WEBVTT - This castle is tax deductible

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike, how large was the castle at your high school

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>growing up?

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm afraid I'm at State school boy. There was no castle,

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>you know. I spent a certain amount of time in

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 2>the demountable classrooms. This was in Brisbane in summer, no

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>air con roasting, so nothing like the sort of facilities

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen at Scott's College.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 3>From Swarts Media, I'm Daniel James. This is seven.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Am, Mike's second is the national correspondent for the Saturday

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Paper and a proud State schoolboy. I asked him in

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>an observed question because we're in an observed situation all

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of our own making the divide between Australia's richest schools

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and our poorest keep getting worse. Mike has looked into

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the void and what he found was a system where

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>rich parents are able to leverage huge tax breaks through

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>charitable donations to their child's school, all in order to

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>build facilities of feudal king would be happy with. It's

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a practice that goes way back, and many argue is

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>outdated today calls and overhaul of the charitable giving system

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that delivers some kids' castles.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>It's Friday, April eight eight. This episode was originally published

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>in July last year.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike, you've been looking into a big redevelopment plan for

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Scotts College, a particularly wealthy private school in Sydney's Bellevue Hill.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell me about it?

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, it's been quite a saga. Back in

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen in this elite boys school in Sydney announced

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that it was going to have a new library. And

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>they had a perfectly serviceable, functional library, but they decided

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>it needed to be upgraded for quote contemporary teaching unquote.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 4>So Scott's Review Hill has just spent almost eighty million

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 4>dollars on knocking down their library and building a Scottish

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 4>baronial castle.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>The design they went with was made to look like

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 2>a Scottish castle, you know, with turrets and battlements and

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>all the rest of it. And it was supposed to

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>be opened in twenty twenty one.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 5>It is as gaudy and tacky as those gold open

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 5>necked Gucci shirts that people wear with the gold chains

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 5>and everything.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 4>Honestly, talk about ostentatious.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Things didn't quite go to plan, and so all these

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 2>years later, the library is still under construction due to

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>various delays, and apparently it was quite difficult for them

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to acquire sandstone and slate from Scotland.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 5>Now it's cost the school three times what they thought

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 5>it originally would. So whoever the project managery should be

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 5>clearly highly embarrassed at the incompetency going.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to build a Scottish arsele mate, you've

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>got to have Scottish slate, right, eighty.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Million dollars for a library that is extraordinary by any standard,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>but particularly Australian standards in twenty twenty four, how did

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Scott's fund this?

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually it's not that extraordinary, I hate to say,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 2>but you know there's a bunch of stories of opulent

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>facilities at elite private schools. You know, these stories are legiant,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 2>wealthy parents and alumni kick in money to build these

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 2>new facilities. Fewer perhaps as conspicuously kitchy as the library

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>at Scots, but you know there's any number of indoor

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 2>swimming pools and you know all sorts of sporting facilities

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 2>and other stuff that they have that are funded through

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 2>these tax deductible building funds. So you know, I guess

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 2>mocking Scots for you know, building this outlandish Scottish castle

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 2>for their boys. Seems like pretty easy sport, but really

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not funny. When you decide to donate to a

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 2>private school, you're a wealthy parent or grandparent, or old

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 2>boy or old girl, you get a tax break for it.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>You can claim up to forty seven cents in the

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>dollar because kicking into private school building funds is considered

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>to be a charitable action, and so it attracts what

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>they call deductible gift recipient status DGR status. So as

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>things stand now, donors to non government schools who are

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>overwhelmingly wealthy parents are benefiting to the tune of some

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred million dollars per year at the expense of

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>government revenue, which ultimately means other taxpayers, most of whom

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 2>could never afford to send their children to elite private schools.

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>We've seen public schools around the country that don't have

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>air conditioning, that don't have grass, they have demountable classrooms.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I definitely don't have castles, that's for sure. The inequity

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>is pretty stark. So how is the labor government justifying

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>having such inequity between students, especially when they pride themselves

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on being the party of the fair.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 2>Go It's a very good question, and you're entirely right.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 2>The contrast between the elite private schools and state schools

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 2>is ex straordinary, you know, very stark. The Australian Education Union,

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>which represents public school and early childhood and Tafe teachers

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and staff, pointed out in a recent report that you know,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>while Scott's is building its Scottish Baronial library, elsewhere in

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales, state students so taking lessons in demountable classrooms.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>So that's one indicator. Another thing that the AEU did

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in its study, it looked at capital works expenditure in

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Australian schools and reported that in twenty twenty one, the

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>amount spent by just five elite private schools for the

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>benefit of their two hundred and ninety four students was

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>greater than the total spent by three three hundred and

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>seventy two public schools who were trying to educate almost

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.239
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred and fifty thousand kids. So eighty two times

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>as much per student on capital works was the way

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 2>it worked out. The inequity is outrageous. And now the

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Productivity Commission, in a major report to government on how

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 2>to reform the entire charitable philanthropic sector has recommended that

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the tax break for private school building funds should be scrapped.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 3>So will the government act that's after the break mark.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The inequity between government and elite private schools has become

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>increasingly entrenched. It's easy to see when you compair a

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Scottish castle to a demandable. So how do we get here?

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Let me take you back in history, because the Productivity

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Commission did quite a good job of that in its report.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>The decision to allow a tax deduction for donating to

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>building funds for non government schools was taken seventy years ago,

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 2>back in nineteen fifty four. And back then, of course

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>such schools were fewer in number, they were far less

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 2>well funded, and of course, back in those days, education

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>was solely the response disability of the states. So the

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>decision happened at a time also when there was considerable

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>sectarian divide in the country. There was opposition to government

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>funding for non government schools, and there was even uncertainly

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>about whether the federal government should be involved at all

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>in education. The federal government did get involved, and a

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>decade later the Commonwealth began providing capital funding for non

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 2>government as well as government schools, So that was back

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>in the mid sixties. But here's the thing, the tax

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 2>break advantage of private schools continued. In nineteen seventy, the

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Commonwealth began giving recurrent funding to non government schools, four

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.239
<v Speaker 2>years i might add before it started providing recurrent funding

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>to state schools, and still the non government schools kept

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>getting a tax deduction for building funds. So we're in

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>this situation where Australia has two levels of government funding schools.

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 2>To a different degree, we have ninety percent of state

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and territory funding for education goes to government schools, and

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 2>more than sixty percent of the corresponding federal funding goes

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to non government store We're talking big bucks here. This year,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>recurrent funding from the federal government for schools totaled something

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>like twenty nine billion dollars, and only about a third

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of that, that's eleven point three billion, goes to government schools,

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>notwithstanding the fact that they educate almost two thirds of students.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Catholic schools get about ten billion, and other non government schools,

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>which is where, of course, the really elite schools tend

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>to be concentrated. They got just over eight billion dollars

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and Of course, despite all this, the tax deduction for

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>contributing to private school building funds continues, despite the fact

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that the circumstances that pertain seventy years ago no longer apply.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Have there been calls to change this arrangement.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes they have for a long time, from education

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 2>unions from others. It was raised by some of the

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 2>feeder reports at the Gonski Report a decade and more ago.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 2>But just last week we found out that the Productivity

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Commission has recommended it too. Now, this is a major

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 2>new report from the Productivity Commission. It went to a

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 2>whole charitable sector, but it specifically recommended that thousands of

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 2>charitable funds that benefit private schools there's something like five

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>thousand of them and their wealthy donus should be stripped

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 2>of their tax deductible status. It found that the building

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>funds that are set up by the non government schools

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to pay for capital works do not meet the appropriate

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 2>criteria for charitable activity and they should not be accorded

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 2>what they call deductible Gift Recipient or DGR status. The

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Productivity Commission set out in some detail the criteria that

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 2>should apply to be registered for DGR status and they

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>found essentially that the private schools didn't meet any of them.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>It's as simple as that, to give one example of

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the criteria, no private benefit should attached to

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 2>charitable giving. But in the case of private schools, what

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>happens is if you give to these building funds, you

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>get a tax deduction for it. If you pay school fees,

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 2>you don't get a tax deduction. So what the Productivity

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 2>Commission found was that there was a trade off going

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 2>on whereby people were kicking into building funds which the

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 2>kids great facilities, but also meant that they could reduce

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the fees they charged for access to those facilities.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing the tax system used to thinly veil middle

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to upper class welfare in this country. How does the

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>private school's experience compare with other charities.

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's another interesting aspect of this report from the

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Productivity Commission. They found that other more needy and more

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>worthy in their view, charitable endeavors miss out under the

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 2>existing DGR regime. There is something like sixty thousand charities

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, but only about forty percent of those have

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 2>tax deductible status. And the report explicitly says and I'll

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>quote it again. The DGR system creates inefficient, inconsistent and

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 2>unfair outcomes for donors, charities and the community.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 3>So whack.

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, you could hardly get a more swinging indictment

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 2>of the current regime. And of course they chose the

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>private schools as the exemplar of all that was wrong.

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>So the nation's five thousand odds school building funds just

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 2>serve as a case study of the randomness and the

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>incoherence of the current system.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 3>So has the government respondent? What are they going to

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 3>do with anything? Well?

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I called the Assistant Minister for Competition, Charities and Treasury,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Lee, and asked him about this last week and

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>he said the government was quote open to considering all

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the reports recommendations, bar one, and that one recommendation that

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>they have said they won't pursue is the recommendation around

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 2>private school building funds. He said, to quote him, that

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 2>was in the interim report. We consulted widely on it

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 2>and we have opted not to pursue that.

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Consulted widely is one way of putting it. What does

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>it say that the government won't even consider changes to this?

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>To be frank, the private school lobby in Australia is

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a bit like the gun lobby in the United States.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>It's hugely politically powerful. It is protected by rich, well

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 2>connected parents who are very keen to protect the privilege

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>of their kids. Furthermore, our politicians come to disproportionately from

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>non government school backgrounds, and overwhelmingly both sides of politics

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>send their own children to non government schools. Despite all this,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 2>all the research shows that private schools actually serve to

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>make Australia not only are less equal, but a less

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>well educated society overall. If you look at the international

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>comparisons of educational attainment, Australia has one of the largest

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 2>gaps in the world between our top achievers who are

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>globally competitive, and the educationally underprivileged who are falling way

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>behind and falling further behind over time. And those tend

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to go to state schools in low SS areas, So

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that's an indictment. I worry also that they also make

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 2>this country less socially cohesive, because you know, rich kids

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 2>are cloistered, poor kids are ghettoized, and I fear we're

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>in a vicious cycle whereby middle class parents feel compelled

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>to pay for private schools, simply because state schools are

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>so poorly resourced, and yet we see wealthy parents getting

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 2>a tax break for building opulent facilities. I'm with the

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Productivity Commission. I think it's outrageous and it should be scrapped. Indeed,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 2>if we're up to me, I would do as they

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 2>do in some other countries and say, well, you're welcome

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to have a private school, but if you charge fees,

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you don't get government money. If you don't charge fees,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 2>you get the same resourcing as state schools. So level

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the playing.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Field, Mike, thank you for your time, great pleasure. Also

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in the news, the company behind the Bertuda Advocate has

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>been running a podcast strategy for Prime Minister Anthony Alberinsi.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The ABC is revealed. While a spokesperson of Labor said

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they have not paid content creators, they did confirm they'd

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>ask them a teena media to provide advice on what

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast the Prime Minister should go on. Podcast appearances been

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a key part of Anthony Alberanesi's re election campaign in

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>a bid to appeal to younger voters, and the detection

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of two chemical compounds on a giant planet one hundred

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and twenty four light years from Earth, are the strongest

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>evidence to date of life beyond our Solar system. According

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to scientists, observations of a planet known as K two

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen B appear to show chemicals that on Earth are

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>only known to be reduced by life. The compounds were

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>detected using the James Webs based telescope, with a scientist

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the discovery saying they now must question whether

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the signal is real and what it means if it is.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm Daniel James. This is seven am. Enjoy your Easter break.