Speaker 1: This is the US Report with James Moroar.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the program. Coming up tonight,
Speaker 2: Prime Minister Anthony Albanezi to finally meet with President Trump,
Speaker 2: and Alish Nielsen is here with an exclusive preview plus
Speaker 2: Trump friends to drop the hammer on Hamas, But will
Speaker 2: he send in the Marines? And who's responsible for the
Speaker 2: government shutdown? Finally a Democrat speaks the truth. But first,
Speaker 2: it has been a massive week. But I don't want
Speaker 2: to look back on what's just happened. Instead, I want
Speaker 2: to open a window into the future, the future of
Speaker 2: the Democrat Party, which is gearing up for a generational
Speaker 2: civil war as a breed of new, slick, social media savvy,
Speaker 2: young and very hard left politicians push to elbow out
Speaker 2: the oldies and aim to get a play on the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty eight Yes, twenty twenty eight, We're almost there ticket.
Speaker 2: Now their targets aren't just the old guard you know,
Speaker 2: the Pelosis, the Bidens, the Clintons. Instead, they are targeting
Speaker 2: people like Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris, Yes Kamala Harris,
Speaker 2: who think twenty twenty eight is their time and that
Speaker 2: these young whipper snappers have to wait their turn. I
Speaker 2: mean when it comes to Kamala Harris, I know, don't
Speaker 2: laugh about this. It's serious. She is not letting this
Speaker 2: thing die, even saying this about her presidential campaign last time,
Speaker 2: which may be the most singularly audacious thing she has
Speaker 2: ever said while she was there promoting her new book
Speaker 2: one hundred and seven Days.
Speaker 1: That is decent. But that is a decent resume. But
Speaker 1: go ahead there.
Speaker 3: Well, some people have actually said I was the most
Speaker 3: qualified candidate ever to run for president.
Speaker 1: I like you, I like this. Some people say, very nice,
Speaker 1: but go ahead. I'm just speaking fact.
Speaker 2: Yeah, under delusional. There is a picture of that interview.
Speaker 2: But you know what, guess what, I think she's still
Speaker 2: going to do it. There's going to be an effort
Speaker 2: to put her up, even though most of the old
Speaker 2: guard will wind up falling behind another candidate, California Governor
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom. And I'll tell you what. As bad as
Speaker 2: he is, just think about what he did to California
Speaker 2: and imagine that happening nationwide. Well, I don't think this
Speaker 2: rising generation of radical young Democrats or democratic socialists as
Speaker 2: they call themselves, are going to wait their turn. And
Speaker 2: not only that, I think they're also far worse because
Speaker 2: these are not idealistic young liberals like say John F.
Speaker 2: Kennedy committed to America and the capitalist system, but instead
Speaker 2: they're determined to overthrow it. They are outgrowths of the
Speaker 2: legendary squad, and they include radicals like New York mayoral
Speaker 2: candidate and radical socialist Zoron mom Donnie, who has been
Speaker 2: forced to back away from his anti police rhetoric, but
Speaker 2: even twenty four hours ago couldn't bring himself to say
Speaker 2: that Hamas should disarm.
Speaker 4: Do you believe that Hamas should lay down their weapons
Speaker 4: and leave the leadership in gaza?
Speaker 5: I believe that any future here in New York City
Speaker 5: is one that we have to make sure that's affordable
Speaker 5: for all, and as it pertains to Israel and palestein
Speaker 5: that we have to ensure that there is peace, and
Speaker 5: that is the future that we have to fight for.
Speaker 2: Well, an absolute gold star to Zoron's media trainer there,
Speaker 2: I mean, how well was that answered? But there is
Speaker 2: another candidate as well from this younger generation waiting in
Speaker 2: the wings, who not only ticks all the identity boxes,
Speaker 2: but is also even more bonkers than Kamala Harris. I speak,
Speaker 2: of course, of Alexandria Ocasio Cortes, leader of that aforementioned squad.
Speaker 2: And what's important to note is that she both talks
Speaker 2: a lot of lefty rubbish but has also grown increasingly
Speaker 2: powerful within the Democrat Party. She's played a very good
Speaker 2: game getting very close to power. And she was in
Speaker 2: a fine form in a CNN town hall on the
Speaker 2: government shutdown Thursday, where she and Bernie Sanders were given
Speaker 2: essentially a free kick to dump on Republicans. Now, some
Speaker 2: of it was pretty wildly entertaining, and just goofy, I mean,
Speaker 2: get a load of her talking about big corporations and
Speaker 2: environmental pollution.
Speaker 4: Here, rivers in rural areas were on fire because of
Speaker 4: corporations poisoning the people who lived in those areas, poor
Speaker 4: middle class communities getting poisoned and dumped on by corporations
Speaker 4: like Deloitte.
Speaker 2: Deloitte, last time I checked, there were an accounting firm
Speaker 2: that just got in a heap of trouble with the
Speaker 2: Australian government over a bogus report they handed in generated
Speaker 2: by AI. But speaking of pollution, here's what she is
Speaker 2: describing when she talks about a clean environment.
Speaker 4: Instead of talking about having air that's drinkable.
Speaker 2: Ah, that sweet, refreshing, thirst quenching air. Oh. And she
Speaker 2: also declared war on Republican boys.
Speaker 4: And they are able to radicalize and target and exploit
Speaker 4: a generation of young boys in particular away from healthy
Speaker 4: masculinity and into an insecure masculinity that requires the domination
Speaker 4: of others who are poorer, browner, darker, or a different
Speaker 4: gender than them.
Speaker 2: Now you see what's going on here. Of course, only
Speaker 2: liberals can express a healthy masculinity. And if you like
Speaker 2: in border secure, well you're mentally ill and probably racist
Speaker 2: to boot. But put away that goofiness. And it is
Speaker 2: quite clear to me that AOC is trying to position
Speaker 2: yourself as the de facto leader of the Democrat Party
Speaker 2: laying down the law here in this next clip about
Speaker 2: what has to happen to end the shutdown.
Speaker 4: If I were Mike Johnson, you should be in that
Speaker 4: office negotiating with a keen Jeffries every damn day until
Speaker 4: we reopen this government. And any day that you don't
Speaker 4: do that is a failure. It is a failure. And
Speaker 4: until there is accountability for people who refuse to work
Speaker 4: to work, then we're going to continue to be in
Speaker 4: this cycle. So you know, in the Senate, the Senate
Speaker 4: majority leader is John Fund. He should be negotiating with
Speaker 4: Chuck Schumer.
Speaker 2: I yes, Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democrat leader, also from
Speaker 2: AOC's state of New York, who famously doesn't know how
Speaker 2: a barbecue work. But I'm glad she mentioned Schumer because
Speaker 2: Schumer is another one of those oldies. The young Democrats
Speaker 2: socialists want to get out of the way. And there's
Speaker 2: a lot of talk right now that AOC might try
Speaker 2: to challenge Schumer for his Senate seat, giving her a
Speaker 2: launching pad to hire office, just in the same way
Speaker 2: JFK moved into the Senate from the House and then
Speaker 2: onto the White House, a past similar as well to
Speaker 2: his Vice President Lyndon Mainz Johnson. And it was telling
Speaker 2: how both AOC and Bernie blew up when the host
Speaker 2: of this town hall suggested that AOC might challenge Schumer.
Speaker 4: But are you saying that Senator Schumer should not be
Speaker 4: worried about a primary challenge from you?
Speaker 2: I mean no, let me jump in on this.
Speaker 6: Talking about I have a country that is falling apart.
Speaker 7: We got a house housing crisis, a healthcare crisis and
Speaker 7: education crisis, massive income and wealth inequality, a corrupt campaign finances,
Speaker 7: and the media says, well, you could run what are
Speaker 7: gonna run for? Nobody caresbody cares, nobody cares, nobody cares.
Speaker 2: But I'll tell you what. That's not a no, is it? Look?
Speaker 2: I reckon moves are already a foot, and she might
Speaker 2: not even wait so long as to do that challenge.
Speaker 2: Shreer's term isn't up until twenty twenty eight. The Democrat
Speaker 2: field to run against Donald Trump's successor is looking fairly unimpressive.
Speaker 2: Let's just say, and just waite, I bet we see
Speaker 2: a white guy Greeney California Democrat in Gavin Newsom heading
Speaker 2: up that twenty twenty eight ticket, and I would not
Speaker 2: be surprised to see AOC rounded out as the Hispanic
Speaker 2: female hard left progressive on the undercard. But all that
Speaker 2: speculation aside. What we are seeing now is something much bigger,
Speaker 2: hard left young Democrats, socialists, Mom, Donnie AOC, plenty of
Speaker 2: others who are trying to steer the Democrats hard to
Speaker 2: the left believing and this is their logic here. They
Speaker 2: believe that by mirroring Donald Trump's surge to the nationalist
Speaker 2: populist right, they will be able to find the same
Speaker 2: sort of success by going to a radical populist left.
Speaker 2: And that's so much of what the economics of people
Speaker 2: like AOC and Mom Donnie are about, to say nothing
Speaker 2: of their social policies and what God help us they
Speaker 2: might do about American foreign policy. Well, personally, I think
Speaker 2: this is all terribly dangerous. I mean, God forbid they
Speaker 2: ever get into power. But I also think this is
Speaker 2: the wrong track for the Democrats because as much as
Speaker 2: he's characterized as being a hard right radical, so much
Speaker 2: of what Trump believes in, you know, strong borders, no
Speaker 2: boys and girls changing rooms, cracking down on violent street
Speaker 2: crime in cities, well this is what most normal people
Speaker 2: believe in, too, what people like AOC believe in hard
Speaker 2: left democrats. Socialism isn't going to get too many takers
Speaker 2: outside New York. And as I always tell my Democrat
Speaker 2: friends and everybody who watches this program, rule number one
Speaker 2: of winning elections is simple three words. Just be normal.
Speaker 2: But for some reason, the Democrats have lost that art,
Speaker 2: and they don't seem to be on the way to
Speaker 2: regaining it anytime soon. Well, joining me now, is Sky
Speaker 2: News is Washington correspondent Analyst Nielsen Analyst, Thanks for joining me,
Speaker 2: Welcome back to the US Report. First of all, I
Speaker 2: got to talk about this meeting that Prime Anthony Albanizi
Speaker 2: is going to finally have in the Oval Office next week.
Speaker 2: We have been waiting for months and months and months
Speaker 2: for this encounter to take place. What's going to happen?
Speaker 8: Look, I think it will be a bit of a
Speaker 8: checkbox meeting for the American side, at least, I know
Speaker 8: that they've been feeling under pressure for a while because
Speaker 8: the Australians have been very kind of upset at being
Speaker 8: so far down the list. Look, Anthony Alberanezi, he's just
Speaker 8: not someone who has a lot of leverage, influence, kind
Speaker 8: of identity within Trump worlds. But also we're just not
Speaker 8: actually in harm's way either. We're not getting the worst
Speaker 8: of the tariffs. We've got the lowest level that the
Speaker 8: US is giving anyone in the world. It seems like
Speaker 8: UCAST is going to go pretty well, and so it
Speaker 8: seems like we're just kind of not a priority. And
Speaker 8: I know that we've had it really good for a
Speaker 8: long time. We had such a star role in the
Speaker 8: Trump administration when so many countries weren't dealing with him,
Speaker 8: and then we got the extra visit to the White
Speaker 8: House because Biden bailed on the Quad meeting and we
Speaker 8: wasted millions of dollars for a meeting that never happened.
Speaker 8: So I think there's that kind of managing that expectation
Speaker 8: as well. But you know, you just never know with
Speaker 8: Donald Trump. He could be in a really bad mood
Speaker 8: that day, or if Albinizi says something that's considered talking
Speaker 8: down to him or kind of making a joke of him,
Speaker 8: I can imagine it will turn very quickly.
Speaker 2: The Prime Minister has to walk sort of a fine
Speaker 2: line with Trump here because on the one hand he
Speaker 2: has to look at like he's your standing up for
Speaker 2: Australia's interests, but on the other hand he can't look
Speaker 2: too obsequious otherwise he'll annoy his labor based back home.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and look, I mean, if Kirstarma can come and
Speaker 8: do the whole dance, don't there's no reason Australia can't
Speaker 8: do the same thing. Just be deferential. It's our biggest ally. Frankly,
Speaker 8: it's been pretty good for Australia, our relationship and Honestly,
Speaker 8: I'm hoping they've done something like I think they should
Speaker 8: have just gone down to the Perth mint get a
Speaker 8: gold submarine, write Uss Trump on it, show up with that.
Speaker 8: It'll be in the Oval office for four years. He'll
Speaker 8: love it and we'll be in the good books. And
Speaker 8: so I think it'll be not coming in trying to
Speaker 8: election them on anything. It would be also my biggest
Speaker 8: yeah recommendation. If anyone cares about my opinion, well.
Speaker 2: No, I think Look, I think your counsel is very
Speaker 2: wise here, but you know, behind the scenes diplomatically, of course,
Speaker 2: we had a much different ambassador during the first term
Speaker 2: of the Trump administration than we do now. I've heard
Speaker 2: concerns that Kevin Rudd has not managed this relationship to
Speaker 2: the degree that it could have been. In fact, that
Speaker 2: the Trump administration has been not thrilled with what they've
Speaker 2: gotten out of him, despite you know, the other positive
Speaker 2: indicators that we've had. Can you let any insight on that.
Speaker 8: Look, from what I can tell, I don't think he's
Speaker 8: really tried. I think what he's done is really try
Speaker 8: and target Treasury, Commerce, State Department, and I think he's
Speaker 8: just known it's a bit of a wash trying to
Speaker 8: fit in with Trump world when they're just so opposite,
Speaker 8: and he's a policy wong, he's left wing. The one
Speaker 8: thing he has is being very anti China. But also
Speaker 8: just anyone who googles him knows exactly what he said
Speaker 8: about Trump, and it's just not something you can run
Speaker 8: away from. And the difference in that, I know everyone says, oh,
Speaker 8: but so and so said something critical about Trump, and
Speaker 8: what about Jade event they admitted they were wrong, and
Speaker 8: so Drud's never done that, and so it's one thing
Speaker 8: to say, yeah, sure, he's representing our interests. Why would
Speaker 8: they be thrilled to deal with him?
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. Well, we'll see just how Kevin Rudd shakes
Speaker 2: out of all of this down the road. But let's
Speaker 2: also go watch some other foreign policy news who we've
Speaker 2: had a call with President Putin. Between President Putin of
Speaker 2: Russia and the US President Donald Trump had this to
Speaker 2: say a little while ago.
Speaker 9: I would say it within two weeks or so, pretty quick.
Speaker 9: Marco Rubio is going to be meeting with his counterpartner,
Speaker 9: as you know, Labrov, and they'll be meeting pretty soon.
Speaker 9: They're going to set up a time and a place
Speaker 9: very shortly. Maybe it's already set up, they've already spoken.
Speaker 9: And I thought it was a very good phone call.
Speaker 9: I thought very productive. But I'll be meeting with President
Speaker 9: Putin and we'll make a determination.
Speaker 2: So he's got a meeting with Vledimer Zelensky of Ukraine tomorrow.
Speaker 2: We've got a Trump Putin meeting in a couple of weeks.
Speaker 2: Here is he trying to knock together some sort of
Speaker 2: solution to the Ukraine Russia war here in the same
Speaker 2: way that he's done in the last several weeks between
Speaker 2: Hamas and Israel.
Speaker 8: Oh yeah, he wants this done. And he said it
Speaker 8: time and again. He's solved seven out of the eight conflicts.
Speaker 8: He likes being the peacemaker. He likes having the world influence.
Speaker 8: And I know it's been such a thing for so
Speaker 8: many years about oh the neocons, they want to be
Speaker 8: world police, and so isolationists. Americans like being the world
Speaker 8: police when they win. They like getting it right, and
Speaker 8: they have been getting it right. So he wants to
Speaker 8: continue that. And he gets to say that it was
Speaker 8: all started under Biden. It wouldn't have happened if he
Speaker 8: was in the White House. That's I mean, I think
Speaker 8: there is some truth to that. He's so unpredictable on
Speaker 8: a world stage. You don't know when he's going to
Speaker 8: drop a bunker buster on Iran, so you don't mess around.
Speaker 8: And I think he knows that. Similarly, by watching what
Speaker 8: happened in Israel with Hamas of them just being worn down,
Speaker 8: he knows that Putin's getting worn down as well. And
Speaker 8: so when he's making those jokes about well, maybe I
Speaker 8: will give a couple of thousand tomahawks to Zelenski, you
Speaker 8: don't know if he's joking or on. And Putin doesn't
Speaker 8: know if he's joking on on. So that's how he's
Speaker 8: wielding his influence. And he wants to bring this to
Speaker 8: an end. He's embarrassed that he said it was going
Speaker 8: to be solved on day one because he thought he
Speaker 8: had a relationship with Putin that hasn't happened. And I
Speaker 8: think he's got a chip on his shoulder about that
Speaker 8: as well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I mean, look, it's amazing that a guy
Speaker 2: who learned a transactional backed up by force negotiating style
Speaker 2: that that's worked so well in the Middle East. Who
Speaker 2: would have predicted that? But just you know, staying with
Speaker 2: the Middle East just for a minute. There's been the
Speaker 2: prospect now raised of American marines potentially even going into
Speaker 2: Gaza to somehow keep the peace. You know, you say
Speaker 2: that Americans like to be the world policeman, But did
Speaker 2: people sign up necessarily for keeping peace in Gaza when
Speaker 2: they voted for Trump? Here is there's going to be
Speaker 2: a bit of blowback on that idea because I know
Speaker 2: there's concerns about that relationship.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I think no Americans want to see any more
Speaker 8: Americans die in any conflict zones that aren't directly defending America,
Speaker 8: and so that would be very toxic. I think if
Speaker 8: Trump ever sends marines into Gaza, we will never find
Speaker 8: out about it. It will be so discreet. They'll be
Speaker 8: disguised as something else, probably for some kind of other
Speaker 8: Arab ally we will never find out about it. They
Speaker 8: certainly wouldn't do it publicly. And I mean, people forget
Speaker 8: that we have had attacks on US baces during this war.
Speaker 8: And also don't forget one of the biggest casualty events
Speaker 8: was Biden building that two hundred and thirty million dollar
Speaker 8: pontoon that sunk after twenty days. People forget a serviceman
Speaker 8: diet after the injuries he sustained in that and it
Speaker 8: achieved nothing. It was supposed to bring all this aid
Speaker 8: into Gaza and it didn't happen. So when you just
Speaker 8: I bring that up because it shows how invested America
Speaker 8: has been in this for so long and how hard
Speaker 8: they've found this until Trump's come in and reset it,
Speaker 8: and He's used those business contacts. He knows that money
Speaker 8: talks more in the Middle East than foreign policy wonkery
Speaker 8: and like just that kind of traditional diplomacy, and so
Speaker 8: he sent in Jared Kushna who's just pulled off the
Speaker 8: extraordinary in.
Speaker 2: This and as you say, it is ordinar Jared kushm
Speaker 2: Kuscher said he could solve it because he read twenty
Speaker 2: five books on the subject. And you know what, they've
Speaker 2: done a hell of a lot better than so many
Speaker 2: decades and decades of experts who thought they knew what
Speaker 2: they were doing, but clearly did an analyst Nielson, thank
Speaker 2: you so much for your time here on the US Report.
Speaker 2: Now let's go to former senior advisor to President Trump,
Speaker 2: Christian Witten. Christian, welcome back to the program. Here, big
Speaker 2: breaking news here. Former US National security advisor to Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: John Bolton, has been indicted. A federal grand jury has
Speaker 2: indicted mister Bolton on charges of mishandling classified information. And
Speaker 2: it sounds from the reports I've read, he is alleged
Speaker 2: to have sent sensitive documents to relating to national security
Speaker 2: through a personal email account. That's a big no no
Speaker 2: if you've got a top secret clearance. The US President
Speaker 2: had this to say, I.
Speaker 1: Didn't know that.
Speaker 9: You're told me for the first time. But I think
Speaker 9: he's a bad person. I think he's a bad guy. Yeah,
Speaker 9: he's a bad guy, too bad. But that's the where
Speaker 9: it goes. That's the way it goes, right, that's the
Speaker 9: way it goes.
Speaker 1: Well, I want have you reviewed the case against him?
Speaker 9: No, I have it. I have it, But I just
Speaker 9: think he's a bad person.
Speaker 2: A Christian put aside the great call out to some
Speaker 2: of his best material with the you're just telling me
Speaker 2: this for the first timeline here. But if this is true,
Speaker 2: if these allegations are correct, these are very serious allegations.
Speaker 2: Ordinary people with security clearances who've done things like this
Speaker 2: have been put away.
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 10: You know, I was talking to a friend who was
Speaker 10: with the FBI in San Diego, and every year there's
Speaker 10: sort of a young non commissioned officer who shows some
Speaker 10: lowly classified information to a girlfriend because he thinks it's
Speaker 10: cool and you know, end of career, probable jail time. This,
Speaker 10: on the other hand, is someone who served at the
Speaker 10: Justice Department and at the State Department and at the
Speaker 10: White House and knows exactly what the rules are, had
Speaker 10: access to the highest classified information, and at least according
Speaker 10: to the which is just a government accusation, it's not
Speaker 10: conclusive proof, but held a sensitive compartmentalized information, top secret information,
Speaker 10: the highest level stuff at his home and put it
Speaker 10: into email and used it in his book. So this
Speaker 10: is someone who knew the rules and broke them pretty
Speaker 10: clearly according to the indictment.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I mean that would put the lie to
Speaker 2: the idea that this is just sort of a revenge
Speaker 2: prosecution here, because this is a narrative that they keep
Speaker 2: pushing that, oh, well, they're going after John Bolton or
Speaker 2: Letitia James because they're just trying to get back Trump's
Speaker 2: just trying to get back, is it enemies? But that's
Speaker 2: not necessarily the case here, is it.
Speaker 11: It's not.
Speaker 10: Actually, this is a case of an injustice being put
Speaker 10: right through prosecution because Bolton so just so clearly he
Speaker 10: put this book into the review process. He sent the
Speaker 10: manuscript just four months after he was fired. No one
Speaker 10: writes a book in four months. That means that throughout
Speaker 10: his short tenures national Security Advisor. And this was rumored
Speaker 10: at the time, and frankly I warned some friends at
Speaker 10: the White House that he did this when he US
Speaker 10: ambassador the UN. He was working on the book while
Speaker 10: he was still in government. That was probably one of
Speaker 10: the big reasons to go in, I think, was to
Speaker 10: make a splash and come out. But Joyce, Judge Lambert,
Speaker 10: who's the name you may recall from the Lewinsky scandal era,
Speaker 10: a Reagan appointee, basically told Bolton because the government was
Speaker 10: trying to stop publication, all the books were published, all
Speaker 10: they were already distributed. And the jet says, well, I'm
Speaker 10: not going to stop this now because I can't. But
Speaker 10: it seems like you broke the law that was in
Speaker 10: the early Biden administration. Biden didn't prosecute it, and now
Speaker 10: Trump has, so finally justice is being served.
Speaker 2: Good good good stuff. Hey, Christian onto other news here
Speaker 2: Ata Washington. Here, this shutdown of the government is remaining
Speaker 2: in place. US lawmakers are trying to shift blame the Democrats,
Speaker 2: are trying to blame the Republicans. But since Democrats have
Speaker 2: just blocked an eight hundred and fifty two billion dollar
Speaker 2: bill that would have at least kept defense funded through September,
Speaker 2: I don't know how the Democrats can keep saying that
Speaker 2: it's the Republicans that are responsible for this when they're
Speaker 2: the ones holding it up and explain to us the
Speaker 2: majorities that are actually needed to pass funding bills, because
Speaker 2: I think some of our viewers here in Australia need
Speaker 2: a little bit of understanding of that process and why
Speaker 2: it's not just a straight majority vote.
Speaker 10: Right. Well, a lot of things in the Senate require
Speaker 10: six the out of one hundred senators to vote for
Speaker 10: klod sure to stop a limit debate, and if you
Speaker 10: don't get that then you just assume debate will go
Speaker 10: on interminably and don't proceed, move on to something else,
Speaker 10: or go home. There are things called budget reconciliation that
Speaker 10: only acquire a bare majority under the current rules of
Speaker 10: the Senate, which actually Republicans could unilaterally change bills like
Speaker 10: these do need sixty votes, and that's unfortunately why Democrats,
Speaker 10: who only have forty seven seats, are able to obstruct this.
Speaker 10: Typically they wouldn't. This isn't deciding all of the next
Speaker 10: fiscal year. It's just extending appropriations while the debate goes on.
Speaker 10: The Democrats, I think, erroneously think the politics of this
Speaker 10: are on their side. But the military has already missed
Speaker 10: one payday. The next one comes up at the end
Speaker 10: of the month. So it's not just people who are
Speaker 10: you studying spotted at owls in California for the Forest Service.
Speaker 10: It's actually people who matter for our national security who
Speaker 10: are now not being paid for work that they've already done.
Speaker 10: And I think, you know, people are going to start
Speaker 10: getting more upset with the Dems.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean that is pretty shocking. That give it
Speaker 2: everything that's going on in the world. If you're not
Speaker 2: giving your soldiers a paycheck, that seems like a pretty
Speaker 2: bad idea of Christian Witten. Thank you so much for
Speaker 2: your time. You're always love having you here on the show. Now,
Speaker 2: don't go anywhere, because after the break, the Great Carol
Speaker 2: Markowitz is going to join me to reveal a startling
Speaker 2: new survey that shows the whole fever for non binary
Speaker 2: genders could finally be breaking. But first, earlier in the program,
Speaker 2: I talked about that CNN town hall segment on the
Speaker 2: government showdown, Shutdown. Well, the White House has just posted
Speaker 2: this clip of the event when Bernie Sanders is asked
Speaker 2: a very important question, have a look at what the
Speaker 2: White House did with his response.
Speaker 3: Republicans have been appealing to audiences, especially young people like
Speaker 3: myself online using social media. Why does Republican messaging on
Speaker 3: social media seem so much more effective than democratic messaging?
Speaker 3: And what can we do about it?
Speaker 7: Well, that's a great question. I think the Republicans are effected.
Speaker 7: They have learned a lot about social media and by
Speaker 7: the way to Tousin hurt that they have friends o
Speaker 7: all all of the major social media platform.
Speaker 2: I'm just going to put it out there that maybe
Speaker 2: actually Bernie the Right does social media better because they
Speaker 2: have a sense of humor. Hi krama, Carol Markowitz. After
Speaker 2: the break, do not Go Anywhere, Welcome back to the program.
Speaker 2: In in a moment, Carol Markowitz joins me with an
Speaker 2: exclusive study about gender identity. Turns out the kids maybe
Speaker 2: all right after all. But before we bring her on
Speaker 2: something absolutely extraordinary happened in the US Supreme Court Thursday,
Speaker 2: and I just had to bring this to you. Justice
Speaker 2: Katanji Brown Jackson, a black female justice on the Court,
Speaker 2: just compared being black to having a disability. Yeah, that's right,
Speaker 2: she said it. And if any white guy on the
Speaker 2: Court said that, well, the New York Times would be
Speaker 2: starting a national conversation that would last forever. Now, to
Speaker 2: give you the background on this, Jackson was making an
Speaker 2: argument in a case brought by the ACLU after Louisiana
Speaker 2: redrew its congressional districts, and when they did so well,
Speaker 2: there was only one district with a majority of minority
Speaker 2: members left. In other words, the problem that she was
Speaker 2: addressing is the idea that ethnicity or race was not
Speaker 2: being used to raw congressional districts, which should seem pretty
Speaker 2: fair to anyone who thinks that, you know, people vote
Speaker 2: on their interests, not on the color of their skin,
Speaker 2: because this is America we're talking about right now. A
Speaker 2: little bit longer here, but stick with me. I want
Speaker 2: to play all of this because it is gobsmacking. First,
Speaker 2: Justice Jackson laid out the background behind the Americans with
Speaker 2: Disabilities Act. What she said was just like the Voting
Speaker 2: Rights Act.
Speaker 12: Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act against the backdrop
Speaker 12: of a world that was generally not accessible to people
Speaker 12: with disabilities, and so it was discriminatory in effect because
Speaker 12: these folks were not able to access these buildings, and
Speaker 12: it didn't matter whether the person who built the building
Speaker 12: or the person who owned the building intended for them
Speaker 12: to be exclusionary. That's irrelevant. Congress said, the facilities have
Speaker 12: to be made equally open to people with disabilities, if
Speaker 12: readily possible.
Speaker 2: Okay, you see how she set this up. Now listen
Speaker 2: to her knock it down.
Speaker 12: I guess I don't understand why that's not what's happening here.
Speaker 12: The idea in section two is that we are responding
Speaker 12: to current day manifestations of past and present decisions that
Speaker 12: disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don't have
Speaker 12: equal access to the voting system. Right they're disabled.
Speaker 2: This is the whole thing right here. This is the
Speaker 2: poison of identity politics, the soft bigotry of low expectations
Speaker 2: that the left, even a black woman of the left
Speaker 2: has For people of African American heritage, to be black,
Speaker 2: they say, is to have a disability to be a minority,
Speaker 2: they say, means that you vote as a block, not
Speaker 2: as individuals, and that the only way you can be
Speaker 2: represented in the Congress is on the basis of the
Speaker 2: color of your skin. Well, frankly, that is racist. There
Speaker 2: is no other word for it. I mean again, whatever
Speaker 2: happened to the old line about the content of your character? Well,
Speaker 2: we're not seeing it here. Well, joining me now is
Speaker 2: Carol Markowitz. You know her well. She is the New
Speaker 2: York Post columnist and host of the Great Carol Markowitz Show. Carol,
Speaker 2: thanks so much for joining me tonight, And I want
Speaker 2: to get to an exclusive report you've got in the
Speaker 2: New York Post where you've uncovered how the gender madness
Speaker 2: amongst America's youth has been pushed by radical activists and
Speaker 2: the study shows the study you've reported on here shows
Speaker 2: what many of us have thought for years, namely that
Speaker 2: the idea that there is no gender or that gender
Speaker 2: isn't binary was in fact fad being pushed by radical
Speaker 2: activists in the US. What could he tell us about nace.
Speaker 6: Well, I can't claim credit for making the discovery. It
Speaker 6: was a researcher named Kaufman and he found that the
Speaker 6: numbers in various studies of non binary students non binary youth.
Speaker 1: Has sometimes been halved.
Speaker 6: Sometimes it's as low as a third of the number
Speaker 6: it used to be five years ago. And it's a
Speaker 6: really amazing change because the thing is, and I say
Speaker 6: this in the piece, non binary is the easiest one.
Speaker 1: It's the one that I say.
Speaker 6: If I were a teenager and I had the control
Speaker 6: of making my teachers and my parents and everybody else
Speaker 6: call me whatever pronoun I decided from day to day, It's.
Speaker 1: The one I would have picked, for sure.
Speaker 6: So the non binary one is the easiest one to
Speaker 6: put on, but it's clearly also the easiest one to
Speaker 6: take off, and so many have done that.
Speaker 2: That's absolutely fascinating that this fever has broken. I want
Speaker 2: to go on, though, because there's another story that fascinated me.
Speaker 2: In the New York Times this week, they reported that
Speaker 2: the Trump administration is considering a radical overhaul of the
Speaker 2: US refugee system that would slash the program and give
Speaker 2: preference to English speakers, white South Africans, and Europeans who
Speaker 2: oppose migrations. That's the way the New York Times reported it.
Speaker 2: But you go down further in the story, and they
Speaker 2: say the proposed changes would put new emphasis on whether
Speaker 2: applicants would be able to assimilate into the United States,
Speaker 2: directing them to take classes on American history and values
Speaker 2: and respect for cultural norms. That Carolyn really wanted to
Speaker 2: get your repeating on this because you were born in
Speaker 2: the USSR, in the old Soviet Union, your family was
Speaker 2: taken in by the US. And once your reaction to this,
Speaker 2: should the government be prioritizing people who are prepared to
Speaker 2: love America rather than people who come from cultures that
Speaker 2: bear a grudge against it and want to tear it down.
Speaker 1: Oh? Absolutely.
Speaker 6: And you know, I can't say that my family knew
Speaker 6: that much about America. Well, what my family did know
Speaker 6: about America they wanted in. They wanted to be a
Speaker 6: part of it. They knew about the freedom, they knew
Speaker 6: about the fact that you could live your life the
Speaker 6: way you chose to live your life, and they wanted it.
Speaker 1: They didn't know a lot of the details, you know.
Speaker 1: I always tell stories about.
Speaker 6: My parents getting to New York and seeing like a
Speaker 6: fancy department store and thinking like, Oh, there's no way
Speaker 6: we'd be allowed to go in there unless we show
Speaker 6: them our money.
Speaker 1: Things like that.
Speaker 6: They didn't know all the details of American life, but
Speaker 6: they knew that they wanted to be part of the culture.
Speaker 1: They wanted their kids to be American. I'm actually named.
Speaker 6: Carol with a K because I was born in the
Speaker 6: Soviet Union and because my parents wanted me.
Speaker 1: To have an American name.
Speaker 6: But they misspelled it, and that's the way it goes.
Speaker 2: Well, I don't think it's a misspelling. I think it's
Speaker 2: perfectly spelled Carol. But I also played some comments earlier
Speaker 2: from Kamala Harris speaking of great Americans here with the
Speaker 2: spelled of the K, claiming that she was the most
Speaker 2: qualified presidential candidate ever? Can she get any more ridiculous
Speaker 2: with this book tour she is on? And do you
Speaker 2: think that she may be trying to God help us,
Speaker 2: make a play to run again in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 1: It's certainly possible. And you know, I don't think she
Speaker 1: has any chance to.
Speaker 6: Get even out of the Democratic primary, but I could
Speaker 6: see it happening, because what else does she have going on?
Speaker 1: I'll tell you. In that same interview, she was asked, like,
Speaker 1: what would be some of your major issues?
Speaker 6: And she couldn't name one, not one, This most qualified
Speaker 6: presidential candidate in history, couldn't name one thing that she
Speaker 6: might potentially run on in a future race. She just
Speaker 6: was always understudied, never had her homework done, never knew
Speaker 6: exactly what was going on, always was given projects.
Speaker 1: That were way over her head.
Speaker 6: And look, the president that she was vice president for
Speaker 6: was barely there himself. So we have no idea who
Speaker 6: Kamala Harris is, or what she wants or what she represents.
Speaker 2: Well, I don't know about you, but personally, I'm kind
Speaker 2: of hoping she makes a run for it, just simply
Speaker 2: because so much great material for this program here. Before
Speaker 2: I let you go, I also want to talk about
Speaker 2: this other story that was broken by Political politico dot
Speaker 2: com this week, which exposed thousands of text messages from
Speaker 2: young Republicans in a group chat with members joking about
Speaker 2: things like slavery and the Holocaust. And it's led to
Speaker 2: a huge controversy with Democrats saying, oh, everybody here has
Speaker 2: to resign, everybody involved with it has to be canceled.
Speaker 2: All of this. But jd Vance had an interesting response.
Speaker 2: He took to Twitter to respond and he said, this
Speaker 2: highlights the lack of outrage when it comes to Jay Jones,
Speaker 2: the gentleman who's running for attorney general in Virginia and
Speaker 2: his horrific text messages where he fantasized about killing children,
Speaker 2: which is fairly worse. I would say, now Vance wrote quote,
Speaker 2: this is far worse than anything said in a college
Speaker 2: group chat, and the guy who said it could become
Speaker 2: the attorney general in Virginia. I refuse to join the
Speaker 2: pearl clutching when powerful people call for political violence. Carol
Speaker 2: sort this out for us.
Speaker 6: It's tough because you know, when I read the political piece,
Speaker 6: my first instinct was they had a paragraph blaming these
Speaker 6: comments that these you know, idiots made on Donald Trump, saying, oh,
Speaker 6: this is this stems from Donald Trump's rhetoric, and it
Speaker 6: absolutely does not.
Speaker 1: So that was my very first take on it.
Speaker 6: I don't think it's difficult to say these people should
Speaker 6: be fired, they should have to step down from their roles.
Speaker 1: What they said was beyond the pale.
Speaker 6: But the Democrats don't do this at all. And so
Speaker 6: the governor candidate in Virginia win some Sears. The Democrats
Speaker 6: of Virginia said, oh, winsome Sears has to say that
Speaker 6: these people should step down, and her comment was perfect.
Speaker 1: It was like they should step down.
Speaker 2: Now you go, yeah, yeah, absolutely right. I think that's
Speaker 2: I think that pretty much sources it out. Carol Markletz,
Speaker 2: thank you so much for joining me here tonight on
Speaker 2: the US report. Now stick around because after the break
Speaker 2: a report on the latest news out of NBC where
Speaker 2: a DEI program is d EA D But first, let's
Speaker 2: check in with the president, who's got some words to
Speaker 2: say about Stephen Miller, his gloriously obsessive boarder security advisor.
Speaker 9: This is many, many steps above, and I want to
Speaker 9: thank Steven Miller, who's right back in the audience right there.
Speaker 9: I'd love to have him. I love watching him on television.
Speaker 9: I'd love to have him come up and explain his
Speaker 9: true feelings sippit. Maybe not his truest failing that might
Speaker 9: be going a little bit too far, but Steven, thank
Speaker 9: you for doing an unbelievable job.
Speaker 11: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I'd love to know those truest feelings too, But you
Speaker 2: know what, I'm not sure I could broadcast them. Stick
Speaker 2: around because there's more un support after the break. Hey,
Speaker 2: welcome back to the program. Now joining me now is
Speaker 2: political commentator You know her well. Stephanie Hamill. Stephanie, thanks
Speaker 2: so much for joining me on the program tonight here
Speaker 2: and I wanted to talk about the White House's memorial
Speaker 2: to Charlie Kirk when he was posthumously awarded the Presidential
Speaker 2: Medal of Freedom. This is what some of what the
Speaker 2: President said at the event earlier this week.
Speaker 13: But it was a horrible, heinous, demonic act of murder.
Speaker 13: He was assassinated in the prime of his life for
Speaker 13: boldly speaking the truth, for living his faith and relentlessly
Speaker 13: fighting for a better and stronger America. Loved this country
Speaker 13: and that's why this afternoon, it's my privilege to posthumously
Speaker 13: award Charles James Kirk, our nation's highest civilian honor, the
Speaker 13: Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Stephanie. I want to ask you about this
Speaker 2: because it was quite bittersweet. He awarded the medal to
Speaker 2: Erica Erica Kirk on what would have been Charlie's thirty
Speaker 2: second birthday now, when he was assassinated. The reverberations went
Speaker 2: around the world, and I can tell you that here
Speaker 2: in Australia, I still have people wanting to talk to
Speaker 2: me about Charlie Kirk. And what happened on that terrible day.
Speaker 2: How is the memory of Charlie Kirk being honored, but
Speaker 2: also how much impact is he still having now in
Speaker 2: death in the United States and among conservatives, young conservatives
Speaker 2: on the right.
Speaker 14: Absolutely, James, and you're not the only one where people
Speaker 14: are approaching you and asking you and wanting to talk
Speaker 14: about Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 11: I mean, people are so affected by this.
Speaker 14: This is something that I think about in people in
Speaker 14: my community talk about every single day. What President Trump
Speaker 14: awarding Charlie the nation's highest civilian honor on his birthday
Speaker 14: was just incredible. It was profoundly moving, and I am
Speaker 14: so thankful for President Trump for remembering Charlie on his
Speaker 14: birthday with this award because we are Charlie. For so
Speaker 14: many conservatives who's there to that share the same values
Speaker 14: as Charlie, which is faith, family, and freedom. This was
Speaker 14: really important for us and his widow, Erica Kirk. I
Speaker 14: don't know how she does it. Her strength and grace
Speaker 14: is just incredible, and she's demonstrated something that I've just
Speaker 14: never seen before, and so we have to give her
Speaker 14: credit and acknowledge her for that. And as for how
Speaker 14: Charlie Kirk's memory and legacy will live on. It's through
Speaker 14: so many voices and people that are standing up and
Speaker 14: feeling more energized and fired up than ever. Think about
Speaker 14: the movement that he put together Turning Point USA. It
Speaker 14: is a well oiled machine. If you've ever been to
Speaker 14: any of the events, there are so many hard working
Speaker 14: people that put together these incredible, incredible events where thousands
Speaker 14: of students get together with some of the greatest political
Speaker 14: minds in this country. And the last I checked, according
Speaker 14: to Turning Point, they've received one hundred and thirty thousand
Speaker 14: inquiries into student chapters across the country.
Speaker 11: This would have been Charlie Kirk's dream.
Speaker 2: Well, want to move on to this story here where
Speaker 2: this week en See News apparently announced they were eliminating
Speaker 2: their teams dedicated to covering various DEI issues, the specific
Speaker 2: channels for Black and Asian, American and Latino and LGBTQ groups,
Speaker 2: laying off about one hundred and fifty staffers. It seems
Speaker 2: to be here this is a big win for the
Speaker 2: culture that news organizations are starting to get the message
Speaker 2: that this sort of identity politics news coverage is not
Speaker 2: working for them and coming on the heels of Barry
Speaker 2: Weiss going to CBS.
Speaker 1: I'd love your thoughts, James.
Speaker 14: There's a lot to chew on here. My first initial
Speaker 14: reaction was NBC laying off their diversity push groups sound
Speaker 14: a little racist according to the left, but also, you know,
Speaker 14: I actually didn't realize that they had these these groups intact,
Speaker 14: that they have specific people pushing news for each color
Speaker 14: and race of of people in America. It's kind of sickening.
Speaker 14: As somebody who's bicultural. My mother is born in Mexico,
Speaker 14: I am American, I was born here. It's just hard
Speaker 14: for me to understand, like why they are creating different
Speaker 14: news divisions targeted at different people. As an American and
Speaker 14: even my mom being from Mexico and living in this country,
Speaker 14: we care about the news that all Americans care about it.
Speaker 14: It's really weird that they were doing that in the
Speaker 14: first place. And as for it being a win, I'm
Speaker 14: a little dubious. I'm actually thinking that it's the fact
Speaker 14: that they're not getting the ratings and they're not making
Speaker 14: the money, so this is the reason why. I mean,
Speaker 14: I guess it's a win in the sense that the
Speaker 14: audience has rejected it, so people are getting so tired
Speaker 14: of the race baiting and all of this actual division
Speaker 14: instead of unification.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's absolutely right. Meanwhile, on the left,
Speaker 2: I find this story amazing. Katie Porter and I've spoken
Speaker 2: about her before. She's trying to become California's next governor,
Speaker 2: and apparently she has refused to say whether or not
Speaker 2: there will be even more videos that will drop this
Speaker 2: week displaying her abusive behavior, which, if you've seen some
Speaker 2: of it before, has been pretty unhinged. Here's what she
Speaker 2: had to say in another interview this week.
Speaker 15: Should California voters feel confident that there aren't any more
Speaker 15: Katie Porter videos out there?
Speaker 16: Well, what I know is that I could have done
Speaker 16: better in those moments. I'm going to be focused on
Speaker 16: earning their votes and earning their trust. That's true in
Speaker 16: every election.
Speaker 15: But not just the CBS interview, the interview with the staffer.
Speaker 15: Can voters be confident that there won't be another one
Speaker 15: of those videos that's going to come to light?
Speaker 16: I'm going to be honest with you. I know that
Speaker 16: that video and that video was several years ago, as
Speaker 16: you know, and I apologize to the staffer. That's super
Speaker 16: important to me and will continue to try to hold
Speaker 16: myself to do better. That's what I can promise.
Speaker 2: Now, Stephanie. By now, everybody has seen the videos, the
Speaker 2: allegations that she dumped scolding hot mashed potatoes on her
Speaker 2: ex husband's head. This woman could become California's next governor.
Speaker 2: What is happening in the Democrat Party that somebody with
Speaker 2: this sort of character seems to have risen to the
Speaker 2: very heights of the party of that state.
Speaker 11: Yeah, I'm laughing because I'm trying not to cry.
Speaker 14: How is it that the Democrats in California would even
Speaker 14: see a potential candidate in her? I mean, she's the
Speaker 14: leading candidate, and I understand that Governor Gavin Newsom is
Speaker 14: a very flawed politician, but this is.
Speaker 11: Almost even worse.
Speaker 14: I mean the video that you're talking about, she flew
Speaker 14: into a rage because her staffer had the audacity to
Speaker 14: accidentally walk in her background. I mean, she started shouting
Speaker 14: expletives at her. We've also read a lot more about
Speaker 14: how she's mistreated other staffers. We also recently saw a
Speaker 14: video where she stepped out of an interview screamed at
Speaker 14: a reporter because she didn't like the reporter's questions. And
Speaker 14: by the way, the reporter was probably a liberal reporter
Speaker 14: who happened to ask all of the other candidates the
Speaker 14: same exact questions. So this is a very messy situation.
Speaker 14: And I you know, she's apologized.
Speaker 11: And said, you know, it was like a bad day
Speaker 11: or whatever. She's just sorry she got caught.
Speaker 14: Okay, absolutely type of personalities. I'm very familiar with them,
Speaker 14: and I'm sure there's a lot more of that, And
Speaker 14: that's why she can't promise that there won't be more videos,
Speaker 14: because this is who she is, and so it's very
Speaker 14: concerning that she's the leading Democrat in California. I really
Speaker 14: hope that Californians will wake up, even if they're Democrats,
Speaker 14: and realize that they deserve better because this woman is
Speaker 14: unhinged and doesn't have the character or judgment to be
Speaker 14: in charge of such a great state.
Speaker 2: Well, Stephanie, very quick follow up. Do you think this
Speaker 2: could sink her campaign?
Speaker 11: I think it could. It could sink the campaign.
Speaker 14: But the problem is, for the most part, the mainstream
Speaker 14: media ignores these types of stories, and so a lot
Speaker 14: of the voters probably won't even know that this happened.
Speaker 14: They won't know the true character of this candidate, and
Speaker 14: so that's what concerns me. But if more people are
Speaker 14: able to watch news sources like yours, James, or some
Speaker 14: of the other news organizations.
Speaker 11: That I speak to, then they can be informed voters and.
Speaker 14: Decide whether or not they want somebody with such a
Speaker 14: hothead to lead their state.
Speaker 2: Well, Stephanie, we do have a few US support viewers
Speaker 2: who love us on the YouTube in America, so we'll
Speaker 2: see what difference that can make. We'll see, we'll find out,
Speaker 2: Stephanie Haw. Well, thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 2: That don't go anywhere because only in America is coming up.
Speaker 2: But after the break, before we hit the break, let's
Speaker 2: check in whether our old pal John Fetterman, who may
Speaker 2: be the last Democrat with any sense left in the
Speaker 2: United States, haven't listened to what he had to say
Speaker 2: about who's really responsible for the government shutdown?
Speaker 17: That's why, that's why shutting the government is really what
Speaker 17: the Democratic Party wants to do. And I follow country
Speaker 17: than party, and it's the wrong thing for the country
Speaker 17: in a period of chaos. I refuse to vote to
Speaker 17: shut our government down. I absolutely would love to have
Speaker 17: I would love to have a conversation about extending the
Speaker 17: tax credits for healthcare. Absolutely, but I would remind everybody too,
Speaker 17: this was designed by the Democratic Party to expire at
Speaker 17: the end of the year. This is not something taken
Speaker 17: from by the Republicans. That's they were designed to expire. Now,
Speaker 17: let's have a conversation to extend it and not shut
Speaker 17: our government down.
Speaker 2: If ever, there was a case of don't judge a
Speaker 2: book by its cover, it was John Fetterman. I mean,
Speaker 2: imagine that caring about America rather than your party. That's
Speaker 2: great stuff and you'll love to see it stick around
Speaker 2: because Only in America is next. Welcome back to the program,
Speaker 2: and now it's time for a little segment we like
Speaker 2: to call only in America. Hey, so there's a lot
Speaker 2: of serious news around the place, but thankfully Artificial Intelligence
Speaker 2: AI is letting us have a little fun with it.
Speaker 2: And no one is having more fun with it than
Speaker 2: the team at something called it Diaper Diplomacy. It's a
Speaker 2: website which retells the events of the day with babies.
Speaker 2: Have a look at how they handled Trump's big trip
Speaker 2: to the Knessett this week and that moment where he
Speaker 2: was interrupted by a pro Palestine protester and O.
Speaker 9: Steve was chosen by me. He never did this before,
Speaker 9: but I knew him as a few things. He was
Speaker 9: a great businessman, but I know a lot of great businessmen.
Speaker 9: To be honest with you, he had tremendous negotiating skills,
Speaker 9: but I know a lot of people that negotiate pretty well.
Speaker 9: Although it is an art, people that can negotiate pretty well.
Speaker 9: But most importantly, see, he's just a great guy. Everybody
Speaker 9: loved him. Everybody they respect him, and they somehow can
Speaker 9: relate to him. I've known him for many years and
Speaker 9: I've seen it over over and over and again.
Speaker 18: Don't Ahua, They don't think I'm gonna come back. Sorry
Speaker 18: for that, mister President. That was very efficient, very.
Speaker 2: Efficient indeed, and hey, you know what else was efficient?
Speaker 2: Tonight's show went by in a flash. Anyway, I'll see
Speaker 2: you next week. Bye bye,