1
00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:06,640
Speaker 1: From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey.

2
00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:13,600
Speaker 1: It's Wednesday, June eighteen, twenty twenty five. The sprawling Middle

3
00:00:13,600 --> 00:00:17,160
Speaker 1: East crisis hits a new gear today after Donald Trump

4
00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:20,520
Speaker 1: left the G seven meeting early and missed his meeting

5
00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:24,480
Speaker 1: with Anthony Albanezi to focus on the Iran Israel war.

6
00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:27,760
Speaker 1: This story's moving fast and you can read the latest

7
00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:31,680
Speaker 1: from our correspondents on the ground, Jonnie Bashan and Leam Mendez,

8
00:00:31,960 --> 00:00:35,560
Speaker 1: plus all the world's best reporting and analysis right now

9
00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:41,720
Speaker 1: at The Australian dot Com dot you. The Crown doesn't

10
00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:44,720
Speaker 1: have a motive for Aaron Patterson's alleged murder of her

11
00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:48,960
Speaker 1: family members, but the prosecutors say they have proved Aaron

12
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:52,800
Speaker 1: Patterson deliberately poisoned them. The defense says that lack of

13
00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:57,200
Speaker 1: an alleged motive means she's not guilty. Today the closing

14
00:00:57,280 --> 00:01:06,080
Speaker 1: arguments in the Mushroom trial, brought to you by Voice Actors.

15
00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:12,400
Speaker 1: If Aaron Patterson deliberately poisoned her elderly relatives, what's the motive?

16
00:01:12,920 --> 00:01:15,600
Speaker 1: And if it was all a terrible accident, how does

17
00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:19,360
Speaker 1: she explain her lies? That's the nub of this week's

18
00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:22,360
Speaker 1: action in the mushroom trial in the Victorian Supreme Court,

19
00:01:22,680 --> 00:01:25,559
Speaker 1: sitting in the Latrobe Valley, where this fifty year old

20
00:01:25,600 --> 00:01:28,720
Speaker 1: mother of two is pleading not guilty to three counts

21
00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:33,200
Speaker 1: of murder and one of attempted murder. Aaron Patterson doesn't

22
00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:36,240
Speaker 1: have to prove anything. The onus is all on the

23
00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:39,399
Speaker 1: Crown to convince the jury that not only did her

24
00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:42,760
Speaker 1: actions result in three deaths, Don and Gale Patterson and

25
00:01:42,840 --> 00:01:47,560
Speaker 1: Heather Wilkinson, and one very serious illness Ian Wilkinson, but

26
00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:52,000
Speaker 1: that this wasn't just reckless or foolish, it was deliberate.

27
00:01:52,840 --> 00:01:57,080
Speaker 1: That's the essential component of murder. In a moment, will

28
00:01:57,160 --> 00:01:59,920
Speaker 1: take you to the defense closing argument by Colin Man.

29
00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:04,560
Speaker 1: But first, here's how the Crown has set out its

30
00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:08,320
Speaker 1: closing to the jury in the past two days. Doctor

31
00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:11,639
Speaker 1: Nannette Roger's sc is the Crown prosecutor. We've used a

32
00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:14,320
Speaker 1: voice actor to bring you her words and all the

33
00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:15,680
Speaker 1: words spoken in court.

34
00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:20,600
Speaker 2: At the heart of this case are four calculated deceptions

35
00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:24,600
Speaker 2: made by the accused. The first deception was the fabricated

36
00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:27,840
Speaker 2: cancer claim she used as a pretense for the lunch invitation.

37
00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:31,840
Speaker 2: The second deception was the lethal doses of poison the

38
00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:36,040
Speaker 2: accused secreted in the home cooked beef Wellington's. The third

39
00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:38,280
Speaker 2: deception was her attempts to make it seem that she

40
00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:42,520
Speaker 2: also suffered death cap mushroom poisoning. And fourthly, the fourth

41
00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:46,200
Speaker 2: deception the sustained cover up she embarked upon to conceal

42
00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:46,720
Speaker 2: the truth.

43
00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:50,880
Speaker 1: The Crown hasn't come up with a motive for Patterson's

44
00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:54,560
Speaker 1: alleged crimes, and it doesn't have to. The Crown only

45
00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:58,000
Speaker 1: has to convince the jury beyond reasonable doubt that her

46
00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:06,200
Speaker 1: actions were premeditated and intentional. If you've been following the trial,

47
00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:10,200
Speaker 1: you'll remember the message exchanges Erin Patterson had with her

48
00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:13,120
Speaker 1: mother in law Gail and her husband Simon in the

49
00:03:13,240 --> 00:03:14,520
Speaker 1: days before the lunch.

50
00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:19,040
Speaker 3: Hi, Gail, I had a needle biopsy taken of the

51
00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:22,600
Speaker 3: lump and I'm returning for an MIRI next week and

52
00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:25,760
Speaker 3: we'll know more after the results of those two things.

53
00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:30,200
Speaker 1: Hi, Erin, how did you get on yesterday with your

54
00:03:30,240 --> 00:03:31,080
Speaker 1: medical tests?

55
00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:32,600
Speaker 4: Love, Don and Gail.

56
00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:37,120
Speaker 3: There's a bit to digest with everything that's come out

57
00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:39,640
Speaker 3: of it all. I might talk more about it with

58
00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:42,720
Speaker 3: you both when I see you in person. Love Erin

59
00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:47,680
Speaker 3: the Crown says Patterson was telling bald faced lies.

60
00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:51,640
Speaker 2: She didn't think her lunch guests would live to reveal it.

61
00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:53,560
Speaker 2: Her lie would die with them.

62
00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:57,600
Speaker 1: But Ian Wilkinson, Erin's uncle by marriage and a pastor

63
00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:01,440
Speaker 1: at the local Baptist church, live to tell his tale.

64
00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:05,560
Speaker 2: Ian Wilkinson told you after the lunch, Aaron announced she

65
00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:08,440
Speaker 2: had cancer. She said she was very concerned because she

66
00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:11,640
Speaker 2: believed it was very serious, life threatening. She was anxious

67
00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:14,920
Speaker 2: about telling the kids. She was asking our advice about it.

68
00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:17,440
Speaker 2: Should I tell the kids or not tell the kids

69
00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:20,120
Speaker 2: about this threat to my life. She spoke about a

70
00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:22,919
Speaker 2: diagnostic test that showed a spot on the scan that

71
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:25,960
Speaker 2: was a tumor. He led a prayer asking for God's

72
00:04:25,960 --> 00:04:28,120
Speaker 2: blessing and that she'd have the wisdom in how she

73
00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:28,880
Speaker 2: told the kids.

74
00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:33,840
Speaker 1: Rogers said Simon's father, Don, before he died, would reveal

75
00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:34,840
Speaker 1: to his son.

76
00:04:35,320 --> 00:04:37,839
Speaker 2: What the accused had told them. That she'd had some

77
00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:40,520
Speaker 2: tests on her elbow which had led to the discovery

78
00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:44,520
Speaker 2: of ovarian cancer. A positive cancer diagnosis is what Don

79
00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:45,200
Speaker 2: told Simon.

80
00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:48,640
Speaker 1: Aaron Patterson said in her time in the witness box,

81
00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:52,720
Speaker 1: she never gave them a definite diagnosis, only that cancer

82
00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:56,120
Speaker 1: was a possibility. She said she really did have plans

83
00:04:56,160 --> 00:04:59,600
Speaker 1: for surgery, but it was a gastric bypass that she

84
00:04:59,640 --> 00:05:01,400
Speaker 1: was too embarrassed to discuss.

85
00:05:02,600 --> 00:05:05,680
Speaker 2: This was an elaborate lie.

86
00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:12,880
Speaker 1: Nanett Rogers told the jury Aaron Patterson knowingly concealed enough

87
00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:16,960
Speaker 1: deathcap mushrooms in the individual beef Wellington's to kill each

88
00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:18,000
Speaker 1: of her lunch guests.

89
00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:21,200
Speaker 2: She made sure she would not suffer the same fate

90
00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:23,960
Speaker 2: as her lunch guests by making herself an individual beef

91
00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:28,000
Speaker 2: Wellington that did not contain any death cap mushrooms. The

92
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:30,839
Speaker 2: sinister deception was to use a nourishing meal as the

93
00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:32,760
Speaker 2: vehicle to deliver the deadly poison.

94
00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:37,239
Speaker 1: Patterson told a Child Protective Services officer she'd never made

95
00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:41,000
Speaker 1: beef wellington before, but used a recipe from Nagi Mayhashi's

96
00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:45,320
Speaker 1: recipe Tin Eats cookbook because she wanted to do something fancy.

97
00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:49,080
Speaker 1: Rogers said that recipe called for a single beef Wellington

98
00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:53,000
Speaker 1: meat encased in layers of mushroom paste and pastry to

99
00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:56,960
Speaker 1: be sliced up, not individual Wellington's, as Patterson made.

100
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:01,160
Speaker 2: Why deviate so significantly from an unfamiliar recipe for a

101
00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:05,160
Speaker 2: special lunch. The prosecution says this was a deliberate choice.

102
00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:08,640
Speaker 2: It enabled the accused to control what ingredients went into

103
00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:11,880
Speaker 2: each individual parcel, and it was the only way to

104
00:06:11,920 --> 00:06:14,960
Speaker 2: be sure that she herself would not accidentally consume any

105
00:06:14,960 --> 00:06:15,920
Speaker 2: death cap mushroom.

106
00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:20,120
Speaker 1: Rogers suggested Aaron Patterson may have made two batches of

107
00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:24,960
Speaker 1: mushroom paste, one poisoned, one knot. In her evidence, Patterson

108
00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:28,359
Speaker 1: said she'd added dried mushrooms from a tubbleware box to

109
00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:29,680
Speaker 1: improve the flavor.

110
00:06:30,440 --> 00:06:33,120
Speaker 2: The recipe book called for seven hundred grams of sliced

111
00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:36,080
Speaker 2: mushrooms to serve six or eight people, so she had

112
00:06:36,120 --> 00:06:38,840
Speaker 2: one point seventy five kilos of mushrooms for a dish

113
00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,400
Speaker 2: that called for less than half. Why then would she

114
00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:44,360
Speaker 2: resort to dried or forage mushrooms she had more than enough.

115
00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:48,320
Speaker 1: Pattison said she thought these were dried mushrooms she'd boord

116
00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:51,279
Speaker 1: from an Asian grosser, but later realized they must have

117
00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:57,080
Speaker 1: also contained dried death cap mushrooms she'd accidentally foraged. Patterson's

118
00:06:57,120 --> 00:06:59,640
Speaker 1: evidence was that she had saved the mushrooms because there

119
00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:03,120
Speaker 1: were two strong for a meal she'd made previously. She

120
00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:06,719
Speaker 1: said they'd smelt pungent, and the jury heard from expert

121
00:07:06,800 --> 00:07:11,120
Speaker 1: witness Tom May that dried deathcap mushrooms had a very strong,

122
00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:13,120
Speaker 1: unpleasant smell.

123
00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:15,880
Speaker 2: Why then, would you add mushrooms that smell funny and

124
00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:18,920
Speaker 2: you're worried might be too overpowering to a special lunch

125
00:07:18,920 --> 00:07:22,240
Speaker 2: you were preparing for guests. The evidence in this trial

126
00:07:22,320 --> 00:07:25,000
Speaker 2: shows that the accused knew how to dehydrate and blitz

127
00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:27,679
Speaker 2: mushrooms into a powder to hide inside food.

128
00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:30,840
Speaker 1: That's a reference to a message sent to the friends

129
00:07:30,840 --> 00:07:33,600
Speaker 1: she made in a true crime Facebook group in which

130
00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:37,160
Speaker 1: she said she'd been hiding dehydrated mushrooms in her children's

131
00:07:37,160 --> 00:07:41,600
Speaker 1: food in order to increase their intake of veggies. Rogers

132
00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:45,360
Speaker 1: then turned to a website called eye Naturalist, where users

133
00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:48,680
Speaker 1: can post their observations about fungi growing in the wild,

134
00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:52,040
Speaker 1: including their specific geographic location.

135
00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:55,800
Speaker 2: There is no direct evidence as to where the accused

136
00:07:55,800 --> 00:08:00,320
Speaker 2: sourced deathcap mushrooms. However, what the evidence does demonstrate is

137
00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:02,200
Speaker 2: that she was aware of a website that could be

138
00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:05,440
Speaker 2: used to locate deathcap mushrooms, and that she had the

139
00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:08,960
Speaker 2: opportunity to source those mushrooms at a time proximate or

140
00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:09,880
Speaker 2: near to the lunch.

141
00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:14,200
Speaker 1: Rogers said analysis of the devices seized from Aaron Patterson's

142
00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:18,000
Speaker 1: home showed she used the map feature on I Naturalist

143
00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,200
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two to view the location of deathcap

144
00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:25,400
Speaker 1: mushrooms in Victoria. Rogers said she didn't seek out information

145
00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:27,120
Speaker 1: about other types of mushrooms.

146
00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:30,320
Speaker 2: The only other people living with the accused in the

147
00:08:30,360 --> 00:08:32,400
Speaker 2: house at the time was her son and her daughter.

148
00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:36,280
Speaker 2: You will therefore have no trouble, I suggest, being satisfied

149
00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:38,959
Speaker 2: that it was the accused using the computer to look

150
00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:41,000
Speaker 2: up death cap mushrooms on I Naturalist.

151
00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:45,040
Speaker 1: In April twenty twenty three, a post on Our Naturalist

152
00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:48,320
Speaker 1: recorded a sighting of death cap mushrooms in the Locke area,

153
00:08:48,679 --> 00:08:51,680
Speaker 1: about twenty eight k's from Patterson's town of land Gatha.

154
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:55,600
Speaker 1: Rogers took the jury to sell tower information that tracked

155
00:08:55,640 --> 00:09:00,239
Speaker 1: Patterson's phone on that day and photos found on her device.

156
00:09:01,120 --> 00:09:04,240
Speaker 2: From all this evidence, you can safely infer that the

157
00:09:04,320 --> 00:09:07,120
Speaker 2: accused firstly was out at the lock reserve on the

158
00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:10,960
Speaker 2: twenty eighth of April twenty three. Secondly that she found

159
00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:15,320
Speaker 2: and collected death cat mushrooms from that reserve. Thirdly that

160
00:09:15,440 --> 00:09:18,000
Speaker 2: then she went to leem Gatha and bought the dehydrator

161
00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:21,120
Speaker 2: within two hours of returning from Locke for the very

162
00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:25,840
Speaker 2: purpose of dehydrating and preserving those death cap mushrooms. And fourthly,

163
00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:29,200
Speaker 2: these photos on the Samsung tablet show the very death

164
00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:31,480
Speaker 2: cap mushroom she collected at the lock Reserve.

165
00:09:34,640 --> 00:09:38,120
Speaker 1: Rogers said Patterson was not seriously unwell after the lunch,

166
00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:41,599
Speaker 1: and she knew that was a problem. She ran the

167
00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:44,440
Speaker 1: jury through evidence that even though Patterson said she was

168
00:09:44,440 --> 00:09:48,000
Speaker 1: suffering diarrhea on the Sunday after the lunch, she didn't

169
00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:51,800
Speaker 1: present at hospital until Monday morning after taking her kids

170
00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:55,199
Speaker 1: to the school bus, and then Roger says she didn't

171
00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:58,120
Speaker 1: tell the doctors and nurses what she now says, which

172
00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:03,360
Speaker 1: is that she'd taken emodium medication on her first visit

173
00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:07,320
Speaker 1: to hospital. On the Monday morning, Patterson left, promising to return,

174
00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:11,040
Speaker 1: even as a doctor called her three times, then called

175
00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:13,240
Speaker 1: Triple O to express his concern.

176
00:10:14,160 --> 00:10:17,960
Speaker 2: There is only one logical or reasonable explanation for why

177
00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:20,959
Speaker 2: the accused left hospital, and after being told she might

178
00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,400
Speaker 2: have consumed a lethal toxin from death cap mushrooms, she

179
00:10:24,559 --> 00:10:27,360
Speaker 2: realized that what she had done was going to be uncovered.

180
00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:29,840
Speaker 2: She fled back to her house to try and work

181
00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,520
Speaker 2: out how she was going to manage the situation and

182
00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:34,800
Speaker 2: how she might explain why she wasn't sick like the

183
00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:37,800
Speaker 2: lunch guests. She knew very well that she had not

184
00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:39,280
Speaker 2: eaten death cap mushrooms.

185
00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:45,080
Speaker 1: Rogers said leaving the hospital against medical advice was incriminating conduct.

186
00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:48,760
Speaker 1: When she did return to the hospital, Rogers says Patterson

187
00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:52,360
Speaker 1: was resistant to medications the nurses wanted to give her.

188
00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:57,360
Speaker 2: Her reluctance to receive medical treatment is inexplicable unless she

189
00:10:57,440 --> 00:11:00,920
Speaker 2: knew she had not eaten what her lunch guests had done.

190
00:11:00,960 --> 00:11:04,240
Speaker 2: This resistance to receiving medical treatment is another example of

191
00:11:04,240 --> 00:11:06,320
Speaker 2: what we say is incriminating conduct.

192
00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:12,840
Speaker 1: On August three, when her lunch guests were critically ill

193
00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:16,720
Speaker 1: in hospital, Aaron Patterson drove to the kunwaraor transfer station,

194
00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:20,360
Speaker 1: the local tip and dumped her dehydrator.

195
00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:24,439
Speaker 2: She wanted to hide the evidence. This is another example

196
00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:27,679
Speaker 2: of incriminating conduct. The defense may argue that this was

197
00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:30,120
Speaker 2: part of a wild panic. The accused did this because

198
00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:32,600
Speaker 2: she was worried she would be falsely accused of deliberately

199
00:11:32,600 --> 00:11:36,439
Speaker 2: poisoning her lunch guests. You should completely reject that position.

200
00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:39,760
Speaker 1: In the witness box, Patterson said that in the hospital,

201
00:11:39,880 --> 00:11:43,240
Speaker 1: Simon Patterson had asked her if she'd use the dehydrator

202
00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:47,720
Speaker 1: to poison his parents, and that statement upset and worried her.

203
00:11:48,679 --> 00:11:51,320
Speaker 2: Her story about Simon accusing her in the hospital of

204
00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:54,520
Speaker 2: using the dehydrator and this sending her into a panic

205
00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:58,720
Speaker 2: is nonsense. Simon Patterson categorically denied to you ever saying

206
00:11:58,760 --> 00:12:01,560
Speaker 2: such a thing to the accused. She knew it would

207
00:12:01,559 --> 00:12:05,240
Speaker 2: incriminate her. She knew that she had dehydrated deathcap mushrooms

208
00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:07,920
Speaker 2: in that appliance, and that she had deliberately done so,

209
00:12:08,559 --> 00:12:10,240
Speaker 2: and she knew that keeping it was going to be

210
00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:11,120
Speaker 2: far too risky.

211
00:12:12,200 --> 00:12:15,480
Speaker 1: Police were onto this almost immediately because they were analyzing

212
00:12:15,480 --> 00:12:19,600
Speaker 1: her bank records, but when they interviewed Patterson on August five,

213
00:12:20,040 --> 00:12:23,920
Speaker 1: she said she didn't own a dehydrator. Rogers said during

214
00:12:23,920 --> 00:12:26,920
Speaker 1: the police search of her home on August five, Patterson

215
00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:31,520
Speaker 1: deliberately concealed her primary phone, phone A, and handed them

216
00:12:31,559 --> 00:12:33,719
Speaker 1: another device, Phone B.

217
00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:36,240
Speaker 2: We say is a dummy phone set up deliberately by

218
00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:38,880
Speaker 2: the accused to trick the police and to conceal the

219
00:12:38,960 --> 00:12:42,680
Speaker 2: existence and most importantly, the contents of her usual mobile phone.

220
00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:46,000
Speaker 2: When police took phone b away after the search warrant

221
00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:49,640
Speaker 2: and tried to analyze it, they found nothing. Why, Because

222
00:12:49,679 --> 00:12:52,600
Speaker 2: this phone was factory resent multiple times after the lunch,

223
00:12:52,920 --> 00:12:54,280
Speaker 2: its contents were wiped.

224
00:12:55,520 --> 00:12:58,920
Speaker 1: Rogers said, despite Patterson's claim to be a keen recreational

225
00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:02,280
Speaker 1: mushroom forager, she was the only one who remembered any

226
00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:06,320
Speaker 1: behavior like this, not her husband, her kids, or any

227
00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:07,480
Speaker 1: of her online friends.

228
00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:11,880
Speaker 2: The suggestion now that these mushrooms may have been accidentally foraged,

229
00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:15,160
Speaker 2: we suggest, is a very late change to the accused story.

230
00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:18,160
Speaker 2: You might think that at some point it dawned on

231
00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:21,920
Speaker 2: her that the Asian grocery story didn't add up, particularly

232
00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:24,000
Speaker 2: when faced with the evidence about the remnants of the

233
00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:27,360
Speaker 2: death cat mushrooms having been found in her dehydrator, she

234
00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:28,840
Speaker 2: had to come up with something new.

235
00:13:29,840 --> 00:13:32,720
Speaker 1: Roger said. The breakdown of Erin and Simon Patterson's marriage

236
00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:36,000
Speaker 1: and the fact Patterson had dragged Donngale Patterson into a

237
00:13:36,040 --> 00:13:38,599
Speaker 1: disagreement about money was significant.

238
00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:41,800
Speaker 2: The evidence shows you might think that the divide between

239
00:13:41,800 --> 00:13:44,040
Speaker 2: the accused and her in laws was deeper than they

240
00:13:44,080 --> 00:13:47,400
Speaker 2: ever knew. We say that the accused was leading a

241
00:13:47,520 --> 00:13:51,359
Speaker 2: duplicitous life. When it came to the Pattersons, she presented

242
00:13:51,520 --> 00:13:55,240
Speaker 2: one side while expressing contrary beliefs to others. When Don

243
00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:58,280
Speaker 2: and Gale sent the accused messages about her ongoing financial

244
00:13:58,280 --> 00:14:01,960
Speaker 2: issues with Simon and meant and praying, she replied with

245
00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:04,920
Speaker 2: an eye roll emoji. She was mocking them and their

246
00:14:04,920 --> 00:14:08,640
Speaker 2: religious beliefs despite attending church with them. If she did

247
00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:11,440
Speaker 2: love them as she claimed, one would expect her to

248
00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:15,280
Speaker 2: inquire after their welfare immediately in those circumstances. But what

249
00:14:15,360 --> 00:14:17,240
Speaker 2: did she do? When Simon told her that Don and

250
00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:20,000
Speaker 2: Gale were in hospital, she immediately went on to talk

251
00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:22,840
Speaker 2: about her own symptoms, never asked a question about Don

252
00:14:22,840 --> 00:14:23,360
Speaker 2: and Gale.

253
00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:27,960
Speaker 1: Rogers ended with an appeal to the jury's life experience.

254
00:14:29,040 --> 00:14:31,320
Speaker 2: Think about what you would do in this situation. If

255
00:14:31,320 --> 00:14:34,080
Speaker 2: this was really just a horrible accident. If you were

256
00:14:34,120 --> 00:14:35,960
Speaker 2: told that the meal you'd cooked and served to your

257
00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:39,359
Speaker 2: family was thought to have possibly contained death cat mushrooms,

258
00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:42,840
Speaker 2: what would you do. Would you go into self preservation mode,

259
00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:46,320
Speaker 2: just worrying about protecting yourself from blame. Would you race

260
00:14:46,320 --> 00:14:48,240
Speaker 2: away from the hospital and do who knows what for

261
00:14:48,280 --> 00:14:50,600
Speaker 2: an hour and a half. Would you be reluctant to

262
00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:53,040
Speaker 2: receive treatment, Would you take two and a half hours

263
00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:56,080
Speaker 2: to eventually agree to get your kids to hospital? Would

264
00:14:56,080 --> 00:14:58,440
Speaker 2: you lie about the source of the ingredients to medical

265
00:14:58,480 --> 00:15:01,800
Speaker 2: practitioners and the Health Department of officials for days, even

266
00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:04,800
Speaker 2: though the truth might help those you claim to love. No,

267
00:15:04,880 --> 00:15:07,520
Speaker 2: that's not what you would do. You would do everything

268
00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:10,120
Speaker 2: you could to help the people you love. You would

269
00:15:10,160 --> 00:15:13,960
Speaker 2: tell the treating medical practitioners every scheric of information that

270
00:15:14,080 --> 00:15:16,680
Speaker 2: might help to identify the cause of the illness, so

271
00:15:16,720 --> 00:15:19,160
Speaker 2: that they could get the right treatment to your loved ones,

272
00:15:19,640 --> 00:15:22,200
Speaker 2: regardless of any risk of blame that might fall on you.

273
00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:26,120
Speaker 2: If your children had come within cooy of the same meal,

274
00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:28,760
Speaker 2: you would move mountains to get them to hospital as

275
00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:32,200
Speaker 2: quickly as possible. And if you yourself had truly consumed

276
00:15:32,200 --> 00:15:34,800
Speaker 2: the same meal, you would gladly receive all of the

277
00:15:34,840 --> 00:15:38,200
Speaker 2: medical treatment you could get your hands on. Aaron Patterson

278
00:15:38,200 --> 00:15:40,280
Speaker 2: acted the way she did because she knew what she

279
00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:41,119
Speaker 2: had done.

280
00:15:44,920 --> 00:16:21,920
Speaker 1: Coming up. Aaron Patterson's lawyer has he say.

281
00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:07,760
Speaker 4: Use your heads, not your hearts.

282
00:16:10,280 --> 00:16:13,960
Speaker 1: On Tuesday, Erin Patterson's barrister, Colin Mandarc got his chance

283
00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:18,120
Speaker 1: to set out in detail exactly why he says Patterson

284
00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:21,720
Speaker 1: didn't mean to poison for elderly relatives and why she

285
00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:22,600
Speaker 1: should be acquitted.

286
00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:27,160
Speaker 4: You have to consider the issues rationally and logically, without emotion,

287
00:16:27,680 --> 00:16:33,000
Speaker 4: without prejudice towards anyone, without sympathy towards anyone, and you

288
00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:36,760
Speaker 4: have to assess the evidence dispassionately with your common sense.

289
00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:40,640
Speaker 1: The barrister acknowledged the deaths of Don Gale and Heather

290
00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:44,840
Speaker 1: Wilkinson and the suffering of Ian Wilkinson was a terrible tragedy.

291
00:16:45,040 --> 00:16:47,640
Speaker 1: He said he understood that the family members who'd attended

292
00:16:47,680 --> 00:16:50,680
Speaker 1: court over the course of the trial were still mourning

293
00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:51,360
Speaker 1: their loss.

294
00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:56,320
Speaker 4: These were good, innocent people, and whoever caused their deaths

295
00:16:56,600 --> 00:17:00,600
Speaker 4: must be held to account. That instinctive design to punish

296
00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:04,840
Speaker 4: the person responsible, to seek retribution, to think that they

297
00:17:04,920 --> 00:17:07,840
Speaker 4: must pay for what they've done, but a jury has

298
00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:10,159
Speaker 4: to fiercely guard against that kind of reason.

299
00:17:11,080 --> 00:17:14,159
Speaker 1: Mandy reiterated the burden of proof rested with the crown,

300
00:17:14,440 --> 00:17:18,080
Speaker 1: not the defense. Basically, Aaron Patterson doesn't have to prove anything.

301
00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:22,119
Speaker 4: Members of the jury, your consideration of the evidence in

302
00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:26,919
Speaker 4: this trial comes down to two simple issues. First, is

303
00:17:26,960 --> 00:17:30,920
Speaker 4: there a reasonable possibility that death cap mushrooms were put

304
00:17:30,960 --> 00:17:35,520
Speaker 4: into this meal by accident. Second, is it a reasonable

305
00:17:35,560 --> 00:17:40,439
Speaker 4: possibility Aaron Patterson did not intend to kill or cause

306
00:17:40,520 --> 00:17:44,600
Speaker 4: serious injury to her guests. And in the end, after

307
00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:47,800
Speaker 4: you've considered all of the evidence, if either of those

308
00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:51,640
Speaker 4: is a reasonable possibility on all of the evidence, then

309
00:17:51,680 --> 00:17:53,840
Speaker 4: you'd find her not guilty.

310
00:17:55,800 --> 00:17:58,840
Speaker 1: Mandy said. Patterson's accounts of when she became unwell and

311
00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:02,080
Speaker 1: where she purchased them ushrooms were mostly consistent.

312
00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:06,359
Speaker 4: She was giving the same account over and over again,

313
00:18:06,840 --> 00:18:10,639
Speaker 4: but to lots of different people in many different contexts,

314
00:18:11,200 --> 00:18:13,960
Speaker 4: and in the end, when you analyze the evidence carefully,

315
00:18:14,400 --> 00:18:17,480
Speaker 4: there's very little meaningful variation in the accounts that she gave.

316
00:18:18,359 --> 00:18:21,360
Speaker 1: He also pointed to the fallibility of memory.

317
00:18:22,200 --> 00:18:26,639
Speaker 4: People have imperfect and honestly mistaken memories. You may recall

318
00:18:26,680 --> 00:18:30,240
Speaker 4: playing games like the telephone game, where messages are whispered

319
00:18:30,240 --> 00:18:33,199
Speaker 4: from one person to another all the way along, and

320
00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:35,399
Speaker 4: then you compare the message that was relayed at the

321
00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:37,200
Speaker 4: beginning to the one that came out at the end.

322
00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:39,920
Speaker 4: It's completely completely different.

323
00:18:41,359 --> 00:18:44,440
Speaker 1: Colin Mandy acknowledged that the Crown doesn't have to prove

324
00:18:44,480 --> 00:18:47,320
Speaker 1: a motive, but he said without one, they can't get

325
00:18:47,320 --> 00:18:47,800
Speaker 1: to murder.

326
00:18:48,280 --> 00:18:51,320
Speaker 4: Without a motive, You're left guessing about the most important

327
00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:54,840
Speaker 4: element of the offense in this trial, and that's intention.

328
00:18:55,720 --> 00:18:58,719
Speaker 1: He said. Pattison didn't have any reason to harm or

329
00:18:58,840 --> 00:18:59,960
Speaker 1: murder her in laws.

330
00:19:00,840 --> 00:19:04,720
Speaker 4: They loved her. She loved them. That's relevant. Don and

331
00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:07,679
Speaker 4: Gale had never been anything but kind and understanding to

332
00:19:07,720 --> 00:19:11,760
Speaker 4: Aaron Patterson. There was absolutely no reason at all for

333
00:19:11,840 --> 00:19:14,600
Speaker 4: her to hurt them in any way at all. Not

334
00:19:14,640 --> 00:19:17,280
Speaker 4: only is there no motive, there are very good reasons

335
00:19:17,280 --> 00:19:20,280
Speaker 4: not to harm these people. And if you do embark

336
00:19:20,320 --> 00:19:22,840
Speaker 4: on this plan to harm them in this way, inevitably,

337
00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:25,679
Speaker 4: whatever happens, you will lose the only people in the

338
00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:28,080
Speaker 4: world who were any support to you and your children.

339
00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:31,480
Speaker 4: You will lose your children, and you'll lose everything that's

340
00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:32,199
Speaker 4: important to you.

341
00:19:33,160 --> 00:19:36,160
Speaker 1: Mandy said she didn't dump the dehydrated because she was guilty,

342
00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:38,640
Speaker 1: rather because she was rattled.

343
00:19:39,440 --> 00:19:41,960
Speaker 4: If you're planning a murder, what's the one thing you

344
00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:45,000
Speaker 4: really should plan to dispose of. That's the murder weapon.

345
00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:47,920
Speaker 4: She would have disposed of it months before and never

346
00:19:47,960 --> 00:19:51,520
Speaker 4: told anyone she had one. She drives to the tip

347
00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:54,520
Speaker 4: in her own car, pays for the disposal of the

348
00:19:54,600 --> 00:19:58,680
Speaker 4: dehydrator with her own bank card, doesn't attempt to disguise

349
00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:02,280
Speaker 4: those actions in anyone. It can only have been panic,

350
00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:06,439
Speaker 4: not because she was guilty, but because that's what people

351
00:20:06,640 --> 00:20:09,720
Speaker 4: might think. It was a deep shock to her how

352
00:20:09,760 --> 00:20:13,080
Speaker 4: these four people became so seriously unwell. It was a

353
00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:15,720
Speaker 4: deep shock because she never intended for it to happen.

354
00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:19,000
Speaker 4: And if that's a reasonable possibility, then she must be

355
00:20:19,119 --> 00:20:22,240
Speaker 4: found not guilty, Mandy said.

356
00:20:22,280 --> 00:20:24,880
Speaker 1: When police asked if she had any leftovers from the meal,

357
00:20:25,240 --> 00:20:27,520
Speaker 1: she gave them her gate access code and said they

358
00:20:27,560 --> 00:20:28,920
Speaker 1: were probably in her bin.

359
00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:31,840
Speaker 4: A guilty person, you would think would have already thrown

360
00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:33,960
Speaker 4: them out. You might think get rid of them, put

361
00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:36,000
Speaker 4: them in a neighbor's bin or a public bin, bury

362
00:20:36,080 --> 00:20:39,200
Speaker 4: them in the backyard, or do something else. There'd been

363
00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:41,439
Speaker 4: two days to do all of that, instead of directing

364
00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:43,520
Speaker 4: the police where to find the evidence that there were

365
00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:47,320
Speaker 4: death cat mushrooms in the meal. So the prosecution theories,

366
00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:51,600
Speaker 4: we say, make no sense. The alternative is far more

367
00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:56,080
Speaker 4: sensible and logical. She didn't know they were poisoned. She

368
00:20:56,240 --> 00:20:58,600
Speaker 4: fed the children of the meat with the mushrooms scraped

369
00:20:58,600 --> 00:21:03,000
Speaker 4: off she threw the leftovers in the bin. She told

370
00:21:03,000 --> 00:21:05,320
Speaker 4: the police where to find them because she didn't know

371
00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:09,439
Speaker 4: they had poison in them. It's straightforward, it's not convoluted,

372
00:21:09,920 --> 00:21:14,160
Speaker 4: it's non elaborate, it's not tortured. An innocent person would

373
00:21:14,200 --> 00:21:17,960
Speaker 4: say go grab them, help yourselves. That's what she did say.

374
00:21:26,280 --> 00:21:30,119
Speaker 1: Colin Mandy sc will resume his closing submissions on Wednesday.

375
00:21:30,520 --> 00:21:33,360
Speaker 1: For all the latest from the Victorian Supreme Court in Morewell,

376
00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:37,320
Speaker 1: and for all the nation's best news, sport, politics and business,

377
00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:40,040
Speaker 1: visit the Australian dot com dot au