

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 9>Prime Minister has for the President of China. But I'm

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 9>glad he's there. I'm glad he's in China building the relationship.

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know that the Prime Minister does talk

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about the importance of people to people relationships, Well, he

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>still can't get a meeting with Donald Trump. Do you

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think the US is watching this trip very closely? It's

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>an extended trip it's a very long trip six days

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>over in China. Is a US watching observing thinking, well.

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Hang on, what about US, what about the number one ally?

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, look, I'm sure they are and I think it's

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 9>unfortunate that the Prime Minister Albanesi hasn't made a priority

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 9>to physically meet President Trump. I mean, I think he

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 9>wasn't keen initially and now he's struggling to get a

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 9>meeting as quickly as he would like. But that's think

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 9>to the great detriment of the relationships. There's been some

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 9>very strong person of personal relationships between both labor and

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 9>liberal prime ministers and US presidents in the past.

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 14>We don't have that now.

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 9>I think that's a shame. They're an important ally, they're

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 9>an important economic partner, so he needs to work on that.

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 9>I think it's to the detriment as we know of

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 9>our still and aliminium industries. We've seen, you know, other

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 9>countries like the UK get exemptions and lower tariffs than

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 9>we have in those sectors. So look, I think it's

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 9>a real I think it's real to our detriment. I

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 9>don't think as we've saw reports last week or a

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 9>week or two ago, I don't think Ambassador Rudd has helped.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 9>We all know the comments he made about the President

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 9>of the United States, and they're leading them from x

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 9>and Twitter. Doesn't mean they disappear or go from people's memory.

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 9>So that's unfortunate as well.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and the elephant in the room still remains Kevin, right,

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 3>you're not wrong there. Now.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The Reserve Bank has called for surcharge fees on card

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>tapping and payWave to be removed. That fee is costing

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Ossie consumers about one point two billion dollars a year

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and the RBA says scrapping it would bring the Australian

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pay market in line with the rest of the world.

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Is this a good idea, Kevin?

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 9>Look, anything that lawa's cost of living is a good idea.

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 9>So I think it's a great thing that we start

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 9>talking about. Just where that charge goes I'm interested in.

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean, if we were to lob that whole charge

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 9>back to small business especially, I think that would be

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 9>very damage into a lot of our small businesses that

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 9>are doing it quite tough.

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 14>As well.

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.399
<v Speaker 9>I'd like to see more transparency around the whole thing.

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 9>You know, do the banks charge the same church er

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 9>charge to small business they do to big business. I mean,

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 9>I think we need some more transparencies about from the

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 9>banks on this, and I think the banks should be

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 9>the ones that bear some of the cost of this,

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 9>not small business.

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I completely agree with you. A good point, Kevin Hogan.

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Good to see you. Thanks very much for your time

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 3>this evening. Appreciate it.

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Coming up after the break, Donald Trump disappointed but not

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>done with Putin. We'll cross to the US. Ow Man

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Brad Palumbo will join us live next.

0:43:57.560 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back. Well.

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is getting in pace with Russia and has

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>given President Vladimir Putin a fifty day ultimatum to end

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the nearly three and a half year conflict or face

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>severe secondary trade tariffs.

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 5>As I thought we would have had a deal two

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 5>months ago, but if it doesn't seem to get there,

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 5>so based on that, we're going to be doing secondary

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 5>tariffs if we don't have a deal on fifty days.

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 8>It's very simple.

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of about one hundred percent that is joining me

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>now is a podcast host of Brad Versus Everyone, Brad Palumbo, Brad, Hello,

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining me. Look, Donald Trump's threats are

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>getting very serious now, aren't they.

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean they are, and I think we should

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 17>all be rooting for him on this, that he's able

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 17>to bring an end to the war and negotiate a deal.

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 17>You know, Trump promised that he would stop it and

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 17>come to peace on day one of his presidency. That

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 17>was always unrealistic for being honest, But if he could

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 17>use this trade leverage to bring about a cease fire,

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 17>I think that would be phenomenal. I think everybody would

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 17>appreciate and celebrate that because it's been years of just

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 17>bloody war after Russia's unjustified invasion. But the idea that

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 17>we could just hold out for Ukraine to eventually win

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 17>the day. I mean, as much as I think most

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 17>people would like to see that, a degree of realism

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 17>and practical practicism and practicality is needed here and Trump

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 17>I really hope he can get a deal done. That

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 17>was part of his pitch to the American people. I'm

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 17>a deal maker. I'll bring this stuff to an end.

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 17>We'll have to wait and see.

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was interesting as well.

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump revealed that Milania Trump actually played a role

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in identifying the issues with Vladimir person. I like that

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it took guy his wife to do so, but what

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>more can you tell us about what she said to

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>her husband.

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 17>Well, she's actually been an influence on him on this

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 17>kind of issue in a particularly interesting way, given her

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 17>background and her different, very international life and connections. And

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 17>it is interesting that he's open to this kind of thing,

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 17>and that tells you she's in his inner circle. She's

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 17>influencing the president. And on the flip side, though, the

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 17>fact that she was informing him about cities being hit,

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 17>you would think his other officials would be a more

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 17>on top of that. But as long as he's ultimately

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 17>finding out about it in a timely fashion, I guess

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 17>that's fine. And hopefully she can work some millennium magic

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 17>and bring this about and bring this to an end soon.

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're all hoping for that outcome. Now, let's change pace.

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We all know Donald Trump and Rosie o'donald. They have

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>had their differences, and I think that's probably.

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 3>Putting it mildly with the pair.

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, they've been exchanging jabs going back decades. But now

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has said he's considering revoking her citizenship after

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>she fled the country to escape his presidency. He took

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>to truth social to say that because of the fact

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best.

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Interest of our great country.

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving serious consideration to taking away her citizenship. She

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>goes on brad to say that she's a threat to humanity.

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've got a laugh, don't you.

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:16.879
<v Speaker 17>I mean it's comical in one sense. I think she's

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:19.240
<v Speaker 17>a clown. I think her stunt of fleeing the United

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 17>States was silly. At the same time, I do not,

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 17>in fact, think she is a threat to humanity. I

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 17>imagine that's just Trump's typical bluster and hyperbole, and this

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 17>is probably just a barb. I don't think he can

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 17>actually revoke her citizenship unless she's committed some sort of

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 17>serious crime or another offense. Americans are entitled to say

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 17>whatever they like, even troll, even be as ridiculous. And

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 17>I'm sord as she has been, and they still are citizens,

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 17>whether any politician likes it or not. So I wouldn't

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 17>anticipate that actually happening. The truth is, though, about these

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 17>kinds of spats, this is good for both of them.

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 17>Rosie O'Donnell will play the victim, but this is great

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 17>for her. This feeds in gets her more attention. She

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:05.439
<v Speaker 17>wants Trump tweeting about her.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Of course she does. She wants the attention.

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 1>But I think Donald Trump absolutely loves it when it

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to a poor old rosie. Oh now, Brad, You've

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>had quite a fun exchange overnight on CNN where commentator

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Anna Navarro dismissed your views because you're a white man.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Here is that moment.

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 11>I want to respond to you saying that I was

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:29.399
<v Speaker 11>hyperbolic when I talked about a vein of terror.

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 3>No, it might be hyperbolic for you as a white man. Oh,

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 3>it's certainly not hyperbolic for me, Latino. No, I'm not

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 3>being racist.

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm not dismissing your opinion.

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 3>J Brad, why do you subject yourself to CNN?

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 17>I think it's fun. I'm here for the day. I

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 17>love it, and I just found it comical because listen,

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 17>this is the problem with the left and with their

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:59.800
<v Speaker 17>addiction to identity politics. Na Navarro made a claim that

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 17>Trump was had a reign of terror in America, and

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 17>I said, I think that's a bit hyperbolic. She said, no,

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 17>it isn't. And then, instead of explaining facts or arguments

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:12.919
<v Speaker 17>about why it's fine, she said, in my race.

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable, Brad, unbelievable, seriously typical of the left, Brad Palumbo.

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for joining me, Thanks for your company.

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Now here's James Morrow hosting in the man Cave.