WEBVTT - Behind the sharemarket fall... your next move

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody. Now, folks, we are in

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle of what looks like a sharp share market

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>shakeout and what I'm going to do in the next

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>two shows is I'm going to split it. And today

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk to a professional inside sharebrooking right,

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>who's also an expert on investor behavior usefully about what's happening,

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happened so far and why. And later in the

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>week I'm going to talk to doctor Sam Wiley and

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to take We're going to take a deeper

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>look at what's perhaps evolving in the market now and

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what are the dangers and opportunities for you the investor

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>going forward and put together, I think this is going

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to be very useful to you. And just before we start,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if you need contexts, you should know the Australian share

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>market as we speak in early April, it's down around

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>ten percent for the year and Wall Street is down

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>around fifteen percent for the year as we talk this morning,

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>after an extraordinary session overnight whereby the Dow ended flat

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but conceals a lot of drama, and it was actually

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>touching bear market levels. That is, at one point in

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street session on Monday this week, American Monday,

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they were touching bear market levels twenty percent down from

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the top. They had a rally at the end based

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on a report that was later contradicted, if not denied,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Trump administration that they were going to cool

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>off on tariffs. Another thing to keep in mind, especially

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>if you are interested in property, is that interest rates

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>will now almost certainly Fowell and I've been skeptical about

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that to date. Not only that, but they will probably

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>accelerate the pace of the cuts that were coming through

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, and it would seem that we could have

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>anything up to we could see your mortgage basically falling

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>from six's to six ish to five ish percent, perhaps

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>official rates falling from four to closer to three percent.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Very important change in the market. So all linked, of course,

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and also I think some renewed focus on the capacity

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and capabilities inside big super lots to talk about. Okay,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>my guest today is Jemma Dale, head of investor behavior

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>at NAP Trade. She's been on the show before.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 2>How are you, Gemma, I'm well, thanks, how you good.

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you on today, Ideal to have you

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on today. So let's just talk first and for what

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we were talking before the show, and I think listeners

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be really interested in this. So what everyone sees so

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>far is the usual thing. By that I mean share

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>market plunge. Now, you see, we all use these words

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>too often, plunge, and we see we get up in

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the morning, we see a headline share market plunge is

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>one percent, two percent. That's not a plunge, right, that's

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>four if it falls nearly five percent in the single session,

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the worst session since COVID. Okay, I'll accept the word plunge.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>This week, on that day, only market's falling. We know why,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>no mystery is there because of tariffs and the threat

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of that. This continues and escalates and gets oursel works,

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and until the market sees that there's an end to

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it of some sort, we simply cannot make a call

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>as to when it's going to stop. However, you've been

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at now this is only a single brokerage, but

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a big brokerage and ab nap trade. And you

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>tell me that you're seeing people buying more than selling,

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>tell me a little bit more about that and what

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly and who are This.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Is the best part of my job and it's so interesting.

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And we had a clear example of how investors respond

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to market volatility, but particularly falls. Right, you talk about volatile.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>No one cares about the up and down. What we

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>care about is the down. Everyone gets a bit bored,

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>particularly because it's slower and unless interesting. Yeah, or out

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the window, out the window, sorry if it's out the window.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 2>So market has plunged, as you say, We saw this

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>in COVID as well. So COVID market peaked to trough

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>in three weeks. That was a plunge, right, that was

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a very significant collapse, very sharp. Then it turned around

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and it raced back up again. And what we saw

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>from our investors during that period was just an extraordinary

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 2>switch from holding cash and very modest trading levels to

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 2>very aggressive buying through the fall and as the market

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 2>turned around and started climbing back up again. So we

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>went from a sort of let's say forty five percent sell,

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.559
<v Speaker 2>fifty five percent buy. There's always a slight buyas toward

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>buying because people are building over time, right, the vast

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 2>majority of people are not selling shares over time. They're

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to build a portfolio, so there's always a bit

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 2>more selling on average, s a bit more buying on average.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 2>During COVID it went to eighty twenty, so eighty percent

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>buying twenty percent selling, and most of the selling was

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>to get back into something else you were rotating through

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>your portfolio, So huge buying through COVID and also a

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 2>huge influx of new investors so our customer base. And

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 2>this was true across most of the retail brokerages during

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>that period.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now, so we don't want to talk about which

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>too much. I'm trying to get a broader picture. But

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is really interesting. Okay, So this week, then,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in this downturn, your turnover is lifting again and you

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>are seeing, yet again, you are seeing, let me just

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>clarify this beyond all doubt, you are seeing people doing

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>more buying than selling this week.

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So what we saw on Monday, which was when

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the market sort of bottomed out, down six percent very

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 2>early in the morning, just after the open, that was

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>our largest trading day ever including the pandemic. It was

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>about ten percent higher than our previous largest volumes, and

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 2>it was absolutely more buying than selling.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So the listener will say, if that's going on in

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>every share Brookridge Fly, is the market.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Falling Because retail investors are less than twenty percent of

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the market, that's the main reason. So the vast majority

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 2>of the ASX and global markets is institutional money. That

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 2>is superfunds and algorithmic traders and hedge funds and any

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>number of large institutional investors. They're driving the flows generally,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>and retail investors are at the margin what we see,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 2>so they will know you will very rarely see except

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 2>in some smaller stocks in particular, which are kind of

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 2>retail focused. You tend not to see retail investors driving

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the price, particularly as aggressive of when you see volumes

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 2>like this, So they're a smaller part of the market.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 2>But we have seen so we have seen some of

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>our larger investors selling, so they're trimming positions, they're not

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>selling their whole portfolio. It's always really important to go

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, if I sell five percent of my portfolio,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that's not the same as selling one hundred percent of

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 2>my portfolio. So they're trimming, and some of them will

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>be trimming positions that they just want to kind of

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 2>settle down. There has been a huge influx of cash

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to our book over the last twelve months. So cash

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>has been climbing and climbing.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So these every day investors have built up cash

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>positions in recent times much more than big super funds

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>would have, and now they are bargain hunting faster than

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>big super funds have. Here's the thing. To what extent

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think your experience in that which is a

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>major share roker in the market is mirrored in other houses?

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 2>It appears to be relatively similar. I will say our

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 2>database were attached to a bank, they skew slightly older,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>they skew more experienced. For obvious reasons. You know, younger

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 2>people might be attracted to a sort of flashy and

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 2>more techi kana name. We tend to have sort of

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of self managed super fund retirees. We have

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>lots of younger investors as well, but it's more representative

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the total population rather than a newer broker that might

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>attract younger people.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So the chances are the newer brokers younger people are.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>The pattern might even be more pronounced.

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>It may be, it absolutely may be so younger investors.

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I find this really interesting. Younger investors learn to investor

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>in COVID, and what they learned was by the dip,

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's what they do.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And they learned in one crash, yes, that you bought

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the and it went flying back up. Right, So it's

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a V. COVID is extraordinary. And it was a V

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>shaped recovery.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a Nike swoosh. It kept going past the V.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Yeah. And if they had been around in two

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>or eight, they would have watched the market take two

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 1>years to fall fifty in the slow mind.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it didn't make experienced month fIF.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, eighteen months fifty five percent slow torture, a crumbling

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>share market where you kept thinking it was turned the

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>corner and it hadn't, Which leads to the question, And

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't I wouldn't even ask you this. I wouldn't

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>ask any one person because no one knows. But I

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>could frame it this way. This generation of bargain hunters

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing come out of the woodwork this week,

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>emboldened by COVID. Is there a danger that this is

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>not like COVID as a reversal.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I think you're absolutely correct. There is a real risk

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 2>because this is restructuring the global economy right if the

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 2>tar stick. And this is the difficulty. No one knows

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the trump and if you think you do, you're wrong.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's highly volatile. The decision making is it's volatile,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>let's call it that. So it's very difficult to predict

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 2>to what extent the twers was stick. There'll be retaliation

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>and so on. But we do assume that there is

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 2>an intention to restructure the global economy and US dominance.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 2>So if we assume that to be correct, inflation will

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 2>rise under tariffs, absolutely will, particularly in the US. It

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>might be deflationary in Australia if we get lots of

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 2>cheap goods from China and other people who can't sell

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>them elsewhere, but inflationary in the US. That puts up

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 2>with pressure on rates, which is interesting. It puts downward

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 2>pressure on share prices. The US consumer could be absolutely

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>crushed by this, So there's a real risk that we

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of fall dramatically into a recession. That is what

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 2>has happened in the previous instances of tariff's being implemented

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 2>like this. But we're going back a century. Don't have

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 2>great data on this.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going back to nineteen the thirties, yeah, okay, on

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what people are doing. So we've established that for listeners

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that it would seem that people are responding very like COVID,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>that they are actually looking for bargains, that they are

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>actually buying more than selling. This is active every day

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>investors who sort of people who listen to this show,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they are also perhaps if they are selling there, they're maneuvering.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're selling out of gold for instance, after getting

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a big run and buying I don't know just about anything, right, yes, so.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Northern Star was our biggest sell yesterday. You're absolutely correct,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that was the biggest sell.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, and that's a gold gold miner. So just

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>before we go into that sort of deep dive, the

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>patterns of what people are buying. Are they going back

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>into the US? Are they going back, if you like,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>into the fire? Are they going straight back to the U?

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it the US bias? Are the ATS?

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>We yeah, so not specifically only the US. When we

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>see ETF buying, it is usually the ASX two hundred

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and the S and P five hundred, but there is

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 2>also now some world. So misky world is sort of

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 2>the benchmark that the UTF matches. I should note all

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of the utfs that we see typically are just basic

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 2>index ets. They're not managed, they're not leverageda Clain Vanilla, right,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>very simple stuff. You know exactly what you're getting, very

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 2>cheap as well, very low mars, and lots of good

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>historical data on the value of investing in that kind

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of product if you don't want to pick the stops yourself. Right.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 2>So we have seen that. We have also seen Nasdaq

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and quite a lot of that and World

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 2>more broadly. But World is sort of seventy percent US

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, so one would trust that investors know

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>when you are buying a World ETF, you are getting

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of US exposure in that and then a

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>smaller amount, much smaller amount of the rest of the world.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, really interesting. We got to take a short break

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and we will be back very quickly because this is enthralling. Okay,

0:12:53.400 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>back in the moment. Hello, Welcome back to The Australian's

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzle podcast. James Kirby with Jamma Dale from Nabdate,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>head of Investor Behavior, who is always good to talk to.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Ani Date have to mention in the middle of a

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>share market downturn. Okay, so tell us now what your

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>data in channel that is showing about people what they're

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>buying and what they're buying, what they're selling, to the

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>extent that you could.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, So one thing I will comment on because

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you just sort of asked this question before. There are

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>different types of investors obviously in any customer set, and

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>we have hundreds and hundreds of thousands of customers and

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 2>so they are quite different. Younger people obviously have a

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>different portfolio and different trading slash investing behavior than older people,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 2>which is quite typical. One of the main reasons is

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>older people have been doing it longer and they're much

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>less likely to own a lot of ETFs. They started

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:56.599
<v Speaker 2>buying direct stocks, so they tend to hold BHP, CBA, CSL, Macquarie.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, big Australian companies has been around a long time.

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 2>So what though, those guys are doing it at the moment,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and our active trade is they are materials, particularly BHP

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and Woodside. Woodside has been absolutely smashed because the oil

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>prices come off so hard. Uh, BHP obviously a lot

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>of exposure to China.

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, just to clarify, people are with these stocks they're

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>buying or selling them.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>They're buying them.

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>They're absolutely they're buying them. They're buying Woodside after the

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sell off of the oils because the oil is down

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>because of a variety of things, including which almost got lost.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll pick I've allowed it to go off in the

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>middle of all this, which which would normally have been

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>big news, but it didn't get through the crash news. Okay,

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So commodity old time commodity miners EH, fossil fuel giants.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and banks. Interestingly enough, Westpac, so, CBA, NAB and

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I and Z are strong by at the moment, less

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>so Westpac. But sometimes that's a normalist. That's just one

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 2>day and for whatever reason, that just wasn't the So

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to say that's a trend. It just

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 2>is what happened yesterday when McQuary got hit really hard

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>yesterday morning and then bounced quite a lot. So it

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>was obviously brought in the morning when it was under

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of pressure. And mccrary's one of the companies

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in Australia with a lot of US earnings and obviously

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.479
<v Speaker 2>a lot of exposure to the US.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and you sign up people searching in they're doing that.

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's an element of swinging towards defense

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in the chase for income and dividends from the bank

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>shares particularly.

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 2>It could be that. I think the real risk with

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 2>bank shares, and now investors are acutely conscious of this

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 2>is they've been until quite recently. If you look at

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>three of the big four, they've come off very hard.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>It looks like CBA has come off hard, but it

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 2>hasn't really. I mean CBA was at one hundred dollars

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>or eighteen months ago. It's still it, what one hundred

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and forty ish. Yes, it made it to one hundred

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and sixty, but it's not exactly a dramatic pullback when

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>you consider it is a bank and it perhaps should

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>not have run sixty percent in eighteen months. It was

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>quite an extraordinary price, and the year was back at

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>around three percent. So for our guys, they know the

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>bank share process is extremely well and they're very reluctant

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to chase. They were mostly trimming banks through the last

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>eighteen months because they felt they had just run too hard.

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>The rotation back in is interesting. I think it's more

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of a quality play than a dividend play, mostly because

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 2>they've got lots of banks already.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay, and as you say, it's worth hearing this folks.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You know the franking are fully frank. Years on the

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>bank shows coming up at seven and eight percent now

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>with the exception interesting the comebob banks. That is the

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is it doesn't fall what was it doesn't fall,

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but it was the one that was supposed to fall hardest. Yes,

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the scause it's run the hardness, but it hasn't. So

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting I often find when you get this

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>period of supervolatility in a big sell off there it's

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>always really worth looking the next thing said, well, what

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>did actually happen? Which stocks did forward? And the other

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>themes we could look at? What about the AI and

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>tech gang.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.479
<v Speaker 2>In the US. So we'll say that just that difference

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>between more mature investors, the ones who've been doing this

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a long time and have stock portfolios versus newer investors

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>who tend to have ETF portfolios, because they're quite different cohorts.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 2>The ETF portfolio guys are just loading up, absolutely up,

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>and we.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Were loading up on ETFs. Sorry, there's no evidence of them.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Broadening, and it may happen, but not yet. So what

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 2>has happened, and we ran this analysis last year. So

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me is that yes, people buy ettfs and

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a bit of a just keep buying mentality, and

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of it is younger people trying to build

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>a portfolio over time. And you can extrapolate to say

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 2>they're saving up to by home or whatever it is.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 2>They're just trying to build up a portfolio over time.

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>They use ETF to do that. What we found through

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 2>a bit of sort of begging through our data and

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>analysis is they are not just blindly buying. They are

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>far more likely to buy. And I mean by a

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>magnitude of like fifty percent on a day the market

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 2>falls by more than one percent, So on a day

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>when it falls six percent in the morning, they are

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>going to buy dramatically more and dramatically more people are

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 2>going to buy. And I kind of love that. I'm like, well,

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>you guys, know what you're doing. This is not just

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 2>random buying. You're actually trying to time just little winds.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 2>They're little accreative wins, right, Like if you just buy

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>it one percent cheaper, but you're doing it consistently, that's

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>quite nice, right, And I think to your question a

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit earlier, like, do we know whether this is

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>a V shape recovery like COVID or a horrendous bleed

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 2>like two thousand and eight. We don't know. Obviously, we

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know at this point. But for those people who

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>are doing cumulative ETF buying, I don't know if they

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>care an enormous amount. This is just a long term

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 2>buying strategy and they will try to buy weakness, and

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>that tends to be the newer investors. That's just their strategy.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, sort of an aggressive exactly.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Is it quite a sophisticated, simple strategy?

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Right, okay, very interesting and no obvious swing back

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>towards the defensive alleged defensive quality of the ASEX with

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the high dividend yield.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Not really. I mean, obviously we sow enormous buying, but

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>we have seen so much cash piling up. We absolutely

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>knew people were waiting for a pullback, and they are

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>absolutely moving on the pullback, which is good to see.

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>They're not just sitting on cash indefinitely. What is always

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting to see is what happens as it continues. You know,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>it's unlikely you get a sell off. That's three days

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>only and then it's all over and back to the races.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 2>So it'll be interesting to see what happens.

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It will be interesting to see what happens. Well, that's sure,

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>but we ruled off the books this morning. We would

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>all be in trouble, wouldn't we. We'd be all our

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>super funds. If we were in big super they would

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>be down considerably because our big super funds are we

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>know from the statistics, more exposed if you like, to

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the US share market and have elevated that exposure recent times.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>And they also have more exposure to on listed assets,

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>which we haven't talked about. Yes, but either they will

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>drop and if they don't mark them down, they become

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>imbalanced if you like, because their shares are down, but

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>their private equity holdings aren't because they haven't marked them down.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So I can't see your way out of that. I

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder had you look at all at I noticed myself

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at the listed what I call the listed on list,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the listed on listed market, which is all these funds

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>which have emerged which give investors exposure to assets that

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are private technically, and then they list them on the

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>stock market and they say there's no contradiction in that.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But I did notice that the funds, private equity funds

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and private credit funds that are listed on the ASEX.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>This is very broad, but they are down perhaps fifty

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>percent more than the market itself. So the market being

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>down ten percent this year so far, some of those

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>big funds down fifteen percent or more. I thought it

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>might didn't be sharper, And I think any observations on

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that whole scene for our listeners.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the comment I would make, we do not

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of appetite for that kind of product

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and structure on. Yeah, So if you look at our

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>younger investors, they're just buying plain vanilla retfs and that

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 2>is their strategy, and they're very consistent about it. So

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>they're quite sophisticated. They try to time it, but they're

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>quite happy to take a small win rather than looking

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 2>to time it perfectly and hold out in cash for

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 2>a year and a half waiting for a pullback. You know,

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>they're just happy to buy consistently. When you look at

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 2>our more mature investors, and again this is a bit

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>of an experienced thing. A lot of them are around

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 2>during the GFC and they have seen what happens to

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I liquid assets, regardless of whether or not they're in

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 2>a liquid structure. They've seen what happens, and it's very

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>clear that they are steering well away from things that

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't understand and when they diversify away from direct

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 2>equity portfolio. So you know, they have a direct equity

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 2>portfolio that have some cash. We obviously don't see everything

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>they have off platform. They have lots of other things

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>generally as well. But if they do go into something

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>beyond their ASX listed exposure, they tend to stay with

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 2>stuff that's pretty vanilla and pretty transparent. You know, they'll

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>go into international equities, you know, they'll go into some

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>rates and so on, but then going into more opaque

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 2>structures at all.

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to ask you almost repeat, is that

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in your It seems as you have come to a

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>conclusion on your own database at NAP trade that the

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>older investor has stocks. They probably started off someone said

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to them by ten stocks. They went in, they bolt

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>two banks, two minors, they've got a supermarket. They played

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>around the edges, et cetera. Some years younger went in

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and they started buying ETFs. Then they both then they

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe increased their sophistication of their portfolio. They had the AX,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the S and P. Then they bought NASDAK, then they

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>bought Miski, then they bought something US small caps or whatever.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>All fine, here's the thing. It seems to me, if

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it keeps going the way it is, that the ETF

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>investors will dominate your platform sooner or later.

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 2>So I get this question a lot, and it's really interesting,

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 2>and no, I love it. I think it's such an

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>interesting question. Right, So, pre COVID ETFs were four percent

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>of our holdings. They are now fourteen percent of our holdings.

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Fourteen percent still pretty small of a yeah, holdings of

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>what people hold overall, so we don't manage it for them.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 2>Just sits on the platform. Yeah, fourteen percent. So that's

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>bigger than any individual holding, It's not dramatically bigger. So

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the sort of top ten Australian stocks, top ten ASX

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>stocks make up about fifty percent of holdings. You know,

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>has that shrunk?

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Has that shrunk to thet You've.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Got to remember our customer base doubled, So the weight

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of ETF holding sits in the newer investors, the weight

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 2>not all of them, obviously some of our more mature

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>investors hold ETFs as well, but they tend to add

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>them to their portfolio. They don't go, God, I'm really

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 2>awful at managing my own portfolio. I'm going to sell

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 2>it all down and go into an ETF. They go, oh,

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 2>here's the thing I don't hold. I'll get some S

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred. So yeah, it's I think what

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 2>is worth noting is, obviously the number of investors has grown.

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm extrapolating across the industry here because I suspect

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 2>it's true, particularly for our bigger competitor. There's one competitor

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 2>that's bigger th enough. And what you see is your

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 2>newer investors are growing the ETF book, and your existing

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 2>investors have a lot of direct equities, and then they

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 2>might can nearbor. Yes.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, so, I think, folks, because we are because the

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>large investors, the institution investors, dominate the market and swing

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the market one way or another. Just be aware of

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>this that though it looks like the everyone's selling and

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>getting out of the stock market, or at least, you know,

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>unloading lots of shares, it's not everyone. It's largely institutional

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>investors and pension funds, your own pension fund, no doubt,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your own super fund. But it's not you the active investor,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>which is very much our listener. Really interesting. Okay, Gemma,

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>take short break. We'll come back with some questions. Hello,

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Kirby talking to Jemma Dale of KNAB Trade, who's just

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>been telling us some very interesting insights into what's been

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going on behind the headlines really of this share market downturn.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It is very much an mirror image of what happened

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in the COVID downturn. Except we know how the COVID

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>downturn ended. We don't know how this one ends. We

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Sorry, folks, tell you what we don't. I'm

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>not even going to try a quick not so much question.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But a couple of quite a few messages came in

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, basically all say the same thing, that

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I was biased against industry funds. I'm not at all,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and I regularly would say that they suit many people,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but I would also very quickly say they should never

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be beyond question. Someone also meant the point that as

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a journalist day and writer, you should regularly declare that

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you have an SMSF. I regularly declare I have an SMSF.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I have an SMSF. I would have mentioned it on

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the show many times. And just for the record, my

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>other half is in an industry fund, you see, all

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>her life, and despite my entreaties, is involved. Yes, of

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.719
<v Speaker 1>course trustee of the Curbly Superinnuation Fund, but has her

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>industry fund going too. So let me tell you there

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are no biases on that. And look, I would just

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>say it would be silly of me to have them.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But there would be times, I suppose on a live

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>show like this where if I'm digging in on a

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>certain theme, it may seem so, but I would strenuously

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>defend that I would have an independent view on, especially

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>on these big themes. But thank you all the same, everybody,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 1>and do always give us your impressions or observations on

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing and keep me in line, all right.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Question from Danny. Question relates to government health funds. How

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>those listed private health companies go since they were battered

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>from pillar to post, Gemma, the Ramses and co. I

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>mean they've been sought off anyway. I haven't looked but

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I preserved they couldn't have been sought off much further

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in this route and health scope. My bi hanging on

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>there and in the middle of it of a takeover

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>place should be interesting anyway, quickly, folks, Delly says, if

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>my question relates to government health fund loading fee cover

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for over thirty one year olds, you all know about that.

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're over thirty one day, they double get you

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get your cover. So he says it's

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>often better. You're often better off paying Medicare levy than

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the health cover due to expensive loading. So you could

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>easily be persuaded to buy health cover private insurance cover

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>if you are older over thirty one. What are your

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this? Okay? We went to James Gerard, our

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>friend financial advisor. He says the loading is collected by

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the private health insurer and not forwarded to the government.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>It's the private health surer keeps the loading correct. There

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are several instances where the Medicare levy search charge will

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>work out better than the hospital coverage under a private

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>health insurance policy. This signals the actual benefits of the

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>policy and purely focuses on what is less pain financially,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what is cheaper? Okay? And then James says, as Daney noted,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>O the people who are liable for a large surcharge

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and people whose income is just over the threshold for

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the surcharge may be better off just paying the surcharge.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you go down the path of paying the

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>surcharge and sidestepping a hospital insurance policy and make sure

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a good public hospital nearby because you never

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>know when you might need it, what there you are?

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>James Gerard has covered all potential angles there, but it

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is it's something that has come up, and it's something

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we're quite acutely aware of. And that's always the answer,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, if you if it's strictly speaking,

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do with the cheapest way, you

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.719
<v Speaker 1>know it's quite obvious what to do, but you take

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a risk, all right? Now? A question from Keaton where

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Jema can come back in? I hope Keaton first name says,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a share I regrettably bought was recently delisted from the

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ASX and listed on the NSX. I've never heard of

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this exchange. My understanding is I need to sell my

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>shares to write off the loss against my gains from

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>selling other more successful shares. What is the easiest way

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to do this? Help would be appreciated. Okay, no advice.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>We never give you advice. This is information only and

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you would never just on the phrasing there. I expect

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>all the I'm talking to, all the Keatons in the

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>world need to sell shares to write off the last

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>against capital gains. You may do so if you wish,

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but that would be the theory behind that would be

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you do it if you want to do it. All right? Ever,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>hear of the NSX gemen. Do you deal with them

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>at all?

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 2>So, yes, I'm aware of it. We do not offer

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the NSX. We do offer tri X. We don't offer

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the NX. We offer you off for THEX.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>We should help keeping first of all by telling him,

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's basically it's in an attempt as an

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>alternative exchange to the AX. There's been several of them.

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>There are several of them, very very small and not

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly well known, but.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, still small. If you go to their website,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 2>it'd actually list the brokers that you can use to

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>trade through them. So Keaton, if you want to go

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to their website, you can find out who will be

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 2>able to place trades on your behalf through that exchange,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>and you can potentially get them to act on your behalf.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's a perfect I mean to make it clear,

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfectly legitimate exchange. Have This is just an

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>attempt and there have been several attempts. And there are

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>other exchanges that you mentioned another one X yeah X

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>c hi dah X you see.

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, goodness may I'm out of date now called used

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 2>to be called t X. Sorry giving away my age already.

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>If you think about the US, you know they've got

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>different markets, right, we don't talk about you know, they

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>got the S and P, they got the Dow Jones,

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they got the nasdak all in the one country and

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't There's been attempts to try and build and

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not to have the AX have a monopoly, which is

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not a healthy thing at all. But that's the historical

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>background there. NSX is a perfectly just useful small exchange

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and as Jemma says, just look at their website to

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>see the brokers they use. And if you then should

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>desire to sell your shares for whatever reason, including the

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that they don't seem to have been going very well.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>If you say the word regrettably holding them, then you

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>can just pick one of those brokers, all right. Terrific. Well, Gemma,

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what a great time to have you on. We could

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>talk every day, good market, We could talk every morning

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for a while and it would all be really interesting

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for our listeners. I thought today was terrific, a really

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh insight into what's going up, back, going on, back up,

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>statistically and evidence based, which is what we are all

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>about here. Okay, thanks very much, Gemma.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolute pleasure. Thank you for having me.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you on, as always, great to have

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Jemma Daye there of trade, head of investor behavior and

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>something of a doyen of market inside trading data, which

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on days like this or weeks like this, is very

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting to know. So turns out active investors, independent investors

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are actually in their bargain hunting already, folks. We will

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>see how they get on in the days to come.

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>We will talk to Sam Wiley later in the week.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Until then, let's have some more correspondence. Great to have

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>those questions today The Money Puzzle at the Australia dot

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Com dot AU. Today's show was produced by the Assema Group.

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Talk to you soon, HM,