Speaker 1: The outside.
Speaker 2: Good morning and welcome to outsiders the show that is
Speaker 2: the globalist fantasies of one world government and decisions affecting
Speaker 2: all our lives being taken by sinister unelected bureaucrats.
Speaker 1: Held bent on power.
Speaker 2: What Penny Wong is to reassuring us all that we
Speaker 2: are safe from the above, And now have the honor
Speaker 2: to invite Senator the Honorable Penny Wong, Minister for Foreign Affairs,
Speaker 2: on behalf of the Prime Minister of Australia.
Speaker 3: Yes, while we were all busy with the imploding coalition,
Speaker 3: last week, Australia joined the globalist elites and signed us
Speaker 3: up to the World Health Organizations Global Pandemic Agreement.
Speaker 4: COVID nineteen crystallized in the archiest of terms what we
Speaker 4: already know to be true. Global challenges require collective action.
Speaker 4: That's why the world came together with a shared ambition
Speaker 4: to act on hard earned lessons, to work towards an
Speaker 4: agreement to reduce the risk of future pandemics and make
Speaker 4: the world safer for everyone, no matter who you are
Speaker 4: or where you live. Because we know these health emergencies
Speaker 4: don't recognize national borders.
Speaker 5: Oh, I feel safer already yes, there you have it
Speaker 5: in one fell swoop, the globalist fantasy of a global
Speaker 5: health bureaucracy with who knows what potential to potentially overrule
Speaker 5: national governments. Thank you so much, Prime Minister.
Speaker 4: Adopting this agreement not only affirms our shared commitment to
Speaker 4: action guarded by principles of equity, it also demonstrates the
Speaker 4: value of the international community working together to find solutions
Speaker 4: to shared global challenges.
Speaker 1: Australia is proud.
Speaker 4: To have served as the vice chair of the Intergovernmental
Speaker 4: Negotiating Body for the Pandemic Agreement, representing our diverse Western
Speaker 4: Pacific region, and I commend all negotiators for their hard work.
Speaker 4: I also thank Director General TETROS, World Health Organization staff,
Speaker 4: and UN and civil society colleagues and other stakeholders for
Speaker 4: your support and contribution to this agreement.
Speaker 3: Needless to say, it was only Donald Trump who refused
Speaker 3: to sign up the US to this monstrosity.
Speaker 5: And speaking of monstrosities, we also learned this week that
Speaker 5: the Biden administration, remember those guys, were classifying as domestic
Speaker 5: extremists and putting on terror watchlists, among others, those who
Speaker 5: opposed the COVID mandates.
Speaker 6: And while Some of the examples that are focused on
Speaker 6: there have to do with those who opposed the COVID
Speaker 6: vaccine mandates. Those who opposed the mask mandates, parents who
Speaker 6: were concerned that their children going to school may be
Speaker 6: forcibly vaccinated at the COVID vaccine without the concenter awareness
Speaker 6: of parents.
Speaker 2: Penny Wong has just signed us up, you and me
Speaker 2: and all of us to the World Health Organization's Global
Speaker 2: Pandemic Agreement. What an absolute disgrace. Will we wait for
Speaker 2: whatever horrors that might entail in the years to come.
Speaker 1: Let's grab the latest outside as news.
Speaker 2: Well, Richard James, a week of the coalitions struggling around
Speaker 2: are they together?
Speaker 1: Are they not together? Who's to blame? Who did what wrong?
Speaker 3: And all?
Speaker 2: It's been a shambles, But maybe they're getting their act together.
Speaker 1: What do you think, Rita.
Speaker 3: Well, from the outside, it looks like the Liberals have
Speaker 3: capitulated and agreed to those four non negotiables essentially that
Speaker 3: the National said they needed to see in place before
Speaker 3: they would sign up the coalition. It's just been very
Speaker 3: confusing a week because at one stage we were told,
Speaker 3: oh no, no, Susan Lee's not wanting to have this
Speaker 3: coalition reformed. It's going to be three years before there's
Speaker 3: another agreement, and then within a couple of days. It
Speaker 3: seems like we're on the verge of the coalition being reformed.
Speaker 3: And I think the Nationals for non negotiables, a couple
Speaker 3: of them might form city folks seem a bit strange,
Speaker 3: but I think they speak to their electorate and given
Speaker 3: that the Nationals are the ones who actually performed well
Speaker 3: at the election, they've got a fair bit of leverage.
Speaker 5: James Well, yes and no, because I think that all
Speaker 5: of this really looks really, really bad for David Little Proud.
Speaker 5: You know, let's not forget David Little Proud is the
Speaker 5: guy who led them into this whole disastrous situation where
Speaker 5: they wound up pulling the pin on the coalition. Now.
Speaker 5: I don't really think that the four issues that we're
Speaker 5: talking about, aside from nuclear were really the approximate reasons
Speaker 5: why this whole thing blew up. You know, the party
Speaker 5: room dynamic so of the National Party is very interesting
Speaker 5: sort of thing. Matt Canavan, I understand, challenge for leadership
Speaker 5: came closer than David Little Proud thought he was going to.
Speaker 5: David Little Proud, who was just on Andrew Clenell just
Speaker 5: now basically forced through this whole de merger of the
Speaker 5: Coalition in an attempt to hold on to his own power.
Speaker 5: So the whole thing I think, you know, with him
Speaker 5: going back, but when he goes back and then you
Speaker 5: know has to go and beg Susan Leigh to take
Speaker 5: them back, you know, I think that he's actually really
Speaker 5: weakened in the long run the National's position so long
Speaker 5: as at least David Little Proud remains leader. And the
Speaker 5: big question now is who comes next. Does Little Proud
Speaker 5: stay as leader or does the party room now look
Speaker 5: at him as having led them up the garden path
Speaker 5: on going to this merger and spill him for somebody else.
Speaker 2: But the first thing to say is that Little Prowd
Speaker 2: did lead the Nationals or was pushed by the National
Speaker 2: party room into the Voice, which was terrific and that
Speaker 2: had terrific results. So a bit of backbone is a
Speaker 2: good thing to see. But the real issue here, Rita
Speaker 2: and James, in my opinion is net zero. That's the
Speaker 2: elephant in the room, and all this is just shadow
Speaker 2: dancing around that issue. Now, the two leaders Susan Lee
Speaker 2: and David Little Proud are on the left of both
Speaker 2: their parties, on the wetter side, the bed wedding side.
Speaker 2: They clearly are still clinging on.
Speaker 1: To net zero. Susan Lee obviously is of that faction.
Speaker 1: David Little Proud just talking to Andrew clene Leans.
Speaker 2: Equivocating but basically, oh, yes, very important that we cut emissions.
Speaker 1: Nonsense, absolute nonsense.
Speaker 2: The rest of the world is abandoning net zero, abandoning
Speaker 2: the idea of cutting emissions. Donald Trump is attacking Kirs Starmer.
Speaker 2: We've had the New Zealanders abandoning it. Everyone is moving
Speaker 2: away from this. The single most important issue that the
Speaker 2: Nationals and the Liberals and the Coalition all have to
Speaker 2: decide is where do they abandon net zero? If they
Speaker 2: want to win the next election, they have to. There
Speaker 2: is no other issue. The rest of this is smoke
Speaker 2: and mirrors.
Speaker 7: In opinion, I agree hundred on that.
Speaker 3: It is interesting though that both Susan Lee and David
Speaker 3: Little Pratt on the left of their respective parties. They
Speaker 3: don't get along, they don't like each other, and I
Speaker 3: think that dynamic has also played a role in this.
Speaker 3: But yeah, there's all sorts of another leadership challenge. A
Speaker 3: bunch of names being thrown up, not just Matt Canavan,
Speaker 3: but we're talking about.
Speaker 5: Michael McCormick has certainly Barnby Joyce said that he would
Speaker 5: back Michael McCormick the are for was reporter.
Speaker 2: We've got Matt Canavan on the show shortly, so we'll
Speaker 2: be putting all those questions to Matt.
Speaker 1: But let's also talk about that.
Speaker 2: The fact you've got, for example, Zoe Daniel, who is.
Speaker 3: Now well, I've got to say I am as as
Speaker 3: as someone who lives in the electorate of Goldstein. I'm
Speaker 3: very scared because so Daniel is well, she's undermining democracy.
Speaker 3: She's I think you know this is a call it.
Speaker 1: A So she's refusing to acknowledge defeat. Well, she's she's
Speaker 1: an election denier.
Speaker 8: She appears to be an election denial.
Speaker 3: She seems to be refusing to accept the reality that
Speaker 3: the votes have been counted. It's more than one hundred votes,
Speaker 3: it's not going to trigger an automatic recount, and she's
Speaker 3: still not conceding to this day. So everyone's announced that
Speaker 3: the Australian Electoral Commission her terrified because this is the
Speaker 3: sort of election denial that is a threat.
Speaker 9: This is a threatmoscopes, you know, but saying that this
Speaker 9: is not the Australian way.
Speaker 3: This is yeah, this is I don't know. I think
Speaker 3: we're in a constitutional crisis.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, So it'll be June sixth. We won't have January sixth.
Speaker 2: Behind the Zoe Dan taking Parliament by.
Speaker 5: Storm Chip Wilson's electorate office.
Speaker 2: But there is one very very big issue which was
Speaker 2: touch has been touched on and talked about this week,
Speaker 2: which is critical. Is this unrealized tax on capital gains.
Speaker 2: Unrealized capital gains tax on your superannuation. This is the
Speaker 2: super accounts over three million. It's unindexed, which means as
Speaker 2: the years go by, more and more people fall into
Speaker 2: that bracket, particularly younger people who underware of what awaits them.
Speaker 2: Unrealized capital gains is the reverse of capitalism.
Speaker 1: It is the.
Speaker 2: Absolute nadea, if you like, of how communism and socialism
Speaker 2: is permeating through our economic system. James, we have this
Speaker 2: idea that the Australian Tax Office can just conjure up
Speaker 2: out of thin air whatever profits they say we made
Speaker 2: and then tax you on it.
Speaker 5: This is so sinister and I want to walk everybody
Speaker 5: through why this is so sinister, because we're starting to
Speaker 5: see a lot of pushback in the media now, you know,
Speaker 5: i'bviously Jim Chalmers offices out there briefing journalists and say no, no, no,
Speaker 5: it's not that big adeal. It is a really really
Speaker 5: really big deal for a number of reasons, not just
Speaker 5: the fact that it is going to tax unrealized games.
Speaker 5: That is to say, gains that you know, might be
Speaker 5: valued in something that's not liquid like shares, but you're
Speaker 5: gonna have to be a tax on and which may
Speaker 5: go down in the future. So if you've invested in
Speaker 5: a business, a small business, if your farm is structured,
Speaker 5: and a lot of people in the agricultural industry have
Speaker 5: their farm structured through super for this very reason, that's
Speaker 5: all over the family farm, you know. And again we
Speaker 5: know how much left wing governments hate independent family farms.
Speaker 5: They just you know, they want to destroy them in
Speaker 5: every sort of which way they can. But you know,
Speaker 5: beyond that too, the way the regulations are written. And
Speaker 5: if you read Robert Cottlebson in the Australian on this stuff,
Speaker 5: he's really really good, he's really scary. The regulations that
Speaker 5: are going to enable this shift are written in such
Speaker 5: a loose way guys, that they could eventually go and
Speaker 5: turnaround and be used to tax other asset classes, including
Speaker 5: the family home. So this is the real citizen. And
Speaker 5: they say, oh, this is small, this is reasonable. It's
Speaker 5: just a few people at the very top end. But
Speaker 5: it's not just the indexation, and we know how bad
Speaker 5: indexation is. But it is also the fact that once
Speaker 5: they wedge in this little principle, then I guarantee you
Speaker 5: the next step is going to be the family home.
Speaker 5: And they are going to use the intergenerational resentment they
Speaker 5: have been stoking over home ownership to come after people
Speaker 5: who have earned money in the home that they paid
Speaker 5: for and that they are planning on using the wealth
Speaker 5: that's grown out of that for their retirement. And it
Speaker 5: is extremely sinister stuff and it is going to be divisive,
Speaker 5: and it is going to be used for an intergenerational
Speaker 5: scare campaign the likes you've never seen to keep labor
Speaker 5: bolted in power.
Speaker 3: Just watching fastly the sort of class warfare, the politics
Speaker 3: of envy that the left absolutely adore, and they're going
Speaker 3: to press ahead with it. And given that the Greens
Speaker 3: have the control in the upper House, the balance of
Speaker 3: power then this is going to get through quite easy.
Speaker 7: They don't even need to negotiate with anybody else.
Speaker 2: And we know the Greens are talking of lowering thats.
Speaker 3: Were like this applied to the family home today, they
Speaker 3: would like it to be applied to other investment vehicles,
Speaker 3: whether that's property or other assets outside of your super
Speaker 3: So this is something that I think really throughout the
Speaker 3: election campaign that Coalition fail to articulate their position, articulate
Speaker 3: what a danger this is, and people kind of just thought, ah, well,
Speaker 3: that's for very wealthy people with more than three million
Speaker 3: in their soup aid doesn't apply to me, so who cares?
Speaker 3: You should care because it will apply to others, and
Speaker 3: even applying to the asset classes it applies to now,
Speaker 3: it's going to be so bad for investment.
Speaker 10: So it's so short sighted.
Speaker 3: For a little bit for a cash grab, not a
Speaker 3: little bit a significant cash crops.
Speaker 5: It is a risk, It is an absolute risk to
Speaker 5: and at a time when we need real capital certainty
Speaker 5: and we want to attract capital from around the globe.
Speaker 5: I can tell you that there's a number of people
Speaker 5: in this country who have a lot of money, serious money,
Speaker 5: who also have a number of passports that are saying
Speaker 5: do I stay here? Do I stay in Australia because
Speaker 5: the risk here to my money, this government and I
Speaker 5: just too great.
Speaker 2: Let me just throw in a couple more things into
Speaker 2: that mix. Reata, which you're absolutely right about. Why this
Speaker 2: is a magic pudding is that labor bringing in millions
Speaker 2: of people. They're just flooding our cities with more and
Speaker 2: more people. So what that does is that inflates This is.
Speaker 1: Magic putting and stuff.
Speaker 2: It inflates the values of property beyond what they're actually worth.
Speaker 2: The tax office then comes in and says, oh, see
Speaker 2: how your property has gone up. Okay, we'll take a
Speaker 2: huge chunk of that, thank.
Speaker 1: You very much. And money doesn't exist. So the money
Speaker 1: doesn't exist.
Speaker 2: It's a fake money, it's a fake tact because what
Speaker 2: we are doing in this country is we're driving out
Speaker 2: genuine investment right and we're replacing it with fantasy economics.
Speaker 2: This is what this is what this election has led to,
Speaker 2: and what Reta says about the Coalition failing to prosecute
Speaker 2: is this show was one of the very few that
Speaker 2: repeatedly raised unrealized capital gains on super throughout the election
Speaker 2: and the Coalition failed to destroy labor, which they could
Speaker 2: have done on this.
Speaker 5: Very and what a contrast from twenty nineteen twenty twenty twelve.
Speaker 5: You know, remember when the Coalition absolutely hammered and destroyed
Speaker 5: Bill Shorten over frankin credit, which were something that nobody
Speaker 5: even understood at the time. But everybody's got superannuation, so
Speaker 5: this one should have been a real walk up start
Speaker 5: and everybody either owns or wants to own a family home.
Speaker 5: They should have just been like, this is an absolute
Speaker 5: tax on aspiration, it is a tax on growth, and
Speaker 5: this is what labor is all about. And now Albanezy
Speaker 5: goes into this, Chalmers goes into this with what ninety
Speaker 5: ninety one ninety three seats, however many seats they wind
Speaker 5: up with, and they think they've got all of this
Speaker 5: political care capital they are going to go they held
Speaker 5: for leather in this Parliament and it won't just be
Speaker 5: this just you wait, the attack on capital and all
Speaker 5: of it's going to be the other thing they're going
Speaker 5: to do. Just watch readA just watch this reader though too,
Speaker 5: because even if you don't have three million dollars, they're
Speaker 5: also going to say, oh, there's this huge part of
Speaker 5: money out there in everybody is super and we want
Speaker 5: to just say, hey, use this for some of our
Speaker 5: nation building projects, uses for infrastructure, users for build to rent.
Speaker 5: They tell you what to do with this. This is socialism.
Speaker 10: This is what.
Speaker 3: Happens when you've got one side who's terrified to fight
Speaker 3: and wants to pretend to be labor light and right
Speaker 3: now listening to the idiot pundits who don't want them
Speaker 3: to do well, who are telling them to via further left,
Speaker 3: to be even more labor light, to be even more unelectable.
Speaker 7: And if you're going to do that, this is what happens.
Speaker 3: Because labor does have a mandate they want in a landslide,
Speaker 3: they have a mandate.
Speaker 10: To push ahead with these.
Speaker 8: Policies just very quickly.
Speaker 2: The soldier over the opposition is to destroy the government,
Speaker 2: bring it down on argument on philosophy, on economics, and
Speaker 2: they fail to do that. But to mimic them is
Speaker 2: the greatest crime against the Australian people. And the Coalitions
Speaker 2: stand utterly condemned for the failure to fight, fight, fight,
Speaker 2: which they should have done at the last election, as
Speaker 2: they did in the Voice and when they.
Speaker 5: Weren't absolutely but the thing is too. You know, this
Speaker 5: country net zero is a very good example of this,
Speaker 5: but it's not the only thing. This whole country here.
Speaker 5: Greg Sheridan had a great piece in the Australia this
Speaker 5: week and he talked about how this is a great
Speaker 5: nation that is headed for mediocrity and there are so
Speaker 5: many ways. Education, the economy, the growing share of government,
Speaker 5: the way ndies is eating up absolutely everything, the way
Speaker 5: the deficit is going to eat up absolutely everything, and
Speaker 5: there's nobody left everything. We're going to turn into Victoria nationally, Rita.
Speaker 5: I know you talk about Victoria a little bit later
Speaker 5: on in the program, but you know, this whole country,
Speaker 5: our luck is going to run out as a lucky
Speaker 5: country if we're not careful. This is what This is
Speaker 5: why the opposition, this is why the coalition needs to
Speaker 5: stop having all of these internal fights over you know,
Speaker 5: oh is it you know, dam it or Michael or
Speaker 5: Susan or Agus or ever, and get together and stop
Speaker 5: talking about themselves because nobody cares. They need to start
Speaker 5: talking to the people.
Speaker 2: They're heading down the wrong already, they are heading it.
Speaker 3: And the personalities matter because if you've got people in
Speaker 3: leadership roles who have no principles who just look at
Speaker 3: focus groups, who don't actually have an ideological basis for
Speaker 3: why they entered politics and.
Speaker 7: What they want to achieve.
Speaker 3: Then you have this labor light mismash of nonsense that
Speaker 3: nobody wants. We've already got a Labor Party, we've already
Speaker 3: got a Greens. We need an alternative, and you've got
Speaker 3: to give people a clear alternative. And since was a
Speaker 3: twenty twenty one when the Coalition adopted net zero, they've
Speaker 3: been smashed into landslide election losses. Like how much more
Speaker 3: proof do you need that this is not working for you?
Speaker 3: Because when you've got a cost of living election, and
Speaker 3: energy is such a huge basis of that, and you
Speaker 3: can't fight that properly because you've signed up to the
Speaker 3: same madness as Labor and the Greens, then what are
Speaker 3: you going to do? And the other thing that is
Speaker 3: so frustrating with the Coalition is that they know what's
Speaker 3: happening in America.
Speaker 7: They know that Trump.
Speaker 3: Is slashing corporate tax, he's slashing regulations, He's making it
Speaker 3: very attractive for businesses to invest in the US. That's
Speaker 3: the entire platform America first, And if you've got companies
Speaker 3: that are looking at where we're going to invest.
Speaker 10: So we're going to go to Australia with.
Speaker 3: All that red tape, black tape, green tape, the high taxes,
Speaker 3: or are we going to go to the US We're
Speaker 3: going to have the red carpet treatment. Think about it
Speaker 3: like this affects everybody. It's not just the big end
Speaker 3: of town. It's going to cost jobs. It's going to
Speaker 3: see our living standards further compromise, and all.
Speaker 2: Of this something I just go correctly to your to
Speaker 2: your Greg Sheridan piece, which was a very good piece.
Speaker 2: As you say, he made the point for the first
Speaker 2: time in print we've seen.
Speaker 1: What we've been saying on this show for years.
Speaker 2: Is that every time the Coalition go down the path
Speaker 2: of we believe in climate change, we believe in climate change,
Speaker 2: they lose, and every time they stand against the madness
Speaker 2: of the climate change orthodoxy.
Speaker 5: They win.
Speaker 2: Greg Sheridan was the first commentates a serious one I've
Speaker 2: seen to put that fact there in.
Speaker 1: Print in front of the coalition.
Speaker 2: Every time you back climate change, you lose. And every
Speaker 2: time you say no, no, no, no, this that this
Speaker 2: climate change stuff has gone too far, you win.
Speaker 5: Is it to understand about this. So you know what
Speaker 5: people don't get here, and this is exactly right we are.
Speaker 5: You know this is we've de industrialized this country. The
Speaker 5: future of the global economy it's AIS. I was just
Speaker 5: in America. The Americans I was talking to you said,
Speaker 5: AI is high tech, but it's also heavy industry. We
Speaker 5: need the power of the energy if we're going to
Speaker 5: be part that revolution and have a slight to that part,
Speaker 5: otherwise we're going to be left behind.
Speaker 3: Well, it's fantastic that it's now in print what we've
Speaker 3: been saying on this program week in and week out.
Speaker 7: For five years, five years at least.
Speaker 8: But the polling even bears this out, even.
Speaker 3: If you're so focused on focus groups and polls, Well,
Speaker 3: the polling shows that when you give the Australian people
Speaker 3: the choice between emission cuts and affordability and reliability, affordability
Speaker 3: is always number one. Always, it is what people care about,
Speaker 3: and particularly when we've got a cost of living crisis.
Speaker 3: So for the Coalition to be so gutless not to
Speaker 3: say we're going to fight.
Speaker 11: This, We're going to talk.
Speaker 1: This is the hill we're going to die on. This
Speaker 1: is what we're going to win.
Speaker 2: The next selection on the IPA have a poll out
Speaker 2: showing fifty eight percent of people Australians are kind of
Speaker 2: ambivalent about net zero. They don't want to be paying
Speaker 2: for it. Let's go to Matt Canavan, a Senator. Matt Canavan,
Speaker 2: great to see you. Matt's up in Rocky fantastic.
Speaker 1: I recognized it immediately. Matt.
Speaker 2: Well, let's let's ask the obvious question, because why aren't
Speaker 2: you the leader of the NATS.
Speaker 12: Well, I'm not the leader because I lost by how
Speaker 12: much you got to have the numbers? I don't know.
Speaker 12: I don't know you want to find out, because I
Speaker 12: knew you'd ask and have to lie, and we don't
Speaker 12: tell people. We keep that to ourselves and respect the room.
Speaker 12: But it was, it was. It was a worthwhile effort
Speaker 12: having a go, and I thank all the people, all
Speaker 12: your viewers, the outsiders definitely got behind me and gave
Speaker 12: it a good show. And I certainly think you know
Speaker 12: we've moved to debait. That's that's the most important thing
Speaker 12: to me, wasn't I didn't really run to become leader.
Speaker 12: I ran to end our ridiculous support of this crazy
Speaker 12: idea of net zero. Now, obviously that fight continues. I
Speaker 12: haven't quite got there yet, but I had good conversations
Speaker 12: with my colleagues about that. I'm sure there will be
Speaker 12: a reflection on that policy at some point while we're
Speaker 12: in opposition here because it's ruining our country. James just
Speaker 12: mentioned it there, how it's de industrializing our nation. We've
Speaker 12: lost our fertilizer industries and plastics industries and nickel industry
Speaker 12: just in the first three years of net zero. I mean,
Speaker 12: how much more punishment can our manufacturing sector take before
Speaker 12: we wake up to ourselves and see that the rest
Speaker 12: of the world is not doing the stuff New Zealand's
Speaker 12: just dropped out. Why don't we actually start looking after
Speaker 12: Australians for a change first?
Speaker 3: So why wasn't net zero one of the four non
Speaker 3: negotiables on the table? Why are we talking about almost
Speaker 3: side issues when the number one issue is.
Speaker 7: The net zero?
Speaker 3: There is the majority of the Nationals Party room still
Speaker 3: in support of net zero.
Speaker 12: Look, we haven't had that debate yet, return suggest I'm.
Speaker 3: Can I suggest.
Speaker 12: Without breaching confidence of the room. I said to people,
Speaker 12: I said to people, don't vote for me unless you
Speaker 12: wanted to scrap net zero. I mean I was running
Speaker 12: on a single issue. You know, if you want to
Speaker 12: get ridden in and zero vote for me. Now, I
Speaker 12: do think, as I say, there's a willingness to open
Speaker 12: this up. There's a question about when and how we
Speaker 12: do that. So maybe I was a battering round that
Speaker 12: was too soon on that issue, but it will have
Speaker 12: the debate. I mean in terms of why it's not
Speaker 12: one of the four I'm I'm not the leader and
Speaker 12: not putting these things, but it comes back to the
Speaker 12: fact that, well, we haven't had this debate yet. We
Speaker 12: haven't adopted a position on net zero since the election
Speaker 12: as the national party room, so you know, a leader
Speaker 12: can't take that forward without the authority of the room.
Speaker 12: I do give credit to David Little Brady has been
Speaker 12: very involved with our party room and those four points
Speaker 12: we have put forward are ones that we all support
Speaker 12: and have supported for a long time, and he's been
Speaker 12: pretty resolute. I think in putting those forward to the
Speaker 12: Liberal Party, glad that we have got to a point
Speaker 12: of common sense here. But yeah, I've always been one
Speaker 12: this week trying to introduce a level of calmness into
Speaker 12: this issue that it's not wouldn't be the first time
Speaker 12: a coalition had to break. Probably won't be the last time.
Speaker 12: We've got plenty of time to work these things out.
Speaker 12: Right now, it seems to me that media has got
Speaker 12: far too much focused on a shadow ministry, which, let's
Speaker 12: face it, is pretty irrelevant in the next parliament. That's
Speaker 12: I'm sorry to be front and honest with my colleagues,
Speaker 12: but we're kind of irrelevant right now. We're almost irrelevant
Speaker 12: the Senate, certainly in the House. We've got to get
Speaker 12: our own act together that the way we become relevant
Speaker 12: again is adopting a set of policies that are going
Speaker 12: to win the support of the Australian people. It doesn't
Speaker 12: matter who's in which particular shadow ministerial position. Right now,
Speaker 12: we lost, We got thumped and we've got to think
Speaker 12: about how we cannot get bumped again.
Speaker 5: Sure, Matt, I mean, look about five minutes ago, I
Speaker 5: don't know if you heard, I was saying that the
Speaker 5: Coalition needs to stop talking about itself and start talking about,
Speaker 5: you know, what it's going to do for the Australian people.
Speaker 5: I'm going to reverse Carot on that though for a
Speaker 5: second and ask you, though you know, is David little proud?
Speaker 5: Is he tenable do you think as a leader, because
Speaker 5: I know an awful lot of Nats feel like that
Speaker 5: party room meeting over Zoom was called with a lot
Speaker 5: of promises and sort of felt everybody sort of felt
Speaker 5: a bit let up the garden path on this and
Speaker 5: that is going to be you know, now, if this
Speaker 5: break continues, or if there's no resolved tension between you
Speaker 5: and you know, your liberal party room colleagues, there's going
Speaker 5: to be no real ability to take on labor for
Speaker 5: the next six years potentially, during which time an awful
Speaker 5: lot of damage is going to be done. And what
Speaker 5: do you start to do beyond these four policies to
Speaker 5: start to say, look, we're serious. We want to reduce
Speaker 5: the size of government, we want to reduce tax, we
Speaker 5: want to reduce the impulsive government and get out of
Speaker 5: people's way, which is what the coalition really should be about.
Speaker 12: Well, I think David's been great over the past way
Speaker 12: becaus I said earlier, he's showing the great strength and
Speaker 12: resolution here to put these issues forward. It was all
Speaker 12: discussed with all of our colleagues. I'm not going to
Speaker 12: go into the details of a party or a meeting,
Speaker 12: but we had those meetings. We went forward with that strategy,
Speaker 12: it looks like a reasonable outcome has been achieved, although
Speaker 12: there's still of course details to work out here. But
Speaker 12: I go back to where you started the question that
Speaker 12: the focus should be on the istral people. And while yes,
Speaker 12: I very much think this issue of zero missions is
Speaker 12: even more important than those four points, the other four
Speaker 12: points we're putting forward are very important as well, to
Speaker 12: our people, to competition in our retail markets, to the
Speaker 12: use of energy resources like uranium. So these are really
Speaker 12: important matters to work through as well, and we've shown strengths.
Speaker 12: So look, these policies are much more important than the
Speaker 12: relationship that we have with people in Canberra, and I
Speaker 12: think that's what's most important. I mean, you know, like
Speaker 12: you mentioned, I think you mentioned your question. There's a
Speaker 12: lot of it. But the question that we mentioned about, well,
Speaker 12: will we not be able to take it up to
Speaker 12: labor And I've heard some people say.
Speaker 13: That losing Matt there, I think the the NBN not
Speaker 13: doing this job properly.
Speaker 1: We'll get back to Matt if it comes back up,
Speaker 1: we'll take a short break.
Speaker 2: We'd come back lots more here on outsiders Back in
Speaker 2: a tick. Great to get you back Matt, you're watching Outsiders.
Speaker 2: Senator Matt Tanavan from the Nationals is with us from Rockhampton. Matt,
Speaker 2: have a look at Listen to Patricia Carvellis from the
Speaker 2: ABC questioning your colleague, what exactly take a question?
Speaker 8: I feel like there's a lot of blokes that.
Speaker 1: Have been asking questions.
Speaker 14: Be nice if I coul ask the question.
Speaker 1: Tricia carvellows, thank you very much. I've just observed this
Speaker 1: too many blokes, Matt, too many blokes asking questions.
Speaker 2: The ABC clearly feel that there's misogyny at work there
Speaker 2: in the corridors.
Speaker 3: Little Proud is obviously an unrepentant text.
Speaker 1: Can you say, mate, put her out of a misery?
Speaker 12: Oh look, how you actually get along with Patricia?
Speaker 15: Really?
Speaker 6: Well?
Speaker 12: I get along with everybody. Maybe it's just a I
Speaker 12: think she was probably just joking.
Speaker 3: There, but well, in that look, I had to look
Speaker 3: at it, Matt. And the first question was asked by
Speaker 3: a woman. The question immediately before Patricia was asked by
Speaker 3: I think there was five women who asked or five
Speaker 3: questions asked by women before that question by Pratucias. They
Speaker 3: weren't being silence as far as I could tell.
Speaker 12: But Rata rata.
Speaker 16: What is a woman A lot You're making a lot
Speaker 16: of judgments there not just quickly, just have to double
Speaker 16: check which women which was actually.
Speaker 5: I just want to confirm with you real quickly. I
Speaker 5: am told by one of our viewers who has two
Speaker 5: screens on, one watching us and one watching the ABC
Speaker 5: Insiders that Kevin Hogan has told the Insiders that net
Speaker 5: zero is National's policy and confirmed that is this in
Speaker 5: fact National's policy to stick with net zero.
Speaker 12: Well, look, as I said, we haven't had a discussion
Speaker 12: since the election on it. To typically, what the situation
Speaker 12: has been is that we have policies that we preves
Speaker 12: he had continued to be our policies until we change them. Now,
Speaker 12: it has been a little bit strange since the election
Speaker 12: that both Susan Lay and David little Proud have said
Speaker 12: will be reviewing a bunch of policies, including IT zero.
Speaker 12: David Little Proud did say that, and my understanding the
Speaker 12: Nationals Party will have a debate on this issue very
Speaker 12: soon and so that's what I'll be focused on, as
Speaker 12: I say, focused on the people and just on that.
Speaker 12: I was actually invited to come on Insiders as well,
Speaker 12: but it passed with you guys. Thank you, thank you
Speaker 12: very much, outsider.
Speaker 2: And the good news is people will actually see you, Matt,
Speaker 2: which is even better, so that's great news as well. Now, listen,
Speaker 2: let's quickly ask you as well about this unrealized capital
Speaker 2: gains tax on super because this is the other big
Speaker 2: issue which wasn't prosecuted properly during the election. We did
Speaker 2: chat about it, but the Coalition didn't really take it
Speaker 2: up to Labor on this.
Speaker 1: This is really Sinnis to stuff.
Speaker 11: Matt.
Speaker 1: What's your thoughts on it.
Speaker 12: Well, it's another big new to tax for people. In
Speaker 12: other new tax form for them, they're going to have
Speaker 12: to fill out not just an income tax form, but
Speaker 12: every year, regardless of whether you're sell anything or not,
Speaker 12: you're going to have to fill out a capital gainst
Speaker 12: tax form and you're going to have to pay capital
Speaker 12: gains whether you have a cash flow or not. And
Speaker 12: this is not just another big tax from the Labor Party.
Speaker 12: It is one of the most inequitable and unfair taxes
Speaker 12: that could be designed, because you will be imposing a
Speaker 12: tax liability on people to do not have the means
Speaker 12: to pay for it. Some people in these situations will
Speaker 12: be farmers that may not have a lot of income,
Speaker 12: they may have drought years, and they'll be hit potentially
Speaker 12: with a capital gains tax. That's the value of their
Speaker 12: farm goes up of course if they don't sell it,
Speaker 12: and they've got that in super but they don't sell it,
Speaker 12: they've got no cash to pay that tax bill. How
Speaker 12: are they going to do it? And this makes no
Speaker 12: sense whatsoever. And you've got pretty much everybody across the
Speaker 12: political spectrum that has any knowledge of finance arguing against this,
Speaker 12: including lots of Ken Henry, who's hardly usually a support
Speaker 12: of the Liberal and National parties. But maybe you know,
Speaker 12: I don't think Jim Chalmers knows a lot about finance.
Speaker 12: He says he's going.
Speaker 5: To agree, but I think we've seen.
Speaker 12: In economics so maybe he should be listening to some
Speaker 12: of these people actually understand how this sort of stuff
Speaker 12: works and how attacks like this could do enormous damage
Speaker 12: not just to individual people, but also to our broader
Speaker 12: economy and investment environment as well. And I think our
Speaker 12: economy we are, from what I hear from business since
Speaker 12: the election, were a real risk of a recession very
Speaker 12: soon because this government has failed to fix productivity, interest rates,
Speaker 12: remain elevated despite the cut this week. Louis should not
Speaker 12: be adding things like this right now and increasing the
Speaker 12: risk of a recession.
Speaker 2: And it also puts a huge risk on farmers apparently,
Speaker 2: as James was saying before, if you start fantasizing about
Speaker 2: what that increased unrealized capital gains on your farm is,
Speaker 2: you're in all sorts of trouble.
Speaker 1: Rita.
Speaker 3: But I think that's part of the point. I think
Speaker 3: they want people to sell down their acid bases. But
Speaker 3: on a different issue, the World Health Organization's Global Pandemic Agreement,
Speaker 3: Australia has now signed up to that.
Speaker 8: Again another big.
Speaker 7: Issue that we did not even hear from the.
Speaker 3: Coalition really throughout the election campaign, and of course we
Speaker 3: knew if Labour one they were going to sign us
Speaker 3: up to this madness. What's that going to mean for
Speaker 3: the country potentially, Well.
Speaker 12: Look, it still ultimately comes down to the sovereignty of
Speaker 12: every government. This agreement doesn't, I know, those different views
Speaker 12: of it doesn't make a government do stuff. But the
Speaker 12: concern I've got is will be an excuse for governments
Speaker 12: to do things that they want to do anyway. And
Speaker 12: so what we really need now is make sure we've
Speaker 12: got the parliamentary accountability in place to stop these kind
Speaker 12: of things happening or highlight them happen before they happen,
Speaker 12: unlike we had last time. That will be very difficult
Speaker 12: in the current parliament because even in the Senate you've
Speaker 12: got a laboring majority. But look, well that's what we've
Speaker 12: got to do. That's got to earn my money as
Speaker 12: a cenator still vehicles to do that, and I'll be
Speaker 12: taking up that fight. I was going to say earlier
Speaker 12: before you know, the lack of telecommunication services in the
Speaker 12: Bush cut me off, and that's what we're fighting for them.
Speaker 12: I was going to say earlier that you know, there's
Speaker 12: all this there's all this controversy about oh if we
Speaker 12: don't have a shadow ministry in place, and that we
Speaker 12: can't hold the governmental account. Well, last year in the
Speaker 12: UK they didn't have a shadow ministry for four months.
Speaker 12: In the parliament sat for more than thirty days without
Speaker 12: a shadow ministry and guess what that coincided with the
Speaker 12: biggest drop in popular support for a newly elected government
Speaker 12: in history. So you can hold a governor account through
Speaker 12: the parliament because guess what, you don't have to be
Speaker 12: a shadow minister to ask questions as a senator. You
Speaker 12: don't have to be a shadow minister to go into
Speaker 12: cenate estimates and put the heat on government officials that
Speaker 12: might be trying to sneak stuff like this through without
Speaker 12: proper scrutiny. And so I would ask respect my colleagues
Speaker 12: to worry a little bit less about what position they're
Speaker 12: in and focus more on the position they've already got
Speaker 12: as a member of the Parliament. And your first job
Speaker 12: as that as a member of that parliament is to
Speaker 12: hold the executive to account, whatever position you're in, whatever
Speaker 12: shadow ministry you're in.
Speaker 2: We can do that anyway, and just very quickly, Matt,
Speaker 2: before we go to your point about the UN and
Speaker 2: what the UN will try and do. The World Health
Speaker 2: Organization is basically an arm of the UN.
Speaker 1: Full praise to your colleague David.
Speaker 2: Chris Afouli in Queensland there the premiere for standing up
Speaker 2: to the UN.
Speaker 1: But this is the point.
Speaker 2: He had to stand up to the UN and say, no,
Speaker 2: don't interfere with our crime legislation. I've been voted to
Speaker 2: do this. It's none of your business. But he had
Speaker 2: to stand up. We have a labor government who will
Speaker 2: not stand up to the World Health Organization if they
Speaker 2: start mandating.
Speaker 1: X, Y or Z or you've got to do this
Speaker 1: or you've got to do that.
Speaker 2: We've seen it before, we saw it during COVID, and
Speaker 2: we're going to see it again. We need a strong
Speaker 2: coalition that are prepared to stand up and say no
Speaker 2: to this stuff, as Chris Offulia is doing in Queensland.
Speaker 1: Just very briefly, Matt, Well.
Speaker 12: We need we need outsiders. We need people on the
Speaker 12: outside holding the insiders to account. And so I am
Speaker 12: proudly staying a member of the outsiders, being a leader
Speaker 12: of the National's Party, and look forward to continuing the
Speaker 12: conversation the next few years.
Speaker 2: Fantastic Matt, had a great day there up in Rockhampton.
Speaker 2: Great to have Matt Canavan on the show as always.
Speaker 3: Now Yes and this week we saw Victorian farmers and
Speaker 3: CFE volunteers descend on the steps of Parliament to protest
Speaker 3: another crippling tax imposed by the dangerously inep state labor
Speaker 3: government that could bankrupt farmers, some of them already struggling.
Speaker 3: Are they one of the worst droughts experienced in more
Speaker 3: than one hundred years It was.
Speaker 17: A peak hour pilgrimage from all corners of the state
Speaker 17: and through city traffic to give the premier a serve.
Speaker 17: Will you pay the bill?
Speaker 6: No, we won't pay the bill.
Speaker 10: Want concerns.
Speaker 17: The five billion dollar expanded Fire Services property levy is
Speaker 17: an unfair burden on those who volunteer on the front
Speaker 17: line where drunk help O we help and grow Victoria's food.
Speaker 18: Wasted money down here in the country just doesn't exist.
Speaker 7: You see.
Speaker 3: The Jacinta Alan government is replacing the fire services levy
Speaker 3: with a new expanded tax called the Emergency Services and
Speaker 3: Volunteers Fund. Only problem is the amount households and landholders
Speaker 3: have to pay each year will almost double. Yes, just
Speaker 3: a casual increase of one hundred and eighty nine percent,
Speaker 3: which for some farmers will mean tens of thousands of
Speaker 3: dollars they'll have to find each and every year. And
Speaker 3: right now we have farmers in Victoria killing tens of
Speaker 3: thousands of perfectly healthy dairy cows because they can't afford to.
Speaker 7: Feed them or water them anymore.
Speaker 3: Livestock agents tell their herald son the situation is so
Speaker 3: grim that avatars across the state are battling to keep
Speaker 3: up with a demand to slaughter dairy cows, with thousands
Speaker 3: being culled each day as the cost of hay reaches
Speaker 3: new highs, jumping another one hundred dollars a tent in
Speaker 3: the last week alone. Imagine what that's going to do
Speaker 3: to dairy prices down the track. That's what Victorian farmers,
Speaker 3: many of them also CFA volunteers, are dealing with and
Speaker 3: that's why they gathered in Melbourne to protest. Peter Creedlind
Speaker 3: was there to hear their stories.
Speaker 1: It's just a discussing money grade and it's just a
Speaker 1: completely unfair on farmers be expected to pay ridiculous overspending
Speaker 1: within the city.
Speaker 19: Government and destroyer burn us and where all volunteers and
Speaker 19: we spend hours and hours out on the fly ground.
Speaker 20: This tax is, as we all know, it's just another
Speaker 20: text to fill holes in the labor government's economy.
Speaker 21: Police spend our Christmas and our New Years and everything
Speaker 21: on the fire jug What were you doing to Cinta?
Speaker 5: Are you sitting at home with your family? Will we
Speaker 5: burn now?
Speaker 3: If you want to get some idea of the disdain
Speaker 3: the Allen government has for regional communities, and look at
Speaker 3: the hysterical overreaction of the Premiere to a little stunt
Speaker 3: by farmer who delivered a small, carefully wrapped box of
Speaker 3: cow mineure to her office.
Speaker 8: She seemed far more upset.
Speaker 3: About that than the very real hardship the drought and
Speaker 3: her government's greed and ineptitude is causing all.
Speaker 8: Justin to seem to care about this week?
Speaker 3: Is that little box of cowpoop, complete with a note saying,
Speaker 3: dearest Jacina, I've considered ju Levy and here's my feedback.
Speaker 8: It's bull dust, love Brutus and family.
Speaker 3: That this was delivered with the help of Liberal MPs
Speaker 3: Bev MacArthur and Nicole Nicole Werner, who escorted the gift
Speaker 3: bearing farmer to just into Allan's office. Premier Allen saw
Speaker 3: that as the ideal opportunity to play the victim, calling
Speaker 3: the disgraceful and even claiming her office's workplace safety was compromised.
Speaker 22: A couple of Liberal politicians acted in a disgraceful inappropriate
Speaker 22: way in a workplace, in the parliamentary workplace.
Speaker 8: And she wasn't done yet.
Speaker 3: The tantrum can She called on the Opposition leader Brad
Speaker 3: Batton to also contemn, condemn, his MPs.
Speaker 22: I condemn that behavior. You know who hasn't condemned that behavior.
Speaker 22: The leader of the opposition, Brad Batton, hasn't condemned that behavior.
Speaker 22: Not call on him to either condemn this behavior or
Speaker 22: is he going to back his backers who did this
Speaker 22: disgraceful act.
Speaker 3: Well, bad Lucture Center, it seems you're not going to
Speaker 3: have Dan Andrew's good fortune. It appears the vic Libs
Speaker 3: have moved on from the days of John Pursudo, who
Speaker 3: attacked his own MPs for fighting the good fight. Instead
Speaker 3: of condemning his MPs, Brad Batton back them for standing
Speaker 3: up for sair fe volunteers and farming communities.
Speaker 1: Look, it's not something I would have done.
Speaker 19: But what I do know is yesterday people were very,
Speaker 19: very angry when it comes to the new taxes that
Speaker 19: are impacting on farms across Victoria. There is a reason
Speaker 19: that thousands of farmers came from all over Victoria with
Speaker 19: their fire trucks, with their uniforms to explain to the
Speaker 19: Vitorian government that they are fed up with being the
Speaker 19: feeding cow for this government's budget.
Speaker 3: What a refreshing change from the quizzling antics of John pursuito,
Speaker 3: who likely would have moved to censure or expel the
Speaker 3: female MPs, perhaps after accusing them of associating with people
Speaker 3: who may have associated with others who once shared a
Speaker 3: platform with someone undesirable. But while brad Batten stuck fat,
Speaker 3: Shadow Treasurer James Newbery, the Member for Brighton who lunches
Speaker 3: with Simon.
Speaker 7: Holmes a court, was all too eager to turn.
Speaker 3: His sights on his liberal colleagues rather than maintain pressure
Speaker 3: on the premiere, saying.
Speaker 10: It's always important to be.
Speaker 3: Respectful in your debate, and what happened was inappropriate. There's
Speaker 3: nothing respectful about abandoning farmers under immense financial pressure who
Speaker 3: can't even afford to feed or water their animals. There's
Speaker 3: nothing respectful about the pitiful relief package offered by the
Speaker 3: Allen government that is entirely in adequate.
Speaker 10: It's an insult.
Speaker 3: And there is nothing respectful about the economic vandalism that
Speaker 3: has seen Victoria record the biggest debt in the country,
Speaker 3: with an annual interest build that is set to pass
Speaker 3: ten billion.
Speaker 10: That's just the interest.
Speaker 3: If you want to know how to hold the labor
Speaker 3: government accountable, then perhaps take a page out of Beckabev
Speaker 3: MacArthur's book, who had this to say about the cow
Speaker 3: manure stunt. She said, Labor MPs are acting like they've
Speaker 3: never seen cowshit before.
Speaker 8: Maybe they don't.
Speaker 3: Get out of Melbourne much if they are genuinely more
Speaker 3: upset about a pile of manure than the total mess
Speaker 3: they've made of their budget. And this state, it's no
Speaker 3: wonder Victoria's going broke.
Speaker 8: That's how it's done.
Speaker 3: And this weekend there's been a major development with this saga,
Speaker 3: with the Sunday Herald Sun reporting that regional councils are
Speaker 3: declaring war on the Allen government over this controversial issue.
Speaker 3: This volunteer levy calling for the immediate cease of introduction
Speaker 3: as communities deal with the going drought. It's time that
Speaker 3: every liberal MP learned that you are elected to hold
Speaker 3: labor accountable, not to engage in stupid factional games and
Speaker 3: undermine your colleagues who are doing a better job than you.
Speaker 1: Fantastic Greta.
Speaker 2: After the break, we've got net Zany, we've got lefty lunacy, wakademia.
Speaker 2: All here on outside is back in a tick. You're
Speaker 2: watching outsiders, and thank you so much for watching us.
Speaker 2: Every Sunday morning. We certainly do appreciate your company. Well,
Speaker 2: net Zany is the wacky, weird world of net zero policies.
Speaker 2: We were just talking to those about those policies with
Speaker 2: Matt Canavan over in America. Donald Trump has slammed Kirs Starmer's.
Speaker 1: Net zero policies.
Speaker 2: So we've seen that he's attacked that in as Matt
Speaker 2: himself just said, in New Zealand, they've abandoned Jacinda r
Speaker 2: Dern's net zero policy. So all around the world they
Speaker 2: are abanding net as we call it.
Speaker 5: James, well, yeah, and I mean this is so crucial
Speaker 5: because around the world. You know, Trump attacked, as you say,
Speaker 5: Starmer for all of the wind from said you should
Speaker 5: get drilling in the North Sea. Absolutely right. But also
Speaker 5: you know the UK has been going help for leather
Speaker 5: on nuclear the last week. We've seen other countries in
Speaker 5: Europe say, you know what, we're going to lift our
Speaker 5: nuclear bands, We're going to go on nuclear, gonna start
Speaker 5: doing nuclear again, We're going to restart our nuclear plants.
Speaker 5: The Biden administration, you know, Democrats on the left had
Speaker 5: a big push for nuclear and you'll remember that they
Speaker 5: went to that big meeting in Dubai and all signed
Speaker 5: on to that big global nuclear agreement. Now, this idea
Speaker 5: that the laws of physics somehow don't apply here in Australia,
Speaker 5: which is basically what labor and you know, a lot
Speaker 5: of the moderate wing of the of the Liberal Party,
Speaker 5: which are heavily invested personally in renewables, like to say
Speaker 5: is an absolute nonsense. And I'll tell you something. I've
Speaker 5: been thinking so much about this because I've been traveling
Speaker 5: the last week, as you know, I wasn't here last week,
Speaker 5: and you know, I started to say this before we're
Speaker 5: about to embark on this whole new revolution of AI.
Speaker 5: And I've spoken to a lot of people in the business,
Speaker 5: you know, the last couple of weeks, and they have
Speaker 5: all said to me, this is a big industrial project
Speaker 5: as much as it is a high tech project. You
Speaker 5: need big turbine spinning inertial power. That's what you get
Speaker 5: from gas, That's what you get coal, that's we get
Speaker 5: from nuclear. You do not get that, despite what Mike
Speaker 5: cannon Brooks said the other day, from batteries and solar
Speaker 5: and how we saw what happened in Spain the other day.
Speaker 5: We're still waiting for the official report, but we know
Speaker 5: how much reliance they have on that. And the thing
Speaker 5: that occurs to me is we have de industrialized as
Speaker 5: a country in a shocking way. The other night, I
Speaker 5: was in Tokyo and I was at the airport bar
Speaker 5: having a drink, and across the airport in Tokyo you
Speaker 5: can see the flames of a refinery going. Japan is
Speaker 5: a serious industrialized nation. We are not a serious industrialized nation.
Speaker 5: Or we don't refine our own petrol, we don't make
Speaker 5: our own fertilizer for our farms anymore. We don't do
Speaker 5: any of these things that we need to. And it's
Speaker 5: a national security issue, it's an economic iss You, Greg
Speaker 5: Sheridan had a ray wed nation in decline if we
Speaker 5: don't fix this, but look at what the rest of
Speaker 5: the world is doing. Why are we somehow special that
Speaker 5: we're immune to the laws of physics and economics?
Speaker 1: Easy?
Speaker 5: He thinks that we can just get this done.
Speaker 3: This is why we've had the biggest fall in living
Speaker 3: standards in the developed world.
Speaker 7: We're not immune.
Speaker 3: And you said we're not a serious industrial nation. Right now,
Speaker 3: We're not a serious nation. We are just defying reality.
Speaker 3: And Trump's not only turbocharging drilling. He is actually also
Speaker 3: turbocharging nuclear energy. He has just signed in several executive
Speaker 3: orders in that direction. He wants to get rid of
Speaker 3: the over regulation.
Speaker 1: Baby fishing because, as James.
Speaker 3: Said, he understands the future of AI and that you
Speaker 3: need power. And to give the Democrats some credit, a
Speaker 3: lot of this stuff is backed by the Democrats when
Speaker 3: it comes to nuclear energy because they also understand and
Speaker 3: Obama was enormous and fracking. He was also interested in
Speaker 3: getting America to be energy independent. But here in Australia,
Speaker 3: we're still clinging on to this fantasy that.
Speaker 10: Renewables are the cheapest form of energy.
Speaker 3: It's a laughable Have a look at your bill if
Speaker 3: you think that's true.
Speaker 8: And we are pursuing that.
Speaker 3: And when you've got an opposition who is not clear
Speaker 3: in their position, who are half pregnant with signing up
Speaker 3: to net zero, well it's no wonder the people of.
Speaker 2: The reality reader is that this country is cursed by
Speaker 2: a bunch of grifters, renewables grifters who are milking the system,
Speaker 2: routing the system, making themselves very wealthy at your expense.
Speaker 1: Just as Reta says, check your electricity.
Speaker 2: Bills, plus all the subsidies that your taxes go through.
Speaker 2: Rather than doing sensible things around the country, these grifters
Speaker 2: have completely corrupted our political system, which is why the
Speaker 2: Nats and the liberal part than the coalition are struggling.
Speaker 1: Do we go net do we not?
Speaker 2: Because they are at the beck and call of these
Speaker 2: very same drift is an absolute national disgrace, and we
Speaker 2: were all paying through the teeth and raiders one hundred
Speaker 2: percent correct. We are not a serious nation any longer,
Speaker 2: and we're gonna find out very soon just how unserious
Speaker 2: we are.
Speaker 5: James, Well, exactly right, and you know it is. I
Speaker 5: don't want to like harp on about it. I don't
Speaker 5: want to scare people. It's a national security issue.
Speaker 12: Rights.
Speaker 1: If what's happening in.
Speaker 5: The Pacific, look at what China is planning, Look at Taiwan,
Speaker 5: look at what's happening in the Pacific. How everything is
Speaker 5: pivoting towards a big conflict in the Pacific. If we
Speaker 5: get cut off and we don't have fertilizer, if we
Speaker 5: don't have fuel, you know, if they cut our cables,
Speaker 5: we know what all of those missions to circumnavigate and
Speaker 5: chart all of the undersea cables and everything around Australia
Speaker 5: that connects us to the world was all about we
Speaker 5: could be toasted in thirty days or less and the
Speaker 5: idea that China has just make us surrender and bend
Speaker 5: to their will without firing a shot. And at the
Speaker 5: moment Ethnelbneasy Labor and a lot of liberal moderates are
Speaker 5: delivering the country to our enemies on a silver platter.
Speaker 5: If we do not do something to turn this around.
Speaker 5: It's really urgent. It's you know, people keep saying, oh, well,
Speaker 5: you know, it's like the nineteen thirties in Europe. Well, hey,
Speaker 5: it's like the nineteen thirties here too.
Speaker 2: Guys, when here we have the unseerious gnats on Insiders.
Speaker 1: That's the other show that some people watch on the ABC.
Speaker 2: I don't know why, but anyway they do. Here he
Speaker 2: was speaking this morning whether to net zero.
Speaker 1: So what is the national's position now on net zero?
Speaker 8: The national support net zero twenty fifteen?
Speaker 12: Has that been settled?
Speaker 8: Well that was settled years ago.
Speaker 2: Oh great, well you're going to stay out of government
Speaker 2: if that's what you think.
Speaker 1: Seriously, you're absolute clowns.
Speaker 2: The Dutch have postponed buying an auction of offshore wind farms.
Speaker 1: Can't think why no interest?
Speaker 2: Apparently nobody turned up to the auction jones, But there
Speaker 2: you go. Anyway, let's on a lighter note, let's have
Speaker 2: some wacademia.
Speaker 1: Oh, actually, not that much lighter.
Speaker 2: Sorry, anyway, controversial academic Randa abdel Fatar is offering free
Speaker 2: classes on Palestine to schools. Oh no, well, if I
Speaker 2: at any of these schools, that kid would be out
Speaker 2: of that school pronto. If whatever her name is, abdel
Speaker 2: Fatar turns up lecturing about Palestine, seriously, the corruption of
Speaker 2: our education system retail.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, she says it's free, and it probably would
Speaker 3: be free for the school. But let's not forget that
Speaker 3: this is a tax pay funded academic, so our taxes
Speaker 3: pay for her work or research, her activism. And yeah,
Speaker 3: I've got an inkling that these classes may not be
Speaker 3: entirely fair.
Speaker 8: And I'm byring.
Speaker 5: Point here. There's another point here, hen You know, I
Speaker 5: do want to talk about this too, because this is
Speaker 5: something we always talk about on this program. And I've
Speaker 5: got a lot of friends who say, oh, you know,
Speaker 5: you just got to give up the culture wars, start
Speaker 5: fighting the culture wars. This is a very important cultur
Speaker 5: war here, sure, because if the right see the culture wars,
Speaker 5: everything the culture war that you know, your kids grow
Speaker 5: up coming home and chanting free, free Palestine. And we're
Speaker 5: talking about the really deadly ways that that winds up
Speaker 5: a little bit later in the program. This is the
Speaker 5: sort of stuff that absolutely needs to be kept out
Speaker 5: of the schools. Teach both sides, teach a fair present,
Speaker 5: to teach real history, and don't teach this well.
Speaker 2: Sydney UNI has been slammed over it came up with
Speaker 2: a plan to segregate Jewish students during Palestine prayer.
Speaker 1: This is where this goes rita.
Speaker 2: If you don't fight the culture wars, you end up
Speaker 2: with this nonsense.
Speaker 3: Everything we've been talking about, even when you're talking about
Speaker 3: something as dry as energy policy, economic policy, it's.
Speaker 8: Roots of the culture wars.
Speaker 3: The reason why you've got people who are so ideologically
Speaker 3: driven on these. Of course, there's the grifters who are
Speaker 3: invested in renewables, so thinking with their hip pocket, but
Speaker 3: the rest of them it's become like a religion, yes,
Speaker 3: and that's part of the culture wars.
Speaker 8: And the left just get the church, the left of
Speaker 8: the culture.
Speaker 10: Wars is why we're in this mess.
Speaker 3: So conservatives going to either start realizing this is the
Speaker 3: reality and fighting.
Speaker 10: Back, or we're going to be in this position.
Speaker 3: And when you've got Jewish students being segregated for their
Speaker 3: own safety in twenty twenty five, it just tells you
Speaker 3: how far we're falling.
Speaker 2: And Donald Trump has attacked the anti senitism that we
Speaker 2: saw at the outbreak in the universities in the last
Speaker 2: American summer. He's now turned around and he's literally stopping
Speaker 2: Harvard from having overseas students as a punishment for them
Speaker 2: not tackling the anti Semitism.
Speaker 1: So it's a big story there in America, but at.
Speaker 2: Least Trump does something about it, unlike anyone in Australia.
Speaker 5: Very quickly.
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris is doing we've told you about here on
Speaker 2: the show. She's doing her speech up in the Gold
Speaker 2: Coast today. Kamala Harris will be lecturing them on being
Speaker 2: unburdened in your real estate ventures by what you're not
Speaker 2: burdened by or whatever.
Speaker 3: I cannot wait to see what word salads she is
Speaker 3: going to be done.
Speaker 1: Someone's filmed that iPhone.
Speaker 3: You know what you real estate agents who are on
Speaker 3: this junkerd who are probably out just in out the
Speaker 3: strip clubs getting drunk every night.
Speaker 10: Please one of you record.
Speaker 1: We got to see it. It's going to be a
Speaker 1: space back in a tick on Outsiders.
Speaker 7: Maybe not record strip puffs.
Speaker 2: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with the Rita Panahee with James Morrow.
Speaker 1: And myself Ruindie.
Speaker 2: South Africa's bars settled in that land as long ago
Speaker 2: as the mid sixteen hundreds. Those farmers have farmed that
Speaker 2: land for centuries, and their produce feeds the nation. Literally,
Speaker 2: on average, ninety percent of farm produce in South Africa
Speaker 2: comes from those white farms. Now, those same farmers, the
Speaker 2: descendants of the original boast settlers, are being forced out
Speaker 2: by a combination of violence, rape, murder, corrupt police forces,
Speaker 2: armed gangs, and the deeply sinister government policy of enforced
Speaker 2: land acquisition without in many instances, any.
Speaker 1: Form of compensation.
Speaker 2: Six years ago, Katie Hopkins made a documentary called plus
Speaker 2: more The Killing Fields.
Speaker 11: If you don't do what do we are getting you
Speaker 11: to do?
Speaker 23: Or when ever your wife in front of you and
Speaker 23: kid and everything generally the one.
Speaker 7: My husband was murdered in what they classify as a
Speaker 7: farm attack and they shut them in the head in
Speaker 7: front of us. Can you found at my feet?
Speaker 24: But in the last year there were roughly eighty four
Speaker 24: farm murders.
Speaker 1: Yes, six years ago.
Speaker 2: Those unspeakable acts were South Africa's dark secret.
Speaker 1: But not to viewers of this show, I might add.
Speaker 2: We have been reporting on this consistently over the years,
Speaker 2: but certainly a secret to most of the world.
Speaker 18: The ground started eating me and said today we're going
Speaker 18: to killue living word boss.
Speaker 2: But the dirty secret is out in the open now
Speaker 2: thanks to the most extraordinary political figure in the world
Speaker 2: and indeed of the last half century, Donald Trump.
Speaker 11: But we have no noquet. We have thousands of stories
Speaker 11: talking about it.
Speaker 25: Sure, we have documentaries, we have news stories, and there
Speaker 25: is Natalie here, somebody here to turn that.
Speaker 11: I could show you a couple of things, and I would,
Speaker 11: I just I have to. It has to be responded to. Sure,
Speaker 11: let me see the article splits over.
Speaker 25: You would and excuse me, turn the lights down, turn
Speaker 25: the lights down and just put this on.
Speaker 11: It's right behind you, John.
Speaker 1: It's not a disparliament.
Speaker 18: Do we thought you people not went to Occupiland with
Speaker 18: permission from you, from the president, from nor what.
Speaker 5: We don't care.
Speaker 11: We can do what we want to do. Who want
Speaker 11: to tell us? We occupilant That's who we are.
Speaker 2: By the way, one of those articles that were held
Speaker 2: up by Donald Trump was written by our.
Speaker 1: Very own reason Panay, which we're very proud of.
Speaker 2: The leftist media called it an ambush and started banging
Speaker 2: on about how the field of crosses that Trump showed
Speaker 2: were representations of the dead farmers as opposed to an
Speaker 2: actual grave yard.
Speaker 1: Well, yes, that was kind of obvious.
Speaker 2: As usual, the left dissembled and obfuscated to attempt to
Speaker 2: deny the significance of the crimes that have been and
Speaker 2: are still being committed. But it was the footage of
Speaker 2: the repulsive hard left politician Julius Malima, who for years
Speaker 2: has packed out South African stadiums with his vile chance
Speaker 2: to kill the boar, shoot to kill, kill the farmer.
Speaker 2: But saw the South African delegation most iletes squirming in
Speaker 2: their seats refusing to watch this footage.
Speaker 8: Pity Kitty Kitty.
Speaker 26: B Shira conto las shoot booti comosa pu the pooor
Speaker 26: theba bull, the poor.
Speaker 11: The burma.
Speaker 5: Pa pa boo pa.
Speaker 1: Pa Yes, fact innocent care and of course there was this.
Speaker 18: So these people, when you want to eat them hard,
Speaker 18: go after a white man, they feel a terrible pain.
Speaker 1: And this in parliament.
Speaker 18: There's nothing you can do. There's nothing this parliament can
Speaker 18: do with.
Speaker 5: Or without you.
Speaker 18: People are going to occupy land will require no permission
Speaker 18: from you, from the President, from no one. We don't care.
Speaker 18: We can do whatever you want to do. Who are
Speaker 18: you to tell us whether we can occupy lent or not.
Speaker 18: Must never be scared to kill. At some point that
Speaker 18: must be killing. So to two your maasa to the poor.
Speaker 2: Trump was rightly appalled that Malayma is allowed to get
Speaker 2: away with this.
Speaker 11: Why wouldn't you arrest that man? That man said kill
Speaker 11: the white farmers, kill the.
Speaker 25: White farmers, and then he danced, and he's dancing, dancing
Speaker 25: and has killed the white farmers.
Speaker 11: Think I'm not sure, but I think if.
Speaker 25: Somebody got up in Barrolment and sort of saying kill
Speaker 25: a certain group of people that he would be in
Speaker 25: he would be arrested very quickly. That man is going
Speaker 25: all over South Africa. And that's not a small party.
Speaker 25: That was a stadium that holds one hundred thousand people,
Speaker 25: and I hardly.
Speaker 11: Saw an MPC.
Speaker 1: Trump knows the stadiums.
Speaker 2: Ramaposer tried to brush it all off, but the reality
Speaker 2: is earlier this year, Ramoposa's government introduced the controversial Expropriation
Speaker 2: Act that makes allow answers for forcibly seizing land of
Speaker 2: white farmers without necessarily paying compensation, providing a very dodgy
Speaker 2: legal framework to cover these atrocities. And Ramoposa has form here.
Speaker 2: He is mocking white people for being cowards and calling
Speaker 2: their claims fictitious, and trying to cover it all up
Speaker 2: under the woke cloak of diversity.
Speaker 27: In many many ways, and none of us ever having
Speaker 27: to want to run away to another country for fictional
Speaker 27: reasons that we are being persecuted. We are united in diversity,
Speaker 27: and none of us should ever feel that they have
Speaker 27: lost courage, that they have now become cowards.
Speaker 2: Worse, here, as the repugnant Ramaposa Court essentially giving his
Speaker 2: blessing to these obscene and vile acts, the question.
Speaker 23: Of land, the land of our fore fathers and our poor.
Speaker 2: Mothers, my return to our.
Speaker 23: People without any fail and without any payment of compensation.
Speaker 2: And it pretty clear where does this sort of political
Speaker 2: leadership lead to? Well Katie Hopkins, in discussing her documentary
Speaker 2: at Prague, U is unequivocal.
Speaker 28: White South African farmers are being hunted from their land
Speaker 28: by black gangs.
Speaker 7: Fact.
Speaker 28: And I had a young son at the time, and
Speaker 28: he would sometimes have nightmares about when the monsters would come,
Speaker 28: you know, at nighttime. But in South Africa, that is
Speaker 28: when the gangs come and they work together and they
Speaker 28: attack white farmers. And some of the things that happen
Speaker 28: to white farmers we don't need to talk about here,
Speaker 28: but the barbarity. It isn't just about burglary, which it
Speaker 28: gets filed away as this is torture.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump being prepared to use access to the Oval
Speaker 2: Office to condemn and highlight some of the world's worst
Speaker 2: governments is indeed a breath of fresh air.
Speaker 11: And those people, in many cases, are being executed.
Speaker 25: They're being executed, and they happen to be white, and
Speaker 25: most of them happened to be farmers. And that's a
Speaker 25: tough situation. I don't know how you explain that. How
Speaker 25: do you explain that they're taking people's land away, and
Speaker 25: in many cases those people are being executed, and.
Speaker 11: In many cases it's not the government that's soon.
Speaker 25: It's people kill them and then take their land and
Speaker 25: nothing happens to them.
Speaker 2: Ravo O'donald Trump, Needless to say, Trump's enemies, such as
Speaker 2: the hugely discredited CNN, try to airbrush the South African atrocities.
Speaker 1: What do you listen? Malemmo was singing kill the boar, Killed.
Speaker 29: The Farmer, was an anti apartheid song from the struggle
Speaker 29: against white mynority rule in South Africa. They've explained that
Speaker 29: this is not a little attack called to attack and
Speaker 29: kill the farmer because of the historical nature of that.
Speaker 1: You know, literally want to kill them. We just want
Speaker 1: to sing that you want to kill them? Got it?
Speaker 12: Okay?
Speaker 1: It's an old folk song. Of course it is in desperation.
Speaker 2: Sil Ramaposa turned to his white colleagues cabinet ministers to
Speaker 2: disprove Trump's allegations.
Speaker 23: I would say, if there was Afrikana farmer genocide, I
Speaker 23: can bet you these three gentlemen would not be here,
Speaker 23: including my Minister of Agriculture.
Speaker 11: He would not be with me.
Speaker 1: Alas, even that backfired.
Speaker 30: My dad was a proper develop as well as a
Speaker 30: part time farmer. And yeah, some of these buddy farmers
Speaker 30: got killed. The farm is still going. My brother's running,
Speaker 30: but that's a constant battle of farms trying to get him.
Speaker 30: They're trying to burn the farms down to chase you away.
Speaker 2: The reality is that the dream of a free and
Speaker 2: prosperous South Africa that so many well meaning people in
Speaker 2: the West fought so hard for. A good friend of
Speaker 2: mine from Finland spent time in a South African jail
Speaker 2: for his efforts in protesting against apartheid. The dream of
Speaker 2: a bright future for all South Africans has been destroyed
Speaker 2: by crime, by Neo Marxism, by racism, and by the
Speaker 2: hard left stoking the fires of racial division. Here is
Speaker 2: the Quasuli Netal Police Commissioner Mkwanazi speaking about the South
Speaker 2: African crime statistics by race.
Speaker 1: Not me talking.
Speaker 31: These are the stats. We have a problem with the
Speaker 31: black men in South Africa. We have a serous problem.
Speaker 31: What we see we put the cars, the races of
Speaker 31: pipe trizos arrested. Out of this number, seven thousand, six
Speaker 31: hundred to ninety one of them were black meat. Out
Speaker 31: of sixty thousand, fifty seven thousand of them are black men.
Speaker 1: It's an absolute tragedy.
Speaker 2: And by the way, what I said earlier, was that
Speaker 2: actually one of the golfers who was with Trump, who
Speaker 2: was talking about his experiences in a farm, not a
Speaker 2: cabinet person. This is an absolute tragedy and it's a
Speaker 2: complete betrayal of what so many people around the world
Speaker 2: fought and in South Africa fought for and dreamed of
Speaker 2: and hoped for and died for. You know, I like
Speaker 2: my visual metaphors, So here's one. Here's downtown Durban today.
Speaker 2: The magnificent dream of Nelson Mandela has been turned to.
Speaker 32: Rubble and to trash.
Speaker 1: For once, you can't just blame the whites.
Speaker 2: Still, Let's leave the final word as I like to
Speaker 2: to those creative kids.
Speaker 32: Out on social media.
Speaker 2: Inside now a very special guest here on Outsiders. As
Speaker 2: you know, on Outsiders, we always pride ourselves on supporting
Speaker 2: the outsiders, supporting those people, particularly small business people, who
Speaker 2: are prepared to stand up against the insanity of the
Speaker 2: red green, black tape that's strangling enterprise in our nation
Speaker 2: and particularly in our cities, and particularly if you live
Speaker 2: in Sydney. You have seen, however, the last few years,
Speaker 2: and it's both liberal and labor governments that have been responsible.
Speaker 2: The life has been strangled out of Sydney nightlife. What
Speaker 2: was once twenty thirty years ago one of the most
Speaker 2: vibrant cities and exciting cities in the world is now
Speaker 2: sadly anything. But one person who was brave enough this
Speaker 2: week to speak up against the green tape and the
Speaker 2: madness and the authorities was the restauranteur from Lady Chew
Speaker 2: in Pott's Point.
Speaker 1: And this is Naji Chew.
Speaker 2: She had a little She's going to join us in
Speaker 2: a second, but I'm just going to show you a
Speaker 2: bit of the clip that she posted on social media
Speaker 2: when the authorities turned up and tried to get her
Speaker 2: to remove some pot plants which he put out to
Speaker 2: make her outdoor scene of her restaurant nice and more
Speaker 2: pleasant for the people there. Oh no, the authorities wouldn't
Speaker 2: have a bar of it. He doesn't have a Look
Speaker 2: at the bit of the footage here, I'm.
Speaker 33: Shut it down.
Speaker 34: I want what's the problem here?
Speaker 1: You can get through what seems to be.
Speaker 34: The problem of a sudden beautiful trees.
Speaker 2: Now, I'm delighted to say that Nichi Chu joins us now. Nigee,
Speaker 2: thanks so much for coming on Outsiders, and thank you
Speaker 2: on behalf of all Sydney siders and people who come
Speaker 2: to Sydney who are so fed up we're not being
Speaker 2: able to dine late into the evening, sit outside on
Speaker 2: the pavement. You stood up against the madness of the authorities.
Speaker 2: Tell us about it and tell us how it's going, Nagie.
Speaker 34: Okay, Look so all this week Clovermore said you attacked
Speaker 34: and you were quite vile towards the rangers. Now, when
Speaker 34: they turned up before I started filming, I did say
Speaker 34: to them, are you kidding me? It is Friday night
Speaker 34: and it's seven pm and we are full. Would you
Speaker 34: mind please coming back when it's not so busy make
Speaker 34: an appointment? And they said, how do we do that? Well,
Speaker 34: it's pretty easy, speak to anyone of my staff, make
Speaker 34: an appointment, come back when it's not so busy. No,
Speaker 34: they did not, and they would not budge. Eight minutes
Speaker 34: later they came back and said, look, we just want
Speaker 34: to have a chat with you, and I said, have
Speaker 34: a chat. I can't have a chat at the moment.
Speaker 34: I'm a very busy member of this restaurant.
Speaker 1: It won't take long.
Speaker 34: Can we please have a chat with you? Which is
Speaker 34: when I said, excuse me. Do not speak to me
Speaker 34: like I'm a naughty school kid like this seculation.
Speaker 7: It's just so rude.
Speaker 34: So they wouldn't leave. So that's was when I said
Speaker 34: to my staff, turn the camera on. This is ridiculous.
Speaker 34: Then they said, we declined to be interviewed, and I said,
Speaker 34: I'm actually really sorry, but I declined your decline to
Speaker 34: be interviewed because I had and I'm really pissed off
Speaker 34: that you won't leave me alone. So what seems to
Speaker 34: be the problem. So when they said, look, it's about
Speaker 34: the plants, I mean, seriously, how can you remain calm
Speaker 34: when two council offices come on a busy night and
Speaker 34: say to you it's about the plants.
Speaker 1: Okay?
Speaker 34: At which point you saw the rest? I videoed it,
Speaker 34: I posted it, and I at the council The rest
Speaker 34: is history, and I'm glad.
Speaker 2: And Naji, that was a very colorful French expression you
Speaker 2: used in there to describe your outrage, which we understand
Speaker 2: your outrage.
Speaker 1: Is, but we won't use it again.
Speaker 2: We won't use it again, but we understand exactly where
Speaker 2: you're coming from, James, Naji.
Speaker 5: You know, look good on you for doing what you're
Speaker 5: doing here. But like for everybody in Australia who might
Speaker 5: not be familiar with this Parts Point, is this really dense,
Speaker 5: should be really vibrant top spot for dieting and partying
Speaker 5: and fun in Sydney. Apparently these are like anonymous complaints
Speaker 5: that have been put into the council. Do you even
Speaker 5: believe that these complaints exist? Why are people living in
Speaker 5: Parts Point if they don't want to live around you know,
Speaker 5: the vibrancy and fun of a place like Passpoint with
Speaker 5: all of its restaurants and eateries and fun things to do.
Speaker 34: What I would like to do once and for all
Speaker 34: is to try to change the law reform. Okay, so
Speaker 34: if you're fineless enough to complain, that should be made illegal.
Speaker 34: If you have a complaint, you should be on public record.
Speaker 34: I understand that initially public anonymity was to protect the
Speaker 34: whistle blower, but it's actually gone the other way. It
Speaker 34: has actually closed the city down. So if we can
Speaker 34: just say, look, if you have a complaint, it should
Speaker 34: be illegal that it's anonymous. Okay, you're on public record,
Speaker 34: and we need to know why. Why you have a complaint,
Speaker 34: is it legitimate? Where do you live and why are
Speaker 34: you're complaining, and how does that actually affect you? Because
Speaker 34: it actually your complaint affects way more people then it
Speaker 34: does affect that one person or a very there is
Speaker 34: small minority.
Speaker 2: And Nargie, can I just ask you how much green tape,
Speaker 2: red tape, whatever council tape regulations, restrictions form filling, how
Speaker 2: much go ahead.
Speaker 34: If you had to join the red tape and it
Speaker 34: go all the way down to America where Trump would
Speaker 34: be like strangled by it.
Speaker 2: So how much of your time and how much of
Speaker 2: an impact does this have on business? On starting up
Speaker 2: a business? You've been in the business a long time,
Speaker 2: how much has it changed over the years? Nagi, Look,
Speaker 2: I lost miss.
Speaker 34: Too, But it's not about mystery right now. It's about ladyship. Okay,
Speaker 34: So I activate this dead grovel of a street filled
Speaker 34: with experiment. I'm a kid, you not, I'm not. Even
Speaker 34: any Potspoint local will tell you she's actually playing this down.
Speaker 34: Homeless people on the streets all matter of experiment. Now,
Speaker 34: I took this over during COVID, gave it a good go,
Speaker 34: and it has been growing incrementally. Now it's a buzz
Speaker 34: with people. Okay, it's very activated.
Speaker 10: Slightly.
Speaker 34: It's what it should be and used to be. And
Speaker 34: so people are saying I can't get through, Well that's
Speaker 34: fine because you don't really need two meters, which is
Speaker 34: what the council says for a wheelchair to get through.
Speaker 34: We are not fat Americans, sorry Trump, but we will
Speaker 34: to be perfectly sensible. You only need one point five
Speaker 34: meters for a wheelchair to get through. You can do
Speaker 34: a wheely on one.
Speaker 8: You can do a.
Speaker 34: Whely even with one meter. But the council keeps enforcing
Speaker 34: this two meter rule and it's actually very inconsistent with
Speaker 34: what's going around in the city. So if you walk
Speaker 34: down seven oh one George Street, for example, very very busy,
Speaker 34: it's completely inconsistent. Wheelchairs cannot get through down this area
Speaker 34: that the City of Sydney actually activated. Okay, so it's
Speaker 34: completely planned dest signed down there. If you may, you know,
Speaker 34: like they use the word clandest staining on me, I'll
Speaker 34: say it. Wheelchair mobility is completely awful down on Short
Speaker 34: Street where Clover decided to make into a now dead zone.
Speaker 1: There we go.
Speaker 2: So thank you so much, Naji, thanks for speaking to us,
Speaker 2: And if you want to support Najie and turn up
Speaker 2: to her restaurant lady too. That's Pot's points. Naji is
Speaker 2: fighting for outsiders who don't want these insane restrictions style.
Speaker 2: She's very sol Thank you so much, Naji, thanks for
Speaker 2: coming on and.
Speaker 1: Good luck with your restaurant.
Speaker 2: And to viewers, Naji did use a couple of expletives there.
Speaker 2: She clearly feels passionate about this issue and she works
Speaker 2: incredibly hard, as do all our small business people. So
Speaker 2: I have a couple of words slipped through that were slightly
Speaker 2: offensive to our ears.
Speaker 1: We do apologize for that.
Speaker 2: After the break, we've got James's donkey votes so much
Speaker 2: coming up here on the Outsiders, and it's it.
Speaker 5: Hello, you're watching Outsiders. I'm James Borrow here, joined us
Speaker 5: almost always by your hosts Rowan Deed and Rita Panahe
Speaker 5: and I tell you what, it really does sometimes feel
Speaker 5: like a sick old world out there, particularly when you've
Speaker 5: got an entire side of politics that seems to glory
Speaker 5: in death and destruction so long as it's enemies on
Speaker 5: the receiving end. Now, late last week in Washington, d C.
Speaker 5: This young couple who worked at the Israeli Embassy in
Speaker 5: the US Capitol were gunned down in cold blood, allegedly
Speaker 5: by this man, Elias Rodriguez, a hard left radical with
Speaker 5: a long history of support for communist, socialist and pro
Speaker 5: Palestine causes, as they left an event at a Washington
Speaker 5: Jewish museum. Tragic, horrible stuff. But hear this footage, Rodriguez,
Speaker 5: who has been charged with two counts of first degree murder,
Speaker 5: yells out his support for Palestine. Well, while the New
Speaker 5: York Times and CNN everybody else tried to dessert a motive,
Speaker 5: I think there you have it, because ever since October seventh,
Speaker 5: we have seen on throlls from hard left groups, radicals
Speaker 5: and chemist organizers to bring the interfada home. Yes, that's
Speaker 5: what they've called for, And now it seems like that
Speaker 5: just may well have happened. But this case keeps getting
Speaker 5: curiouser and curiouser. According to reporting by the New York Post,
Speaker 5: Rodriguez's dad has close ties to the Democratic left. It
Speaker 5: was even invited to Donald Trump's joint address to Congress
Speaker 5: earlier this year by a far left lawmaker or very curious,
Speaker 5: but not as curious as the failure of the left
Speaker 5: to con rather than celebrate these killings with trolls even
Speaker 5: in Australia commenting on Jewish groups posts about the murders, saying, quote,
Speaker 5: good riddance, just six stuff. And of course this has
Speaker 5: become a global phenomenon. I mean, just look at the
Speaker 5: comments running here on this live feed of a police
Speaker 5: update on the shooting, all filled with calls to again,
Speaker 5: yes that idiot chant free, free Palestine, which is what
Speaker 5: the alleged killer shouted, as I've played before when he
Speaker 5: was taken into custody. And of course there are demands
Speaker 5: as well, therefore the destruction of the Jewish state. Meanwhile,
Speaker 5: in Washington, there was Democrat squad member Ilhan Omar who
Speaker 5: couldn't even bring herself to condemn the shooting herself.
Speaker 19: Congresswoman Omar, you buddy, say, can I get your reaction
Speaker 19: to the shooting that happened to DC last night.
Speaker 2: I'm going to go for now.
Speaker 5: Yes, that's right, She's just going to go for now.
Speaker 5: What an absolutely cowardly response. Meanwhile, in Canada, Green's candidate
Speaker 5: in Alberta named Jayden Baldonado appeared to celebrate the murders,
Speaker 5: saying peaceful protest has failed in comparing the shooter to
Speaker 5: Luigi ban Joni, who was accused of shooting dead the
Speaker 5: CEO of CEO of an American health insurer on Manhattan
Speaker 5: Street last year, also in Canada. This TikToker seemed to
Speaker 5: revel in the deaths and hoped the shooter would be
Speaker 5: taken care of in jail.
Speaker 12: I'm at a bath and dusk.
Speaker 5: And no, I don't think she means taking care of
Speaker 5: in the sarcastic sense that you or I might think either.
Speaker 5: But for on his reactions, there's no going past this
Speaker 5: fellow Kai called guy Christiansen, who not only defended the
Speaker 5: killings but said he was even more of a hero
Speaker 5: the shooter, the elleged shooter, than Aaron Bushnell, the US
Speaker 5: Air Force airman who set himself on fire in front
Speaker 5: of the Israeli Embassy in Washington in protest of what
Speaker 5: was going on in Gaza. Get a load of this guy.
Speaker 33: I take it back. I do not condemn the elimination
Speaker 33: of those two Zionist officials who worked at the Israeli
Speaker 33: embassy last night. And here's why he spent his days
Speaker 33: working at the Israeli embassy fighting to maintain Israel's genocide
Speaker 33: and support for that genocide. In this country. He is
Speaker 33: a war criminal, and the same was true for the woman.
Speaker 33: This was not because they were Jewish, it was because.
Speaker 1: They were Zionists.
Speaker 33: And a manifesto from the suspect in custody, Elias Rodriguez,
Speaker 33: who apparently, if we are to believe this is true,
Speaker 33: he is part of the movement and he has consistently
Speaker 33: posted about Palestine. He targeted these two because of the
Speaker 33: connection to the state of Israel, because they are Zionists,
Speaker 33: not because they are Jews. Now, I want to remind
Speaker 33: you that while this attack took the lives of two
Speaker 33: human beings, Israel has murdered thousands of Palestinian civilians in
Speaker 33: cold blood without any shame. I ask you, what is
Speaker 33: the difference between Elias or Jigus and Aaron Bushnell? To you,
Speaker 33: perhaps the only difference I can see is that Aaron
Speaker 33: Bushnell's sacrifice in flames protesting his government's role and a
Speaker 33: genocide he could no longer bear to be a part of.
Speaker 33: It's more palatable to this world because he did not
Speaker 33: throw the final stone in his last moments at the
Speaker 33: mob of criminals. Who's suffering they've brought to this world
Speaker 33: is more than this world can bear any longer.
Speaker 5: Nice perm kid, Hey, make of that what you will,
Speaker 5: but it feels to me like we are going back
Speaker 5: into the same cycle of history we saw in the
Speaker 5: nineteen sixties when the left glorified Kretnis murderers from Chay
Speaker 5: Grivara to Charles Manson in the name of revolution. Now
Speaker 5: they're doing it again, celebrating Hamas and calling for their
Speaker 5: style of nehilistic violence to be re enacted in the West. Again.
Speaker 1: Thanks James.
Speaker 2: That's deeply disturbing, particularly that last character, and the whole
Speaker 2: story is just terrific. But this is what happens if
Speaker 2: the West doesn't have the moral leadership to stand up
Speaker 2: and say this stuff is wrong.
Speaker 1: The universities, in the streets, it is wrong.
Speaker 5: This is why, you know, it's been such an absolute
Speaker 5: disaster for the last almost two years.
Speaker 12: Now.
Speaker 5: You know that we've seen these canvas occupations, and the
Speaker 5: big chat has been over and over again, bring the
Speaker 5: inter fada home, bring the interfara home. That means terrorism,
Speaker 5: that means murder, that means what we saw here on
Speaker 5: the streets. And this is all part of that broader
Speaker 5: decolonize rhetoric. You know, it's not just anti Semitism, but
Speaker 5: it is anti Western decolonizing rhetoric that leads to this
Speaker 5: sort of violence.
Speaker 7: Well that's one of their popular chants.
Speaker 3: Popular philosophy is when it comes to this issue, is
Speaker 3: about globalizing the interfada, and this is what it means.
Speaker 3: And even when October seven happened, there were academics in
Speaker 3: the States, people often with profiles and a few of
Speaker 3: work bold in saying what did you think decolonization meant?
Speaker 3: Did you think it was just going to be a paper?
Speaker 3: This is what decolonization is. So I think we've got
Speaker 3: to realize that. And when we talk about decolonizing the
Speaker 3: curriculum at different universities and their projects happening at Australian
Speaker 3: universities about colonizing, we've got to see how sinister and
Speaker 3: ugly it is, because it's always presented as some progressive, inclusive,
Speaker 3: lovey dubb it when it is absolutely ugly and destructive.
Speaker 3: And again we talk about the culture wars. You don't
Speaker 3: fight the culture wars. This is what happens.
Speaker 2: This is all gent Let me just said one thing
Speaker 2: that I've said repeatedly, but I will keep saying it
Speaker 2: that Peter Dutton's one great thing apart from winning the
Speaker 2: voice of the Center and Warren was his stance on
Speaker 2: opposing the whole pro Palestinian pro Hamas agenda. He was
Speaker 2: the only leader we've had in this country to stand
Speaker 2: up and repeatedly and forcefully call it out for the
Speaker 2: evil that it is.
Speaker 3: And Monsy did oppose the voice. That's his other great.
Speaker 1: Achieve No, I said, as well as the voice exactly.
Speaker 5: But I mean, you know, this is the thing. It's
Speaker 5: the great irony is that this decolonizing rhetoric. Know, this
Speaker 5: actually comes from kind of eighteen nineties blood and soil
Speaker 5: nationalist rhetoric out of Germany. Like this part of the
Speaker 5: philosophical roots of this this is this idea that people
Speaker 5: have this sort of you know, essential tie to a
Speaker 5: piece of land. That's how they get the whole thing
Speaker 5: from Palestinians. But that's also where you wind up with
Speaker 5: a lot of the welcome to country stuff here in
Speaker 5: countries like Australia and Canada. But it ties in with
Speaker 5: this really toxic thing which was a French sort of
Speaker 5: movement in the fifties and sixties. France Finan the Rest
Speaker 5: of the Earth, and that was a book that was
Speaker 5: really influential in the Academy sixty eighty years ago. It's
Speaker 5: coming back and again it was about the idea of
Speaker 5: bringing revolutionary, decolonizing violences from the country where the country's
Speaker 5: being colonized to the colonizing country. In that case, they
Speaker 5: mean it's America, they mean Australia. This is what this
Speaker 5: is all about. It's really violent, it's really sinister. It's
Speaker 5: anti Semitic, but it's also deeply, deeply anti Western large.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and let's not forget that the Nazis were the
Speaker 2: National Socialist Party of Germany. They were socialists. That was
Speaker 2: the hard left at work. And the interesting thing James
Speaker 2: and reader about what Donald Trump has been talking about
Speaker 2: with South Africa. Again, it's the same thing if you
Speaker 2: allow race to become the driver in your politics. The
Speaker 2: brilliance of Nelson Mandela as he said, we're going to
Speaker 2: put all that behind us. That's it done and dusted.
Speaker 2: We're all equals, and people bought into that dream. But
Speaker 2: then you had all the truth telling staff all of
Speaker 2: this stuff, which then went ripped the scab open again.
Speaker 2: All the hatred comes out again, and we are going
Speaker 2: down the same path because Albanesi and Wong will bring
Speaker 2: the voice back in in some other form. We're gonna
Speaker 2: have truth telling, We're gonna have treaties, We're gonna have
Speaker 2: all this racist garbage that labor are going to ram
Speaker 2: down our throats in the coming years.
Speaker 3: Well, we've already got eight based treaties.
Speaker 10: Sadly in Victoria.
Speaker 7: They're just pressing ahead with that.
Speaker 3: And if they bring in a legislative voice, which is
Speaker 3: what we talked about just before the election, when Penny
Speaker 3: Wong let it sleep that it's just a formality, you know,
Speaker 3: it's just going to be like same sex marriage. Will
Speaker 3: wonder why we ever opposed it, she opposed it. Let's
Speaker 3: not forget that many of us were fairly consistent on
Speaker 3: that issue.
Speaker 7: And they don't have a mandate to do that because we.
Speaker 3: Had a we had a referendum just eighteen months ago
Speaker 3: on that very issue. But they could argue this is
Speaker 3: a different thing. It's not in the constitution.
Speaker 1: Anyone will say I said it before the election.
Speaker 5: Yes, no, I mean, but it is also I just
Speaker 5: want to say too that it's really sinister, this whole
Speaker 5: sort of thing. The two whisues South Africa and the
Speaker 5: Israela things tied together. But also the left just really
Speaker 5: is happy to glorify the deaths and the murder of
Speaker 5: people that you know are in an enemy class, you know,
Speaker 5: and it's just kindest thing. That's why I mentioned Luigi
Speaker 5: Joan who killed Brian Thompson, the United Healthcare ceo. That guy,
Speaker 5: the alleged killer there has been celebrated as a sex symbol,
Speaker 5: as a hero, and you know big, you know, got cheers.
Speaker 5: You know, people mentioned him like you know, talk shows
Speaker 5: and things like that. This guy, the same thing may
Speaker 5: very well happen again.
Speaker 11: You know.
Speaker 5: This is why the left, The Daily showed it a
Speaker 5: big riff on the South Africa thing where they laughed
Speaker 5: at the idea haha, white farmers being killed haha, haa.
Speaker 5: You know, and this is the whole idea. Well, if
Speaker 5: you're a white farmer, a healthcare ceo, or a Jew
Speaker 5: or Israeler THEBC, you know, you're a fair game. You
Speaker 5: get steamweled, the same thing, you know, the Soviet Union.
Speaker 5: You're a kulak, you're a business owner, your bourgeois, you know, whatever,
Speaker 5: you're gone, you're done, haha, your death is to be celebrated.
Speaker 5: This is where this leads. This is why it's so sinister.
Speaker 5: This is why I go on about it and join
Speaker 5: all the dots.
Speaker 1: So join all the dots.
Speaker 2: It was Sila Rampose's government that put Netta Yahoo in
Speaker 2: the dock with the IC International Court of Justice said, oh,
Speaker 2: what Israel is doing is they're you know, barbaric there
Speaker 2: war criminals. So that was the South Africans doing that.
Speaker 2: You go to a any any indigenous march here in
Speaker 2: Australia and there'll be the Palace pro Palestinian flag.
Speaker 1: You know, they don't even hide it all. They's one
Speaker 1: and the same thing.
Speaker 2: Course, you join the dots and it is, as James says,
Speaker 2: the Marxist attack on the West, and we are in
Speaker 2: the crossers. And that's that's the reality of the situation.
Speaker 3: And we've got people who are supposed to represent a
Speaker 3: conservative side of politics who say, oh, there's no jobs
Speaker 3: in the culture wars, why would we want to This
Speaker 3: is the values of your country, This is the future
Speaker 3: of your country. If you can't be interested in that
Speaker 3: as a politician, you're in the wrong game. If you're
Speaker 3: just in there because you have obsessions about tax policy,
Speaker 3: then I don't know, go be a charted accountant. This
Speaker 3: is what people actually care about in a deep and
Speaker 3: it reaches everywhere, every facet of life. It's not just universities,
Speaker 3: it's not just what you see on television, it's not
Speaker 3: just foreign policy. It is everywhere, and it does impact
Speaker 3: ultimately economically.
Speaker 7: Well, of course, get interesting.
Speaker 5: Because the thing is, you know, this is why I
Speaker 5: think Scott Morrison was very much you know, like that
Speaker 5: was so wrong to say, because if you're a center
Speaker 5: right party, and if your party is based around values
Speaker 5: of individual rights, freedom, achievement, you know, being left alone
Speaker 5: to do your thing and achieve for your family, you know,
Speaker 5: those are values. And if you let the left run
Speaker 5: rampant through the schools, the culture of the media, of
Speaker 5: the ABC and push values that are antithetical to that,
Speaker 5: then people are not going to hear your case. They're
Speaker 5: going to just think that socialism is the norm, collectivism
Speaker 5: is the norm. You know, this is what Anthony ALBINIZI
Speaker 5: wants to push hard for the next six years and
Speaker 5: reset the entire dial on this nation. What we are
Speaker 5: as a country, you know, from center right to a
Speaker 5: center left nation. That's why culture absolutely I matagine if
Speaker 5: you're a center right party like the liberals. Hello, you've
Speaker 5: got to fight for the values that are going to
Speaker 5: support people to vote you into power one day.
Speaker 3: Well, the only big win the Conservatives have had in
Speaker 3: the last five years, other than Queen's end life that's
Speaker 3: sort a big win I'm talking about nationally is the referendum,
Speaker 3: and that was when they were absolutely in the end,
Speaker 3: clear eye, single minded, unapologetic about the position, and they
Speaker 3: won in a much bigger ago where.
Speaker 5: They focused too. At twenty thirteen they focus.
Speaker 3: Of course, but in the last five years that's the
Speaker 3: only win that can count on. Hopefully they can learn
Speaker 3: from that.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a short break. After the break
Speaker 2: Canbra Clown Show in a tick roll up, roll up,
Speaker 2: step right this way. It's the greatest show on Earth.
Speaker 2: You won't believe your eyes as we pull cats out
Speaker 2: of bags and meet the Pope in our favorite clown
Speaker 2: show headgear. Yes it's Albozo and the Canbra Clown Show
Speaker 2: back from their Royal Gala People World tour under the
Speaker 2: Vatican Big Top. More on that in a second, but first,
Speaker 2: lots of tension in side show Ali and the Tunnel
Speaker 2: of Love or should that be the Haunted House, as
Speaker 2: two of our favorite amateur clowns little to be proud of,
Speaker 2: and then you numer numer numerology, clairvoyance, Madam lay down
Speaker 2: Susan hopped in and out of bed with each other
Speaker 2: all week Like most marital spats, nobody quite knew what
Speaker 2: the fuss was really all about.
Speaker 21: I can tell you because I was in the National
Speaker 21: Party party room that made this decision, the decision which
Speaker 21: was then conveyed to the Liberal leader, and that was
Speaker 21: not part of our consideration.
Speaker 2: Okay, okay, But they appear to be kissing and making
Speaker 2: up over the weekend. Maybe they should book a romantic
Speaker 2: room at Kim's on the Central Coast for a couple
Speaker 2: of nights. But what sort of damaging effect has all
Speaker 2: this had on the kids, one must ask.
Speaker 5: It's no good.
Speaker 1: I'm afraid.
Speaker 2: Here are some young Libs who put out a video
Speaker 2: on the ABC of all places, discussing their future.
Speaker 35: There's people on the conservative side of politics that say
Speaker 35: the Coalition needs to go further to the right.
Speaker 8: That's why they're losing the election.
Speaker 35: If the Coalition needed to go further to the right,
Speaker 35: one nation would be in government.
Speaker 1: But they're not.
Speaker 35: They need to be progressive on social policy issues of
Speaker 35: climate change and abroad. But when it comes to the economy,
Speaker 35: that's where they need it to state their difference with labor.
Speaker 5: Oh dear.
Speaker 1: Young man.
Speaker 2: Firstly, I hate to break it to you because you're
Speaker 2: going to find out soon enough climate change policies and
Speaker 2: net zero are the modern Australian economy and indeed are
Speaker 2: the single greater threat to your future prosperity or impoverishment.
Speaker 2: And moreover, unless the Coalition commits to abandoning net zero
Speaker 2: and pulling out of Paris, you won't have an economy worthy.
Speaker 1: Of the name.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 35: There's also an element of cultural warfare, you know, picking
Speaker 35: what flag to stand in front of. I think Australians
Speaker 35: are more interested in what a government is going to
Speaker 35: do for them.
Speaker 1: Oh dear, what government's going to do for them.
Speaker 2: If the Liberal Party think pandering to the woke left
Speaker 2: and demanding middle class welfare is the way ahead, Australia
Speaker 2: is in for some very troubling times.
Speaker 1: Indeed, I think.
Speaker 35: The more important thing to do is to sort of go, Okay,
Speaker 35: what does it mean to be a conservative in twenty
Speaker 35: twenty five?
Speaker 8: So what does it mean to be.
Speaker 6: Sort of socially progressive.
Speaker 8: By economically a bit more liberal. How does that frame now.
Speaker 2: Oh dear, it's catching. How about not being socially progressive?
Speaker 2: Socially progressive is a meaningless left wing term which covers
Speaker 2: everything from some fairly reasonable proposals to a Pandora's box
Speaker 2: of socialist horrors, such as divisive racist politics like the
Speaker 2: Voice built around smashing traditional norms and values and replacing
Speaker 2: them with tribal politics and the welfare state. So young liberal,
Speaker 2: instead of pandering to the socially progressive labor light nonsense,
Speaker 2: how about actually sticking to the ideas that Robert Menzie's
Speaker 2: fought for fighting socialism.
Speaker 1: Still, it's not all doom and gloom.
Speaker 2: At least one young liberal lad appears to have his
Speaker 2: head screwed on properly.
Speaker 15: I think one thing we need to focus on is
Speaker 15: making sure we have a comprehensive plan, but one that
Speaker 15: really reflects liberal values. That we are the party of
Speaker 15: small government and small spending.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, I was intrigued by this tweet put out this
Speaker 2: week by the ultra Lefty Australia Institute saying carbon offsets
Speaker 2: are quote a sham.
Speaker 1: Couldn't agree more.
Speaker 5: We are all.
Speaker 1: Paying for this stupidity.
Speaker 2: This sham quote from the Australia Institute huge news today.
Speaker 2: Energy Australia has been forced to admit what Australia Institute
Speaker 2: Research has long known. Carbon offsets are a sh sham
Speaker 2: and do nothing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Speaker 1: And the gloats.
Speaker 2: They even helpfully included this clip from last year.
Speaker 8: It's cheaper to greenwash in Australia. They're not.
Speaker 20: It's cheaper to buy carbonov It's cheaper to pay a
Speaker 20: certification fee to climate.
Speaker 8: Active and to buy some offsets from a.
Speaker 20: Wind farm than it is to implement the technology that
Speaker 20: you need, or go one hundred percent renewable, or change
Speaker 20: your business practice or change your business model.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's the great carbon offset sham. Even the lovies
Speaker 2: are waking up to it. Meanwhile, what has been called
Speaker 2: the biggest scandal since Watergate has hit the USA with
Speaker 2: the uncovering of the way the media and the bureaucrats
Speaker 2: and the White House all colluded to cover up the
Speaker 2: mental decline of Joe Biden. What is particularly galling to
Speaker 2: many Americans is how they were constantly lied to by
Speaker 2: so many people who had met with Joe Biden, swearing
Speaker 2: that he was in perfect shape, sharp as attack, a
Speaker 2: mental gymnast, smarter than he's ever been, such as this.
Speaker 14: Start your tape right now, because I'm about to tell
Speaker 14: you the truth and f you if you can't handle
Speaker 14: the truth. This version of Biden intellectually, analytically is the
Speaker 14: best Biden ever.
Speaker 1: Or how about this.
Speaker 10: I have spent countless hours with this president, whether in
Speaker 10: the Oval office or on the road, and I have
Speaker 10: to say he's sharp, he's engaged, he pushes us for information.
Speaker 2: But one person not mentioned in the current controversy who
Speaker 2: perhaps should be mentioned is our very own Albozo, our
Speaker 2: Prime Minister, himself a passionate supporter of Joe Biden, who
Speaker 2: had this to say when he was asked at a
Speaker 2: press conference following last year's Quad meeting where he spent
Speaker 2: time with Joe Biden about Joe Biden's mental faculties as one.
Speaker 3: Of her A relatively few number of people who's had
Speaker 3: this one one meeting.
Speaker 11: With you, what your personal impressions of Joe Biden.
Speaker 24: That's here, He's fit, he is titally on top of
Speaker 24: his brief.
Speaker 8: Wow, I haven't heard oh really?
Speaker 2: So was Alboso simply fooled, or do we have a
Speaker 2: liar in the lodge.
Speaker 1: I'll let you be the judge of that.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, we have this quite frankly bizarre footage out from
Speaker 2: Albosa taking his traveling circus all the way to Indonesia.
Speaker 2: They say wrestling with his labor colleagues is like herding cats,
Speaker 2: So maybe that's where Alboso developed this particular skill. Make
Speaker 2: of this what you will, but it appears to be
Speaker 2: Albosa give the Indonesians as some kind of gift a
Speaker 2: scarf to put around a cat, A.
Speaker 1: Cat in a pram with a scarf around it.
Speaker 2: The Qataris give their friends six hundred billion dollar jet airplanes.
Speaker 1: We give our friends a cat in a scarf.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, Labor are pressing ahead with their unrealized capital gains
Speaker 2: tax on super which we now learn Alboso and many
Speaker 2: of his fellow clowns will be exempt from Hallelijah. Yet
Speaker 2: here he was with Peter Stefanovic a few months ago
Speaker 2: assuring us that this was not the case. How will
Speaker 2: you personally be taxed under your proposed changes, PM when
Speaker 2: you retire.
Speaker 24: I would have to out of the contribution. That is
Speaker 24: the payments that I received there would be graded.
Speaker 2: Text ocean Again, it is up to you to decide
Speaker 2: whether Albozo was simply not across the detail.
Speaker 1: Or whether we have a liar in the lodge. You
Speaker 1: be the judge.
Speaker 2: Next stop, Alboso took his clown act to attend the
Speaker 2: inauguration of Pope Leo the fourteenth, complete with a clownish
Speaker 2: crocodile dundee hat.
Speaker 1: Not everyone got the joke.
Speaker 2: One startled observer, doctor Claudio Betty commented, men should not
Speaker 2: wear hats.
Speaker 6: Prime Minister, even or a hat?
Speaker 35: Is that typical producol wearing a hat for a mass
Speaker 35: like that?
Speaker 11: I wouldn't.
Speaker 8: I would say absolutely not.
Speaker 36: But of course the sun was very bad and.
Speaker 5: I think that.
Speaker 36: I mean, my idea is that, considering that it's a
Speaker 36: silly surgical celebration, men should not wear hats. But well,
Speaker 36: eventually I think that their protocola had to be changed
Speaker 36: a little bit because the sun was really hot.
Speaker 2: Yes, the Pope definitely prefers men without hats. I wonder
Speaker 2: what with the nineteen eighties pop group men without hats
Speaker 2: have to say about that hyperbol extreme exaggeration or telling
Speaker 2: the truth. We like to dish up the criticism on
Speaker 2: this program where it's warranted, but we also like to
Speaker 2: serve up.
Speaker 1: The praise where it's warranted.
Speaker 2: Praise to David Chris Afooley, the liberal leader of Queensland,
Speaker 2: the premiere there, for standing up to the United Nations.
Speaker 1: RITA tell us about this.
Speaker 3: Well, they're expanding their adult crimes at all time laws.
Speaker 3: So if you are a U offender but you commit
Speaker 3: a serious crime, then you're going to do some punishment
Speaker 3: for it, And they've got a youth crime crisis and
Speaker 3: they're tackling it. And Christoph Foley had a message for
Speaker 3: the UN who are crime These legislation isn't what should
Speaker 3: be the UN in a progressive country.
Speaker 1: It's an infringement on basic child rights.
Speaker 2: Christphooley, using language almost as colorful as our earlier guest,
Speaker 2: a similar sentiments.
Speaker 5: Here we go, David Chris.
Speaker 37: Here's my message to the United Nations. You don't control me,
Speaker 37: and I don't answer to you. I answer to Queenslanders,
Speaker 37: answer to a whole heap of those people back there
Speaker 37: who've had their lives turned apart.
Speaker 5: That's great. How good is that? You know? And I
Speaker 5: just wish, by the way, that we would see this
Speaker 5: sort of strength and moral fiber from the London police
Speaker 5: because there's an amazing story that's just broken overnight that
Speaker 5: a man whose identity is being withheld for his own safety,
Speaker 5: which tells you where this is going. Well, he was
Speaker 5: arrested because he went to a counter demonstration at a
Speaker 5: pro Palestine march carrying a sign mocking Nasrallah, the head
Speaker 5: of Hesbela. The police pulled them in and said, Oi,
Speaker 5: do you think it's all right that you had a
Speaker 5: sign that would inflame pro Hesbela people, which is insane
Speaker 5: because Hesbela is like a terrorist group. But okay, five,
Speaker 5: this shows where free speech is in Britain. It's an
Speaker 5: absolute joke. Who've seen people like Alison Pearson, the Daily
Speaker 5: Telegraph columnists, the woman who's been banged up for thirty
Speaker 5: one months for that tweet and this this is where
Speaker 5: free speech really has gone off the rails in Britain.
Speaker 5: And by the way, this is what happens when you
Speaker 5: have multicultural society without assimilation. You have to lose all
Speaker 5: of your other rights and keep place together.
Speaker 3: Bedives who say they're above the cultural war, yeah, I
Speaker 3: fight them also in Britain, I mean that do not
Speaker 3: have free speech.
Speaker 7: That is just.
Speaker 5: In free speech.
Speaker 8: Absolutely.
Speaker 3: Former police officer had four officers at his home because
Speaker 3: he posted something talking about the rise of anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: In the UK and you got caught reading the Spectator
Speaker 2: that Brexity magazine hadn't done with Quarrel books. That's it
Speaker 2: for this week's Outsiders. Thank you so much for watching us.
Speaker 2: But what a busy week you have.
Speaker 5: Every evening.
Speaker 2: I mean I never miss it the Rita Panahe show
Speaker 2: at eleven pm.
Speaker 1: And of course come Friday, thank god it's Friday.
Speaker 2: When you get the full Outsiders, you get the world
Speaker 2: according to Rowan Dean At seven o'clock, you get James
Speaker 2: Morrow at eight o'clock, you get Rita panahere at nine o'clock.
Speaker 1: What a great night Friday night is. That's the night
Speaker 1: to stay and watch Telly. We'll see you next Sunday.