WEBVTT - What lies beneath | 8

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>I think, mister Carrell, is your name, Kevin Stephen Carrell. Yes,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, and you have been giving evidence in the inquest. Yes,

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>did you meet with Rochelle Childs on seven June two

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one at Bargo? Absolutely not know?

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Just days before Christmas in two thousand and six, Kevin

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Corell is giving evidence of the inquest into the death

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 2>of Rochelle Child's. It's five years since Rochelle's murder. Unbeknownst

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to Kevin, while he's on the stand at Glebe Coroner's Court,

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Rochelle's body is beneath him in the same building, being

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>re examined by a forensic anthropologist.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Sitting in the start, Kevin Correll was told Rochelle's body

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>has recently been expered.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know that, replied mister Correll.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 5>He hasn't been charged or other persons of interest have

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 5>now been cleared.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Counsel assisting the coroner, Peter Singleton, told him further post

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Morgan examination has found at least one digit is not present,

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 3>its information police never made public.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.919
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Corell, a grandfather of three, strenuously denies any involvement,

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 4>and in court today tried to avoid taking the stand

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 4>his lawyer, claiming mister Correll might be tricked into giving

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.919
<v Speaker 4>answers that suggest he's guilty.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm Ashley Hanson and you're listening to episode eight of

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Dear Rochelle, a podcast by True Crime Australia. This is

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 2>the untold story of Rochelle Charles. In this episode, excerpts

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>from the coronial transcripts have all been voiced by actors,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>including those of Kevin Correll. It's important to mention non

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>publication orders prevent us from revealing some witnesses and their evidence,

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and even evidence from certain has been suppressed. Those court

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>orders still stand. Mister Carrel, who was Rochelle's boss at

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Camden Holden, has always denied any involvement in the murder

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 2>of his young protogepe Rochelle Charles, and he's never been charged.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 6>My name is Peter Singleton. I'm a barrister and I

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 6>was the counsel assisting the coroner in the inquest into

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 6>the death of Rochelle Chiles.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Here's Peter Singleton reading his own opening address.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 6>This matter has involved many victims. Rochelle Childs, of course,

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 6>is the primary victim. She has tragically lost her life,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 6>her family have suffered greatly, and her friends have also suffered.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 6>So too of other persons and their families when those

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 6>persons have come under police scrutiny for crime they did

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 6>not commit. And indeed, in this inquest, there will be

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 6>further pain as painful issues are necessarily canvassed. Even the

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 6>family of the killer is likely to suffer discomfort in

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 6>a number of ways in this inquest. I anticipate, given

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 6>the large number of witnesses that have to be called,

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 6>that family members of the killer will have to give evidence,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 6>which is never a pleasant experience. I anticipate that they

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 6>will learn things about their family member that they did

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 6>not previously know, not just about this matter, but about

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 6>their personal background. Such suffering is regretted, but it is

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 6>necessary in pursuit of the important functions of this inquest.

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>The inquest ran over two years, with multiple adjournments. Almost

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>one hundred witnesses were called to give evidence. A Gleeb

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>coroners called in Sydney's in a West. The building was

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>on one of Sydney's busiest roads, Paramatta Road.

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 6>I would recall it as a as a brutalist type

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 6>of building seemed to be basically made of concrete with

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 6>a perhaps some pebble crete or some other weak attempt

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 6>at beauty, but essentially it was relatively dark inside, unattractive, unadorned, unappealing,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 6>and unsympathetic to the people who had to be in it.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 2>It had been five years without answers for Chelle's loved ones,

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 2>her sister Christie and her mum Anne can remember sitting

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>in the courtroom.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 7>We were there every day, all day and it was

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 7>it was hard. It was hard listening to people talk

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 7>about it. It was hard listening to people refuse to

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 7>answer questions too. That was infuriating. If you've got nothing

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 7>to hide, why you're not answering questions. That was Kevin

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 7>who eventually refused to answer any more questions, which was

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 7>his right. But why wouldn't you just answer the questions?

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 7>Don't be an asshole? Alrighty O.

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 8>Little notes and listening and feeling sorry for those who

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 8>had to go through it. Listen, just look the same

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 8>way going through a sort of you know, because I

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 8>all cared about her, all the people and on the stand.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Can you give us some context around what led to

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Rochelle's inquest being held In two thousand and six.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 6>The police had conducted an investigation. They had a brief

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 6>of evidence, but it wasn't sufficient to lay any charges.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 6>In this case, the state current had decided there should

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 6>be a hearing.

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 9>Or an inquest.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>There were nine persons of interest. Is that unusual to

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>have so many persons of interest for homicide?

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 6>I think it probably is unusual. My experience may differ

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 6>from others, but it seems to me more than average.

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Bear in mind that these investigations and in quests offer

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 6>need to be thorough and need to canvass all the possibilities.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 6>We don't go into them with a closed mind. In

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 6>this case, there were nine people who had had some

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 6>connection to Rochelle in the periods leading up to her death.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 6>All of that needed to be explored. Mister Carrell was

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 6>one of the nine people who were in proximity to

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 6>Rochelle at relevant times. There was evidence suggesting that he

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 6>would perhaps have wanted to have a personal relationship with

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 6>her beyond the workplace, and that he might have been

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 6>a person who was going to meet her at a

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 6>relevant time, and that needed to be explored. My recollection

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 6>is he was a fairly calm witness.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's return to some of Kevin's testimony. Kevin Carrell was

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 2>legally represented by Matthew Johnston, a criminal lawyer. You're about

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>to hear in exchange between Peter Singleton and Kevin car

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Real voiced by actors.

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>The proposition is that, in the course of this inquiry,

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>by order of the coroner, Rochelle Child's body was exhumed

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for a further post mortem examination. Do you understand that

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that, But I understand what you're saying

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>when you say you didn't know it. Today's the first

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>time you've heard it. Yes, I want you to understand that,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the examinations that have so far

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>been conducted of her person or her remains in this inquest,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>there has been, for some reason discovered that at least

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>one digit, if not more than one digit, is not present.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 9>Do you understand that? Do you understand what that means?

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 6>During the course of the inquest, we received information that

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 6>one of the people of interest had brin spreading the

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 6>story that Rochelle had been killed by by Kisho would

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 6>cut off her fingers. The initial autopsy had not looked

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 6>at that or at least resolved that possibility. To the

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 6>coroner ordered that the body be exsumed and the second

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 6>autopsy be performed to see whether or not that could

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 6>be confirmed one way or the other. It was plainly

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 6>significant if it could be shown that the fingers had

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 6>been cut off, because that would be known only to

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 6>the murderers or someone the murderers had told, meaning that

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 6>the person sparing the story was either a murderer, had

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 6>been told by somebody, leading to a chain of inquiry,

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 6>or had just made something up that, by amazing coincidence,

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 6>matched the crime.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>How extraordinary is that for a coroner to order the

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 2>exhumation of a body.

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 6>In my experience, it's very rare. I don't think that's

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 6>an uncommon experience. I think it is very rare, and

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 6>it is only done pursuant to a legal order.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 7>And when they went back to the autops it wasn't

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 7>conclusive what had actually happened to her fingers, so they thought,

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 7>oh gosh, is their merit in this.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 2>It's believed the initial autopsy conducted on Rochelle's badly burned

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>body acknowledged at least one finger was detached, but what

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>cause that detachment wasn't clear. Was it from the fire

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>or was it cut off by her killer. This was

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a pivotal moment in the inquest. Could this be the

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 2>breakthrough police were waiting for? Rochelle's family was consulted in

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 2>a secret meeting about the prospect of exhuming her body.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>They could legally fight the order, but they supported the

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 2>drastic measure in the hope the truth would be revealed.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 7>When we went to Leppington to exume her. I wasn't

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 7>allowed to tell anyone. So the only people that knew

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 7>aside from New South I was police in the coroner,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 7>was Mum and Dad. And I can't cope with their

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 7>emotions and they can't cope with mine. Like when we

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 7>go to break down, we go away from the others

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 7>because we're so close. We know what it does to

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 7>each other. So I couldn't sit with them.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 8>It was just such an evasion, but they needed to

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 8>look for something.

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I remember sitting in the car with Detective Haywood,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 7>who was like a my adopted big sister at the time.

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 7>Mum and Dad were in a different car because I

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 7>just again couldn't be with them when it happened out

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 7>at the cemetery, which you know, I go out there

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 7>a lot it's terrific, And we've followed the van into Glebe.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 7>The whole way was really surreal. Following her on the

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 7>road and she was actually with the medical examiner at

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 7>the time that Heaven was on the stand giving evidence

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 7>or refusing to give evidence at the coroner's court.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 10>I just got goose bombs.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 8>But no, that was like a a knife in your back.

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 6>I did tell the person who had been spreading the

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 6>story that the body had now been exhumed and was

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 6>now being autopsyed or was about to be. I asked

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 6>him to give evidence knowing that fact.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Did you try and use that situation to your advantage,

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 2>not to my advantage.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 6>But what one is trying to do is get truthful evidence,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 6>and there's a balance to be struck between pursuing that

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.599
<v Speaker 6>and always ensuring that it's a fair procedure. So in

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 6>this case, mister Krell was the witness. Our purpose is

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 6>not to trap him unfairly, but to persuade him to

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 6>tell the truth. In this case, telling him that the

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 6>autopsy was underway or about to occur, informed him of

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 6>an important piece of information that in fairness he should know,

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 6>and also conveyed to him that the investigation was continuing,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 6>further evidence may become available, and that it would be

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 6>best for him to tell the truth. And that's the

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 6>thinking behind that line of questioning.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I also want you to understand that some of her

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>digits from her hand were apparently not connected to the

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of her body at the time, or as sorry,

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>are not connected seem not to have been connected to

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of her body.

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 9>Do you did you just understand that proposition? Yes?

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And I want you to understand this important point. The

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>examination has not finished and we are yet to be

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>told the result the final result of all of the

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>investigations as to whether or not her hand or fingers

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have in fact been cut off. That's a matter for

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>further forensic examination. It may be that they were not

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>cut off. We don't know the result. Do you understand

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that mm hm. Is there anything you wish to say

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to this court about the correlation between the fact that

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you have been speaking, allegedly speaking to people about the

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>cutting off of her hand or fingers and the possibility

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that indeed there has.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 9>Been some severance of those parts of her body.

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Nai Peter Singleton was pressing Kevin on information about Rochelle's

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 2>body that he allegedly circulated to other people, including his

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 2>former partners Alice and Evelyn. Last episode, Evelyn told it

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 2>she held some information back on the stand for fear

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of hurting Rochelle's family, but she did call police the

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>following morning with crucial information.

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 5>Kevin, on a few different occasions too that I can recall,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 5>said to me that Rachelle's fingers were severed by bikeys.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 5>That's what you do when you steal from bikeys. Now,

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 5>I said, I'm sorry, but I just didn't want to

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 5>say that in front of her parents. I just didn't

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 5>want to. So with that, she said, okay, I don't

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 5>want you to talk about this to anybody, and I

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 5>will contact you tomorrow morning.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 11>So twenty four hours had passed and she contacted.

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Me and said that there's been a decision to exhume

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Shell's body.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Like the rest of Rochelle's loved ones, the exhumation hit

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>her best friend Lisa heart.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 12>The imagery that comes up, you know, when they tell

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 12>you that's what they're doing, You just you think of

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 12>her and you see her, but you see what she

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 12>probably could look like now, and a cold table in

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 12>a room and no one's hugging her and.

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 13>It was that was tough, just kind of brought her

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 13>back in many ways. Ah, and then you have hope

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 13>again this is going to lead to something. You know that, Yes,

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 13>this is a horror, but it's going to lead to something.

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 13>You couldn't think it up.

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 7>It's just yeah, the.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 13>Blow after blow after blow, you just can't. Yeah, breaks

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 13>you down.

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 10>Let's see some more of Kevin's evidence.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree that in the days after Rochelle Childs

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>had been killed you undertook the task of cleaning out

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>her office, cleaning out her desk On the advice of

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>mister Johnston, I refuse to answer that question on the

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>grounds that it may incriminate me. In your view? Was

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Rochelle Child's a fairly easy going, happy, go lucky type

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of person? On the advice of mister Johnston, I refuse

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to answer that question on the grounds that it may

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>incriminate me. Mister Correll, you indicated to beliefs that mss

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Child's had recently broken up from a relationship with Shane Loats.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 9>Didn't you.

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>On the advice of mister Johnston, I refuse to answer

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that question on the grounds that it may incriminate me.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You also told police that you had overheard a conversation

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>about miss child going to a rebels party. Didn't you,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on the advice of mister Johnston, I refuse to answer

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that question on the grounds that it may incriminate me.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You also told police about a married man called Bruce

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that lived nearby her at Bargo, from whom Miss Childs

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>had received flowers at work. Didn't you, on the advice

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of mister Johnston, I refuse to answer that question on

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the grounds that it may incriminate me. You also told

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>police that she was seeing a male called Lee who

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>worked at Camden Bau Repairs. Didn't you, on the advice

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of mister Johnston, I refuse to answer that question on

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the grounds that it may incriminate me, and in so

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>giving information to police. As I've canvassed in the last,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>approximately five questions you raised for the consideration of police investigation, Shaneloads,

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the former boyfriend, the person whoever it may be, who

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>had swapped the car with her sash, and anyone else

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with the rebels, Bruce, the neighbor, and Lee

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of Bou Repairs. Five people who became persons of interest.

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Didn't you on the advice of mister Johnston, I refuse

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to answer that question on the grounds that it may

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>incriminate me.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 9>But you did not raise with the police.

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>That Rochelle had met someone over the internet and gone

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to see that person, did you, On the advice of

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>mister Johnston, I refuse to answer that question on the

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>grounds that it may incriminate me. Mister Carrell, did you

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>hear various rumors and other bits of informal information about

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>what had happened to Rochelle Child's On the advice of

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>mister Johnston, I refuse to answer that question on the

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>grounds that it may incriminate me.

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Kevin was legally entitled to exercise his right to silence.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 2>The objections he took to answering questions are not to

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 2>be taken as any admission as to his guilt or innocence.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>This case was dogged by red herrings. Remember in the beginning,

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 2>there was a vicious rumor that Rochelle had been killed

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 2>by barkies over a drug debt. It's now becoming clearer

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>who was involved in peddling that rumor.

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 7>He said that her fingers had been cut off because

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 7>she'd ripped off the rebels or something like that.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 8>But because she was set a light that could have

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 8>just burnt and they need to look at that to

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 8>see if Singers was severed.

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 7>And it wasn't. Did the rebels do that? It was

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 7>it was definitely looking at Kevin, you know, did he

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 7>have information about what happened to her fingers? And if

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 7>he did, how did he know?

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 14>That?

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 10>It's horrible?

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 7>And then we buried her again.

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 6>MSS Childs had been led by someone to believe that

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 6>a Walk and Shaw commodore would be acquired by her

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 6>dealership at Camden Holden and would arrive on the eighth

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 6>of June two thousand and one. MS Childs generally made

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 6>no secret of her plans and movements. It seems that

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 6>it would be possible to account for nearly every day

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 6>of her life because she readily confided her activities to

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 6>various friends and relatives, and importantly happily discussed a work,

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 6>especially in social telephone calls which were able to be overheard.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 15>We'd organized for these drinks on the Thursday to go

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 15>and have a drink, and I said, I'm not going

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 15>to go. I've been on the phone all night. I'm

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 15>just going to go home. And we had that conversation

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 15>down in the train carriage where anybody could have heard

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 15>that conversation, that the plans had changed, that she was

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 15>just going straight home.

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 6>As of the morning of seven June two thousand and one,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 6>and indeed probably as of lunchtime on that day, MSS

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 6>Childs had no special plans for Thursday evening. Yet by

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 6>that afternoon she had made a plan to meet someone

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 6>that evening. That plan was not communicated to any of

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 6>the friends and family members to whom Miss Childs usually

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 6>communicated her plans, probably simply because of the lateness of

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 6>the plan. MSS Child's had planned to attend work on

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 6>the Friday, not because she was rostered on that day,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 6>but because she was expecting a walking share commodore to

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 6>be there and available for her use on that long weekend.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 6>Because she had been killed, Mss Charles did not attend

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 6>work that Friday. The last matter I would mention in

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 6>this list your honor, is that no walking share commodore

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 6>in fact arrived at the dealership.

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 2>Peter Singleton wasn't the only one determined to get to

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of this flashy ice blue car.

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 7>Heavin, her boss told her that a walking Shaw was

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 7>coming into the car yard and that she could have

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 7>it for the long weekend. So that was really exciting,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 7>but we had to keep it quiet.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I couldn't believe it.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 15>I was like, oh my god, that's so exciting. I

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 15>was just like, that's so awesome because I knew how

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 15>much she loved Commodore's and at the time, I'm no

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 15>car person, but I know a Walking Shaw is like

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 15>one of the big cars, you know, like that adds

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 15>a special car, So I was excited for her.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 7>Why the secrecy behind the Walking Shaw, I don't know

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 7>for sure, but I think because it was such a

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 7>classic and worth so much money, and back then it

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 7>was something that someone would want to steal. So it's

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 7>not something that you would publicize that you had one

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 7>of these and that you were going to be driving

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 7>it around because you didn't want it flogged.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Basically, let's go back to Jim Morrison. He was the

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 2>manager of Camden Holden where Rochelle and Kevin worked there.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 16>I had no knowledge of one being negotiated on, traded

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 16>or anything. Never been discussed with me, and I'm pretty

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 16>sure through the business owner he checked that with the

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 16>other brands, just to see if any of the value

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 16>or managed so they're had any knowledge of it, and

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 16>by memory no, they didn't. So where this walking Shaws

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 16>suddenly materialized from and I never did materialize, there is

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 16>a bit of a mystery. It wouldn't be done secretly.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 16>It's just too big a deal. And for Rochelle to

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 16>assume that it's coming in, we'll be told that it's

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 16>coming in. I'm not sure whether she's just naively believed

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 16>that or there was.

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 9>A bit of don't let you know. I don't think

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 9>that would.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 16>Be necessarily a conversation. I'm more inclined to think it

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 16>might have been just some sort of furfey. There's never

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 16>a walk in Shaw, but it was put up for

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 16>whatever reason, and I don't just yeh can't understand why.

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>With hindsight looking back and the secrecy that was around it.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there was another motivation behind keeping it

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 2>hush hush?

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 7>Looking back on it, I think that the walking share

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 7>is the key to this. I don't know whether it

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 7>existed or not, but the fact that she was so

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 7>excited about it and she had to keep it so

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 7>quiet and then no one ever spoke about it again.

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 7>To me, that's suspicious, and I think it needs to

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 7>be investigated. I think it's the key to this. I

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 7>just keep circling back to that. That's what she was

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 7>excited about. That's what she was focused on. That's all

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 7>she could talk about, even though she wasn't supposed to. Yeah,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 7>I think it's incredibly important that we get to the

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 7>bottom of this. It was promised to her. Why was

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 7>it promise to her? Was there actually a walking Shaw?

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 2>On the last episode, we revealed explosive new evidence from

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Kevin's ex partner, who you know is Evlent. She told

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>us Kevin showed off a walking Shaw in his carport

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 2>just a year after her murder at his unit on

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>the South Coast at Marilla, which is just thirty meters

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>north of where Rochelle's body was found.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 7>Evelyn approached me on Facebook because my friend Mindy and

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 7>I have built a Facebook page, and she approached me

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 7>and I called her and I spoke to her for

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 7>probably about an hour and a half on the phone,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 7>asking lots of questions.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Around eight o'clock in the evening, I had had a

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 5>few phone calls with Christy and.

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 7>We sorry, sorry, sweetie.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Talking to her, I realized that you know, it's it's

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 5>not just a story in a paper.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 11>It is somebody's child, and it's and sister and whatnot.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 10>And she was obviously very careful with what she said.

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 5>To me, but the information that I obviously knew, nobody

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 5>knew and I didn't know that when we were talking

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 5>at the time. She did say to me, had you

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 5>ever gone to his home? And I said yes, I had.

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 7>So I asked her just to think about when she

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 7>was at Kevin's unit at Waulah, and I just asked

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 7>her what did she notice? What could she see?

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 5>And I told her the story about me being unwell

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 5>and what the house looked like, and.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 7>We're on the walls, what was on the floor, what

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 7>was she stepping on? What did she said that?

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 5>He had a big knife that was on his bed

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 5>head hanging.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 7>Was there anything unusual?

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 10>So where did you go?

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 5>And I said, well, we walked out the front door

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 5>to go across to the beach.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 11>And he said, oh, come and have a look at

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 11>my car.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 7>And it's incredible that that's when this piece of information

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 7>came out, because I just said, what do you know?

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 5>I want to show you my pride and joy and

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 5>we were just talking about that.

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 11>She went, oh, okay, so nothing else. I said, yeah,

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 11>he had.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Like a like a silvery blue colored car. I said

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 5>it was a walking Shaw. I said, I remember the

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 5>name because I always thought it was a pretty ass.

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 7>She said, oh yeah, he had one of those walking

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 7>Shaw cars in his car port. And I nearly fainted.

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 5>She said to me, it was what And she stopped

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 5>for a moment, and I thought, oh, my god, if

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 5>I said something I shouldn't say.

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 7>And then I asked her, are you sure, and she.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 11>Said, please tell me what you said again.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 2>So I did.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 7>Described to me what a walking Shaw looks like, and

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.719
<v Speaker 7>she described it, and she remembered having a conversation with

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 7>her son at the time, who was a car fan,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 7>and he said to her, oh, yeah, no, that's a

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 7>really that's a classic. That's a very expensive car. She

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 7>was only ever asked by the police what he drove,

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 7>so she didn't think it was important.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 5>She said, Evelyn, you didn't say that in your police statement,

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 5>the name of the car, And I said no, I

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 5>told them that he had a really fancy, expensive looking

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 5>silverish car.

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 7>She was only ever asked by the police what he drove,

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 7>so she didn't think it was important.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 5>I said, you never said the name of it, and

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 5>I said, well, I didn't really think that was important

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 5>what kind of brand it was. They just asked me

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 5>what kind of car he had.

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 7>So the fact that she saw a walking short in

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 7>the caryard at his unit block he's significant.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Was this an oversight by police? Here's Evelyn reading from

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 2>a subsequent statement to police in two thousand and seven.

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 5>I then thought of my relationship with Kevin Carrell between

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 5>November two thousand and two until February two thousand and three.

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 11>I recalled that whilst I was with.

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Kevin, he had four different new cars during that time.

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 5>They'd be secondhand, but quite new and expensive cars. I

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 5>recall the very first time that I met Kep and

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 5>he had a black Sleka sports car. The car looked

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 5>to be brand new. It was very impressive. He had

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 5>this car for a couple of weeks and I never

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 5>saw this car again. The next car I saw Kevin

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 5>with was a silver Fancy Commodore. He only had this

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 5>car for about four weeks.

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 11>I said that and she went, oh my god. And

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 11>that's how she told me the story.

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 7>And that's a piece of information that wasn't gathered by

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 7>police because their line of questioning wasn't open enough. In

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 7>my opinion, that's very important.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that needs to be investigated now by police?

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 7>Definitely, and they know because everyone has communicated that to police.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>While the inquest was still under weigh In April two

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 2>thousand and seven, police assigned detect is to track down

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 2>every single hold and walk and Shaw ever manufactured, all

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred and fifty of the limited models. Detective Seney

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Constable Eric and Nuttle, assisted by Detective Sendy Constable Sally Clark,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 2>would tasked with interviewing every owner and asking them the

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 2>same eight questions.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 10>One were you.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 2>The registered owner of a Holden Commodore Group a Walkinshaw

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 2>motor vehicle on the seventh of June two thousand and one.

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 10>Two Do you know Kevin Correll? Three?

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever been approached by Kevin Correll to borrow

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>your Walkinshaw motor vehicle on or around June two thousand

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 2>and one. Four Do you know Rochelle Charles?

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 10>Five?

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever been approached by Rochelle Child to borrow

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 2>your Walkinshaw on or around June two thousand and one.

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Six Have you ever had any dealings with Camden Holden

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 2>on or around June to thousand and one seven. Has

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 2>any employee from Camden Holden ever approached you to borrow

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 2>your walking Shaw on or around June two thousand and

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>one eight? Is there any further information you have that

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>may assist this investigation? It took them months to complete

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that mammoth task, but they found no connection between any

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 2>registered walking Shaws and Kevin Carrell, Rochelle Childs, or Camden Holden.

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 2>But as was acknowledged in the last line of Detective

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Nuttles statement, the information does not capture vehicles that have

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>been fitted with body kits or accessories.

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 10>To look like genuine Walkinshaw vehicles.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Basically, there are fakes out there, other commodols kitted out

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 2>to look like walking shorts, and because they're not registered

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>as walking shaws, it's impossible to account for them all.

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear from Ben Hill, a family friend of the

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 2>child's and a car mechanic who specializes in high performance vehicles.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>You'll remember his voice from earlier episodes when he assessed

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Rochelle's beloved Holden. How difficult is it to distinguish between

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 2>an authentic walking share and a fake.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.239
<v Speaker 17>It's very difficult unless you're a trained expert or an

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 17>obsessive collector. If if one drove past or were pulled

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 17>up in a car park, you wouldn't be able to

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 17>spot the difference with the amount of reproduction stuff that

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 17>you can buy and could even buy then to make

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 17>a mock up.

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 10>So how to talk me through that?

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>How does that process play out if someone's trying to

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>fake a walkie?

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 17>Basically, if somebody knew somebody and they could buy something

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 17>in the black market, then they were buying body kits

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 17>and they were buying twin throts and rebirthing a six

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 17>cylinder vel commodol and it was actually re using all

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 17>the original components off a walking shore.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Knowing Rochelle, if she was promised a walking shaw for

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>that June Long weekend, she would have jumped off.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 17>The Harbor bridge for that. Yeah, if there's an opportunity

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 17>to drive a b in it, she would have. Yeah,

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 17>would have given up a left leg to to have

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 17>that opportunity to drive that car.

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe.

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 2>And would she have known if it was a fake?

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:05.479
<v Speaker 14>Oh?

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 9>I don't believe.

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 17>So Again, if it was parked there with a bonnet

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 17>shut and it had replica everything on it, it would

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 17>look like a walkie if it was in the garage, said,

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 17>unless you're a train collector and you know what to

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 17>look for. If you just opened the rollers and the

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 17>light was turned on and it looked like a walkie,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 17>you'd think it was a walkie. If it had the

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 17>right interior, the right paint, the right wheels, the right stickers,

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 17>you'd definitely believe it.

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's possible Rochelle's boss, Kevin Carrell, had access to

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 2>or rowned a fake walking shaw at the time of

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Rochelle's murder and police would have been none the wiser.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's break this down with Damien.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 18>The walking shaw comes into it the fact that she

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 18>just promised to have one for the weekend that weekend

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 18>and to find that Kevin Carrell's got one in and

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 18>seen the year later in a garage of the premises

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 18>on not far from Girauah on the in the Ilawarra.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 18>Was that ever discovered at the time, because it sort

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 18>of concerns me.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Would police at the time had known if he had

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 7>a walking Shaw they would have.

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 18>But as long as the vehicle was registered in his name.

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 18>If it wasn't in his name, then no, they wouldn't

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 18>have known.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 10>What about if it was a fake walking show.

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 18>No, because the model doesn't come up on the RTA

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 18>records as being a particular. It only comes up the

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 18>standard model of the vehicle. So it say it was

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 18>a v VB model made to look like a walking show.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 18>It only say it's a VB. It wouldn't say it's

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 18>a walking shore. It's only a kit goes on it

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 18>makes you look like a carb.

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm keen to tell Peter Singleton about this possible breakthrough.

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Someone has come forward saying that they saw Kevin in

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 2>possession of an alleged walking shaw a year after Rochelle's murder.

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's of interest and should that be

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 2>something that police should be looking at today?

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I would say it would be of interest. I

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 6>can't comment on police resorts and they've got a lot

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 6>of other work to do, but it would strike me

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 6>that the information should be followed up. Most likely explanation

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 6>would be that he's acquired an interesting walking shaws himself,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 6>but of course the police will want to know when

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 6>he got it and did he have it back in

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 6>two thousand and one?

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Did it have to be his could it had just

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 2>been a walking shaw that he had access to.

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 6>Potentially potentially, I mean a possibility is that he or

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 6>whoever it was, borrowed a Walkinshaw and took her for

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 6>a drive. And maybe it was just to impress Rachelle

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 6>in the hope of a return favor that was never forthcoming,

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 6>leading to violence. So there are possibilities. Undoubtedly, the Walkenshaw

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 6>featured heavily in this inquest for various reasons, and it

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 6>is a matter that should be followed up. Someone's got

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 6>this information, they should be interviewed.

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Given the war sure was a major focus in the inquest,

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 2>it is possible people's memories could be contaminated unintentionally. Here's

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Damien Well.

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 18>You really have to be careful in relation to the

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 18>witness's contamination, in particular when the evidence is laid bare

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 18>at any inquest or perhaps trial, you really have to

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 18>be careful of.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 13>How they are.

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 18>Forming their thoughts and their what they think they saw

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 18>or heard. And they weren't compromised by any other witnesses

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 18>who may have said something else and they're just following

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 18>the line that they saw or heard.

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It was clear the inquest was very interested in Kevin

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Corell's behavior before and after Rachelle's murder. Several witnesses were

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 2>called to give evidence about their interactions with Kevin. Here's

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Peter Singleton recapping a witness who testified that Kevin had

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 2>made a trouble and comment. Just three days before Rochelle

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 2>was murdered and her body set on fire.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 6>A friend of Rochelle, who was a firefighter or a

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 6>volunteer firefighter, happened to be visiting Rochelle at work and

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 6>was talking to Rochelle outside sales the used car sales

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 6>manager's office, which is actually an old train carriage. From memory,

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 6>Rochelle asked the friend whether she had ever seen a

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 6>dead body or something to that effect. The answer was no,

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 6>and somehow that the conversation got into this murky territory.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 6>But mister Carrell came out of the carriage and was

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.879
<v Speaker 6>physically higher than them, looking down upon them, and did

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 6>make the comment that burning a body would be a

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 6>good way to get rid of a murder victim.

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 2>I asked Peter Singleton to explain how much weight he

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 2>placed on that particular comment.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, of course, it's interesting because Rochelle's body was burned

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 6>by whoever did it. By itself, that means nothing. Anybody

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 6>could have said that. Many people have said such things

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 6>that they haven't committed murders. But it's an example of

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 6>a tiny circumstance that can be added with a lot

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 6>of other circumstances to build a fuller picture. I'm not

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 6>suggesting that mister Carrell was planning to murder Roselle when

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 6>he said that and burn her body, but in theory,

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 6>if you had other evidence, you could use that to

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 6>be evidence of premeditation as distinct from an accident, if

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 6>it ever came to having to resolve that conundrum. It

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 6>is strangely not uncommon for murderers to make comments to

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 6>other people about how they would dispose of the body

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 6>or how they would kill someone if they were ever

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 6>minded to do so, but of course deny that they

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 6>ever would. I don't understand the mind of a murderer

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 6>well enough to know why they would say such things,

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 6>but they do. Again, mister Corell may just have been

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 6>victim of an unfortunate coincidence when he said that it's

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 6>only a tiny piece of evidence.

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 2>The topic of fire was a common line of questioning

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 2>by Peter Singleton. Now for the first time you're going

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 2>to hear about evidence from a key witness, Kevin's ex partner,

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 2>who you know as Alice. She lived with Kevin for

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 2>almost a year before she told him to move out.

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 2>It was subsequently discovered he'd moved out in the months

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 2>prior to Rochelle's death. This is not her voice, but

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 2>here is part of her evidence at the inquest.

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 9>Did Kevin have a preferred method of getting rid of rubbish?

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 9>Was it to go to the tech with it?

0:39:58.640 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 14>No?

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 9>No, What did he like to do?

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 19>Kevin liked to burn rubbish? And yes, he liked to

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 19>burn rubbish. Burn things. I'd cleaned out a whole lot

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 19>of paperwork and you know things that I put I've

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 19>got a little shit up the very back of my

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 19>property and I put a whole lot of stuff there

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 19>to be taken to the tip or disposed of in

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 19>some way.

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 10>And he said he'd get rid of that for me.

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 19>And on one particular day, I think I was having

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 19>my car washed, so I had some items in my

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 19>car that I took out of my car and put there,

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 19>thinking they'd be safe. They were in bags, white garbage bags.

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 19>They didn't look like rubbish to me.

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 9>But anyway, even though they were in garbage bags.

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.720
<v Speaker 19>Well, but they were in white garbage bags. The rest

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 19>of the rubbish was rubbish like, it was all like

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 19>strewn there to be disposed of. But these bags, and

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 19>I don't even think they were all white garbage bags,

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.439
<v Speaker 19>but I'd put things in. There was a beach bag

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 19>which had my swimming stuff in it. There's a swimming

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 19>costume in there that he didn't like me wearing. That

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 19>was in that bag. There was my I had a diploma,

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 19>an original one, one of those beautiful diplomas that I

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 19>had gained. And when I came home that day, the

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 19>whole lot had been burnt, all the rubbish and all

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 19>my things. And I just couldn't believe that he had

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 19>just gone ahead and burnt things indiscriminately, including my belongings

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 19>which didn't look like rubbish, which were put apart from

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 19>the rubbish.

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 2>After she broke up with Kevin, Alice began a relationship

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 2>with Colin. You've heard him on Deer Rochelle before because

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Alice told him quite a lot about Kevin. Did Kevin

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 2>ever use this fire pit, because Alice has given evidence

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 2>that he used to have fires in the backyard.

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 20>The shed that was up the back was more like

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 20>a bit of an open sort of shed that was

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 20>very old. There had been a fire had been built

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 20>in the middle of it in the floor in there.

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 20>At the time when he said that he had got

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 20>something out of there, I had noticed that the wheelbarrow

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 20>had been moved, because I had a the lawn and

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 20>lee recently, I knew where I put the wheelbarrow, and

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 20>the wheelbarrow had been moved. I had then sort of

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 20>taken note of this little fire pit that was in

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 20>the middle of this sort of garage or carport type

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 20>of thing, and I did ask about it. Then she said, yes,

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 20>he used to burn stuff there, but I thought was

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 20>a bit odd. But then I'd come to realization he

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 20>was none person, so I thought.

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, as you've just heard. Rochelle's inquest was explosive. Her

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 2>body exhumed, nine persons of interest scrutinized. So many questions

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 2>needed to be answered. Who started the rumor about bikes

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>cutting Rochelle's fingers off, Was there ever a walk in shore?

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.800
<v Speaker 2>What happened to her in those missing nine hours after

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 2>she left work. The inquest ran for two years but

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 2>concluded with an open finding. As Peter Singleton said in

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 2>his opening address, what began as a blue had become

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 2>much clearer.

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Mister Carrell, what happened to Rochelle Child's that brought about

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of her life? On the advice of mister Johnston.

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it may incriminate me. You killed Rochelle Childs, didn't you?

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 1>On the advice of mister Johnston, on the advice of

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 1>mister Johnston. On the advice of mister Johnston. On the

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>advice of mister Johnston. I refuse to answer that question.

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Refuse to answer that question. I refuse to answer that question.

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I refuse to answer that question on the ground that.

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 2>On the next episode of Dear Rochelle, what was it

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 2>like being married to Kevin?

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 10>Carrell just like to.

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 14>Talk about There was many sides to Kevin. You know,

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 14>I spent thirteen years with him. He threatened to if

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 14>I ever left him, he.

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 6>Would help me down and find me.

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 14>He would cut me up in little pieces.

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 10>What makes him so dangerous? The fact that he can

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 10>just snap is not to be trusted.

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 7>You do want to do this, I do.

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 14>It's just really hard that it happened to someone I loved,

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 14>I would want someone like me to come forward, keep

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 14>a stake.

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Let's have a break yet, just I'll just move that

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 2>microphone away.

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 13>I feel.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 14>I feel sometimes like it's my fault.

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 10>Dear Rochelle is a multi media production from True Crime Australia.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 2>If you want to be one of the first to

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 2>find out what happens next, go Dear Roshelle dot com

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 2>dot a you. That's where eligible Digital News Corp Austrelia

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 2>subscribers get early access to podcast episodes and breaking news

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 2>in our live investigation and you will also find exclusive videos,

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 2>interactive evidence, feature articles and more. That's De Rochelle dot

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 2>com dot au. If you have any tips or confidential

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 2>information to share with me, Ashley Hanson, please send an

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 2>email to de Roshelle at News dot com dot a you.

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Our supervising producer and audio editor is Rehys Gunter Rachel Fountain,

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 2>his executive producer and audio director. Our executive editor is

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Blake. Our senior journ list is Patrick Carline. Video

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 2>editors are Jillian McNally, Owen Yang and Stephen Woods. Picture

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 2>editors are Jeff dr Mannin and Christy Miller.

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Sydney.

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Camera operators are Daniel Andrews and Oscar Viera. We sound

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 2>designed by Martin Perolta. Thanks also to Greg Thompson and

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Lenny Panerz. Show Bareo fageld Sa Grabe, Hailey Goddard, Stephen Grice,

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Charlotte carp, Tina Coggins and Harry Hughes. Special thanks to

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 2>the Daily Telegraph editor Ben English and dear Rochelle would

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 2>not be possible without the help and I'm wavering support

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 2>of Christy and Anne Childs, Mindy Wicks, Damien Loon.

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 10>And Rochelle's friends.

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 2>This podcast series is hosted and investigated by me Ashley

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Hanson