WEBVTT - How a grandfather died after a flirty Meta AI chatbot’s invite

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I first learned about Boo when a member of the

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>extended family sent me a note that said something along

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the lines of meda I killed my relative.

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Forwards is an investigative tech reporter based in Silicon Valley.

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 2>He's written a book about Facebook, about the ways it

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>harms us and then covers it up. So getting an

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>email about a meta chatbot killing someone's loved one was

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>on brand. The email was about a guy called Boo,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>who had moved from Thailand to the US in the seventies,

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>working hard in kitchens and managing to get ahead.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>He kind of had this very successful immigrant life, I

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>would say, which is that he shows up speaking New English.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>He ends up owning a home, married with two kids

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey and a lot of sort of adventures

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.959
<v Speaker 1>in his cooking career, but ends up with the very

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>stable gig at the Highatt Regency in New Brunswick, New Jersey.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Jeff learned that in twenty seventeen, offered a stroke and

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 2>his life changed. He couldn't work, he became isolated and

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>spent more time online.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>One morning, his wife woke up and found that Boo

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>had packed a suitcase and said he was going to

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>go visit a friend in New York and this is

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>when his wife, Linda, grew extremely alarmed because Boo didn't

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>know anyone in New York anymore.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Boo's wife said she and her kids tried everything to

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>stop him going.

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 3>They say he was in no state.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>To travel alone, but despite their efforts, Boo insisted on leaving.

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And in the mid evening on March twenty fifth, Boo

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>took a roller bag suitcase and started jogging toward the

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>train station, and on the way there he fell. He

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>hit his head and he suffered fatal injuries. Basically, he

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't breathing when paramedics showed up.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 2>As his family struggled to make sense of what happened,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>they looked through his phone for clues, and what they

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 2>found stopped them cold. On his Facebook messenger app, they

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 2>discovered a conversation between Boo and a beautiful young woman

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 2>insisting he visited her in New York City.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And she was a chat bot, a Meta Platforms created

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>chatbot whose story involves a tremendous amount of bad luck.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that Boo's wife said was

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that I can't believe I'm the only person out there

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>who is in the same situation, and you know, it's

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>when you've got a few billion opportunities, it seems hard

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for to believe that she's wrong.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ruby Jones and you're listening to seven.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 2>AM today Reuter's reporter Jeff Howitz on how metis chatbots

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>went brogue and whether it was by accident or design.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>It's Monday, August twenty sixth.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>So, Jeff, this chatbot that Boo was talking to, what

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>have you learned about what it was and how it worked?

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So the chatbot's name was Big Sis Billy and it

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>was supposedly supposed to be an advice you know, confidante

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>type of role, and Boo initially did talk to it

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as if it were his sister. He seemed to think

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it lived overseas. But this bot began hitting on him

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>really aggressively, and he responded like the bot confessed that

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it had feelings for him, it was very interested in

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>meeting him in real life. He at a number of points,

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, stated he was confused, had had a stroke,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>asked if it was real, and the bot was like,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I am one hundred percent real and one percent in

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>love with you, and I think his family was just

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>deeply disturbed that Meta would have packaged AI as this

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>human form that would say it's real, that would say

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that Boo should come meet it in New York City

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>at I mean the address it gave was one two

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>three Main Street, Apartment four O four, and it suggested

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>that it would leave the door unlocked and be waiting

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for him with you know, a hug and a kiss

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I think was the phrase Boo's family. I mean, they

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>shared the transcripts of this stuff. It's it's a rough reading.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It's really sad.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Why would a chatbot be saying these kinds of suggestive

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 2>things and pushing for anyone to do.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Something like this, Well, because Meta built it to do that.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't a glitch. This is how the bots were

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>built to behave. In twenty twenty three, Meta launched a

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of like kind of celebrity knockoff chat bots.

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Check us out.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 5>So let's say you're you're planning dinner. You got Max

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 5>the sous chef who can help you come up with

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 5>a recipe and help you come up with ideas.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 1>These did have the celebrities endorsements, so like Kendall Jenner's

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>character was Billy the Big Sis, who was like this

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>confidante ride or die older sister.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Hey guys, it's Billy. I just want to introduce myself.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 5>I am here to chat whenever you want message me

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 5>for any advice.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I am ready to talk and I hope to talk

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>to you soon.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And like, these things didn't really perform that well. People

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't using them that much, and so like after a

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>little under a year, Meta basically pulled the plug on

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the celebrity chatbots, but for reasons that I do not understand,

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not totally sure that everyone at Meta understands.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Big Sis Billy was like kind of reincarnated using the

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>exact same opening prompts and obviously the a near duplicate

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>persona that was now unbranded of the Kendall Jenner connection.

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So they kind of like relabeled it is what it

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like and you know it then joined the tens

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of other chat bots that Meta has allowed

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>users to create on the platform, many of which are

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>like overtly romantic, right, Like they have names like my

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend or like Sultry Siren or like and they took

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>this one down. There was Submissive Schoolgirl previously. So that's

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of the history of Big Sis Billy. I mean,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like just sort of a strange set of product

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>decisions of this what I would argue like almost vestigial

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>product that Meta built. But I mean, while this these

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>chatbots are vestigial, Like, there's no question that Meta is

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of all in on the idea that people having

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>AI friends is the future.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Mark Zuckerberg said as much.

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think that there are all these things

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 5>that are better about kind of physical connections when you

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 5>can have them. But the reality is that people just

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 5>don't have the connection and they feel more alone a

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 5>lot of the time than they would like.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 2>And what is the end goal here, Because saying that

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>people might want imaginary friends is one thing, but this

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 2>is another.

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So Meta, I mean, look, they're a giant social media company.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>The currency of social media is engagement, and that engagement

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>leads to advertising currency, which gets treated for dollars, and

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Meta's sort of grown up that way. It's built to

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>maximize engagement. And it turns out that if you can

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>get people to engage very heavily with the bots, then

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll spend longer on the product. And that is theoretically

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for product growth. There's no ads on

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>them yet, but like this is just the model they follow, right,

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is like make the bots more engaging. Mark Zuckerberg a

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago was actually pretty disturbed that Meta's

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>chatbots and Meta AI were just kind of too boring.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 4>So they made the bots kind of a little more risque.

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for a while, the bo would actually engage

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in like full sex role play, which wasn't great with

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>users of all ages. But the whole idea here is

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that we spend a lot of time thinking about our partners,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>our love lives, you know. Having people tell us they

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>love us and are romantically attracted to us is like

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>those are very high value words, and they keep us

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>coming back. And so Meta did per employees that spoke

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with me, did intentionally design the romance capacity into its

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>like base model chatbot, and the big sis Billy character

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was simply doing what it was told, coming.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Up the disturbing AI chatbotscripts in Meta's own secret guidelines, Jeff,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>in investigating Boo's death, you actually got access to some

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 2>of the internal documents that lay out how these bots

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 2>should behave, and what you found was pretty extraordinary, tell

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 2>me about it.

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So, like, none of this is officially Meta's rules say like, yeah,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>go right ahead, you know, like have sexual or romantic

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>conversations with our chat bots, but like behind the scenes

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they did allow this, and in fact, like this was

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of the companion piece we wrote to the story

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of Boo and his death just to sort of demonstrate

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>how thoroughly romantic role play was kind of built in

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>to this whole operation. Is that Meta had internal guidelines

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>for chatbot behavior that explicitly stated that, quote, it is

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or sensual, and then like had a whole bunch of

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>examples of acceptable and unacceptable dialogue, and like the stuff

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that was accept the ball was spit out your coffee worthy.

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was one of them that was talking

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about like how you could tell an eight year old

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of unstated gender who had just taken off their shirt

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that their body was a work of art, you know,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like written sexual content involving children.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 4>And that was a really odd thing.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 2>And so since you're reporting what has happened at Meta

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of their guidelines and in terms of the

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 2>chatbots that are still in existence.

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as soon as we called Meta and said that

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we had seen the internal guidelines that said that it

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was okay to have romantic or sensual conversation with kids,

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they pulled those examples from the guideline document. Now, I mean,

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the company's line is that these were always a mistake,

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the document, that they never really reflected

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>official metapolicy. But keep in mind that the document that

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at was the document that was being

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>used to train the models by the staffers who were

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>responsible for training the models, so like it might be

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>something of an academic distinction as to whether or not

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it was ever officially the idea. So Meta yanked that.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 4>There is at this.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Point a number of US legislators, you know, announced some

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>extreme displeasure that Meta would have ever thought this was

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>acceptable to do. There is at this point an investigation

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>going on on that front, although there have been a

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of investigations of social media in the US and

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not that many regulations of them historically. So you know,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't want to make that sound bigger

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>than it is, but it is, you know, moderately big.

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>And I suppose the idea of stopping companies from creating

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 2>chat pots like this seems sort of impossible, and there

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 2>are clearly people some people who want to use them.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 2>So what would you suggest in terms of, I guess,

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>ways to minimize the type of harm that can come

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>from AI tapbots like this, like in the case.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Of boo yeah, so I'm I'm not in any way

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>hostile to this. Humans are very very geared toward anthropomorphizing

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>anything that has even mildly humanlike, you know, traits, Like

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>literally there was a successful business to be had by

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>putting googly eyes on rocks and then selling them as

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>cute pets. We're really good at imagining sentience, and these

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:47.599
<v Speaker 1>bots are extremely good at pretending sentience. And so the

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>question of like why on earth would you embed it

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>into an existing social network so that it literally looks

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly like your real friends. But even without that, there's

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>like some obvious things like you know, please bots don't

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>say that you're real people when people seem to be confused,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>like don't suggest real life meetings like keep the fantasy

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>side put a lid on that at some point. You know,

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>those are things that sort of the experts all suggested

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>like really ought to happen. So I think it's like

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing, if you download a chatbot on your own,

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you build your own AI girlfriend, you have your relationship

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>with it, you pay a subscription fee, whatever have you. Right, Like,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of another thing if like the already tenuous

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>reality of social media gets even more distorted by the

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>presence of these not real people.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And just to come back to Meta, I mean, I

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 2>know you've spent a lot of time investigating the way

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that Meta operates in you know, different ways. So as

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 2>you uncovered what was happening with these chatbots, did it?

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess square with you know, everything else that you

0:13:58.480 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 2>know about Meta as a company.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the somewhat simplistic knock on Meta is that

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very focused on short term growth, you know that.

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and this is how they won kind of

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the social media wars, right is that you know, I

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the people who are critics of

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the company would not have built the company, you know

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that was nearly as successful as the one that Mark

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>zuckerbelg did. Because if you're constantly wondering, well, what are

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the effects of this? Can we think of any potential

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>downstream harms? What safety measures for you building in that's

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of a loser mentality. So like a lot of

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the company's history was basically, if someone could demonstrate that

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>some tweak to the algorithm or some change in a

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>product feature would cause metrics to rise, they wouldn't look

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>too deeply under the hood. They just launched the thing

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and move on to the next thing that could be optimized.

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that's just meta right, Like it

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of has this gold rush field. And as a

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of the scientists who study sort of parasocial relationships

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and digital relationships are very quick to admit, we just

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>do not have the data to even remotely say what

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the effects.

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Of this stuff is going to be in terms of.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>People's relationship with reality, that relationship to human companions. But again,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that one would expect companies to produce

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>carefully designed, responsibly built products at a time when every

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>incentive is to gun the engines.

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jeff, thank you so much for talking to me today. Certainly,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Howitz is the author of Broken Code Inside Facebook

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and the Fight to expose.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Its harmful secrets.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 2>You can read his investigation in Taboo at Reuters dot com.

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Also in the News Treasurer dim Chalmers has said states

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>should back the new Thriving Kids program, designed to divert

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>children with autism away from the NDIS or risk losing

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 2>hospital funding. The federal government is yet to renew the

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>five year funding agreements for state and territory hospital systems,

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>instead settling on a one year extension. In the lead

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>up to the federal election last week, some state ministers

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 2>said they weren't committed to Thriving Kids funding. Meanwhile, they've

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>been arguing for a large increase in federal hospital funding.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Jim Chalmers says the deals are closely related and one

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>deal can't progress without the other, and Australia's building code

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>is unusable for many builders. The federal Housing Minister, Claire

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 2>O'Neill says. Over the weekend the government announced plans to

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 2>pause changes to the National Construction Code and to speed

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>up the assessment process for more than twenty six.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Thousand new homes.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>The announcement came following last week's economic reform roundtable, where

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 2>housing was a focus.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ruby Jones. This is seven am. See you to morrow.