WEBVTT - Credlin | 6 August

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Peter Quedlin Live from year twenty four.

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Good evening, welcome to the program. Great to have your company.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Here's what's coming up tonight on the show. Chris Bowen's

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 2>climb and hypocrisy lavish overseas travels stuff was tabled today,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 2>of course, that taxpayer funded Fiji summit and most leaders

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>in the world are saying no, we don't want to come.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>And the growing cost of chasing net zero aid. Morrison

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>with all that in a moment, Plus more fallout two

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 2>from Victoria's damning Iback report and why critics say the

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 2>watchdogs toothless. A former New South Wales Supreme Court judge

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>joins me he'll outline what must change if Victoria is

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>serious about cleaning up corruption. Questions over the safety and

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>security about politicians too arise in threats from the radical left.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Plus while Tony Burk's got a battle on his hands

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to get Labour's migration policy through cabinet, Paul and Hanson today, well,

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>she's made her points on open borders very clear.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>So I don't care.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 4>What people think, whether you know it's going to affect

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 4>their businesses. They're not going to sell them many products

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 4>or the universities because they won't have the number of

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 4>foreign students coming in here.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't care.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 4>My concern is for those Australians that can't get a

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 4>roof over the head and a decent standard of living

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 4>and way of life.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>We will stay on this issue because labor's in a

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>world of pain over migration for too long. They've used

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>record high migration as a way to pump prime. They're

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>faltering budget position to artificially spike growth numbers to make

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>things better than they really are to avoid a technical recession.

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>But that strategy is coming unstark, as every Ponzi scheme

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>eventually does, and this time it's got as much about

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a cultural impact of mass migration that's loading the polling

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>pressure on labor as much as it is they hit

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 2>on households because much as migration can mask a bad budget,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and under the Albanezer government up until now, that's what's happened. Eventually,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it hurts people out of per capita basis when the

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 2>unplanned arrival of millions hits housing, employment and social cohesion

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 2>in per capita terms, So that's GDP per person. Australia

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>is going backwards, and as the polls show. People have

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 2>woken up as to why it's not just parties on

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the center right filling the high migration backlash.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 3>But now all also labor.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's what's got Tony Burke, the Home Affairs Minister,

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 2>so spooked that he's acting. At least he was acting

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>until he hit a brick wall at Cabinet on Monday.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Having got ahead of himself, Burke had booked a spot

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 2>today at the National Press Club, all set to deliver

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 2>what had been briefed out as the major speech on migration,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>replete with speculated changes to targets and new rules for

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>asylum seekers, until he was rolled.

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's be really clear about what happened here. Tony

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 6>Burke arrogantly booked in a National Press Club address to

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 6>announce a new policy which he had not yet got

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 6>Cabinet approval for. He took it to Cabinet on Monday.

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 6>He got rolled at Cabinet by his colleagues, who forced

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 6>him to cancel his speech on Thursday in a public

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 6>humiliation of the Minister for Home Affairs because he hadn't

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 6>done the work and it wasn't yet ready to be

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 6>publicly announced. For a very senior cabinet minister and a

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 6>very serious, seriously experienced politician like Tony Burke. This is

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 6>about as embarrassing as it gets, and I really start

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 6>to question whether the government even has a plan to

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 6>follow through on their announcement that they want to reduce

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 6>migration from the budget nearly four months ago now, because

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 6>this is what this is about. This is about achieving

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 6>the targets that failed to make every other financial year.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>The reality year is that Labor has never once met

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>any of its migration targets. Every year it puts out

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>a set of forecasts that every year arrivals into Australia

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 2>exceed them. Indeed since the Albanezer government was elected, and

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>this has meant the entry of millions into this country.

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 2>Partly it's the fake budget hit that I mentioned above,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 2>the Ponzi scheme that big migration numbers do to the budget,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 2>but Labour's also use mass migration as a way to

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>buy itself more votes, because as soon as people land here,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Labor can't wait to make them citizens, and in the

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 2>mass events held by Burke just prior to last year's

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 2>election also signed them up as quickly as they can

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>as voters. Until that was the polls turned against them.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>This is why Burke's panicking even though cabinets Left faction

0:04:58.640 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>is pushing back.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>James Pattison again, Well.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 6>It's definitely about politics. This is a government that was

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 6>very happy to bring in one and a half million

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 6>people over the first few years of their time in office,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 6>but now that it has become a political problem for them,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 6>they are desperately running around looking for a solution. And

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 6>the kind of things that Tony Burke apparently proposed to cabinet,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 6>which his colleagues have pushed back on, are the kind

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 6>of things that the Labor Party has criticized Conservative governments

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 6>for contemplating doing in the past, including restricting their peal

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 6>rights in the soylumn system, including forcing people offshore to

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 6>make applications, including really cracking down on appeals and applications.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, these are the kind of things that no

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 6>one joins the Labor Party to do. If they are

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 6>contemplating doing them, the only reason can be because of politics.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 6>They don't sincerely believe in these kind of tough changes.

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Well that's the coalition refusing to buy Labour's newfound support

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 2>for sensible migration, also refusing to buy it is One

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Nation leader Pauline Hanson. If anyone thinks she'll let Labor

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>try and rebrand themselves as somehow tough on migration or forget.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 4>It, they're sched to do anything but based on really

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 4>the one issue is mass migration that's happened in Australia.

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>So Tony Burker saying, hey, I really need to pull

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 4>back on my speech that I was going to give

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 4>it the Press Club because he's got to peace the Unions,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 4>he's got to peace the other left leaning in his

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 4>party as well and the Greens. So he's got a

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 4>battle on his hands.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Look nothing else.

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 2>What's happening now is that finally we Australians are having

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 2>the long overdue debate on migration that you have been

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>demanding for years, that in the end is a good thing,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>right and this today too. Weeks and weeks after the

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>offensive segment first day, and days after the woman who

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 2>created it gave a half hearted apology of her own,

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>ABC Managing director Hugh Marks finally bit the bullet and

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>apologize for airing highly offensive rape based content regarding Missus

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Gina rein Hart, not that the Communications Minister had anything

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to do with it. Just hours before the ABC apology,

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Arnaka Wells reviews to even say that one was warranted.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 7>My personal view is that that was unacceptable, but it's

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 7>not for me to make that determination. It's for the

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 7>ombdsman to do so. And I'll anticipate your next question, Harry.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 3>If the onbodsman finds that, like.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 7>In my view, it's unacceptable, it would be appropriate for

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 7>the ABC to issue an apology. But what's important is

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 7>that that process plays out first, and that's what any

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>news publisher would expect the Minister for Communications to act

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 7>in this process.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, she wasn't alone. All those Labor MPs fence sitting

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>unwilling to demand the ABC do the right thing, indeed

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>saying that they've never seen the tape.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 8>Please, I haven't seen the clip that you're referring to.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 8>It's not a show that I watch.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 9>I want to be clear, I've not seen the video

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 9>and I don't intend to watch it.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>From what's been described to me, it is unacceptable.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>At least Labour's Peter Khalil was honest enough to call

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 2>it out for what it was.

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 10>It's unacceptable no matter who it is, whether you agree

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 10>you disagree with the person that kind of violent imagery

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 10>and that misogynist imagery. It would not be accepted for

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 10>any of the any of my colleagues in the Parliament

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 10>who are women.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Well good on him.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 2>The public outrage about the segment was real, absolutely, But

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>don't think for a minute that's what's prompted the ABC's

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 2>change of heart today. After all, the ABC doesn't care

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 2>about the public or ratings for that matter, given it's

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar yearly budget is guaranteed whether people watch it

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>or they don't. Now what finally saw the ABC do

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the decent thing here was the threat of legal action

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>from a businesswoman with very very deep pockets. And even

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>the apology today came with barbes like this Hu Mark's

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>declaring that while the Ombudsman's found the film did not

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>breach the ABC's editorial policies, the ABC acknowledges the episodes

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 2>fall in short of community expectations. Now, what sort of

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>editorial policies does the ABC have if it thinks that

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 2>naming and threatening a woman with anal rape and associated

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>violence is not a breach of them? That instead, it's

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>it's comedy, it's satire. It's not satire, it's sadistic and

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the ABC. Well, they know the difference. The ABC's problems

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 2>with bias are systemic. The ABC's waste of taxpayer billions

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is legendary. I mean, I was the ABC advisor for

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Richard Allston when he was the Communications Minister under John Howard.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I was also the chief of st after Helen Coonan

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>when she held the same portfolio a few years later.

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 2>And I've now come to the position that the ABC

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>should no longer be supported by the taxpayer purse. If

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>people want to watch it or listen to it, good

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>on them, they should access it now via a subscription service, because,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>like you, I can think of far better ways to

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>spend that one point two billion every year. An hour

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 2>back to Victoria and the release of the corruption watchdogs

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 2>report into Operation Richmond. New Premier Ben Carroll hid from

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 2>genuine scrutiny yesterday, holding a quick and dirty press conference

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>at exactly the same time as the IBACK Commissioner was

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>handing down her bombshell report into the Andrews government and

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 2>backroom deals with the firefighters union. And that was so

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't have to answer any tough questions.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 11>I have not read the report. I'll be reading the

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 11>report tonight. It has been tabled in the Parliament. While

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 11>I'm here, I'm going to read the report carefully. I'm

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 11>going to study it and give the Victorians the action

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 11>and the answers they deserve.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 9>Did you time this press conference specifically to avoid taking

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 9>questions on this matter? You knew it was being tabled

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 9>at nine point thirty this morning?

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 11>No, this was always in my diary.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Well today when we all assume the report would have

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 2>been read and Carol would front the cameras hit away

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>again instead sending out a colleague to take the media hits,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and if you can believe it, they hadn't found time

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>to read the report either.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Have you read the report?

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 12>I've been catching up on my new portfolio and I

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 12>have been starting to get into this report.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 7>Are you interested to read it?

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 8>If you'll learn anything new?

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 12>I think we can always learn from a recommendations that

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 12>from IBAC and the observations that they make, and I

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 12>think that I will all of us will have a rate.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm mean, look at the game here, state and federal.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the new playable from Labor. I haven't seen it.

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>About the Gena rein hart Skittle, I haven't read it about.

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 3>The IBAC report.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Ben Carroll can't be credible on crime and corruption, saying

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>that he'll root it out. That integrity is an optional

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>anymore under his leadership if he can't front the cameras

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and address a report into a government where he sat

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 2>around the table as a senior member of cabinet. Now,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>worse still, the public servant named hundreds of times in

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the report remains tonight the head of the Education Department

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>in Ben Carroll's new government. At the very least, Tony

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Bates should have been sacked and Carroll should have had

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the guts today to front the media.

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 13>By the end of the day. Yesterday, Carol should have

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 13>sacked Miss Debates. What did the premier do? He claimed

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 13>he hadn't read the report. He then hid for the

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 13>rest of the day. He's hidden again today.

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>I'll say it again.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>He can change the leader in Victoria, but you can't

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>change labor. All right, let's go to Camperow for the headlines.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Appleitico reporter Trey mcintish.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 5>The ABC has finally apologized to gena Ryan Hart over

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 5>a controversial segment that depicted a violent assault of the

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 5>mining magnate. It was part of the Race Around the

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 5>World program Gena Rean Hart had asked for an apology

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 5>and threatened legal action. The matter was referred to the

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 5>ABC Obitsman. On Thursday, Managing Director Hugh Marx released his statement.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 5>While the ombitsman has found that the film did not

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 5>breach the ABC's editorial policies, the ABC acknowledges the episode

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 5>has fallen short of community expectations. The ABC apologizes to

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Missus and to anyone else affected or upset by the

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 5>publication of the film. Parliament returns here next week and

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Labour is facing an uphill battle to get its gambling

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 5>reforms through the Senate. The changes appear friendless. The Coalition

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 5>joined the Greens in demanding major reform, including stopping inducements.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Labor has been pressed on whether it's really willing to

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 5>walk away from these reforms if it doesn't get its way.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 7>We are some ways away from that. We're having constructive discussions.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 7>I'll continue to do that with my counterparts. We'd love

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 7>to see this.

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 6>Past and I think a sensible balance can be struck here.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 5>The Acting Prime Minister, Richard Miles in Darwin today. He

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 5>can't escape questions though about why Luke Gosling is still

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 5>a Special Envoy despite facing assault allegations. New twenty four

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 5>has been told not everyone and cabinet is happy with

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 5>the decision.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 9>There is a legal process underway in relation to Luke,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 9>so there's you know, I'm just limited in what I

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 9>can say, but there's also a presumption of innocence.

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 5>Also today, Labour's Ed Husick is taking leave after he

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 5>was involved in a serious car accident with the tr

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 5>on Sydney's M seven on Tuesday night. The MP was

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 5>taken to hospital with minor cuts, fractures and concussion. Trudy

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 5>McIntosh News twenty four camera, all.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, let's get across all those headlines and more and

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 2>bring in my panel now, National Affairs editor at the

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Daily Telegraph, News twenty four host James Morrow and the

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Deputy Executive director with the IPA, Dan Wild.

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Dan.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into the internal ructions inside Labor in a moment.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 2>But Tony Burke canceling that press club address today, just

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>more AMMO for Pauline Hanson.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Why bring in to me people that don't fit the

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 4>needs that we want in Australia. We don't need any

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 4>more Uber drivers nail technicians, dog walkers. These people gone

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 4>stop all that. So I don't care what people think,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 4>whether you know it's going to affect their businesses. They're

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 4>not going to sell them many products. All the universities

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 4>because they won't have the number of foreign students coming

0:15:58.280 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 4>in here.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't care.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Clearly, Dan, this is biting into Labour's private polling. Now

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>that's the only reason they had tried to take anything

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 2>to cabinet.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 13>Well, that's right.

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 14>We know that this is a government that has been

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 14>driven by politics and politics only when it comes to immigration,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 14>and their program has been a total disaster. I mean

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 14>you outline the economic disaster with the per capita growth

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 14>going backwards for ten out of fifteen quarters. We know

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 14>the social problems, the political problems that have come from

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 14>that as well. So look what's happening here, as you

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 14>well know, is we've seen this all across the western world.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 14>We've seen it in the UK where Nigel Farage the

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 14>insurgency force decimated the Tories and then he started taking

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 14>all of the labor voters in the in the regions

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 14>and the outer parts of the major cities who had

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 14>had a gupfull of mass migration. We saw it in

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 14>the US where Trump won in twenty sixteen, in large

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 14>part because he won a whole bunch of Democratic voters

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 14>who maybe had never voted Republican ever before, but listened

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 14>to Trump's message on immigration and said we need to

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 14>have a chain. And that's clearly happening here now in Australia.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 14>What I find interesting politically, Peter is you've got probably

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 14>half the Labor Party who probably understand this is a problem.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 14>You know, these are out of suburban people, with a

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 14>lot of blue collar, working class voters who don't want

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 14>this anymore. But you've got a bunch of Wokesters as

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 14>well in the inner cities who want mass migration. They

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 14>believe that multiculturalism is a force for good, because they

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 14>want to dilute Australian culture, because they believe Australia is

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 14>a bad racist country. So how on earth they're actually

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 14>going to get a sensible immigration policy out of that cabinet,

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 14>I don't know, And I don't think Tony Burt's going

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 14>to be able to get the job done.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the old labor right James would have backed sensible migration.

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 2>They have been rolled by the labor left and consistently

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 2>that's occurred obviously on Monday with Tony Burke. But it's

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 2>like that battle over night in Michigan where the socialists

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 2>radical left are changing the face of the Democrats as well.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, and that recent Michigan that you allude to is

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 15>really fascinating because you know, what happens in America we

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 15>see eventually land in Australia as well. And what we've

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 15>seen over there is this Democrat socialist politics. It's basically,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 15>you know, a hard left socialist politics twinned with a

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 15>free Palestine, gaza kind of Muslim brotherhood adjacent style of

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 15>politics that ties very closely to Islam. Now a Muslim

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 15>candidate there in Michigan has one Michigan has a huge

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 15>Muslim population. He's very radical, very radical on Israel. He

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 15>beat a Democrat establishment candidate who, as you say, Peter,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 15>it would have been basically like, you know, a labor

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 15>right type pro industry, pro worker, pro America. And now

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 15>the politics on the left there are now entirely you know,

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 15>not just anti America, but an anti American and I

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 15>think that's where you're going to wind up seeing a

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 15>push on the left coming from you know, We already

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 15>saw that happen with Tony Burker, what happened to him cabinet?

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 15>What's just going to get worse here, I suspect.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to IVAC and Victoria and Ben Carroll

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 2>who yesterday hadn't read the report and today was hiding

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:00.120
<v Speaker 2>under his desk.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 13>What did the premier do? He claimed he hadn't read

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 13>the report. He then hid for the rest of the day.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 13>He's hidden again today.

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>You can't say you want to be tough on corruption

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>if you can't read the report. You can't front the

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>front the camera's dad, and you can't tell us what

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 2>you're going to fix.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 14>Exactly. And you can't say that you're going to stand

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 14>up for integrity. I mean, this was his big pitch,

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 14>right that he's going to be mister integrity. Well he's

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 14>already failed that. And look, the issue here is that

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 14>Ben Carroll was a very senior and influential member of

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 14>the Andrews government and the Allen government. Did he seriously

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 14>not know about any of this. I'm not saying he's

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 14>necessarily implicated in at all, but if you want to

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 14>be a man of integrity and of leadership, then you

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 14>needed to have done the right thing at the time.

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 14>He also stood by at best during COVID when the

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 14>schools were locked down. He's Immigration minister. All the schools

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 14>were closed and all of the damage that has done

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 14>to children in the next generation. There's been no accountability,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 14>there's bien, no apology, there's been no acceptance that anything

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 14>has been done wrong. So look, ultimately, he started his

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 14>premiership by saying he's different. I'm not Andrews, I'm not Alan,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 14>I'm going to lead a different kind of government, basically

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 14>saying you can trust me more than you can trust

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 14>anyone else to fix the state. But I've got to

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 14>say the fact that he's been running and hiding is

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 14>you know, it's already raising some serious questions in voters'

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 14>minds about whether he is actually any different from the

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 14>other two that came before him.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 2>I'll get into the big spending from Chris Bowen on

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>international junkets in a moment. This story that's broken this

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:48.239
<v Speaker 2>afternoon about the Prime Minister quietly charging taxpayers for a

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 2>family trip. It looks like a used family reunion to

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>bring his adult son down to canber for the budget. Now,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I think this is pretty extraordinary. The Sun's twenty five,

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 2>as I understand, and it's working. Now, why on earth,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 2>James Morrow, a taxpayer is paying for this?

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 15>Well, I have absolutely no idea, but as a taxpayer,

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 15>this is the sort of thing that absolutely infuriates me.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 15>You know, every month when I get paid and when

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 15>everybody else who's a pay as you go taxpayer gets paid,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 15>they take a huge chunk of all of the money

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 15>that you make and say, well, we need it for

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 15>all these important things. And some of those important things

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 15>include apparently flying the twenty five year old kid of

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 15>the Prime Minister, who makes something like a half a

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 15>million dollars a year I guess, from city to camera,

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 15>which is not the most expensive flight in the world.

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 15>Why can't the Prime Minister put his own hand in

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 15>his own pocket, or Nathan put his own hand in

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 15>his own pocket for a ticket down to camera, or

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 15>just get in the car and drive. It is absolutely infuriating.

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 15>And it is these little things, I think, much more

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 15>than you know, billions of dollars in way the dis

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 15>or things like this that really aggravate people, because you know,

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 15>those are the things that you can identify with and

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 15>you can think, why is he doing this? He's on

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 15>a half million dollars a year. It's infuriating.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>And he's got two luxury homes and he's got a

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 2>car provided by the taxpay. I could go on the

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister costs us millions and millions a year that

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the Sun's not a dependities twenty five years of age.

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 3>I left home at eighteen.

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, come on, mate, grow up, put your hand

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 2>in your own pocket, pay your own way.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's go.

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>If I can now of those comments from One Nation

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Senator Malcolm Roberts, these are the latest praising American conspiracy

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>theorist Alex Jones, who, amongst other things, claimed that the

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Sandy Hook massacre was staged.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 16>But Alex Jones is well respected by many people. You know,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 16>he was wrong about Sandy Hook. He was wrong about

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 16>nine to eleven. But I talked to him about COVID.

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 16>He and I were both right. Talk to him Digital Lady,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 16>he and I are both right. Talk to him about

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 16>climate fraud. He and I are both correct.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so he admits he was wrong on Sandy Hook.

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>But this is a real headache for Pauline Hans and

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>haven't listened to her response.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Today we get a lot of people contacting our offices

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 4>and talking about chem trials. And you've got to understand,

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Malcolm Roberts is always that scientist that comes out of him,

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 4>and I want to see the data everything that he

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 4>talks about showing me the data. But Alex Jones was

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, he denied that Sandy Hook even happened as

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 4>a big conspiracy theory.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think that my concern.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 4>You correct, there's a few issues here that have been

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 4>raised brought to my attention. And until I can sit

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 4>down and have a talk with Malcolm next week for

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 4>three regards to it, to get to the bottom of

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 4>the matter, I will do that next week when we're

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 4>in Canberra.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, down I want to be a

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>fly in the wall for that one. But she's not

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>happy with him. I think she has to really be

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 2>credible now she is playing in the big league. Think

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 2>she's had some crazy lunatics in her party before. Some

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>have left their own accord. Some she's had to show

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 2>the door. I honestly, I think now I'm at the

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 2>point where she has got to cut him loose. If

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 2>she wants her brand to be credible.

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 14>Well, I'm not sure. Malcolm Roberts was agreeing with those

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 14>statements by Alex Jones, at least from that clip. That's

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 14>not what I got from it. But I do take

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 14>the broader point that what Australians want and what the

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 14>country really needs is for one nation, but also every

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 14>political party to be focused on the big issues that

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 14>they face, and certainly any distraction from that would be

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 14>a huge issue. So I think this is an issue

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 14>that probably all parties have to deal with. If they

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 14>move from being a smaller party and a more minor

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 14>party to something going into the mainstream, they are going

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 14>to get more scrutiny, as they should. I think what

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 14>Senator Hanson said there was pretty fair enough. So you know,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 14>what do Australians want where they want to focus on

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 14>cutting immigration, to getting rid of the net zero madness,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 14>and to making sure Australian value is at front and

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 14>center in our public life. So you know, if one

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 14>nation can stick to that, then they're going to keep

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 14>doing pretty well in the polls.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, James Mourrow, though, I think people also want my

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 2>nation to be credible now and to keep their place

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 2>as a real force, and if they're dragged down by

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>stuff like this. Even even though I know she's loyal

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>and even though I know they have a history. Then

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>it takes one nation out of the equation and we're

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 2>back to the two major parties. And I think a

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of people are showing poll by pole that they

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 2>want this sort of contest.

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, look, I think people want that contest. I think

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 15>the key for one Nation is really just to show

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 15>themselves as being both professional and outsider. And that's the

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 15>way they're going to have to go. Be really careful

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 15>about their candidate. It's not just Malcolm, but in general,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 15>because all of that just creates noise that the media

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 15>hops on and that distracts from their key message.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I haven't had any on my show ever, and

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a reason for that. I'll leave it there, Thank

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you both. Fresh from the Press Club speech yesterday, where

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>he faced increased scrutiny over Labour's failure to get anywhere

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 2>near their twenty five thirty emissions targets, Chris Bowen's now

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 2>facing heat over his globe trotting travel expenses and that

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Fiji climate junket that almost everyone in the world he's

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 2>invited to have said, sorry, mate, we're not coming. Boeing's

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 2>latest spending released by the Parliamentary Expenses Authority shows he

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>spent some three hundred and forty five thousand dollars.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>In international travel. I have a look at that screen.

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Forty one thousand dollars for six days in Germany and Singapore,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>seven thousand for just one night in New Zealand, nine.

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Days of the US.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Well that's cost you over one hundred thousand dollars. On

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 2>and on and on it goes. Those costs are extraordinary.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Now he wants this summon in Fiji. No one wants

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 2>to go. It's all unbelievable. We're cutting private health rebates,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 2>aren't we for seniors, and yet this bloke can't stop

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 2>spending joining me now, the director of Energy at the

0:26:55.760 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Center for Independent Studies, Aidan Morrison Aiden quick to tell

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 2>all of us, you know, lower your emissions Australia. Well,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 2>here's carbon footprints out of control. So too, is that

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 2>level of spending, How on earth is it justified?

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 17>Look, he's absolutely committed to being this kind of global leader.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 17>He clearly wants to be the you know, the top

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 17>of some headline script that looks very important on some

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 17>media coverage. So leading that international charge that he is

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 17>trying to try to reduce carver emissions is the job

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 17>that he wants, but clearly he's actually meant to be

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 17>in charge of the country that's proving that it can't

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 17>be done without enormous increases in our power prices. So

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 17>I'm just kind of a pall that he's still so

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 17>committed to trotting around the international stage where he's not

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 17>really taking responsibility for the clear failures of his own

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 17>policy in Australia, which have been promised to lower prices,

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 17>and everything that he's doing is pushing prices up in

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 17>Australia and really making it hard for industry to get

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 17>ahead in Australia. So it's disappointing to see that kind

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 17>of posturing taking his time attention, as well as the

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 17>carbon emissions and the money, but that money is trivial

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 17>compared to the waste that is occurring in the energy

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 17>system at the moment, the enormous subsidies that we're paying,

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 17>which are what really grinds my gears.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll just go to that because it really was

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 2>digging in yesterday when pressed about the emission's targets at

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 2>the press climb, haven't listened, so you.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Would reach the eighties two percent renewable target. That task

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 3>looks very difficult.

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 7>Will it be on you if labor fails to meet

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 7>any more of its climate action KPIs in the next

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 7>four years.

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, as I said, thank you for the question, Elizabeth,

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 8>But as I said, we are making very good progress

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 8>on many elements of our transition. There's others where we're

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 8>facing headwinds, which we've always been frank about. We faced

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 8>the international circumstances of now two global energy shocks in

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 8>our four years, which is historically our high proportion. Australians

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 8>knew that in twenty twenty five. They knew what we

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 8>said in twenty twenty two. They knew our record, and

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 8>they asked us to keep going. Obviously, if you ask

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 8>the question, is it on me? Yes, that's right.

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 3>That's the spin. I didn't give us the facts.

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 17>Look, he's absolutely clutching its straws there trying to say

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 17>there's headwinds on some things, but other parts are going well.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 17>The reality is the only thing that is moving in

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 17>the energy transition is calling it is household adoption of batteries,

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 17>which he has thrown the most insane level of subsidies

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 17>at spending. Initially he thought to be two point three billion.

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 17>After six months he'd spent all of that. It was

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 17>meant the last four years, and the projections took it

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 17>to fourteen billion, and he taped it back down to

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 17>about seven billion. So the amount of money that's been

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 17>splashed to try to drive this household uptake of batteries

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 17>is just enormous. But the truth in the field is

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 17>that the grid scale solar has completely stalled unless it's

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 17>got government underwriting revenue guarantees basically, and wind is completely dead.

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 17>There's not that. There's only one wind project being built

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 17>in New South Wales at the moment and everything else,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 17>and he acknowledged this as well. So basically, onshore wind

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 17>is going nowhere. Offshore wind is basically dead, and he

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 17>blame global forces for that. Hydrogen of course going nowhere.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 17>So all these promises that he has absolutely bet the

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 17>farm on for our energy future have come to nothing.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 17>And yet he's still trying to basically scrape together sort

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 17>of threads of an optimistic story by splashing enormous subsidies

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 17>of cash to keep household solar and batteries moving.

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Just quickly.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, data centers he was talking tough yesterday about them,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 2>saying he'll basically override the States. A lot of public

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 2>servants contacting me. He's seen you ones out of Canberra

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that I know, and said that constitutionally, this is a

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 2>real problem for his plan.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 17>That's absolutely right, and I think that we saw actually

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 17>some of the journalists get up and they were trying

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 17>to ask the question too, obviously quite a bewildered, like

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 17>you know, what do you mean you'll legislate under what

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 17>head of power? Exactly, Chris, because the states have pretty

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 17>clear authority to plan how they use their land. They've

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 17>got total authority to manage their own energy needs and

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 17>uses as well and industries. So they're going to have

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 17>to find some very creative kind of loophole for the

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 17>government to actually legislate. So Chris Bowen's kind of again

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 17>being totally out of step for where his powers did

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 17>and didn't extend, and it seemed like really quite determined,

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 17>a little bit menacing for him to sort of say, look,

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 17>we will just legislate. Just watch us. So no one

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 17>could figure out exactly what he's going to do there,

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 17>but he thinks that he can use his power. He's

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 17>absolutely in sense that other states want to continue to

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 17>use whatever fuel is available and the investors want to use.

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 17>So he's it looks incredibly out of step, quite autocratic,

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 17>that he's trying to reach into it and de mean

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 17>in what is normally state powers.

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 3>All over there. Thank you Aiden.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 2>After the break, more on the IBAK reporter out of Victoria.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 2>So is this it for Daniel Andrews off Scott Free.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 3>We'll see. After the break, we'll go back.

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>They are flooding in your flags, your images that you

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 2>photographed and sent to me on email, Australian flags flying

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 2>with pride right around our wonderful nation.

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll show you those in a moment.

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 2>But now to more fall that from the damning IBAC

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 2>report into Dan Andrews' era firefighter negotiations, released yesterday after

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>an extensive eight year probe. Here to discuss it in

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 2>more detail, retired New South Wales Supreme Court Judge and

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>chair of the Center for Public Integrity, Anthony Wheeley. Anthony,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 2>thank you for your time. I'll ask you at the outset,

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 2>if the same things happened in New South Wales as

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 2>detailed in the report tabled yesterday, would they meet the

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 2>definition of corruption.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the definition of corrupt conduct in New

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>South Wales is very wide. I often think it can

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>be summarized by four propositions. Does the conduct constitute a

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>breach of public trust? I think in this case, the

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>conduct that's unearthed in the IBACK inquiry would conceivably amount

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to a breach of public trust. I Secondly, I think

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it would constitute possibly an abuse of office. It could

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>also constitute quite easily a serious breach of the codes

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of Conduct in Victoria. And finally, I think it's conduct

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that obviously and clearly undermines public confidence in government and

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>public administration, all those things put together. I think the

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>answer to your question is yes.

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Plenty of analysis yesterday and comments indeed from the IBACK

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Commissioner about how constrained they were in terms of pursuing corruption.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 2>As you discuss, have we got a toothless target in Victoria?

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I do think it has some serious deficiencies. The

0:33:55.160 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>first one is that the definition of Corrupt Conduct Act,

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as I've said, is very narrow. It was introduced by

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the Baalue of Government in about twenty eleven twenty twelve.

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of criticism at the time saying, well,

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>why don't you make it wider like other other states,

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>territories and the like. So if we look around the

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>country at the moment, we've got New South Wales, Queensland,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or the Territory Act, and the Federal Knack too, they've

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>all got this wider definition of corrupt conduct. But Victoria's

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>languishing with this very narrow one. So in that sense, yeah,

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it lacks teeth. Secondly, the fact

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that this inquiry has taken so long I think is

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>part partly due to the structure of the legislation, not entirely,

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but I mean seven years. I mean that's just beyond

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the pale. And I think also the fact that public

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>hearings can only be held in exceptional circumstances. In this

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>day and age, I think the better test should be,

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>as a is in other places, is it in the

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>public interest to hold a public hearing? And part of

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that test is look at whether people's reputation will be

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>unfairly damaged by having it in public. So I think

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's become more sophisticated. There are better guidelines, but Victoria

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>persists in the limitation of only exceptional circumstances. For public hears.

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So those three things I think deprived of this body

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of its effectiveness as it I mean, we've got to

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>be fair. They can, of course make findings of criminal conduct,

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but the question is whether you want your integrity bodies

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to be focusing only on criminal behavior or whether you

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>want them looking at corruption, integrity, good government, good behavior

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on a wider basis, and I think the latter is preferable.

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 2>So one of the former commissioners, Robert red Lake, he

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 2>has gone public and said that he argued for many years,

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 2>as he said, did his predecessor, for the powers to

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>be augmented, to be boosted to something like they have

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 2>in New South Wales. That was certainly the view of

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the current commissioner, both very strong in that regard. And

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 2>when the government does it. At what point does a

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 2>government refusing to give the anti corruption watchdog the powers

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 2>it needs to fight corruption amount to corruption in itself.

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting one. I suppose we've got to be fair.

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the legislation was passed by parliament, so it

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just the government who's responsible for the legislation being

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>narrower than it should be. So no, I think the

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>answer is now I wouldn't see it as corrupt, because

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 1>after all, it did, as I say, still allow iback

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at criminal based corrupt conduct. But it was

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just too narrow and I think that that was partly

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>due to self interest by the government and the continued

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Kin You refusal to expand the legislation,

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>although many people were critical of it, was also I

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think due in part of self interest and political protection.

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I can understand that parliamentarians don't want to be particularly

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>exposed to public hearings and public findings, but you know

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that is self interest, and I think the public interest

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>requires that if you go to have an integrity body,

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be an integrity body with teeth. It's

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 1>got to have a wide path, and in this case,

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately that's not been the case. But I'm very pleased

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to see that the Liberal Party in Victoria said that

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they would now embrace the widening of this definition. And

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it now goes back to the new premier in Victoria.

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's see whether his aim that his government is one

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of integrity. Let's see him bring forward a bill and everybody,

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think empolierment will support it. And the time is

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 1>right and it'll be wonderful if that could happen.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I hope you are right, Justice, Really, I'll leave

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>it there, thank you. All right, before the break, let's

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 2>have a look at your flags all.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Around the country.

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 2>As I said, front yards, backyards, on your truck, on

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 2>your car, absolutely everywhere.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 3>They've been coming in.

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 2>I've kept my team busy putting them up via the

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>email onto the system. You've got wonderful mementos there, some

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 2>farm equipment you can see on the screen, but lots

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 2>of connections with the military too, proudly up in flagpoles

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 2>and beautiful backyards. I must say, some beautiful bits of

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Australia I'm seeing as they come flooding in. But one

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 2>thing is consistent in your emails to me, your messages

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 2>with the photographs. You absolutely love this country and you

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 2>are absolutely prepared to fight and defend it at the

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 2>ballot box if required. Aren't they magnificent? All Right, we'll

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 2>come back to more of those next week after the break.

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Real concern about personal security for Pauline Hansen. How much

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 2>is this going to stop her campaigning in the activist

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 2>breeding ground of Victoria.

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 3>Welker backs still to come.

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 2>The worrying rise of the socialist left in America with

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 2>another pro Palestinian candidate taking out the Michigan Democratic primary.

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 2>But first I want to turn to those scenes from

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Monday night left wing activists straight out of Central casting

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 2>at the One Nation that Victorian Launch Party protesting there

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 2>out the front. Yes, I know paul and Hanson's always

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>copped protesters, but what we're seeing now and the personal

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 2>slurs being hurled at it looks like an escalation to me.

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 2>And it all comes at a time that we're worried

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 2>about the safety, aren't we around the world of our

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 2>politicians doing me now, someone who knows a fair bit

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.760
<v Speaker 2>about this, he was once a close personal protection officer

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 2>a CPP of politicians in the past, you knowing well,

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 2>David Craig, former AFP Detective Superintendent. Though, David, we've got

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 2>some pictures on the screen. You know exactly what it's like,

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 2>as I say, to give CPP support to politicians. There's

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 2>you dancing though with Pauline Hanson. I know you worked

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 2>with other politicians as well. I mentioned she's always been controversial, right,

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 2>so she's always had a level of protest. But how

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:32.280
<v Speaker 2>would you assess things now? Compared to when you worked

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 2>closely with her in the past.

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 18>Look, I think in the mid nineties, Peter, it was

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 18>a more stained threat environment. She was particularly disruptive in

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 18>the political scene, whereas now I think everything is coming

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 18>a little bit more to the center and it's not

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 18>as bad. However, a fair way from the election. Yet

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 18>the protests back in the mid nineties were things being thrown,

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 18>and not just daily depth threats, but multiple daily death threats,

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 18>and it was a matter of prioritizing which was the

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 18>worst and what needed to be actioned. I think that

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 18>things will ramp up as we are closer to the election.

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 18>But one thing for sure, no one on this planet

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 18>will intimidate that woman. She man, She is tough, she

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 18>is a tough customer, and she will not be intimidated.

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 18>I can tell you that now.

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 2>It only takes one though, And I look at the

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 2>case of Anne winnecam in the United Kingdom, where police

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 2>there have said they think it was someone motivated by

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 2>left wing ideology. We saw that Health CEO gunned down

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 2>in New York again left wing ideology. The activist class

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 2>on the left. Can't debate them, you can't reason them

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 2>with them. You can't even disagree that's ramping up in

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this country in a way we haven't seen before.

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, that's right, Peter. It is they're becoming more brazen

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 18>because I don't think that they've been met head on

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 18>with serious consequences yet, but as far as disrupting traffic

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 18>and wherever it might be, But there are serious consequences

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 18>if the left or any ideology wants to escalate things further.

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, what about the defense business in Melbourne? We are

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.439
<v Speaker 2>told now there was an arson attack last year. We're

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 2>told now it's being investigated as an act of far

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 2>left terrorism.

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 18>Well that's a prime point, Peter, and it's very heartening

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 18>to see that it demonstrates to the Australian public, or

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 18>it should, that our terrorism laws are ideology neutral. So

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 18>regardless of your ideology, if you meet the criteria, and

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 18>that's a fairly high bar with terrorism, but if you

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 18>breach that threshold and you can be looked at for

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 18>terrorism charges, you can be looking at life in prison.

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 18>So it's no longer just a little bit of a protest.

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 18>You will face some serious law enforcement and court time,

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 18>jail time if you're convicted.

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I need to get a comment on some things that

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Chris Mins had to say, vowing that you'd close a

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 2>legal loophole. This is after the Supreme Court refused to

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 2>place a supervision order on Yaka Ben Shabah, the nephew

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of slain Isis terrorists Kalade Sharuf ben Shabier. I don't

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 2>want to run through this rap sheet again so people

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 2>understand the man's background. Convicted this year over a twenty

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 2>four assault of a gay couple, was later charged while

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 2>in Bou over an alleged case of pro Isis material.

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Those charges were dropped.

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And he was released in April on a conditional release

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 2>order after he successfully appealed the sentence of that assault.

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty four.

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 2>The Premier says the terror laws must err on the

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 2>side of public safety. I have to say I agree.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 2>So explain why a supervision order would generally have been

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 2>sought by authorities, David.

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 18>Well, it's a civil order and it's done in respect

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 18>to whether the Supreme Court assesses that there's an enduring

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 18>and unacceptable risk of terrorism. Now, it's good that Chris

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 18>Mins is taken a step forward and to mend the legislation.

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.240
<v Speaker 18>I just would like to buy him an uber pass

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 18>to get to Canberra and show Tony Burke what to

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:09.959
<v Speaker 18>do so we could fix up this isis Bribe's mess

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 18>as well, with the same sort of legislative amendments.

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard any movement from the federal government to

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 2>do exactly that?

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 18>No, I haven't, pert, I haven't heard a thing. I

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 18>have read the One Nation policy in its draft form

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 18>of their protections against foreign fighters, and I think that

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:35.800
<v Speaker 18>that's a very sensible idea. It's moving from an executive

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 18>decision to the court and that's going to be more

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 18>constitutionally acceptable, and I think it's got a lot of merit,

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 18>and I think anyone who argue against that policy will

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 18>have to come up with something very similar.

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Very interesting. There leave it, David, thank you.

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Right next up that result out of Michigan.

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 3>We want to pull that apart.

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Abdul l said, what does that mean for the future

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:58.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Democrats in the United States?

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 3>The International panel coming up? All right, it's been.

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 2>A monumental note in the United States. There has been

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 2>a big win for abdul l sayed, and the Democratic

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Senate primary in Michigan. Donald Trump, well Mince's words when

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 2>he referenced El sayed.

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 17>Filth, crime, death, destruction, embarrassment.

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 16>You lose your home, you lose your apartment, and that's

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 16>where the communists will take us one hundred percent. When

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 16>I watch Abdul, he's.

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Full of shit.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mincey's words, there was wrong? Could youribut a coachhy

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Gada and former labor MP uncle Danby joined me.

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't like that sort of language from a leader.

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Let me be up front there. But I tell you what.

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 3>The movement now to the.

0:45:55.960 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Radical, extreme crazy left, those shitless left communists left now

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 2>for the Democratic Party bids troublesome. Not just for the

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 2>United States, but I think for the Western world.

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 19>It is ascendant. It's not uniform, but it is ascendant.

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 19>You have him, you have Maine, you have Maryland, Colorado,

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.399
<v Speaker 19>all these places Mamdani of course famous example, Wisconsin, they

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 19>are ascendant. You could argue that it's actually now the

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 19>mainstream winging of the Democrat Party because these candidates do

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 19>have the momentum on their side. It's underpinned by demographics

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 19>which favor them in Michigan, in a big Muslim community,

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 19>all of that.

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 3>So this is a downstream consequence of that.

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 19>It's also underpinned by economics, they're just a lot of

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 19>young people that have economic despair, can't get a job,

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 19>can't buy a home. People like this come around and

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 19>say free healthcare for all, We're going to freeze rent.

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 19>Sounds good. And then there's a third thing too, where

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 19>they are change candidates. They are charismatic. He is not

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 19>bad looking, able to sell the message in a very

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 19>concise way. And these establishment types that just go to

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 19>Washington and stay there forever don't land anymore. So it's

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 19>a multi layered problem. But the wings the wind is

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 19>certainly in the seals of these steps and candidates.

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 2>I still remember where I was when I watched the TV.

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, were hubas ten at night and saw planes

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 2>fly into buildings in New York. And I never thought

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 2>in my lifetime I would see this happening, particularly in

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the United States. The commentary that he's had about Jews,

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:26.879
<v Speaker 2>about Israel, about the Western world, about defending freedom and democracy,

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.760
<v Speaker 2>not just him obviously, ma'm dar and everyone else, Michael,

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 2>this must drive you to despair.

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 20>How quickly the young people at the three university towns

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 20>who voted for l s A ed forget. I agree

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 20>with Bill mar the left wing TV host and James Carvill,

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 20>the architect of Clinton's two victories, that these DSA people

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 20>are infiltrators. It's a different political party, the Socialist Alliance

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 20>that these people will adhere to. They are taking over

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 20>a centurist party. Now I know Mike Rogers from our

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 20>respective Intel Committee days, and he's a normal Republican, very

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 20>good operator, only lost last time by nineteen thousand votes.

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 20>I think donors and all people in America who take

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 20>this DSA threat seriously should get behind turning out working

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 20>class people and African Americans who in Detroit who low

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 20>these far left types. So if you can get African

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 20>Americans and working class people to outvote the university students,

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.240
<v Speaker 20>that's a political victory over these DSA people.

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:37.800
<v Speaker 3>So that was going to be my next question.

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 2>If the Democrats are going to persist in put these

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 2>people up at the general election the midterms obviously not

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 2>so far away. What's going to be the general view

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of the electorate that are they going to fly with

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the electorate.

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 19>The Democrats are really excellent at coming together, much more

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 19>so than Republicans. When the primary fates are behind them

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 19>and they're in the general, they put eighty million dollars

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 19>behind his opponent. It was a more mainstream, regular Democrat.

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 19>So you said that so quickly, eighty.

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Million, and I love that.

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 19>In Australia, that's what we've spent in a national election

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 19>in one Senate ary. So it's not that they're not

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 19>backing the mainstream people. But she lost, not by much,

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 19>not as much as A. Paul said, but she lost. However,

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 19>come the midterms and even the presidential which will start

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 19>the d after the midterms, they will rally behind these

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:22.760
<v Speaker 19>people to win against Republicans and then try to infate

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 19>after that the way Nancy Paulus has been fighting with

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 19>AFC and that you know will continue. But I think

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:27.720
<v Speaker 19>they're going to rally.

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 20>And a lot of normal people, including African Americans in

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.760
<v Speaker 20>Detroit and working class people, don't agree with these filift people.

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 20>And it's up to Mike Rodgers to rally the normal

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:38.720
<v Speaker 20>people against these DSA infiltrators.

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Just quickly Iran this deal on the table. It looks

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:43.959
<v Speaker 2>like Iran could have a win.

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 20>The worst thing for Donald Trump would be to be

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 20>perceived by Americans as a loser. So I've been watching

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 20>the American generals on Fox and they say there are

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 20>alternative munitions which could be used if he wants to

0:49:57.880 --> 0:49:59.839
<v Speaker 20>start the fight back. Well, yes, to do is keep

0:49:59.880 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 20>the Uranian economy turned off by keeping the blockade on,

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 20>keep his nerve. I'm afraid you might be right, though.

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 20>If he makes a deal and seem to be to

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 20>Iran's advantage, he will really be punished in the midterms

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 20>by Americans who not only don't like the war, but

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 20>don't like losers even more.

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 2>And it can't go tough on these democratic characters. If

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 2>he's gone week on Iran, gott to leave it there.

0:50:22.640 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Have a lovely weekend. Have a lovely weekend to you too.

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you right now. That I was going to

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 2>say i'll see it won't be early. It was six

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 2>o'clock as usual on Monday night. James McPherson sitting in

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:33.880
<v Speaker 2>for Andrew bolt tonight.

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy