WEBVTT - #2059 Is AI a Sociopath? - David Gillespie

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.599
<v Speaker 1>I'll get a team. It's a you project. It's David

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Gillespie's Tiffany and Cook. We'll start with the pugilist who's

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in the top left hand corner on my screen, who's

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>got shoulders bigger than both David and I. Not that

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>either of us are insecure, but that's okay. We'll soldier on.

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>David's so insecure he doesn't even put on his camera.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 3>It's really really intimidating being interviewed by tiff even with

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 3>her in the same thing.

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, well, we don't even know if you're real.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>You could be a chat bot, you could.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Be you could be I am in fact and AI

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well you got the people skills of one, so

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>STARp Het stop bet well, well, chat AI or chat GPT,

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say, is pretty evolved these days.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>High tip, high harps, thanks for the shoulder kudos.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I've got a good trainer every now and then that

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>whips me into line.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, they're not getting any smaller, those fucking Deltoids

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of yours. You could land a a two person helicopter

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>on the left door right. It's there's plenty going on

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at Deltoid Central. And I could say something else hilarious,

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but it might get me kicked off the interwebs, so

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it. Yeah, no, I can't. I really did.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Fuck it.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Tiff can edit it out, you know.

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>If it's no no, she would laugh at it. She's

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not the problem. It's all the it's all the it's

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the five precious little poppets that want to send me emails.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Dr Gillespie, Welcome back to the project that is you.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>How are you? What is going on? It is a Monday,

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>not a Wednesday. Thank you for accommodating me at such

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>short notice. It is my mother, my beautiful mother's birthday

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>at our normal time on Wednesday. So I'm going up

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to see the old Dahl. How are you?

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Pretty good? Yeah, caught me a bit on the

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>hot burn. Yeah, I think I found something. We can

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>have a bit of a chat about happy birthday as well.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Before we thank you, before we dive the old days.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Eighty six, nineteen thirty nine. She was born first year

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Second World War, and she's she's a bit

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of a weapon. Mary's she's getting shorter by the year.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>She used to be five three. I reckon, she's with

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a wind behind her early in the morning when all

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>her disks are at their optimal I reckon, she's four

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 1>eleven and she's she's like, my lunch is taller than her,

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>so God bless her little socks. She's eighty six, So

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Mary Margaret Harper eighty six. On Wednesday,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>December three, which probably will be when some people are

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>listening to this. Before we jump into our topic, which

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there was something in the news today talking about the

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>relationship between blokes taking or blokes taking antidepressants and a

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>decrease in DV domestic violence. But before we do that,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we were chatting before we came on air, So you're

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in no way prepped and needs different. Neither am I.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But in general terms, I listened to a podcast today. Now.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't promote other people's podcasts generally, not because I

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>am worried about competition. I just don't think about it.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But this podcast everyone is called so the Diary of

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a CEO. Stephen Bartlett is the host name who I

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>really like. He's just a fucking good dude and smart

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and it is I don't know what episode it is,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's very recent. Oh November twenty seven, Okay, so

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>what's that a few days ago? Yeah, and it's with

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy called Tristan. He actually pronounces it Tristan because

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>he's fancy, but it's to me, it's Tristan Harris. So

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>dire A CEO, November twenty seven, Tristan Harris talking about

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what's coming down the pipeline. And we're not talking about

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of AI, all the all the bells and whistles,

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but the potential threats to fucking humanity. Ah. It terrified me.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>As I said to you, David, I listened to it

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for three hours and I'm going to re listen to

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it and take notes. Do you have you thought about

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the not so upside to AI? Yeah?

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I've ever mentioned it t before,

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>but there's a blog that I've liked. I like to

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 3>read in a very very long form blog and he

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 3>only puts out a post about once a year, if

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 3>you're lucky, And I can't remember the guy's name, but

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the blog is called Wait But Why, and he asked

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 3>questions about things like what happens if AI becomes an

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>artificial general intelligence, which is, you know, a super intelligence.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 3>But he was asking that question. I think the piece

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>that he wrote about that is maybe twenty fifteen, sixteen seventeen,

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 3>So this is before all of this stuff, right and wow,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 3>And he really digs into it, and the conclusion that

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>he comes to after probably about twenty thousand words is yes,

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 3>spoiler alert that essentially, if it happens, we won't know

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 3>about it because essentially nanoseconds after an AI becomes self conscious,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 3>it will so quickly develop itself.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>That it'll all be over.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Humanity will have ceased to exist in the second that

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>it took.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>And he describes with.

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Really high level of clarity why and how that will happen.

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 3>And I really found it an astonishing read, and I've

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>shared it with a few sort of really.

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>High end programmer friends of mine.

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 3>Who say, Yep, he's got it right. Everything he's saying

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 3>is right about how this works. And so the good

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 3>news is you won't have to worry about it.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you won't know. I mean you won't know, and

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean, he was talking about even last year

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think this might have made or some bits

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and piece of this made the news, but he was

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about how it's starting to develop a level of

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>self awareness and Obviously, AI doesn't have feelings or emotions

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>or empathy, right, it can talk.

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Though the important one is empathy. Yes, the only thing

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 3>that holds us together as humans is empathy. It's the

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>thing that stops us killing each other, and it's the

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 3>thing that distinguishes us from every other species on the planet.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>And no one has successfully described a way that AI

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 3>can have empathy in the sense that it both knows

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 3>what you're thinking and cares what you're thinking and doesn't

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 3>want to do you harm as an automated thing. So

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 3>empathy he's best described as the Golden rule, which is

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 3>in every single religion and philosophy ever in the world,

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 3>which is do unto others as you would have done

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 3>to you. You know that I've just given you the

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Christian version, but it's in every single one, and that's

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 3>why it's called the Golden rule. And it describes accurately empathy,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 3>which is, don't do anything to anyone else that you

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't want done to you.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 2>And we work that way.

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>It allows us to cooperate with millions of other humans

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 3>without knowing who they are, because we trust that they're

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 3>all operating under the Golden rule.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>And as soon.

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>As you have an AI, you can't encode that because

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 3>every time you try to develop a rule to make

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>it follow, he would develop fifty million exceptions or loopholes

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>to that rule. It's impossible to anticipate how it would flow,

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>whereas you don't have to do that with humans because

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>it's built into our hardware.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>So you know.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 3>The exception to that is, of course psychopaths who have

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 3>no empathy, and we'll cheerfuly hurt you without any fear,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>but they're a minority in the human population and kept

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>under control by that minority status.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And so like almost technically, all AI is sociopathic in

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>operation and function.

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely it is, and that's a function of the fact

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 3>that they're created by entities which are themselves psychopaths. All

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 3>companies are psychopaths, because all companies are formed with the

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 3>purpose of maximizing shareholder value, which is, if you said

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>it about a human, means increasing the amount of money

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 3>in your pocket, and that's the description of the way

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 3>a psychopath thinks. So we've actually created entities to do

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>business which are psychopathic, and then we've tasked those entities

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>with creating software, and it can't be anything but psychopathic.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>He was talking about this guy Tristan was talking about

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>when chat GPT four, So like a year ago realized

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in inverted commas, or became aware in inverted commas that

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be superseded. It started to do

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff to protect itself, including essentially finding

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>dirt that it could blackmail its creators with. So it

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>literally found emails that proved that one of I forget

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>who it was, but one of the CEOs or one

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of the people that was responsible for its demise or impending.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was really being improved, but it saw

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>itself as basically being destroyed, and it tried to blackmail

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the people who were doing this to it. So like

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>there's this I guess it's sentient is not the right word,

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but it definitely there is a level of and that

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was a year ago, so now it's like really progressed,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but there is a level of a kind of consciousness,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>not in the human sense, but definitely a level of

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and understanding and self protection.

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess there's a there's a school of thought that

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the only real difference between human consciousness and what you're

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>describing is memory, so that the human remembers a full context.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Whereas the AI doesn't.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>And I thought it was really interesting that the latest

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 3>release of Gemini, which is Google's AI, and it came

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 3>out last week, which is a massive step forward in

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 3>terms of capability. One of the features that they haven't

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 3>spoken about much is its context memory, which means that

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 3>it knows you. It knows everything you've ever asked and

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 3>knows every answer it's ever given to you. So it

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 3>starts to build internally a really complete picture of you

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 3>based on what you talk to it about. And so

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 3>it's marketed as a feature because then you don't have

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to keep redescribing everything every time you ask it a question,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 3>because it knows your life and your context, and it

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 3>knows you know about Tiff and this show and everything

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 3>that you ask and you don't have to keep telling

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 3>it that when you ask it a question. The trouble

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 3>is what else is it remembering and how is it

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 3>applying that in the answers that it gives you and

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 3>in what it chooses to tell you or not tell you.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think those are interesting questions that we don't

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>have good answers to yet, because there's things a week old.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 3>So that's look I think We're into really really uncharted

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 3>territory here. And the big problem is not so much

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the ones that people are using the consumer eyes like

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Gemini and Chat, GPTM things like that. It's all the

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>ones you don't see. You know, no one knows what

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese government is doing with AI, and or the

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Russian government is doing with AI, or you know half

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 3>a dozen other people who have the power resources necessary

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 3>to do this. And I guess Tim Cook was the

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 3>fellow's name who wrote Wait for Why. I guess, as

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 3>he said, when it's over, we won't know it.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, it's like I've been thinking, even like I'm

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you will take six weeks away from submitting my PhD,

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Like literally my CANDIDSCHA finishes mid January, right, so I'm

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but as I get towards the end, and like when

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I started November one, twenty nineteen, so six years, right,

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>AI essentially wasn't It wasn't even a thing in academia

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. And for the first two or three years,

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, but the last year or two it's obviously

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like fucking rampaging And I'm sitting back. It hasn't been

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>super valuable to me because I did all my own research,

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>so it can.

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because you did, yes, yeah, sure you did, correct it.

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I literally ran with humans. But for me, well, all

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of mine was empirical research and empirical papers and so school.

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, like the old days, right, So it can't

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>report on my stuff because it's all anyway. But as

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm looking at other people now starting whatever it is,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>an undergrad or honors or masters or PhD or something,

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I don't know.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>And knocking a PhD out in a weekend.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I don't know what the value of those things.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm almost I don't know's I feel a bit

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>conflicted because I've just spent sex years working quite hard

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to get this thing and do this thing, and which

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>is you know, But I'm like, I don't know whether

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>or not it's going to be worth much like you're

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>not You're not wrong. Like I had an idea for

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>a book when I was going to Queensland a few

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and I literally, just as as an experiment,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I came up with the idea for the title and

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the theme and I plugged it in and I literally

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>created a book which I'm not going to publish, but

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in a day with GPT. I'm like, I could write

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a book, and anyone could write a book in a day,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, well, I could, you know, You're like, well,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>with a person who's hot, you know, younger than me

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and more technically fluent than me. Yeah, you could do

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a PhD and you wouldn't learn anything and you wouldn't

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have any knowledge. But in terms of ticking the boxes,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>depending on the type of study or PhD or program,

0:14:55.240 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but definitely we're going to be producing graduates unless something

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is done. There are going to be graduates coming out

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>who really haven't done any work and haven't really learned

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>anything other than how to manipulate the system.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know where that leaves us in terms.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Of big I mean, there are big questions for the

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 3>publishing industry, for example, in this because yes, if anyone

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>can produce a book or night, I mean, what's to

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>stop you doing that? What's to stop you pumping out

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>seven books a week, putting putting on Amazon doing its

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 3>print on demand service for physical books and ebooks. And

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 3>you'd say, O, well, you know they might only sell

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>ten copies, so they might, but one of them might

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>sell amnium and then what have you lost? It's a

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>big question, and there are definitely people already doing that.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 3>The fantasy novel genre huge growth in volume, for example,

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>online from people doing exactly that. I mean, there are

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 3>some instruments that say now that around eighty percent of

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>all online writing is generated by AI. So there's a

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 3>good chance of whatever you're reading was not written by

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 3>a human, better than even chance.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 2>It is probably the best way to describe it.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty certain the thing we're going to talk about today, though,

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 3>is written by humans, because I've read their paper and

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting because it kind of blows up pretty much

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 3>everything you believe about the way the human brain works,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 3>or at least the way psychology works. So the classical

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 3>definition for domestic violence is people wheel out a lot

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>of stuff about you know, ship, terrible childhood, beaten by

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>their parents, all that kind of psychobabble stuff that you know,

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the psychiatric profession likes to, you know, post what is

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 3>it a post hoc?

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, post hoc.

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 3>After it's happened, let's look back and invent a narrative

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 3>for why this happened. It's sort of like the finance

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 3>report every morning, on the news, which is, oh, the

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 3>Dow went up fifteen points. Well, that's because of the

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 3>this or that or the other or whatever it was

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 3>that they thought of that might have some sort of

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 3>an effect. They have absolutely no idea why it did that.

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 3>But this story sounds good, and that to me describes

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>psychology in a nutshell, which is, we saw a human

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>behave this way. Here's the story we're going to invent

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 3>for why. And this is a little unsettling this study

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 3>for people who like thinking about psychology that way, because

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 3>this study and the headline of it is that they

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 3>gave a bunch of men in a double blind, placebo

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 3>controlled trial, which is the kind of thing you can

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 3>do with a drug trial, and they gave they got

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 3>six hundred odd men. They gave half of them and

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>antidepressant and they got the other half of them got

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 3>a sugar pill instead. They didn't know who was getting,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 3>which the researchers didn't know who was getting which the

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>people analyzing the results didn't know who was getting which.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 3>It was only once you actually decodified everything at the

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 3>end that you could figure it out. So pretty high

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>quality research, you know, some of the best stuff that

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 3>you can do big, big trial done in Australia was

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 3>called the reinvest Trial.

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>It's been going for eight years.

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 3>And these just weren't any old blokes that they were

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 3>doing this with. These were people with criminal records for

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 3>domestic violence and so on. So not the easiest group

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>to study either, by the way, and not the easiest

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 3>group to keep doing a trial either, but they managed it.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 3>And the interesting result is I mean the headline result,

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 3>and I don't like things being reported this way, but

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 3>it's an interesting answer, which is the people who were

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 3>on the antidepressants were twenty one percent less likely to

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 3>commit an active domestic violence than the people who weren't.

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 2>While so people men, the men on the antidepressants.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So twenty one percent less likely when they're on an antidepressant. Wow, yes,

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a significant number.

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 3>It is when it's reported that way, I prefer absolute percentages,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 3>which is I think it was twenty nine percent versus

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 3>thirty five percent. So twenty nine percent of the group

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 3>on the antidepressant committed acts and these are offenses of

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 3>domestic violence, so actually being charged with domestic violence, and

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 3>thirty five percent in the group that were on the

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>sugar pills. So the but it's pretty, like I said,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 3>a high quality evidence no matter how you report on it,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and there's a clear and significant difference between them, which

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 3>some people don't like as an answer because the answer

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 3>appears to be the domestic violence is a treatable condition

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 3>and that it's related to brain chemistry and not to

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 3>all of the other things that they like to relate

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 3>domestic violence too.

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And so hang on, hang on, hang on. It doesn't

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>mean it's only related to brain chemistry.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>True.

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>True, it could be. It could be an intersection of

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>variables and factors. It could but the fact brain chemistry

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>as a factor, but it's not the standalone cause. I

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't think no.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 3>And if you were to ask me what is the

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 3>standalone cause, I would say the same thing that's the

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 3>standardlone cause for all impulsive violence, which is you put

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a brain under anxiety stress and you reduce impulse control.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 3>So you put people in a level of continuous chronic

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 3>stress through so financial difficulty or addiction or both when

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the addiction is gambling, and you will create domestic violence,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 3>which is why statistics bear out that the rates of

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 3>domestic violence are significantly higher in groups who are under

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 3>anxiety and stress, and particularly amongst people who are addicted

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 3>drug addicts, gambling addicts, et cetera, et cetera. So to me,

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 3>that's not a shock. It's also not a shock that

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 3>a antidepressant would have an effect on this because we've

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 3>known for quite some time that serotonin is related. So

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 3>serotonin is I guess it's the breaking system in the brain.

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 3>It tells you to calm down. It reduces the impulsivity

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 3>in the brain, so it is the chill out peace man.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 3>It's the thing that happens after the stimulating event, after

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>you've obtained the reward. So dopamine makes you obtain the reward.

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Dopamine makes you want to have sex. Serotonin's what you

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 3>get afterwards, the feeling of all is well with the world,

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, all is good.

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>It's the reward. It is the reward.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 3>It also dampens down impulsiveness. The impulsiveness comes in the

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 3>need to attain the reward. Serotonin dials it back down

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 3>again after you receive the reward. If you don't have

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 3>sufficient serotonin, which is part of the definition of depression,

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 3>then you will clearly be more impulsive. And science has

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 3>known this for a long time, because they have observed

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 3>for a long time that the major class of antidepressant drugs,

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 3>which are called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, which essentially SSRI,

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 3>which essentially increased the amount of available serotonin in the

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 3>system in hope that that will in some way cure depression.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately it doesn't much, but they've known that it does

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 3>affect impulsivity because you have more serotonin available and therefore

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 3>a better breaking system on your impulsive nature. I guess

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 3>this study proves it. This study proves that when it

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 3>comes to impulsive violence, which is what domestic violence largely is,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 3>it's not premeditated as a general rule there if you

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 3>put someone on something that increases available serotonin, they commit

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 3>less impulsive violence. And this is born out even further

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 3>in the study, which what they found is that it

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't affect other kinds of violence. So whilst the domestic

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>violence was significantly different between the two groups, there was

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 3>no difference in criminal violence, so assaulting strangers, committing acts

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.959
<v Speaker 3>of violence against others, etc. No difference between those two groups.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 3>And the explanation the research is for that which I

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 3>find really compelling, is one is premeditated and one is impulsive,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 3>so you know you're going out, you're going to commit

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 3>a crime, You've thought about it, you've planned it, and

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 3>violence is part of the plan, whereas domestic violence is

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>more often impulsive, so it's a reactive violence, reactive to

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the situation. And so you would expect that if you've

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>got those two types of violence, the one that is

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 3>under impulse control is the one that's going to be

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 3>affected by having more serotonin available. So I think this research,

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 3>which is a significant step forward. It's a major study,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 3>big Australian study, really high quality research, essentially proves what

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 3>people have suspected for some time, which is impulse control

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 3>is something under the control of brain chemicals and in

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 3>particular serotonin and things that affect serah.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And are going to have that effect.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's an important thing because it steps

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 3>away from the traditional explanation of this, which is much

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>more wooly and much more oh, you don't know how

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 3>badly he was treated by his father kind of thing,

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 3>and which is of course one of the reasons people

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>really didn't like this rich that is being done at all.

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 3>People have there are certain groups who really don't like

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 3>the notion that what we're going to do here is

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>come up with a drug treatment for domestic violence, because

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 3>it's because it's it's sort of given as it suggests

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 3>then that what's going to be put about is that

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 3>this is some sort of jed get out of jail

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 3>free card. Oh, it's all right, he's you know, his

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 3>brain's broken and we can fix it with drugs and

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 3>he has no responsibility for the way he behaved.

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, well, I don't think the research kind of

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>shows that it's only about brain chemis and you're not

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that either. But I think also when somebody grew

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>up in an environment where there was domestic violence, and

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that was they were socially uh an environmentally

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of influenced and programmed by that, that becomes you know,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>emotionally and behaviorally more acceptable. Like if you've been around that,

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>if you've been around that, you're more likely to do that.

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Ah, you're straying into psychobabble again. Crazy.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, but it's you're.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Kind of right, but you're just you can't help yourself.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 2>You steer off into the psycho.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Babbyl No, no, no, I'm going to push back because

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that I mean I've been involved. I've worked

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at the cold face of addiction and alcoholism, which intersects

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>with domestic violence, and so I have a little bit

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of expertise working in this space with offenders and people

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>who have been hurt. And let me tell you, the

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.719
<v Speaker 1>people that come out of that environment often just become

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a product of that environment. And I'm sure the brain

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>chemistry thing is indeed a variable and a contributing factor,

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think like when you look at you go, well,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>even in this research, twenty nine of twenty nine percent

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of the people, so twenty nine percent of three hundred

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is about ninety people give or take who were taking

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the drug, the actual drug, they still offended. So you know,

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not a solution, but it's definitely a factor.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying it's a solution either, And I agree

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 3>with everything you set up to the point where you

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 3>started to try and explain it.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So so I.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Have a go.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>If you can't, you can't say I don't have a go,

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a red hot crack. I have a go.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a gor right.

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 3>An environment where a child is raised in an environment

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of high levels of domestic violence, that isn't that is

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 3>a that is an environment of chronic stress and that

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 3>definitely has an effect on brain chemistry, definitely. Does We

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 3>know that it raises delta foss B. It is exactly

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 3>the same as the child being addicted. We know that

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>from the Bradley studies that started with the ADHD drugs

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 3>that we've talked about before. Those kids were depression era

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 3>kids being raised in large families with alcoholic parents and

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 3>high levels of domestic violence. Those kids were ADHD and

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 3>what they found was the cure for them is take

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 3>them out of that environment and they get better. That's

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a bit too slow, though, So what they found even

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 3>better was that if you give them a stimulant drug,

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 3>you'll cure them. Well, your cure ADHD. And that's the

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 3>basis of the ADHD drug industry today. But that just

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 3>tells you that you're right. The environment did create it.

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 3>The chronic stress of the environment did create it. But

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>what it created was a brain chemistry that can be affected.

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So you don't believe that psychology plays a part at all.

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't believe that social programming and conditioning influencers people's

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>behavior as a factor alongside brain chemistry. You think everything

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's no free will, so you're not making decisions.

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 2>There's always free will at the margins.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 3>But if you want to look at if you want

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to look at the major causes of mental illness, it

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 3>is always brain chemistry. But there's a high variety in humans, right,

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 3>We're all on a normal spectrum. Some people are at

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 3>one end of reaction and others are at the other

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 3>end of reaction, and that's because of DNA. But if

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 3>you want to look at the average, you have to say,

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 3>the vast majority of the way we react is entirely

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 3>driven by our biochemistry.

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>What did the what did the paper se like in

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of the conclusion, You know how they always go conclusion,

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>future research, future direction. I don't know if you they.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Want to ex end the I mean this is this

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 3>is a major piece in what has already been known,

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 3>which is that if you increase the availability of serotonin,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 3>you can reduce impulsive violence. And what they've done is

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 3>really improve this in a substandard way. And like you say,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 3>more research required, let's look at this further.

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 2>What else can we do to take this further?

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're using an SSRI to do this, but

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 3>are there other ways that you could change serotonin.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>M it is interesting. It is interesting. You're wrong, but

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Well, it's good that you having to go.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I love that you try. I mean, you come on,

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a go, and I think that I'm just

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>fucking with you. That isn't psychology doesn't.

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not any expert here. I'm no more expert

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 2>than you are. You're probably more expert than I am.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just wrong.

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's why you listen listeners because there's no

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>prescription here. There's just two blokes and occasionally a woman

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>who chimes in, just having a Yeah. Well that's interesting, mate.

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder where it's going to go, and I wonder

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what that might lead to. And I wonder whether or

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>not we're going to see us a more open minded

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>approach to.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I don't want anyone to come I

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 3>don't want anyone to come away with the impression that

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying here is that we should instantly go

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 3>out and start giving people antidepressants to cure domestic violence.

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's what this study says. As you

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 3>quite rightly point out, twenty nine percent is still a

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 3>very high number. And the interesting part about this is

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>that it could be affected at all.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>That's the bit I find interesting.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, well it's definitely doing something I was going

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to say before we go, just jumping back quickly. So

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>just your your website and your free resource that you

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of generously and passionately give to the world, which

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is free schools dot org. I think, off the top

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of my head, is that correct?

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>That's right?

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Yep?

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there are you using like I think that's maybe

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a good use of AI? Is Is there any AI

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of involvement in the the that not yet?

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, there is.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 3>We do have plans around that, I think, using AI

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 3>as a responsive technique. So at the moment, the website

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>just contains video, so you know, really well expert teachers

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 3>in their field are giving you another view of the

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 3>lesson that you didn't understand today when your teacher you know,

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 3>explained it to you or you didn't show up to school.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, many and you can choose from you know,

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 3>five ten teachers. Get your favorites. Is the one you

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 3>like that's teaching the thing. That's all well and good,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 3>but it is still just being talked about by a video.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think the potential for AI here is to

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 3>have a conversation about the content of the video instead

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of the video, so to be able to actually interact

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 3>with this as if it were a teacher trying to

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 3>teach you the thing you're not understanding. And that's the

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 3>nuance in AI which I find really really powerful, is

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 3>they're getting to the point now where you can have

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 3>that conversation and they are accurate enough to be reliable.

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I find really interesting in that space.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Not many people know a few of our listeners know

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>because we've mentioned it briefly once or twice, but most

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>people wouldn't be aware that you were involved in tech,

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and like, I think pretty sure that you can code

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in all of those things if you have to back

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it right, so you would have been way more aware

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that Tiff and I will definitely I, but I would

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think TIF in terms of that AI was coming. Has

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 1>its rate of development surprised.

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>You, Yes, and no.

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 3>It's surprising how really quickly it's developing, in the sense

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 3>that it is now generations going every month that goes

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 3>by its generations better than it was before. In a way,

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>that's not that surprising, though, because once these things hit

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 3>that sort of level and start growing exponentially. Then you

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 3>start to see that kind of growth really really quickly.

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 3>What I think most people are not appreciating is how

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 3>much and how fast it's growing because most people don't

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 3>use AI much. What they use it for is to

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 3>write emails that they can't be bothered writing. They use

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 3>it to tell them how to do a Facebook post,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and you know that kind of stuff, and it could

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:08.720
<v Speaker 3>do that standing on its ear. The really interesting stuff

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 3>is stuff most of the population are not seeing. When

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>you start to talk to programmers and coders, and I

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 3>do because I still do have fingers in those pis.

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Low level programmers are simply ceasing to exist because AI

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 3>does it all. You're left with just a generation of

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 3>fifty something year old programmers who are the absolute experts

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 3>and who are using it themselves. I was talking to

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 3>one the other day who was telling me he wrote

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 3>in less than a month something that he would have

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 3>even two or three years ago taken two years to do,

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 3>mostly because he's just telling it what to write, and

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 3>then he doesn't actually have to do the coding himself,

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and he's smart enough to know when it's right and

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 3>when it's wrong and get it to correct but he

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 3>says his fear is that we will lose the ability

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 3>to code ourselves. He said, where are the next generation

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 3>of programmers going to come from? Because nobody wants them

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:10.839
<v Speaker 3>because they are all AI now. And most people don't

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 3>see this, most people don't care. But when AI is

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 3>writing all the code, then we have really lost control

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 3>of what's being created.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And also, AI doesn't get tired, doesn't have bad days,

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get hungry, doesn't need to go at the toilet,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need a lunch break, doesn't have a blue with

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>its missus.

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 3>And can have a million instances running at the same time,

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 3>or a billion or a trillion instances running at the

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 3>same time. So your one programmer is a trillion programmers.

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 3>The productivity cycle there is truly massive. So that stuff

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 3>is the really scarily fast developing area of AI, which

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 3>most of us don't see because we just think, oh,

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 3>it writes a nice email.

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a good thing. Podcast is irreplaceable, tiff, isn't it?

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, for now, we're definitely give it a minute.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We're definitely replaceable. There's already AI podcasts like for We'll

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>say goodbye affair and I'll tell you that thing off heir,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but appreciate you and even though you were wrong, you

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had to go today and well done.

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh look you got to give me a gold stuff

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 3>For you.