WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 12 September

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>From the Sky Center. This is Paul Murray Live. Get overon.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Sharry. Can we go straight to space?

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Like as we speak right now, history is happening, way way, way,

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>way way up there there where the first person to

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>pay their way not just into the upper atmosphere but

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>up and outside, and the first space walk is happening

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>as we speak now. Apparently the cost is the best

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>part of two hundred million dollars. Now as you can see,

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the camera angles and we're seeing somebody come just back

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in then. But can you believe this that when man

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>first walked on the moon, we were all huddled, well

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not me, but we were all huddled around TV and

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>radio and the signal had to come via parks. And

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>look at where we've come. When now something that isn't NASA,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>people who aren't astronauts, but people who are civilians who

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously training, safety, all the rest of it, are abled

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay their way to space. And right now as

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we speak, you can see that the hatch is open

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and there are people who are looking out into the

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>grape beyond. Now tonight we'll do all the normal stuff

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we're doing, but can we just soak this up for

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of seconds because I just find this incredible.

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>You don't know how they do it. It costs an

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of money, but this is the future for

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>those that are going to be able to afford it.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>They're not just going to float around in the upper atmosphere.

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You may well be able to get into space, open

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the door and go for a walk when there's another

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>version of somebody doing it, because there are four people

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who will have the opportunity. We'll return to that footage,

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but welcome to the show this Thursday night. There is

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot to get to, including yet another attempt of

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this government. It's attempt number two now when it comes

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to trying to censor the Internet. I hate this idea

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think the second version is any better

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>than the first version. Also, it was muck Up Day

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>today in the queens Land Parliament, the last time that

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>idiot hopefully will be in the parliam as the Premier.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And Meghan Kelly, we showed you how fired up she

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was yesterday. Well twenty four hours on, she is ready

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to rock and talk everything about that awful debate that

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>took place and what should happen in the future. She

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. But first you know that we have been

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>following the bouncing ball from when it was a report,

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to a report that they hid, to a report that

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they put on the table, to a discussion that they

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>started to have, to negotiations that have now gone through.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Today the government says that they have a deal to

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>find a way through the Parliament to change how much

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay for aged care. Now, I know

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of people who are worried about this.

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>What is very important is that the Liberals have been

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>able to say in this deal that if you're currently

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>physically in age care, there will be no changes as

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>best as I understand or triple check that. But this

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is all for people who will move into age care

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or need at home care in the next of a while.

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I told you that we followed the excellent Inside Baseball

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting here with Philip Coury the whole way through, so

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>he deserves the credit and respect for me to tell

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you what his assumption is of things here. He says

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that of the so called richer retirees, they will instead

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to age at home, but they would be

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>required to pay up to eighty percent of the everyday

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>living costs such as cleaning, gardening and food and fifty

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of so called independence costs. That's things like somebody

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>picking you up, taking you to the doctor. The overall

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>which essentially will require part pensioners and self funded retirees

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to contribute more for their care based on their assets.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Now it's important too, it's not necessarily about your family home,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but your family home does play a part in this.

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you've got things like superannuation shares, other forms

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of income, or you are going to have to pay more.

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I am going to get right into the detail on

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this to give you a little indication of what might

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be happening in July next year. Again, it is weighted

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>towards increasing home care costs. Now, remember half of all

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>people that are in aged care are not in an

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>age care facility. They are at home with an at

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>home package. The biggest financial changes are for the people

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to stay at home for as long

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>as you can, for as much as you would all

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.679
<v Speaker 1>want to be in your home for as long as possible. Again,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Philip Kurry with plenty of information and detail here where

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it says that under the changes which both major parties

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and the sector say are essential to keep the system

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>financially sustainable. The maximum amount that you will contribute to

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>your care at home or in an aged care system

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is moving from the current cap of seventy nine thousand

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars way up to one hundred and thirty thousand dollars.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>So that is the overall cost is going to be

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. So let me walk you through this. Okay,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>For people who are in aged care currently they pay

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty three thousand dollars. If you're a pensioner but you

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have a house, from July one next year, it'll

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>be basically the same. For full pensioners, but you own

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>a house and the values somewhere around six hundred thousand

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars twenty four thousand dollars, you will be paying another

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>for and a bit thousand dollars every single year until

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you have put in one hundred and thirty thousand dollars.

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>For part pensioners who own a home over a million dollars,

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going from the current thirty one thousand up by

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>about five thousand dollars to thirty six thousand dollars. Again,

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you keep paying the thirty six thousand dollars until you

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>hit one hundred and thirty thousand dollars For part pensioners

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>who own a home, say nine hundred thousand dollars, and

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got say five hundred thousand dollars super shares or

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>something else. This is a big whack. From thirty four

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year, it's way up forty seven thousand,

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred dollars. That's a big change for people who

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>own a home that could be worth something like one

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>point six So many of the suburban homes around Sydney

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>would be worth that, certainly for Melbourne and Brucebane as well.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Plus again you have other assets, super and the rest

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of it. Up to nine hundred thousand houses for a

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>whack from forty nine thousand dollars a year. This is

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to be in a facility, it'll go up, so sixty

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>two eight hundred dollars. Now, of course that is not

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the total amount that you'll have to spend. There's lots

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of other little ways that age care companies who run

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>these homes fine ways to get you. But the overall

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>number that the government will help support you is changing,

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's changing in pretty big ways. Now there isn't

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a person watching who doesn't want to stay in the

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>home for as long as possible. Why because you deserve

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that independence. Why because you've earned that independence, because you

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>worked hard to have the home that you live in.

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You love it. It's where the memories are, it's where

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>you've spent so much time in the garden renovating the

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>memories of the kids, and of course a place where

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>grandkids come over. Again. Some changes here. But interestingly, the

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>government when it's released the data today and it is

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>very complicated to give you exact numbers. Hopefully in the

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>next couple of days the news organizations will give you

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the chance to put in all of your details and

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>see what the changes are. So I don't have a

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>comparison to you how much you currently pay, but this

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is what's going to change. Okay, So if you're a

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>full pensioner, you're renting, you've got no other sources of income,

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to pay two four hundred and sixty seven

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year to stay at home. If you've got

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a part pension, you own your home, plus a little

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of super, it'll be eleven and a half thousand dollars.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>The same for self unded retiree. Now the Commonwealth Seniors

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Card comes into play here. If you've got one and

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand dollars in assets, it'll be about eleven

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half thousand dollars. And then we start to

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>take some big steps. A self funded retiree who does

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have a Commonwealth Seniors Card and as I say, about

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand dollars in assets, that's sixteen thousand and

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the so called rich, the self funded retiree with no

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Commonwealth Seniors Card five hundred thousand dollars in assets, you

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>will be paying sixteen thousand, six hundred and fifteen dollars

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a year. Now, at some point we're all going to

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with the system, which is why I'm

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>giving you as much information as possible right now. Now

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this will save the federal budget, but of course it

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>will cost people more. These things do not kick in

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>until July the first of next year, so don't be

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>worried about something happening in the next month or so.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But this is something that is going to be happening.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>It will pass the Parliament, which is why the Prime

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Minister gave it the full Prime Ministerial Courtyard treatment today

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like he was making history by making you pay more

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for age care at home or somewhere else.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>We know that increasingly as as Australians want to spend

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>more time living at home. As a result of the

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 2>reforms that we're announcing today, around one point four million

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Australians will benefit from a new support at home program

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 2>by two thousand and thirty five, helping them remain independent

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>in their home and their community for longer.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, again, devil is always in the detail. We'll all

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>work through that over the next few days. But I

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>know we've been on this journey since December last year

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>when this looked like it was what's going to happen

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>now again your family home. They say it doesn't really

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>count in your calculation of wealth, but clearly you can

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>see that there are gradients there about the family home. Now,

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>whether that is just the buried lead somewhere, or we'll

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>get more clarity as we go through the documents. I'll

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>do that for you when we come back and keep

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>chatting next week. Remember being here on a Sunday night

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>as well, because we get in before everyone else obviously,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but also we'll have a bit more research on this.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>For his part, Peter duttn't Remember, these laws only happened

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>because both of the major parties have agreed.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>He said this, It's no secret that we've been discussing

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>age care with the government. I want people to have

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 3>dignity as they age. I want there to be sustainability

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 3>in the age care system. I want people to know

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 3>that when you or dad, a grandma, grandpa going too

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>an age care setting, that they're getting the best care provided.

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 3>And so we've been in discussions with the government to

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 3>have a look at what they're proposing, and then we'll

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 3>we'll make a decision as to what our next step

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 3>will be.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I certainly hope the opposition does not

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>get involved in is another plan that was announced today

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which was another version of censoring the internet. Remember the

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>word that was used over and over during the Voice

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>campaign when they started to lose, and then they've been

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>screaming from the rooftops after sixty percent of the country

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>said hell no. Begins with an M. Misinformation, misinformation, misinformation.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>The misinformation which is there some misinformation.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Now again, we all know what's true, what's not true,

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what's a lie? But misinformation is this new sort of

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhat made up middle word of course, it is generally

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>interpreted by left wing think tanks and by governments and

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so called fact checkers, which of course is to always

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>generally follow whatever the government says is true at the time.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Now we know that there were many things that were

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>ruled misinformation over the past couple of years that turned

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>out to be stone cold truth. There was stuff that

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you knew at the absolute time was truth, like say

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the Hunter Biden laptop, but it was all declared misinformation

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>because the government at that time wanted to hide things

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that left wing of politics wanted to hide. That at

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the last presidential election. But here in Australia again there

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is apparently some great need for social media companies to

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be punished if they host misinformation. Now they tell us

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that media organizations are exempt. But my reading of it

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to this point is that it's about what you broadcast,

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>not if somebody posts a link from a media organization

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on social media platform that, again a left wing think

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>tank will turn around and suggest to be misinformation because

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not the government line. I've got the legislation, seventy

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>five pages in length. I will read it in excruciating

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>detail and get more advice. Again over the weekend. Be

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>here Sunday night. But let's have a look here. The

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Australian newspaper again previewing this today that the second take

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>on the Misinformation Bill the censoring of the Internet. I'm

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>not calling it the misinformation bill. It is the censoring

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet. This is not just going after what

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you post on Facebook or Twitter. But if you're somebody

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who likes listening to a certain podcast or a certain

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>watch a certain YouTube video and then again you want

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to share those on socials. This is what it's all about.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Shutting down And as anyone remembers during the COVID times

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that yes, of course there's plenty of sources that just

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't tell the truth, even those that are trying to

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>turn around and challenge the narrative. But there were plenty

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of people who were challenging the narrative and doing so

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in those formats. So as a free speech guy, this

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>has massive concerns for me, because remember, what is misinformation

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is determined by government, by the bureaucracy of government, or

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>by the henchmen of the left wings of the parties

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>of government. Today, Sky News, which is generally speaking, been

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of what's been put up here. I don't say

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that as an official position. I'm just saying that of

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>many of the articles that we've done as analysis skynews,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot Au, they say that it's an attack

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on our freedoms. They of course is we But still

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the government revised Online Misinformation Bill SLAMM is having a

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>chilling effect on free speech. Again, i'd say misinformation law,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I say censoring the Internet, because Australians have a very

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>different attitude to censoring the Internet than they do to misinformation.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not playing by Teal and Green and Radio National

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Talk here. Okay, this is from our article. Like the

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>previous draft, the new laws would empower the Australian Communications

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and Media Authority to impose massive fines of up to

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>five percent of global revenue on a social media platform

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that fails to adequately crack down on misinformation and disinformation

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on their platforms. Remember, the government decided what was true

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in COVID. The government will turn around and say that

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>even when we can find data that pushes back against

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>their narrative, that it ain't true and therefore the Minister

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Communications Authority would have even greater power to shut

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>down alternative views and by that men alternative facts, are

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>men alternative views to whatever their view is of the day.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The ACMA will be also given powers to approve enforcibility

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of codes for dealing with misinformation and disinformation. And interestingly,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>here are we talking about codes that are exclusively for

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Internet or do they extend to the areas they

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>currently regulate television radio ACTMA doesn't have play a role

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in things like the Press Council, But does it extend

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>again to the opinion piece in the newspaper that someone

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>objects to? Again, I think when somebody is wrong, the

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>best way to deal with it is to argue why

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they are wrong, not to pretend that they are not

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed a voice. For his part, the Home Affairs Minister

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and a free speech advocate, James Patterson, he feels like

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I do. This is not what it seems.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we're going to get ourselves into a

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 4>very dangerous state of affairs if we allow, for example,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 4>during an election campaign, a American or Chinese headquartered social

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 4>media platform decide what Australians can and cannot hear from

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 4>political candidates and political parties. I think we always have

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 4>to have a strong bias for free speeches.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>On all right now. I don't want anyone to be

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>given safe haven for lies, but I think the way

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to combat them is to say this is wrong. Let

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>me explain why. If you read an article that you

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>see as being wrong, then feel free to write your

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>own version of it in anywhere from your sub stack

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to the paper and all in between. There's plenty of

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>new ways to push back rather than again people who've

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>always hated people of the right using this as a

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>way of deliberately trying to shut down the arguments that

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>push back against a pretty draconian system which is being

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>proposed right now now. Also, political lies apparently are going

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to be captured inside the misinformation regime. Now, remember the

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>political lie of the Labor Party of oh, they're planning

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to privatize medicare. Well, they of course said that, despite

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it clearly was not true, despite the

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>fact the government, the opposition of the government at the

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>time it said no, no, no, no no. They said, oh, well,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>there's this report somewhere that proves our point. Would things

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like medi scare be banned under this again, you'd have

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where one side of politics says, well, this

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is your plan, because we've got the piece of paper

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and the other side of politics that says, well, no,

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not who adjudicates this is it a bunch of

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>again people with loyalties to the party of power at

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>any one time. And this affects people on the left

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and the right because we get the governments we like

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and don't like every few years. The Minister has incredible

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>powers under this as well to be able to see

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>something they personally don't like and to refer it to

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the system to be put through the ringer. This is important. Meantime,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Another Liberal Party perspective on this comes from James McGrath,

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>again belling the cat that this looks like something far

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>more benign, but once you actually lift up the hood

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and have a look at censoring the internet, it's not

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>a good idea.

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 5>A Liberal National Party will always support freedom of speech.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 5>We're not going to support any bill that attempts to

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 5>curtail freedom of speech. We're particularly worried about the fact

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 5>that the Minister can direct an investigation into someone's exercise

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 5>of freedom of speech.

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That is so wrong.

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 5>No minister, whether especially a Laber or Green minister, should

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 5>be into hearing with our god given right to express

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 5>our freedom speech in this country.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the problem with this is that we don't

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have free speech in Australia. Have the illusion of free

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 1>speech in Australia everything from defamation laws to now potentially

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>misinformation or censoring the Internet laws decency standards, which again

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>are patrolled by people who want to shut down people

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like Kyle and Jackie Oh, despite the fact that there

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are two million people each and every day who listen

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to them. This is the sickly slope of someone's judgment

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about who can and can't play for obvious reasons. If

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you to fame someone, if you tell an obvious and

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>provable lie, then there's consequences. If somebody simply disagrees with

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you or presents our whole collection of information that yes,

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>confronts your argument, but if your argument is based in

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>something that you can prove to be the data that

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>you chose to form your opinion about. To me, I

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want the government involved in this whatsoever. We'll see

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the next couple of days. Now, state

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>premiers around the country well as porketting I think once said,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>don't get between them and a bucket of money. Well,

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the bucket of money that exists for the state premiers,

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>local government and the federal government is extraordinary. According to

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Statistics, in the financial year of twenty twenty

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>two to twenty three, the total amount of revenue that

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>came to all three levels of government in Australia in

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>one year was three quarters of a trillion dollars seven

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty five point eight b four billion dollars. Yet,

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that they all collected in three quarters

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of one t four trillion dollars in one year, state

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>governments in particular have run things like our health system

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 1>right into the ground now. They make announcements every election

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>where they say ten percent more of this, and one

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and more that and fifty five more this than that.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But the reality of the health system as it exists

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>right now and certainly administered by mostly labor governments around

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the country, but it's liberal governments too. Hospital ramping is

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 1>a disgrace. Could somebody tell me how if state federal

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>local governments get three quarters of a tee for trillion dollars?

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>How in almost every state hospital ramping is the worst

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's ever been, ever been. Hospital ramping, of course, is

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>when you call Triple O, you get into the ambulance,

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the ambulance takes to the hospital, there's no pardon me,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no space in the hospital, which means if you

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>call Triple O you mightn't get an ambulance. In places

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like Victoria, we know that when people haven't been able

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to access the Triple O system, thirty three people died,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but the government got re elected because they lighty about

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>how great the system is. You know, we've shown you

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>how many stories about people when it comes to hospitals.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>That's just one example of what I think is a

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 1>gaping hole between what comes in and the results that

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>come out. But specifically, I also want to talk about

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>hospitals here. This was a story that was on seven

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>News a couple of days ago in Sydney. It's been

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>reheated by the Daily Mail and it is in and

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>around the Bankstown Hospital. This was on one of those

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>days when there weren't enough beds, which meant there was

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>hospital ramping, and when people turned up at the emergency

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>room there were so few beds that people were lying

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>on the floor in pain. Have a look at this

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>image and tell me are we doing something wrong? If

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the federal state and local governments get three quarters of

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars in one year. But this is what

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>your fellow Australian may well be met with if they

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>end up turning to a hospital in pain. It's a

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>disgrace and you should put maximum pressure on anyone currently

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>involved in the administration of these hospital systems because they

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>are failing. Which brings me to Queensland and yet another

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>reason why you should flush this mob in the next

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. Today was the last of parliamentary sitting before

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming Queensland election. I hope it is the final

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>day that we see this bloke, Stephen Miles as the

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Premier in that chamber. I hope it is the last

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>day that we see Shannon Fentaman in that chamber as

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the Health Minister, that a Vet Darth as the Attorney General,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and a whole bunch of other people who have absolutely

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>screwed Queensland and think that you are so stupid that

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you can be bought off for the whole collection of

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>giveaways that are really about setting land mines for an

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>incoming LNP government. You see when they do things like

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>artificially pushed down things like public transport fares, if they

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>inevitably turn up, then Labor will turn around and say

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>under the LNP public transport faares have gone up six

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twelve percent, see with one thousand dollars of

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a credit. When it comes to your power bills, they

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>will again turn around and say at the next election,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>should they be coming in from opposition, they will of

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>course say your power bills have gone up by seven

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand percent under an LMP government. That's the game that's

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>being played right here. But I want to show you

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>here is the back and forth in the last question

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>time and pick who you think should be the Premier

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of Queensland. I think it's David Crucifooley and Daylight.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 6>Second, will the Premier apologize to all of them? Or

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 6>does the Premier prefer to end this fifty seventh Parliament

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 6>written into the pages of history, always denying any responsibility

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 6>for the youth crime crisis.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 7>The leader of the Opposition talks about apologies.

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 5>And he hates being held responsible for what Campbell Newman

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 5>and he did, but he has never once apologized.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>He has never.

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Done to the fourteen thousand Queensland as he's signable.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, they're still doing the Campbell Newman thing please speaking

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of how good is it? The Kempbell Newman and Anastasia

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Palachet will be here on Queensland election night on the panel.

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>How good is that going to be? Looking forward to it?

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>And of course this bloke thinks that the traditional media,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the ones who have actually followed the failures of his government,

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>well it's going to report how bad his government's been.

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's try and get to the kids via social media.

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Taxpayer thundered, of course, have look at the type of

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>garbage that is being shoved down the throats of certain people.

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>If your feed happens to accidentally have this bloke turning

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>up in it, again, this is what this bloke does

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with his time as the Premiere of Queensland, his ministers

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the same, please please. News out of Sydney today is

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that the electorate of North Sydney, the former seat of

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>course of Joe Hockey before that Ted Mack gone, the

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>seat will be has been jettisoned, which does mean one

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>for you a teal in the Parliament, but the actual

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>person may well end up running. Kayla Tink is the

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>current MP and today she is saying she is not

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>going to run against any of the existing Teals, certainly

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not going up in some I don't know Teal fight

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>where Zalie Steger would most likely win and probably hold

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on to the seat of Warringer. I think that's hers

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to lose whenever she chooses at some point in time.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Alas that Northern Beaches well wow, okay, but she's going

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to run somewhere else. My prediction she'll run in a

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>seat called Bradfield. Bradfield is in the north shore of Sydney.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a place that voted yes despite the fact that

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it has a liberal MP. It voted yes at the

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>last at the referendum. So watch this place, watch this space.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Whether the Teal effect means she gets elected or not,

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll all find out together. But I think that's where

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>she will end up popping up. But you'll have a

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>fight with a kind of Teal who lost at the

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>last election, but then was so passionate that she actually

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>set up like a fake electorate office, like she was

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be the MP. So bring on the Teal

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>on Teal fight. That may well happen there something different

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>before we get into American politics and the conversation tonight,

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>No Sooksno lefties, I should tell you this Thursday night,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful Megan Meghan McCain, Meghan Kelly, which was a

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit later. So I love this in the Channel

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>nine papers today, which was that they have got their

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>hands on some photos which had been taken by a

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>collection of tradees who were making their way in and

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a rand Antarctica. Now I'm sure they were doing great work,

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but in between their great work, they took some amazing

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>photos like have a look at these. Now. I have

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>no plans on going anytime soon, but the idea that

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you can see the Aurora estrallis the Southern lights as

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>they call them, the snow that's falling down this wonderful

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>frozen soap bubble I think it is. And then anyone

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>who's ever been in the snow loves to take this

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>photo where you take the boiling water and flip it

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>up and it looks like an explosion like that. I

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's very cool, very cute. I'll tell you exactly

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>where you can find that. A little bit later now

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>lefties think that they have killed off finally the dragon

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that is Donald Trump. Of course that's rubbish. We all

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>know the debate that took place yesterday. Well, hard to

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>tell anyone if you're scoring these things. Of course, Harris

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up winning the debate, quote unquote, but we all

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>know that it was a very slanted room, that there's

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of people who thought, hey, she was

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>too passive aggressive. I think African American men are going

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to be fascinating to watch where they go in the

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>next little while, and obviously as soon as Donald Trump's

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>getting into dogs and cats and all the rest of it.

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>And please don't see me in the videos. I've seen them.

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I've read it all. But you get the point, right,

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't need to win you over. It doesn't need

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to win me over. He needs to win independence over,

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and he needs to win suburban and women over all. Right,

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>currently his lead with men is greater than she is

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with females. But we'll get to the magic factor that's

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going to change all of that in a moment or

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>two's time. But again, I said, lefties thought that she

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was playing some sort of four D chest doing this

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>guy in when of course all she was doing was

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>being passive aggressive. She poked the bear and the bear

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>swiped back, but he was the analysis of the view.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 7>Vice President came on that stage, she reached for his.

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 8>Hand and she was almost behind his podium because they

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 8>were clearly not going to meet in the middle. Do

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 8>you think that set the tone for the knafe because

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 8>I thought, well, it was such an amazing roll off.

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Please meantime an opinion piece in the Turnbull Times, well

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it says that if you think anything but Kamala Harris

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>just eviscerating, destroying Donald Trump, leaving his carcass behind. If

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you think anything other than that, then apparently shame on you.

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We were realistic about his performance, but we absolutely gave

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it and rightly so in my view, to those moderators

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and how rigged that game ended up being. We'll get

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to Meghan Kelly in a moment or two's time. But

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the Taylor Swift endorsement. Now again this global marketing genius,

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>who is a global marketing genius who my daughters love,

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and again worthy person time Person of the Year. But

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>she's always kind of been on the left of recent cycles.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>She's never been pro Trump.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's from Tennessee, but the city bits of Tennessee

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>are very different than the rule bits of Tennessee. Anyway,

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>This again was NBC in the United States, saying Tita

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to change it all, baby, and he won't

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to shake it off. See what I did.

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 7>Just moments after the debate.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 9>It was the Instagram post that ricocheted across the Internet

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 9>and social media.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Taylor swiftner endors Madam vp kum.

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 9>A left territt pop megastar Taylor Swift telling her two

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 9>hundred and eighty three million followers that after seeing artificial

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 9>intelligence of her falsely endorsing Donald Trump, she felt the

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 9>need to be transparent.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Rubbish. No, she just was on the bandwagon and she's

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>there now. The main power that she has, apart from

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>advocating for the candidate, is she does actually tell people

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>who are young to get registered. You're allowed to register

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to vote. There's not cheating to tell people to do so,

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 1>so there will be a spike in that. So the poles,

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing that comes out in the past twenty four hours

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is credible because of just how fast these things turn around.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So what do we have to look at betting markets?

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>She was down, she's up, but she's not way up. Okay,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Now again, you'd prefer to be fifty to forty nine,

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>but under this model, still people believe that Trump would

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>win in Pennsylvania, but the margin is much shorter right

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>now and Nevada. If he does both of those, of

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>course he's the president. The prediction models, yes, they changed

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. However, Trump remains until the debate bump polling

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>comes in sixty one percent chance of winning the presidency.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But as you can see, we really are only talking

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>here about a changeover. Just before the start of the month.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy dropping out, that's when things started to break away

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and now start to come back together. Nate Silver, who

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>puts all of this together, on his podcast today and

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>he explained that his expectations are that most likely she

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>ends up with a two point bounce. Now that's nationally

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>really kind of irrelevant, because it still would mean that

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump would most likely win the states that he

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to win. But if there's a two point change

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in those states, then obviously she would end up as

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the person to beat. But it's only still not even

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>halfway through September. We're going to get all the way

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to the end of September, then all the way through October.

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to be in the United States for

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that election and to carry you through with all the

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>data between now and then and to talk to my

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>wonderful friend Meghan.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 8>I feel like most men are watching that saying I

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 8>can't wait to vote against her? What man watching the oh?

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 7>And this is my favorite?

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Please please? Right?

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 8>I feel like most men had their balls busted by

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 8>this kind of a very annoying woman, and probably now

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 8>more than ever, can't wait to to the polls and

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 8>vote against her.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 7>You tell me, I.

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Think it's I think it's a very fair point. I

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely agree with her. We'll wait and see what happens altogether.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 1>No sooks, no lefties, quick break back with more here

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Murray Live. Don't forget there's people floating above

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>us right now in space? Cool right, all right, no sooks,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>no lefties. Freyer Leitch is here, and let me get

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a title right from the Mensies Research Center. She's so polite.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I sit here and say that she's from you know,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you name it right, She's been polite. She never corrected me,

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm correcting myself the Mensies Research Center. Good on

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>your rockstar, And of course from a Doni Media, our

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>dear friend legend of Mount Cooper News Times had so

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>much more around Brisbane, the wonderful Lisa got Lisa. Awesome

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to see you, so prayer. I'll start with you here.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Censoring the Internet. I think that's what it is. It's

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not a misinformation bill. It is the censoring of the

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Internet the legislation itself. That's my trick to go and

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>read it up Hill down Dale. I want to know

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>what the definition of misinformation is. I want to know

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>who is going to be policing that, how it works,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>how the complaint system works, What say you about what

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they're planning to do? What have you read?

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 7>It is honestly unbelievable.

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the first time they tried to put this

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 10>bill forward, it received tens of thousands of submissions from

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 10>concerned public members who.

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 7>Just want to have an opinion.

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:24.719
<v Speaker 10>There was backlash against this from the whole spectrum of politics,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 10>everyone from your civil liberties counsels to your law counsel

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 10>to the Human Rights Commission. Even like everyone was against

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 10>this crazy Yeah, yeah, We've never probably never seen something

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 10>so unifying for the whole of politics in Australia as

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 10>our opposition to this bill. So they've tried to rework

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 10>it now, but the fundamental flaws are still there most foundationally,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 10>they have not been able to get around the core issue,

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 10>which is, how on earth do you define misinformation? Who

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 10>is going to be the arbored of what is true

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 10>and false? They have no answer. They're trying to shift

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 10>it from Akma and to the social media companies. The

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 10>social media companies don't want to be the ones deciding that.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 10>On Matter's website, they say, we as a private company,

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 10>do not want to decide what is and isn't true.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 10>That's why they have independent third party fact checkers like

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 10>the r MIT fact Lab that hasn't published a single

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 10>thing since Sky News exposed that it was biased against

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 10>The Voice in August of last year. So this is

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 10>just absolutely riddled with issues. But the fundamental problem that

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 10>no legislation will ever be able to overcome is who

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 10>decides what is the truth?

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Hellelujah sing it well done. I mean, look again,

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>my advice to anyone who wants to fight this, do

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not call it the misinformation bill. Call it the censoring

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet bill. All right, stop labor censoring the Internet?

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Right that from all the way from the Greens, the

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Victorian socialists, One nation lives whatever, right, if you're opposing

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's about censoring the Internet. Don't fall in for their terminology. Lisa,

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are we over the top here or do you think

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>something is really going on here?

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 11>I think you're right, And I think if you listen

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 11>to you tonight talk about censoring the Internet, and you know,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 11>it's when you start getting sick of saying it, people

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 11>start to hear it. So think about how you're each

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 11>way elbow caught on. Most people don't really understand what

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 11>they're talking about. When you hear someone say misinformation, it's

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 11>one of those words now that the young people today

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 11>are just sounds so old, but yeah, just throwing around randomly.

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 11>They don't really understand what that is. And as Frey

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 11>I said, there is no real definition as to what

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 11>it will be like. We already have deformation in this country.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 11>You go to court to prove truth. Truth is how

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 11>you stand up against defamation. I don't think we can

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 11>rely on the social media companies to policit themselves. And

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 11>it's terrifying to think that, particularly going into an election,

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 11>you can have some bureaucrat somewhere deciding what should be

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 11>on the Internet or what shouldn't because think about how

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 11>many people now rely on those news feeds on their

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 11>social media to actually understand what is happening in the world.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 11>They're england enough as it is most of the time.

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 11>So if they're getting you know, if the algorithm itself

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 11>isn't limiting what you're getting, then you're going to have

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 11>these decisions made about what you are allowed to read.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:15.919
<v Speaker 7>It's dangerous again.

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're going to turn around and they're going

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, it doesn't affect the media organizations. It's

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not about what's on television, it's not about what's on radio.

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's about what you see or hear on those places

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and repost right. And also for what I don't like

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is that one of the examples of while we absolutely

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>need this is because what people may or may not

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>have been tweeting in and around the Bondo stabbings now

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>again in real time, government can't get involved in that

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>even a couple of days or a week later, they

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>can't get involved in in that. And I think that

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that is you know, I'm not going to fall for

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this garbage where they're going to pretend that the reason

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for it is this vague example, rather than turning around

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and saying, okay, last year there were this many parts

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that were misinformation. Here's examples, here's examples, here's examples. They

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it. I think just what they want to

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>do is exactly what happened during the Voice, which is

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>anything against the narrative or the sales pitch is defined

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>as misinformation because if it was deformation, it'd be off

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to a court. If it was a lie, again, we

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>have systems to be able to deal with that. If

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>it was discriminatory, we'd be able to go and deal

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>with that. It's about giving when all of that fails

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>one little thing. It's a little bit like you know

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>when cops want to crack down on certain communities, they go, look,

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we can't get you for this, but we'll get you

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for that. Al Capine, we can't get you for this,

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get you for taxes.

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 7>That's what I reckon, spot on, you're absolutely right.

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 10>I remember during the Voice campaign, I made a bunch

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 10>of tiktoks about why I was voting no. They got

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 10>over six million views and it actually got me onto

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 10>the ABC's Q and A, which is quite an experience.

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 10>I was up against Jed Kearney, who's a Labor member

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 10>of Parliament, and I was the only one on the

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 10>panel that had the balls to actually say why I

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 10>was voting no. And as I'm speaking and articulating what

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 10>we know the majority of Australians believe, she yells out,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 10>that's misinformation. That shows you exactly what is behind this bill.

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 10>This is an attempt by Labor to silence dissenting opinions.

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:20.919
<v Speaker 10>They did it in the Voice and now they're rolling

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 10>out the legislation to allow them to legally silence you

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 10>as well.

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I love it, I love it. I can do it

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>all night. But there's other things to talk about. Now.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>You've gone through the Queensland local government process, so I

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think a few months ago in Queensland, of course, but

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>there is once coming up this weekend in New South

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Wales Victoria and ow Mat Nicholas rees in a few

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks after that. But let's get down to something here.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's all be honest. No one has any idea who

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 1>therese people are, all right, literally, like, if you're lucky

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to see a poster somewhere, okay, name, I don't

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>know who that is, all right? Most people, you know,

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the olden days, you used to go and double

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>check the local paper and you read this sort of

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five word blurb. Nowhere is anyone really going to

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>sit around and literally google each and every one of

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the candidates, which means that we have this level of

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>government that has strayed from its purpose, where people are

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>being elected because people go bang bang bang, sayer, what

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Yeah, what do you think of that?

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 11>I got recused to vote at the local election? I

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 11>stood the accused to vote at the local election, and

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:28.760
<v Speaker 11>you're right, it wasn't that long ago here in Brisbane

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 11>and people standing around me. They had no idea who

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 11>they were voting for. They don't understand the difference in

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 11>many of them as to what council is responsible for,

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 11>what state's responsible for, or what even federal is responsible for.

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 11>So no that they don't do the research going in.

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 11>But I can tell you what, and I know you'll

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 11>talk about it later, but the behavior at some of

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 11>those polling booths was just embarrassing and outrageous.

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, let's get to that right where again

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the pettiness like and again we all know what it's like,

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>whether you've been around the board of a little athletics

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>club or your footy clab let alone, all the rest

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of the councils, and you see all these people right

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the bully their way home and say we're going to

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about world affairs and all of this rubbish. Okay,

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>we know what the main functions are, and there are

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>people that are overtly trying to get onto these councils

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that have no interest in those basic functions. And again,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>no disrespect, I don't mind a bit of youth on there.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, one of the papers was out there

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>today saying, look at all these nineteen year olds that

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>are running great, but they don't know what it's like

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to drop a kid off at school. They don't know

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what it's like to all the planning decisions that come

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>from a life after you're over the age of nineteen.

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But frey again the pettiness of this, the stuff people

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing to other people's posters, like smearing the worst

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>possible stuff on it. Ideally I'd say that it's voluntary

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>voting rather than compulsory for something like this, But how

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>does anyone arm themselves with the information to know who

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the hell these people are.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, look, I was actually helping out at a pre

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 10>pole booth in Balmain, so the Inner West councils, extremely

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 10>left wing. It was quite the experience. And I was

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 10>out there in my blue Liberal T shirt. I think

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 10>maybe one in ten people actually knew they had to vote.

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 10>Most people just walked past and went, oh, is.

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 7>There an election on? I thought that, yeah, exactly.

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 10>But the behavior of so this is a Greens, Greens

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 10>dominated area and they have been atrocious. There is a

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 10>Jewish candidate in the Inner West who had Zionist scum

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 10>written on her poster. She's been receiving anti Semitic abuse

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 10>for almost ten years now. She's had swastikas drawn on

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 10>her posters before as well, and we think it's members

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 10>of the Greens doing this. It is just appalling behavior.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 10>But what really gets.

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Me the lawyers we don't know.

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's alleged, right.

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 10>But what really gets me is I had a member

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 10>of the Greens come up to me. We had this

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 10>great chat and he was just apologizing for how anti

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 10>semitic the Greens had become, how pro terror they'd become.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 10>I and I just sat there thinking, why don't you

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 10>say something. This is the problem with the Greens. They

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 10>have gone so so far off the rails as a party.

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 10>But nobody is willing to stand up and call them out.

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Correct, We'll see what happens. I think. Yes, I've got

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a theory about where the moderate Greens may end up.

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on. All the telling about the next to

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the wall got less than thirty seconds. So give me

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the bumper sticker version of winner or loser of the week, Lisa.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 11>Winner of the week, whoever was preparing Kamala Harris for

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 11>that debate? That media team behind there did amazing work.

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 11>And losers I'm taking out of context this week. The

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 11>losers are the protesters in Melbourne. They are the pure

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 11>definition of the Australian version of a loser.

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 10>I agree with Lisa on the winner, and I think

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 10>the losers are also the Victorian taxpayers who are paying

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 10>for the police.

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen million barks apparently. Thank you, guys, I do appreciate it.

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Adward's nosooks, no lefties, especially with fined up ladies. I

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>love it all right. Speaking of Meghan Kelly straight after

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the break here on Palul Murray Life, there is no

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>better person in front of a camera and on he

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>than the wonderful Meghan Kirey. And she was amazing yesterday

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in her immediate hot take on the debate. Well, we're

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>here a day later and it's time to talk to

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 1>her from the United States. Megan, congrats on the way

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you handled it. We played it all on the show

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>last night. Your immediate reaction, and you could see your

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>rage because you're not like me, like someone who's just watching.

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>You've done this, You've hosted these things before, and you

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>could see that you were seething with rage because these

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>people weren't just not playing fair. They were deliberately trying

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to kill off one of those two candidates.

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, it was a three on one pileon. It was

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 8>an ambush, and they went in there prepared to do it.

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 7>Looking back on it now, going.

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 8>Back, and you know, we pulled the transcript and you

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 8>read it, you know all the questions and how it worked.

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 8>And every single time Trump tried to bridge away or

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 8>didn't answer the question and tried to answer either his

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 8>own sort of thoughts, to offer his own thoughts on something,

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 8>or even meander on defending himself against one of her attacks,

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 8>they would bring him back to their difficult question, like

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 8>the question was this. Every time she did that, she

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 8>got a pass. They never never once did that to her.

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 8>Every time he said something they didn't think was true,

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 8>they fact checked him nine times out of ten.

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 7>Their fact check was.

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 8>Bs, it was made up, it was a lie, or

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 8>it was an opinion, which had no place at a

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 8>presidential debate.

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 7>How many fact checks did they do of her? None? None.

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 7>Her lies were all over the place.

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 8>She started the debate by saying, you're going to hear

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:31.720
<v Speaker 8>a lot of lies tonight, and indeed that was true,

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 8>but they were from her, and then, as if on

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 8>c in order to help ABC News in its attempt

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 8>to stick the stiletto in Trump's jugular, you get CNN's

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:46.479
<v Speaker 8>Daniel Dale, the official fact checker of CNN, who looks

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 8>at this debate and says he lied thirty three times.

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 7>Kamala Harris won.

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 8>That's what the Republicans are up against in this country.

0:44:57.719 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, just off the top of my head.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 8>She lied in the way she kept saying he's responsible

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 8>for twenty twenty five, even though he explicitly said that

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 8>he had nothing to do with it. She lied by

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 8>calling these Trump abortion bands in which he could He

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 8>repeatedly said he doesn't want the federal government to have

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 8>anything to do with this. This is a state's rights issue.

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 8>She knows he has nothing to do with the abortion

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 8>bands in state by state. The good people on both

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 8>sides live about Charlotteesville, the bloodbath lie. There were so

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 8>many that you, as a moderator, if you wanted to

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 8>get into the fact checking business, you absolutely could have

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 8>called her out on that. In my view, would have

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 8>been inappropriate at presidential debate. But if you're going to

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 8>do it to him, you have an obligation to do

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 8>it to her. And as I mentioned, those fact checks

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:47.879
<v Speaker 8>themselves erroneous, opinion layden and totally out of place. And

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 8>when it's on one side, now it's election interference. Now

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:56.720
<v Speaker 8>you actually do look like a partisan act. The only

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 8>silver lining to any of this is that I have

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 8>to leave that the viewers at home watching this understood,

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:08.720
<v Speaker 8>if not explicitly, then on a gut level, this is unfair.

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 8>I can sense when I'm watching an unfair fight. When

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 8>I watch a prize fight between two boxers and the

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 8>ref keeps stepping in when the one starts pummeling the other,

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 8>but not when it goes the other way, I know something.

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 8>I know one person is in an inferior position when

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:27.959
<v Speaker 8>it comes to a fair contest, and I naturally start

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 8>to feel some empathy for that person and actually at

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 8>the same time disdain for the two pummelers or in

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 8>this case, the three of them. And so ultimately today

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 8>I feel like they could have gone so far that

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 8>the backlash will be against them and Kamala Harris as

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 8>opposed to against Donald Trump, who took the beating.

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I also think that for a lot of people

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>who sit and watch it live, I'm I'm entirely sure

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that everyone sits there forever because these things. I don't

0:46:57.440 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>know why they're on side light. I know, sort of

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>prime time differently in different countries, but it feels like

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this thing keeps going so late, and I reckon if

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:06.839
<v Speaker 1>you're watching the first thirty minutes, I just couldn't help

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but think that this wasn't just the Team Blue World

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>versus the Team Red World. I think there was a

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an idea where like, maybe just as

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a bloke, but I was watching and watching the whole passive,

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>aggressive facial nonsense from her, which was all, Oh, he's

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:26.879
<v Speaker 1>so crazy, he's so unbelievable. Oh really all of that.

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It was like, Man, this is not divorce court, Okay,

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I get it you don't like him, but the idea

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's.

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 12>Just such a supercilious, such a supercilious figure.

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:38.320
<v Speaker 1>That why is he even here.

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, he's here because he actually won a nomination, not

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 12>like you, where you and your mates, you know, put

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 12>Biden out of his misery and then you slid in

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 12>and the media's pretended that you're.

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 5>Not who you are.

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 8>Oh, I'm dying to talk to you about this more.

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 8>Because in this contest it's boiled down to male versus female.

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 8>It's not to say Trump does of millions of female

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 8>supporters and she has millions of male supporters too, but

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 8>at the edges, like, what's making the difference in this

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.799
<v Speaker 8>race are the men are going overwhelmingly for Trump by

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 8>some fifteen point margin, and women are going by a

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 8>ten point margin for Kamala Harris. And I was looking

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:20.959
<v Speaker 8>at this thinking what man is looking at that saying.

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I might sit it out.

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 8>On an election day. I might be busy, might be

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 8>too busy to get to the polls. I feel like

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 8>most men are watching that saying I can't wait to

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 8>vote against her? What man watching the Oh? And this

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:37.319
<v Speaker 8>is my favorite?

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 13>Oh place place right like I feel like most men

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 13>had their balls busted by this kind of a very

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 13>annoying woman, and probably now more than ever can't wait

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 13>to rush to the polls and vote against her.

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You tell me, Megan, we love you. I want everyone

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:58.240
<v Speaker 1>every day watched the show. You can find it on YouTube.

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Serious ax saying if you got it, eat on an

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.439
<v Speaker 1>eightive VPN in Australia right now. Bit the busses don't

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>know that. Megan love you to say you.

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Great.

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 7>To see you too, Paul, see you next week.