WEBVTT - The U.S. Report | 17 October

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the US Report with James Moroar.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the program. Coming up tonight,

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Anthony Albanezi to finally meet with President Trump,

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and Alish Nielsen is here with an exclusive preview plus

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump friends to drop the hammer on Hamas, But will

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>he send in the Marines? And who's responsible for the

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>government shutdown? Finally a Democrat speaks the truth. But first,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>it has been a massive week. But I don't want

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>to look back on what's just happened. Instead, I want

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 2>to open a window into the future, the future of

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the Democrat Party, which is gearing up for a generational

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>civil war as a breed of new, slick, social media savvy,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>young and very hard left politicians push to elbow out

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the oldies and aim to get a play on the

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty eight Yes, twenty twenty eight, We're almost there ticket.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Now their targets aren't just the old guard you know,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the Pelosis, the Bidens, the Clintons. Instead, they are targeting

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>people like Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris, Yes Kamala Harris,

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>who think twenty twenty eight is their time and that

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 2>these young whipper snappers have to wait their turn. I

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 2>mean when it comes to Kamala Harris, I know, don't

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>laugh about this. It's serious. She is not letting this

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 2>thing die, even saying this about her presidential campaign last time,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>which may be the most singularly audacious thing she has

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 2>ever said while she was there promoting her new book

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and seven Days.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>That is decent. But that is a decent resume. But

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>go ahead there.

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, some people have actually said I was the most

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>qualified candidate ever to run for president.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I like you, I like this. Some people say, very nice,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but go ahead. I'm just speaking fact.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, under delusional. There is a picture of that interview.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 2>But you know what, guess what, I think she's still

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 2>going to do it. There's going to be an effort

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 2>to put her up, even though most of the old

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>guard will wind up falling behind another candidate, California Governor

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Newsom. And I'll tell you what. As bad as

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>he is, just think about what he did to California

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and imagine that happening nationwide. Well, I don't think this

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>rising generation of radical young Democrats or democratic socialists as

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>they call themselves, are going to wait their turn. And

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>not only that, I think they're also far worse because

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>these are not idealistic young liberals like say John F.

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy committed to America and the capitalist system, but instead

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>they're determined to overthrow it. They are outgrowths of the

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>legendary squad, and they include radicals like New York mayoral

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>candidate and radical socialist Zoron mom Donnie, who has been

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>forced to back away from his anti police rhetoric, but

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 2>even twenty four hours ago couldn't bring himself to say

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>that Hamas should disarm.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Do you believe that Hamas should lay down their weapons

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 4>and leave the leadership in gaza?

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 5>I believe that any future here in New York City

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 5>is one that we have to make sure that's affordable

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 5>for all, and as it pertains to Israel and palestein

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 5>that we have to ensure that there is peace, and

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 5>that is the future that we have to fight for.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, an absolute gold star to Zoron's media trainer there,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how well was that answered? But there is

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>another candidate as well from this younger generation waiting in

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the wings, who not only ticks all the identity boxes,

0:03:55.280 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 2>but is also even more bonkers than Kamala Harris. I speak,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>of course, of Alexandria Ocasio Cortes, leader of that aforementioned squad.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>And what's important to note is that she both talks

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of lefty rubbish but has also grown increasingly

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>powerful within the Democrat Party. She's played a very good

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>game getting very close to power. And she was in

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>a fine form in a CNN town hall on the

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 2>government shutdown Thursday, where she and Bernie Sanders were given

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 2>essentially a free kick to dump on Republicans. Now, some

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>of it was pretty wildly entertaining, and just goofy, I mean,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 2>get a load of her talking about big corporations and

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>environmental pollution.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 4>Here, rivers in rural areas were on fire because of

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:52.119
<v Speaker 4>corporations poisoning the people who lived in those areas, poor

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 4>middle class communities getting poisoned and dumped on by corporations

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 4>like Deloitte.

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Deloitte, last time I checked, there were an accounting firm

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>that just got in a heap of trouble with the

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 2>Australian government over a bogus report they handed in generated

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 2>by AI. But speaking of pollution, here's what she is

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>describing when she talks about a clean environment.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Instead of talking about having air that's drinkable.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Ah, that sweet, refreshing, thirst quenching air. Oh. And she

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 2>also declared war on Republican boys.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 4>And they are able to radicalize and target and exploit

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 4>a generation of young boys in particular away from healthy

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 4>masculinity and into an insecure masculinity that requires the domination

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 4>of others who are poorer, browner, darker, or a different

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 4>gender than them.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Now you see what's going on here. Of course, only

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>liberals can express a healthy masculinity. And if you like

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 2>in border secure, well you're mentally ill and probably racist

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 2>to boot. But put away that goofiness. And it is

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>quite clear to me that AOC is trying to position

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>yourself as the de facto leader of the Democrat Party

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 2>laying down the law here in this next clip about

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 2>what has to happen to end the shutdown.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 4>If I were Mike Johnson, you should be in that

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 4>office negotiating with a keen Jeffries every damn day until

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 4>we reopen this government. And any day that you don't

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 4>do that is a failure. It is a failure. And

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 4>until there is accountability for people who refuse to work

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 4>to work, then we're going to continue to be in

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 4>this cycle. So you know, in the Senate, the Senate

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 4>majority leader is John Fund. He should be negotiating with

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Chuck Schumer.

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I yes, Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democrat leader, also from

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>AOC's state of New York, who famously doesn't know how

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>a barbecue work. But I'm glad she mentioned Schumer because

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Schumer is another one of those oldies. The young Democrats

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>socialists want to get out of the way. And there's

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talk right now that AOC might try

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 2>to challenge Schumer for his Senate seat, giving her a

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>launching pad to hire office, just in the same way

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 2>JFK moved into the Senate from the House and then

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 2>onto the White House, a past similar as well to

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 2>his Vice President Lyndon Mainz Johnson. And it was telling

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>how both AOC and Bernie blew up when the host

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>of this town hall suggested that AOC might challenge Schumer.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 4>But are you saying that Senator Schumer should not be

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 4>worried about a primary challenge from you?

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean no, let me jump in on this.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 6>Talking about I have a country that is falling apart.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 7>We got a house housing crisis, a healthcare crisis and

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 7>education crisis, massive income and wealth inequality, a corrupt campaign finances,

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 7>and the media says, well, you could run what are

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 7>gonna run for? Nobody caresbody cares, nobody cares, nobody cares.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>But I'll tell you what. That's not a no, is it? Look?

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I reckon moves are already a foot, and she might

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 2>not even wait so long as to do that challenge.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Shreer's term isn't up until twenty twenty eight. The Democrat

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 2>field to run against Donald Trump's successor is looking fairly unimpressive.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's just say, and just waite, I bet we see

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>a white guy Greeney California Democrat in Gavin Newsom heading

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 2>up that twenty twenty eight ticket, and I would not

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>be surprised to see AOC rounded out as the Hispanic

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>female hard left progressive on the undercard. But all that

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 2>speculation aside. What we are seeing now is something much bigger,

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>hard left young Democrats, socialists, Mom, Donnie AOC, plenty of

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>others who are trying to steer the Democrats hard to

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the left believing and this is their logic here. They

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:21.359
<v Speaker 2>believe that by mirroring Donald Trump's surge to the nationalist

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 2>populist right, they will be able to find the same

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of success by going to a radical populist left.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>And that's so much of what the economics of people

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>like AOC and Mom Donnie are about, to say nothing

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 2>of their social policies and what God help us they

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>might do about American foreign policy. Well, personally, I think

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 2>this is all terribly dangerous. I mean, God forbid they

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 2>ever get into power. But I also think this is

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the wrong track for the Democrats because as much as

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 2>he's characterized as being a hard right radical, so much

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 2>of what Trump believes in, you know, strong borders, no

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 2>boys and girls changing rooms, cracking down on violent street

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>crime in cities, well this is what most normal people

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>believe in, too, what people like AOC believe in hard

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>left democrats. Socialism isn't going to get too many takers

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 2>outside New York. And as I always tell my Democrat

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>friends and everybody who watches this program, rule number one

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of winning elections is simple three words. Just be normal.

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>But for some reason, the Democrats have lost that art,

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and they don't seem to be on the way to

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>regaining it anytime soon. Well, joining me now, is Sky

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>News is Washington correspondent Analyst Nielsen Analyst, Thanks for joining me,

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the US Report. First of all, I

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 2>got to talk about this meeting that Prime Anthony Albanizi

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>is going to finally have in the Oval Office next week.

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 2>We have been waiting for months and months and months

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 2>for this encounter to take place. What's going to happen?

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think it will be a bit of a

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 8>checkbox meeting for the American side, at least, I know

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 8>that they've been feeling under pressure for a while because

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 8>the Australians have been very kind of upset at being

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 8>so far down the list. Look, Anthony Alberanezi, he's just

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 8>not someone who has a lot of leverage, influence, kind

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 8>of identity within Trump worlds. But also we're just not

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 8>actually in harm's way either. We're not getting the worst

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 8>of the tariffs. We've got the lowest level that the

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 8>US is giving anyone in the world. It seems like

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 8>UCAST is going to go pretty well, and so it

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 8>seems like we're just kind of not a priority. And

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 8>I know that we've had it really good for a

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 8>long time. We had such a star role in the

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 8>Trump administration when so many countries weren't dealing with him,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 8>and then we got the extra visit to the White

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 8>House because Biden bailed on the Quad meeting and we

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 8>wasted millions of dollars for a meeting that never happened.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 8>So I think there's that kind of managing that expectation

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 8>as well. But you know, you just never know with

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 8>Donald Trump. He could be in a really bad mood

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 8>that day, or if Albinizi says something that's considered talking

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 8>down to him or kind of making a joke of him,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 8>I can imagine it will turn very quickly.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister has to walk sort of a fine

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>line with Trump here because on the one hand he

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>has to look at like he's your standing up for

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Australia's interests, but on the other hand he can't look

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 2>too obsequious otherwise he'll annoy his labor based back home.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and look, I mean, if Kirstarma can come and

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 8>do the whole dance, don't there's no reason Australia can't

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 8>do the same thing. Just be deferential. It's our biggest ally. Frankly,

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 8>it's been pretty good for Australia, our relationship and Honestly,

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 8>I'm hoping they've done something like I think they should

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 8>have just gone down to the Perth mint get a

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 8>gold submarine, write Uss Trump on it, show up with that.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 8>It'll be in the Oval office for four years. He'll

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 8>love it and we'll be in the good books. And

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 8>so I think it'll be not coming in trying to

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 8>election them on anything. It would be also my biggest

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 8>yeah recommendation. If anyone cares about my opinion, well.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I think Look, I think your counsel is very

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>wise here, but you know, behind the scenes diplomatically, of course,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 2>we had a much different ambassador during the first term

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Trump administration than we do now. I've heard

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>concerns that Kevin Rudd has not managed this relationship to

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the degree that it could have been. In fact, that

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration has been not thrilled with what they've

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 2>gotten out of him, despite you know, the other positive

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>indicators that we've had. Can you let any insight on that.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 8>Look, from what I can tell, I don't think he's

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 8>really tried. I think what he's done is really try

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 8>and target Treasury, Commerce, State Department, and I think he's

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 8>just known it's a bit of a wash trying to

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 8>fit in with Trump world when they're just so opposite,

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 8>and he's a policy wong, he's left wing. The one

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 8>thing he has is being very anti China. But also

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 8>just anyone who googles him knows exactly what he said

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 8>about Trump, and it's just not something you can run

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 8>away from. And the difference in that, I know everyone says, oh,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 8>but so and so said something critical about Trump, and

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 8>what about Jade event they admitted they were wrong, and

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 8>so Drud's never done that, and so it's one thing

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 8>to say, yeah, sure, he's representing our interests. Why would

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 8>they be thrilled to deal with him?

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. Well, we'll see just how Kevin Rudd shakes

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>out of all of this down the road. But let's

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>also go watch some other foreign policy news who we've

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 2>had a call with President Putin. Between President Putin of

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Russia and the US President Donald Trump had this to

0:14:58.640 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 2>say a little while ago.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 9>I would say it within two weeks or so, pretty quick.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 9>Marco Rubio is going to be meeting with his counterpartner,

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 9>as you know, Labrov, and they'll be meeting pretty soon.

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 9>They're going to set up a time and a place

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 9>very shortly. Maybe it's already set up, they've already spoken.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 9>And I thought it was a very good phone call.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 9>I thought very productive. But I'll be meeting with President

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 9>Putin and we'll make a determination.

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 2>So he's got a meeting with Vledimer Zelensky of Ukraine tomorrow.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got a Trump Putin meeting in a couple of weeks.

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Here is he trying to knock together some sort of

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 2>solution to the Ukraine Russia war here in the same

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 2>way that he's done in the last several weeks between

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Hamas and Israel.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, he wants this done. And he said it

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.359
<v Speaker 8>time and again. He's solved seven out of the eight conflicts.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 8>He likes being the peacemaker. He likes having the world influence.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 8>And I know it's been such a thing for so

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 8>many years about oh the neocons, they want to be

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 8>world police, and so isolationists. Americans like being the world

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 8>police when they win. They like getting it right, and

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 8>they have been getting it right. So he wants to

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 8>continue that. And he gets to say that it was

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 8>all started under Biden. It wouldn't have happened if he

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 8>was in the White House. That's I mean, I think

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 8>there is some truth to that. He's so unpredictable on

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 8>a world stage. You don't know when he's going to

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 8>drop a bunker buster on Iran, so you don't mess around.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 8>And I think he knows that. Similarly, by watching what

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 8>happened in Israel with Hamas of them just being worn down,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 8>he knows that Putin's getting worn down as well. And

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 8>so when he's making those jokes about well, maybe I

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 8>will give a couple of thousand tomahawks to Zelenski, you

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 8>don't know if he's joking or on. And Putin doesn't

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 8>know if he's joking on on. So that's how he's

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 8>wielding his influence. And he wants to bring this to

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 8>an end. He's embarrassed that he said it was going

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 8>to be solved on day one because he thought he

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 8>had a relationship with Putin that hasn't happened. And I

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 8>think he's got a chip on his shoulder about that

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 8>as well.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean, look, it's amazing that a guy

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>who learned a transactional backed up by force negotiating style

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 2>that that's worked so well in the Middle East. Who

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>would have predicted that? But just you know, staying with

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East just for a minute. There's been the

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>prospect now raised of American marines potentially even going into

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Gaza to somehow keep the peace. You know, you say

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that Americans like to be the world policeman, But did

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>people sign up necessarily for keeping peace in Gaza when

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 2>they voted for Trump? Here is there's going to be

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a bit of blowback on that idea because I know

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 2>there's concerns about that relationship.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think no Americans want to see any more

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 8>Americans die in any conflict zones that aren't directly defending America,

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 8>and so that would be very toxic. I think if

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 8>Trump ever sends marines into Gaza, we will never find

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 8>out about it. It will be so discreet. They'll be

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 8>disguised as something else, probably for some kind of other

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 8>Arab ally we will never find out about it. They

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 8>certainly wouldn't do it publicly. And I mean, people forget

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 8>that we have had attacks on US baces during this war.

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 8>And also don't forget one of the biggest casualty events

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 8>was Biden building that two hundred and thirty million dollar

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 8>pontoon that sunk after twenty days. People forget a serviceman

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 8>diet after the injuries he sustained in that and it

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 8>achieved nothing. It was supposed to bring all this aid

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 8>into Gaza and it didn't happen. So when you just

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 8>I bring that up because it shows how invested America

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 8>has been in this for so long and how hard

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 8>they've found this until Trump's come in and reset it,

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 8>and He's used those business contacts. He knows that money

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 8>talks more in the Middle East than foreign policy wonkery

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 8>and like just that kind of traditional diplomacy, and so

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 8>he sent in Jared Kushna who's just pulled off the

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 8>extraordinary in.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>This and as you say, it is ordinar Jared kushm

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Kuscher said he could solve it because he read twenty

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 2>five books on the subject. And you know what, they've

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 2>done a hell of a lot better than so many

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 2>decades and decades of experts who thought they knew what

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 2>they were doing, but clearly did an analyst Nielson, thank

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>you so much for your time here on the US Report.

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Now let's go to former senior advisor to President Trump,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Christian Witten. Christian, welcome back to the program. Here, big

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 2>breaking news here. Former US National security advisor to Donald Trump,

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.959
<v Speaker 2>John Bolton, has been indicted. A federal grand jury has

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>indicted mister Bolton on charges of mishandling classified information. And

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>it sounds from the reports I've read, he is alleged

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 2>to have sent sensitive documents to relating to national security

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 2>through a personal email account. That's a big no no

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 2>if you've got a top secret clearance. The US President

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 2>had this to say, I.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Didn't know that.

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 9>You're told me for the first time. But I think

0:19:55.720 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 9>he's a bad person. I think he's a bad guy. Yeah,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 9>he's a bad guy, too bad. But that's the where

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 9>it goes. That's the way it goes, right, that's the

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 9>way it goes.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want have you reviewed the case against him?

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 9>No, I have it. I have it, But I just

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 9>think he's a bad person.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 2>A Christian put aside the great call out to some

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 2>of his best material with the you're just telling me

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 2>this for the first timeline here. But if this is true,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 2>if these allegations are correct, these are very serious allegations.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Ordinary people with security clearances who've done things like this

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 2>have been put away.

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 10>You know, I was talking to a friend who was

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 10>with the FBI in San Diego, and every year there's

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 10>sort of a young non commissioned officer who shows some

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 10>lowly classified information to a girlfriend because he thinks it's

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 10>cool and you know, end of career, probable jail time. This,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 10>on the other hand, is someone who served at the

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 10>Justice Department and at the State Department and at the

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 10>White House and knows exactly what the rules are, had

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 10>access to the highest classified information, and at least according

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 10>to the which is just a government accusation, it's not

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 10>conclusive proof, but held a sensitive compartmentalized information, top secret information,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 10>the highest level stuff at his home and put it

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 10>into email and used it in his book. So this

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 10>is someone who knew the rules and broke them pretty

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 10>clearly according to the indictment.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean that would put the lie to

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the idea that this is just sort of a revenge

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 2>prosecution here, because this is a narrative that they keep

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 2>pushing that, oh, well, they're going after John Bolton or

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Letitia James because they're just trying to get back Trump's

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 2>just trying to get back, is it enemies? But that's

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily the case here, is it.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 11>It's not.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 10>Actually, this is a case of an injustice being put

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 10>right through prosecution because Bolton so just so clearly he

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 10>put this book into the review process. He sent the

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 10>manuscript just four months after he was fired. No one

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 10>writes a book in four months. That means that throughout

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 10>his short tenures national Security Advisor. And this was rumored

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 10>at the time, and frankly I warned some friends at

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 10>the White House that he did this when he US

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 10>ambassador the UN. He was working on the book while

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 10>he was still in government. That was probably one of

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 10>the big reasons to go in, I think, was to

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 10>make a splash and come out. But Joyce, Judge Lambert,

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 10>who's the name you may recall from the Lewinsky scandal era,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 10>a Reagan appointee, basically told Bolton because the government was

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 10>trying to stop publication, all the books were published, all

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 10>they were already distributed. And the jet says, well, I'm

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 10>not going to stop this now because I can't. But

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 10>it seems like you broke the law that was in

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 10>the early Biden administration. Biden didn't prosecute it, and now

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 10>Trump has, so finally justice is being served.

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Good good good stuff. Hey, Christian onto other news here

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Ata Washington. Here, this shutdown of the government is remaining

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 2>in place. US lawmakers are trying to shift blame the Democrats,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>are trying to blame the Republicans. But since Democrats have

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>just blocked an eight hundred and fifty two billion dollar

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 2>bill that would have at least kept defense funded through September,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how the Democrats can keep saying that

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 2>it's the Republicans that are responsible for this when they're

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the ones holding it up and explain to us the

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 2>majorities that are actually needed to pass funding bills, because

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I think some of our viewers here in Australia need

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of understanding of that process and why

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>it's not just a straight majority vote.

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 10>Right. Well, a lot of things in the Senate require

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 10>six the out of one hundred senators to vote for

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 10>klod sure to stop a limit debate, and if you

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 10>don't get that then you just assume debate will go

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 10>on interminably and don't proceed, move on to something else,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 10>or go home. There are things called budget reconciliation that

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 10>only acquire a bare majority under the current rules of

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 10>the Senate, which actually Republicans could unilaterally change bills like

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 10>these do need sixty votes, and that's unfortunately why Democrats,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 10>who only have forty seven seats, are able to obstruct this.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 10>Typically they wouldn't. This isn't deciding all of the next

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 10>fiscal year. It's just extending appropriations while the debate goes on.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 10>The Democrats, I think, erroneously think the politics of this

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 10>are on their side. But the military has already missed

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 10>one payday. The next one comes up at the end

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 10>of the month. So it's not just people who are

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 10>you studying spotted at owls in California for the Forest Service.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 10>It's actually people who matter for our national security who

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 10>are now not being paid for work that they've already done.

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 10>And I think, you know, people are going to start

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 10>getting more upset with the Dems.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that is pretty shocking. That give it

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 2>everything that's going on in the world. If you're not

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>giving your soldiers a paycheck, that seems like a pretty

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 2>bad idea of Christian Witten. Thank you so much for

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 2>your time. You're always love having you here on the show. Now,

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 2>don't go anywhere, because after the break, the Great Carol

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Markowitz is going to join me to reveal a startling

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>new survey that shows the whole fever for non binary

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>genders could finally be breaking. But first, earlier in the program,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 2>I talked about that CNN town hall segment on the

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 2>government showdown, Shutdown. Well, the White House has just posted

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 2>this clip of the event when Bernie Sanders is asked

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>a very important question, have a look at what the

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 2>White House did with his response.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Republicans have been appealing to audiences, especially young people like

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 3>myself online using social media. Why does Republican messaging on

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 3>social media seem so much more effective than democratic messaging?

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>And what can we do about it?

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's a great question. I think the Republicans are effected.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 7>They have learned a lot about social media and by

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 7>the way to Tousin hurt that they have friends o

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 7>all all of the major social media platform.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to put it out there that maybe

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 2>actually Bernie the Right does social media better because they

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>have a sense of humor. Hi krama, Carol Markowitz. After

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the break, do not Go Anywhere, Welcome back to the program.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 2>In in a moment, Carol Markowitz joins me with an

0:25:56.000 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>exclusive study about gender identity. Turns out the kids maybe

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 2>all right after all. But before we bring her on

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>something absolutely extraordinary happened in the US Supreme Court Thursday,

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and I just had to bring this to you. Justice

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Katanji Brown Jackson, a black female justice on the Court,

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>just compared being black to having a disability. Yeah, that's right,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>she said it. And if any white guy on the

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Court said that, well, the New York Times would be

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>starting a national conversation that would last forever. Now, to

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 2>give you the background on this, Jackson was making an

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 2>argument in a case brought by the ACLU after Louisiana

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>redrew its congressional districts, and when they did so well,

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.719
<v Speaker 2>there was only one district with a majority of minority

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 2>members left. In other words, the problem that she was

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 2>addressing is the idea that ethnicity or race was not

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 2>being used to raw congressional districts, which should seem pretty

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 2>fair to anyone who thinks that, you know, people vote

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 2>on their interests, not on the color of their skin,

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 2>because this is America we're talking about right now. A

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit longer here, but stick with me. I want

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 2>to play all of this because it is gobsmacking. First,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Justice Jackson laid out the background behind the Americans with

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Disabilities Act. What she said was just like the Voting

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Rights Act.

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 12>Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act against the backdrop

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 12>of a world that was generally not accessible to people

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 12>with disabilities, and so it was discriminatory in effect because

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 12>these folks were not able to access these buildings, and

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 12>it didn't matter whether the person who built the building

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 12>or the person who owned the building intended for them

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 12>to be exclusionary. That's irrelevant. Congress said, the facilities have

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 12>to be made equally open to people with disabilities, if

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 12>readily possible.

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you see how she set this up. Now listen

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 2>to her knock it down.

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 12>I guess I don't understand why that's not what's happening here.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 12>The idea in section two is that we are responding

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 12>to current day manifestations of past and present decisions that

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 12>disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don't have

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 12>equal access to the voting system. Right they're disabled.

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the whole thing right here. This is the

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>poison of identity politics, the soft bigotry of low expectations

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that the left, even a black woman of the left

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 2>has For people of African American heritage, to be black,

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>they say, is to have a disability to be a minority,

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 2>they say, means that you vote as a block, not

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 2>as individuals, and that the only way you can be

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 2>represented in the Congress is on the basis of the

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>color of your skin. Well, frankly, that is racist. There

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>is no other word for it. I mean again, whatever

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>happened to the old line about the content of your character? Well,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 2>we're not seeing it here. Well, joining me now is

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Carol Markowitz. You know her well. She is the New

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 2>York Post columnist and host of the Great Carol Markowitz Show. Carol,

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining me tonight, And I want

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 2>to get to an exclusive report you've got in the

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>New York Post where you've uncovered how the gender madness

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>amongst America's youth has been pushed by radical activists and

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the study shows the study you've reported on here shows

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>what many of us have thought for years, namely that

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the idea that there is no gender or that gender

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 2>isn't binary was in fact fad being pushed by radical

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 2>activists in the US. What could he tell us about nace.

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, I can't claim credit for making the discovery. It

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 6>was a researcher named Kaufman and he found that the

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 6>numbers in various studies of non binary students non binary youth.

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Has sometimes been halved.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 6>Sometimes it's as low as a third of the number

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 6>it used to be five years ago. And it's a

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 6>really amazing change because the thing is, and I say

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 6>this in the piece, non binary is the easiest one.

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the one that I say.

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 6>If I were a teenager and I had the control

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 6>of making my teachers and my parents and everybody else

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 6>call me whatever pronoun I decided from day to day, It's.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>The one I would have picked, for sure.

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 6>So the non binary one is the easiest one to

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 6>put on, but it's clearly also the easiest one to

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 6>take off, and so many have done that.

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>That's absolutely fascinating that this fever has broken. I want

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>to go on, though, because there's another story that fascinated me.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 2>In the New York Times this week, they reported that

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration is considering a radical overhaul of the

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 2>US refugee system that would slash the program and give

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>preference to English speakers, white South Africans, and Europeans who

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 2>oppose migrations. That's the way the New York Times reported it.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But you go down further in the story, and they

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 2>say the proposed changes would put new emphasis on whether

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 2>applicants would be able to assimilate into the United States,

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 2>directing them to take classes on American history and values

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and respect for cultural norms. That Carolyn really wanted to

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 2>get your repeating on this because you were born in

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the USSR, in the old Soviet Union, your family was

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 2>taken in by the US. And once your reaction to this,

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>should the government be prioritizing people who are prepared to

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 2>love America rather than people who come from cultures that

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>bear a grudge against it and want to tear it down.

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Absolutely.

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 6>And you know, I can't say that my family knew

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 6>that much about America. Well, what my family did know

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 6>about America they wanted in. They wanted to be a

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 6>part of it. They knew about the freedom, they knew

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 6>about the fact that you could live your life the

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 6>way you chose to live your life, and they wanted it.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>They didn't know a lot of the details, you know.

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I always tell stories about.

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.959
<v Speaker 6>My parents getting to New York and seeing like a

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 6>fancy department store and thinking like, Oh, there's no way

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 6>we'd be allowed to go in there unless we show

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 6>them our money.

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Things like that.

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 6>They didn't know all the details of American life, but

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 6>they knew that they wanted to be part of the culture.

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>They wanted their kids to be American. I'm actually named.

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 6>Carol with a K because I was born in the

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Soviet Union and because my parents wanted me.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>To have an American name.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 6>But they misspelled it, and that's the way it goes.

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't think it's a misspelling. I think it's

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 2>perfectly spelled Carol. But I also played some comments earlier

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 2>from Kamala Harris speaking of great Americans here with the

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>spelled of the K, claiming that she was the most

0:32:54.680 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 2>qualified presidential candidate ever? Can she get any more ridiculous

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>with this book tour she is on? And do you

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.959
<v Speaker 2>think that she may be trying to God help us,

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 2>make a play to run again in twenty twenty eight.

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly possible. And you know, I don't think she

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>has any chance to.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 6>Get even out of the Democratic primary, but I could

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 6>see it happening, because what else does she have going on?

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you. In that same interview, she was asked, like,

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what would be some of your major issues?

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 6>And she couldn't name one, not one, This most qualified

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 6>presidential candidate in history, couldn't name one thing that she

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 6>might potentially run on in a future race. She just

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 6>was always understudied, never had her homework done, never knew

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 6>exactly what was going on, always was given projects.

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>That were way over her head.

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 6>And look, the president that she was vice president for

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 6>was barely there himself. So we have no idea who

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 6>Kamala Harris is, or what she wants or what she represents.

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know about you, but personally, I'm kind

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 2>of hoping she makes a run for it, just simply

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 2>because so much great material for this program here. Before

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I let you go, I also want to talk about

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 2>this other story that was broken by Political politico dot

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 2>com this week, which exposed thousands of text messages from

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 2>young Republicans in a group chat with members joking about

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>things like slavery and the Holocaust. And it's led to

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a huge controversy with Democrats saying, oh, everybody here has

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 2>to resign, everybody involved with it has to be canceled.

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 2>All of this. But jd Vance had an interesting response.

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 2>He took to Twitter to respond and he said, this

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 2>highlights the lack of outrage when it comes to Jay Jones,

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 2>the gentleman who's running for attorney general in Virginia and

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 2>his horrific text messages where he fantasized about killing children,

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 2>which is fairly worse. I would say, now Vance wrote quote,

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.280
<v Speaker 2>this is far worse than anything said in a college

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 2>group chat, and the guy who said it could become

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the attorney general in Virginia. I refuse to join the

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 2>pearl clutching when powerful people call for political violence. Carol

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 2>sort this out for us.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 6>It's tough because you know, when I read the political piece,

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.439
<v Speaker 6>my first instinct was they had a paragraph blaming these

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 6>comments that these you know, idiots made on Donald Trump, saying, oh,

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 6>this is this stems from Donald Trump's rhetoric, and it

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 6>absolutely does not.

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>So that was my very first take on it.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it's difficult to say these people should

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 6>be fired, they should have to step down from their roles.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>What they said was beyond the pale.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 6>But the Democrats don't do this at all. And so

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 6>the governor candidate in Virginia win some Sears. The Democrats

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 6>of Virginia said, oh, winsome Sears has to say that

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 6>these people should step down, and her comment was perfect.

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It was like they should step down.

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Now you go, yeah, yeah, absolutely right. I think that's

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that pretty much sources it out. Carol Markletz,

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining me here tonight on

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the US report. Now stick around because after the break

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 2>a report on the latest news out of NBC where

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a DEI program is d EA D But first, let's

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 2>check in with the president, who's got some words to

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 2>say about Stephen Miller, his gloriously obsessive boarder security advisor.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 9>This is many, many steps above, and I want to

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 9>thank Steven Miller, who's right back in the audience right there.

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 9>I'd love to have him. I love watching him on television.

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 9>I'd love to have him come up and explain his

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 9>true feelings sippit. Maybe not his truest failing that might

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 9>be going a little bit too far, but Steven, thank

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 9>you for doing an unbelievable job.

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to know those truest feelings too, But you

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 2>know what, I'm not sure I could broadcast them. Stick

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 2>around because there's more un support after the break. Hey,

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 2>welcome back to the program. Now joining me now is

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 2>political commentator You know her well. Stephanie Hamill. Stephanie, thanks

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining me on the program tonight here

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 2>and I wanted to talk about the White House's memorial

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 2>to Charlie Kirk when he was posthumously awarded the Presidential

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Medal of Freedom. This is what some of what the

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 2>President said at the event earlier this week.

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 13>But it was a horrible, heinous, demonic act of murder.

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 13>He was assassinated in the prime of his life for

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:21.959
<v Speaker 13>boldly speaking the truth, for living his faith and relentlessly

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 13>fighting for a better and stronger America. Loved this country

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 13>and that's why this afternoon, it's my privilege to posthumously

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 13>award Charles James Kirk, our nation's highest civilian honor, the

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 13>Presidential Medal of Freedom.

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Stephanie. I want to ask you about this

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 2>because it was quite bittersweet. He awarded the medal to

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Erica Erica Kirk on what would have been Charlie's thirty

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 2>second birthday now, when he was assassinated. The reverberations went

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 2>around the world, and I can tell you that here

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, I still have people wanting to talk to

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 2>me about Charlie Kirk. And what happened on that terrible day.

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 2>How is the memory of Charlie Kirk being honored, but

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 2>also how much impact is he still having now in

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 2>death in the United States and among conservatives, young conservatives

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 2>on the right.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely, James, and you're not the only one where people

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 14>are approaching you and asking you and wanting to talk

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 14>about Charlie Kirk.

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 11>I mean, people are so affected by this.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 14>This is something that I think about in people in

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 14>my community talk about every single day. What President Trump

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 14>awarding Charlie the nation's highest civilian honor on his birthday

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 14>was just incredible. It was profoundly moving, and I am

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 14>so thankful for President Trump for remembering Charlie on his

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 14>birthday with this award because we are Charlie. For so

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 14>many conservatives who's there to that share the same values

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 14>as Charlie, which is faith, family, and freedom. This was

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 14>really important for us and his widow, Erica Kirk. I

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 14>don't know how she does it. Her strength and grace

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 14>is just incredible, and she's demonstrated something that I've just

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 14>never seen before, and so we have to give her

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 14>credit and acknowledge her for that. And as for how

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 14>Charlie Kirk's memory and legacy will live on. It's through

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 14>so many voices and people that are standing up and

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 14>feeling more energized and fired up than ever. Think about

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 14>the movement that he put together Turning Point USA. It

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 14>is a well oiled machine. If you've ever been to

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 14>any of the events, there are so many hard working

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:42.240
<v Speaker 14>people that put together these incredible, incredible events where thousands

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 14>of students get together with some of the greatest political

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 14>minds in this country. And the last I checked, according

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 14>to Turning Point, they've received one hundred and thirty thousand

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 14>inquiries into student chapters across the country.

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 11>This would have been Charlie Kirk's dream.

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, want to move on to this story here where

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 2>this week en See News apparently announced they were eliminating

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 2>their teams dedicated to covering various DEI issues, the specific

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 2>channels for Black and Asian, American and Latino and LGBTQ groups,

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 2>laying off about one hundred and fifty staffers. It seems

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 2>to be here this is a big win for the

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 2>culture that news organizations are starting to get the message

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 2>that this sort of identity politics news coverage is not

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.399
<v Speaker 2>working for them and coming on the heels of Barry

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Weiss going to CBS.

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd love your thoughts, James.

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 14>There's a lot to chew on here. My first initial

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 14>reaction was NBC laying off their diversity push groups sound

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 14>a little racist according to the left, but also, you know,

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 14>I actually didn't realize that they had these these groups intact,

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 14>that they have specific people pushing news for each color

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 14>and race of of people in America. It's kind of sickening.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 14>As somebody who's bicultural. My mother is born in Mexico,

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 14>I am American, I was born here. It's just hard

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 14>for me to understand, like why they are creating different

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 14>news divisions targeted at different people. As an American and

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 14>even my mom being from Mexico and living in this country,

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 14>we care about the news that all Americans care about it.

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 14>It's really weird that they were doing that in the

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 14>first place. And as for it being a win, I'm

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:28.439
<v Speaker 14>a little dubious. I'm actually thinking that it's the fact

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 14>that they're not getting the ratings and they're not making

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 14>the money, so this is the reason why. I mean,

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 14>I guess it's a win in the sense that the

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 14>audience has rejected it, so people are getting so tired

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 14>of the race baiting and all of this actual division

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 14>instead of unification.

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's absolutely right. Meanwhile, on the left,

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I find this story amazing. Katie Porter and I've spoken

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 2>about her before. She's trying to become California's next governor,

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 2>and apparently she has refused to say whether or not

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 2>there will be even more videos that will drop this

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 2>week displaying her abusive behavior, which, if you've seen some

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 2>of it before, has been pretty unhinged. Here's what she

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:13.760
<v Speaker 2>had to say in another interview this week.

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 15>Should California voters feel confident that there aren't any more

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:22.479
<v Speaker 15>Katie Porter videos out there?

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 16>Well, what I know is that I could have done

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 16>better in those moments. I'm going to be focused on

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 16>earning their votes and earning their trust. That's true in

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 16>every election.

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 15>But not just the CBS interview, the interview with the staffer.

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 15>Can voters be confident that there won't be another one

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.399
<v Speaker 15>of those videos that's going to come to light?

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 16>I'm going to be honest with you. I know that

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 16>that video and that video was several years ago, as

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 16>you know, and I apologize to the staffer. That's super

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 16>important to me and will continue to try to hold

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 16>myself to do better. That's what I can promise.

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Now, Stephanie. By now, everybody has seen the videos, the

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 2>allegations that she dumped scolding hot mashed potatoes on her

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:07.800
<v Speaker 2>ex husband's head. This woman could become California's next governor.

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 2>What is happening in the Democrat Party that somebody with

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 2>this sort of character seems to have risen to the

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.280
<v Speaker 2>very heights of the party of that state.

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I'm laughing because I'm trying not to cry.

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 14>How is it that the Democrats in California would even

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 14>see a potential candidate in her? I mean, she's the

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.800
<v Speaker 14>leading candidate, and I understand that Governor Gavin Newsom is

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 14>a very flawed politician, but this is.

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 11>Almost even worse.

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 14>I mean the video that you're talking about, she flew

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 14>into a rage because her staffer had the audacity to

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 14>accidentally walk in her background. I mean, she started shouting

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 14>expletives at her. We've also read a lot more about

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 14>how she's mistreated other staffers. We also recently saw a

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 14>video where she stepped out of an interview screamed at

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 14>a reporter because she didn't like the reporter's questions. And

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 14>by the way, the reporter was probably a liberal reporter

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.360
<v Speaker 14>who happened to ask all of the other candidates the

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 14>same exact questions. So this is a very messy situation.

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 14>And I you know, she's apologized.

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 11>And said, you know, it was like a bad day

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 11>or whatever. She's just sorry she got caught.

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 14>Okay, absolutely type of personalities. I'm very familiar with them,

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 14>and I'm sure there's a lot more of that, And

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.240
<v Speaker 14>that's why she can't promise that there won't be more videos,

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:29.439
<v Speaker 14>because this is who she is, and so it's very

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 14>concerning that she's the leading Democrat in California. I really

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 14>hope that Californians will wake up, even if they're Democrats,

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 14>and realize that they deserve better because this woman is

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 14>unhinged and doesn't have the character or judgment to be

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 14>in charge of such a great state.

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, Stephanie, very quick follow up. Do you think this

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 2>could sink her campaign?

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 11>I think it could. It could sink the campaign.

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 14>But the problem is, for the most part, the mainstream

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 14>media ignores these types of stories, and so a lot

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 14>of the voters probably won't even know that this happened.

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 14>They won't know the true character of this candidate, and

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 14>so that's what concerns me. But if more people are

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.840
<v Speaker 14>able to watch news sources like yours, James, or some

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.320
<v Speaker 14>of the other news organizations.

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 11>That I speak to, then they can be informed voters and.

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 14>Decide whether or not they want somebody with such a

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 14>hothead to lead their state.

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, Stephanie, we do have a few US support viewers

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 2>who love us on the YouTube in America, so we'll

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 2>see what difference that can make. We'll see, we'll find out,

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie Haw. Well, thank you so much for your time.

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>That don't go anywhere because only in America is coming up.

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 2>But after the break, before we hit the break, let's

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 2>check in whether our old pal John Fetterman, who may

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>be the last Democrat with any sense left in the

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 2>United States, haven't listened to what he had to say

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 2>about who's really responsible for the government shutdown?

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 17>That's why, that's why shutting the government is really what

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 17>the Democratic Party wants to do. And I follow country

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 17>than party, and it's the wrong thing for the country

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 17>in a period of chaos. I refuse to vote to

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 17>shut our government down. I absolutely would love to have

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 17>I would love to have a conversation about extending the

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:19.839
<v Speaker 17>tax credits for healthcare. Absolutely, but I would remind everybody too,

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 17>this was designed by the Democratic Party to expire at

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.760
<v Speaker 17>the end of the year. This is not something taken

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 17>from by the Republicans. That's they were designed to expire. Now,

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 17>let's have a conversation to extend it and not shut

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 17>our government down.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 2>If ever, there was a case of don't judge a

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 2>book by its cover, it was John Fetterman. I mean,

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 2>imagine that caring about America rather than your party. That's

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 2>great stuff and you'll love to see it stick around

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 2>because Only in America is next. Welcome back to the program,

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and now it's time for a little segment we like

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to call only in America. Hey, so there's a lot

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 2>of serious news around the place, but thankfully Artificial Intelligence

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 2>AI is letting us have a little fun with it.

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 2>And no one is having more fun with it than

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the team at something called it Diaper Diplomacy. It's a

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 2>website which retells the events of the day with babies.

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Have a look at how they handled Trump's big trip

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 2>to the Knessett this week and that moment where he

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 2>was interrupted by a pro Palestine protester and O.

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 9>Steve was chosen by me. He never did this before,

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 9>but I knew him as a few things. He was

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 9>a great businessman, but I know a lot of great businessmen.

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:50.760
<v Speaker 9>To be honest with you, he had tremendous negotiating skills,

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.240
<v Speaker 9>but I know a lot of people that negotiate pretty well.

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 9>Although it is an art, people that can negotiate pretty well.

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 9>But most importantly, see, he's just a great guy. Everybody

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 9>loved him. Everybody they respect him, and they somehow can

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 9>relate to him. I've known him for many years and

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 9>I've seen it over over and over and again.

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:29.800
<v Speaker 18>Don't Ahua, They don't think I'm gonna come back. Sorry

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:41.360
<v Speaker 18>for that, mister President. That was very efficient, very.

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Efficient indeed, and hey, you know what else was efficient?

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Tonight's show went by in a flash. Anyway, I'll see

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you next week. Bye bye,