Speaker 1: On scorn Lils Oscodia.
Speaker 2: This is the reader Panecky Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the reader Panicky Show. Coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. Why the latest news poll has the Albanizer
Speaker 3: government in panic mode? The lessons from the failed race
Speaker 3: based referendum. I'll speak with Dan Wild about that shortly.
Speaker 3: The latest from the US with Alex Stein and what
Speaker 3: major motion picture is being slammed as one of the
Speaker 3: worst films ever made. I'll discuss that with Kinsey Schofield
Speaker 3: and we never miss Left is losing it tonight. Kamala
Speaker 3: tries a new Jamaican accent.
Speaker 4: Have you know empathy man?
Speaker 3: You know for the suffering? Now, today's news poll shows
Speaker 3: the Coalition leading Labor for the first time since the
Speaker 3: May twenty two election. This is an enormous boost for
Speaker 3: the opposition and in particular Peter Dutton. Is the one
Speaker 3: year anniversary today of The Voice being defeated, and it
Speaker 3: was through the Voice that Peter Dutton showed Australians that
Speaker 3: he is a conviction politician. He can articulate a conservative
Speaker 3: position and is unashamed about pursuing those goals, something many
Speaker 3: so called conservative leaders in the past have failed to
Speaker 3: do and that strength, that contrast with the Prime minister
Speaker 3: is partly why Anthony Alberize's approval rating has also fallen
Speaker 3: to a new low. Now, let's have a look at
Speaker 3: some of the data. The Coalition have a two point
Speaker 3: lead now over the Labor government in the two party
Speaker 3: preferred figures, the two major parties did not actually see
Speaker 3: a change to their primary vote from the last News poll.
Speaker 3: Coalition is still at at thirty eight percent, Labor at
Speaker 3: thirty one, But that change in the two party preferred
Speaker 3: vote for the coalition is due to more preferences flowing
Speaker 3: to them. Newspaul showed that one percent of the Greens
Speaker 3: went down by one percent and one nation went up
Speaker 3: by one percent. Joining me now for more on this
Speaker 3: as Daniel Wild, Deputy executive director at the Institute of
Speaker 3: Public Affairs, Dan, what do you make of these figures?
Speaker 3: If they hold, will the Albert Easy government be a
Speaker 3: one term? Wonder?
Speaker 5: At the moment reader, if these figures hold, it will
Speaker 5: probably be a labor minority government, but of course the
Speaker 5: momentum is shifting against Labor and towards the Coalition. I
Speaker 5: think your assessment is right, which is that Australians are
Speaker 5: rewarding Peter Dutton and the Coalition for sticking to the values,
Speaker 5: particularly on the Voice to Parliament, where Australians did not
Speaker 5: want to be divided by race. We've also seen important
Speaker 5: policy around nuclear power, around big business and other key areas.
Speaker 5: So you know what this shows, reader, is that Australians
Speaker 5: will back leaders who have vision and who stick to
Speaker 5: their principles and who reflect and speak up for the
Speaker 5: values of mainstream Australians. And that is exactly what Peter
Speaker 5: Dutton and the Coalition are doing at the moment.
Speaker 3: Now. Today does mark the one year anniversary of the
Speaker 3: failed Voice referendum, and the Yes advocates are still in denial,
Speaker 3: utter denial about what happened and why they continue to
Speaker 3: blame things like misinformation and disinformation for the defeat of
Speaker 3: the Voice instead of accepting the reality that the overwhelming
Speaker 3: majority of Australians do not want to be separated by race.
Speaker 3: We don't want to have racial privilege enshrined into our
Speaker 3: founding document. Earlier today, there was a heated debate between
Speaker 3: a NO advocate Warren Mundine and YES advocate Eddie sinnot
Speaker 3: deal with the.
Speaker 6: Real issues of crime to deal with the real issues
Speaker 6: of education and deal with the real issues of economic participation.
Speaker 7: There were many, many pieces of misinformation. It was something
Speaker 7: that the No campaign was able to exploit and use
Speaker 7: very well. Warren's problem with the truth and honesty. Just
Speaker 7: continue worrying.
Speaker 6: This is the lie. This is the lie that he
Speaker 6: goes on with. This bloke is a worrying boy.
Speaker 8: Warren, and I got the statistics, I got all the
Speaker 8: information to show you you're often a fantasy world.
Speaker 6: Start focusing on the local people and.
Speaker 7: Stop going on with this stupidity about calling people lit Now.
Speaker 3: Voice architect Megan Davis has also lashed out. She took
Speaker 3: the opportunity to express her support for Labour's draconian Misinformation
Speaker 3: Bill because she says that the No vote was built
Speaker 3: on lies, so called lies that were propagated, and that
Speaker 3: the result could have been different if those misinformation laws
Speaker 3: were in place. Is she right down where the Yes
Speaker 3: camp victims of disinformation?
Speaker 9: Well, it shows that the elites don't get it.
Speaker 1: Reader.
Speaker 5: One year on, they don't understand why Australians voter know,
Speaker 5: which was the simple reason that we do not want
Speaker 5: to be divided by race.
Speaker 9: It was that simple.
Speaker 5: Now, the interesting question is whether those if these proposed
Speaker 5: misinformation laws were.
Speaker 9: In place, would the No campaign have one.
Speaker 5: I don't know, Maybe they wouldn't have because the misinformation
Speaker 5: laws are about censorship. They are about censoring the opinions
Speaker 5: of mainstream Australians. We saw unprecedented censorship throughout the Voice
Speaker 5: debate by tech companies and by government. And what it
Speaker 5: shows is that on referendum night Anthony Abernezi himself he
Speaker 5: blamed misinformation. Well, it's time to put up or shut
Speaker 5: up to those Yes campaigners who are saying the No
Speaker 5: campaign only one.
Speaker 9: Because of lies. What were they?
Speaker 5: What was the misinformation that the No campaign engaged in.
Speaker 5: They don't have any examples, because there are none. Australians
Speaker 5: understood what the Voice was about. They understood it very
Speaker 5: well and they comprehensively rejected it.
Speaker 3: Well, they may say that the suggestion that the Ullery
Speaker 3: statement from the Heart was more than one page would
Speaker 3: be a piece of disinformation, when of course it wasn't
Speaker 3: because it was certainly more than one page, and they
Speaker 3: objected to that fact being shared. And you're so right.
Speaker 3: What's often called disinformation misinformation are just inconvenient facts that
Speaker 3: left don't want to the public to know about. And
Speaker 3: I think really throughout that debate, Dan, the most impactful
Speaker 3: arguments were the arguments from the S camp. When you
Speaker 3: actually broke down the positions these people had what they've
Speaker 3: argued for in the past. When you quoted them word
Speaker 3: for word, which I often did in columns I wrote
Speaker 3: or on this program, that is what really brought the
Speaker 3: message home to Australians that this is something that we
Speaker 3: do not want in our constitution. We do not want
Speaker 3: to have racial division, racial privilege enshrined into our founding document.
Speaker 5: Well, that's right, And if there was misinformation, it was
Speaker 5: by the Yes campaign. I mean remember the Prime Minister
Speaker 5: himself said, oh, this is just a modest proposal.
Speaker 9: It's a modest request. No, it wasn't.
Speaker 5: It was fundamentally changing the entire edifice of our parliamentary
Speaker 5: democracy by permanently enshrining racial division in our nation's founding documented.
Speaker 5: So it's just a tiny little request. It was never
Speaker 5: a grassroots movement. It was a movement designed by and
Speaker 5: for the elite activist class. And that's why Australians voted
Speaker 5: for it. They're not silly. They understood that this was
Speaker 5: not going to create one job, stop one crime from
Speaker 5: being committed, or fix one single problem out in the bush.
Speaker 3: Now, let's have a little trip down memory lane and
Speaker 3: see how the likes of Warren Mundine and Just Enterprise
Speaker 3: were treated by segments of the media.
Speaker 8: We're going to sit here and cop laws from.
Speaker 3: Well, we're not going to sit here. You abusing before
Speaker 3: a National treasure like Marcia Lanton who never said that
Speaker 3: Australians were racist and her.
Speaker 9: Words were twisted. I'm going to stop you.
Speaker 3: Their warrant.
Speaker 6: People make the decisions.
Speaker 3: I think, well, we've just seen who Warren Mundane is.
Speaker 10: That's right.
Speaker 3: Do you have any thing further.
Speaker 11: To add I didn't say that Australians are racist.
Speaker 3: National Treasure Aron, Here is a video that Warren Mundane
Speaker 3: was referring to, and yes it does appear to be
Speaker 3: to show that National Treasure Marsha Langdon did actually say
Speaker 3: that the No campaign was racist while speaking at a
Speaker 3: Regional West Australian forum.
Speaker 11: Every time the No case raises one of their arguments,
Speaker 11: if you start pulling it apart, you get down to
Speaker 11: base racism. I'm sorry to say it, but that's where
Speaker 11: it lands. Or just sheer stupidity.
Speaker 3: And remember these hideous remarks that Noel Pearson made about
Speaker 3: just Center namber Jinpurprice on ABC Radio during a fifteen
Speaker 3: minute winch fest that the ABC allowed to go unchallenged.
Speaker 12: She's caught in a vortex. That reminds me of Pauline
Speaker 12: Hanson twenty six years ago, because paul and Hansen got
Speaker 12: caught in a vortex, and it's a celebrity vortex, a
Speaker 12: celebrity bortex. It's very compelling, that gets her out in
Speaker 12: front of people and that gets a lot of cheers,
Speaker 12: but it's also a redneck celebrity vortex. And their strategy
Speaker 12: was to find a blackfellow to punch down on other blackfellows.
Speaker 3: Dan, there was so much ugliness, so much division. Has
Speaker 3: the country healed from that yet?
Speaker 9: Yeah, we're still bitterly divided, reader.
Speaker 5: The Prime Minister has comprehensively failed to unite us after
Speaker 5: the Voice defeat. We've got the activist class that keep
Speaker 5: on trying to divide us. They understand why Australians voted no.
Speaker 5: My concern, though, reader, is that we won the war,
Speaker 5: but we are at risk of losing the peace because,
Speaker 5: as you know, these activists don't stop just because Australians
Speaker 5: democratically voted no. We've still got treaty processes underway where
Speaker 5: I am in South Australia. They've got a state based
Speaker 5: voice to Parliament even though two thirds of South Australians
Speaker 5: voted no. So at the end of the day, we
Speaker 5: need to make sure that racial division of any kind
Speaker 5: is refuted because it has no place in our country.
Speaker 3: Now let's move on to the state premiers being accused
Speaker 3: of being disrespectful after a number of them, including the
Speaker 3: Victorian and New South Wales premiers, a declined and invitation
Speaker 3: to meet with our Head of State, King Charles the
Speaker 3: Third when he arrives in Australia this week, and no
Speaker 3: state premier will attend a special reception in Canberra later
Speaker 3: in the week which is said to be attended by
Speaker 3: a number of high profile political and community leaders. Premiere
Speaker 3: just Into Alan from Victoria has declined to attend. Instead,
Speaker 3: she's sending a junior labor MP, Nick staykhosts I've never
Speaker 3: ever heard of him in her place. New South Wales
Speaker 3: Premier Chris Mins. He says he's got a cabinet meeting
Speaker 3: so he won't be able to be there. Queensland Premier
Speaker 3: Steven Miles has got an election campaign, has mainium premieres overseas,
Speaker 3: and the South Australian premier has also got a cabinet meeting,
Speaker 3: and Roger Cook from WA has other commitments. Stands so
Speaker 3: not exactly the red carpet treatment for our head of
Speaker 3: state there. Do you think that's fair enough? Do you
Speaker 3: think this is just a deliberate snubbing, or they're too
Speaker 3: busy with other things, or is it actually a principal position.
Speaker 3: If these premiers are Republicans, should they be sticking to
Speaker 3: their guns and saying we're not going to meet with
Speaker 3: the king because we don't even believe in that system.
Speaker 5: I think it's probably deliberate, to be honest, And even
Speaker 5: if they are Republicans, they should still respect the institutions
Speaker 5: of our constitutional democracy which have afforded them the opportunity
Speaker 5: to be in the positions that they are, and they
Speaker 5: should be more respectful to the king, because it's not
Speaker 5: just about the individual who happens to be the king
Speaker 5: at the time, as I say, it's about the institutions
Speaker 5: which flow from that. And we have an incredibly stable democracy,
Speaker 5: a well functioning democracy because in part the monarchy sits
Speaker 5: over that.
Speaker 9: So you know, this is really sort.
Speaker 5: Of university student activism level stuff that I think most
Speaker 5: Australians look at and they think it's pretty petty, to
Speaker 5: be honest, no matter what side you're on, it just
Speaker 5: looks petty.
Speaker 3: Well, he is still the head of state. So even
Speaker 3: if you're a Republican, I guess the argument would be
Speaker 3: until we are a republic, or if we are ever
Speaker 3: become a republic, this is the system that you've elected
Speaker 3: to participate in, and you've got to respect the head
Speaker 3: of state. Dan Wild, thank you for your time this evening. Now,
Speaker 3: education and particularly school choice are big election issues in
Speaker 3: the US. Doesn't receive the coverage it deserves, but it
Speaker 3: is certainly an issue tens of millions of Americans care
Speaker 3: passionately about. On the one side, you have the left,
Speaker 3: the bureaucracy, the unions led by this woman.
Speaker 13: Whether it's wages or a dignified retirement, or education opportunity
Speaker 13: or college without crushing death, or family leave or healthcare
Speaker 13: or housing, any of the things are important every single day.
Speaker 3: We need to fake to.
Speaker 13: Get Kamala Harris and ten Wall selected.
Speaker 3: Are you ready are you ready, Oh dear, that's Randy Winkgarden,
Speaker 3: the president of the American Federation of Teachers. And on
Speaker 3: the other side you have my next guest, who has
Speaker 3: been one of the most effective advocates for school ches,
Speaker 3: Corey DeAngelis. Thanks for your time. Randy there has targeted
Speaker 3: you personally in her speeches. Tell me why you think
Speaker 3: school choice is such an important issue.
Speaker 6: Well, look Brandy's video.
Speaker 2: There is basically free advertising for the school choice movement.
Speaker 6: Every time she opens her mouth.
Speaker 2: That should be counted as an inkind contribution to the
Speaker 2: Republican Party because she's fighting the trapped kids in her
Speaker 2: failing government run, unionized, monopolistic schools. And do you want
Speaker 2: this unhinged lunatic educating your kids.
Speaker 6: This is why we should have school choice.
Speaker 2: Families should be able to choose the school that works
Speaker 2: best for them, that has the best math, reading and
Speaker 2: writing outcomes, and also that in a way that aligns
Speaker 2: with your values. You want a curriculum that is not
Speaker 2: far left socialism. You want the schools to focus on
Speaker 2: the basics on education, not on indoctrination.
Speaker 3: Well, tell me about school choice. It essentially means that
Speaker 3: the parents have the power. The funding is attached to
Speaker 3: the child, so they could put their child in a
Speaker 3: school that may not necessarily be the one they're zoned to,
Speaker 3: but it's, like you said, one that matches their values,
Speaker 3: or has better academic results, a better sports program, whatever
Speaker 3: they're looking for. Where do the Trump and Harris camps
Speaker 3: land on this issue? Is this something that Kamala Harris
Speaker 3: may be willing to compromise on.
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris is a communist who thinks your kids belong
Speaker 2: to the government, whereas Donald Trump understands that parents are
Speaker 2: the primary decision makers for their own kids.
Speaker 6: He believes in school choice.
Speaker 2: He's called for full throated universal school choice. He's on
Speaker 2: the side of parents. Kamala Harris is an enemy of
Speaker 2: parental rights and education. She could have chosen Josh Shapiro.
Speaker 2: He's the governor of Pennsylvania, a must win swing state
Speaker 2: in the US that Democrats need to win in November.
Speaker 6: She didn't choose him.
Speaker 2: Because he supported school choice. She chose Tim Walls, the tyrant,
Speaker 2: who was a former member of Randy Winegartens and American
Speaker 2: Federation of Teachers, and the Democrat Party in the US
Speaker 2: is a wholly owned subsidiary, the teachers Union. So Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris is going to do the bidding of the teachers unions,
Speaker 2: and that means trapping kids in their failing unionized in
Speaker 2: doctrination centers, whereas Donald Trump, he knows families are in
Speaker 2: the best position to make the best decisions for their
Speaker 2: own kids' education.
Speaker 3: And Randy Winegarden, I've got to say, she really did
Speaker 3: disgrace herself during the COVID era her desperation to keep
Speaker 3: schools closed for as long as possible, despite the fact
Speaker 3: that schools were open in much of the world, even
Speaker 3: places where there were lockdowns, and masking the smallest of kids,
Speaker 3: all sorts of measures that were just crazy, but the
Speaker 3: unions backed them strongly. Now, Trump has said that he
Speaker 3: wants federal education dollars to follow the student Tell me
Speaker 3: what that would mean for parents.
Speaker 2: Yeah, in the US, we have the US Department of
Speaker 2: Education at the federal level provides about eight percent of funding.
Speaker 2: It shouldn't exist at all. I mean, it was great
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy nine. Is a payoff from Jimmy Carter
Speaker 2: to the Teachers Union, the National Education Association, and in
Speaker 2: our constitution, the word education does not exist. So the
Speaker 2: entire department is a violation of our tenth Amendment.
Speaker 6: It should be up to the states.
Speaker 2: Each of our states have state level departments of education.
Speaker 6: That's all you really.
Speaker 2: Need, and we also have local school boards as well.
Speaker 2: But Donald Trump fighting for school choice, you can also
Speaker 2: abolish the department. There's a bill while also passing a
Speaker 2: bill in Congress right now called the Educational Choice for
Speaker 2: Children Act. It's a tax credit where people can get
Speaker 2: their federal tax dollars back to be used for KATE
Speaker 2: to twelve education expenses. So it's not actually, you know,
Speaker 2: federal public money following the student. It's people keep getting
Speaker 2: to keep more of their hard earned tax dollars and
Speaker 2: using that for.
Speaker 6: KATE the twelve education expenses.
Speaker 2: And you can also abolish the Department of Education at
Speaker 2: the same time.
Speaker 6: But we also have at the state level.
Speaker 2: There have been twelve states in the past three years
Speaker 2: that have passed universal school choice, having state.
Speaker 6: Dollars follow the child.
Speaker 2: And this is why Randy Weingarten's freaking out on stage
Speaker 2: just because we're winning so much. I'm almost getting tired
Speaker 2: of winning Rita. We've had so much momentum in the
Speaker 2: past three years more than we've had in the preceding
Speaker 2: three decades. Because they fought to keep the schools closed.
Speaker 2: They upset parents who got to see what was happening
Speaker 2: in the classroom and vote.
Speaker 6: Bacham said it best.
Speaker 2: We cannot continue to send our children to Caesar for
Speaker 2: their education and be surprised when they come home. As Romans,
Speaker 2: parents aren't surprised anymore.
Speaker 6: They've woken up. They're never going back to sleep.
Speaker 2: And that could get Donald Trump into the White House
Speaker 2: in November because he's on the side of parents.
Speaker 3: It is, like I said at the start, a huge
Speaker 3: issue for so many voters. Tell me about how much
Speaker 3: more is being spent on education and whether that's increased
Speaker 3: the academic results of the average student, because the spending
Speaker 3: seems to have exploded. You shared some data showing that
Speaker 3: around twenty thousand dollars is spent per student per year.
Speaker 3: That's one hundred and sixty percent more than one hundred
Speaker 3: and sixty percent high in real terms inflation adjusted to
Speaker 3: what was being spent in nineteen seventy. But the results
Speaker 3: are dropping. Where is that money going? Is it all
Speaker 3: going to the bureaucracy Like that graph which I.
Speaker 6: Saw, Yeah, exactly. The government school system has become.
Speaker 2: More of a jobs program for administrators and adults as
Speaker 2: opposed to an education initiative for kids. Since two thousand,
Speaker 2: enrollment for students that only went up by about five percent,
Speaker 2: Administrative staffing increase by about ninety five percent, about fourteen
Speaker 2: times the amount of student increase in places like Chicago,
Speaker 2: where they fought to.
Speaker 6: Keep the schools closed for two years.
Speaker 2: Here in Chicago, they've increased their staffing by twenty percent
Speaker 2: since twenty nineteen, but their student enrollment has decreased by
Speaker 2: ten percent. And what other industry do you lose your
Speaker 2: customers to the tune of about ten percent and then
Speaker 2: you go on a hiring spree. That's because it's a monopoly,
Speaker 2: has no incentive to spend money wisely. But guess what
Speaker 2: when you have school choice, when people can vote with
Speaker 2: their feet take their money elsewhere, well, the providers of
Speaker 2: the service, the district schools start to say, hey, maybe
Speaker 2: we should spend our money wisely, maybe we should listen
Speaker 2: to the pay parents. And then that is a rising
Speaker 2: tide that lifts all boats. Competition improves the outcomes in
Speaker 2: our government schools when parents can take their money elsewhere.
Speaker 6: So this is a win win solution.
Speaker 3: Corey Deangelas, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 3: Thank you still to come your favorite segment, Lefti's Losing It,
Speaker 3: Plus the latest from the US with Alex Stein, including
Speaker 3: a Donald Trump is appealing to jen Z voters. Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for lefties losing it And let's start
Speaker 3: with the many accents of chameleon Kamala. She can go
Speaker 3: from Ivy League to the ghetto.
Speaker 4: So friends, sixty four days, let's just get through the
Speaker 4: next sixty four days.
Speaker 3: She's even pulled out a little Latino heat in recent weeks.
Speaker 3: But I believe this this may be the first time
Speaker 3: she's tried a Jamaican accent.
Speaker 4: Have you no empathy? Man, You're not for the suffering
Speaker 4: of other people? Have you no sense of purpose?
Speaker 3: She's so authentic, so likable and confident. Of course I jest. Now,
Speaker 3: Kamala has a man problem. And it's not just Doug
Speaker 3: knock him out, m Hoff. No, He's not the only
Speaker 3: one causing her headaches. But the fact that so many
Speaker 3: American men, including black men, do not want to vote
Speaker 3: for her. Now, the reasons are numerous. They're real and
Speaker 3: valid reasons, but of course the simplistic take is that
Speaker 3: these men must be sexist. Here is Barack Obama lecturing
Speaker 3: the Brothers as he calls them on why they must
Speaker 3: back Kamala.
Speaker 14: You did not yet see the same kind sort of
Speaker 14: energy and turn.
Speaker 15: Out in all words of.
Speaker 6: Our neighborhood's and communities isms.
Speaker 11: I was run.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 14: I also want to say that that seems to be
Speaker 14: more pronounced with the brothers.
Speaker 3: He then went on to lecture them about why they
Speaker 3: must pick Kamala and why any reluctance must be due
Speaker 3: to what sexist, misogynist monsters they are.
Speaker 14: You just aren't feeling the idea of having a woman
Speaker 14: as president, and you're coming up with other alternatives.
Speaker 6: And other reasons for them.
Speaker 14: And so now you're thinking about sitting out or even
Speaker 14: supporting somebody.
Speaker 6: Who has a history of tech agree to you.
Speaker 14: Because you think that's a side of strength, because that's
Speaker 14: what being a man is, putting women down. That's not exciting.
Speaker 3: Now that little ranch inspired some feedback from members of
Speaker 3: the black community, male and female.
Speaker 16: I want Barack Obama and every Democrat out there to
Speaker 16: know you do not own Black people.
Speaker 1: We are not slaves.
Speaker 16: Our chains are gone. We do not owe you anything,
Speaker 16: and we don't have to give you an account for
Speaker 16: how we choose.
Speaker 17: To vote the Democrats that unleashed Barack Obama into the
Speaker 17: while to shame us black men for not supporting Kamala
Speaker 17: Harris despite the fact that she's yet to unveil any
Speaker 17: policies that represent our interests. But if it was a
Speaker 17: white politician shaming other white man for not voting based
Speaker 17: on identity politics, y'all will call him racist. Why is
Speaker 17: it okay for Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and all these
Speaker 17: other people that supposedly look like me? Why is it
Speaker 17: okay for them to get on TV and shame me
Speaker 17: for not voting for them simply because they look like me.
Speaker 9: That's racist, brother, I don't know how else to put it.
Speaker 9: That is racism.
Speaker 17: I don't have to vote for Kamala because she's quote
Speaker 17: unquote black, just like I shouldn't have voted for Yo,
Speaker 17: because you got up there, you tap dance for the establishment,
Speaker 17: and you ain't do a goddamn for the black people
Speaker 17: that put you in office.
Speaker 18: You brother, you ain't got a last thing for us.
Speaker 18: In the eight years that she was in a White House.
Speaker 18: And you think you gonna pop up doing an election
Speaker 18: year and try to scold black myth and not wanting
Speaker 18: to vote for your candidate.
Speaker 3: Have you lost mine?
Speaker 15: I spent seven years of my life fighting your administration,
Speaker 15: you and Biden, by the way, for my husband's military benefits.
Speaker 15: My daughter died because of Obama care. I don't give
Speaker 15: a about you.
Speaker 19: This message is for President Obama first and foremost. You're
Speaker 19: not gonna tell me what I'm gonna do and what
Speaker 19: I'm not gonna do. Number One, I ain't gonna vote
Speaker 19: for Kamala Harris. I think that she's gonna make a
Speaker 19: bad president. She's a bad vice president. Everything she does,
Speaker 19: she tries to politicize it, and she hasn't shown the
Speaker 19: fact that she wants to put America first ever. So
Speaker 19: I'm not voting for that individual.
Speaker 14: What you thought you was doing, Barack Obama, Boy, you
Speaker 14: didn't stepped out there.
Speaker 6: All you did was black men off.
Speaker 14: Bruh.
Speaker 10: All you did was.
Speaker 20: Black men off.
Speaker 8: Why y'all think the American people's doing Why y'all think
Speaker 8: the Democrat Party.
Speaker 10: Owned black folk? The Democrat Party don't own black folks.
Speaker 21: Brh.
Speaker 6: What you thought you was doing with that. We see
Speaker 6: the play.
Speaker 10: We know we see the play. Kamala Harris is losing.
Speaker 10: She's not gonna win.
Speaker 8: The audacity of you to say to us that we
Speaker 8: are required and we better vote for Kamala Harris and
Speaker 8: that we don't want to see a woman in a
Speaker 8: position of power, You're a liar.
Speaker 3: Let's just say, sample, folks, plenty more where that came from. Now,
Speaker 3: let's check in with the man who Kamala Harris handpicked
Speaker 3: as her running night, Tim Walls. Here, Tim tries to
Speaker 3: reload a gun. This is the man they picked to
Speaker 3: inject masculinity and country vibes into the campaign. They set
Speaker 3: up this contrived hunt to showcase that masculinity and gun prowess.
Speaker 3: It's not working out too well. There. That is just
Speaker 3: appalling stuff. Now, there'll be plenty more left is losing
Speaker 3: at content with my next guest, And it seems Donald
Speaker 3: Trump's youngest son, Baron, has been influencing his father's decision
Speaker 3: to tap into the gens z market by speaking with
Speaker 3: popular influencers, comics, and podcasters, including Andrew Schultz. They sat
Speaker 3: down for a wide ranging chat last week covered some
Speaker 3: big issues, but they also covered some funny stuff too. Here,
Speaker 3: Donald Trump talks about how he comes up with nicknames.
Speaker 2: I'm good.
Speaker 6: Poker hunters, and there is temp. Tim was good? What
Speaker 6: about done with Tim?
Speaker 22: It's hard to say. In other words, it's a lot
Speaker 22: and you can't stutter it through when you call it.
Speaker 22: It's really a lousy word to say, but it's quite accurate, right,
Speaker 22: Comrade Kamala, it's a little hard to say she's comrade
Speaker 22: because she's obviously a communist. She's horrible, So I call
Speaker 22: her comrade and it's not bad. But when you put
Speaker 22: the names together, it's a little like You've got to be.
Speaker 10: Able to pun.
Speaker 6: You're got to be able to put it out there.
Speaker 3: Let's bring in my second favorite Texan of all time,
Speaker 3: the host of Prime Time with Alex Stein on Blaze TV.
Speaker 3: Alex Stein Trump is made for these chats. He is
Speaker 3: genuinely funny something he's really not given a great deal
Speaker 3: of credit for you, and he seems authentic. Very different
Speaker 3: to what we saw from Kamala on the call her
Speaker 3: Daddy podcast did last week, or even when she appears
Speaker 3: with Stephen Colbert or Howard Stern. Big difference between the two.
Speaker 1: Yeah, one hundred percent.
Speaker 23: I mean, Donald Trump is probably the best comedian right
Speaker 23: now in America, him or Shane Gillis, and he has
Speaker 23: the delivery of I mean literally of any top comedian.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody can compete with Donald Trump.
Speaker 23: And he speaks at those rallies in front of hundreds
Speaker 23: of thousands of people, So I mean, he's literally our
Speaker 23: best orator of my generation, which is kind of crazy
Speaker 23: to think that Donald Trump became the best public speaker
Speaker 23: in the world, but.
Speaker 6: I firmly believe that.
Speaker 23: And then on top of it all, He's going to
Speaker 23: go on Joe Rogan's podcast, so we're really going to
Speaker 23: get to see his laid back, kind of, you know,
Speaker 23: off the cuff personality.
Speaker 3: Well, this is huge, And for people who don't understand
Speaker 3: the Joe Rogan phenomenon and the massive, massive reach she
Speaker 3: has and the type of audience he has alex because
Speaker 3: it's not just conservatives or right l people. Joe Rogan
Speaker 3: was a big Bernie Sanders fan for the longest time.
Speaker 3: The whole COVID craziness seemed to red peel him a
Speaker 3: little bit. But he's got a very diverse audience, a
Speaker 3: massive audience, and Trump appearing on that program I think
Speaker 3: is going to be significant.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 23: One, I think that could be a huge difference in
Speaker 23: this election if you can actually sway some voters because
Speaker 23: Joe Rogan has a libertarian type audience, So it's really
Speaker 23: going to be able to be a huge I mean,
Speaker 23: this could be the momentum that Trump needs. And really,
Speaker 23: we're in the ninth inning.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're in the fourth quarter.
Speaker 23: Whatever metaphor you want to say, our analogy, I mean,
Speaker 23: it's the end of the game. So they need to,
Speaker 23: you know, throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.
Speaker 1: And I think this could be big.
Speaker 23: So I'm excited for Donald Trump, you know, considering elections
Speaker 23: basically a month away.
Speaker 3: Oh absolutely, It's bigger than any interview on MSNBC or
Speaker 3: CNN or CBSABC. The reach that Rogan has is incredible. Now,
Speaker 3: things aren't going particularly well for Kamala Harris. Not only
Speaker 3: is Saturday Night Live finally mocking her, and some of
Speaker 3: their skits, I've got to say, have been pretty good,
Speaker 3: but even the young kids are having a go.
Speaker 6: Hey, Jenny, did you do your tourist today?
Speaker 20: Well, I grew up in a middle class family. My
Speaker 20: mom she was Indian and.
Speaker 24: I grew up in a middle class family, and we
Speaker 24: are proud of our generation and we all have we
Speaker 24: all had small blue towns, and we all grew up
Speaker 24: having small shops.
Speaker 6: Jenny, did you finish your school work yet?
Speaker 20: Well, I grew up in the middle class family, and
Speaker 20: we have small businesses. We had small businesses.
Speaker 17: It was great, Jenny, I thought, I told you to
Speaker 17: take out the dog.
Speaker 20: Well, I grew up in the middle class family and
Speaker 20: we made coll he greens. But they were so popular
Speaker 20: that we made them in the bathtub. Don't you just
Speaker 20: love fried chicken?
Speaker 3: Oh? Adorable but also pretty accurate. We've seen that from
Speaker 3: Harris just repeatedly, her absolute failure to answer the most
Speaker 3: straightforward questions and just going into these meandering stories about
Speaker 3: her childhood and her experiences and explaining what inflation is
Speaker 3: to us instead of telling us how she's actually going
Speaker 3: to address the issue.
Speaker 23: Yeah, and she says she lived in a middle class family,
Speaker 23: as she you know, her whole adolescence is basically in Berkeley, California,
Speaker 23: or Canada, which is a very nice place. And you
Speaker 23: know that's what's sad about Kamala Harris is that she's
Speaker 23: not genuine whatsoever. She's such a Phony's saying with Tim Walltz,
Speaker 23: like people would like her more if she was genuine,
Speaker 23: but she just tries to pand her to these people.
Speaker 23: And she's so inauthentic. Everybody can tell that she's not
Speaker 23: who she pretends to be. And second cheer is a
Speaker 23: Latina accent, the next second cha is a Jamaican accent.
Speaker 1: I mean, she's almost like.
Speaker 23: A stand up comedian at this point, doing just impressions
Speaker 23: of different cultures.
Speaker 3: Yes, but we're laughing at her, not with her. There's
Speaker 3: a difference there. Now, another woman who has been talked
Speaker 3: about as a future presidential candidate, Michigan Governor Gretchen Wittmar,
Speaker 3: has caused outrage after participating in this weirdness.
Speaker 9: What is that?
Speaker 3: Alex explained it to me, you're in that generation that
Speaker 3: I don't know what that is? Is that some gen
Speaker 3: Z craziness? What is it?
Speaker 23: Well, really, what it is it is an attempt at
Speaker 23: just trying to be shocking and bizarre. And that's why
Speaker 23: that gen Z person you know to be I'm not
Speaker 23: trying to defend where but she probably didn't realize how
Speaker 23: weird this video was. And that's what this podcast was
Speaker 23: trying to do. They want it to be almost like
Speaker 23: pseudo sexual and it has all these kind of weird undertones,
Speaker 23: and it's supposed to be ambiguous.
Speaker 1: It's just supposed to be bizarre and weird and quick.
Speaker 1: And that's what it did.
Speaker 3: And that's why the Catholics. The Catholics are upset because
Speaker 3: they think it's mocking community, their religion and mocking Yeah,
Speaker 3: so I don't know if that's the intention, but the
Speaker 3: whole thing, I mean, why partician, I don't know. I'm
Speaker 3: gonna don't know why you're giving her a pass because
Speaker 3: she just looks like a fool. I mean, this doesn't
Speaker 3: elevate her standing in any way. She's the governor of
Speaker 3: a state, for the love of God. Now, the Trump
Speaker 3: rallies are continuing across the country. The assassination attempts have
Speaker 3: not slowed him down. This little interaction caught my eye, Alex.
Speaker 3: Have a look at the way Donald Trump reacts when
Speaker 3: a baby starts crying during a rally in Nevada.
Speaker 22: And don't let that be be bothering because it doesn't
Speaker 22: bother me.
Speaker 10: To me, is that beautiful? Where is that baby?
Speaker 6: That's a good looking baby. Don't worry about it. MoMA
Speaker 6: doesn't bother me, you know what I mean?
Speaker 12: Happy, beautiful, beautiful baby, perfect baby Alex.
Speaker 3: I had to look at some of the comments under
Speaker 3: that video, and it was mainly just women who were
Speaker 3: very impressed that he didn't get annoyed with a crying
Speaker 3: baby during a speech and an interruption. What do you
Speaker 3: reckon about that? Those little insights I think can be
Speaker 3: very valuable in telling you about a person.
Speaker 23: Yeah, one, I mean Donald Trump would be a dream
Speaker 23: grandfather to have, and obviously he likes children.
Speaker 1: He has a bunch of children, so it's.
Speaker 23: Proof that he's the opposite of Kamala Harris, who wants
Speaker 23: to be able to abort every single baby basically up
Speaker 23: until birth. Donald Trump actually loves little babies and wants
Speaker 23: to protect them.
Speaker 1: So I think the proof is in the pudding.
Speaker 3: Now, the pro biological reality sportswear brand Xxxy Athletics is
Speaker 3: released an ad absolutely blasting Nike over its refusal to
Speaker 3: stand by women and women's sport to protect it from
Speaker 3: the radical gender ideology that sees males identifying as women
Speaker 3: competing against women. Have a look, Dear Nike, you dear
Speaker 3: Nike you.
Speaker 1: Why won't you stand up for me? Why won't you
Speaker 1: stand up for me?
Speaker 15: Why will you?
Speaker 3: Why do you claim to support women and girls?
Speaker 9: Yeah?
Speaker 21: Oh, I mean you do, most you remain silent today.
Speaker 25: Males are our identity, our sports, our spaces.
Speaker 3: Men and boys are stealing opportunities.
Speaker 25: Metals, trophies, and our future and is not care or jas.
Speaker 1: In fact, it's often dangerous.
Speaker 3: Yet you refuse to use your platform to stand up.
Speaker 9: You say you're for social justice and progress.
Speaker 20: So why do you allow men's rights to come before ours?
Speaker 9: See?
Speaker 23: You, with a big.
Speaker 9: Platform comes an even bigger responsibility.
Speaker 3: You have a chance to do the right thing, not
Speaker 3: just do the easy thing, Alex, They're absolutely right. Nike
Speaker 3: has been very active politically. It's taken a stand on
Speaker 3: a bunch of political issues, from BLM to Burkers. It
Speaker 3: has used Dylan Mulvaaney to advertise its female clothing range,
Speaker 3: So it's definitely taken a position on this issue. It
Speaker 3: just hasn't taken a position that supports biological girls and women.
Speaker 23: Well, you know, I hate to say it, Rita, but
Speaker 23: I actually sided with Nike on this here in America
Speaker 23: because I like transgenders and women's sports because I can
Speaker 23: gamble on them and I can win money Like Leah Thomas.
Speaker 23: I mean, I'm basically wealthy.
Speaker 9: Now will we can do?
Speaker 23: They give us odds here in Las Vegas. I've won
Speaker 23: more money on these transgenders and women's sports than any
Speaker 23: of the women that could ever do. So I don't
Speaker 23: want to outlaw it personally, but I can understand why
Speaker 23: those women are affected, and I'm very empathetic to them.
Speaker 3: You are thinking of only yourself, but you're right, there
Speaker 3: won't be too many women in women's sport if we
Speaker 3: let the men participate, because there's a reason why we've
Speaker 3: got the different categories. How important is that issue? I said,
Speaker 3: it is one that some in the feminist movement are
Speaker 3: talking about. Obviously it's not up there with inflation or
Speaker 3: illegal immigration crime, But is it something that's been talked
Speaker 3: about and the lead up to the election.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I know, it actually is a really big issue.
Speaker 23: And the San Jose State but women's volleyball team, there's
Speaker 23: been colleges forfeiting games against them because they have a
Speaker 23: transgender athlete. So it's just encouraging more transgenders to maybe
Speaker 23: transition their sex to get a competitive advantage in sports
Speaker 23: and America is one thing that people actually care about.
Speaker 23: People care more about sports than they do politics. So
Speaker 23: it is a big issue. But the only thing is
Speaker 23: I don't know if it's as big an issue as
Speaker 23: abortion or you know, the economy, but one hundred percent,
Speaker 23: it's an issue that gets talked about a lot, especially.
Speaker 1: In the media.
Speaker 3: Thank you Alex Stein, Thank you Rita. Still to Come,
Speaker 3: a major motion picture, has been slammed as one of
Speaker 3: the worst films ever made. Kinsey's Scofield will tell us
Speaker 3: what to avoid at the Cinema's next Welcome Back. Joining
Speaker 3: me now celebrity and role commentator Kinsey Scofield. Kinsey, Let's
Speaker 3: start with the controversy surrounding the latest edition of Vogue magazine.
Speaker 3: Critics have a criticized as its front cover portrait of
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris. It looks like she has been given quite
Speaker 3: the makeover, a bit of airbrushing there, and to add
Speaker 3: insult to injury, the photo was reportedly taken on October seven,
Speaker 3: the anniversary of Hamas's terrorist attacks on Israel. You think
Speaker 3: she'd have other things on her mind on that crucial date, Kinsey, Yeah, I.
Speaker 25: Mean Anna Wintour are remembering the biggest I mean that
Speaker 25: the most slaughtered Jews since the Holocaust. I don't know.
Speaker 3: I don't know, Kamala.
Speaker 25: It is being reported by The New York Post that
Speaker 25: that is what she was doing. She would argue that
Speaker 25: she also planted a tree that day with her husband,
Speaker 25: who slapped his girlfriend and impregnated his the nanny, So
Speaker 25: she would probably justify it by saying, hey, I had
Speaker 25: a full schedule, I also planted a tree. But I
Speaker 25: think it's pretty vile to ensure that you've shot that
Speaker 25: Vogue cover versus, you know, really making an effort to
Speaker 25: listen to the Jewish community who have felt abandoned by
Speaker 25: the Biden administration over the last twelve months.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, and it's not just the conflict in the Middle East,
Speaker 3: which is ongoing, but the increase in anti Semitism, and
Speaker 3: it's amongst the left, it's amongst the people who back her.
Speaker 3: So she hasn't even an added responsibility there because we've
Speaker 3: seen it in university campuses, even within her own party.
Speaker 3: The squad has set some shocking things even in the
Speaker 3: last year. Now, Kinsey, let's move on to Warner Brothers
Speaker 3: sequel to its hit twenty nineteen film Joker It has
Speaker 3: garnered some of the worst ratings of any major film
Speaker 3: release this year. The film is a musical and features
Speaker 3: Lady Gaga, and fans are posting their reaction. They're not impressed.
Speaker 26: Guys, me and my WiFi have vie and we're going
Speaker 26: to go watch Joker Too. And the screening before us
Speaker 26: everyone's leaving, like, everyone is leaving early. There can't be
Speaker 26: that bad, right, I'll see the reviews are saying is bad,
Speaker 26: but everyone is leaving early. What the fuck is this?
Speaker 26: I'll let you guys know how I rated it.
Speaker 1: That's garbage.
Speaker 14: You'll see that movie right there, that movie right here,
Speaker 14: see that movie Joker Too.
Speaker 1: Trash.
Speaker 3: I absolute see a.
Speaker 17: Movie, not a Broadway musical.
Speaker 10: It's not what I paid my money for.
Speaker 21: They add nothing, They add absolutely nothing. Ultimately, I found
Speaker 21: the script to be very very thin, and if you
Speaker 21: were to take the musical numbers out of this, I
Speaker 21: really don't think you'd have anything left. My issue with
Speaker 21: Joker Too is that it fundamentally, fundamentally doesn't want and
Speaker 21: doesn't need to exist now.
Speaker 3: According to Rotten tomato Is, the film garnered a pitiful
Speaker 3: thirty three percent from the critics and just thirty two
Speaker 3: percent from the audience. And in addition to it's a
Speaker 3: box office opening, earning only sixty percent of what the
Speaker 3: original twenty nineteen film took. Kinsey, So what was Warner
Speaker 3: Brothers thinking with this one? Involving Lady Gaga turning it
Speaker 3: into a musical, and like we heard there from the critic,
Speaker 3: the actual storyline, the script is almost non existent.
Speaker 25: Yeah, I think Warner Brothers knew that this wasn't it.
Speaker 25: There's a great shot from Good Morning Britain where the
Speaker 25: reporter asks the stars every if this was everything they
Speaker 25: expected in Gaga, Phoenix and Phoenix kind of look at
Speaker 25: each other awkwardly and laugh, and you know. According to
Speaker 25: Punk News, Warner Brothers declined to test screen Joker to
Speaker 25: to audiences at all before the film was complete. So
Speaker 25: to me, that says we don't want it to get out,
Speaker 25: that this is a nightmare.
Speaker 3: But then why release it. It's not a little independent production.
Speaker 3: This is an expensive venture. You would think if you
Speaker 3: could tweak it and make it watchable, you would do
Speaker 3: that if your Warner Brothers. Now, let's talk about the Swifties.
Speaker 3: The ex girlfriend of Taylor Swift's current boyfriend, Travis Kelsey,
Speaker 3: has spoken out about how her fans, the Swifties, are
Speaker 3: trolling her online, just leaving disgusting messages. This is despite
Speaker 3: the fact that Kayla Nicole and Travis Kelcey stopped dating
Speaker 3: back in twenty twenty two, and Kelsey didn't start dating
Speaker 3: Swift until September twenty twenty three. Why would her fans
Speaker 3: be abusing this poor girl?
Speaker 25: Okay, so I told you were first to know. I've
Speaker 25: handed in my Swifty card. I'm no longer a Swifty,
Speaker 25: but I have to say that the Taylor trolling started
Speaker 25: after Kayla liked some mean tweets about Taylor Swift on
Speaker 25: social media the Swifties side. She also unfollowed Patrick Mahomes
Speaker 25: and Brittany Mahomes and was very public about it, saying,
Speaker 25: I unfollowed them because, you know, I was seeing them
Speaker 25: with Taylor Swift and it was upsetting to me. You know,
Speaker 25: it's the striystand effect. If people know they're getting to you,
Speaker 25: they're gonna go harder. So I think that she gave
Speaker 25: too much of herself away by acknowledging I'm hurt by
Speaker 25: Tyler and Taylor.
Speaker 3: Nah Kinzi rapa. Kanye West and his Australian wife Biancas
Speaker 3: and sorry. They were rumored to be on the rocks divorcing,
Speaker 3: but they've just been spotted in Tokyo together seemingly happy.
Speaker 3: What's going on there? Oh my god?
Speaker 25: An insider said that their relationship is definitely rocky and
Speaker 25: described the couple as not divorced yet. And a new
Speaker 25: lawsuit accuses Kanye of drugging and assaulting an ex assistant
Speaker 25: during a PDDY studio session, So there is no shortage
Speaker 25: of drama when it comes to the West family. In
Speaker 25: the same court documents, his ex assistant claims that Kanye
Speaker 25: allegedly told his wife that he wanted to sleep with
Speaker 25: her mom while she watched.
Speaker 3: What That's a different world to ours, kin z them.
Speaker 3: I'll just digest that and we'll discuss it next time.
Speaker 3: Before you go, Prince Harry Meghan Markell have come under
Speaker 3: five for accepting six million dollars in donations from Fidelity
Speaker 3: charitable like group that reportedly also donates to supposedly anti
Speaker 3: LGBT and anti illegal immigration groups. That is certainly at
Speaker 3: odds with the very woke Sussexes, and they're very woke brand.
Speaker 3: Is there going to be a refund sometime in our future?
Speaker 25: Well, I highly doubt that. But this, you know, puts
Speaker 25: a smile on my face because Harry and Meghan's motto
Speaker 25: is show up, do good, and clearly not google who
Speaker 25: you're associated with. This is one of a slew of
Speaker 25: people that Harry and Meghan should have second guest before
Speaker 25: getting in bed with, because you are who you associate with.
Speaker 25: And this is a very bad look for the Sussexes.
Speaker 3: Certainly very inconsistent with what they've told us there about
Speaker 3: before you go, just quickly, what's this story about Megan
Speaker 3: Mikael saying she's the most bullied person in the world.
Speaker 3: Did she actually say that or was she misquoted?
Speaker 25: Well, her team says that she didn't actually say that,
Speaker 25: but Rita I found an article in twenty twenty where
Speaker 25: she did say that. So she said it before, why
Speaker 25: would she not say it again? I think this is
Speaker 25: just a masterclass in gas lighting, considering the fact that
Speaker 25: she has been accused recently by twelve former and curtent
Speaker 25: employees in the Hollywood Reporter of being a bully.
Speaker 3: Kinsis Gofield. Thank you, that's it from mail. See you
Speaker 3: at eleven tomorrow Up next is Nears Night