WEBVTT - 'IT’S FOR A PAYCHECK NOT A PREMIERSHIP’: Let’s get real about the Chiefs’ recruitment

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, welcome back everyone to another episode of Code NRL

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Monday's podcast. I'm joined by Fatima Kadou Hey, Fatima, Hi,

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll stay look at you this time?

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Sorry about last week and Bulldog Richie. How are you Bulldogs?

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd be I'm well, very good mate.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alex also known as Nerrol Soapbox and winter is

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>over for some hopeless teams this season. The Broncos got

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>up manly, got up ubut and then we saw the

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Tigers with an unbelievable upset against the Sydney Roosters. Bulldog

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>you wrote about this in Bulldogs Bite. What do you

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>make of the Tigers over the weekend?

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Unbelievable? I really couldn't believe what I was watching as

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the game panned out. Where has this been? Eight losses

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 3>in a row and they come out and bowl over

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the Roosters who have been incredibly consistent over the last

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 3>what month? Month and a half, which beggars the question,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 3>well begs the question, rather, where has this form been?

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Why aren't we getting this every week with the Tigers?

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I know consistency in enerrole is difficult given this, but

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>what they've served up over the last work eight weeks

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>has been appalling at times, absolutely terrible. This gives them

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 3>some hope. There's a pulse at Concord, but the pulse

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 3>can only keep bipping if they actually start to put

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>games back to back, and this is their greatest challenge.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>There's no point having a win like that if they

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>don't back it up. This season's gone, but next year

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>it's got to be a year whe they've got to

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>start to put together some consistent results. It's hard, but

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 3>this is a club that's been a failure a failure

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>for fifteen years. We saw yesterday what they can do

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 3>over to them.

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, so for Tim, let me ask you, is this

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>more embarrassing for the Roosters or exciting for the Tigers.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 4>I think it's both. I think I think it's both

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 4>of those things, just on the Tigers. Why I found

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 4>that performance so impressive is it might have been last

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 4>week or maybe two weeks ago, where Benji Marshall basically

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 4>admitted that, yes, this team is mentally fatigue. The headlines,

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>the roller coaster, the circus, the rest of it is

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 4>actually getting to this team, and we'll see it now.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 4>I get that. I get that we're seeing that in

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 4>our performances. Club on fatigue, absolutely, but it is true.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, you could see it in the performances that

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 4>this was a team that wasn't you know, I'm not

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 4>gonna say I didn't want to be there, but was

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 4>clearly struggling in terms of mental fatigue.

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 3>You know what, they're not in aeral players. If they

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 3>can't cope with that, they are not up to aneral standard.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>But the comeback and to beat the Roosters, who all

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden a lot of people are talking about

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 4>being the Premiership favor over Penrith and in the way

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 4>they did it, shades of what got everybody excited at

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the start of the year showed and I agree like

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 4>that there is still some fight in there and there's

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 4>still with some fight in Benji Marshall. There's still some

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 4>fight in that team. The question now is can they

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 4>back it up? Because I'm assuming they expelled a lot

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 4>of energy to get that victory on the weekend. Can

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 4>they back it up? And I think that will give

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 4>us more of an indication of whether Benji has enough

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 4>hope for it to be a building block into the summer.

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but losing is a habit, so we see teams

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>go on this skid and when you get that win, though,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of resets everything. You've got this opportunity. Now,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, the team's back. They're buzzing, the coach has

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>got a bit more self esteem, a bit more confidence

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on what the playing group's doing.

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>It feels that the team can now go into.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>The last I think they only have two games left

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to one game left, going with a bit of hope

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they could ruin the Cowboys season. Really, that could be

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a strong motivation for the Tigers. The Cowboys need those wins.

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's some really promising things out. I think, Bulldog,

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you're right on, like fatigue is not excuse every team

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is struggling. But I noticed in Justin Holbrooks pressa when

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Newcastle Knights put out a future performance against Manly.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Not that I'm complaining about it, and he said, oh,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we've had a long run, we're tired. But when you've

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>got results on the board, you get that excuse. When

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you've been losing and been putting in poor performances, you don't.

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And Tigers fans get upset about that. They say, why

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't the media leave us alone? Well, if they were,

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just like you've said, bulldog. If they were just better,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>there would be less scripting.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I think just the whole book was talking about mental fatigue.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a completely different type of fatigue that

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, Yes, they're professionals, they get paid a lot

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 4>of money. You know they should, you know, whether it's

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 4>on the club to make sure that they've got the

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 4>right people in place to help them deal with the

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>mental side of things. I think maybe Justin Hodbrook was

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 4>talking about sort of the physical side of things as well.

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you go on a run and you

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 4>end up being mentally fatigue because you've been winning, Like

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the vibe is completely different when you're winning. So yeah,

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I get it they're professionals, but I also do think

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 4>it's absolutely possible for a club mentally to be down

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 4>in the doll drums after what they've been through and

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 4>for that to be reflected in how they play.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 3>But the importantly we know about a false storm though

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 3>we've had a minute, we've had false hope, and we've

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 3>been let up the garden path multiple times in the

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>last fifteen years, and they've all added up to nothing.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely nothing, which is why I said, so, yeah, totally

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 4>agree what we see is enough there for a building

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 4>block because there is so much more to go, you know,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 4>and probably looking back, the excitement over them at the

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 4>start of the year was a bit of a false storm.

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 4>But I mean there's something there. I don't know if

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're going to play in the top

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 4>eight next year, but you know, if they scrambled like

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 4>they did, I think there was this five minutes into

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 4>the second half where you know, they defended three straight sets.

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 4>We hadn't seen that from them for a really long time.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>That shows that there is some fight, that there is

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 4>some care, and they have the right attitude.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>So well Tiger sides, at least there's some fight in

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the team, like, at least they've got something. When twelve

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>went off in the first ten minutes or something, I

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thought they're doomed. Then Billy Smith's scores in the corner,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and I go, there's going to be an absolute flogging.

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>At least there's some fight.

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Build there, certainly is. I always get perplexed at Tigers

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>fans who come at the media for a perceived over

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 3>examination of their side. My argument back is, is this

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 3>what you accept? Do you not want the media to

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 3>call out your side? For consistent failure. Do you not

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 3>want the media to find out why your side is

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>going so ordinary? Why pick out the media and bag them.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Shouldn't those questions be directed at the club to find

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 3>out why. Yeah, you're bagging the wrong people. Get to

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the club find out how it's gone so bad for

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I agree, it's an easy target the media. It's fine.

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I doesn't bother meat orter for ducks back. However, it

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 3>just it fascinates me that they go for the media

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 3>rather than actually going they're playing the ball, not the player.

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's interesting because you look at the Broncos and

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 4>all the media scrutiny they've received this year, you know,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 4>and in past years. When was it when they won

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 4>the wooden Spoons? So you know, Canterbury, how much studenty

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>have they been under in the last twelve eighteen months.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know, it's not just the Tigers.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you avoid scrutiny when you win, so and

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been a decade and a half of incompetence, so

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>What about the Roosters. I mean, we talk about the

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Tigers winning, good luck to them, but that loss could

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 3>be a hammer blow to the Roosters, who I still

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 3>think can win the competition. I'm not going to write

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 3>them off. They're on thirty six points with the Panthers

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 3>and the Warriors, so not the end of the road

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>by any means. But it was just the way that

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 3>they lost. They looked lethargic, they look weary. They had

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>no spark that had a tann of ball inside the opposition.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Twenty did bugger all with it, let's be honest, and

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 3>their big stars just didn't stand up. I thought Sam

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Walker was average at best, Chairs didn't do a whole lot.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a real week of soul searching, because if they

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>don't pull themselves out of this quickly, the season of

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>hope can evaporate very quickly.

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, and we've seen that happen with the Sharks.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I was trumpeting their chances only a few weeks ago,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and they barely got by against the Titans after two

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>consecutive losses. Yeah, the Roosters look like they just thought

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this game would fall over and they'd win, which is

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>credit to the Tigers.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>They did show the fight to defend.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But in addition to that, but the Rusters didn't go

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>right in the second half no longer need to I

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>sa Toya Cherry, Evans Ramsey out the back. Why did

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they keep going left or like meander through the middle?

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>They It just looked like a team that expected that

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they would win and didn't get that result. But to

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>be fair, they've had this in them. They have been

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on a nine game winning streak and been one of

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the best teams in the competition. But they've only played

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>three excellent games. So I'm not willing to write them

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>off because they've played plenty of games like that and one.

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I still think they're one of the best teams in

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the competition. Do you think they go all the way?

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think I think the Warriors are for me,

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 4>are the team that's going to go all the way.

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 4>But it was interesting watching the Roosters because you're right,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 4>what we saw from them sort of were those bad

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 4>habits that they had before they went on their runs.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 4>So I think Billy Smith, you know, makes a poor

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 4>defensive error, it leads to a try. I think, then

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 4>he makes another handing error they can't defend. It leads

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 4>to a try, Lindsay's at Lindsay Collins era try and

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 4>then Afar who White who has been easily their best

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 4>player all year, their best, most consistent player, comes up

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 4>with a loose spoor, a brain snap moment that hands

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 4>over a possession that allows Jock Madden to kick the

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 4>field goal. So you know that was really you know,

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 4>it was discipline and not being able to back up defensively.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 4>On the back of that poor discipline, we hurt them.

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Wilto be really happy about the Roosters Warriors. So this

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>is out out of those top three teams, the three contenders,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they've probably been in the best form in recent months.

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>They actually had the toughest game in the round as well.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>They were the only one going up against a strong

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Top eight team, and as much as there was a

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>fight back from the rabbit O's, the Warriors really just

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>showed their premiership credentials. My thought on the Warriors right

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>now is that I don't actually think it matters who's

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>playing in the halves, not because they're inconsequential positions, but

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that's how clean and clear Andrew Webster's system is. But

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 1>as well as how dominant his pack is they play.

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been having online this week for saying the Warriors

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>play boring footy, but I don't mean boring in that

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not creative. It's just that get down the field,

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>kick to your corner, put pressure on, put increase your

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>line speed, make them make a mistake, and then capitalize

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on the back of that bulldog. When you say, survey

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the three title contenders at the moment, where do you

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>put the worry?

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I went out on a limb two weeks ago

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 3>and I said it would be East the West in

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the Grand Finals, which is Roosters the Panthers.

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>We shan't let you forget.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 3>No, you shan't, And I'm more than happy for you

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>to bring it up when you want. Having said that,

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I can't go back on my word, so I'm going

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 3>to sit here right now and stick with what I've said.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Otherwise it looks like I'm pissed week and I don't

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 3>want to do.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>That, or you're open to new information.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. But look, to be fair, they still

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>all are on thirty six points. Yeah, so it's not

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>like one of those two are fallen away. The Panthers

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 3>will be right there, as will the Roosters, but certainly

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>in terms of form and momentum, which is crucial at

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 3>this point of the year, you find the good teams

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>start to build that momentum about three weeks out that's

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 3>right here, right now, and the Warrior's big pack of

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>forwards are just absolutely pausing, creating havoc.

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yep, I think I write about it.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 4>I did write about it in the Tackle, about the

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Warrior's power game, and I think that's what sets them apart.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Like if you look at you know, the teams that

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 4>have those sort of dominant forward packs, the Warriors for

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 4>me right now playing the best power game in the NRL,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 4>but also their bench, you know what I mean, Like

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 4>their bench Come on, and you know there was Eddie

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Arama Taba who for me had a bit of a

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>breakout game. He makes a break and I think he

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 4>sets up Chanelle Harris to Beta. It might have been,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 4>but he makes that break from an even just as

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 4>unbelievable pass from Demetric Bymonga, you know. So. Yeah, I

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 4>just love the way they play. Yes, it's simple, but

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 4>at the same time you want to watch them because

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 4>you want to see all the freaky things they're forwards

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 4>can come up with. What I liked about their result

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 4>the most is Yes, you're right, bulldog. They're all on

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 4>equal points, but there is a single point separating the

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Warriors and Penrith, and I love that they were cocky

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 4>enough to go after that single point, to put themselves

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 4>at the top of the ladder.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>That would have been a direction coming down from the

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>coaching box, right.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, come on, yeah, if you're putting a field

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>got this is so disrespectful.

0:11:58.160 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Look at the Warriors. You see the lot of the

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 3>don't you. Andrew Webster learned his craft, he learned under Ivan.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>He obviously listened, he learned, he digested, he was educated,

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of similarities in the way that

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 3>they play. And if you look at Coach of the Year,

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 3>it was only last week I was seeing in the

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 3>praises of Justin Holbrook if he could have taken them

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 3>from last seventeenth, the fourth or fifth, he's coach of

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the year. But it can change very quickly. One bad

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>loss and you look now and you think, gee, how

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>can we go past Andrew Webster. He's going to have

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to be coach of the year, isn't he.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I still rate Wholebrook just because of the story. I

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what influences how that decision is made, but

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to take a team from the Doldrims into the top

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>eight is impressive. But Andrew Webster's equally is impressive. And

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing we talk about their bench, their forwards

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>coming through, forward's coming off the bench. It's really easy

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to have a great next man up culture when you

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have an excellent system. So I think there's times where

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like the attention goes to the players, but it

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>overlooks how much great work Andrew Webster and his coaching

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>staff have done.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 3>Just going to meander to the left here with the

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Coach of the Year, you look at the and there's

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>a few contenders. I think it's an award that has

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 3>to go and hold until Grand Final day. I think

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>all the other awards can be handed out at the

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Daim Medal, which is a glittering night. But I think

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the Coach of the year it should probably be announced

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 3>on the rostrum when they hand out the trophy.

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is good.

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 3>I think the premiership winning coach pretty much you get

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 3>it most year.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh I was going to say, is that what you

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 2>think it should be?

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Because people say it should be iving, it should be

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>even clear a year after year after year, So like

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>why are we talking about Hoolebrook. Some people say it's

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>not the most improved coach award, it's the best coach

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of the competition.

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>So for you on that, do you.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>View it as the best coach as the coach that

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>got their team to win the camp or it created

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>the most transformation in their team.

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 3>The criteria for Coach of the Year is uncertain. We

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 3>don't actually know. I don't think it's ever been actually

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>fed out a blueprint as to why you are voting

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>for the Coach of the year. But you will have

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>coaches who have done extraordinary well, like a whole book example.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>But the coach of the year should really be the

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 3>bloke that holds up the trophy. He's got his side

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>to win the premiership. I just think that, no matter

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 3>how many arguments you throw forward, he's the best coach

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 3>of the comp because he's got his side there.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I viewed it's like, well, he gets to

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have the premiership credential though, premiership winning coach. I love

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the story. I really love the story of the Knights

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this year. Like, yeah, everyone wrote them off. I bet

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you two wrote them off. I didn't write them off,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but no one thought that they would be good this year,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>especially after that trial game against the Bulldogs. You know,

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they've gone and scored forty seven more tries this season

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>compared to last. Their attack was completely revolutionized, and even

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that game and they were woeful against mainly they were

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely terrible.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>But that was their first.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Loss by more than two points since Round eight. What

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is this team we're watching like? For me, that's a

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>coach with incredible credentials. I'm voting I'm still going for

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Hoolebrook for Coach of the Year. Well, the true identity

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of signing double O seven has been revealed. Joey Marnu

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is joining the Chiefs. He said that he would only

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ever go back to the Roosters, but I guess tax

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>free money.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Talks, Bulldog. What are you making of the Chiefs?

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Now? Great bye, No doubt about that. Joey marn who

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>was an elite player in the Enneral several years ago,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>he adds to what is an obviously incredibly impressive recruitment drive. However,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I want to point this out. Okay, let's go through

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 3>the list one by one. Brian Totto outstanding, absolutely outstanding,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Alex Johnson wonderful player, getting too all the end of

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 3>his career wrecked.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Zak Lomax will have been at rugby for a year

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 3>picking up god knows how many bad habits. Joey Marnho

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 3>French rugby four three two or three two or three

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 3>French rugby back to the general is an incredibly big

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 3>jump to make. We look at Jerome Leuy. His form

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 3>this year has been patchy at best. He's got another

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 3>year next year before he goes there is a year

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>old and that year is at Paramatta hardly setting the

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 3>competition on fire. So and Kinda Watson is obviously getting

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>older as well. So you look at that roster. It

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 3>looks great on paper. I'm just trying to break it

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 3>down to say, I don't think it's as impressive as

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>what some people think.

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's got a lot of star power to it.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But I would suggest that most of the players that

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>they've signed this might be their last contract. But by

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the time I think Leui and to O we're get

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>into the Chiefs are going to be nearing thirty. I

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>think Manu will be thirty two. They don't have that

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>much footy left in them. But at the same time,

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so what are you saying Boulder, do you think that

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll make the AID? Do you think that they're building

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a squad that will be respectable.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about the age of shit. I want

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>to know about their forwards. Yeah, because their forwards are

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 3>very light on. I want to know about their forwards.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I can have a bit more of an educated stab.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess as to where they'll finish in that year. One. Look,

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 3>it's going on a different path the Perth. They're going

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 3>down the tradesman like path. This mob's going down the

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 3>glamour path. And that's fine. That's a good analyswent My

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 3>only as I said, my only reservation here is that

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the signings look very good on paper, but when you

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 3>peel it back individually, there's a few flaws in there,

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 3>which are people I don't think are digesting fully.

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.239
<v Speaker 4>But there's also a lot of experience and a lot

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 4>of premierships. Yeah you know what I mean. So yeah,

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 4>and I do see where Bulldogs coming from. It feels

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 4>like you could probably there's a question mark you could

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 4>put aside next to every signing, but you look at

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 4>what they've achieved at the NRL, what they all rep

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 4>players in some form. So yeah, I think they're putting

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 4>together a pretty good team.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>People said they remember when the Dolphins came in and

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:38.719
<v Speaker 1>people thought they were going to be terrible because they

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>sold They signed a lot of old players from the

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Storm and a lot of experience that seems to work

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>with a new franchise getting that experience where we've seen

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>at least proof concept.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think that.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Chiefs will be Premiership contenders. That's definitely.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>They're absolutely assembling a top eight squad. Though a lot

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of fans, though of other clubs, are really frustrated, Bulldog.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>They say it's unfair. This tax free salary for the

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>players is just creating an completely unfair playing field.

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Do you think it's unfair?

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's unfair, but every club agreed to it. Yeah,

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 3>all the clubs knew what was going to happen. They

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 3>just didn't look at the fine detail. They were offered

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 3>the four million and they're all greedy gutses and they

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>grab the money and guess what four million bucks was

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 3>offered to me? I grab it too, yeh. What I'm

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 3>saying is, though they didn't go through and really look

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 3>at the fine print down the bottom which said tax free,

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 3>contract acts, free third parties. Now they've realized, Holy hell,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 3>this is the bomb that's gone off in the in

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 3>a row. None of us anticipated this. We all thought

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 3>that P and G would run Stone Motherless last, and

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 3>yet here we are talking about them potentially being a

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>top eight in their first year. So it's unfair. But

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 3>who's to blame. The NRL, I think had to give

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 3>them some concessions, otherwise they would have been a disaster.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 3>And no one wants any new club to come in

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>and be crap from year one. They're not going to

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 3>be and that's because of the contract situation.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And not only did they take the money, but

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 4>a part of me still feels like I'm talking to

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 4>club types, is they really underestimated the Chiefs's ability to

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 4>be able to now somebody like the why And once

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 4>they did that, all of a sudden, the Dominoes four became.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 3>A cool place to go to some degree, where before

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 3>that it was a place you wouldn't compound in the

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 3>third world nation.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 4>There. Yeah, you know, look just on that. I think

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 4>at the same time that obviously those players are going

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 4>to PNG because they believe in the vision, you know,

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 4>they're happy to take their families there. They think they

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 4>can relocate start a new life there. The rest of it,

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 4>I think also the chiefs so would deep down know

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 4>that they will probably end up giving more releases on

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 4>compassionate grounds. And it would not surprise me if it's

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 4>a couple of the players. Not that I know anything

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 4>about this, but you know what I mean. There's also

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 4>happens for the warrant that they can't anticipate that. Yes,

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 4>I've got everybody on board for now, but those players

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 4>still going to feel the same after twelve months, after

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty four months.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>They'll have the biggest rotation roster and then a rule

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>by far, you won't see a Tom Traboy Wach type

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 3>any year player at P ANDNG. They'll be there for

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 3>their two years, then they're out. You said they're sharing

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 3>in their vision. I think they're sharing in their cash.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where there's any vision at all, or

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 3>that can be the concern. That's and you know what,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 3>I've got no problem with that. I've always said when

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.959
<v Speaker 3>footy players come out and say it's not about the money,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 3>it is, and good luck to you. I'd take the

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 3>money as well. I don't know why these rugby league

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 3>players have to come out and feel at some sort

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 3>of moral dilemma to say that you've gone for the cash.

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Take the money down, blokes, go and set yourself up

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 3>for life.

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's the thing. So the other criticism of

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this team is that they are motivated by the paycheck,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>not the premiership. They are going there to get the

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>really great deal. It's not like they grew up going gosh,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I cannot wait to play for Papua New Guinea. This

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>is just an opportunity that they've taken on that. The

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>clubs took the four million dollars, and I would take

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars too. What I wouldn't do is then

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>winge about the four million dollars that I got because

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't inspect the fine print.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Bulldog.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to throw it to a question to you

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to clear it for our fans in a second. But

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fans that are upset about the chiefs and the tax

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>free salary exemptions that they're getting, they really should be

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>taking out their fury at the clubs.

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 2>The clubs signed off on it.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>The CEOs can't come out and say we're not into

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this because they've signed the deal.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I suspect we're going to see.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Far more coaches and players connected to clubs come out

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and criticize it.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>The clubs can't because they took the money.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But there is an important caveat here that I want

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to clear up with your bulldog. So a lot of

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fans out there think that because they have the tax

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 1>free exemption, that and it's doubling what they're paying, it

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>means they can underpay players.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 2>But that's not how it works with the salary cap,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 2>is it. Now?

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 3>The salary cap does state quite clearly that you have

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 3>to the n ROR will set some form of a

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 3>value on every player. So for example, Hudson Young can't

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 3>go there for six hundred thousand dollars. He's clearly a

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 3>lot better than that that the NRL will say, we

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>think he's valued at nine hundred whatever it may be.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's not correct what you're saying. The NORAL will

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 3>step in and for Tiamy, you understand it to be

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the same that the NORAL will put an individual value

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 3>on every single player.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the way I understand it is the salary cap

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 4>order star will expect that they are registered as market

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 4>value at fair value.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, and that means that at Hudson Young can't

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>go for six hundred, It's going to be closer to

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a million, which means that every single signing at the

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs will be a superstar because they have to play

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the players what they're worth. They're not getting Jerome Leuie

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for seven hundred thousand, they're paying one point two. They

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have the same salary cap. Peter Landy's tried to explain

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that did a poor job at it, but he is

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>saying like eventually every spot will be filled, but it

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>won't be filled completely with superstars.

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I think what the club's fear, and it's a genuine fear,

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 3>is that they just can't compete. They know if P

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 3>and G come hunting one of their guns, they just

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 3>throw their hands up. Now, what can we do? The

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Raiders of table the one point one million dollar offer

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 3>a year over three years for Hudson Young, it's three

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 3>point three. They ain't going to cut it. That's the

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 3>biggest offer in the history of Camber going back to

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighty two. And they still know that if P

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and G want him, they'll probably get him.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's see what clubs are also doing in that breath

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 4>is that they're allowing players to talk before November one

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 4>just to.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Pang Yeah, so why do you think that's happening, Because

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 3>they want to know if you're going to go, then

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 3>we want to know. Now. We don't want to hang

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 3>around to November one because we want our money to

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 3>go and plan to sign him, him, upgrade him, and

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 3>then that's how the money is going to be spent.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 3>But by waiting around in November one, it's a ticking

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>time bomb which just waits to go off, and it

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 3>goes boom on November one, and by then other players

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:01.360
<v Speaker 3>may well have potentially decided privately to move elsewhere.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, at the end of the day, this was never

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>going to work unless there was some advantage given to

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the chiefs. So fans can winge about it, complain about it,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's the CEOs who signed the deal. Well, as

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>much as I'm sure the teams that are currently in

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the top eight wish it was settled. There's still hope.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a glimmer, the tiniest glimmer of hope for Manly fans.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to happen, but the Bulldogs generally have

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a shot of making the top eight Bulldog I'll go

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to you. Is this top eight settled?

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, No, clearly it's not settled because of the state

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>of the table in terms of points. I think the

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 3>top eight now will be the top eight. I don't

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 3>think the Doggies will get there or bet they can

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 3>still so as far as I can see there one

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 3>went outside of the eight on twenty six points and

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the two teams above them on twenty eight other Cowboys

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 3>and South Sydney. So technically we've got three going into two,

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 3>haven't we if we really want to peel it back

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and make it simplistic. So it's up to whether the

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Doggies can pick up two wins, which they have to do.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 3>You've written down there. For Tima they play the Panthers

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 3>and the Broncos. So look, I think the Panthers can

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 3>end the Bulldog's hopes and that would mean I guess

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 3>going to the final round that the top eight hunt

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 3>is finished.

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>But for Tima you need to win some points a

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Bulldogs fans, so do you think they can make it?

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Do?

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 4>I need to win points the Bulldogs fans, I think

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 4>all I think they can beat Brisbane in the final round.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 4>They showed they've got Penrith's money in round six. I

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 4>think it was interestingly for Penrith with no Jack Coggo

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 4>who's been suspended, Ivan Cleary now has to make a

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 4>decision about whether Blaze to Lunge comes in or whether

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 4>he goes with Jack Cole. And it was that game

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 4>in round six that really exposed Blaze to Lunge's defensive issues.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 4>Like Galvin and Preston, who were really good on the weekend,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 4>That combination with Matt Burden being on that right side

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 4>as well, really exposed him that It'd be interesting to

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 4>see what decision their IBN makes. Look Canibury were good

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 4>on the weekend. Penrith I think found a bit of

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 4>their mojo back. I think they I called them ratherless

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 4>without Asao last week. I think Nathan Cleary handled you know,

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 4>being without Yo a lot better against Melbourne. I can't

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 4>see them winning Penrith, beat beating Penrith, so I think

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 4>that's what will hurt their chancest to the end.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a super steep hill to climb. Except if this

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is why it's nerve racking right now for rabbit Os

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and Cowboys fans. If that there's one team that delivers

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and performs against the Panthers, It's the Bulldogs. And that's

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>why Bulldogs fans won't give up hope because they know

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that this team. In fact, if there's a team SURROUNDO

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>knows how to beat and how to play against, it's

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. So it could be this is going to

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be so exciting, it could be agonizing, or it could

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we could be going into the last round still not

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>knowing the top eight, which is always awesome.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 2>For the season.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And now for our final segment of our weekly episode,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fans bs Messages of the week. If you are pissed off,

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>if something's got you wound up, if you've got a

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>strong hot take, we want to hear it.

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>We've got two here for team.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to throw this one to you from Scott

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>from Kayama, Lovely place to live, tax free, P and

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>G deals. Now about beating NRL clubs, the game is

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>chasing money, not passion.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 4>A bit of yes and a bit of no on

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 4>that one. I mean, is there more passionate face when

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 4>it comes to Rugbilly than PNG?

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there isn't. They absolutely love it. And you know,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 4>like Bulldog said, which player really deep down. Isn't chasing money?

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Eric, I don't understand the question. Is it the game

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 3>is chasing money?

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 4>What does the game is chasing money.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 2>About the investment?

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Like would you ever go to P and G unless

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the massive amounts of money were available from the government?

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, No, I get what he's say. I guess. Look,

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 3>there are some issues there that the players are going

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 3>to have to confront, but it's all going to be

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 3>smothered by rivers of gold.

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the money. Scott, Sorry, mate, bulldog, throw

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this one to you. This is a spicy one from

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Gus in Melbourne, one of the few fans down there. Okay,

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So Bellamy's empire crumbles as young guns fail to fill

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the boots of legends. Is the end of an era?

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Is this the end of an era? In Melbourne?

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Gus thinks so.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 3>No, Gus, I can't agree. From memory. They've got Jermaina,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Sarco and Bronson Cherry going down there. A couple of

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>handy boyers, particularly Osako has been absolutely outstanding this year.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 3>He'll take over from will Warlbrick, who's going back to

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the Warriors. But look, while they got their spine there,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 3>Harry Jerome cam and so far long ago back there,

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 3>They'll always be competitive. They throw a few extra players

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 3>in there. Look, is Melbourne's empire over in terms of

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 3>winning premierships? Probably? But are they going to be successful

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 3>next year? I think they will be. Yeah.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a course. The rules this year

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>really hampered. It took too long for Melbourne to adjust,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and then the rules changed back. The key issue for

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Storm is that they just don't have the forwards right now.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It all hinges on Stefano and when he's off, it's

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not that much to do with the spine they've been injured.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I reckon that Melbourne are too great a club in

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Bellum is too good a coach to be written off.

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So Gus, we disagree mate. The empire is not crumbling.

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>They've just had a rough season. I disagree with Bulldog.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they still could win one, even though I

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>hate the Storm. All Right, folks, thanks so much for

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>joining in. We'll catch you next week, and don't forget

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this Fozball lives