WEBVTT - Should you have a Self Managed Super Fund?

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby, the World editor at The Australian. Welcome aboard everybody. Now,

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think that you should have a self managed

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>super fun Maybe you have a self managed super fund?

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's worth the effort? Or alternatively, if

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you had won, would you be better off? Would you

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be a more successful investor? I've had a self managed

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>super fund for about twenty years, but I don't know

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as much as my guest today, it's Julie Dolan. She's

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>fed up SMSF, self managed super funds and the state

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>planning at KPMG. Hi, Julia, how are you?

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Hi? Good? Thanks Jones?

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>How are you good? Thank you? Nice to have you on.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have someone actually with a helicopter view

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of this area. It's the sort of two lines to it.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean as a journalist I watch it in two ways.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>I watch it like as a sector is it getting bigger?

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it getting smaller? Or are the trends et cetera?

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And then I watch it as an investor does it

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>still make sense for me individually to have one? And

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is it going well enough? And have I got it

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>structured in the correct fashion. But like one of the things,

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I suppose just just first of all, usefully and this

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>is pure coincidence, don't you know. It wasn't my smart

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>planning or anything. But the new ATO numbers are out

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>about participation if you like on self managed super funds.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It's you'll immediately challenge me on this, I'm sure, but

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that the number of super funds

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in Australia is stuck hard in or around five hundred

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and six hundred thousand for as long as I can remember.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But I believe it's growing, but it seems to be

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>only growing a little bit. What's theual numbers?

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Actually, yes, James, you must have had you must have

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 2>had a magical wand on the figures because they actually

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>came out yesterday from the ATO. They come out of supporter. Yeah.

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I planned it all. Yeah, so what would.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>If you've planned out? So once again, yeah, the growth

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>is the growth is consistent like it's once again, there

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>was another seven three hundred setups in the in during

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the quarter and there's only in a small number of

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>wind wind ups. But you have to I suppose when

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I look at it. I look at the legislative landscape

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 2>and even setting up new funds these days, it's the

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>ATO even most times, most times they're not will give

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 2>a potential trustee a call and go through to make

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>sure that they are a fit, that they're doing it

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>for the proper reasons. So I don't mind the steady

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 2>growth because then with all the changes that are happening

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, and the ATO being the regulators, there's

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 2>is a stronger chance that the ones are getting set up,

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 2>they're getting set up for the right purpose, and so

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>it's maintaining even more so the credibility of the industry

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that it deserves. So the latest numbers, I've actually got

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>them written here. We're six hundred and sixteen six six

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and sixteen thousand, four hundred funds and equipped,

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and that is made up of eight hundred and ninety

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>six billion dollars. So we're literally just just behind the

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>opera my gv MY super sector as the second largest,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>So we're definitely a big player.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It's always it's always large because the people who have

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>smsfs have more money, of course they do, and just

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a few other things separately, Investment trends and Vanguard released

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>their report also released their report today that this is

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the one that triggered my idea to talk to you today.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So very briefly, folks, if you're listening about the big picture,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>over an number of smsfs continues to rise. There's about

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and fifteen thousand sms ss across Australia and

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the average balance is and this is really interesting, right,

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's three hundred and thirty thousand dollars, this is what

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>they say. And of people establishing new funds that is

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the average balance is three hundred. Yeah, and the average

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>age is forty seven. This is and this year. We

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the time on the show Julie, how

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>much should you have who have an sms F. I

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>mean you might say how long is a piece of strength?

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had people on the show seriously saying you need

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars more typically maybe six seven hundred. I know,

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember what the figure is from the

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>professional associations, but obviously those figures are very low because

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>they want as many people to join as possible. But

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you know money talk. So here's the number

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of folks for the average person age forty seven who's

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>starting and SMSF At the moment, it's three hundred and

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand dollars, Judy, is that is that enough money

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to start a fund?

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Do you think, Well, I've got clients. It absolutely depends.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>I've got clients who are starting it in their twenties

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 2>because they want to. It's not necessarily to me about

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the money. Obviously, you do need to do your cost

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>benefit analysis. But at the end of the day, it's

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the type of person that you are as well. So

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>if you really do want to have control and transparency

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and you really do want to have the ability to

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 2>invest accordingly and grow your superinnuation earlier the better.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The sooner the better, I suppose. So, yeah, but the

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>sooner the better. You're not going to have three hundred

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Most people aren't going to have three hundred and thirty thousand,

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>are there.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>No, it's more the fact of the obviously the age,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it's their ability of how much money they have outside.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>And also we're in a different world too, in the

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>sense that the younger than someone is, it's the more

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 2>of their the superinnovation of their job. They're super guarantee

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>that's going in so that consistent ability. And also insurances,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>so if insurances are going to go into the fund,

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 2>that that can potentially make it a small fund to

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>potentially a very large fund should it triggering it ben occur.

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>And also whatever assets are sit outside. So I don't

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>have a hard and fast rule. You know, obviously you

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>don't start one with a very very small amount, but

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 2>it does.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there a rock bottom minimum that you would see?

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I would probably say that to two hundred two fifty.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sort of comfortable with that based on doing analysis

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 2>that sits outside.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's very interesting now, folks, I find with surf

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>managed super funds. I was probably younger than most people

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>when I did it, but that was because I was

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>writing about it and I thought, you know, you should

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of walk the talk. But I find this in

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>terms of manage super funds. In terms of people thinking

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>about it, the average age is forty seven, which is

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>useful to a point. That's the commencement age. The average age,

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of course is older, will skew older because by definition,

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>if people start on average at forty seven, then if

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, it's older people who have them,

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and older people are wealthier because they saved for longer.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>That all makes sense, but Judy, it seems to be

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the two types of people who kind of think about

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>actively think about self managed super funds, who may not

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have them as a young person or young young up

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to the age of forty seven, which are who are thinking, Hey,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could do a lot more, I could

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have control. Crucially, people will often say I want to

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>put a property in there. I know property. I like property,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and my big fund, my Australian super Cibus or whatever.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing that. They can't buy the house around

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the corner that I want to buy. That's a big

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>distinction for funds. The other thing that happens is on

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the other side where people have big savings and super

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>where they have I wish we could get a clear

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>number on this, but there is a point in the

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>big super funds be there retail or industry where really

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they're designed for the average investor, and you're not an

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>average investor anymore. And certainly in many funds you're crosss

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>opsidizing other in terms of the fees you're paying and

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>all that you could be paying much less. Could you

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>explain that to us?

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it is interesting because even when you look

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 2>at the statistics on the industry funds, obviously the amounts

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>are a lot smaller and they're an accumulation phase too.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 2>When you look at the self managed fund where on

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 2>it's a very high level of pension drawdown phase and

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 2>the fund and the money is still increasing. So that's

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>a very important point.

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Allow yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 2>So we're in a very heavy drawdown phase. So it

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 2>once again does come back to the person and their

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 2>willingness to to have that very clear transparency in control

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and also to invest in other assets that may not

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 2>fall within the you know, their prove product listing or

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>structure of their industry fund. And there's there's a lot

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 2>of reasons that I see people set them up. A

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of them do they do if they're in business.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It's part of their structuring in businesses, especially if they've

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 2>got commercial property.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>A lot of those. It's another huge thing that if

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>you have a business, you can buy your fund, can

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>buy a property and you can rent from your fund basically,

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>which is such a winner if you have a business.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's that is that is quite common. And then

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>it's it's people coming up to look, there's there's a whole.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 2>I call it the life cycle of the self managed fund. There,

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 2>it's a constantly moving depending on the profile, what members

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 2>are in, what members are coming in, what are the

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 2>what are the needs and wishes of those specific members.

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>So it constantly changes and moves. And that's why I

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>love them so much, because it can ebb and flow

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 2>for a family depending on that specific members investment needs

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 2>and desires and requirements.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned how having a certain matter of super fund

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>apart from the control, apart from that, you should be

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>paying less in You should be, but you may not

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>be paying less in fees. Depends on how much you

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have and how you operate, and whether you have loads

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of bts in there, for instance, and it's just this

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>minimum low touch fund, or whether you're this incredibly diversified

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>fund and your accountant is bamboos of every with your

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>new investments. But then you're going to have higher fees.

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>But what I want to ask you is you mentioned

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>other assets. The obvious one is direct property. Is there

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.359
<v Speaker 1>other asset classes that I can put into my SMSF

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that I don't get a big fund?

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? The main one is property, definitely, and it may

0:10:54.200 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>also be investments with related parties around allowable and investments

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 2>and structures. So without going into too much complexity, it

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 2>maybe going into lend leverage and ultimately it usually is

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>property but leveraging the superinnoation with a related party to

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>go in in tenants and common to acquire property or

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>into an unrelated trust to do certain things. So there

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>is a subset of different investments that an industry fund

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>won't allow for. And it's also another big thing with

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>self managed funds. It's the timing. It's the timing of

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 2>when you put your contributions in. It's the timing of

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>when you pay your tax yes point, timing of starting retirement,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the timing of making sure the who, when and how

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>of your superinnoation goes to your loved ones. So it's

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 2>it's also it comes back to that control of making

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 2>sure that you really are maximizing the life journey of

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>your contributions to retirement, to a state planning and the

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>most affected by for your family. It's very difficult with

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 2>an industry fund because you just dominate. You're just controlled

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>by forms ben sent out to you and you don't

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 2>know what's happening behind the scene.

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they are designed for that. They are designed

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for mass engaged there and they work very well on

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>that basis. But they do, but not if you want

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to do so you're talking about timing, I mean, I

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>think another point what timing is in terms of asset

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>allocation and tactical asset allocation. You can decide if you

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>think that the market is overheating, you can reallocate the

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 1>money out into something else. Likewise, if you think a

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>certain area is undercooked and it's going to come flying back,

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you can move it around or even the safe spaces

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of chairs. Right, So the shaar is tanking. You know,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's tanking. The whole world it's tanking. The big super

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>funds are going to be very slow to get around

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to getting out there, but you can do seconds and

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you can have true diversification.

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>You can have true diversification where you can go I

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 2>want I even want cash, I want turned deposits, I

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 2>want list of securities in these industries, and I want

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>like you can really work with a financial advisor, even

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>depending on how savvy the investor is to to really

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 2>have that investment strategy that is required for your fund

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.599
<v Speaker 2>to be that proactive investment strategy that dictates how you

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 2>are going to invest for your retirement. So it does

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>allow you that control and transparency of those words I

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>keep using, but they're very much the case. You can

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 2>very much, you know. But there's a flip side. The

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 2>flip side means that you are required to follow strict

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>rules that are that are handed down by the ATO

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 2>because they are the regulator. And it is a very

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 2>very high tax concession environment. So there is you do

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>have to follow a subset of rules and it does

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>take time. It's another it's another entity that needs tax

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 2>returns to me.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>The flip side, if I look back at twenty years

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of having a Serve super fund, is the spinning out

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>forms which seems to get worse worse. It gets worse

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and worse, and the length and the complexity of these

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>forms get worse and worse. I'm just doing one at

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment. What is it? Oh, this isn't even something

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to do. This is an existing organization which

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>has changed its rules and has said to me I

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>must update my form filling for them. And it's just

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>one asset, you know, it's good for it's worth ah, yes,

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't really matter what it is. The point

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm making is that people have to they really have

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you really have to say, Okay, I take that on board.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to do it.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you put the time into it board. Yeah.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you if I walked into your office and said,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>how long is it going to take me every year

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>or every month? Have you got a benchmark answer?

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's obviously the investing. It depends on how active

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 2>you want to be as an investor and where you are.

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So if you the more active you are, obviously the

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 2>more time it's going to take. Or if you're a

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>set and forget or if you're this part of your

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 2>portfolio that you set and forget, well it doesn't take

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>too much time. But it's a big thing. Is once

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>again the investment strategy that you need to put your

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 2>mind to. The ATO doesn't want to see just a

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 2>standard template. They actually want you to go. As a trustee,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm different to a member. I have trustees duties. That's

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a covenant, that's that is required that you must act

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>in the best interest of members, be it yourself in

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the sense of looking at the investment strategy of the

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 2>fund and making sure it's in line with the sole

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 2>purpose of retirement for the members be yourself.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so what's new in this area? Like what has

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>changed SMSFS for there was there was a period obviously

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>where they were front and center of the news for

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the simple reason that you could put any amount into

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>super in those days it was uncapped. And then on

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>top of that, the whole area was new and it's

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>mushroomed and now it's uh now it's matured or so

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>years in yeah, gentle pace of growth. It's sort of

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>more or less a proxy with the wider population. Uh So,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so what is different now than than that period?

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Definitely maturity. Maturity the industry is absolute, and maturity the

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 2>industry is actually carved out certain rules that you know,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>people were potentially maybe taking advantage of that. We're going

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 2>against the intention of the laws. Political but you know,

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>obviously a different elected, different different government coming through unfortunately,

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 2>they've wanted to have a look at the rules that

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>sit over there and what can be tweaked, which I

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>would like for that to stop for a little while.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Personally, I mean, I mean, in a way, it's in

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a way it's a it's a live beast, right, I mean, in.

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>A way, it's a huge amount of money.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Are we dreaming that they will ever be left alone?

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's part of the past that we have

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to take on and see if you want to be

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>active with SUPER. Part of that has been across the rules,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>which not that they're changing, but that they will never

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>stop changing.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's like income tax rules as well. It

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 2>is just what tax tax changes all the time. But

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, I could talk for hours about the concept

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 2>where superannuation sits within the landscape of our retirement policy

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 2>and how much tweaking can get too much because at

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, it is one of the pillars,

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and one of the pillars is government support. One of

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 2>is self funding through superinnoation, and one of it is

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>assets that sit outside of super. And the government support

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 2>side is obviously shrinking. The coffers are shrinking, and so

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 2>it is encouraged. It should be more encouragement to be

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>able to self self serve and self invest and be

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>self sufficient. So changing these rules all the time and

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>cutting the ability to continue to contribute is got to me,

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 2>is going against this self ability to self you know,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>fun to your own retirement. So it's a blind line

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>of tweaking.

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>If I said to you, apart from indexation inflation indexation

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>which was built in anyway that all changes of lead,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen any. I haven't seen one encouraging change

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to super for years. No, they're generally discouraging, am I

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is that totally great?

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 2>And it shouldn't be discouraging. It should be encouraging. So

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>we want to save and we want to be able

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to be self sufficient in retirement because we need to be.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're seeing this even now without cost of

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 2>living crisis, We're needing to be even more self sufficient

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>moving forward. So I feel like it's a band aid

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 2>approach consistently on these changes, and even I could once

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 2>again spend hours talking about the three million dollar proposed change.

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a band aid's there's no logic behind it.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, well we might deal with that in moments.

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>We might take you for that break. Yes I have,

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I hope I've come. I've learned how to actually explain

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>this tax in less than thirty seconds.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I prepared to because I'd be glad to hear it.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah you can. After the break, Hello and welcome

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby,

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the editor at The Australian. I'm talking to Julie Dolan,

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>who is the head of SMSs and the State Planning. Julie,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I've just thought in terms of your job title, they're

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to be related to SMSs.

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 2>And I know I do fad into each other.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We are told it sober told the have nothing to

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>do with each other. But there you are with that.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I would just leave that for our listeners to ponder. Okay, now,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>if I've got an SMS and I see that the

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>big funds are knocking out of the park and they're

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>doing ten percent a year, and that's not the case anymore,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>but there was a year or two where they were

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>doing ten percent a year, or I read you know,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously you always read about the most successful fund right,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's always going to be a couple of funds

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that do great and we paid ess to the ones

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.239
<v Speaker 1>who are appalling. How do I score myself. I've got

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>an SMSF Why do I score myself? Should I just say, okay,

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I take a fund see bus are super and I've

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>got to pick them every year? That has the approach.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's so difficult because you're comparing apples to orangers like,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 2>unless you're really understanding what the underlying investment methodology is

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>and how active they are versus if it's just set

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and forget versus if it's active management, then the fee structure,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>it's it's and then even just trying to, you know,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>get to the real bottom figures and not just the

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 2>broadcasted figures, it's it's very difficult. I think with a

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 2>self managed fund, you need to be comfortable with your

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>own profile. So you need to be comfortable with you

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>as an investor and how much risk you're prepared to take,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and then then invest accordingly. Don't try and chase returns

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 2>because you know, and don't try to look backwards on

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>past performance. We know that that that's not the way

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.239
<v Speaker 2>to go. So sitting there going this is me as

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>an investor, and me and my timeline towards when I

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 2>want to retire or whatever your situation is, this is

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 2>what I'm comfortable with, and based on that profile, you

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:19.239
<v Speaker 2>seek competent advice or invest accordingly based on what your

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>comfort level is.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, is there a rock bottom the turn where you said, look,

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you'd really want to be doing x percent above at

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>least want.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>To keep CPI. You want at least you don't want

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>to be going backwards with your dollars, that's for sure.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to be sitting at all in cash

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and going backwards. But some people are some people comfortable

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 2>with that.

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder how they're comfortable with that.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a very hard one to do. Every Actually, every

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>fund is different, Every single super fund is different. That's

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>why I love about them in essence, because they're investing

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>accordingly based and it's not only just based on them,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>it's based on the profile of their family.

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that even gets even more interesting when the

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 2>kids come in.

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and of course all funds have too. Generally, generally

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be two partners, husband and wife or whatever. Yeah,

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a sort of a core unit in super But

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you can have up to six people in the fund. Now, Yeah,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but what's the average since.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 2>It's still dominant, it's still a dominant two member fund. Still,

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>there's there's pros and cons of bringing children into the

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>fund or even prize and cons of having business partners

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 2>in there.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, yeah, okay, I won't go down that ali

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>just for the moment, because I wanted to ask you

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>one or two other things, more contemporary issues. So we

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>had a budget recently, and we've had some well's. There's

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>text the main news cross out of the budget, none

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of which was in the budget per se. But this

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>year is there are tax cuts personal tax cuts across

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the board. The ones on the upper end are smaller

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>than they were going to be, but there are still

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts for everybody, as they like to tell us.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Now in terms of Super and tax, the biggest news

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>probably for a long time, is that, apart from inflation

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>indexing as I mentioned, where the amount you can put

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in has increased a little bit, pre tax contributions has

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>gone from twenty seven and a half thousand to thirty thousand,

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and the SGC, the compulsory amount that must go into

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>SUPER on your behalf each year goes from a eleven

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to eleven point five percent in July. So we all

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>know that. But the newest thing in tax and super

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is that, for a long time, being the last couple

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of years, how tax worked in super was once you

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>had more than one point nine her capitac her head

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>per remember, then you started to pay tax and it

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>was at fifteen percent, and then out of the blue,

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the government has announced a second tax, a new tax,

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>a fresh tax. This tax kicks in at three million,

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and once you've more than three million, you pay another

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent tax. And this tax is completely different. It's

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>based on paper gains and people are furious about this.

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>All I want to say to you is, is there

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>any reason to think that it's not going to go

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>through as planned?

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm still keeping my fingers and toes crossed. So where

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>we currently stand is obviously they're the Senate to Elect Committee.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 2>There was a report done back seventeenth of May, and

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 2>they supported supported that report to say go through unchanged.

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they said. They basically said, it's fine, it's fine. Yeah,

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>paper gains, it's fine, not even putting in it.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, even though as an industry we've been fighting hard, fighting, fighting, fighting, fighting,

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>even coming to as another solution of doing a deeming rate.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 2>And so there's been there's been all sorts. So last

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 2>week it went through the Lower House and it actually

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 2>got adjourned a few times because there was an about

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 2>twelve to fifteen MPs really really showing distaste and concern

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 2>about a lot of policies, and mainly around the unrealized

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>gains and the lack of indexation and the flow on effect.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 2>There's so many flow on effects. Those two are highlighted,

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>but when you actually get into the nitty gritty of

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the proposed changes, there's a whole lot of subset of consequences,

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>which there's a lot there. And where we currently stand

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 2>now is it's going into Senate to the upper house,

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 2>and we expect that there will be a very strong debate.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 2>So government's trying to push through it to be legislated

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>by thirty June. We've still got another election as well

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be sitting on the side. So I'm

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 2>praying and hoping that common sense will still prevail even

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>though we're getting to the twenty end. I'm being an

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>optimist here and I'm sitting out all my energy.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Right all right, Well, I just don't know. I don't know.

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how parliament really works. But I suppose that's.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Where we stand, that that's the actual facts right now.

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>So there is a distinct possibility that there could be

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>some sort of detail understandate that amends this tax. That

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>remains a distinct possibility, doesn't it.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 2>And we've still got a way to go. We do

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 2>have still a way to go.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>So okay, yeah, all right, and so that's uh. With

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that way against smfs and the participation in them, do

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you think difficultes through.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, it will definitely affect the funds that are at

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>maturity and the ones that have got more than you know,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 2>obviously the three mil with luck of indexation, will affect

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 2>funds going forward. So that is that is, it's a

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a there differently will be didn't That's for sure.

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>There'll be a release if it goes through. There'll be

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>a strong, a big release of funds, which will which

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 2>will cause issues in its own right in the sense

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 2>of potential full sale of assets which weren't planning to

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 2>be sold and unnecessary transaction. Causes a whole lot of

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 2>stuff that may come out of this. Another big sleeper,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 2>which I spent a lot of time talking to clients on,

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 2>is not only the proposed div two ninety six tax,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 2>but it's the death benefit tax that sits on top

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of it.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Just before you tell us about that the two nine six, folks,

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is the three million tax.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Just just so everyone's sorry, it's I mean accounting nerd there.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>That's all right for all notes. It's just some of us.

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll pay to translate a bit. So tell us what

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to say about the death pack death benefits.

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so a lot of clients, so everyone, you know, James,

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 2>you get your own financials and you have part of that.

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>You have your member statements, and if you're over sixty

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>and you take you can you can access your superinnuation

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 2>without paying any tax as a lump summer a pension,

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>beautiful system, beautiful thing. But still on your member statement,

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 2>you would have a tax free and a taxable component

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 2>that's shown there. And basically that tax free amount is

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>your after tax money so that you've been able to

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 2>put into the fund over the years, and the balance

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>is all the earnings that it's made and all your

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 2>your super guarantee contributions that it's built out. Now a

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.239
<v Speaker 2>lot of funds, that's quite a big especially for how

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 2>long you know you've been in yours for twenty years, James,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you may have quite a large taxable component there too.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 2>So what that means is dependent on who it goes

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>on your passing. If it says goes out to ultimately

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 2>goes out to adult financially independent children. There is up

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 2>to seventeen percent tax on that amount.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, bux, a compustible component is taxed at seventeen percent effectively. Yeah,

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>something changed.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 2>No, it's just the fact that this additional tax with

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 2>in the fund is another tax on top of another

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>tax that will potentially it's working through with clients saying

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>all right, well you're in this space, now what do

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 2>we do in start to move? Is a hybrid model?

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess, I said, because this notion of double tax,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which will ask you.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 2>One wels you're alive to take to take money out?

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, so it's the it's the it's the effective folks.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Just to clarify in case you're you're not following this,

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and it is. It's super. So it's tricky. But like

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>people say, what happens to you if you? If you

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.239
<v Speaker 1>if in terms of inheritance and super is becoming more

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and more correct me band things around here, Julie. Inheritances

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>become more important in relation to SUPER. Right, so often

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>people will have more on SUPER than anything else except home.

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>The taxable component that Julie's talking about, there the believe

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it or not, the little bit that you got a

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>tax concession zones over the years, they will tax that

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>part when you die in your death benefit and effectively

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>works out as seventeen percent. So that's that's what you're

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you're alluding to, Is that right?

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? So it's if you're in that category where you've

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 2>got a highest superinnuation balance and you do have a

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>high taxable component, and you have potentially this additional tax

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>that may apply. It's working through. I work through with

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 2>clients on what is the best structure, what is it?

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 2>What are your potential plan B and c this If

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>this tax comes through, do we look to move some

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>money out? And if we do, what structure does it

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>go into the potentially having like a hybrid model of

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 2>investment vehicles?

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I have two more questions through and try and

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>make them short. One this thing about having a threshold

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and super extreme is it effectively a cap? I mean

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>really basically, would you be a fool to have more

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>than three million and super ever under these new rules?

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh do you want to put that? Do you want

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to put that question to one side? Put it? What

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>did they say a reserve result?

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? The way the reels work because you can have

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a really high balance that not have to pay the tax.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 2>So there's a whole misconception around how it works.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, isn't it also the case that you could leave

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the money in the super system, per se the system,

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and only pay fifteen percent on it rather than the

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>bit that success couldn't you have it in the system,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but you'd only be paying fifteen You wouldn't be paying

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>marginal rates or anything.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, you'd have to take it out of the system,

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe have it in another tax vehicle too, meant to

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 2>keep the rates down.

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You might, But if you did nothing, if you were

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>if inertia, then what would happen if it would be taxed?

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, if you had over three million, it's not the

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not all the amount over three million, it's what

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 2>your balance is at one July twenty twenty five when

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 2>it comes in. Yes, so f your balance is at

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>seven million and it increases just seven and a half,

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 2>it's only that half a million dollars that that's the

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 2>baseline of the calculation. So it's always important to note

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 2>that too. It's not everything over three million. This is

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>just a standard cap.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So keep all that in mind, folks. Should you be

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in the fortuer position to have that amount in super

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure many listeners are saying, really, I don't

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 1>have this problem, which you probably don't, but if they

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>don't index it for inflation, you'd yeah, how fast it

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>comes around. Let me tell you if you think about

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>house prices and how much they've moved, well, just just.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not only about that time. Yeah, it's not about that,

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 2>James too. It's just the fact also that it's going

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 2>against the basic tax principles.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't tax paper gains.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's that's really the heart of the problem here,

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 2>is that there.

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, we take and we certainly will take that.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Take that on board. Yeah, okay, we will break and

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we will be back with some great questions designed specifically

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for Julie because I have a couple of the SMSF

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>questions which I've collected for her. Okay, back in a moment, Hello,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. James

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Kirby talking to Julie Dolan from KPMG. Okay, Tracy says,

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>my husband and I have a self manager super fund

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and also two daughters and a younger son. What would

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>be the positives and negatives of incorporating them into the

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>s MSF now that it can have six members. You

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that briefly.

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, So the positives are it's obviously bringing the

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 2>power of bringing more money into the one the one area,

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 2>into the one bank account per se or the one

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>structure to invest. So you've got you've got the leverage

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of more capital to invest. So that's that's a very

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 2>positive piece. The other piece is education. I like the

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 2>fact that you know your children are on the journey

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 2>with you on educating around how to invest and learning

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 2>what everything around that means. And you know, obviously it's

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a reduction in fees potentially by bringing consolidating the family

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 2>super together, so they'd be the main advantages. The main

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the disadvantages are you are all in it together, so

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 2>there could be they always you know, that could be

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 2>cause issues on the family side around disagreements on investing.

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're always killing each other. Would be killing each

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>other inside in the SMSF meeting too. Maybe that's what

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you're alluding to.

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Also too, it's not to underestimate underestimate the responsibility of

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the children having to be directors.

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, of course that's a big one, and I would

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>think also we have because this is new, it's not

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>being tested. But if you have very old parents who

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.240
<v Speaker 1>just want income, and you've got very young, very relatively

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>younger adult participants, and they want something entirely different, and

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I think of.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>This whole area of elder abuse that's coming through each abuse.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which a new corridor if you like our potential

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>new corridor to it. Yeah, that's an article for me

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to write some day, Julie your mind, Okay, I think unfortunately,

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>just on time we can fish in. One more question.

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>It's from Mask. After substandard returns over two years, I've

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>decided to take over the management of my self managed

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>super Fun and I plan I think he means the

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>investment allocation. I plan to move about twelve stocks and

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>three managed funds to over and flit them into a

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 1>few selected exchange traded funds. Is there anything I should

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be considering before doing this, tax implications, et cetera. Is

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there a recommended way of making a change.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So of course everyone loves ETS. Certainly they love its simplicity,

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>low fees, and this concept that you can only go

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so wrong and I can't go any more wrong than

0:35:55.480 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. But and this is never advice, folks. This

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is information only, but from a universal perspective, when someone

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>has some sort of eureka moment and says, gee, you

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>know my fund is too complicated, I'll slam it all

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>into ETFs, one for the US, one for Australia, you know,

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>one for bonds.

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 2>What what? What?

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>What's your got reaction to that, Judy.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 2>My gut reaction to that is, never do anything for

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>tax reasons. So do it purely if it's a good

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 2>investment for you. So once again, you know, based on

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, James, if it's getting too complex, if

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the risk is getting a little bit skewed to what

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you're comfortable with, do it for you based on your

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 2>investment principles. Don't don't ever do an investment decision for tax,

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 2>because it's just it's a byproduct.

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, of course, and that's the point that that's regularly

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>made by advisors across across all investing. You don't do

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it for tax. Do it, does it makes sense, and

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>then see what the taxes correct? Exactly. Terrific. That's a

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>good way to finish I think, thank you very.

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Much, thank you, James. I really enjoyed journey on.

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Show and thank you very much. We haven't we haven't

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>talked much before, we haven't had you on the show before,

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was great. Thank you much very much. We

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>will have you again, lovely to talk. That was Julie Dolan, Folks,

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>head of SMSF and Estate Planning at KPMG. Okay, I

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't get through all the questions because Julie was so

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting and there was so much to talk about there.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>And I know that we don't do SMSs perhaps as

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>often as we should. It's a great area. I recommend

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's an active investor to look at them. I'm

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>not saying get one, do one, but certainly check them

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>out and see what they suit you. And as I say,

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I've had one myself for twenty years or so and

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been real education. As you can imagine, through the years,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>through the GFC, through everything as at COVID and everything else.

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>You are tested, that's for sure at times with them,

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>because you're on your own and you can't just hope

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>that the committee investment committee at a big super fund

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is getting it right. That's the thing I think that

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we should all keep in mind. All right, let's have

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some more questions. The money puzzle at the Australian dot com.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Dot au is the email I hope to you soon