Speaker 1: Your non Sky News Australia starts.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: I love it.
Speaker 1: This is Outside.
Speaker 4: Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders, the show that is
Speaker 4: to woke, virtue signaling and identity politics on steroids. What
Speaker 4: Kamala Harris and her weird vice presidential pick ah as
Speaker 4: a gift to satire?
Speaker 5: Hi, this is Tim.
Speaker 6: It's Kamala Harris. Good morning, Governor.
Speaker 5: Good morning madam Vice president.
Speaker 6: Listen, you weren't my first choice. To be honest, you
Speaker 6: weren't even in my top ten.
Speaker 7: But no one else wants to run as my VP
Speaker 7: because they all know I'm going to lose. You are
Speaker 7: the only one who is willing to be my running mate.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 5: I mean, this is basically career suicide. But I did
Speaker 5: some dumb shit a few years back, and now I'm
Speaker 5: totally controlled by the deep state, and so they told
Speaker 5: me either I become your running mate or I get
Speaker 5: Epstein in a New York.
Speaker 9: Prison artificial intelligence, artificially generated spoof. But as they say,
Speaker 9: it's funny because it could be true.
Speaker 7: Basically, we're going to pretend that you're a normal American
Speaker 7: white guy. There's a bunch of things you did that
Speaker 7: we got to run away from here. You passed a
Speaker 7: law requiring tampons in the boys' bathroom in schools. You
Speaker 7: basically cheered on the George Floyd ryders who burned down
Speaker 7: your cities. You implemented a snitch hotline during COVID, and Tim,
Speaker 7: you signed a law that allows the state to take
Speaker 7: custody of children if their parents refuse to let them transition.
Speaker 10: And if you think that's funny, just wait until these two,
Speaker 10: if they do get real power.
Speaker 7: Okay, So Tim, tell me your radical left political views
Speaker 7: are those real?
Speaker 5: Oh no, of course not.
Speaker 11: No.
Speaker 5: Honestly, I will have whatever political views you pay me
Speaker 5: to have.
Speaker 6: I love it. Tim, You're like the white male version
Speaker 6: of me.
Speaker 5: You're right, no one voted for me either. Hey, Kamala,
Speaker 5: let's see what can be unburdened by what has.
Speaker 4: Been, unburdened by what has been And while those two
Speaker 4: romp scarily towards the White House, let's grab the latest
Speaker 4: Outsiders news. Well, we normally start with Australian news, but
Speaker 4: what is happening in Britain is so concerning the assault
Speaker 4: on free speech, the assault on social media, the assault.
Speaker 1: On freedom of expression.
Speaker 4: They're kind of weird, perverse attitudes of many of the
Speaker 4: law enforcement authorities who are rushing around the place busily
Speaker 4: looking into people's social media tweets and posts and instagrams,
Speaker 4: rather than you know, going out and kind of catching
Speaker 4: the bad guys as they're supposed to do. Reata and James, James,
Speaker 4: what is going on in England in your opinion?
Speaker 10: Ah, well, I mean what we see on the news
Speaker 10: is very disturbing. As you say, Rod, you know, there
Speaker 10: are parts of Britain where real crimes break ins, burglaries,
Speaker 10: violent crimes, none of them get solved for years, you know,
Speaker 10: the police are too busy doing other things and what.
Speaker 2: Are they doing.
Speaker 10: Well now they are going after people who posted anything
Speaker 10: that they decided and the language is really really vague
Speaker 10: in support of these riots which we saw that broke
Speaker 10: out after that. Let's not forget horrific incident where those
Speaker 10: children were killed and injured by a madman with a
Speaker 10: machete at that Taylor Swift dance concert. And since then,
Speaker 10: of course there's been this huge outbreak of violence. Now,
Speaker 10: what I think is going on here is we have
Speaker 10: seen for years, We've talked about it on this program.
Speaker 10: We saw it in the Brexit vote We've seen the
Speaker 10: way the British political class, particularly labor, has a real
Speaker 10: contempt for traditional working class Britain and working class British people.
Speaker 10: And now they have risen up and some of those
Speaker 10: scenes have been gratious grace, so we have to say that.
Speaker 10: But they have risen up and the police are more concerned.
Speaker 10: The Prime Minister is now known as two tier kar
Speaker 10: Keir Starmer because of his police are here. They are
Speaker 10: going after people who are involved with the riots. And
Speaker 10: yet you know, you see people getting three years for
Speaker 10: social media posts now and people who've been involved in murders,
Speaker 10: bashety killings, all sorts of things. Those people have been migrants,
Speaker 10: they've gotten six months or even less. So there's a
Speaker 10: real two tiered policing system here. It's really disturbing because
Speaker 10: free speech England being the place where free speech as
Speaker 10: we know it, John Stuart Mill, they are Pagetica. All
Speaker 10: of that stuff came out of Britain and now they
Speaker 10: are burning it on a pire rize.
Speaker 1: You're the queen of social media. I mean, what is
Speaker 1: going on the way they are.
Speaker 4: Seen to be focusing on social media as court yes,
Speaker 4: as James's riots is burning is looting. There's some very
Speaker 4: bad things and the police should go after the people
Speaker 4: perpetrating those crimes. But they see, yeah, absolutely absolutely, And
Speaker 4: where were they when social media was whipping up all
Speaker 4: pro Palestinian anti.
Speaker 9: Since we saw the elements of the far right involved
Speaker 9: in some of those rights and violence, that seems to
Speaker 9: be all they have talked about. There is absolutely no
Speaker 9: mention of the protests that we have seen, and there
Speaker 9: is extensive footage of this of these mobs of masked men,
Speaker 9: many of them from migrant backgrounds. They may be born
Speaker 9: in Britain, but certainly that they identify as members of
Speaker 9: the Muslim community often and we've seen just rampages, people
Speaker 9: being attacked in gangs, all sorts of violence, even intimidation
Speaker 9: of media and the media who have just gone out
Speaker 9: of their way to present this entire uprising as purely
Speaker 9: a far right issue as opposed to no, there is
Speaker 9: real violence from the other side as well, and much
Speaker 9: of that has not been addressed neither by authorities either.
Speaker 9: We're talking about the police here, we're talking about the
Speaker 9: fact that you've got politicians making all sorts of statements
Speaker 9: that are just or well in and you've got the
Speaker 9: police commissioner. You've got police on the beat who are
Speaker 9: behaving with this two tier selective policing, so you can
Speaker 9: understand why trust in those institutions is plummeting. And this
Speaker 9: started with the Tories. This isn't just a labor issue.
Speaker 9: We saw that politicization of the police force under the Tories.
Speaker 9: Labour's only been in power for a month and my gosh.
Speaker 4: I think people get confused because what basically happened is
Speaker 4: this character with a machete killed three girls.
Speaker 1: It was almost appalling crime.
Speaker 4: Now, a lot of people took that as although the
Speaker 4: guy himself was born in Cardiff to parents of Ruandan background,
Speaker 4: a lot of people initially took this to be an immigrant,
Speaker 4: an illegal immigrants, so they posted on social media saying
Speaker 4: and illegal immigrants has gone out and killed the three girls.
Speaker 1: In fact it was a British citizen.
Speaker 4: A lot of the trouble seems to have stemmed from
Speaker 4: that and comments made on social media expressing extreme anger
Speaker 4: and frustration with years and years which we really can't
Speaker 4: understand in this country, but years and years of illegal immigration,
Speaker 4: where it's not only the fact that the people are
Speaker 4: coming into the country, it's the fact James that many
Speaker 4: that the British taxpayer is funding, often in small towns
Speaker 4: and villages across England, Ireland and Scotland, a beautiful accommodation
Speaker 4: or not necessarily beautiful but expensive accommodation, hotel, accommodation, TVs
Speaker 4: and all of that. Seeing that, they took out their
Speaker 4: frustration and the Kissama's government have accused everyone of far
Speaker 4: right thugery, even though about thirty three percent of the
Speaker 4: population agree with this frustration with high immigration.
Speaker 2: Rowan.
Speaker 10: This has been going on for This has been going
Speaker 10: on for decades. There was a minister in the Blair
Speaker 10: government who was caught out I think in the Blair government,
Speaker 10: and I forget his name, but he said that they
Speaker 10: wanted high immigration so that they could rub Britain's face
Speaker 10: in multiculturalism. There's been a real program on by the
Speaker 10: British left, particularly the labor political class. You know, the
Speaker 10: demographics of many of these towns in the north of
Speaker 10: England has completely changed. People who lived there for generations
Speaker 10: have seen a change. They've seen their economic opportunity go
Speaker 10: with globalization. They've seen this huge demographic change and readiomsthing
Speaker 10: you said is important to you said, you know, many
Speaker 10: of the crimes that blamed on migrants are actually for
Speaker 10: people who were born in Britain. This is the other
Speaker 10: bit of it. They create this failure of integration. So
Speaker 10: you know, Australia still does a reasonable job, but I think,
Speaker 10: you know, we can argue about that about integrating migrants.
Speaker 10: Britain seems to do a terrible job because these communities cluster,
Speaker 10: they speak their own language, they maintain their own culture.
Speaker 10: To this side, the government says, the government says, these traditions,
Speaker 10: you know, these traditions are worthy of keeping around and
Speaker 10: being supported, and we support them, we honor them, British traditions.
Speaker 2: You know, they're terrible and we need to get rid
Speaker 2: of them.
Speaker 9: But the problem isn't just illegal immigration. The problem is
Speaker 9: mass legal migration and also this complete abandonment of assimilation
Speaker 9: as a principle that you should actually pursue. In fact,
Speaker 9: the similation is now a dirty word. The Tories again,
Speaker 9: they were promising every time they go to election it's oh, well,
Speaker 9: we have immigration levels of tens of thousands per year.
Speaker 9: The last year they were in power, there was about
Speaker 9: a million who came in. So when you've got mass
Speaker 9: migration without assimilation. You've got illegal immigration that has really
Speaker 9: not been tackled in any meaningful way. This unrest, this
Speaker 9: deep underlying issue is far bigger than a few rat
Speaker 9: bags far right, and those people have legitimate concerns that
Speaker 9: the majority I'm talking about who say we can't sustain
Speaker 9: these sorts of immigration levels and if people are going
Speaker 9: to come here, they should embrace British values. And at
Speaker 9: a time where you've got this deep self loathing in
Speaker 9: the country that we're seeing throughout the West right here
Speaker 9: in Australia America, where everything Western is inherently evil and
Speaker 9: should be criticized and defeated, you've got that happening, the
Speaker 9: endless culture wars, plus this mass migration, lack of assimilation.
Speaker 9: No one should be surprised at what's happening in the UK.
Speaker 9: Now it's going to happen here if we're not keping.
Speaker 4: It's also just James talk about the social media aspect,
Speaker 4: because this is where free speech is being threatened in Britain,
Speaker 4: as James said, the home of free speech, and the
Speaker 4: problem is the Labored government is using this opportunity. They're saying, well,
Speaker 4: hang on, there are these riots and protests well, as
Speaker 4: I said. According to the UK Telegraph, thirty four percent
Speaker 4: of Britons agree with the sentiments of the protesters. Now,
Speaker 4: the fact that some of these protests have turned ugly
Speaker 4: and there's been a tax on immigrant hostels and so on,
Speaker 4: that is clearly and obviously wrong, but that is not
Speaker 4: where the problem lies. The problem lies is that the
Speaker 4: Keirstarma government is now putting a blanket kind of thing
Speaker 4: across social media, saying well, social media is to blame
Speaker 4: for stirring up these rights, which is of course complete nonsense.
Speaker 4: It's individuals who commit crimes, not social media posts. But
Speaker 4: have a listened to the police commissioner here basically saying
Speaker 4: in echoes of what we heard from the e Safety
Speaker 4: commissioner in this country, Oh, we've got to stop and
Speaker 4: suppress social media around the world.
Speaker 1: Have a listen.
Speaker 6: What are you considering when it comes to dealing.
Speaker 9: With people who are whipping up this kind of behavior from.
Speaker 1: Behind a keyboard maybe in a different country.
Speaker 12: Being a keyboard warrior does not make you safe from
Speaker 12: the law. You can be guilty offenses of incitement stirring
Speaker 12: up racial hatred. There are numerous terrorist offenses regarding the
Speaker 12: publishing of material.
Speaker 4: So they're focusing on social media and then they're even
Speaker 4: prosecuting people because of social media posts. Listened to this
Speaker 4: judge only a couple of days ago.
Speaker 13: You have been committed for sentence, having pleaded guilty to
Speaker 13: an offense of publishing written material which is threatening, abusive,
Speaker 13: or insulting, intending thereby to stir up racial hatred. This
Speaker 13: offense is so serious that an immediate custodial sentence is unavoidable.
Speaker 4: So rita, there you have it. You have the law
Speaker 4: coming down on social media. This will be happening here
Speaker 4: in this country if the Safety Commissioner.
Speaker 9: Gets so absolutely sinister and it is again. Labor have
Speaker 9: been in power for about a month and already they
Speaker 9: are cracking down on dissent. They want to silence anybody
Speaker 9: who is against the prevailing leftist narrative where you can
Speaker 9: be thrown in jail for two years for a social
Speaker 9: media post. And they've come up with this term they
Speaker 9: call online violence. Violence is violence. There's not online salce.
Speaker 9: You can incite violence, you can make threats online, but
Speaker 9: this term online violence is being misused, overused, and it's
Speaker 9: going to be used to silence mainstream it's not totally
Speaker 9: about Redia.
Speaker 4: It's already happening Rega and James. You're seeing a dramatic
Speaker 4: decrease in the amount of social media coming out of
Speaker 4: Britain because people are now terrified.
Speaker 1: It's having that feeling, and that's the point.
Speaker 10: And you do, like, let's be really artisked about what
Speaker 10: these laws are.
Speaker 2: These are blasphemy laws, all right.
Speaker 10: The new religion in Britain and increasingly the new state
Speaker 10: religion in the West is multiculturalism and diversity. And people
Speaker 10: who post against that now you know, these are blasphemy laws,
Speaker 10: and blasphemy has always been, you know, in traditional societies
Speaker 10: the highest crime. That's why they are moving violent defenders
Speaker 10: out of British prisons to make room for people who
Speaker 10: have committed these offenses. So let's be really clear about
Speaker 10: the nature of what is going on here. But let's
Speaker 10: also been really really clear. You know, we love to
Speaker 10: think in Australia we're immune to all of these things.
Speaker 2: Absolute nonsense. You know.
Speaker 10: This past week or two weeks ago, the Albany's government
Speaker 10: released its Multicultural Framework Review. And this thing they commissioned
Speaker 10: two years ago when they came into power. This thing
Speaker 10: is an absolute blueprint for the exact sort of crack
Speaker 10: up of society that we're seeing in Britain. They want
Speaker 10: to see citizenship tests, I mean citizenship ohs given in
Speaker 10: other languages so that people don't have to know English
Speaker 10: to become a citizen. There's all sorts of pleas for
Speaker 10: war funding for separatist groups. The entire thing is about
Speaker 10: breaking up society into its constituent parts and destroying any
Speaker 10: idea of a unified Australian identity.
Speaker 2: This is where we are, this.
Speaker 4: Is what's happening in Britain. And I'll just quickly show you,
Speaker 4: play you a clip. We're going to Matt Goodwin in
Speaker 4: a second, and I want to play I wanted to
Speaker 4: play this clip for Matt, but I want to play.
Speaker 1: It to you first of all.
Speaker 4: Here which is two police officers from separate areas in Britain,
Speaker 4: both of whom seem to feel it's important to begin
Speaker 4: their press conferences with a greeting in Arabic.
Speaker 1: Now, this is exactly to James point.
Speaker 4: This is immediately dividing society, saying this group here, there's
Speaker 4: that group there, and we're going to have our press
Speaker 4: conference to appease that group and appease that group or
Speaker 4: whatever it is. So just have a listen to these two.
Speaker 4: We'll play two of them, but I'm sure there's many,
Speaker 4: many more. It has the automatic idea that the police
Speaker 4: must instantly try and appease certain community groups.
Speaker 14: Have a listen, Selama, the comm Good morning everyone, and
Speaker 14: thank you to the leaders and elders that have afforded
Speaker 14: me this opportunity to speak to you personally.
Speaker 1: Hell, so I'm welcome.
Speaker 9: My name's Phil Hutchinson and I am the superintendent.
Speaker 4: So that's how shades of elders and certain greetings.
Speaker 1: In this country. Women, Well, this is what happens.
Speaker 4: This is this is identity politics written large, and now
Speaker 4: it's written into the law. So the law and the judge,
Speaker 4: they're all the authorities are using identity politics, judging you
Speaker 4: by identity politics.
Speaker 9: Well, this is another thing that I will speak with
Speaker 9: Matt about. But where are the female elders in that group,
Speaker 9: because let's obsession about gender equity go out the window
Speaker 9: when it's dealing with the Muslim population and the fact
Speaker 9: that that that religion does have a female problem. And
Speaker 9: I don't care what you want to pretend, and my
Speaker 9: family fled and Islamu's country. I can tell you the
Speaker 9: rights of women in Muslim majority countries are not the
Speaker 9: same as men. That's just a reality and we just
Speaker 9: ignore it at the moment.
Speaker 4: We'll also put up a photo of Keir Starman taking
Speaker 4: the knee with his deputy leader to Black Lives Matter,
Speaker 4: So again, identity politics rit lives.
Speaker 1: There they are.
Speaker 4: That's the British Prime Minister taking the knee with his
Speaker 4: sidekick to identity politics.
Speaker 1: Let's bring in Matt Goodwin.
Speaker 4: Matt, always great to see you, so much for you again.
Speaker 4: It's so much it's been going on in Britain this
Speaker 4: past week. Give us your breakdown on it. And you
Speaker 4: know we've been discussing it, the threats to social media,
Speaker 4: the way the law and the authorities now seem to
Speaker 4: be playing this identity politics game. How serious is it
Speaker 4: and how concerned are you about free speech in Britain?
Speaker 1: Matt Well, the.
Speaker 15: First thing to say is this is very serious and
Speaker 15: I'm deeply concerned about what is about to happen in
Speaker 15: this country, the home of Magna Carta, the home of
Speaker 15: individual liberty. I think what we've seen over the last
Speaker 15: week is the new labor government only a month old
Speaker 15: respond to the riots and protests by essentially saying this
Speaker 15: is all far right thuggery. The white working class are racists.
Speaker 15: There's nothing to see here apart from criminality and people
Speaker 15: breaking the law. Now, back during the Black Lives Matter protest,
Speaker 15: which you've just mentioned, the debate was completely different.
Speaker 1: At that time.
Speaker 15: It was let's talk about what is underneath the anger,
Speaker 15: let's talk about the understandable concerns and the grievances. For
Speaker 15: this time around, nobody's interested in doing that in the
Speaker 15: political elite. They are just shutting this down. So what
Speaker 15: we are going to see over the next few weeks,
Speaker 15: here's my prediction, new legislation expanding the definition of Islamophobia
Speaker 15: so we can't critique Islam in British society. We're going
Speaker 15: to see social media regulations being tightened. We've had remarkably
Speaker 15: police today saying that they would look for extraditing people
Speaker 15: who are making comments on social media that are inappropriate
Speaker 15: or deemed to be legal but harmful whatever. That no
Speaker 15: idea what that phrase means, but this is you know, look,
Speaker 15: I mean, am I living in Britain or am I
Speaker 15: living in the Soviet Union? I'm not entirely sure anymore.
Speaker 15: All I can tell you is I'm deeply concerned about
Speaker 15: the direction of travel.
Speaker 9: Well, yeah, you might as well be in North Korea
Speaker 9: or China, because you've got the London's Metropolitan Police Chief
Speaker 9: threatening too. Like you mentioned, extradite the likes of Elon Musker.
Speaker 9: Anybody who is in his mind posted something online that
Speaker 9: could be a f offensive insightful. Lets us actually have
Speaker 9: a listen to him talking about this.
Speaker 4: The road.
Speaker 9: Well, that's that's something else that wasn't London Metropolitan Police Chief.
Speaker 9: But uh, it's interesting.
Speaker 1: I could just come in on that.
Speaker 15: Yes, that clip is very revealing. What you just saw
Speaker 15: was a labor counselor calling for the murder of people
Speaker 15: participating in the immigration protests. And the reason that is
Speaker 15: important is because the entire political elite in this country
Speaker 15: have only talked about the criminality and thuggery as they
Speaker 15: call it within the white working class. They've not talked
Speaker 15: about the Muslim gangs turning up with weapons and organized
Speaker 15: violence in Northern England. They've not talked about labor counselor
Speaker 15: openly calling for the murder of people participating in immigration protests.
Speaker 15: So this is why after this week, our Prime Minister
Speaker 15: Kiir Starmer is now widely being called to tier care.
Speaker 15: There is a two tier politics here. There is the
Speaker 15: politics of minorities who are seen to be good, sacred,
Speaker 15: morally righteous, and then there is everybody else who is
Speaker 15: seen to be suspicious or racist or far right. And
Speaker 15: this is you know, for a government that is one
Speaker 15: month old. I mean, this is a disastrous start for
Speaker 15: Kir Starmer and the Labor government.
Speaker 10: James Well, you know, you talk about the sort of
Speaker 10: the sacredness of migrants in diversity, and it seems to
Speaker 10: me I was saying before, this feels almost like this
Speaker 10: is kind of a religious holy war here in Britain,
Speaker 10: led by a political class which has decided that the
Speaker 10: way that it will get power is by sacrificing traditional
Speaker 10: working class. Britain's on the altar of political correctness and
Speaker 10: everybody else come along for the ride and you'll be
Speaker 10: okay as long as you mouth the right words, say
Speaker 10: the right things. But this seems to be a complete
Speaker 10: rejection of hundreds of years of progress that Britain has
Speaker 10: made towards being, you know, a place of liberty, with
Speaker 10: its own very British traditions.
Speaker 15: Well, of course, the left throughout its history has also
Speaker 15: celebrated riots and protests as a means of getting things done.
Speaker 15: I mean, yeah, suff rejects, for example, the chartists, the
Speaker 15: levelers on the left. Historically a street protest was celebrated.
Speaker 1: But here we've.
Speaker 15: Got, you know, the wrong kinds of people protesting about
Speaker 15: the wrong kind of issue, which is mass immigration. Now,
Speaker 15: just one thing to say on this, if you're part
Speaker 15: of the white working class in this country, it's entirely
Speaker 15: logical and rational for you to have concluded that actually
Speaker 15: the only way you're going to be heard is by
Speaker 15: protesting on the streets of Britain over these issues. Because
Speaker 15: you've watched Black Lives Matter, you've watched pro Hamas, anti
Speaker 15: Semitic protesters marching through the streets of London. You've basically
Speaker 15: learned the lesson that the only way of having your
Speaker 15: voice listened to in this system is by bypassing the
Speaker 15: ballot box and protesting on the streets. I mean, if
Speaker 15: you look at the polling this week in Britain, the
Speaker 15: most revealing part of this event for me was not
Speaker 15: that most people rejected violence and disorder. That's to be expected,
Speaker 15: that's to be welcomed. But it was between forty percent
Speaker 15: and sixty percent of all people either said these immigration
Speaker 15: protests were justifiable, or they sympathize with them, or they
Speaker 15: expressed support for them, you know. And this is what
Speaker 15: Keir Starmer is missing. There's another conversation going out there,
Speaker 15: guys in the country, and it's a lot of people saying,
Speaker 15: I understand why these people are frustrated, because I'm frustrated
Speaker 15: to I don't feel safe in my own country.
Speaker 9: And this goes a lot deeper than just immigration and
Speaker 9: lack of assimilation. Unshocked, there weren't protests. There weren't riots
Speaker 9: when we saw the full scale of the grooming scandal.
Speaker 9: We heard about Rotherham, but that was not just confined
Speaker 9: to Rotherham. It was throughout parts of the country where
Speaker 9: these girls', vulnerable young girls were systematically abused, rped, sold
Speaker 9: into sex work some of them, and the authorities didn't
Speaker 9: do anything for years because of concerns about not being
Speaker 9: politically correct targeting certain immigrant communities because they were the
Speaker 9: chief perpetrators in these crimes. So is that tell us
Speaker 9: about the deep underlying issues here, Because I think people
Speaker 9: are thinking, Okay, this is just because of one incident
Speaker 9: here or another incident there, when really this unread has
Speaker 9: been brewing for some time.
Speaker 15: I think it's a great point. There's no coincidence. It's
Speaker 15: not a coincidence that the rioting is particularly strong in
Speaker 15: a town like Rotherham, where an estimated one thousand, four
Speaker 15: hundred young white girls were systematically raped, as you say,
Speaker 15: by mainly Pakistani Muslim gangs. What was so shocking about
Speaker 15: that scandal was not only the extent to which the
Speaker 15: media class and the political class suppressed the story, and
Speaker 15: they really did suppress the story for many years. A
Speaker 15: lot of the reports have shown that, but it was
Speaker 15: actually how it became a symbol of this broken model
Speaker 15: of multiculturalism. Now, this is the key point about the
Speaker 15: riots and protests. What Britain has invested in for the
Speaker 15: last thirty or forty years is a model of multiculturalism
Speaker 15: that has said, Okay, if you're a minority group, you
Speaker 15: can keep your identity, to keep your cultural practices, your beliefs,
Speaker 15: your languages, will let you get on with it. But
Speaker 15: if you're in the majority, well we're not so comfortable
Speaker 15: with you preserving and celebrating your identity, your values, your culture.
Speaker 15: What we're going to say to you is you need
Speaker 15: to repackage your identity around the celebration of diversity and multiculturalism.
Speaker 15: And if not that, you're going to have to be
Speaker 15: ashamed of your identity because it's Western, and it's British
Speaker 15: and it's racist, etc.
Speaker 1: So that has left a lot of.
Speaker 15: People with nowhere to go because if they want to
Speaker 15: defend their identity, they're proud of their national identity, they're
Speaker 15: not allowed to express it. And then they see the
Speaker 15: scandals like grooming and they say, well, well, why are
Speaker 15: we letting people in our country that don't respect us,
Speaker 15: certainly don't respect our children, They don't seem to want
Speaker 15: to live according to our rule of law and our
Speaker 15: ways of life. And we're being told that we should
Speaker 15: be ashamed of who we are. Well, we're not going
Speaker 15: to have this anymore.
Speaker 16: And I think that is.
Speaker 15: Essentially is the mood that has run through a lot
Speaker 15: of those northern towns, a lot of those working class towns,
Speaker 15: where again people have just looked at the political class
Speaker 15: and said I'm not going to have this anymore.
Speaker 4: And Labour's response to that has been suppression of freedom
Speaker 4: of expression and freedom of speech. Matt Goodwin, you write
Speaker 4: brilliantly on your Matt Goodwin substack blog blog, so I
Speaker 4: urge people to go and check out more because you're
Speaker 4: one of the few voices of reason coming out of
Speaker 4: the UK.
Speaker 1: Before they ban you, Matt, heaven.
Speaker 4: Help us, but I urge Outsiders to go onto Matt
Speaker 4: Goodwin's substack blog and check out more there.
Speaker 1: Thanks Matt.
Speaker 4: Great to chat to you as always, will speak again
Speaker 4: soon in a tick Rita's reality Check.
Speaker 1: You don't want to miss it, very funny.
Speaker 9: Raygan, Welcome back to Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Notorious
Speaker 9: Dei and Dean James Tupac Morrow. And I'm reader Pane
Speaker 9: and for the first time in my life, I've watched
Speaker 9: a member of the Australian Olympic team perform and known
Speaker 9: with one hundred percent certainty that I could do better.
Speaker 9: One hundred percent certainty. Of course, I'm talking about Rachel
Speaker 9: Gunn aka Ray Gun and the funeral which has swept
Speaker 9: the nation and indeed much of the world as millions
Speaker 9: react in shock and bewilderment and fits of laughter to
Speaker 9: Australia's entrant in the breaking event. Yes, apparently breakdancing is
Speaker 9: part of the Paris Games, and for once, I'm delighted
Speaker 9: that we are not allowed to show you any footage
Speaker 9: from the Paris Games, because, trust me, her performance was
Speaker 9: so excruciatingly bad that people genuinely believe that it was
Speaker 9: some elaborate joke, a sort of a big Chris liliesque
Speaker 9: joke on the Games. But alas, it was all too real.
Speaker 9: And though we are not permitted to show you footage
Speaker 9: of ray Gun's performance at the Olympics, let's have a
Speaker 9: look at how this pronoun and oun seeing academic specializing
Speaker 9: in the cultural politics of breakdancing, managed to qualify for
Speaker 9: the Games. There are supremely talented athletes who train tirelessly,
Speaker 9: who have sublime skills, strength and speed, and most will
Speaker 9: never qualify for the Games. But here we are. It's
Speaker 9: twenty twenty four, the age of absurdity, where the Olympics
Speaker 9: include males with x Y chromosomes in combat sports being
Speaker 9: celebrated and given medals for beating the for Jesus out
Speaker 9: of women, and where we have breaking, which, to be fair,
Speaker 9: can be highly entertaining when done right. To do it right,
Speaker 9: you need enormous strength and skill but sadly that was
Speaker 9: lacking for Raygun and the smartest thing to do after
Speaker 9: her disaster stress performance at the Games would have been
Speaker 9: to pretend it was a joke, join in the laughter show,
Speaker 9: the all the ability to have a laugh at yourself.
Speaker 9: But no, we have gone straight into full victim mode
Speaker 9: and now we're bet copying lectures even from the Australian
Speaker 9: Olympic committees and emirs.
Speaker 17: If you don't know Rachel's story in two thousand and eight,
Speaker 17: she was locked in a room crying being involved in
Speaker 17: a male dominated sport as the only woman, and it
Speaker 17: took great courage for her to continue on and fight
Speaker 17: for her opportunity to participate in a sport that she
Speaker 17: loved and that got her to winning the Olympic qualifying
Speaker 17: event to be here in Paris. She is the best
Speaker 17: breakdancer female that we have for Australia.
Speaker 9: Crying over the patriarch is hold on breakdancing? Imagine that?
Speaker 9: What a time to be alive, Adamirs. Their claims that
Speaker 9: Rachel Raygan is the best breakdancer we have in Australia
Speaker 9: really was a cat to day night unavailable.
Speaker 2: Damn the list, how are you saying how killed are
Speaker 2: you able.
Speaker 9: To that may have actually scored some points? How about
Speaker 9: this potential Olympian And let's not forget the dancer who
Speaker 9: put breaking on the map in this country, Chris Lily's Jonah.
Speaker 18: Were polyp the only only full Polynesian people here in
Speaker 18: the whole school.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I'm one of the best breakdancers in the whole
Speaker 6: of the school.
Speaker 16: You're the brick in this whole suburb, in the whole suburb.
Speaker 1: In the whole suburb.
Speaker 9: I'm not even kidding. Some of chrys Lily's moves there
Speaker 9: were more skillful than what we saw from ray Gun,
Speaker 9: who I think would have benefited from some training from
Speaker 9: Elaine Venice. Lord, that's enough frivolity for now. We're not
Speaker 9: allowed to mock what seemed to be designed for mockery.
Speaker 9: Not when we learn Raygun is a serious university lecturer
Speaker 9: whose academic work includes gems like this on the impact
Speaker 9: of Breaking's inclusion in the Olympics on the Australian breaking
Speaker 9: scene and the dangers of settler colonial structures that rely
Speaker 9: upon radicalized and gendered hierarchies. She's still talking about breakdancing
Speaker 9: there by the way, But you know the laugh song.
Speaker 9: Not only our taxpayers funding that sort of academic work,
Speaker 9: but she scored a spot in the Olympic team flights
Speaker 9: accommodation in Paris. I mean, she's the one who should
Speaker 9: be laughing. Really, but don't you dare mock her because
Speaker 9: that makes you a misogynist. Let's hear from animeus again.
Speaker 17: What we have had as women athletes has faced in
Speaker 17: terms of criticism, belittlement, judgment, criticism and simple comments like
Speaker 17: they shouldn't be there.
Speaker 9: She shouldn't be there because she can't dance. Anna, this
Speaker 9: isn't a gender thing. And Reygarn also called the painfully
Speaker 9: woke sports media jumping to her defense. One of the
Speaker 9: very first was Will Swanton, who decried the manner in
Speaker 9: which Reygun has been criticized, writing lead me out of it.
Speaker 9: Good on her worth, noting though that the same writer
Speaker 9: had no issues piling on Novak Djokovic even as it
Speaker 9: was banned from the Australian Open, chucked in detention and
Speaker 9: even deported from the country. He wrote this. He wrote,
Speaker 9: to Melbournians have been to Helen back, you cannot expect
Speaker 9: them to watch an unvaccinated Djokovic roll into town. And
Speaker 9: greet him with no worries. Mate, what's good for them
Speaker 9: is good for him. I think he's trying his luck
Speaker 9: by saying he probably won't come if he has to
Speaker 9: be vaccinated, testing the waters. Seeing if he can get
Speaker 9: away with special treatment in the coming weeks, he will
Speaker 9: accept the reality vas up or vanish from the summer
Speaker 9: of tennis. Don't be too surprised if he relents. Well, yeah,
Speaker 9: that age well didn't it. Novak didn't bend his principles
Speaker 9: and he was welcomed back, and far from vanishing from tennis,
Speaker 9: he has gone on to win Grand Slam after Grand Slam,
Speaker 9: his one gold. And you know what, I bet if
Speaker 9: he puts his mind to it, he could even excel
Speaker 9: at breakdancing.
Speaker 1: We could have done a breakdancing thing, hedn't we We
Speaker 1: could have Please can't.
Speaker 9: Show up breakdown this earlier. Maybe in a few weeks,
Speaker 9: but I am confident that I could even teach you
Speaker 9: to to do better than that. Maybe with you.
Speaker 2: Is the trump douth you.
Speaker 4: Well, let's bring in us into the Bridget McKenzie. Bridget
Speaker 4: always great to have you here on Outsiders. We're not
Speaker 4: going to ask you to break dance. I bet you're
Speaker 4: a better breakdancer than anyone.
Speaker 1: Here or anyone at the Olympics.
Speaker 4: But listen, there's lots of local news to discuss now,
Speaker 4: so let's talk about it. The first thing I want
Speaker 4: to mention to you is a great speech by David Harris,
Speaker 4: who's the CEO of the agric Australian Agriculture Company, and
Speaker 4: he made the point that the existential threats to farming
Speaker 4: and to agriculture in general are the greatest he's ever seen.
Speaker 4: And these threats come from climate activism, greens, green tape,
Speaker 4: red tape, black tape, so many threats now upon the
Speaker 4: Australian farming industry, agricultural industry.
Speaker 1: Do you agree with him?
Speaker 19: Bridget absolutely? Rowan and great to be with you.
Speaker 20: I liked tortured poets back in the day rather than breakdancing.
Speaker 20: But yeah, it's great to see get up early and
Speaker 20: seen fifteen hundred meter run by Jess Hull. But in
Speaker 20: terms of agriculture, I don't know what's happened in this
Speaker 20: country where we see farmers becoming the villains, which is
Speaker 20: essentially what we've got.
Speaker 19: It's not just the far left, as you've outlined.
Speaker 20: But indeed our own labor party who's doing preference deals
Speaker 20: at the last elections with animal activists that have seen
Speaker 20: the shutdown of the live sheep trade in Western Australia,
Speaker 20: a state that absolutely gave Anthony Alberanezi the Prime ministership.
Speaker 20: And so no matter where you look, we're seeing agriculture
Speaker 20: under attack. The end game, I believe is the end
Speaker 20: of livestock production more generally in this country, which would
Speaker 20: be an absolute tragedy, and I think is based on
Speaker 20: a lack of scientific literacy across the broader community, because
Speaker 20: there's study after study demonizing farmers and farming practices which
Speaker 20: are really underpinned by dodgy science.
Speaker 19: You know, the fact you just look at the Olympic village.
Speaker 19: If we're going to continue with the theme.
Speaker 20: We've got concerns that world yeah, concerns that world records
Speaker 20: aren't being broken because nobody can get enough protein into
Speaker 20: these athletes actually power and fuel their absolute performance.
Speaker 19: And instead these left wing people are wanting to see
Speaker 19: lab grown meat.
Speaker 20: I mean, human being didn't become as big and strong
Speaker 20: and smart as we are by eating plants.
Speaker 10: James, Well, so we're going back to Parliament, where is
Speaker 10: we've seen some really interesting things happen over the last
Speaker 10: several weeks.
Speaker 21: Here.
Speaker 10: Number one, I think is this fight between the RBA
Speaker 10: and the government on inflation, on interest rates, and this
Speaker 10: narrative of government spending. What sort of narrative can we
Speaker 10: expect as the government returns to Parliament this week about
Speaker 10: the way their irresponsible spending is driving up inflation. We've
Speaker 10: just seen another gift to another sector in the childcare
Speaker 10: sector that I think a ten percent fifteen wage gift
Speaker 10: with no productivity increase. At some point, when is the
Speaker 10: government going acknowledge that it's making the problem worse.
Speaker 19: I don't think you're going to see that at all
Speaker 19: from this government, James.
Speaker 20: If you believe in double speak aka nineteen eighty four style,
Speaker 20: this government's got it in space. They ignore the laws
Speaker 20: of physics, which haven't changed just because they got into parliament,
Speaker 20: and the laws of economics, which have underpinned the way
Speaker 20: the marketers worked.
Speaker 19: For centuries and that continues.
Speaker 20: So what I think we're dangerously seeing is the RBA
Speaker 20: versus the Treasury versus Jim Charmers, and the RBA won't
Speaker 20: be I don't believe, won't be influenced by the Labor
Speaker 20: Party or the Treasurer is pleading or begging or false economics.
Speaker 20: The reality is, Michelle Bullyt couldn't have been clearer. State
Speaker 20: and federal Labor government's spending has made the economy hot,
Speaker 20: and that means inflation is going to stay higher than
Speaker 20: it needs to be for longer.
Speaker 19: And it's Australians who are paying the cost.
Speaker 20: And no matter how often Albo and Jim say that's
Speaker 20: not the case, doesn't change the facts. And I think
Speaker 20: you're seeing it in the suburbs right around our country
Speaker 20: that people are struggling with their mortgages and the RBA
Speaker 20: will not be bringing those interest rates down until it
Speaker 20: can have some confidence that the government will get it
Speaker 20: spending under control.
Speaker 9: Now Bridge, and you can look forward to the Greens
Speaker 9: urging the Albanesi government this week to put targeted sanctions
Speaker 9: against Israel, condemn the net and Yahoo government, all sorts
Speaker 9: of other measures that they want the Albanezy government to meet.
Speaker 9: How is that going to go? Because we know Labor
Speaker 9: are compromised on this issue. They have been all over
Speaker 9: the shop, They've shown little moral clarity. How are they
Speaker 9: going to cope with this new Green assault on this issue.
Speaker 19: Well, I think they're going to have their usual flaccid response.
Speaker 20: I mean, these guys don't know up from down, they
Speaker 20: don't know ally from foe, and they're actually really challenged,
Speaker 20: particularly in the Senate where the Greens do have significant
Speaker 20: numbers and can really determine whether legislation passes or not.
Speaker 20: And see Penny Wong as the leader of the Government
Speaker 20: in the Senate, get quite worked up each and every
Speaker 20: time the Greens put one of these kind of wedging
Speaker 20: motions on the table, and I think they're going to
Speaker 20: be similarly challenged again. At the end of the day,
Speaker 20: leadership is about doing the right thing despite the protestations
Speaker 20: and the angst around you. It is standing firm in
Speaker 20: the face of challenges. And every single time a challenge
Speaker 20: is put forward to this government, they fall flat and
Speaker 20: can't seem to recognize that you have to stand for something.
Speaker 19: And I think you're seeing that in the polls.
Speaker 20: The Australian Government knows that these guys aren't on the
Speaker 20: Australian people's side. They're simply on the side of winning seats,
Speaker 20: particularly in this case with the Israel issue in Western
Speaker 20: Sydney and protecting some of those ministers who have significant
Speaker 20: Islamic populations in their electorates.
Speaker 1: Bridget I also wanted to ask you.
Speaker 4: We had last week on the show Willie Packer, one
Speaker 4: of the investors in the Jabaluka uranium mine up there
Speaker 4: near Kakadoo. At the Gama Festival, Anthony Albanize. He made
Speaker 4: a song dance about how the future for Indigenous Australians
Speaker 4: would be based entirely on renewables and basically climate technology.
Speaker 1: At the same time he shut down Jabbaluka, which.
Speaker 4: Was a shorefire investment worth billions of dollars potentially to
Speaker 4: Australian investors and taxpairs. What do you make of Albanese's
Speaker 4: Do you think the future for Indigenous Australians is renewables
Speaker 4: only as he claims?
Speaker 20: Well, I think this is a classic case of twenty
Speaker 20: first century colonialism. You know, you can have the glass beads,
Speaker 20: not the mirrors. It's just insane, absolutely insane. We want
Speaker 20: to see economic empowerment, particularly for marginalized Indigenous Australians, and
Speaker 20: that means all options on the table to actually grow
Speaker 20: well paying jobs in the Northern Territory. And that's exact
Speaker 20: the government is now wanting to shut those opportunities down.
Speaker 20: And we know Australia's uranium is going to power progress
Speaker 20: over this century, particularly as the world is seeking to
Speaker 20: triple its net zero nuclear energy production overcoming decades, so
Speaker 20: it should be a bright future for Jabaluka and the
Speaker 20: territory uranium deposits. Instead, once again, Albo is picking ideology
Speaker 20: over practical solutions that will actually help people.
Speaker 10: James, there was an intering news snippet this week that
Speaker 10: out of Queensland, the opposition there were sort of the
Speaker 10: government there hasn't been running hard on an anti nuclear
Speaker 10: scare campaign trying to tie the coalition to nuclear energy,
Speaker 10: because it was said that in the regions there's a
Speaker 10: lot less take up of the scare campaign than people
Speaker 10: had on the left had originally thought. Is this an
Speaker 10: indicator that the nuclear issue is going to be prosecuted
Speaker 10: as a top tier issue in the coming election campaign,
Speaker 10: which could be sooner than we.
Speaker 1: Think, James.
Speaker 20: I think Australians are recognizing that that nexus between ideology
Speaker 20: and reality is real. The outlook for prices for their
Speaker 20: energy production, for the reliability of energy production is at
Speaker 20: risk if we actually don't get some baseload into the network,
Speaker 20: and they know that the renewable rollout is a disaster
Speaker 20: and it's not going anywhere fast, particularly as those regional
Speaker 20: communities that are having to put up with the twenty
Speaker 20: eight thousand kilometers of transmission lines and the solar panels
Speaker 20: and the wind farms are saying, hang on, what.
Speaker 19: About our private property rights?
Speaker 20: So Australians are looking at net zero nuclear as a
Speaker 20: viable option not just to twenty fifty but well into
Speaker 20: next centric because if we ca get this nuclear positioning right,
Speaker 20: a bit of a grease and oil change at sixty
Speaker 20: years and these assets can go up to ninety years.
Speaker 20: And I think Australians who've traveled the world, particularly young people,
Speaker 20: know that if it's okay for France, if it's okay
Speaker 20: for the US and UK, it is something that should be.
Speaker 19: Okay for Australians going forward.
Speaker 20: And so I'm excited about having a sensible conversation doesn't
Speaker 20: involve comics of three eyed fish, et cetera, but a
Speaker 20: mature debate about how we power progress in this country
Speaker 20: going forward, and nuclear is going to be a.
Speaker 19: Part of that.
Speaker 4: Here here senat Bridget McKenzie always great to chat to you,
Speaker 4: Thanks so much for coming on Outsiders this morning, and
Speaker 4: great to have.
Speaker 1: You here with us. As always, She's great. Coming up.
Speaker 4: Let's do some net zany and some wacademia and we've
Speaker 4: got some very big Outsiders.
Speaker 1: News in a tech welcome back.
Speaker 4: You're watching Outsiders with Rita Panahee, with James Morrow and
Speaker 4: myself Rowan Dean, and thank you so much for watching
Speaker 4: us every Sunday morning. We certainly do appreciate it. Indeed,
Speaker 4: we have some very big news for you this morning.
Speaker 4: Outsiders will be appearing at the twenty twenty four Seapack
Speaker 4: Conference at the Sophotel in Brisbane on the weekend of
Speaker 4: October five and six, and we will be hosting.
Speaker 1: This very show live from that event.
Speaker 4: We will be chatting to guests at Seapack, will be
Speaker 4: taking questions from the audience, one of yours. If you're
Speaker 4: smart enough to be there, and we can't wait to
Speaker 4: see you there.
Speaker 1: It will be a terrific occasion.
Speaker 4: So if you'd like to see Outsiders live, make sure
Speaker 4: you go to www dot SEAPACKCPAC.
Speaker 1: Dot network to get your tickets. More on this how's
Speaker 1: the week's going Now, let's have some net zany Well.
Speaker 4: Bridget mackenzie mentioned the diet of the Olympians and it
Speaker 4: seems that rita worms were part of that nutritious green
Speaker 4: climate change influenced.
Speaker 9: It's so sad for these Olympians. Not only do they
Speaker 9: have to deal with, you know, breaking being an Olympic sport,
Speaker 9: this discoverer, but no, really, we've seen the green games.
Speaker 9: We've seen these awful beds, and sleep is very important
Speaker 9: for an Olympian and these beds seem to be something
Speaker 9: that you know, they're like a child put together cardboard.
Speaker 9: They've got no air conditioning, a lot of them during
Speaker 9: the heat of the summer. And most importantly, they're not
Speaker 9: getting their nutritional needs met. They've run out of eggs,
Speaker 9: run out of protein because they want to be sustainable
Speaker 9: and have a plant based diet at these games. So
Speaker 9: that has been the emphasis. And it's not what athletes
Speaker 9: want and need. I mean, it's not easy being green.
Speaker 1: You should see what it does to you break.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 10: It's not only what athletes you know, don't want or need,
Speaker 10: it's what people don't want to need. What we saw,
Speaker 10: what we've seen here, guys in that Olympic village is
Speaker 10: a taste of the Klaus Schwab future. This is the
Speaker 10: easy bugs future, you know, this is it, except it's
Speaker 10: all easy bugs, you know. But it's because it's in French.
Speaker 10: But seriously, this whole idea of socially engineering, what these
Speaker 10: guys these and these are the elite athletes. They're not
Speaker 10: the ordinary people, you know, can you they said, well, no,
Speaker 10: we're gonna have enough thangs and we're deliberately not going
Speaker 10: to have things. We're deliberately going to create a shortage
Speaker 10: of meat protein so that people eat the vegan stuff.
Speaker 9: That's often teams that can afford it. Some of them
Speaker 9: are shifting their athletes out of the village just so
Speaker 9: they can have a more comfortable place to sleep. But
Speaker 9: they can have air conditioning that can have decent But
Speaker 9: I mean.
Speaker 1: It's like you shouldn't.
Speaker 2: You're in French, French, like you were in the home
Speaker 2: of the state Freez.
Speaker 4: You are at the home of all of this sales food,
Speaker 4: you know, and pago, you know.
Speaker 2: I mean, they should be eating fois gras before their races.
Speaker 2: It's so ridiculous.
Speaker 4: Well, we talk about the Olympians, the one Olympians, Well
Speaker 4: Australia has done exceptionally well in the Olympics, and much
Speaker 4: of that thanks and praise must go to Gina Ryan Hart,
Speaker 4: who of course have sponsored so many of our athletes.
Speaker 4: And indeed there were photos that you might have seen
Speaker 4: of an amazing river cruise down the river sen there
Speaker 4: with the two gr Wagu beef pies. So I think
Speaker 4: they were probably starving by the time they got there.
Speaker 1: Please Gina, let us have the kidman pies. Fantastic stuff.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about evs.
Speaker 4: We have Mercedes, we have Audi, so Mercedes are There's
Speaker 4: been this kind of several unfortunate events in Korea, South Korea.
Speaker 4: There have been fires are there's your EV's in South Korea,
Speaker 4: And there's a thing now called ev phobia which has
Speaker 4: taken over in South Korea because people are nervous that
Speaker 4: their car park will end up looking like what you
Speaker 4: see on the screen.
Speaker 1: There forty cars.
Speaker 10: I mean like the think is too like this is
Speaker 10: actually a real nightmare situation. This is in the car
Speaker 10: park underneath then apartment block. Here, these things are impossible
Speaker 10: put out. You've got a little bird for hours. It
Speaker 10: torched this fire towards at least forty other cars, damaged
Speaker 10: a whole bunch more, a bunch of people in the
Speaker 10: building were taken for smoke inhalation and other injuries. Thankfully
Speaker 10: nobody was even worse injured with this. But I mean,
Speaker 10: these things are ticking time bombs ready to go. What
Speaker 10: happens if this happens in a shopping center in a
Speaker 10: westfield somewhere. Actually, it's a disaster. And unlike a petrol fire,
Speaker 10: you can't put them out.
Speaker 9: This is the problem because if you've got a building
Speaker 9: that isn't going to be able to withstand a file
Speaker 9: like that that you have to let burn out, you
Speaker 9: can't pour water on it. That's that is scary stuff.
Speaker 9: And as we get more and more of these vehicles
Speaker 9: on the road and into apartment blocks and undercover car
Speaker 9: parks and underground car parks.
Speaker 1: What can go exactly? And how do you?
Speaker 4: Meanwhile, are knocking back their plans for their evs. So
Speaker 4: there you go, Chris Bow and take notes. Lots more
Speaker 4: coming up in a tick here on Outsiders Don't Go Away. Hello,
Speaker 4: you're watching Outsiders with Rita Pannahee, with James Morrow, and
Speaker 4: with myself. Rowan Dean, a friend of mine told me
Speaker 4: this week in sorrow as much as in despair that
Speaker 4: he doesn't think Donald Trump can win the US election
Speaker 4: because all the momentum is on the side of Kamala
Speaker 4: Harris and her deeply disturbing vice presidential pick Tim Waltz.
Speaker 1: I disagree.
Speaker 4: I think when Americans go to the polls, they will
Speaker 4: ask themselves the same quest questions they ask themselves every
Speaker 4: four years, and having looked at the two competing teams,
Speaker 4: the capitalists versus the Communists, and answer those same questions,
Speaker 4: they will vote for Donald Trump and jd Vance, possibly
Speaker 4: even in my opinion, in a landslide. Which questions will
Speaker 4: they ask themselves? Well, the same ones asked by one
Speaker 4: of America's greatest ever presidents, Ronald Reagan.
Speaker 2: President Ronald Reagan, who has a few questions for you.
Speaker 11: All of you will go to the polls, who stand
Speaker 11: there in the polling place and make a decision. I
Speaker 11: think when you make that decision, it might be well
Speaker 11: if you would ask yourself, are you better off than
Speaker 11: you were four years ago? Is it easier for you
Speaker 11: to go and buy things in the stores than it
Speaker 11: was four years ago? Is there more or less unemployment
Speaker 11: in the country than there was four years ago? America
Speaker 11: has respected throughout the world as it was.
Speaker 1: Do you feel that our security.
Speaker 11: Is a c that we're as strong as we were
Speaker 11: four years ago. If you don't think that this course
Speaker 11: that we've been on for the last four years is
Speaker 11: what you would like to see us follow for the
Speaker 11: next four then I could suggest another choice that you.
Speaker 1: Have President Trump, He'll make America great again.
Speaker 4: Yes, that is, of course a new ad from the
Speaker 4: Trump campaign which shamelessly but legitimately borrows the cutos and
Speaker 4: success of the Reagan Republican years to sell Trump's Republican Party.
Speaker 4: And indeed, if Americans do manage to ignore all the
Speaker 4: razmatas of the Kamala smoke and mirror show and ask
Speaker 4: themselves the fundamental questions about national prosperity, national security, and
Speaker 4: national well being, the only answer is, of course, to
Speaker 4: vote for Donald Trump. The race obsessed, climate obsessed, transgender
Speaker 4: obsessed Harris and Waltz team, or should we just call
Speaker 4: it by its real name, the Obama Term four team.
Speaker 4: May sway young wocottheads and old fashioned socialists, but at
Speaker 4: the end of the day, I have faith that mainstream
Speaker 4: America will ignore the phony black accents and all the
Speaker 4: other stupid woke stunts.
Speaker 1: Don't take my word for it. Ask your average American.
Speaker 22: I'm a black American woman and I will not be
Speaker 22: voting for Kamala Harris. Why because my vote has nothing
Speaker 22: to do with me being black. My vote has to
Speaker 22: do with the fact that I like safe and secure borders.
Speaker 22: I'm not a fan of inflation, and I like a
Speaker 22: president that puts America first. And that candidate for me
Speaker 22: is Donald Trump. And it's time that people be so honest.
Speaker 22: Whether you like the may or not, we need Donald
Speaker 22: Trump in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 4: The shamelessness of the attempt to paint Kamala Harris, who
Speaker 4: quite rightly paraded herself as a proud in the for
Speaker 4: most of her career, are suddenly predominantly black.
Speaker 1: Well, it hasn't worked, and nor should it have.
Speaker 4: People are not fools, as this journalist Citizen Journalists discovered
Speaker 4: when she asked numerous black and Hispanic voters in the Bronx.
Speaker 4: She wandered around the Bronx and asked them if they
Speaker 4: were persuaded by Kamala's identity politics. The answer was a
Speaker 4: resounding no, with one woman specifically referencing Martin Luther King's
Speaker 4: plea that we judge people like Kamala not by the
Speaker 4: color of her skin, but by her character.
Speaker 11: But she's going to keep running on that color.
Speaker 23: She's got to have a misconception about how black people
Speaker 23: really wrong.
Speaker 24: If you bring somebody into office that looks like you
Speaker 24: but then continues to detriment your community.
Speaker 11: What was that for?
Speaker 24: But if you choose somebody who can raise your community,
Speaker 24: then you choose the right one.
Speaker 1: Yes, who do you choose? Personally?
Speaker 4: I choose Trump and there were many many others who
Speaker 4: expressed the same sentiments. Interesting that, unlike Trump and Vance,
Speaker 4: both Kamala Harris and her VP pick Tim Waltz.
Speaker 1: Have repeatedly been accused of.
Speaker 4: Being phonies, chameleons who shift their identities to pander to
Speaker 4: the perceived crowd. And we'll be chatting James Reacher and
Speaker 4: I shortly about another element of.
Speaker 1: That with Tim Watts.
Speaker 4: By the way, if I may be so bold, may
Speaker 4: I offer up a word of advices to Kamala and
Speaker 4: other politicians who are desperate to pander to the black vote.
Speaker 4: If a black person asks you who your favorite living
Speaker 4: rapper is, try to avoid naming someone who is dead.
Speaker 23: Best rapper alive Tupac, you say he lives on a lot.
Speaker 19: I know I can't do.
Speaker 6: Listen, West Coast girls.
Speaker 19: Think Tupac lives on I'm with you.
Speaker 1: I'm with you.
Speaker 19: So Tupac keep.
Speaker 6: Going, keep doing that. Who would I say? I mean,
Speaker 6: there's so many.
Speaker 16: I mean, you know, I.
Speaker 23: There are some that I would not mention right now
Speaker 23: because they should stay in their lane.
Speaker 6: But others, I mean, I want to know who would
Speaker 6: keep moving?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 9: That was not supposed to be a stumpery either?
Speaker 1: What about uh?
Speaker 4: Huh?
Speaker 1: What a vacuous individual? Donald Trump is only saying that.
Speaker 1: Many in the black and colored communities are thinking.
Speaker 9: What do you think about Trump? Say Kamala Harris as black.
Speaker 6: I thought she was Indian.
Speaker 9: She was saying she was Indian.
Speaker 4: Personally, my biggest fear is not that Trump will lose
Speaker 4: the popular vote, but that, through whatever means, the Democrats may,
Speaker 4: as I believe they did in twenty twenty, although most
Speaker 4: so called experts disagree with me, unethically fortify or in
Speaker 4: fluence the actual ballot voting to the extent that the
Speaker 4: numbers fall their way. Indeed, this week, a group of
Speaker 4: Georgia citizens held a press conference at the State Board
Speaker 4: Election alleging precisely that.
Speaker 3: May I remind you that Forton County has been found
Speaker 3: to be in violation of election law, not once for
Speaker 3: the hand eyed it, but twice for the machine count.
Speaker 3: And now we can prove that.
Speaker 2: They intentional had intentional.
Speaker 3: Human intervention, which is the predicate for election fraud.
Speaker 4: Interesting, although I must point out there's no suggestion that
Speaker 4: votes were intentionally mishandled, or that any of the erarors
Speaker 4: identified would have changed the election result.
Speaker 1: I don't know, we shall see, but one thing is
Speaker 1: for sure.
Speaker 4: It's not only Americans who should be sweating over who
Speaker 4: wins this forthcoming US presidential election. The future of the
Speaker 4: entire world depends on this choice. If Harrison Waltz Waltz
Speaker 4: into office, we will likely see multiple disasters around the world.
Speaker 1: Too horrifying to contemplate.
Speaker 4: Saul Zelenski's communist takeover of the world's most important democracy
Speaker 4: will have succeeded. Coupled with the new socialism of Britain
Speaker 4: that we were talking about, and authoritarianism and censorship, it
Speaker 4: is hard to think of a more terrifying time for
Speaker 4: Western Judaeo Christian values and a more dangerous existential threat
Speaker 4: to human individuality and our personal freedoms. We are already
Speaker 4: seeing the appalling socialist government in Britain launching a full
Speaker 4: on Orwellian assault on free speech. But if, on the
Speaker 4: other hand, as I believe will happen, Donald Trump and JD.
Speaker 4: Vance win the election, we will see not only a
Speaker 4: stemming of the totalitarian tides around the world, but a
Speaker 4: return to common sense freedom, free speech, liberty, and all
Speaker 4: the values our parents and grandparents and their parents.
Speaker 1: Fought and died for.
Speaker 4: And Abraham alliance in the Middle East will hopefully see
Speaker 4: Israel joining in a prosperous and peaceful new alliance with
Speaker 4: the Saudis and other Sunni states, and the end of
Speaker 4: the threat of Iran. Under Biden and Harris and Waltz,
Speaker 4: Israel is treated as little better than a pariah state.
Speaker 4: And it is no secret that one of the reasons
Speaker 4: Waltz was chosen was because the other more preferable candidate
Speaker 4: was Josh Shapiro, so called moderate left winger, who would
Speaker 4: have been a perfect pick except oh, he's Jewish and Israel.
Speaker 2: What a disgrace.
Speaker 1: The Democrats are modern lefties.
Speaker 4: Is it any wonder that under this dreadful Biden Harris administration,
Speaker 4: the younger generations have been utterly brainwashed into anti Semitic
Speaker 4: left wing beliefs, with many simply being unaware of the
Speaker 4: other ends of October seventh, one of the greatest crimes
Speaker 4: of this century. Have a look at this video in
Speaker 4: which a young reporter asks young New Yorkers if they'd
Speaker 4: even heard about the rapes and murders at the Nova
Speaker 4: Rock Festival.
Speaker 25: I wanted to ask if you've heard about the music
Speaker 25: festival massacre.
Speaker 15: No, no, I'm not.
Speaker 16: I have not heard about it.
Speaker 10: No I have it.
Speaker 25: Tell me about this massacre took a place in a desert.
Speaker 25: About three thousand young people came to celebrate life. This
Speaker 25: whole festival was about peace, and three hundred and sixty
Speaker 25: four people were murdered by terrorists and forty plus people
Speaker 25: was taken as hostages from this music festival.
Speaker 1: That's so sad.
Speaker 6: I haven't heard of that.
Speaker 1: Honestly, it's kind of poorly crowd.
Speaker 19: I think it was horrible. I feel bad that I
Speaker 19: didn't know about that.
Speaker 6: Where was it?
Speaker 1: They didn't know about it?
Speaker 26: Where was it?
Speaker 4: And then when the reporter young lady informed them that
Speaker 4: the festival was in Israel. Their initial concern and compassion
Speaker 4: was instantly replaced with suspicion and denial.
Speaker 25: I wanted to ask if you've heard about the music
Speaker 25: festival massacre.
Speaker 19: No, no, I'm not.
Speaker 16: I have not heard about it.
Speaker 1: No, I haven't tell me about this.
Speaker 25: Massacre took a place in a desert. About three thousand
Speaker 25: young people came to celebrate life. This whole festival was
Speaker 25: about peace, and three hundred and sixty four people were
Speaker 25: murdered by terrorists and forty plus people was taken as
Speaker 25: hostages from this music festival.
Speaker 1: That's so sad.
Speaker 16: I haven't heard of that.
Speaker 1: Honestly, it's kind of poorly crap.
Speaker 19: I think it was horrible. I feel bad that I
Speaker 19: didn't know about that.
Speaker 6: Where was it?
Speaker 2: Sorry?
Speaker 4: That was the same clip played twice, but in the
Speaker 4: actual clip, what then happens is she tells each of
Speaker 4: those individuals you just saw there who show their concern
Speaker 4: for this sterious rock festival, they've never heard of it.
Speaker 4: These atrocities occurred. Then, when the reporter tells them that
Speaker 4: it took place in Israel, one by one, all those
Speaker 4: same people you just saw start making excuses and saying, oh, well, yes, well,
Speaker 4: that's because the Palestinians have been oppressed and they start
Speaker 4: just buying the violence. Say will Palestinians have a right
Speaker 4: to be violent against Jews?
Speaker 1: And they carry on in this vein justifying the attacks
Speaker 1: of October seventh.
Speaker 4: That's how deeply ingrained anti Semitism infused with this pro
Speaker 4: Palestinian a gender has become amongst the young people.
Speaker 1: And that was just a random group in New York.
Speaker 4: Anyway, Speaking of rock concerts, I couldn't help but be
Speaker 4: struck by the irony that this week finally saw the
Speaker 4: release on the streaming platforms of the film of George
Speaker 4: Harrison's nineteen seventy one concert for Bangladesh, which he threw
Speaker 4: together at the last minute with the help of Bob Dylan,
Speaker 4: Eric Clapton, Ringo Starr and others to raise money to
Speaker 4: help the dire situation then in Bangladesh at the request
Speaker 4: of his friend, the Indian musician Ravi Shanka. Most people
Speaker 4: back then hadn't even heard of Bangladesh, so apart from
Speaker 4: the film and the triple album, Harrison also wrote a
Speaker 4: hit single which he called Bangalah.
Speaker 1: Here's a bit of the film.
Speaker 15: I'd just like to say before we start off with
Speaker 15: the concert, to thank you all.
Speaker 4: For coming here.
Speaker 27: War was going on between Pakistan and Eastern Pakistani. Then
Speaker 27: that's where I belong to you, and John immediately said
Speaker 27: that you would help.
Speaker 4: That concert became the prototype for Live Aid and every
Speaker 4: other worthy, politically motivated mega charity rock concerts since. Yet
Speaker 4: here's the great tragedy as we speak right now, Bangladesh
Speaker 4: is engulfed in the most horrific violence, with Hindus and
Speaker 4: other minority communities bearing the brunt of what is rapidly
Speaker 4: becoming a genocide of unimaginable proportions, according to an opinion
Speaker 4: piece published on news eighteen dot com, with a s
Speaker 4: systematic campaign of terror being fueled by Islamist extremists targeting
Speaker 4: Hindu homes, businesses.
Speaker 1: Temples, and lives.
Speaker 4: In more the bizarre, the Naturi Khali temple was desecrated
Speaker 4: and Hindu homes were set ablaze, displacing many families. In
Speaker 4: Chittagong's Hajari Golly, the street of the Sri Krishna Temple
Speaker 4: was attacked and mobs attempted to break into Hindu homes there,
Speaker 4: specifically targeting families with young girls. Horror stories on social
Speaker 4: media are bound with images of one young Hindu girl
Speaker 4: being deliberately drowned by a vicious lynch mob. These are
Speaker 4: not isolated incidences, but part of a coordinated effort, says
Speaker 4: News eighteen two. Annihilate Hindu in Bangladesh. Hindus being massacred
Speaker 4: by Islamist lynch mobs and Muslim gangs. No rock concerts
Speaker 4: for the Hindus, no Western pop stars pouring money an
Speaker 4: aid to stop this evil genocide, and even more disgracefully,
Speaker 4: not a peep out of presidential wannabe and once proud
Speaker 4: Indian Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: Well. The Albanezi government is trying to.
Speaker 4: Save the climate, save the world, save the planet by
Speaker 4: destroying natural landscapes. And someone that knows this all too
Speaker 4: well is environmentalist and photographer Steve Nawakowski. Steve great to
Speaker 4: finally get you on outside, as we've tried and failed
Speaker 4: a few times.
Speaker 1: You're about to come on the other day, and then
Speaker 1: Donald Trump went and got.
Speaker 4: Assassinator or an attempted assassination halfway through, which threw our
Speaker 4: plans out by Trump.
Speaker 1: That's what you did. Indeed, Steve, so great to have
Speaker 1: you here.
Speaker 4: Now you are a you know, you have very firm
Speaker 4: environmental beliefs, happy to hear those. Your concern is, well,
Speaker 4: I don't want to paraphrase you tell us you're concerned
Speaker 4: about windmills, wind turbines and so on, renewables technology.
Speaker 1: What it's doing to your precious rainforests.
Speaker 18: Yeah, it was just not ter rain forests. But it's
Speaker 18: too high burst high biodiversity forests right across Australia really,
Speaker 18: but more so in Queensland. Because I live in Queensland.
Speaker 18: I've also got a background.
Speaker 16: In cartography, which is map making, so I've.
Speaker 18: Been mapping what has been going on and what is
Speaker 18: planned in terms of this renewable rollout.
Speaker 16: But I'll just go back a step.
Speaker 18: I was actually very supportive of industrial scar renewables up
Speaker 18: until about six years ago, and I observed the construction
Speaker 18: and I was actually engaged in some of the photography
Speaker 18: and documentation of the construction of the very first industrial wind.
Speaker 16: Farm here in Queensland, and what I saw blew me away.
Speaker 16: And it was told to us at the.
Speaker 18: Time that this wind farm would deliver enough power to
Speaker 18: power ninety thousand homes, and I thought, well, that's a
Speaker 18: price we need to pay. We need to destroy the
Speaker 18: beautiful mountain Emerald Plateau, which is a very high by
Speaker 18: diverse area about an hour west here of cans And
Speaker 18: I thought, well, that's a price we need to pay
Speaker 18: for renewables. But lo and behold, we've now got around
Speaker 18: sixty five such projects he marked for the Great Dividing
Speaker 18: Range of Queensland. And then when you start looking at
Speaker 18: the actual energy generation from these wind farms, they deliver
Speaker 18: really meaningless electricity generation. And so I put my cautographic
Speaker 18: skills to work and then started mapping where these projects
Speaker 18: are going.
Speaker 16: Here in Queensland we don't have the wind.
Speaker 18: Resources such as South Australia or Victoria on the coastline,
Speaker 18: for example. So what these wind farm companies are doing
Speaker 18: is accessing and targeting the high elevation areas of this
Speaker 18: state where there's a meager wind resource. And it's those
Speaker 18: areas that have escaped industrialization, urbanization, high value agriculture, and
Speaker 18: these are the places that are being told to us
Speaker 18: that we need to protect as refugeia areas in a
Speaker 18: changing climate.
Speaker 16: Yet it's these very areas that are being smashed to
Speaker 16: smithereens for wind farm developments. Here in this state.
Speaker 18: So I've mapped around three thousand, three hundred and sixty
Speaker 18: five turbines proposed for Queensland at various stages of the
Speaker 18: approval process, and that's going to deliver about twenty two
Speaker 18: gigawatt of nameplate capacity. Now, what I discovered with Mount
Speaker 18: Emerald is that only ran at eight teen point one
Speaker 18: percent capacity factor for the year of twenty twenty two,
Speaker 18: so we've.
Speaker 16: Got really dismal wind resources.
Speaker 18: So what that means is that those three and three
Speaker 18: and sixty five turbines would only delivers a five gigawatt
Speaker 18: of capacity factor, so that number will need to be
Speaker 18: trippled to keep the lights on in summer if the
Speaker 18: wind is blowing. So it's completely I don't think Australians
Speaker 18: are aware of the scale of the task at hand
Speaker 18: to try to achieve these targets that the government is
Speaker 18: talking about.
Speaker 9: Oh and we're seeing from your images and what you've
Speaker 9: just described, beautiful natural habitat being destroyed so we can
Speaker 9: put up these wind farms. That we've also learned in
Speaker 9: the past week that the enormous cost into decommissioning each
Speaker 9: wind turbine four hundred thousand to six hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 9: the total costs, the total destruction to put up these farms.
Speaker 9: How are Australians not aware of all of that? I
Speaker 9: mean we're hearing even farmers aren't aware of the decommissioning
Speaker 9: costs and some of them may lose their properties because
Speaker 9: these decommissioning costs haven't been written into the contracts and
Speaker 9: the costs being affirmed at the start of the construction.
Speaker 18: Well, we don't know what a decommissioning plan even looks like.
Speaker 18: Can someone tell me what a decommissioning plan for a
Speaker 18: wind turbine.
Speaker 16: Is because.
Speaker 1: I don't know what that is.
Speaker 18: So, for example, those concrete foundations, which consist of around
Speaker 18: one two hundred tons of reinforced concrete, they can't be reused,
Speaker 18: so they can't be reused.
Speaker 16: So they need to bring in the concrete batching.
Speaker 18: Plants, invaders, the rock blasting and putting a brand new
Speaker 18: foundation for the next generation of wind turbine that will
Speaker 18: go maybe on the same wind turbine pad. And what
Speaker 18: I'm saying here in Queensland, I don't even believe the
Speaker 18: wind resource is there for these wind farms to even
Speaker 18: be recommissioned down the track. So I'm involved in an
Speaker 18: organization called Rainforest Reserves Australia. So we've embarked on this
Speaker 18: project to map how many turbines are in the pipeline
Speaker 18: in Australia. And we've mapped seventeen thousand, one hundred and
Speaker 18: seventeen turbines in the pipeline. But we've got another four
Speaker 18: hundred and twenty five projects to map, so we can
Speaker 18: safely assume there's over twenty thousand turbin turbines. Now, if
Speaker 18: you can imagine that each turbine will cost around ten
Speaker 18: million dollars, So ten million dollars per turbine times twenty
Speaker 18: thousand turbines an astronomical amount. Now, that doesn't that doesn't
Speaker 18: include the high voltage transmission. So when Heed tens of
Speaker 18: thousands of kilometers a new transmission, you have to remember
Speaker 18: that forty three percent of your electricity bill is transmission costs.
Speaker 18: We then need to ferm it and back it up
Speaker 18: with very expensive short lived batteries, and then we need
Speaker 18: a fleet a whole range of pumped hydros, and we look,
Speaker 18: you know, you can see what's happening with snowy hydro too.
Speaker 18: The Youngler pumped hydro in Queensland is estimated to be
Speaker 18: well over twenty billion dollars. And then on top of that,
Speaker 18: we need a brand new fleet of gas plants to
Speaker 18: keep the lights.
Speaker 16: On when all that fails. So one can tell me
Speaker 16: how the price of electricity can go down? Is yeah, anyway, Now.
Speaker 4: I think that's a great point, because finally, Steve, what
Speaker 4: really infuriates me is that so many people like yourself,
Speaker 4: love the Australian environment, love the rainforests, love the bush,
Speaker 4: want to protect it, love going there for walks or
Speaker 4: holidays or whatever, and are desperate to keep our natural Australia.
Speaker 4: And they believe they've been sold the lie that we
Speaker 4: are preserving all this by going into renewals. But you're saying,
Speaker 4: and you, with your love of the enronmement, what do
Speaker 4: you say to those people who love the Australian environment.
Speaker 1: Are they being hoodwinked by this renewables push.
Speaker 18: Or completely hoodwinked? Renewables are the antithesis of biodiversity protection.
Speaker 18: This is not climate action, but this is actually biodiversity vandalism.
Speaker 18: And I've come to the conclusion I had to put
Speaker 18: all my ideology aside and look at what needs to
Speaker 18: be done, and nuclear is the no brainer.
Speaker 16: It's the silver bullet that we require.
Speaker 18: And I firmly believe that by simply swapping out retiring
Speaker 18: coal plants with nuclear for likeful like, that's the cheapest,
Speaker 18: the easiest solution, and we can meet our targets that way,
Speaker 18: and it has the least impact on biodiversity, and that's
Speaker 18: really the way forward. And then what we can then
Speaker 18: do is we can solve the METI our targets, and
Speaker 18: then we can really look at the really the big
Speaker 18: issues such as rewarding this great nation and bye and
Speaker 18: revegetation and sequestoring carbon.
Speaker 16: From out of the atmosphere, and that's something that's not
Speaker 16: even discussed.
Speaker 1: Fantastic.
Speaker 16: The first thing to tackle climate change is to keep
Speaker 16: trees in the ground, and we're we're.
Speaker 1: Not seeing that.
Speaker 4: Steven Alkowski, so great to chat to you, and people
Speaker 4: can contact you at the Rainbow Research.
Speaker 1: I guess they look for your reserves rainforest reserves. Fantastic,
Speaker 1: Thanks Steven Alkowski. Great to chat to you.
Speaker 4: Finally coming up lots more in a tech changes donkey
Speaker 4: vote see antick.
Speaker 2: Hello you're watching Outsiders. I'm joyous.
Speaker 10: James borrow here as always with rita right side of
Speaker 10: the bed in the morning, Panahy and Rowan perpetually and
Speaker 10: preternaturally perky. Now, in a moment, I'm going to bring
Speaker 10: you more breaking news from the Tim Waltz stolen valor scandal.
Speaker 10: But first it's time to find out what the Democrats'
Speaker 10: words of the week are.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 10: Last week, the theme of the Kamala Harris campaign was weird.
Speaker 10: But then they went and picked a guy for running
Speaker 10: mate who appears to have lied about his war record
Speaker 10: and did things like signing a bill to put tampons
Speaker 10: in boys' high school bathrooms. And well, you know, after
Speaker 10: all that the weird attack on the Trump Harris Trump
Speaker 10: advance ticket didn't look like it was going to stick.
Speaker 2: So what did they do? Well?
Speaker 10: This week They've picked some new words to pump out
Speaker 10: through the Democrat media industrial complex, words like joy.
Speaker 5: The one thing that I will not forgive them for
Speaker 5: is they're trying to steal the joy from this country,
Speaker 5: the joy.
Speaker 1: Felt by Americans backing the Harris Walls ticket.
Speaker 6: We are joyful warriors.
Speaker 22: Being joyful as part of the American identity, the joy factor.
Speaker 9: Campaign of joy.
Speaker 6: You're talking about radical joy.
Speaker 1: It is downward joyful.
Speaker 2: It looks like a joyous rally.
Speaker 5: It looks like a joyous occasion, the real zeal And
Speaker 5: joy in the campaign.
Speaker 15: The joy that you're bringing back to the country, joyful,
Speaker 15: exuberant rally.
Speaker 1: Thank you for bringing back the joy.
Speaker 2: It's not just joy but freedom.
Speaker 28: We want to recognize the right all people have to
Speaker 28: freedom and liberty to make choices, especially those that are
Speaker 28: about heart and home, and not have their government telling
Speaker 28: them what to do.
Speaker 10: No, I don't know, call me cynical, but joy and
Speaker 10: freedom heart words. I associate much with the left side
Speaker 10: of politics, which had a good time at Woodstock and
Speaker 10: has been raining on everybody's parade ever since. Tut dont
Speaker 10: eat that stake, don't tell that joke, don't laugh at that.
Speaker 1: Shame on you.
Speaker 2: But that's the Democrat way.
Speaker 10: That's why I don't believe them for a second, and
Speaker 10: neither should you, especially when you find out that just
Speaker 10: below the service here, Democrats, including Kamala Harris's running mate
Speaker 10: Tim Waltz, think your freedoms, Yes, your freedoms should actually
Speaker 10: be curtailed. Is it any wonder that the guy who
Speaker 10: as governor of Minnesota presided over one of the most
Speaker 10: vicious and draconian lockdowns in the nation, and even set
Speaker 10: up a snitch hotline where you could daub on your
Speaker 10: neighbors if they left the house. Is also no fan
Speaker 10: of free speech. Well, no, the freedom of course, on
Speaker 10: which all other freedoms rest.
Speaker 2: Check this out.
Speaker 10: Here's what would be Vice President Tim Waltz says about
Speaker 10: the definition of free speech.
Speaker 1: I think we need to push back on this.
Speaker 5: There's no guarantee of free speech on misinformation or hate speech,
Speaker 5: and especially around our democracy.
Speaker 2: Well there you go.
Speaker 10: In that little grab, he summed up the left's holy
Speaker 10: trinity of censorship, disinformation, hate speech, and anything that threatens
Speaker 10: quote our democracy, which is a big difference to actual democracy.
Speaker 10: But I'm sorry, Governor, that's wrong, because the whole point
Speaker 10: of a free society is that bad ideas, even hateful ones,
Speaker 10: can be tested, hateful ideas can be contested, and when
Speaker 10: it comes to real democracy and not our democracy, which
Speaker 10: is just leftist code for vote for us or you're
Speaker 10: a bigot, the more speech the marrier. And let's also
Speaker 10: be real clear about this. The left wants to use
Speaker 10: and has used, the labels misinformation and disinformation to shut
Speaker 10: up its critics, and they want to use the force
Speaker 10: of law to do that.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 10: They did it during COVID and New Vision. Now I
Speaker 10: want to share this with you has emerged of members
Speaker 10: of the Biden Harris team working out ways to get
Speaker 10: evidence of Joe Biden's mental decline. Evidence we showed you
Speaker 10: every week four years on this program shut down as misinformation.
Speaker 10: Here's a bit of Biden Harris digital director Rob Flaherty
Speaker 10: on a Zoom call explaining how the Democrat National Committee
Speaker 10: created a program to track what they believed to be
Speaker 10: information and get platforms to shut it down.
Speaker 29: One of the smartest things that I think the party
Speaker 29: did itself was over the last couple of years invested
Speaker 29: in a team that Tim runs and you'll hear from Tim,
Speaker 29: to detect and track misinformation and misinformation narratives in the
Speaker 29: sort of various corners of the Internet and then actually
Speaker 29: go out and flag it to platforms as as a
Speaker 29: violation of their policy.
Speaker 10: Now we got it, then wonder what sort of things
Speaker 10: might they consider misinformation or disinformation.
Speaker 29: It is one thing to know that there is a
Speaker 29: lot of conversation online about corruption or or you know,
Speaker 29: mental fitness or any of these things, or or you know,
Speaker 29: the vice president's record on the crime bill, which you
Speaker 29: know is sort of a controversial piece of legislation in
Speaker 29: the early nineties, but it was it was another to
Speaker 29: go okay and now.
Speaker 10: What ah, Yes, topics like Biden's mental fitness, Biden family corruption,
Speaker 10: even a stance on a crime bill, all of this
Speaker 10: which I think should be discussed.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 10: To them, to the left, it's misinformation, disinformation and it
Speaker 10: needs to be censored now. On that same call, Becca Rinkovich,
Speaker 10: Joe Biden's Rapid Response director, also classified talk of Biden's
Speaker 10: mental decline as misinformation and disinformation around his mental acuity.
Speaker 8: We saw a huge amount of volume and a lot
Speaker 8: of impact on narratives like Joe Biden was being manipulated
Speaker 8: by the radical left and disinformation around his mental acuity.
Speaker 10: And BECA revealed a whole sinister plan. They had to
Speaker 10: track people across the Internet to counter this disinformation.
Speaker 8: We targeted folks based on online behavioral cues, building out
Speaker 8: personas based on the type of content they were consuming,
Speaker 8: what they were searching, the kinds of websites they were visiting,
Speaker 8: so that we could target folks in real time as
Speaker 8: they were exposed to that disinformation.
Speaker 10: Well, there you have it, the White House, people working
Speaker 10: for Joe Biden and the Democrats talking about targeting people
Speaker 10: for spreading narratives that they found unhelpful, which they then
Speaker 10: call misinformation. Now, when you take this along with other
Speaker 10: data we've seen in so called Twitter files about the
Speaker 10: way the White House directly heavy social media platforms, including
Speaker 10: the pre elon Twitter or Exodus now to again shut
Speaker 10: down unhelpful but as would later turn out to be true,
Speaker 10: narratives about Biden's health and much else, including COVID. Besides,
Speaker 10: that doesn't sound much like the freedom that they're talking about,
Speaker 10: does it, I mean? And only about only at as
Speaker 10: much as we associate this favorite famous left winger with
Speaker 10: the emotion of joy.
Speaker 3: Aner to be able to introduce for the first time
Speaker 3: ever anywhere.
Speaker 10: That Now we got some more breaking news here from
Speaker 10: the growing scandal of vice presidential nominee Tim Wolson claims
Speaker 10: that he lied about his military record. New vision has
Speaker 10: just surfaced of Waltz telling gold Star families at a
Speaker 10: Congressional committee hearing about his experience with PTSD when he
Speaker 10: returned from military service.
Speaker 26: Have a look and both of you, with your keen
Speaker 26: understanding of how this works, especially from National Guard families.
Speaker 26: I can tell you this having been one of those
Speaker 26: that came back. We were in support of oef but
Speaker 26: being setting in there with OEF OIF veterans, when we
Speaker 26: came back, they showed us the horse whisper and told.
Speaker 1: Us to be nice when we went home.
Speaker 26: And that was the extent of it. That was in
Speaker 26: two thousand and four. Now I'm proud to say that
Speaker 26: because of the people setting in here and people who
Speaker 26: came before me, things have changed over the last four years.
Speaker 2: Gosh, you see what he does there.
Speaker 10: He's replying that he came back from Afghanistan or Iraq,
Speaker 10: but in fact, the only thing he didn't come back
Speaker 10: from is in fact, he came back from Italy. This
Speaker 10: issue keeps getting worse and worse for the Democrats. And
Speaker 10: the fact that the Democrats had to have known about
Speaker 10: these problems with Tim Waltz and still picked him, well,
Speaker 10: to me, that shows just how contemptuous they are of
Speaker 10: military service and the American voter.
Speaker 1: Great stuff, James, and I agree with you.
Speaker 4: I think they held the electorate in contempt and I
Speaker 4: think there's also a cockiness and a confidence which disturbs me.
Speaker 4: They seem to think that they know that they're going
Speaker 4: to win. That's what disturbs me most. I also want
Speaker 4: to play you a clip that was a great editorial, James.
Speaker 4: I want to play you another.
Speaker 1: Clip of of.
Speaker 4: Waltz where he's basically saying confessing that he's a socialist.
Speaker 1: This is the clip where he says that socialism is neiliness.
Speaker 1: Here we go to play it for you in a second.
Speaker 5: Now here we go, but we can get out there,
Speaker 5: reach out, make the case, and for one thing, don't
Speaker 5: ever shy away from mark progressive values. One person's socialism
Speaker 5: is another person's neighborliness.
Speaker 4: One person's socialism is another person's neighbors Try telling that
Speaker 4: to people in Oh, I don't know, Poland or Hungry
Speaker 4: or Ukraine.
Speaker 10: Well tell you something wrong with socialism gets very native.
Speaker 10: You know what else when they bring in the tanks
Speaker 10: speaking of neighborlyess. Because we spoke about this in the editorial.
Speaker 10: Here there's another clip going around because he's been going
Speaker 10: around at all of his rallies and saying, you know,
Speaker 10: mind your own damn business. That's their new catchphrase. It
Speaker 10: is about reproductive rights. But please, this guy set up
Speaker 10: a COVID snitche line the idea that Democrats who want
Speaker 10: to meddle in every aspect of your life are the
Speaker 10: party of getting the government to mind their own damn business.
Speaker 10: It is Orwellian doesn't even begin to describe it, really,
Speaker 10: But on the.
Speaker 9: Issue of stolen value, which is something that we know
Speaker 9: the American electorate cares deeply about and gratefully. So absolutely,
Speaker 9: it's instructive that a few citizen journalists, it seems on
Speaker 9: X have uncovered the history of this man when he's
Speaker 9: been governor. So you look at the press in that state.
Speaker 9: How did they not at any point come across this
Speaker 9: information that his background, his claims about his military record
Speaker 9: were not kosher. And it's just taken a few days
Speaker 9: on X. And this is why that platform is so.
Speaker 1: Crucial, well, absolutely critical.
Speaker 9: Censorship happening on meta platforms, and it's the last one left.
Speaker 1: Absolutely going to take a short break back clown show
Speaker 1: in a tick roll up, roll up, step right this way.
Speaker 1: It is the whacky show on Earth. It's the Canberra
Speaker 1: clown Show.
Speaker 4: The magical world where dreams and fantasies become reality after
Speaker 4: all was less than a couple of years ago that
Speaker 4: the headlines of our major newspapers were excitedly.
Speaker 1: Gushing about how Australia was on the verge.
Speaker 4: Of becoming a renewable superpower, thanks in no small part
Speaker 4: to two of our most entertaining renewables clowns, known to
Speaker 4: circus lovers everywhere as the comedy duo Malcolm and Mike
Speaker 4: but Lass or should that be at lassion this week?
Speaker 1: Even the best laid.
Speaker 4: Dreams can come crashing down, as we learned oops. According
Speaker 4: to the finn quote, sun Drive, the high tech solar
Speaker 4: panel manufacturer backed by Mike cannon Brooks and Malcolm Turnbull,
Speaker 4: is harving its number of staff. The restructure of Sundrive,
Speaker 4: which includes the replacement of its chief executive, will raise
Speaker 4: new questions about Labour's controversial one billion dollars solar SunShot
Speaker 4: incentives program, which has already been criticized by economists ahead
Speaker 4: of the next federal election end of quote. Has Robert
Speaker 4: gott Liebson wrote in The OS about this veritable renewables
Speaker 4: clown show quote It took less than six months for
Speaker 4: the alban Easy government and some of Australia's biggest climate
Speaker 4: investors to whoops change their mind on a solar panel
Speaker 4: manufacturing plunge. The government and the project backers discovered the
Speaker 4: enormous costs in challenging China in the areas where it
Speaker 4: dominates the market and slashers prices to keep others out.
Speaker 4: Given the base facts were known six months ago, the
Speaker 4: speed of the reversal, says Robert gott libsen of the
Speaker 4: decision to make solar panels in Australia, has shocked those
Speaker 4: who believed that the Maid in Australia plan can be
Speaker 4: based around climate investing. Oh still, you can't keep a
Speaker 4: good circus act down, I always say. And here on
Speaker 4: outside as we have a sneak peek behind the curtain
Speaker 4: as Malcolm and Mike rehearse for their next exciting renewables
Speaker 4: venture together. Sorry my mistake, that was actually sad clown
Speaker 4: by the Puddles pity party. No less easy mistake to make,
Speaker 4: I would have thought.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, down in.
Speaker 4: The Burly Griffin big Top, Senator Malcolm Roberts was confronted
Speaker 4: by a group of overpaid public servants who rudely pretended
Speaker 4: that they didn't know what the senator meant. When he
Speaker 4: asked them about Labour's disgraceful ute tax and why would
Speaker 4: they I doubt any Labor politicians or our paratchicks.
Speaker 1: Have ever been anywhere near a ute in their entire lives.
Speaker 1: All the better to tax than I guess. I'd like
Speaker 1: to move under the ute tax. Please that, Sener Roberts. Sorry,
Speaker 1: we don't have such a thing you to refer to
Speaker 1: the correct you're a new car text? Thank you no
Speaker 1: new car tax? Well you know that what I'm talking about.
Speaker 6: How about you just say, Senator Roberts, so that we
Speaker 6: can get the right people to the table.
Speaker 16: I'd like to know the new the new fees for
Speaker 16: petrol and diesel vehicles.
Speaker 1: What arrogance, mind you?
Speaker 4: As I always say, what self respecting fair dincome Ossie
Speaker 4: needs a smelly diesel.
Speaker 1: Powered ute when you can buy a.
Speaker 4: Fashionable electrical smart car instead, effect for doing the tough
Speaker 4: jobs around your solar powered farm. And speaking of smelly
Speaker 4: old oil, what a relief to also learn in the
Speaker 4: same Senate estimates that only weeks after coming into power,
Speaker 4: the alban easy clown show sold off.
Speaker 1: All our oil reserves.
Speaker 2: I mean, who needs oil?
Speaker 30: So Australia sold all of the oil reserves in the
Speaker 30: United States Strategic Reserve correct one point seven.
Speaker 31: Million barrels around about June twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: Correct, what was what was the sale amount? Two and
Speaker 1: twenty million.
Speaker 16: I would have to take that on noticing charge and
Speaker 16: have that in mind, Beeldram.
Speaker 1: And also who was the oil delivered to?
Speaker 6: Sorry, I would have to also have to have it
Speaker 6: on noticing.
Speaker 30: And how much was paid in sellers or fees, commission
Speaker 30: or whatever it is?
Speaker 6: Happy to break that down for you.
Speaker 1: I'll notice how much.
Speaker 30: Is the continuing empty lease in the US Strategic Reserve costing?
Speaker 16: Would you have an ongoing contract for that? And I
Speaker 16: will again come back to you with at leasing costs.
Speaker 32: On that.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable.
Speaker 4: And then there's COVID to be frank, I don't know
Speaker 4: where we would be without one Nation's Malcolm Roberts. Senator
Speaker 4: Roberts also quized the Canbra circus about the phenomenal waste
Speaker 4: of taxpayers money on the purchase of COVID vaccines.
Speaker 1: Eighteen billion dollars.
Speaker 33: Was spent on wait for it, two one hundred and
Speaker 33: sixty seven million COVID nineteen vaccine doses have excessive No
Speaker 33: not if you live, work and breathe inside the Canberra
Speaker 33: Big Top.
Speaker 34: We have an acceptable level of waste for the program,
Speaker 34: which is something that we look into to make sure
Speaker 34: it's an effective and efficient use of public money.
Speaker 31: So, by my simple calculations, two hundred and sixty seven
Speaker 31: million vaccines is ten each. That's for people who didn't
Speaker 31: want to be vaccinated. Well, so it's even more than
Speaker 31: ten per person per Australian per baby.
Speaker 34: I won't question your maths, Senator, but I think I think,
Speaker 34: going back to my comment about having a portfolio approach
Speaker 34: and noting that you know different different vaccines under the
Speaker 34: advice of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunization have
Speaker 34: been recommended over time for different groups, such as the
Speaker 34: Astroseneka vaccine, it was necessary to have you know some
Speaker 34: flexibility in the purchasing arrangements.
Speaker 4: Remember, this is your money at work, all your taxes
Speaker 4: at work. Great work, Senator Robertson may I say I
Speaker 4: was pleased to hear this COVID mandate apology from former
Speaker 4: New South Wales Premier Dominic Perrete this week.
Speaker 1: Ultimately, mandates were wrong. People's personal choices shouldn't have cost
Speaker 1: them their jobs.
Speaker 4: Thank you, Dominic would have been nice if you'd come
Speaker 4: on outside. That hasn't said that when we were saying
Speaker 4: it at the same time a couple of years earlier. Then,
Speaker 4: of course, this week everybody's favorite Canbra clown Albozo himself
Speaker 4: was running around in circles and tying himself up in
Speaker 4: knots as to whether he had or had not committed
Speaker 4: his government to setting up a macarata commission. Kraikee called
Speaker 4: his shifting stance cowardly and the ABC mocked the three
Speaker 4: different approaches one, two and three albou had at three
Speaker 4: different Gama festivals. So just to clarify, did albo or
Speaker 4: did albo not commit his governments to a macarata?
Speaker 1: Here he is back. In twenty twenty one.
Speaker 35: As a priority, Labor will establish a Macarata Commission with
Speaker 35: responsibility for truth telling and treaty. It will be established
Speaker 35: or a process of open nominations and review. The commission
Speaker 35: will facilitate local truth telling and advise on a national
Speaker 35: framework for treaty making, and it will work with a
Speaker 35: bok to Parliament.
Speaker 4: The macarata is a so called truth telling part of
Speaker 4: the ULARU statement that the Australian people voted overwhelmingly against
Speaker 4: in the Voice referendum. No Macarata is intrinsic to the
Speaker 4: Ularus statement and intrinsic.
Speaker 1: To the Voice.
Speaker 4: Therefore, like the Voice, it should now be dead, buried
Speaker 4: and cremated, because that is the will of the Australian people.
Speaker 4: Perhaps Alboso hadn't read the detail. But then again, as
Speaker 4: he told three aw's Neil Mitchell, why would he do.
Speaker 2: You agree with most of what is said in those
Speaker 2: twenty five.
Speaker 16: Voters, I haven't read it.
Speaker 35: If you haven't read it, there's one hundred and twenty pages,
Speaker 35: why would I know what I know what the conclusion is.
Speaker 4: Alas Albozo got the conclusion completely wrong, as has become
Speaker 4: the hallmark of his leadership. Have A listened to this
Speaker 4: bumbling buffoonery As albo awkwardly tries to convince Sky's Peter
Speaker 4: Stefanov why the Reserve Bank of Australia is wrong when
Speaker 4: they blame labour's excessive spending for our crippling inflation.
Speaker 16: Well, this is the quote here from the RBA.
Speaker 35: Public demand is forecast to be stronger than previously expected,
Speaker 35: reflecting recent public spending announcements by federal and state governments.
Speaker 1: Are you saying they're wrong. Yeah, that's very different.
Speaker 32: That's very different from the way that you characterized it, Peter.
Speaker 32: Inflation has a range of aspects, and that's why we've
Speaker 32: made sure we agree that inflation needs to be further moderated.
Speaker 35: It's been cut in half since we came to office.
Speaker 32: One of the reasons why two.
Speaker 1: Things we've done.
Speaker 32: We've designed all of our reforms to put that downward
Speaker 32: pressure on inflation.
Speaker 4: With If that were the case, Albo, then why is
Speaker 4: money too type to mention? Let's ask simply read hyper
Speaker 4: Bowl extreme exaggeration, but it's no exaggeration to say we've
Speaker 4: got some very exciting years for you.
Speaker 1: Outsiders.
Speaker 4: Will be appearing at the twenty twenty four Seapack Conference
Speaker 4: at the Soft Hotel in Brisbane on the weekend of
Speaker 4: October fifth and sixth, and we will be hosting this
Speaker 4: very show live from that event.
Speaker 1: We'll do a bit of hyper Bowl there.
Speaker 4: Maybe Stephen Miles might pop in because he's a big
Speaker 4: fan as we know of this show, the Queensland premiere.
Speaker 4: In fact, here he is showing what's what's support and
Speaker 4: what a fan he is of outsiders. Have a listen.
Speaker 4: I suspect he hasn't.
Speaker 9: I suspect it's just more hyper bowl from the leader
Speaker 9: of the opposition.
Speaker 1: Good Man, you legend hyper bowl.
Speaker 4: Now, Rita Kamala Harris seems to can easily explain technology
Speaker 4: to us.
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 9: You know what, she's really good at explaining things. We've
Speaker 9: heard her explain diplomacy, democracy, She's explained space travel. We
Speaker 9: enjoyed that buses, she's into buses and ven diagram. And
Speaker 9: now she's gonna explain storage, cloud storage.
Speaker 23: Yes, listen, so you're now no longer are you necessarily
Speaker 23: keeping those private files in some file cabinet that's locked
Speaker 23: in the basement of the house. It's on your laptop
Speaker 23: and it's then therefore up here in this cloud that
Speaker 23: exists above us.
Speaker 10: Right.
Speaker 9: You know, I suspect she actually thinks there's a cloud
Speaker 9: which with information. I mean it still exists in a
Speaker 9: data base locked in a room somewhere, possibly.
Speaker 10: India, in India if you ever went to it's Actually
Speaker 10: it is scary, how stupid that is. It is scary
Speaker 10: because you know, the cloud is just other people's computers,
Speaker 10: that's what it is. So it's slocked on down, but
Speaker 10: she thinks it is up there on a celestial cloud
Speaker 10: with angels playing the part to your data.
Speaker 4: She's also a bit of a power junkie, Kamala. I
Speaker 4: have listened to her boasting about the power that she
Speaker 4: has or wielded when she was a prosecutor.
Speaker 23: You know, the power I have as a prosecutor is
Speaker 23: that with the swipe of my pen, I can charge
Speaker 23: someone with a misdemeanor, the lowest level offense possible. You
Speaker 23: may get arrested for a few hours, you will be
Speaker 23: embarrassed in your community, you will miss time from coming
Speaker 23: onto the Google campus, all because with the swipe of
Speaker 23: my pen, I have tried charged you with a crime
Speaker 23: which I may.
Speaker 6: Choose to dismiss two weeks later.
Speaker 23: It's an incredible amount of power.
Speaker 1: The arrogance is unbelievable. James, I remember the IKAC leader.
Speaker 4: Hear Megan Latham boasting and pulling the wings off butterfly.
Speaker 10: It's really interesting all this thing about she said about,
Speaker 10: you know, dismissing charges, because when she was prosecutor, and
Speaker 10: she became prosecutor, she dismissed an awful lot of charges
Speaker 10: against people who were associated with her.
Speaker 2: Lover Willie Brown.
Speaker 10: So she's very much into prosecuting, but also not prosecuting
Speaker 10: when it is convenient for her prelidic What about.
Speaker 9: All the people she prosecuted for marijuana offenses and then
Speaker 9: a few years later she's joking about marijuana use. So
Speaker 9: this woman has just got absolutely no principles. She will
Speaker 9: say a great needs to be said to get elected.
Speaker 1: Well, Ben still has decided he would like to be black. Now,
Speaker 1: Idland Jewish, have a listen.
Speaker 21: I just want to let you know I'm going to
Speaker 21: match your one hundred and fifty thousand dollars donation. Everybody's
Speaker 21: got to get out and vote and donate. And she's
Speaker 21: also an historic candidate. You know, it's going to be
Speaker 21: the first woman president, and that's incredibly exciting. And you
Speaker 21: know she's Indian, she's black, she's everything you could be,
Speaker 21: more than one thing. It's incredible ball. You know, I'm
Speaker 21: Jewish and Irish. I wish I was black. Every white
Speaker 21: Jewish guy wishes he was black.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's gonna win, trust me. That's it for Outside's
Speaker 1: gonna see you next Sunday and night. Am. Thanks for
Speaker 1: watching today,