WEBVTT - Red-hot sharemarket - your next moves

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby, the Weather editor at The Australian. Welcome aboard, everybody.

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I expect you're more than aware just how good share

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>market investing is right now. Our share market, folks. Even

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the ASX is up eleven percent in over the last

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve months. Dividends to that there's fifteen percent in the bag.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>The US market is steaming along. It's up twenty four

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>percent in the last twelve months. And more than that,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there are so many signs that this market has got

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the ideal conditions to keep going. On a broad basis,

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there's always things you can worry about, and you can

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>always worry. I can tell you about a slump or

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a surprise setback or a correction in the September or

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 1>October period when the Americans get wobbly every year as

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they face Christmas. Winter is coming. You've seen Game of Thrones,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what it means, same thing in the share market. Now,

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on top of all that, we've got Donald Trump, who

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think we might as well take it

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>as read this morning that the markets at least think

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be re elected, and there's like a

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty to sixty seven percent probability in the money markets

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>right now, but that he will be re elected. That

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>means a Republican administration, that means pro business administration, and

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that means a big lift in stocks. Traditionally, you know

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump first time round, from the day he was elected

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to when COVID arrived the US market went up sixty

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>percent or so, people will be thinking that there's a

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>good chance that will happen again. So I want to

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about chairs today, and just before I start, by

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, one or two pieces of correspondence about when

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I talk about chairs, and do I have a conflict

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of interest, et cetera. I mean I have an SMSF

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course I want to invest. I have all

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the things that you have in terms of shares, just

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to clear the air in terms of ordinary shares. This

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't ETF re funds in my portfolio I have. I

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>try to keep it to ten always. Just now, these

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are the ten shares I have. I am not going

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to give you wastings aroundthing, but here they are. Are

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you ready? Come on with bank CSL Hansen technology a

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>quarry bank. Quarry technology NAB, Next, DC, Cube, Ramsey and Reo.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of them I've had for twenty years. Some of

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>them I've had four a year. My guest today is

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a regular on the show Friend of the Show. It's

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Jemma Dale, head of Investor Behavior and SMSF at NAB Trade.

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh are you, Gemma?

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm well, thank you? How are you?

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of my portfolio?

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the million dollar question, isn't it?

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Instinctive response?

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Probably my first question would be what else do you have?

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not telling you what else I have? Oh, I

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have ECF, since I have some active fun and I

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have gold, and I feel I like to think my

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>SMSF is very well diversified. I mean, I'm obsessed with

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>deir feresssification, and I do think it's very well diversified,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>though I find the share component constantly gets bigger than

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I meant it to for the simple reason shares have

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>been so good for so long.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's quite interesting. I mean the most interesting thing

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>about that is we focus on the individual stocks because

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you can see their performance. It's very hard to get

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>excited about the performance of your ETFs, to be honest,

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and some of the very well diversified components of your portfolio,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 2>even though they're going to be thousands of securities by

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the time you add them all, lot would be my guess,

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and so you've probably got exposure to thousands of things,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and yet you look at the ten that you can

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>definitely put a number on and worry about those. And

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>we're all the same. We all do it very You've

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of banks in there, but you're doing

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 2>very well out of them, so certainly can't complain at

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the moment.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no dogs in there. There's one dog. Let me

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>call it out loud and clear. I wish I didn't

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>have it. I'm stuck with it, and I should have

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the guts to sell it. But then every time I

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>look at it, I say, maybe it's coming round, which

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is Ramsey Healthcare. And there's one absolute ripper in there,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>which is next TOC, followed closely, I might add, by

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>mcquari Technology, and both those docks are AI plays in

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>my mind, though I have next TC for years, but

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to Mcquarie Technology relatively recently. Anyway, I'm just putting that

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>out there, folks, just to clear the air, and because

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about shares today. Exclusively because I

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a terrific market. Jem At tell me, first

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, because you see all the data and a

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>trade and you see what's coming in and what people

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>are doing. Do you detect any change in the flavor

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of shared trading, the volume of shared trading, the demographics

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of shared trading in this last few months as people

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are starting to realize, gee, the market's damn good for

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>quite some time.

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so interesting. The last few years have been fascinating.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we've talked about this before, but the well

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 2>over half of our investor base has joined us since COVID,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 2>so the huge influx of new investors and new accounts

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 2>for us. But new investors came through in that COVID

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>period when the market fell off a cliff, so that

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent in three weeks dip on the ax and

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>saw very similar responses from share markets around the world.

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Was when the vast majority of our new accounts were opened,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and in the subsequent sort of twelve months, so people

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 2>came to investing during that period and had this incredible

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to buy shares at a very discounted price, and

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>then they rocketed back very quickly. So many of our

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 2>investors have had a really interesting first experience. If you

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 2>started training for the first time in nineteen ninety nine,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you had a very different experience that somebody started in

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and A lot of people you know who

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>have been around for a long time felt that was

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>a normalist that period, but it was your first experience,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't right. That's what share investing is for you now,

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>and so those people are familiar with a pretty strong market.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>That's half of our investors. Those who've been around a

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>long time tend to have much bigger portfolios. I've had

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot more time to build up their wealth. You

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>mentioned you've got CBA and McCrory and CSL. They're the

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of shares that have made people a lot of

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>money over the long term. You know, if you're buying

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>those in the nineties, and a lot of our investors were,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>then you have done extremely well. Those people are moving

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 2>money around but feeling reluctant to throw a lot of

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 2>money at this market, which I find really interesting. So

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>our cash book is very high at the moment. Newer

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.559
<v Speaker 2>and younger investors are mostly buying ETFs and just buying

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 2>them consistently as a wealth creation strategy. That's a very

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 2>common strategy now more and more people are doing it,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>and they're pretty agnostic as to mine market movements. They

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>will buy more on a down day, which I find fascinating.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>So you think they're agnostic, but they're very aware of

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>what is going on in the market, and they will

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 2>absolutely buy more if the market gets hammered in the

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>US overnight and futures are down, they will throw more

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>into an ETF that day than they would if futures

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>were really positive. But it's a long term strategy for them,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>and they tend to do it consistently. And then our

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>more mature investors are a little bit anxious, right They're

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>seeing CBA above one hundred and thirty dollars, They're seeing

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>prices that feel quite stretched in some areas of their portfolios.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 2>And because those portfolios have been around a long time

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and tend to hold things they're very familiar with and

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>know very well. Yeah, they're a little bit of nov

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I would guess, you know, they're not super keen to

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>chase these prices.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Right. Okay, let's take it on board. One of the

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>things we were saying about, and I imagine our listeners

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are something broadly similar. Right, So they have the ETF

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so core and satellite, they have the maybe they only

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>have ETFs, Maybe they have some ETFs, like I have

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to achieve certain things right to access the most of

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the offshore. As you notice, all those stocks are Australian

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>an offshore. I'm using atfs and funds mostly. But when

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the composition of the market, so people

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>will say the thing, we're obsessed. Why do we talk

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about individual shares when ETFs are so important or they

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>may be for our listeners because they're the swing factor. Right,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the difference between having an ordinary year the same

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>as everyone else, winning big or losing. And that's I

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think that that will never I don't know, but I

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think that will ever change. That will never go.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The attraction of shares and the particular attraction of shares

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that they can do so well. And ETFs are fine,

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they're great, but you will never ever do any better

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>than the norm.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 2>With an ETF. Yeah. Absolutely, really think to me, as

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I said, there is this very strong preference for ETFs,

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 2>particularly in younger investors. And funnily enough, you talk about

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>using ETFs for offshore. But our investors tend to start

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>with the AX. And when I say tend to, I

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>mean there is a dramatic difference between the number of

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>investors and the amounts of money they put to the

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 2>ASX two hundred. It is the first investment versus what

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 2>is a long way down the list, which is the

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred. As this second option, it

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 2>is a long way behind. So people start buying the

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>ASEX first and then they diversified beyond that, which I

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>find fascinating. And yeah, the appeal is really obvious, which

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>for so many young people and so many people new

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 2>to market, I don't know what to buy. That's always

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>the biggest question. I don't know what to buy. ETF

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>just takes that problem away for you. Right, just buy

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the whole market. You'll be fine. And as you say,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 2>then you don't have any opportunity to outperform. You're going

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 2>to get the market minus the tiny feet. But you're

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna get market. That's great. It's better than enough, right,

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 2>it's very good based on how performance has been over

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the last twelve months. There are many others who are

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 2>looking for something much better than that, and they feel

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>very strongly about making their own choices. Funnily enough, they

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>tend to be more experienced investors. They're not young people,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, willing to bet their shirts, right, it's quite

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the opposite. It's people who are very experienced. They know

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing, and they're absolutely going to try to

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 2>get a better return than the market or and it

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 2>was something I didn't ask you about your portfolio. They've

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>got a very specific need. So a lot of our

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 2>older investors invest for yields, and they are not looking

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 2>for high growth. That's not what they're after. They're not

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>going to take a punt on ZIP. They just want

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 2>yield and that's what they're going to invest for.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very true. The irony is that there would have

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>been twice literally haven't met twice as much money if

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they had bought a US ETF rather the S and

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>P if I found it, rather than the ear six

0:10:58.800 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>year after year.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Certainly, the last twenty years have been pretty astonishing for

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>US equities.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Twenty years was due Jemma.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 2>That will do it for the vast majority of people.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>For most of us, that is long enough as a timeframe.

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, absolutely, the US has been astonishingly strong in

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>terms of its performance, and that has been the rise

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 2>of tech. Right. It's very clear what drove that performance,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and it's very clear when you look at the composition

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of the S and P five hundred, now what has

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 2>driven that performance. There's a lot of people making comparisons

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to sort of the ninety nine two thousand era right

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 2>now based on the hype around AI, but we haven't

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>seen the pullback. We thought we saw it in twenty two,

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 2>and it just came around again, right.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Comes around again. The other thing is, yes, I know,

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine, sure you know, but maybe it's not

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine. Maybe it's nineteen ninety five. Yeah, and

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>there's four fabulous years to go. I mean, I don't know,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to Both of us have experienced

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>enough that I'm not silly enough to ask you, do

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you know where the market's going? And I'm not going

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to puntificate as to where it's going. But a couple

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of things I do want to ask you when we

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sit there now as investors on the share market, so

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we look at that, we look at the return on

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the share market, and it's well above average, okay above

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>average on historical figures. It's above average on recent figures.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>There is four percent inflation of course, okay, so really

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got to put that in If you say,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>oh my my shares did ten percent last year, it's great,

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they did, but it's four percent inflation, so you

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>got to put that in mind. When there was no inflation,

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>six percent would have been the same. That's one thing.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And we have the dividends. The big dilemma I think

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for Australian investors is you mentioned about so many people

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>who want yield and the older very broadly, the older

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you are, the more you want yield. It's as simple

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as that. And by the time you retire, it's all

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you want, right. I talked to someone the other day,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>very very well known financial journalist, and they are for

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the first time in their life, they're looking for advice

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because they're so confident in their own ability that they

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>never thought of asking anybody as for advice before. But

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, what do you want? You know, what

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>do you want? And this person simply said, I just

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>want income. We hit his wife and just want income.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what happens when you get to a certain point,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's fair enough, and you maybe do you think

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you lose your nerve as you get older as well

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of investing.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's not necessarily you just don't need

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 2>to take the risk anymore. You know, a young person

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>is trying to build from nothing. You know, it's unless

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 2>you've inherited some money or you happen to cross a

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 2>windfall or something. You are taking any excess cashflow you've

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 2>got from your job and trying to build something aggressively.

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 2>You've got to build it fast, you know. When you're young,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you've got to build it fast because you're coming off

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>with such a low base, Whereas when you're older, it's

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 2>about the preservation of what you have and you're far

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 2>more to lose. And we know about sequencing risks, so

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>for anyone who's not familiar with the concept, you understand

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 2>it intuitively, but it's really there's a lot of academic

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 2>work around it now. Sequencing risk is effectively when you

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 2>are drawing down on your money. So say you have

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 2>a million dollars to provide for your retirement and you're

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>taking out fifty thousand dollars a year. If you suffer

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>a massive downturn in the market in year one, and

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that million dollars turns into six hundred thousand dollars, which

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>sounds dramatic, But this happened to a colleague of mine

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine, he

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 2>was back at work.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It happened to everyone in two thousand and eight too.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Then the market felt fifty percent of us never forget that.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And he had a diversified portfolio, he'd taken a

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of care, he worked in finance and markets, he

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>knew what he was doing, and he was back at

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>work twelve months after retirement to rebuild. Because when you're

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>pulling down fifty thousand dollars a year out of six

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand, it runs out very quickly compared to pulling

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>it out of a million that might be growing. So

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>that sequencing risk, if you suffer an adverse event right

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of your retirement, is very damaging to

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the long term outcome of your portfolio and your wealth frankly,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and your lifestyle. So people, it makes sense to be

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>anxious about losing a lot early in retirement in particular,

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>And as you get older, does it matter so much?

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>You're okay? The vast majority of older people I speak

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>to and retired people they don't want to draw down

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>on the capital at all, and retirement they want to

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 2>preserve the whole lot and just live off the income.

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's where that desire for yield comes from. It's

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>not a really chunky yield. And I don't want to

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>think about drawing down on the capital. That's too much

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>risk for me.

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And that is I suppose in a way,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the optimal it's the optimal situation. I think we

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>should be careful. And we had actually awn on the

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>show Very Interesting a few weeks ago about that whole

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>issue about how you know, I mean, yes, you'd rather

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>not draw down on capital, but similarly, you're not going

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to live for a thousand years, okay, there is a

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>point of which you could safely actuarially make an esspence

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>say okay, and as soon I live to one hundred

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and ten, you know, and then you can walk backwards

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>from there. That would be I would imagine safe enough

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for most people even today with the longevity risk that

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we have. But on the market and where it's going.

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So we crossed the eight thousand mark on the ASX

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred the other day, big number very important milestone,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>important to show that we are in blue sky, that

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the ASEX is really starting to move, and let's just

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>put the US to one side just for the moment

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>at this part of the show and talk about the ASEX.

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>One other very big change occurred just around the same

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>time that was happening, and that was that that our

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>market is, as everyone knows very much based on two things,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>banks and minors and BHP had been the biggest stock

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in the market for years, and CBA on Monday morning

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>this week, because I was going to do a story

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>gem about how it was going to overtake BHP, and

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as I was doing it on Monday morning, I had

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it actually written, and I had it written in this

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>way that said it's going to overtake. I had a

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about lunchtime, I looked again and the numbers had changed

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>around and it had overtaken. So a bit of luck

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that I was able to say on the day, hey,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>CBA is after becoming the biggest stock. It happened before

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>my eyes. But and I think this time around it

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to stay there. And I think it's stayed

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>there before about four years ago, it was there for

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a year. And here we are again. What does that mean?

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that our biggest stock is a bank

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>now and the banks are under the pinning our ASX now,

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not the miners.

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's an interesting one, not least because I work

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>for a bank.

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but we talk about bank stocks as a generic.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll talk about them generally, but it's worth calling out CBA.

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>CBA is broadly understood to be the most expensive bank

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 2>in the world based on share pricense valuation. That's an

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary thing. And it is a very high quality bank.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, it doesn't carry the risk of US banks

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of the other alternatives out there in

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the world. It is very exposed to the Australian consumer

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>through home loans. It's a very strong franchise and it

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 2>continues to maintain this massive premium over the other Australian

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 2>banks and over other global banks because over literally decades,

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>it's continued to maintain its margins to an extent, you know,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 2>better than others, let's put it that way. It continues

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 2>to have this very strong footprint and have the largest

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 2>home loan share in the Australian market. The Australian homelan

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>market continues to hold up despite constant predictions of fallen

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 2>house prices. All of the things that are supposed to

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>undermine the share price of CBA and the Australian banks

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>just don't come to fruition. It doesn't mean they never will.

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 2>It just means that it's called the win. Don't make

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 2>a trade for a reason shorting the Australian banks. It

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>has cost a lot of people a lot of money.

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>We keep thinking that can't continue to grow at this

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>right in terms of the share prices.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And yet and it's really worth thinking about the folks.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just because Jemma works for a bank.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I mean, I would think a

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more of her. There's no way that she would

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>simply talk her book or anything like that. Because I've

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>had her on the show lots of time.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>She didn't work for bank.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh no, no, but she doesn't talk

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>her book. And anyway, here's the facts. It's very hard

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to find a buy notes. It's almost impossible to find

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a single stoff broker in the Australian stock market that

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>would tell you to buy banks right now. There's there,

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there's holds and underweights and everything across the board. On

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>all the banks and on CBA. And here's the thing.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>All those brokers are wrong, and they're wrong all year,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're wrong month after a month. This is August.

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>They're saying it since late last year. That doesn't mean,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>as Jemma says, they will be wrong in the future,

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>But I tell you what, right now, they're wrong. So

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the point I'm making is that we have the banks

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>now dominant on our market, and then we have the miners,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and we have the usual suspects CSL and some of

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest stocks. Macquarie Bank two also never forget in

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there very much, so now in the top ten, even

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>though it's an investment bank and not typical and would

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more risk and a different nature of

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>risk than what we might call high street banks, the

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>big four that we all know. So, Jemy, what are

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>your troops on n AB trade? What else are people buying?

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, one of the things that I always

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>think about one of the great quotes about stock market

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>investing is that it's you can look at a stock

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can have your opinion on us, and you

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>could be very good mathematically. You could have it all

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>worked out, and you might think that it's going to

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>go up, and that's all fine, But actually what matters

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is whether other people think it's going to go up.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what matters. Right. So I'm digging here and I'm

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to find out from you, what are your database

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are millions of investors? What are they looking at now?

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>What are they like?

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 2>It's always the best question. The one thing I found

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>about working in this part of the industry so working

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>with non advice. The people who trade via and a'm

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>trade generally don't have a financial advisor. They're making their

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>own decisions, non advised individuals managing their own money. Is

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>it is amazing how astute people are when it's their

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 2>own money on the line. They are not outsourcing this decision,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and they tend to be very thoughtful about it. There's

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talk about how ignorant retail investors can be,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and they refer to the dumb money. We just don't

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 2>see that at all. You see quite the opposite, very thoughtful,

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>very well considered investing. And the COVID period was the

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 2>classic example where people went out and the top ten

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 2>stocks were stuff your mum would tell you to buy.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 2>All big four banks were in there, all four of them.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 2>BHPM re overre in the AASX two hundred ETF was

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 2>in there, right, that's what people bought during COVID. Every

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>single one of those things has performed extremely strongly since,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and it was an incredible opportunity. So to your question

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 2>about what peop doing, they are all loaded to the

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 2>eyeballs with banks. Right. Everyone has bought banks at various

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>points over the last couple of decades, in some cases

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 2>back in the nineties, and then they bought a ton

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>more during COVID, which was a brilliant decision across the board.

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 2>If you're buying three of the big four sort of

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 2>sub sixteen dollars, you had a good time, and you

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 2>know seventy dollars range for CBA. People have so many banks, right,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and so they're not buying banks at the moment. This

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 2>is not what they need. There's been a very dramatic

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 2>rotation into materials, and that's been going on for about

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 2>twelve months now.

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Explain broadly what materials are, because it's more than just miners, isn't.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 2>It it is? But to be honest with you, for

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>our guys, it's mostly BHVAN round right. So I'm using

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 2>a general term, but I'll be more specific. A lot

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of interest in BHP, a lot of interest in rio

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 2>ford eskew has been our biggest trade for literally years,

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 2>but that's a small handful of very wealthy traders who

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 2>mostly trade it very actively, so it doesn't.

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And they're literally they're treating it off the in oor

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>placed because it's a pure it's a pure connection.

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>To pure plate, right. So it's a very straight line

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 2>between what happened with the iron ore price what happens

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 2>with the fortescue price. And if you're very onto that,

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>you can make a lot of money, but you need

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 2>to be very onto it. So we have people who

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>do that that is very much that's their thing, and

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>there's another group of investors who are very interested in

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 2>Fortescue comes and goes from their portfolios as well. There

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 2>was a brief liftier moment and there are people who

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of flirt with it again at the moment. But

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>we just have seen this real shift back to materials

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 2>from an investing perspective because people feel that perhaps everything's

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>not fully priced yet, whereas they feel with financials they are,

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and then when they're looking to the broader market, there's

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>sort of less that people are excited about, and we

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>start to see more ETF investing in someone.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, I hope they're right about to miss you.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the iron ore is the thing. I mean,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you can have all all the interest in Nikola and

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Lithian that you like, but really, if the iron ore

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>price things, folks, I'm sorry, the ship goes with it. Okay,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to stop right there. We're going to take

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a break. When we come back, we're going to talk

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about the Trump trade, What would the election Trump mean,

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>how important is the US to our market and what

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>may be ahead in the rest of the year. Back

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, Hello, Welcome back to the Australians Money

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle podcast. James Kirby here with Jemma Dale from NAB Trade. So, Jemma,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought the market was pretty looking pretty good. I

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thought the US markets were steaming along. Because I'm looking

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>at it for forty years, I'm very aware that the

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>September October period is our damn rocky period in global

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>markets because of the US, and the US now represents

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Just to reiterate, folks, the US represent sense seventy percent

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of the global market just now. The Morgan Stanley Capital

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>International Index. That's extraordinary. What happens in the US is

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of extreme importance to what happens to all markets, including ours.

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And if it rises, we will rise with it, and

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if it falls, we will fall with it. And so

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it really matters. And so we leads us to the question,

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>if Trump wins with his pro business agenda, with his

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>track record of lifting markets the last time, with his

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>track record of pushing old industry, fossil fuels, oil coal,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he's anti certainly anti environmental advocacy. He's not pro electric

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>cars despite all the money Elon Musk wants to give him.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>He's going to dictate to a serious extent the nature

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of the market as it comes along. Used to be

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>mixed on tech. But he now has JD Vance as

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he's running mate, as he's the VP who is big

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with Silicon Valley, backed by Peter Thiel, who I'm sure

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you will know who's behind Planter with that extraordinary preamble.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's tough, isn't it, Gym. I ask you what difference

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>will trumpon make? Just tell us what do you think?

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>It's fascinating, is it? There's so many questions that all

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 2>market participants are trying to answer because the biggest question

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>in markets for the last twelve months then when's the

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Fed going to cut?

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>So question one was when do we cut? And that

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 2>answer at the moment is September. Previously been six cuts

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 2>in the year, that's what we were expecting. That's the

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 2>market was pricing, and six cuts now the back to

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>two they're expecting September. So it was always about rate cuts.

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>And despite the market's extraordinary enthusiasm for cuts, historically, the

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Fed is cutting because the economy is falling off a cliff,

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>and so those first cuts are quite positive for the market,

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and then after that it all looks very bleak, and

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 2>so you actually you want to you can get out

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>in front of the first couple, and then after that

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 2>it really looks ugly. In terms of what Trump is

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 2>going to do, it's fascinating. So the first question I

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>think for a lot of investors what is going to

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>happen with tax cuts at a corporate level. If we

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 2>look at his first election win, there was a dramatic

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 2>uplift in corporate profitability post Trump, and it was all

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 2>tax cuts. Every dollar of it was tax cuts. That

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>has some implications for an economy that is as heavily

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>indebted or a government that's as heavily indebted as the US.

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of questions about the US dollar.

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of questions about what happens with the

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 2>treasury and the debt that is being carried currently and

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>being raised regularly. It is it's quite extraordinary to try

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and unpick the range of things that are on the

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 2>table currently. There's tariffs as well, and trade wars that

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>may start again do we know about this? And obviously

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 2>feeding into the Nasdaq at the moment, there is talk

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that Jamie Diamond may become the next set the Secretary

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Treasury. That is very appealing to a lot

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 2>on Wall Street for a lot of reasons. I love that,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>but I think that would also come the market a

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 2>bit because he's obviously not known to be a highly

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 2>political character. He's known to be money guy. He knows

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 2>what he's doing.

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But can I ask you between the lines? To me,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that you're saying, Okay, the definsits,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. That's going to push up interest rate, it's

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>going to push up inflation to the US. And we

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>just put that to one side, but that would seem

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a natural consequence of his disposition and the

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>American administration's disposition that we could expect under Trump advance.

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. Tell us, then, what the most interesting

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is about the US dollar? And I noticed more

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and more of this talk about d dollarization. Can you

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>explain what the theory is about the US dollar, what

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>could happen to it and what would it mean for

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>us as Australian investors.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 2>This it's a really interesting one and it is getting

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 2>more and more attention. Trump appears to be of the

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>view that the US dollar is too strong and is

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the world's reserve currency and has been for a long time,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and at current and historical levels it is too strong.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>And more to the point that everyone has been happily

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>devaluing their currencies against the US, which allows them to

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 2>export to the US and has, in his view and

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>advances an interesting choice, hollowed out American industry, particularly manufacturing,

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that you can't produce goods in the US because they're

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 2>too expensive to export. He mentioned tractors, which is quite interesting.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 2>So his view is when you've got a very strong dollar,

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>you're hollowing out US manufacturing the sort of Middle America

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>that votes for them, and to that extent, he does

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>not want a strong US dollar. He would like the

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 2>dollar to fall relative to other currencies, which would allow

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 2>them to be far more competitive in export markets in manufacturing,

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>but has hum implications for everybody else. And so it's interesting.

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean Australia, the US is not our number one

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 2>you export market, and the things that we export are

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>not easily substitutable. So your point about iron ore is

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 2>a really good one. Right. You're not going to go

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and get your iron or from a waterbup places. There

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>are alternatives, and most of it goes to China. Then

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the question becomes, if China can't export to the US,

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>do that have implications for Australia When you look at

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 2>a company like CSL where their earnings are pricing US dollars,

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 2>is that a problem. So you can see ripple effects

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 2>across so many different areas, and this is I think

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>why so many people would be very keen for someone

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>like Diamond to go in and be working with the

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 2>administration to ensure that maybe some of those implications are

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 2>thought through before we aggressively try to devalue the currency.

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, and if they did devalue the currency, which cause okay,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so quick win for US Heartland America feels better about itself.

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But then the US wouldn't be the US. The decline

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of the US as a reserve currency, which by the way,

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>has barely occurred, but if it started to occur, what

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>would that mean?

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Then for Australia, there's a few different things to consider.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>One is how much in Australia is priced in US dollars.

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 2>We're not a country that is as heavily dependent on

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the US dollar as many others, you know, so you

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>can see the implications for China, for example. For US,

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 2>they're probably secondary effects rather than direct, and so we

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 2>don't see quite as much anxiety here. It's more going

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.719
<v Speaker 2>if we have to work through this, what are the implications?

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 2>But for some companies and some sected the implications and

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 2>quite significant.

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, one last thing, what would it mean for gold?

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Rhetorical question.

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Rallying for a while, right, people have been watching this

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's quite interesting to observe. And the major hypothesis

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>for why it's been rallying is that central banks have

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 2>been buying. Have they been buying in anticipation of a

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 2>d dollarization. Maybe they have, so there is a hypothesis

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that there will be more upward pressure on the gold price,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and then it's quite attractive, even though it has rallied

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 2>very strongly.

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, talking about the top ten stocks, we

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about banks and miners, but you know the miner

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's appeared in the top ten is Neumont. Newcrest just

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>sold the wrong time, folks, Sorry but you are, oh lord, Newcrest.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. Honestly, they've floundered around for years and years

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and then they sold to Numant and guess what gold

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is going beautifully. Remember folks, that just because gold is

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>going up doesn't mean the gold miners go up because

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they have to mine and often they get it wrong

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>big time. But in the main they should do better.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It's never a perfect correlation.

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>That it's disappointed, no, oh man, it's the most it's

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a particularly unreliable relationship the direction of the gold price

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and the direction of gold miners. Okay, that's for another show.

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a moment. If that's a great question.

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast.

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm James Kirby, the Wealth editor at The Australian, talking

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to a friend of the show, Gemma Dale, head of

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Investor Behavior and SMSF at NAB Trade. As I have

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>often said, one of my favorite job titles. It's funny

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>when I go on other people shows they say, oh,

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I love your title wealth editor, but I like kind

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of investor behavior. I must say I love that one.

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>All right. Now I'm not telling them what to do.

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm just looking at it. Yeah.

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>No, but it's such an interesting area, all right. Bruce says,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>what is the difference between infrastructure investments made by private

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>equity and those led by infrastructure ETFs and does this

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>explain the relatively poor performance of infrastructure ETFs? Bruce, that's

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a terrific question. I wonder, are we perhaps thinking that

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the private equity performance of infrastructure is better and they

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>say it is, or we're late to believe it's so good,

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because how do we know? But what do you think, Gema?

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I think there's multiple parts of this question. I thought

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 2>about a lot. Actually, private equity firms will have an

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure arm in many cases, but that doesn't mean they

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 2>approach it the same way they do private equity. The

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 2>way they would to text sort of startup for example.

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 2>So the goal of private equity is to get in

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 2>very early, take a very active role in the company,

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes it will turn around the big company that's

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>existed for a long time it's really broken. Private equity

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 2>buy it up, get in there, restructure it, turn it around.

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 2>That's quite different to infrastructure, where your goal is effectively

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to own something that generates a pretty consistent return over time.

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just tipping over. It's tipping along.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, something that's ticking overs are quite different. So even

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 2>though it maybe a private equity firm that is owning

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the assets, it's not approaching it like a private equity business.

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot of unlisted infrastructure. It's not stuff

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>that isvailable on the ESSEX or a listed exchange. And

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 2>then you've got your listed plays and then you've got ETFs,

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 2>and then you've got passive versus active. So it's all

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>very It depends on what you're comparing. Infrastructure is a

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.919
<v Speaker 2>really good example of where it's a very broad term

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that covers a lot of different things, and you need

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to look at the underlying assets to got is this

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>something I want to invest in? Because the performance will

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 2>be dramatically different. We saw during COVID that all of

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 2>these things that were supposed to be great long term

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 2>investments that just spit out a long term return and

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to worry too much about volatility, ended

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>up being very volatile. Toll roads, airports, all of that

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 2>stuff complete disaster during COVID did the exact opposite of

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 2>what they were supposed to do long term because of

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 2>very dramatic change in the world. So the other thing

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 2>that is very important to some people, less so others,

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 2>but absolutely matters if you're an institutional investors. There's a

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of energy exposure in some font So you'll see

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 2>some with thirty percent more exposed to non renewable energy

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 2>sources fossil fuels, let's be frank. And then they will

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 2>have pipelines which are also, let's be frank, non renewable

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 2>energy sources. In most cases that can be forty or

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent of the assets, and if that's not for you,

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 2>you need to think about that. But also there are

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 2>a lot of institutional investors who will not touch something

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that's fifty percent fossil fuels. It's just a much bigger

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>universe than perhaps people anticipate and you want to look

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 2>at what is actually being held in it and think

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 2>long and hard about whether or not it's for you

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 2>and whether you think it's going to perform the way

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>it wanted to. Right.

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a really good answer. As you say, it's

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a world within a world, Bruce. And you know, with

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructurrey Ta, if you know, you know what the

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>deed is. With the private equity infrastructure player, you have

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>no idea what's going on there. They might be firing

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the entire management, they might be changing the entire plan.

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, don't build that bridge, build another one completely different.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's almost not comparing apples with apples, though it sounds

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like it. Okay, really good, thank you for that, Gemma.

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Now Bruce cleverly puts in the second question, and that's

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>always fine. Folks. You can put in two questions. If

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 1>they both make sense to me, and they're both relatively succinct,

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>they have a very good chance of being read out. Okay.

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>The second one is the debate over the minimum amount

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>required for a self managed super fund rages on. One

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>factor often mentioned is the running cost. Scary figures are

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>sometimes used last year our SMSF costs a total of

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, six hundred. That's the tax turn preparation Order's

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>an asseic. No, no financial advice, as we didn't use any,

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and we keep getting lesters from people offering to do

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it for less. Can you explain the discrepancy between the

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>quoted figures. This is a great question, Bruce, again, two

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Well done, Bruce. I'm the same, okay.

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I have ANMSF for about twenty years and I get

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>letters all the time from these people. I don't know

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>how they get my name and address. I love to

0:37:58.360 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know how they get it, because I didn't give it

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to them, and they're offering. They just said the SMSF owners.

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't actually know who I am, but they've got

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>enough information to get a letter to my home and

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>they offer to do my SMSF for tiny amounts. The discrepancy,

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I imagine, is the same as anything else. You know,

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>You'll have two people drop it a leafless in your door,

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>saying they'll clean your gotters, and one says they'll do

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it for fifty bucks, and one says five hundred. And

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of guess why one's fifty and wants

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. Maybe that's rather simplicitic. Gemma, who is Russ

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You must remember at a SMSF at one of the

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>nation's biggest banks may have a more sophisticated answer. Ah.

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 2>So this is funny because a friend of mine uses

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the very low cost administrators for his SMSF.

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 2>And when I say he uses it, what I mean

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 2>is his wife is an accountant and she does all

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 2>the paperwork and then submits it to them, and then

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 2>they do the last tiny bit. So it's quite fascinating. Effectively,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 2>what happens is you do most of the work and

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 2>then you provide the administrator. They do the bare minimum

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 2>at the end, just require I imagine cost it out

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 2>at her hourly rate. It's probably a very poor decision

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 2>on their part, but you know it's got to be done.

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 2>So this is I find this fascinating and I've looked

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 2>at this so many times, and it's always worth noting

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 2>who has done this research and emphatter commas about what

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the cost is and what their motivation might be for

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 2>putting it out there. The assumption is often that you

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>have a financial advisor, which in your case was Bruce.

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Is not the case right, you don't have an advisor,

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 2>so you can chuck out several thousand dollars worth of

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 2>fees that have been assumed in this situation. And there

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 2>are always a lot of assumptions. The other thing they

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 2>will assume is asset management fees, So they assume that

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 2>you have managed funds generally, well they used to. Maybe

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 2>they will say now they're actively managed dtfs and they

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 2>will put in one hundred basis points for that, or

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty basis points for that, or they

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 2>might assume you have a retail managed fund and it

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 2>might be two hundred basis points for that, so they

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 2>layer them right, So they go, your accountant's going to

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 2>charge you five thousand dollars a year, and then the

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 2>order is going to charge you one thousand dollars a year,

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and then you are going to pay two percent of

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 2>your assets if you're in managed funds. Now they may

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 2>have brought these down because obviously fees, all of these

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 2>things have fallen dramatically over the last ten years. So

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not quite sure exactly what their assumptions are. Now

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 2>they have hopefully reflected the market a bit better, and

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 2>then an advisor fee, so many people will pay an

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 2>advisor a fee of anywhere between sixty and one hundred

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 2>basis points if you pay an asset based fee. So

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 2>once you add all of those things up, you can

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 2>be talking ten thousand dollars plus to run a fund.

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>But the vast majority of people don't do that, right, Like,

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 2>when I look at what we have on NAB trade,

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 2>which is a very meaningful number of estimatests, they're people

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 2>running their own share portfolio. There's no holding cost because

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 2>they're hint based assets, and they just sit on the platform.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Then you get your statement at the end of the

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 2>year and just give it to your accountant, so you

0:40:58.080 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 2>give it to your administrative.

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>What percentage of them use advisors?

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm n AB traide virtually none, Right, Yeah, I.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Would have thought so. I would have thought so, because

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing is it's self.

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Managed, That's right. And it's not to say that investors

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 2>who have smsfs don't use advisors. Many of them do.

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 2>They tend to be, ironically, the wealthy ones who want

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 2>quite sophisticated advice, and so we do see a lot

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 2>of that. To NAB owns JBWIR for example, and most

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 2>of our Jbear clients will have a self managed super fund,

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 2>but they don't have it necessarily for the share advice.

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 2>They have it because they have a business, real property

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 2>in there, because they have other assets in there that

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 2>are quite complex and would not otherwise be able to

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 2>be held inside super So for the vast majority of people,

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 2>you have a self managed super fund for a specific

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 2>set of reasons. A lot of people do it just

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>for control because they want to run it themselves. If

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 2>you're doing that and you're only holding shares and ETFs,

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>your running costs are super low. If you have a

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 2>far more complex and you're trying to hold those assets

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 2>for specific reasons, and you wanted to own business for

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 2>your property, so you can own a property that your

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 2>business leases from your SMSF inside super that's an amazing strategy.

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 2>For some people, you might want to borrow to by

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 2>property inside souper, which is much harder to do than

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 2>it used to be, but it does work for some people,

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 2>usually very wealthy people. That's got a completely different set

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of costs, right, So you can't compare these things again,

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 2>not apples with apples. If you're happy to cost your

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 2>paying and a couple of grande a year is not bad.

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You're just not Those assumptions that you use are just

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:36.800
<v Speaker 2>not relevant to you. Don't worry about it.

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think that's broadly right too. As you see.

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, if it's two grand on an SMSF and

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>we're assuming your sms if isn't tiny, then it's going

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to make sense really, And you don't use financial advice,

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and if you did, the number is supposed to be

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 1>four thy three hundred a year, which is so different

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and would change everything. Unfortunately, I think that just must

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 1>be paid. And the discrepancy between the quoted figures because

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of games, as Gema alluded to, some of

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>which I didn't even know. But I also, I mean,

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you get what you pay for you would think as well.

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I should note though, financial advice is not just what

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 2>to hold in your smasef right, So the advice might

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 2>be what contributions you should be making every year, how

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 2>much you should be withdrawing. There can be some tax

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 2>advice in that, not the accounting sense of tax advice,

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 2>but just how you structure those things. There could be

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of value added advice in there that's not

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 2>specifically just about how the SMSF is run. So again

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 2>a bit disingenuous to include the whole cost of financial

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 2>advice in that cost of running an SMSF. It's a

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of assumptions.

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. Now, Bruce, you monopolize the question segment of

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>our show this week with are two very smart questions,

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>so congratulations. No one's ever done that before, but you

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have because we've run out of time, but that was terrific.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Jemmerdale, head of Investor Behavior and

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 1>SMSF at NAPTA. Great to have you on as always.

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Thank you and we'll talk again. Okay, folks,

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>do recall that we have an email which I would

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>love you to send some questions, observations, complaints to the

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzle at the Australian dot com dot au. Talk

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to you soon.