WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 14 October

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:04.479
<v Speaker 1>On scorn Lils Oscodia.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the reader Panecky Show.

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the reader Panicky Show. Coming

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 3>up tonight. Why the latest news poll has the Albanizer

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 3>government in panic mode? The lessons from the failed race

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 3>based referendum. I'll speak with Dan Wild about that shortly.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 3>The latest from the US with Alex Stein and what

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 3>major motion picture is being slammed as one of the

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 3>worst films ever made. I'll discuss that with Kinsey Schofield

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 3>and we never miss Left is losing it tonight. Kamala

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>tries a new Jamaican accent.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Have you know empathy man?

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 3>You know for the suffering? Now, today's news poll shows

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the Coalition leading Labor for the first time since the

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>May twenty two election. This is an enormous boost for

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the opposition and in particular Peter Dutton. Is the one

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>year anniversary today of The Voice being defeated, and it

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>was through the Voice that Peter Dutton showed Australians that

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>he is a conviction politician. He can articulate a conservative

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 3>position and is unashamed about pursuing those goals, something many

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 3>so called conservative leaders in the past have failed to

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 3>do and that strength, that contrast with the Prime minister

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>is partly why Anthony Alberize's approval rating has also fallen

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 3>to a new low. Now, let's have a look at

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 3>some of the data. The Coalition have a two point

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>lead now over the Labor government in the two party

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 3>preferred figures, the two major parties did not actually see

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 3>a change to their primary vote from the last News poll.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Coalition is still at at thirty eight percent, Labor at

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty one, But that change in the two party preferred

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>vote for the coalition is due to more preferences flowing

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to them. Newspaul showed that one percent of the Greens

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 3>went down by one percent and one nation went up

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 3>by one percent. Joining me now for more on this

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>as Daniel Wild, Deputy executive director at the Institute of

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Public Affairs, Dan, what do you make of these figures?

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 3>If they hold, will the Albert Easy government be a

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 3>one term? Wonder?

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 5>At the moment reader, if these figures hold, it will

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 5>probably be a labor minority government, but of course the

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 5>momentum is shifting against Labor and towards the Coalition. I

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 5>think your assessment is right, which is that Australians are

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 5>rewarding Peter Dutton and the Coalition for sticking to the values,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 5>particularly on the Voice to Parliament, where Australians did not

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 5>want to be divided by race. We've also seen important

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 5>policy around nuclear power, around big business and other key areas.

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 5>So you know what this shows, reader, is that Australians

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 5>will back leaders who have vision and who stick to

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 5>their principles and who reflect and speak up for the

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 5>values of mainstream Australians. And that is exactly what Peter

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 5>Dutton and the Coalition are doing at the moment.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 3>Now. Today does mark the one year anniversary of the

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 3>failed Voice referendum, and the Yes advocates are still in denial,

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 3>utter denial about what happened and why they continue to

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 3>blame things like misinformation and disinformation for the defeat of

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the Voice instead of accepting the reality that the overwhelming

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 3>majority of Australians do not want to be separated by race.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>We don't want to have racial privilege enshrined into our

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>founding document. Earlier today, there was a heated debate between

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 3>a NO advocate Warren Mundine and YES advocate Eddie sinnot

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>deal with the.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 6>Real issues of crime to deal with the real issues

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 6>of education and deal with the real issues of economic participation.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 7>There were many, many pieces of misinformation. It was something

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 7>that the No campaign was able to exploit and use

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 7>very well. Warren's problem with the truth and honesty. Just

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 7>continue worrying.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 6>This is the lie. This is the lie that he

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 6>goes on with. This bloke is a worrying boy.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 8>Warren, and I got the statistics, I got all the

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 8>information to show you you're often a fantasy world.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 6>Start focusing on the local people and.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 7>Stop going on with this stupidity about calling people lit Now.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Voice architect Megan Davis has also lashed out. She took

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity to express her support for Labour's draconian Misinformation

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Bill because she says that the No vote was built

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 3>on lies, so called lies that were propagated, and that

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the result could have been different if those misinformation laws

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 3>were in place. Is she right down where the Yes

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 3>camp victims of disinformation?

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, it shows that the elites don't get it.

0:04:59.680 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Reader.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 5>One year on, they don't understand why Australians voter know,

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 5>which was the simple reason that we do not want

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 5>to be divided by race.

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 9>It was that simple.

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 5>Now, the interesting question is whether those if these proposed

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 5>misinformation laws were.

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 9>In place, would the No campaign have one.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, Maybe they wouldn't have because the misinformation

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 5>laws are about censorship. They are about censoring the opinions

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 5>of mainstream Australians. We saw unprecedented censorship throughout the Voice

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 5>debate by tech companies and by government. And what it

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 5>shows is that on referendum night Anthony Abernezi himself he

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.119
<v Speaker 5>blamed misinformation. Well, it's time to put up or shut

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 5>up to those Yes campaigners who are saying the No

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 5>campaign only one.

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 9>Because of lies. What were they?

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 5>What was the misinformation that the No campaign engaged in.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 5>They don't have any examples, because there are none. Australians

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 5>understood what the Voice was about. They understood it very

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 5>well and they comprehensively rejected it.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, they may say that the suggestion that the Ullery

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 3>statement from the Heart was more than one page would

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 3>be a piece of disinformation, when of course it wasn't

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>because it was certainly more than one page, and they

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 3>objected to that fact being shared. And you're so right.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 3>What's often called disinformation misinformation are just inconvenient facts that

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>left don't want to the public to know about. And

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 3>I think really throughout that debate, Dan, the most impactful

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 3>arguments were the arguments from the S camp. When you

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>actually broke down the positions these people had what they've

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.119
<v Speaker 3>argued for in the past. When you quoted them word

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 3>for word, which I often did in columns I wrote

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 3>or on this program, that is what really brought the

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>message home to Australians that this is something that we

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 3>do not want in our constitution. We do not want

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to have racial division, racial privilege enshrined into our founding document.

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's right, And if there was misinformation, it was

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 5>by the Yes campaign. I mean remember the Prime Minister

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 5>himself said, oh, this is just a modest proposal.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 9>It's a modest request. No, it wasn't.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 5>It was fundamentally changing the entire edifice of our parliamentary

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 5>democracy by permanently enshrining racial division in our nation's founding documented.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 5>So it's just a tiny little request. It was never

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 5>a grassroots movement. It was a movement designed by and

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 5>for the elite activist class. And that's why Australians voted

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 5>for it. They're not silly. They understood that this was

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 5>not going to create one job, stop one crime from

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 5>being committed, or fix one single problem out in the bush.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's have a little trip down memory lane and

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>see how the likes of Warren Mundine and Just Enterprise

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 3>were treated by segments of the media.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 8>We're going to sit here and cop laws from.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're not going to sit here. You abusing before

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 3>a National treasure like Marcia Lanton who never said that

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Australians were racist and her.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 9>Words were twisted. I'm going to stop you.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Their warrant.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 6>People make the decisions.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I think, well, we've just seen who Warren Mundane is.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 10>That's right.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any thing further.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 11>To add I didn't say that Australians are racist.

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 3>National Treasure Aron, Here is a video that Warren Mundane

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 3>was referring to, and yes it does appear to be

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>to show that National Treasure Marsha Langdon did actually say

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 3>that the No campaign was racist while speaking at a

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Regional West Australian forum.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 11>Every time the No case raises one of their arguments,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 11>if you start pulling it apart, you get down to

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 11>base racism. I'm sorry to say it, but that's where

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 11>it lands. Or just sheer stupidity.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 3>And remember these hideous remarks that Noel Pearson made about

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:06.599
<v Speaker 3>just Center namber Jinpurprice on ABC Radio during a fifteen

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>minute winch fest that the ABC allowed to go unchallenged.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 12>She's caught in a vortex. That reminds me of Pauline

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 12>Hanson twenty six years ago, because paul and Hansen got

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 12>caught in a vortex, and it's a celebrity vortex, a

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 12>celebrity bortex. It's very compelling, that gets her out in

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 12>front of people and that gets a lot of cheers,

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 12>but it's also a redneck celebrity vortex. And their strategy

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 12>was to find a blackfellow to punch down on other blackfellows.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Dan, there was so much ugliness, so much division. Has

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the country healed from that yet?

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we're still bitterly divided, reader.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 5>The Prime Minister has comprehensively failed to unite us after

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 5>the Voice defeat. We've got the activist class that keep

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 5>on trying to divide us. They understand why Australians voted no.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 5>My concern, though, reader, is that we won the war,

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 5>but we are at risk of losing the peace because,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 5>as you know, these activists don't stop just because Australians

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 5>democratically voted no. We've still got treaty processes underway where

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 5>I am in South Australia. They've got a state based

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 5>voice to Parliament even though two thirds of South Australians

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 5>voted no. So at the end of the day, we

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 5>need to make sure that racial division of any kind

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 5>is refuted because it has no place in our country.

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Now let's move on to the state premiers being accused

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 3>of being disrespectful after a number of them, including the

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Victorian and New South Wales premiers, a declined and invitation

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>to meet with our Head of State, King Charles the

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Third when he arrives in Australia this week, and no

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 3>state premier will attend a special reception in Canberra later

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 3>in the week which is said to be attended by

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>a number of high profile political and community leaders. Premiere

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 3>just Into Alan from Victoria has declined to attend. Instead,

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>she's sending a junior labor MP, Nick staykhosts I've never

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 3>ever heard of him in her place. New South Wales

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Premier Chris Mins. He says he's got a cabinet meeting

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 3>so he won't be able to be there. Queensland Premier

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Steven Miles has got an election campaign, has mainium premieres overseas,

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 3>and the South Australian premier has also got a cabinet meeting,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and Roger Cook from WA has other commitments. Stands so

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 3>not exactly the red carpet treatment for our head of

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 3>state there. Do you think that's fair enough? Do you

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 3>think this is just a deliberate snubbing, or they're too

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 3>busy with other things, or is it actually a principal position.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 3>If these premiers are Republicans, should they be sticking to

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 3>their guns and saying we're not going to meet with

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the king because we don't even believe in that system.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 5>I think it's probably deliberate, to be honest, And even

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 5>if they are Republicans, they should still respect the institutions

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 5>of our constitutional democracy which have afforded them the opportunity

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 5>to be in the positions that they are, and they

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 5>should be more respectful to the king, because it's not

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 5>just about the individual who happens to be the king

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 5>at the time, as I say, it's about the institutions

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 5>which flow from that. And we have an incredibly stable democracy,

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 5>a well functioning democracy because in part the monarchy sits

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 5>over that.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 9>So you know, this is really sort.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Of university student activism level stuff that I think most

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Australians look at and they think it's pretty petty, to

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 5>be honest, no matter what side you're on, it just

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 5>looks petty.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, he is still the head of state. So even

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 3>if you're a Republican, I guess the argument would be

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 3>until we are a republic, or if we are ever

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 3>become a republic, this is the system that you've elected

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 3>to participate in, and you've got to respect the head

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 3>of state. Dan Wild, thank you for your time this evening. Now,

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>education and particularly school choice are big election issues in

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 3>the US. Doesn't receive the coverage it deserves, but it

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>is certainly an issue tens of millions of Americans care

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 3>passionately about. On the one side, you have the left,

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the bureaucracy, the unions led by this woman.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 13>Whether it's wages or a dignified retirement, or education opportunity

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 13>or college without crushing death, or family leave or healthcare

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 13>or housing, any of the things are important every single day.

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 3>We need to fake to.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 13>Get Kamala Harris and ten Wall selected.

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 3>Are you ready are you ready, Oh dear, that's Randy Winkgarden,

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the president of the American Federation of Teachers. And on

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the other side you have my next guest, who has

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>been one of the most effective advocates for school ches,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Corey DeAngelis. Thanks for your time. Randy there has targeted

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>you personally in her speeches. Tell me why you think

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>school choice is such an important issue.

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, look Brandy's video.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>There is basically free advertising for the school choice movement.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 6>Every time she opens her mouth.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 2>That should be counted as an inkind contribution to the

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party because she's fighting the trapped kids in her

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 2>failing government run, unionized, monopolistic schools. And do you want

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>this unhinged lunatic educating your kids.

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 6>This is why we should have school choice.

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Families should be able to choose the school that works

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>best for them, that has the best math, reading and

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>writing outcomes, and also that in a way that aligns

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>with your values. You want a curriculum that is not

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>far left socialism. You want the schools to focus on

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the basics on education, not on indoctrination.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, tell me about school choice. It essentially means that

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the parents have the power. The funding is attached to

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the child, so they could put their child in a

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>school that may not necessarily be the one they're zoned to,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 3>but it's, like you said, one that matches their values,

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 3>or has better academic results, a better sports program, whatever

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 3>they're looking for. Where do the Trump and Harris camps

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>land on this issue? Is this something that Kamala Harris

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 3>may be willing to compromise on.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris is a communist who thinks your kids belong

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to the government, whereas Donald Trump understands that parents are

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>the primary decision makers for their own kids.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 6>He believes in school choice.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>He's called for full throated universal school choice. He's on

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the side of parents. Kamala Harris is an enemy of

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>parental rights and education. She could have chosen Josh Shapiro.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 2>He's the governor of Pennsylvania, a must win swing state

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 2>in the US that Democrats need to win in November.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 6>She didn't choose him.

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Because he supported school choice. She chose Tim Walls, the tyrant,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 2>who was a former member of Randy Winegartens and American

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Federation of Teachers, and the Democrat Party in the US

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 2>is a wholly owned subsidiary, the teachers Union. So Kamala

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Harris is going to do the bidding of the teachers unions,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and that means trapping kids in their failing unionized in

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>doctrination centers, whereas Donald Trump, he knows families are in

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the best position to make the best decisions for their

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>own kids' education.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>And Randy Winegarden, I've got to say, she really did

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 3>disgrace herself during the COVID era her desperation to keep

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>schools closed for as long as possible, despite the fact

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 3>that schools were open in much of the world, even

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 3>places where there were lockdowns, and masking the smallest of kids,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of measures that were just crazy, but the

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>unions backed them strongly. Now, Trump has said that he

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 3>wants federal education dollars to follow the student Tell me

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>what that would mean for parents.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in the US, we have the US Department of

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Education at the federal level provides about eight percent of funding.

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>It shouldn't exist at all. I mean, it was great

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen seventy nine. Is a payoff from Jimmy Carter

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>to the Teachers Union, the National Education Association, and in

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>our constitution, the word education does not exist. So the

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>entire department is a violation of our tenth Amendment.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 6>It should be up to the states.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Each of our states have state level departments of education.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 6>That's all you really.

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 2>Need, and we also have local school boards as well.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 2>But Donald Trump fighting for school choice, you can also

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 2>abolish the department. There's a bill while also passing a

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 2>bill in Congress right now called the Educational Choice for

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Children Act. It's a tax credit where people can get

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 2>their federal tax dollars back to be used for KATE

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 2>to twelve education expenses. So it's not actually, you know,

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>federal public money following the student. It's people keep getting

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to keep more of their hard earned tax dollars and

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 2>using that for.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 6>KATE the twelve education expenses.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>And you can also abolish the Department of Education at

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the same time.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 6>But we also have at the state level.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>There have been twelve states in the past three years

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>that have passed universal school choice, having state.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 6>Dollars follow the child.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 2>And this is why Randy Weingarten's freaking out on stage

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>just because we're winning so much. I'm almost getting tired

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of winning Rita. We've had so much momentum in the

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 2>past three years more than we've had in the preceding

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 2>three decades. Because they fought to keep the schools closed.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>They upset parents who got to see what was happening

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 2>in the classroom and vote.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 6>Bacham said it best.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>We cannot continue to send our children to Caesar for

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>their education and be surprised when they come home. As Romans,

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>parents aren't surprised anymore.

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 6>They've woken up. They're never going back to sleep.

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 2>And that could get Donald Trump into the White House

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in November because he's on the side of parents.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 3>It is, like I said at the start, a huge

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 3>issue for so many voters. Tell me about how much

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>more is being spent on education and whether that's increased

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the academic results of the average student, because the spending

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 3>seems to have exploded. You shared some data showing that

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 3>around twenty thousand dollars is spent per student per year.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 3>That's one hundred and sixty percent more than one hundred

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 3>and sixty percent high in real terms inflation adjusted to

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 3>what was being spent in nineteen seventy. But the results

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 3>are dropping. Where is that money going? Is it all

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 3>going to the bureaucracy Like that graph which I.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 6>Saw, Yeah, exactly. The government school system has become.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>More of a jobs program for administrators and adults as

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 2>opposed to an education initiative for kids. Since two thousand,

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>enrollment for students that only went up by about five percent,

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Administrative staffing increase by about ninety five percent, about fourteen

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 2>times the amount of student increase in places like Chicago,

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 2>where they fought to.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 6>Keep the schools closed for two years.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Here in Chicago, they've increased their staffing by twenty percent

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 2>since twenty nineteen, but their student enrollment has decreased by

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 2>ten percent. And what other industry do you lose your

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>customers to the tune of about ten percent and then

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you go on a hiring spree. That's because it's a monopoly,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 2>has no incentive to spend money wisely. But guess what

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 2>when you have school choice, when people can vote with

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 2>their feet take their money elsewhere, well, the providers of

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the service, the district schools start to say, hey, maybe

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>we should spend our money wisely, maybe we should listen

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 2>to the pay parents. And then that is a rising

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>tide that lifts all boats. Competition improves the outcomes in

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>our government schools when parents can take their money elsewhere.

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 6>So this is a win win solution.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Corey Deangelas, thank you so much for your time this evening.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you still to come your favorite segment, Lefti's Losing It,

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Plus the latest from the US with Alex Stein, including

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a Donald Trump is appealing to jen Z voters. Welcome back.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Now it's time for lefties losing it And let's start

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>with the many accents of chameleon Kamala. She can go

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 3>from Ivy League to the ghetto.

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 4>So friends, sixty four days, let's just get through the

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 4>next sixty four days.

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>She's even pulled out a little Latino heat in recent weeks.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 3>But I believe this this may be the first time

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 3>she's tried a Jamaican accent.

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Have you no empathy? Man, You're not for the suffering

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 4>of other people? Have you no sense of purpose?

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 3>She's so authentic, so likable and confident. Of course I jest. Now,

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Kamala has a man problem. And it's not just Doug

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>knock him out, m Hoff. No, He's not the only

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 3>one causing her headaches. But the fact that so many

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 3>American men, including black men, do not want to vote

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>for her. Now, the reasons are numerous. They're real and

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 3>valid reasons, but of course the simplistic take is that

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 3>these men must be sexist. Here is Barack Obama lecturing

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 3>the Brothers as he calls them on why they must

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 3>back Kamala.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 14>You did not yet see the same kind sort of

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 14>energy and turn.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 15>Out in all words of.

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 6>Our neighborhood's and communities isms.

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 11>I was run.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 14>I also want to say that that seems to be

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 14>more pronounced with the brothers.

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>He then went on to lecture them about why they

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 3>must pick Kamala and why any reluctance must be due

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to what sexist, misogynist monsters they are.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 14>You just aren't feeling the idea of having a woman

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 14>as president, and you're coming up with other alternatives.

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 6>And other reasons for them.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 14>And so now you're thinking about sitting out or even

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 14>supporting somebody.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 6>Who has a history of tech agree to you.

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 14>Because you think that's a side of strength, because that's

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 14>what being a man is, putting women down. That's not exciting.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Now that little ranch inspired some feedback from members of

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the black community, male and female.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 16>I want Barack Obama and every Democrat out there to

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 16>know you do not own Black people.

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>We are not slaves.

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 16>Our chains are gone. We do not owe you anything,

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 16>and we don't have to give you an account for

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 16>how we choose.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 17>To vote the Democrats that unleashed Barack Obama into the

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 17>while to shame us black men for not supporting Kamala

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 17>Harris despite the fact that she's yet to unveil any

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 17>policies that represent our interests. But if it was a

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 17>white politician shaming other white man for not voting based

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 17>on identity politics, y'all will call him racist. Why is

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 17>it okay for Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and all these

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 17>other people that supposedly look like me? Why is it

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 17>okay for them to get on TV and shame me

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 17>for not voting for them simply because they look like me.

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 9>That's racist, brother, I don't know how else to put it.

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 9>That is racism.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 17>I don't have to vote for Kamala because she's quote

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 17>unquote black, just like I shouldn't have voted for Yo,

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 17>because you got up there, you tap dance for the establishment,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 17>and you ain't do a goddamn for the black people

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 17>that put you in office.

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 18>You brother, you ain't got a last thing for us.

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 18>In the eight years that she was in a White House.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 18>And you think you gonna pop up doing an election

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 18>year and try to scold black myth and not wanting

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 18>to vote for your candidate.

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Have you lost mine?

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 15>I spent seven years of my life fighting your administration,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 15>you and Biden, by the way, for my husband's military benefits.

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 15>My daughter died because of Obama care. I don't give

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 15>a about you.

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 19>This message is for President Obama first and foremost. You're

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 19>not gonna tell me what I'm gonna do and what

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 19>I'm not gonna do. Number One, I ain't gonna vote

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 19>for Kamala Harris. I think that she's gonna make a

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 19>bad president. She's a bad vice president. Everything she does,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 19>she tries to politicize it, and she hasn't shown the

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 19>fact that she wants to put America first ever. So

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 19>I'm not voting for that individual.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 14>What you thought you was doing, Barack Obama, Boy, you

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 14>didn't stepped out there.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 6>All you did was black men off.

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 14>Bruh.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 10>All you did was.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 20>Black men off.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 8>Why y'all think the American people's doing Why y'all think

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 8>the Democrat Party.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 10>Owned black folk? The Democrat Party don't own black folks.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 21>Brh.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 6>What you thought you was doing with that. We see

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 6>the play.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 10>We know we see the play. Kamala Harris is losing.

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 10>She's not gonna win.

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 8>The audacity of you to say to us that we

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 8>are required and we better vote for Kamala Harris and

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 8>that we don't want to see a woman in a

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 8>position of power, You're a liar.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's just say, sample, folks, plenty more where that came from. Now,

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 3>let's check in with the man who Kamala Harris handpicked

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 3>as her running night, Tim Walls. Here, Tim tries to

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 3>reload a gun. This is the man they picked to

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>inject masculinity and country vibes into the campaign. They set

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 3>up this contrived hunt to showcase that masculinity and gun prowess.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 3>It's not working out too well. There. That is just

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 3>appalling stuff. Now, there'll be plenty more left is losing

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 3>at content with my next guest, And it seems Donald

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump's youngest son, Baron, has been influencing his father's decision

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 3>to tap into the gens z market by speaking with

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 3>popular influencers, comics, and podcasters, including Andrew Schultz. They sat

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 3>down for a wide ranging chat last week covered some

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 3>big issues, but they also covered some funny stuff too. Here,

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump talks about how he comes up with nicknames.

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm good.

0:27:55.320 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 6>Poker hunters, and there is temp. Tim was good? What

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 6>about done with Tim?

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 22>It's hard to say. In other words, it's a lot

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 22>and you can't stutter it through when you call it.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 22>It's really a lousy word to say, but it's quite accurate, right,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 22>Comrade Kamala, it's a little hard to say she's comrade

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 22>because she's obviously a communist. She's horrible, So I call

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 22>her comrade and it's not bad. But when you put

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 22>the names together, it's a little like You've got to be.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 10>Able to pun.

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 6>You're got to be able to put it out there.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in my second favorite Texan of all time,

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the host of Prime Time with Alex Stein on Blaze TV.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Alex Stein Trump is made for these chats. He is

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 3>genuinely funny something he's really not given a great deal

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 3>of credit for you, and he seems authentic. Very different

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 3>to what we saw from Kamala on the call her

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Daddy podcast did last week, or even when she appears

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 3>with Stephen Colbert or Howard Stern. Big difference between the two.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred percent.

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 23>I mean, Donald Trump is probably the best comedian right

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 23>now in America, him or Shane Gillis, and he has

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 23>the delivery of I mean literally of any top comedian.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody can compete with Donald Trump.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 23>And he speaks at those rallies in front of hundreds

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 23>of thousands of people, So I mean, he's literally our

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 23>best orator of my generation, which is kind of crazy

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 23>to think that Donald Trump became the best public speaker

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 23>in the world, but.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 6>I firmly believe that.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 23>And then on top of it all, He's going to

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 23>go on Joe Rogan's podcast, so we're really going to

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 23>get to see his laid back, kind of, you know,

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 23>off the cuff personality.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is huge, And for people who don't understand

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the Joe Rogan phenomenon and the massive, massive reach she

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 3>has and the type of audience he has alex because

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 3>it's not just conservatives or right l people. Joe Rogan

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 3>was a big Bernie Sanders fan for the longest time.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 3>The whole COVID craziness seemed to red peel him a

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 3>little bit. But he's got a very diverse audience, a

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 3>massive audience, and Trump appearing on that program I think

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to be significant.

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 23>One, I think that could be a huge difference in

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 23>this election if you can actually sway some voters because

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 23>Joe Rogan has a libertarian type audience, So it's really

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 23>going to be able to be a huge I mean,

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 23>this could be the momentum that Trump needs. And really,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 23>we're in the ninth inning.

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're in the fourth quarter.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 23>Whatever metaphor you want to say, our analogy, I mean,

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 23>it's the end of the game. So they need to,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 23>you know, throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think this could be big.

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 23>So I'm excited for Donald Trump, you know, considering elections

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 23>basically a month away.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely, It's bigger than any interview on MSNBC or

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 3>CNN or CBSABC. The reach that Rogan has is incredible. Now,

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 3>things aren't going particularly well for Kamala Harris. Not only

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 3>is Saturday Night Live finally mocking her, and some of

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 3>their skits, I've got to say, have been pretty good,

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 3>but even the young kids are having a go.

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Jenny, did you do your tourist today?

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 20>Well, I grew up in a middle class family. My

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 20>mom she was Indian and.

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 24>I grew up in a middle class family, and we

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 24>are proud of our generation and we all have we

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 24>all had small blue towns, and we all grew up

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 24>having small shops.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 6>Jenny, did you finish your school work yet?

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 20>Well, I grew up in the middle class family, and

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 20>we have small businesses. We had small businesses.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 17>It was great, Jenny, I thought, I told you to

0:31:59.040 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 17>take out the dog.

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 20>Well, I grew up in the middle class family and

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 20>we made coll he greens. But they were so popular

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 20>that we made them in the bathtub. Don't you just

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 20>love fried chicken?

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Adorable but also pretty accurate. We've seen that from

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Harris just repeatedly, her absolute failure to answer the most

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 3>straightforward questions and just going into these meandering stories about

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 3>her childhood and her experiences and explaining what inflation is

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 3>to us instead of telling us how she's actually going

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 3>to address the issue.

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 23>Yeah, and she says she lived in a middle class family,

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 23>as she you know, her whole adolescence is basically in Berkeley, California,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 23>or Canada, which is a very nice place. And you

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 23>know that's what's sad about Kamala Harris is that she's

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 23>not genuine whatsoever. She's such a Phony's saying with Tim Walltz,

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 23>like people would like her more if she was genuine,

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.719
<v Speaker 23>but she just tries to pand her to these people.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 23>And she's so inauthentic. Everybody can tell that she's not

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 23>who she pretends to be. And second cheer is a

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 23>Latina accent, the next second cha is a Jamaican accent.

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she's almost like.

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 23>A stand up comedian at this point, doing just impressions

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 23>of different cultures.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but we're laughing at her, not with her. There's

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 3>a difference there. Now, another woman who has been talked

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 3>about as a future presidential candidate, Michigan Governor Gretchen Wittmar,

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>has caused outrage after participating in this weirdness.

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 9>What is that?

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Alex explained it to me, you're in that generation that

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what that is? Is that some gen

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Z craziness? What is it?

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 23>Well, really, what it is it is an attempt at

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 23>just trying to be shocking and bizarre. And that's why

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 23>that gen Z person you know to be I'm not

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 23>trying to defend where but she probably didn't realize how

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 23>weird this video was. And that's what this podcast was

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 23>trying to do. They want it to be almost like

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 23>pseudo sexual and it has all these kind of weird undertones,

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 23>and it's supposed to be ambiguous.

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just supposed to be bizarre and weird and quick.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's what it did.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's why the Catholics. The Catholics are upset because

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 3>they think it's mocking community, their religion and mocking Yeah,

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 3>so I don't know if that's the intention, but the

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 3>whole thing, I mean, why partician, I don't know. I'm

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna don't know why you're giving her a pass because

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 3>she just looks like a fool. I mean, this doesn't

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 3>elevate her standing in any way. She's the governor of

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a state, for the love of God. Now, the Trump

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 3>rallies are continuing across the country. The assassination attempts have

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 3>not slowed him down. This little interaction caught my eye, Alex.

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at the way Donald Trump reacts when

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 3>a baby starts crying during a rally in Nevada.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 22>And don't let that be be bothering because it doesn't

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 22>bother me.

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 10>To me, is that beautiful? Where is that baby?

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 6>That's a good looking baby. Don't worry about it. MoMA

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 6>doesn't bother me, you know what I mean?

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.720
<v Speaker 12>Happy, beautiful, beautiful baby, perfect baby Alex.

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 3>I had to look at some of the comments under

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 3>that video, and it was mainly just women who were

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 3>very impressed that he didn't get annoyed with a crying

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 3>baby during a speech and an interruption. What do you

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 3>reckon about that? Those little insights I think can be

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 3>very valuable in telling you about a person.

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 23>Yeah, one, I mean Donald Trump would be a dream

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 23>grandfather to have, and obviously he likes children.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>He has a bunch of children, so it's.

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 23>Proof that he's the opposite of Kamala Harris, who wants

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 23>to be able to abort every single baby basically up

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 23>until birth. Donald Trump actually loves little babies and wants

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 23>to protect them.

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think the proof is in the pudding.

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Now, the pro biological reality sportswear brand Xxxy Athletics is

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 3>released an ad absolutely blasting Nike over its refusal to

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 3>stand by women and women's sport to protect it from

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the radical gender ideology that sees males identifying as women

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 3>competing against women. Have a look, Dear Nike, you dear

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Nike you.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Why won't you stand up for me? Why won't you

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>stand up for me?

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:53.399
<v Speaker 15>Why will you?

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Why do you claim to support women and girls?

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 21>Oh, I mean you do, most you remain silent today.

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 25>Males are our identity, our sports, our spaces.

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Men and boys are stealing opportunities.

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 25>Metals, trophies, and our future and is not care or jas.

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's often dangerous.

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Yet you refuse to use your platform to stand up.

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 9>You say you're for social justice and progress.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 20>So why do you allow men's rights to come before ours?

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:20.439
<v Speaker 9>See?

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 23>You, with a big.

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 9>Platform comes an even bigger responsibility.

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 3>You have a chance to do the right thing, not

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 3>just do the easy thing, Alex, They're absolutely right. Nike

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 3>has been very active politically. It's taken a stand on

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of political issues, from BLM to Burkers. It

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 3>has used Dylan Mulvaaney to advertise its female clothing range,

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's definitely taken a position on this issue. It

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 3>just hasn't taken a position that supports biological girls and women.

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 23>Well, you know, I hate to say it, Rita, but

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 23>I actually sided with Nike on this here in America

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 23>because I like transgenders and women's sports because I can

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 23>gamble on them and I can win money Like Leah Thomas.

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 23>I mean, I'm basically wealthy.

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 9>Now will we can do?

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 23>They give us odds here in Las Vegas. I've won

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 23>more money on these transgenders and women's sports than any

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 23>of the women that could ever do. So I don't

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 23>want to outlaw it personally, but I can understand why

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 23>those women are affected, and I'm very empathetic to them.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 3>You are thinking of only yourself, but you're right, there

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 3>won't be too many women in women's sport if we

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 3>let the men participate, because there's a reason why we've

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 3>got the different categories. How important is that issue? I said,

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 3>it is one that some in the feminist movement are

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.479
<v Speaker 3>talking about. Obviously it's not up there with inflation or

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 3>illegal immigration crime, But is it something that's been talked

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 3>about and the lead up to the election.

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, it actually is a really big issue.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 23>And the San Jose State but women's volleyball team, there's

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 23>been colleges forfeiting games against them because they have a

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 23>transgender athlete. So it's just encouraging more transgenders to maybe

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 23>transition their sex to get a competitive advantage in sports

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 23>and America is one thing that people actually care about.

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 23>People care more about sports than they do politics. So

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 23>it is a big issue. But the only thing is

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 23>I don't know if it's as big an issue as

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 23>abortion or you know, the economy, but one hundred percent,

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 23>it's an issue that gets talked about a lot, especially.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>In the media.

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Thank you Alex Stein, Thank you Rita. Still to Come,

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 3>a major motion picture, has been slammed as one of

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the worst films ever made. Kinsey's Scofield will tell us

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 3>what to avoid at the Cinema's next Welcome Back. Joining

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 3>me now celebrity and role commentator Kinsey Scofield. Kinsey, Let's

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 3>start with the controversy surrounding the latest edition of Vogue magazine.

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Critics have a criticized as its front cover portrait of

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris. It looks like she has been given quite

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the makeover, a bit of airbrushing there, and to add

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 3>insult to injury, the photo was reportedly taken on October seven,

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the anniversary of Hamas's terrorist attacks on Israel. You think

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 3>she'd have other things on her mind on that crucial date, Kinsey, Yeah, I.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 25>Mean Anna Wintour are remembering the biggest I mean that

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 25>the most slaughtered Jews since the Holocaust. I don't know.

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Kamala.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 25>It is being reported by The New York Post that

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 25>that is what she was doing. She would argue that

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 25>she also planted a tree that day with her husband,

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 25>who slapped his girlfriend and impregnated his the nanny, So

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 25>she would probably justify it by saying, hey, I had

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 25>a full schedule, I also planted a tree. But I

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 25>think it's pretty vile to ensure that you've shot that

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 25>Vogue cover versus, you know, really making an effort to

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 25>listen to the Jewish community who have felt abandoned by

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 25>the Biden administration over the last twelve months.

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and it's not just the conflict in the Middle East,

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 3>which is ongoing, but the increase in anti Semitism, and

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.399
<v Speaker 3>it's amongst the left, it's amongst the people who back her.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.439
<v Speaker 3>So she hasn't even an added responsibility there because we've

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 3>seen it in university campuses, even within her own party.

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 3>The squad has set some shocking things even in the

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 3>last year. Now, Kinsey, let's move on to Warner Brothers

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 3>sequel to its hit twenty nineteen film Joker It has

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 3>garnered some of the worst ratings of any major film

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 3>release this year. The film is a musical and features

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Lady Gaga, and fans are posting their reaction. They're not impressed.

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 26>Guys, me and my WiFi have vie and we're going

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 26>to go watch Joker Too. And the screening before us

0:41:56.120 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 26>everyone's leaving, like, everyone is leaving early. There can't be

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 26>that bad, right, I'll see the reviews are saying is bad,

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 26>but everyone is leaving early. What the fuck is this?

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 26>I'll let you guys know how I rated it.

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>That's garbage.

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 14>You'll see that movie right there, that movie right here,

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.879
<v Speaker 14>see that movie Joker Too.

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Trash.

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 3>I absolute see a.

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.280
<v Speaker 17>Movie, not a Broadway musical.

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 10>It's not what I paid my money for.

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 21>They add nothing, They add absolutely nothing. Ultimately, I found

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 21>the script to be very very thin, and if you

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 21>were to take the musical numbers out of this, I

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.800
<v Speaker 21>really don't think you'd have anything left. My issue with

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 21>Joker Too is that it fundamentally, fundamentally doesn't want and

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 21>doesn't need to exist now.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 3>According to Rotten tomato Is, the film garnered a pitiful

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 3>thirty three percent from the critics and just thirty two

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 3>percent from the audience. And in addition to it's a

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 3>box office opening, earning only sixty percent of what the

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:07.320
<v Speaker 3>original twenty nineteen film took. Kinsey, So what was Warner

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 3>Brothers thinking with this one? Involving Lady Gaga turning it

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:15.760
<v Speaker 3>into a musical, and like we heard there from the critic,

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the actual storyline, the script is almost non existent.

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 25>Yeah, I think Warner Brothers knew that this wasn't it.

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 25>There's a great shot from Good Morning Britain where the

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 25>reporter asks the stars every if this was everything they

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 25>expected in Gaga, Phoenix and Phoenix kind of look at

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 25>each other awkwardly and laugh, and you know. According to

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.959
<v Speaker 25>Punk News, Warner Brothers declined to test screen Joker to

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 25>to audiences at all before the film was complete. So

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 25>to me, that says we don't want it to get out,

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 25>that this is a nightmare.

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 3>But then why release it. It's not a little independent production.

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 3>This is an expensive venture. You would think if you

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 3>could tweak it and make it watchable, you would do

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 3>that if your Warner Brothers. Now, let's talk about the Swifties.

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 3>The ex girlfriend of Taylor Swift's current boyfriend, Travis Kelsey,

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 3>has spoken out about how her fans, the Swifties, are

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:18.760
<v Speaker 3>trolling her online, just leaving disgusting messages. This is despite

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Kayla Nicole and Travis Kelcey stopped dating

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty twenty two, and Kelsey didn't start dating

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Swift until September twenty twenty three. Why would her fans

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 3>be abusing this poor girl?

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 25>Okay, so I told you were first to know. I've

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 25>handed in my Swifty card. I'm no longer a Swifty,

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 25>but I have to say that the Taylor trolling started

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 25>after Kayla liked some mean tweets about Taylor Swift on

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 25>social media the Swifties side. She also unfollowed Patrick Mahomes

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.919
<v Speaker 25>and Brittany Mahomes and was very public about it, saying,

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 25>I unfollowed them because, you know, I was seeing them

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 25>with Taylor Swift and it was upsetting to me. You know,

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 25>it's the striystand effect. If people know they're getting to you,

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.439
<v Speaker 25>they're gonna go harder. So I think that she gave

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 25>too much of herself away by acknowledging I'm hurt by

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 25>Tyler and Taylor.

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Nah Kinzi rapa. Kanye West and his Australian wife Biancas

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 3>and sorry. They were rumored to be on the rocks divorcing,

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 3>but they've just been spotted in Tokyo together seemingly happy.

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.359
<v Speaker 3>What's going on there? Oh my god?

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 25>An insider said that their relationship is definitely rocky and

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 25>described the couple as not divorced yet. And a new

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 25>lawsuit accuses Kanye of drugging and assaulting an ex assistant

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 25>during a PDDY studio session, So there is no shortage

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 25>of drama when it comes to the West family. In

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 25>the same court documents, his ex assistant claims that Kanye

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 25>allegedly told his wife that he wanted to sleep with

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.240
<v Speaker 25>her mom while she watched.

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 3>What That's a different world to ours, kin z them.

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I'll just digest that and we'll discuss it next time.

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Before you go, Prince Harry Meghan Markell have come under

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 3>five for accepting six million dollars in donations from Fidelity

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 3>charitable like group that reportedly also donates to supposedly anti

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 3>LGBT and anti illegal immigration groups. That is certainly at

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 3>odds with the very woke Sussexes, and they're very woke brand.

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Is there going to be a refund sometime in our future?

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 25>Well, I highly doubt that. But this, you know, puts

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 25>a smile on my face because Harry and Meghan's motto

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 25>is show up, do good, and clearly not google who

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 25>you're associated with. This is one of a slew of

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.760
<v Speaker 25>people that Harry and Meghan should have second guest before

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:55.399
<v Speaker 25>getting in bed with, because you are who you associate with.

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 25>And this is a very bad look for the Sussexes.

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Certainly very inconsistent with what they've told us there about

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 3>before you go, just quickly, what's this story about Megan

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Mikael saying she's the most bullied person in the world.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Did she actually say that or was she misquoted?

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 25>Well, her team says that she didn't actually say that,

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 25>but Rita I found an article in twenty twenty where

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.399
<v Speaker 25>she did say that. So she said it before, why

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 25>would she not say it again? I think this is

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 25>just a masterclass in gas lighting, considering the fact that

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.800
<v Speaker 25>she has been accused recently by twelve former and curtent

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 25>employees in the Hollywood Reporter of being a bully.

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Kinsis Gofield. Thank you, that's it from mail. See you

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 3>at eleven tomorrow Up next is Nears Night