WEBVTT - Paul Muray Live | 28 May

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray.

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 2>Live Wednesday Night. Yeah, the end of hump Day.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We're on our way towards the weekend, but there's plenty

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of work to be done between now and then, including

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a great conversation with the most fine up lady in

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the world. She is exclusive to this program on a

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday Night, the wonderful Megan Kelly, who found it rather

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>funny that the real estate agents of the Gold Coast

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>got together and paid Kamala Harris money to hear her

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>speak on the weekend.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I should be offended that I wasn't invited first. I'm

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 3>much bigger in Australia than Kamala Harris's. Where at my invitation? Realtors?

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>All right? Today the new opposition leader has announced their

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>plan and number of people for the Shadow Ministry, and

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Susan lay will be on this program in the next

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of minutes to go through some of the decisions,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the big task that is ahead, and

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a little of her personal story as well. I'm please

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have a chance to talk to

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>her about these things. Now, let's go through what you

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all know to be the case. Some people, some people

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>down Now. Obviously, renewal absolutely front and center. Reality is

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>up to two election losses. Many of the people who

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>were at the very front end of those two election

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>losses are being moved aside or down. Reality of politics,

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>reality of professional sport, reality of media, reality of every

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>business is that not everyone gets a promotion. Sometimes just

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>staying in the game is the promotion. Sometimes people move sidewards,

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and yes, some people are punished for performance or a

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of other personal reasons and they start to

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>move backwards. The difference between professional sport or the real

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>world is that in politics, we know how long this

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to go. For there's a three year term,

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>some people will move further up, some people will be

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pulled back, and some people will come in from the cold.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>That is the reality. But obviously, after losing thirty seats

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the past two elections, there are people who needed

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to come towards the front. Some of those people who

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are being brought towards the front. As you can see here,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Tad O'Brien is the deputy Liberal leader, gets to pick

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever he wants to do, and he has chosen that

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the shadow treasurer really important. Focus

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on small business is going to be where Tim Wilson

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. Dave Sharma is there when it

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to the money as well, A big brain fella,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>James McGrath. He's going to move to urban infrastructure. Michaulia

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Cash becomes Foreign Affairs James Patterson. Remember he was the

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Home Affairs guy, so he's had immigration, national security. Now

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>he starts to broaden himself out and he is a

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>spectacular performer both in the Parliament, in Senate estimates and

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on television. So him and the Finance portfolio really important. Yes,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>people have been dudded. Jane him essentially out the back door.

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Will she come back, Well, it'll be up to other

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>people to make mistakes and her to impress that it

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is time for her to return. Sarah Henderson goes from

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>education out the back door. Michael McCormick, Barnaby Joyce both

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>former Deputy prime ministers. Now remember that in part is

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>a decision by the National Party as to who they

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>put forward, and then Susan Lee makes her decisions about

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>who serves. But let's not pretend there aren't going to

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>be some noses out a joint. But again the same

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>team that's been playing for a long period of time,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>both in government from twenty thirteen and then the elections

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of sixteen, nineteen, twenty two and twenty five. Yep, some

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>people are going to move forward, some people are going

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to move back. And I think all of these people

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>are good people. So there's nothing personal about this. A

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people want to talk about your Cindernampa Jupa

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Price really important that she of course maintains the shadow ministry. No,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>she is not in the shadow cabinet. I know that,

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Ruffle Sum. I'll let Susan Lay explain in a moment

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>or two time why the decision has been made. But

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>people that are her supporters are openly saying that it's

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>about trying to broaden out the things that she's going

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to be focused on. Angus Taylor foreign affairs, he's of

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>course the chief leadership rival, perhaps setting him overseas as

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a way to keep him busy. And Dan teen well,

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he moves into new positions as well. This, in part

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is what Susan Lee had to say her new team today.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Our team is one of strivers and optimists, of leaders

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 4>and listeners. The new coalition shadow ministry balances experience with

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 4>new talent. It reflects the full range of our philosophical traditions,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 4>values and perspectives across our two great party rooms.

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, as always when you are handing out such prizes,

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>there are not enough prizes for enough people that are there.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>If the coalition had not reformed, then there might have

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>been almost prizes for every single person from the back

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>bench all the way through to the deputy leader. But

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>also what seems very obvious, apart from pulling some new

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>faces towards the front, people like Angie Bell, great politician

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in and around the southeast of Queensland. People like Melissa Macintosh.

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>She's been able to hold on to the western Sydney

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>seat of Lindsay, regardless of whether they were the lives

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>were in government or opposition, or even going further back

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>as they did at the last election. She's going to

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting fighter. You've also got a balance, not

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>just male female, not just left right, not just state

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>here and there. But also remember that one of the

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>roles of a shadow minister is to be the person

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>asking questions of the minister. So say, for example, the

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Minister for Communications, well they are in the Lower House,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the person asking questions of them. You would ideally like

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to have them in the lower House, the same as

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Affairs Penny Wong upper House. Hence why Mikaylia cash

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>as what I think is a continuing of her as

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the Senate for the Opposition, She of

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>course takes on Pennywong there. So there seems to have

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>been in all of the different balancing acts an attempt

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring new Yes, some older faces move back, some

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>people move sidewards, but you're also trying to match up.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And I've got to say one thing in particular that

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm really looking forward to my questions like Angus Taylor

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in Defense asking questions of the Deputy Prime Minister. I'm

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to Andrew Hasty in Home Affairs asking questions

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>directly of Tony Burke. You see how these things all

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.119
<v Speaker 1>start to line up. That's part of the decision making. Again,

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>will this be the team that will be there in

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 1>three years going to an election? Probably not, Why because

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that's always the case. Is it the team that will

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be automatically and at some point into the future ministers

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in all of these portfolios, Well, logically not given the

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>position that the party is in. But is it more

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>than a liquor paint. Is it an attempt to put

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>new faces and to move to the next generation of people. Yeah, obviously,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes that can be a screaming heap because yep,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all of these people are in experience. The government turns

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>around and essentially points at an inexperienced opposition and drives

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that home as a reason why you have to re

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>elect a government. But as Paul Ericson said, and this

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is really important, whether you like this or not, my

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>job's not just to tell you the stuff that you like,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but to tell you the stuff that obviously the other

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>people are telling us is what they believe to be

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>their worldview. The Labour Party boss Paul Erickson now, he

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>said that one of the ways they were able to

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly go after Peter Dutton and many of the people

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>who were in the key positions in the coalition at

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this last election, and yes, many of those were gross

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>distortions or just outright lies, was that they had polling,

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>constant polling for the past three years about what were

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>people's perceptions of the previous government and what were people's

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>perceptions of their performance in the previous government. And given

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that that government had not just lost, but lost handsomely,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the remnants of that government lost again handsomely

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>at this last election. Part of the logic about the

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>renewal here again, like it, dislike it, Susan lay in

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a moment, We'll ask the questions and you can be

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>convinced or otherwise by her answers. But to give her

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to explain these decisions rather than them to

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>be explained or judged for you, I think is a

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>good thing, especially when somebody is at the start of

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>their leadership journey. Again, I've said all the way through

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>when there are big clangers, I'll call them out. But

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the big clangers in all of this.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But when I talk about that renewal, I want to

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>point your attention to the New South Wales Labor Party. Now,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>when Christina Kanneely was wiped from office, this was a

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>scandal riddle government that the Liberal Party for four and

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>almost eight years was able to point to as you

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to go back to that. You wouldn't want

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to go back to that. So when Chris Mins was

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>putting together his shadow cabinet, and yes they were talking

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>about a fourth term, not a third term in office.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>From memory, there was just one or two members of

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the entire shadow cabinet that were even MP's in the

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Kanneli government that had been blown away. So we've seen

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>how brutal and effective the weaponization of lies about a

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>politician's past can be when it comes to the Labor Party.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And obviously you don't make a decisions that are just

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about fear of the Labor Party, but you want to

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>take as many angles of attack off the table for

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you to be able to reset, reintroduce yourself and get

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the attention back onto a government. It's set up to

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a government about how many times it drops the ball?

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And when it drops the ball? Do you have a

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>shadow minister who can ask question after question, day after

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>day to put somebody on the ropes. Perfect example about this,

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Tim Wilson in part is going to have responsibility for

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>small business. Do you know who has responsibility for small

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>business in the government. It's an l now, yes, sir,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>former childcare minister, but essentially a person whose main role

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was sitting behind the Prime minister and rolling her eyes

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and acting like everything that she'd said was either everything

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the Prime minister or a minister had said was the

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>most shocking or funniest thing she'd ever seen. Well, she

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of course now has responsibility for small business. I can't

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>wait to see Tim Wilson versus ANL. Don't you think

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>that NL is going to be the one double checking

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>her notes rather than Tim Wilson, who, of course very

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>success was part of putting on the agenda of the

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen election, things like frankin credits. So it's all

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>about the contest, not just in presentation, not just in ideas,

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but also with an eye to the future. So yes,

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>big benefit of the doubt will be given by this

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>program to make sure that there is not a repeat

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of the last two elections. Now can there be? You

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>bet you? Numerically, if you have any seats in the parliament,

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you can end up with no seats in the parliament.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But obviously, what's the definition of insanity to keep doing

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the same thing and expect a different result. Now, I

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>want the focus to be on the bad government. I

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>want the shadow ministers to be the ones that can

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>prosecute that argument. Not for our amusement here, but for

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the wider public and wider media to be able to see.

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I want people who may well have voted for the

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Party and turned away from the Liberal Party to

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>re engage with it as an option into the future

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>because of the people that are being put in front

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of them. That's all I'm playing here. That's all of

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the above the water and below the water currents of

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>my attitude to this opposition and the decisions that are

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>made in the next little while. All right, We're also

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going to have people on the show tonight who have

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>been promoted demoted. How do you deal with it? What happens,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you make sure that it doesn't just become

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a festering saw. How do you work your way from

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>out in the cold right back into the center of government.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got people who have lived that experience and they

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>will join us a little later in the meantime. Susan

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Laigh in just a couple of minutes here on Palmurray

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Life to explain the decisions to you, not me, to

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you about her choices when it comes to the Shadow Cabinet. Now,

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>remember we used to say that bank bashing was an

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Australian sport. It was like an unofficial sport for everyone

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to winge about banks and their profits and how much

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this and how little that, and so much so that,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of course there was eventually a Royal commission, of which

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not many recommendations were of actually put in place, and

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody ever followed up. But everyone still remains wedded to

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the banks probably that you either had your kid account

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in or the one that you got your homeland. We

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>don't move around lot when it comes to banks. But

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a new national sport that I think is

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be threatening bank bashing as our new national sport,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and it is intergenerational bashing. Now. We have seen this

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in politics, we see this in social media, we see

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this in social commentary about the amount of winging that

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>goes on. We're say, for example, the millennials, well, they

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>want to have a crack at the boomers. The boomers

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>want to have a crack at Generation Z. The older

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>builders will they think Gen X is a little too loose,

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and obviously Generation OW for too young to vote right now.

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>But they're going through a very radical school system right now.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm pretty sure those born in twenty twenty five

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have a political opinion yet. But this happens all

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the time to me. You can watch news programs, current

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>affairs shows, you can read opinion pieces on those websites,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>or you can listen to podcasts, and so often this generation,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that generation who had it better, who had it tougher,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>all of it stuff. We used to joke about this

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff in generations previous, where you know, you'd always joke

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>about your parents or your grandparents telling stories about, oh,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you think it's tough to walk to school, Why I

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>had to walk up a hill and down a hill

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and pass the crocodiles and with bare feet while I

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was dragging cement block. It used to be a joke

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about how the generations used to interact. But now it

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is being weaponized by what I think, you're pretty bad actors,

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>people who don't want the country to get along instead,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>people who believe that anyone who disagrees with them should

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>either shut up and disappear or fall off the perch,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and then they get what they want. That's not healthy

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for a country. Perfect example of this is the housing debate. Now,

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know that there'll be a group of people

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>who'll say you're winging now about how expensive a unit is.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Where we had seventeen percent interest rates before that, you

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>know you weren't able to get a bank depositive five

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>percent you needed twenty percent up front. Everyone's got this story,

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and property is difficult to get whether this generation has

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it slightly better than that or this one had it

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>slightly worse. Again, everyone has their own perspectives, and like statistics,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>they can be brought up by lots of different people

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to make lots of different points. Now, often, one

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that you see the difficulty of housing

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>affordability appearing in the media as regularly as it is

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is not because it's not an issue. It is an issue.

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But let's also be honest that many of the people

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>who are writing the articles are the very people who

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>are in the middle of the struggle to be able

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to buy a home. So therefore it becomes the number

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>one issue that they are interested in, and when you

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>publish it online, regardless of what publication I'm showing you here,

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of people are interested, lots of cliques, and as

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we know, the more the cliques, the more the repeat business.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Here are some young people again talking about their difficulties

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>right now when it comes to buying homes. Again, I'm

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not pretending it's not hard.

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you think you'll be able to afford a home

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 4>within the next ten years. Absolutely not no, no, no,

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 4>at not's you're at all very crazy, sir, No, probably not.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 5>I really doubt I'll be able to afford a house.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the clap back like this one I

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>think from news dot com dot Au about a dad

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>who had a post basically telling everyone, look, you know,

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want you want the fancy lifestyle, you want

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the new car, you want the new everything, Well guess

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're not going to save you post it on

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>socials and that causes a whole thing. And then another

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>version of the people who have weaponized youth to believe

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that every generation other than theirs is killing the planet

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to climate change. Does you also find

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it interesting that, despite the existential threat, that those monthly

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>protests have not happened since the government stopped being liberal.

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course there is the people who like

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to push back against those who are full of hypocrisy

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to arguments about climate like the boss

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of Woodside, dutifully reported by the Turnbull Times with dripping

0:15:54.520 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sarcasm in their headlines. The boss of Australia's gas giant Woodside,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Mego Nail, has attacked young people who take an ideological

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>stand against fossil fuels, suggesting they are hypocrites. Why because

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't just hit a switch and expect the lights

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to come on. Why, well, obviously you need to make

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that there is things like gas that are part

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of that picture. As she turned around and said, as

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>she's referred to people being happy to buy fast fashion

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on things like Timu which are carbon intensive, while simultaneously

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>blowing up about carbon emissions of a Western Australian fossil

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>fuel plant. So the human impact and the consumer's role

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in driving energy demand and emissions is absolutely missing in

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the space in this conversation. Well, well, well there had

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to be pushed back and intergenerational fighting, didn't they, Because

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that yeah, mego, Neil's got a point,

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the people who want all of the advantages

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of the modern world, all of people who do not

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>care that China produces more emissions than we do, need

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand. There was only so much STRAIGHTI can do,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but bang one of the go to people at the moment,

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>a person who has already announced that their own candidacy

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to try to be a teal in the Senate at

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the next federal election. Well, of course, straight into the

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>turbul times there. As the twenty six year old and

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a member of Generation the I am proud to say

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that I have never made a purchase from fast fashioned stoughts.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>This was her pushback. See Meg O'Nell's point is absolutely incorrect,

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>because my personal circumstances do not recognize hers. Acknowledging this

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>flaw is important. We should all be striving to make

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>environmentally friendless choices. However, pointing out that this is a

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>prime example of a straw ban argument is a more

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pressing point. The blatant scapegoating of young people while directly

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>destroying our climate, and on and on and on and

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on and on. Now, of course,

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the point is, if you are absolutely serious about pulling

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>back on emissions, you do every single thing in your

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>life to pull back on those emissions, unless, of course,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to give a speed each somewhere, and I'm

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure that you didn't ride your bike to get

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to that. Any conversation about this is well, of course,

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know I can solve the world, but I'm not

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>responsible for its problems.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's true too, and very obviously a fossil fuel

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>company clearly creates more carbon dioxide emissions than any one individual,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 2>no question. But again, something about this intergenerational debate that

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 2>sometimes needs a little bit of water port on it.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Are the bigger picture, and the bigger picture is for

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 2>those who want to clap back at the evil fossil

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>fuels people, or perhaps even the fossil fuels people, trying

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to pretend that it's the people clapping back that are

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the problem.

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>China is the problem. How many times we have to

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>show you this. This, by the way, is not some

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>right wing group. This is the Union of Concerned Scientists.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>The numbers are from twenty twenty, but they say it's

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty similar to the picture right now. China more than

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent, the rest of the world twenty percent. That

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Speaker 1>means we're at six o'clock on the climate clock and

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>all of those people are polluting more than we are.

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You add the United States, Russia and India, you get

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to forty five minutes past the climate clock. Australia one

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the problem. So even if we do everything

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the Guardian wants, or we do everything the fossil fuel companies,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what get what? Guess what China will replace what we save.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't hide. Sixteen days of emissions is what they

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>can produce, and that wipes out everything we do in

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>one year. So it's great that everyone wants to blow

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>up at things like a fossil fuel company in Australia.

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>If you choose to do so, fine, But if you're

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>actually fared, it can deep in your bones fired up

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>about the existential threat to the planet that is climate change.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>There is a joint called the Chinese Embassy. There is

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a joint choice called the Chinese Consulate in a city

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>near you. Feel free to go and march and have

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a protest there, But of course it is interested in

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that because it's not as easy as being able to

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>pretend that everything is someone else's fault. Well, if you

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>actually want to blame a repeat China, Third World, United States, India, Russia.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Forty five minutes of the climate clock, And just one

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>last point, if I could make a little cultural reference

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons, of course, is very key to me as

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a gen XA of being able to explain the world

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>both before I was here and give us an insight

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>into the world after I was young, and it was

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>at the front and center regardless of what part of

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the generation span you sit on, which part of the

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>intergenerational war you wish to fight. There is one rule

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that you cannot avoid. And Grandpa Simpson puts it right

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>when he says.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 6>What the hell are you two doing? That's cold rocking out?

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 6>You wouldn't and it's dan, Dad, you're not with it.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 6>I used to be with it, but then they changed

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 6>what it was. Now what I'm with isn't it? And

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 6>what's it? Seems weird and scary to me.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It'll happen to you, correct and you that's just what happens,

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>all right. And it is always hilarious watching like in

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the same way, like the divorced dad tries to dress

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.239
<v Speaker 1>like the twenty six year old girlfriend. It's always a

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>bit weird when you start to see people that are,

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, older than fifty, that are trying to campaign

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like they were still twenty five and twenty five year

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>olds who want to pretend that everyone else other than

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>them has screwed everything else. But thanks so much for

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the internet, electricity and every other invention, and a little

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>further to these divides that exist in our society, And again,

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they have to be clash points but

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they are key ways that people identify themselves. And of

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>course we know that there's great difference between people under

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the age of fifty as voters under the age of fifty,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>between male and female. And just look at the electoral role.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>This is not polling, it's not an opinion. This is

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the number of people who were qualified and enrolled to

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>vote at the election just gone. There are more under

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the age of fifty, and there are more than a

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>female and no not all a uniform and vote in

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>one way. But if everything's fifty to fifty, if like

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of people under fifty and fifty percent of

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>people over fifty fifty miles and fifty percent of females,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>guess who would win under fifty and female right as

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the key determinants of elections, And increasingly we know that

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there are different ways that the cities are voting as

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>opposed to regional areas. Now, interestingly, today we've got maybe

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a little preview into something that I've got to say,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I have been seeing in all of the time we've

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>been doing the ourtowns going around the country, which is

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe when we started out, things like the part of

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the RSL were a little more at the heart of

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the culture of a regional town, but now competing for

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that attention is high end restaurants, cafes, pretty modern stuff.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Not to suggest that pubs and RSLs aren't, but you

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>get my point. Today we learn that the Sunny Coast

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>has now been overtaken by Geelong as the place where

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>people who leave cities have gone and lived in. In fact,

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>if you have a look at this, which is the

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Regional Movers Index that was put out today by the

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Regional Australia Institute, you can see that there was big movement,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>not sixty four percent of the entire population, but of

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who moved, they moved out of the cities.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>They moved into the bush pretty level in the Northern Territory.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>They moved into the bush in Queensland. Level in South Australia, Tasmania.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, a little more you had a scenario where

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>again people were vacating the cities moving into the bush

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in places like Victoria. Well guess what the local government

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>areas where people are moving to and they take their

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>politics with them. Greater Geelong, the Sunshine Coast, Lake Macquarie,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the one I'm not going to try to pronounce I

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>apologize in Victoria, Maitland in New South Wales other areas

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that have had major movements of people from the city

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>moving to them bringing their politics with them Townsville, Gladstone, Latroe,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Bendigo and Denmark in Western Australia. Now we won't know

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the full picture of who lives where and therefore to

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to start to marry the electoral role with

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the censors, which of course is the National Survey of

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Australia until we have one in the next few months.

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the census gives us the best possible

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>indication as to literally how many people rent, how many

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>people own, how many people have an investment property in

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>particular seats, meaning if there are high interest rates, you

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can start to do the sums on whether this seat's

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>going to change or that seat's going to change. I

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>love this Dart, I love these facts, and I love

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>being able to go on the deep dive with you

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>very patiently while I was doing so. Is Susan Lee,

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the brand new opposition leader who joins us now after

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>assuming the position and obviously also giving out the shadow

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>cabinet positions today. Susan firsty, congratulations, thank you so much

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, and again strength and love from all

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of our viewers after the loss of your mum mate.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much, Paul. It's been an incredible two weeks.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 4>But above all the privilege of leading the Liberal Party

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 4>with the fantastic team that I have and that I

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 4>reflected on today as I appointed my shadow ministry going forward.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 4>And it's interesting is David Little Proud and I walked

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 4>into the party room and walked back out. We were

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 4>talking about flood affected communities in rural Australia and how

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 4>we were both very keen to get out of that

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 4>building and back into communities and sell our message about hope,

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 4>about the future and about being a really strong and

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 4>determined opposition that will take the fight up to this government.

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about again that the many different balancing

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>acts when you come up with a shadow ministry again

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>House versus Senate. Where is the person that they are

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>taking them on, where are they questioning, Who's a new phase?

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>All the rest of it. Right when you were making

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what have been considered to be tougher cause, So say

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody who may will have been very prominent in the

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>last election but may not be as prominent in the

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>next four months. What was you thinking there? Did you

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have to start to bring forward a new generation? Were

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>people being pushed because they were negatives? Give me an

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of hour you came up with the list.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 4>You're right, Paul, it is a balancing act. But the

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 4>talent in my party room is extraordinary. It reflects the

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 4>broad depth of Australia's life experience across this amazing country,

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 4>from the bush to the city and everywhere in between.

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 4>So every conversation was about drawing on that talent, which

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 4>is something I want to do for the future. Frankly,

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 4>over the years I've been on the receiving end of

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 4>calls where I've gone somewhere else in the Parliament. I

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 4>don't necessarily like the language of going up and down

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 4>and the backbench being something that is not preferred from

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 4>time to time. It's not, but everybody can play a

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 4>role wherever they sit in the Parliament, and everyone knows

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 4>what an extraordinary privilege it is to walk into either

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 4>the Senate chamber or the House of Reps chamber and

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 4>advocate for the things they believe in from wherever they

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 4>are placed.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 5>So it was.

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Important for me to talk to my colleagues talk to

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 4>my team and remind them that opposition is not a

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 4>hierarchical game. We need all our players on the field,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 4>every single one of them, every day, because we've got

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 4>a really big job to do and we've got a

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 4>really big fight on our hands. Most importantly, we want

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 4>to be the best possible opposition as a coalition everywhere

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 4>in every corner of this country. We can be and

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 4>we will be.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I do like again some of the four D chests

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that you've got to play here, which is putting the

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>right people in the right jobs, but also who are

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they going to be taking on in the Parliament because

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the reality of opposition is making the most of the

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>failures of a government, meaning in the very limited time

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that an opposition gets to be put on level pecking,

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>which generally speaking, question time contests matter. And I really

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like the ones that you've set up here. In Home

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Affairs it's going to be Andrew Hasty asking questions of

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Tony Burke. I like that, In small business it's going

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to be Tim Wilson asking questions of NL I like that.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to energy, it's going to be Danteen

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>versus Chris Bowen. I like when it comes to communications,

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be Anaka Wells versus Melissa Macintosh. How

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>much did that come into your thinking?

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 4>Does? And that balance between the Senate and the House

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.479
<v Speaker 4>is something that you have regard to. It's not the

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 4>be all and end all, but it's important. And I'll

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 4>add another one. Mikaylia Cash who is now our Foreign

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Affairs spokesperson, sitting in the Senate as our Senate leader

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 4>opposite Pennywong, and she will definitely hold her own and

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 4>she'll definitely take the fight up to labor.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So about just into Nampa, jimper Price. There are obviously

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>very warm feelings for most people who watch on this

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>channel towards her. No doubt there is inside your party roop.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>She's now literally part of the broader team. It's specifically

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal team over the Nationals team. She's moving into

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a defense what you used to be called defense material,

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>which is defense personnel and also levels of defense procurement. Now,

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that this is a really interesting area

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and obviously a very rich one to be able to

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>through things like Senate estimates to pull the government apart.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But for those that want a specific answer about why

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.040
<v Speaker 1>do you seem to wear why do you seem to wear.

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Well? I share those warm feelings for Jacinta and I

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 4>want to make that very clear, and our party room

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 4>does too, and we're delighted that she is now a

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 4>member of the Liberal Party. I spoke to her before

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 4>this appointment, Paul. She's very pleased to take it on.

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 4>As your viewers know, and you advocate so strongly for

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 4>the defense of our nation is crucial. It's critical, and

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.719
<v Speaker 4>it's one of the most important periods that we are

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 4>now facing as a country. It determines our prosperity. And

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 4>defense industry, which you mentioned can be a great Australian

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 4>success story and I certainly saw some of that in

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 4>the previous parliament, so the industry aspects are vital. Working

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 4>with Angus Taylor, who's taking on that senior senior role

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 4>as our shadow Minister for Defense, they will be a

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 4>formidable team. And I'm really excited for Jacinta to take

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 4>this next step and communicate and build the relationships she

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 4>has been so successful doing up until this point and

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I know will continue to do now.

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot time to talk about many many

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>subjects and certainly, of course your story is an exceptional one,

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>from the shearer's cook to the person being able to

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>do university degrees while being a pilot. There's a lot

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, and we are going to get to

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>know you as Australia does in the next little while

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as the alternative Prime Minister. What I also want to

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about, though, is for those millions of people who

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the election result that they wanted. There's obviously

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that sense of disappointment, but also there's a need to

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to the people who did not vote or may

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>well have changed of the past couple of elections, considering,

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of course the win in twenty nineteen versus the result

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty two or twenty five. I hate to quote him,

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's I think a good little way that he

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>took to opposition, which was Bill Shorton saying first year

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was about the party, second year was about policy, third

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>year was about politics. Obviously, I'm not going to verbal

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you that the inspiration for the Susan Lee leadership is

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be Bill Shorton, because we can imagine how

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be immediately spun out of control. But

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>how important is it to you that all three of

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>those things look different in three years than they looked

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>three months ago.

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 4>They're all important, Paul, and they're all important from day one.

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 4>I certainly won't be stringing them out over a three

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.959
<v Speaker 4>year period. We will all be hitting the ground running.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 4>There's no doubt that we suffered a resounding defeat on

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 4>May the third and Australians handed us a lesson. We

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 4>have to listen to it with humility and we have

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 4>to engage and meet modern Australia where it is. And

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 4>when I talk about modernizing the party, I don't mean

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 4>moving to the left or the right. I mean meeting

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 4>people where they are and understanding they're different initiatives, they're

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 4>different wishes, they're different things that are important to them

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 4>wherever they happen to live. Now, our policies are up

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 4>for review, but our values are not. What I want

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 4>to do in setting myself and my team up for

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 4>this important next stage is to spend time listening. I

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 4>would love it if you and I could perhaps be

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 4>on a listening town hall somewhere in this amazing country,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 4>and genuinely, listening is something that you do incredibly well,

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 4>and you come out of those town halls and those

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 4>meetings just filled with optimism because you know, what we

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 4>see around us in the Australian people is very much

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 4>worth fighting for.

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 5>So I do want to do that.

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 4>My team will be doing that, and we will be

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 4>asking Australians what they want in us. But above all,

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 4>this is an opportunity I believe for us to reconnect,

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 4>to accept, as I said with humility, that we didn't

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 4>meet the expectations of Australians and that we have work

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 4>to do. But as I've moved through this period of

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 4>reforming the coalition with David littl Proud and the administration

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 4>that you necessarily take on as a new leader, I

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 4>just can't wait to get out there, out into the

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 4>real Australia that gave me the gifts that I'm so

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 4>privileged to reflect on today as leader and make me

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 4>so determined and to want to give back to the

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 4>country that has given me so much. So there's a

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of fighting to do and I'm up for it

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 4>and I can't wait to get started.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. Susan, thank you so much for the conversation tonight.

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>There many more to come, and on behalf of the

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>minions of people who definitely want a different result for

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the country. Go get him.

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, good on you.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Mate, Susan Lee. They're the opposition leader joining us from Aubrey.

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>What a crazy couple of weeks that she has had,

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, I said, benefit of the doubt of the

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>team that has put in place. And I think some

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of those contests, including Angus Taylor in defense Angus Taylor

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>versus are Richard Martins in between his private flights to Jeelong.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to this, all right, some political experience next,

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and then the wonderful Meghan Kelly want to say. I

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>told you we were going to talk tonight with people

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who have seen all the ups and all the downs

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of both opposition and government when it comes to their

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>own careers and shadow ministries and ministries and leader of

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this and leader of that, and of course it is

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>none other than the carry of a champ. That are

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>none other than Brombin Bishop single carry over a champ, Sorry,

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>my love. And of course so she gave me that look.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And Stephen Conroy just always gets close, but he's always

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>get a help. So the really obvious and boring question

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>was what do you think of? The interview's second most

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>boring question is what do you think of the shadow ministry.

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to an interesting question as number three,

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what's your advice to people who didn't maybe get what

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 1>they wanted today or even in the government reshuffle, And

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you if you are out Nicole bring yourself

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>into the center of things. Bromwin, what is the advice

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>for maybe those people who are being pushed into more

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>mentor role than minister role or shadow minister role. What

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think?

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, the first thing is you've got to take it

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 7>as it is, and then you've got to take the

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 7>opportunities to have an impact and carve out of roll

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 7>for yourself and what you can do from me, I

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 7>went from the highest being thought to be the next

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 7>prime minister, the leader of the opposition prime minister and

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 7>preferred over Paul Keating and John Houston too, coming into

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 7>the Parliament and seeing the change of leadership, and I

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 7>didn't perhaps handle the first of that the best way.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 7>But nonetheless you just get in there and then you

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 7>pitch a new work hard and find opportunities.

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>And look, again, I know that I'm being a little

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>bit again, I was talking about not happy talk again.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand how eventually once you're rubbed, if you rubbed

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way many many times. Then obviously it ends

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>up with the majority of your colleagues at one point

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in time saying time to change the leader. But Stephen

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>again again, as one of the joys of you, guys

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>is the experience of being on a back bench, into

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the outer into the middle, back on the way. What's

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>your advice again to those who either didn't get what

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they wanted, sideways or maybe up and down.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Look, the thing about politics is everybody has gets knocked

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 5>over during the course of their career. But in politics

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.919
<v Speaker 5>the key part is not you know how easy is

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 5>when you're on the up, it's how you manage when

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 5>you get knocked over. You stand up, you dust yourself off,

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 5>just sook a bit and you wander off into a

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 5>corner and just ignore everybody. Or do you get up

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 5>and as you've just said and promise that you've just

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.760
<v Speaker 5>got to work hard, you've got to re establish yourself.

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I personally thought that Jane Human was one

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 5>of the most articulate of the front benches for the

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 5>Opposition over most of the last two and a half years. Unfortunately,

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 5>she had what she would think, I'm sure is a

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 5>disappointing election campaign, and she's now paid the price and

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 5>she's on the back bench. But she will apply herself

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 5>in the Senate and she will be good at what

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 5>she targets, and she will rebuild herself, rebuilds her ability

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 5>to land punches on labor, and I'm sure she'll be

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 5>back in the future. What she shouldn't do is go

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 5>sookn off and thinking, oh woe is me. You know,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 5>your knuckle down, you get you know, you get back

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 5>into it. There's plenty of Senate as much, plenty of

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Parliamentary committees, and plenty of opportunities to do media where

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 5>she will be able to rebuild her career. Not everyone

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 5>follows that approach. Some really throw the toys out of

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 5>the cot, and some say or you know, all positions

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 5>weren't elected on merit today. I mean, at least she's

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 5>still on the front bench, so I don't know what

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 5>she's tossing the toys out of the cot over far

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 5>more disappointed disappointed people in the Liberal Party today than

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 5>just sent the price.

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, let's talk about that. Just enterprise of

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>it all is that I think, you know, obviously, if

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I'm making the call, but I'm not

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>making the call right. It is that I think she's

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody that you want to keep at that highest level

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of shadow ministry, that being in the in the shadow cabinet.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>The silver line thing is that, yes it's not the

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>highest of positions, but there's some absolute rich pickings and

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you both know to be both asking and answering questions

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>in centered estimates. Defense procurement in Australia is a shoka.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a shocker, and if you turnover enough rocks,

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there's enough moments where you turn that into the rock

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>star moment that absolutely makes the case for promotion undeniable.

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Am I right? Bromwin.

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, She's got every opportunity to shine. And it's interesting,

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 7>very often when an opposition forms its ministry, there is

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 7>no shadow cabinet, shadow out of ministry. It is just

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 7>the shadow ministry want and it all works together. And

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 7>that's more usual actually. But Susan's chosen to go this route.

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 7>But that's no problem for your center. She's got plenty

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 7>of opportunities.

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, myth. All right, let's jump to a couple of

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>things other things here, which is of course the super

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>super innuation tax. For now, I am loving the number

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of people that are ramming at home and rapping the doors,

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and isn't it terrible and shaking the sky down? Awesome? Great.

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we just had an election and he had

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to make all of these points at maximum

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>volume in the same but the number of people and

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying organizations that have come out post election, where

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>were you pre election? We know all of that, but

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we're now starting to get back into what I was

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about before, which was the intergenerational war of things.

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Ross Gittens turns around and says that it's just about

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.760
<v Speaker 1>rich old white blokes winging about, you know, their patch

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of coin. There's people on social.

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 7>Media talk about himself like that should saying, you know.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>What, you know, this idea that all young people will

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 1>end up paying it's rubbish because we're not paid enough.

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Rah rah rah. Your thoughts as somebody who was speaking

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>loudly about it for the many weeks prior to the election.

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 7>But unfortunately I wasn't a minister with carriage of the

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 7>issue where it should have been, and it should have

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 7>been out there loud and bold and properly debated. There

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 7>is no mandate for this tax, No mandate for it

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 7>at all, because it was never debated, and for me,

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 7>it's important to separate it out into two parts. There

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 7>is a proposal to tax superannuation over three million dollars

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 7>at the thirty percent rate. That's one issue. The second

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 7>issue is to introduce a brand new tax that has

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 7>never existed before, and that is to tax the use.

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 7>But that's a complicated term, I understand. Let's explain it out.

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 7>That means that you will be taxed annually on any

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 7>increase in anything you own by the tax offers. And

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 7>you've got no payment and you haven't sold anything, but

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 7>you're going to have to pay that tax every year.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 7>It's a tax which is punitive with any moral impromata

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 7>at all, and it should be the pressure should be

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 7>on the government to scrap it.

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>With Stephen, let me guess we got ninety four seats

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and almost control of the Senate. That equals no mystery

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 1>about the policy. Therefore, mandate is that your response.

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Look, Robin was breathtaking. There. This is a piece of

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 5>legislation that has been held up in the Senate for

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 5>the best by six or twelve months. This has been

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 5>debated uphill and down dale. It was absolutely front and

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 5>center of parliamentary debates. It is impossible to say there's

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 5>no mandate for this. This is like saying John Howard

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 5>didn't have a mandate for the GST after he took

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 5>it to an election in ninety eight. Of course he

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 5>had a mandate.

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 7>I'm sorry, put this had made that front and center and.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry Brian center and it has been debated at length.

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 5>The fact that you take the advice to campaign on it,

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 5>the fact that the Liberals wouldn't take your advice in

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 5>campaign is a deep floor of theirs. But also arguing

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 5>about only eighty thousand people who were impact on it

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 5>this year. I accept the indexation argument. We're going to

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 5>be all in the future.

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Forgive me, guys again once we had my editorial, Susan

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Lee and all of those other things. Not enough time tonight,

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>but I assure you into the future plenty, plenty, plenty.

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, quick break back with more with one of them,

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Meghan Kelly, who's got plenty to say about why Kamala

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Harris was on the Gold Coast this weekend our favorite

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>time of the week to talk to our favorite person

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world, the wonderful Megan Kelly joins us from

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States. How are you, Rockstar?

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm great? How are you look?

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm always great, but I've just done a

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>new level because Australia was touched by greatness in the

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>past few days. You know, I know that this little

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>old eye and continent doesn't make a lot of news

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>around the world, but we were changed for the better

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>because a true global leader just graced us with her

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>presence for a day and a half. Kamala Harris was

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>here and just an example of what you've missed out

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>as a president. She was addressing a real estate conference.

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're lucky, aren't we to just get a

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of this gold dust that the realtors of

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Australia are what bring her out of hiding?

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 3>Like for what lessons exactly? First of all, she's never

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 3>been a salesperson. Don't you have to know sales and

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 3>very well to be a realtor, Like that's their one

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 3>of their greatest skills. You'd think they'd want somebody who

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is an excellent salesperson. She's never been in the public

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 3>sector doing any sort of sales work whatsoever, other than

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 3>her fake little stint at McDonald's. But let's face it,

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 3>those burgers sell themselves. So what could be gleaned from her?

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 3>First of all, you got to be a little concerned

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 3>that could be one thing if she and hot demand

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 3>over here, and like she just made time for the Aussies,

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.280
<v Speaker 3>because that's out of the goodness of her heart. Nobody

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 3>wants her, Like she had to go over there where

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 3>her reputation didn't so much precede her in order to

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 3>get a check. So, my friends, we need to be

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more discerning in our invitations. And then

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the bits that I saw because originally earlier today at

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 3>least it wasn't put out on video, so we were

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 3>just getting little sneak peeks at it from what my

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 3>friends over there, you know, got and put online.

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 4>It was just.

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 3>More inanity, saying absolutely nothing about anything, with a huge

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>wind up to every single quote unquote point she was

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 3>about to make. She makes you work so hard you

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 3>have to sift through five hundred words to get to

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 3>the flour that actually do have meaning. But then you

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 3>realize that those two are entirely empty.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, I would like to suggest that somebody like Kamala

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Harris is basically just giving a version of the same

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>speech wherever she goes, which of course is the laziest

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>possible thing, and they get paid a huge chunk of change.

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Can I read from one of the newspaper accounts of

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what she said? Quote, oh, she said real estate agents

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>could be considered quote civic leaders for their role in

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>connecting buyers with suitable homes. She just turns up anywhere

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.919
<v Speaker 1>an insert industry or who I'm talking to and tell

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>them that they're civic leaders. They're flogging apartments around Australia

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and beachside on the Gold Coast. Civic leaders.

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Please, I'm sure they don't even see themselves like that.

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Like they know a lot about houses and what would

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 3>make somebody happy, and what's a good deal and what's not.

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 3>But civic leaders. What is that? That's like your preacher,

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 3>probably your mayor. You know. I don't know, some activist

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 3>in talent who's taken up an issue that's important to

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 3>the town, like no windmills offshore. I don't know, but

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 3>it's probably not the realtor. And that's just, of course

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:06.280
<v Speaker 3>her empty problem because CIA took her on as a client,

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 3>this big agency that I used to be with too,

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sorry to tell you, but you guys were

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the only takers. So Soul was really excited until they

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 3>found out like literally no one else wanted her. I

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 3>shuddered to think what the check looked like. They cannot

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 3>get her any gigs over here. No one wants to

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 3>hear from her. She not only could she not sell

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 3>real estate the way the people listening to the show

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 3>likely can, she couldn't sell herself. So why would you

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 3>think she would have something of value to say to

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 3>you about sales, which is the business of real estate. Like,

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:41.439
<v Speaker 3>she didn't win the presidency, she didn't win the nomination. Ever,

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:44.399
<v Speaker 3>she couldn't. She failed miserably when she actually did run.

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 3>She couldn't sell herself as an inspirational woman, nor as

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 3>a woman from Puerto Rico or Jamaica or where else

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 3>did where her accents from. She couldn't sell herself as

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 3>any of those things. All she really is is an

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:03.320
<v Speaker 3>out of work lawyer. So I mean, maybe you should

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 3>ask her about contract law. She might be able to

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 3>say something valuable on that front. Otherwise there was a

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 3>waste of everyone's time.

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>See, I was disappointed that she didn't try An Australian accent,

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>because as you say during a campaign that she was

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, if she was in the south, she tried

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to sound a little southern.

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 3>And what was something your daughter?

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't your daughter have a little piece of advice as

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to how you can try.

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you can sound Australian. You say, rise of lights.

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Rise of blights. Yeah, hi, I'm Kamala. Have you got

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>any raise of lights? Say?

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:38.720
<v Speaker 4>That would have worked?

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It would have worked.

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 3>What I'm actually saying is rise up lights. I'm in

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 3>American English. I'm saying rise up lights, but it translates

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 3>into Australian English into razor blades. But I sound like

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:56.799
<v Speaker 3>a local, don't I absolutely?

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And you are welcome on any of any of our

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>conferences anywhere, and they'll pay you better than she.

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, I know I should be offended that

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't invited. First, I'm much bigger in Australia than

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris is. Where's my invitation?

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Reeltors mate, I'll give you the tip. There isn't There

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't a town in this country where somebody wouldn't be

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:18.479
<v Speaker 1>willing to put you up in a spare bedroom. All right.

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:20.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the type of joint we are. You know, there's

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lovely hotels, there's beautiful resorts, but you know, come and

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>stay at some maytewns.

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Except always we'll be there. I'll bring my favorite pillow.

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching. Now, before we get

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to the late debate, I think there's a good idea

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's rattling around. The more China will continue to pollute

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the planet, the more likely it is that the effects

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of which are going to be all sorts of disasters

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that we have to deal with. That's just the reality.

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Remember Australia one percent of the world's problem one, China

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty three. Once you put together the rest of the

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>third world, then you throw in America, then you throw

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:03.839
<v Speaker 1>in India, then you in Russia. Forty five minutes of

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the sixty minutes of the climate clock are the actual problems.

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:09.879
<v Speaker 1>As long as that happens, problems will ensue. But there's

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting idea disaster relief Australia. They want to

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 1>put in place a floating army of former members of

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the Australian Defense Force who can be deployed to the

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>various of natural disasters that happen around the country. This

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 1>is on top of that volunteer service. I don't think

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a brilliant idea. Total cost to get to ten

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand people who would be able to be deployed. They're

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>not the army, they're not the sees, they're supplementary, would

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>be about eighty seven million dollars, or a fraction of

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the two hundred and fifty million dollars that the government

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>spend on itself last year in advertising. Surely that's the

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>way to go, and surely that would be a good idea.

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>We will be talking in the next little while to

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the disaster relief Australian people because I think it's a

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:55.319
<v Speaker 1>good idea. As is to keep watching for the late

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>debate