Speaker 1: Lotus is outside. Good morning, and welcome to outsiders. The
Speaker 1: show that is, to the entire unbelievably compromised and untrustworthy,
Speaker 1: woke mainstream media what Donald Trump is to the entire woke,
Speaker 1: untrustworthy mainstream media.
Speaker 2: I'm thinking about going that'll be next week to the
Speaker 2: rocket launch. I hope you're all going to join me.
Speaker 3: I'd like to put you on the rocket and get
Speaker 3: ready here for a while.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 4: One of Donald Trump's most endearing traits to supporters and
Speaker 4: infuriating to his detractors is the fact that he can
Speaker 4: actually think on his fate and come up with some
Speaker 4: devastating one liners.
Speaker 5: You've called women you don't like, fat pigs, dogs, slavs,
Speaker 5: and disgusting animals your Twitter.
Speaker 1: Account only Rosi O'Donnell.
Speaker 2: And speaking of women, here's the reinvigorated Republican. And boy,
Speaker 2: aren't there plenty of those out there now? Mike Johnson
Speaker 2: speaking of the house, pointing out what you weren't allowed
Speaker 2: to say only three weeks ago.
Speaker 6: For anybody who doesn't know my well established record on
Speaker 6: this issue, let me be unequivocally clear. A man is
Speaker 6: a man and a woman is a woman. Man and
Speaker 6: a man cannot become a woman. That said, I also
Speaker 6: believe that's what script for teaches. What I just said,
Speaker 6: But I also believe that we treat everybody with dignity.
Speaker 1: Yes, there we go. A man is a man and
Speaker 1: a woman is a woman. Who'd have thought it. It's
Speaker 1: called the Trump effect. It doesn't. The weight of the
Speaker 1: world on your shoulders feel so much lighter these days.
Speaker 1: You can actually speak your mind and say the unsayable,
Speaker 1: which brings us right to outside as news. Well, we
Speaker 1: now learn it's official. We've all known it, We've all
Speaker 1: felt it in our lives, particularly if you happen to
Speaker 1: be involved in small business or farming or setting up
Speaker 1: any big business for that matter. We all know that
Speaker 1: the Australian economy is going backwards James officially. Now we
Speaker 1: now learn from the Star stats and the grafts and
Speaker 1: everything else that Jim Charmers and Anthony Albanize have driven
Speaker 1: this country down, down, down.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, you know, Rowan, you said a more. But
Speaker 2: ago you were talking about the burden being eased on people.
Speaker 2: And that may be the case in the United States
Speaker 2: where Donald Trump's president, but here in Australia, where we
Speaker 2: still have the earth of the alb and easy regime.
Speaker 2: Things are going backwards, and the numbers confirm it. So
Speaker 2: we've got action coming up. Do not be fooled by
Speaker 2: what they will keep saying, which is that wages are
Speaker 2: going up and that people are doing better. The numbers
Speaker 2: here now prove that our standards of living are going backwards,
Speaker 2: not only in real terms. You know, we are now
Speaker 2: back to where we're several years ago before the pandemic
Speaker 2: in terms of our real disposable income that's the real
Speaker 2: money you have in your pocket and what that money
Speaker 2: can buy. But we are also falling behind in relative
Speaker 2: terms other major economies, particularly in the US, So we
Speaker 2: are becoming poorer in real terms and in relative terms.
Speaker 2: And that's all on labors watched due to their high
Speaker 2: spending and their mismanagement of the economy.
Speaker 4: I'm talking about the worst decline in living standards since
Speaker 4: the nineteen fifties, worse than the recessions we've had, the
Speaker 4: recessions we had to.
Speaker 7: Have, remember that one.
Speaker 4: So when we talked in the past about the per
Speaker 4: capita recession that we're in the middle of and it's
Speaker 4: gone now for what six quarters, This is the impact
Speaker 4: people's living standards are dropping. They're having less money for
Speaker 4: the essential things they need, they're having less money to
Speaker 4: spend on the few luxuries they may be able to afford. So,
Speaker 4: whether you're talking about those who are just making ends
Speaker 4: meet or those who are doing better financially, everyone seems
Speaker 4: to be impacted. This decline in living standards is a
Speaker 4: national emergency. This is something that should be treated like
Speaker 4: a real crisis, because that's what it is. It impacts
Speaker 4: every single household and we don't want to be giving
Speaker 4: our kids a lower standard than living than what we've enjoyed.
Speaker 1: What we're doing region, I'll just ask we'll just get
Speaker 1: our team to put those two graphs back up again,
Speaker 1: or a couple of them. The first one which shows
Speaker 1: the living standards have come to a shuttering hold, which
Speaker 1: shows right at the top of the chart that'll come
Speaker 1: up on the screen in a second. There you go,
Speaker 1: you see living standards. There's the Australian history that we've
Speaker 1: all lived through, all those great years of our lives
Speaker 1: going up and up and up, and then you get
Speaker 1: to a peak when you get the alb and Easy
Speaker 1: government coming in and wow, look right at the top
Speaker 1: of the chart there, there's your big, big fool down
Speaker 1: and what we're seeing there, as Reeda said, you know,
Speaker 1: worst decline in living standards since the nineteen fifties. There's
Speaker 1: a reason for this, and the reason is very simple.
Speaker 1: It's that Jim Chalmers is a clown. He is clueless.
Speaker 1: He doesn't know what he's doing. They're spending more and
Speaker 1: more and more money at the same time as the
Speaker 1: reserve banker's job it is to bring to make sure
Speaker 1: that inflation is kept under check. They're trying to keep
Speaker 1: inflation under check here, while at the same time the
Speaker 1: labor government charmers, is spending money, spending money here, which
Speaker 1: is driving up inflation. It's a circus act, it's a
Speaker 1: clown act.
Speaker 2: You're assally got one bit here, you usually got one
Speaker 2: bit energy. Yes, so it's not just it is not
Speaker 2: just the spending money, yes, that is doing it. It
Speaker 2: is the deliberate attempt to make your energy bills higher
Speaker 2: through the renewable transition that everybody knows is costing more money.
Speaker 2: You know, we saw Ted O'Brien revealed the figures from
Speaker 2: the Economics for of the other day, five hundred billion
Speaker 2: dollars more of that renewable trends is going to cost
Speaker 2: us and that's before it hits our bills. This is
Speaker 2: the great threat to labor at the next election. It
Speaker 2: is that people have less money in their pocket now
Speaker 2: than they did the creature.
Speaker 1: Let's look at the second graph again, which shows Australia
Speaker 1: compared to the rest of the world, and I think
Speaker 1: this is the real point. That's us the reddish line
Speaker 1: at the bottom. Look at the rest of the world
Speaker 1: going gangbusters and look at us falling behind over the
Speaker 1: last couple of years. What happened in the last couple
Speaker 1: of years retail anything.
Speaker 4: We had a radically left a labor government come in,
Speaker 4: a government.
Speaker 7: That told us they were going to be moderate.
Speaker 4: Remember at the alb and Easy from page of the
Speaker 4: Daily Telegraph telling us I'm not woke my genders for
Speaker 4: the mainstream. It's not economically for the mainstream, and it
Speaker 4: certainly isn't culturally for the mainstream. We saw on nine
Speaker 4: one introducing the Voice, that were obsessed with the Voice
Speaker 4: for a good twelve months until it failed at dismally.
Speaker 7: And everything they do in.
Speaker 4: Their economic is from the neo Marxist book.
Speaker 7: That's how they understand the world. That's their worldview.
Speaker 4: And then it easy has been in the socialist left
Speaker 4: faction of the Labor Party pretty much his entire adult life.
Speaker 7: So this is who they are.
Speaker 4: You can't change people just because they say I'm going
Speaker 4: to be moderate, I'm going to be responsible economically.
Speaker 7: It's not going to happen.
Speaker 4: This is not who they are.
Speaker 1: Well, i'll tell you who they are. It's not only
Speaker 1: the Marxist playbook, it's the Whitlam playbook, and worse than that,
Speaker 1: it's actually the Ned Kelly playbook. They're actually stealing your
Speaker 1: and my money today in front of our eyes. They're
Speaker 1: stealing from the Future Fund, which was set up by
Speaker 1: Peter Costello and John Howard to guarantee payments that the
Speaker 1: government would owe public servants and other people well into
Speaker 1: the future. That money has now been stolen by Jim Chalmers.
Speaker 1: They are now saying, oh, the Future Fund, which was
Speaker 1: all set aside. I think it's two hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: billion dollars or so that has been invested, well invested
Speaker 1: for twenty years. They're now saying, oh, that money is
Speaker 1: going to be used to crean energy and renewables complete
Speaker 1: failures economic failures as due to the sloan rights. You
Speaker 1: may as well put all that money in the future.
Speaker 1: If I'm in the dustbin now it's cactus, it's dead
Speaker 1: and buried. Great work, Jim Charmers. You are a joke.
Speaker 1: You are the worst treasurer we have had since the
Speaker 1: last worst treasure which was Wayne Swan who happened to
Speaker 1: be your boss. Great work mate, James.
Speaker 2: Oh well, I mean just on this future fund business here,
Speaker 2: this is just absolutely disgraceful. You know this, this money
Speaker 2: was put aside. It was created by John Howard chaired
Speaker 2: by Peter Costello until very recently to uh provide the
Speaker 2: money for public service salaries, you know, Commwell's public pensions.
Speaker 1: And all of that, so that our kids wouldn't have
Speaker 1: to have.
Speaker 2: So it was a very smart idea and it's done really,
Speaker 2: really really well. And Charlbers saying, oh, well, we want
Speaker 2: to move that down to the national interest priorities, which
Speaker 2: are our priorities, which are renewable projects, which we know
Speaker 2: is a bubble that's all reliant on subsidies and on
Speaker 2: you know, because having basically a public housing landlord, which
Speaker 2: you know Sigamath returns on that. This is a disaster.
Speaker 2: In the making. This is the whole thing. Never stand
Speaker 2: between a treasurer and a pile of money. That treasure
Speaker 2: is Jim Chalmers. He is going to squander. He's going
Speaker 2: to absolutely squander the legacy of twenty plus years of good.
Speaker 1: God within the next five months.
Speaker 4: Now you watch him socialist and a big pile of
Speaker 4: other people's mind.
Speaker 7: That's what we're dealing with.
Speaker 4: These terms can be scary for some people's socialistness. You
Speaker 4: look at the philosophy he had, that's precisely what's happening.
Speaker 4: And there will be some winners out of this, as
Speaker 4: it always is where socialism is in action. There'll be
Speaker 4: some people at the top end of town, some of
Speaker 4: these renewable rent seekers, who are going to be very
Speaker 4: happy with this arrangement. But for the everyday Australian, not
Speaker 4: only is the future fund being squandered, but it's being
Speaker 4: put towards something that's already making your life harder, which
Speaker 4: is this renewable transition that is costing us our fortune.
Speaker 4: That the pressure energy is putting on households is going
Speaker 4: to be a critical issue at the next election. The
Speaker 4: Coalition need to be clear eyed about this, just like
Speaker 4: that were with the voice where they could prosecute their
Speaker 4: arguments coherently because.
Speaker 7: They knew where they stood. So if you're wedded to
Speaker 7: this net zero position, it's.
Speaker 4: A little bit hard to be talking about reliability and
Speaker 4: cost and the prosperity of the country when your end
Speaker 4: goal is very similar to what Labor is wanting. So
Speaker 4: you have to deviate from that Morrison policy position and
Speaker 4: give the Australian people a real choice at the ballot.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, net zero means one thing. It means net zero
Speaker 1: economic growth. It's a disaster already at COP twenty nine,
Speaker 1: which is the latest ridiculous a climate change gabfest over
Speaker 1: and Azerbaijohn. Of course, the oil rich nation there, they've
Speaker 1: got the COP twenty nine there, Chris Bowen's wandering around
Speaker 1: making a clown of him self over there, trying to
Speaker 1: hand out our money. They they're not handing out enough
Speaker 1: of our money. And so the delegates from the so
Speaker 1: called poorer nations, we've been there where their handout they
Speaker 1: want half a billion on that's we want a trillion
Speaker 1: dollars and they've walked out because they're not getting enough money.
Speaker 1: The thing is a joke, a disaster.
Speaker 2: James well, you know what else is a disaster. As
Speaker 2: at that same meeting, you know, there was an effort
Speaker 2: to try and get Australia to come on board with
Speaker 2: the nuclear clean energy revolution, and they said, no, that's okay,
Speaker 2: we'll do the wind budles, we'll do the solar panels,
Speaker 2: but we won't do the thing that all of these
Speaker 2: other countries are actually going out there and committing to
Speaker 2: building more of. Britain has got a huge race for
Speaker 2: it on nuclear energy development the United States, it's a
Speaker 2: bipart is an issue. Joe Biden pro nuclear, the Democrats
Speaker 2: pro nuclear. Why this has to be you know, it's
Speaker 2: so funny because you know the labor constantly accuses the
Speaker 2: coalition to being negative and saying oh, they're always saying no,
Speaker 2: they're always saying no. Well, you know, get with the
Speaker 2: rest of the world labor and say yes to nuclear
Speaker 2: because that's the only way we're going to get out
Speaker 2: of this.
Speaker 1: And it's the only way if you genuinely believed in
Speaker 1: climate change. That is obviously the only technology were a new.
Speaker 7: Clear is the only way.
Speaker 4: But we've got enough coal and gas in this country too, as.
Speaker 1: We know, As we know, hundreds of Rita and I
Speaker 1: have just been returned from the moomba the amazing Santos
Speaker 1: gas works out the gas fields out there. We'll tell
Speaker 1: you all about that later, but just on the topic
Speaker 1: quickly you want to mention and we'll be talking Mike
Speaker 1: Schellenberger seon, so don't you don't want to miss that.
Speaker 1: But of course, like all readimensioned socialists and Marxist totalitarians,
Speaker 1: they always want to control information. They always want to
Speaker 1: censor you, they always want to control what you can
Speaker 1: say and think. So they attempted the Albanezy Marxist to
Speaker 1: bring in this Combating Misinformation, Disinformation Censorship bill. Let's call
Speaker 1: this what it is a win for outsiders of course,
Speaker 1: naturally we were the first people onto this months and
Speaker 1: months ago, telling you watch out for this disgraceful or
Speaker 1: wellyan bill that was coming down misinformation and disinformation. We
Speaker 1: were talking about this back when the coalition we're trying
Speaker 1: to introduce a similar thing so we would know what
Speaker 1: we're talking about on this. It's a win for us
Speaker 1: and for you, the people of Australia, and for you
Speaker 1: the outsiders, because this thing is dead, buried and hopefully
Speaker 1: cremated ah, but let's what tricks. Will they try and
Speaker 1: bring it back in the next next year. Do you
Speaker 1: think James it's been dead for the moment? Why I think?
Speaker 2: I think that the battle has been won on this
Speaker 2: not the war number one. The Coalition hasn't said they're
Speaker 2: not going to introduce so because they've been talking about
Speaker 2: their own Misinformation Bill number two. If you go back
Speaker 2: and to look what Michelle Roll and the Communications Minister
Speaker 2: has said on this the other night at the Sydney Institute,
Speaker 2: she mooted other ways to go and do this. The
Speaker 2: big key here though, is that all of this, I
Speaker 2: believe is being driven from overseas. There's a big lobal
Speaker 2: censorship effort on The Biden administration pushed a lot of it.
Speaker 2: The other day, Elon Musk tweeted about how what Australia
Speaker 2: is trying to do is backdoor control of the Internet.
Speaker 2: With Donald Trump coming in and with Elon Musk having
Speaker 2: his ear, he should make sure that the State Department
Speaker 2: and all the other agencies that are out there behind
Speaker 2: the scenes convincing smaller edations like Australia to test this
Speaker 2: legislation to undermine freedom of speech on the Internet. That
Speaker 2: all of that stops tomorrow as soon as Trump comes
Speaker 2: in into inaugurated.
Speaker 1: Real well, we don't have.
Speaker 4: A first Amendment here, so what better place to test
Speaker 4: these crazy ideas. And the Misinformation Bill may be dead
Speaker 4: and buried for the time being until they reimagine it.
Speaker 4: But the social media ban, the so called under sixteen
Speaker 4: ban that is going to pass it looks like and
Speaker 4: that one is a disgrace as well. It may be
Speaker 4: well intentioned, but it is ill advised. It is going
Speaker 4: to be a means of introducing a digital ID, because
Speaker 4: how are you going to prove that Rowan is not
Speaker 4: fifteen if he wants to access xtraor Instagram. So you
Speaker 4: need to either have some sort of digital ID or
Speaker 4: I don't apprear happening.
Speaker 1: And nobody out there should play into these as.
Speaker 7: There's not much detailed, So we're.
Speaker 1: Going to pass it through Parliament. So it's up to Australians.
Speaker 1: Yet again, it's up to the outsiders. It's up to
Speaker 1: the real people of Australia to say we are not
Speaker 1: going to do this. Labor Coalition, don't care who you are,
Speaker 1: we are not doing this. We are not signing up
Speaker 1: to your digital or Wellian manipulation of ourselves, our tax
Speaker 1: on free speech. We ain't doing it. So if the
Speaker 1: Internet crashes or social media crashes in this country is
Speaker 1: down to you, you sensors, you or Wellian people out there,
Speaker 1: Coalition and labor as shame on you all.
Speaker 7: Just the coalition is in this.
Speaker 4: And what this stars is give the Office of the
Speaker 4: East Safety Commissioner enormous power because the e Safety Commissioner
Speaker 4: is essentially going to come up with how this will
Speaker 4: be implemented because there is scant detail in the legislation
Speaker 4: and I can see what's going to happen. Kids these days,
Speaker 4: they've grown up.
Speaker 7: On social media.
Speaker 1: They'll figure it out.
Speaker 4: We get a VPN, they'll be basing themselves in any
Speaker 4: country they want to be, to be accessing whatever site
Speaker 4: they want. It will be the average person who perhaps
Speaker 4: doesn't want to have digital idea or doesn't want to
Speaker 4: show their passport or license to some social media company
Speaker 4: to establish their age.
Speaker 7: They're the ones who are probably going to be different.
Speaker 1: Right, It'll be the pensioners who are hit hardest.
Speaker 2: Figure out it's not about you know, just about being
Speaker 2: able to access extra Instagram or whatever. It is about
Speaker 2: creating a whole digital ide mechanism to track everything you
Speaker 2: do and control everything you do. Government control of information.
Speaker 2: So don't just think that this is about oh I
Speaker 2: kick it on ext or whatever.
Speaker 1: No, that's right, bigger than that. It's government control of
Speaker 1: the means of information. And it goes against every fundamental
Speaker 1: coalition principle. So you people in the Coalition who are
Speaker 1: pushing this stuff, you are again going against the entire
Speaker 1: history of your party, in fact, the entire history of
Speaker 1: conservatism and liberal thoughts going back hundreds and hundreds of years.
Speaker 1: You have no idea the damage you are risking and
Speaker 1: what you are planted, the fire that you are playing
Speaker 1: with be so you know, I can't I tell you
Speaker 1: the wrong path you are on on this. Any kind
Speaker 1: of banning of information will always always end in disaster. Anyway,
Speaker 1: there's lots to talk about the ICC, the so called
Speaker 1: International Criminal Court, bunch of grifters over there in some
Speaker 1: capital city in Europe, paid for by US, of course,
Speaker 1: swaning around their fancy restaurants and doing all the rest
Speaker 1: of it, coming up with things to keep themselves employed.
Speaker 1: Like all these globalist organizations. We should be pulling out
Speaker 1: a little lot of them. By the way, the UN,
Speaker 1: the World Health Organization, let's get Australia out of all
Speaker 1: of them. Trump's going to start pulling America out. We
Speaker 1: should follow suit. But they have come out with a
Speaker 1: great idea. Hey, let's arrest Benjaminette and Yahoo. The prime
Speaker 1: minister of the only democracy in the Middle East, a
Speaker 1: guy who's trying to keep his nation alive, a guy
Speaker 1: who's trying to get catch the villains and free the
Speaker 1: hostages after the horrific October sent seventh atrocities. So what
Speaker 1: are these clowns the ICC do? Oh, let's arrest them.
Speaker 1: Talking to us as someone who knows the law inside out,
Speaker 1: particularly international law, Natasha Hausdorff, great to have you back
Speaker 1: on outsiders. This is an absolute disgrace. What has happened?
Speaker 1: Tell us the legal ramifications and your thoughts on the
Speaker 1: fact that they are saying the International Criminal Court have
Speaker 1: put out an arrest warrant for the Prime Minister of Israel.
Speaker 8: We'll always wonderful to be with you. Just unfortunate that
Speaker 8: it's in these circumstances. Yes, this is a decision by
Speaker 8: the pre trial chamber to issue arrest warrants, not just
Speaker 8: against Israel's prime Minister Benjamin Nettannieu and former Defense minister
Speaker 8: You are gallant, but also against a dead man. Muhammed
Speaker 8: Dive Haramas confirmed his death some three weeks ago. So
Speaker 8: the overriding impression, certainly from that inclusion of a dead
Speaker 8: Kamas terrorist, is that the Court is seeking to approach
Speaker 8: this matter looking as if it's going after both sides
Speaker 8: and some even handed fashion. Of course, that in and
Speaker 8: of itself is drawing an ab horrent moral equivalence between
Speaker 8: the only democracy in the re leased and an internationally
Speaker 8: prescribed terrorist organization. But quite apart from those optics, the
Speaker 8: lack of jurisdiction that the Court has to issue this
Speaker 8: the rest warrant, the flagrant violation of its own rules
Speaker 8: in not allowing Israel the opportunity to investigate and prosecute
Speaker 8: any credible allegations, and proceeding in these circumstances in a
Speaker 8: plainly political fashion throws an awful lot of the law
Speaker 8: out of the window, and it's a further step, unfortunately,
Speaker 8: in the weaponization of international legal institutions against Israel. It's
Speaker 8: interesting that you remark on the personnel at the Court. Anecdotally,
Speaker 8: I can say it seems that the vast majority of
Speaker 8: the work of the International Criminal Court appears to be
Speaker 8: done by unpaid interns. Nonetheless, this is at the cost
Speaker 8: of hundreds of millions of dollars that is funded by
Speaker 8: member states of the ICC, including Australia, and it is incumbent.
Speaker 8: I would suggest on every single state that actually upholds
Speaker 8: the rule of law that prize as international law to
Speaker 8: hold the Court to account on this victimization of the
Speaker 8: Jurish state, because, as the last important aspect that I'll
Speaker 8: highlight here, these arrest warrant applications were predicated on entirely
Speaker 8: false information. The prosecutor of the ICC put out a
Speaker 8: public summary of his application which he made on the
Speaker 8: twentieth of May, and every phrase of every sentence of
Speaker 8: that public summary was false. It's been shown to be
Speaker 8: false by the organization. I'm very very proud to be
Speaker 8: involved with UK lawyers for Israel that went through those
Speaker 8: allegations chapter and verse, including the suggestion that Israel closed
Speaker 8: crossings inta Gaza prevented AID from going in. Nothing could.
Speaker 8: Nothing of that sort, in fact, happened. On the contrary,
Speaker 8: the facilitation of Aid into the Gaza strip by Israel,
Speaker 8: by Kogat in particular, which is the unit of the
Speaker 8: IDF that's responsible for this, has far exceeded the requirements
Speaker 8: of the population of the Gaza Strip. Whether that's got
Speaker 8: to the people that need it inside the strip, unfortunately
Speaker 8: that has been hampered by Hamas. But in terms of
Speaker 8: facilitating aid into the strip, Israel has gone above and
Speaker 8: beyond to ensure that that has occurred, and all the
Speaker 8: international aid bar one percent which was kept back for
Speaker 8: security reasons, has in fact been provided into Gazata.
Speaker 7: What is the practical effect of this order?
Speaker 4: What countries can Benjamin Netanya, who not visit now because
Speaker 4: he could be arrested.
Speaker 8: Well, this is a very good question. Certainly, there are
Speaker 8: certain states who have immediately said they will not be
Speaker 8: enforcing these warrants, Argentina, Hungary and the Czech Republic. But
Speaker 8: even those states that haven't publicly come out to say
Speaker 8: that they would enforce have quite a difficult balancing exercise
Speaker 8: now to conduct, because the validity of these warrants is
Speaker 8: going to be critical to the consideration that these states
Speaker 8: have to take. On the one hand, they may consider
Speaker 8: themselves to be bound as members of the Court to
Speaker 8: acquiesce to any request that they enforce these warrants. But
Speaker 8: on the other hand, they are also bound by immunity
Speaker 8: in international law, which heads a state like this and
Speaker 8: now enjoy. And if these are, in fact, as I
Speaker 8: strongly argue them to be unlawful warrants made on the
Speaker 8: basis of no jurisdiction without validity, then seeking to enforce
Speaker 8: them would in and of itself be a breach of
Speaker 8: the international customary laws on the immunity of heads of state.
Speaker 8: So it's putting a lot of these individual members of
Speaker 8: the ICC in a very very difficult position.
Speaker 2: James, Well, given all of that, and given to what
Speaker 2: you've talked about and spoken about so eloquently about just
Speaker 2: what a threat to jurisprudence and legal principles this ICC is.
Speaker 2: We know in the past it's been used by dictators
Speaker 2: to prosecute enemies and things of that nature. Should nations
Speaker 2: like Australia simply pull out of the ICC.
Speaker 8: Well, that's one option. Another is to make it very
Speaker 8: clear to the Court up with this we will not
Speaker 8: put and to indicate very strongly that all of the
Speaker 8: questions about jurisdiction which were raised with the Court both
Speaker 8: in twenty twenty when the pre Chile Chamber was first
Speaker 8: considering the opening of an investigation in this context, and
Speaker 8: also again now in the context of this application for warrants,
Speaker 8: many States, international legal experts, international organizations made representations challenging
Speaker 8: the Court, and that is the key here. If the
Speaker 8: Court cannot be reformed, if it cannot be stopped from
Speaker 8: this political agenda, than leaving it is always an option.
Speaker 8: But seeking to raise this issue on the agenda when
Speaker 8: it threatens international law more broadly, and when it also
Speaker 8: essentially puts at risk all other law abiding Western liberal demostration.
Speaker 1: So Natasha, just very quickly, I've only got a minute left,
Speaker 1: but I just want to ask you. Penny Wong, our
Speaker 1: foreign minister, you know who she is, and Ed Husick,
Speaker 1: one of our other labor ministers. They've come out and
Speaker 1: said on I know, the ICC must be allowed to
Speaker 1: carry on. It's independently respected its independence. Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: This comes along with a raft of other things that
Speaker 1: Penny Wong in particular has done. They've recently banned Alete
Speaker 1: Shaked from coming into Australia. She's a former justice minister
Speaker 1: from Israel. What does this tell you? Just very briefly
Speaker 1: about the Australian labor government.
Speaker 8: Pennywong in particular a Yalla shakerd was on her way
Speaker 8: to a strategic dialogue that she'd been invited to attend,
Speaker 8: one that is well respected and well attended. It's pretty shameful.
Speaker 8: Perhaps not something that's surprising in the context of the
Speaker 8: string of anti Israel initiatives that this government has taken.
Speaker 8: The recent change in the last week in UN votes
Speaker 8: a historic shift in Australia's voting record. Critically, though, this
Speaker 8: is putting Australia at odds with US foreign policy. I
Speaker 8: mean even the Biden administration called out the arrest warrants
Speaker 8: is outrageous. But certainly the next US administration is going
Speaker 8: to be even further at odds with the policy that
Speaker 8: this government has been endorsing towards Israel at the United
Speaker 8: Nations and other international organizations, and that cannot be a
Speaker 8: good thing for Australia going forward.
Speaker 1: Natasha Hausdorff, always great to chat to you and get
Speaker 1: your clear eyed vision on what is actually going on
Speaker 1: in the world. Thanks so much and we'll chat to
Speaker 1: you again soon. That's Antechasko. They're from UK lawyers for
Speaker 1: Israel coming out lots more here on Outsiders Don't Go
Speaker 1: Away Back in a particular.
Speaker 4: You're watching Outsiders with your host Rowan Dean James Morrow,
Speaker 4: and I'm reader panning here and soon will be joined
Speaker 4: by one of the most important journalists of his generation,
Speaker 4: a man who has revealed the extent of the censorship
Speaker 4: industrial complex.
Speaker 7: But first, one would hope that.
Speaker 4: After the unmitigated disaster that was the workification of bud Light.
Speaker 4: You remember that a much loved brand decided to trash
Speaker 4: itself by having a transactivist promote their product. This is
Speaker 4: what happens when far left corporate dimwitz infiltrator company and
Speaker 4: start spouting about diversity, equity and inclusion. Bud Light's dalliance
Speaker 4: with lefty activism did not go well. Sales plummeted, the
Speaker 4: brand was trashed, and the pairing company lost well over
Speaker 4: a billion dollars a billion with a b lessons learned.
Speaker 4: Surely no corporate would be so reckless, so irredeemably stupid
Speaker 4: to go down the woke road and bud.
Speaker 7: Light itself well step forward.
Speaker 4: Iconic British car company Jaguar Indian don't nowadays, but Jaguar
Speaker 4: has gone from this.
Speaker 9: Have you ever noticed how in Hollywood movies all the
Speaker 9: villains are played by Brits?
Speaker 1: Maybe we just sound right, thank you Mary.
Speaker 10: The wheels drive Jaguars.
Speaker 1: All. Yes, it's good to be bad.
Speaker 7: That's what the branding used to be.
Speaker 4: Swave, sophisticated, a little dangerous, it's good to be bad.
Speaker 4: But Jaguar has now rebranded, unveiling a new logo and
Speaker 4: an ad that the company hopes will lead to an
Speaker 4: explosion of sales.
Speaker 11: You be the judge.
Speaker 4: What in God's name was that? Where were the cars?
Speaker 4: Where's the Jaguar? Why were there deranged, angry folk wielding sledgehammers?
Speaker 4: How does that meant to inspire anybody to buy a
Speaker 4: luxury car? As for create exuberant?
Speaker 7: What sort of a slogan is that create exuberant?
Speaker 4: Did a semi literate advertising intern on affoord to a
Speaker 4: coke bender come up with.
Speaker 7: That create exuberant?
Speaker 1: Naturally?
Speaker 4: The ad has been mocked far and why Jaguars tweet
Speaker 4: promoting that ad has some one hundred and twenty five
Speaker 4: thousand comments, and approximately one hundred and twenty four thousand,
Speaker 4: nine hundred and ninety five of them are highly critical.
Speaker 7: And that's putting it lightly.
Speaker 4: People are so outraged by this crap that they're using AI.
Speaker 12: To improve the ad, while others.
Speaker 4: Are creating their own Jaguar ads. This one using AI
Speaker 4: took less than an hour to put together. It's a
Speaker 4: lot better than what we just saw. But I think
Speaker 4: my favorite one so far is this work of art.
Speaker 7: Talk about create.
Speaker 13: Exuberant, insert abnormal.
Speaker 7: Yes, that's what we're saying there.
Speaker 4: Of course, the adults who now run Jaguar have responded
Speaker 4: to the mockery with the usual DEI words. Apparently, if
Speaker 4: you hate their stupid ad, you are an intolerant bigot?
Speaker 4: Is there another type? The managing director Rodon Glover what
Speaker 4: sort of name is that, has said the car maker
Speaker 4: must move away from traditional automotive stereotypes what people who
Speaker 4: actually buy cars? And he also called criticism of the
Speaker 4: ad vile and a blaze of intolerance.
Speaker 7: What an income pooper.
Speaker 4: If you want to see some of the marketing genius
Speaker 4: behind the ad, then meet Jaguar brand executive Santino.
Speaker 3: We're on a transformative journey of our own, driven by
Speaker 3: a belief in diversity, inclusion, creativity policy, and most importantly action.
Speaker 3: We've established over fifteen DEI groups such as Pride, who
Speaker 3: are here.
Speaker 4: Tonight fifteen DEI groups, So they've been busy.
Speaker 7: Let's be honest.
Speaker 4: Nothing we saw in that Jaguar ad is actually exciting,
Speaker 4: groundbreaking or in any way innovative.
Speaker 7: It's the same time.
Speaker 4: Old work trash we see promoting everything these days, from
Speaker 4: chewing gum to insurance companies.
Speaker 7: But I'm sure.
Speaker 4: Jaguar will eventually work out that corporate virtue signaling will
Speaker 4: not translate into car sales, just as bud Light figured
Speaker 4: it out. But after they lost more than a billion dollars,
Speaker 4: bud Light is now trying desperately to win back their
Speaker 4: customers by mocking stupid ads.
Speaker 7: Here is their.
Speaker 4: Latest effort, featuring anti woke comic Shane Gillis.
Speaker 10: Because a passion, What's a snake?
Speaker 1: We are all lost? Yeah, I'm lost one hundred loss yere,
Speaker 1: but we are on all right?
Speaker 6: I just sparking for that's Yeah.
Speaker 1: Hey, I think I'm in the wrong commercial.
Speaker 2: What this isn't right?
Speaker 1: Wait?
Speaker 14: Aren't you Andre?
Speaker 1: No, I'm I'm Shane.
Speaker 3: Well, if you're here, Andre.
Speaker 1: Is, world advertising industry is struggling, struggling to.
Speaker 4: Get off the coke Yeah, get off the four day
Speaker 4: coke vendors and start off up with some creative.
Speaker 1: It can't even get back on it. Actually, maybe that's anyway.
Speaker 1: Great to have with us now, Michael Schellenberger. Great to
Speaker 1: have you back here where you belong on Outsiders. Mate,
Speaker 1: you've done some brilliant work. You've just been in Australia.
Speaker 1: By the time the plane had landed back in the States,
Speaker 1: your work had been very successful. We hear this morning
Speaker 1: that the Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill is dead and buried.
Speaker 1: As we've just been discussing, it will probably rear its
Speaker 1: head again next year in some other ghastly form. Michael,
Speaker 1: tell us briefly what you thought of Australia and our
Speaker 1: attacks on free speech while you were here.
Speaker 14: Yeah, it's great to be with you guys. Well, it's
Speaker 14: great to be in Australia. We had a lot of
Speaker 14: meetings with people that were really concerned around the censorship legislation,
Speaker 14: which has been a wrongly labeled misinformation legislation, because we
Speaker 14: all know the only way to combat misinformation is with
Speaker 14: free speech, with accurate information. Censorship is not a solution
Speaker 14: to misinformation. It's just a way of exercising political control.
Speaker 14: So we're very happy to see this. I mean, there
Speaker 14: was a huge outpouring on x formerly Twitter around that legislation,
Speaker 14: a lot of concern from Australians who really do want
Speaker 14: their free speech rights.
Speaker 1: Obviously we're very or maybe not.
Speaker 14: Obviously, there's now a whole new set of concerns around
Speaker 14: a digital idea that they're calling a child protection bill.
Speaker 14: So it's like one thing gets defeated, one totalitarian bill
Speaker 14: gets defeated, and another one shows up that we're worried about.
Speaker 14: So yeah, it seems like there's just some forces in
Speaker 14: Australia and around the world that really want to infringe
Speaker 14: upon our freedom of speech and our privacy.
Speaker 1: So just spell out very clearly, Michael, your objections, because
Speaker 1: we've tried, but seems a lot of politicians, even on
Speaker 1: the conservative side of politics, are not listening. Explain really
Speaker 1: clearly what is so wrong about an under sixteen ban
Speaker 1: on social media.
Speaker 14: Well, and I should say, I'm a father of two children.
Speaker 14: I think that they did have too much social media.
Speaker 14: I agree that social media for minors can cause significant harm.
Speaker 14: It can create a lot of anxiety that fish full
Speaker 14: effect that I've think we're all familiar with that. Being said,
Speaker 14: I was just with Jonathan Haite, who's one of the
Speaker 14: leading psychologists that writes on this issue, wrote a whole
Speaker 14: book on this, and he said that what works is
Speaker 14: phone free schools, parent groups where the parents agree to
Speaker 14: limit social media for their kids. And in Australia I
Speaker 14: learned that there's another proposal to give children specific kinds
Speaker 14: of phones that allow them to communicate but doesn't allow
Speaker 14: social media. What I've never heard is that you need
Speaker 14: to give the entire population, including all adults, a digital
Speaker 14: idea that would follow them everywhere online. That is something
Speaker 14: that the World Economic Forum has been pushing for years.
Speaker 14: It's a way of mass surveillance. There's actually there literally
Speaker 14: is a Black Mirror episode about the tutulitary and dystopian
Speaker 14: future of having everything you do online be rewarded or
Speaker 14: punished by the government. That's what they have in China,
Speaker 14: a social credit system.
Speaker 1: It's deeply creepy.
Speaker 14: I think people have rightly been resisting digital identification for
Speaker 14: years and it's very cynical for them to try to
Speaker 14: sneak it in as part of a bill supposedly to
Speaker 14: protect children.
Speaker 2: James Well, I want to go back though to this
Speaker 2: disinformation and misinformation push here, and I would love to
Speaker 2: get your sys because you see what's happening in the
Speaker 2: policy arena and behind the scenes. Can you tell us
Speaker 2: about why countries like Australia are being used as I
Speaker 2: think test cases for these sorts of maneuvers and what
Speaker 2: is the US government, what do you know state some
Speaker 2: of these ngngos. What are they doing behind the scenes
Speaker 2: to push these bills here? This seems like it's a
Speaker 2: real violation of our sovereignty.
Speaker 14: Yes, yeah, I mean it's very strange. And there's there's
Speaker 14: things that we know and can prove, and then there's
Speaker 14: things that we suspect. We know that the intelligence community
Speaker 14: in the United States was involved in censorship efforts through
Speaker 14: the Department of Online Security. We know that they were
Speaker 14: involved in Western Europe. We see the same thing in Britain,
Speaker 14: in Canada and Brazil and in Australia. Your e Safety
Speaker 14: Commissioner is an American and when she came to Australia,
Speaker 14: she very pointedly said that she had been recruited into
Speaker 14: the CIA but turned it down.
Speaker 15: That's a very.
Speaker 14: Very weird thing to say. I can't I think it's
Speaker 14: reasonable to be just about that. I think there's some
Speaker 14: hard questions that have to be asked about that, obviously,
Speaker 14: or maybe not obviously, but our two countries have a longstanding,
Speaker 14: deep relationship as part of the Five Eyes intelligence gathering organizations,
Speaker 14: and so you start to see these things in all
Speaker 14: the Five Eyes countries that are very similar. And then
Speaker 14: the legislation demanding censorship not just in Australia but around
Speaker 14: the world. I think it's reasonable to suspect that there
Speaker 14: appears to be an effort to censor the entire global
Speaker 14: Internet through the nations, that through the Allied nations of
Speaker 14: the United States, knowing that it's a little harder to
Speaker 14: do in the United States because we have this very
Speaker 14: strong free speech protection in the First Amendment. So yeah,
Speaker 14: it's very suspicious.
Speaker 2: I know.
Speaker 14: I spoke to a number of senators about it who
Speaker 14: are very concerned about this, have been asking questions about this,
Speaker 14: have many more questions about this. We don't want the
Speaker 14: government getting involved in policing what we can say online.
Speaker 14: That's the bottom line is illegal. We do not want
Speaker 14: thought police. That's where George Orwell feared in his book
Speaker 14: nineteen eighty four. That's what we see depicted on shows
Speaker 14: like The Black Mirror, and we see taking place in China,
Speaker 14: we do not want that in our western liberal democratic countries.
Speaker 7: Read the UK is possibly.
Speaker 4: In a worse position than even Australia is because they're
Speaker 4: politicians have just pressed ahead with this censorship, so much
Speaker 4: so that there's now reports that MPs want to summon
Speaker 4: Elon Musk to testify about X's role in the rights
Speaker 4: we saw in the summer there after the Southport killings.
Speaker 4: Tell me about what's happening in the UK and is
Speaker 4: Elon Musk likely to go and be questioned by Labor
Speaker 4: and pays.
Speaker 14: Well, it's a great question. I mean, for me, Britain
Speaker 14: is the second biggest concern in the world after Australia.
Speaker 14: You know, sadly it's yeah, it's exactly what you're happening.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 14: The people are calling the Prime Minister here Starmer, they're
Speaker 14: calling him two tier cure because he's creating a two
Speaker 14: tier justice system. He's literally they're literally letting sex offenders
Speaker 14: out of prison and putting people in jail and prison
Speaker 14: for things they've posted or said online. And of course,
Speaker 14: of course most of us have laws against inciting violence
Speaker 14: in the immediate term. But these are people that are
Speaker 14: going to jail in prison for things that did not
Speaker 14: incite violence, for being offensive. There's hundreds of people are
Speaker 14: visited by the police every year in Britain. It's very
Speaker 14: extreme and shocking, and this has been increasing under two
Speaker 14: tier cure Starmer and I think you see a sort
Speaker 14: of anarchode tyranny. We're a sort of anarchy in terms
Speaker 14: of street level crime. We see something very similar here
Speaker 14: in San Francisco, and then a tyrannical sensorial privacy invading
Speaker 14: force at the top, you know, the for the online
Speaker 14: world and for the rest of us. So it's a
Speaker 14: very concerning development because that sort of model of two
Speaker 14: tier justice and anarcho tyranny appears to be the model
Speaker 14: that that liberal and left governments, so called progressive governments
Speaker 14: around the world are pursuing.
Speaker 1: At the same time, Michael Shellenberger, you were out here
Speaker 1: and the Combating Misinformation Disinformation Bill looks like dying this week.
Speaker 1: So well done there, but your work is not finished.
Speaker 1: You've got to come back and defeat this under sixteen
Speaker 1: social media band. So we'll expect to see you early
Speaker 1: next year or whatever. Michael Shellenberger always great to have
Speaker 1: you here on Outsiders and what a legend Michael is.
Speaker 16: There.
Speaker 1: After the break, we'll speak to esteemed oncology professor Angus
Speaker 1: stout Gleish about oh, hang on COVID measures, Australia got
Speaker 1: it wrong? No really, yes, right here on Outsiders in
Speaker 1: a tick. You're watching Outsiders and thank you so much
Speaker 1: for watching Outsiders every Sunday morning and doing as you
Speaker 1: so often do. It's so kind of you making us
Speaker 1: the number one show on Sky News Australia. Now joining
Speaker 1: us now to discuss the COVID pandemic. We haven't talked
Speaker 1: about that for a while, so let's get stuck into
Speaker 1: it with Anger stal Gleish, the emeritus Professor of Oncology
Speaker 1: at the University of London and principle of the Institute
Speaker 1: of Cancer, Vaccines and Immunotherapy. Anger is great to have
Speaker 1: you on already your title is making me nervous. Tell
Speaker 1: me what is the single? There's so many things and
Speaker 1: you're an expert on There's so many things that Australia
Speaker 1: did wrong around COVID, from lockdowns and mask mandates to
Speaker 1: vaccine mandates. What for you now? With hindsight, the benefit
Speaker 1: of hindsight. Admittedly, what is the single worst thing Australia
Speaker 1: Australian governments inflicted on the Australian people during COVID, Well.
Speaker 17: The first thing I would say was the lockdown. There
Speaker 17: was actually no need for this, and I think it
Speaker 17: was universally agreed. But everybody who's looked at this and
Speaker 17: this seems to have been a controlled initiative, like around
Speaker 17: the world, everybody did it except Sweden, and I got
Speaker 17: I really admire angers Technol, the chief medical officer there
Speaker 17: who said, no, we're not doing it will cause far
Speaker 17: more harm than anything else. But I think we're here
Speaker 17: today to discuss the dreadful use of vaccines and the
Speaker 17: mandates that have caused so much problem. And it's very
Speaker 17: clear now that why on earth did they do this?
Speaker 17: I mean, I have no idea because from the very
Speaker 17: beginning these vaccines were not vaccines, particularly the ones that
Speaker 17: ended up after AstraZeneca with all the clocks and they
Speaker 17: were shut down. But the Messenger RNA vaccines of Pizer
Speaker 17: and Mederma of course unbelievable problems and damage to people.
Speaker 17: And I don't think we will ever really be able
Speaker 17: to get over that. I mean the whole concept. I
Speaker 17: challenged from day one. I said, you know, right from
Speaker 17: the beginning, this virus escaped from the laboratory. It has
Speaker 17: six insects that could only have been put in manually.
Speaker 17: My peers said, well, this can occur randomly. I said, no, once,
Speaker 17: but not six times. This has been and the most
Speaker 17: important thing. We said that the vaccine was eighty percent
Speaker 17: homologous to humans, that was bound to cause major side effects.
Speaker 18: Now why did everybody go along with it?
Speaker 17: I mean we informed everybody, the government through the five
Speaker 17: Eyes process that this.
Speaker 18: Would happen, but everybody ignored it. So why did this happen?
Speaker 17: And now we know that it's even worse than that
Speaker 17: that the vaccines were. The quality control was appalling. They
Speaker 17: changed the mechanic is a manufacture. Between the trial and
Speaker 17: the rollout of about six billion people, this thing was
Speaker 17: full of contaminants. It was full of sequences that can
Speaker 17: actually get into your genome. And my big concern is
Speaker 17: that a lot of them explain why that couple of
Speaker 17: years into this epidemic, we still have massive excess deaths,
Speaker 17: excess sests in Australia, New Zealand and everywhere, and a
Speaker 17: lot of these now are due to cancer. And that's
Speaker 17: basically what I want to discuss here. The red flags
Speaker 17: are so enormous. Why has the government not banned these
Speaker 17: vaccines immediately? For a starts, COVID doesn't exist anymore, and
Speaker 17: if it does, it doesn't kill anybody anymore. So why
Speaker 17: are you using vaccines boosters that we now know increase
Speaker 17: the rate of cancer and the cancers are appalling, their
Speaker 17: turbo cancers.
Speaker 4: Oh that's terrifying because not only did everybody go along.
Speaker 7: With this, we were forced to take it.
Speaker 4: If you wanted to keep your job, if you wanted
Speaker 4: to travel, if you wanted to enter a shopping mall
Speaker 4: and buy essential things, you had to do this. And
Speaker 4: not just adults, but children. In Victoria, we had kids
Speaker 4: who couldn't enter clothing stores, who couldn't go to just
Speaker 4: everyday places without their vaccine pass without what is going
Speaker 4: to be the impact on children who were at the
Speaker 4: lowest risk from COVID? We knew that from the start,
Speaker 4: who've been forced to take these vaccines. Will we even
Speaker 4: know the full extent of the damage that's been caused
Speaker 4: to some of these kids?
Speaker 18: Well, I mean, I think this is right.
Speaker 17: It was draconian, dystopian, and totally unnecessary. I mean, I
Speaker 17: criticized our own chief medical offs a, Chris Whitty, and
Speaker 17: I use the words again that or moron. He basically
Speaker 17: wanted to vaccinate our children in order to protect their grandparents.
Speaker 17: So in that one center, he said, you knew nothing
Speaker 17: about vaccines. You only vaccinate to protect somebody else. You
Speaker 17: do not vaccinate to protect other people. And by that
Speaker 17: sentence he said, well, the vaccines didn't work because all
Speaker 17: the grandparents and parents had already been vaccinated. It was
Speaker 17: unbelievably stupid. No child died of COVID unless they had
Speaker 17: some underlying condition like leukemia. It was absolutely apharrent that
Speaker 17: they would even think of this, And they were pushed
Speaker 17: into this by Physa and all the people that Phisa
Speaker 17: and Maderna wanted to get this into everybody.
Speaker 18: These were not vaccines.
Speaker 17: These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into
Speaker 17: your genome.
Speaker 1: And this is one of.
Speaker 17: The reasons we're seeing this horrendous rise in turbo cancers.
Speaker 17: I am terrified what they've done to our children. I
Speaker 17: think everybody who went along to that should actually stand
Speaker 17: up to try and defend themselves and go to court.
Speaker 17: This is unbelievable, the incompetence, medical negligence, everything, and nobody
Speaker 17: is accepting responsibility for this. It is unbelievable case of
Speaker 17: cognitive dissonance. And I hold everybody to account. I hold
Speaker 17: the chief Medical officers to account, the Chief scientific officers
Speaker 17: to account, the so called in the UK, we have
Speaker 17: had stage one of the most inappropriate ever.
Speaker 18: But you know it is unbelievable.
Speaker 1: It had to do.
Speaker 18: Now.
Speaker 17: I cannot believe the MHRA and the TGA and the
Speaker 17: FDA the level of in competence and negligence, and they
Speaker 17: have to be held This is Neuromberg trial stuff.
Speaker 18: They are so awful. Now we know about the contamination.
Speaker 17: Your TGA have stood up and said, oh, we've done
Speaker 17: this little study, that study, what have you. But it
Speaker 17: doesn't really matter because they're safe and effective. They started
Speaker 17: with the mandate that these vaccines were safe and effective. No,
Speaker 17: they were never ever effective. The very I've looked at
Speaker 17: the first submissions of PISA to the FDA, there was
Speaker 17: no evidence that they were effective whatsoever. Basically hope and
Speaker 17: they were never ever safe. Their first mandate, sorry, the
Speaker 17: first submission of visa show that they caused every single
Speaker 17: side effect you could ever possibly want, and yet the
Speaker 17: fd DA still approved them, and the TGA and the
Speaker 17: MHI went along with it. This was absolutely criminal negligence.
Speaker 17: Their job was to say are they safe? Are they effective? No,
Speaker 17: they were not, and yet they signed off on.
Speaker 2: It, profess Professor, You know we had in Australia, and
Speaker 2: I know a lot of other countries had pandemic plans
Speaker 2: put together a long time before this happened, and none
Speaker 2: of them called for lockdowns. And yet pretty much every
Speaker 2: nation went along with the lockdown plane, except for Sweden,
Speaker 2: which did very well comparatively. When you look at it,
Speaker 2: Why do you think so many nations like Australia all
Speaker 2: went in with this? You know, in the wake of
Speaker 2: this pandemic that we know was caused by a virus
Speaker 2: that was done in a lab that was doing research
Speaker 2: that was paid for by the US to get around
Speaker 2: its own restrictions.
Speaker 18: Well, I totally agree.
Speaker 17: As I said, my colleagues and I were the first
Speaker 17: to point out that this escape from the lab. There
Speaker 17: was no other explanation. There was six positive charge in
Speaker 17: this virus, two of them had been previously published out
Speaker 17: of Wuhan in Western medical literature.
Speaker 18: So why did they cover up? Why did they do
Speaker 18: the lockdown? Why did they do the Monday?
Speaker 17: I'm sorry that I couldn't believe that my peers and
Speaker 17: humanity would descend to such loads. This basically, the whole
Speaker 17: thing was planned. The whole lockdown was an experiment in control,
Speaker 17: and there was this man had a project in its
Speaker 17: Department of Defense. They were doing this genetic engineering, which
Speaker 17: Obama quite rightly says should never have been done. It's
Speaker 17: a gainer, a function. Fauci was told not to do it,
Speaker 17: so what did he do? He got it done elsewhere,
Speaker 17: including the Wouham the Boratory in China.
Speaker 18: And he lied. I believe Ran Pauls held him up
Speaker 18: on this.
Speaker 17: And the greatest thing that's happened is that Robert F.
Speaker 17: Kennedy has written the most brilliant book, How Evil Fauci
Speaker 17: is the real and to be Fauci Well gets into
Speaker 17: power in January, this whole thing, I believe will be over.
Speaker 17: He will basically hold them all to her cut up
Speaker 17: for this because I believe this is the greatest crime
Speaker 17: of the century.
Speaker 18: What happened over.
Speaker 1: This, Well Professor Dalglish, I agree with you to be
Speaker 1: fascinating once Robert Kennedy gets there inter seated power and
Speaker 1: it'll be absolutely fascinating. Thank you so much for your insight.
Speaker 1: So I will point out that the TGA would disagree
Speaker 1: with you on excess mortality. They would argue that that's
Speaker 1: due to people missing diagnosis and so on. But I
Speaker 1: can imagine your response to that. We don't have time
Speaker 1: for it. But I think your views are perfectly clear
Speaker 1: and you've argued that case brilliantly. Thank you so much,
Speaker 1: Professor Dalglish. After the break, we'll speak to Tony Seabrook
Speaker 1: about the impact of labors green dreams on farms. In
Speaker 1: a tip. Hello, you're watching Outsiders with Rita Prosperity Panahe, James,
Speaker 1: Moneybags Morrow and myself Rowan recession proof Dean. Let's talk
Speaker 1: about something that's rarely mentioned these days by politicians. Good
Speaker 1: luck and getting rich, being lucky enough to be wealthy,
Speaker 1: and by being wealthy, also being lucky. These used to
Speaker 1: be things we used to celebrate and admire in this country.
Speaker 1: We were, remember, not only the wealthy country, but the
Speaker 1: lucky country. Not anymore. But here's a bloke back in
Speaker 1: the nineties, a good looking, dappy, young American man, as
Speaker 1: it happens, who also happened to combine being wealthy with
Speaker 1: being lucky, which comes first? I wonder He was asked
Speaker 1: to try his luck and toss a football through a
Speaker 1: ring in what's called the Million Dollar Toss live on television.
Speaker 1: Unless you try it, no easy feat. I imagine you
Speaker 1: still own.
Speaker 19: Your own their line.
Speaker 6: Oh they haven't taken that away from Enna.
Speaker 1: No good, I.
Speaker 20: Can't what we gotta get a word.
Speaker 1: No, how did you do that? I don't know. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Yes, that was the young Donald Trump. Of course,
Speaker 1: wealthy and lucky, and of course it's an oldtruism that
Speaker 1: you make your own luck as indeed, ultimately you make
Speaker 1: your own wealth. That used to be Australia too. We
Speaker 1: made our own wealth and we were lucky. The writer
Speaker 1: Donald Horn coined the phrase the Lucky Country to describe Australia.
Speaker 1: He meant it ironically, but the name stuck because it
Speaker 1: is true or it was. Australians were the lucky country
Speaker 1: at the last century. We were blessed with both wealth
Speaker 1: fantastic wealth due to our abundance of natural resources and
Speaker 1: good fortune, often due to our resilience and our love
Speaker 1: of hard yaker of hard work and always being ready
Speaker 1: to have a go. That was the Australian way. The young,
Speaker 1: the young Donald Trump has gone on to defy the
Speaker 1: haters and the grievance mongers and will shortly become the
Speaker 1: forty seventh President of the United States, determined to make
Speaker 1: his country great again. Meanwhile, here down Under, we're going down, down, down,
Speaker 1: and we're going under. According to report in The Australian
Speaker 1: we mentioned earlier, our living standards have come to a
Speaker 1: shuddering halt, and compared to the rest of the Western world,
Speaker 1: in the last two years we are plummeting. Yes, the
Speaker 1: last two years. That certainly rings a bell. That would
Speaker 1: be when the miserable Albanezy labor government have been in power.
Speaker 1: But it's no surprise that our country is going backwards
Speaker 1: because those people running at the Labor Party, they despise wealth,
Speaker 1: making money, being successful, having a go, hitting the big time.
Speaker 1: That used to be the definition of the Australian dream.
Speaker 1: But generating wealth appears to be an alien concept to
Speaker 1: labor politicians, except of course, when it comes to setting
Speaker 1: up their own post parliamentary careers on the union superannuation
Speaker 1: gravy train. But when it comes to hard working, every
Speaker 1: day Aussie's labor are so marinated in their own undergraduate
Speaker 1: green socialist sludge of envy and resentment that they despise
Speaker 1: good fortune and they despise the rewards that come from
Speaker 1: hard work and individual effort. In fact, they go out
Speaker 1: of their way to hinder both of those. More red tape,
Speaker 1: more green environmental tape, more black indigenous cultural tape. Try
Speaker 1: setting up your own business these days? But will things
Speaker 1: ever change? Can we turn back the clock? Is anyone
Speaker 1: prepared to talk about returning us to the good old
Speaker 1: days of Aussie individual wealth and prosperity and hard work
Speaker 1: as opposed to endless welfarerism and living off the public
Speaker 1: purse in cushy bureaucratic government jobs paid for by other
Speaker 1: people's hard work. Well, yeah, there's a great line I
Speaker 1: heard on the weekend, let's make our bank balances great again.
Speaker 1: And it was a particularly amusing as well as credible
Speaker 1: line coming from Australia's greatest business person, Gina Ryan.
Speaker 20: As I have repeatedly stated, we need to cut government tape, regulations,
Speaker 20: government wastage and tax burdens across Australia. We need a
Speaker 20: USA style doge doje that delivers action, one that helps
Speaker 20: to return dollars to our pockets and investment back to Australia.
Speaker 20: Don't be frightened to call for quote, make our bank
Speaker 20: accounts great again? Close quote. We need governments to reduce
Speaker 20: the number of approvals required for projects. The first to
Speaker 20: go should be the federal departments, which repeat what the
Speaker 20: state departments already do, lessening the complexity, delays and expense
Speaker 20: of both state and federal departments. We need to return
Speaker 20: to reliable and cheaper energy.
Speaker 1: Make our bank accounts, Make our bank accounts great again.
Speaker 1: Now that's a slogan every Aussie batler and trade would
Speaker 1: happily get behind. Peter Dutton take note, because that's what
Speaker 1: it all boils down to, every struggling person who looks
Speaker 1: at their bank account then looks at their bills. Soaring
Speaker 1: grocery bills thanks to Jim Charmers inflation, soaring electricity bills
Speaker 1: thanks to Chris Bowen's renewables, insanity, sowing business bills thanks
Speaker 1: to Albanesi and Plibisek and Burke and the whole gang
Speaker 1: of them driving up business costs. Missus Reinhardt was speaking
Speaker 1: at the twin National Agricultural Day and National Mining Days,
Speaker 1: two days of celebrating and honoring the two industries that
Speaker 1: the entire wealth and prosperity of this nation has been
Speaker 1: and always will be built upon Australia's farming and mining
Speaker 1: and their related industries. The AG Day was at the
Speaker 1: superb Pinfalls Estate in Adelaide, with the cream of the
Speaker 1: agricultural industries there, and the Mining Day was held at
Speaker 1: Santos Natural Gas Fields in the Cooper Basin, amazing an
Speaker 1: area the size of England deep in the Aussie outback,
Speaker 1: where Rita and I were honored to join the celebrations.
Speaker 1: For seventy years Santos has been supplying natural gas to
Speaker 1: Australians and helping power our prosperity and our standards of living. Shortly,
Speaker 1: we'll be speaking to one of the keynote speakers at
Speaker 1: the AG Day, Tony Seabrook. What Missus Reinhardt spelt out
Speaker 1: in great detail was how the onerous burdens of big government,
Speaker 1: the endless compliances and regulations that are driving so many
Speaker 1: small businesses and big businesses and farms to the wall,
Speaker 1: whilst compliance and approvals and red, green and black tape
Speaker 1: it means almost it's almost impossible now to start these
Speaker 1: new projects, new mining projects. Try that mining and agriculture
Speaker 1: do well. This country does exceptionally well. That's the lesson
Speaker 1: of history. And when mining and agricultural do poorly, every
Speaker 1: single one of us does poorly. Which is why it
Speaker 1: is such a disgrace that this labor government is literally
Speaker 1: killing the golden goose, plucking its wings, not only killing it,
Speaker 1: tearing off its beak and chucking its carcass into the multure.
Speaker 20: Agriculture gets harder and harder with the onerous and growing
Speaker 20: burden of government and policies not at all friendly to
Speaker 20: agriculture or its survival. Ditto not friendly to the major
Speaker 20: revenue owner, the mining industry either. Electricity and fuel prices
Speaker 20: laden with excise duty and rising which affects the costs
Speaker 20: of everything. Thanks to the same green ideology, we face
Speaker 20: government wastage and increased bureaucracy, adding to a record natural debt.
Speaker 1: GENA Reinheart went on to point out that we have
Speaker 1: now had six quarters in declining living standards, and she
Speaker 1: offered some practical solutions of her own, including urging and
Speaker 1: incoming Coalition governments to commit to ending the excise tax
Speaker 1: on fuel if they want to get really serious about
Speaker 1: easing Labour's horrendous inflationary pressures which affect every aspect of
Speaker 1: our lives and every business. End the excise tax on fuel,
Speaker 1: and exhausted hardworking Australian voters would express their gratitude to
Speaker 1: the Coalition in droves where it matters most, at the
Speaker 1: boot box. Above all, gene Reineheart warned of the very
Speaker 1: real danger of Australia turning into a version of Argentina
Speaker 1: one hundred years ago.
Speaker 20: Does anyone see where Australia is heading if we continue
Speaker 20: like this? I mean the hundred plus years of socialism
Speaker 20: and poverty which changed Argentina from having one of the
Speaker 20: eight highest standard of living in the world thanks to
Speaker 20: its mining and agriculture industries pre decades of socialist governments.
Speaker 20: The Argentinian history shows the two go together, socialism and poverty.
Speaker 1: Isn't it great to hear a business leader speaking up
Speaker 1: about the things that matter. I wish a lot more
Speaker 1: of them would be as brave as Gina Reinhardt Missus.
Speaker 1: Reinhardt also told the story that Rita told on the
Speaker 1: show a few weeks ago about Pean Up the squirrel.
Speaker 1: And this was the story about this rescue peta squirrel
Speaker 1: in New York that had become famous on Instagram for
Speaker 1: itsqu tricks and so on, but was then literally hounded
Speaker 1: to death. Euthanized is the cloaqueal term by New York's
Speaker 1: Orwellian left wing and vironmental bureaucrats. Gena Reinhart used the
Speaker 1: story as a metaphor for the terrifying overreach of big government,
Speaker 1: claiming to be working for the greater good, but in
Speaker 1: fact doing immense and often irreversible damage.
Speaker 20: They had every reason to be frightened the government agents
Speaker 20: decapitated them. Well, this may have influenced some voters who
Speaker 20: weren't previously concerned about the increasing power and intrusion into
Speaker 20: lives big government and socialism provides. As Vice President elect
Speaker 20: Vance pointed out, this is what can happen when we
Speaker 20: let government get too big and become too intrusive in
Speaker 20: our lives. As elong Musk says, I quote, the larger
Speaker 20: government gets, the less individual freedom you have. I think
Speaker 20: that's really the core thing your freedoms have just been
Speaker 20: eroded year after year with more and more government laws
Speaker 20: and regulations and regulatory authorities.
Speaker 1: And as Rita reminded me, there was also Freddie the
Speaker 1: raccoon who was decapitated along with the squirrel. Nice work,
Speaker 1: New York Department of Agriculture, sorry of Environmental whatever. Also
Speaker 1: at the Agriculture and Mining conferences was National Senator Matt Canavan,
Speaker 1: a great friend of his show, who, hearing Missus Reinhardt's
Speaker 1: suggestion of our own version of Elon Musk's Department of
Speaker 1: Government Efficiency doge to weed out all the billions of
Speaker 1: dollars of waste, he came up with this brilliant idea
Speaker 1: for precisely that under a coalition governments it should be
Speaker 1: there in their manifesto, a Department of Implementing No Government
Speaker 1: Overreach dinger And there's Matt's logo. Well done that, and
Speaker 1: may it's add, and may I add how great it
Speaker 1: was to see so many Coalition and One Nation MPs
Speaker 1: attending both of those conferences agricultural mining. If you work
Speaker 1: in those industries, Coalition and One Nation were there. I
Speaker 1: looked around. I didn't see any labor Greens or any Teals.
Speaker 1: If we don't have agriculture and mining in this country,
Speaker 1: we literally have nothing. And the way Albo is going
Speaker 1: that day draws closer and closer. Anyway, I'm sure the
Speaker 1: labor and the Greens and the Teals had more important
Speaker 1: things on their minds than you know, Australia's wealth and prosperity.
Speaker 1: You know, they were probably out there banning Israeli politicians
Speaker 1: from entering the country or donating money, your money to
Speaker 1: ANWA and other such mods. Anyway, joining us now the
Speaker 1: other keynote spoken speaker at the National Agricultural Day, head
Speaker 1: of the Partialist in Graziers Association in Wa, Tony Sebrook,
Speaker 1: there we go. Okay, Tony, great to see you. You
Speaker 1: spoke brilliantly. Good to be good to have you here. Now.
Speaker 1: You spoke brilliantly at the National Agricultural Day the other evening.
Speaker 1: You made the point. Really it was a bit doom
Speaker 1: and gloom for us, some individuals in the room, but
Speaker 1: you were telling the truth that things are pretty grim
Speaker 1: out on the land. Now, tell us, as a farmer
Speaker 1: what the government is doing to make life so onerous
Speaker 1: when you're just trying to bring food to the people.
Speaker 1: Of this country.
Speaker 16: Yeah, well, well, Ron, we are a manufacturing industry. We
Speaker 16: do it out in the paddock, but we manufacture. We're
Speaker 16: the last surviving serious manufacturing industry in Australia, the very
Speaker 16: very last surviving one, and we're still well competitive and
Speaker 16: Heaven only knows how we're doing it that we are,
Speaker 16: and what we ask of government is to sit down
Speaker 16: and talk to us because they're prapping on about new
Speaker 16: age men maufacturing. We had new age manufacturing. We were
Speaker 16: so damn good at it, and it's all dyed one
Speaker 16: by one. Major companies have shut shop and gone. We're
Speaker 16: still here. We have the answers. We asked the government
Speaker 16: to sit down and talk to us about what they
Speaker 16: might need to do to give us a better chance
Speaker 16: of survival. And it does not involve subsidies or handouts.
Speaker 1: Now, tell us, just briefly, the sorts of red tape,
Speaker 1: green tape, black tape that the average farmer in Australia
Speaker 1: now has to cope with or deal with simply to
Speaker 1: try and get some food onto the table. Some kale
Speaker 1: into the muffins of all of us sitting in the cities.
Speaker 16: Well, and we interface with a lot of government departments,
Speaker 16: and we are incredibly heavily regulated. West Australian farmers, according
Speaker 16: to the IPA, are the most regulated farmers in the
Speaker 16: whole of Australia. But it's not as simple as just
Speaker 16: regulation on us. It's all the people we deal with,
Speaker 16: the fuel supplies, the furllozer supplies, it's everybody that supplies
Speaker 16: us that's bogged in this mire of govern intervention. And
Speaker 16: it's the charges and the costs of us interfacing with
Speaker 16: them that are just building us into the ground. Simple
Speaker 16: issues like education, travel, health. There's a whole raft of
Speaker 16: stuff that wouldn't cost the government very much money at all,
Speaker 16: but absolutely crucial to people living and staying in the bush.
Speaker 16: So it's not just agriculture, it's the whole broader community.
Speaker 16: And Gena's suggestion about the removed ex ice on fuel,
Speaker 16: this is absolutely brilliant. Now the governm will stand up
Speaker 16: and say, oh dear, we need the money and we
Speaker 16: can't afford to not have the money. Well, of course,
Speaker 16: you can just stop wasting the damn stuff, stop spending
Speaker 16: it all over the place on projects we don't need
Speaker 16: to do. Recognize the fact we're in dire strife and
Speaker 16: stop throwing it around the place, stop building up debt.
Speaker 16: We need to pay interest in and sit down and
Speaker 16: listen to us.
Speaker 4: Well, they've got all those bureaucrats to pay for, so
Speaker 4: they need to spend that money. This war on farmers,
Speaker 4: we're seeing it across Europe, in Ireland, in the UK
Speaker 4: now with the introduction of these new taxes that are
Speaker 4: going to completely devastate the farming sector. Do you fear
Speaker 4: that things will get worse that if we do have
Speaker 4: particularly a coalition between the Labor and the Greens, that
Speaker 4: they are going to introduce the sort of measures we've
Speaker 4: seen across Europe.
Speaker 16: Read there's a whiff of Whitlam in this. And I
Speaker 16: was well and truly involved in the agriculture and industry
Speaker 16: back then, and this government is as blind and as
Speaker 16: deaf as Whitlam was. We are our own worst enemies
Speaker 16: as farmers, because we'll put up with any sort of crap,
Speaker 16: you know, we just keep on keeping on bashing on
Speaker 16: trying to make it work. When you see backpackers driving harvests, wives, daughters,
Speaker 16: sons that have sort of fourteen or fifteen years of
Speaker 16: age doing work that they ought not to be forced
Speaker 16: into doing. It's the resilience and the fact that we
Speaker 16: demil won't give up, but makes the government think, oh,
Speaker 16: they're okay, we don't need to do anything. I'd like
Speaker 16: to sit down with some senior bureaucrats who are prepared
Speaker 16: to actually listen to us and and make the changes
Speaker 16: we need, because farmers, when a farmer goes to town
Speaker 16: starts tipping manural over the roads, that is an act
Speaker 16: of absolute utter desperation. It means they'll stop listening. And
Speaker 16: I don't want to do that. I wouldn't advocate that,
Speaker 16: but with the average and cultural heroty Jack and Wa
Speaker 16: the voice a whole raft of things that just showed
Speaker 16: how utterly toned death they were. The future really concerns me.
Speaker 16: It can be vibrant right across roads now. We can
Speaker 16: have a brilliant future in mining, mining in particular with
Speaker 16: agriculture as well, or we can just keep on going
Speaker 16: down the path we're going, which will not end well.
Speaker 2: James, And how concerned are you then that with the
Speaker 2: continued net zero push and the crash a crash through
Speaker 2: approach that labor is taking this they seem to not
Speaker 2: want to listen to anybody on any of this stuff,
Speaker 2: that it will be farmers in the frame next for
Speaker 2: nitrogen emissions like we've seen in the Netherlands, and that
Speaker 2: a European style war on farmers will continue here in Australia.
Speaker 16: Look, it's happening even now. The interesting thing I addressed
Speaker 16: the university gathering a little while ago and I indicated,
Speaker 16: why are you so bothered with us when you're piling
Speaker 16: on a three eight jet aeroplanes with three hundred and
Speaker 16: twenty thousand liters of aviation fuel on board to go
Speaker 16: to Europe, not because you need to, but because you'd
Speaker 16: like to, and you're worried about emissions from the people
Speaker 16: that feed you. You climb on a cruise liner with
Speaker 16: several thousand people on board, going nowhere and having a
Speaker 16: good time because you want to, and you're worried about
Speaker 16: a farmer producing food actually having some emissions on his property. Now,
Speaker 16: where's the perspective in all of this?
Speaker 1: Fantastic? Those big jet airliners are very important to take
Speaker 1: people to climate change conferences. How dare you suggest otherwise?
Speaker 1: Tony Sebrook, Tony, great to see you at the National
Speaker 1: Agricultural Day the other day, and thanks so much for
Speaker 1: coming out on Outsiders love the big map of Wa
Speaker 1: there behind you. That's great stuff, thanks Matte. Take care.
Speaker 1: That's Tony Seabrook there from the Parcel and Grazes Association
Speaker 1: in Wa. Of course, what's more happening here on Outsiders
Speaker 1: can take Hello?
Speaker 2: You're watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan, Filibuster, Dean and
Speaker 2: Rita silent majority, panahe And of course I'm James Morrow
Speaker 2: here with all the latest news as the new Trump administration,
Speaker 2: Mark reboot, Mark two prepares to launch. And let's just
Speaker 2: say I reckon that despite its hiccups, this transition is
Speaker 2: already going better than expected. Why even the losses are
Speaker 2: turning into wins with the replacement of Attorney General nominee
Speaker 2: Matt Gates with a new nominee, Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondie.
Speaker 2: Sorry Australians, her name is only spelled Bondi, But Bondie
Speaker 2: is in fact an impressive pick for those who have
Speaker 2: been paying attention. And she has a long history of
Speaker 2: the going against the rise of socialism and democrat corruption
Speaker 2: that has ruined the United States under Joe Biden. Now
Speaker 2: this goes back. Her history goes back a dozen years
Speaker 2: She was one of the key state attorneys general back
Speaker 2: then fighting against the Obama administration's attempt to socialize healthcare
Speaker 2: in the United States. So she's got form. She was
Speaker 2: also attacked by lawyers for OJ Simpson when she fought
Speaker 2: against the NFL star turned killers parole in Florida. Oh
Speaker 2: and there's more. Bondi was also a fierce critic of
Speaker 2: biden family corruption and Hunter's role on the board of
Speaker 2: that corrupt Ukrainian oil and gas company Barisma.
Speaker 5: At the Democrats convention, we were told to look at
Speaker 5: Joe Biden as the model of integrity. But when you
Speaker 5: look at his forty seven year career in politics, the
Speaker 5: people who benefited are his family members, not the American people.
Speaker 5: Let's take a closer look. We all know about Joe's
Speaker 5: son Hunter. Biden at to Ukrainian oligarch put Hunter on
Speaker 5: the board of his gas company even though he had
Speaker 5: no experience in Ukraine or in the energy sector none,
Speaker 5: Yet he was paid millions to do nothing. He only
Speaker 5: had one qualification that mattered. He was the son of
Speaker 5: the man in charge of distributing USA to Ukraine.
Speaker 2: She was also a key player in the Democrat's unsuccessful
Speaker 2: attempt to impeach Donald Trump and spoke at the twenty
Speaker 2: twenty Republican National Convention, again making the bidens lining of
Speaker 2: their own.
Speaker 1: Pockets a key theme.
Speaker 2: But here's how we know that Pam Bondy is really
Speaker 2: a great pick for Attorney General. I simply the Democrats
Speaker 2: are losing their minds. Have a look at this meltdown
Speaker 2: on MSNBC.
Speaker 15: Pam Bondi is exactly what I was saying in the
Speaker 15: last segment that we should all fear because she's competent.
Speaker 15: We may not agree with her ideologically, but she actually
Speaker 15: knows how to do this job. So if anyone on
Speaker 15: the Democratic side or anyone who cared about liberty or
Speaker 15: justice was thinking, well, maybe Matt Gates will screw this
Speaker 15: up and that'll give us some time, No, pambody knows
Speaker 15: what she's doing. She knows what she's doing about immigration. Remember,
Speaker 15: Florida is one of those states that's been very aggressive
Speaker 15: about migrants and deportation and moving people to different states
Speaker 15: and everything else like that. Florida has enacted all sorts
Speaker 15: of rules and laws to curtail students and what they
Speaker 15: can do on campuses and finding legal justifications for manipulating
Speaker 15: education money. She is a dangerous and effective pick. And
Speaker 15: that's frankly worse than what we would have got with
Speaker 15: Matt Gates, even with the deplorable moral background that he has.
Speaker 2: Dangerous and effective. Gosh, we can't have that now, can
Speaker 2: we look? For god knows how long Democrats have accused
Speaker 2: Donald Trump of not hiring competent women.
Speaker 1: Well, what's the old saying?
Speaker 2: Be careful what you wish for?
Speaker 1: Great stuff, Thanks, James. Well, a war has broken out
Speaker 1: here on the Outsider's desk. You will not believe what
Speaker 1: I have unleashed, the most chaotic thing. I worked in
Speaker 1: advertising for many years as a creative director. And the
Speaker 1: one thing is who gets the credit for the idea?
Speaker 1: And it turns out that Matt Canavan's idea for Dingo
Speaker 1: for a doge like Dingo's department of a government stopping
Speaker 1: government overach. My co host here, James Morrow, was saying
Speaker 1: he thought of exactly the same idea. Who got their
Speaker 1: first James, Matt Canavan or James Mora, Well, I don't know,
Speaker 1: but this could get ugly.
Speaker 2: We wrote this column here in the Daily Telegraph on
Speaker 2: Tuesday for a Wednesday's paper proposing exactly, this idea of
Speaker 2: a dingo against government overreach, taking on the Elard Mosk
Speaker 2: Dooze idea. So I don't care who gets the credit,
Speaker 2: so long as they cut the spending and cut the
Speaker 2: government overreach.
Speaker 1: And oh yeah, maybe are taxes too Exactly. Well, I'll
Speaker 1: play creative director and say, obviously the two great creative
Speaker 1: minds came up with the same idea at the same time.
Speaker 1: Fantastic news. Let's talk too, now to former British Commander
Speaker 1: Richard Kemp live from Miami. Richard, you do get around.
Speaker 1: It's great to have you here on Outsiders where you belong. Now.
Speaker 1: Lots to talk about we want to talk about. First
Speaker 1: of all, we had Natasha Hausdorff on or earlier talking
Speaker 1: about the ICC and the disgraceful thing that's happening there
Speaker 1: with Nettan Yahoo, So I want to get into that
Speaker 1: in a second. But first of all, I just wanted
Speaker 1: to ask you about Donald Trump's idea of court marshaling
Speaker 1: everybody involved in the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal. What do you
Speaker 1: make of that as a military man yourself.
Speaker 9: Well, I wouldn't I wouldn't support that. I think the
Speaker 9: undoubtedly there were horrific misjudgments made which had significant strategic
Speaker 9: effect on the United States and on Western democracies overall.
Speaker 9: But I think, you know, they were acting under the
Speaker 9: direction of the President of the United States, and I
Speaker 9: think it's he that if anyone has actually already been
Speaker 9: court martial, found guilty, and dismissed from the government. So
Speaker 9: he's in a way taken.
Speaker 1: By his own party exactly, and has followed up by
Speaker 1: the people of America, Yes, exactly exactly.
Speaker 9: I think they expressed their disapproval of that and other
Speaker 9: actions by him very effectively earlier this month. But I
Speaker 9: think that, you know, the reality is that many misjudgments
Speaker 9: were made by military people in the way this was conducted.
Speaker 9: But I would don't I don't think there were there's
Speaker 9: any grounds for saying, let's say that they deliberately acted
Speaker 9: against the interests of the United States. I think, I think,
Speaker 9: you know, it's it's an unfortunate aspect of the policies
Speaker 9: of the Biden government, rather than deliberate military miss abuse
Speaker 9: of anything.
Speaker 1: I think he had the generals in mind, and they
Speaker 1: tend to be more politicians anyway. But let's have a
Speaker 1: quick look at Netanyaho's response to the International Criminal Court
Speaker 1: a bunch of drifters over there in Europe on the
Speaker 1: public purse issuing an arrest warrant for the Prime Minister
Speaker 1: of Israel. His prime Minister's response.
Speaker 10: The anti submitted decision of the International Court in the
Speaker 10: Hague is a modern Dreyfus style and it will end
Speaker 10: the same way. One hundred and thirty years ago, the
Speaker 10: French Jewish officer Alfred Dreyfuss was falsely accused of treason
Speaker 10: by a bias French court.
Speaker 9: Richard Kemp, your thoughts, Yeah, it's it's it's it's a
Speaker 9: biased it's a biased court that has not only stepped
Speaker 9: outside it's its remit in doing this, and it's it's jurisdiction.
Speaker 9: But it's twisted every aspect of its own charter to
Speaker 9: bring this about. Just as an example, I mean, the
Speaker 9: state of Palestine do not exist.
Speaker 1: It's a fiction.
Speaker 9: It may be an aspiration, but it's certainly not of
Speaker 9: genuine state. And you cannot be a members state of
Speaker 9: the ICC unless you're a state. And yet somehow the
Speaker 9: ICC has allowed the state of Pastar. Not only that
Speaker 9: it's defined its boundaries, it has to define its boundaries
Speaker 9: to determine where alleged defenses were committed. That's been a
Speaker 9: matter of international discussion and negotiation for decades, Yet the
Speaker 9: ICC came up with their own conclusion. The ICC cannot
Speaker 9: try cases where there's a country concerned that's able to
Speaker 9: has a judiciary itself and the political will to carry
Speaker 9: its own trials. That's part of the principle of complementarity,
Speaker 9: which is a founding principle of the ICIC ignored Israel
Speaker 9: is a country that can do it itself. It's also
Speaker 9: ignored an international treaty that the Oslo Courts in which
Speaker 9: the Palestinian authority agreed under an international treaty to not
Speaker 9: to have legal jurisdiction over Israeli citizens. Yet somehow, on
Speaker 9: their behalf, the ICC has taken that jurisdiction. So those
Speaker 9: that you know, those are jurisdictional issues which are very serious,
Speaker 9: which never nothing like this has ever been done before.
Speaker 9: No democracy has ever been come under a scrutiny in
Speaker 9: this way by the ICC, or restaurants have not been
Speaker 9: issued for any other democratic country. And you know, I'm
Speaker 9: sure we're probably not all the time, but the basis
Speaker 9: for the chargers are completely unfounded. One charge of starvation,
Speaker 9: another charge of deliberate killing unlawful killing, both completely completely
Speaker 9: without evidence, without foundation. Nothing of the icy said suggests
Speaker 9: any real evidence of either of those charges.
Speaker 2: James, and just on this whole idea of Palestinian sovereignty.
Speaker 2: We had the Australia vote the other day, you know,
Speaker 2: in favor of sub form of Palestinian sovereignty. But this
Speaker 2: whole idea of the Tuesday solution, now, this has to
Speaker 2: be understood now as a complete pipe late because who
Speaker 2: are we dealing with. There's nobody to deal with, that's
Speaker 2: not how mass not terrorists. At this point, I mean,
Speaker 2: don't we need to eject some realism with the people
Speaker 2: who would want to be going down that road on
Speaker 2: this Who are we dealing with?
Speaker 9: Yeah, I mean the two state solution was a fiction
Speaker 9: from the beginning. Really, it was never a possibility, and
Speaker 9: that was partly, not entirely, but partly because the Palestinian
Speaker 9: people and their politicians don't want a two state solution.
Speaker 9: They've rejected a two state solution repeatedly over the decades.
Speaker 9: So even if we all yearn for a two state solution,
Speaker 9: certainly the Palestinians don't want it. How do you achieve
Speaker 9: it if that's the case. But since the seventh of October,
Speaker 9: it's become absolutely ridiculous. There was a two state solution
Speaker 9: of sorts before the seventh of October. You had Gaza
Speaker 9: and independent entity left by Israel to govern itself.
Speaker 1: And look what happened.
Speaker 9: That was the two state solution, and that would be
Speaker 9: the outcome of any two state solution which included Judaa
Speaker 9: and Samaria. And you mentioned Harms. Let's not forget the
Speaker 9: Palacini authority themselves are equally opposed to Israel as her
Speaker 9: mass are. They hate Israel, they want Israel gone, they
Speaker 9: want one state and that's the Islamic state in the
Speaker 9: land of Israel.
Speaker 4: In Montreal, in recent days, we've seen the most shocking protests,
Speaker 4: the pro Palestinian mobs attacking people, causing all sorts of
Speaker 4: damage and violence in downtown Montreal. There's been several arrests.
Speaker 4: How do you see the ongoing protests in the West
Speaker 4: that are not dampening down, they're doubling down. And there
Speaker 4: seems to just be this flood of anti Semitism that
Speaker 4: is very bold and unashamed now coming from the left.
Speaker 9: Yeah, and let's not forget the jew hunts in Amsterdam
Speaker 9: earlier a few days ago. Another example the horrific anti Jewish,
Speaker 9: anti Israel sentiments among many people, I wouldn't say in
Speaker 9: any way a majority, but a significant minority of people
Speaker 9: on our streets. And it's fueled by the governments, and
Speaker 9: it's fueled by things like you know, the British government,
Speaker 9: the Canadian government saying in response to the ICC or
Speaker 9: resta warrant, we will arrest Prime Minister Netanyahu if he
Speaker 9: comes to our come that that adds fuel to the
Speaker 9: fire of these protests because of course, you know, if
Speaker 9: you're going to arrest him, it's because he's a war criminal.
Speaker 9: And that's that's very, very greedily and hungrily lapped up
Speaker 9: by these crowds to incite more violence. And it's irresponsible
Speaker 9: on the part of people like Justin Trudeau and Kiir
Speaker 9: Starmer in the UK to effectively what they're doing is
Speaker 9: inciting violence. They may not be doing it deliberately, but
Speaker 9: they are actually inciting violence against their Jewish populations in
Speaker 9: their country.
Speaker 1: And Richard and Richard, I'll jump in there. I think
Speaker 1: you or may not be aware of Wullara, the suburb
Speaker 1: of Sydney that had vandalism slogan's jew hatred slogans. The
Speaker 1: other day we've had the Penny Wong, the Australian Foreign Minister,
Speaker 1: denying the entry into this country of Alet Shaked, who's
Speaker 1: a former justice minister in the Israeli government. What sort
Speaker 1: of a message does this send out? Says to me
Speaker 1: that the Australian government, the Australian labor government of Albanesian Pennywong,
Speaker 1: seems to be far more on the side of the terrorists,
Speaker 1: the Hamas and that mob than it is on the
Speaker 1: side of the people, the Jewish people of Australia and
Speaker 1: the Jews of Israel. If it's constantly supporting one side
Speaker 1: against the other, is that the message that people are getting.
Speaker 9: It's a very clear message, and it's you know, you
Speaker 9: have to look at the Australian government with contempt when
Speaker 9: you see that they're willing to allow people associated with Hamas,
Speaker 9: directly associated with mass to have visas to enter Israel,
Speaker 9: and they've allowed Australia, sorry to I beg your pardon
Speaker 9: to Australia, and they've allowed Palestinians from guards that to
Speaker 9: come into Australia when there's every probability that they are
Speaker 9: associated themselves with Hamas, yet they won't allow in a
Speaker 9: politician from a Western democracy. So it's not just showing
Speaker 9: that they side with the Hamas terrorists over a democratic state,
Speaker 9: but it's also showing, as I said before about Britain
Speaker 9: and Canada, it's incitement. This is these kind of measures
Speaker 9: banning an Israeli politician coming to Israel.
Speaker 1: What does that tell you?
Speaker 9: Why would you ban them? Because they're trouble And that's
Speaker 9: incitement and it fuels the flames of the anti jew
Speaker 9: and anti Israel hatred that's taken hold in all of
Speaker 9: our countries, including Australia.
Speaker 1: I'm afraid to see Colonel Richard Kemp. Always great to
Speaker 1: chat to you, Thanks so much, and you're I couldn't
Speaker 1: agree with you more on those sentiments you've expressed there.
Speaker 1: That's Colonel Richard Kemp from Miami, always got his finger
Speaker 1: on the pulse of what is happening there in the
Speaker 1: Middle East. Lots more coming up. Clown show in a
Speaker 1: tick roll up, roll up, step right this way. It's
Speaker 1: the most despicable, appalling and repugnant show in town. It's
Speaker 1: a left wing freak show of anti Semitic troops, sorry
Speaker 1: tropes in a grotesque career of perversities known as the
Speaker 1: Burley Griffin Big Top, where this week the Canbra Clowns
Speaker 1: took their act onto the international stage to the unmitigated
Speaker 1: horror of many and the delight no doubt of cheering
Speaker 1: terrorists across the globe. Yes, first up this week was,
Speaker 1: of course, we had the horror show known as Alboso
Speaker 1: the Awful and Pennywise the Clown. Allow me to quote
Speaker 1: from correspondence sent to this program this week, dear Rowan,
Speaker 1: Under Anthony Albanezi and Pennywong, Australia has reached a never
Speaker 1: before low point in our international standing and credibility. After
Speaker 1: the Second World War, Doctor Herbert vere Evatt Doc Evertt,
Speaker 1: former Australian High Judge, Attorney General and parliamentary leader of
Speaker 1: the ALP, helped draft the Charter for the United Nations
Speaker 1: which established the State of Israel. Today, the ALP, together
Speaker 1: with the Greens and Teals, support and fund racist terrorist organizations.
Speaker 1: He's referring, of course, to the allegations against UNWAH and
Speaker 1: the proven links between AUNWAH and Hamas and now this,
Speaker 1: an Israeli ex politician who doesn't share Albanesian Wong's two
Speaker 1: state solution ideology and might upset the river to the
Speaker 1: sea mobs, has been banned from entering Australia. Yes, under
Speaker 1: this vile government, labor sponsored anti Semitism at the highest
Speaker 1: levels of government is now on full display to the
Speaker 1: entire world. The Australian government has barred a former Israeli
Speaker 1: Justice minister Alet Shaken, a former elected Israeli politician and
Speaker 1: member of the democratically elected Israeli Parliament and government, from
Speaker 1: entering this country. This is as aborrend and disgraceful as
Speaker 1: it gets, but nothing is too low for the grubs
Speaker 1: of the Australian government. On What grounds has this clown
Speaker 1: show banned Alet Shaken because she might quote incite discord?
Speaker 1: What because like a majority of Israelis, like people all
Speaker 1: around the world, like Vivek Ramaswami, like members of our
Speaker 1: own parliament, like me, like Reta, like James. Indeed, she
Speaker 1: doesn't believe that under current circumstances or for the foreseeable future,
Speaker 1: the so called two state solution is a viable proposition
Speaker 1: for Israel. Am I to be banned from entering my
Speaker 1: own country if I say so, is John Howard to
Speaker 1: be banned from entering Australia? Is John Howard only this week?
Speaker 19: We will never get a settlement that you can call
Speaker 19: by that name in the Middle East until there is
Speaker 19: an unconditional acceptance by all of the Arab states of
Speaker 19: the right of Israel to exist. Behind those secure defenses.
Speaker 1: Are Elagabus and here is and here is vivek Ramaswami.
Speaker 16: If Israel wants to at long last abandon the myth
Speaker 16: of a two state solution, Israel should go ahead and
Speaker 16: abandon a two state solution.
Speaker 1: And here is me. There can be no two state
Speaker 1: solution full stop. So Penny one, am I to be
Speaker 1: banned now? Israel is a democracy, unlike any of its
Speaker 1: neighboring Arab states, is the only democracy in the region.
Speaker 1: I let checkhem is a successful conservative politician banned from
Speaker 1: entering this country by this despicable anti Semitic government. But unbelievably,
Speaker 1: Pennywog wasn't content with that horror show. She decided this
Speaker 1: week to make matters even worse. This week, the discredited
Speaker 1: International Criminal Court has disgustingly issued arrest warrants for the
Speaker 1: elected Israeli Prime Minister benjaminette Nahou and his Defense minister.
Speaker 1: The Israeli opposition leader has denounced this outrage as a
Speaker 1: reward for terrorism, which it is. Nigel Farage has blasted
Speaker 1: the decision, saying the ICC loses more and more credibility
Speaker 1: each day, and even around the world. Even Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has described this decision as outrageous. But of course along
Speaker 1: comes Pennywise, the clown sorry Pennywog, our foreign minister who
Speaker 1: flies yet again in the face of our most important ally,
Speaker 1: the United States, in the face of Israel, and in
Speaker 1: the face of every Jewish person in Australia. And instead
Speaker 1: of agreeing with America that the arrest stunt is an outrage,
Speaker 1: Penny Wong got put out a press release stating that
Speaker 1: Australia respects the independence of this court and its important role.
Speaker 1: Her sidekick Ed Husick agreed with her. What a joke.
Speaker 1: The ICC Independent Criminal Court is a discredited kangaroo court
Speaker 1: which unbelievably is attacking Israel for legitimately defending itself against
Speaker 1: the despicable terrorist attacks of October seventh. And then finally
Speaker 1: this week, we also got the grotesque anti Semitic attacks
Speaker 1: in Sydney's Willara suburb, described by the Australian Jewish Association
Speaker 1: as quote domestic terrorism against Jews as it meets the
Speaker 1: common definition and the UNFO lawful use of violence and intimidation,
Speaker 1: especially against civilians in the pursuit of political aims. That's right.
Speaker 1: Australians from all walks of life are horrified by this
Speaker 1: sick hatred of Jews being spread out, spewed out onto
Speaker 1: our streets, and the complete and utter failure of the
Speaker 1: Albanesi government to ignore all the warnings over the past
Speaker 1: year about how this government's actions are pouring fuel on
Speaker 1: the twin fires of anti Semitism and terrorism. Albanesi's horrific
Speaker 1: failure as a national leader stands in start contrast with
Speaker 1: former Prime Minister John Howard.
Speaker 19: I can't tell you how angered and discuss that I
Speaker 19: am at what happened in Laa overnight. I think it's
Speaker 19: a demonstration of naked anti Semitism, which we should all,
Speaker 19: whatever our political views are, we should denounce it. I
Speaker 19: always thought this country had a long tradition or bipowersan
Speaker 19: detail station and rejection of any Semetrizo.
Speaker 1: Thank you, mister Howard. Compare that moral clarity of a
Speaker 1: former prime minister with the joke that is the clown
Speaker 1: show in Canberra today. This Australian Labor government is now
Speaker 1: being accused around the world of being an anti Semitic
Speaker 1: clown show, and the only people laughing are Hamas and
Speaker 1: Islamist terrorists. No music today, Let's leave the final word
Speaker 1: to ailette shakem.
Speaker 21: Australia and Israel have always had very warm relationship and
Speaker 21: this current anti Israeli government will be in the end
Speaker 21: just anti Semitic, anadgote in the relationship between the two countries.
Speaker 21: So see you soon and love you all.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's net zany. That's the wacky, crazy, insane world
Speaker 1: of net zero, and it gets madder and madder by
Speaker 1: the day. COP twenty nine is currently underway. That's where
Speaker 1: Chris Bowen is spending your money after having jetted over
Speaker 1: there and doing all sorts of deals. James, you have
Speaker 1: some breaking news. Well, four hours ago they made a
Speaker 1: deal at COP twenty nine which is going to cost
Speaker 1: us all. Tell us about it.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, don't shoot the master on this one, guys.
Speaker 2: But three hundred billion dollars billion with a b per
Speaker 2: year to be transferred. That's US dollars from the developed
Speaker 2: world to the developing world to help mitigate climbing impacts,
Speaker 2: which is what they always say. But of course, you
Speaker 2: know this is just a continuing shakedown scheme that all
Speaker 2: of these cop programs are in fact, really that's what
Speaker 2: I mean so far, you know, and that's split on
Speaker 2: developing nations sent to the developing world. Is all head
Speaker 2: in the pocket shakedown scheme, this whole you know, you
Speaker 2: see where all of the stuff around Cliverer girls, it's
Speaker 2: always about the money, you know, It's about the subsidies.
Speaker 2: It's about the shakedown. This is one element of it,
Speaker 2: the subsidies we get here in Australia going off to
Speaker 2: big renewables investors or the other part of the equation.
Speaker 2: None of it's actually of course changes the weather and
Speaker 2: if they did believe it would, then they'd be doing
Speaker 2: the whole thing on zoom exactly.
Speaker 7: But also I think Donald Trump is going to put
Speaker 7: a stop to this.
Speaker 1: He really has to.
Speaker 4: I think that yeah, this and You'll shake down ain't
Speaker 4: going to be happening under a Trump administration.
Speaker 1: He'll just laugh but Australia plays along with this, and
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what a joke Australia is. We seriously
Speaker 1: are we're going to be handing, you know, however much
Speaker 1: money millions here there and ever. To every grifter who
Speaker 1: puts their hands out and claims that their island is
Speaker 1: sinking or their whatever whatever, go down to Fort Dennis
Speaker 1: in Sydney Harbor if you want to see how fast
Speaker 1: the islands are sinking. It's exactly the same as it's
Speaker 1: been for the last century or so. But anyway, have
Speaker 1: a listen to this. This was wait for it, welcome
Speaker 1: to country at twenty nine US.
Speaker 4: We're not on Australian lands. I'd still like to start
Speaker 4: with acknowledging the traditional owners of Australia in the Torrest
Speaker 4: Traite Islands and pay my respects to their eldest past president.
Speaker 5: And emerging what there's.
Speaker 1: Emerging, this is mental lunacy. These people should be reaped up.
Speaker 1: They should be in straight jackets. What on earth are
Speaker 1: you talking about?
Speaker 2: Real?
Speaker 1: That wasn't really that is real. That is what Canberra
Speaker 1: has become.
Speaker 4: But what expensive to the home host country, Because imagine
Speaker 4: if we have people coming here and doing acknowledgment of
Speaker 4: traditional owners of the.
Speaker 22: It's more offensive to us people who are going over
Speaker 22: there to negotiate deals to hand out our body on
Speaker 22: their behalf are when they do things like that, they
Speaker 22: are saying they don't actually even believe even the legitimacy
Speaker 22: of the government.
Speaker 1: That they are all of money or the taxpayers. It's
Speaker 1: giving them all a thate hundred percent. Well, the madness
Speaker 1: goes further. We did do We call this segment net
Speaker 1: zany for a reason. As they're prancing around Cop twenty nine.
Speaker 1: As they're doing they're welcome to countries and Norris this
Speaker 1: particular country is getting colder. Brisbane just had its coldest day,
Speaker 1: so while all that's going on, they're shivering their coldest
Speaker 1: day in twelve years in November, which would to the
Speaker 1: average person suggest that perhaps the planet is not warming
Speaker 1: to the doomsday extent. He's not a new demand And
Speaker 1: oh there's a snowstorm in the UK. Both sides of
Speaker 1: the planet.
Speaker 2: It's cold, didn't they say, RhoD I'm sorry, you know,
Speaker 2: I'm showing my age here. I'm old enough to remember
Speaker 2: when they used to see. British school children will never
Speaker 2: know snow. They will never see snow because of climate change,
Speaker 2: and of course.
Speaker 1: Because it's all in Brisbane. It's all in Brisbane. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're just snow in Brisbane. That'd be funny, that would
Speaker 1: be great. We look forward to that out that'll be
Speaker 1: coming in the ice skating on the river not too distance.
Speaker 1: Let's do a bit of hyperbol ass and hyper Let's
Speaker 1: have the hyperbol sting. I love it. It's so good.
Speaker 4: Hyperbol Joe Rogan, prita, Joe Rogan, God love him. He
Speaker 4: has highlighted that Donald Trump was one hundred percent right
Speaker 4: where he said the COVID death rate is probably under
Speaker 4: one percent, a statement that he was attacked mercilessly for.
Speaker 7: Let's just have a look at what was said.
Speaker 2: A lot of conversations with a lot of people that
Speaker 2: do this pick the number is way under one percent.
Speaker 1: In a fact check, the World.
Speaker 17: Health Organization says the coronavirus death rate is three.
Speaker 18: Point four percent.
Speaker 6: President Trn lies that the World Health Organization is wrong.
Speaker 3: The number is three point four percent.
Speaker 15: Three point four percent is what it's being reported.
Speaker 1: Boy sound jay death rate.
Speaker 3: The percentage is three point four percent, and no hunts
Speaker 3: from the president can change that.
Speaker 15: Trump light about the most re A World Health Organization
Speaker 15: estimate that the global death rate of coronavirus is three point.
Speaker 1: Four percent of Jesus, The three point four percent death
Speaker 1: rate was wrong, and WO Data later updated it to
Speaker 1: a fraction of one percent, under one percent.
Speaker 4: What No, we've talked already on this program about the lies.
Speaker 7: We were told, the coercion to get.
Speaker 4: A vaccine that we now learned from an expert isn't
Speaker 4: actually a vaccine. And you know what, you knew that instinctively,
Speaker 4: because what vaccine do you need to have boosted every
Speaker 4: few months, single and you still.
Speaker 7: Get the virus and also that virus.
Speaker 2: Beyond that though, you know, like the other thing we've
Speaker 2: spoken about in this program today is the Misinformation Bill.
Speaker 2: And again this is why that misinformation Bill was so sinister,
Speaker 2: because so much of the stuff that we said on
Speaker 2: this program during the pandemic was called misinformation. Don Trump
Speaker 2: said that was misinformation, the one percent figure, the less
Speaker 2: than one percent figure. He was right, We were right,
Speaker 2: and yet there was a whole effort to censor us
Speaker 2: and people like Donald Trump because we were telling the
Speaker 2: truth and we were trying to get people to resist
Speaker 2: the panic.
Speaker 4: How crazy is this the actual information the Abenezy government
Speaker 4: used in their disinformation explainer had disinformation in it. It
Speaker 4: incorrectly stated that Trump was going around telling people to
Speaker 4: inject bleach, which is one of these lies that the
Speaker 4: left pushes, like the fine People hoax and all the others.
Speaker 4: And that was actually in the Albanesi governments explainers saying why.
Speaker 7: This bill is necessary. That's dead and buried.
Speaker 4: But I'm telling you this social media ban for under
Speaker 4: sixteens has got so many consequences that have not been
Speaker 4: thought through by a lot of people who supported. You
Speaker 4: may think social media is not great for young people.
Speaker 4: I tend to agree, but this sort of ban is
Speaker 4: going to impact everybody and it just creates it also
Speaker 4: level of control for bureaucrats with it.
Speaker 1: It also means read so that kids, if this social
Speaker 1: media band goes ahead, kids will only have one source
Speaker 1: of information, which is the ABC or the school or whatever.
Speaker 1: That's what they want. That's what the left wants, so
Speaker 1: that they will be brainwashing their kids with stuff like this.
Speaker 1: This is our Gore at COP twenty nine only the
Speaker 1: other day, still the great grifter of our era, still
Speaker 1: pushing the same old line. Here he is al Gore.
Speaker 23: He's scientists say, in this pure reviewed study we estimated
Speaker 23: collapse around mid century.
Speaker 1: What what some of the.
Speaker 23: Load bearing elements of our entire earth ecological system are
Speaker 23: at risk? And what are we doing just talking away,
Speaker 23: talking away? Y?
Speaker 7: Yeah, completely mad that one.
Speaker 4: But this is a man who's god what no scientific
Speaker 4: gradations become what a billionaire through this grift? Every prediction
Speaker 4: shouldn't that he has, Every doomsay, catastrophic prediction has been wrong,
Speaker 4: And yet he speaks with such authority. He gets up
Speaker 4: there no shame, and we.
Speaker 1: Pay us like Bowen to go and get our money
Speaker 1: away to all these more grifters. I mean, the whole
Speaker 1: thing is a massive con. A massive co is exposed
Speaker 1: as surely, I promise you this, as surely as that
Speaker 1: one percent of Donald Trump was exposed only a few
Speaker 1: years later as being the truth when everybody said it
Speaker 1: was all. I guarantee you climate change will be exposed
Speaker 1: as a massive hoax and a massive con, and we'll
Speaker 1: all be sitting around there all be going, oh, oh really, really,
Speaker 1: I never who'd have picked it? Who would have picked it? Anyway?
Speaker 1: And the madness carries on as well as very quickly
Speaker 1: what could possibly go wrong? We the British Police are
Speaker 1: now allowed to have a transgender squad. I blokes who
Speaker 1: think they're women going around doing strip strip searchers of
Speaker 1: women who'd have thought it the crazy but only just.
Speaker 1: That's outsiders for the week. We'll see you next Sunday
Speaker 1: at nine am. Thanks