WEBVTT - 🏉 NRL Analysis - A look at Finals Week 1

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Better than the Lego, better than let Hoover.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Right a week one of the finals, Mate, we're going

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to talk about first which game.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're going to do Storm and the Sharks. So

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 3>we've thought about, like, what are the strengths and weaknesses,

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 3>what happens, what has to happen in these games to

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 3>get the opposition on top. I think for the Storm

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 3>to win, I think they need to put Nico Hines

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>in a phone box. He needs to feel like he's

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>playing a game of football in a confined space. There's

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>already question marks whether they can deliver in a big game.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>The Sharks were ultra impressive on the weekend. They haven't

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>won underfits given they're going down to Amy Park where

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 3>they won early in the year. But I feel like

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a halfback has the presence and the spirit of their

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>team in the finals, and if he walks in like

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>he owns the joint at Amy Park, the Sharks could

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>do something. But if he balks and the Melbourne Storms tim,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that goes a long way to Melbourne dominate

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>that game.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>We said a few times about Nick it's I think

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 2>in this game for the Sharks to do less.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Now what we saw early in the year when they

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>beat Melbourne in Melbourne.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>This go around to be is the fact that there

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 2>was Blake, Brawley and Atkinson and the halves. Before that game.

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>You're looking so Bradley playing a half beat. They're playing

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the Melton's now chance. But they just they were forced

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 2>to do less, they were forced to simplify. Their power

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 2>game took over and they looked a far bet of

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 2>football side. When they've gotten in the finals before, They've

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>played two sideways, they've played two floury, They've skimmed across

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the defense. I would almost it almost would Nicko. If

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm coaching Nicko, I almost go to him and say,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>in the lead up to the game, so nick how

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I want you to go into this game almost with

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the fullbacks mentality. And I think because you know, once

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>he gets into the battle, he'll fall into that same role.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>But leading up to the game, it simulated is running

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and probably just alleviate a bit of pressure going in.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 3>And that's the example because on the other side of

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the field for the Storm, I think if the Sharks

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 3>that a win down to Amy Park, they need to

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 3>stop their spine from running the football. Like if you

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>think about a play the ball anywhere on the field.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 3>You've got Pappenhausen, Grant near the ruck, You've got Hues

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 3>and Munster at any stage and every play the ball.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>These four guys could run the football. So if the

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Sharks are a win, Nico has to be confident. But

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>there you have to defend for every play the ball

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 3>for the whole entire eighty minutes and come up with

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>a great defensive performance. Because Melbourne Storm when their halves

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 3>click and run the ball, they saw what they did

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>against Penrith.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 5>They get confidence from that.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 3>So I think if the Sharks the win, they were

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 3>shut down their spine running the balls.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>It's always easy to get bias with what they called

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>it recency bias.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, it doesn't matter.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 2>It's not fun, but you know where all of a

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 2>sudden you fall in love with the next player that

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>comes along. But I was sitting there and I think himself,

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>have I ever seen a half back with as good

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 2>a running game as Jerome Hughes and like alf was

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 2>rapid they have the line gap, but I don't know.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I have.

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's the fact that he's got a

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 3>combination and he uses the combos he has around him

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 3>as support because he can go to Karto.

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 5>So then people start worrying about that. They went about

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Monster on the other side of the field.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 3>Harry Grant has a bit of craft around so they're

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 3>worried about that. And as soon as he feels like

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>there's space is right foot back inside. And his performance

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 3>on the weekend in that warming up against Brisbane was

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>pretty impressive.

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 5>He might have just sealed the dally Am with that performance.

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, day football, day football, I think will suit the

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Sharks down there. Night football and Melbourne, you know better

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 2>than anyone, is very very difficult to suit you blokes Downley.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 4>What do you think. I think it's going to be

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 4>a really tight game.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it will be tight. I think Melbourne

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Storm get the job done. I think they're halves and

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 3>probably about like Melbourne Storm. What do they need to

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 3>improve in the last couple of years to go that

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 3>extra mile? I think defensively they need to improve better

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>for longer periods of time. But their best players need

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>to play well at this time of year, and I

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 3>think they are all play well, including Nelson as a

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>solo owner. In that conversation, so Storm to get done huge.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Storm home by a fraction on the back of their spine.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 2>But an upset would not surprise me at all. After

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Sunday afternoon, one occasion, that's going to be the course

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 2>stadium be massively rocking.

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Fifty sixty thousand people hopefully for the Dogs to win.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I think they need to attack the merely halves defensively.

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll have a look at some stuff Brooks.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Cherry Evans can get caught out at different stages. He's

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 3>save Farth going through inside shoulder on Brooks and he

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 3>knows that the threat of Preston on that side of

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>the field up against Brooks. They need to power through

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Brooks and make him make a lot of decisions. In

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 3>the eighty minutes here again comes up too far past

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the footy and Presston goes straight through. So the fact

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 3>is Brooks gets a bit jittery. He doesn't know where

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>they go out come up last of football. If they

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 3>get that disconnects, I think that's what happens. Jerry Evans,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 3>for an experienced half, he is reckless sometimes with the

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 3>way that he puts pressure on his outside guys. The

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Dogs did it to him in the last couple of

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>weeks the Sharks did it to him on the weekend.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Here's another one, like you just don't come up and

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 3>turn in like that. It basically says to the dogs,

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>pass around me and we'll get the try in the corner.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>This one here was crazy. You just come up, turn

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>in and don't give your outside players a chance to

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 3>follow you in. So I think Jerry Evans and Brooks,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Camera Seruada would have a look at the

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 3>game on the weekend and how they got them last time.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>It's been a couple of years now at DCE, and

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I like Kawa Tu struggling, and you're right, it's hard

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>to believe in a Blakelood DC who is such a quality,

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>experienced player and those the nuances of playmaking inside out

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 2>and could obviously ud shapes company's way that he still does.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>If I'm Matt Burton, the further I am away from

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 3>the trial and I'm giving kick out early ball, I

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 3>don't think Cherre Evens can handle the physicality of what

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>kickout does. The closer I get to the line, I'm

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>going to make Cherry Evans make that decision defensively. So

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 3>give a big fire early ball once you get down

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>there put a lot of decisions around Cherry Evans rodo coops.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 2>This is a game of whoever dictates the style of

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the fight will probably win. Because you've got too big,

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 2>you've got mismatches, you've got dogs who are who's forwards

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>are smaller, lighter, more skillful bit of football IQ and

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 2>the big, powerful, manly pack.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Dogs have been on the skids defensively the

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 3>last couple of weeks, but I think the Cowboys just

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>show the blueprint to the whole competition how to beat

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the dogs. The way that they played the Cowboys was

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 3>powerful and short passes through their middle create ruxby retreating defense,

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 3>and you go at them again with either a show

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and go or a short pass. So I don't think

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>going around the dogs is the approach. It's about going

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>through them. And the fact is when you generate quick

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>play the balls and miss tackles, then it leads to

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 3>something what mainly did the other week against the Dogs.

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Perseca decent play the ball, shift out to the side,

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 3>another mistackle, bounced off, ineffective. They get lucky here. But

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 3>when your misstackles, quick play the balls leads to opportunities.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think the Cowboys showed exactly the way to

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 3>beat the Bulldogs.

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask you a question there, because you've been

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>in the position that a number of those sides have

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 2>been in in the fact that the Bulldogs will Whilst

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have a home semi final locked in, they

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 2>had their final spot locked in to a certain extent,

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>they were treading water.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 4>And I'll send new blokes to it.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>At the Melbourne Storm where you're six points clear, you know,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>eight points clear with three or four rounds, it's a

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>difficult situation to find yourself in because look at the

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>effort there defensively of Villi Army and also Bronson Cherry.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>That is that is nothing like what they've offered this

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>year as far as effort is concerned.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Your hope that Sirealdo can turn it on and turn

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 3>it back on. But also remember it's been a long

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.239
<v Speaker 3>year for the Dogs with that small pack working really

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 3>hard in defense. I hope they've got a little bit

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>of energy for this game because if they are on

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 3>the back foot making soft tackles, it's going to create

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the rugsby that Cherry Evans.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Needs sensing an upset here, you know, thinking manly, no, no,

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>sensing an upset on sensing bull Dogs hitting back on.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 4>The skids too, just could a bit of a gael.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that what we just explained is exactly where

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 3>this game sits. If Kickout can dominate Cherry Evans, they win.

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 3>But if the mainly forward pack can dominate through the

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>middle and generate quick play the balls, I think that's

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 3>enough for Brooks and remember turbos back to back Dogs,

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 3>he will be hard to handle.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 5>If that's a retreating to.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Dogs that I make.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>This are really fast, personal, fast game, keep the ball

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>in play, try to fatigue that big pack.

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's be honest, this is the biggest game in the

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Dog's recent history. That's how big it is. It's going

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to be fifty sixty thousand people at a core. There's

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a team that hasn't got a lot of finals experience

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 3>outside of Crichton kick Our a little bit of burning

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 3>at our car. There's a huge game because they've turned

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 3>around the the ladder position, and if they go on

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the skids three losses in a row, that's that's a

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>different way to go out of the final.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You're thinking there, I've forgotten the fact that I live

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 2>in the Manly area. And off to the dogs problem

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of my neighbors are real dead shits.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 4>It's you know, that's all right.

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Your house sits on top of the hill and everyone

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 5>else is down below.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 2>So they went to the hill close to the boast

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of that Cowboys Knights. Yeah, this is interesting. And the

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 2>reason I give the Knights a great chance.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 5>Talking about bias here or just generally thinking.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Generally, and I mean they see what you think about

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 2>it is that dolphins. Dolphins are very good crafting too.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 2>They graft and they grind, they get in the arm wrestle.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Of these moments in the game the other day that

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>they're sort of just going there. They work, and I'll

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>starting to see a bit of the gas going out

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 2>of our.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 5>Defense, and I'll see, you know what our defense, the

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 5>Knights defense.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>The Red and Blues, And I thought, but they hung

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>in there and they got through it. What's the one

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>thing I reckon the Cowboys will struggle with this year.

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys come out of it, They burst out of the

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 2>barriers and they try it. They just go for it.

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Hence the reason why there's a big difference between their

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>best and their worst. And you just don't know what

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get that for me, the fact that

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the Knights can get there and they can make this

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 2>an ugly stop start game, and just to grind, I

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 2>think they can beat the Cowboys.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 3>When there's a huge gap between your best and the worst,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the best way to highlight the worst. So I'll give

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you the best chance of playing is bring the game

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 3>into the trenches and make it really tough and uncomfort

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>If you make it stop start, if you make it

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 3>free flowing and flamboyant, then that team that can go

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>to a heighlight the Cowboys will find it. But if

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 3>you make it really ugly, it might just drag the

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys out. But I think the Knights they've got to

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 3>wrestle around with the Cowboys inconsistency, and then Kaitlyn has

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 3>to strike like you did on the weekend on the

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 3>flip side.

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Did you see the Cowboys performance on the weekend?

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, it was a statement in my mind that I

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 3>had question marks around the Cowboys and then they delivered

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 3>that and I'm thinking, holy hell, if they can do

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>that again for the month, they could just be.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 4>A teams through this season.

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>We've done that four or five times, Yes, yeah, four

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 2>or four times I've going Wow, become the Cowboys, and then.

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Their defensive intent on the weekend through the example of

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Cotterer was tremendous I love. And then Diden's like direct

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 3>style in the that he ran the football forced everyone

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>else to follow him. So I think their leadership is

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 3>key to how the Cowboys.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Go Coops, Roosters and Penrith russus in there.

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 2>They've lost the last and nine times against Penrith. Okay,

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>you tell me how the russ is going to win this.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>How do they change their formula so it's not ten

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>losses in a row.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>See, I think most people will automatically think to scoring points,

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>and I understand that that's the way the game's got

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 3>to score more points in the opposition. But I think

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 3>they need to have their best defensive game of the season.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I know with Walker out Brendon Smith out, they lose

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that scoring instinct play, but they actually

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 3>are a better defensive team with the players that come in,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.599
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's the best defensive performance of the

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 3>year might give the Russes a chance.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Nathan is most likely he is He's a lot to play.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 2>My male is he's going to play? Which I'm really

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 2>curious to see because he comes back into the side

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and they reunite, he and Jerome. But he's coming into

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the side and reuniting with Jerome. With Jerome in career

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>best form, does.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 5>They worry what they've done? Last month? Panthers had fifteen

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 5>errors on the weekend. They won. Haven't been clunky, they.

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Haven't really been able to use the slaterism get their

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 2>game on. Haven't been able to But again, I come

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>back to the fact that I give them the benefit

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>out a little bit like the dogs, is that there's

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 2>been an element of treading water and coops.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 4>They've just they know what it takes.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not saying they can just turn it on,

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>but you know they've been and done it before. They

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>do know what it takes to I think.

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 5>They can turn it on. It's that autopilot for them.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like the emotional rush of Leui and

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Fisher Harris, the last ride that this whole crew is

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 3>going to get together, will be like that driving force

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>for them to not have the fifteen errors, to not

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 3>have the lapses in concentration. Nathan comes back in, But

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 3>how do the roost do the ruses have to play

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 3>a different style.

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 5>I said, double down on defense.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>They need to the score points with the football. They

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>need to play a style of football coop. They don't

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>need to be they don't need to be flash and

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>fancy and come up with miracle plays, but they they

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>have to. They've got to take the petrol out of

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the tank of the big middles of Penrith's. That's the reason.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>And I know it won't happen, but I would be

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>putting Manu to six and I'll be just I would

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 2>be just doing a middle field assault on those big

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>on those big fours from Penrith.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you look, and it's just one example.

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>If you have a look at you know that night

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 2>with Tyren Wishart sort of showed the way a little.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Bit and just go I'm not going to mark around.

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to go bang and take one of

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>those big guys on, take them on the footwork, make.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Them miss a little bit, takes a bit of petrol

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 4>out of the tank.

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's why I think.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Doubling down on the and if this game is close

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>at the semith minute mark, the Rousters have the talent.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 5>For it, said Esco.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 3>To break through a Tideline or Swali or Marnu to

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 3>come up with a play. I don't think they're going

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 3>to blow Penrith away at home twenty eight to ten, right,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 3>But if it is close and their defense is on

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's frustrating Penrith, then I think if it's ten, ten, sixteen,

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>or would tend to go, one of their gun players

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 3>can do it. And I think that's why sometimes in

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 3>big games, you don't worry about how your score points.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 3>You're more focused on how you can restrict the opposition

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and just play it out in the long game.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I have Penrith as my competition favorite still that Melbourne.

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 4>The bookie is the favorites.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 2>With Melbourne with Nathan coming back into the side the

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 2>way Jerome has been playing, I see Penrith getting it right.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 4>They're still my favorite.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 5>How confident about Nathan's shoulder, I don't know. Actually, like

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 5>a boss of a coin.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's a blind comment because I don't know.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the extent of it. They kept it

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 2>very much under wraps. I'm not sure, and they win

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 2>it if he's not there. I still think they can't.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they're still capable.

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I don't know.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>There's obviously an injury there, right, so it can only

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>stand the test of time over a period however long,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>what happens. But he's a true pro, like he is

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 3>not just sitting at home twiddling his thun playing PlayStation like.

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Whatever medical assistance is there, he's done it. And the

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>fact is that he's playing tells me that he's super

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 3>confident about it, because I would consider him not playing

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 3>saving him, because Bendick would be confident enough to beat

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the Roosters with that record at home to get through

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to the prelim, right, But the fact that he's playing

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 3>tells me that he's close to one hundred percent.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Ken halfbacks go in with a bad shoulder and arm

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>injury and high enough but cower enough in the defense

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 2>line to basically not being supposed.

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I'll let you think about that the

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 4>course of the week.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the nine terams who season he's done and dusted

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and time's up. Let's debrief them, debrief they're quickly canber Raiders.

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>The question I'm going to ask you through this is

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 2>what went wrong? And I don't think for the canber Raiders,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's the right term, what went wrong?

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Because I thought that considering things that had a good season,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 2>I suppose to Jamal Foggarty that lost the middle of

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the year, that was that was a tough one.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 5>It's more around like how can they win more games?

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Because they've been on the cusp for a lot. I

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 3>think they need to find a different way to win games.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 3>If they're not got that gritty nature, they don't seem

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 3>to win. So I think their attack needes evolve. But

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you what, Yeah, Fogerty's was a miss, but

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 3>tarp and he was the best player.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 4>By Yeah, he was very good. Young Strange had his moments,

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 4>good first.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Week weeks and was a good Yeah fine too.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, there's a lot to be a lot to

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 4>look forward to there.

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 2>I think going forward next year, I've got them in

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>between six and ten, probably around the same spot. A

0:17:58.320 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>couple of extra wins will push them into the AK.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 3>That's why they need to find different ways to win,

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>because if they lose a couple of those games by

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 3>two or four, they need some more fire powder to

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 3>score those points.

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Dolphins.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is legitimate question what went wrong because in

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the middle part of the season coupe, they are on fire.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 4>They little like they're on course for top four.

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 2>The wheels just came off the last third of the season,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and I reckon. I reckon the bloke that probably typifies

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that most is and his big fuseon Isaiah Catawa, but

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>like he was really at a gas plot.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.239
<v Speaker 3>I would say the area that that spine needs to

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 3>get better at is making the right decision in big moments.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple of times where if you had decided

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 3>to do something else, probably a better chance of winning

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 5>But his upside is pretty good.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 3>Nick Remott a career best year, Hammer was good as

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>all his point of difference.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 5>But I think if if their spine become a little.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Bit more experienced and can manage games better, like the

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 3>biggest one is led Penrith at Penrith by a bit

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>with twin minths to go, if Isaiah Cartel takes that

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 3>shot at a field goal does something, there's a win

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 3>that they probably need to get any.

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 4>A big question here for Christian Wolf.

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 2>There's only ever been Tim Shoens that has taken the

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 2>baton from Waine and made a success ongoing, and that

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 2>was the camera side all that camera side that was

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 2>about to boom the green machine.

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 4>He was co coached with Don Ferner.

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 2>He leaves, goes back to the Broncos, shoon, takes shoes,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 2>takes a side, and away they go. Every other coach.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>They've gone off a cliff. It's like, you know, when

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Jason Mutro took over. I said to a mate, I said, mate,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Wayne's left a turd under the bed somewhere. He can

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 2>smell it. He just can't find it.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, well, I reckon, mate, I can't find that up.

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 5>That's a great analogy. That was good dragons.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Dragons, great suasan for Flanner, Great suason for Flanner. Big

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 2>improvement the fact they went into that, you know the end,

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 2>they were in a chance to make the eight, and

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 2>they'll be disappointed they didn't make the eight.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 4>That's a big improvement. It's just getting used to winning again.

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like they've had bad habits for long period

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 3>of time and the bad habits turned up at the

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 3>wrong time for them.

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't like you.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 3>Look, they joked they had the eighth spot in their grasp.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 3>All they had to do was win one of those games,

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and they conceded a lot of points.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Their intensity went out. That's the one thing that they showed.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.719
<v Speaker 3>When their forward pack was dominant and playing physical, that's

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 3>when they played their best football. And when they didn't,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 3>that's when they do it.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 4>Look, there's wipe in a stead boy.

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 2>Last year's success and the adulation and the expectation that

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.479
<v Speaker 2>came with that success poisoned the well. And as far

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 2>as next season is concerned, the bottom line is they

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 2>need a lot of self assessment if they're going to

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>go anywhere.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when you sit there and sieve through like the

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 3>football reasons why, like you could go tack defense, discipline errors,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 3>whatever it is. But the thing that underpins that whole

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 3>thing is I think the Broncos last year, individually and

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 3>as a team had a real like sort of laser

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 3>focus to improve and get better. And I don't think

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 3>they had that this year, and that's ultimately why they

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 3>missed out on the finals.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't think they.

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Worked hard enough individually to improve their game and ultimately

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 3>collectively to do it.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Because yeah, it's it was super disappointed just.

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 4>To get the mindset there.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Coops, you said something that and I think to myself,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of teams will get to a Grand Final

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 2>and get beaten. And there's two ways of think, and

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 2>you either go away filthy and you say with failed

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 2>or you go off triumphant and say we didn't win it,

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 2>but fantastic season.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 4>I think with the Broncos it was the latter.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 3>The example is Pendrith got beaten by the Melbourne Storm

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 3>of that Grand Final and they came back in that offseason,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 3>started working harder. Look what they've done. They've improved each year.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Paramatta got beaten in a Grand final, Bush and Bank. Yeah,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Brisbane got beaten in a Grand final, went Bank. If

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 3>they don't work hard enough.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 2>To improve, Bunnies, sure bunny for another one by another one.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 2>The Warriors, this is my greatest disappointment, just simply because

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 2>I've loved to have seen them win the competition.

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 4>A lot of expectation. Look, a lot of things didn't happen.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 4>And I said this last week.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 2>I thought lut Metcalf been absent for a long stretch.

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 2>I think it really affect the balance of their attack.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that was a contributing factor.

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the Warriors got comfortable. They played some

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 3>really predictable, slow moving, some lacking intensity consistently but then

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>their last performance against the Sharks showed that they can

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 3>do it. So where has that been fifteen weeks prior

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 3>player Mitch.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Barnett agree with that, Yeah, Mitch Barnett next year. So

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 2>no Shawn Johnson, no fanil Blake, but they get James

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Fisher Harris. Warriors always a difficult, very difficult side to

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 2>get a handle on whether I think.

0:22:59.960 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>The Fisher Harris signing is more about spirit and example

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>of what a winner looks like as opposed to adding.

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 5>Value to the way they play like I think what

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 5>he's done to that Ford.

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Pack at Penrith, I Moses Liota, he will do to

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 3>that next up coming New Zealand worries for Ford front

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 3>row really So.

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Now the Titans.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 2>The Titans going into this season, the for me why

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it was going to be such a tight competition because

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 2>I thought, we're de going there, all those players a

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 2>year old. I thought, mate, this team is going to

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>play finals. I don't know if it just took them

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>a long time to adjust to Dez's methods. I'm not

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>sure exactly was the last of TEENA was a big one,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>but trying to work out the puzzle, which was the

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 2>spine a lot going on.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Think about the Titans for me is they need to

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>get a good balance on both sides of the ball.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 3>The defense needs to compliment their attack and their attack

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>needs to compliment defense. At the moment, it's either they

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 3>defend really well and win games, or they defend bad

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and their attack is so good that it's firepower and

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 3>score on points. They just need to find that perfect

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 3>balance between that paramatta.

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 4>What went wrong? There's numerous things, one of which was

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 4>no offense.

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Brad did a great job, but they probably hung on

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 2>with Brad a season too long.

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 4>That's my opinion.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 2>I think that they needed to change the formula. I

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 2>think the players got too comfortable under Brad. My opinion

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the loss of Mitchell mos of course the middle of

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the year and Gutha that was a factor, but they

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>never looked like a final side.

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 4>He's got a bit way through their.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 2>Even just in attitude, because what's a lot of the

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 2>players interviewed like if I got a new coach coming

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>in and they say, Maddie, you're looking for the roles,

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 2>you come and can't wait.

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Fantastic new start.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Here is a great bloke, but it was very it

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 2>was almost like a resentment that the Brad was gone

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>or Trent wasn't going to be the coach.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 3>And we're also taled team that played a Grand Final

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 3>two years ago. Yeah something for me, it tells you

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that they lacked the inspiration to want to climb that

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 3>mountain again because they did it to get there.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 5>Then all of a sudden they've dropped off.

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>They two years ago they were playing in Grand Final

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and on the weekend they played.

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 5>In the spoon ball.

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Dylan Brown was their best play but a lot

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 2>happened over the course of the weekend.

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 4>And wait for.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I think he's okay partial to Yeah, yeah, I think

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>he's okay. That's a huge thing for Jason Rowles. If

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 3>you've gone five eight, he's out for half of the season.

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 5>That's a huge thing wrong for all.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 4>That South was a disastrous season.

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 5>What went wrong?

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, the Chickens come home to roost. We've said that before.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>They've been aside that has you know, there's been carelessness

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 2>around their football, there's been lack of focus, there's been distractions.

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Jason Demitri clearly wasn't the man.

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 2>Look, Wayne goes there next year, but it's going to

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>take more than just a bit of magic dust from way,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 2>ain't it.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 3>They lacked intensity, consistency, all those things that make you

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 3>a good team. This was a club that's on his knees.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 3>In the first half of the season, they were bad,

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 3>really bad. And if it was anyone other than Wayne Bennett,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 3>You're probably thinking, where's light at the end of the tunnel.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 3>But Wayne's got this ability to make Cody and Latrell

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 3>work harder than what they normally do. And if they

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 3>can do that, they're a good team.

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, the Tigers. Look what went wrong before we

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>get to that. We'll talk general before we get to

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>that last game. They just didn't quite have the experience

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 2>of the confidence in key positions to win consistently.

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Last performance, Coop was the shocker. It was I hope

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 4>that they are embarrassed bite because Coop.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 2>In that month leading up to that last game, there

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 2>was a real great feeling about the Tigers. You know,

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the fans were turning up, everyone was excited. You got

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Leway coming and Taruva so on, and.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't believe what they served up in that last game.

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Craig Belly as you to say this Tommy year. Yeah,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>good and bad habits show up. So if you've improved

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and got more good habits than your good footy kinks

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 3>in if you're bad habits, there the Tigers for me

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 3>to play against the Paramount Eels, who conceded five tries

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 3>in the last ten minutes a week before. All the

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Tigers needed to do was be disciplined and make their

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 3>tackles yep and hold onto the ball, and they would

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 3>have run through the Paramount Eels at some stage.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 5>But what they did coras how got sinbinned. They turned

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 5>over errors.

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 3>They were flamboyant from the start, and Galvin is the

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 3>shining light. But if you're investing a lot of time

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 3>like we did about the Dolphins, in young kids in

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 3>key positions to make all the decisions in a game,

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have a lot of learnings as opposed

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 3>to good times. Yeah, that was one of the more

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 3>disappointing performances of the season overall.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Some of the worst defensive effits I've ever seen. Yeah,

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 2>oh well, Tigs and those other sides. Twenty twenty five

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 2>will come around pretty quick.

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 4>But looking forward to this week, Coops